In short
How to identify “red flag” charities and give more effectively; also discusses EQ Investors’ “philanthropy company” model and tools for finding high-impact charities.
Guest background
John Spiers is an entrepreneur and philanthropist; founder/chair of EQ Investors (a UK B corporation wealth management firm). He previously set up Best Invest in the 1980s and sold it to 3i. He chairs the Big Give and created the charity platform Giving is Great.
Key claims
- Don’t judge charities mainly by overhead/CEO pay; focus on real impact.
- Charity data is often poor; Charity Commission categories and reporting can be misleading/outdated.
- Effective giving requires evidence of outcomes, not just outputs (e.g., services delivered).
- Government funding often favors large national orgs; John argues for match-funding to reduce risk and help smaller/local charities.
Notable examples
- City Harvest (surplus food collection → hot meals).
- Big Give match funding to “stimulate” donors.
- EQ Foundation owns ~a quarter of EQ Investors shares (stability/culture), with caveats about passive charity shareholders.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOUnderstanding EQ Investors
0:45 to 3:00
John Spiers discusses the purpose and structure of EQ Investors.
“how entrepreneurs can spot opportunities in inefficient sectors, and why AI may transform the way we all work and give.”
The Impact of Charity Ownership
3:00 to 6:30
John shares insights on how having a charity as a shareholder influences business operations.
“what you like and maybe don't like about it?”
Finding Effective Charities
6:30 to 10:29
John explains what to look for in a charity to ensure impactful donations.
“And then it took a year or two before we made this big share transfer.”
Focus Areas in Philanthropy
10:34 to 14:00
John discusses his specific interests in charitable causes, including early childhood and environmental issues.
“So what are your areas of particular focus?”
Philanthropy in Business
14:00 to 14:44
Explore how businesses can integrate philanthropy into their models.
“And therefore, in some ways, it's a sort of extension of me.”
The Impact of Company Culture
14:44 to 16:42
Understand the importance of a purpose-driven culture in businesses.
“How big a constraint is that on the sort of...”
B Corporation Insights
16:42 to 18:09
Learn about the B Corporation certification and its benefits.
“that there's a strong culture throughout of not being a me, me, me type environment.”
Introducing Giving is Great
18:09 to 19:07
Discover the creation and purpose of the Giving is Great initiative.
“I think we're the highest scoring B Corp in the UK at the moment.”
Evaluating Charities Effectively
19:07 to 22:17
Find out how to assess charities for potential support.
“where I thought that if a charity had attracted support from a good grantmaker, that that would make it more likely that it was going to be of interest because I was trying to find charities myself to support.”
Barriers to Charitable Giving
22:17 to 24:29
Discuss the reasons wealthy individuals may not donate to charities.
“and fairly frequent recycling of people.”
Show all 21 chapters
The Importance of Effective Charities
24:29 to 28:00
Understand why supporting effective charities is crucial for impact.
“Well, I would agree with you running Big Give.”
Understanding Charity Impact Measurement
28:00 to 29:20
Learn about the challenges in assessing the real impact of charities and the importance of rewarding effective ones.
“100 times what other charities are achieving?”
The Role of Matching Funds in Charitable Giving
29:20 to 31:40
Discover how match funding can increase donations and attract new donors for charities.
“Well, you said it's very hard to find out or assess what their real impact is.”
Government Funding and Local Charities
31:40 to 34:40
Explore the challenges smaller charities face in securing government funding and the need for a revised approach.
“I think also a colleague of mine coined the phrase, he said, generosity is contagious.”
Evaluating Charity Financial Health
34:40 to 36:20
Learn how to assess charity reserves and the implications for funding decisions.
“And it's the only solution, really, because neither central government nor local government can deliver anything more than the emergency type services.”
Navigating Charitable Giving as a New Donor
36:20 to 40:00
Get guidance on how to start philanthropic giving and the questions to ask about charity effectiveness.
“If their reserves are above the – the Charity Commission, I think, recommends a maximum about nine months.”
Assessing Charity Reporting and Impact
40:00 to 42:00
Understand the difference between output reports and true impact reports in charity evaluations.
“Yeah, you say that we help elderly people.”
Evaluating Charities: Data and Subjectivity
42:00 to 45:20
Learn how to assess charities through data and subjective judgment.
“You're never going to find 100 % perfect data that proves beyond all doubt this charity is achieving incredible results.”
Leadership in the Charity Sector
45:20 to 48:50
Understand the importance of leadership qualities in charities.
“Well, I mean, for me, that's the number one thing.”
Fundraising Challenges and Strategies
48:50 to 51:10
Explore the complexities of fundraising within the charity sector.
“If people are prepared to give up their time for what you're doing, that looks good.”
The Rewards of Giving and Volunteering
51:10 to 53:20
Discover the emotional and practical benefits of donating time and skills.
“But we can't be sure that that's going to happen.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Welcome to All About Business with me, James Reed, the podcast that covers everything about business, management and leadership.
0:16How do we know that charitable giving really makes a difference? And what does it take to build businesses that don't just generate profit for private shareholders, but also create measurable impact for people and communities? Joining me today on All About Business is John Spears, entrepreneur, philanthropist, and founder of EQ Investors, one of the UK's leading B corporations. John has built a career proving that profit and purpose really go hand in hand. And in this episode, he shares practical insights on what makes philanthropy effective, how entrepreneurs can spot opportunities in inefficient sectors, and why AI may transform the way we all work and give.
0:57well today on all about business i couldn't be more delighted than to welcome john spears john is an entrepreneur and philanthropist of note and he originally set up a business called best invest back in the 1980s which he sold very successfully to 3i and he's currently the chair of eq investors john has also established a charity platform called giving is great which is a fantastic resource for charities. He's a classic car enthusiast, doesn't mind me telling you that, and a champion croquet player, which must mean he has a mean streak. So John, thank you for coming in. And let's begin at the beginning.
1:36What is EQ Investors and why is it called that? EQ is a wealth management business. I spent most of my adult life working in that sector. And after I'd sold Best Invest and was no longer involved at all with it, then I still had a hankering to involved in that sector. And I think it's one of the few sectors that I feel that I've got some competence in. So I bought a fairly small business and I renamed it EQ because the emotional quotient, you know, being a measure of people's emotional intelligence, got to some of the heart of what I wanted to do because I wanted to run the business in the way I'd originally run Best invest and which private equity don't always, which was to be thinking of the client first and letting the bottom line look after itself if you'd done the proper things correctly.
2:29Whereas what I was seeing was people would start with a spreadsheet and then try to manipulate the business to achieve that result. And in my view, that's not likely to be successful in the long run. So EQ has an interesting structure. It's what I call a philanthropy company. And you're my first guest who's actually involved with a chairing a philanthropy company, which is exciting. So will you just tell us what that structure is so that our listeners know and we can explore what you like and maybe don't like about it? Well, the EQ Foundation is a registered charity that we set up soon after we bought the business.
3:07and I gifted some of my shares to it. So it now owns roughly a quarter of the company. And there are various reasons for doing that. But one was I felt that this would give some comfort to our clients and to our staff, that there would be some stability and that the culture of the way we're to run the business would be that we are trying to do the right thing. so so the other shareholders now your foundation owns a quarter yourself and people who work in the business is that right yeah so they're you and they have three quarters and and has that turned out to be the case has it given it some stability has it been have you how long ago did you do this now just over 10 years so you've got 10 years running yeah in this way i think it has but i do you know i think i think there are disadvantages to it too i think the trouble with having a charity as a major shareholder is, first of all, that charity is unlikely to have any expertise or anything else that it can bring to the party to make the business more successful.
4:14It's likely to be a passive shareholder. Secondly, its predominant interest will be in receiving an income. So it will be keen to see a regular and consistent stream of dividends. And finally, it's unlikely to have the capacity to support a capital injection if the business is in a high growth phase and needs to raise money. So I think in some businesses, it can work extremely well. I don't think it would be an appropriate structure for an early stage business that was going to be capital intensive. So you've been doing it for 10 years. Has it been a good message to customers? Do your clients like it?
4:55I mean, you're called EQ, you have a Charity Foundation owning a quarter of the business. That's a definite distinct position in the market in wealth management, I imagine. I think so. I think wealth management is a business where it's absolutely essential that your clients have complete confidence and trust in you. And it takes a long time to build up trust. You can lose it very quickly, but it takes a long time to gain it. So anything you can do that helps to boost the chances of people reaching a level of confidence that they're prepared to transact with you is good for business. And you feel the foundation is part of that, that helps with that?
5:31They trust you more because of it, do you think? I think it's part of it, but I think it's one piece of the jigsaw. Yeah. But you were very deliberate in making that decision to set it up like that. I was. When I was contemplating the structure, I originally had the idea that we, rather than being a shareholder, that we would gift a certain proportion of profits to charities each year. and there was some test marketing of that and actually they got some kind of surprisingly bad responses from it. Who are you testing that with? Customers? Potential customers, yeah. Right, and why? What was the response?
6:10When something's new and people don't understand it, we're in a world where people often tend to think, well, there's something, you know, this sounds a bit weird, it's probably not good and they thought, well, you must be making too much money if you can do that. If you can give it away. You must be charging me too much. this kind of thing. So we sort of played it down a lot after that. And then it took a year or two before we made this big share transfer. And that's been fine. But that was your generosity. I mean, personally. And that was me. So you decided you wanted to give it away. No one's going to say, why should you do that?
6:43That's your business, isn't it? It was my money. So it didn't affect you. So you should be applauded for doing that as an entrepreneur. And no customer complained. Not as far as I know. They should know. Why would they? Because the company has shareholding. And I think because we, and then with the EQ Foundation, we have some knowledge and expertise in trying to find good charities ourselves to support with our money. That is of interest to some of our clients, that we can try and help them as well. and there's a big move going on within the financial services sector that some people believe it should be a compulsory activity for financial advisors to be able to give advice on philanthropy as well.
7:23I don't personally think that would be appropriate but I do think first of all I think anybody who's thinking of making philanthropic donations is likely to be in a similar situation to I was when I first realized I had more than enough money for myself which is I didn't know what to do. I just didn't know how to find the right charities. It's not like finding good businesses. There isn't a bottom line that you can look at and give you an indication this charity is doing really good work. So it's one of the most difficult things that I've come across in my life is how to find really effective charities from the 200 ,000 that are registered in the UK.
8:05Yeah, I'm just thinking that that must be the case. I mean, what are your sort of top learnings, I suppose? If you want to look for a really great charity, what should you be looking for? Well, the fundamental thing you're trying to look for is what's their real impact? What are they achieving? You know, what you definitely don't want to ask is how much they're spending on overheads, how much the CEO get paid. Evidence to show that that at best gives you no reliable answer and at worst gives you the wrong answer. Far better the charity spends a lot of money employing the best person available in the sector than saves money and gets somebody who's great.
8:44So that's a very important message. So looking for impact is critical, but of course it's very hard to measure, very hard to judge it. What I started doing a while back as a sort of shortcut, if you like, to sort of get my short list down to something manageable, I thought, well, my background, as you know, is in the investment world. And I was thinking one night, if I didn't have the expertise or the time to find investments myself, then the shortcut is I can look and see, well, what are the top guys out there doing? What's Terry Smith buying? What are a few more people like that? And if I see, oh, they're all buying the same stock there, I might think, well, there's something interesting happening here.
9:24And I realized that we could begin to do that in the charitable sector. so if I can find a small charity in the cause area that might interest me and we're all got our own very personal beliefs about that which you know can't be interfered with but if I find one in my preferred sector and it's already being backed by say Comic Relief and Esme Feb and a few other top grant making charities well that's going to give me some encouragement you know I know that they will have done a lot of research before they did that. So it means that I probably should take a look at that one. What if hiring could be completely free?
10:04Well now it is. Whether you're filling dozens of roles over the next few months or looking for your next team member right now, read.co.uk can find them for free. Between now and the end of the year, read.co.uk is giving away 1 million free job listings to employers across the UK. No catch, no long-term commitments, just more businesses being able to find their perfect hire. But don't wait. These listings aren't free forever. Visit reed.co.uk forward slash millionjobgiveaway today and be part of 1 million opportunities to love Mondays. So what are your areas of particular focus? Charity, it sounded like you've got some specific ones that you like to...
10:45Areas that really interest me are early years. So the first thousand days after you're conceived. If you're conceived, that's interesting. Because while you're in the womb, if you're unfortunate enough to be in a hostile environment, there might be domestic violence going on, there might be abuse, there might be drugs, all sorts of things, then that's likely to have a very severe impact on the development of your brain. And if you experience what are called adverse childhood experiences, ACEs, these do have a lasting impact. So you're sort of talking up to the age of three in my arithmetic. At the age of three.
11:22You know, there's a potential rewiring opportunity maybe during puberty. But, you know, if you've been in the wrong place at three, chances are, you know, you're going to struggle to settle in school, settle into family or whatever, no matter what is provided for you. So getting involved at that point, anticipating where there may be problems, is likely to pay huge dividends. And you said that there's some rewiring potentially possible at puberty. Do you get involved in that stage as well? Yeah, absolutely. You support charities of that space. Yeah, because you're going to miss people early on.
12:01So have a second chance. I know you've been a very supportive champion of the Big Give. That's a charity I chair over many years now. And thank you for that. But I think you've also shown interest in green and environmental causes as well. Yes, that's right. I think that is the biggest challenge probably facing humanity. Yes. So to ignore it, I think, feels wrong to me. I mean, the challenges are so great that it can be a little overwhelming. But more recently, we've been backing some very early stage science in conjunction with Cambridge University to try and improve the process for extracting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
12:47It's very high risk. It might come to nothing, but it could be transformative. Yeah, it's worth a go. Well, that sounds exciting. So with Big Give, we're creating Earth Rays, which is going to be an even bigger appeal for environmental charities next year. And I'm hoping we'll find a media partner and a sponsor for that. So anyone listening wants to get involved. I mean, if you're from Netflix, we'd love to hear from you. But yeah, I completely concur with what you say, John. It's the biggest challenge facing us all. And we should seek to do something about it. So I want to go back to this Philco, quarter of the business owned by charity.
13:26You said that you didn't think that charity could be a very engaged, I suppose, shareholder. But is it possible that the way a charity supports a business is somewhat different through being a charity? It brings a different ethos to the company, to what might be a purely capitalist type run business. And maybe that's more supportive than we first realized. It could be. And I think it's going to depend a lot on what is the structure of that charity. I mean, the EQ Foundation is a foundation that I created and I run. And therefore, in some ways, it's a sort of extension of me. And so it probably doesn't add as much as, whereas if you had, say, Esme Fairbairn or something, let's say, as a shareholder and with access to all of the resources that they would have.
14:25So there are other ways of doing it. There are other ways of doing it, yeah. I suppose one of the great examples was the Wellcome Foundation. And that worked out very well indeed, but equally they realized the time had come when they needed to divest. Yeah, yeah. And so this capital raising point. How big a constraint is that on the sort of... It hasn't been for us because we're not a capital intensive business. And, you know, unfortunately we haven't been growing all that fast. But even if we had been, I think that would have been manageable. But I think, you know, clearly there are some businesses that are very capital intensive and then it would be difficult.
15:03So those reservations you expressed then, they haven't been experiences that you've felt directly but they're they're sort of reflections that you've sort of come to looking around the business world thinking that this do you think more companies should be philanthropy companies i think i think more companies should be aware of the opportunity i think each business should make its own mind up in the light of its own circumstances yeah definitely i think there's a it's a well as it was in your case a personal decision very personal decision whether you want to give that away or not yeah and usually it does come out of some you know it's some something to do with the founder you know charities aren't generally in the business of putting you know putting money into companies as venture capital and then seeing how well it does there are a few a few are but by and large they're not in that space well we had a very interesting conversation with phil conningham from raspberry pi obviously done really well and that started out as a charity so sort of the other way around so then it's still a substantial shareholder and but have built a very valuable business which has been good for the business and the charity yeah so so i i think well i suppose i should declare my hand i've written a book called karma capitalism supporting the idea of philanthropy companies and trying to encourage other people to think about it but as you said it's a business by business decision but part of our research shows that these companies last longer, they're more successful, and people like working in them.
16:34And so for those reasons, I think that's good for business as well as from the philanthropic side of things. Yeah, I think it's likely, isn't it, if a charity is at or close to the heart of a business, that there's a strong culture throughout of not being a me, me, me type environment. And And that's likely more conducive to pleasurable working and long-term success. Yeah, and I think these days especially, I think people buy into, they want to work for an organization that has a purpose. I think so. I mean, we certainly, you know, we're glad that we have a very strong connection and staff feel, you know, pleased to be part of the business with low staff turnover as a result.
17:18And, you know, it's increasingly hard to find, I think, these days. Yeah, yeah. Despite that, you know, we were one of the first B corporations in the UK. And, you know, and I think that's a great movement. But, you know, sadly, you know, it just takes time. It's still a relatively small number of companies that are in that group. But you've found that to be a positive thing from your point of view to do that as well. Very much. I mean, their certification process has certainly become considerably more taxing. But then that kind of pushes you, you know, So that was actually, that's what led us to me to transfer part of my shareholding to the foundation.
17:59Was it? Because we could see our score would be improved. Oh, I see. So any B Corp companies listening who want to improve your score become a philanthropy company. Exactly. That's a good message. So, yeah. We're aligned on that. I think we're the highest scoring B Corp in the UK at the moment. And one of the reasons. Fantastic. Well, that's good to know that you get a higher mark if you're a B Corp. Because I've heard it's become a more testing assessment. Well, I guess it's interesting too that B Lab, which is the organization that monitors B Corporations, they do see it as a positive indicator.
18:35And that's why they give the additional score. Interesting. My wife, Nicola's company, which is called Beeble, is appropriately enough a B Corp. So I'll let her know she should also become a Philco. So you've obviously been very generous philanthropically and you've got your own foundation. Tell me about Giving is Great, because this is a great creation of yours that has all sorts of potential benefits for people interested in this space. Well, Giving is Great came out of that same revelation I mentioned a few minutes ago, where I thought that if a charity had attracted support from a good grantmaker, that that would make it more likely that it was going to be of interest because I was trying to find charities myself to support.
19:20And I would go to the charity commission search engine and, for example, say I'm looking for homeless charities. And I would just get a list of names, most of which I'd never heard of before, nothing else about them. And it wasn't even as easy as getting a needle in a haystack. So - You said there are 200 ,000 charities. 200 ,000 to choose from. So I had this idea and I had a really smart guy as my chief technical officer at the time. And on Monday, I said, I've had this idea, you know, get this database of all the charities and I get this database with all the grants, both of which are available for anybody to download.
19:57This might work. And he was the kind of guy that two days later, he said, have a look at this. And he'd gone and built it for me. And so we started using it. And - So what did it tell you at the beginning? What could you see? Well, we immediately started putting, saying, well, you know, show us in some sector, show us some charities that come out of this. And once again, there'd be a list of names that we'd never heard of. But once we then looked at them, we thought, yeah, this is interesting. And the first one I think that we actually supported was City Harvest, which I still rate very highly.
20:33They're one of the leaders of collecting surplus food from supermarkets, manufacturers, distributing it to other charities. It's primarily fresh food, but not exclusively. And then those other charities turn it into a hot meal that can be given for people in need. We never would have found them before. So that was just a start. and then we started to think well what else can we what else can we do with this digital information that is freely available to us that might give us an indication that this charity is uh is interesting well one you know there's obvious things like do they have a have they consistently been filing their accounts late i'm embarrassed enough to say my own charity fell into that trap.
21:25And, you know. But that's a warning flag. Well, to me, yeah. I was being sloppy. You know, it's quite right that I got my wrist slap from giving as great for it because I needed to tighten up, and I did. So giving as great told you. Giving as great told me I'm not running my own charity very well. That's good. So, you know, if you're consistently running deficits or if your income's declining. I mean, these aren't necessarily things that mean you'd never support a charity, but I mean, you need to do a little bit more digging. What's the shape of the board? Is it the same three people who've been on it for 10 years and they look a bit like me?
22:08Well, that would not be a good indicator for me. I want to see, ideally, a broad age range, good gender mix, and fairly frequent recycling of people. So there's new ideas coming in. Again, it doesn't mean to say I'd never back a charity that had three people like me as the trustees. It just means it's a line of inquiry that I want to satisfy myself. Is there a really good reason for that? And giving is great will tell you that. Giving is great does. So we're only as good as the digital information available. Sadly, that is nothing like as good as it could be. You know, I really wish the Charity Commission would put the resources in to make the digital data far, far better.
22:58You know, the reason most commonly given is we can't afford it. There's a simple solution to that. If you run a company, every time you fill in your annual return, you have to pay a modest fee to a company's house. I think it's about 20 pounds. If every charity had to do the same thing, it raised over three million pounds for the charity commission. And why would you object to that? I mean, you're getting the benefit of being regulated. You should pay for it. Have you suggested this? Well, that's probably to the wrong person. Well, if anyone's listening, that sounds like a good idea because I think it would be really helpful if it was probably digital.
23:41Yeah, because we're in a digital age. Of course. And if we just got far better information, because the charity sector is pretty broken. I'm sure you find this too. Why do you feel that? Most people don't know how to give. They lack the confidence. They've read about a few scandals and a very small number of charities. They don't know what to look for. And that holds them back. We know that particularly amongst wealthy people in the UK, the vast majority of them give no significant amount of money to charity. I mean, I just feel terribly upset about that. It's a massively lost opportunity for the charities, even more for those people, because I know the joy that I've had when you've supported a very successful charity and you've seen what they've achieved.
24:35And it's the best feeling you can get. Yeah, yeah. Well, I would agree with you running Big Give. So most wealthy people don't give money to charity. They don't give anything significant. And your sort of assessment of that is they don't know how to or they don't think of it or it's not sold to them properly? What's your view, John? It's going to be a whole collection of things, but for the vast majority, it's too difficult. You know, it's not, you know, investing has been made pretty simple and there have always been plenty of people out there trying to sell you investments. The only person who's trying to sell you philanthropy is a charity that's trying to raise money.
25:14And because we get a lot of that if we're walking down the streets or in our email boxes or whatever, people are asking for money, we've got our defences up. And we feel embarrassed. You know, if a friend comes and asks you for a bit of money, I don't know about you. No one really likes being asked for money. I'm sort of thinking, well, okay, but, you know, is this charity any good what work have you done on it and and this is what again i say with giving is great if someone's asking you to support their favorite charity just check it out on giving us great doesn't mean to say if it's got some negative comments on it that you wouldn't support it but it'll give you a few questions maybe you can then put to them and you can say well why have you been filing your accounts late um so that's very good advice give you a bit of basis but the The most important thing is if you can get some evidence of the good they're doing, you know, if you can see, wow, those people, you've taken them off the scrap heap of life and given them the kind of opportunities.
26:18Because the thing that drove me was, I mean, I've been astonishingly lucky in my life. You know, I was not subject to any adverse childhood experiences as far as I'm aware. You know, I was in a stable home environment. I went to a good school. I went to a great university. I've enjoyed employment through my life whenever I've needed it or wanted it. And I've been moderately healthy. So I've been lucky, but a lot of people aren't. And if you were in the wrong place in those first thousand days that we talked about, it's not your fault that you've ended up on the street. You don't have the capacity.
27:02And it took me a long time to realize this. I thought, why don't they just go and get a job? They can't. There are serious issues deep inside them. It may not be possible to address them at all now. But even if it is, it's going to take time and it takes a dedicated intervention. You're not going to get that from the state. The charitable sector is the only hope for doing something about this. so that so that's a real call for action from the wealthier amongst the population to step forward really because as you say the state can't do it and these charities there are lots of them many of which are really great which you can help people surface now on giving is great they are but as in most walks of life there's a massive difference between the really good ones and the okay ones.
27:57The best charities are achieving more than 100 times the impact. 100 times what other charities are achieving? You know, than an average charity. That's huge, that difference. So it really makes sense to spend a bit of time to try to, you know, because the need is unlimited. Right. So every penny that goes into charitable sector needs to work as hard as possible. And because the normal laws, the Darwinian laws of commerce don't apply, you know, in the commercial world. They're not going to go bust in the same way. In the commercial world, you go bust or you get taken over if you're not very good.
28:38In the charitable world, if you've got a good fundraiser, even if you're rubbish at what you're doing, you're - Your customers aren't going to be - Nobody knows. so rewarding those those charities that are really good is a very important part of my mission and that's what i'm trying to do with giving is great i'm trying to make it easier for the cream to come to the top of the pile um and what we're seeing now is that more and more charities are looking at their score on giving is great so just like i did how can we get my how can we get our score up And that's good. In a small way, I think we're starting to drive a little bit of change, but my, we've got a long way to go still.
Read the full transcript
29:21Well, you said it's very hard to find out or assess what their real impact is. I mean, given the range of things that charities do, that must be incredibly difficult. It is incredibly difficult. And I think unless you've got a lot of time and a lot of experience, you need to rely on somebody else. And that's where, to say, it's useful that we have a lot of very good grant-making organizations in this country. And they are doing this full time. They're doing a lot of the due diligence. They're doing the due diligence and checking it out. And, you know, they also want to find the best. So that's a good proxy.
30:06With Big Give, which obviously you have been engaged with for a number of years, I find that it seems to favour the more dynamic charities because they have to go out and raise funds themselves and get their supporters activated to support the appeal. And we obviously do due diligence on the charities as well. But I've found that match funding is a very important way of making those pounds go further. Would you agree with that? I do agree. I mean, as you know, I've been supporting the Big Give ever since I set up the EQ Foundation, I think. I think it's a very simple way of just trying to stimulate something in people of, oh, I'm kind of getting something for nothing here.
30:51And I need to do it now because this opportunity won't be here maybe next week. Yeah. So, and what we all know is that the charities have managed to attract a lot of brand new donors by using this technique. And hopefully they can then engage with them and keep them supporting them in future years. So I think matching is a great idea. You know, there are some weaknesses to it. But overall, I think it's great. And I often, when we're supporting charities, we will do it on a match basis and we'll say, well, you need this. We'll give you, say, half of it, but you need to get the other half. And you can use us as the lever to get that.
31:39Yeah, exactly. It makes all the money go further if we can achieve that. I think also a colleague of mine coined the phrase, he said, generosity is contagious. When you can see other people giving, other people come behind it and support it. Absolutely. Absolutely. Well, and I think it's also the comfort and the strength of numbers. If other people are doing this, then they can't all be wrong. You'd hope not. You'd hope not. But we find that people give more and they give more often when there's a match. And as you said, rightly, the charities find a lot of new donors as well, which is good for them.
32:25Where do you see this headed? I mean, because a lot of things government cannot do, but people are asking more and more of government, you know, and taxation looks likely to rise. And the pressure on government is huge, but there are more and more social demands. is there some sort of new settlement you can envisage or how's this going to evolve because it looks like it might break? Well, of course, you know, the government allocates a large amount of money to the charitable sector, but unfortunately does it in a pretty bad way a lot of the time. Explain. How does it allocate it? Well, for sort of fairly understandable reasons, they tend to prefer to deal with national organisations.
33:12Because then they can enter in a single contract and whatever the services can be delivered across the country. You understand that. But as you know, the real dynamism is not in these big national organizations. It's in the smaller ones, the local ones that know their communities really well. Or it could be the smaller ones that want to become national and they've spent some time developing a program that's highly effective. But they don't have that national scale. And we see that all the time, that these guys are being starved of those government funds. Right. And they're going to some other organization that, you know, is very clearly less good at doing it.
33:53I would like to see, first of all, I think the government funding should always be provided on a match basis. Yeah. Because government's never going to be very good at spotting the best charities either. At least you'll have the world pulled over their eyes. So a simple way of diffusing your risk there is say, well, we'll give you a million pounds or whatever it is, but you've got to raise a million or maybe two million or three million yourself. And if you can't do that, well, you don't get anything. And that would be an indication that they're not so effective. So I think a combination of using matching and providing a way for smaller charities to get a decent share of the pie would have a massive impact.
34:44And it's the only solution, really, because neither central government nor local government can deliver anything more than the emergency type services. we ran a small charity appeal through big give earlier in the year and it was it was successful but it would need to scale up considerably to to meet that um but i would agree because it's in those smaller charities you have the local they're like social entrepreneurs the sort of dynamic people who know the community and want to get things done there's a local heroes these people and it'd be good to back them. And they know the local circumstances.
35:23And if they're founders, they're passionate. I mean, there's no such thing. They're not working a 35-hour week. They're probably working far too hard. And they're probably inspiring the other people who work with them to do something similar because they're on a mission. I'm not saying that – I mean, there's a whole lot of areas where you have to have big infrastructure if you're providing emergency aid internationally and so on. And it's hard to do that without that. So you said earlier that you shouldn't be looking at the sort of admin costs of the charity. I mean, if a charity's got a lot of cash in its accounts, they don't need any more usually, do they?
36:05I mean, isn't that sort of reading of the accounts part of the... Oh, if they've got excess reserves. I mean, some charities have huge reserves, don't they? Yeah, then they don't need the money. So you would say they wouldn't be priorities for me? Yeah, I mean, giving is great. We'll flag that up. We'll flag that up. If their reserves are above the – the Charity Commission, I think, recommends a maximum about nine months. Actually, I think there's nothing wrong with being a bit more, especially if you're a fast-growing charity. Yeah, if you're a business, that would feel a bit tight, wouldn't it?
36:39Well, it would be. I wouldn't like that, yeah. I agree. Nine months, yeah. I agree. But there's a lot of donors will not support you if you've got more than one year's overhead in cash. Given the volatility of something and the lack of visibility on future donations, I'm with you. I think this is too high, but that's where the guidance is. We'll flag it up, I think, if it's over a year. And again, it's not saying don't support it, especially if it's fast growing. Because if it's fast growing, the measurement's being done on the average of last year's income, and you're already way above that. So, you know, it's a measure that needs to be looked at with some care.
37:20So I'm a sort of – imagine I'm a wealthy person who's come into a bit of money. I don't really – I know I want to do something philanthropic. I want to support charity, but I don't know where to go. I don't know how to start. So someone's told me giving is great. Go and check it out. It's worth checking out. John Spears is great, and he knows what he's doing. It's worth it. So I go there. I've decided I want to give away 50 grand. What should I do when I get there? When I go to giving is great. What should I be asking it? What should I be looking for to help make a good decision? Well, I think the first thing, we've all got highly personalized preferences.
38:02I want to support teenagers. Preferences, yeah. So, you know, it's working out. so i know that but beyond that i don't know i've got no idea which charities okay okay and if you want to support teenagers maybe you know you're not particularly bothered whether you know you're probably keen on getting them into work you're probably keen on helping them with any addiction issues they're helping them launch into life you know you know you know it could be so the actual the type of intervention probably not so important to you it's the actual beneficiary now this is where it gets difficult because you see, this is where it comes back to this poor quality data that we're getting.
38:42Um, when you set a charity up, the charity commission requires you to, uh, stipulate who you're going to help and what you're going to do. And, um, and there's a small number of preset categories. Children would be one of them. Teenagers is not, um, elderly people would be one. And a lot of charities, they would think, well, let's tick all of them because we don't know exactly where we're going to end up. And then we're covered. That's not that helpful, if you want to. So then, of course, it becomes completely useless. You're then trying to find, you know, you want to help elderly people and you find that ticked that box 20 years ago, but they don't do anything.
39:22So children would cover the teenager category or young people? Well, would it? Well, would it? You know, I mean, this is it. There isn't a category for teenagers. Right. And I agree with you. I think that's a very important category. So that whole context, that needs to be revisited by the Charity Commission. There needs to be more choices. And every time that you fill your annual return in, you should be obliged to update it. Because at the moment, you're not. You fill in your financial information. You don't even look at it. We get people coming under Giving is Great, Charities, and they say, information on your site's all wrong.
40:02Could you show us what it is? Yeah, you say that we help elderly people. We don't. We don't do that at all. And we say, well, if you go on your page on the Charity Commission, you'll see that that's what it says there. That's why it's there, I guess. You know, if that's not true, you can go online and you can edit it directly to the Charity Commission and that will update our site very quickly afterwards. And they'll say, thank you very much. But, you know, they've not been prompted for this ever since they set the charity up. They're not probably even aware of it. And this is where, you know, it's not rocket science to get this right, and it make it so much better.
40:36Now, we at Giving Us Great have tried to make much more granular analysis of the beneficiaries using a bit of AI and stuff. But I think it's better than just relying on the charity commission, but it's nothing like as good as I want it to be. So you can put on there who you want the beneficiary to be, and that will narrow it down. Will you get every charity that's in that sector? No. All right, so I might get some charities coming up, and then I want to know how good they are impact-wise. What questions should I ask about that? First thing is just to have a look at what they're publishing themselves on their impact reports.
41:18Most charities these days publish something called an impact report. Most of them, unfortunately, are not impact reports. What are they? They're output reports. Output reports. They'll tell you what the charity has done, but they'll say, we have provided services to 1 ,200 children this year. Right. But they won't say what's been here. How those children have been affected by those services. What's the effect of that? So it doesn't take you very far forward. The better ones will then. Right. It will start to give you something. It's sometimes hard to know, isn't it? I mean, you take some children to Jamie's Farm, which I think is a great charity.
41:56Yeah. How's their mental health improved by that? I don't know, probably. Well, often they'll do a survey. Is that, how reliable is that?
42:07You're never going to find 100 % perfect data that proves beyond all doubt this charity is achieving incredible results. Eventually, you'll have to make a subjective judgment. And philanthropy is all about, for most people, it's just about activating the heart. That's the first driver of this. What do I really feel like doing? What I'm trying to do is to give people the opportunity to access their brain as well. So that I really want to give to this one. But just before I do, let's do a bit of a sense check. Could we do better? Yeah. And we won't get 100 % perfect answers, but I think it's better than doing nothing.
42:53No, I think it's really helpful. And the more information, this conundrum around the charity commission, I was just thinking, listening to you, you know, a really good management consultancy or someone like Microsoft could do a bit of pro bono work and really help the whole sector in a huge way if they did what you were suggesting, if they just charge 20 quid or whatever. I mean, so if anyone's listening who might be able to help with this, Please, please get in touch because I think that's something that would be hugely helpful. To me, you know, if you and I turned up there tomorrow, I think we'd get this sorted pretty quickly.
43:26But then, you know, I don't know. I know I've always been a bit overambitious about my own view of my ability. But I think Microsoft's a better idea. Someone. I mean, it sounds like it's very doable, though, that this data could be better packaged up. It's totally doable. Better published. But they did change the whole annual return methodology a couple of years ago. What a mess that was. A lot of charities could not file at all online for months. And as a result, they now permanently look as if they filed late. And then we now have to fill a whole lot of extra questions in, none of which address these issues, some of which were sort of hot topics at the time, and a lot of which don't look very relevant.
44:11And what was the process for going through to create that? It didn't feel like it was in any kind of inclusive process that got the people who are active in the sector together. I certainly had never had an opportunity to comment on it. They didn't come and talk to you. No. That might have been a good idea. I'm one of the biggest users of their data. Yeah. No one's ever contacted me. And I tick the box that says, would you like to be contacted about this? I say yes, many times. no one has ever been in touch with me to say, can we have a chat with you and see what's good and what's bad about this data?
44:45Well, given what I'm learning, I think that would be an hour very well spent. If I'm from the charity commission, please pick up the phone to John. I don't think I'm going to be getting a Christmas card from him this year. But don't worry about that. I do think it would really help shine a light on what's possible. But yeah, I mean, sometimes you have to pay for things, I suppose if they change that 20 quid for filing your accounts point you made earlier, could unlock a lot of upsides. That's enough money to deliver a lot of change. Yeah. What about leadership in the charity sector? Absolutely.
45:21Well, I mean, for me, that's the number one thing. I mean, just as it is with a business. Yeah. I'd rather have a top CEO running a bad business than the other way around because he'll work out it's a bad business and change it. So leadership, I mean, we will not support in a significant way any charity that we don't have high level of confidence in the senior leadership. Does that mean you meet them? Yeah. So how would that, what would you go, how do you progress that? Do you go and sit down with them or do you invite them for an interview or what do you do? How do you assess their leadership qualities?
46:03Yeah, before we get to that, we will have accumulated as much information as we can. This is like evaluating a business, isn't it? Yeah, yeah, yeah. So you do desk research. We have a structured process. So we know which bits of information we need to get. What are you looking for in terms of the bits of information you need to get? Just to help people think about this. We're looking for things like how secure is the income? You know, if you're 100 % reliant on donations and a significant chunk of that is from one or two sources, you know, who may not want to continue, that would be a worry. I wouldn't mean to say I wouldn't support them, but it would be something I'd want to talk about.
46:49I would want to look at how they're evaluating impact and what their plans are for improving whatever information they've got there. and I'm interested in ambition
47:06because I'm not personally so interested in supporting really good local organizations that are happy just carrying on doing the great work they are already doing locally. I want the ones who are able to say, we're going to take this and either ourselves or in conjunction with other organizations help to roll this out. But that's my personal point. To make the work go further. Yeah. That makes the money go further. It means we can have a bigger impact. Yeah. So those are the top three things you look at. And in terms of the CV of the CEO, is there anything you look at on there? I like to see some commercial experience.
47:45Right. You know, I think someone who's been the other side of the fence and can demonstrate some success there is a big plus for me. And why is that? Well, because you know that in the harsh commercial environment, they've been successful. And we know commerce is very, very competitive these days. So if you've done well there, you must have some skills. And do you think those skills are transferable? Not always. No. So it's a different type of skill set perhaps? Yeah, no, I've seen examples of where someone's come in and where it's not worked. I think where it's most... What happened there, without naming names, obviously, but what was the sort of problem?
48:37Often you've got to handle people a little differently. If you've got a big reliance on volunteers... You need to be polite. I mean, personally, I think having a lot of volunteers is another example of a vote of confidence in an organization. If people are prepared to give up their time for what you're doing, that looks good. But it can also be dangerous because it's really hard to manage volunteers, and especially if you start to try to manage them the same way as you would manage your salaried staff. Go on. Why? What do you need to get? What's different? Why are you all turning up 10 minutes late?
49:19Can't really, well, I'm a volunteer. So I think things are simple as that. It's timekeeping. Yeah. Or, you know, you don't seem to have done much today. Well, you know, what do you want to do about it? It's hard. I mean, it might be you actually really want to get rid of that volunteer. How do you do that? There's someone who just comes in and chats to the other volunteers all day and slows them down. No. But, you know, it's a bit hard to say, would you mind doing that somewhere else? So a charity leader needs to be good at dealing with volunteers in a way that a business leader might not have to think about.
49:54That's one example. Have you got any others? That's an interesting one. Charity leadership is always going to involve fundraising. Right. So if you've been running a business and it's been a business with positive cash flow, you might not have needed to go raising more capital. So that's... But business is always involving sales, isn't it, I suppose? Yeah. They're not the same thing, though, you're saying. So fundraising is more like raising capital than sales. Yeah, except that it never ends. You're always raising more funds because of this whole structure that there's very little long-term visibility on funding.
50:32And people, as they say, have their guards up because they don't like being asked for money. Well, that's quite challenging. You know, grant makers are overwhelmed with demand, especially right now. You know, I mean, what I'm hearing is the climate's the toughest it's been all the time that I've been involved in this sector. So corporates are coming back as well. So it's a really hard environment. Now, in some ways, in the long run, that might be quite good news because if the Darwinian principles do apply and then the less good charities drop out, in the long run that could be good news. But we can't be sure that that's going to happen.
51:14No, it is a tough environment for fundraising and there's a growing demand for the services at the same time. Exactly. That's the challenge. And that's not going to stop. do you have any any message that you want to transmit more widely to for people to get behind charities at this point as we sort of wrap up our conversation given what you just said john i think i think the the maybe the most important thing is that when you when you're giving money or it may not be money it may be time or it might be skills it's incredibly rewarding when you can see how that it's being effective um and i said earlier it's probably the best feeling that life can give you so i encourage anyone who's got the capacity to try to get exposure to that and you know not just to limit their giving to helping people who are collecting money on the streets or through mail shots and things, but to get some human experience out of it.
52:26So you can give money, you can give time, you can share your skills. You can go and look on giving is great. All these things are vital. Most charities, if you're recently retired, particularly from one of the professional service firms, you will have a bundle of skills and a contact book that could be so useful. You know, so many charities are struggling often with really basic things, you know, just can't get their IT to work properly. Struggling to hire the right kind of people or can't decide, you know, offices, should we have a physical office or not? What are the options? so someone who you know can be someone who can give that extra uh level of uh of knowledge can be so useful and particularly make introductions to uh to people who then might be able to deliver some of those specialist services and the key as well as doing some good is that it's enjoyable rewarding and has given you personally great satisfaction for what you just said most of the time most of the time most of the time when i'm doing it with a charity commission i can say i'm in a state of joy work not every day but you but you you stressed a moment ago that it's net positive over you know overall if it if i wasn't getting something emotionally out of this i wouldn't be doing it no and you've been doing it a long time yeah yeah well thank you so much john for coming in to talk to me.
53:57Well, thank you for the opportunity, James, and thank you for all the great work you're doing through the Big Give and other... We'll do our best to continue that, and thank you for your ongoing support for it. That's something that means a lot to us, so I'm very grateful. I ask two questions at the end of every podcast. I'm going to ask you the same. Oh, you didn't warn me about this. No, well, the first of them is, what gets you up on a Monday morning? Because at Reed, we love Mondays. Uh, I've never had, you know, I don't really have, ever since I stopped being a teenager, I've never had a problem getting up.
54:33You know, I mean, I, I, I'm, I'm a, I'm a lark, not an owl. So, um, I, yeah, I, I get up and, but I am a, you know, and this, I'm not proud of this, but I will, something will have landed and it'll be, we need to get that done. You know? So you have something on your mind you want to get into. I've always got a to-do list and I wish I didn't, but I do. So that's what gets me going. Your to-do list gets you up. That's great. And the last question is a question from my interview book, Why You, 101 Interview Questions. Where do you see yourself in five years' time? Hopefully still above ground. And I think, you know, life is good when you're still experiencing new things.
55:26so I hope I'm in a situation where I'm still able to be meeting new people learning new things trying out new things myself well so do I thank you very much John thanks for coming to talk to me thank you John for joining me on all about business I'm your host James Reed chairman and CEO of Reed a family-run recruitment and philanthropy company if you'd like to find out more about Reed, John and EQ Investors. All links are in the show notes. See you next time.
From the publisher
Is it possible to be a highly successful entrepreneur without compromising your commitment to customers, staff, and society?
In this episode of All About Business, we’re joined by John Spiers, entrepreneur, philanthropist, veteran of the wealth management industry, and Chairman of EQ Investors, one of the UK’s leading B Corporations. John shares why he returned to the sector to found EQ Investors, how he deliberately built its culture around putting the client first, and why the bottom line will look after itself if you do things correctly.
He reveals the unique structure of EQ Investors, with a foundation owning a quarter of the shares, giving clients and staff confidence in the company’s long-term stability and purpose. This purpose-led structure earned the company the highest B Corp score in the UK. John also shares his critique of shareholder-focused capitalism and the short-term pressures of private equity, arguing why a long-term, stakeholder-first model creates greater business resilience.
John shares his immense knowledge on how to be an effective philanthropist, explains the creation of his platform, Giving Is Great, and offers vital advice on what to look for, and what not to look for, when assessing a charity’s effectiveness.
This episode is packed with valuable insight if you’re an entrepreneur interested in purpose-driven business, investment strategy, and how to build a company that prioritises all its stakeholders for long-term success.
Timecodes:
03:52 The concept of philanthropy companies
05:14 Challenges and benefits of philanthropy companies
12:34 The importance of early years and environmental causes
21:24 The creation and impact of giving is great
33:12 The power of matching donations
39:59 Challenges in charity data and impact reporting
47:58 Evaluating charity leadership
54:17 The rewards of philanthropy
Check out EQ Investors website:
Follow EQ Investors on LinkedIn:
Start your free trial at Reed.ai NOW!
All About Business is brought to you by Reed Global. Learn more at Reed.com
This podcast was co-produced by Reed Global and Flamingo Media. If you’d like to create a chart-topping podcast to elevate your brand, visit Flamingo-media.co.uk
