In short
Episode topic: Whether the “sexual revolution” should be replaced by a new sexual culture amid rising male-female alienation, hookup culture fallout, Me Too backlash, and “tradwife” internet trends.
Guest backgrounds
Louise Perry is a British columnist for the Wall Street Journal (Free Expression) and author of The Case Against the Sexual Revolution. She has worked in a rape crisis center and teaches/has taught consent workshops; she also has anthropology and women’s history training.
Key claims
The pill enabled an ideological and material shift by giving women private control over fertility; however, hookup/casual-sex norms disproportionately harm women via unplanned pregnancy, sexual violence risk, and vulnerability when alone with men. Me Too is framed as a successor to earlier radical feminist critiques but ends up emphasizing reputation-damage and consent training rather than addressing deeper drivers. Perry argues rape is not mainly ideological, so consent workshops can’t outweigh pornography exposure. “Reactionary feminism” centers biological sex differences and the need for men and women to find ways to get along, not to assume psychological interchangeability.
Notable examples
Hugh Hefner/Playboy as early male-driven sexual revolution; Andrew Dworkin and Catharine MacKinnon’s pornography critique; Sex and the City as mainstreaming sex-positive individualism; tradwives as “internet ideology” responding to anger/sadness about women’s burdens (pregnancy/childbirth pain, care work) and modernity.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Tradwife Phenomenon
0:33 to 1:47
Discussion on the Tradwife movement and its implications in modern feminism.
“Are the Tradwives successful reactionary feminists?”
Introducing Louise Perry
1:47 to 2:15
Introduction of Louise Perry and her book 'The Case Against the Sexual Revolution'.
“Louise Perry is a reactionary feminist, a columnist for the Wall Street Journal Free Expression section, and the author of the book The Case Against the Sexual Revolution.”
Defining the Sexual Revolution
2:15 to 3:27
Louise Perry explains her view on the sexual revolution and its dual nature.
“I should probably start by saying what I think the sexual revolution is or was.”
Critique of Casual Sex Culture
3:27 to 4:55
Exploring the negative impacts of casual sex culture, especially on women.
“What then is the critique of the New World Order?”
Women in the Workforce
4:55 to 7:39
Louise discusses the intersection of the workforce changes and the sexual revolution.
“So in that sense, a culture of casual sex is very much worse for women than it is for men.”
Feminist Critique of Sexual Revolution
7:39 to 11:25
Exploring the feminist critique of the sexual revolution and its evolution over time.
“And particularly if the mother stops earning because she's had a baby, that becomes a real problem.”
Me Too Movement and Its Implications
11:25 to 14:01
Analysis of the Me Too movement as a response to the sexual revolution's failures.
“And it was certainly by the 90s, the sex positive vision, as it's sometimes called, was riding high.”
The Evolution of Me Too and Consent
14:01 to 17:08
Explore the implications of the Me Too movement and the role of consent workshops.
“No, I think you have to see Me Too as a kind of successor to the MacKinnon and Dworkin era.”
Understanding Reactionary Feminism
17:09 to 21:47
A discussion on the concept of reactionary feminism and its historical context.
“It's partly a joke, but like all things, all labels begin as jokes and become sort of realities to some degree.”
Navigating Heteropessimism and Relationships
21:48 to 26:15
Investigate the phenomenon of heteropessimism and its impact on modern relationships.
“We're in a different technological moment along several dimensions, right?”
Show all 18 chapters
Cultural Alienation and Gender Politics
27:50 to 28:04
Analyze the rising cultural alienation among genders and its political implications.
“There's just much more hostile discourse between men and women coming from the feminist left, obviously coming from a kind of masculinist right.”
Exploring Male and Female Alienation
28:04 to 37:55
Discussion on cultural alienation affecting men and women and its implications.
“And this, I think it's the negativity that is really striking to me.”
Navigating Dating in the Modern Era
38:03 to 42:00
Advice for young people on dating and relationships in a digital age.
“So I'm really interested in what you think the models of improvement are.”
Historical Perspectives on Sexual Norms
42:00 to 45:00
Explore the historical challenges women faced regarding sexual choices and norms.
“There wasn't really a safe way of having an abortion.”
Balancing Tradition and Modernity in Sexual Ethics
45:00 to 48:20
Discuss the complexities of merging traditional sexual ethics with modern liberal values.
“I don't want a world in which women are completely subservient to men and have no...”
Feminism's Evolution and Its Challenges
48:20 to 52:20
Analyze the evolution of feminism and the challenges it faces in a changing cultural landscape.
“Like this is why you, I guess, you went straight to very strict norms when I asked you, right?”
The Future of Gender Relations and Happiness
52:20 to 56:00
Examine future gender relations and the pursuit of happiness in marriage and family.
“You're not just going to say, now it's 1955 again, right?”
The Tragic Outlook on Reactionary Feminism
56:00 to 56:56
Explore the challenges and individual agency within contemporary feminism.
“I guess the reason why reactionary feminism may never find a large popular audience is that I think I just have quite a tragic outlook on these questions.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Ross Douthat:Every day your business is late to AI, you fall two days behind, and the competition isn't slowing down. That's why there's NetSuite Next. NetSuite Next puts AI into everything you do. It surfaces custom insights automatically, deploys AI agents to handle routine work, and lets you ask questions conversationally, just like talking to a colleague. AI isn't coming, it's here, and your business needs to be too. If your revenues are seven figures or more, try NetSuite Next free at netsuite.ai slash NYT. Are the Tradwives successful reactionary feminists? Are they Louise Perry readers who've taken the right point of view?
0:41Yes, who found their internet ideology in Double Down.
0:49Ross Douthat:The growing alienation between men and women is, to my mind, one of the biggest stories of our time. I'm choosing to continue to be celibate. I have zero interest in dating ever again. I'm not dating nobody. It's not worth it. It's visible in our politics, where the sexes are more polarized than ever before. and is visible all over the culture in a feminist and progressive mood that seems to despair over heterosexuality itself and in the rise of toxic online misogynist influencers on the political right. Women exist for sex. You guys need to be able to stand up to your woman and tell her, shut the f*** up, okay?
1:29Ross Douthat:Females don't have independent thought. They don't come up with anything. They're just empty vessels. And then, of course, there's the debate about the mysterious tradwife phenomenon. I submit to my husband. Our husbands are to be the breadwinners as we are to be the breadmakers. And my guest this week has some provocative ideas about where the trouble started. Louise Perry is a reactionary feminist, a columnist for the Wall Street Journal Free Expression section, and the author of the book The Case Against the Sexual Revolution. Louise Perry, welcome to Interesting Times. Hello, lovely to be here.
2:02Ross Douthat:So I'm going to ask you to start by talking about a book that you wrote several years ago now in the misty days of the early 2020s that was called The Case Against the Sexual Revolution. So make that case. I should probably start by saying what I think the sexual revolution is or was. Or was. So I think it's two things. I think it was an ideological revolution, but I think at least as importantly, it was also a material revolution because of the pill. The distinctive thing about the pill compared with other contraception is that women can control it themselves and it's invisible. So you can be walking around temporarily sterile and in that sense, a different creature from someone who is fertile.
2:55And in some sense, it's difficult for us now to really fully imagine what it would be like to live in a world without contraception. It's like the technological basis of so much of contemporary ways of life and of politics. And so the book was not a refutation of the sexual revolution. I'm a beneficiary of the sexual revolution in loads of ways. And I think that there were upsides. It's as the title says, it's the case against.
3:27Ross Douthat:So what is the case against? What then is the critique of the New World Order?
3:35that there are important ways in which men and women are different from one another, which in any other era is just a completely trivial thing to say. But it is somewhat provocative right now. There are obvious physical differences between the sexes. Only women can get pregnant. There's an inherent asymmetry in terms of physical vulnerability, which is just a fact that we can't get away from. And then more controversially, there are also some ways in which men and women differ on average psychologically. There are obviously outliers in every direction, but in general, so when I'm thinking about sexual relationships, men have a stronger drive in general towards having casual sex and having lots of partners, enjoying all the fruits of the sexual evolution than do women.
4:24and women also disproportionately suffer the costs of sexual relationships that go awry. So in terms of unwanted pregnancies, which still happen even in the age of contraception, I think it's something like half of pregnancies in America, probably the same in Britain, are unplanned. Women on a physical level suffer that entirely. And also women are much more likely to suffer from sexual violence and will always be at a disadvantage when alone with a man. all else being equal. So in that sense, a culture of casual sex is very much worse for women than it is for men. Even if there will be some women who enjoy casual sex, who seek it out, I don't refute that.
5:11I think that a culture where that is the expected way in which one makes one sexual debut, so in college, is bad in general for women. And to some extent, I've written this book as a millennial, right? So I've come out of when I was a student, that really was the prevailing culture that really was riding high. That might be less true now. I think we can get onto this.
5:33Ross Douthat:Right. No, we're going to talk about how completely the world has changed since you wrote the book. I wrote this book in like 2020, yeah. Right. You're writing about a world in which sort of the norms around sex are at least supposedly defined by hookup culture. Yeah. Okay. So the case for it is straightforward, right? You give women a kind of autonomy that they didn't have before. You enable people to escape from scenarios where they have to marry the first man that they had sex with, right? And then this feeds into a different kind of material revolution where women are able to succeed and thrive in the workplace as never before.
6:24Ross Douthat:How does that fit into your critique of the sexual revolution? Is it just sort of an asterisk? Is it something that's inseparable from the changing sexual landscape? How do women in the workforce fit in? Um, it's, I mean, it's somewhat distinct from the, the, the technology shock of the pill that we've mostly been speaking about, but it's connected. I mean, when women, women's mass entry into the labor market is partly, partly an ideological product. I would say that it's actually more a consequence of the economy changing and the sort of jobs that women can more easily do becoming more plentiful.
7:06But also when it takes less time to keep a household warm, clothed and fed, it becomes more possible for women to participate in public life. Obviously, women have always worked, but traditionally the sort of work that women do is the sort of work that can be combined with childcare. typically in agricultural societies like processing raw materials because you can do that when children are around but anyway the nature of women's work does change post-sexual revolution a lot of that is to do with macro changes in terms of technology and it does present some serious challenges when it comes to the sexual and reproductive side of things because there is a you know elizabeth warren famously in the two income trap points out that when And when it becomes the norm for both parents to take home a paycheck, you introduce a fragility in the domestic economy where if the mother, well, if either parent for any reason stops earning, that's a problem.
8:08And particularly if the mother stops earning because she's had a baby, that becomes a real problem. Because if the assumption is that you have two paychecks and you're competing for, say, housing against other families who also have two paychecks, then families with a single income are at a disadvantage. So this, and this, there are ways in which, this is a very good example, I think, of ways in which the, a culture which seems to offer endless choice to women in particular can, in a way, restrict choice. In terms of the history of the sexual revolution, I want to tease out how much the kind of sexual transformation of society is separable or not from that economic transformation.
8:57Ross Douthat:When I think about the history, it seems like there is a period that is sort of very distinctively male driven. That is that I think people sometimes tend to underestimate this because of the sort of narrative around it that folds all good things together. Right. And says we got sexual sexual liberation and we got feminism at the same time. And it was a wonderful package deal. And in reality, if you go back to the late 50s and into the 60s and even into the early 1970s, you would say some of the dominant figures of the sexual revolution at that point are Hugh Hefner, right? Playboy and the Playboy philosophy.
9:39Ross Douthat:But then you also very quickly have a feminist reaction, I think, that picks up on at least some of the points you're offering in critique from the beginning, right? That focuses on sexual violence and rape, right? And the dangers of those things that focuses on the vulnerability of women, the need to sort of figure out what consent actually means in these circumstances. Can you give me your sense of what is the feminist critique of the sexual revolution? And then I guess from your perspective, why does it not succeed in sort of dealing with the problems and the fallout? So, yes, the feminist critique of the sexual revolution emerges, you know, almost immediately.
10:23Andrew Dawkins and Catherine McKinnon, these are some of the key figures who are from the get-go saying this isn't in women's interests. And there's the so-called sex wars of the 70s and 80s. It's an intra-feminist argument over exactly this. And I think that the...
10:40Ross Douthat:What was that argument? So Dworkin and McKinnon, among others, were highly critical of pornography in particular. And really very prescient about pornography. Because of course at the time they were talking about kind of smutty magazines. Which now seem to us to be quite tame. But actually, I don't think that Dawkins would have been surprised at all by what internet pornography has ended up looking like. I think that they had a better sense actually of where the cultural winds were blowing than their critics. They're also very critical of the sex industry in general and of the idea of women's role being as instruments to male sexual pleasure.
11:23But they ended up losing the argument. And it was certainly by the 90s, the sex positive vision, as it's sometimes called, was riding high. And then the emphasis was not so much on women as a class, because Jorkin and McKinnon, they're thinking really in Marxist terms about women as a class of people who are affected in these kind of material ways. the feminists who end up winning the day culturally take a more individualistic approach, see it more as a choice that women can make on a personal level to maximize their own autonomy by using whatever tools they want to, et cetera. Again, I think this is now somewhat consigned to history, but that was the sequence.
12:09And then when, say, Sex and the City comes along, those kinds of... Right.
12:13Ross Douthat:No, by the time you get to the late 1990s and the early 2000s, this is sort of the peak of Friends as the most popular American sitcom and then Sex and the City. And there's sort of an assumption that feminism, sex positivity, and a sort of highly individualistic vision have carried the day. Would you say that like a weakness of the sort of Dworkin and McKinnon perspective was that it was simply too sex negative, right? I mean, that's sort of my impression looking back, right, is that if you say, okay, we have this fierce feminist critique of the sexual revolution, but it goes all the way to saying that, in fact, there's really no way for men and women to be together at all.
13:01Ross Douthat:All sex is rape, supposedly. All sex is right. I think she never precisely said those words, but she obviously meant them. Dworkin, yes. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, it's interesting how post Me Too, there was a kind of resurgence of interest in Dorkin in particular, and a view from some feminists who hadn't lived through the sex wars that maybe they had it right all along. I have a lot of respect for Andrew Dorkin in particular mostly because she was an extremely good writer I think that often gets forgotten about her but yeah I mean also an extremist absolutely an extremist and the hostility towards men is palpable but then equally I mean what comes out of Me Too right is this immense sense which I think is still with us of despondency and disappointment around what the sexual revolution seemed to have offered.
13:53The offer was liberation. And it's fairly obvious to everybody that that hasn't been delivered.
14:00Ross Douthat:Right. No, I think you have to see Me Too as a kind of successor to the MacKinnon and Dworkin era. Yeah. Where, again, you have this sort of reassessment of hookup culture and everything associated with it that does sort of adopt a version of the argument, you're making, right? That this is a landscape that obviously benefits men or at least powerful men, exploitative men, predatory men. But then where do you think Me Too ends up? Like what is the cultural takeaway from Me Too? Where does it leave us? Yeah. I mean, so the solution offered by me too is so either I guess employing sort of gossip networks to damage male reputations it's one of the few tools that women do have at their disposal to deal with predatory men so it's that and then it's also proposals to sort of re-educate men so things like consent workshops.
15:04I used to teach consent workshops because my first proper job out of university was working for a rape crisis center. And one of my jobs was to go into schools and teach consent workshops. So I'm not completely opposed to consent workshops.
15:17Ross Douthat:What was it like to teach consent workshops? So consent workshops, I think, do something different from what people think that they do. So I think that the purpose of a consent workshop is actually to typically taught in schools or universities is to tell students what the law is to protect the institution and that we've made it clear what's acceptable and also to tell victims where they can go for help what consent workshops don't do is like reprogram young men which is i think a typical feminist response to say no we should teach men not to rape i don't think that is the primary driver of sexual violence, ideological.
15:59And this is one way in which I differ from a lot of feminist thinking. I don't think that rape or rape culture is an ideological product. I think it's a biological thing primarily, which we can respond to in all sorts of societal ways. I mean, if we're concerned about ideological... I mean, this is one criticism that I have of the more individualistic feminist position, which is that if you think that rape is a product of propaganda, shall we say, consent workshops are no match for pornography. Just think of the hundreds of hours that a typical teenage boy might be exposed to pornography compared with 30 minutes of a consent workshop.
16:40I mean, there's no match. So just on that basis, we're at a disadvantage. and Dawkins and McKinnon's position on banning pornography makes a lot more sense. If you think that rape is a product of ideology, that makes so much more sense than any other intervention.
16:58Ross Douthat:And this is why your style of feminism is part of, it gets labeled reactionary feminism. I know that's a term that you're fed. It's partly a joke. It's partly a joke, but like all things, all labels begin as jokes and become sort of realities to some degree. But that's a term that's, I think, most associated with a writer named Mary Harrington, who's also your fellow Brit. And so reactionary feminism, as I would describe it, seems to emerge after Me Too to some degree where you have the sense, okay, we had yet another feminist attempt to get to grips with the downsides of the sexual revolution.
17:40Ross Douthat:And it just didn't lead to a stable system. Right. It just ended up leading to more alienation between the sexes. They also emerge, particularly in the UK, in debates around transgender issues, right, where the reactionary feminists sometimes are people who were radical feminists, right, who were sort of insisting on differences, biological differences between the sexes that then they feel get effaced by the push for transgender rights. But that's my description. What's your description of your own perspective? Reactionary feminism certainly is a, it starts from the assumption of crucial biological difference.
18:27Ross Douthat:And it thinks that many forms of feminism have underplayed how important that is. Yes. An expression that Mary likes to use is men and women have to find a way of getting along. But that is not necessarily a given, right, in other styles of feminist thought. I've often been accused of being anti-men in my book because I say things boldly like sexual violence is overwhelmingly committed by men and sexual violence is a product of male sexual desire and all this kind of stuff. A lot of people take that as an indictment of men. I don't. I just think it's a fact. But it's paired obviously - Something can be a fact and an indictment.
19:12I suppose so. But maybe, I suppose I forgive men for this because I think it's also true that there are all sorts of virtues that are found in men and are maybe found more often in men than they are in women.
19:26Ross Douthat:Such as? I mean, the challenge of youthful male energy is that this period of maximum danger in terms of violence and aggression is also typically the period of maximum energy and the risk tolerance that men have, which leads them to do violent things, is often also the same risk tolerance that allows them to be inventive and adventurous and all of these great things. And I say this as a mother of two boys. I think that - You want them to have high risk tolerance. Yeah. And in some sense, every society has to try and solve this problem. What do we do about this energy that we find in young men?
20:06How do we channel it? Because if you don't channel it in a good direction, it's very destructive. And so do you, I don't know, Maybe you send them off to war or you send them to boarding schools or whatever. There are various solutions that we've tried. I don't think that the solution that has been toyed with in our own era of just pretending that men and women are the same psychologically or physically is productive at all. I think that's a mistake. So I guess that what reactionary summons is a different relationship to the recent past. It's not an attempt to roll back the clock just a little bit by a few decades.
20:44It's more of an attempt to look at the sweep of human history and think, okay, what are men and women like? And how have people in different times and places solved these problems, which we are also grappling with? So my first degree was in anthropology. And then I did a degree in women's history as well. and I think that my anthropological training has probably done more even than working in rape crisis to sort of shape my view of the contemporary moment because I think there are so many ways in which our culture is so strange in terms of the long sweep of human history. So strange and we think such odd things and have a tendency to assume that we are somehow outside of history or somehow completely unlike men and women of the past and that we don't need to solve the problems that they did using the tools that they had.
21:42And hey, we have the pill. So we're not completely wrong about that. There are some ways in which we are outside of history and we have very different tools at our disposal.
21:50Ross Douthat:Right. We're in a different technological moment along several dimensions, right? I want to get to the question of the effects of the digital revolution on relations between men and women. But before I get there, I just want to consider why a non-reactionary feminist might look at your argument or your critique and have some strong doubts, right? And so I think one obvious thing that they might say is, okay, look, yes, we have not exactly figured out an ideal way for men and women to get along under feminist conditions. Fair enough. was the way that men and women got along in Victorian London or Georgian London or any prior period in this metropolis's history.
22:41Ross Douthat:Was that some ideal model? No. Every era has a non-ideal model because life is non-ideal. And in this particular era, women have received jobs, legal rights, all kinds of forms of independence. And this is the crucial point, They are choosing that, right? Women are more politically liberal or more politically progressive in both the United States and in the UK. They've become still more politically liberal in the last few years, and we'll get to that in a moment. But generally, they are free actors in a free society making free choices. And a case against the sexual revolution that starts with the idea that it has been bad for women, isn't that accusing women of false consciousness to some degree, of not understanding their own interests?
23:39So two things I'd say to that. One is I think that what's sometimes called heteropessimism, this buzzy word, is an indictment of the social revolution.
23:52Ross Douthat:What is heteropessimism? Heteropessimism is what's sometimes used to describe particularly women's feeling of antagonism and disappointment towards heterosexual relationships with men and the feeling of just wanting to opt out, which is often a product of being burned by hookup culture. And I think that a lot of this is downstream of lack of friendships with the opposite sex. I think also feeds into women not necessarily having had any positive close relationships with men until they are inducted into a sexual culture, which assumes that the default initial relationship will be casual. I think that is a lot of what explains heteropessimism, that if your only experience of men is within a culture which does favor their interests, I just mean specifically the sexual culture, favors their interests, it's not surprising that women are feeling negative.
Read the full transcript
24:46And it's not difficult to find women raging against a culture of casual sex.
24:52Ross Douthat:But then also people are still falling in love and getting married, right? And they are getting married and falling in love less often than they did 40 or 50 years ago. But the marriages that are made have tended now to be a bit more durable. The divorce rate is down somewhat, right? So you have kind of people who do get married are selecting into marriages that are, you know, reasonably long lasting, are more egalitarian, right? Men do more housework and spend more time taking care of children and so on. And again, there are the compensations of professional success and independence, right? I mean, how do you wait for those?
25:34Ross Douthat:Like, maybe the price of professional success and education is just a little more hetero pessimism. And maybe some people will just opt out. Right. And they're allowed to. Yes. That's fine. And clearly there are people who are, despite all of the ways in which we have redesigned the default life course, such that it is no longer the standard sequence to be essentially match made by your community and then to get married and have children all this default. There are people who are nonetheless doing that. One thing that I would say, though, to feminists, to fellow feminists, is that if we can't find a way of encouraging a feminist way of having children, like if feminist cultures turn out to be cultures that cannot reproduce themselves, then the political project dies within a generation.
26:46Ross Douthat:This is Maurice Shema, host of The Last 12 Weeks, a new podcast from Serial Productions, The Marshall Project, and The New York Times. A couple of years back, I got an email from a defense lawyer who wanted me to write about his client. The client, David Wood, was on death row in Texas. Had been there for more than 30 years. The lawyer was writing because David Wood had lost all of his appeals. He was set to be executed. The lawyer's plan to stop the execution was to try and prove something that nobody had successfully done in three decades. That one of Texas' most notorious serial killers was actually innocent.
27:23Ross Douthat:It wasn't that the lawyers didn't have a case to make. I know two people fabricated testimony to get a guy executed. It's just that they had so little time to make it. The last 12 weeks. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
27:48Ross Douthat:Just what you were talking about with heteropessimism, right? Yeah. There's just much more hostile discourse between men and women coming from the feminist left, obviously coming from a kind of masculinist right. Yeah. And this, I think it's the negativity that is really striking to me. And again, lots of this, maybe especially in the States, but I'm sure in the UK, as well has focused on men and male alienation. But there was a really good essay in the New Statesman, sort of left of center, right, British publication about female alienation that sort of women are moving left out of a kind of profound cultural alienation, deep pessimism about the whole social structure, like sort of hostility to capitalism and hostility to young men seem to go together.
28:42Ross Douthat:And then you have obviously something very powerful happening with younger men who are sort of deep into forms of right-wing politics that are like, you know, sort of tangled up with misogyny as well as forms of racism and antisemitism. How much of this do you think is just digital conditions? Like just as the pill was a revolution, like how much of it is just the internet is bad for relations between men and women? I think quite a lot. One of the things that the internet does is that it exposes what the other sex is saying about you all the time. Okay, go on. Yes. No, this is something that say more about what that means.
29:24Ross Douthat:So what would previously have been locker room talk or would have been women gossiping amongst themselves is public and exposed in a way that it was never historically. And I think that that type of talk ought to be private. It's perfectly normal and natural for people to have mostly homosocial kind of friendships and to say vulgar or unkind things in private. But now, of course, the internet blasts this out into the public domain. I think that is part of the problem. I think also, and this has been much commented upon, the extent that the internet encourages people to double down on their ideologies is also part of the problem.
30:08I'm sure that this is a big part of what's going on with young women.
30:15Young women are very mimetic. I mean, human beings are very mimetic, but young women I think are more mimetic. So for instance, young women are often the originators of new slang. They're very sort of socially sensitive and fashions and so on often originate among young women. And that ability, which is both good and bad, is turbocharged online because the internet is this remarkable tool for mimesis. Hence why I think you see actually greater political radicalization among young women than among young men. Obviously, the young male political radicalization is more commented upon because younger men are more dangerous.
30:56It's probably the main reason that we're more worried about violence that they might commit. I think the manosphere is unlikely to encourage young men to be violent and dangerous. I think it's quite likely to encourage them to be lonely and sad. And that seems like a problem. but in terms of who has actually changed politically over the last 10 years it's young women who are veering left and young men who've actually stayed relatively still at least the median young man has stayed relatively still yeah you can see that in in polls that there's
31:29Ross Douthat:i think you'll get a slight rightward tilt for young men and you do have you do have some polling that will say you know sort of ask sort of feminist coded questions about like what are your expectations for your wife and are working women good for society and so on. I think in some of those you do see also some rightward movement among Zoomer men. But if you're just asking about sort of general questions of political affiliation, it's a very stark divergence among young women relative to men. And this is very bad for relationships. It does seem as though men and women de-radicalize each other through exposure, through positive intimate exposure.
32:11And that's exactly what's not happening.
32:14Ross Douthat:What about though, so in addition to sort of misogyny on the right and anti-masculinity on the left, you also have a sort of cultural phenomenon in the last few years that is itself sort of reactionary, right? Which is the trad wife, right? Are the trad wives successful reactionary feminists? Are they Louise Perry readers who've taken the right point of Have you? Who've doubled down on the, who've, yes, who found their internet ideology and doubled down. I mean, yes, I mean, trad wives are an internet phenomenon, obviously. Yes. But what do you make of them? I have sympathy with, I think that trad wives are angry and sad for the same reasons that progressive feminists are angry and sad, but they have a different set of solutions, which they think will solve it.
33:07Ross Douthat:Churned butter. You churn the butter. Everybody notices that not only are relations between the sexes mutually embittered, but also there are certain ways in which women's lot is just quite tragic. There are ways in which, say, the nature of the female reproductive system is that it causes a lot of suffering often in a way that just isn't true for men because we have more complex reproductive systems. Pregnancy is difficult. Childbirth is painful. There's no way of opting out. I can tell from experience a plan C section still necessitates a lot of suffering. There's no way through this which doesn't necessitate suffering.
33:46And in very traditional cultures, that's understood as the counterpart to the male burden of waging war and suffering by defending the community. The male warrior and the female, the woman in childbirth are in some sense the counterparts to one another. These are your twin roles. But of course, men don't do that anymore in cultures like ours. Men have basically been excused the suffering traditionally that they were burdened with. And also men do less of the, it's a strange feature of the modern economy, is that the jobs that men used to do, including around the home, are quite easy to automate.
34:29So we don't really need men to chop firewood anymore, for instance. But we do need women to do a lot of care work because that hasn't so far proved to be something that one can automate. So women look around and they see there are burdens that I am presented with, which seem unfair to me. And rather than blame God, which would be one option, there's a desire to blame the people. Or Adam and Eve.
35:00Ross Douthat:Yes, right. Again, the trad option is to... But for many people, they think maybe this is a product of politics. Maybe this is patriarchy or whatever. And there's an attempt to try and solve the problem. And I think tradwise, in a sense, they're doing that, right? Like say the position on childbirth, a popular view among people in the kind of tradwife online space is... Which of course isn't very trad because it's deeply online. So there's an inherent connection there. We're performing everywhere. Right. is that the reason that childbirth is painful and dangerous and difficult is because of modernity has ruined it in some sense.
35:38The hospitals are the problem that the sort of male-dominated, I actually wrote my thesis on this, male-dominated obstetrics has wrested it from the traditional control of women and this is why it's bad. And so you have things like free birthing emerging as a very small subculture, but this is where you give birth not only at home but without any assistance. You give birth on your own in the hope that maybe this solves the problem. And of course it doesn't. So these are wicked problems. They are just wicked problems. And I feel very sympathetic to women and men of all of these different online generated subcultures who are sort of raging against the world and the unfairness of some of...
36:29There are problems that modernity can't completely solve. We live so much more comfortably and safely than any of our ancestors, but there is still pain, there is still
36:41Ross Douthat:social friction, there's everything that can't really be solved. No, but wait, I'm going to ask you to solve them. That's why you're here, right?
37:04Ross Douthat:Tell me if any of this sounds familiar. Eating meat is the key to good health. Nicotine can boost brain function. GLP-1s are a miracle drug. I'm Dani Blum. I'm a health reporter at The New York Times. We're bombarded pretty much constantly with claims about how to live better and feel better, and it's really hard to separate fact from fiction. That's what really differentiates my reporting and The Times, is that I am scouring the science. I am speaking with leading experts. I am making sure that everything I write is rigorously researched, reported, and that I can back it up. And when the science isn't clear, sometimes that is the story, that we don't know the answers yet.
37:45Ross Douthat:And that's a level of nuance and depth you're not going to get just floating around the Internet. That's what you get when you subscribe to The New York Times. If you already subscribe, thanks. If you'd like to, go to mytimes.com slash subscribe.
38:03Ross Douthat:So I'm really interested in what you think the models of improvement are. Is there a different culture that's imaginable in a world with the pill and the internet, right? And I'm going to ask you to imagine it. You're in charge tomorrow, right? And we can start this as just what advice would you give to a young person, let's say, going to college, going to university, right? We would say over here, going to university with minimal romantic experience who's not sort of profoundly religious in a way that sort of sets a script for their sexual life. How should this hypothetical young person approach dating?
38:46Ross Douthat:Like what is the system that should exist? I guess those are different questions. you can take it either way. Well, I'll start by offering one concrete view, which is on contraception. I am not completely opposed to contraception. I think though that women in particular should behave as if contraception doesn't exist. If you would not have sex with this man, if you weren't using contraception, then you should not have sex with him at all. I mean, in choosing the man rather than the moment, you know, if this man wouldn't make a potentially a good father to your children, then you shouldn't have a sexual relationship with him.
39:20I think I would absolutely say that to my sure to my sons as well right um but i'm not completely opposed to contraception and in fact when the pill was first came on the market it was available exclusively to married women as a means of spacing births and actually i think that that is the key miraculous thing that the hormonal contraception can do is allow women to safely space births for the sake of their own health um because having a baby every year is bad for your body maybe that's my concrete proposal that you should use contraception within marriage rather than as a means of seeming to have consequence-free sex.
39:58But the problem is it isn't actually consequence-free, either physically, but also socially or psychologically. In terms of the rest of it, I tend to think that this might be a problem that kind of solves itself. People are going to find in the the post-digital revolution, there will be people and there are subcultures that emerge who are able to solve these problems, who find solutions to not being completely so deranged by the internet that they can't form relationships with the opposite sex. Something that I'm noticing at least as time goes by is more and more people making efforts to log off and to reject being excessively online as a spontaneous recognition that it is deranging.
40:50So maybe more people will do that as time goes by. And those will be the people who find spouses and have children and pass on that culture.
40:58Ross Douthat:Right. Is that too optimistic? Well, I want to dig in a little bit though on what that culture actually looks like, right? So you're basically arguing that we should have a culture of greater sexual restraint in which people try to have sex primarily with people who they consider prospective mates. So in this world, just to imagine it, there is still premarital sex. Probably not. There's no premarital sex. I thought in this book about just saying... So now we're becoming very reactionary here. Well, is it reactionary? It is obviously completely intuitive to say, for a woman having sex in some sense is one of the most consequential things that she can do because if she gets pregnant by this man, that is, all the options are difficult.
41:52And particularly, I mean, something I think we forget about abortion, up until recently, up until the 60s and 70s, abortion was not just illegal, it was very dangerous. There wasn't really a safe way of having an abortion. So for all of our female ancestors, your options if you get pregnant and you don't want to be are all very difficult. Of course, given that, you should take very seriously indeed who you have sex with and when. And of course, it makes sense to say that you'll only cross this line once the man has been approved by your family and community in some sense. and also has made a costly and public declaration of commitment to you.
42:36And one way of doing costly and public declarations of commitment is through marriage.
42:42Ross Douthat:So you've read, but yeah, I have many questions. So first, in our world, this world, right, where there is contraception, there is the birth control pill, there will be, you know, unknowable technologies around, you know, in the future surrounding reproduction, right? There is the internet, there is sort of a degree of just sort of generally individualism and social liberalization that's connected with technological change and economic change and so on that isn't going away. In that world, is it imaginable to have that kind of stringent norm outside of, again, sort of an intense religious community?
43:32Yeah.
43:32Ross Douthat:Right. Well, I think the religious are going to inherit the earth for multiple reasons. But so then in the future, you're suggesting, right, that this kind of ethic returns via just the return of religiosity. Maybe. Because religiosity is what yields people having children, right? Yeah. But earlier you were saying that feminists, progressives, people who are, if they are religious or not, you know, religious traditionalists, should wish for a world where their own ideas sort of flourish and continue. So what are they, you know, someone who's listening to this conversation who considers themselves a liberal feminist, right, and wants to have an ethic around sex that leads to good relations.
44:16Ross Douthat:Are you just saying learn from the conservative Christians? I'm going to draw a distinction between feminist and progressive. That's fine. So I favor a very broad definition of feminism. Yes. Politics for women, queer women, okay. And specifically, I think politics that recognizes the inherent vulnerability of women and therefore the fact that there needs to be a sort of rebalancing in some sense to account for that vulnerability. That's not at odds with being religious. I don't think. But obviously, some religions are better or worse for women in that sense. And the thing that I am aware, the liberal feminists watching and I completely agree, is that I don't want Gilead.
44:59Or there are various real world examples of this. I don't want a world in which women are completely subservient to men and have no... It's not even just the ability to work, although that's important. It's the ability to do things like you know one thing that I really appreciate about living in the modern feminist society that I do is things as basic as the ability to um swim in public I'm also Australian and um Australia has a real swimming culture and it occurred to me recently that the beach culture that Australia has is so modern and so fragile because it specifically relies on um the ability to share common space without conflict, but also the right of women to go to wear scanty swimsuits, to go into the sea safely without being harassed.
45:49That's the sort of thing that is potentially imperiled by the failure of feminist societies to reproduce themselves. And I'm using feminist in the most expansive way possible.
46:01Ross Douthat:Yes, but that culture is itself connected to permissive norms around sexuality that allow people who are teens and early 20s to say nothing of, you know, older people, right? But they're not married. They want to have sex with someone. They have sex with them in, I think, the same spirit that you might wear a string bikini to an Australian beach, right? It seems to me very hard to say we're going to have a society where there's an ideal of sexual chastity that is at least somewhat equivalent to the ideals in the traditional past and also have Australian beaches. Yeah. I'm trying to be a centrist, Ross.
46:44No, I know. I know, but it's genuinely difficult.
46:46Ross Douthat:Well, or to take another example, right? I think that it is plausible to imagine a world that had an ethic of chastity around sex that was also comfortable with women succeeding in the workforce. I think you can separate those things. But I think it's understandable that historically, feminists look and say, we had the ethic of chastity in a society that used it to control women, tell them that they shouldn't go to college, or they should only go to college to meet a husband and so on. And the fact that two things came in together historically doesn't prove that they go together, but it's an indicator, right?
47:23Ross Douthat:Like, can you separate those things? I don't know. And I also, also another strong argument against the reaction feminist position is to say that, you know, we would, we might like it if everyone sort of spontaneously realized that, particularly in a world with the pill, that it is better for you if you basically adopt soft trad norms of your own volition. But realistically, if you look at every period of the past, really, the way that this actually gets enforced is through something like slut shaming and through sexual double standards. Yes. Is it possible to have, and I don't like those things, I would rather women not suffer like that.
48:04Is that possible? I don't really know. I'm not sure if I have, I can offer critique. I'm not sure if I can be the architect of an entirely new sexual culture.
48:17Ross Douthat:Okay. But in terms of evolutions, right? Like this is why you, I guess, you went straight to very strict norms when I asked you, right? I don't think that... And when you go straight to strict norms, it immediately raises all of the questions that I've just pushed at you, including questions about what happens to gay and lesbian people under these conditions where the sexual landscape and incentive structure is very different. And again, where an ethic of chastity was associated with profound hostility to homosexuality, right? All of these questions immediately come up. And if you don't have an answer for them, is there a gradualist position?
49:03Ross Douthat:where you would say, look, you could have a society where, you know, people were understood to have sex before marriage, but there was a kind of ethic around it that said casual sex is bad. I hope so. I mean, so the one thing I'd quibble with is strict norms. Like, I don't think that a social disapproval of premarital sex counts as strict. Historically, for instance, it was quite common for brides to be pregnant on their wedding day because often they would have sex when they got engaged. History is messy in this sense. The problem though, of course, with trying to, and this is the challenge always of the conservative, of trying to defend any kind of historical society is that people always point to the trade-offs of that model and the bad things about that society, which are absolutely true.
50:04But that's why I'm pushing you on to what extent can post 1950s norms be preserved
50:17Ross Douthat:around, you know, every, I mean, there's, the list is just extremely long, right, of things that you could, that you could throw in questions around consent in marriage and marital rape, right? How much of that is, in the end, compatible in some near future or far future with an ethic of sexual restraint? And to what extent is there just this fundamental tension that we're dealing with where you can have female emancipation or you can have sexual restraint, but you can't have both. Well, I hope that's not true. And I would say that female emancipation is on a spectrum. So one can imagine, because they have existed, societies where women have, say, the right to vote, but also there are clear default templates for having children and it's considered eccentric not to, for instance.
51:15That seems to be possible. Whether or not that's possible long term, I guess, is the bigger question. Because it does seem as if there's a tendency to have a ricocheting between more permissive and more restrictive sexual cultures. And maybe that's where we are right now. When I wrote the book in whatever, 20, 20, 21. I wrote at the end, you know, at the moment, you know, millennial liberal feminism is riding high, but I wonder if there might be a reaction and there might be, you know, you see, you hear these, these trad wives, et cetera, on the internet, you know, maybe this is going to be something more substantive.
51:52And I think that has happened. And there has been a significant rebellion against the liberal feminist assumptions of say the me too moment.
52:01Ross Douthat:But it seems to me that both in sort of the trad wife phenomenon and in the more male masculinist parts of that rebellion, there is just a kind of one, a fundamental unrealism about the kind of society that we live in and how it could plausibly evolve. You're not just going to say, now it's 1955 again, right? That's not going to happen. So what would be your argument from a feminist perspective to the people who are like, what's she doing calling herself a feminist, right? Feminism is terrible and responsible for every evil in society and we just need to bring back patriarchal authority. Why should they care to preserve things that feminism has won?
52:53I think it is good for women to be educated and to have minds of their own. One of the things that we have learned from the sex revolution is that women actually do have remarkable capacities to actually outshine men in some professional contexts. Women are actually just as capable as men are of using their intellectual capacities. it is a real shame for society aside from the interest of those women it's a real shame for society to lose that i would say that that's true it's also the case that professional life is is at odds at certain crucial moments with motherhood and that to for women to entirely imitate the male um life course will often be at odds with having children at all and so there has to be a point at which that kind of gives way and there has to be some site of compromise but
53:52Ross Douthat:but why is it good for the man to help figure out those balances because that's i mean that's what certainly like that's what i tried to do in my own marriage right it's like you are trying as a man in the 21st century a conservative man but not you know not a masculinist influencer right? You are trying to find a balance that enables my own wife to be professionally fulfilled while also having kids. And it is a balance. There's no simple solution, right? But why is that good? Happy wife, happy life. Is that an expression that Americans use? Sometimes. I've heard it. Yes. Yeah. That seems compelling to me.
54:32Do you want as a man to have to manage an unhappy subservient wife? I think probably not.
54:39Ross Douthat:And if you did, That would be itself bad, right? Betray your lack of virtue. Yes. Yeah. Yeah. So I think that is one reason too. It seems I am pro-marriage not only because it's a means for having children and so on, but also because I think one remedy potentially, or the remedy that I take in my own life at least to the battle of the sexes is to look at the differences that clearly exist between men and women. and rather than read them as antagonistic, read them as charming and interesting and funny. And there is no better arena in which to learn that than in marriage and to become genuinely fond of the opposite sex.
55:23That seems a very important step on the road towards men and women getting along. And again, that seems to be obviously in the interest of both men and women to have good marriages.
55:32Ross Douthat:And you probably can't achieve that to the necessary and proper degree if you start with an assumption of fundamental inequality. Right? Yeah, with the man as a tyrant. Right. That this is the key insight of feminism is to say that all good things flow from some assumption, not of interchangeability, but some assumption of male and female equality. I think that's true. That you are marrying an equal. Yeah. I guess the reason why reactionary feminism may never find a large popular audience is that I think I just have quite a tragic outlook on these questions. Maybe this is my instinctive conservatism, my temperamental conservatism.
56:21I don't think that there are at scale clear solutions. but I think at the individual level they can be. I think one good thing to say for our current era is that if you have sufficient agency and strength of will, you can almost have it all pretty much. We all have the capacity actually to resist all of the negative trends that we've spoken about today, which maybe wasn't so true for our ancestors. So in that sense, maybe the modern choice is available to us for a good thing.
56:56Ross Douthat:All right. On that note, Louise Perry, thank you for joining. Thank you.
57:27Thank you.
From the publisher
The growing alienation between men and women is, to my mind, one of the biggest stories of our time.
It’s warping our politics and culture through the rise of misogynistic influencers on the right and a growing sense of feminist despair on the left.
My guest this week believes that our problems today can be traced back to the sexual revolution. She argues that it reset relations between the sexes in a fundamentally negative way and ultimately benefited men. Louise Perry is a columnist for The Wall Street Journal’s Free Expression section and the author of “The Case Against the Sexual Revolution.”
- 0:00 - Intro
- 01:28 - “The Case Against the Sexual Revolution"
- 16:20 - What is reactionary feminism?
- 21:30 - The effects of the digital revolution on men and women
- 30:29 - The tradwife phenomenon
- 34:58 - What about premarital sex?
- 43:38 - Can female emancipation and sexual restraint coexist?
(A full transcript of this episode is available on the Times website.)
Thoughts? Email us at interestingtimes@nytimes.com. Please subscribe to our YouTube Channel, Interesting Times with Ross Douthat.
Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.


