In short
The UK’s alleged “death of free speech,” arguing that social-media opinions lead to police action, prison, and “cancel culture,” with censorship driven by political elites and media regulators.
Guests
Lucy Connolly (described as a “cancelled and outspoken” figure; a Tory councillor’s wife; 10,000 Twitter followers; jailed after a deleted X post following the Southport massacre). Dan (Rob’s co-host/guest; a comedian/journalist and host of “Katie’s Arms” pub night; interviewed under caution by Devon & Cornwall/Dorset police over calling himself a “spaz”; worked with the Free Speech Union).
Key claims
Police and prosecutors are politically compromised; the state uses arrests to chill speech; “Online Safety Act” and libel laws enable censorship; media regulators target outlets like GB News and Nigel Farage; examples show disproportionate punishment.
Notable examples
Lucy Connolly’s 31-month sentence for a tweet (she deleted it within hours); comparison to a rioter with a shorter sentence; Peter Lynch’s alleged suicide after being jailed for anti-police protest language; Dan’s “spaz” interview under caution; claims about Starmer’s role and “libel tourism.”
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe State of Free Speech Today
0:45 to 2:44
Exploration of the perceived threats to free speech and societal reactions.
“Whatever I say, and I don't say things to offend.”
Police Involvement and Social Media
2:44 to 3:45
A discussion on the role of police in regulating social media opinions.
“And I want to make sure that they're going out doing what they're supposed to do.”
Case Study: Lucy's Experience
3:45 to 5:54
Lucy shares her personal story about being arrested due to a social media post.
“Or you're going to lose your job if you don't.”
The Legal Consequences of Online Speech
5:54 to 7:05
Discussion on the legal ramifications faced by Lucy for her tweet.
“I hadn't even looked at any of the comments on it, you know, before I deleted it.”
Prison Time for a Tweet?
7:05 to 9:06
Lucy reflects on her lengthy prison sentence for her social media activity.
“They originally arrested me on a Tuesday, interviewed me.”
The Impact of Social Media Policies
9:06 to 10:00
Lucy discusses the restrictions she faces following her release from prison.
Cancel Culture and Its Consequences
10:00 to 12:27
Exploration of the broader implications of cancel culture on society.
“I'm like, I'm not prepared to shut up, if that makes sense.”
The Hateful Culture Phenomenon
12:27 to 14:02
Discussion on societal hatred and the need for constructive dialogue.
“This did, you know, this cancel culture where it happened to a friend of mine on Twitter as well.”
The Culture of Hatred
14:02 to 14:32
Explore the difference between envy and jealousy in today's society.
Freedom of Opinion
14:32 to 15:18
Discussing the importance of defending free speech regardless of personal beliefs.
“Yeah, I've spoken out in defence of people who've been cancelled.”
Show all 26 chapters
Consequences of Censorship
15:18 to 15:54
Examining the societal impacts of censorship and social media policing.
“I think everybody shit themselves and went, oh, God.”
Media Control and Regulation
15:54 to 17:45
Analyzing attempts to control mainstream media and dissenting voices.
“Maybe if it was like a campaign of hate that had gone on for a long time, different circumstances, that's why we have the Malicious Communications Act, isn't it?”
The Dangers of Censorship
17:45 to 19:50
Discussing the Online Safety Act and its implications for free speech.
“There's like libel tourism, abuse of the libel laws, which makes it very impossible for someone to risk speaking out about a rich person, for example.”
Arrests for Expression
19:50 to 20:55
Addressing the alarming rise in arrests related to social media posts.
“So the solution for all of these losers, these people who are losing the argument, whether it's Keir Starmer, whether it's Harry and Meghan, is let's censor things.”
Case Studies of Injustice
20:55 to 23:40
Reviewing personal stories of individuals facing severe consequences for speech.
“oh, no, you know, we don't get involved in the justice system stand anymore.”
Navigating Legal Challenges
23:40 to 28:00
A personal account of dealing with police scrutiny over speech and expression.
“So he'd protested against Brexit, he'd protested against COVID, he believed in the deep state, he believed that the government were not looking out for its people.”
The Arrest and Its Aftermath
28:00 to 29:19
Learn about the author's experience with the police regarding free speech.
“seater audience, and I'd be arrested on stage.”
Self-Deprecation and Language Reclamation
29:20 to 30:59
Discover the nuances of self-deprecating humor and its impact on identity.
“So what did the, but what was the accusation?”
The Impact of Surveillance and Intimidation
31:00 to 33:00
Explore how surveillance affects personal freedom and speech.
“Do you realise by calling yourself a spaz, you're causing offence to other people.”
Targeted Actions and State Control
33:00 to 34:59
Examine how state actions are aimed at suppressing dissent and controlling narratives.
“life, I have family and children and things.”
The State of Free Speech in the UK vs. the US
35:00 to 37:09
Compare the differences in free speech protections between the UK and the US.
“I think at that time they saw that those riots or the flare up could have become a nationwide riot.”
The Rise of Independent Media
37:10 to 41:26
Understand the growing influence of independent media on public discourse.
“It seems to be worse now just because there's social media.”
BBC vs. Independent Outlets
41:26 to 42:00
Analyze the differences in reporting between the BBC and independent news outlets.
“it's the main reason I think why they want to shut GB News down, is because we can hold a mirror up now to their coverage.”
The Telford Grooming Gang Scandal
42:00 to 43:11
Learn about the significant media coverage issue surrounding the Telford grooming gang scandal.
“Whereas GB News, we weren't around at the time, but obviously then we've kind of been leading the charge when it comes to the grooming gang stuff.”
The Rise of GB News
43:11 to 44:25
Discover how GB News has positioned itself against traditional media outlets like Sky News.
“But it's gone through phases, hasn't it, where initially the establishment just laughed at it.”
Engaging with Real People
44:25 to 45:40
Understand the importance of connecting with ordinary people in news reporting.
“We are building an audience, a huge audience of people who really value what we do.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Free speech as we knew it is dead. Or at least that's what it feels like. Everywhere you look, conversations are being shut down, people are being cancelled and ordinary people are getting imprisoned for opinion on social media. So what happened to open debate and the right of having your own opinion? Because right now it feels like something fundamental is under threat. So today we're sitting down with the cancelled and the outspoken to expose the truth on what they believe is really going on what about free speech do we have that in the uk no we don't have free speech in the uk should we not of course i look listen i say what i want when i want come and arrest me i dare you to yeah you know it's like it's one you know it's it's like you know it's not going to happen it's you know and people that allow if someone came and knocked on my door and said oh you said something well I'd shut I'd shut the door in their face would you have the police yeah I'd shut yeah yeah shut the door in their face and I'd be like that fuck off I'd just be like open the door yeah something you said on wallop it's called social media it's not you'd honestly tell them to fuck off it's my social life this is not it's not work media it's not called work it's called social media what I do in my social life as long as I'm not harming people, yeah, and I'm not going around stabbing people and I'm not going around.
1:30Whatever I say, and I don't say things to offend. I don't say things to, I don't manipulate anything. I don't say things out of malice. You know, I say them because if you want to come around my house, I would, I'd slam the door in their face, bang, straight away. They've got no, they can't do anything about it. It's when you entertain it. It's when you go, oh, well, what did I say? Don't even ask them. What do you want? Da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da. Wallop. Slam the door in their face. But people are going to prison for social media posts. Yeah, well, it's because they've decided, because they've literally, oh, sign here, sign here.
2:12It's like when they go, oh, can you just sign this document? When a policeman goes, blah, blah, blah, can you just, once you sign away, you're done. You're done. So you refuse to sign? Yeah, refuse to talk, refuse to communicate. refuse to sign. So refuse to even, even start a conversation. It's like, wallop, go and do a job elsewhere. Get out of here. See you later. Okay. And I respect it. I do. That's the thing about the police force as well. Why I want to become mayor of London is because I want to give them the top cover. I want to train them correctly. And I want to make sure that they're going out doing what they're supposed to do.
2:48And this is why, this is why I say the police force have been compromised politically. They're being used as a political tool. Fancy the government sending a policeman around your house because you've said something on social media. Five of them to Lawrence Fox. I know. Send five. Fancy that. It's like... Because he says something about Sadiq Khan. This is what I pay my taxes for. Yeah. This is what I pay my taxes for. It's like to keep me safe and not for you to come around my house and tell me that that I've posted something online. I paid my taxes so you can go out and keep us safe and secure and keep us away from people being stabbed in the streets or our phones being nicked, sexual abuses from our women and children being raped and abused.
3:36This is what I pay my taxes for, for you to do that. I can't imagine. Can you imagine being a police officer and someone going, you're going to have to go around Rob's house. He said something on social media. And I'm not doing it. Or you're going to lose your job if you don't. well, you know, these are proper police officers that have been in there for a while, properly trained, you know, that have got something about them, not the DEI sort of muppets that have been put in there that go, oh, yes, oh, yeah, yeah, I got offended and come around with pink hair. You know, it's, you know, proper police officers.
4:14Can you imagine? Imagine being told that and being threatened with your job going, and I know that happens because I've got very good friends within these organisations. And they're like, you can see it on the streets. You can see the division on the streets. The division, the friction and division within the Metropolitan Police is so fragile right now that the proper police officers are leaving. Lucy, how did you end up in prison for a social media post? Well, I'm not 100 % sure, to be honest. I think it was very politically motivated. When I first saw all the posts on Twitter and stuff, you know, after some, it was a whole week later, actually.
4:59Was this after Southport? Yeah, so I actually made that tweet on the day of Southport within hours of it being announced that, you know, that atrocity had happened. And I'd obviously deleted it the same evening. Once I'd calmed down and thought, you know, you can't write that, take that down. Right. It was a whole week before it kind of reared its ugly head again, if that makes sense. Because I didn't think anything more of it. I deleted it, taken it down, carried on with normal life, carried on on Twitter as normal. Yeah. And then I don't really know what made it pop up again. So what, it re-earthed itself, didn't it?
5:33Yeah, so like a week later. So I think it was like the Monday after. I'd seen this post saying, yes, but you're a racist, aren't you, Lucy? and you're a Tory councillor's wife and all of this. And I was like, oh, gosh, you know, like, where's this come from? Right. So the week after you posted it, nothing had happened. The police hadn't called, come over. Nothing at all. I'd deleted the tweet. I hadn't even looked at any of the comments on it, you know, before I deleted it. I hadn't engaged. Did it blow up a bit? Was it a lot of views? I think so, apparently. You know, apparently it had 300 and something views.
6:05But as you know, on Twitter, it doesn't have to actually be a view for you to scroll past it, does it? just so I had a fairly big following. I had about 10 ,000 followers. So you had 10 ,000 followers and it had how many views? I think 300 and something thousand. Right, okay, fine. I'm sure they said. My point was they accused me of inciting violence, but I didn't. There had been no violence. There had been no riots at the point that I made that tweet. I took the tweet down within hours of making it because I knew it wasn't the right thing to say. What did they say? Inciting racial hatred. Exciting.
6:40I think the actual charge was publishing written material that was likely to, not even did, likely to stir up racial hatred. They'd already made it quite clear before they knew any of my circumstances, before they'd looked at any mitigating circumstances, before they'd looked into any character references, all those kind of things that judges ordinarily take into consideration when they're handing out sentences. Take it you've never been arrested before? No, never. First time in the cells. Wow. So they held you. Yeah. So they held me going back a bit. They originally arrested me on a Tuesday, interviewed me.
7:19I explained myself. They let me go, bailed me with conditions not to post on social media. I didn't. I didn't break those bail conditions. And in the, you know, even in the police documents, it says, you know, there's not enough evidence to charge her here. and somehow that changed from the Tuesday to the Friday so I you know left the police station that Tuesday evening with bail conditions to I think the date in November to go back to check back in and you know that the police officer said to me on the desk he said oh you know they'll put that back the courts are so backed up don't expect to be actually you know called to answer bail in November so you know I'd gone home thinking you know I'd spent my few hours in the cells I'd got my telling off you know wasn't proud of myself that was the end of it yeah oh no so that was the tuesday evening you know friday morning i'd literally just got out of bed had a shower i was putting the bins out friday's bin day in our street and then as i was putting the bins out this police car comes down the street and i thought i just know i just know they're coming for me it was this is like before eight in the morning so that obviously they were you know you're arrested for da da da da da.
8:33How many police came? Two that time. Okay. And they arrested you for what? I don't actually know what they were arresting me for the second time. But they took you away straight away? The same charge, I think, a public audit charge. So, yes, they took me there and then. Yeah. And then, yeah, I was never released. Do you regret pleading guilty? Yes, definitely. I got 31 months in total. 31 months for a tweet? 31 months for a tweet. Has that ever happened before? No. people that went out in the in the riots or you know there was a guy sentenced in northampton just before me he'd gone out in the riots he'd gone out with crowbars he and balaclavas he'd met load of people he was involved he did hurt people he was on first of all he's on a gbh charge then they dropped it to abh then they dropped it to a fray he was already on a suspended sentence i think he got 20 months 19 20 months he got less than he got less than me and he'd gone out in the riots he'd physically hurt people and he had previa and he still got less than me so how did you feel when you got 31 months i couldn't believe it and what he essentially did was he added on my credit so i got my 25 credit for going guilty but all he did was added it on before he took it off right so he could have started from two years which was the minimum the sentencing guidelines start from and then he could have took 25 % off and then I'd have obviously served 40 % of that so it would have been a lot less but what he did do is he said well you know had you have gone to trial and been found guilty you'd have got four point something years well hang on a minute isn't that the whole point of going guilty so that you don't go to trial and you get your credit so the judge actually gave me four years something but then he took the 25 % off four years for a tweet something like that it was for four years this i can't i'd have to look it up so the but the 25 then took it down to 31 months so and you served in total how long 12.4 months okay because i served 40 of the of the sentence right yeah are you allowed to post on social media i'm allowed to post on social media which is a bit backwards really isn't it considering that that was what my offense was you know yeah i can post on social media but i'm not allowed to delete anything on my phone and they are allowed to check my phone i'm allowed i have to let them check my phone which is fine there's nothing on there you know that they're they're gonna find how do they do that will they come over and check it or no they've just i just when i go into probation i just open my phone and they might scroll through my facebook or what have you to make sure you know how often do you have to check in at the minute every two weeks it was every week now it's they've done it every two You have to go and check in every week for a deleted post.
11:21And, yeah, I'm on licence. That's until March 2027. I have to do this. Is there anything you can't say? No, as in as long as it's legal. Right. Yeah. And I've had this discussion with them. I'm like, I'm not prepared to shut up, if that makes sense. You know, as long as whatever I'm saying is legal and not derogatory, etc. I can say what I like because, believe it or not, we do have free speech in this country. Oh, you think we do? Well, we don't, no. But we're supposed to, aren't we? And you can't shut people down just because you don't like their opinion. It's disgusting. How have we got to this stage in the UK where if somebody doesn't like what you're saying, if they don't agree with what you're saying, they want you cancelled.
12:03And not only do they want you cancelled, they go after your family. They go after your children. They go after your businesses. They stop at nothing. And who's they? The people that I would call them extreme lefties. I wouldn't even say lefties because like my family are all lefties, you know, they're all northern and my mum's a lefty. But she certainly wouldn't dream of, you know, seeking out something somebody had said that she didn't like and finding out where they worked and going to their employer and make, you know, this started quite a while ago. This did, you know, this cancel culture where it happened to a friend of mine on Twitter as well.
12:36he's got his own business and they sort out they he's got an anonymous account but you know they managed to find out who he was and where he worked and then they were you know making malicious claims about his business and all because his politics don't align with yours give your head a wobble wow really are you really that nasty that you would you know people jeering at me that you She deserved to go to prison. And my family deserved that, did they? My daughter deserved to be without her mummy for over a year and struggle the way she struggled. You people are abhorrent. That's all I've got to say to you.
13:17There's just this culture now, especially with social media, of people going after people. And that's how I feel, what happened to me. The people that didn't like me. Unless they didn't like me, they didn't know me. I know they just think they don't like you don't know you know they didn't like a couple of your tweets or yeah I don't know I mean I'm sure you've had it yourself you know you're successful you've done well for yourself have you ever had anybody attack you or yes slander you that of course but are they in a position where they've done better than you in life no there you go there's your question no haters are ever doing better than you because successful people are too busy to hate on others and i and i see this and they know what it takes and i've noticed this quite a lot just recently you know like just from observing after i've come out and i just think why are you attacking that guy why because he's got a better car than you more money in his bank that didn't and the way i see it it's like good luck to you you might be envious you might think oh i'd love that house oh i'd love that car but there's a big difference between envy and jealousy isn't there and wow I just we've just become such a hateful culture right now you know like why why not wish people well and it's okay to say I don't agree with that person and move on you don't have to go to such extents to you know try and ruin people or slander people not just me but just people in general because you don't like what they say yeah I'd say tough shit and I don't like lots of things that lots of people say, but I scroll on, you know.
14:55Yeah, I've spoken out in defence of people who've been cancelled. And one of the reasons I wanted to talk to you, it's not even relevant if I agree or disagree. If people are being cancelled and imprisoned for their opinion and it isn't breaking the law, if you don't stand up for that, regardless of their opinion, then you will be next. I think this is what happened with me. I think everybody shit themselves and went, oh, God. That could be me. Yeah, that could be everyone. And everybody kind of recoiled, didn't they, on social media and stuff and then thought, you know what, they're going to come knocking on my door.
15:34But then they win, don't they, if that happens. And it's such a fine line, isn't it? Because I am sorry for what I tweeted. I shouldn't have tweeted it. But I also do not agree that I was treated fairly, you know, and I do not and I never will believe that we should be sending anybody to jail for a social media post. Maybe if it was like a campaign of hate that had gone on for a long time, different circumstances, that's why we have the Malicious Communications Act, isn't it? So I've got a question for you. Yeah. If Keir Starmer was sitting here, what would you say? What would I say? I'm not sure I'd want to sit next to him.
16:15But if he was? I took contempt for him. If he was, I would just ask him what he thinks he's actually achieving right now. I mean, let's not, he is, he must be the world's most, you know, the country's most hated. He certainly is in my time. Even people that voted for him that I know are like, what have I done? The return of the sausages, the hostages. I think that Priest-Darmer is absolutely attempting to control the mainstream media. Like, you look at the fact that he wants the off-communists, as I call them, this is the state regulator of the media in the United Kingdom, effectively the body that actually ended up being the final straw that got me cancelled from GB News.
16:57They want to stop Nigel Farage being able to present on GB News, for example, so there's a whole load of control of the mainstream media going on. But actually what they're most concerned about and what they most want to shut down is this revolution, right? So it's disruptors, it's outspoken, but it's also, Rob, and probably they view these guys as more of a threat. It's the citizen journalists that are on the ground covering the hotel migrant protests, covering what's going on with migrants up and down the country, actually going into the HMOs where they live, going into the hospitals where they're being treated.
17:37And they want to delegitimize that type of journalism, which is, I believe, revealing the truth. And so there's a whole load of things that are being done to try and shut down free speech in this country. There's like libel tourism, abuse of the libel laws, which makes it very impossible for someone to risk speaking out about a rich person, for example. there's um huge pressure being put on the social media giants to shut down free speech and when people challenged Starmer over this he literally said well if you don't agree with my censorship then I believe that you're a supporter of pedophiles and and you're a supporter of Jimmy Savile he literally said that I mean that's not an exaggeration and it's nuts because what people are doing is they are hiding behind trying to protect children as a way to actually shut down genuine debate.
18:36I mean, we've seen it with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle too, for example, because they fundamentally want to shut down their critics, right, on social media, people like me, people like Piers Morgan, they don't want us speaking out. So they've pretended, oh, no, but the reason we want this censorship is because we have to protect our children. And obviously, there are tragic cases about what's happened with children being bullied via social media. But the solution is not censorship for all. Okay, the solution is not the Online Safety Act, because what it's actually doing, Rob, is encouraging censorship of difficult conversations important conversations conversations like the ones we're having now aimed at adult because there's a chance a child might view it well I'm sorry that's not good enough for me I'm a free speech absolutist we've got to have these conversations and by the way kids are going to find this stuff whether they like it or not and all this so-called censorship is doing is driving them into the grips of the dark web which is far far worse than anything that you might find on YouTube.
19:51So the solution for all of these losers, these people who are losing the argument, whether it's Keir Starmer, whether it's Harry and Meghan, is let's censor things. Let's take away free speech and let's cover up why we're really doing this by saying, oh, we want to protect the kids. Well, we all want to protect the kids. We all do. But as you know, kids have always been bullied in a whole load of horrendous ways. Technology is now the latest way being used, but it's not an excuse to take away free speech. And what about like these, what, 12 ,000 arrests, is it? And, you know, people even going to prison for social media posts?
20:34I mean, I guess you must think that's pretty ridiculous. I mean, it's insane. I mean, we have more arrests for social media posts than despot countries like Russia. I mean, it's absolutely not. So we're becoming a communist country then? Well, I think we are. And I think we're becoming an authoritarian country. And I don't really think that any of the arguments that people in power make about, oh, no, you know, we don't get involved in the justice system stand anymore. Because trust me, I mean, I followed very closely the case of Lucy Connolly, who was the grieving mother who was jailed for 31 months because of one post on X on the night of the Southport massacre, which she deleted, by the way.
21:21She went out for a walk with the dog. She deleted the post within hours. She was locked up for 31 months. There were loads of extenuating circumstances in her case. the fact that she had lost her son because of NHS neglect, her baby son, and so she was traumatized by seeing what Axel Rudakabana did in that Taylor Swift dance class. But even if that wasn't the case, she posted something which some people were offended by. Yeah, I don't think it was violent in any way. It was maybe unpleasant. But she was not only locked up for 31 months, the whole justice system was designed, Rob, to come down on her like a ton of bricks to provide a warning to the rest of us, us mere mortals.
22:06Be careful what you post because you could end up being like Lucy Connolly. So she was in remand. She was not a threat to anyone. I mean, we've literally seen Jihad Al Shami, right, who is our most recent Islamist terrorist who attempted to blow himself up at a synagogue in Manchester, but failed. However, did still see two people killed as a result of his terror attack. And he was out on bail for rape. Clearly a dangerous man, right? An Islamist extremist on bail for rape. Lucy Connolly behind bars locked up over a long period of time for a post on X. It was insanity. We all know it was insanity.
22:54But I think all of this is designed to try and send a chilling warning to everyone. Just don't say what you're thinking. And that's a dangerous society. Don't you think? If you feel something, if you see something happening around you, but you think, oh, I can't say this. I can't say this. I've got kids. I might get locked up. And I see that going on. I see so many people who are too scared or who say to me, oh, Dan, you're brave. And it's like, what a crazy thing to say. I'm a journalist. You know, I'm a long-term journalist who worked in the mainstream and just believes in revealing the truth.
23:32There should be nothing brave about that. But we're living in a country where journalists have actually been targeted. I think what keeps happening, Rob, is the police take on these cases, think they're doing the right thing and then are immediately freaked out by the backlash but the problem is when it's not Katie Hopkins when it's not Alison Pearson when it's not Graham Linehan the problem is when it's you and you're arrested and no one is speaking up for you yeah because Lucy Connolly became the public face of what was I believe the most revolting attempt to stun British patriots into silence.
24:12And probably the case that was most upsetting to me was that of Peter Lynch, who was the father of, I think, four good family man who had been a protester, and he'd been an anti-establishment protester in the United Kingdom for many years. So he'd protested against Brexit, he'd protested against COVID, he believed in the deep state, he believed that the government were not looking out for its people. Loads of things that I believe, and he was on the streets and he had his signs and this is what he did. This was his way to express his democratic right to free expression. And after the Southport massacre, he found himself and obviously he chose to go there at one of the protests outside a migrant hotel.
24:53But I've seen the police body cam footage, Rob, and I've read the court transcripts. And there is absolutely no suggestion that Peter Lynch was at all violent towards any police officer. He called them scum. he said that they were protecting child killers. Now, I struggled to see how him saying that was anything other than factual. Again, some people might find it offensive, some people might find it inappropriate, but it was his opinion based on what he'd seen in regards to the Southport massacre. Anyway, he was locked up, pleaded guilty, which was a crazy decision, but of course, everyone was virtually forced into pleading guilty because they were remanded in custody and told, if you don't plead guilty you're going to get an even longer jail sentence but his jail sentence was insane I believe it was over two years and he is said to have killed himself in prison the details of this case are so disturbing to me because we're not being told the whole truth about what happened most recently we've learned via one of the hearings of his inquest that the day before his death, he had been charged with a crime behind bars in prison.
26:08But we're not able to know what that was. And remember, Martin Brunt, who is the crime correspondent for Sly News, had reported that so-called right-wing protesters like Peter Lynch were going to be targeted by Muslim gangs in prison. And so Peter Lynch lost his life for expressing his democratic right to protest against the regime. And this happened to a whole load of people. Most of their cases are forgotten and their lives have been destroyed. And it just is meant to provide a warning shot to all of us. Were you arrested recently? was it just a caution where you were arrested? What really happened?
26:57I was sent a letter in early, I'm going to say May, April, May, at the start of my last tour is to frame the reference on it. And it said, reason to believe, speech that is against, I want to say section 230, but I don't know the correct one, something to do with offensive speech on my Katie's arms, which is my pub night that I run every Friday, glass of wine, put the world to right. lots of people join in have a laugh at me and so I had two choices on the letter one which I can send to you actually that'd be helpful one is to be arrested and two is to come in interview under caution and I've been through this before in the past as you can imagine the choices are come in and talk to us and it being recorded as a serious matter that could that will be the file they put together to send to the CPS to see if they can charge you or we'll come and arrest you.
27:54So I pushed back because I was trying to say, I'm not, I'm not going to do it. But equally, I had a tour and knowing how police work, especially with me, that would be the start of a tour, a thousand seater audience, and I'd be arrested on stage. It wouldn't be done politely or discreetly or helpfully to me. So I worked with Free Speech Union. We agreed I would come in at the end of the tour so I knew that I would be able to I wouldn't fail any of my audience which I refused to do and um I tried to I rewrote the statement the free speech union helped me draft a correct statement I drafted what I wanted to say which was a couple of sentences and much more rough punchy and it was agreed that if I was going to have free speech help me which I'm very grateful to Toby and the team that we would have a compromise.
28:44So we got it down to one page. And I went in there of my own free will at an agreed time. I was taken to a room by two bints from Devon and Cornwall police and Dorset. So the whole of the south of England. CID, which I said the other day was chief inspectors division. It's not. It's criminal investigation division. Whatever. They said, I just see it. That's all I see is the clown car into a room. And then they begin the recording. And then you have to, I was interviewed for an hour and a half in criminal proceedings. What did they ask you? Well, because I called myself a spaz. So what did the, but what was the accusation?
29:29The accusation is that I caused offence, perceived offence to others. by self-depreciating by calling myself a spaz on my Katie's Arms which is a live Instagram feed that you would have to I'm not standing like outside here on the street corner with a megaphone going I'm a spaz maybe you're a spaz right which is effectively the stuff I was doing I was being Joey Deacon this won't be a reference you know but no I am actually disabled you just did it again though yeah I have a disabled card yeah and on the train this morning So I buy a ticket with a disabled card because you get a really good discount.
30:08Right. And then when they come down, they say tickets, all tickets passes, please. I try and act as spaz as I can to challenge them, to challenge them to see if they'll ask for my disabled card. So when they come up and go tickets passes, I go with my phone and then to challenge that, go on, ask me for my disabled card. And typically they don't. One has. I do this to get it. So it's my gag with myself. You know I'm missing half my head. I am a spaz. I tell people be more weird. Take up more space. Be as odd as you can be because so many more people will find a place to fit in under your wings if you're weird, regardless.
30:49So an hour and a half in Devon and Cornwall Police, in a cell thing, being recorded. And then she had questions after questions. Do you realise how offensive the word spaz is? Do you realise by calling yourself a spaz, you're causing offence to other people. You had a glass of wine in your hand. Do you drink often? Would you consider yourself a drunk? Are you a drunk and a spaz? At which point I just lost it. There was loads of times in that. And what I'm trying to get, and I promise you, if I get it, I will give it to you before I release it, whether you want to use it or not. And you can have first refusal.
31:25But we are trying to get the recording of me in that interview under caution, because with a good edit on that there I mean there is a whole stand-up routine in that I mean some of the questions you tell is it acceptable to take the piss out of yourself you know just for an hour and a half truly unbelievable and then at the end she stopped the recording and then warned me not to talk about any of this because it might cause me more problems than I already had so do you think they're going to come for you again so no so then because the process is the punishment so you send the early letter in may then we agree okay katie will come in in august i go in in august and then uh august september october november we just heard i don't know was it a week ago so then end of november oh there's no charges so you have to wait three months to see if the cps the crown prosecution service will decide is it chargeable i mean how much money must that have cost must have cost tens of thousands of pounds tens and tens of thousands of pounds it was done ahead of the unite the kingdom rally in the uk because they knew i would be a speaker i think it's always a warning shot across your bow to say, wind your neck in, trying to intimidate you out of being the speaker, because maybe you'll be arrested on the day.
32:53And then what you have to remember for people that think, well, it's Katie, she's used to it, it's Katie, she's used to it. You know, in my private life, I have family and children and things. So you are then prepared. When the door knocks, you're prepared. So I immediately remove myself. The children know not to answer the door. If they do answer the door, I'm not there. You are, the knock on the door becomes something. It's not a nothing. I'm not afraid of being arrested, but it's not a nothing when it's in your home. So it has impacts for sure. But I'm out using this word spaz as much as I can because I feel like it's a reclaiming thing, right?
33:33We have to reclaim language, the right to self-deprecate. I would never stand in the street and go, spaz, someone, unless it was a mate. So was this targeted? You got targeted? Yeah, 100%. I think before Unite the Kingdom rally, there would have been some sort of missive going out, you know, get the heads down. Like in military terms, you fire shots where you vaguely think the enemy is to get their heads down in order that you can move forward. So that would be what happened there. Just a scattergun, get the heads down, hope she pulls out, you know, take away the noise from Unite the Kingdom. That would be my interpretation.
Read the full transcript
34:07Wow. And we've just had Lucy Connolly on the show. Oh, bless her. And she got four years. Like people don't know this because she wasn't in for four years. She got four years for a tweet. And she said that the person who was being tried before her was convicted of GBH, had a balaclava, used a crowbar and got two years. And she got four years for a tweet. And she believed it came from Kia Starmer. For sure. It was a directive. What do you think about that? Because sometimes I think, OK, well, maybe they needed to control the riots and make a few examples. I'd love to be naive. I think we're all treated fairly, but we're obviously not.
34:50Could that there have been a revolution then? And then part of me thinks it's completely unfair and ridiculous and it's just a surveillance state. What do you think? Yeah, I think Lucy Connolly is absolutely correct. I think at that time they saw that those riots or the flare up could have become a nationwide riot. I absolutely think that moment was there. You know, everybody was ready. It could have absolutely become nationwide an uprising against the government and illegals attacking our kids. So they had to take an immediate and draconian action. They let out rapists and paedophiles and the rest of it to make space.
35:25There's no way you would have got those individuals into court at that rate if it wasn't a government directive, because as you all know, the wait list for court system is two years plus. And then for them to be sentencing individuals at the rate that they sentenced them at the seriousness of the sentencing was a message out to everyone else. The same idea, as I was just explaining, get your heads down, you know, fire across the fire across and take out, you know, some of the major players and the others will put their heads down because they don't want it happening to them. So absolutely, I think that's what Lucy got.
35:58And I think she's done very well to come out of it sane and speaking up. Do you think it's right that that happened? It's absolute insanity that that's happened. The thing that gives me secret comfort is that Keir Starmer, of course, comes from the legal profession. You know, he was chief prosecutor when grooming gangs were widely ignored. the fact that the legal hierarchy no longer exists. Barristers don't exist anymore because of AI. Legal is gone. Judges even are gone. So there is a time coming where it isn't humans controlled by a government that's going to be dispensing law. So there is a future moment of hope.
36:41But I absolutely think that came directly from Keir Starmer. And some of us will just have to take the punishment. Lucy took it. The other guys took it. The guy that didn't make it out of prison that killed himself in there. Well, yeah, he didn't. He takes the punishment but didn't get to survive it. I'll take it. You know, that's just going to be the price you pay for being visible at the pointy end of things. Well, where does that end then? Well, where we're going, which I think is not a good place. I mean, I've always believed that Britain has never had free speech. It seems to be worse now just because there's social media.
37:15but I lived in America for 10 years where you literally do have free speech. You can say anything you like. I remember one night, look, Spurs player who had a heart attack. I can't remember his name. He was a black guy anyway. And he had a heart attack on the pitch. Luckily, there was a doctor in the house and they managed to save him and they defibrillated him and all the rest of it. And obviously, it was a big story and people were tweeting about it and how brave he was and how great he was. And there was this one particular guy, I remember, and he was in Texas. making really horrible kind of racist posts about, you know, I wish he died and all this kind of stuff, you know.
37:51And people were like, you know, mate, you've got to stop this. You know, we're going to send the police, they're going to come around. And the guy just went, police aren't coming to my house in America. They don't have control over what I say. I can say what I like. And he's right. And what do you think about that? Again, it's not pleasant. But I don't think the state should have a role, unless you're breaking the law. and you might argue that he was breaking a law here if he was saying racist things, that you're not going to go halfway across the world to arrest somebody for breaking the law in your country.
38:24For example, I know a lot of people have re-registered their Twitter accounts in Germany for some reason. Apparently you get more protection if you do that. I'm not quite sure why. I'm not aware of the ins and outs of all that. But so it's a very complicated kind of area. You know what I mean? and because of what we could see happening it seems to me that you're much more free to speak out whatever your opinion is in America than you are here. So with mainstream media, we seem to have a lot of disruption to it. GB News is kind of a disruptor because I guess it's more independent media. Podcasters are now bigger than the BBC, a lot of them.
39:04Do you think this is a good thing? Oh, I think the more the better generally. Yeah, because for... Because you have room for more voices. more discussion and debate. And it allows people to think critically. And I'm noticing something really, really interesting happening, which is more younger people becoming engaged in the kind of conversations that we're having. More younger people now have got the ability to consume the kinds of media that you were talking about there, which allows them to think more critically and allows them to think differently at times and then also have more conviction in their views and beliefs if that challenges the mainstream narrative as well.
39:43So I think that's a really, really good thing. I don't think you can have enough of that. And for too long, really, people were reliant on one or two major sources of news, which was basically the BBC. And then, you know, what do you want to add the other one in there? I suppose Sky News or Channel 4 News or whatever, that cohort of people there. And now I think people are realising that you actually can't trust them to tell you the truth. And it's about time that that was called out. Because just think about the level of power that they have, undiluted power that they have had just forever since they existed.
40:27The BBC... And we pay for that privilege. We pay for the privilege, yeah. If everyone is watching either the BBC or Sky News and they both parrot the same line at you, then we're all getting the same line. And for a lot of people who've got busy lives, who've got other jobs, who maybe just consume an hour of news a day and aren't obsessed with it, maybe in a way that we are, you know, don't live and breathe it. That's just what they get. So fair enough to them. They just take what they see at face value. They just go, they let it wash over them. They're like, oh, that's the news. That's the fact then.
41:02And then they go, actually, a lot of the time it's not. Or there is another narrative to it, or there is another way of looking at it. So now we're having more voices like GB News. I think that it allows people to think more critically, to look at things in a slightly different way, to question that established narrative, to question what they really think about things as well. Go, hang on a minute, now I've seen it from this perspective. Do I think that? Do I disagree? And the thing that the establishment media cannot handle, it's the main reason I think why they want to shut GB News down, is because we can hold a mirror up now to their coverage.
41:36So I will unashamedly go on my show and we'll pick a news story of the day and I'll go, right, this is what happened. Do you want to see how the BBC covered it? And once you see it like that, you kind of can't unsee it. It's the subtle bias from the BBC as well. It's like their story selection. I mean, they've not really gone big on the China thing. I think until recently, they hadn't even mentioned the China Spice scandal. you know and you know things like the grooming gags i've used this example quite a bit so if people have seen me say this before apologies but i want to say it again the telford grooming gang scandal at the time was the uk's largest ever grooming gang scandal the largest ever and the bbc initially only reported it on their website on their local shropshire page so if you wanted to find out about the uk's largest ever grooming gang scandal you would have had to have gone on the BBC website, clicked Shropshire, and then scrolled down a bit and then have found it.
42:34You know, that's pretty... Whereas GB News, we weren't around at the time, but obviously then we've kind of been leading the charge when it comes to the grooming gang stuff. So you can see now their stories by omission, says a lot of their buyers. And they can't get away with it anymore because we're here, you're here, other outlets are here. We talk about some of these things. They can't get away with it anymore and they hate it and that's why they want to shut us down, really. That's flattering, isn't it? Yeah, it is. Yeah. I mean, well, it is. This is the thing. If you're on irrelevance and inconvenience, I mean, it's one of those things, you know.
43:07I mean, I wasn't at GVD's when it first launched. I don't know. I think I maybe came a few months after it and everything. But it's gone through phases, hasn't it, where initially the establishment just laughed at it. And then they kind of became a bit more sinister about, oh, you know, oh, it's just a bit rubbish, isn't it? and then it gradually became a thing of we need to shut this down. And you think, well, if we weren't having an impact and you weren't scared of us and we weren't potentially putting out a business, like I think we will do to Sky News, I think we'll put them out of business.
43:41Really? Sky News needs to go early. They have got, I think, what is it, another year or so on their broadcasting licence, I think I'm right in saying. People don't talk about that enough. They're losing a lot of money. They're losing a lot of money. Why carry on? I mean, they're a distant third now. So GB News is the top, the nation's number one news channel in terms of viewership and has been now for three months in a row. And I hope we're about to bring up the fourth month. So it's us and BBC News Channel and then Sky News. Well, if you're looking at spreadsheets over in wherever the head office is over there and you've only really got another couple of years or whatever it is on your licence, why not save yourselves a couple of hundred million pounds and just go early go early what's the point you're not going to win it's over it's finished so just go um and then that leaves us in the bieb doesn't it and that's exactly where we want to be i think exactly where i want to be anyway come on let's have it i mean these people that have seriously you know people have suffered enough i'm bang up for the fight and i i'm glad that people sneered at me and at gb news when we started because I've kept the receipts.
44:54Absolutely. And I cannot wait. We are building an audience, a huge audience of people who really value what we do. And crucially, we value them. Right. I don't go around to places and talk down to people. If I want to go and do a news report, when people invite me into their front room and give me a cup of tea or something, and some of them might, you know, these are just nice, ordinary people who might speak a bit or use the odd little, you know, kind of fruity turn of phrase every now and again, but it doesn't make them a bad person. You know, I love that. I love that kind of stuff. Real people.
45:31I like that kind of thing. We don't go and sneer at these people, you know. So it's about time that there was a news channel that represented you common man and woman. And, you know, like I said, you know, I'm bang up for the fight.
46:15This episode was brought to you by Disruptive Media. helping bold entrepreneurs stand out through podcasting, video, and social content. Visit disruptivemedia.co.uk to learn more.
From the publisher
From midnight arrests for offensive memes to the chilling reality of 31-month prison sentences for a single tweet, this episode exposes a nation at a breaking point.
While the cancelled and outspoken gather to reveal how the UK’s justice system is being weaponised as a political tool, one mother shares the harrowing story of losing a year of her life over a deleted post. As the line between social media and state control dissolves, we ask the ultimate question: in a country governed by fear and censorship, is anyone truly free to speak their mind?
BEST MOMENTS
"I got 31 months in total for a tweet... People that went out in the riots, there was a guy sentenced... he’d gone out with crowbars and balaclavas... he got 20 months. He got less than me, and he’d physically hurt people."
"The police force have been compromised politically. They’re being used as a political tool. Fancy the government sending a policeman around your house because you’ve said something on social media—five of them!"
"If people are being cancelled and imprisoned for their opinion and it isn't breaking the law, if you don't stand up for that regardless of their opinion, then you will be next."
Exclusive community & resources:
For more EXCLUSIVE & unfiltered content to make, manage & multiply more money, join our private online education platform: Money.School → https://money.school
And if you’d like to meet 7 & 8 figure entrepreneurs, & scale to 6, 7 or 8 figures in your business or personal income, join us at our in-person Money Maker Summit Event (including EXCLUSIVE millionaire guests/masterminds sessions) → https://robmoore.live/mms
🔗 CONNECT WITH ROB
📸 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/robmooreprogressive/?locale=en_GB
📸 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/robmooreprogressive/
👨💻 Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/robmoore1979?originalSubdomain=uk
🌍 Website: https://robmoore.com/
🎙 A NOTE FOR THE #DISRUPTORS:
The world is on the edge of a revolution. Wealth, power & information are being disrupted.
Mainstream media is dying. Your freedom is being challenged. Your money is being debased. #Disruptors & Rob Moore asks the questions others dare not to ask. Disruptive & diverse guests speak out on topical world issues & their areas of success & influence. As the world has changed, Disruptors has evolved to diverse global movers, shakers & change makers who stand out & speak up.
Want to start your own podcast? Get in touch - Disruptive Media. https://disruptivemedia.co.uk/
If you don’t risk anything, you risk everything.




