In short
Good Bad Billionaire: Episode Summary - Bernard Arnault: The Wolf in Cashmere
Episode Overview This episode of Good Bad Billionaire focuses on Bernard Arnault, the CEO of luxury brand conglomerate LVMH (Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy), detailing his rise to becoming one of the richest people in the world. The hosts, journalist Zing Tsjeng and BBC business editor Simon Jack, analyze his background, business decisions, and the ethical implications of his wealth.
Key Highlights
Background of Bernard Arnault
- Origin: Born in 1949 to a wealthy industrialist family in France. His family had significant influence, with his grandfather owning a construction company.
- Early Aspirations: Initially aimed to be a concert pianist but was directed towards business.
- Business Start: Joined the family firm, Férinel, at 22 and began major restructuring, leading to his first million dollars by selling off parts of the company focused on holiday homes.
Business Trajectory
- Shift to Luxury: Encountered success after moving back to France and purchasing the failing Boussac group, which owned Christian Dior.
- Hostile Takeover: Gained control over LVMH through strategic share purchases, ousting key players in a dramatic corporate maneuver, earning the nickname "the Wolf in Cashmere."
- Expansion: Under his leadership, LVMH acquired numerous high-profile brands, including Tiffany & Co., Givenchy, and Fenty.
Financial Acumen
- Wealth: Currently estimated at $220 billion, trading places with Elon Musk for the title of the richest person globally.
- Market Strategy: Pioneered a method of democratizing luxury, making it accessible to a broader audience through strategically important products like bags, accessories, and cosmetics.
Key Discussions
Ethical Considerations
- Ruthlessness: Arnault has been characterized as ruthless, exemplified by his aggressive business tactics, including selling off employees and assets to maintain control and profitability.
- Philanthropy: While he has made significant donations, such as to the Notre Dame reconstruction and various health initiatives, his contributions are often seen as minimal relative to his immense wealth.
Legacy and Power
- Cultural Impact: Recognized for reshaping the luxury fashion landscape, but questions arise about whether he will be remembered as a visionary or simply a conglomerate operator.
- Succession: With all five of his children involved in LVMH, discussions around succession and the future of the brand are prevalent, hinting at a competitive and intense family dynamic.
Scoring Bernard Arnault
The hosts assess Arnault based on various criteria
- Wealth: 10/10 - One of the richest individuals globally.
- Rags to Riches: 5-7/10 - Born into privilege but expanded significantly.
- Villainy: 8/10 - Noted for ruthless business practices.
- Philanthropy: 2-3/10 - Considered modest relative to wealth.
- Power: 4-5/10 - Holds significant industry influence but less active in public affairs.
- Legacy: 3-8/10 - Mixed opinions on lasting impact within the fashion industry.
Conclusion The episode reflects on Bernard Arnault's complex persona, assessing him as a "bad" billionaire due to his cutthroat business tactics and limited philanthropy, despite the impressive growth and cultural influence of LVMH.
Next Episode Teaser The hosts tease the upcoming episode featuring Kim Kardashian, discussing her unique path to wealth and influence through her fame and ventures in the beauty and fashion industry.
---
For more insights and discussions, listeners are encouraged to engage via email or social media, sharing their thoughts on whether they view billionaires like Arnault as good, bad, or just another billionaire.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK. Hey Ryan, that was a fast trip. It was like you teleported. Yeah, just got in. I'll get all my expenses logged, I promise. Oh no, you're okay. SAP Concur uses advanced AI, so your expense report will practically write itself. Quite the breakthrough. It's like we've been teleported into the future. Alright. So, just curious, would you give us written permission to convert your matter into energy patterns and reassemble you at, say, random travel destinations? Margaret, are you building a teleporter? No. Yes. SAP Concur helps your business move forward faster.
0:34Learn more at concur.com.
1:01You stream the best of British TV with Britbox. Watch with a free trial today.
1:10Hello there. The world of golf has got a lot going on in the moment. So what you need is a podcast which keeps you on top of all those important issues, but also throws in obscure 1980s television references or ponders why no babies are called Nigel anymore. So join me, Andrew Cotter, with regular guest Ian Carter and Eddie Pepperill, the philosopher player who gives us the insight from life on tour. And it has a pun for a title. What more could you want? Probably a lot more, but that's all you're getting. The Chipping Forecast. Listen on BBC Sounds.
2:02Welcome to Good Bad Billionaire. Each episode, we pick a billionaire and then we find out how they made their money. Then we judge them. Are they good, bad or just another billionaire? My name is Zing Zing and I'm a journalist, author and podcaster. And I'm Simon Jack and I'm the BBC's business editor. And this week we are talking about none other than the wolf in Kashmir. Bernard Arnault. You said that so much nicer than I did. I'll know the chairman of LVMH, Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy, a huge conglomerate, a house of brands. You may not know LVMH, but you will know some of the stuff they own.
2:38You'll know brands like Louis Vuitton, Hennessy, Christian Dior, Givenchy, but you'll also probably have heard of brands like Sephora, Tiffany's, Marc Jacobs, Kenzo, Celine. Famously, they say in Paris that all roads lead to Arnaud. They're like what I call the Diageo of fashion. Diageo owns like Johnny Walker and Gordon's Gin. It's a house of brands so that the actual conglomerate itself is not as well known as the stuff that it sells. And his current family fortune is estimated at$220 billion, which basically means he spent the last year trading places with Elon Musk as the richest man in the world.
3:14Yeah, one week he's the richest, the next one it's Elon's. But he's very much at the very top of our billionaire tree. and you wouldn't be surprised if you don't know what he looks like i mean i have to confess that even though i know his name i actually had no idea what he looked like before this episode yeah he's 74 years old now been in the business since he was in his well early 20s yeah um should we do some numbers yes let's do some numbers lvmh has got 75 luxury brands you've run through a few of them some of the biggest ones tiffany kenzo mark jacobs christian dior there's a name that will come up a lot in this podcast.
3:49It's very much his rosebud. It's his through line, the inspiration for everything he does. Also, he likes to tell people. He likes the finer things in life himself, which is appropriate enough. He likes modern art. He owns work by Picasso, Basquiat, Hearst, Warhol, many more. He even built his own museum, the Louis Vuitton Foundation in Paris. It was designed by Frank Gehry, a famous architect and cost more than 100 million euros. And when he started out, he didn't want to be the richest man in the world. He wanted to be concert pianist and wooed one of his wives with a rendition of Chopin's Etude.
4:23Honestly, that is the most French thing I've heard. He's also a big tennis fan. And one year, his children bought him a game of tennis with Roger Federer, who was then at the peak of his powers. And he won a point, which is pretty good. That is pretty good against what many people consider the greatest tennis player of all time. Let's have a listen to the man himself. This is him talking to The Clothes Show on the BBC in 1998. We have a very, in the group, a very entrepreneurial spirit. The group is managed not like a bureaucracy, but like a federation of entrepreneurs, each of them being run by an entrepreneur.
5:08And so we motivate our team as a team of entrepreneurs I wanted to go beyond the last achievement always. Not very French. As George Bush famously and hilariously once said, the French don't even have a word for entrepreneur. It's also not very fashion. I mean, I actually used to work in fashion magazines and there was always this constant tension between, you know, fashion is full of creative, artistic people who need to be kind of coddled and be given a creative channel to express themselves. And you come up against this hard-nosed, but fashion also has to make tons and tons and tons of money.
5:51And I think LVMH kind of epitomizes that, you know. Because I've never understood fashion about how people spend so much money, how these places are worth so much cash. And one person said to me, he said that they make it all from belts, shades, all those kind of like staple handbags. That's where the money gets made. Well, this is the other thing. So I think that there's a whole kind of class dynamic in how people approach fashion, right? So the people who make these gorgeous clothes would like to think, you know, Duchess so-and-so is wearing it and that's what gives it value. But actually, what Arnaud did with LVMH is he started realising you could democratise fashion.
6:26So you might not be a duchess, but you can afford a little leather belt or a little leather key ring or a lipstick. And you're bringing fashion and luxury to the masses. And that's how they made loads of their money. Yeah. But let's listen in this podcast. We know this form by now. We go back to basics and we take them from zero to a million when they make the first million. Then we go from a million to a billion. And then we look back on their career and judge them on a variety of criteria. Are they good? Are they bad? So let's start at the beginning.
6:59Bernard. OK, you can you should say his name because. Bernard Arnault. So good. I mean, so French. He has a very conventional upper class French upbringing. So he's born into a wealthy industrialist family. He plays piano and has tennis lessons. And his maternal grandfather owns a construction company called Ferret Savinal that his father takes over when Bernard is just a baby. Yeah, I think they describe themselves as petit bourgeois. Yes. So he's probably always destined to go into business, right? And his mother enjoys fashion and is a particular fan of Christiane Dior. Remember that name? Yeah.
7:36And she wore Christian Dior perfume. She wore Diorissimo, which you can still buy. I actually look this up. It's£84. He's a family man, though. He spent a lot of time with his grandparents. And apparently after his grandfather dies, he asked to move in with his grandmother because she was lonely. So he's clearly quite family oriented, right? Yeah. And being family oriented, even though he wanted to be a pianist, it looked destined that he was going to join the family business. Funnily enough, I think, as we'll see, he doesn't tend to treat non-family business partners very seriously. No. So his grandmother pushes him to join the family firm, which he does as a 22-year-old in 1971.
8:16He was born in 1949. He marries a little later. They've got two children, Delphine and Antoine, and they will all follow him into business. I think all his children from both marriages are actually in the family business now. Yeah, all five of them. Yeah. So he starts work at this Ferré-Savinel, and within three years he's running the place. I mean, so his father is technically the chairman but his son is kind of at the age of what, in his early 20s, running things. Yeah, and they called it a small company. By standards of LVMH now it was, but it's still got 1 ,000 employees. He's in charge at 25.
8:51Can you imagine a 25-year-old managing 1 ,000 people? I don't think I could manage a herd of cats when I was 25. No, me neither. So his grandmother gives him shares, which makes him a significant shareholder. That will be part of his modus operandi to get hold of the company to exert control. Yeah. I mean, so if you own the majority of shares in a company, you basically get the quarter shots, right? Well, you usually would be, you know, you'd certainly have a seat on the board. If it was a significant shareholding, you might even be nominated as chairman, as he in fact was eventually. But anyway, so he's in effective control.
9:25And then he starts making some big moves. In 1976, he sells off bits of this business. So the family business, in a stroke, goes from 1 ,000 employees down to 20. Now, his share of the proceeds of that sale make him a millionaire. So Bernard is a millionaire. So he's made his first million. He starts refocusing the company entirely and going into, in a way, a new direction into real estate. And he also renames the company. So he compresses the name into Ferronel. And so no longer about construction, about real estate. So he was basically selling what we used to know in the 80s and 90s as timeshare apartments, which is like a kind of part ownership of a holiday home somewhere.
10:08That was a big thing in the 80s. I didn't grow up with timeshare. So what are they? Do you just agree to occupy this holiday home between August and September and someone else occupies it in June to July? Exactly right. There might be several parties all by a certain number of weeks. so you share the cost of a holiday home. So he succeeds by selling one house in 1978. By 1979, 100 houses. By 1980, he sold 1 ,000. So this is his first big success. It is. So by 1980, he's showing his taste for the finer things in life, for luxury. He buys himself a plane for business travel, is living a luxury lifestyle, starts a mini chain of restaurants.
10:50That doesn't work out, so he sells that off. Often the thing we've seen about billionaires, Not everything they do works out, but they dust themselves off and have another go. And this is a period of him dusting himself off and having another go, because Britain and the US are getting more pro-business and capitalist. You know, this is a time of Thatcher and Reagan. But in 1981 in France, things are going a different direction. François Mitterrand comes in as president. He's a socialist. Some business people take a sharp intake of breath and he doesn't do that. He just leaves. Yeah, he just peps up his stuff in a private plane and just goes to Quebec, of all places.
11:28Yeah, Quebec and Canada to expand his holiday home business beyond France. His company, Ferinel, it turns out the houses they're used to building, people aren't wanting to buy. So he upsticks again and moves to New York State. And the franc at this point is actually quite strong against the dollar. So he's got a bit of buying power. And he opens an office on the 45th floor of the Rockefeller Center. I don't know if you've ever been to the Rockefeller Center. No, but it's pretty bougie, isn't it? Yeah. One of the things you do in New York is go to the top of the rock. And appropriately enough, because Rockefeller, of course, the ultimate billionaire, in today's money, he'd be richer than all these guys.
12:07So I don't think that association was lost on him. But at the time in America, he doesn't actually do very well. So he tries different real estate ventures and they are sort of a flop. He doesn't seem to understand the business or the market. You know, he builds a tower block in Florida, but Americans find the apartments too small, so you don't want to buy them. And they also buy a nuclear power plant. So that's a double cross in his favour. I'm really fascinated by the fact that Americans want more space than Europeans. I think that's quite an interesting miscalculation, a pretty fundamental one if you're selling real estate.
12:39Yeah, exactly. And, you know, some other projects go bankrupt. So it kind of seems like he's boxed himself into the wrong business. And at this point, so he says, there's a famous story, apocryphal or not, we don't know, about a conversation he has with a New York cab driver. Yes, he has a chance encounter with a cabbie. You can almost like see it in your mind, right? The Netflix adaptation of this. He hails a cab, maybe on Fifth Avenue or something, gets in and he asks this New York cabbie, what do you know about France? The cabbie cannot even name the president of France at the time. But he says, oh, I know the name Christian Dior.
13:14Light bulb moment, maybe. Yes, exactly. And that is the moment where Arnaud goes, I'm in the wrong business, you would think. OK. And so in 1983, he goes back to France. He's got a slightly more business friendly administration. Mitterrand's still in charge, but a slightly different constitution of the government there. And it's in fact, the government plays a big part in this because they want to find a new owner for a company called Boussard Sanfres. Frère, which has gone bust. And they're looking around for a new owner saying, we want some bids to come in. And conveniently, for this narrative, Boussac also owns Christian Dior.
13:54So Arnaud bids$80 million. He's got some backing from private banks. He's got$15 million from his own company, Ferronel, and he wins the bid. But the French government is a little bit wary of this guy because remember at this point he doesn't have any fashion or retail or textile experience he's a real estate guy so they have a condition of the deal which is that the Bussac group will be kept together including its personnel so nobody gets fired and Arnaud says we yes of course. Yeah okay and that is a that is very French the idea that the conglomerate stays together that was kind of par for the course in those days.
14:30And how often is it that the French government has a policy of just stepping in and administrating the sales of these conglomerates when they go bust. Is that normal? Well, France has a much more interventionist government policy than you would see. As he pointed out, you know, this is the time of Reagan and Thatcher, where they were very anti that kind of government intervention. Their approach was let the government get out of the way and let the free market take its course. But in France, a much more muscular interventionist posture from the government. Which Arnaud takes advantage of, right?
15:00So he ends up buying Boussac and he's appointed managing director, but he soon breaks his promise to the French government. Yeah, he sells off the bits of the company he's not interested in, for example, textiles, weaving, paper. There was a disposable nappy diaper business. He made$400 million from the sale of that alone. So he's doing what some people would call these days asset stripping. He's selling off bits of the business, selling off the assets to have more focus on the things that he's interested in. And he keeps Christian Dior. Surprise. Surprise, surprise. Le Bon Marché, which is a department store.
15:37A blockchain, which will be important for some of the other brands, which we'll see later. And he even retires the Bussac name. And he lays off 9 ,000 workers in two years and becomes known as the Terminator. And I think what we can say about this guy, and we'll discuss it at the end, is that he is, for all his entrepreneurial and promoting entrepreneurial spirit, he's also pretty ruthless. Yes. And it's not really the done thing in France, right? No. If you talk to business people, as I do, when they say doing business in France is a nightmare because you can't sack anyone. So he's bucking the trend.
16:12So when he violated the terms of this handshake agreement with the French government, was there anything France could do about it? Not particularly. I mean, the government didn't like it, but in the end, he owned it. He had control of it. So there was no real recourse in law. The government didn't like it. But if you own the company, you own the company. And crucially, he also made the company make money. So by 1987, this formerly failing business earns around$112 million on a revenue of$1.9 billion. He then starts doing something which comes around a lot in this story. He invests in the young French designer Christian Lacroix.
16:50He also buys the high street fashion store. Celine will see that he's very good at picking people to put in places like Marc Jacobs, like Pharrell Williams, we'll find out later, like Rihanna, one of our other billionaires. So he's starting to hone in on what he knows and presumably loves best, which is luxury fashion. Yeah. Bear in mind, he has got no involvement so far with LVMH, the company he currently is the biggest shareholder of. But things are going on because in 1987, it was announced that Moet Hennessy and Louis Vuitton were to merge. These are two very powerful businesses coming together run by two very experienced and well-known business people.
17:26And this is where the fun and games really start. Yeah, this is the succession bit of this episode, I want to say. In one corner, we have Henri Racamier. He married into the Vuitton family and has run it for the past decade. And in the other corner, we have the booze guy, Moet Hennessy, which is run by a general manager called Alain Chevalier. So Chevalier, booze, Ricamier, Vuitton. But Ricamier, a part of the family, Alain Chevalier, importantly, just a general manager. And, you know, they're very different, but together they kind of make sense. And actually, Rikamia describes the two brands coming together and merging as the second best marriage of his career.
18:08The first one is presumably his marriage to his wife. So Chevalier's got this one side, this successful group, Hennessy, Christian Dior perfumes, Rock Cosmetics, which is still very popular now. And on the other side, you've got Louis Vuitton. We've all seen the bags. And he had spotted a massive opportunity in selling goods, luxury goods to the Far East. So together, LVMH are pretty powerful, but they get worried about a takeover. So Chevalier starts seeking a supportive investor to ally LVMH with so they can avoid this kind of takeover. Yeah. And so he picks Guinness PLC, which is obviously the drinks company.
18:46They were already a distribution partner for the Moet Hennessy bit of the company in America and Asia. They understand the drinks business. So the initial stake is small, but Chevalier soon suggests that Guinness increased their stake to 20 % so that LVMH as a whole is more protected. OK, but I want you to explain the thinking here. Why is it that giving more of a stake to someone else makes LVMH more protected from a takeover? So if your ally owns a significant chunk of the business, it's going to be harder to oust you if someone who's on your side owns a bigger chunk. But Rekamier starts thinking, hang on a second, the alcohol bit of the business is overtaking mine.
19:25So he says, I need a bit more financial firepower in my corner. So he then approaches Bernard Arnault to bid for 25 % of LVMH stock and to partner with the Vuitton family. But instead, Arnault in fact joins the other side. Yeah, so that is the big knife in the back, right? Because Arno coming into LVMH is supposed to make the luxury goods side stronger. But instead, what he does is he approaches Guinness to form a holding company that buys 24 % of LVMH for 1.5 billion. And then he starts buying even more. Yeah, he bought$600 million worth of shares in three days, another$500 million in January 1989.
20:071989. By this point, Arnaud and Guinness have got 43.5 % of the shares and over a third of the voting rights. So then in 1989, he's unanimously elected chairman of the LVMH board. So while these two were duking it out, Arnaud comes around the back and ends up as top dog. Yeah, I mean, really, they let the wolf in at the door, didn't they? At the front door. So Riquemier, who was the Louis Vuitton part of the business, he's stripped of power, ousted from the board. And then Arnaud turns on Chevalier as well, forcing him to resign. Looking back on that, he went, Mr. Chevalier was an excellent manager, but there's one big difference between us.
20:44He was not a shareholder of importance in the business he was in, but I make sure I am the controlling shareholder of the businesses I'm in. Dismissive of him and also very illuminating about the way he does business. So the two principals are now both out the door, leaving Arno in charge. I mean, And can you imagine being those two guys thinking, what the hell is going on? Do you think they saw the writing on the wall? I think probably by the time they saw the writing on the wall, it was too late. You're absolutely right. This looks like a border in battle straight out of the succession kind of style.
21:19And that's why the French press nicknamed Arnaud the Wolf in Kashmir, the Machiavelli of finance.
21:29Have you ever heard the tale of the football player turned armored car robber? It's a story so wild, it almost seems fake.
21:39It's an implausible tale of drugs, greed, and walk away escapes. It's like something out of a movie. A man steals a bag of money from an armored car here at this bank, but it's how he gets away that has everybody talking. With unearthed documents and previously unreleased audio, we tell the story of Anthony Curcio in full. I'm Johnny Marl. This is Sports Strangest Crimes. Listen on BBC Sounds.
22:11LVMH now is in his complete control. Like he's really just bossed this whole thing, you know, like he has taken an opportunity and completely spun it in his direction. Yeah, and this is going to be how he continues to build his fortune. He will buy up shares, taking full control eventually of these different brands and on the way creating this absolute colossus. And this is something about all the billionaires we've talked about, right? They always fundamentally work for their own interests. They have a drive to just dominate. So they're not happy with just a handshake and agreement and, oh, yeah, you've got like a percentage of this company.
22:46Let's be happy with that. They just want to own it all. Yeah, and he wanted to be top dog for sure. But listen, buying the business is one thing. Resting control of it is another thing. You've then got to make a success of it, which he does. So after he takes over, LVMH report a 24.9 % increase in group sales. So they're making$1.3 billion in the first six months of 1989. So he actually, you know, for all the drama, for all the knifing in the back, he actually makes a success of it. And he has a real flair for picking people and spotting talents. He's, you know, you know more about this stuff than I do.
Read the full transcript
23:20Yeah. So, I mean, the decisions he made to appoint heads of fashion houses, I mean, it's a staggering run. So you have people like John Galliano in charge of Givenchy. Even I've heard of John Galliano. Exactly. So you put him in charge of Givenchy. It's hugely successful. You know, you get celebrities to wear these brands. So Nicole Kidman and Dior. You talent spot people like Phoebe Philo, who he appoints to the head of Celine. She is now considered an icon in fashion design. he appoints people who revolutionise these brands in the public's imagination and he also is very good at celeb spotting.
23:55So, you know, he spots Pharrell, who's now in Louis Vuitton. He spots Rihanna, who is another billionaire we talked about to set up Fenty. So he's got a great eye. Yeah, he understands the brands, has a way of keeping them relevant. He brings, you know, for a guy who's now 74 years old, he's actually quite good at spotting things that are cool. Yeah, exactly. I think that's what keeps LVMH relevant. relevant. Although, and you would maybe struggle to get people in the fashion industry to say this on record, but the increasing celebrification of fashion is something that, you know, especially French people find a little bit distasteful.
24:30Yeah, but it turns out to be very clever when it comes to things like the internet. When we talk about some of our other billionaires, the likes of Kim Kardashian, like you say, Rihanna, these are people who've made millions of billions, who have joined our billionaire list because they rode the social media when this helped LVMH in its own way. Exactly. And he's very keen to build his empire to the 75-plus brand juggernaut that it is today. And he makes very few mistakes. So there's quite a famous misstep with Gucci in 1991. He has an opportunity to get it, but he thinks he isn't going anywhere.
25:09Unfortunately, then Gucci makes a ton of money. He later on tries to acquire it again in a very acrimonious war with another billionaire, his luxury rival, François Pinot, who owns Kering, which owns Saint Laurent, Balenciaga, Alexander McQueen. You know, he makes some mistakes, but he always finds a way of winning in the end. And also he does something which, again, we keep going back to how French this is or how non-French, which is that usually in these conglomerates, they're a big juggernaut. They tend to have like kind of management structures where nothing can happen unless this happens over here.
25:41And it's all kind of very bureaucratic. Whereas he gives a percentage and shares profits with the individual brands. So they feel like they're running their own businesses rather than being a small cog in a massive machine. And that really supercharges the company. So he goes on a bit of a buying spree between 1993 and 97. So this is the point where he acquires other brands that you may have heard of, like Kenzo, Marc Jacobs, Lueve, Sephora. He integrates Celine into the group. Yeah. And then he does a deal which turns out to be really important. He buys DFS, duty free shoppers. Now, we've already done an episode on the guy who founded that, Chuck Feeney.
26:19And you can go back and listen to that one. And in that story, LVMH coming along was a big payday for Chuck Feeney, who owned it. But of course, what it did was it gave LVMH massive distribution. They owned those enormous duty-free concessions in airports. And that gave him massive distribution for luxury brands right around the world, particularly in the Far East, which was about to go on a luxury spending spree. And this is at the point at which he becomes a billionaire. So when he purchases DFS, sales are$2.9 billion. And there's an increase in net sales by 54 % in the first year. So in 1997, Arno is on the Forbes list for the very first time and they estimate his wealth to be$3.1 billion.
27:05So he is officially a billionaire.
27:12But he's not done yet. No. So he goes on another spending spree. So over the next 25 years, he continues to expand LVMH. So this is the point he has a deal with Selma Cartney, with Rihanna. He also, for the succession heads out there, acquires Laurel Piana, which is Kendall Roy's favourite brand, the baseball cap that Kendall wears. That's Laurel Piana. So, you know, this guy basically, you know, he has his fingers on cultural touch points that you never knew existed. Yeah. So I always think that when you own lots of brands, people don't know that you own all these brands. So there's this illusion of choice.
27:51Shall I go for Dior or shall I go for Givenchy? And not realising that actually they're all owned by the same people. So it's the same with Diageo in a way. Shall I have this brand of whisky or that brand of whisky? They're owned by the same people. And all the money just goes straight up to the same wallet. Yeah. I mean, like you say, he made a few missteps. The Gucci thing didn't go well. He tried to buy Hermes, I would say, but I imagine it's Hermes. Posh scarves, right? Yes, very posh. OK. And so he tries to do it with his usual MO, which is to sort of secretly buy up a shareholding. But he doesn't quite get there.
28:26Nevertheless, he makes a big profit on that. Right. Because Hermes is very successful, but it's owned by a very protective family. So by the time he approaches Hermes, it's in its sixth generation of family ownership. They're very into family succession in the same way that he is, as we'll find out. But when he buys up the stock, the family cotton's on, they take him to court. And French court rules he has to sell a stake. But he wins when he loses because by selling it, he makes money. A$5 billion profit on that. Very nice. Thank you very much. And in 2021, probably the biggest acquisition of all.
29:00He buys Tiffany's, as in the jewellery brand, for$15.8 billion, which is the biggest luxury brand acquisition ever. It's on the history books. Yeah, and Tiffany is huge in the States, right? Oh, it's massive. I mean, it's an icon of American jewellery design. Yeah, and we should just point out that it's not just brands that he's been buying. He made a few investments in some little tech companies like Netflix, Spotify, TikTok, Airbnb, Uber. He's probably making a lot of money here too. Oh, yeah. So he's diversifying and investing in interesting companies that also makes him quite a lot of money.
29:39And also, I think it's important to point out that the LVMH success story relies quite a lot on China. You've got this emerging middle class in China. He made an early bet on that being a key market and that really paid off. So as early as 1992, and to put it in context, in the 90s, China was just introducing the first economic reforms. Vuitton opens a store in Beijing. It's in a basement in a hotel, but still it's a foothold in the market. And at the time, there wasn't even any hot water in the hotel that the store is in. But he still thinks there's an opportunity here and I'm going to get in there regardless of the cost.
30:14Probably riding the most significant economic wave of the late 20th century. And that luxury market in China alone is now enormous. And I was looking at the LVM8 share price just today. And what happened was, if you remember, there was a big crackdown on communist corruption and bribery and all that kind of stuff. When Xi Jinping came in, he said, we've got to stop that. And a lot of people thought that the bottom was going to fall out of the luxury market. And it did wobble a bit. But the LVM8 share price just seems to go up and up and up. I was looking at from 2000 to 2008, it quadrupled. It quadrupled again from 2008 to where we are today.
30:53So it seems to be unstoppable. And even during the pandemic, people were still buying luxury goods because everyone was stuck at home just online shopping. So even when the rest of the world is clearly losing, LVMH finds a way of making money out of it. And so here we are. He's worth$220 billion. He's got all of his children working there. He's 74. There's another succession line here, isn't there? Oh, yeah. And now the big talk is who is going to succeed daddy in the family business? And just reflecting on it, you know, he's super competitive. His kind of mirror image is François Pinot from Pinot Printemps.
31:30And you can tell something about someone. After the Notre Dame Cathedral fire, François Pinot offered 100 million euros to the reconstruction effort not to be outdone. He immediately on the same day promises 200 million. Yeah, I'll see your 100 and raise you another 100. I'm sensing some competition, you know. In financial circles, they call that the big swinging dick syndrome. So maybe we'll leave that out. No, I think we should keep that in. The other thing I found out is that apparently he reportedly interviews all of his children every month, one by one, to gauge who will be the right person to take over.
32:09Can you imagine? It's time for your monthly job interview with your dad. That makes succession look like a picnic. I mean, it's the most high-pressure lunch ever. So there we have it. Bernard Arnault. Depending on which week it is, sometimes the richest, sometimes the second richest man on the planet. Let's judge him.
32:30We're judging our billionaires whether they're good, they're bad, or just plain rich on a number of categories. And we're going to give them scores out of 10. First one? First one is wealth. How rich is he? I mean, he's very rich. I mean, he's got a score of 10 on this one because on any given day, it's either him or Elon Musk are the richest people in the world. So, you know, that's a straight 10, obviously. Yeah, that's full marks, definitely. There's no question about it. So let's go to the next one, which is rags to riches. How far have they come? I mean, he didn't start in rags. His family, they had a company of a thousand people.
33:05His grandmother gave him shares. They described themselves as petty bourgeois. But still, he's come a long way to be the absolute richest person, one of the richest people in the world. But had, if not a silver spoon, a nice bronze one at the very least. I would give him, you know, I think a seven. OK, I'm going to go a little bit lower than that because I'll give him a five. He started out with a foot on the industrial ladder. He went to one of the Grand Écoles in France, the École Polytechnique. And that's like the Oxbridge of France, right? Correct. And, you know, basically the France, you know, managerial ruling classes all go to these Grands Ecoles.
33:42So he's got a massive leg up. So five out of ten. So for me, it's a five. OK. Well, this is the interesting category for me, villainy. Isn't it funny how often very tight families can be very ruthless with anyone outside the family? And I think in this case, the way he manoeuvred and managed to oust both the bosses of LV and MH, putting himself as top of LV MH, was straight out of a kind of drama. So we saw his ruthless boardroom antics. He sacked people very early on. It's not easy to sack people in France. You've got to be really determined to do it. A tough environment in which to work, no doubt.
34:22He's a very tough cookie. and not only that but there's a slight air of Bond villain when they were basically outbidding each other of how much money they were going to put into the Notre Dame Cathedral. There's more than philanthropy going on there, isn't there? Oh, definitely not. I mean, like you say, it's a bit of a dick swinging competition. Yeah, I think on villainy, I'm going to give him high marks on this. I'm going to give him an eight. And now, you know, he's no arms dealer but he's ruthless, an eight. He is very ruthless. And, you know, he is putting his kids through their paces if they want to step into his shoes.
34:57I mean, I think that interviewing the kids once a month about how their job is going borders on abuse. I mean, apparently the thing I read is he also only has half hour lunches. So imagine the most stressful 30 minutes of your life. You must be prepping for an entire week before you meet your own father. One of the things I find most interesting about LVMH is that, you know, they really embody these two contradictions. So, yes, luxury, yes, artisanal, you know, couturiers and gorgeous leather handbags and scarves and things. But then you also have this very American Anglo-Saxon, we got to make it make money.
35:34And in some ways, that's completely contradictory to the ethos of being a fashion designer. So the thing about the fashion industry, which is what I learned from being sort of tangentially attached to it for a few years as a journalist, is that it attracts all these incredibly sensitive artistic people who love clothes and love design, but they get sucked into this corporate machine. And some of them thrive. Some of them do very, very well. Some of them completely burn out. And I think LVMH kind of embodies that. It sells that idea of being an artist's dream to the public and they want a slice of luxury, but there's this whole machine behind it.
36:08And that sounds very much like it was Bernard Arnault's direction to turn it into that. Yeah. Yeah. And the other thing I don't quite understand about some of the billionaires, when we talked about him when he first got to the Forbes list, three billion, I'd be out long before then. Yeah. To go from three to keep going to I want 200, I want 220 billion. I don't know. Some people are just wired that way. And I don't know whether that's villainy or greed or what it is. I mean, I'm sure some people find it aspirational, right? Not resting on your laurels. But yeah, there is something of that personality type in the billionaires we've talked about.
36:40So I think on this category, I would give him an eight, actually. Although I think if you spoke to a French person and you described his character and what he's done and, you know, the way he ran French companies, they would probably give him a 10. Yeah. Well, yeah, it's interesting, wouldn't it? In the US, he'd get a medal. In France, he probably gets suspicion, you know, probably that gets a slightly different reaction. The Machiavelli of finance, as they put it in the French press. OK, both eights on that, on Villainy. So then we have philanthropy. We've already mentioned this once, but let's go through some of the other things we know about him.
37:10So he donated to the leading cancer research centre in France, the Institut Curie. He supported research and treatment of Alzheimer's disease. LVMH has contributed 11 million to fight the wildfires in the Amazon rainforest, which is quite interesting given, you know, the fashion industry is a huge driver of consumption. One of the most polluting industries. Exactly. Especially things like leather. Yeah. OK. So and obviously he put the 200 million doubling his old rivals, Francois Pino's contribution to rebuilding the Notre Dame. I honestly think that is a kind of I'm going to take that out of the philanthropy category because I think there's something else going on there.
37:52So I'm given how rich he is. I'm, you know, three max on on on philanthropy. Yeah, I mean, he's listed by Forbes as one of the top 50 philanthropists in the world. But given he's also either the second or first richest person in the world at any given time, that strikes me as being a little bit mean. It seems to me that philanthropy should be expressed as a percentage of your total wealth, not the absolute number, right? Exactly. Go on. I'm a three. What are you? I'm going to give him a two. OK, fine. OK. And that then brings us to power. always a tricky one this because obviously there are some people who can launch missiles and you know invade yeah and invade countries and what have you and our billionaires tend to not to be that but in his case I mean absolute wealth does bring quite a bit of power you know you can get things done you have enormous financial resources and let's face it he can make or break any designer.
38:48He can create and destroy careers, I would say. So he's got a certain amount of power there. And when you think about it, he actually hasn't exercised a lot of that power given he's the first or second richest man in the world. Like look at what Elon Musk does, for instance. It's like he could easily kind of ring up politicians and say, I'm the richest man in the world, do this for me. But he doesn't. So I don't know, maybe he does have some restraint. Yeah. Or maybe he's just not that interested in power for power's sake. I mean, basically, he sets a bunch of talented people challenging targets to make as much money as they can in a very competitive world, which has basically been on an upward trajectory because of emerging middle classes in places like China.
39:29And, you know, presumably India will follow suit in 10, 20 years as well. He's also hitched his wagon in a way to the celebrity culture and the influences. He's been a net beneficiary of that. But power, I wouldn't say huge. No. He could probably use his power to do better things. You know, like if he said LVMH is going to go completely green, totally sustainable, that would have a huge effect on the world. That's a good point. He's in a position of real leadership there where he could exert some of the power. I'm going to give him a four. Yeah, I'm going to give him a five, I think. Okay. And then finally, legacy.
40:05For fashion, like what he did for fashion is completely trailblazing. I think whether or not you agree with his method. But didn't he just hoover up a bunch of brands and put them in the right places, like in airports and in department stores? But he also selected people to head them up, like very interesting, creative, artistic people. You know, like John Galliano at his height was completely changing the way that people looked at fashion. You know, similarly with Celine, you know, people still fight over original Celine clothes from the time that Phoebe Philo was in charge. which, you know, all these brands individually had huge effects on culture.
40:43You know, they basically changed the way that people looked at clothes. And he was the kind of invisible hand behind all of that. You know, he was the Wizard of Oz behind the curtain. So for me, I think he actually scores quite highly. I'm going to totally disagree with you on this one. I'm going to say that people will not be talking about Bernard Arnault in 20 years in the way that people will talk about Bill Gates and Elon Musk. I think that he basically, he assembled a house of brands that each individual brand, the talented people you've talked about, the Gallianos, the Marc Jacobs of this world, they will have a more lasting impression than the person who just assembled them all together.
41:22So I'm going to give him, I'd give him a three for legacy. Oh, I'm going to go the opposite. I'm going to give him an eight. I feel like if you spoke to people within the fashion industry, they would be like, he's the Bill Gates of fashion. He's the person who made a lot of things happen. But maybe he doesn't want to step into the limelight or own that title. Maybe that's why he's always been kind of behind the scenes. But if you know fashion, you will know his name. Well, I think I've demonstrated amply that I don't know fashion. But it's good to disagree. It's good to disagree. So Bernard Arnault, for me, a mover and shaker who will go down in some history books.
41:58Okay, for me, Bernard Arnault, a shadowy conglomerate building, hoover up of brands. who I suspect we won't be talking about in 20 years. So good, bad or just another billionaire? I don't know. I think mainly bad because I think that he was ruthless. There's clearly a kind of arrogance and a kind of one-upmanship to him. I'm going to say, sorry, Bernard, you fall slightly on the bad side of our good, bad billionaire category. I'm kind of torn because I love some of the brands that he kind of helped to, I mean, nurture in his own relatively ruthless way. I am torn between just another billionaire and bad.
42:40But I think I'm ever so slightly edging towards bad because putting aside the fact that I loved some of the brands that he works with and owns, you know, even before I knew who he was. But reading about his story and what he did, especially to take over LVMH, I was like, oh, this isn't a guy who just loves nice clothes and great design, is also a guy who you probably wouldn't want to sit across a table at a boardroom. So I think bad. Okay. Bad. I'm sorry. I love your clothes, but you're a baddie. I thought you were going to be blinded by the brands that you love, but you should come down on the same side.
43:16Sorry, Bernard. You are full on for both of us on the side of slightly bad billionaire. So Zing, who have we got next episode? So next episode, we've got the queen of Instagram herself, none other than Kim Kardashian. who's made a fortune by not really doing anything at all apart from being famous. Well, we'll talk more about that in the episode. OK, join us for Good Bad Billionaire for our next episode when we talk about Kim Kardashian. Thanks for listening to Good Bad Billionaire. This podcast is produced by Hannah Hufford and Mark Ward. James Cook is our editor and it's a BBC audio production.
43:53So if you enjoyed listening, then please tell a friend.
44:06Hey, let me ask you something. Have you heard George's podcast? Me and Ben Brick are back with a blast. This time with stories from Africa's past. Not too distant, unsolved mysteries. Unsung heroes from untold histories. I'm trying to make sense of the present day. Join me on this journey by pressing play. Have you heard George's podcast, Chapter 4? Listen on BBC Sounds
From the publisher
The rise and rise of the French entrepreneur who vies with Elon Musk for the title of richest person in the world. Bernard Arnault is the head of luxury brand conglomerate LVMH, a house of brands that owns Givenchy, Louis Vuitton, Moet, Hennessey, Christian Dior, Sephora, Tiffany & Co, Marc Jacobs, Fenty and some 70 other luxury labels.
Journalist Zing Tsjeng and BBC business editor Simon Jack trace Arnault's unstoppable ascent from scion of a northern French industrialist family, to Quebec and New York, then back to France where a ruthless takeover hoists him to the top. Is he good, bad, or just another billionaire?
The podcast that uncovers how the world's wealthiest people made their money and asks if they are a positive or negative force for the planet uncovers a story of boardroom dramas, hostile acquisitions and a fortune of over $200 billion.
We’d love to hear your feedback. Email goodbadbillionaire@bbc.com or drop us a text or WhatsApp to +1 (917) 686-1176.
To find out more about the show and read our privacy notice, visit www.bbcworldservice.com/goodbadbillionaire




