In short
Podcast Summary: Joe Lonsdale: American Optimist - Episode 132: Sen. Bill Hagerty
Podcast Overview Podcast Title: American Optimist Host: Joe Lonsdale Guest: Senator Bill Hagerty Episode Focus: Public safety initiatives in Memphis and regulatory frameworks for AI and cryptocurrency.
---
Key Themes and Discussions
- Government Shutdown and Political Dynamics
- Senator Hagerty's Viewpoint: The current government shutdown is politically motivated rather than due to policy disagreements.
- Criticism of Chuck Schumer and the Democrats for their handling of the shutdown.
- Discussion of the impacts on federal employees and vulnerable populations relying on government services.
- Memphis Safe Task Force
- Background: Memphis has been facing a high crime rate, notably the highest homicide rate per capita in the U.S.
- Collaborative Efforts:
- Senator Hagerty partnered with President Trump and Memphis Mayor Paul Young (Democrat) to establish a task force addressing crime.
- The initiative involved multiple federal agencies leading to thousands of arrests and rescue operations for missing children.
- Outcome: Positive feedback and a vision to transform Memphis into a safer environment for families and businesses.
- Senator Hagerty's Background and Career Path
- Professional Journey:
- Started his career at the Boston Consulting Group.
- Transitioned into venture capital, leading to noteworthy successes in the private sector.
- Served as U.S. Ambassador to Japan before being elected to the Senate.
- Foreign Military Sales and U.S. International Relations
- Foreign Military Sales:
- Senator Hagerty discussed his efforts to streamline military sales to Japan during his ambassadorship.
- Highlighted the importance of timely and effective military support amidst rising tensions in the region.
- Regulatory Frameworks for Cryptocurrency and AI
- Stablecoin Legislation: Senator Hagerty is a leading proponent of stablecoin regulations (GENIUS Act).
- Emphasis on creating clarity and consistency in regulations to protect the U.S. dollar's status as the global reserve currency.
- AI Regulation:
- The need for a balanced approach that fosters innovation while safeguarding personal and intellectual rights.
- Concerns about unregulated AI leading to societal issues versus the potential for economic growth.
- Optimism for the Future
- Vision for America:
- Senator Hagerty expressed hope for American innovation, prosperity, and global leadership.
- Emphasis on the importance of bipartisan cooperation to address pressing challenges and ensure public safety.
---
Key Takeaways
- Public Safety Initiatives: Collective efforts can bring significant positive change to struggling cities like Memphis.
- Bipartisan Collaboration: Effective governance and public safety measures transcend party lines.
- The Future of Technology: Regulatory clarity is crucial to harness the potential of emerging technologies such as AI and cryptocurrency while maintaining national security and economic stability.
- Optimism Amidst Challenges: A belief in America's ability to overcome challenges and thrive through innovation and leadership.
---
Conclusion This episode of *American Optimist* highlights the critical intersection of politics, public safety, and technological advancement. Senator Hagerty's insights reflect a proactive approach to governance and the importance of collaboration across political boundaries to address societal issues effectively. The discussion reinforces a hopeful narrative for America's future, driven by innovation and community partnership.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00George Soros spent$600 ,000 to back a DA candidate who's come in and basically stop prosecuting crime. He's doing this all over the country. Memphis had the highest homicide rate per capita of any city in the United States of America. As I saw President Trump gaining momentum, I realized things are going to change in America. And things can actually change in my home state. The market is moving to a digital economy. The dawn of a new golden age, if you will, enhanced by AI. My biggest concern is we keep making it legal. You're not going to achieve scale economies if you have patchwork regulation that basically chops it all up.
0:30You've been a major leader in this area, including stablecoin legislation. Making the framework simple, straightforward. that will, again, facilitate U.S. dollar dominance in the new arena. We're going to see an America that is the envy of the world and one that stands for prosperity and freedom and liberty in a way that no other nation possibly could.
0:55Senator Hagerty is one of our most thoughtful leaders in the Senate. He was an ambassador to Japan before. He was very successful throughout his career at PCG and building companies. It's great to have an American leader who understands business, understands the principles behind our country, who's a key leader in the Senate and is stepping up and partnering with President Trump and others to fix crypto, fix crime, and a bunch of other great areas. Excited for you to meet Senator Haggerty. Welcome to American Optimist. Really excited to have our friend Senator Bill Haggerty here. Thanks for joining us, Mr.
1:22Senator. Joe, it's great to be with you. Thank you. You're ambassador to Japan. You're the senator from Tennessee after a successful business career. I'm excited to talk about a lot of topics. Let's jump right into the big thing going on right now. I think we're about a month into a government shutdown, which is a long time for a government shutdown. Is there an end in sight? Sounds like the Democrats, like Schumer's afraid of his far left. What's going on here? Well, I think you've hit the nail on the head in terms of the politics behind all of this. And let me be clear, Joe, this is a shutdown over politics.
1:48This is not a shutdown over some sort of policy disagreement or some great concern about the United States. In fact, Chuck Schumer and the Democrats are willing to basically hold the United States hostage in order to get at certain political goals that they have. I think, frankly, these are intramural political problems because the concerns that have been articulated to me regarding the Democrats have to do with the far left of their party. And you look no further than New York State, where Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries hail from, deeply concerned there that they are going to elect a communist to be the mayor of New York.
2:21Perhaps by the time this podcast airs, that will have happened. I'm not sure. The other concern, I think, is very personal to Chuck Schumer, and that's the fact that AOC has become more popular than he is in New York State. And were she to primary him today for the United States Senate, many people believe that Schumer would be in jeopardy of losing his job. And the biggest hit that she's had against Chuck Schumer is that he took a knee to Trump, that he caved into Donald Trump because he actually kept the government open the last time this opportunity arose. So I think he's come to a decision that at least it's in their parochial best interest, political best interest, to shut the government down and demonstrate, quote, maximum resistance to Donald Trump.
3:03This is Trump derangement syndrome on steroids, in my view. And what's the net result of this? Let's see. Air traffic controllers just missed their second pay period. You've got people responsible for our nuclear arsenal that aren't being paid. You've got young law enforcement officers. You've got people at our border. You've got military that are not being paid. I don't think many families, Joe, can go two, three pay periods and endure this. And then what's going to happen this weekend is that SNAP benefits are not going to be available. So those people, some of the most vulnerable among us, are going to find themselves unable to access food.
3:40I've got my team working right now on outreach and connectivity, if you will, to food banks and churches and things in local charities that can try to help fill the void. But Chuck Schumer is doing all of this. And I think with an aim to somehow blame this on Donald Trump. If you look at what's happened, the Democrats have voted 13 times to shut the government down since this started about a month ago. Under Joe Biden, they voted 13 times to continue this budget. This is actually their budget that that they're being asked to continue. And they've just decided to shut the government down in a in a temper tantrum of sorts because they I think they just can't stand the success that Donald Trump has been achieving.
4:20And here's one of the piece of it. Initially, I thought they're going to try to do this to to prove a point that they can stand up to Trump. Then I noticed that they had this no kings rally that was that was coming up. I thought perhaps they're going to stay until the no kings rally has taken place. And that would be enough. Well, we're way past that. And now what I'm hearing is that they're going to wait until the election of the New York mayor, the governors in Virginia and in New Jersey. I don't know what the end point is, but here's what I would say. If you look at the projection of the U.S.
4:52economy at the end of Joe Biden's years, the end of 2024, they were looking at, you know, this quarter that we're in to be about a 1.8 percent GDP growth quarter. We're at four. Wow. The economy is doing far better than the Democrats want to see. And perhaps this is their effort to try to take the economy down, too, because if you stop paying air traffic controllers, air travel stops, you can just imagine the knock on effects of that in terms of slowing our economy down. And if that's their goal, I think it's truly, truly despicable that they would put, again, their own parochial political interest ahead of the success of our of our United States and the pain that it's causing American families.
5:30No, it's terrible. And you mentioned you serve on the appropriations committee in the Senate, and you mentioned that they kept extending these things in the past as well. Is there any chance we get back to regular order? Like what has to happen to do these things in the traditional way? So there's certainly a chance to do it. You've got John Thune now that's actually agreed to bring appropriation bills to the floor of the Senate. Chuck Schumer would not do it. And you ask yourself, why wouldn't Schumer have done that? Because Schumer preferred to cut these deals in a back room, not with the benefit of the appropriations committee, not with the benefit of the transparency that that brings, but rather having the Senate leadership come up with what they called an omnibus bill and give us 24 hours to read it, jam it down our throats and say the government's going to shut down.
6:11Now we're going to default on our debt, whatever the threat might be. This is where they hide all those extra things for friends in Africa or like random NGOs and stuff. Exactly. Exactly. So it's a terrible process. Much better that you actually work through the normal appropriations process. We've been trying to do this. We've actually moved three of the dozen bills through the United States Senate. The House has done all of theirs. But we've got to get back to the appropriations process. And you had, again, last week, all the Democrats block us from moving on to the defense appropriations bill.
6:38We wanted to start doing this process even while the government shut down just to get the homework done so we'd be in a better position to execute once the government reopens. Well, it seems they don't want to reopen the government and they don't want to negotiate on appropriations. You don't have to answer this, but I just want to ask a lot of my friends on the left who I talk to. They say, when we're in charge, we're going to get rid of the filibuster. And some of them who are good friends of me, they say, Joe, we don't understand. We're going to get rid of it anyway. Why are you guys keeping it right now and letting all this dysfunction happen?
7:03How should I respond to them? You know, it's it's sad when President Trump first came into office the first term. There were, I think, 33, 35 Democrats who signed on to a letter saying that it would be the ultimate destruction of the Senate were we to do away with the filibuster. And the filibuster requires bipartisanship. Yeah, that's a big difference between the House and the Senate. That's why things don't move as quickly. But it also requires us to consider and work across the aisle to get things done. The Senate slower. We have six year terms. We're supposed to be thinking strategically about the future of the United States.
7:36You compare that to the House of Representatives, two-year terms, presidents, four-year terms. No, in theory, it's a great thing. It's served America well for a couple of centuries. It seems to not be working. Yeah, but the notion that the Democrats would destroy that, I guess, shouldn't be surprising, Joe, because they've destroyed everything else. And it's unfortunate that it was Harry Reid was the first one that did away with the filibuster on judges. That's called the executive calendar. Mitch McConnell took it one step further and said, OK, we'll do that with the Supreme Court as well. Frankly, I think President Trump is so frustrated on the entire judiciary side, he'd be happy to do away with all of this.
8:10Something called a blue slip process that have that blue slip process, which, by the way, the Biden administration didn't abide by it. Wow. But Chuck Grassley is trying to maintain that sort of institutional. He's a traditional guy. He's late 80s. Exactly. Exactly. He's a traditionalist and a hell of a strong voice in the Senate. But Chuck believes that this is an important part of the institution. What's resulted from that, though, is that President Trump can't get any U.S. attorney, for example, appointed in a blue state because that blue slip process breaks apart, falls down. Chuck Schumer is not going to allow it.
8:44For example, Jay Clayton, the former head of the SEC, the former managing director or whatever they call the title, the head of Sullivan and Cromwell, one of the finest firms in the world. a complete Boy Scout, and I mean that in a very positive way. He's not going to be able to be approved to be the U.S. Attorney for the Second District of Manhattan. This is crazy, but that's exactly what's happening. Well, I hope when you guys figure that out in the Senate for all of us, it's a tough, tough thing to have to deal with what's going on with the far left holding you hostage. Let's talk about Tennessee, because you're the senator from Tennessee.
9:11This is an important story that's not getting enough attention. The Memphis Task Force with the president, you guys have, I don't know if surge is the right word, but you've surged into Memphis with a lot of different agencies and you're having amazing results. What's going on there? Something very positive is happening, Joe, and something that I probably wouldn't have imagined when I made the decision to run for the United States Senate. I've been serving in the Senate for five years now. I never even ran for dog catcher before this, didn't run for student government. This is the first time I've ever been in any elected office.
9:37And when my wife and I were talking with President Trump about doing this, I was serving as U.S. ambassador to Japan at the time and got the call that Lamar Alexander was going to be retiring and that President Trump felt I should step up and do this. We didn't know what it might bring, what the opportunity might be. And I remember President Trump explaining to me that he thought I could actually have more of an impact coming to the United States Senate. This is one of those areas. And I'll take you back into my childhood to understand it a bit more. When I was a kid, my godfather went back to seminary and became a priest.
10:12His first assignment was in Memphis, Tennessee as a pastor. And his son, who was my age, looking forward to seeing them, they invited me to come out and visit one summer and spend a couple of weeks. And my parents thought very hard about this. This is when I was about 14 years old. And they decided that I couldn't go. I'm from the middle part of Tennessee, a small town there, because they were concerned about my safety. This is a problem that's been going on. So Memphis has been a dangerous city in America for a long time. Sadly, that has been the case. When I was, I stepped out of the private sector to come in and help a friend of mine who'd become governor to run the economic development portfolio.
10:47I was the commerce secretary in essence for the state of Tennessee and recruited a major employer to bring 1 ,200 jobs from the Northeast to Tennessee. 1 ,200 jobs that paid, again, this is 12 years ago. Salary range was$90 ,000 to$120 ,000 per person. So these were good jobs that were coming in. And And I got a call from the CEO, Joe, and he said, Bill, could you please send us crime statistics for your state that suppress Memphis? He said, I've got people that are worried that they might move from New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, that they're going to be less safe in your state than they are up here.
11:22And I said, that's just hard to believe. It's something that's affected the entirety of our state. Yeah, so it hurts the reputation of everything. So we're making something positive happen. Roll forward. We're in the fourth quarter of 2024. The situation seemed hopeless. It got become much worse during the pandemic in Memphis. George Soros spent$600 ,000 to back a DA candidate from Yale Law School who's come in and basically stopped prosecuting crime. He's doing this all over the country. I know. It's just created a terrible doom loop, if you will, where the perpetrator is arrested and let out.
11:57That demoralizes the police department. The victims won't work with the police to work up the crime. It'll work up the charges because they know that the perpetrator is going to be on their doorstep and they're not going to they're not going to be jailed. So it really put Memphis in a terrible, terrible doom loop. And in 2023, I think Memphis had the highest homicide rate per capita of any city in the United States of America. So deeply troubling. And the question was in the whole arena of defund the police, which seemed to have been the Democrats platform, could we do something about this? And as I saw President Trump gaining momentum, I realized things are going to change in America and things can actually change in my home state.
12:34And I started the conversation back in 2024 with the current mayor of Memphis. Paul Young is his name. Somebody who cares deeply about his city. He's a Democrat. I'm a Republican. And my suggestion to Paul, which I think he took to heart, was that at its most fundamental level, public safety is something that all government servants owe their constituents. And I said, it doesn't matter whether there's an R behind your name or a D behind your name. It's up to us to deliver public safety. And if we can't, we should be fired. And we agreed to start working together. I started the conversation with Cash Patel in December of 2024, Pam Bondi in January, to prioritize Memphis and see if we could make a real dent in the crime problem.
13:19We worked very quietly. Why would you tip off the criminals? We were very quietly put together a task force. The first wave came in at the very beginning of the summer with federal marshals. About 140 arrests took place then. We didn't hear too much about this in the media. There's a reason you didn't hear about it because we didn't want to draw a lot of attention to it. The next wave came with an FBI task force that had some additional DEA people, but we troubled the FBI resources in Memphis. 500 more arrests, Joe. The worst of the worst. When President Trump saw that progress, he said, OK, we're going to provide Memphis the full menu.
13:51And that's the DEA, the FBI, the IRS. Think about it. These criminal organizations have illicit revenue streams. These are gangs. That's why they took down the Chicago Mafia famously, right? Exactly. That's exactly what it took to get Al Capone. And so we've got, I think, in total, 13 or 14 different federal agencies that are on the ground working on this to make certain that when we pick these people up, these criminals, that they're being charged federally. Because that's how we get around the Soros appointed DA. That's how we make sure that they don't wind up in the Shelby County Jail, but they wind up in Leavenworth.
14:24We're taking these people out of our state. And so far, we are now about another thousand that have been incarcerated, that have been arrested now through this next wave. Are most of these thousands tied to gangs or mafia groups? Most of them are hardcore gangs, particularly if you go back to the first effort. The Memphis Police Department has known who these people are. But again, they've been demoralized, they've been understaffed. And that's all changing. And if you think about removing, talk about 2 ,000, 3 ,000 hardcore criminals from the area. It's going to change the area. Exactly. It's going to change the area and it's going to lower the demands in the police department.
14:58And we're going to make Memphis the safest city in America. And my job and my pledge to the to the to the mayor and to the people of Memphis and the governor has been right alongside with me on this is that to the extent resources are necessary long term to sustain this. I'm going to do everything I can to provide the federal resources that are necessary. The governor is going to do everything he can he could do to provide the state resources necessary. And we're going to properly resource Memphis going forward from a public safety standpoint. So it remains one of the safest cities in America, and it will have a transformative impact.
15:30It's a great city, great opportunities. Elon Musk just put the hyperscaling operation XAI there,$70 billion of investment. Ford Motor Company's got the Blue Oval City coming in, a huge investment there. There's so much opportunity and so many things to be optimistic about. And now that we're working on and addressing the public safety concerns, I see nothing but upside from that. I heard you guys found some kids you saved, too, at this operation. Is that right? Joe, the number is extraordinary. The count's probably north of 50 children now that have been returned to their families. These are these are missing children.
16:00It's crazy. It is crazy. And I've spoken with law enforcement there. How could something like that happen? A number of them have been runaways. They get runaway and then they get caught up in something and kind of kept. Exactly. Exactly. And they're back with their mother, their grandmother, you name it. But you think back what happened with the pandemic, the Shelby County School System, that's Memphis, did away with the requirement to attend school. So there's no truancy issues that the police can question a young person about. So they see a bunch of kids on the street corner. They can do nothing about it now.
16:35They don't have to go to school. And so absent a truancy law, these kids have basically been on the street, and they found their way to the wrong places, I think. And so this is all changing. And I think what we're going to see long term is a lot of appreciation. I've had such positive feedback, Joe, in terms of what's happening in Memphis. People feeling safer. Businesses thriving again. People relooking at Memphis as a place they might want to locate their families or grow their businesses and that type of thing. So we're back into a positive feedback loop right now. And it would not have happened had we not been in a position to work with the local mayor and had a had had a administration, I should say, that was willing to step up and stand for law and order.
17:15One part of the Trump EO I thought was interesting, too, that we did a lot of work on was just holding the spend accountable with the NGOs and the homelessness complex and all of that. Is that is that tie into Memphis at all, too? Do you guys have to fix people illegally camping or any of those groups? The extent of that, I'm not I'm not I'm not fully aware of what the extent might be. But again, we're getting the full menu of federal resources there. So they are addressing this as well. And I know that NGOs have been operating there, particularly with the illegal alien community, that their actions have been deeply concerning.
17:44So I don't have the specifics in terms of how it's being addressed there on the streets of Memphis. But I do know that that's one of the items on the menu that are that are being looked at there. It's a big one in a lot of cities, especially L.A., Chicago. These other cities are resisting Trump right now. They don't want to come in. They don't want to fix it. I mean, you're getting people shot every weekend. I think there's more than a dozen people every weekend on average or even higher in Chicago. It's crazy. Are we going to go be able to go in and fix these cities? Do you have to have the governor's cooperation?
18:08Like, what's it take to do more of these? Well, in Tennessee, we definitely do have the governor's cooperation. Clearly, that's not the case in Illinois, California. And what we've seen, this goes back to the whole motive behind the crime at our southern border. You've got these blue states that have situated sanctuary cities inside their states. What are those sanctuary cities designed to do? They serve as magnets. Those magnets actually backfill with illegals the fleeing of citizens from those states. People moving from California, from New York, from Illinois to my home state of Tennessee. They're going to your home state of Texas.
18:43They're going to Florida. They're fleeing because things have gotten so bad. And the way these politicians have decided to backfill this is to attract illegal immigration. Now, let me get to the bottom of this. The reason and the motive behind this crime is that the census counts those illegal aliens for the purpose of allocating congressional districts and for the purpose of allocating electoral votes. At the end of the day, Joe, this is about power. California has more electoral seats than it, quote, deserves because they're able to count. These illegals that gives people who are actually citizens a disproportionate power relative to people that are citizens in my state where we don't have a large illegal population.
19:21So that is something that is a major flaw in the system. I tried to address it legislatively and every Democrat voted to block me on it. Of course, because it's giving them more power. Exactly. But that's the motive behind all of this. And so that's why I think you're seeing the resistance from these governors in blue states is because they don't want to lose their congressional power. They don't want to lose their electoral votes, and they're willing to subject their population to the crime, to the drug addiction, to all of the social problems that come along with this. This is one of those things that would take 60 votes in the Senate right now in order to fix, which is frustrating, obviously, because they're cheating.
19:53Indeed it is. It's a 60 vote issue. We cannot get there with the Democrat Party that is voting in lockstep to maintain this broken system because they figured out how to game it and gain more power in the process. Well, I hope we keep fighting and fix the census and do better. That's important work. I want to ask a little bit about your background. You have an awesome background. I think you started, I think, originally VC and private equity before going into consulting in Japan a little. Well, I'll go back. I actually started my career at the Boston Consulting Group. Oh, God. I attended school at Vanderbilt University.
20:22And coincidentally, that's where the founder of Boston Consulting Group and Bain & Company both attended Vanderbilt. So that was sort of my indirect path to get hired by Boston Consulting Group. What a great experience for a young man like myself. I think I'd been to all of seven states, Joe, before I went to work for BCG, and I wound up working on five continents. Just an incredible experience. And I was at BCG in the early years, so I actually knew the founder, Bruce Henderson, very well. I learned from the best. And to be able to do that around the globe, at the time I joined, Joe, BCG had 250 professionals worldwide.
20:58Now they're 35 ,000. So it was just a great time, formative time to be there. And they were literally changing the world, and I got to be part of it. But they're the ones that sent me to Japan back in 1988. I was there for sort of the apex of that bubble economy. I learned Japanese then, and that was a foundation for me then to go back as ambassador later. On the private equity front, I left BCG to go do a program called a White House Fellowship. The U.S. had just entered the Persian Gulf War. I was in Japan working for BCG then, and I thought, you know, I'd like to find a way to contribute, to give back, to participate in some way.
21:29So I applied for this program and went and spent a year in Washington serving this fellowship. at the time for Vice President Quayle and learned a lot there, had a good experience, then back to the private sector. That's when I went into the venture capital and private equity side. And one of the first deals that I did with my team was to lift out a division of one of my former clients at Boston Consulting Group, R.R. Donnelly, a printing company, had a small division that lifted that out. I'd modeled it to return four times our money. We hit it at just the right time in terms of the whole dot-com era.
Read the full transcript
22:03the eyeballs that started going to the B2C componentry. This was the part that actually was consumer-facing. It had no revenues, but a lot of traffic. And so the investment bankers came to see us and said, you know, we can really make something happen here if you'll change the name of the firm to the B2C component, which was MapQuest and take it public, which we did. So instead of a Forex return, I got 100 times return on our money. And that was a nice enough start for me to then go form my own firm, which is what I did. And that's how I got into private equity. Amazing. And then you went to work for governor in Tennessee.
22:33And then you became an ambassador to Japan again, based on your history there. What inspired you to do that? You knew Japan and loved it and wanted to go back? I'd been dealing with Japan from a business standpoint for years. And I certainly understood the strategic relevance of Japan to our overall posture. The Indo-Pacific, an incredibly important part of the world for America. And you think about where Japan's situated. We've got more U.S. military there than any other country in the world. Because it's a tough neighborhood, Joe. You've got North Korea, Russia and China right at your doorstep.
23:02And I can't underemphasize the concerns that I have about China right now. When I got there in 2017 as ambassador, we moved them out of the East China Sea where they were harassing the Senkaku Islands for the Japanese. They're back doing that again. The South China Sea, they built all these artificial islands and really trying to militarize that. We push back there. You think about what was happening in North Korea. Kim Jong-un was saying his button was bigger than the president. And they were launching by the time by the time we got our assets where they needed to be. Kim Jong Un calmed down.
23:30They're meeting in Hanoi. They're meeting in Singapore. And things calmed down tremendously. All of that's come back up again. And Kim Jong Un actually just launched before the president went out. So I think he's desiring a little bit of attention. If you think about what's happened with China, that's the far greater concern. And after the Biden administration failed so miserably in Afghanistan, we saw the sorties and the incursions in the Taiwan Strait go up tremendously. What we saw is aggression around the Philippines that just continues now. All of this happened after our failure in Afghanistan and it's just increasingly stepped up.
24:07China is testing the region like never before. And I think they realized that under the previous administration, there would be no response. Well, things are different now between President Xi and President Trump. I'm optimistic based on some of the conversations I've had with the team that that we're going to make. We're going to cover some positive ground. I've actually been with President Xi and President Trump together on multiple occasions. I've seen the two men in the same room. I've seen them interact. And there was definitely a relationship of mutual respect, Joe. But that was before the pandemic.
24:37That's before they floated a spy balloon over our country. And if I think about the behavior of China since 2020, there is a real chasm there that needs to be addressed. Some weird nationalist kind of energy he's trying to channel, but he's doing some really inappropriate things with it. Indeed. Indeed. But I'm hopeful that with the two leaders in the room, we'll find a breakthrough. We'll find a better place. And I think with respect to critical rare earth minerals, magnets that we need, et cetera. You know, China has tested us hard there. President Trump has demonstrated that he's not going to take that lying down.
25:08He's definitely, you know, with 157 percent tariffs, let them know that's not going to be tolerated. And my sense is that there's and I know that there's a framework that Scott Besson and Jameson Greer have negotiated. That's our Treasury Secretary and our U.S. trade representative. That framework's in place. President Trump and President Xi will be together discussing that. And I hope what will emerge will be a new level of cooperation. Maybe the cooperation is the wrong choice of words, but but but a way to to move move forward without harming one another. Yeah. Well, we got to watch them closely with their actions there.
25:37I know you guys successfully got them to double their defense spending over the last several years, which is a big, big deal. You said Japan stepping up again. One of my favorite stories that you told me at one point was how you helped accelerate the delivery of some of the weapons we need to defend Japan to them, which is something that, you know, our bureaucracy is pretty complicated to deal with and actually deliver things to our allies. Can you tell us a little bit about that? Sure. Well, when I got to the embassy, this is 2017, and Japan is the third largest economy in the world after the U.S.
26:03and China. So it's a large embassy. I think we had perhaps 23, 24 other departments beyond the State Department that were there at the embassy reporting to me. I'm responsible for this. So I'm going through all the departments. And of course, we have a large DOD component there. And one of the major activities there is called foreign military sales. That means that our allies buy our equipment. You want us to be interoperable. That leverages us around the globe. And I asked a very simple question. From the point in time the Japanese say, yes, I'd like to install a particular system. How long does it take for us to deliver that system?
26:38Yeah. The answer was, it takes a long time, sir. So are we talking months? We're talking years, sir. We're talking years. So long story short, we sort of BCG the thing to figure out what it actually looked like. It's five and a half to seven years in some cases, Joe, which is crazy. And the majority of that time is tied up in bureaucratic paperwork. Yeah, just waiting for bureaucrats to approve things. So I took the charts, went to see President Trump, laid them out on the resolute desk there with HR McMaster on one side and General Kelly on the other side. And we talked through it. President Trump said, fix it.
27:11Fix it. Get the bureaucratic time way down. I called Secretary Mattis at the time right after I walked out and explained to him what the conversation had been. He said, Bill, this has been bugging me since I ran CENTCOM. I'm all for supporting you in this. And I said, let's just make Japan a test case and see if we can can make something happen here. So the Pentagon put in place a tiger team, as they called it, and they did a monthly report with me and they just started chopping away. What can we process in parallel that we've been processing in series? Are there things that we're doing that are redundant or, frankly, conflicting?
27:41And so just working through the process. And we also had a team working on the Japan side to figure out how they could better interact with the U.S. government. So we were making real progress. the pandemic hit i run for senate and the administration changes so we're getting back into it right now but i'm very optimistic that we we have a significant process improvements that we can make and rather than delivering an obsolete piece of equipment five years after the fact i hope we're going to be in a position to deliver something much more meaningful much more rapidly yeah i mean everything's changing every two or three years at this point so we gotta we gotta get these cycles you're the technologist i mean you you understand the pace of technology development We can't be competitive in those.
28:19I find it comical when we make a deal with another country and say, we're going to deliver you these subs in 2037. I say the whole world's going to be a different place. What are you doing? Exactly. Exactly. And I think I think we're waking up to that. And the world has woken up to that. But the procurement mechanism associated with the Pentagon is so convoluted and so complicated. It's just got to be rethought. And I think we're we're putting people in place there now who are doing precisely. I have some friends who are bold in the Department of War. So I'm feeling good about about that. You also serve, I want to ask you, on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
28:49This is something a lot of us have thought a lot about. One of the things that we've been pushing on is to change how we think about aid. My friend Ben Black and I wrote a piece about rather than just giving aid, we should be encouraging investment in market development and making our partners stronger. So rather than just think of USAID, what's going to change there and what should we be doing differently with aid? Well, I'm very optimistic about what Ben's going to do. He and I have had numerous conversations about what the DFC, the former overseas private investment corporation, which we doubled the balance sheet in the first Trump administration.
29:16And what we need to do is change some of the authorities so we can actually play ball on a strategic level. And what happens is when the Democrats are in control, they send them off to do environmental deals. And, you know, they're working on things that might be nice to have in countries that probably aren't as strategic. We need him playing in the areas that are really strategic for the United States and in areas that make a real difference for America. If you think about what happened to USAID, Joe, an agency that perhaps started out well-intended to deliver aid to countries that need it and in so doing advance our, I think the term is called soft power.
29:56Joe and I at Harvard coined that term. Yeah. But to advance our soft power at the same time. What's happened, though, is that agency has completely lost its direction. as we went through it. And when President Trump came back in the second term, I was in the closed door meeting with the Foreign Relations Committee as we went through program after program to find things that we would never want funded and just are not in America's interest at all. And so I think bringing it back, bringing the funding back under the State Department, you can assure alignment as opposed to keeping it independent and lost, which is where it was, gives us much greater hope, I think, that those dollars that are expended on overseas development, those dollars that are expended on overseas aid, will be done in a way that's consistent with U.S.
30:40foreign policy. And there was no consistency in what was happening before. Well, I think a lot of the people in those departments don't believe in markets and capitalism to begin with. And so, for me, I think a lot of the money should be tied towards helping them develop market-wise and investing and partnering, which I think is a form of respect that you're partnering with them as opposed to just giving money that just kind of gets wasted. It's back to that old adage, teach a man to fish as opposed to give. It really is true, Joe. I agree with you. Philosophically, that's the right posture to take.
31:06And I think that's exactly where Ben Black wants to take his effort. I love it. I'm very bullish on all of that. We'll see what we could build to help our allies. We have to talk about digital assets and AI as well. Because you've been a major leader in this area. You've been calling for regulatory clarity around digital assets, which has been very important. Because I think they purposely kept some of the regulation from the last SEC obscure in order that they just attack anyone doing crypto stuff. I think it was very unfair. Coinbase and others complained about this. And you've sponsored a lot of legislation here, including stablecoin legislation.
31:35Tell us what you're doing, where we stand right now to fix this. You know this very well, Joe, as a business person. You need certainty and clarity in order to be able to invest in a given market. The United States was not clear whatsoever. Under Gary Gensler's leadership at the SEC, they kept it as murky as possible. That enabled him to say, you know, I know a crime when I see it. Let him be a bully. Show me the man and I'll show you the gun. that he's a friend but someone else is not doing it to him and he goes and investigates him right it's it's i let you be a bully yeah it really it really was a terrible environment and what they were doing is basically running one of the most competitive one of the most innovative industries in the world offshore yeah and i talked to developer after developer entrepreneur after entrepreneur saying you know my next operation in this area my my next big project is going to be in some other country that was heartbreaking to me and and the other thing i thought very carefully and strategically about was the role of the dollar as reserve currency.
32:28It's absolutely vital to us. And when a country loses that reserve currency status, it's generally not good. I think about what happened when Spain lost that status to the British crown, when the British crown lost that status to the United States of America. It is an incredible means of projecting strength. It's incredibly important that the United States retain our reserve currency status. And had we not played in the digital currency arena, Joe, had we stayed out, which is exactly where the previous administration was, what currency would take over? You know the market is moving that way. The market is moving to a digital economy.
33:00If the dollar is there or the dollar is not there to play, I think it was extraordinarily dangerous. So you want all the stable coins to be dollar denominated as much as possible. Exactly. And I think by making the framework simple, straightforward, every one of the stable coins that will be issued now will be backed up by U.S. Treasury securities, safe and secure. That will, again, facilitate U.S. dollar dominance in the new arena. I feel very good about where that's going. We're working right now on market structure legislation. That's going to be a much broader piece of legislation, but again, to provide the certainty necessary for this industry to continue to thrive in the United States.
33:32I love it. And it's an interesting analog right now for something else we're seeing that I'm curious to get your feedback on. The Genius Act and the market structure stuff is creating clarity in an area where before there was a patchwork and there was murkiness and it wasn't clear. We're seeing a lot of that with AI right now. And this is a complicated topic because I think a lot of us, including me, by the way, want to hold big tech accountable i was around the table a couple nights ago by the way with friends who run a lot of the big ai companies and they're we're all agreeing you know short-form videos with ai is like a form of heroin i don't even know she maybe she'd be illegal i don't know it's very scary right these short-form videos it's like really bad for our kids probably bad for us too by the way uh and there's all these things with abusing kids about you know creating material you probably want people to be able to create a woman or whatever or men too i guess with so there's all these things you want to like hold them accountable and not do and not make kids want to hurt themselves at the same time, there's all these things that are going to make our economy far more productive and create a lot of wealth.
34:25And it's a new industrial revolution, right? Which we want to be part of. And by the way, if that is not here, it's going to be in China or somewhere else. We're going to get behind. Our national security is going to be threatened. So it's an interesting nuance, right? We have to allow it to win without having it do bad. And having these 1 ,200 laws being proposed in the States with a patchwork of things is a mess. We're not going to win if that's how it goes. So there's a lot of debate about this right now. Where do you stand on these issues? So if I go back to my roots, starting my career at Boston Consulting Group, if there's anything I understand is the importance of economies of scale.
34:56And you're not going to achieve scale economies if you have patchwork regulation that basically chops it all up. This is a game that's going to be won by scale, compute scale, data scale. We need to do everything that we can to not create barriers for that. At the same time, I understand I'm from Tennessee. We have an artistic community there, great songwriters, great singers, et cetera. They want to protect their intellectual property. And a lot of stuff's getting dumped into these models. You think about it, Joe, if you and I wanted to ask the model to create a song that sounds like fill in the blank of the artist, it could come up with something.
35:28Like it probably makes a pretty good country song, but it couldn't have made it five years ago. Exactly, exactly. So I think there's a fine line there with respect to respecting intellectual property and that sort of thing. I think we can do that, though. And I think we're going to have to do it. It's incumbent on us to make that happen. And so I've got you've got competing demands of protecting those who own the data versus being able to compete against countries like China that are doing that are not constrained by the laws in any respect. And they're they're putting capital, energy, compute power and data everywhere they can get it.
36:04I'm not giving you a great answer because it is complicated, but I certainly understand the complexity of it. I'll also say this. about 10 days ago i did a fireside chat with masa sun masa is the ceo of softbank one of the largest investors in ai in the world masa in fact is doing a project here in america with larry ellison from oracle i believe michael dell uh they're going to make a massive investment here in artificial intelligence and you've got a number of things to get out of the way one is just just the chips and the capacity to do it the energy required to do it all these are things that are strategic priorities for us as a nation.
36:41But where might it take us? That's what I asked Masa. And he talked about super intelligence. And I asked him to define super intelligence. He said 10 ,000 times smarter than the average human is super intelligence. And to put that into perspective, and this is a crude metric, but he said, think about the difference between a human's brain and a fish's brain. That's the difference we're talking about. And he said, he felt we would achieve super intelligence before we achieve general intelligence meaning you can take everything from aristotle all the way to the present time dumping into a large language model on a particular vertical topic and the algorithms can work on that data you can crunch that data and you can come up with answers that would not be possible in the lifetime of a researcher here in america we just saw the first scientific breakthrough i think out of google a few weeks ago we're using ai right so they're just starting to make breakthroughs that are new which is very exciting.
37:35I think the potential there is he described it enormous. So, you can think about it vertical by vertical. You're going to have the ability for a generalist, and this is what he said is very hard to do. He said, Bill, I know you can take care of your mother. You can drive a car. You can bake a pie if you wanted to. That's very hard to do in an artificial intelligence arena. But a generalist will be equipped now with such incredible tools that productivity will be through the roof, that we'll be discovering new things. And he could see the dawn of a new golden age, if you will, enhanced by AI. And as I talk with hyperscalers, as I talk with people that are in the value chain, one of my first concerns is that we're not in a bubble.
38:13To make certain we aren't, because a lot of this funding is coming to my home state of Tennessee. Joe, I don't think we're in a bubble. I think this, even though the investment today is denominated in trillions of dollars, there is so much potential that's coming from this. So much is being gained in terms of productivity. I'm very optimistic about where this can go. We're seeing a lot of growth and productivity already in a lot of industries. My biggest concern is we keep making it legal because otherwise it's not going to be able to keep the foundational infrastructure working. Yeah. Yeah. I think that's incumbent then on people in my role.
38:42It's a big chat about whether or not it's done in Senator Cruz's committee or NDAA. But anyway, it's a big thing for the Senate to figure out. Yeah, it absolutely is. And I don't want to shirk from that responsibility, but it's got to say it is complicated and I think we're working very hard on it. I really appreciate that. But we started American Optimist to push back on cynicism and pessimism we're seeing in our country. Honestly, when you come to D.C., there is a lot. We could be cynical about the stuff you're dealing with in the Senate right now. But what are you most optimistic about? Where do you see progress being made?
39:08So, Joe, like you, I'm a parent. And I took on this job because I felt like my wife felt the same way. We've been given a wonderful gift to grow up in this country. And we've been exposed to some wonderful things. And if people like us won't step up and make certain that that possibility is there for our children and their children, what's going to happen to this nation? I'm actually quite optimistic about where things are going for my children and for yours. But it's going to take leadership. This is the greatest country in the world, bar none. And if you think about the prosperity, the liberty, and the freedom that the United States has delivered, not just for our own people, but for other nations around the world, we've been liberators.
39:46We stand for something. And I think the time is now. We're being challenged like never before, whether it's from China, from Russia, from Iran, from Venezuela, you name it, from within. The time has come for us to stand up for what we believe in, to stand up for what makes America great. And the time has come for us to see and continue to be that light for everybody else to admire. And I think as we do that, we're going to see cities like Memphis become safer again. We're going to see our economy thrive. We're going to see supply chains become more secure. We're going to see the dollar dominant again.
40:19We're going to see an America that is the envy of the world and one that stands for prosperity and freedom and liberty in a way that no other nation possibly could. Well, with confident leaders like you putting your life to fight for us, I think it makes all of us more optimistic. So thank you very much. Thank you, Joe. It's good to be with you today. Thanks.
From the publisher
In 2023, Memphis earned the distinction of the nation’s most violent and dangerous city. Senator Bill Hagerty had seen enough. Together with President Trump, he helped orchestrate the most important public safety initiative you probably haven’t heard of — until now. Thousands of criminals arrested, dozens of children rescued, and they even figured out how to work around a Soros-backed District Attorney. This is just one of many fronts Sen. Hagerty is leading on since joining the U.S. Senate.
A businessman by background, Sen. Hagerty began his career at Boston Consulting Group, growing the business in key markets like Japan, before launching his own private equity firm. In 2011, he stepped up to serve, bringing billions of dollars of investment into Tennessee as the state’s Commissioner of Economic and Community Development. In 2017, he was appointed U.S. Ambassador to Japan and played a critical role in bolstering our alliance and countering China, before being elected to the U.S. Senate in 2020.
We begin with the Senator’s diagnosis of the government shutdown and whether Republicans should end the filibuster and break the gridlock. Then, we dive into the Memphis Task Force and the Senator’s groundbreaking work to partner with the White House and a Democratic mayor to save a great American city. More than a dozen federal agencies have quietly surged into Memphis; they’ve arrested thousands of criminals, and better yet, are doing it in a way that prevents the Soros-backed DA from releasing them back on the streets. Next, we discuss the Senator’s business career and path to ambassador. One of his great successes: accelerating the delivery of U.S. weapons to Japan — a process that used to take five to seven years! Finally, we cover his leadership on stablecoin legislation — the GENIUS Act — and how he’s approaching regulatory frameworks for crypto, AI, and other emerging technologies. Sen. Hagerty has quickly become a key leader in the U.S. Senate, and you’ll see why.
00:00 Episode intro
01:20 Government shutdown; end the filibuster?
09:05 Memphis Safe Task Force
14:47 xAI in Memphis & new opportunities
20:10 Boston Consulting Group to Ambassador to Japan
25:45 Accelerating Foreign Military Sales to allies
28:46 USAID & how to reform foreign aid
31:14 GENIUS Act; leading on stablecoin legislation and crypto
33:37 How to approach AI regulation
38:55 Optimism for the future
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit blog.joelonsdale.com




