In short
Podcast Episode Notes: How to Invest in Single Stocks (but Why You Probably Shouldn't)
Episode Overview In this episode of the "Making Money" podcast, hosts Damien Jordan and Timeyin Akerele discuss the complexities and risks of investing in single stocks, featuring insights from Sasha Yanshin, a personal finance YouTuber. Sasha shares his investment strategies while cautioning listeners about the pitfalls of stock picking compared to investing in index funds.
---
Key Themes and Discussions
- Investment Philosophy
- Majority should avoid single stocks: Both Damo and Sasha emphasize that most people would be better served investing in index funds due to the time and research required for individual stock investments.
- Personal enjoyment in stock picking: Despite advocating for index funds, Damo allocates 10% of his investments to individual stocks for personal enjoyment.
- Sasha's Background
- Professional experience: Sasha studied mathematics and has worked in retail banking, risk management, and strategy consulting, which informs his investment approach and analysis.
- Understanding the Risks
- Homework is essential: Sasha stresses that investors must conduct thorough research before investing in any company. This includes evaluating financial documents (like 10-Qs and 10-Ks) and understanding market dynamics.
- Avoiding the "fan club" mentality: The hosts discuss how some investors treat stocks like fandoms, ignoring risks and potential downsides associated with their investments.
- Investment Process
- Valuation models: Sasha describes his approach of building bottom-up models that analyze revenue streams and cost structures to assess a company’s true value.
- Time commitment: He notes that a thorough analysis for each company can take significant time, estimating around 20 hours or more per quarter for proper research and analysis.
- Market Behavior
- Panic vs. fundamentals: The episode highlights how stocks can be undervalued during market panic, creating buying opportunities for informed investors. The example of Tesla's price drop to $100 illustrates this point.
- Diversification and Portfolio Management
- Diversification is key: The discussion emphasizes that having a diversified portfolio mitigates risk, as different companies will peak at different times.
- Target prices: Sasha talks about setting target prices for stocks based on thorough valuation, emphasizing that actual selling should be based on valuation rather than market sentiment.
- Psychological Aspects of Investing
- Mental resilience: The episode discusses the psychological challenges of investing, especially during downturns, and the importance of maintaining a long-term perspective.
- Avoiding hype: Sasha advises against being swayed by popular investment trends or social media hype, urging listeners to focus on fundamentals.
---
Key Takeaways
- Investing in individual stocks requires significant time, research, and a strong understanding of fundamental analysis. Most people would benefit from investing in index funds instead.
- Investors should avoid emotional reactions and instead focus on logical, data-driven decisions when evaluating stocks.
- Building a diversified portfolio and setting realistic target prices based on detailed analysis can enhance investment outcomes.
- Psychological resilience is crucial in navigating market fluctuations; long-term thinking often yields better results than short-term speculation.
---
Conclusion The episode serves as a cautionary tale for potential stock investors, urging them to understand the extensive work involved in successful stock picking while also acknowledging the enjoyment some find in the process. Ultimately, a balanced approach that combines knowledge, self-awareness, and prudent risk management is essential for successful investing.
---
For inquiries or personalized financial advice, listeners are encouraged to reach out via the podcast's contact details:
- Email: makingmoney@getmost.co.uk
Sponsors
- MoneyWeek Magazine
- TaxZap
- Vanta
- Odoo
Legal Disclaimer This episode does not constitute financial advice and is intended for educational purposes only. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01You know what I love, Damo? Things that save me time. You don't have YouTube Premium, mate, so I just don't believe that. Granted, I'll give you that one. However, I've got one for you. A great time saver in personal finance is Money Week magazine. They spend a lot of time distilling the biggest stories in personal finance down into consumable chunks, so you don't have to scroll and scroll. They give practical tips on savings, investments, pensions, the UK economy, the global economy. It's like your five a day, but for finance. If you want to give Money Week a try, you can get six issues in print and the app absolutely free by visiting moneyweek.com forward slash money.
0:34After your trial, you'll save an extra£5 a quarter on the subscription, which is exclusive to Making Money listeners. And that's moneyweek.com forward slash money. But there's a link in the description if you just want to click that.
0:48Do you want to invest in individual companies? Maybe you want a piece of Tesla, NVIDIA, Amazon. For most people, it's not the right choice. Most people don't have the time to do it. Most people don't have the skills to do it. So let's say you're invested in a relatively small portfolio 10 is relatively small right that's 200 hours a quarter choosing when to buy is is half of the half of the package but a much more difficult thing i think for most investors is trying to decide when when should you sell sasha yanshin is a fellow personal finance youtuber and he invests in individual stocks as you know i invest 90 of my portfolio into global index funds it's a method that i have faith will get me where i need to go but i know you've probably thought about stock picking.
1:29And I wanted to do an episode where Sasha walks us through his process so you can see what it really takes. The most undervalued factor in all of this. If you don't do your own homework, what are you doing? Right, very excited for this conversation. Joining us today is Sasha Janshin, my YouTube friend slash nemesis. Competitor. Yeah, and therapist. You get me through the dark times, we talk a lot. But also probably one of the smartest people I've ever met. That's very kind. You know, it's okay. You need to meet more people. So we've got you on today. I suggested that you come on because you invest in individual companies.
2:07I've seen your process and I want to communicate to people what the work that they should be doing if they want to invest in companies, individual companies. Because, you know, I preach about a global index. And I think we see a lot of people just diving into individual companies without actually really understanding what they need to do. So we're going to talk about that. can we just start first of all by talking a little bit about your background yeah sure and kind of how it's how that suits your ability to buy individual companies i i studied math at university and then i kind of applied for a bunch of different jobs not knowing what i wanted to do and ended up in uh retail banking so i worked at some big american banks in various different roles and like risk management and uh building valuation models that kind of stuff then i um progressed and worked in a few different jobs that are not worth covering in any detail.
2:56And energy, a few other things. You were just on the board for phones for you. No small thing at the age of life there. It was a bit before that, but... Big of a hand. Humble brag, let's go. And after that, in 2014, is when I started my consulting business. So that was a strategy consulting firm called Strategy Desk, where I worked with the banks, we did quite well. So we began working with a lot of banks and resources companies, probably worked with the vast majority of the banks in the UK and large financial services companies, worked a lot in the US, worked in the Middle East, quite a bit in Asia.
3:35Yeah, so our work was twofold. We helped banks launch in new jurisdictions or launch new products, that kind of stuff. So that's kind of one half of the work. And the other half of the work was mergers and acquisitions, mostly in finance and bid and tech. A big bank wants to acquire a mid-sized bank or a credit card company or something they would come to us and we would value the business for them um and that's combining the valuation skills with the the sort of the the knowledge of the industry and knowledge of the inside of how these products work and how to best value what you should pay for them because i never liked consulting when covid hit um and we got hit very hard because a lot of our business development a lot of our business was face to face i kind of saw that like this is the opportunity i'm going to go and start actually doing something that i probably personally enjoy more and so that's when the youtube started in march 2020 the more i began looking into it the more i kind of realized that there is a big gap out there in people sharing um information about this from position of any any kind of experience or any kind of knowledge i think you know in 2020 2021 the world of investing just blew up globally right so we had um people sat at home with excess money so people started suddenly paying down credit for the first time ever um people started saving and investing money at a huge rate that's never happened before at the same time as all that happened all the new investing apps turned up like the robin hoods and the trading two-on-twos and the whatever like all these popular apps turned up out of nowhere and and they were free and very easy and very accessible you know you didn't need 5 ,000 quid to start investing.
5:15A lot of the finance YouTube space got very, very busy with, how shall I put it politely? People who perhaps do not quite really always know what they're saying. And I'm not saying that I necessarily know everything, but you sometimes watch some of the content and you just hold your head in your hands and just say, what is this? People really oversimplify. people oversimplifying people treating investing like it's some kind of game or like it's some kind of team sport or like some kind of team sport i like that yeah the whole social media relationship with investment is bizarre so you have people who um they you know they think that investing in a stock is like joining a fan club so you have to go and uh decide that you like a company and from that point onwards you need to buy the scarf you need to buy all the paraphernalia yet you can only ever say good things about it.
6:11You can't ever entertain that anything could possibly be wrong. The CEO is a god from that point onwards. You all bow down and worship him however many times is necessary. And they don't talk about the risks. You're not allowed to assess the risks. You're not allowed to say, oh, these decisions over here, like these parts of the business are maybe bad parts of the business. Those decisions are maybe bad decisions. I think if you don't understand the major downsides or the major risks of the companies that you invest in if you don't genuinely think there are like significant risks and significant downsides you're not investing you're just in the fangler well if you've not valued the business all you've got is hope right exactly so i think that's why the belief point comes in like and it's like it's more of a religion than it is math at that point yeah could i ask you a pretty direct question then yeah so you know the stats you know how hard it is to invest why do you think that you can beat the market?
7:03Well, this is the thing. I say in many of my videos on YouTube, the vast majority of people should not be investing in stocks. It should be just, not in individual stocks, should be investing just in a broad market index. But I also know that a lot of people, even though they get told this, will not do it anyway. Me included. So my kind of objective is, well, I'm going to try to do my best to try to share some of the process, some of the analysis, some of the thinking with other people who are like-minded. For me personally, I'm just like, I'm happy with where I am. But the thing is, my situation is probably very different to most of the audience that I have.
7:51You know, I'm very aware of that where if I lost the investments that I have, I reckon I'd be all right. I have a business with multiple different sides to the business that is growing. The business is the biggest investment. And ultimately, yeah, and I say this to people, and I make occasional videos about this. They're videos that get absolutely no views because nobody cares. Nobody's interested in the simple fact that the best way to have a really large investing portfolio is to make a lot of money. If you go and invest in this broad market index at 10%, but you put in a million quid, your portfolio is going to do better than getting 25 % return but putting in 200 quid a week or a month or whatever.
8:33Okay, so you want to invest in an individual company. What do you do? Yeah, there's only two things but each of those probably takes quite a while. First, you've got to decide what price you're happy to buy in at and then compare that to what the price is today to determine what the upside is. and that's the process going to take you a long time but it's relatively simple you might really like the company you might not really like the price and vice versa sometimes you might want to invest in a company you don't particularly like but you think it's very undervalued and therefore you feel there's an upside in there and then the second thing is you've got to know when you're going to sell because that could happen in two months or in three months it could happen in 10 years you don't know um and again that's going to be driven by evaluation and the way you would value a business is if you were like a lot of people when they invest in stocks they don't treat it like they're buying a business but that is exactly what you're doing you're buying a small share of business but let's say you're buying the whole thing like you're buying a corner shop you would want to go through the books you would want to go and see exactly how those books have changed over time what are the different trends in the local area what is the demand for the types of products that the corner shop sells?
9:48Is there stuff that the corner shop does not sell, but could be selling where there's a potential upside that is not yet being materialized? Is there a general regeneration in the area? Is there actually something happening in the city where long term there's a potential less footfall that's going to be hitting? You should do all these same things with investing in a company because you're becoming a part owner of that business. So you would want to go and build a valuation model. And valuation model can come in very different guises. I tried to do a bit more work by building a bottom-up model where you would take each single part of the business, each business line, each single revenue stream the company has and try to figure out how that revenue stream is being generated.
10:30What are the drivers of that? Is it selling a particular service? What is the monthly price for the different options? What is the propensity for that price to change over time? What is the propensity for people to buy the various different products that the company sells, how's that going to change in the future? And basically, model all of those different things out and then just add them up to figure out what the overall business metric is going to be because each of those business lines will have its own cost base. The overall business will have its general costs. It will have its marketing costs.
10:59How do those marketing costs relate to the number of people who will be buying the products? Is there a performance marketing budget that directly brings people in? Is there a general brand marketing budget that they're always going to be spending? How is that going to change over time as the company grows? so real simple real simple two simple steps just knock it together i think people need to rethink investing in many many many cases out of what i see because a lot of people do think it is really simple and the fact is it isn't and that's why most people should not be investing and it's very weird because i do i do yeah i do an invest yeah sorry i do i do run an investing channel or of financial management channel.
11:41And it probably very much goes against what I do. I'm making a course where I'm going to try to sell the analytics kind of like learning to people. But I'm saying that most people shouldn't be doing it. And that's because that's the case. Most people don't have the time to do it. Most people don't have the skills to do it. You know, a lot of people are not very comfortable with just making a little basic table in Excel, let alone build a whole model in it, for example. And that's probably just the most basic version that you might build, you might want to build more sophisticated things to run scenarios, etc.
12:14Yeah, most people should probably steer clear if you're not prepared to do some version of that. Because if you're just basing your investing decisions off what you've heard from somebody else, even if you trust that person, that person might have wildly different risk tolerance to you. They might have a wildly different situation. They might be happy to lose all their money because in a different scenario, they will make a huge return. Their risk-reward ratio is very different to yours. You might not be very happy at all losing all of your investments. It might be a life-changing amount of money to you.
12:50They might be earning a lot of money. You might not be earning a lot of money. So they're gonna be just fine. You're not. So it's huge. You can't just listen to what somebody else is doing and copy what they're doing because they're likely to be in a different situation to you. And if you don't do your own homework, what are you doing you're just you're just gambling you just you found a stock you found a ticker symbol you found a price it's a hundred dollars like how do you know if you should invest in it or not because some random guy on youtube said so i mean like smack yourself in the face yeah uh like it's just not the way to do it how long does it take you to build a model around yeah yeah um a long time so i think a lot of people so for me if you're investing in a company just just deciding which company let's say let's say you've decided to analyze a particular company like there's time that it will take you before you even get there just to kind of weed some out by filtering or whatever what's that process um yeah so so let's say you're going through the financials you're just quickly filtering things where you you want companies in particular times and everyone has their own approaches or their own filters but let's say you identified you want to value a business right um you will need to go and read through all of their like recent 10 qs or 10 ks you need to go and read all the different sec submissions outside there sorry i'm gonna ask what are 10 qs and what are 10 ks sorry so um 10 qs and ks are the quarterly and the annual submissions the official report yeah so every quarter they release the results and there's a short version that they publish and that everyone talks about in social media.
14:35Then there's a much longer, more in-depth version with more stuff that gets sent to the SEC that nobody reads, even though that has a lot of stuff that is not in the short version that you really should read. I mean, there can be 100 pages or whatever of stuff. A lot of it is fluff and a lot of it is just copy and pasted, the same paragraphs over and over, but you still need to read to check that nothing's changed or if there's a new line somewhere. So you filter the businesses, you then go, okay, I want to value this business. You consume all of the documentation that exists around that and you're doing that every quarter.
15:06Yeah, but even before you do that, right? So you've got to go and assess all of the past stuff from a company, go and build a model. And for me, building a proper bottom-up model as a model where you're not just taking the last, I don't know, five years worth of revenues and just saying, oh, I'll apply a 30 % growth rate or something. If you're building a real model, valuing a business from first principles like what each individual business line trying to understand like what are the drivers behind every pnl line in that could you give us a real example to tesla like what yeah so so tesla is one of the companies in my portfolio and like in my model i'd be looking at um individual factories individual potential factories what are the timelines or production lines within individual factories how many cars you think that production line will make in a given year yeah how many cars will that make what are the different optics around each different factories so for example like what what do the margins look like in china versus what do the margins look like in texas versus what would the margins look like if they started the factory in brazil or in indonesia or in india all these like potential sites that they're developing like like how does that look differently to germany what are the risks of unionization in terms of like pays and how do you get this accurate data like if you're looking at how much would it be in brazil how are you going to figure that out so this is this is a good question the idea with all of this is always try to minimize the overall error.
16:26So trying to figure out like, I'm never trying to like get it perfect, but I think I'm trying to get orders of magnitude and trying to say, okay, well, if I do a top down, and a top down model is one where you just take the overall numbers and just extrapolate and try to figure it out. And the problem with that is, let's say you assign like a 30 % growth rate for five years. If you just change that to a 35 % growth rate, and you don't really know which one's right, the difference in 10 years time is going to be significant like a really like the device is going to be huge whereas if you if you do bottom up you can often reduce some of that error by kind of saying okay well you know like this production line it might produce 10 more cars or 20 more cars or whatever at max capacity it's probably unlikely to produce 10 times as many cars as whatever you're trying to model and often like sometimes there is a risk of being on the wrong side um with all of your forecasts but if you're trying to do best reasonable estimate as a baseline before you do variations before you do probabilities on top of that you you are probably going to benefit from some of the errors cancelling each other out as well um because if you apply a top down and you you are you're out that multiplier applies to everything within the whole lot whereas what you're saying is there's a margin of error that you can get and a couple of errors in a top down model because so let's say your costs are too low and your like revenue growth is too high the multiplication of those two together can be like orders of magnitude like it can be two or three x difference to your target price whereas in in the scenario we're trying to work out like what what would the average cost be okay maybe you're going to be a bit out on wages here or a bit out on something else over there but ultimately at the end of the day um you're you still like this is the thing like you can be the most accurate forecaster in the world, but you don't know what's going to happen in the future.
18:15So a lot of your guesstimates are going to be wildly wrong because things happen. Companies don't do what you think they're going to do. Companies screw up or companies outperform significantly what you think they're going to do out of nowhere. So you can never know for sure. You're just trying to, at any one point, just try to say, if you were buying the business, how much would you pay? And I think a lot of people don't necessarily do this exercise because there are businesses that that i love but i would not pay the current share price for that business because i think it's like way too expensive um it's like if you know you go to a shop there might be a brand of whatever it is that you like beer or whatever that you really like but it's it's double the price of everything else so you're not going to buy it and the same here like um people say oh you don't believe in the company i'm like i believe in lots of companies but not that price say like i held amd stock for a long time and i sold it this is the only position i sold this year um and i love the company i i use their products i buy their ridiculously priced processes because they give me the performance i need in my work and stuff like that like i'm a big fan of what lisa sue is doing over there i sold the stock because i felt that it reached my target price and i didn't have any more upside left and like that that's the only and i think that's probably an even bigger thing and the choosing when to buy is is half of the half of the package but a much more difficult thing i think for most investors is trying to decide when when should you sell because a lot of people just think just are in this fan club mentality i will never sell this stock because yeah diamond hands you know got to hold all the way to the top and then you sit there and then the stock at some point collapses back down or something happens or the thesis changes could you give the example of lucid motors because i know this is a good example that kind of can you run through that yeah so i held a very small position lucid because early on when it's a very difficult company to value and i had a small position because very it's a very it was a very high risks uh risk stock because um a new company uh they went public via a spack that never produced a car they make evs a lot of risks a lot of uh potential problems however the company um had a lot of things going for them which others in this space did not they had virtually unlimited funding because they were backed by Saudi Arabia.
20:33They still are. They're a majority shareholder. So, you know, in terms of startups, the most common reason people go under is they run out of funding and they can't get the funding rounds done and stuff like that. They poached a guy from Tesla. Yeah, so they poached a guy who was in the early design team or apparently heading up that team, question marks as to exactly what the exact definition or who exactly was heading up. But anyway, when the first Model S was designed. But so they post a bunch of other people as well. So like they seem to get the right people in place. They seem to have that they got a good space in Arizona.
21:08They built what by all accounts is a pretty decent factory over there. They had a lot of things going for them, things which most of the other startups in the space did not have. i felt it was quite decent it was a very speculative bet um in the sense that i knew that my valuation was likely to be highly like out uh depending on what happens but i had a valuation and um the stock for some reason i think i think just uh evs became really popular just ran up every car company yeah and i want to like all of that was so i was buying it i can't remember what it was like 10 15 bucks well the spot price is 10 yeah so i think it was about 11 12 at the time yeah so i was buying a lot um early on and and and then and then they ran up and i sold at 40 and i got i got the usual fanboy hey like you don't believe in the company um that's exactly what they sound like what's what's the stock now like four yeah four dollars now and you know like i should have lost money on that one i should i should have absolutely lost 100 % of my position on that one or whatever I would have lost if I was selling now maybe 70 % because it's like all the despite all the good things the company is just significantly underperforming and there's a lot there's a lot more warning flags and red flags now that are more visible than they were back then so I should have lost money on that one but because I guess of this approach where I will always sell at the target price I still managed to collect an upside and trip on my money for no reason like just just luck i think there's something counterintuitive or some people think it's they don't quite wrap their head around when you invest what you're saying is the valuation is the point that i might sell up yeah a lot of people talk about target price and i think this is one where i use the same term because it's a term that people kind of understand but i probably mean something slightly different because for a lot of people their target price is what they think a stock is going to be at a particular point in time and there's two big problems with that one you don't know what the stock price is going to be ever and two you certainly don't know exactly when that's going to happen so when people say my target price is 500 in 2025 i always just look at it go like means nothing what does that even mean so for me it's very simple it's probably far simpler than what all of this stuff is which is i think i value a company and i it's always present value and i think like if i was buying that company today based on my best estimate for me um what would be a fair price at which i'll buy it um and if the current share price is significantly lower then i feel that i'm buying a company at a discount and if the bigger the discount the better as far as i'm concerned will it ever sell at full price maybe sometimes it does and when it does when it reaches what i think is a fair value i'll sell it doesn't necessarily mean that i have to wait 10 years and then sell the valuation it was when I first bought because the valuation will change over time.
24:04So I might be buying a stock today. And this has happened with some companies in a big way. When I was buying AMD a long time ago, I certainly did not have a valuation of which I sold today. And the same is likely to happen in the future. Like it could go up, it could go down. There are companies where I had a much higher initial valuation, but things happened. The future projections are much lower today, but the price is also much lower today. And I may have been buying very close or at the current target some time ago. But if I'm continuing to buy today and I still think that there is a significant upside, people often think, oh, the stuff you did in the past matters.
24:43But it really doesn't. You just got to execute. It's like when you play particular games, there's a strategy. You just execute the same thing over and over. And it's so boring. But that's what gets the returns. it doesn't matter that you bought that stock at four times the price like two years ago if you think still today that it is actually good like you know based on numbers not based on sentiment or because you believe in the company or whatever um then you should continue doing it um and sometimes you get rewarded very heavily for it and sometimes you will not um the average is is what is what is what you're playing at um and and trying to understand like The valuation will shift over time, but your valuation – and there's always a bit of art to it because if a stock runs up and it is 5 % off your target price, should you sell or should you not sell?
25:32Well, I mean, it depends. It's a complicated question. What other upsides are you seeing in other stocks? How many of the stocks in your portfolio? Is there a better opportunity? Should you put your money to work elsewhere? Are there bigger risks elsewhere? So it's not necessarily – you don't have to wait exactly to the penny for the target price. but you have to you know if one of them has run up and everything else has a huge upside well yeah i mean i'll take i'll shave a little bit off i'm happy to take a bit low a bit less and redistribute and so kind of it does vary how time consuming is your process i mean if you invest in the index fund you just leave your money there and you just put it in every month exactly yeah how many like stocks do you have and then yeah how many hours do you have on each stock like if you have like 10 for example in your portfolio how on a day-to-day how does that look for you yeah so so my portfolio is usually quite tight so i probably only ever have after about um up to 10 positions um major positions i think at the moment it's seven um and then some smaller ones um but with each stock i would say every quarter if you invest in the company every quarter you have to at least read all the like the powerpoint presentations the releases that they do the the 10q forms with the sec you have to read everything else that they publish as well all the news all the like appointments etc you have to read stuff about the industry you have to read stuff about what the competitors are doing because they're going to directly impact the performance of the company as well and preferably you want to read the main competitors official financial filings too so that you understand exactly what's happening i'd say to properly read all of that stuff every quarter um you know just to read the forms by the company probably talking two three four hours a quarter then to read all the other stuff from everyone else it's another two three minimum i also want to caveat this by saying that like you did this for a job and you graduated from oxford with a maths degree it comes a little bit quicker to you to most people deciphering these documents takes a little while i read one of these documents it probably take me like six hours to i mean just to like absorb it um because you know that's not not my skill set i I can tell a dick joke on a finance video pretty well, but that's my skill set.
27:39But, you know, I think it comes quickly to you, you know. Maybe, and I guess like we all need to take advantages of the unfair advantages that we have. But I'll say, yeah, so you're probably doing at least, I would say seven to 10 hours of reading, minimum per company. Then the model, like the first time you build is going to be a long amount of time. Then you maybe are just doing adjustments or improvements or fixing a few things or whatever it is. And when you're doing that, maybe it's only two to three hours a quarter to go and adjust your model. Let's say you only do one major update to your model every quarter.
28:17But then you need to listen to the earnings call because stuff gets said on the earnings call that is neither in the 10Q or any presentation or anything. And they answer live questions from analysts where they might give away something that isn't printed anywhere else. So you need to listen to that. That's an hour and a half to two hours on top of that. Is there an in-call between? The only score is when the company does a live call after they've published the results, where they go through the results and then they answer some questions that people have submitted. And then typically the format is then they answer some live questions from some select analysts that they like.
28:49So yeah, so that's another, let's say two hours to do that of time. So when you add that up, you know - It's a full-time job. You've got a YouTube channel, so like you don't work nine to five. So for the average person working nine to five, is this, is this realistic? It works five to nine. Five a.m. to nine a.m., basically. Well, that's probably five, that's probably 20 hours a company a quarter, right? So let's say you invested in a relatively small portfolio. 10 is relatively small, right? You know, that's 200 hours a quarter. For you. Well, for you, not for the average, average like Britain.
29:25So it might be a bit more for the average person. Not for Rain Man over here. Yeah, exactly. but you know like and that's before accounting for anything else you're going to be doing in terms of actually earning money and i don't think most people have 200 hours every three months that they can possibly and i'm saying that's the bare minimum because if you're if you're going a bit further if you're actually going to be diving more what about the process of trying to discover new companies not the ones that you're already invested in the screening process or managing your portfolio trying to decide like you know is there a macro reason why you should be redistributing or moving money around or anything else like that.
30:01Last time we recorded, Tamein, you were having some real dramas with your accountant. So how's that been going, mate? They're sacked. So drama sorted. They're a big corporate firm. They didn't really reply to my emails very quickly, like took a week or two at times. And they charged me way too much. I mean, I've got pretty simple taxes. And yeah, they were charging me thousands. They saved me some money. But yeah, I had to move on. Slow and expensive. Pretty much. Yeah. This is one of the reasons that we're really happy to be partnering with TaxApp. It's a tech platform that makes self-assessment simple.
30:29Whether you're self-employed like me, a freelancer, or a director like Demo, big dog. Instead of sending endless emails, bills, and spreadsheets to your accountant, you just connect your bank, answer a few questions that are only relevant to you, and your tax return can be ready in as little as 15 minutes. TaxApp is really easy to use, and it's HMRC-recognized software. So it's safe, secure, and legit. The price is also decent. So if you're self-employed with one income stream, it's just£89 as a one-off fee. No big accountancy fees. And we also have a discount code, of course. If you need to file a self-assessment this year, give TaxApp a try.
31:01We've left a link in the description and use the code MONEY10 for 10 % off your first tax filing. That code is MONEY, M-O-N-E-Y 1-0. So, Mr. O 'Carolet, I hear you are a salesman. Elite salesman, yes. One of the best, they say? I've got a little bit of experience in the game, yeah, I could say. done a few deals a bill a bill what would your compliance team say about you they would say that I am always nagging them and that essentially I just have I have beef with compliance I love the team compliance slows down all my deals because every time I get to the finish line they've got to check documents KYC GDPR and it's just a nightmare it slows the deal down by like two three weeks it's always on both sides as well isn't it sometimes it can be blocked on the other side exactly well that's where today's sponsor can help Indeed.
31:50Vanta helps companies of all sizes get secure and compliant fast. And they stay that way. They do it by automating compliance with over 35 security and privacy frameworks like SOC2, ISO 27001 and HIPAA. Yeah, all of them. And this saves businesses so much time and money. According to a recent IDC study, Vanta customers save over half a million dollars a year in costs. Not bad. And they also help you complete security questionnaires up to five times faster, which is great because everybody hates filling out forms. If you're a business that needs to prove security and compliance, visit Vanta.com forward slash making money to sign up for a completely free demo today.
32:27That's Vanta.com forward slash making money. There's a link in the description though, so you can just click that. I probably spend far more time analyzing companies that I do not invest in. Just because like there are too many things I don't like, or I think the valuation is too rich. or there are companies that I used to be invested in that I held a position in NVIDIA for a long time. I think actually very early on in my channel, like one of the very early investing videos I did was I sold my position in NVIDIA. So by that point, I already held it for a long time, ran up. And yeah, it's run up even more because we've had the AI bubble since then.
33:04And obviously, you're never gonna be able to always time the peak or whatever. But there are companies where they're doing well now and I used to own them. I don't know them now. I think this mentality that the stock market is about playing games or trying to win or something. It's a method for getting a return on my money. I'm putting my money to work in these companies. And, you know, like some years you have a bad year. Like I had a pretty bad year last year. I think most people had a pretty bad year last year. Generally, because of my investment in visual stocks, when the stock market does badly, I do significantly worse.
33:44When the stock market does good, I tend to do a bit better on average. So, you know, just in last year, I think the stock market went down a bit, but I went down, what was it, 35, 40 % something? You know, Tesla collapsed by a factor of four, so it could be all worse. But in other years, like this year, I think so far the same portfolio is outperforming the market by three or four times. It swings around about, and I'm not here for a quick 100%. I'm not interested in... Do you enjoy the process? I enjoy the process. You enjoy it all. You have to. Because I've seen your portfolio makes me want to go gray and lose my head.
34:26Crypto makes you a bit strong because you can see an 80 % loss and be like, well, that's that. But to have to monitor it every day, or not every day, but to have to be aware of all of your different stocks and do all this reading and all this, like you said, you lose 40%. It's stressful. for i think it would be for most people because especially um people who have not been through it before so i remember like the thing that really got me into investing it's it's an interesting anecdote um i'll tell you without naming names but i was working at i was working at a big american bank um during the financial crisis um i ended up walking out of that bank with my cardboard box with my stuff in it um so so i've been i've been on that um on that train but at one point um on the morning when Lehman collapsed, all the bank stocks were being destroyed in the stock market.
35:14And I sat relatively close to a pretty senior guy in the overall bank. And I remember seeing, because this was outside any kind of disclosure periods or anything like that, we weren't privy to any insider info or anything, but just the stock goes down from, I can't remember what it was like from 60 to three dollars or something like that um and the guy just goes and buys like a pretty reasonable six-figure amount of the stock at three dollars and i'm sitting there going i'm just observing because i'm a graduate you know on a graduate salary uh just watching this and i'm like i'm trying to understand the mentality and the mentality is very much like like everyone's panicking the stock is just collapsing for no particular reason and there's nothing fundamentally wrong with the bank there's nothing like in any of the disclosure there's nothing in the documents and nothing in the numbers but the market is panicking so you go and you go and do the opposite of what all the people running around waving their hands in the air are doing um i think the stock price is now i can't remember it's 115 something um i've never seen someone make that much money in such a short space of time um probably even since then just um live um sitting next to them and i and and that's kind of when i really began understanding the mentality properly um and i think a lot of people have not been through that necessarily especially some of the newer investors where you kind of like stuff goes down stuff goes up um long term um it sounds incredibly simple right long term the strategy is you you buy low sell but buy low sell high doing it is so hard like talking about it super easy but doing it because you know like the stock goes down and oh my god you made a mistake and then the stock sits down for a year for two years for three years sometimes you invest in the company that is a great company the company actually performs incredibly well continues performing incredibly well for years and the stock never goes up because sentiment is a thing and the market doesn't like it and the investors like that will happen sometimes a company that doesn't deserve to go up will go up that will also happen um and and kind of understanding that it's a mix of an of art and science is is really really important because a lot of people think it's purely one or the other and it's like you need to understand that there's a huge element of luck in it um but a bit like with poker you need to build the science where you play knowing that there is a luck element but knowing what you do when luck goes for you or against you um and i think if you the moment you stop um understand like stop understanding that in the true sense um you you probably you've probably lost and you shouldn't be investing in stocks the thing so to to kind of like caveat that as well you talk about the guy and the example of him buying into the bank i think a lot of retail investors really bought into the buy the dip narrative and like they they throw in they go into the fire but they they haven't got the other side of it by the dip because you know you go and look at some of the cases recently because everyone was into i didn't really ever understand this but everyone went crazy on amc and gme and i'm looking at it and i'm sitting there going i just fundamentally do not compute i'm like a company is valued on nothing to do with numbers um like you like you think you're gonna outsmart the hedge funds um because you think that you know how shorts work i think this episode is probably nowhere near long enough for us to actually go into how shorts can unwind without them having to buy back everyone's stock but anyway um so everyone everyone's sitting there kind of thinking okay well how do we um how do we play this game how do we make 1000 percent quickly and i'm sitting there like what are you guys doing and then the stock begins going down and begins going down further and it's like oh no we're gonna buy we're gonna become multi-billionaires and i'm sitting there going oh no like the company is literally printing a new share class and selling it to you because they know that you're chumps and you're going to buy it anyway and you and then you do what the fuck you're doing so like you said you spend around 200 hours a month no a quarter a quarter about 200 hours a quarter like researching your stocks and building your models how do you have time for that when you have your job i'm a kid yeah i have i have two two unfair advantages over many other people i think So one is my job is directly linked to the investing that I do.
Read the full transcript
39:44For most people, that is not the case. So I can go and value companies and then I can go and discuss that in making content. I can go and share my opinion because that's also extra information and I earn money from ad revenue, etc. So for most people, that's not the case. So you don't earn your income in the same way as you manage your investments. So the hours are separate. For me, they're a bit more ingrained. But also, I just, yeah, I work a reasonably high number of hours. There are many times when I'm working early. I get into the office very early. I work through, then I go back, do bedtime, et cetera.
40:26Then I come back to the office, do the evening shift, drive home at 2 a.m., sleep, repeat. And I'm okay with that. Most people probably would not be okay with that because, I mean, most people have a life.
40:42So, yeah. And I think time is the biggest, the most undervalued factor in all of this, I think, by people. People just think, oh, I can quickly go and do stuff. But you can, and maybe it'll work out for you. There's a reason why the vast majority of active investors underperform the stock market. and the reason is part because it's just extremely hard to do but part because a large number of these people including the fund managers don't do their homework and the reason the fund managers don't do their homework is because a lot of people think oh you know this guy's running a whole fund they have all these analysts and computers and stuff like that but it's not their money well it's not their money but most people don't understand how a fund manager makes the money they don't care if the stock market goes up or down They make their fees.
41:36They're just going to charge you. If they talk about a company that's nobody heard of, that might be doing some cool mining somewhere in Australia or something, nobody cares. Nobody will give them money. But if you're invested in all the popular stocks, everyone's going to give you money irrespective of what those stocks do because they like Tesla and they like Palantir and they like NVIDIA and whatever else is popular at the moment, right? So it's important to understand that all those active fund managers underperform the market, but that doesn't necessarily, that's kind of part of, they don't care.
42:08That's part of their strategy. Some fund managers are there to make long-term returns for their customers. Most fund managers probably are not. They're there to earn fees and that's what they do. And it doesn't really matter what the past performance is that much. Because when the stock market goes up, even if you're underperforming, you're still going to get returns. You can still print, you know, I got 8 % in that year. most people are not savvy enough to actually even compare to what the average of the S &P 500 was in that year or whatever they just look at it go oh well this fund earned an average of eight percent over the last five years like yeah the S &P 500 did twice you know so what yeah so I think it's it's extremely important to kind of understand what drives the the the different people in in the active investing community some people like me like you watch a YouTuber talk about stocks That YouTuber earns revenue from you watching them talk about stocks.
43:05They're going to talk about popular stocks because that's the stuff that people want to watch. It doesn't mean they're the best stocks to invest in. It doesn't mean that those companies are going to get the best returns. It means that they're going to get enough views to get enough advertising revenue to pay their bills and their sponsors are going to pay them more money. Now, you've got to think about why people are doing things. And often those things are not in your best interest. They're in that person's best interest. It's really important to understand also that just because a company is popular does not necessarily mean that it is a bad investment or a good investment.
43:38It's kind of irrelevant. There are companies that do extremely well that are really popular, and there are companies that go to zero that are extremely popular and vice versa. So I kind of just ignore the hype as best as I can because there are some stocks that I invest in that nobody cares about. Nobody follows. Nobody talks about YouTube. I tried in the past making a video about it. Nobody watches it. So I don't talk about it. And there are other companies they invest in that are extremely popular and there's a spectrum. And I think the best thing you can do is to ignore the hype and kind of not base your decisions based on the hype.
44:12And then watch our YouTube channel. And watch my YouTube channel where I'll talk about the stocks that everyone's talking about. Do you think you always need like so much research or can you sometimes be like, make a judgment call? like for example like covid or the airlines crash you're like eventually we're going to fly again do you think you can do that or do you have to and be like okay they're all seriously under underpriced underpriced i'll buy them and hold for a bit i think it kind of depends in the way i guess if you see a major major crash which probably happens every covid 40 years or something and like covid was one example where there was a flash crash right um in 2008 every bank just went to zero and the thing is you can lose by playing that game as well because you could invest in a company that does eventually go to zero because of the factors but very often the panic engulfs a much broader spectrum than actually and it ends up getting affected by whatever is causing the panic you know in 87 when the stop like like sometimes there's just a weird scenario where there's an opportunity that doesn't happen very often um but but yeah sure sometimes you can you should probably do some homework because often you know like the covid scenario is played out how it has um it could have played out very differently right like covid could have been more like the 1918 whatever spanish influenza or a stronger strain than that like we didn't really properly know at the time when everything began really crashing and going down it could be much worse it could have been something where for the next decade the travel industry is disrupted significantly where we're all like working remotely and not going out for a much longer period like it could have like it didn't which is great but um there's always this kind of risk factor where you you make a call and you say oh it's going to be like this but you don't know um and so the travel industry could have been hit even harder um it's possible right i made that judgment call without doing the research but i bought alphabet because it was like everyone's going to be locked indoors and that's the kind of business that that's going to do okay either way the airline like you say is a risky i mean warren buffett sold out of the airlines at that point and said these businesses have changed but people piled in didn't they so to me that was like i'm not going near airlines if that man's saying you should be buying them well yeah i mean or it could have been replaced by more local travel um it could have been replaced by whatever like technology has a weird way of making jump uh jumps as well it could have been that a new form of travel that is faster like you know a replacement for supersonic jets or whatever and then the airline stocks do what the car stocks are doing today and getting absolutely destroyed um because they're not switching to EVs and EVs are just eating their lunch and in 10 years time those companies are going to be bankrupt.
46:54Like yeah it's difficult especially with these established industries where if there is a disruption it's difficult to understand whether the disruption is a short-term effect that is going to go away or if it's the start of a larger disruption process is going to end up killing them. And it's always easy in retrospect it's often not so easy at the time how do you how do you factor that into your modeling then um well you it's difficult to do it so so the way the way you would do that probably in a model is not so much in the actual direct valuing uh process because you can't go and price in every single risk effectively into a bottom-up traditional model what you can do is you can do what um you you can run scenarios where you take the same model and you build multiple different overlays where you're saying what is the probability of these different scenarios playing out or these different risks playing out and each of them might affect some of your assumptions so this is why bottom-up model is really great because it's easy to multiply things through so if you go and say okay there is a productivity a factory productivity jump where you know robots actually work on production lines in 2030 you might say okay i don't know how likely that is but i'm going to assign a relatively low likelihood of probability but it could happen so it's a low likelihood of probability but the upside would be significant because it would significantly reduce labor costs it would mean that the production line could be operating at three or four times whatever it is the efficiency so you might go and add that in you'll have a whole suite of different scenarios and this is how i do my valuations so if all of these different scenarios have probabilities some of them are correlated so you have to take account of that because you know like if if this happens this is also likely to happen or the opposite like if this happens this is highly unlikely to happen so you've got to figure out how to build that in some of them are completely not really correlated at all like there might be a macro scenario and might be a technological improvement scenario which are really not like they both could happen or one could happen without the other or whatever so you've got to build that in and then you just run a multitude of simulations over the distribution of the probabilities of all these different things.
49:03And you might have heard people talk about Cathie Wood's ARK Invest because they published their Monte Carlo simulations, which is something very similar to this, which is basically just a run through the different spectrum of potential outcomes. And based on that, you get a field almost of potential outcomes. So you're saying, okay, instead of the share price, my target share price is not$100, or maybe that's the average. But I see that there's a big spike of all these different things playing out. It's highly likely to be, based on my assumptions, somewhere in the 80 to 120. And that's quite narrow range.
49:37And if the price for that particular stock says today is 20, you'd be saying, okay, I'm pretty happy because I can see that after considering all these different things, there's quite a hefty wedge over there with a significant upside. on the contrary you might you might be saying okay like the middle ground is quite high but there's also a very high chance that you're actually going to lose all your money the company's going to go down on average over long over the long term the numbers for me play out and i always do the same thing and like i'll always buy on the same basis and i'll always sell on the same basis um and whenever a company that i really like goes and hits my target and i think i look at my distribution like okay there's not much more that i'm going to be collecting here I'll sell every time and sometimes things happen and you know this AI wave that we're seeing this year you couldn't have seen that realistically coming say three years ago so you can't predict all of these things happening that's going to be my next question like have you had any huge unforeseen things come into your model and then have you had to change your model as a result always and you adjust the key is to adjust because my initial valuation on a company can often be wildly different to what the final valuation which I sell because you constantly adjust It's like my valuation on a stock that I invest, say, in 2015 or 2016 or whatever, will be very, very different to the valuation on the same company today because things happen and things change and the competitive landscape changes and the technology landscape changes.
50:58And say in the last two years, a lot of my valuations have come down significantly because companies have slowed down. A lot of people also don't pay attention to that. So, you know, if you think a company is going to do well, when it's going to do well is massively important. because if it's five or ten years later than um what you think um the the discounting will will kill it doesn't matter because if they only start doing well in 2040 in today's dollars that might make it not very worthwhile of investment uh a lot of people say oh i'll be invested for as long as it takes yeah and they could have had that just in a bank account generating a bit of interest on cash and instead they're generating nothing in the market for all that period yeah there's a lot of these weird mathematical truths where you talk about it and And like, for example, there's a big new trend of people saying, I'm invested in this one stock because I believe in this company the most.
51:49I think it'll do the best. Diversification. Diversification is for losers. That sounds very risky. And I'm sitting there going, even if you're right, even if you're right, even if it plays out for you, you're mathematically far more likely to do better if you divest between a number of different companies. and obviously ideally it would be a reasonable but as we're talking about time you're always limited um in time and time is a variable that people overlook but so you can't you can't go and realistically run a portfolio with so many companies in it not well because because you're just going to be blindly investing um gambling but if you um but if you say carry five to ten stocks for example um even if some of those stocks don't you don't have as much i hate that word conviction in them or you think you know the upside is smaller or whatever um if you go and invest the money into that company um you don't know which one is going to shoot out when this is that point like the company that you think is amazing it could take 10 years for that company to come through um or you might be sitting there trading sideways for all that period but when you invest in say let's say let's call it five one of those could accidentally come through right next year for whatever reason there's a new tech thing that's happened that happens that your company is particularly favored by so that company goes you sell and you redistribute suddenly that redistribution has significantly increased the positions in the companies in the other companies in your portfolio and you're waiting for them to come through that effect of redistributing the winners gives you a huge long-term upside in terms of your portfolio performance that people just completely overlook.
53:34Because you can't predict exactly when, but if you have multiple different companies in your portfolio, the likelihood is they will peak or they will go up at different points. So that outlier effect on a portfolio. Exactly. And giving yourself the option to have outliers, because you might be invested in the best stock ever, but the stock market might just not agree with you. It's the same with YouTube, right? To simplify the example, I could say I'm going to make one video, it's going to be the best video I ever make and I throw it out there or I make 100 videos and then five of them randomly that I just don't know drive 50 % of all of the growth on the channel.
54:06And it's a great example because you only have so much time. You can't go and make 2000 videos because they're going to suck. Yeah. Right. So again, like you can only put so many fishing rods in, but putting just one in with the best bait is probably not going to be as efficient as having a few different approaches and a few different styles and seeing which one of them works best. And this, yeah, I think people who argue against diversification, just the math doesn't lie. And you can do a relatively basic proof of that by just showing the typical distributions of how long it takes for the valuation to come through or for you to collect your upside.
54:47And even as a long-term investor, the likelihood is every now and then one of your companies will go up and you will sell. like some years you will sell a lot in 20 in 2021 i sold most of my positions um because they all like the stock market went absolutely bananas um and since then uh i've not sold very much at all like this year i've only sold one position i've like basically my portfolio has been doing nothing it's so boring when i just the stock market is down um the stock market um crashed last year Most people didn't really call it a crash. I mean, it went down 20%, 25%, right? Then it's been going down this year as well.
55:29You just can't see it because the eight AI stocks are propping it all up. If you strip them out, the stock market is actually down this year as well. And I think most people just look at the overall numbers and that narrative is not very popular. But we're in a downturn and we're at the end of the second year of that downturn. and if you look historically at downturns and when a good time to invest in companies is I mean most people probably only really look at the big tech giants they're invested in Google and Facebook and Amazon and whatever but there's a lot of other companies out there and a lot of them are beaten up at the moment and it's quite a long downturn we've had I think is it 10 months is the average and we're like I can't remember the average years I did the math at some point I think it's 10 and 11 months yeah it's not very long no from top to bottom And yeah, I don't know exactly when the bottom is, but I just know it's the point I always make is when I go to the shop and there's a chocolate bar on sale, it's a really simple example because we always think about that example differently.
56:32So it's normally two pounds and you come in and it's one pound. Now, I personally go, oh, that's great. It's a chocolate bar that I place a lot of value in and I think it's massively undervalued. So I'm going to buy it at one pound. the popular investing mentality at the moment is i'm gonna wait maybe tomorrow is going to be at 95p and i'm sitting there going okay i mean keep waiting like maybe maybe you'll be back at two pounds um yeah i i remember um in december last year when tesla stock crashed to a hundred dollars and everyone began it's very popular when a stock does really well everyone becomes a fan when a stock does really badly everyone becomes a hater um it's the social media way of things with investing but but everyone's saying i was going to go down even more it's going to zero it's all scam i hate elon i hate whatever okay whatever uh i i don't i don't play those games either way i'm not i don't play the fan games either but um but i was sitting there going yeah yeah i mean um i think i think it's really bad a really bad idea to invest in a stock like at a hundred dollars there'll be plenty of opportunities to come back and invest like an absolute boss at$300 instead.
57:47You've got to wait until it's on the way up, man. You've got to wait until it's on the way up. Otherwise you're catching a falling knife. Never catch a falling knife. Such a popular argument right now. Oh no, it's on the way down. I'm like, yeah, if you're buying something that has a high likelihood of going to zero, yeah, I mean, that's a problem. If you're buying something where you genuinely like have a good reason to think that it is not going to zero, but it's actually massively undervalued, there could be a slightly better point of buying in. But generally speaking, like I find when you buy in, in stuff where you feel is massively undervalued and then sell in stuff that hits your price target, on average, you do quite well.
58:27Did you buy more Tesla when it went to$100? Oh yeah. But was that in your model or was that a reaction to the undervalued price? No, I think my model actually, my valuation went in that period, it went down from$900 over the space of like a year and a half to about$770, I think. But you still saw a seven times upside on$100, so you might. Yeah, and it's all about the upside. It's all about kind of saying what you think. And obviously, there are always risks, right? There are risks that the regulators will turn against EVs because lobbying, because unforeseen energy pressures, because whatever.
59:05there are risks that like the unionized workers are gonna are gonna cause problems and there is the competitors actually show up you know instead of not showing up i mean a lot of people say yeah nobody else has a chance but i i always question that it's like like there is always a chance that somebody else comes along you know if one company can do it so can others um and kind of dismissing everyone else and just saying there's only one potential person who can do this is a very quick path to you know it's it's it's very easy to kind of say there's only one there's only one of of anything there will be others um the question is when and how quickly they'll replace the current the current um the current company that is breaking uh the market will be the boring dinosaur incumbent in the future and is going to be disrupted themselves you know and and sometimes it's a hundred years like what's happening with ford but ford at one point was the the company that was building the first factories for cars and absolutely, you know, and okay, that took a long time for them to become the dinosaur.
1:00:10But these things do go in cycles. And not thinking that at some point the company you invested in is gonna be worth selling is just a weird attitude. So T, you're gonna start investing in some individual companies? Absolutely not. I'm looking forward to - Good for you. Yeah. Yeah, Will, our producer, does the newsletter every week and I'm just looking forward to him summarizing what a Monte Carlo distribution is or whatever it is. Simulation, sorry, Monte Carlo simulation. So yeah, check out the newsletter and see Will's attempt at summarizing this episode. I was trying to make it simple. Oh no, it was fine.
1:00:46No, it was great. It was great. It's what was needed. The whole point was to kind of show people the work that is needed and it's not simple. So you shouldn't oversimplify it because you're not doing it justice to the work that you do. You know, there's all of that. The key thing for me for this is you are not in the market to make yourself rich. You're trying to get a return on your money. You could just buy an index, a broad index, and you will get that return on your money. You can go about your day and you can work and you can focus on the things you're good at. But if you've got a passion for investing, maybe you want to do it the way Sasha does.
1:01:16And that could work as well. There's a spectrum there. You don't. But going in and just buying individual businesses without doing the work that you're doing is gambling. And you probably will then not even get what you would have got with a broad index. Yeah, absolutely. And it's a bit like, I don't know, learning to play. If you want to be a concert pianist, it's going to take you quite a while to get there. And you're going to have to do a lot of work. And a lot of that work is going to be mind-numbingly boring. You're going to be sitting there playing the scales. And investing is the same as any other skill like that.
1:01:46You're going to have to do a lot of work. A lot of it is going to be boring. If you don't want to do the work, you're probably not going to be a concert pianist. For most people, it's not the right choice for a multitude of reasons. Most people shouldn't do it. if you want to do it great i know i know most people listening will listen to say you shouldn't do it and do it anyway that's how people are that's why i have 10 of my portfolio that i do i have there's a hard and fast rule then because it yeah we all want to gamble we all we all want to roll the dice so i have a set limit of 10 of my portfolio on the side that i do that with yeah you just gotta the key thing i think in in all of this is you've got to make sure that you were really genuinely deep inside happy with your choices that you know if this all goes the wrong way you knew the risk and you understood it because a lot of people say oh yeah i understand the risk and then it all goes south and oh no you know all the people investing in the various like dog flavored tokens and nfts and stuff like that just just like i'm looking at what were you guys doing like i remember when the peak of that craze was um all the big youtube has started promoting all the flocky you know whatever i made i made i made a video like immediately saying this is the dumbest shit i've ever seen in my life um and since then all of that stuff that was being promoted by the biggest influencers has gone down 99.9 whatever percent um and is basically worthless and i'm like i wasn't it wasn't rocket science um it was it was really simple it's just if you took off your like crazy i want to make fast money lens it wasn't it was obvious because it got views exactly it's that point again the only reason they spoke about it was because people they've got a load of views yeah and people just wanted to make way more out of ad revenue on that than he ever did putting money into flocky you know or whatever it was yeah yeah yeah um and it's it's sad but it's difficult as a content creator it's very difficult as a content creator to steer away from that because naturally you're always pulled into like you know that you can make a video on this and it'll be super easy and quick you have to do very little research you can just sit there and talk and you can record the video and do the whole thing in two or three hours which is a little less you'll get loads of views and you could but you um as with any business like my attitude here is i want to be doing this in 10 years time i'm not here for it's the same as investing right you'll lose a lot of integrity yeah i'm just happy just going uh slowly in the slow lane flames yeah the flames are pretty I find them funny and I think I think most of the long term viewers find them amusing because I started doing them as a joke and then I kind of just just kept doing it because well they work they work and they get people to click but yeah and everyone's doing the flames now you kind of started that I think yeah thanks so much for coming on absolutely pleasure thank you for having me we're going to go get some beers now all of us yeah that's really why I came to London yeah that's why I'm here
1:04:44if you missed anything in that episode don't worry we do a really good summary of everything that's gone on and what we discussed in our newsletter you can sign up using the link in the description and don't forget to subscribe to the podcast and leave us a review it really makes a difference and lets us know what we're doing right this is not financial advice the reason it's not financial advice is because it's not tailored to you like we say a lot on the podcast, investments can fall and rise. In fact, this is almost a guarantee. Remember, past performance is no guarantee of future results, so your money is always at risk with investing.
1:05:15Also, remember other fees may apply. We explain the principles of building wealth, but if you want personalised advice, it's worth speaking to a financial advisor. As with everything financial, please do your own research. We really encourage that because no one cares more about your money than you. this episode was recorded by Jack Hobbs it was produced and edited by Ruth Edwards Johnny Hunter is in charge of all our marketing and it's all brought together by Will Stollerman
From the publisher
Most people shouldn’t invest in single stocks - they’d be better off investing in index funds - but that doesn’t stop a lot of people trying. That’s the view of Sasha Yanshin, YouTuber, Damo’s friend and nemesis - and it’s Damo’s view too. Despite that, Sasha does invest in individual companies and Damo does keep up to 10% of his allocation for investing in specific stocks (because he enjoys it).
In this episode, Sasha explains his process, as well as some best practices in case you want to chance your arm. But please be mindful of the risks and consider capping your exposure if it is something you want to try.
🤝 Get 1:1 help with your money from our financial adviser service
https://makingmoney.email/financial-advisors-audio
🎉Sponsors
MoneyWeek Magazine - Try it for free:
https://moneyweek.com/money
TaxZap - Do your tax return / self-assessment:
https://makingmoney.email/taxzap
Vanta - Get your company secure and compliant: https://vanta.com/makingmoney
Odoo - Apps to run your business: https://www.odoo.com/r/MM1
📈 Investment platforms we use:
Trading 212
Watch this video where Damo explains how to get the most from it: https://youtu.be/BVVZhrM0LVQ
Get a free share worth up to £100 when you sign up for a new Invest or ISA account and deposit at least £1.
Use the code ‘MM’ or this link: https://www.trading212.com/join/MM
InvestEngine
Get up to a £50 bonus when you invest at least £100.
https://investengine.pxf.io/daOD2Q
Vanguard
Minimum investment of £500 or £100/month.
https://www.vanguardinvestor.co.uk/
--
If you purchase a product or service using one of the links above, we may receive a commission. There will be no additional charge for you. Remember investments can fall and rise - and past performance is no guarantee of future results. Other fees may apply. Your money is at risk.
This is not financial advice. The reason it’s not financial advice is because it’s not tailored to you. We explain the principles of building wealth but if you want personalised advice, it’s worth speaking to a financial advisor. As with everything financial, please do your own research. We really encourage that because no one cares more about your money than you and if you learn the basics then it will change your life.
