AI Selloff, Apple vs. OpenAI & the Future of Defense Tech

14 Jul 2026 · 49 min · 25 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

An episode of Bloomberg Tech covering (1) an AI-driven selloff in memory/semiconductors after SK Hynix’s South Korea rout and US ADR debut, (2) Apple’s trade-secrets lawsuit against OpenAI amid Apple’s device ambitions, and (3) FCC regulation of space communications (spectrum, orbital data centers, direct-to-device), plus AI’s implications for defense tech and biotech vs China.

Guests and backgrounds

  • Dina Bass: Bloomberg reporter covering AI infrastructure.
  • Ipek Oskadeh Shaya: Swissquote senior market analyst.
  • Brendan Carr: FCC Chairman.
  • Mark Gurman: Bloomberg consumer tech and Apple editor.
  • Joe Lunsdale: 8VC managing partner; Palantir co-founder.

Key claims

  • Memory makers (SK Hynix, Micron) are trying to make AI memory less cyclical via multi-year customer deals; HBM supply constraints are central.
  • A correction is underway due to volatility and speculative ETF/leveraged-fund trading.
  • FCC is shifting space approvals to “assembly line” objective criteria; supports direct-to-device competition.
  • Apple’s lawsuit aims to deter Apple employees from joining OpenAI hardware efforts.
  • Lunsdale argues the US is ahead in AI and cyber, but China’s IP/patent strategy and slow FDA timelines threaten biotech and defense innovation.

Notable examples

  • HBM used for NVIDIA AI GPUs; SK Hynix ADRs down ~9% and SK Hynix shares down >30% in Korea.
  • Apple alleges Tang Tan (former Apple iPhone design VP) encouraged prototype/component sharing.
  • FCC plans new mid-band spectrum (160 MHz) and cites Starlink/Amazon/AST Space Mobile for direct-to-device.
  • Anthropic letter to the White House alleges Alibaba distillation; OSTP memo to share info with closed-weight model companies.
  • Lunsdale cites Orca Bio approval and Palantir/8VC defense and AI investments.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

The AI Selloff Overview

0:00 to 0:22

A discussion on the recent AI stock selloff and its impact on the US market.

“With the highest number of young STEM graduates per capita in the EU, Ireland has the people and skills your company needs to succeed here.”

The AI Selloff Overview

1:00 to 1:54

A discussion on the recent AI stock selloff and its impact on the US market.

“When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track.”

The AI Selloff Overview

2:23 to 3:52

A discussion on the recent AI stock selloff and its impact on the US market.

“spills over into the US market Monday, sending SK Hynix ADRs falling in just their second US trading day.”

Memory Chip Market Dynamics

3:52 to 5:18

Analysis of memory chip companies and their strategies amidst AI demand.

“And so they've been coming to these companies and asking for multi-year deals, which is a new thing in that business, at least.”

AI and Chip Supply Challenges

5:18 to 6:32

Exploring the supply issues surrounding HBM chips and the impact on AI.

“At the same time, while NVIDIA dramatically dominates the AI chip space, we are seeing some smaller new competitors as well as larger competitors like Google.”

Market Analysis and Investor Sentiment

6:32 to 11:01

Insights on the current market trends and investor behavior in the tech sector.

“Let's take a look at today's big number,$4.4 trillion.”

Regulatory Landscape of Space Economy

11:01 to 12:52

Discussion with FCC Chairman Brendan Carr on regulating the emerging space economy.

“We're also looking at the US listed shares of ADRs of TSMC.”

FCC's Role in Orbital Data Centers

12:52 to 14:01

Chairman Carr explains the FCC's regulatory role in satellite communication.

“Chairman Carr, thank you so much for being back on Bloomberg Tech.”

FCC's Role in Space Economy and Wireless Networks

14:01 to 19:20

Learn about the FCC's new approach to satellite approvals and wireless network regulations.

“of low-Earth orbit satellites or data centers.”

Antitrust Concerns and the Paramount Deal

19:21 to 21:04

Explore the implications of a potential antitrust lawsuit regarding the Paramount deal.

“This is Bloomberg Tech speaking with FCC Chairman Brendan Carr.”
Show all 25 chapters

Disney's Broadcast Licenses and Diversity Practices

21:05 to 24:18

Understand the FCC's ongoing inquiries into Disney's broadcast policies and diversity practices.

“But I hope you appreciate to ask you about what the latest is there and your reaction to a statewide antitrust suit.”

Apple vs. OpenAI: Trade Secrets Lawsuit

24:19 to 26:26

Discover the details of Apple's lawsuit against OpenAI over trade secrets and employee conduct.

“FCC Chairman Brendan Carr joining us from our DC studio.”

Apple vs. OpenAI: Trade Secrets Lawsuit

26:56 to 27:17

Discover the details of Apple's lawsuit against OpenAI over trade secrets and employee conduct.

“Ireland has the people and skills your company needs to succeed here.”

Apple vs. OpenAI: Trade Secrets Lawsuit

28:15 to 28:31

Discover the details of Apple's lawsuit against OpenAI over trade secrets and employee conduct.

“and fund your account in five minutes or less.”

Market Impact of AI-Fueled Stock Route

28:32 to 30:05

Discussing the effects of South Korea's stock market decline on US markets.

“The thing about AI for business, it may not automatically fit the way your business works.”

Concerns Over AI Distillation by Chinese Firms

30:06 to 32:30

Exploring the implications of Chinese firms using US AI models.

“that below that key$1 trillion market cap level.”

Investing in Biotech Amidst Competition

32:31 to 37:04

Joe Lunsdale discusses the US biotech sector's challenges and advancements.

“Joe Lunsdale is the managing partner of 8VC and a co-founder of Palantir.”

Shifts in Defense Tech and AI Integration

37:05 to 40:52

Examining the recent cultural shifts in Pentagon procurement and AI usage.

“and not stolen to China because our system is broken.”

Shifts in Defense Tech and AI Integration

40:53 to 42:03

Examining the recent cultural shifts in Pentagon procurement and AI usage.

“Joe Lunsdale from 8BC and a co-founder of Palantyce sticks with us.”

Shifts in Defense Tech and AI Integration

42:08 to 43:46

Examining the recent cultural shifts in Pentagon procurement and AI usage.

“Brokered services by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA and SIPC.”

Discussion with Joe Lunsdale on 8VC's Growth

44:04 to 45:02

Joe Lunsdale discusses the recent fund closure and investment opportunities in AI.

“managing partner at 8VC, co-founder at Palantir.”

Investment Strategies and Market Dynamics

45:04 to 46:23

Exploring investment stages and the current venture capital landscape.

“What stage do you principally deploy at?”

The Rapid Growth of AI Startups

46:24 to 47:55

The conversation shifts to the swift expansion of AI companies and their impact.

“I mean, we were lucky to get to work on Airborne with Palmer Luckey last year, right?”

Defense Investments and Strategic Outlook

47:56 to 49:48

Lunsdale shares insights on defense tech investments and future directions.

“You said a moment ago you're coming off the back of two very good years at the firm.”

The Future of Defense Tech and Innovation

49:49 to 54:31

Discussion on emerging defense technologies and their implications.

“European drone startup Helsing has closed a$1.8 billion funding round.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00With the highest number of young STEM graduates per capita in the EU, Ireland has the people and skills your company needs to succeed here. IDA Ireland, the National Investment Development Agency, can help you find and nurture the people you need to internationalise and thrive. Our talent is just one of the extraordinary benefits Ireland has to offer. Learn more at idaireland.com. Invest in extraordinary.

0:30The thing about AI for business, it may not automatically fit the way your business works.

0:35Ed Ludlow:At IBM, we've seen this firsthand. But by embedding AI across HR, IT, and procurement processes, we've reduced costs by millions, slash repetitive tasks, and freed thousands of hours for strategic work. Now we're helping companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business, IBM. When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track. For midsize and large companies, that isn't always easy. Risk can touch multiple parts of an organization at the same time, often in ways that aren't immediately obvious.

1:14It might involve property, liability, or cyber. It could stem from regulatory requirements or challenges tied to a specific industry or the scale of an operation. At that level, managing risk becomes an ongoing discipline, not a one-time decision. At The Hartford, the focus is on helping businesses manage risk before it turns into something more disruptive. That means working with companies to identify where they're exposed, decide what matters most, and put practical standards in place so risk is managed as part of day-to-day operations. And when losses do happen, The Hartford can pair that risk control work with insurance coverage grounded in underwriting, risk engineering, and claims experience developed over time.

1:54Learn more at thehartford.com slash risk mitigation. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts, radio, news.

2:11Bloomberg Tech is live from the heart of Silicon Valley with Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

2:20Ed Ludlow:This is Bloomberg Tech. Coming up, an AI-fueled stock rout in South Korea spills over into the US market Monday, sending SK Hynix ADRs falling in just their second US trading day. Plus, Apple and OpenAI's AI rivalry enters the courtroom, with Apple filing a sweeping trade secrets lawsuit against the ChatGPT maker. And we're joined by FCC Chairman Brendan Carr to talk regulating space and Palantir co-founder and 8BC managing partner Joe Lunsdale on AI to defense tech. Wall Street's been rattled by a sell-off in chip makers that once again originates from the trading session in South Korea. Samsung, the Kospi, SK Hynix.

3:02Ed Ludlow:Overnight, the Kospi tumbles. SK Hynix suffers its biggest one-day drop on record. Samsung also sinking sharply. That weakness is spilling into the US session with SK Hynix's newly listed ADRs, but also more broadly looking at the stocks, AI chip stocks under presser. So just the second trading session after SK Hynix's record-breaking US debut, investors again questioning whether the AI rally has simply run too far, too fast. Bloomberg's AI infrastructure reporter, Dina Bass, is with us. And Dina, the last thing that you and I wrote about heading into the weekend, the question fundamentally is, has AI changed the memory business, right?

3:40Ed Ludlow:Is it no longer cyclical? today's sell-off, maybe some of those questions are being raised. Go back to that story. What was the net conclusion that we as a team had from SK Hynix selling ADRs? Sure. I think the net conclusion that we have is that certainly the memory companies like SK Hynix, like Micron, are trying to leverage the interest in AI to make their market less cyclical, which is to say there's been such a shortage of memory chips that the customers that need them need them desperately. And so they've been coming to these companies and asking for multi-year deals, which is a new thing in that business, at least.

4:15And so, you know, SK Group is chairman and SK Hynek's CEO were telling us, look, you know, this is now less, you know, not really a cyclical business when somebody comes to you and signs a bunch of your customers sign deals that go over many, many, many years. And we don't expect supply to catch up with demand anytime soon. So certainly those companies are trying to figure out ways to make this less cyclical.

4:39Ed Ludlow:The ADRs are down 6%, but not as severe as the record drop that we saw in Korea. I think it'd be really helpful just to set the scene and explain the field. There are just three names, really, in memory. And the situation right now is that demand far outpaces their ability to supply. In any market, that's a pretty healthy position to be in. Sure. And, you know, what's happened here is that SK Hynek's kind of pioneered using a type of memory called HBM for the critical AI chips that are sold by NVIDIA, the GPU chips. And there are not enough of those. Everyone is seeking more and more of those.

5:17And so it's made these three memory vendors who all make HBM, you know, much more central to the AI market. At the same time, while NVIDIA dramatically dominates the AI chip space, we are seeing some smaller new competitors as well as larger competitors like Google. And different types of chips are, in some cases, using other kinds of memory. You know, the other question, I think, more long term is if the HBM chips are such a bottleneck that they're holding everything up, do we see any sort of innovation, any way that, you know, companies develop to either have to use less of it or to use something different?

5:59Because at a certain point, being able to use something other than the thing you can't get enough of could become a, you know, a huge benefit value add lead in a way to lead the market. it if you're a company that can figure that out. And so that over the long term also becomes the pressure. If the supply is so short for so long and these companies, even with building out manufacturing facilities, can't keep up, there's a strong incentive to figure out a way to do it differently or use less of it. Whether that's possible, we'll see.

6:29Ed Ludlow:Bloomberg's Zena Bass, who leads our coverage of AI infrastructure. Thank you very much. Let's take a look at today's big number,$4.4 trillion. That's the combined value of TSMC, Samsung, and SK Hynix. Three tech stocks driving outsized returns in emerging markets. Now, here's the story. Here's kind of what happened overnight. Investors are looking to rotate out of that. Those three names kind of have the equivalent weighting in emergent markets indices as the MAG7 does in the S &P 500. And lots of evidence that big funds now are looking away in other areas of the emerging market economy, energy, gaming, and those three names maybe having some of the shine wear off.

7:09Ed Ludlow:Our next guest believes a correction in chip stocks is already underway and tech investors should brace for a deeper drop. Swiss quote senior market analyst Ipek Oskadeh Shaya joins us for more. Correction, technical correction, but also psychological. You saw this coming. We've talked about it in recent weeks. Just reflect on what you saw in the Asia session, particularly Korea, and what that's telling you. Well, exactly. We see a huge volatility, especially in the Korean membership makers since weeks, actually, we can even say months. And what we see today is that the latest leg up of the SK Hynix, for example, is thought to be in the lead to the US listing.

7:52And what we see today, especially what we saw in the Korean session, the 15 % drop in SK Hynix share price was probably due to some profit taking, but also the very usual investor behavior of buy the rumor, sell the fact. Now, it does not matter much why, because what we see is huge volatility. And if you look at the price chart today, we do see that a correction is underway. And we think that the downside risks do prevail as long as the volatility remains this high.

8:21Ed Ludlow:It was only Friday that SK Hynix broke the record for a first-time US share sale. They priced the ADRs 149. They're just under 158 right now. The first question I asked SK Group Chair Chae Taewon was, well, when are you going to sell more ADRs? Listen to his answer. I have some confidence that the demand will grow. Our supply capacity is never going to catch up. So first thing is that we have to keep the stock price stable. And well, hopefully in the long run, then we can have that upside potential. And SK wanted to see some stability in the ADRs before they come back for more. But the timing of this is so interesting because there has been volatility of late.

9:04Well, especially looking at the market, we also see a lot of speculation and some commodity that has become so speculative right now. There are ETFs and leveraged ETFs where trading these funds and that's amplifying the intraday moves. We see up to double digit percentage up and downs in the Korean chip making stocks every single day almost. So the price stability could be reached, but with that would also come the less speculative nature of this price action, which would actually lead to stable, sustainable gains. But at the current prices, I don't think that that would be possible. Again, the key here is stability of the prices.

9:42And this is why we are watching every single day the volatility that we have in the Korean chipmaker stocks. And we are far, far from the levels that we could call stable right now.

9:52Ed Ludlow:Ipek, overall, is Swissco bullish or bearish on the technology sector? Bullish, outright bullish, especially in the longer run. And this bullish view is also shared by our bigger institutional clients. This being said, in the short one, there are risks that many of Swissco clients are also pointing out regarding the high valuations in some pockets of the technology stocks, stocks, especially including the chip makers and the valuation gap with the EM technology, stocks that could eventually, you know, help SK Hynix and Samsung gain even more and squeeze more juice out of the US markets, but also the geopolitical uncertainties and the rising borrowing cost environment.

10:34So the short term risks are there. But what our clients are looking to do is to buy the dips each time Nasdaq goes down, because this is exactly what they think is going to happen. It is that not only technology will benefit from AI, but the AI productivity gains will eco through industries and will help indices and the economy grow bigger, faster and more stable.

10:58Ed Ludlow:Yipek Oskar Deskaya of Swissco back on Bloomberg Tech. Thank you very much indeed. We're also looking at the US listed shares of ADRs of TSMC. Softer, 7 tenths of a percent. The Taiwanese shares were modestly higher. We got June data. So June sales rose 68 % year on year. What the street then did was put that into its model for the month of June and try and work out where they think the June quarter was. And basically Bloomberg's calculations are that TSMC sales jumped 36 % and there is a lot of AI spending momentum. It's a big story out there, but the US listed shares kind of modestly lower. Remember, TSMC releases its quarterly earnings this Thursday.

11:39Ed Ludlow:Now coming up, regulators like the FCC are becoming a bigger part of the picture when it comes to the space race. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr joins us next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

12:05Ed Ludlow:the seattle seahawks are about to get a new owner a group led by tech billionaire vino kosler will purchase the super bowl champions beating out reported bidders including arcelon Mattel CEO, Aditya Mattel, and former Boston Celtics owner, Wick Grosbeck. The deal, valued at$9.6 billion, is expected to set an NFL record. Regulators are increasingly shaping America's space race. The FCC decides who gets access to spectrum, approves satellite communication systems, and is now confronting the next frontier of the space economy, from orbital data centers to direct-to-device connectivity. Joining us now is FCC Chairman Brendan Carr to discuss the future of space communication, spectrum, wireless policy, before we turn to some of the major media issues facing the Commission.

12:59Ed Ludlow:Chairman Carr, thank you so much for being back on Bloomberg Tech. Should we start with maybe the more nascent area of SpaceX's business plan, which is Orbital Data Center. I think a lot of value to the audience and to Americans is, could you just explain how the FCC regulates Orbital Data Center? Why it has a role in oversight of how much material from a compute perspective will be in orbit above the Earth? Yeah, that's your question. So at the FCC, and frankly, all across the Trump administration, we're focused on two things. One, we want to make sure that consumers are right away feeling a difference in their life.

13:41And right now we're seeing that on the connectivity front with speeds are up, prices are down, competition is intensifying. But the second piece goes to your question, which is what are the fundamental regulatory changes we can do that are going to pay off for consumers in the long run? And a lot of that has to do with the emerging space economy. To your point, we're seeing many, many more things go into orbit, whether it's all of this new generation of low-Earth orbit satellites or data centers. And so the FTC has a role to play. One, to make sure that everyone has the spectrum access they need in order to launch those.

14:14But even things like orbital debris end up hanging off of a lot of the FCC's authorizations. And of course, that's in conjunction with a broader group of regulators as well.

14:23Ed Ludlow:When SpaceX or another player comes to the FCC seeking approval to deploy data centers in the form factor of a satellite into orbit, what are the considerations by which the FCC decides approval to block approval? Well, the first thing for us is we want to go much more quickly. When I took over, we launched what we called a Build America agenda, and a key piece of that is boosting America's space economy. And it used to be when we would get satellite applications that would come in, we would get one or two or three a year, and we would do individualized, bespoke custom reviews. And what we're fundamentally changing is to an assembly line mindset.

15:04In fact, we're going to vote this month to change how we run our Space Bureau operations So it'll be objective criteria. And if you hit those, you should expect much faster FCC approvals. In fact, we've cut the backlog of FCC approvals down by about half. We're moving much faster. And so we're giving people objective criteria to hit. That way we can end up improving thousands or hundreds of thousands of applications, whereas before our processes would take us months or years to do a small handful of that.

15:33Ed Ludlow:Away from orbital data centers, a big focus right now is the wireless networks in the context of space. prior iterations of the FCC debated and looked at a fourth national wireless network with EchoStar. And I think I'm right in saying, Chairman Carl, you were critical of prior approaches to that future market. What has happened in the interim is that the FCC has handed some of those same licenses to SpaceX for Starlink. What do we interpret through that mechanism? Well, you're right. There was a mindset several years ago that said we have to have four separate standalone mobile wireless providers, let alone many other competitors that we have in the broader connectivity market.

16:21And people said that if you didn't have four, that prices would rise for consumers or speeds would slow down. And we haven't seen that obviously at all. We've completed the process of facilitating DISH, EchoStar, effectively exiting the market when it comes to mobile wireless. And consumers continue to benefit from a lot of price competitions, which is a great time for consumers. But it's also a really good time for companies because we're taking a lot of the costs, unnecessary costs, out of the system, whether it's permitting reform, whether it's allowing providers to retire these old copper networks that they had to subsidize in addition to their new networks.

16:56And so this old view of having to have four individual mobile wireless providers or the sky would fall, we didn't buy. And obviously, I think the evidence is coming in to show that that this new theory is correct.

17:09Ed Ludlow:You told Bloomberg last week that you have not had substantial conversations with SpaceX about their wireless ambitions, substantial conversations. So Chairman Kaj just asked if you had any conversations of any degree of substance with SpaceX about it. no i don't think i've had any of much i guess if i hadn't used a substantial maybe i would have avoided the follow-up question but i don't recall having any conversations with them about that look i do think one of the things we're really excited about is this new emerging trend towards direct to sell technology where you can go straight from one of these low-worth orbit satellites right to a handset obviously starlink is doing that we've facilitated them getting from spectrum to do it, but also Amazon is looking to do it.

17:55AST Space Mobile is looking to do it. So we want every single competitor in this sector to do well.

18:02Ed Ludlow:Overall, the FCC has done quite a large body of work to come up with some kind of regulatory framework, I think, right, for direct-to device. The accusation is of maybe favoritism towards SpaceX. You've also denied several of their requests. How are you going about building out that framework? Yeah, a couple things. On direct-to-sell in particular, our view was to have two or three facilities-based providers in that segment so that the United States could lead the world in that. And that's something that I think is really important to President Trump, is that U.S. lead when it comes to these new emerging technologies.

18:40And we are in a really good position to do that. There are always lots of stories about FCC taking action to benefit Starlink or SpaceX, and I get it. It probably results in more clicks. But the reality is we are uplifting every single operator or business that's in the space economy. We're taking actions that benefit Amazon Leo, that benefit many smaller providers as well. So Reflect Orbit, Logos, AST Space Mobile, of course SpaceX as well. So there's many, many companies in this sector that are benefiting from our new mindset at the FCC, which is to go faster with these approvals. We don't want to get stuck navel-gazing.

19:18Ed Ludlow:We're live on Bloomberg Television and on Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Tech speaking with FCC Chairman Brendan Carr. There's also a technical consideration about spectrum, which is why is it important, Chairman, for a direct-to-device provider to have exclusive spectrum use in and amongst everything else that's happening up there? Well, it's a very efficient way to operate, to have your own spectrum. And so we've been very open to spectrum deals. On the one hand, we've had about$130 billion worth of deal flow go through the FCC, this Trump administration, not just mobile wireless, but across the board.

19:53And we're moving hard on spectrum as well, and not just direct to sell. We're voting this month to create 160 megahertz of new spectrum for mid-band offerings in what's called the C-band. And it's effectively going to create what we're referring to as a super band of 440 megahertz wide channel for mid band spectrum, for 5G, for 6G. But you're right on the satellite side as well. So SpaceX has access to, I think it's 65 megahertz of spectrum that they can use for direct to sell. Amazon just announced that they are looking to purchase Global Star, which also has spectrum that could be used for direct to sell technology.

20:31So you see a lot of the players in this space, AST as well, that are looking to obtain their own spectrum rights so they can stand alone and offer that service in a complement to existing connectivity services.

20:46Ed Ludlow:Chairman Carr, just before the show started, Bloomberg broke some news in a story that a group of about a dozen states is poised to sue to block the Paramount Skydance Warner Brothers deal. I think there had been prior reporting that various attorneys across those states have been preparing for that anyway. I know that the FCC kind of has a nominal role to look at the foreign financing of such a deal. But I hope you appreciate to ask you about what the latest is there and your reaction to a statewide antitrust suit. Well, it's hard to see a real legitimate antitrust action. But, of course, you know, I leave it to the antitrust experts to weigh in on this.

Read the full transcript

21:27I did think it was interesting that there was a statement, at least attributed, to the California Attorney General that said that they would not sue if Paramount agreed to spin off CNN. It's hard to conceive of a competition or antitrust theory that takes you all the way up to the point where owning or not owning CNN as part of that broader group is a legitimate line that antitrust or competition law would draw. For our part, we do have a piece of this with respect to some of the foreign investment, and we're running a standard process on that. and we haven't made a final decision there yet.

22:00Ed Ludlow:In recent interviews, you've also been asked, of course, about Disney. And you've said that you've not made a decision on whether to pull Disney's broadcast licenses over various diversity and inclusion practices. Again, remind us of the FCC's remit in that area, but what it would take for you to look at a potential action. with respect to disney in particular the fc has three proceedings that are going on or sort of three buckets of issues one starting all the way back in march of 2025 i wrote a letter to disney leadership raising concerns about some of their practices including what we call invidious forms of dei discrimination where there's potential evidence indicating that they may have been discriminating with respect to pay or compensation or workplace opportunities based on race, gender, or protected characteristics.

22:54There's a role for the FCC there. We have particular rules on EEO policies and discrimination. So we've been looking into that for quite a while. In fact, we've been doing some letters of inquiry, our versions of subpoena, and frankly, the view was that Disney was being disingenuous in the way it was responding to the FCC's inquiries. And so we took the next step in our enforcement abilities, which was we called in all of Disney's broadcast licenses for early renewal. So Disney has now applied, and they have to demonstrate that they've been operating in the public interest. There have been petitions to deny the renewal of those Disney stations.

23:33And so the F.C. is looking at all of that very carefully right now. To your point, we've not made the final decision. but at this point Disney is demonstrating, attempting to demonstrate that it should get those licenses renewed and we'll ultimately see what the record shows. We also have obviously a separate issue going on with Disney right now with respect to The View and their claims of The View being a bonafide news program but we have the DEI, the license renewal, and The View proceeding going but more broadly we're trying to hold all broadcasters accountable to their public interest standard.

24:04We have issued similar actions with respect to a number of other broadcasters. I think for years, people took the view that broadcast TV should be treated just like cable or a podcast or a newspaper, but that's not what the Communications Act and Congress said. And so we want to make sure that all broadcasters are, in fact, living up to their public interest obligations.

24:23Ed Ludlow:FCC Chairman Brendan Carr joining us from our DC studio. Thank you very much indeed. Apple and OpenAI's AI rivalry has entered the courtroom. Here's what happened on Friday. Apple filed a sweeping trade secrets lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it encouraged former Apple employees to bring confidential information and unreleased hardware as it ramped up its own device ambitions. Bloomberg's consumer tech and Apple managing editor Mark Gurman is with us. And throughout the weekend into today, Mark, you've written about what this means. The latest piece from you is about what it means for OpenAI's hardware rethink.

24:57Ed Ludlow:What do we need to know? Yeah, in my view, this lawsuit really will put a halt to the behavior that Apple is alleging, at least I believe, that Apple employees who right now are considering job offers from OpenAI, considering applying to OpenAI, in discussions with OpenAI, they're going to think twice about it. If they don't end up going to OpenAI and anyone at Apple finds out they were considering going to OpenAI, definitely the company leadership is not going to be too pleased with them. If they do leave to OpenAI, they're going to open themselves up to all sorts of scrutiny and potentially being dragged into litigation down the road.

25:30So certainly there's going to be a lot of rethinking over there.

25:33Ed Ludlow:This was OpenAI's statement. We have no interest in other companies' trade secrets. At the center of this and a defendant named by Apple in the suit was Tang Tan, formerly of Apple, now OpenAI's hardware chief. That specific accusation, Mark? Yeah, Tang Tan, he was the VP of iPhone product design until 2024. So one of the most senior people at Apple created this company with Johnny Ive and Sam Holtman and a few other folks. And he's alleged to be telling people at Apple to bring prototypes and other components over to job interviews. and Apple really presents him as the ringleader here, so to speak.

26:09So we'll see what happens in court once they get through discovery. But right now, everything I'm hearing is that OpenAI is still on track to announce their first device this year and ship it in 2027. And we'll see if that ends up happening.

26:22Ed Ludlow:That's Mark Gurman, who leads our coverage of consumer tech. Thank you very much. It's halftime. Coming up, Joe Lunsdale, 8VC managing partner and Palantir co-founder, joins us. It's going to be a wide-ranging conversation. the firm's new fund, AI, defence tech, and we're going to go pretty much for the rest of the show. There are a lot more news stories and market movers to check into. Don't go very far. There's a lot more to come. This is Bloomberg Tech.

26:55With the highest number of young STEM graduates per capita in the EU, Ireland has the people and skills your company needs to succeed here. IDA Ireland, the National Investment Development Agency, can help you find and nurture the people you need to internationalize and thrive. Our talent is just one of the extraordinary benefits Ireland has to offer. Learn more at IDAireland.com. Invest in extraordinary. Support for the show comes from Public.com. If you're actively involved in your portfolio, you probably catch yourself repeating the same actions, buying the dip, manually sweeping idle cash, putting on a hedge.

27:36On public, you can now create AI agents that handle all these tasks on your behalf. Just describe what you want to do in plain English. Like, if the VIX hits 25, buy a put option on the S &P 500. Or, if my cash balance goes above$20 ,000, move the excess into my direct index. You approve of the workflow, and your agent handles the rest. Monitoring the market, watching for your conditions, and executing your strategies exactly as defined. An investing platform driven by your intent, not just your clicks. You can also get full read and write access to your account via the public API. Go to public.com slash market and fund your account in five minutes or less.

28:17That's public.com slash market. Paid for by Public Investing. Brokered services by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA and SIPC. Advisory services by Public Advisors, LLC, SEC Registered Advisor. Complete disclosures available at public.com slash disclosures. The thing about AI for business, it may not automatically fit the way your business works.

28:40Ed Ludlow:At IBM, we've seen this firsthand. But by embedding AI across HR, IT, and procurement processes, we've reduced costs by millions, slash repetitive tasks, and freed thousands of hours for strategic work. Now we're helping companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business, IBM.

29:12Ed Ludlow:Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. It's just the second day of trading for SK Hynix's ADRs. There's an AI-fueled stock route in South Korea spilled over into the U.S. market Monday. Bloomberg Tech Equity reporter Carmen Reinecke has the latest. Fresh off our interview with SK Group Chair Che, he wanted price stability in the ADRs. Well, we're only two days in and we haven't quite got it. What are you looking at? Yeah, so what we're seeing here is that the route in South Korea's market has spilled over into the U.S. with SK Hynix ADRs down about 9%. What's really interesting here is that the South Korean stock, it's fallen a lot, more than 30 % drawdown.

29:51And it actually has brought the company's market cap below a key$1 trillion level that it hit after a blistering rally in memory stocks that we've also seen in the US market. So we've seen SK Hynix now dip below that level. It's about$875 billion in market cap that also weighed on Samsung, brought that below that key$1 trillion market cap level. And we've seen more pain here in the United States as well. So not only are we seeing those SK Hynix ADRs today, we're seeing shares of Micron, Western Digital, SanDisk all fall. The SOX is down on the day. The NASDAQ 100 is down. So we're seeing a lot of pain here come over from that South Korean market route.

30:32Ed Ludlow:Bluebirds, Carmen Reinecke across SK Hynix. Thank you very much. Alarm bells are ringing in Washington over concerns that Chinese firms are training their AI on U.S. models. This process, known as distillation, can be a cost-effective way to make new models that perform nearly as well as advanced systems, but on certain tasks. Bloomberg's Maggie Eastland has been writing about these concerns in the latest edition of Bloomberg Business Week. And Maggie, the most recent flag on this from the U.S. side comes from Anthropic. Tell us about that. absolutely so anthropic sent a letter to the white house and to several senators essentially accusing one of its biggest chinese competitors alibaba of using this tactic of distillation which is highly technical but as we note in this feature piece a lot of researchers in the u.s also use this technique so it's a bit of a thorny problem for washington to try to solve though there have been some early efforts.

31:30Ed Ludlow:Solve for through legislation, through executive order, what's the mechanism that the administration's looking at? Absolutely. So for now, the White House has released a memo, specifically OSTP. So that's Michael Kratios, the White House official, signed this memo, essentially saying that the Trump administration was going to work to share more information with the closed-weight AI model company. So that's OpenAI, Anthropic, Google in some cases. So essentially, the U.S. is going to be sharing information to help them find users who are improperly distilling and sort of crack down on that activity.

32:11The AI companies also want more action from the U.S. They're currently pushing and lobbying for some protection so that they could share more information with each other without having to worry about any antitrust prosecutions.

32:26Ed Ludlow:Bloomberg's Maggie Eastland with a must read in Business Week magazine. Thank you very much indeed. Let's stick with the AI race, but how investors are approaching it. Joe Lunsdale is the managing partner of 8VC and a co-founder of Palantir. And Joe, welcome to Bloomberg Tech. Thanks for having me, Ed. Good to have you here in SF. Look, I think you've said a number of times that you believe the US is still leading in the AI race. But there are a number of factors to consider, particularly on biotech as well, which we'll get to a little bit later. But take that and run with it, your current attitude to this market.

32:59I mean, you're just talking about distillation. China, for the last few decades, has been very good at doing whatever they can to copy and steal our IP and our trade secrets. And this is no different, right? And then fortunately, we are, I don't know if it's six months ahead or 12 months ahead or what it is. We are significantly ahead. And in a world where the agents are doubling capabilities every few months, that's a very, very large gap, which means we're way ahead in cyber. It means we're way ahead in other critical areas that will allow us to compete with China. So it's a great spot we find ourselves in and we've got to make use of it.

33:29And I think it's almost silly to expect the government to be able to stop them from stealing. We haven't done that for years. It's going to be up to these companies to figure out how to detect and stop these attacks. That's the only way it's going to happen.

33:39Ed Ludlow:You're an adventure investor, but also a serial entrepreneur, founder, call it what you will. It's interesting to read some remarks by Palmer Luckey the other day saying basically stop patenting things because the moment you put something into a patent, it becomes vulnerable to theft is how he would put it. You're just educating. You're just educating our adversaries. I mean, the patent office is completely broken at this point. You will have things in China in the biotech world, for example. In biotech, you kind of have to patent certain things because you have a molecule you put all this money into and you don't want someone else to be able to obviously sell that molecule.

34:13But China will within 24 hours. Someone in China will see a new target you're patenting. And they'll see the results. And they'll start their own programs. And even file other patents themselves right away that are similar but just different. And the whole thing is a mess right now.

34:27Ed Ludlow:You are very focused on biotech in the context of U.S. versus China. I think you have some strong feelings about it but raise the alarm on it. What is the sort of core of your concern? Well, you know, obviously we work in defense and we work in healthcare and we work in other areas. And, you know, biotech is a very exciting area right now in particular because AI is going to allow us to cure a lot of diseases. It's already making some really, really big breakthroughs since this is one of the most exciting new areas. But China has been successfully stealing our sector over the last seven years.

35:00And so we've gone from being the vast majority of new therapeutics and drugs in the U.S. And now China, if you look at the curve, it's come up to well over a third of all the new ones. and in some cases more than a half of what you can measure earlier stage. So they're basically taking over the sector. It would be one thing if they were purely doing this on a competitive basis. That's, you know, if people are really talented and they're doing it competitively, that would be fair. But it's not like that. What it is is it's taking U.S. firms and taking U.S. investors and getting them to be able to do things cheaper and better in China.

35:31It's the only thing is using a patent office. It's the only thing is using PhD for people who come over here and are forced to send things back. The whole thing is a very active kind of rape of the sector. And it's also exacerbated by the fact that our FDA is slow. So, for example, in China, if you want to take a drug to a phase one trial, it takes some places you can just do it right away for certain areas. In some places, it's 90 days for the pre-IND and IND, it's called, to go to a phase one. In the U.S., the pre-IND and IND, over 700 days. So we have to accelerate this if we're going to compete.

36:01Ed Ludlow:What about through the lens of 8VC? So I think you wrote recently that America needs to beat China and unleash cures. Yes. How does your activity as an investor and what 8VCs focus on reflect that? What's in the portfolio that you think you're supporting to enable that? I mean, listen, there's so much exciting stuff going on. We had really great news in the last couple of weeks. Orca Bio was officially approved, got their label. So that means it went through phase one, phase two, phase three. And the data was so strong that it got through a little bit faster than normal and is able to basically do bromelagraphs, which are used against blood cancers much more safely, much higher survival rate over the first year.

36:39And then this also has lots of potential applications against autoimmune diseases like Crohn's and multiple sclerosis. So that company is very exciting to me. There's a lot of other stuff we're doing with AI and antibodies, antibody platforms, you know, with Alloy, for example. There's just a lot of new discoveries being made. The problem is if we have a new discovery made, we're confident it's going to save a lot of lives. If we invest in it and China is able to copy it and go faster, it stops our ability to invest in it. So what we're fighting for is I want the ability to make profitable investments where the business is built in the U.S.

37:09and not stolen to China because our system is broken.

37:12Ed Ludlow:You're raising also an interesting point about oversight. You know, earlier in the program, we had FCC Chairman Brendan Carr on talking about regulating space. That's the FCC. So in this case, it's the FDA. And how much you feel the FDA should have direct oversight of how AI is used in that field? It's a good question. Listen, I think there's a spectrum here, right? And I'm not some kind of like wild-eyed radical that wants anarcho-capitalism and no government. That's not what I'm arguing for. There's a spectrum where I think Europe, we all see, has gone way towards safetyism, towards a culture of proceduralism where nothing gets done and everyone attacks new things and they take forever, right?

37:51You mean from the blocks perspective, the regulatory perspective? From the regulatory perspective, I was just over there, like none of the bottle caps come off as their big innovation, right? Everything's very slow and they've had far fewer big wins the last 50 years because of that. And so that's obviously a failure case. And then I'm not arguing to go all the way to no regulation, but right now FDA is very slow. It's very unaccountable. It's like a mafia, where if you criticize it too much, they might just decide to make you wait a year. It's unaccountable, unchecked power. We shouldn't have that in a free society.

38:23We should have multiple bodies that have to compete. We should have multiple paths, and they should be held accountable to going faster.

38:28Ed Ludlow:Let's go back from the focus of the vertical of biotech to broadly AI in America. Where do you see America's biggest advantage right now? I mean, our biggest advantage is that we are still like the most free society with property rights and checked power and the ability to have what we call creative destruction. So when we come up with new technology, with this AI wave, there's a lot of new possibilities for higher productivity in every industry. It's changing how defense works, changing how manufacturing works, changing how health care works. And we do have, in some areas, too much regulation.

39:03But overall, we still have a society, unlike China, where it's going to be much easier to redo our industries and to shift them in ways that are much more productive. So not only are we ahead in AI, we're also ahead in deploying it to a bunch of areas.

39:17Ed Ludlow:Later in the program, we're going to zero in on defense tech. You co-founded Palantir 2003? That's right. 23 years ago. So take that experience, but specifically to AI, software side, right? How does this administration facilitate success differently to prior administrations? What is your experience present day, 2026, versus what it was like when you guys started Palantir and you were trying to get this into the real world, the software itself? Well, listen, and I don't think, you know, defense in America is not a very partisan thing, which is great, by the way. I think this is not a question about even this administration, which is doing a great job.

39:57but I think it's like a shift in the mindset of the Pentagon, which has been reflected for the last several years. And what you've seen is that Palantir and SpaceX and then later Andrel and Saronic broke through. And when they broke through and showed these better solutions, showed what was possible, it was 10 times better than what was there before. The admirals learned, the generals learned, and people in procurement said, wait a second, we can't just keep giving these giant documents written by Raytheon and Lockheed and all the other primes the full power to block everyone else. We have to actually say, let's have more open competition.

40:30Let's let in new possibilities. And you're seeing that cultural shift happen pretty dramatically over the last five or six years. You have, I have friends like Emil, who's undersecretary of engineering and research, and people like Depsek Feinberg and the secretary and others who are being a lot bolder in pushing things in the right direction. So you're definitely seeing, though, the culture of the whole place has been moving the right direction for years now.

40:52Ed Ludlow:We're going to return to that conversation on defense tech in a little bit. We're going to take a quick break. Joe Lunsdale from 8BC and a co-founder of Palantyce sticks with us. We'll be right back. This is Bloomberg Tech.

41:25idle cash, putting on a hedge. On public, you can now create AI agents that handle all these tasks on your behalf. Just describe what you want to do in plain English. Like, if the VIX hits 25, buy a put option on the S &P 500. Or, if my cash balance goes above$20 ,000, move the excess into my direct index. You approve the workflow and your agent handles the rest. Monitoring the market, watching for your conditions, and executing your strategies exactly as defined. An investing platform driven by your intent, not just your clicks. You can also get full read and write access to your account via the public API.

42:03Go to public.com slash market and fund your account in five minutes or less. That's public.com slash market. Paid for by Public Investing. Brokered services by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA and SIPC. Advisory services by Public Advisors, LLC, SEC registered advisor. Complete disclosures available at public.com slash disclosures.

42:25Ed Ludlow:The thing about AI for business, it may not automatically fit the way your business works. At IBM, we've seen this firsthand, but by embedding AI across HR, IT, and procurement processes, we've reduced costs by millions slash repetitive tasks and freed thousands of hours for strategic work. Now we're helping companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business, IBM. When you own your own business, you own every decision. Now own the card that rewards you for it. The Chase Sapphire Reserve for Business card brings the best Sapphire Reserve benefits to business owners who expect hardworking rewards.

43:08Designed to meet the needs of business owners at scale, this pay-in-full card elevates your travel experience and offers premium benefits and value toward business services that will take your business to the next level. Fuel your business and maximize rewards with 8x points on all purchases through Chase Travel, 3x points on social media and search engine advertising, annual partnership credits, and more. Make every journey more rewarding with a$300 annual travel credit and access to a network of airport lounges, whether you're looking for pre-flight productivity or time to rest and recharge.

43:42Chase Sapphire Reserve for Business. It's the card that gives back all you put in. Learn more at chase.com forward slash reserve business. Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. Accounts subject to credit approval. Restrictions and limitations apply. Cards are issued by JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, member FDIC.

44:03Ed Ludlow:Okay, we're back with Joe Lunsdale, managing partner at 8VC, co-founder at Palantir. Big recent news is that 8VC closed a$1.5 billion fund, the firm's largest to date. And I think we just start there. I don't think you've said very much more about the fund than what's in that post on the screen on X. Yep. Timing? Why? What for? I mean, you know, we're in the middle of the most exciting, you know, revolution, industrial revolution, I'd call it, in a very long time in the United States. and we've had our best couple years ever at the firm. There's just a lot of things happening that are possible now that were definitely not possible a couple years ago in the economy.

44:41And Palantir, as an example, I think before AI was probably worth$30 or$40 billion. And past AI now is valued at$300 billion. I think this is a 10x bigger wave, similarly than anything we've seen before versus the SaaS wave we were doing versus what's going on now. And we have companies across the board growing 5x, 10x a year. It's a really fun time.

45:02Ed Ludlow:When, Joe, do you and 8VC get into those? What stage do you principally deploy at? And how do things kind of cross your desk? I always find that part interesting. Yeah. How do you find them? So this is 8VC's seventh core fund. And, you know, we're a little bit different in that about 30 % of our money goes towards things we help found ourselves and build ourselves. Companies like Sironic, which we'll talk about. Companies in healthcare and logistics and other areas as well. and we're usually seed Series A, some Series B. So we're earlier stage investors. But these days, like a Series A, it could be a$60 or$100 million round and we could be doing 50 of that from the fund.

45:38So it's a lot bigger checks. So having a$1.5 billion fund in venture capital today, I would say it's sort of like having a$400 or$500 million fund a decade ago. It reflects where the market is. In terms of how much you do and the size. Yeah, if someone were to tell me 15 years ago I was doing a$1.5 billion fund, and I'd be like, that's ridiculous. That's so much money. Now it's like a reasonably normal size top venture firm.

46:02Ed Ludlow:What about from the LP's perspective? I appreciate that there's value and discretion, right? But what is it the LP's ask you about? Their interest in AI broadly, what they sort of, they're investing with you because they want exposure to something specific. Yeah, it's always unclear. I'm supposed to like boast about my returns on TV or something. But I think just like when you absolutely hit it out of the park and you're in a bunch of things that are working. I mean, we were lucky to get to work on Airborne with Palmer Luckey last year, right? We're lucky to get to work on, I mean, there's just a long list of these things that are working very, very well in our portfolio, both in defense and in kind of core cognition we led around last year.

46:40And it's absolutely crushing it. One of the most important new AI companies. I think it's had three rounds now since we got in a year ago, right? So the pace of everything, like things that happen now in a quarter is like things used to happen in a year. It feels like the pace has sped up four or five X. And so I think there's only a certain number of firms that are involved consistently in a bunch of the very, very top talent and best companies. And so you end up being very oversubscribed.

47:03Ed Ludlow:So Scott's a regular on the show and you're a visitor to San Francisco, a regular visitor. Yes. But up by Broadway Tunnel, there's a bus stop ad and it says, Devin, but it works better now. And that's all it says. I mean, it keeps getting a lot better. It's really good. It's just, you know, it's just how, like, some of these companies from a very small start have grown quickly but got themselves into the culture of what's happening in industry. And it's really fun right now because you're – I'm working with these entrepreneurs and a lot of them – I'm 43 now. So my karma is I have to work with, like, a little bit difficult young people, right, which I was 20 years ago, I suppose.

47:40But now it's like, I mean, these companies are growing to billions of revenue in three or four years. One of the entrepreneurs we're working with, they're like doubling revenue every quarter. And you're having a conversation, how are we going to keep doubling for the next three or four quarters? And I mean, it's really fun. This is stuff you could never have done before.

47:57Ed Ludlow:You said a moment ago you're coming off the back of two very good years at the firm. What do the exits look like then? You're talking about returns as realized through an exit or are these a big gains? I mean, there's both. There's definitely, I mean, listen, we're big investors in XAI and X, which became SpaceX, and we're very happy to be involved in that. I'm very, very bullish. I'm going to hold on to that for a long time. I think Elon's right. It could be bigger than the economy of the Earth if we get it right. So, I mean, I guess that's an exit. I mean, we're invested in all sorts of things in AI that are likely to go public soon.

48:31We have other things we invested in that have just had seven or eight up rounds and that have high margins and billions of revenue now, right? So I think it's a spectrum. I mean, I don't really plan on exiting our very best defense positions for the most part. I think these are things that you could exit. You could obviously sell the entire androal position or sironic position or others, but we're not going to do that for now.

48:49Ed Ludlow:I want to ask you a final sort of more academic question, which is everyone, you know, uniformly at the moment has said we've moved from software is eating the world to now hardware is eating the world. Does that reflect where eight VCs currently positioned or you still think that there is a world for both as an investor? You know, I'm really focused on how we bring more advanced manufacturing to the U.S., and that's going to involve a lot of AI and a lot of hardware. I think to be able to do what the manufacturing engineers in China can do, we have a lot more to build here. We have some of our companies working on that problem.

49:22I think in general we're focused on productivity and outcomes. And so, yes, hardware is very important, but I think outcomes, I mean, listen, you have a$5 trillion a year wages in the services industry in the U.S. This is a massive industry in the U.S. And if we can make those outcomes two or three or four times more productive, which we've seen we can, that's just going to be a multi-trillion dollar wealth creation. So hardware is important, but I wouldn't just ignore outcomes in these other massive industries that we're clearly transforming right now.

49:49Ed Ludlow:Joe Lonsdale, ABC, stay with us. We have a story out of Europe. European drone startup Helsing has closed a$1.8 billion funding round. It's an$18 billion valuation. around cementing the firm as Europe's largest defense startup, demonstrating investors' continued interest in the region's defense firms amid, of course, the ongoing war in Ukraine. Investors included Goldman Sachs, Dragoneer Investment, JPMorgan Chase. But Helsing says the company remains predominantly European-owned. So let's focus in on defense tech, Joe. I mean, interesting case study out of Europe. I don't think you guys are in Helsing.

50:22Listen, my good friend Jeanette Firstenberg helps run General Catalyst. She was an early investor there before she was at GC. I think it was founded by people who had been at Palantir in Europe, and so we're fans of them. It's a very important company. The ecosystem is a lot of people that know each other. I'm very lucky to have all these people who helped me build Palantir and Adapar, like Scott Wu, for example, from Cognition from Adapar, building and running a lot of these dozens of top companies right now. So it does tend to come from a small number of places, and a lot of these people did use to work for us.

50:51Ed Ludlow:You talked a little bit about there's no plan for some time to get out of Anderil or Saronic. You know, you are long-term investors in those. But Saronic in the here and now, there was news just before we came to air. It's an exciting morning. So could you explain it to us, the basics of what Centcom is demonstrating in a video? I think we're going to pull the video up. Yeah, well, listen, Centcom just put this out. So I can only say what's public, but they said there were three Corsairs involved in an attack on the Bandarabas base. And so these are unmanned drones. These are the same drones that saved the pilots in the Strait of Hermes when the Hitachi crashed last month.

51:27and in this case they're being used in an attack and you know right now there's three of them and you can imagine what you do with hundreds of them sironic i think is the biggest position

51:38Ed Ludlow:uh or individual company or size scope it for me uh we have we have we have quite a few large positions but sironic we co-founded out of the firm and it's called that's what you explained earlier the format's different it's an eight so we have so 30 percent of our money goes towards companies we help build so dino is the main founder along with vib uh dino from marukas who is a Navy SEAL, and they've built an amazing team of top talents around them in Austin, Texas, and just so many people in AI and hardware, people who experience from Tesla and other places, and they're scaling very, very quickly.

52:07It's one of the most important defense companies in the U.S.

52:09Ed Ludlow:Joe, could I ask you for your assessment of how Secretary Hegsef has or has not changed the relationship between the Pentagon, the Department of War, and how it works with startups, essentially, not just the private sector? Listen, I think it's become more obvious to the leadership in the Pentagon that the very top startups are way ahead of the primes in a bunch of areas. And what they've done is they've shifted things. And he's been very bold about this to focus on fair competition, to let others break in, let others prove they can create designs. I mean, what was happening before is the incentives were to create very, very exquisite designs that were very, very expensive.

52:48So you might be able to build the best thing in the world, but it's 100 times more expensive. and what Palmer and Andrel and Dino at Saronic and others have demonstrated is actually there's designs that you can make 100 or 1 ,000 more of these for the same cost and that are in many cases even better.

53:03Ed Ludlow:One of the things we've been tracking over the last couple of years is sort of, well, it's declassified allocations. A lot of it still goes to Lockheed, but do you see it changing? Yeah. The proportion? Yeah, no, I think this is what people don't realize is we're still the little kids in some ways. I mean, we have the best stuff, but it's growing from a small base And it's growing very quickly, and you're starting to see very large, very important contracts that are changing the nature of warfare and what's possible with these new companies. But the vast majority of money is still captured by the primes.

53:31The primes have these congressional districts locked down where they're producing things in 49 states, and it's kind of bolted into the NDAA that they automatically get the contract, even if their stuff sucks, because it's a jobs program. It's not about deterring our enemies. But slowly over time, our Congress is waking up and saying, wait a second, this shouldn't just be about a jobs program. There's actually bad guys in the world. We actually have way too much debt in this country. Let's spend less money on better things, even if it's not as politically connected.

53:57Ed Ludlow:Joe, we're just in the last 45 seconds of the show. The next frontier in defense tech for you, a specialist area that you're most focused on? Well, listen, I think there's a lot of stuff going on with massive production of drones and the land, which is like overland, and the sea with Sironic, and the air, of course, with so many different companies, and in space as well with Apex and others dominating that area. and I think how we counter that with new forms of high-power microwave, with people like Epirus and other types of electronic warfare, there's just lots of advances being made there. So it's a very dynamic time, really important to engage in this and stay ahead of the bad guys.

54:32Ed Ludlow:Joe Lunsdale, managing partner at 8VC, co-founder of Palantir, here on Bloomberg Tech for the first time. That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech. Another look at markets. This is what we've looked like for most of this morning's session. Chip stocks leading declines, SK Hynix ADRs under pressure, but not as severe as they were in the Korean trading session. Remember, they priced those ADRs at 149. We're getting close to it. A reminder for Thursday, we have an exclusive conversation with Ryan Cohen, the CEO of GameStop, which withdrew a bonus plan that could have paid him as much as$35 billion so that that company can focus on a bid for eBay.

55:10Ed Ludlow:You don't want to miss it. It's going to be around 11.30 Eastern time, 8.30 here in San Francisco. A lot to recap on the show. an extended conversation with FCC Chair Brendan Carr, an extended conversation with 8VC and Palantir co-founder Joe Lunt. They'll find it all on the pod. You know exactly where it is online, Apple, Spotify, iHeart, all the Bloomberg platforms. What a way to start the week, eh? See you tomorrow. This is Bloomberg Tech.

55:38Healthcare doesn't always work great. If you've ever waited on a refill or couldn't schedule an appointment, you get it. That's the kind of stuff Optum is changing. They're using data and technology to integrate patient care, pharmacy, and everything else. So healthcare is connected, not complicated. What's that look like? Cheaper prescriptions that are easier to get and care that looks at the whole person, how you need it. Optum is helping make healthcare work as one for everyone. Learn more at business.optum.com. The official language of football is trash talk, late night group chats, memes, and unbelievable highlight clips.

56:16That's why Boost Mobile brings you our new global connection plan. The first plan ever made for WhatsApp. Get unlimited data, talk and text, international roaming, and calls to over 100 countries for just$40 a month. $40 price includes$5 a month auto pay discount. After 40 gigabytes of premium high-speed data, speeds will be lowered. Coverage not available everywhere. Visit store or boostmobile.com for details. Ask yourself, what are your best people spending their time on right now? Expense reports, receipt chasing, month-end close that takes weeks. You become what you spend on, and that's not what you're building toward.

56:51Brex is the intelligent finance platform that eliminates that work before it starts. AI agents that handle the manual stuff automatically, so your team can spend their time on what actually compounds. It's time to get Brex AF. Learn more at brecks.com slash AF.

From the publisher

Bloomberg’s Ed Ludlow breaks down why an AI-fueled stock rout in South Korea spilled over into the US market Monday, sending SK Hynix ADRs falling in their second US trading day. Plus, Apple and OpenAI's AI rivalry enters the courtroom, with Apple filing a sweeping trade secrets lawsuit against the ChatGPT maker. And, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr joins to talk regulating space, and Palantir co-founder and 8VC managing partner Joe Lonsdale sits down with Ed to discuss his outlook for the defense tech sector.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Bloomberg Tech

All 342 episodes
AI Selloff, Apple vs. OpenAI & the Future of Defense TechBloomberg Tech · 49 min
Listen in VO