BI Weekend: Kraft Heinz Split, Macy’s Earnings

5 Sep 2025 · 38 min · 20 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

This Bloomberg Intelligence “BI Weekend” episode covers multiple business topics across healthcare, consumer packaged goods, consumer retail, tech regulation, AI talent, clean energy policy, and ESG investing.

Guests and backgrounds

  • Scarlett Fu and Paul Sweeney host.
  • Jen Bartaschus (Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Retail Analyst) covers Kraft Heinz and PepsiCo.
  • Ken Shea (Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Consumer Products Analyst) discusses PepsiCo activism.
  • Jennifer Rhee (Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Litigation Analyst) analyzes the Google antitrust remedy.
  • Mark Gurman (Bloomberg News Managing Editor for Global Consumer Tech) discusses Apple’s AI talent losses.
  • Emily Cohn (Bloomberg Consumer Team Leader) covers Macy’s and Dollar Tree earnings.
  • Antoine Wagner-Jones (Bloomberg BNEF Head of Trade and Supply Chains) covers Trump policy impacts on clean energy supply chains.
  • Shaheen Contractor (Bloomberg Intelligence Senior ESG Strategist) discusses ESG funds and nuclear weapons.

Key claims and examples

  • Kraft Heinz plans to split into two public companies (condiments/box meals vs slower-growing grocery like Lunchables) to reinvigorate growth amid declining shelf-stable demand; expects about $300M in dis-synergies.
  • Elliott built a ~$4B stake in PepsiCo, pushing to “re-franchise” beverage bottling (divest capital-intensive bottling; concentrate business is the “golden part” like Coca-Cola), plus possible food SKU rationalization (Frito-Lay strong; Quaker Foods targeted).
  • Google: a judge rejects breaking up Google/Chrome; allows search default payments for one year; no Chrome divestiture and no Android contingent divestiture.
  • Apple: lead robotics AI researcher Jian Zhang left for Meta; more AI researchers leaving; Apple “Intelligence” and Siri lag; likely major Siri update in iOS 26 spring cycle.
  • Macy’s raised annual outlook; strong comparable sales growth in three years; “reimagined” stores redesign assortment and layout; Dollar Tree raised guidance but investors disappointed as price-hike benefits fade under tariffs.
  • Clean energy: Trump administration reverses parts of the Inflation Reduction Act (e.g., EV tax credit ending; expanded “foreign entity of concern” rules), creating uncertainty and delaying factory investments; US may be self-sufficient by 2030 for some downstream products, but inputs (battery components) remain globally dependent.
  • ESG: EU guidance excludes nuclear weapons from “controversial weapons,” potentially increasing ESG exposure; values-based investors may face mandate conflicts; scrutiny likely rises.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Changing Healthcare with Optum

0:00 to 0:26

Learn how Optum is transforming healthcare accessibility through technology.

“If you've ever waited on a refill or couldn't schedule an appointment, you get it.”

Changing Healthcare with Optum

0:30 to 0:57

Learn how Optum is transforming healthcare accessibility through technology.

“With our unified Team Michigan approach, businesses scale faster and compete at the highest level.”

Market Analysis and Fed Discussion

1:42 to 2:36

Insights on market trends and the impact of tariffs on sectors.

“How do you think the Fed is looking at tariffs, the uncertainty of tariffs?”

Kraft Heinz Plans to Split

2:36 to 2:59

Kraft Heinz announces a split into two separate companies and its implications.

“Because this week, Kraft Heinz announced its plans to split into two separate publicly traded companies.”

Impact of Consumer Trends on Kraft Heinz

2:59 to 3:46

Discussing how changing consumer preferences are affecting Kraft Heinz's performance.

“But trends have changed, and consumers have changed, and it just hasn't materialized the way they originally thought it would.”

Dis-synergies of Breaking Apart

3:46 to 4:49

Exploring the potential dis-synergies as Kraft Heinz splits into two.

“You mentioned several times how the consumer has changed.”

Future of Packaged Foods

4:49 to 8:31

Analyzing the current state and future of the packaged food industry.

“When you put companies together, the Press Release often talks about the synergies that are going to be, the cost synergies, maybe some revenue synergies, maybe.”

Elliott Management's Stake in PepsiCo

8:31 to 13:26

Discussion on Elliott Management's investment in PepsiCo and proposed changes.

“Our thanks to Jen Bartaschus, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Retail Analyst.”

Elliott Management's Stake in PepsiCo

14:03 to 15:15

Discussion on Elliott Management's investment in PepsiCo and proposed changes.

“we've reduced costs by millions, slash repetitive tasks, and freed thousands of hours for strategic work.”

Court Ruling on Google Antitrust Case

15:59 to 19:50

Analysis of the recent US court ruling against breaking up Google.

“Judge Amit Mehta ruled against the government's proposal to break up Google.”
Show all 20 chapters

Apple's AI Talent Exodus

19:50 to 24:06

Discussion on Apple's loss of AI researchers and its implications.

“Our thanks to Jennifer Rhee, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Litigation Analyst.”

Retail Earnings: Macy's and Dollar Tree

24:07 to 28:00

Insights on Macy's positive performance and Dollar Tree's challenges.

“This week, the department store chain Macy's raised its annual outlook and reported its best comparable sales growth in three years.”

Introduction to the Episode

28:00 to 29:54

Learn about the episode's focus on the Trump administration's impact on clean energy.

“That was Emily Cohn, Bloomberg Consumer Team Leader.”

Overview of Energy Transition Research

30:30 to 30:52

Understand how Bloomberg NEF tracks the clean energy transition.

“This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlett Foo and Paul Sweeney.”

Impact of Trump Administration on Clean Energy

30:52 to 33:38

Examine the recent changes in clean energy policy under the Trump administration.

“And this week, we took a look at how the Trump administration is impacting the clean energy transition.”

Challenges in Clean Energy Investments

33:38 to 36:21

Learn about the uncertainties that are hindering new investments in clean energy.

“So that scrapped the electric vehicle tax credit, for example, that is gone.”

Insights on ESG Investing

36:21 to 37:36

Explore the evolving landscape of ESG investing regarding nuclear arms.

“Is it, what are the capital markets like for any of this these days.”

Ethical Dilemmas in ESG Funds

37:36 to 42:04

Discuss the ethical conflicts arising from ESG funds' investments in nuclear weapons.

“We move next to some recent research by Bloomberg Intelligence on environmental, social, and governance investing.”

ESG Investing and Value Conflicts

42:04 to 43:14

Explore the conflicts between ESG values and traditional investing approaches.

“So it was always up in the air as to whether what was included.”

ESG Investing and Value Conflicts

43:32 to 44:06

Explore the conflicts between ESG values and traditional investing approaches.

“If you've ever waited on a refill or couldn't schedule an appointment, you get it.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Scarlet Fu:Healthcare doesn't always work great. If you've ever waited on a refill or couldn't schedule an appointment, you get it. That's the kind of stuff Optum is changing. They're using data and technology to integrate patient care, pharmacy, and everything else. So healthcare is connected, not complicated. What's that look like? Cheaper prescriptions that are easier to get and care that looks at the whole person, how you need it. Optum is helping make healthcare work as one for everyone. Learn more at business.optum.com. As industries evolve faster than ever, companies need an environment that accelerates strategic growth, and Michigan delivers on that promise.

0:37Scarlet Fu:From emerging startups to global enterprises, Michigan offers what executives value most, a resilient, innovative ecosystem, diverse communities that attract top talent, and a quality of life that supports work-life balance. With our unified Team Michigan approach, businesses scale faster and compete at the highest level. Michigan, pure opportunity. Seize your opportunity at michiganbusiness.org. Wise is the smart way to manage the currencies you need around the globe. When you send money abroad using your bank, you could get hit with hidden fees and exchange rate markups. There's a better way.

1:10Try Wise. Wise uses the exchange rate you'd usually find on Google with no unwelcome surprises. Plus, most transfers happen in under 20 seconds, which means your money arrives in less time than you've been listening to me. It's simple and free to sign up when you download the Wise app. Be smart. Get wise. T's and C's apply.

1:33Scarlet Fu:Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News. This is Bloomberg Intelligence. With Scarlett Fu and Paul Sweeney. How do you think the Fed is looking at tariffs, the uncertainty of tariffs? Let's take a look at the sectors and how they perform. A lot of investors getting whipsawed every day by news events. Breaking market headlines. And corporate news from across the globe. Could we see a market disruption, a market event? Are people just too exuberant out there? You see some so-called low-quality stocks driving this short-term rally. Bloomberg Intelligence. With Scarlett Fu and Paul Sweeney.

2:08Scarlet Fu:On Bloomberg Radio, YouTube, and Bloomberg Originals. On today's Bloomberg Intelligence show, we dig inside the big business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets. Each and every week, we provide in-depth research and data on some of the 2 ,000 companies and 130 industries our analysts cover worldwide. Today, we'll take a look at why U.S. Judge ruled against the government's proposals to break up Google. Plus, we'll look at why more AI researchers are leaving the tech giant Apple. But first, we begin with news from the food and beverage company Kraft Heinz. Because this week, Kraft Heinz announced its plans to split into two separate publicly traded companies.

2:41Scarlet Fu:One company will sell condiments and box meals, while the other will include its slower-growing grocery products like Lunchables. For more, Scarlett and I were joined by Jen Bartaschus, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Retail Analyst. We first asked Jen what this news means for Kraft Heinz, 10 years after its initial merger. It was just about a decade ago that they put the companies together with the plans that it would become kind of a packaged food powerhouse. But trends have changed, and consumers have changed, and it just hasn't materialized the way they originally thought it would. So what did the two companies get out of this merger then?

3:16So, you know, when we're looking at what they brought together, they brought together some products where they were able to recognize some synergies. They were able to do some co-branding, some, you know, product development, that sort of thing. But as I said, the consumer has changed and demand for shelf-stable packaged food products is just less than it was. And so we've seen multiple years where scanner data shows that Kraft Heinz brands have sort of been shrinking a little bit. And I think this separation is an attempt to kind of reinvigorate growth in different parts of their portfolio.

3:49Scarlet Fu:You mentioned several times how the consumer has changed. Let's dig into that a little bit more. Are we talking about because of the anti-obesity drugs like GLP-1? Is it a case where RFK and Make America Healthy Again is really taking root? I mean, this is kind of a slow moving shift in the consumer, right? It is indeed, Scarlett. It's a slow moving shift. And it started, you know, coming out of the pandemic. In the pandemic, everybody sort of retreated to familiarity, right? They went back to brands. They went back to shelf stable products. And since then, there's been more emphasis on things that are more natural, lower sodium, healthier for you, that sort of thing.

4:28And while Kraft Heinz has been making updates to their portfolio, it is hard to envision how kind of electric orange mac and cheese has a long-term growth, a long-term growth appeal to people where, you know, there's pressure from, as you said, RFK on more like natural colorance and things like that. So, you know, their portfolio is caught in that crosshairs. When you put companies together, the Press Release often talks about the synergies that are going to be, the cost synergies, maybe some revenue synergies, maybe. Are there dis-synergies when you break them apart? Yeah, there are dis-synergies.

5:01The company expects about$300 million in dis-synergies. Thankfully, most of their manufacturing practices are fairly separate, but there is a component to that. Kraft Heinz actually said in May they were exploring strategic options. There's been repeated rumors that it would result in a split of two companies. So the confirmation isn't necessarily unexpected news.

5:24Scarlet Fu:Paul, dis-synergies, does that just mean upfront costs? I think so. I need a new CFO. I need a new accounting department. I don't know. So go ahead, Jen. Jen, what's next for the packaged food business? I mean, is this just a industry-wide secular decline? Well, right now, it appears to be, especially in North America, a bit of a secular decline. Pockets of growth are becoming more and more isolated. And so when you're looking at scanner data, the problem is the consumer, as I said, they're shifting behaviors, but they're just not buying as much as they used to. And you see this even with Walmart or Target or Kroger, where people used to buy in multiples and stock up their pantries, and they just don't shop that way anymore.

6:06They're buying more on an as-needed basis, and part of that is the macroeconomic environment. And so that just doesn't favor these companies right now, where historically they've been pantry staples. And so right now when consumers are looking what they're going to make for dinner tonight, a bigger portion of their plate is fresh foods. So the perimeter of grocery stores are doing much better than the center of the store, which is these shelf-stable products.

6:32Scarlet Fu:Let's talk about the folks who brought these two companies together. It's Berkshire Hathaway, run by Warren Buffett, and 3G Capital, run by a group of Brazilian operations guys. Where do they stand in all this, Jen? What happens to, do they each still hold stakes in the companies? I mean, do they come out looking better 10 years later? Well, Berkshire Hathaway still has a large stake in the company. I think they own just over 25 % of the outstanding shares. But they did relinquish their chairs on the board shortly before the strategic options were announced, or that the company was exploring strategic options.

7:10So they've been slowly pulling back. From the time of their initial stake, they're probably still going to come out ahead, but it has been a 10-year play for them. Do we know where they're going to put their shares? Are they going to go equally between the two companies? Because I'd like to invest alongside Warren Buffett, I think. At this point, I don't think that's been disclosed, but it is certainly something that everyone will be watching for.

7:33Scarlet Fu:What will you be watching for, Jen, in terms of how competitors respond or react or move to kind of take advantage of this breakup? I think what will be interesting is to watch the level of promotional activity. There will likely be some effort to take market share. And Kraft Heinz is likely to up their marketing spend in order to try to drive volumes just ahead of when this split actually becomes realized to sort of show improvement in some of their legacy brands. So what that really sets a stage for is actually probably good for the everyday shopper, and that there'll be probably more sale items, more discounts.

8:16But it also means that it's less profitable sales for the companies that are involved in chasing that market share. So it will be interesting to watch how it unfolds. Companies only expecting this to close or to be realized at the second half of next year. So there's some time for those dynamics to play out.

8:33Scarlet Fu:Our thanks to Jen Bartaschus, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Retail Analyst. We turn next to more news in the consumer product space. This week, activist investor Elliott Investment Management announced it built a stake of about$4 billion in the food and beverage company PepsiCo. This makes Elliott one of PepsiCo's largest investors. And after the announcement, Elliott outlined its plans for the beverage company. This includes potentially restructuring its beverage unit and reviewing its snacks offerings. For more on all of this, Scarlett and I were joined by Ken Shea, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Consumer Products Analyst.

9:03We first asked Ken what the future looks like for PepsiCo and whether the company could eventually break up. I wrote a report over Bloomberg Intelligence saying that given the weakness of the stock, it's really just a matter of time where these talks are going to be revived. Recall back in 2014, Tryon, an activist, actually advocated that, breaking the company up between beverages and foods. The company decided not to do it. It made the case that it was getting good synergies between the two. Fast forward, Elliot isn't quite going that far. In Elliot's letter, it said it believes that value can be created by simply having the beverage side, roughly 40 % of the business, just re-franchise their bottling operations.

9:44In plain English, what that means is to divest those capital-intensive operations, manufacturing operations, that create the finished product from the syrups and concentrates that Pepsi, the beverage company, sells. That's really the golden part of that business. The jewel of that business is the concentrate business. That's what Coca-Cola does. Coca-Cola sells concentrate syrups at a high margin to third parties to make the product. PepsiCo chooses to do it in-house. that results in tying up capital, lower margins, and so on. At the same time, Elliot is also saying on the food side, perhaps some SKU rationalization is due, meaning there's a lot of food products there that they may not be well-suited to sell.

10:30The Frito-Lay is doing really well, although it's kind of a slowdown right now with many consumer products. It's the Quaker Foods, I think, it's really targeting and saying, Maybe some reduction there may be in order. So that's really what the gist is today with Pepsi.

10:44Scarlet Fu:All right, Ken, thank you for that very, very detailed rundown. I want to pick up on what you were talking about with the bottling business, refranchising the bottling business, which is what Coca-Cola does right now. What does Coca-Cola give up by doing that? I mean, there had to be a reason why Pepsi chose to keep it in-house up until now. Yeah, that's a great question, Scarlett. So go back in time, what, 10, 15 years ago or so, both companies had done that. They both had separated those businesses. PepsiCo decided to retain or it sold and then it bought it back and it decided to keep it. It made the case at the time that the soft drink business was in a downturn.

11:21Volumes were weak. They thought by gaining more control over those bottling operations, they could right size the ship. They could get it back in order, align the interest between the bottlers and the company. Because you've got to remember, Coca-Cola, by separating it, it is to some degree accepting a little risk. I mean, these are third parties. These are independent companies. They can sell beer. They can do other things. PepsiCo didn't want them to do that. PepsiCo said, look, we want you to be fully aligned with what we want. So that's what they said they gained from that. And I guess there's some truth to that.

11:56But you're giving up a lot also for the factors that I mentioned before. Ken, you've been covering this consumer space for a long time. you've seen the cycles come and go it seems like we're in a cycle of breaking these companies up i mean you've seen this game before how do you think this is going to play out across the consumer space well i you know given the pepsico stock before today was down about 20 over the last two years so it's really disappointed investors and beyond that it's that their long-term algorithm of high single digit comparable eps growth is not going to happen this year they're looking at flat earnings this year.

12:32And investors see the writing on the wall. They see a slowdown. And they're saying, look, maybe there's more than just a cyclical element here. Maybe there are some structural things this company can do. I think Elliott's making some good points here. And I think PepsiCo ought to follow through on some of these if they want to regain some of the low sentiment that's out there among investors.

12:54Scarlet Fu:Do you expect other investors to jump in here and kind of ride on Elliott Management's coattails? I mean, is Elliott going to be empowered to ask for more going forward? That's a great question. I think there are going to be some supporters of Elliott. Like I said, I think Elliott's making some fair points. PepsiCo has been really disappointing on the operational side. And like I said, in the stock front, I think it ought to be open ears to listen to what Elliott says. I think others will support Elliott in this case, yes. Our thanks to Ken Shea, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Consumer Products Analyst.

13:29Scarlet Fu:Coming up, we'll look at why the department store chain Macy's raised its guidance for the year. You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in-depth research and data on 2 ,000 companies and 130 industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via BI Go on the terminal. I'm Scarlett Fu. And I'm Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg. The thing about AI for business, it may not automatically fit the way your business works. At IBM, we've seen this firsthand. But by embedding AI across HR, IT, and procurement processes, we've reduced costs by millions, slash repetitive tasks, and freed thousands of hours for strategic work.

14:09Now we're helping companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business, IBM.

14:19Scarlet Fu:Let's talk about healthcare for a second. It doesn't always work the way people expect it to. If you've ever waited on a prescription refill or had a hard time getting the care you needed, you know the feeling. The system should just work better for everyone. That's exactly what the people at Optum are trying to do every day. They're a health care company linking patient care and pharmacy services and using data and technology to drive the whole system so care is connected, not complicated, for patients and providers. Things like making it easier to get care that looks at the whole person, from primary care doctors to mental health support and even in-home care, and then using technology to make sure they all work together.

14:58Scarlet Fu:Technology designed to help doctors spend less time on busy work and more time with their patients. And those prescriptions? Optum is working to bring costs down, save patients money, and make it easier to get refills. Little by little, Optum is helping make healthcare work as one for everyone. Head to business.optum.com to see how. As industries evolve faster than ever, companies need an environment that accelerates strategic growth, and Michigan delivers on that promise. From emerging startups to global enterprises, Michigan offers what executives value most, a resilient, innovative ecosystem, diverse communities that attract top talent, and a quality of life that supports work-life balance.

15:38Scarlet Fu:With our unified Team Michigan approach, businesses scale faster and compete at the highest level. Michigan. Pure opportunity. Seize your opportunity at michiganbusiness.org. This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlett Foo and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio. We move next to some news from the tech giant Alphabet. This week, U.S. Judge Amit Mehta ruled against the government's proposal to break up Google. This includes a forced sale of its Chrome browser in the biggest antitrust case in three decades. And the ruling is seen as a setback for the U.S. government in its bid to curb the power of big tech companies.

16:17For more, Scarlett and I were joined by Jennifer Ree, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Litigation Analyst. We first asked Jen for a clarification on the recent court ruling. You know, really, the court aligned much more so with what Google proposed than what the Department of Justice proposed. No divestiture of Chrome or contingent divestiture of Android because that was in there. Some data sharing, no exclusive agreements. Some search syndication, meaning a search engine, can basically provide results that just come straight from Google, right? They're mimicking Google. The surprising thing, though, here, and what was great for Apple, is that the judge said Google could continue to pay for search default positions.

16:54That's with Apple, with Mozilla. It pays some OEMs to pre-install Google search on the Android phones that they manufacture. And that, I think, was a really big surprise.

17:04Scarlet Fu:How is this remedy consistent with the original ruling, with the original findings? of the court. You know, I actually have a really big problem with aligning those two things, because I don't think that it is. In terms of no chrome divestiture, I think it's very consistent. And Paul, you know, I've been on this show before, and I've been saying for two years that there would not be a chrome divestiture ordered here. But where it's inconsistent is with this default position, because having a monopoly is not illegal, but it's the conduct that maintains the monopoly that's exclusionary, that is illegal.

17:34And what the judge found in that liability decision that the conduct that was illegal were the default agreements, right? This was exclusionary. This kept other search engines from being able to grow and scale and get better. He's allowing those default positions to stay in place. Now it's a shorter term. It's only for one year. Theoretically, in one year or one year after that, other search engines that have improved can compete for that contract. But it's still odd to me that what is found to be illegal is allowed to continue. What does this mean for just Silicon Valley in general? Can I sit back if I'm a CEO in Silicon Valley and say, hmm, the courts are maybe a little bit more aligned with our industry, how we think about the world than maybe the government?

18:16I would say that the way Silicon Valley can think about it is that this judge was cautious and this judge did talk about needing to apply caution when you're dealing with tech markets and Silicon Valley companies because judges don't understand it. They don't want to impact the route, the innovation, and the natural course of the industry, right? They don't want to distort that. And so it does suggest that it's more likely a judge is going to be cautious in future remedies for other cases. But what I think everybody has to keep in mind, because I've seen people talking about the fact that there's read through for some of these other monopolization cases, I don't really think that there is, because the facts are entirely different case by case.

18:55The markets are entirely different. And what made a divestiture remedy inappropriate here doesn't necessarily exist as a fact pattern, let's say, in FTC v. Meta or U.S. DOJ v. Apple or the other DOJ case against Google in the ad tech space. Those are different cases with different facts. And I don't think that there's necessarily a read-through that companies are safe from divestiture orders because of this one.

19:16Scarlet Fu:Do we think that AI, the quickness in how it's developing, played any kind of role in the judge's decision here? Oh, absolutely, 100%. The judge even observed that in the liability hearing, which was now a year and a half or so ago, that AI barely came up at all. Other than by Google, it barely came up. But in the remedies hearing, it was all about AI. And the witnesses were all AI. And he says it just shows in a year or year and a half how much things have changed. And the fact that you now have real competition to general search other than other general search engines. And I think that impacted him a lot.

19:50Scarlet Fu:Our thanks to Jennifer Rhee, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Litigation Analyst. Staying on tech this week, we learned that the tech giant Apple lost Jian Zhang, its lead AI researcher for robotics, to meta platforms. Three more AI researchers are also leaving Apple's in-house large language models team to join other companies. The departures are part of an exodus of AI talent from Apple, and the AI departures may only worsen with a potential shift toward using third-party models. For more on this and all things Apple, Scarlett and I were joined by Mark Gurman, Bloomberg News Managing Editor for Global Consumer Tech.

20:24You first asked Mark if he thinks it's a problem Apple is losing its AI experts. It's only a problem if it impacts the consumer. And right now, Apple's AI efforts are impacting the consumer because Apple intelligence and Siri lag very much in comparison to competing products on other platforms. Now, this can all be turned around, right you've got the ability for apple to do partnerships i predict there'll be some sort of big ai partnership for apple i've reported that they were they're in talks with google on an ai partnership i've reported they've been in talks with anthropic and open ai on potential ai partnerships they get one of those done it's a different ball game they buy a company i reported first reported over the summer that they've talked to mistral reported that they talked to perplexity i don't expect either of those deals to get done but that certainly shows you where their head's at If this all gets turned around with a major new version of Siri next year, if they get the Apple intelligence pipeline heading in the right direction, if they buy and hire the right LLM people, they could be in pretty good shape.

21:31Don't forget, Apple has the best ecosystem, they have the best hardware, and they're able to deploy new features and operating system upgrades faster than any other company. And so at the end of the day, this is still their game to lose because there are so many levers they can pull, especially with their cash balance to turn this thing around.

Read the full transcript

21:49Scarlet Fu:So why haven't they done any of those things so far? Why are they waiting? What's the holdup? Well, you know, Apple, unfortunately for them, they're very tied to a couple cycles, right? They have their spring cycle and then they have their fall cycle. The fall cycle has been set for some time. There's really no changing that. That's locked and loaded. You'll see the introduction of those products and those software features next Tuesday. at the iPhone 17 launch event. The spring is really the next opportunity for there to be major new features, right? That's when they're going to roll out a pretty big update to iOS 26 called iOS 26.4.

22:25At that time, I expect them to release an overhauled version of Siri that are going to fix a lot of these issues. That's a long time from now, though. It is a long time. Yeah, it is a long time. And the truth of the matter is that the AI space runs far more quickly than even the mobile space. You saw a lot of innovation in the smartphone space over the last two decades. AI is moving 10 times as fast as that. And they're aware of that. They're smart people. I guess they've made the decision that they're comfortable with their timing. Did they run the risk of making a fundamental error in their judgment of that timing?

22:59I don't think they're comfortable with the timing. I think that the timing was actually even further out. I wasn't expecting a major new version of Siri with incredible enhancements for consumers, probably not until the end of 26 or sometime, even at the tail end of 2027. So this is going to be happening at least six to 12 months sooner than Apple had originally planned. They are probably one or two years away, if they did nothing, of starting to bleed share to competing smartphones with major AI features. Right now, to tell you the truth, we talk about AI all day, every day. It's very important to the market.

23:34It's very important for the current technology age. Nobody's buying phones because of AI or not because of AI. But we are moving towards that. And that is going to happen. It's one or two years away. And so if they're not in good shape by then, they're going to start being impacted, not only in terms of what we talk about, not only on Wall Street in the stock market, but in actual purchasing decisions by consumers. Because right now, consumers only care about a few things when they buy new phones. They want to fix their broken screen. Yep. They want a better camera.

24:02Scarlet Fu:That was Mark Gurman, Bloomberg News Managing Editor for Global Consumer Tech. We move next to earnings in the retail space. This week, the department store chain Macy's raised its annual outlook and reported its best comparable sales growth in three years. This comes despite new tariffs and moderation in consumer spending. Meanwhile, the discount retail company Dollar Tree raised its annual sales guidance. However, it disappointed investors, stating the benefit from price hikes would disappear. For more on these companies, Scarlett and I were joined by Emily Cohn, Bloomberg Consumer Team Leader.

24:33We first asked Emily for her key takeaways from Macy's most recent quarter. I think this falls in line with what we've heard from other retailers. Shoppers are still shopping. They're being precise about what they're spending on being choosy. They called out home furnishings and apparel as strong sellers, also citing high demand for fine watches, jewelry, mattresses. So they are shopping. I think the main question I have is, how long will this last? How promotional are some of these retailers? How promotional do they have to be? Because I know that goes right to the margin. Yeah, I mean, that's an interesting segue into Dollar Tree.

25:10I think Dollar Tree raised prices so far this year to offset the cost of tariffs, and shoppers felt that, and that has a limit. There's only so far you can raise prices, and I think that is starting to eat away at their bottom line. They can't really raise prices that much anymore. I think these retailers are in a difficult spot. They want to keep prices low because of how the consumers is feeling, but also their costs are up on account of tariffs.

25:39Scarlet Fu:I would imagine Dollar Tree has a lot less cushion, as you say, to raise prices given who they're targeting and given how they're seeing a lot of higher end consumers trade down to Dollar Tree than a Macy's. Macy's did say explicitly that price increases are on the way, didn't they? Yes, they said that they have already started and that they're coming, but their sales are strong. And I think, you know, they're in the midst of a turnaround. There were signs that Tony's Spring Strategy is taking hold. Comp sales rose more at his reimagined stores than they did overall. What's different about a quote-unquote reimagined store?

26:15Good question. I think that is a really good question. I think these are the stores where they believe that they can have the greatest edge. So they're doing a lot to reinvigorate sales. They're redesigning the stores. They're rethinking their assortment. And these are the stores that they say we should really watch. This is the future of Macy's.

26:37Scarlet Fu:Let's put this into context, what we heard from Macy's, what we heard from Dollar Train, of course, Dollar General earlier in the month, or was it this month or last week, in any case. What are we hearing from retailers overall? Because investors are punishing some and rewarding others, even though the message, I would say is fairly consistent that consumers are spending. They're just being really, really weary and careful. I think you nailed it. I think retailers continue to point to strong sales momentum. People are shopping, even in the face of tariffs and threats of inflation. I think the question I have is knowing that retailers stock up months ahead of time.

27:16They had their inventory that they sold through now months ago, perhaps even before tariffs. I don't think we've really seen the full paths through of the cost of tariffs yet. And I think we'll continue to see that in the coming months, and especially during the all-important holiday shopping season. Let's go there. Is there a consensus building to how the holiday season may shape up? It's still early. I think the outlook isn't great so far. Although Tony Spring did say that the back-to-school shopping season. He used the word good, and he said that back-to-school is generally a good bellwether for the holiday shopping season.

27:58So there was a slight note of optimism there, but not totally bullish.

28:03Scarlet Fu:That was Emily Cohn, Bloomberg Consumer Team Leader. Coming up, a look at how the Trump administration is impacting the clean energy transition. You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in-depth research and data on 2 ,000 companies and 130 industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via BI Go on the terminal. I'm Scarlett Foo. And I'm Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg.

28:48Now we're helping companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business, IBM.

28:58Scarlet Fu:Let's talk about healthcare for a second. It doesn't always work the way people expect it to. If you've ever waited on a prescription refill or had a hard time getting the care you needed, you know the feeling. The system should just work better for everyone. That's exactly what the people at Optum are trying to do every day. They're a healthcare company linking patient care and pharmacy services and using data and technology to drive the whole system so care is connected, not complicated, for patients and providers. Things like making it easier to get care that looks at the whole person, from primary care doctors to mental health support and even in-home care, and then using technology to make sure they all work together.

29:37Scarlet Fu:Technology designed to help doctors spend less time on busy work and more time with their patients. And those prescriptions, Optum is working to bring costs down, save patients money, and make it easier to get refills. Little by little, Optum is helping make healthcare work as one for everyone. Head to business.optum.com to see how. As industries evolve faster than ever, companies need an environment that accelerates strategic growth. And Michigan delivers on that promise. From emerging startups to global enterprises, Michigan offers what executives value most, a resilient, innovative ecosystem, diverse communities that attract top talent, and a quality of life that supports work-life balance.

30:18Scarlet Fu:With our unified Team Michigan approach, businesses scale faster and compete at the highest level. Michigan, pure opportunity. Seize your opportunity at michiganbusiness.org. This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlett Foo and Paul Sweeney. On Bloomberg Radio. On Bloomberg Intelligence, we often look at research from Bloomberg NEF, previously known as New Energy Finance. They're the team at Bloomberg that tracks and analyzes the energy transition from commodities to power, transport, industries, buildings, and agriculture sectors. And this week, we took a look at how the Trump administration is impacting the clean energy transition.

30:56For more, Scarlett and I were joined by Antoine Wagner-Jones, Bloomberg BNEF Head of Trade and Supply Chains. We first asked Antoine to explain how the Trump administration is now impacting the transition to cleaner energy. There's a few things that have happened that are quite dramatic in recent months. There's been a bill that has been passed by the Trump administration, which seeks to reverse a lot of what was brought in under Biden under the Inflation Reduction Act, which was this big climate bill that gave all of this federal money, mostly in the form of tax credits for clean energy. A lot of that's being cut.

31:28So there was a really big high profile tax credit for electric vehicles. that's going to be gone as of this month and a lot of the other stuff is made much harder to access so this is a big problem for many of the manufacturers who have led to over 110 billion dollars of announcements for factories in the United States there's a lot of question marks about the face of those factories and the business case under the current environment.

31:53Scarlet Fu:Does the current administration want a transition to clean energy to green energy? The current administration is focused on a number of different things, such as when it comes to energy, load increasing due to data centers is one. A nuclear revival for the United States is another. When it comes to clean energy, when it comes to electric vehicles, those are things that are being actively diminished in terms of their rollout and support at a federal level. So the answer is no, they are pushing against it. So how are companies within the entire supply chain, how are they reacting? They're waiting and seeing for, for example, there's a number of different things that are happening where it's just not clear what the outcome is going to be.

32:36One of the things is that in the most recent bill that's been passed by the Trump administration, there's a number of rules around whether or not you can have any kind of Chinese involvement in a factory project at any real level. It seems incredibly expansive beyond what was done under the Biden administration. and the guidance for that isn't out yet and that's just one of the things where uncertainty is just continuing we're still waiting for clarifications on that specific rule and then if you zoom out again the tariff situation the volatility there we've had recent news around you know the ultimate supreme court decision which will likely impact many of the so-called reciprocal tariffs um is going to be you know something that we are waiting for early next year and that's just one example of how even with the tariff situation, things are changing by the day.

33:22And there's a lot of uncertainty there too. So in terms of new investments, very little is happening because people are waiting and seeing. And that's due to the volatility, not just in terms of federal support and the fate of those programs, but also in terms of trade policy.

33:37Scarlet Fu:And there was the one big beautiful bill as well. How did that change up the landscape? So that scrapped the electric vehicle tax credit, for example, that is gone. That has also brought a whole host of what's called foreign entity of concern rules around accessing many of those tax credits. Those rules were in place under the Biden administration, but in a much more restricted form. These are being expanded, be far beyond what they were. And the aim there is really interesting. Originally, there was a thought that the Trump administration, when it came to Chinese involvement, investments in the US would be much less ideological, much more, quote unquote, quote, transactional.

34:13That doesn't seem to be the case with this bill, where suddenly you have a new series of rules which are going to make it extremely hard for any project where there's any, you know, any kind of doubt as to some Chinese investment in the form of debt, financing inputs into a factory from going ahead and receiving tax credits. That's one big outcome from this bill. And we're still waiting on the guidance for that and how it's going to play out. I mean, does the US have the capability to be self-sufficient in you know transitioning to cleaner energy or does it need a global supply chain it needs a global supply chain so what we've done we've just published a huge report sort of detailing um uh the current installed capacity for lots of different sectors in terms of factories online in the united states we look at what's been announced we make a call as to what could come online and when it comes to some products like downstream products for things like solar modules so solar panels in their finished form when it comes to lithium-ion battery cells so that's batteries in their finished form the u.s actually has a pretty good shot at being self-sufficient by 2030 we think however and this is a big however when it comes to the inputs the components that go into those things so for a battery it's stuff like the cathode the anode you're going to have to rely on other trade partners if we suddenly have rules which shut out china from those supply chains that means that the mapping exercise that we've done suddenly becomes quite relevant, where you begin to say, oh, well, Japan has a surplus in separators that are used for making batteries.

35:38South Korea has a surplus in cathodes. And that's when you start having this sort of rejigging of all the different puzzle pieces and where procurement teams are going to be very busy over the next few months.

35:47Scarlet Fu:Can any of that be brought back to be made in the US onshore manufacturing? That's the aim. And under the Biden administration, where you had not just tariffs that were relatively stable, but you also had visibility in terms of future support. And you also had demand side policies, which meant that there'd be local demand for your product that was locked in. Even under those circumstances, still quite hard to do with the kind of price increases you see in the US. We've got a lot of announcements. We'll see whether those factories get built now. But in terms of that midstream, we haven't seen as much in the way of announced investments.

36:17And it's very unlikely that we're going to see anything in the short term under the current environment. So the short answer is no, not anytime soon. Is it, what are the capital markets like for any of this these days. I would think with the uncertainty that you've laid out for us, capital markets, are they dried up? Yeah. It's become a lot harder and we've seen a real fall in terms of VC funding, for example, for a lot of these projects. There's been a shift towards things like AI, defense spending, and there's also some big question marks about the suitability of some of these early stage funds for funding clean energy and climate technology in general.

36:54The returns profiles are very different to many other sectors. And that means that, yeah, that means that there's an increased relevance to the kind of policy changes we've been seeing recently. And actually, when it comes down to it, you really do need a lot of state support, even, you know, that needs to be qualified. When it comes to EVs, that might be the case. We're still going to see a lot of deployment of solar power, for example, and things like batteries, because costs have just gone down so dramatically that a lot of that will be built, even without the kind of federal support that we saw until recently.

37:26So there is a silver lining for some sectors, but for many sectors, we're going to see some real difficulties in terms of financing.

37:32Scarlet Fu:Our thanks to Antoine Wagner-Jones, Bloomberg BNEF, head of trade and supply chains. We move next to some recent research by Bloomberg Intelligence on environmental, social, and governance investing. Now, in simple terms, ESG is a framework used to evaluate a company's management of environmental, social, or governance risks. And since the war in Ukraine, roughly half of the ESG-registered equity funds in Europe have been allocating at least some capital to companies that manufacture, supply, or transport nuclear arms. Now, according to Bloomberg Intelligence, that number may only increase. This comes as recent guidance in an EU proposal leaves nuclear arms out of its definition of controversial weapons.

38:10Scarlet Fu:For more, guest hosts Lisa Matteo and Alexis Christoffers spoke with Shaheen Contractor, Bloomberg Intelligence' senior ESG strategist. They first asked Shaheen to break down how ESG funds are tied to nuclear arms. Traditionally, I mean, ESG funds defense, this whole thing has been quite controversial. So historically, ESG funds tend to exclude such sectors, such weapons, I guess. Now, the companies I analyze are part of Nordisk Bank's exclusion list, you know, biggest, one of the biggest asset owners, things that are excluded. So what's happened now is that the EU in a new rule, it's defined controversial weapons, but it's left nuclear weapons out.

38:50So it now defines it as cluster ammunition, landmines, things like that. So it's now explicitly not, for the lack of better words, controversial, according to the EU. But doesn't that sit in direct conflict with what these ESG funds are supposed to be about, like ethically and morally? Or is this really about following the money at the end of the day? So it's, I guess, traditionally, ESG has been about, you know, socially responsible investing, values investing. Actually, those are two separate things. So if you want to go based on your values, your ethics, then yes. But ESG now, or the way we analyze it, it's following the money.

39:28It's financially material metrics that lead to outperformance. It's funny how it all leads there, because, I mean, initially it was do no harm, right? Do no significant harm. And so it's hard to make the argument that nuclear weapons may not do significant harm. So I would say a lot of these values things, they're so subjective. I'm not saying that they do say significant harm, but I'm just saying it's so subjective and ever-changing. That's the point, I guess. That is true. But it could boost returns if defense continues to outperform. Correct, correct. So there are two things. It could boost returns, but at the same time, some values-based investors might, you know, it might go against their mandates.

40:03So I guess the point is we cannot assume that these funds now no longer have such exposures. It would lead to greater fund scrutiny. That's the point of this. You have to examine the fund. So who's going to be driving this push into these ESG funds, sort of focusing or including now nuclear weapons? So driving the push, it's always been Europe. If you're talking about, you know, who's investing into this, it's always been Europe. North America, I would say, is seeing a bit of a pause when it comes to these kinds of investments. It has been for a while. And when you look into that, I was looking at some of the numbers that you put.

40:38You said five ESG funds have 7 % or more of their portfolio invested in companies excluded. How significant is that figure? So 7 % of your portfolio in such companies, it's quite substantial. It's concentrated. Now, the number behind that, that five ESG funds, it's not that much. I think contrary to what people might think, you know, historically, exposure to such companies that are involved in nuclear weapons like Safran, Jacob Solutions, it hasn't increased. So before the war, the Russia-Ukraine war, people might have hoped. It increased, but actually it didn't, but it could going forward. Russia's invasion of Ukraine, did it push money into these ESG funds for the inclusion of nuclear weapons?

41:24So it did not push ESG funds to increase allocation into these companies. That's the point. And it's interesting because you would expect that it did. But I think Norgous Bank, you know, being on Norgous Bank's exclusion list has such a like stigma to it historically that it didn't. And that being said, that could change now. So I'm still confused. So why does the EU want to change things? Don't know. Why do the EU want to change things? It's about the returns, right? I guess. So let me. So historically, the EU defined controversial weapons as, you know, according to international treaties and UN principles.

42:04So it was always up in the air as to whether what was included. So some asset managers excluded nuclear weapons. summed in. So it was always a gray area. It was never defined. Now it's explicitly defined as not being included, if that makes sense. It does. It does. But what do they risk pushing away value-based investors? Yes. So that's the point. You know, it could boost returns, but then you have this conflict for people where this does not align with their value. So it's that dual conflict. So again, the point is funds might need additional scrutiny. If that doesn't align with my values, I can't assume that those companies are not in the fund.

42:42And sort of the next generation of investors are doing that, because you're talking about younger investors, where those things sort of matter in a way they maybe didn't for the prior generation. Yes. I mean, surveys show that. A lot of research shows that. How this pans out, we'd have to see as the younger generation takes on this challenge. Well, that's how I was going to ask. Where does this go from here? I think, where does this go from here? So I think if we continue to focus on ESG as sort of risk and returns, I think that's where we go from here. these values-based things are very subjective.

43:12Scarlet Fu:Our thanks to Shaheen Contractor, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior ESG Strategist. That's this week's edition of Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in-depth research and data on 2 ,000 companies and 130 industries. And remember, you can access Bloomberg Intelligence via BI Go on the terminal. I'm Scarlett Fu. And I'm Paul Sweeney. Stay with us. Today's top stories and global business headlines are coming up right now.

43:39Scarlet Fu:Healthcare doesn't always work great. If you've ever waited on a refill or couldn't schedule an appointment, you get it. That's the kind of stuff Optum is changing. They're using data and technology to integrate patient care, pharmacy, and everything else. So healthcare is connected, not complicated. What's that look like? Cheaper prescriptions that are easier to get and care that looks at the whole person, how you need it. Optum is helping make healthcare work as one for everyone. Learn more at business.optum.com. Whatever your goal, trade show giveaways, client gifts, or team gear, 4imprint has the promo products to match.

44:15With thousands of options, from apparel and drinkware to tech and totes, it's easy to find the right fit for your brand and budget, with standout choices at every price point. And with their 360-degree guarantee, you can be 4imprint certain your order will show up just right, right on time. Explore more at 4imprint.com. 4imprint. 4certain. wise is the smart way to manage the currencies you need around the globe when you send money abroad using your bank you could get hit with hidden fees and exchange rate markups there's a better way try wise wise uses the exchange rate you'd usually find on google with no unwelcome surprises plus most transfers happen in under 20 seconds which means your money arrives in less time than you've been listening to me it's simple and free to sign up when you download the wise app be smart get wise t's and c's apply

From the publisher

Hosts: Paul Sweeney and Scarlet Fu
Watch Paul  and Scarlet LIVE every day on YouTube: http://bit.ly/3vTiACF. 
On this podcast:

- Jennifer Bartashus, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Analyst, Retail Staples & Packaged Food, discusses Kraft Heinz separating into two publicly traded companies.
- Kenneth Shea, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Consumer Products Analyst, discusses Elliott Investment Management’s stake in PepsiCo.
- Jennifer Rie, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Litigation Analyst, discusses Google dodging a Chrome Sale in an Antitrust Case.
- Mark Gurman, Bloomberg News Managing Editor for Global Consumer Tech, discusses Apple’s AI talent leaving.
- Emily Cohn, Bloomberg Consumer Team Leader, discusses Macy's earnings.
- Antoine Vagneur-Jones BNEF Head of Trade and Supply Chains, discusses the transition to clean energy.
- Shaheen Contractor, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior ESG Strategist, discusses how an "EU rule clarification may boost ESG Funds’ nuclear arms exposure."

Bloomberg Intelligence, the research arm of Bloomberg L.P., has more than 400 professionals who provide in-depth analysis on more than 2,000 companies and 135 industries while considering strategic, equity and credit perspectives. BI also provides interactive data from over 500 independent contributors. It is available exclusively for Bloomberg Terminal subscribers.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Bloomberg Intelligence

All 414 episodes
BI Weekend: Kraft Heinz Split, Macy’s EarningsBloomberg Intelligence · 38 min
Listen in VO