In short
Big Technology Podcast Episode Summary
Episode Title
The Secrets Of Ray Dalio and His Dot Collector Transparency Software — With Rob Copeland
Host
Alex Kantrowitz
Guest
Rob Copeland
- Author of *The Fund: Ray Dalio, Bridgewater Associates, and the Unraveling of a Wall Street Legend*
- Role: New York Times reporter
---
Episode Overview In this episode, Rob Copeland discusses his book on Ray Dalio, the founder of Bridgewater Associates, the world’s largest hedge fund. The conversation delves into Dalio's business philosophy, the infamous Dot Collector tool, and the culture at Bridgewater, exploring why employees willingly submit to such a demanding environment.
---
Key Themes and Discussions
- Ray Dalio's Rise to Fame
- Background: Dalio started Bridgewater in 1975, achieving success through predictive economic research.
- Key Events: His predictions during the 2008 financial crisis solidified his reputation, earning him significant financial rewards.
- Public Persona: Beyond finance, his principles for life and work have attracted a wide audience, making him a pseudo-celebrity.
- The Dot Collector Tool
- Functionality: Employees rate each other's attributes (e.g., believability) in real-time during meetings using iPads, with results displayed on personal profiles akin to "baseball cards."
- Impact on Culture: The tool fosters a competitive environment, leading to internal politics where employees may be incentivized to rate negatively to meet required quotas.
- Controversy: Negative feedback is a core aspect, with employees required to provide a certain amount of criticism.
- Radical Transparency
- Philosophy: Dalio’s principles emphasize honesty and transparency over emotional interactions.
- Implementation: All meetings are recorded, and transparency in decision-making is prioritized.
- Criticism: Critics argue this leads to a toxic workplace environment, where employees fear humiliation.
- Workplace Culture at Bridgewater
- Intense Environment: Employees describe a high-pressure atmosphere where mistakes are publicly scrutinized.
- Comparisons to Cults: The culture is likened to that of a cult, with a focus on total commitment to the principles, often at the expense of personal well-being.
- Employee Experience: Many employees report feeling broken down and humiliated, with a cycle of fear and negativity.
- The Business Philosophy Debate
- Investment Strategies: Questions arise about the effectiveness of Bridgewater's investment strategies, with claims that the actual implementation is vague and overly reliant on Dalio’s opinions.
- Success or Distraction?: The efficacy of the Dot Collector as a tool for enhancing investment decisions is disputed, raising concerns about its actual utility.
- Public Perception and Media
- Media Representation: Dalio's methods often receive uncritical coverage from media outlets, raising questions about transparency regarding the negative employee experiences.
- Consultants and Advocates: Noted figures in business praise Dalio’s approach, complicating the narrative around Bridgewater’s practices.
---
Key Takeaways
- Dalio's Impact: Ray Dalio's approach to management and investment has left a lasting mark on both hedge fund operations and broader business practices.
- Controversial Practices: The Dot Collector and radical transparency promote a culture of harsh feedback that is both criticized and lauded.
- Work Culture Reflection: The discussion raises critical issues about modern work cultures, employee wellness, and the ethics of demanding environments.
---
Conclusion Rob Copeland provides a nuanced view of Ray Dalio and Bridgewater Associates, exploring the complexities of their business philosophies and practices. This episode serves as a thought-provoking examination of how high-stakes finance intersects with personal and organizational ethics.
For further insights, Copeland's book *The Fund* offers an in-depth exploration of these themes and the implications for the future of workplace cultures.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Let's go inside the secrets at Bridgewater and of its founder Ray Dalio in an interview with the author of a revealing new book. All that and more coming up right after this. LinkedIn presents.
0:15Welcome to Big Technology Podcast, a show for cool-headed, nuanced conversation of the tech world and beyond. Today, we're going to talk all about Ray Dalio, his fun Bridgewater, and his famous computer system that let his employees raid each other in real time called the Dot Collector. And we're going to do it with the author of a brand new book. Rob Copeland is here. He's a New York Times reporter and the author of The Fund, Ray Dalio, Bridgewater Associates, and The Unraveling of a Wall Street Legend. Rob, welcome to the show. Thank you for having me. Thanks for being here. So let's talk about who Ray Dalio is and why you were interested in writing a full book about him.
0:52What sort of made him rise to that level? Sure. And sparked your interest? Sure. Well, first of all, I think people should know that I've known you for a number of years and that I once ran into you at an Alaska Airlines lounge in which... that's true it's true it's true and neither of us were flying first class but we both had credit card access and were filling up on their waffle station um before cross-country flight so that's some exclusive big technology news break right there uh but uh i it was a great moment to bond i feel like yeah it's important to give listeners a little bit of context of our relationship here let's be in the full disclosure moment so look i'm not now they know i'm not a nobody here i've seen you in a lounge.
1:33That's what I just want people to know. Well, I feel like it's the perfect setup to talk about the world's biggest hedge fund. There's a seamless seek here. And I will eventually at some point this hour answer your first question. What I'll tell you is I've been a business reporter for more than, excuse me, for about a decade and a half. And for some majority of that time, I've been reporting on and around Bridgewater Associates. It's the world's biggest hedge fund, but I'm not super interested in them just because they're a hedge fund. You know, there's a lot of big, important, frankly, boring companies.
2:09And Bridgewater is anything but boring. Its founder, Ray Dalio, has become world famous for supposedly inventing these principles, these rules, calls them principles for life and work. And he wrote a bestselling book about it. He's millions of people have viewed his TED talk. They listened to him on LinkedIn. He was interviewed by freaking Gwyneth Paltrow. He's really become this sort of pseudo celebrity. He's just become a figure far outside the financial world. And I think he's great fun to write about. Right. And so the principles are not just about like how to invest, but they are about how to live your life, how to conduct business within your organization.
2:56And to me, the thing that put Ray Dalio on my radar is that his company practices some of the most insane transparency I've ever seen, including this dot collector piece of software that people sit in meetings with iPads and rate each other's believability and other attributes. And they get a score to which, you know, supposedly they were then trusted within the organization to make decisions. Now, we're going to get into all of this more, but that to me is like the fact that he tried to go outside of finance and become this business guru really is what makes him interesting. And we don't talk a lot about a lot of hedge fund managers on this show, but it made sense to dedicate an episode because of that.
3:42Well, and let's be let's be honest. As a hedge fund manager, Ray Dalio was famous to people like me, people who are finance reporters at The New York Times. But as the inventor of the principles and this new way to live your life, and he literally calls it the holy grail. He says, if you do this, you will be rich. That has made him incredibly famous and put him in, frankly, a level that of no other hedge fund manager I can think of. Right. And we'll get to the principles. But it's first important to note that Dalio got to where he was initially based off of some really good calls. I mean, he didn't just apparate into thin air and become this person sitting down with Paltrow and talking about how to live life.
4:29He made great calls, including about two significant economic downturns that he was able to profit off of. In particular, the 2008-2009 crash, where he himself pocketed something like$750 million. Talk about like, before we get into the principal stuff and the dot collector, I mean, talk about like what initially propelled Dalio to business success. Sure. So there's two versions of this story. There's the version that Ray Dalio would tell you, and there's the version that my book, I think, breaks open. Let me tell you the Ray Dalio version, which is he starts Bridgewater. He's relatively unsuccessful, son of a jazz musician.
5:10He did go to Harvard Business School, but he starts Bridgewater in his apartment in 1975 and does incredibly deep economic research. He researches how nations, how governments work, how whether the currencies are going to rise or fall. And he begins to be pretty good at predicting economic trends. This makes him world famous in 2008, when he is credited with being one of the very few people to see that the subprime mortgage crisis is about to burst. And to his credit, But Bridgewater's funds do make money that year. And that's a year when the stock market crashes. And that really propels him into another echelon of a figure.
5:53How was he able to see the crash before it happened? He would say that he had studied for so many decades how so many countries work that it was almost obvious in retrospect. He sends he does have evidence, by the way, he's not just claiming that he did. He does write a weekly or a daily newsletter that he sends out to clients. So he was able to point and say, look, I was warning about this, sort of wave this letter around. And that got him a lot of attention, not just in hedge funds, but invited to the White House, became friends with Ben Bernanke, Tim Geithner. These are these are the top economic figures of that era.
6:29So you're saying that the reality is a little different than the story that he's telling? The reality is a lot different. And to be honest, Alex, it is something that even I didn't know until I really started researching for this book. And I did something that I recommend no one ever does. I went back and I had a research assistant. She was amazing. I kind of plug her. Her name is Abigail Somerville. She is truly the best. And we together read every single news article that Ray Dalio had ever been quoted in from 1975 onwards. And what we found was nonstop since the 1980s, Ray Dalio has been predicting economic calamity.
7:10Virtually every single year, he has predicted a giant crash. And so what happens in 2008 is he's not lying. He did predict an economic crash of 2008. What he doesn't talk about very often is all the other years before that, that he predicted the same crash. That never happened. But it's not like his fund lost money in the earlier years. And he was able to make a significant amount of money in the downturn. So, I mean, even the fact that he did cry wolf a lot, like the fact that he was able to take what he knew, put the strategies into place and avert the catastrophe and actually make money. And I mean, isn't that exactly what you're supposed to do as a hedge fund manager?
7:51Look, let's give him a ton of credit. In the 1980s, 90s, 2000s, most people on Wall Street and beyond still believe that you made money in the markets sort of through your gut, that you could quote unquote read the tape. They called it reading the stock tape. And that was how many managers made money. like people like George Soros, who becomes a famous billionaire. That's how they did it. Ray had a different outlook. Ray said, I will do research and I will make these written rules and I will follow these rules, even if my gut tells me otherwise. And he was fabulously successful at that. Look, he made billions of dollars before anyone really even knew who he was.
8:34And that's a credit to him. Okay. And so then obviously this stuff works and he's like, well, I have the investing principles down. Now I'm going to start applying them to management and life. And this is how the principles start to emerge. Is that right? Exactly. So he he's made his billions. He's made more money than we could ever spend. Right. And he begins to say, what what is out there besides wealth for me? And he realizes that these rules that he has for investing, they really come from his overall philosophical outlook. And his philosophical outlook can be boiled down to, you should just be honest with one another.
9:13You should just, we should be able to stop this interview right now. And I should say, Alex, professionally, that question didn't work. Here's how I would have said it. You should be able to stop me in the middle and say, Rob, you're rambling. And that should be impersonal. And that if we could do that with one another, we would come to a better outcome because we would remove the emotions from it and we would just, we would move on with our day. I feel like there might be some spiritual kinship between you and Ray Dalio on that front. You're not one to hold back your opinion. Well, I think here's the main difference between me and Ray Dalio, which we'll get into, is I'm not pretending that this is some high-minded philosophy.
9:56I can just tell you what my personality is and I can tell you at that waffle bar at the Alaska Lounge. I can tell you what your personality is, but I'm not getting in front of millions of people and saying, follow me into the abyss. Right. So let's talk a little bit about that abyss, right? So the principles are all about transparency. Like, is there anything else to them or does it really all boil down to like, tell people how you feel? I mean, what's your, can you just give us some examples of what these are, how they're implemented in the firm and what, you know, what type of ground they cover.
10:30So his overarching philosophy is called radical transparency, which means that things that could be, that would normally be kept secret should be held out in the open. So for instance, any meeting at Bridgewater should be taped and anyone should be able to listen into it and to weigh in on it later. This philosophy basically comes down to, we should find the most believable person, the most trustworthy person and get them involved in every decision in their remit. Now, the principles themselves, and we could talk about this for hours and we won't, but they basically boil down to seeing a natural order of things.
11:11He makes a lot of comparisons to the animal kingdom. He says, for instance, when the lion, I might have the animals here wrong, but the meaning is true. When the lion eats the hyena, that's terrible for the hyena, but it's part of the natural order of things and it would fall apart if we didn't let the lion eat the hyena so there is a an appeal to that right you you can't listen to what i'm saying and not say okay i i see that yeah and then how did it manifest itself in the firm well the problem is it's very different um in practice than how he has described it in person so at the beginning in, say, around that 2008 financial crisis, the principles were really just sort of like one man's word.
11:58It was just a few sentences written on a piece of paper, and it was a few nice metaphors, and no one took it all that seriously. Sort of like how you walk into an office, you walk into an apartment building, and it's written on the wall, have a sunny day. It doesn't mean you have to put that into your heart and take that with you all day. The problem is he keeps writing more and more principles, and they get less philosophical and more literally. And they say things like, if someone does something wrong, they prescribe for what he calls public hangings. So now we should learn from each other's mistakes by watching us metaphorically execute someone, which at Bridgewater would be firing them.
12:42He says that we should diagnose even the smallest problem. So if something goes wrong, if something as small as, you know, the peas in the cafeteria are wilted one day, we should haul in the head of the cafeteria in front of video cameras. We should really probe, in his words, we should probe what happened, what thought process led to those peas. And we should frankly humiliate people. Yeah. And so that gets us into this dot collector example where people basically hold iPads in meetings and start rating their coworkers based off of their belief ability and other attributes. And then apparently that's the way that they weight decisions in the firm.
13:26I want to talk about that at length when we come back to the break. So why don't we do that? We're here with Rob Copeland, the author of The Fund, Ray Dalio Bridgewater Associates and the Unraveling of a Wall Street Legend. We'll be back right after this to go deep into the dot collector and real time transparency at Bridgewater. Did you know your credit card points and miles can lose value to inflation? Credit card companies often reduce the redemption value of your points and miles. Now, imagine a credit card with rewards that can grow in value. With the Gemini credit card, you can earn Bitcoin or one of over 50 other cryptos instantly with no annual fee.
14:02Every swipe at the store or gas pump earns you instant rewards deposited straight to your account. Plus, sign up now for a$200 Bitcoin bonus to kickstart your rewards. Visit Gemini.com slash card today. Check out the link in the description for more information on rates. Again, if you're looking to invest in Bitcoin but don't know where to start, the Gemini credit card makes it easy. The Gemini credit card is issued by WebBank. In order to qualify for the$200 crypto intro bonus, you must spend$3 ,000 in your first 90 days. Some exclusions apply to instant rewards in which rewards are deposited when the transaction posts.
14:39This content is not investment advice and trading crypto involves risk. The Gemini credit card cannot be used to make gambling related purchases. What the hell is going on right now? And why is it happening like this? At Wired, we're obsessed with getting to the bottom of those questions on a daily basis. And maybe you are too. I'm Katie Drummond, the Global Editorial Director of Wired. And I'm hosting our new podcast series, The Big Interview. Each week, I'll sit down with some of the most interesting, provocative, and influential people who are shaping our right now. Big interview conversations are fun.
15:15I want a shark that... That eats the internet. That turns it all off. Unfiltered and unafraid. So in a lot of ways, I try to be an antidote to the unimaginable faucet of reactionary content that you see online, to the best of my ability. Every week, we're going to offer you the ultimate luxury of our times, meaning and context. True or false, you, Brian Johnson, the man sitting across from me, one day, at some point, as of yet undefined in the future, you will die. False. Tell me more. Listen to The Big Interview right now in the same place you find Wired's Uncanny Valley podcast. Subscribe or follow wherever you get your podcasts.
16:03And we're back here on Big Technology Podcast with Rob Copeland, author of The Fund, Ray Dalio, Bridgewater Associates, and the unraveling of a Wall Street legend. Okay, so before the break, we teased a little bit about the dot collector. Let's just go with an example. Can you tell us a little bit about how this thing would collect feedback on people in real time? Sure. So everything we've been talking about, all these ratings, what's happening is Ray and all the employees are rating themselves, rating each other in categories like ability to think clearly, things of that nature. That's not a literal category.
16:39And each time I rate you, I'd be rating you right now, by the way, during this conversation. I might be saying, Alex, I'm not really feeling the critical thinking from you. I might be giving you a four out of 10 on critical thinking literally right now. I just put it into, I'd have an iPad with that. That would be a dot. Yeah, come on, Rob. I read the book. I mean, at least give me a six. I mean, ability to read, I'll give you a 10. Okay, great. By the way, do the same. You'd be able to see that I was doing that. And you could say, well, I'd give you a five on ability to diagnose truth. So all of these ratings, which are called dots, they're all accumulated on something that Bridgewater called its baseball cards.
17:22So it's essentially every employee, all their ratings, sort of just like a baseball player, you'd be able to see their stats, their RBIs. And this is something called the dot collector. So it's collecting all of your dots. It's ingesting thousands of ratings in all of these different categories. and the idea being that we've collected all of these dots and that I should just be able to pull it up and say if Alex and Rob are having a disagreement, I should be able to say, well, I can see that in all these other meetings, Alex has actually been judged to be pretty good at XYZ and Rob has not. So I'm going to side with Alex on this one.
18:05How did this not incite very vicious internal politics? I mean, if you're walking out of a meeting and you have, do you see who's rating you what? Alex, it's cited the most vicious internal politics. You do see what people are rating you. You can rate them back. You can also take polls. So let's say I really believe, Alex, this conversation is going terribly. I think everyone agrees with me. I can stop this in its tracks and I can put up a poll on the dot collector and I can say, do you think Alex is looking at this right? and people can vote. By the way, whichever one of us loses that vote, we're going to get a whole lot of negative dots.
18:48Really? I want to point one other thing that people might be thinking. Okay, so you've got this dot collector, but how can you force people to use it? You know, I've got a job. You've got a job. Maybe I just go throughout my day and maybe the peas in the cafeteria are wilted, but maybe that doesn't rise to the level of a dot for me. What Bridgewater starts doing is it starts telling employees, you have to rate a certain number of incidents per day. You have to put in dots. And not only that, but a certain percentage of your dots must be negative. So they are forcing you. Stack ranked. Exactly.
19:29They are. If there weren't internal politics before, they they're now guaranteeing there will because I can't just walk around and say, great job, guys. I have. And I'll say Ray Dalio's defense here is, remember, his whole philosophy is trust in truth, is to offer frank feedback. So if you're not offering a certain amount of negative feedback, then we're never going to grow. Then we're just patting each other on the back. You know, Rob, it seems like this was kind of the distilled essence of the feedback cultures we've seen. It doesn't exist in a vacuum. The idea of being harsh with feedback doesn't exist just in Bridgewater.
20:13It's been the subject of books. It exists within Netflix to some extent. Meta has it, though I think a little bit softer than the Bridgewater, like actual constructive feedback, although everybody talks about feedback. I mean, do you see this as more of like a product of a moment and or did it influence that moment? I would say yes and yes, both. First of all, this is definitely the wildest, most extreme example of this idea. Reed Hastings and Ray Dalio actually, there are a lot of similarities to their culture. And Ray has talked about it inside Bridgewater about how much he admires what Reed has done.
20:57What I would say is that technology, the ability to have this dot collector, the ability to rate in real time has sort of poured gasoline on this. Because it's very different. Remember, it's very different if you and me, we're not alone right now, unless this is the lowest rated episode in big technology history. But if we're alone and I'm saying, Alex, let me just look at you straight on and just say, like, what you said in that meeting, I didn't think that came in your mouth very well. Here's how I would have said it. Probably there's a shared trust between us. We can move on. It's very different when we start talking about doing this essentially in public on a huge scale.
21:36And Bridgewater had, you know, 2 ,000 employees at peak when everyone can see what everyone else is getting rated for in real time. And then it's a snowball rolling down the hill to hell. Yeah. Is it like an Uber driver where you get a certain low rating and you're booted off the app? It's well, yes. First of all, literally, if you don't have high enough ratings in certain categories, you will get what Bridgewater calls sorted, sorted out. They don't call it getting fired. They call it sorting you. Sounds like a mafia term. You said it, not me. The what I would say is. Like an Uber driver, you know, if you get an Uber, if you see your Uber driver has what's a bad rating now, by the way, it's like four, seven, five.
22:20I think I'd like I get kicked off Uber. Anything under like 4.6, you might as well not be driving. If we run out of things to talk about, this ends up with you and me checking our Uber ratings together. We're going to do it at the end. And I better be higher than you, Alex. I don't even want to live. I don't think there's a chance of that. I'm not the kind of guy who gets a high Uber rating. I'm the kind of guy who says take the bridge, not the tunnel. That's a New York joke for our West Coast listeners. the um right the problem is if i can walk into a meeting and i can already see that you alex have a lot of red dots have a lot of bad feedback on say you can finish me off and i should finish you off by the way because there is very little incentive for me to go against the curve because if i stand up for you now i'm putting myself out there publicly and you know yeah go ahead well i i I spoke to someone, I spoke to a lot of people with this experience, but I spoke to someone who was there for only about three months and she had a pretty rough transition at Bridgewater, but she wanted to stay.
23:29She wanted to learn to use the principles to learn more about herself, but she said it was just a negative feedback loop. She said, if you mess up in your first week, you are marked as the weak prey and then it just gets piled and piled onto you and you can't stay. Now, I want to say something really important here, which is everything that I've just said to you. If Ray Dalio were here right now, he would tell me that I was only talking to disaffected employees and that many people love it. But I can tell you that for this book, I went and I got the internal HR emails. I got their own memos, people telling Ray this is a self-defeating loop, that people are scared that at any moment they may be fired.
24:16And the real scary thing for me about Ray Dalio and Bridgewater is that he knew, he did know, he does know, and he will continue to know that this is the real impact of the principles and he apparently does not care. Well, he's also, there are plenty of enablers, right? I mean, if you looked at, he did that 60 Minutes interview or it was either them or Ted or maybe both, where he's talking about the dot collector and the reporters like in the room being like, wow, they're like really rating based off of the system. And he's like showing it off. And I just think that like in the popular imagination, there's like no feeling that like what is happening or no like statement that what is happening is pretty messed up.
25:05Absolutely. Look, and we've seen this, You see this in tech all the time, these tech heroes who are here to save us. I was blown away researching this book. You know, Adam Grant, very famous organizational psychologist, Wharton professor, writes bestselling books. He goes in and he sees Ray Dalio and he witnesses this and he writes that it's based in it. He devotes a whole chapter of his book to it. And he writes that it's basically one of the greatest things he's ever seen. Later, Ray Dalio hires Adam Grant to a paid job as a consultant. This is a talk about a feedback loop. I mean, you can you can decide that for yourself.
25:46But yes, 60 minutes CBS, CBS this morning. So many interviewers, they just sat, heard Ray Dalio's version of things and said, well, this is fantastic. Listen, I like you a lot, Alex. I don't think you should run for president. I don't like I it's just like he got put on this other level and no one just stopped and said, hold on a second. How about we just switch the angle of it, switch the aperture? Why don't we ask the people who work for him what it's really like? Well, anyway, did did other companies try to embody this? Like, did the other companies try to build the same software? So this was Ray's great dream.
26:27And he talked about it endlessly inside Bridgewater. and they spent more than$100 million on this technology. His great dream is that the principles and the dot collector would be adopted by other companies. And he went to some of the most famous men in business. You know, he told people inside Bridgewater, he was talking to Elon Musk about doing this at Tesla. He visited Jack Dorsey when Jack Dorsey was running Twitter. You know, Bill Gates endorsed the principles. the wild thing is that all of these quite famous and successful people they sat and they listened and they never said anything publicly against ray but most of them did not actually adopt these ratings tools which should tell you quite something right so he had these like what would you call them outwardly constructive relationships with silicon valley royalty but But when he tried to sell them on the actual product that he bet his whole life on, it was a no.
27:26Well, and he did. He was successful with one company, sort of. So he was successful with Coinbase. I don't know exactly how, but he got Coinbase to do a trial program where they brought the dot collector to Coinbase. And spoiler alert, the reaction among Coinbase employees was quite poor. And when reporters asked Coinbase about this, Coinbase's defense was it was not that that this was their defense. It was this product was so unpopular that not enough employees used it to make it worth continuing. So they didn't they neither defended nor insulted it. They just said nobody wanted it. And I know that that was very devastating for Ray.
Read the full transcript
28:12Right. And I guess like thinking about. the culture inside Bridgewater. I mean, Bridgewater knew that they were perceived as like cult-like and somewhat negative on the outside. And, you know, being in New York at the like height of Ray Dalio's career and having people getting offers there, like I had friends or even before the height, like I had friends who were very clear-eyed telling me that I got this offer from Bridgewater and I don't know about it. It seems like the culture there sucks and it's very harsh. So I want to ask you a question because you've been speaking to the people that decided to take those job offers and work there.
28:51Why would people subject themselves to such an environment? And by the way, I want to add something. I talk to people who still work there. I didn't speak to just disaffected people. I spoke to a lot of people with very complicated feelings about Ray and about Bridgewater. Remember, this goes back to the principles. And the principles say if you follow these rules, you will achieve a higher level version of yourself. it's a challenge and it's it is a way it's it's one of the best pitches i've ever heard more than money is he's pitching you a chance to achieve a better version of yourself so a lot of people even people who otherwise are clear-eyed said well if i put myself through this gauntlet and at the end of a year two years ten years setting aside the money i may literally figure out what I'm good at.
29:43This could change my life. And that's still what Bridgewater pitches to this day. They're still going out and saying, we operate on principles and we're a place where you can challenge yourself. It reminds me of, I don't know if you've seen these TikToks of these like, you know, fake military camps for men who want to toughen themselves up and they pay like thousands of dollars to be yelled at by you know former marines like going up muddy hills and becoming quote-unquote men after that so i haven't seen those tiktoks because my tiktoks are all shirtless men giving me um advice on weightlifting i don't know why the algorithm thinks that but um the uh i will tell you that ray actually compares bridgewater to the intellectual navy seals these are these are his words so he absolutely would agree with that that comparison and those people remember you're in your tiktok which apparently you have a little bit of a sadomasochist thing which i think we should explore on a on a future episode of this of this program i'll be back for sure um well i'll be back just for that i'll interview you but the uh remember you're paying them this is even better bridgewater pays you so you know maybe you're having a terrible time.
31:02And for many of the people who are in the book, as you follow their way, you can see how difficult this is for them. But they are getting paid a lot of money. So I'll skip to your next question, which is a lot of people ask, you know, is it a cult? I would say I can't answer that question for you because Bridgewater has threatened me with many, many lawsuits. And I'd like to, you know, keep my one bedroom apartment. But I will say if it's a cult, it's a cult where you it paid a lot of money to stay. So that's just another way to, that's another reason to stay. Money notwithstanding, do you think people actually get that benefit out of the experience that they're looking for?
31:44I mean, do you think Bridgewater, you know, iron sharpens iron, so to speak? Do you think Bridgewater can turn people into like the essential form of themselves by dealing, by living within these systems? So for this book, I spoke to hundreds of people, people still at Bridgewater, people who've left Bridgewater. And I truly try to find those true believers. And I will just tell you that even people who Ray considers his closest acolytes don't necessarily fully buy into the principles. I don't. But everybody who leaves say it's not says it's not worth it. Not everybody says it's not worth it, but everyone says it's nothing like what he says it is, that the principals and the stock collector are weaponized tools to be wielded principally by Ray and those in his favor against anyone who is out of favor.
32:40It's not... I mean, there's a lot of crying. Yeah. There's a lot of crying in your book, obviously. I wonder what it is about our work culture today that makes people... I mean, yes, I understand that people want to become this distilled version of themselves and want to go through this, but just it's work. You know, it's crazy to me. It's just your job. I know, but what do you think it is about the fire work culture that makes people say, yeah, that sounds okay. Well, I'd like to talk about the crying for 10 seconds because probably my favorite thing I ever heard back from Bridgewater from, you know, I fact-checked this book.
33:16I offered them a chance to comment. We spent years going back and forth with Ray and his lawyers and Bridgewater's lawyers. One of my favorite things I've ever heard from a Bridgewater PR person is we have no record of people crying regularly at the office. Because there's a scene, isn't the opening scene of your book, somebody, it's not even regular crying. It's the display of crying for learning purposes that struck me. There's the opening scene of your book is someone just absolutely breaking down, that being recorded and put in the transparency library. And then Ray encouraging people to watch it.
33:52Absolutely. This is where I'd like to pause just to say the book is actually a lot of fun. I didn't want to write a downer of a book. This book is a ride. It was a ride for me to write it and report it. But yes, there is a real darkness here and people, it's not just crying. They're being broken down in front of the cameras for everyone for what many people would say, pleasure. But I do want to get back to your question because I really love this idea that our job has to be our identity. And that is central to Bridgewater's pitch, is that the principles are for life and work. Now, look, Google, what Google pay for the laundry for their employees, all these tech companies encourage you to stay more and more at the office.
34:42Bridgewater did even more than that. They made sure their headquarters was so far away from New York that many of their employees lived with each other during the week. This became their whole life. And it really does become a closed society off of the grid. And with, I think, some really upsetting results. I'm going to keep talking about this because I love it. So I work for the New York Times. It's my day job. It's my real job. This book is my passion. And people ask me all the time, you know, they'll point to something in the Times that they didn't agree with or a reporter's tweet they didn't like.
35:24And they'll not just ask me about it, but they'll basically say it's my fault. And I always try to say to people, you know, I don't walk around with a New York Times tote bag. This is my job. This is not my identity. I love my job. I'm very lucky to work here. I'm proud of this news organization, but I'm not going to reflexively defend everything the New York Times does. At Bridgewater, you have to be fully in. You are 100 % believe that the principles, or you have to say you believe in the principles. But it is something that it's like, it's not, it's maybe shocking, but not surprising in our work culture.
36:04Like, I'm glad you have this disassociation in some ways, or you're between your identity and your job, but our work culture does have this sort of like, you know, willingness to put ourselves through hell for employers. Absolutely. And your employer now, it feels like they, they almost don't want an employee who treats it as a job. They're hiring you for a job, but they want you to say, no, I would do anything. One of the, you know, I, you know, I used to live in San Francisco for a few years. This is one of my favorite. Well, here's another story. I helped to move a dresser out of your apartment.
36:37So it wasn't just that. It is. It wasn't just that Alaska lounge, but go ahead. Well, but let's really be honest. You actually helped me move that dresser out for a third friend. You are such a good friend. That's true. It wasn't even, it was a CB2 dresser. Right. This episode is now sponsored by Crate and Barrel. But the, I will say this whole Silicon Valley mentality, which has now taken over the workplace, like writ large, just act like an owner. You know, everyone should act like the owner of the company. You should treat the company's money like it is your own. That's all well and good if you are the owner.
37:15But I don't think we should all act like the owner of our workplace because our workplace can disappoint us, you know? Definitely. Did this stuff work? I mean, I actually like we've been talking about this all throughout about the dot collector, about how brutal it could be. and the one thing that would almost excuse it, well, not even excuse it, but rationalize it, shall we say, is if the people who were rated highest and they were super believable and they were given wide leeway to make investments and they made those investments and it worked. So what, I mean, obviously, it's gotta be a closed loop system and a successful one to say, okay, this thing is real and effective.
38:01What actually happened? Okay, so this is really the fateful piece of logic that links Bridgewater and the principles together, which is that Ray would say that he built this whole investment system. He became so rich off of these rules, and these rules led to the principles. So that just got me thinking, what is this investment system? When he talks about it, it is so absurdly general. He'll say, I could be long or short anything in the world. You know, that basically means at any point I could hold any asset. It's, you know, just mumbo jumbo. And I watched many interviews with him talking about the investment system, where he just never said anything concrete.
38:51My career as a business reporter is talking to really successful, really smart people, or at least people who think they're really smart. and they don't usually have trouble. It's expressing like, oh yeah, we think that the Euro zone is in trouble. So we're going to short the Euro. That's their job. Good on them. It's my job to tell people about their perspective. So for years, I tried to crack the secret of Bridgewater's investment system. What are these rules, these timeless and universal rules that Ray talks about? And as I kept investigating, this remarkable thing happened is that Bridgewater's main fund, it just kept doing poorly for years upon years since from the end of 2010, almost uninterrupted for a decade and more.
39:41It was just falling so far behind the markets. And when I started talking to investment staffers, they said, you know, you know, what Ray thinks is a rule isn't what you or I think is rule. A rule to me is if X happens over here, Y happens over here. To Ray, if Ray thinks of it, it's a rule. If it's Ray's opinion, it's a rule. And that just got me, then I just, it all clicked for me. That there is no investment secret. There is no secret sauce. It's just Ray. Here is where my lawyers would like me to tell you that lawyers for Bridgewater Associates say there is an investment system. They just won't tell you about it.
40:29Full stop. So is your belief that all this data collected in the dot collector, was it used for investment purposes? I believe the dot collector, as my research would tell me, is just a giant distraction. That it all had to do with nothing to do with investments. But it was a metaphor. It is a metaphor for how Bridgewater deals with investments that Ray and Bridgewater would like to say that we have a similarly data-driven approach for our investments. What I can tell you is I've spoken to people intimately involved with those investments, people still intimately involved with those investments, and not a single person has ever been able to identify an actual quantitative, what I would consider to be a 2023 level quantitative rule.
41:20And to the contrary, people have given me many, many, many examples of what Ray wanted, Ray got. You know, it struck me in an excerpt you published in the Times, you know, talk about a whole firm that rates itself this way. And then you would imagine if everybody's rating each other this way, that everybody would be able to make investments. But you say that at Bridgewater's peak, which was 2 ,000 employees, fewer than 20 % were assigned to investments or related research. And something like 10 % were in an inner circle that was actually making these investments. Even fewer. So this - Even fewer.
41:58Right. So this whole notion that these rankings were being used to weight people's ability to invest, just on its face, seems ridiculous. There is something called the Circle of Trust at Bridgewater. It's about 10 people. They sign lifetime contracts and Ray allegedly lets them in to see the real secrets of Bridgewater. They have to swear not to work anywhere else. Everyone else at Bridgewater has functionally no specific idea of what the firm is doing with its money. Yeah. Sounds like Scientology. I'm really glad that those words came out of your mouth, Alex, not mine. Okay. Well, that's just my perspective.
42:43I don't know. Anyway, so you tried to work at Bridgewater. That's what Ray Dalio was saying in a tweet storm directed at you a few years ago. So talk a little bit about your history with him. It's great fun. Okay. So I graduated college in 2009, right after Ray Dalio made a fortune predicting the financial crisis, couldn't get a job anywhere. I was moved back home with my parents and I applied to so many jobs in 2009, 2010. One of them was a hedge fund called Bridgewater Associates. And I was living in a three-bedroom apartment with four people. I was actually having a lot of fun, to be honest.
43:22I was an absolute wreck back then. And I applied, had no idea anything to do with them. I think I had one or two interviews. They didn't take me. I never thought about it. I didn't think about it again for a few years. And then a few years later, actually, they reached out to me and they tried to hire me for a job editing their economic research. I had another few interviews. I turned them down. None of this was too extraordinary to me. I've I have unsuccessfully applied, Alex, to many jobs in my lifetime. I don't know if you have, too, but I don't I don't bat a thousand on this. and once I started writing about Bridgewater around 2015 it became very clear to me that Bridgewater had no idea that I had applied there they had no idea that I had any history there and so I I mean I didn't know anyone there I had interviewed one on the phone or in person once or twice and then eventually Ray figured out that I had interviewed there and he just went apeshit He started attacking me, calling my bosses, saying I was a disaffected person who couldn't make the cut there.
44:33You know, one of my – this is – the book that I wrote is not a book about how journalists are heroes. I am not a character in this book. I don't figure out some great thing and swoop in and save the day. But I will say there is – at the very end of the book, there is a chapter about my history with Ray that was enormously fun to write. because it's been enormously fun, to be honest, tussling with this super charismatic, I'll put it, billionaire for the last better part of a decade. Yeah, let's end here. So we've spoken through this entire conversation about a way of working and a way of investing.
45:15And we've talked about how it's framed in high-minded terms. And we've talked about people trying to achieve their essential or their greatest possible condition by working at a place like this, using the principles, and how Dalio was trying not to just be a businessman, but in some way a guy who guides people's lives. after Sam Bankman-Fried's whole situation and the movement where they were trying to be effective altruists and make all this money so they can improve the world, I'm starting to get a little wary of business people who talk about anything else than, I mean, of course, okay, if your product solves a problem, but if you're talking about how you're trying to improve the world through your company, that's when I start to get a little bit concerned.
46:03Do you think we're going to start to look at this stuff differently or are we going to continue to allow people to use this language to cloak what's going on behind the scenes? I think for better or worse, we're all looking for a hero. And for the last decade or so, maybe longer, business people have stepped into that void for a lot of reasons that could be the subject of probably another whole podcast. And I hope that our experience with not just Ray Dalio, but, you know, Adam Newman and Travis Kalanick and Sam Minkman-Fried and all of these people who said they were going to, quote unquote, disrupt for the better our lives.
46:42I hope we realize that the hero is not always the guy with the biggest checkbook. The book is The Fund, Ray Dalio, Bridgewater Associates, and the Unraveling of a Wall Street Legend. The author is Rob Copeland, also a reporter for The New York Times. I enjoyed reading it. I enjoyed speaking with you, Rob. Thanks so much for coming on. I'll be back. All right. Thanks, everybody, for listening. Thank you, Nick Gwattany, for handling our audio and LinkedIn, for having me as part of your podcast network. Always great to come to you here today, here every Wednesday. So thank you for listening. We're back on Friday, breaking down the news with Ronjan Roy.
47:18Thanks again for listening, and we'll see you next time on Big Technology Podcast.
47:31What the hell is going on right now? And why is it happening like this? At Wired, we're obsessed with getting to the bottom of those questions on a daily basis. And maybe you are too. I'm Katie Drummond, the Global Editorial Director of Wired. And I'm hosting our new podcast series, The Big Interview. Each week, I'll sit down with some of the most interesting, provocative, and influential people who are shaping our right now. Big interview conversations are fun. I want a shark that that eats the internet that turns it all off unfiltered and unafraid so in a lot of ways I try to be an antidote to the unimaginable faucet of reactionary content that you see online to the best of my ability every week we're going to offer you the ultimate luxury of our times meaning and context true or false you Brian Johnson the man sitting across from me one day at some point as of yet undefined in the future you will die.
48:29False. Tell me more. Listen to The Big Interview right now in the same place you find Wired's Uncanny Valley podcast. Subscribe or follow wherever you get your podcasts.
From the publisher
Rob Copeland is the author of The Fund: Ray Dalio, Bridgewater Associates, and the Unraveling of a Wall Street Legend and a New York Times reporter. He joins Big Technology Podcast to discuss his new book, offering a revealing look at Dalio's business success and the making of his legend. We talk extensively about Dalio's Dot Collector tool, which allowed his employees to rate each other in real-time on attributes like believability. Then we ask why so many would subject themselves to this type of workplace, and whether the tool actually worked.
---
You can subscribe to Big Technology Premium for 25% off at https://bit.ly/bigtechnology
Enjoying Big Technology Podcast? Please rate us five stars ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ in your podcast app of choice.
For weekly updates on the show, sign up for the pod newsletter on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6901970121829801984/
Questions? Feedback? Write to: bigtechnologypodcast@gmail.com


