1. Podcasts
  2. Bloomberg Surveillance
  3. Bloomberg Surveillance TV: October 23rd, 2026
Bloomberg Surveillance

23 Oct 2026 · 22m · 7 chapters

Episode artwork

Bloomberg Surveillance TV: October 23rd, 2026

In short

Bloomberg Surveillance episode covering (1) tech/AI market jitters after tech’s concentrated outperformance, (2) hyperscaler capex, free-cash-flow and financing concerns, (3) credit/equity diversification and election-driven anxiety, (4) energy/oil risk premium around Hormuz and tanker constraints, plus brief tech headlines (SpaceX, SK hynix, OpenAI valuation).

Guests

Lizanne Saunders, Schwab; Dan Ives, analyst at “York for Life” (as stated in transcript); Rebecca Babin, CIBC.

Key claims

AI leadership is shifting from “who spends most” to “who can afford to stay quality with balance-sheet strength”; sell-side vs buy-side estimate gaps drive outsized selloffs; hyperscaler capex should be judged alongside falling cash flows and more debt financing; profitability matters (profitable Russell 2000 up ~18% YTD vs non-profitable slightly down); energy flows are costlier (Hormuz transit ~5x start-of-year; ~3x ships), with limited buffers and risk premium.

Notable examples

Samsung’s selloff after beating sell-side but missing buy-side; Meta’s share issuance reaction; Russell 2000 profitability spread; SpaceX cell-site expansion talks; OpenAI valuation target cut to ~$125B; SK hynix scrapping US listing; European SPR/diesel releases; 27-strip crude strength.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes.

Chapters

1:41

Tech Market Overview

Discussing market stability in tech following significant downturns and investor concerns.

“Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or anywhere else you listen.”
2:24

Investor Sentiment on AI

Exploring investor anxieties around AI and its impact on market portfolios.

“Is the financing piece of this really being called into question, circularity of financing?”
3:52

Market Reactions to Earnings

Analyzing how earnings from big tech firms affect market expectations and stock performance.

“So that, to me, is really the key, is how wide a spread is there between the sell-side and the buy-side estimates.”
5:44

Capital Expenditure and Market Impacts

Discussion on the implications of capital expenditures on the market and tech companies.

“Russell 2000 stocks were in slightly negative territory on a year to date performance.”
7:22

Election Anxiety and Market Volatility

Understanding how upcoming elections contribute to market anxiety and volatility.

“has to be thought of now more from an attribution standpoint, as opposed to just purely from an asset class standpoint.”
14:00

Tech Market Dynamics and Midterm Concerns

Explore the impact of neoclouds and political shifts on tech companies.

“And ultimately, does the disappearance of some of these neoclouds end up slowing down the build out and prolonging the cycle and the earnings for the likes of NVIDIA and some of the big semiconductors?”
20:52

Energy Price Hikes and Supply Chain Pressures

Analyze the rising costs of energy and the implications for the market.

“But the price of crude hasn't come down.”
A man walking through an airport, asking his phone a question

Ask about this episode

Get the gist, explore an idea or ask about something said.

Claude

On Bloomberg Surveillance, what are the key points of this episode?

Searching your listening

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00If you invest or lead a business, one-sided views aren't enough. Join me, Brad Rogoff, and my team at Barclays Research as we debate what's driving markets on the Flipside podcast. Find the Flipside wherever you get your podcasts. When you're a business owner interested in expanding to new markets, there's a lot to consider and countless questions to answer before making the call. The most important one being, are you ready? That's where ChachiPT comes in. Give it a goal, add your files, and ask chat to help you map out different scenarios for the future of your business. So when growth is on the table, you've got an expansion plan ready to implement.

0:38Get started at ChachiPT.com. For big business, AI opened up a world of promise, but that world of promise turned into a world of pain. Cost spiraling, data trapped, security and governance risks multiplying, and ROI out of reach. That's why enterprises turn to Boomi to connect data, apps, and AI, helping them operate securely, efficiently, and at scale. Boomi turns a world of AI pain into a world of AI gain. As Boomi says, we got you. Head to boomi.com. That's B-O-O-M-I dot com. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News.

1:24This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Farrow, along with Lisa Abramowitz and Anne-Marie Hordern. Join us each day for insight from the best in markets, economics and geopolitics. From our global headquarters in New York City, we are live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from 6 to 9 a.m. Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or anywhere else you listen. And as always, on the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App. We begin this hour with tech steadying following its worst day since June. Lizanne Saunders of Schwab writing, the AI story isn't over, but it's moving from who spends the most to who can afford to stay up in quality with focus on balance sheet strength.

2:01Lizanne joins us now for more. Lizanne, welcome. How much pushback are you seeing to this build out? You mean in terms of investors and how they're approaching their portfolios? It is absolutely the number one question. I just did a number of client events this week around the country and angst about AI, but really broad questions, not a lot of questions with specificity. Just what do you think here? Is it a bubble? Is the financing piece of this really being called into question, circularity of financing? So the interest is heightened. And John, another part of the reason for that is if we just lapped the start of the current bull market, October 12th was the end of the 2022 bear market.

2:47During that span of time, that four, slightly more than four years, only tech and comm services outperformed the index itself. The remaining nine sectors underperformed. So, just from that, we know there's been concentrated positions. And that's why I think you've seen this shift toward more defense in the last couple of weeks. Supporting that concentration, as you know, Lisanne, you've got the numbers. It's been massive earnings, fantastic figures, particularly for this year for the big tech players. Dan Ives was on the program a little bit earlier on this morning. He tried to make the case the next week when we get numbers from Google, Microsoft, Amazon, it'll calm things down.

3:23Do you see it the same way? Well, I'm not an analyst covering the stock. So I think for things to calm down, those earnings collectively would have to be better than expected. And these days, companies need to be both top line and bottom line on the sell side consensus published numbers. But what we've also learned with the action of certain stocks is you can outperform the published sell-side consensus. It's still underperformed the unpublished buy-side expectation. We used to think of that as the whisper number. So that, to me, is really the key, is how wide a spread is there between the sell-side and the buy-side estimates.

4:01And that's when you get stocks that, in some cases, get taken out to the woodshed. You just think about a few months ago when Samsung had the same problem. They reported better than the sell-side consensus, but they arguably undershot the buy-side expectation, ultimately took the KOSPI down 40 percent along with it, subsequently rebounding, of course. Yeah, there's a real question, though, just to build on what John was talking about next week, what the hyperscalers are going to announce with respect to CapEx plans. Will bigger-than-expected CapEx plans be a positive for the market or a negative for the market, given either—you could read it two ways, right?

4:37On one hand, their ambitions are increasing and so are their CapEx. Yay. On the other hand, they're being fiscally disciplined. Which is the story that the market wants to hear? I think an undershooting of CapEx would be a bigger negative story than reinforcing what are pretty healthy CapEx numbers. So I think it's less about what that dollar spend is and how are we financing it. You know, you have seen a big drop in the cash flows of the hyperscalers. you had had significant cash flow to finance the capital spending that has since dropped now. And collectively, you've gone into negative territory in terms of the year over year growth in cash flows, which is why there is more debt financing.

5:22But I think it's a bit bifurcated and I think it will stay bifurcated. It's down the quality spectrum that you're seeing troubles, especially as you move away from the mega cap names. I only track it on a weekly basis, so it's a few days old. But as of last week's close, the profitable Russell 2000 stocks were up 18 percent year to date. That's handily outperforming the S &P 500. But the non-profitable Russell 2000 stocks were in slightly negative territory on a year to date performance. So that's a massive 18, 19 percentage point spread just based on are you profitable or not. I think that's the bigger underneath the surface story is what your interest coverage is.

6:01Are you high low debt to equity. What is the outlook for your profitability and profit margins? This is very much a quality trade. And I think that probably has some persistence. How big of a signal was Meta's sell-off in response to, among other things, issuing more shares that didn't have voting rights? I mean, if some of the biggest, strongest players start to rely more on equity sales to finance some of their ambitions, how is that taken in the stock market? Well, in the case of Meta, we saw how it was taken with its stock. And Meta is one of the primary reasons why, in an aggregate sense, you saw the hyperscalers' free cash flow numbers drop so precipitously.

6:44So, I think there's sensitivity to that in the equity market. By the way, there's also sensitivity to that in the fixed income side of things, in investment-grade credit. And that's another important point. In this environment where we think about crowded trades and concentration on the equity side of things, you now have to consider when establishing a diversified portfolio that if a big part of the fixed income sleeve is also corporate credit, that you've got that AI exposure that spans into the fixed income side of the portfolio too. So, I think diversification has to be thought of now more from an attribution standpoint, as opposed to just purely from an asset class standpoint.

7:30Lizanne, as we are getting closer to the midterms, John made a joke at the top of the show. But honestly, how much is this is just anxiety and everyone waiting for that to be a clearing event or do you not think it will be? Well, I think it's absolutely part of the anxiety. I don't have to tell anybody that this is an emotional period. And one of our messages is be mindful of not letting the emotions, particularly if they're election-driven emotions, infiltrate your investment decision-making too much. Part of the reason why volatility tends to pick up in advance of elections, particularly even and even more so midterm elections relative to presidential elections, but things do tend to calm down after.

8:14So I think it's absolutely a force that is behind some of the skittishness that you're seeing at least under the surface of the major indexes. Stay with us. More Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

8:30If you invest, lead a business or allocate capital, one-sided views aren't enough. Join me, Brad Rogoff, the Global Head of Research at Barclays on the Flipside podcast. Each month, I go head to head with one of our expert analysts on my global team to debate the economic and market issues that matter most. From inflation and AI to equity and credit trends, each debate helps you see what headlines might miss. Find the flip side wherever you get your podcasts. This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by Chachi PT. I'm Carol Masser. Millions of Americans are taking peptides, short strings of amino acids that can act as biological signals for cells.

9:11Bloomberg's Anika Inampudi reports peptides may be exploring their next frontier, the brain. People are taking peptides for mental clarity and cognitive benefits and to gain a competitive edge or stave off the effects of aging. Both insulin and semaglutide are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Because importing or selling unapproved peptides for human use is not legal in the U.S., many people turn to online forums for guidance and overseas vendors with questionable credentials to obtain them. Unapproved peptides, which are marketed as research chemicals, have been circulating in what's become a billion-dollar gray market amid the rise of do-it-yourself medicine as people increasingly turn to social media or artificial intelligence for medical help.

9:54That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute, brought to you by ChatGPT. Get started at chatgpt.com.

10:04On our radar this morning, SpaceX expanding its infrastructure footprint. Sources telling us here at Bloomberg the company is in talks to secure at least 80 ,000 sell sites across the U.S. with the help of at least one major cellular infrastructure firm. That name is up 2 % so far this morning. Elsewhere, SK Hynek scrapping plans for the US listing of its Solidime unit. The chipmaker facing strong opposition from both regulators and shareholders. The company citing, quote, recent capital market conditions for the decision. There goes another one. And finally, OpenAI lowering its valuation target in its latest funding round.

10:36Sources telling us here at Bloomberg the chat GBT maker has shifted its value by 150 billion in recent talks, bringing its new target to 125, the previous target much higher. Yeah,$1.4 trillion at a time when this is one of the big kahunas, right? It's the$1.25 trillion now OpenAI versus the$2 trillion Anthropic. And ultimately, that sucking sound you hear is money going toward these players and nobody else, potentially. If there is an Anthropic IPO, it comes with nobody else really doing IPOs because the IPO window has essentially come to a shut. And so to the degree that the IPO window is open to these selective players, the key question is at what valuation and how much do investors welcome it versus fear it at a time of real questions around capital reasons.

11:20We've got Dan Ives of York for Life with us around the table. Dan, good morning. Great to be here. What's breaking in your world?

11:26Dan Ives: Look, I think it's a tug of war because on one hand, I was just in the issue last week, the demand has accelerated, I think, about 30 percent over the last month. Just in terms of what we see with chips, enterprises going full down, the AI stack, we'll see that from hyperscale earnings next week. But then, like you talked about, I mean, just given, call it 20 % of that, it's going to have to be ultimately financed via debt, capital raises, the pressure, the core weave worries. You know, I think the reaction that we saw with Meta, I think was a head scratcher. To some extent, relative to just unbelievable numbers, but yet stocks sold off.

12:02Dan Ives: So I think, look, it is as nervous as I've seen relative to maybe a SaaS apocalypse, if I go back to earlier this year. It's almost a SaaS apocalypse 2.0 on the infrastructure side in terms of what's happening. You mentioned a couple of companies. Let's divide them and draw a firm distinction between some of the major companies with massive, legit balance sheets and then the more speculative leverage players. You mentioned a core weave. This market's starting to reassess and question the business model in neocloud firms. If those neocloud firms went away, and just do the scenario analysis with me, if that went away, that business disappeared, what would it mean for the marginal demand for, say, a chipmaker right now?

12:39Dan Ives: Look, that's 50. I mean, if you think about even on an NVIDIA core, that's 10%. I mean, we're talking about the neoclouds play. You almost need more neocloud from a capacity perspective than we have today. I would argue the core weave is the nebbias. They're more consolidators to some extent, what we're ultimately going to see on the neocloud side. But today, demand supply is 13 to 1. So it comes down to those that argue that the demand is not there relative to what the capacity bill that will be, I'll argue it's the opposite. So to some extent, when you look at the hyperscalers, they're going to have to continue to ramp up cap backs.

13:16Dan Ives: We'll see that next week with the hyperscalers. And I just view this as more of, you'll call it like a growth scare, credit scare, but I don't think it dents, my view that we're in year three of an eight to ten year build out because like i've said this is vegas strip 1955 the build out i'm not saying 1956 there weren't issues 1957 but that is how big tech companies are viewing it and it's are you saying it's a casino well i'd say that to some extent not in the casino but in the fact that you went to vegas But the fact that there's one strip and if you don't have a spot on the strip, then ultimately you'll be in Reno.

13:58Well, I guess the question isn't just whether you're building out the strip. It's how long it's going to take. And ultimately, does the disappearance of some of these neoclouds end up slowing down the build out and prolonging the cycle and the earnings for the likes of NVIDIA and some of the big semiconductors? because ultimately on the margins in the near term, that short-term demand goes away.

14:23Dan Ives: Yeah, I view it right now is that if there's some neoclouds on the lower end that go away, then that capacity ultimately gets bought up. So I don't think that necessarily slows it down. But my view, going into midterms combined with what we see on the credit side, let's just say 5 % of the data centers don't get built. You still have 800 to 1 ,000 data centers that will get built. And for every dollar on CapEx, there's a$5 to$6 multiply across the rest of tech. And that second, third, fourth derivative speaks to the Palantirs, the snowflakes, the crowd strikes, the Palo Alto's, what's happening across the country.

15:00What I'm hearing from you is that the bigger are going to get bigger simply because they have the cash flow to actually finance this. And ultimately, more of this is going to have to come out of cash flow. More of them are going to have negative cash flows going forward and are not going to really have or not going to see the desirability to turn as much to debt markets. to finance this. Is that kind of what you're seeing? And that ultimately that could affect their equity valuation, but they could emerge the winners overall in terms of their scope and scale. No doubt.

15:26Dan Ives: It's a great way. And it's a balancing act for them because if they ultimately pull back, let's say Microsoft pulled back, Amazon pulled back, others would accelerate. You talk about Anthropoc, they'll go IPO in November. As they become public and as OpenAI goes public, whether it's$1.2 trillion or$1.4 trillion, the arms race just gets accelerated. So I think these tech companies recognize there's 12 to 18 months to do this. Still. Still. The build-outs, they understand there's a window to do this. Because they see from their customers, like Microsoft, you'll hear it next week, they see from their customers, they're waiting in line.

16:04Dan Ives: They're trying to accelerate ultimately where they're going to be. And if Microsoft can't do it, then they'll go to Amazon. They can't do it. They'll go to Google. That's why Oracle right now is maybe in the toughest spot because they're trying to be a hyperscaler, but they're doing it on debt. And that's why the stock you just continue to see reflect a lot of those negative concerns. Dan, you mentioned midterms. Is it just about data centers? Because yesterday, dozens of lawmakers came out after this Axios report about AI agents breaking into people's bank accounts. Most notably, Bernie Sanders says AI needs to be paused now.

16:38Is there more of a risk of something happening, given the fact that it looks likely that Democrats are going to sweep the House and even potentially the Senate?

16:46Dan Ives: I think the worry going into the midterms, and I think that maybe this hasn't been talked about as much because obviously we're talking about credit and tenure, but a lot of the concerns that I see is just more politically because if you have some sort of blue wave, Democrats negative on AI, negative on data center build-outs, something like Hochul and the moratorium we see, Look, that continues. That's a real threat. Because the reality is that for every data center that doesn't get built in the U.S., China wins. So that, I think from an investor perspective, you go state to state. If something doesn't get built in one state, go to another.

17:24Dan Ives: But I think that right now, from an investor perspective, is definitely a concern going into midterm. So if it's a blue tsunami, which some Republicans have told me they're concerned about, Do you think we open up much lower on all of these hyperscalers November 4th? Look, if you have a blue wave boost, it would be negative for tech, no doubt. Now, then the question is what becomes grandstanding political talk versus the reality? And I think that will ultimately be like has investors sort of gleaned through it. But I think that's sort of the issue right now, because any regulatory or any data center sort of slowdown, that's something that stifles innovation.

18:03Dan Ives: for the US for the first time in 30 years is ahead of China when it comes to technology. And that right now is the conundrum. But I believe next week, hyperscale earnings, that calms down the market, showing that I think we're the growth. I've got to follow up. I mean, we had Meta and SpaceX. Numbers were pretty good. Didn't calm anyone. Yeah, and I think that this will be viewed, the Meta and SpaceX reactions, in the coming weeks and months as more of a buying opportunity relative to how the market reacted. I think if Meta reports earnings next week, stock's up. I just think it happened at a time where the nervousness is there.

18:40Dan Ives: And right now, look, New York City cab driver is bearish on tech. There's a lot of nervousness that we're seeing. But I just view this as a SaaS apocalypse 2.0 rather than the time to hit exit. Never mind the New York City cab driver. When you get bearish, that's when I know it's a buy. Stay with us. More Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

19:03This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by Chachi PT. I'm Carol Masser. Millions of Americans are taking peptides, short strings of amino acids that can act as biological signals for cells. Bloomberg's Anika Inampudi reports peptides may be exploring their next frontier, the brain. People are taking peptides for mental clarity and cognitive benefits and to gain a competitive edge or stave off the effects of aging. Both insulin and semaglutide are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Because importing or selling unapproved peptides for human use is not legal in the U.S., many people turn to online forums for guidance and overseas vendors with questionable credentials to obtain them.

19:44Unapproved peptides, which are marketed as research chemicals, have been circulating in what's become a billion-dollar gray market amid the rise of do-it-yourself medicine as people increasingly turn to social media or artificial intelligence for medical help. That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. Get started at chatgpt.com. As your wealth grows and your needs change, finding the right financial advisor can make all the difference. Edward Jones offers comprehensive wealth management to help give you a greater sense of confidence and control while you focus on living a life you love.

20:17Your Edward Jones advisor takes the time to truly get to know you and provide personalized strategies to help keep your goals on track. Whether you're passionate about charitable giving, considering business succession, or legacy planning with the next generation in mind. With more certified financial planner professionals than nearly any other firm, Edward Jones Financial Plans are custom built around what matters most to you. Because the key to being rich is knowing what counts. Edward Jones, member SIPC.

20:51let's talk about energy at the heart of some of these conversations brent crude continuing to climb heading for its third consecutive weekly gain rebecca babin of cibc writing more oil is moving through a system that is increasingly expensive to operate and has far less cushion when something goes wrong playing with fire can leave you with third degree burns rebecca joins us now for more rebecca welcome to the program how people understand this the supply of energy is higher. It's bounced. But the price of crude hasn't come down. How much more expensive is it to move energy now? So it's a lot more expensive.

21:26It's five times more expensive to get a barrel through Hormuz than it was kind of at the start of the year. And it takes three times as many ships to do that. So you're looking at a system that's under extreme strain to get those barrels through. So there's a big distinction with a barrel that moves in freedom of navigation and a barrel that moves under an escort or a ship-to-ship transfer. So those costs are very much being embedded into the risk premium we're seeing in Brent prices right now. So as the flows have increased, we're not seeing that pullback in prices because it's simply much more risky, much more expensive to do so.

22:04And as we've seen escalation kind of come this week and rumors that there potentially is, you know, an attack coming before the midterms, you see traders very much on edge, not necessarily wanting to be short into a weekend where there could be kinetic action. So the market's reflecting a lot of risk premium and it's warranted. We don't have a huge inventory buffer at this point. And yes, the barrels are flowing, but they're not flowing through freedom of navigation. Do you see any way that the administration can ameliorate some of these concerns? I spoke to the energy secretary recently and was talking about the scale of the sanctioned oil tankers that potentially real companies can use them if they're carrying legal oil.

22:48Can that help at all? So I think 13 to 15 percent of the global fleet is sanctioned right now for VLCCs. So removing sanctions on some of those carriers could, on the margin, help relieve this strain in the tanker market and get a little bit of relief on these freight rates. But I don't think it's necessarily this kind of silver bullet that's going to really solve this problem. And I think this really, Anne-Marie, points to the bigger issue we're seeing. We keep trying to solve this with one Band-Aid after another, but we are literally looking at a kind of a system that's broken and being held together by Band-Aids, and that's just not going to necessarily create a lasting solution.

23:34So could it help on the margin and reduce some of the freight rate costs we're seeing? Potentially, but keep in mind, those sanctioned vessels are all like 20 years old. They're the older, they need repairs. They have some of them have already been been being used by the shadow fleets. So it's it's really it's it's not a huge help. I mean, again, it's it's not going to hurt, but it's just not going to solve the problem. Fragile environment. Where do we have cushions right now around the world? Yeah, so where the cushions are, we do still have a European SPR that's fairly well stocked. Of course, they have announced that they're going to commit to releasing what they already announced they would release in March with the 20 million barrels of diesel over the coming months.

24:15It's helpful. there is a decent amount of a remaining SPR in Europe that I think they are very cautiously deploying. And you can imagine why, right? They are importers of every molecule, every source of energy. Do they really want to release it out into the market with so much uncertainty as to what comes next? We don't really see the end line for the conflict. And where you're really seeing that reflected is in the 27 strip of crude. 27 strip of crude is making year-to-date highs. Front month, not making year-to-day highs. 27-strip is. So if you're Europe and you're looking at that, do you say, do I want to release or not?

24:52It's questionable. But that's where there's a buffer. Outside of that, we've really exhausted a lot of the inventories. Commercial inventories are what comes next. And it's running pretty tight. How high do prices have to go, Rebecca, before people start to invest in building new refineries or build new drilling sites? That is a great question. And I think it's less about the front month price and more about that strip and looking longer dated. And I think if we can get confidence that this is a lasting cycle, this isn't just a we're going to rip higher, demand's destroyed, and we come right back down to 60, that's when you start to see the investment happen.

25:36And I think that is something that comes over the next 6 to 12 months. This isn't a decision that's going to be made in 2 to 3 months. I think if we consistently hold kind of on that 27, 28 strip in the mid-80s, low-90s, you could see that marginal increases in barrels start to come on in bigger projects. A little bit different for refineries. I think that's a much harder battle on a regulatory front. So I think you would see crude production increase pretty meaningfully in 12 to 18 months. But I think refining is not something that's going to be solved. I don't know what price that happens. It's more of a regulatory, I think, issue more than a price issue.

26:16This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, bringing you the best in markets, economics and geopolitics. You can watch the show live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or anywhere else you listen. And as always, on the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App.

26:39A business gift should do more than check a box. It should reflect your brand and show someone they're appreciated, recognized, and truly seen. 4imprint offers thousands of high-quality, customizable products, like premium apparel, drinkware, tech, and more, making it easy to create a gift that feels meaningful and on-brand. And with 4imprint's expert support and their 360-degree guarantee, you can be 4imprint certain your order will arrive exactly as intended. Explore gifting with confidence at 4imprint.com. 4imprint. 4certain. If you listen to financial news, you know a lot of time is spent thinking about what's next.

27:17The next opportunity. The next investment. The next move. But sometimes what matters most is being ready for what you never saw coming. For more than 75 years, Cincinnati Insurance has worked with independent agents to help protect businesses, homes, valuables, and more. Because planning for the future isn't only about knowing what's next. It's about making sure you're ready for what you can't predict. Let Cincinnati Insurance make your bad day better. Find an independent agent at CINFIN.com. For big business, AI opened up a world of promise, but that world of promise turned into a world of pain.

27:55costs spiraling, data trapped, security and governance risks multiplying, and ROI out of reach. That's why enterprises turn to Boomi to connect data, apps, and AI, helping them operate securely, efficiently, and at scale. Boomi turns a world of AI pain into a world of AI gain. As Boomi says, we got you. Head to boomi.com. That's B-O-O-M-I dot com.

From the publisher

Featuring:

  • Liz Ann Sonders, Managing Director & Chief Investment Strategist at Charles Schwab
  • Dan Ives, Senior Managing Director & Partner at Yorkville Ives & Co.
  • Rebecca Babin, Managing Director & Senior Equity Trader at CIBC Private Wealth Group

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Bloomberg Surveillance

All episodes