In short
Podcast Summary: ChooseFI - Episode 485
Episode Overview Title: 485 | Mailbag: Spending Down to Zero, High Fee 401k, Mini Retirements Description: In this episode, hosts Jonathan and Brad, along with guest Rachael Camp, delve into pressing questions from the FI community, including concepts like spending down to zero, high-fee 401(k)s, and the idea of mini-retirements.
Key Themes
- Spending Down to Zero
- Discussion around the concept from the book "Die With Zero" by Bill Perkins.
- Explores the idea of spending down assets during retirement rather than just living off interest (the 4% rule).
- Rachael emphasizes that many in the FI community are overly conservative, leading to unspent savings.
- Importance of balancing the desire to save with the need to enjoy life and experiences today.
- Ratcheting Rule and Guardrails Approach
- Introduction of the Ratcheting Rule by Michael Kitces, allowing for increased spending if investments perform well.
- Guardrails approach by John Guyton, where spending is adjusted based on portfolio performance, allowing for potential decreases in spending if necessary.
- High Fee 401(k)s
- Rachael discusses the implications of investing in a high-fee 401(k) plan.
- Importance of employer matches despite high fees.
- Suggests advocating for better investment options within employer plans.
- Mini Retirements
- Encourages listeners to consider mini-retirements as an alternative to traditional notions of retirement.
- Highlights that taking time off can positively impact career paths and financial goals in the long run.
- Reminds that life experiences, including travel, should not be sacrificed for financial gain.
- Roth IRA Contributions
- Advises on strategies for making Roth IRA contributions, especially for those nearing income phase-out limits.
- Discusses the backdoor Roth IRA strategy as a solution.
- Clarifies misconceptions about the five-year rule and its applicability to Roth conversions.
Detailed Notes Introduction
- Hosts welcomed Rachael Camp back for a mailbag episode.
- Emphasized the value of listener questions in shaping the discussion.
Spending Down to Zero (1:38)
- Ryan's question about the feasibility of spending down retirement savings.
- Rachael supports the idea that many individuals over-save and should reconsider their spending strategies.
- Discusses the balance between enjoying life now versus saving extensively for the future.
The Ratcheting Rule and Guardrails Approach (10:15)
- Kitces' Ratcheting Rule: Allows for increased spending during successful market periods.
- Guardrails Approach: Spending can move within set boundaries depending on market performance.
High Fee 401(k)s (31:15)
- Discusses concerns about high fees associated with 401(k) plans and how to approach investment decisions.
- Strong recommendation to always grab any employer match, regardless of fees.
- Suggests advocating for lower fees within employer 401(k) plans.
Mini Retirement Considerations (41:48)
- Discussion on the potential benefits of taking time off to travel.
- Highlights that it can enrich life experiences and possibly even enhance future income and savings capabilities.
Roth IRA Contributions and Phase-Out Limits (49:54)
- Discusses strategies for those close to Roth IRA contribution limits.
- Introduces and explains the backdoor Roth IRA strategy.
- Clarifies the implications of directly contributing without considering phase-out limits.
Conclusion (55:57)
- Concludes with a reminder of the importance of balancing financial strategies with life experiences.
- Encourages listeners to stay engaged and proactive in their financial journeys.
Resources Mentioned
- Books:
- *Die With Zero* by Bill Perkins
- *Thinking in Bets* by Annie Duke
- Articles and Websites:
- Michael Kitces’ research on withdrawal strategies
- John Guyton’s guardrails approach
- Jillian Johnsrud’s insights on mini-retirements (Episode 451)
Recommendations for Listeners
- Ask Questions: Engage with the hosts by submitting questions for future mailbag episodes.
- Consider Financial Strategies: Evaluate personal finance strategies discussed such as the Ratcheting Rule and Guardrails Approach.
- Mini-Retirements: Explore the idea of mini-retirements and consider how they may fit into personal financial and life goals.
- Stay Informed: Follow related financial blogs and podcasts for ongoing education in personal finance.
This podcast episode offers valuable insights into various financial independence strategies, encouraging listeners to think critically about their financial decisions and personal life experiences.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Hello and welcome to Chooseify. Today on the show we have another mailbag episode and we're joined by our good friend Rachel camp who is back for the second mailbag. She was such a hit the first time and I had so much fun recording with her. And not to mention, she's a CFP and financial expert and just the perfect person to have back on for these type of mailbag episodes. So in this one, we're going to tackle some interesting questions. The first was about dying with zero and how to actually think about spending down your money and what the safe withdrawal rate might be on that. Then we move into high fee 401ks and do you match?
0:37Do you max out your match? a sabbatical and mini retirements, and the phase-out limit on Roth IRAs. I think this is going to be a really fun episode. And with that, welcome to Choose FI.
0:54Rachel, thanks for joining me again. I'm excited to have you here. Of course. Thank you, Brad. I'm so excited to be back. Yeah, this should be fun. So, okay. As always, we get a ton of listener questions, which is one of the most exciting parts of Choose a Vi, but also the most daunting for me because I get these emails constantly. And obviously to everybody out there, you should know the drill at this point, but feedback at choose a vi.com or just get on my newsletter, choose a vi.com slash subscribe and hit reply to any single one of those emails that I send out and just send in your questions.
1:25And that's what we use to source mailbag episodes like this. So Rachel, like I said, a little bit daunting. Sometimes we had a list of dozens of questions and you picked out a few that you thought would be especially interesting. So, all right, Rachel, let's start with Ryan's question, which I think could be the longest answer of the bunch, depending on how in-depth we go here. So Ryan asked, have you ever looked at scenarios where you spend down the retirement balance? So basically your financial independence, your net worth, instead of just spending the earned interest as the 4 % rule suggests, I'm sure we're going to touch on that, but the book Die I was zero has me rethinking my approach for retirement and I've adjusted my personal Excel retirement calculation to do just this.
2:06So instead of targeting a fine number that is 25 times your annual spend, you would target a number that supports spending down through retirement that eventually depletes the retirement fund by age 90 or whatever age you select, or maybe play it safe and spend it down to 250 ,000 or some other arbitrary buffer. I realize this is a riskier approach, but it seems logical to me to think about it this way. So, okay, Rachel, Ryan thinks this is logical. And obviously a lot of us have read Die With Zero and it may explicitly say, spend down your money or it's implied or some interpretation, but do you think this is logical?
2:43Like where would you start with this? Yeah. Well, I do love the book Die With Zero. I think it was a book written to us, the financial independence community. It was definitely not a book written for your average person who actually probably doesn't need to think about the risk of not spending enough money. Most of us have the opposite problem where we probably aren't saving enough. So this book really feels like a book written to the financial independence community. And I do, I like a lot of the themes of it, which is a lot of us have these fears of running out of money, not being conserved enough in our estimates.
3:20When in reality, most of us are probably over saving. We will probably save more than we can ever spend. And we actually should be thinking about some of these other fears. What if I don't get to enjoy this money? What if this is the only time I could enjoy this trip or the only time I could spend time with my children? So I love that this book brings up these questions. I think it's really, really important. As far as the logistics behind it, I mean, Die With Zero, great name, brilliant name for a book. Is it logical? For me, I've struggled with it, with the math around it. And actually, if you read the book and correct me if I'm wrong here, but I believe what he suggests as kind of a strategy, his strategy for dying with zero is actually annuities.
4:04And I found that fascinating when I read it because in the financial independence community, there is this kind of negative association with annuities, which is fair. I mean, first and foremost, when we talk about annuities, we have to think about it as insurance rather than an investment. And he says that in the book as well. So I think his strategy is interesting. And he basically says, look, if you're not going to go the annuity route, then you basically have to be your own insurance company. And then you have to have a cushion in order to do that. So we're having a cushion. Now we're kind of right back to that 4 % rule.
4:40So the way that I've looked at it and the methods that I have studied have taken this approach, kind of the ideas behind this approach of, well, the 4 % rule was designed to survive a worst case scenario. And we certainly can't ignore the possibility of a worst case scenario. There is the potential that we retire into a bad market. And then we actually do have to withdraw only 4 % in order for the portfolio to survive. That's a very real scenario. Now, it's not as likely as some of these alternative scenarios where we actually end up passing away with multiples of what we started with. So I think when you look at the numbers on a 30-year time horizon with a 4 % withdrawal, it's a less than 10 % chance that you end with less than your starting principle.
5:29So if you start with 1 million, it's a less than 10 % chance that you actually die with less than 1 million. And it's an over two-thirds chance that you actually die with double what you started with. So like I said, I love this book because it does begin to challenge that idea of, okay, great. But why are we operating just in a way that survives a worst case scenario? Why can't we think about what if we have a good scenario? What if we retire into a good market? And there are other strategies, variable withdrawal strategies or dynamic withdrawal strategies, whatever term you want to use that start to address that question.
6:08And I can get into the idea of what some of these strategies look like too. Yeah, I love that. So, okay, I would love to dive into those, but let's just slow down a little bit because you said so many incredible things there. So clearly, Die Was Zero, not written for the average person. It was essentially written for the FI community, though not explicitly, though he did mention the FI community in there, which is pretty cool. It's funny because I thought of Die Was Zero more as a mental framework of reallocating spending. So it's interesting how people can read the same text and focus on different aspects.
6:42Like, frankly, it didn't enter into my mind the true die with zero dollars. Like that doesn't seem to be a goal for me, but obviously to each his own. I don't think if you could somehow maybe slide into home plate on your last day with zero dollars. Yeah. If you were guaranteed of that, would that be such a terrible thing? No, probably not. All you need to know is the day you die. Yeah, the exact date and place. So yeah, I thought of it as that mental framework. And that has served me so well, I think, just over the last year or two, since I've read the book, and to really rethink my own spending, but it hasn't been, honestly, Rachel, like this cataclysmic, like total revamping of my financial life.
7:26It's just more like, okay, look, I understand these are probably the next 15, 20 years are the best years of my life. I need to spend, I need to spend a little more than I probably was comfortable. So anyway, that's about me. That's an aside. I think getting back to the important business at hand, you said most of us are too conservative and I suspect this is true. And then, and you further bolstered that with those amazing stats of 66 % chance that you're going to die with double what you started with and less than a 10 % chance you die with less than what you started. I mean, that's extraordinary.
7:58And what's so interesting is Bill Perkins has actually become a very high level amateur poker player, maybe semi-pro or even better poker player. So it's funny to be talking about him. And then I think in terms of, okay, thinking in bets, right? Like if you had a 90 plus percent chance of greater than what you started with and withdrawing that entire time. I mean, you take that bet all the way to eternity, right? Like that's extraordinary with a two thirds plus chance of dying with double. So I just want to kind of set the stage that, okay, yeah, we say 4 % safe withdrawal rate, but I think honestly, Rachel, you and I both know this.
8:34Like most people are far lower than that. They're thinking 3 % or they convince themselves, oh, just one more year of work. Oh, in my calculations, I'm not going to include social security because who knows if that'll be there. Like it's conservative built upon conservative. And then you get to a point where I suspect there's much greater than a 66 % chance of people in the FI community dying with more than double what they started with. Yeah, there are. And, you know, I started this career working with retirees and many of them had this. I don't think they'd consider themselves in the FI community.
9:08A lot of them are older, but they have the exact same mindset of many of us of, I just want to go one more year. or once I do retire, it was really hard for them to switch the flip and start spending to go. That is a really hard switch to make that I think we don't talk about enough. When you're a really good saver, you're really good with delayed gratification. The idea that you're just going to wake up one day and say, okay, now I'm going to do the opposite of everything I've just been doing the past 40 years is really, really hard. But I will say, and to your point, I agree. I think Bill's point in the book was to kind of get across some of these really important themes of let's consider the risks of not enjoying the present day.
9:48Let's maybe think about spending more today and really understanding that there are only certain things we can do when we're young, when we have the energy that delaying that so far to the future, it just won't look the same. And I think that's really the point he's trying to get across. Of course, me, I am thinking through the logistics of how does this actually work? Is it possible? And that is kind of the question here. Right. That's exactly Ryan's question. So yeah, I love that that's where your brain goes. So I know you prepared a ton for this. So let's dive into this. I'd love to go for it because that's not something that's really crossed my mind.
10:21And I think this will be really interesting. Yeah. So I will say if anybody's really interested in this, I would direct them to Michael Kitchis. He's a really successful financial planner and he really dives deep on all the research. So a lot of what I have learned has been through his research. And Michael Kitchis kind of came at this problem with, okay, yes, so there is the worst case scenario that we do need to survive. We certainly can't ignore it because to your point, Brad, we're working in bets here, but the bet of that I might potentially run out of money is a really scary one that you don't want to go through.
10:56But then Michael brings up the great point. Okay, what if we have the alternative scenario to where we retire into a good market and things actually go well. What then? And the withdrawal strategy that he has actually come up with himself is called the ratcheting rule. So a ratchet, like a tool, goes in one direction. That's kind of the idea behind it. And his thought process with this is you start with the floor. So if you retire with a million portfolio, you have a 30-year time horizon, then maybe you'd use the 4 % rule. So that'd be$40 ,000. You can adjust it for inflation every year going forward.
11:35Now, the idea is if the market does well, I should have the chance, the opportunity to increase my spending. I don't think we should keep it at$40 ,000 adjusted for inflation every year if the market were to take off, because that's the scenario where we end up dying with multiples of what we started with. So the example that he gives is the rules are if your portfolio increases by 50%, so that would mean we go from 1 million to 1.5 million. Now I can give myself a 10 % spending increase. So now you're going to add 10 % to whatever you're spending. And this is to be reevaluated once every three years.
12:18And that's to limit exactly how many times you're giving yourself the spending increase. again, to be careful, to be conservative. So the idea behind that ratcheting rule is that if the portfolio does well, we get to increase our spending. The exact details of it, it can look differently. That is the most common example I see when he brings it up. Okay. All right. That's very interesting. So right. Every three years, you're not doing this constantly. This is not something you're looking at your net worth every day, week or month. So, okay. If your net worth is up 50%, you can give yourself a 10 % increase.
12:53Okay. That's interesting. In your scenario there, the 30-year time horizon. So actually the time horizon is less than 30, presumably at that point, right? Because your next number of years into it. That's interesting because to my ears, that actually sounds very conservative. Like if you were to restart, just using this scenario, if you were to restart FI and say, okay, I'm going to throw out the number of years that I was already I'm just starting today with a$1.5 million net worth, the safe withdrawal of the 4 % would be 60 ,000. And we're saying like, okay, it might be closer to 44 ,000 plus whatever inflation adjustment.
13:31So that certainly seems reasonable for sure. Okay. As you can tell, I'm just wrapping my mind around as we're going through it. I think you'll be surprised that as we go through these different examples that they are still conservative. So if you look at the 4 % withdrawal rule, again, that's based off a 30-year time horizon. It's designed to survive every scenario. But if you just look at increasing that to 5%, I want to say the failure rate is 20%, which when we're talking about running out of money is really high. And then if you bump it up to 6 % withdrawal rate, I think the failure rate goes up to close to 50%, might be 45 % to 50%, really high.
14:10So these numbers do get scary really quickly, which is why I want to preface this by saying these are still conservative. And again, it's because we have to think about, well, what are we trying to avoid? We're trying to avoid running out of money. And to me, I think it's worth erring on the side of caution, being conservative to avoid that scenario. Totally agreed. Wholeheartedly agreed. I think a lot of us are, palms are sweating just thinking about running out of money, right? So clearly, that's not a tenable situation for the vast, vast, vast majority of people listening, right? So obviously, Ryan's question and your intellectual exercise of, hey, what would it actually look like to maybe spend this down?
14:49But nevertheless, you have to always have in the back of your mind, this is at minimum, I'm thinking 30 years. I mean, for me, I'm getting a little older at this point, I'm 44, but I still have another 40, hopefully 40 to 50 years. I wonder how does that timeframe also factor in it? Because I think when a lot of us run these numbers, it is based on 30 years and we've seen the Trinity study and this and that, but how do you adjust for the longer time horizon that a lot of people might be facing? Yeah. And that's why I keep saying and emphasizing a 30-year time horizon. The floor is 4 % for a 30-year time horizon.
15:27When we're talking about 40, 45 year time horizon, the 4 % rule actually does not hold up anymore. And now we're looking at, I believe the correction is we're bringing it down to 3, 3.2 % to be safe. So that is of course, even more conservative, but this does bring me to another example or another strategy that you can use, which is called the guardrails approach. And this was created by John, I hope I don't say his last name wrong, Gutton, G-U-Y-T-O-N. So if you want to look him up, that's how he spells last name. And it's how it sounds. You put guardrails on your portfolio. So you would start with the most common guardrails would be 3 % and 5%.
16:09And the idea is as long as you stay within those guardrails, you're fine. But for Michael Kitsch's strategy, the only direction spending can go is up. Now I'm going to talk about a strategy where spending can actually decrease. And of course, we can assume the negatives with that. But you stay within the 3 % and 5 % as guardrails. So if your portfolio were to take off and now what was before a 4 % withdrawal is now a 2 % withdrawal, you get to actually increase spending to bring it back up in between the guardrails. So if it drops all the way down to a 2 % withdrawal rate, now you can give yourself a spending increase up to say 4 % to bring it back up within the guardrails.
16:54Now the flip side of this is if the market starts doing poorly and now your guardrails, you slip out of the guardrails the other direction and now you're withdrawing 6 % on what was 4 % say last year, now you actually have to decrease spending. So that is the drawback of this strategy. It may allow you to spend more than the Kitsis strategy. But the drawback is now you have to cut spending potentially if the market does poorly. And I'm always wary of that because we know how hard it is to cut back spending rather than increase spending. Right. And to do that on a dime year by year would be really difficult for a lot of people.
17:35It's interesting how much of personal finance is really behavioral and psychological. And I think a lot of people just hearing those first two options might say, oh, wow, in the Kitsis option, it's only up, right? It's up only. And I can be my conservative self, but oh, I've given myself a raise. I've gotten to that point. Whereas the second guard rails approach, okay, I like that I could potentially go up to five, but man, would it be hard to go all the way back down to three. So right, obviously everybody has to figure out what works psychologically for them, but I suspect that would be harder, especially if it's like a dramatic difference, right?
18:10Like a$2 million portfolio, 5 % of that is a hundred grand a year. And then boom, the next year you're down to 3 % or 60 ,000. Oh, though, I guess would it be 3 % of the current value, right? Yeah. So would it work? It would be worse than that. That's a huge impact. Yeah. Nice. Okay. Because you're comparing it to the current value of the portfolio. Yeah. Okay. So it would be much worse than even I thought. Okay. Got it. But nevertheless, that's something to consider. And we will link up in the show notes, because I suspect each of these different options have very in-depth articles about them that people can read on precisely.
18:50But one other last thing I wanted to touch on before you move on here is when you said the 40 to 50 year, when I asked you about the longer time horizon, you said, okay, what that probably means is maybe a 3.2 % safe withdrawal rate. And that's interesting because it ties almost precisely with what Karsten, a big earn from early retirement now has said, like in every single thing that he's run for, and I don't, I don't want to put words in his mouth necessarily, but for the fire movement basically is 3.2 or 3.25 get you as close to a certainty as you can get barring some crazy zombie apocalypse style thing that we can never account for.
19:29So 3.25 is the exact number that he had as well. So I think for those of us who are prone to this conservatism with our money, don't go below 3.2. There's almost no scenario. Again, as always, this is not financial advice, but I am as conservative as it comes with my money and I don't want to run out of money, but 3.2 has got to be the floor for my own calculation. Yeah. From my research, I've seen the same. Although I have seen some occasionally somebody say, I want to say 2.65 % is a safe withdrawal strategy. But really, this speaks to why I like to take it year by year. Granted, I think you should have a strategy for your entire retirement or work optional life, whatever that looks like, because I don't think you should be reinventing the wheel every single year.
20:15But I do like to say, all right, what's the plan for this year? What has the market done and react based off of the data, the information that we have, rather than maybe setting something in stone and refusing to change it. So that's why I like some of these other strategies is it's a dynamic approach and it does get to change with what the market has done. Yeah, I like that. I like that too. Okay, Rachel, is there a third strategy? There's one more. Yes, we'll get into. And again, I'm doing my best to represent these as accurately as possible. I'm hoping I'm not making a mistake anywhere, but I would encourage everybody to go and look at the research.
20:52All three of these people have done amazing research on it. They're all very smart people. So we mentioned Michael Kitchis, John Gutton, and then Nick Majuli of Dollars and Data is the last one. And I believe he calls his flexible spending strategy. And if you want to look it up, I think the article is titled How to Save More in Retirement. And I even want to say this was a collaboration between him and the mad scientist. It was. Yes. So this was a really interesting one. It's a little bit more complex. But the idea is, can I save more in retirement if I am willing to cut back in bad years? And his answer is yes.
21:27But what you have to do first is determine what percentage of your spending is discretionary spending. So what we mean by that is what's the spending that you can cut out? So we're looking at things like going out to eat or going to concerts, some of these things that you don't need to survive. But if we enter a bad market, these are the things that could be cut out. And look at that as a percentage of your spending. So you have your fixed expenses, maybe housing, if you're still paying for housing, food, of course, is the big one, transportation, whatever it might be. Those things that can't go away, that even in a bad scenario, you'd still have to continue paying for them.
22:08And then you're going to look at your discretionary and determine, okay, how much of my spending is allocated to discretionary spending? So you decide that percentage. So say it's like 20%. So if we have, let me go ahead and pull up the heat map. Like I said, I would direct everyone to here, but Enigma Julie has a heat map depending on the percentage of your spending that is discretionary. So if you pull it up, you can go to the percentage and go down and based off the different withdrawal rates, it shows you percentage chance of success. So at 20 % of discretionary expenses, you still have a 97 % chance of success at a four and a half percent withdrawal rate.
22:49So now we've gone from four to four and a half. Now, granted, the higher your discretionary expenses are, the higher the withdrawal rate you can start with. So say 50 percent of your expenses are discretionary. Now we're looking at a withdrawal rate of 5.25 percent at 100 percent chance of success. If you determine that 50 % of spending is discretionary. And if you needed to, you could cut it out. So that's the very first step that you're going to do. Does that make sense? It does. It is fascinating. And I'm looking at this article actually on the madfientist.com, but it's the exact same article.
23:26And yeah, this beat map is incredible, right? So I guess the higher percentage that discretionary expenses make up of your total spending, the more latitude you have to have a higher withdrawal rate, because I guess they're arguing fixed costs, you don't have much leeway with. But in a down year or down set of years, if that happens, you can lower those. Nobody's going to spend themselves into oblivion. I think it's what most people who have the wherewithal to reach financial independence, they're not just going to blindly heedlessly spend their money, right? So if you have a significant percentage of discretionary expenses, you have a lot more latitude to lower them.
24:04I think that's the general concept. Yes. And I'll tell you how their rules work. So step one is determine percentage of spending that is discretionary. So if you're spending 100 ,000, just to use simple numbers, 50 ,000 is discretionary. Now you can look at the heat map and look at the 50 % range and see what a safe withdrawal rate is. Now here's where you're going to potentially change how much you spent. So what he says is at the end of every year, December 31st, you're going to look at where the market is compared to market highs. And he uses the S &P 500. So where is the S &P 500 today compared to old time S &P 500 highs?
24:48So if it is within 10 % of S &P 500 highs, so let's just say the market may be pulled back a little bit, 2 % from highs, but you're still within 10%. You get to spend all of your discretionary income for the next year. So you get to spend the full 100 ,000 no changes need to be made. And I want to make one more explanation here. So the side that is fixed expenses adjusts for inflation. The side that is discretionary never adjusts for inflation. So if you go through and dig through the research, you'll see that he mentions that. So every year you're going to be looking at, can I spend this 50 ,000?
Read the full transcript
25:24Do I need to alter it? Or can I not spend it at all? So best case scenario, the market is close to market highs, you get to spend the full 50 ,000 of discretionary. Now let's say the market is greater than 10%, but less than 20 % away from S &P 500 highs. Now we're in correction territory. And his recommendation here, or based off the numbers they ran, is that we cut discretionary expenses in half if we're in correction territory. So instead of spending the full 50 ,000, now you can only spend$25 ,000 for the coming year. So you still have your$50K of fixed expenses that you can spend. And now you have to cut discretionary by half to$25 ,000.
26:07Now the worst case scenario is if we are in a bear market territory and we are greater than 20 % away from S &P 500 highs. This is when we're in a bad market, huge down market. We have to cut our discretionary expenses to zero. So now you're only spending$50 ,000. So you can imagine the negatives, the pullbacks of this. If we were spending$100K last year and now have to spend$50K, that's difficult. So one thing, if anybody were to look into this strategy and really implement it, I would always say, be really careful on what you consider discretionary expenses. Maybe don't go 50%, but maybe even if you calculated at 50%, maybe do 20 or 30 to give yourself more cushion because to go from a hundred thousand and spending to 50 ,000 is a drastic change.
26:56Oh yeah. But isn't that funny, Rachel? The end result of so many of these is always, oh, but be a little more conservative than the research actually suggests, which is, again, it gets back to Ryan's original question, which is, hey, is there some mathematical way I can calculate this down to I'm sliding into home plate with$0. There really isn't because it's so difficult to know. Obviously, it's impossible to know the returns of the market over the next 30, 40, 50 years. It's not doable. So there's no way we can say in early 2024 that here's the precise calculation to have$0 and not run out of money in the intervening time.
27:41So I think at the end of the day, that's the short, succinct answer. But what's cool is, and you're illustrating here so beautifully, is there are different methods to not just blindly say, all right, I retired on X date and here's my withdrawal forever. I think that's difficult for people to just have that, okay, this is my one number. And regardless of whether that was calculated 30 years in the past or what's happened in the intervening years, I would like to update it. And I think a lot of people would, but they also, Rachel, don't want to over-engineer it. And I think that might be an issue as well.
28:16Yeah. I love that you brought up that point because one of my hesitations, and again, I think what Bill's point with this book was, was the overarching themes of, maybe you should consider spending more, you're probably being too conservative in your estimates, things like that. But the actual logistics behind dying was zero. Well, now we go from being too conservative to the other side, which is where I still think it's an obsession we don't need to have. So now there's people out there that want to optimize their money as much as possible. And I've kind of personally gone through this phase of I am fine with not optimizing every aspect of my life.
28:55I understand that maybe there are hours I worked or years I worked that I'll never spend that money, but I've come to grips with that and I'm comfortable with that because I still believe on the other end of the spectrum, which is you should spend all the money and make sure you maximize all of your hours that you've worked. It's still kind of an unhealthy relationship with money. And I still think it's giving money a little too much power. I totally recognize that I might not optimize every dollar while I'm alive. And I've just come to accept that and be fine with that. So I think it's always a balance.
29:28And that's why when I'm thinking through these strategies, is still err on the side of caution and understand that we can't run this scenario perfectly. There's way too many variables we don't know. We don't know when we're going to die. We don't know inflation. We don't know rate of returns. There's just no way to do it. So I've just accepted and become really comfortable with the fact that I am fine if I leave this world and things were not perfectly optimized from a financial standpoint. Well, that is, I think, the perfect way to leave this. And really, it does become a psychological exercise to as much as it is numbers on a page.
30:04And I think the thing that I'm leaving with most, especially from what you just said, and the entirety of it was wonderful, but just that those percentage chances of dying with double or more of my money, which suggests to me, okay, I don't have a brand new safe withdrawal rate. I'm not all of a sudden magically making it 7 % because I think that's obviously going to greater my likelihood of having not only double or even the same amount of money, but hopefully not zero, right? But what I'm leaving with that is saying, all right, maybe my natural tendency is to not increase my spending. But I have some more latitude now.
30:43I have some more latitude in my 40s and 50s. And especially as long as I'm keeping up to date with what's going on with the market. Is it roughly normal-ish conditions? Are there... I mean, you will know if you're in a 10-year down market, right? And then obviously you have to make adjustments. So I think this is a holistic answer. And I think you just did a marvelous job in that, Rachel. So thank you. Thank you. Yeah. Told you it would take a little longer on that one. Yeah. Yeah. But man, that was worth it. I think people are really going to enjoy this. Thanks for listening to Chooseify and for all your support of our mission here.
31:18The absolute best way to support Chooseify is when you sign up for your next rewards credit card to use our cards page at chooseabout.com slash cards. I keep this page constantly updated, so it should always be the top resource for you. Thanks for being part of our community and for your support. So let's move on to the next question. This one came in from Nicole. She said, hi guys, I just started listening to your podcast. I'm a 42 year old single mom and new to investing and saving and FI in general. I currently contribute to my employer 401k and I'm in a position where I can max it out. But from what I can tell, the fees are just too high.
31:55Is it still a smart move to invest over my employer match into the account? Or how else can I invest that money pre-tax into an investment or retirement account? I don't have an HSA available to me. Thanks so much for your time. I'm excited I found your podcast. So, all right, Nicole, thank you. Welcome to the community. This is awesome. And I suspect this is a question that a lot of people have. So Rachel, ultimately succinctly here, it's we have 401k. The options aren't that great. There's high fee options for the investments. And for most people, what that means is when you look at that page of your investment options and you look at the column that probably says expense ratio, if you don't see something that says 0.0 something or 0.1, we're looking for low fees under like 0.2 % in an ideal world.
32:39A lot of companies have total stock market funds or S &P funds that have 0.03%, 300ths of a percent. So if you look at that list and see 0.5%, 1%, something like that, Rachel, how do you approach that? Yeah. And I'll talk about this on how to view it and thinking about it as a guideline. So of course, I don't know quite enough about this listener to give her a very good answer, but I can kind of give a framework for how to think about this. So first off, I love to hear that she's looking into pre-tax options. I think Roth options get all the attention, especially in our community. And I have a lot of clients that they come to me and I see everything is in Roth and they're continuing to put everything in Roth, but they are in a really high tax bracket and probably in their peak earning years.
33:27So I do think it's great, but it depends on the person to be considering pre-tax options when you're in your peak earning years. And I think that's one variable here that's really missing because the pre-tax accounts are more valuable depending on if you're in that higher tax bracket. So what you can do is actually look at and compare the fees to the tax savings from contributing to that account. So I'm a huge fan of paying attention to taxes. We think about returns, we think about all these things, but one of the variables that we can actually have some control roll over and can calculate to some level of accuracy is taxes.
34:09So if we were to look at this and say, okay, here are the fees that I'm paying. And again, I don't know exactly what the fees are for her. It could be half a percent. It could be one and a half percent. It's a wide range. And of course, the higher the fee is, the more of an impact that is going to have. You can compare that fee to, okay, but what are the tax savings I'm getting from this account? Because she mentioned she doesn't have access to an HSA. And that's another great option for pre-tax account. So if you did have access to an HSA, you had high fees in your 401k, I might say, okay, look at getting the match, then maybe look at an HSA.
34:42And then you have a deductible IRA contribution, which already most people can't do because the phase-out, income phase-outs for that start pretty early on in the income. So there's not too many options. If you are a traditional employee, you have that pre-tax 401k, you don't have access to an HSA. But one of the very first things I would look at is what is the tax impact for putting money contributing to this 401k and how does that compare to the fees? And then of course, I always don't think enough people do this, but this is something I always tell clients. And it really depends on the size of your company and maybe what level or what role you're in, but maybe advocate for changing your 401k.
35:28Sometimes I will write out an email that my client can just copy and paste and send to their HR and say, hey, I'm really interested in putting more money away into my retirement, but I'm not happy with the fees here or the options that we have. Is there any way we can look into some other options and maybe try to bring the fees down? I've had some really pleasant experiences where this is actually has had an impact. So I always encourage people to, why not try that option? The worst thing that can happen is they respond and say, no, we can't change the 401k plan. I love that. I know I've gotten a ton of listener emails over the years.
36:03It's amazing when you have empowered people who now have the financial knowledge that frankly, most people in your HR department don't have, and that's no slight on HR departments, certainly. It's most people don't have. And if you show up and say, hey, here's the net worth impact on making this decision for every single employee at our company. Like this is the biggest raise you could ever give people, even if it's unbeknownst to them. Like I suspect a lot of well-meaning people are going to move to try to get those lower fee options. So yeah, that's really cool. And I love that you focused also on pre-tax buckets because I think, I think a lot of people in, like you said, kind of the greater personal finance world focus on Roth, but we in the FI community look at the pre-tax buckets because it's, hey, I'm controlling my tax rate now.
36:53I'm getting a tax deduction now. And for a lot of people in the FI community, there are some pretty advanced strategies to potentially get your money out down the road using, let's say, a Roth IRA conversion ladder, which Rachel, way back when in episodes 17R and 163R, we have two case studies on that to talk people through it. It's outside the scope of what we're doing here right now, but there is a potential that if you get to a retire early figure where you're earning very little income, where you can get the vast majority of your regular 401k or regular, ultimately your traditional IRA, that money out tax-free or pretty darn close to tax-free, which is extraordinary.
37:33And I think that's one of the superpowers of the FI community. So yeah, I mean, I focus on these pre-tax buckets if I can. So, okay, right. This is ultimately, we're in a situation where they have an employer match, I guess we didn't touch on that, right? Is regardless of fees, do you have blanket advice for employer match? Always get the employer match. I mean, it is a, for most people... It's just awful, right? Yeah. We teed it right up. That's an easy one. Yeah. It's 100%. For most people, 100 % return on your money if they match it dollar for dollar. That's not a return. You're going to find anywhere else.
38:13And there is kind of like an obsession over fees sometimes. And we don't think about the other variables in the equation. Okay, but sure, the fees might be high. But if I'm getting 100 % return on my money, that's going to be any fees there are. There's nowhere else I can go that will give me a guaranteed 100 % return on my money. Yeah, that is an absolute slam dunk in my perspective as well. And so two other factors is like you said that your current marginal tax bracket has got to be factored in here. I'd love to hear your thoughts on that. But the second piece would be, okay, yeah, the fees are significant now, but many people are really not staying at jobs forever.
38:55And it's not like you're locking in those fees for 50 years. When you separate from that company, you're able to roll out that 401k into a traditional IRA that you control at an investment firm of your choice at that point. So this is a little dicier, Rachel, I'm hesitant to say, but I think it's something to keep in mind in the sense that like, yeah, there's a real high likelihood you're not going to be at that job for 30 years. So you're not stuck with those fees. So to forego, let's say you were in a super high marginal tax bracket, to forego that tax deduction now for fees that might only impact you for a couple of years, I think there's some give and take here.
39:35Yeah, that is a great point. I'm so happy you brought that up because we also have to remember that there are contribution limits to these accounts every year. We don't get to go back and make up for those contributions that we missed in previous years. So I do think there is a weighting we have to think about here on, well, this, I can't put in 22 ,500 or whatever amount it is every single year forever. So it might be an opportunity that I don't want to pass up. So let's go ahead and put that money in. And it does get to grow tax deferred. Again, another tax savings that we have to think about in the future when we're thinking about this compared to fees.
40:16But it's such a great point because once you leave your employer or if you reach a certain age and your employer allows for it, you can roll these over to an IRA or you can choose a low cost custodian. Now you can move all of your investments into low cost investments with no tax impact. So it is worth thinking about the missed opportunity of what if I don't contribute to this account, this really valuable account, I can never go back and make up those missed contributions. Yeah, that's a really good point. So I guess just finally, before we move on, is there just like a back of the envelope marginal tax bracket that you consider for, there's always that age old, like we said, the Roth versus traditional, this is not financial advice to any person or anyone specifically, obviously, but even just back of the envelope, if you're in the 12 % marginal bracket, where do you come down?
41:10If you're in the 22 or 24, whatever it is, how do you think about that? If somebody gave you 30 seconds to answer that? Yeah, it's hard. I'll try to answer it quickly. Really hard. Yeah. And I take it person by person because somebody's peak earning years might be in the mid 20 % tax rate. Somebody's peak earning years might be 37%. So I do like to think about it for that person? And okay, do I think at this age, maybe in late 30s, early 40s, mid 40s, whatever it is, am I probably in my peak earning years? And is this a time where I should defer taxes? Yes. So I prefer to think about it in that way rather than give a, if you're in the 12%, always wrong.
41:51You should do this. I was trying to lower the pressure with the 30 second thing there, not the, uh, it wasn't holding you, but you gave a perfect answer there. So it depends ultimately. And I think that's, that's the short answer to most of these questions, but I think we're giving like a toolbox for how to think through these issues. So, all right, let's move on to the third question now. So this next question comes in from Andy and I'm going to paraphrase here because he gave just an incredible amount of information, but I think at its heart, he's talking about potentially going on a mini retirement or sabbatical.
42:25And he gave us some financial information. And he's curious if he's crazy for doing this. So I'm going to read here specifically just to give everybody a flavor. So he has no student loans. He's about$70 ,000 spread across some retirement and HSA buckets, no debt. And he's early on in his accumulation phase. And ultimately he's saying, I plan to move abroad for 12 to 24 months on a work holiday visa early next year. I have$20 ,000 on my emergency fund,$15 ,000 in cash separately saved for these travels, I would be quitting my current job in the US. I work in software and I would do some odd jobs between my travels while abroad.
43:03And my question to you is, am I crazy for doing this? I've been inspired by your episodes that discuss many retirements and I've been planning this for the past five months. Basically, I'm just hoping for some reassurance that this won't completely derail my fly endeavors. So yeah, I mean, Rachel, this is a really good one. Where do you launch off with this? Well, first I want to say I just love this community because we are constantly challenging the ideas behind traditional retirement. So first it was, what if I want to retire at 40 instead of 65? And now it's, what if I want to do a mini retirement now and go back to work?
43:36So I love it. I love that we're thinking about all the different ways that we can do this. As far as him and his specifics, of course, again, it's hard to say. $20 ,000 in an emergency fund and$15 ,000 in cash might sound too low for some people, but I don't know how he's spending. Or again, he mentions a strategy for creating income when he goes abroad. So that alone is a little bit hard to say, but I will say the great thing about a mini retirement or sabbatical is that the math is really easy, right? So in the beginning of this episode, we were going through all these withdrawal strategies and we were thinking about a portfolio that has to survive a 30 to 45 year time horizon.
44:14Now, when we're dealing with mini retirements and we're talking about six months or a year or two years, the math is easy and we don't have to run these crazy Monte Carlo simulations and see the percentage chance of success. It's essentially save up the cash that you need, your living expenses that you need, and keep it in cash. We don't want to invest this money because we're going to need it within the next six months to 48 months or however long it might be. So that's the good news is that the math and the saving and the strategy there for a mini retirement is really simple. Now, as far as is this going to derail and throw off all the progress I've made, again, can't say for sure the impact that it's going to have other than to say it probably will have some sort of impact.
45:02Could be negative, might even be positive depending on what you do during that sabbatical. So if you're just going, you're in your career, you take a year or two years off, you're not saving during that time, and you go back to work, you go back and you're making the same income you were before. Yeah, that's going to throw off your freedom number, your freedom age, maybe by a year, maybe by two years, it will have some impact if we were to look at it in a vacuum like that. But then there's a lot of research behind sabbaticals or behind mini retirements to show that it could actually be positive to your career.
45:40If you use it as a time to think about maybe a career shift or even to start a side hustle, again, though, I want to emphasize if you want to relax and take a break, that's what you should do. Not everything should be around work. But for a lot of people who have done this, they've actually, when they've returned to work full time, they've actually found it's had a positive impact on their income. Now they can save more and it might have positively impact their financial freedom endeavors. So it's hard to say if we were to look at it in a vacuum, yeah, it might knock a year off or two years off of your financial freedom goals.
46:17But I also want to encourage everybody that we don't have to look at every decision solely based in the numbers and what impact it will have on your net worth. Sometimes we can think about what if in 20, 30 years, I can no longer take that backpacking trip to Southeast Asia. What if, you know, 20 years, my children are fully grown and I don't get to make up this time. This is the only time I can spend with them while they're young. There's other factors to consider here. And you may look at the numbers and say, this looks like it's going to have a negative impact to my financial freedom goals, but that's okay because that's not the only variable I'm considering.
46:56Yeah. Yeah. And I love how this ties into the first question where we talked about dying with zero, right? And I think Bill Perkins would say that, hey, that one to two years, if you're talking, okay, I've pre-funded this essentially. So Andy has$15 ,000 set aside. He's going to be doing some odds and ends. And sure,$15 ,000 isn't going to pay necessarily for the entire one to two years, but it sounds like he's got a good portion of this covered. I know our good friends, Christine Bryce from millennial revolution have talked about like just how inexpensive it can be to travel for a year. I mean, I think if I remember correctly, their number was somewhere in the vicinity of like $25 ,000 for the two of them.
47:39So it's really doable. And then yeah, going back to die with zero is would you trade those two years of, okay, yeah, you might have to work two extra years in the backside, but you just got these two years traveling the world that you could never, ever replace that. And Andy doesn't say precisely how old he is, but let's say in your twenties or thirties, you're not going to replace that in your seventies. You're just not, you're just simply not. So I think that's important. Another thing, I just have all these random thoughts in hearing this, like he works in software. Is it possible in this new day and age of working remotely, have you considered getting a software job that you could work one day a week?
48:16And then this whole thing become, maybe it doesn't set you back at all, right? Like maybe if your life only costs $25 ,000 a year and you're making even a fifth of a software salary, you might actually be able to save money along the way. So again, just a random thought. Our good friend Jillian Johnsrud has a new website called retireoften.com and she has a podcast of the same name where she talks very explicitly about mini retirement. So I think I would send Andy there. I would send anybody who's thinking about a mini retirement generally. And Jillian was on the show late last year where we talked about mini retirements.
48:51It was episode 451. And she actually said, like you said, Rachel, you never know. Sometimes this could actually accelerate your path to five. That was actually the title of the episode, many retirements to accelerate your path to five. So Jillian has some interesting, interesting thoughts on that. So yeah, I mean, this is a good one from Andy, right? It's like, yeah, in a vacuum, is this going to quote unquote, set you back? I mean, yeah, I guess by the technical definition, but oh goodness, to have a year or two to travel the world, like that sounds like a pretty good trade to me. Same here. Yeah.
49:24When I think about my life and the way that I want to live it. I do my best to try to minimize regrets. And I think if most of us were to look at our life at a whole and think, at the end of my life, do I see myself regretting that one to two years that I took off to travel the world? I can't imagine any of us would really regret it, especially, yeah, no, no chance. No one is going to say, and I wish I would have just worked through those two years. Now I could have 3 million instead of$2 million. dollars. You know, there's other variables. There's other factors that should go into your decision-making outside of just the numbers, your career and what you do for money.
50:03Here, here. Couldn't agree more. So Andy, we're, uh, we're giving you our, with the information we have, we're giving you our blessing. That sounds absolutely wonderful and enjoy and let us know. Definitely get back to it. So yeah, indeed. That sounds amazing. All right, Rachel, we're going to do, uh, the last question here. I'm going to paraphrase Devin's question, which was a great one. So he is contemplating a Roth IRA contribution here in the new year. And he's concerned that his income is going to actually go over the phase-out limit. And I guess he wants to make the contribution early in the year, but then is worried about, hey, what happens if I'm over this phase-out limit?
50:41What do I do then? So Rachel, how does someone like Devin here consider this? They want to make a Roth IRA contribution or really a retirement contribution, but they're worried about the limits and worried about going over them. What do they do? Yeah. I can answer this pretty easily because I have been in this exact situation before personally. Yeah. So a Roth is an account that I contribute to every year. And it got to the point where I was worried that I was on the cusp of being phased out of directly contributing to the Roth. So what I did is it's very simple. I just did the backdoor Roth IRA.
51:15Some people are concerned that maybe there's some downside to doing the backdoor rather than directly contributing to the Roth. And just to give you guys a quick explanation here of the backdoor Roth, that's when you make a non-deductible IRA contribution and then you convert it to the Roth. So it's a legal loophole for a way for higher earners to get around the phase out limits. So what I decided to do is just not overthink it, do the backdoor Roth, as long as you make sure that you can avoid the pro rata rule, which makes sure that you have$0 in traditional IRAs, SEP IRAs, any type of IRA, those need to be cleared out in order for you to do this in a clean way where you're not going to be double taxed.
52:01So that's what I did. And to be honest, as long as you don't have money in the traditional IRA, I don't see any downside to it other than it's an extra step. It's going to take you a little bit more time to do the backdoor Roth rather than just directly contribute to the Roth. I will say I've had people worried about the five-year rule and think that the backdoor Roth is inferior to directly contributing to the Roth IRA because of the five-year rule. The five-year rule states that on conversions, you have to wait five years in order to pull those out. So Brad, you mentioned the Roth conversion ladder earlier.
52:39There's that strategy where you convert money that you're going to spend in five years down the road so you can get into it penalty-free. What most people don't know is that this doesn't apply when we're talking about the backdoor Roth IRA because the five-year rule only applies if it is a taxable conversion. So when we're doing a non-deductible IRA contribution, you're choosing to not deduct that money on your taxes and you're converting it over to the Roth. So that conversion is actually not taxable. And the IRS has issued guidance on this and has confirmed that and said, the five-year rule does not apply to these types of conversions.
53:15So hopefully that's not too in the weeds. I can just hear people saying, but what about the five-year rule? It can make it inferior to a direct Roth contribution. But even that isn't the case. So if I were close, and like I said, I've done this personally, I was close. And he makes a good point of, I don't want to wait a whole year, potentially give up earnings, that's what I would do. Just do the backdoor Roth as long as you avoid the pro-rata rule. Wow. Okay. I love the advanced strategy. That's really great. And do we have the actual... So what if he didn't listen, just chooses to ignore your advice here, and he actually directly contributed to the Roth IRA and then finds towards the end of the year, hey, I'm over that phase out.
53:58What do you do then? I meant to bring that up in my original point, but that is... It's a headache to have to go through and pull out those Roth. And I've done this before. I know it because I've done it before for a client. They contributed to the Roth. They thought they were going to be under the phase out limits. Then they got a huge bonus at the end of the year, pushed them over the limits. Now they need to take out the money they put into the Roth and you have to calculate, okay, so they already had money in the Roth. So what amount of earnings is attributable to that contribution? And you have to, yeah, you have to take that out as well.
54:28There's an IRS calculator that you have to use. That's why if it takes an extra step now, to me, it is worth it to avoid the headache of having to take out those excess Roth contributions, calculate the earnings on those contributions. And then of course, if you forget about it, you risk penalty, you risk all kind of crazy things that just aren't fun to go through. So in my head, I'm thinking, let's avoid that scenario completely and just do the backdoor Roth. Okay. That is critical information. So right, it's not just like there's an easy undo button. I want to pull this out. You can undo it, but it's not easy at all.
55:05Okay, so that leads us to believe, yeah, you want to be really cautious with this. Now, again, he doesn't want to forego the earnings, which is why he wants to put it in in January or February. But realistically, you have until, is it when you file your tax return the following year? Or is it April 15th? Or if you extend it, do you get the extended? And I guess in essence, you have all the way until at minimum April 15th of the following year to put that money in. So once you've calculated what your modified adjusted gross income is, right? Yeah. So you could wait and just see what the final numbers are and do it then.
55:43The only caveat is if you do end up having to do a backdoor Roth, it is slightly cleaner to make the non-deductible IRA contribution and do the conversion in the current year rather than wait. And again, I've been through all of this. You've been there. I've been there. I have done it where I did the contribution and the conversion and different years. It is certainly possible. It's just slightly cleaner to do it within the same year. I always prefer to do it within the same year. So again, just in my head, it's an argument for just do the backdoor Roth. Okay. Well, you sold me. That makes a lot of sense.
56:15So yeah, I'm really glad we talked through that. And man, we just bombed through four questions. And I think this is a really, really useful episode. I think both the nuts and bolts, like you just talked through on the, on this last question. So interesting to like, I didn't even know that, like, I would not have considered that. Okay. Doing the non-deductible Roth and then the backdoor that that's actually better in the current calendar year. So like the interaction of how that works with a regular, oh, but you have until April 15th of the next year. So with again, the behavioral, the die was zero, the, how do we think about our money?
56:50So this really covered everything. Thank you so much for being here round two and hopefully of many in the future. Where can people reach out to you? Yeah. Thank you, Brad. I had so much fun answering these questions with you today. So Twitter is where I am most active or X, whatever you call it. Camp underscore wealth. Yeah. Camp underscore wealth on Twitter at camp wealth on Instagram. And then my website is rachelcampwealth.com. Nice. Awesome. And we will certainly have the links in the show notes. That's the easiest way. Just click on through. and until next time, Rachel, thanks again. Thank you.
57:24Thank you for listening to today's show and for being part of the Chooseify community. If you haven't already, the best ways to get involved are first subscribe to the podcast. So you're listening to this on a podcast player and just hit subscribe and then subscribe to my weekly newsletter. I actually sit down every Monday and write this by hand and I send it out Tuesday morning. So just head over to chooseify.com slash subscribe and it's really, really easy to get on the newsletter list right there. And I would greatly appreciate it. It's the best way to get in touch with me. You can actually just hit reply to any of those emails and it comes directly to my inbox.
58:01So that's the way that I keep a pulse of the community and how we keep this the ultimate crowdsourced personal finance show. And finally, if you're looking to join an in-real-life community, we have Chooseify local groups in 300-plus cities all around the world. So head to chooseify.com slash local and you'll find a list of all of those cities in 20 plus countries all across the world. And if you're just getting started with FI or you have a family member or a friend who you think would be interested, two easy ways. Choose a FI episode 100 is kind of our welcome to the FI community. And even though it's a couple of years old at this point, it still stands up and it's a really great just starting point to get an understanding of what is financial independence?
58:43What are we doing here? Why are we looking to live a more intentional life where we save money and use it as a springboard to live a better life? And then Choose a Vi created a Financial Independence 101 course that's entirely free. Just head to choosefi.com slash fi101. And again, thanks for listening.
From the publisher
In this episode: spending down to zero, the ratcheting rule, the guardrails approach, high fee 401k's, and mini-retirements.
This week we are diving back into the listener mailbag with Rachael Camp to address the pressing questions our community has! Whether it's curiosity towards the concept of dying with zero, determining whether it is a good time to take a mini-retirement, or working with high-fee 401k's, Brad and Rachael tackle it all! Listen along as YOU the community dictate the conversation with your hot button FI questions!
Rachael Camp:
- Website: www.rachaelcampwealth.com
- Twitter: @camp_wealth
Please note:
Rachael Camp offers advisory Services through Creative Financial Designs, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser, and Securities are offered through cfd Investments, Inc., a Registered Broker/Dealer, Member FINRA & SIPC, 2704 S. Goyer Rd., Kokomo, IN 46902. 765-453-9600. Camp Wealth is not affiliated with the CFD companies.
Timestamps:- 0:55 – Introduction
- 1:38 – Spending Down to Zero
- 10:15 – The Ratcheting Rule and The Guard Rails Approach
- 20:38 – Flexible Spending Strategy
- 27:01 – Does Everything Need to be Optimized?
- 31:15 – High Fee 401k's
- 41:48 – Mini Retirement Considerations
- 49:54 – Roth IRA Contributions and Faze Out Limits
- 55:57 – Conclusion
- "Die With Zero: Getting All You Can from Your Money and Your Life" by Bill Perkins
- "Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the Facts" by Annie Duke
- The Ratcheting Safe Withdrawal Rate – A More Dominant Version Of The 4% Rule?
- The guardrails approach is a flexible retirement withdrawal strategy: Here's how it works
- Early Retirement Now
- The Problem with the 4% Rule (and Why You Could Retire Even Sooner)
- The Roth IRA Conversion Ladder | A Case Study | ChooseFI Ep 17R
- Roth IRA Conversion Ladder Case Study | ChooseFI Ep 163R
- Retire Often
- Mini-Retirements to Accelerate Your Path to FI | Jillian Johnsrud | ChooseFI Ep 451
- Subscribe to The FI Weekly!
- Top 10 Recommended Travel Rewards Credit Cards
- Empower: Free Dashboard to Track Your Finances
- CIT Bank Platinum Savings Account
- M1 Finance: Commission-Free Investing, 1-click rebalancing
- CashFreely: Maximize Your Cash Back Rewards
- Travel Freely: Track all your rewards cards and points
- Emergency Binder: For Your Family's Essential Info (code 'CHOOSEFI' for 20% off)
- Student Loan Planner: Custom Consult (with $100 Discount)
- Get a cheaper phone plan with Mint Mobile
