Why NM Meta child safety verdict could be 'first crack in the dam'

25 Mar 2026 · 25 min · 12 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

New Mexico’s civil verdict against Meta over child exploitation on Facebook/Instagram, framed as a potential “first crack in the dam” for social-media accountability; includes a brief related energy segment about Trump-era offshore wind lease refunds and oil-price risk from the Strait of Hormuz.

Guests and backgrounds

Raul Torres, New Mexico Attorney General, who sued Meta in civil court; Scott Tong (interviewer). Also mentioned: Jake Biddle, staff writer at Grist (offshore wind settlement segment); Samantha Gross, Brookings Institution director of Energy Security and Climate Initiative (oil/energy segment).

Key claims

Meta knew via internal documents that its platforms are addictive and facilitate predatory behavior; it prioritized profits over child safety; Section 230 is a “liability shield.” New Mexico jury found willful violations and awarded $375 million; Meta will appeal.

Notable examples

New Mexico undercover sting using a fake 13-year-old profile that quickly drew sex solicitations/graphic requests and led Meta to send monetization/growth guidance instead of flagging risk.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Current Events Overview

0:59 to 1:42

Explore the implications of recent global energy events and their connection to social media.

“The Trump administration is paying a billion-dollar subsidy to a French company to not build wind turbines in the U.S.”

Meta's Child Safety Verdict

1:42 to 2:20

Discussion of the New Mexico jury's verdict against Meta for child exploitation.

“But first, it's a big day for social media companies, though from their perspective, not a good one.”

Accountability in Social Media

2:20 to 3:04

Insights on the responsibilities of social media companies regarding child safety.

“Meta has been in order to pay$375 million in damages.”

The Undercover Investigation

3:04 to 4:21

Details of a sting operation revealing the dangers of social media for minors.

“And because of that, the jury in New Mexico found them liable, found that their actions were willful and rendered a$375 million judgment in our favor.”

Legal Implications and Future Actions

4:21 to 5:50

Legal expert discusses the implications of the New Mexico ruling and potential changes in regulation.

“And part of your case was a state undercover operation that created a fake social media profile of a 13-year-old girl.”

Financial Impact on Meta

5:50 to 8:00

Exploration of the financial repercussions for Meta following the verdict.

“And it's going to be a blueprint for what comes next.”

Closing Remarks from Raul Torres

8:00 to 8:13

Raul Torres discusses the significance of the ruling and future challenges for Meta.

“safety features built into their platforms.”

Trump Administration's Wind Farm Settlement

10:06 to 14:00

Analysis of the recent settlement involving the Trump administration and energy companies.

“The Interior Department agreeing to pay almost a billion dollars to a French multinational oil company in exchange for them giving up their leases that allow them to build offshore wind farms in the Atlantic Ocean.”

The Current State of U.S. Offshore Wind Investments

14:00 to 15:43

Learn about the challenges facing U.S. offshore wind investments amid political tensions.

“AI data centers, cryptocurrency, electric vehicles.”

The Oil Crisis: Comparing Current Wars to Historical Events

17:40 to 24:08

Explore the current oil crisis in relation to past oil shocks and geopolitical conflicts.

“pointed out the two oil crises in the 1970s together lost about 10 million barrels of oil a day.”
Show all 12 chapters

The Implications of U.S. Oil Policies

24:08 to 26:06

Discuss the effects of U.S. oil policies, including sanctions and market manipulation.

“What about the administration's, you know, kind of boasting of, well, we'll use Venezuelan oil?”

Future of Energy Security: A Shift Toward Renewables?

26:06 to 26:48

Consider how the current crisis may accelerate the transition to renewable energy.

“We have been focused on oil, but this is also a natural gas crisis for countries that use liquefied natural gas.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Raúl Torrez:This message comes from Intuit TurboTax. With TurboTax expert full service, match with a dedicated expert who will do your taxes for you from start to finish, getting you every dollar you deserve. It's that easy. Visit TurboTax.com to match with an expert today.

0:19Raúl Torrez:WBUR Podcasts. Boston.

0:23Jake Bittle:It's the first but not the last time that I think juries across this country are going to demand real accountability from Meta and social media companies writ large. How New Mexico took Meta to court over claims of child exploitation on Facebook and Instagram and won.

0:49Jake Bittle:it's wednesday march 25th and this is here and now anytime from npr and wbur i'm chris bentley

0:58Jake Bittle:today on the show extraordinary events in energy and it's not just the war in iran The Trump administration is paying a billion-dollar subsidy to a French company to not build wind turbines in the U.S. Also, government payouts notwithstanding, global oil and gas supplies are strained by the war, which has exposed just how vulnerable we are to shocks in the price of fossil fuels.

1:27Raúl Torrez:I feel like we've gone so far down a bad road, and Iran has really demonstrated that it can effectively close the Strait of Hormuz, that we really don't have a way to go back. That's what really scares me.

1:41Jake Bittle:That story coming up in about 10 minutes. But first, it's a big day for social media companies, though from their perspective, not a good one. In Los Angeles, a jury found Meta and YouTube owned by Google were to blame for the depression and anxiety of a woman who compulsively used social media as a small child. That verdict comes a day after a New Mexico jury found Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, knows all about the child exploitation that goes on on its social media platforms, but doesn't do enough to stop it, prioritizing profits over kids' mental health. Meta has been in order to pay$375 million in damages.

2:24Jake Bittle:The company said it will appeal. New Mexico's Attorney General, Raul Torres, brought his suit against Meta in civil court, and he spoke with Scott Tong about it earlier today, before the verdict in the LA trial came down. Well, Meta's known for years that this is a dangerous product, an addictive product, and a product that actually facilitates predatory behavior on the platform. They've known that because of their own internal documents, Safety experts have been raising red flags and recommending specific changes. But again and again, executives, including Mr. Zuckerberg, have chosen and prioritized profits over safety.

3:04Jake Bittle:And because of that, the jury in New Mexico found them liable, found that their actions were willful and rendered a$375 million judgment in our favor. And it's the first but not the last time that I think juries across this country are going going to demand real accountability from meta and social media companies writ large. And for parents who are listening, parents of teens who are using these apps more broadly, what should they know about the dangers facing underage users today? Well, first, they need to understand that the business model that drives this company is one that's really centered on engagement.

3:45Jake Bittle:And it's engagement at all costs. They want to keep kids connected to the platform. They should also understand that the same things that connect people with their likes and interests also connect predators on the platform with kids that are on the platform. And so both of those things together should give parents real concern about having kids accessing these platforms in ways that, frankly, at this point are not safe. And they should also understand that the company hasn't been honest about the dangers that they know exist in these spaces. And part of your case was a state undercover operation that created a fake social media profile of a 13-year-old girl.

4:29Jake Bittle:What did that sting operation reveal? Well, what we were trying to do through the establishment of an undercover account was to recreate the experience of a young girl on the platform. We wanted to see for ourselves what the response would be. And frankly, it was shocking. They were immediately inundated with solicitations for sex, requests for graphic material, and an explosive growth in the following of predominantly men from all over the world. And what's even more shocking is that in response to that growth on that particular account, rather than raising a red flag, the company sent information to the account about how they could grow their user base and how they could monetize that following.

5:12Jake Bittle:That's a clear example of what's wrong at the core of this company. They have continued to prioritize engagement over safety, and we found that very clearly through our undercover investigation. Mm-hmm. Nationally, what do you hope comes of all this? Well, I think this is the first crack in the dam. You know, Meta and other social media companies have been hiding behind Section 230 for years, despite the fact that we've known how dangerous Oh, Section 230, which gives them some legal immunity from what is posted on their platforms, yeah? Yeah, that's correct. Section 230 was created in a totally different era in the early gaze of the internet and has become a liability shield that they've hidden behind for years and years, because this is effectively a products liability case brought under our consumer protection laws, there's an opportunity now to hold these companies accountable in a way that frankly has never existed before.

6:13Jake Bittle:And it's going to be a blueprint for what comes next. In terms of our own case, we will be back in front of the district court in May on our public nuisance claim. We'll be arguing that Meta has created a public nuisance. And we will, in addition to financial penalties, we'll be asking for injunctive relief, specific changes to the design features of the platform, the algorithm, elimination of end-to-end encryption for miners, and an independent monitor to really enforce those features and those changes. What it will also do is potentially create a roadmap or a blueprint for how this company could change its product offerings not only around the country, but around the world.

6:55Jake Bittle:Now, the jury in New Mexico has acquired Meta to pay$375 million, as you say, for violating state law. It was a fraction of what the state requested. We're talking about a company that's worth $1.5 trillion. Financially, could this effectively be a slap in the wrist? Well, we don't have any illusions that the fine that was rendered by the jury yesterday is sufficient deterrence to change their behavior. But if you think about the relative size of New Mexico and the user base here, if similar types of actions are brought in other jurisdictions, which I anticipate they will, the potential penalties will add up really quickly.

7:36Jake Bittle:And the financial impact on the company's bottom line will add up considerably. But I also think that the wave of litigation is going to prompt congressional action. I think it's going to prompt Congress to really re-examine Section 230 and some of the stalled legislation that's been pending there for quite some time. And when that happens, I think you're going to realize a sea change in the regulatory space in terms of what we expect of social media companies and the safety features built into their platforms. Raul Torres is the Attorney General of New Mexico. Mr. Torres, thank you again for joining us.

8:13Jake Bittle:Thank you so much.

8:18Jake Bittle:Coming up next, President Trump is a NIMBY when it comes to wind farms. And his backyard is the U.S. Robin Young has that story after the break.

8:40Raúl Torrez:Support for Here and Now Anytime comes from SelectQuote. If you're new to life insurance, you're not alone. Thankfully, there's SelectQuote. For over 40 years, SelectQuote has helped more than 2 million Americans understand their options and get the coverage they need. SelectQuote takes the guesswork out of finding the right life insurance policy. Life insurance is never cheaper than it is today. Get the right life insurance for you for less and save more than 50 % at SelectQuote.com slash anytime. That's SelectQuote.com slash anytime. This message comes from MidiHealth, a virtual care platform for women in paramenopause and menopause.

9:21Raúl Torrez:Chief Medical Officer Dr. Kathleen Jordan shares the wide range of symptoms they work to address for women in midlife. There's dry eyes, dry hair, dry skin, there's dry mouth, trouble sleeping, panic and anxiety attacks. When we ask patients about common symptoms, on average they report six. MidiHealth, committed to helping women in midlife with paramenopause and menopause care. accessible via telehealth visits at joinmidi.com. This message comes from Carvana. Finance and buy your next vehicle with Carvana. Shop a huge selection, customize terms to fit your budget, and buy completely online. No hassle, no pressure.

10:02Raúl Torrez:Get the car you love the easy way with Carvana. Let's take a closer look now at a settlement the Trump administration reached earlier this week. The Interior Department agreeing to pay almost a billion dollars to a French multinational oil company in exchange for them giving up their leases that allow them to build offshore wind farms in the Atlantic Ocean. Instead, the Trump administration hopes to direct the company's investments towards fossil fuels. Jack Biddle has been writing about this for our editorial partner, Grist. And Jack, a headline that Grist has written is pointed. It says the government is paying total energies.

10:38Raúl Torrez:That's the French company. Jake, rather. Sorry. Jake, the government is paying Total Energies, the French company, to halt a wind farm it isn't building in exchange for fossil fuel investments the company is already making. Can you flesh that out?

10:54Jake Bittle:Yeah, so when the Trump administration began last year, Trump said, I don't want to build any more wind farms. We're freezing all new wind sails. And so the industry has been at a standstill for more than a year now. And Total was not really, I don't think, planning to use this lease anytime soon. But the administration would have liked to cancel it. So basically the point of the settlement is to say, well, we're just going to basically refund you the cost of this lease, which is for an energy resource that the market doesn't really exist for anyway. And we're going to pay you this money to do oil and gas investments.

11:35Jake Bittle:This is an oil and gas company. It's one of the largest oil and gas companies in the world. They already invest in oil and gas. So there's an aspect of kind of just, it feels like the whole thing was sort of a waste of everyone's time, but there's also kind of a publicity stunt aspect about this as well, I think.

11:52Raúl Torrez:Well, we had to flesh that out because one would think, you know, this administration couldn't just block the development because it's against wind farms? Right.

12:02Jake Bittle:So they've tried to block the development of other wind farms. So in December, the Department of the Interior issued a stop work order for five that were, you know, some of them were already active and others were extremely close to being completed. They went zero for five in the courts on those. The courts threw those stop work orders out immediately, and those five wind farms are close to being finished. There really aren't any other major wind farms under construction, but the administration, I think, saw that it can't go in and just unilaterally cancel leases. So now it's sort of going to plan B, which is can we find a way to put a good spin on basically giving these companies a refund?

12:40Raúl Torrez:Well, how does a billion dollars of taxpayer money look like a good spin? It looks like a windfall for this company. And wouldn't other companies that maybe have been sitting on their leases, as you point out, because they're waiting for the Trump administration to move on, wouldn't they say, hey, yeah, give me a billion too?

12:58Jake Bittle:Right. So those are both really good questions. So it's important to know that Total actually did pay almost a billion dollars for these leases, which under the previous situation with a government that was completely uncooperative, were basically worth nothing because you couldn't build wind on them. So the government, this I think is like, even though it seems kind of like taxpayer subsidy to not produce wind, this is basically the government preemptively losing in court and saying, okay, fine, we'll refund you for this asset. I think you're right to say that maybe other companies might want refunds as well, and it's possible you'll see that.

13:33Jake Bittle:But really all that happens there is that then the territory goes back to the government, which perhaps in some future administration could lease it out again.

13:41Raúl Torrez:Look, we are also talking to you in a moment when we're hearing, in another segment on the program, that with what's happening in the Strait of Hormuz, there are a lot of energy companies who are saying, we actually might really want to think about shifting to renewable and wind farms. And, you know, we have all these new energy costs coming, you know, AI data centers, cryptocurrency, electric vehicles. What is your sense of how other companies might view what the Interior Department just did through that prism? Yeah, absolutely.

14:17Jake Bittle:So there is a broad sense globally that, you know, All kinds of energy resources are needed to meet demand growth. And many companies that have invested in U.S. offshore wind, including Total, Equinor, Orsted, the big ones in the East Coast, are still investing in offshore wind everywhere else. And they're even investing in other kinds of energy resources in the United States. I mean, Total develops and sells solar energy in parts of this country. I think this is just a huge hole, right? U.S. offshore wind is uninvestable because of the animus that the administration has displayed for it. So even though you need all kinds of energy, this is kind of the one that no one's interested in building at this moment other than the five that are almost complete.

15:00Raúl Torrez:And just briefly, this company secured these leases during the Biden administration. What are they saying about what's being lost when a project like this is bought off?

15:08Jake Bittle:Right, so I think there's a huge amount of work that goes into developing these leases, right? You do all these agreements with fishermen, tribes. it's kind of just a waste of their time. But as the CEO said in his statement in Houston when he signed this deal, we believe this is a more efficient use of capital in the United States right now. And since you can't build wind here right now, he's probably right. Yeah.

15:32Raúl Torrez:Well, look, you refer to it as total energies. I said total, the English. I also called you Jack. You are Jake. Jake Biddle, staff writer at Grist. Jake, thank you so much.

15:42Jake Bittle:Merci beaucoup.

15:47Jake Bittle:By the way, we reached out to the Department of Interior for comment on this story and have not heard back. But staying with energy, the price of oil is way up because of war in the Middle East, of course. But there's reason to believe the market is actually underpricing the risk. Coming up, why the U.S. can't drill its way to lower fuel prices. We'll be right back.

16:22Raúl Torrez:This message comes from Betterment. Their automated investing and saving tools give you the quiet confidence of someone who knows where to put their money. With tax-smart tools that help grow your after-tax returns year-round. Get started today at Betterment.com. That's B-E-T-T-E-R-M-E-N-T dot com. Investing involves risk. Performance not guaranteed. Betterment is not a tax advisor, nor should any information herein be considered tax advice. Please consult a qualified tax professional. This message comes from Babbel. Babbel's conversation-based language technique teaches you useful words and phrases to get you speaking quickly about the things you actually talk about in the real world.

17:04Raúl Torrez:With lessons handcrafted by over 200 language experts and voiced by real native speakers, start speaking with Babbel today. Get up to 55 % off your Babbel subscription right now at babbel.com slash NPR. Spelled B-A-B-B-E-L dot com slash NPR. Rules and restrictions may apply. This message comes from Carvana, who makes car selling easy. Enter your license plate or VIN, get a real offer in minutes, and have your car picked up from your door. Sell your car the easy way with Carvana. Pickup fee may apply.

17:39Jake Bittle:This week, the executive director of the International Energy Agency, Fatih Birol, pointed out the two oil crises in the 1970s together lost about 10 million barrels of oil a day. How does that compare to the war today? Only as of today, we lost 11 million barrels per day.

17:58Raúl Torrez:So more than two major oil shocks put together.

18:02Jake Bittle:Samantha Gross is director of the Energy Security and Climate Initiative at the Brookings Institution, And she tells Robin Young she's worried about where this is going because there's no apparent off-ramp in this war.

Read the full transcript

18:14Raúl Torrez:We're not really seeing any of the three parties of this war looking for an exit. Instead, they seem to be barreling down the freeway. And the oil crisis is getting worse as we go. Well, let's talk about that. Worse than the 70s, as we're hearing. For those of us around in the 70s, you know, first in the early part of the decade, oil-producing countries imposed an oil embargo on the U.S. for supporting Israel in the Yom Kippur War. Then later, in 1979, we had the Iranian Revolution. It seemed worse. You know, first President Nixon told gas stations to ration fuel and people were fighting on long lines and some countries banned driving on Sunday.

18:53Raúl Torrez:In the U.S., demand for larger cars fell. Here's a CBS report from November of 1973.

18:59Jake Bittle:But an accessory for the cars people already own is a big seller, locking gas caps. To ensure no one can siphon away that precious fuel, more and more motorists are keeping it under lock and key.

19:13Raúl Torrez:That's the late Terry Drinkwater, CBS, reporting from Simi Valley in California. You know, people were locking their gas tanks. Jimmy Carter, you know, wore sweaters, told us to turn down the thermostat. So, long question, Samantha, but why is that not happening? There's a couple of different reasons we're not at that level. One is that we're not feeling the full brunt of the disruption yet. Companies have oil and storage. There is still oil on the water in transit. And so we're not feeling as bad as this is going to get if it goes on. The other thing that is true is that markets are much better at allocating fuel to where it needs to go.

19:55Raúl Torrez:We produce a lot of oil in the United States. That helps. So I don't expect, even if this sticks around, to see gas lines like we saw in the 1970s. But I do expect to see very high prices. The U.S. is now the world's largest oil producer, something else that happened after the 70s. But we understand one of the problems there is it's the kind of oil the U.S. produces is an easier one to sell. so the U.S. still has to import an oil because that's the kind our refineries can turn into gas. Yes. What happened is back in the 1980s and 90s, heavy crude oil, which is generally less expensive to buy, was quite cheap.

20:40Raúl Torrez:And so U.S. refineries set themselves up, many of them, to run this less expensive crude oil. What they didn't know was coming is starting in the 2010s that the U.S. would have this boom of crude oil production, become the world's largest oil producer. But most of that new oil is actually light, sweet, very high quality oil. So it's completely sellable, but it's actually not what many of our refineries are set up to run. And so today we do a bit of a swap. We sell this very high quality oil and import lower quality oil because our refineries are better at running that lower quality oil. Well, you told on the media that markets have been nonchalant about the war.

21:23Raúl Torrez:There's also been criticism of the president that he may have been nonchalant or worse. The Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen told CNN that President Trump was lying when he said on Truth Social on Monday that he had held productive conversations with Iran to end the war. Fortune reported that 15 minutes before the president made that announcement, roughly$580 million worth of oil futures changed hands in a single minute. Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman said flat out this isn't just insider trading, meaning someone new. It's also treason. But what does it mean to us, the consumer, when someone's accused of manipulating the market in that way?

22:04Raúl Torrez:That trade right before President Trump made his announcement was certainly sketchy. Overall, markets will find the price that makes sense for balancing supply and demand, but these kinds of gyrations and the potential for insider trading are certainly sketchy and may be making individual people a lot of money, but I don't think they're affecting where prices are going for consumers overall. And I think that trajectory is going to continue to go upward. I said at the very beginning of this conflict that I thought that the oil markets were being rather nonchalant. Maybe that's not the right word anymore, but I still feel like the market is not completely taking in what's happening here.

22:50Raúl Torrez:The market seems to be collectively thinking that this is going to be a short conflict and that we can go back to conditions on February 27th before this all happened. I just don't believe that. Well, this is the thing that scares you. It sounds like this nonchalance. And the Trump administration is focused on increasing fossil fuel production and dependence in the U.S. It's reversed a lot of renewable energy ideas. your sense there, because I thought I also heard you say that some in the industry are, this is kind of a wake-up call, like maybe we do need the renewable energy because what we're seeing in the Strait of Hormuz.

23:31Raúl Torrez:Yeah, the thing that really scares me is not so much that the market isn't responding. It's that I don't see a political way out of this. I feel like we've gone so far down a bad road and Iran has really demonstrated that it can effectively close the Strait of Hormuz, that we really don't have a way to go back. That's what really scares me. And the implications that that could have for the global economy, for the U.S. economy, despite the fact that we're the world's largest producer of oil, we're still completely connected to global markets. What about the administration's, you know, kind of boasting of, well, we'll use Venezuelan oil?

24:14Raúl Torrez:The statement about using Venezuelan oil to get out of this crisis makes no sense at all. The Venezuelan oil industry has suffered from more than a decade of neglect. The industry is in bad shape, held together with chewing gum and duct tape. And it's going to take years to significantly impact production. If we're still in this crisis years from now, that's a huge problem. Venezuela is not going to help us. Years from now, jumped out at us, I'm sure, to others as well. What about, you know, the U.S. has already lifted sanctions on Russian oil, which is, I mean, Russia wins. Yeah, I'm immensely frustrated with the lifting of Russian sanctions and the lifting of sanctions on Iranian oil that's already on the water.

25:00Raúl Torrez:Right, because that's the idea, that lifting sanctions on Iranian oil, because it's already going through the strait. But lifting it on Russia, which is still waging a war against Ukraine, Is that the frustration? It's certainly a source of frustration. If you think about the Iranian oil, it was already on the water, meaning it already has a buyer and is reaching the market. What lifting the sanctions does is rather than being sold at a cheaper, on-the-down-low kind of price, it can be sold at the market price because it's unsanctioned. The same is true with Russia. Russia had buyers for some of its oil.

25:38Raúl Torrez:It's just that it had to be sold through the shadow fleet at lower prices because that oil couldn't go through the formal channels. If we unsanction it, it means Russia makes more money. I think the big winner from all of what's going on in the Middle East right now is Russia. Samantha Gross, do you see anything positive on the horizon concerning energy security, your bailiwick, in this crisis? The one thing that I think this might do is actually accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels. We have been focused on oil, but this is also a natural gas crisis for countries that use liquefied natural gas.

26:20Raúl Torrez:20 % of that global capacity is offline as well. And so I think this will push for both more efficient vehicles and electric vehicles on the oil side. and then also encourage more renewable electricity generation for those who can't get LNG. Samantha Gross, Director of the Energy Security and Climate Initiative at the Brookings Institution. Samantha, a grim outlook, but thank you so much for joining us. It's always good to talk to you.

26:54Jake Bittle:That's it for the show today. Here and Now Anytime comes from NPR and WBUR Boston. Today's stories were produced by Wilder Fleming, Hafsa Qureshi, and Jill Ryan. Our editors were Todd Montt, Michaela Rodriguez, and Michael Scotto. Technical direction from Caleb Green and Matt Reed. Our theme music is by Mike Moschetto, Max Liebman, and me, Chris Bentley. Our digital producers are Alison Hagen and Grace Griffin. And here and now's executive producer is Alan Price. Thanks for listening. We'll be back with you tomorrow.

27:41Raúl Torrez:This message comes from Angie. If you're tackling a home project, check out Angie.com. From roofing to remodels and everything in between, Angie connects you with skilled pros who do such a good job, you might trust them to do other things, like pull out your tooth or be your kid's godfather. Don't actually ask them to do those things. Just let them get the job done well. Angie, the one you trust to find the ones you trust. Find a pro for your projects at Angie.com. That's A-N-G-I dot com. This message comes from Squarespace, a platform for building a custom on-brand website. Choose from award-winning templates, showcase your work, and manage payments.

28:22Raúl Torrez:Visit squarespace.com slash NPR to get 10 % off your first purchase of a website or domain. This message comes from Viking, committed to exploring the world in comfort. Journey through the heart of Europe on an elegant Viking longship with thoughtful service, destination-focused dining, and cultural enrichment on board and on shore. And every Viking voyage is all-inclusive with no children and no casinos. Discover more at Viking.com.

From the publisher
In a first-of-its-kind verdict, a jury in New Mexico found Meta hid what it knew about child exploitation on its social media platforms. New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez explains how the company misled children and teenagers about the safety of Facebook and Instagram.

Then, the Department of the Interior is paying a French energy company nearly $1 billion to stop plans to build an offshore wind farm in the Atlantic Ocean. Grist staff writer Jake Bittle details why the Trump administration is so against wind energy.

And, the war in Iran continues to harm energy markets around the world. Samantha Gross, director of the Energy Security and Climate Initiative at the Brookings Institution, discusses the long-term effect.

To manage podcast ad preferences, review the links below:

See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy

More from Here & Now Anytime

All 224 episodes
Why NM Meta child safety verdict could be 'first crack in the dam'Here & Now Anytime · 25 min
Listen in VO