⁠I Was 100% in a Global Index Fund Until I Realised This

1 Jun 2026 · 1 h 10 min · 26 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Pensioncraft’s Ramin Nakisa explains why he moved from 100% global equities to a 60/40 portfolio (60% equity, 40% fixed income), how he calculated his “number” for retirement, and what worries him about inflation-driven bond/equity correlation breaking down.

Guest backgrounds

Ramin Nakisa runs Pensioncraft and previously worked in banking; he also studied physics/biophysics and cognitive psychology at Oxford, including neural network modeling. He built tools for investors (e.g., Monte Carlo simulations) and creates educational content.

Key claims

  • 100% equities worked historically (Dimson Marsh Staunton: ~5–6% real returns over ~120 years), but he changed due to risk appetite and not wanting inevitable ~40% drawdowns.
  • He reached a target income and used simulations to estimate longevity; he also has ongoing business income, reducing reliance on portfolio risk.
  • Inflation spikes can make bonds and equities fall together, reducing diversification benefits.
  • He uses short-duration money market funds to avoid duration risk; may switch to gilts if yields rise.

Notable examples

  • “TR73” long-duration gilt described as “old man’s crypto” (very volatile; ~80% drop in 2022–23).
  • Inflation shocks: post-COVID supply issues, tariffs, and Strait of Hormuz; UK services inflation (e.g., chocolate/services) staying sticky.
  • Rebalancing: roughly once a year; more after big crashes, but avoid overtrading.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Investing Philosophy Shift

0:45 to 1:16

Discussion on Ramin Nakisa's change from 100% equities to a diversified portfolio.

“There are certain things which are toxic for bonds and equity.”

Ramin's Past Justifications for 100% Equities

1:16 to 1:54

Exploration of Ramin's reasoning for previously maintaining a 100% equity portfolio.

“to go into today i want to ask first of all though what was your justification for being 100 equities up until this point?”

Behavioral Aspects of Investing

1:54 to 4:26

Ramin discusses the psychological ease of a straightforward investment strategy.

“So I just thought, yeah, I would make it really simple as well.”

Evaluating Risk Appetite and Changes

4:26 to 8:01

Discussion on how Ramin's risk appetite and life circumstances led to portfolio changes.

“You know, it's just one global equity exposure.”

Defining Happiness and Lifestyle Choices

8:01 to 8:34

Ramin reflects on his definition of happiness and simple lifestyle choices.

“And I didn't need the risk, to be honest.”

Career Journey and Intellectual Growth

8:34 to 10:30

Ramin shares his career path and how various experiences shaped his insights.

“It's funny because I made a video about this and I showed me in a Lambo thanks to AI when I had big gold chains.”

Finding Your Financial Number

10:30 to 14:01

Ramin explains how he calculated his target financial number for retirement.

“But then banking, I kind of found what I was looking for, I think, because it was so interesting and finance applied the maths for something really practical.”

Determining Financial Independence Number

14:01 to 15:56

Learn how to calculate the amount of money needed for retirement based on lifestyle and withdrawal strategies.

“And that's the point where I just thought, yeah, I'm there.”

Investment Journey and Risk Management

15:57 to 18:19

Explore the phases of investing and how personal circumstances influence risk tolerance.

“You just think, I don't want to get out of bed every day.”

Investment Journey and Risk Management

20:16 to 20:55

Explore the phases of investing and how personal circumstances influence risk tolerance.

“Compliance often gets in the way of scaling a business because as you grow, you need to prove you're compliant with various rules and regulations for other businesses to work with you.”
Show all 26 chapters

Shifting Portfolio from 100% Equities

21:00 to 25:44

Understand the rationale behind reducing equity exposure and balancing investments with bonds.

“Okay, so the portfolio now, it's gone from 100 % equities, which is one of a few different global funds, they just track the global stock market.”

Impact of Inflation on Bonds and Equities

25:45 to 28:00

Examine how inflation affects the relationship between bonds and equities and the implications for investors.

“old chunk of money and I don't spend that much.”

Effects of Oil Supply on Inflation

28:00 to 29:50

Discussion on how disruptions in oil supply contribute to inflation and economic challenges in the UK.

“being negative and being a good diversifier.”

Shifts in Investment Strategy

29:50 to 31:00

Transitioning from longer duration bonds to money market funds in response to economic uncertainties.

“So you get that wage spike and then all the prices are the other way.”

Understanding Duration Risk in Bonds

31:00 to 33:50

Explaining the difference between short and long-duration bonds and their impact on investment risks.

“You see, what I went for was a money market fund instead of a longer duration guilt fund.”

Linkers and Inflation Protection

33:50 to 36:40

Exploration of inflation-linked bonds and their effectiveness as a hedge against unexpected inflation.

“It's very, very, very low risk, because they only buy very, very, very safe things.”

Using Money Market Funds for Stability

36:40 to 41:00

Benefits of using money market funds for capital preservation and as a safe investment choice.

“I mean, that's why I think this yield curve tool is cool, because you can see that it's a living thing.”

Finding and Investing in Funds

41:00 to 42:00

Advice on where to find money market funds and bonds and how to invest in them.

Understanding Money Market Funds

42:00 to 44:10

Learn about different brokers and money market funds available for trading.

Evaluating the 100 Minus Your Age Rule

44:10 to 47:50

Discuss the appropriateness of the 100 minus your age rule for asset allocation.

“So if we did 100 minus my age, it would be 75.”

Risk Appetite and Portfolio Management

47:50 to 50:00

Explore the concept of risk appetite and its impact on investment decisions.

“So you might - And you've got your kid, I assume, in 100 % equities.”

The Reverse Glide Path Strategy

50:00 to 52:30

Learn about the reverse glide path and its advantages for managing retirement assets.

“And, you know, sometimes I put stuff into cash savings.”

Bonds vs. Stocks: Understanding the Differences

52:30 to 56:03

Discuss the complexities of bonds compared to stocks and their roles in investment.

“I mean, whenever I hear about this financial engineering stuff, I'm always a bit wary.”

The Importance of Bonds Over Stocks

56:03 to 58:08

Explore why bonds are considered a vital financial instrument compared to stocks.

Preparing for Market Drawdowns

58:08 to 1:02:04

Learn about the inevitability of market drawdowns and how to prepare for them.

“Yeah, I mean, if you're accumulating, these kind of crises are great.”

Reflections on Political Climate and Technology

1:02:04 to 1:06:05

Discuss the current socio-political landscape and the impact of technological advancements.

“I think overall, the younger generation I've got more faith in, like Gen Z, I feel like they're kind of like, oh, we need to protect the planet, we need to do more things.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Just quickly before we get into the episode, at the minute we're really trying to understand how people in the UK are saving for their futures. We hope that we can turn it into something really useful, maybe a rapport or a video on my channel. We'd love your input, it would take about five minutes, it's completely anonymous, and if you're up for it you can find a link in the description. Look, I know how equity works. There are periods of incredibly good returns, but then you get these 40 % peak to draw falls. I know it will happen, I don't know when. Ramin Nikisa from Pensioncraft is back. Like me, he's spent years explaining why investing 100 % in global equities works.

0:36But recently, he's changed his portfolio, cutting his exposure by almost half. What changed? And what might make him change his mind again? There are certain things which are toxic for bonds and equity. What worries me is that these kind of situations where we get inflation spikes seem to be becoming more frequent. how have you worked out that number but i really want to ask you is how have you worked out what you want in life because i'm still trying to figure that out myself and it's like give me give me some wisdom please so a bit like me your philosophy as far as i could gather was always 100 equities but you've recently changed that and that's the reasons behind that what we're going to go into today i want to ask first of all though what was your justification for being 100 equities up until this point?

1:23Well, I think a lot of the research I did just showed that equity just does really well if you're willing to hold it for the long term. So I think I was pretty cautious when I started investing and then I moved towards 100 % equity eventually, because the stats are just overwhelmingly impressive. If you look at its returns above inflation, it's what, 5%, 6 % over the last 120 years. This is the Dimson Marsh Staunton numbers. So I just thought, well, I just want the extra return. I'm comfortable with the risk. I don't need the money anytime soon. So I just thought, yeah, I would make it really simple as well.

2:00Because I had a member of my community who said, look, you've got these different regional allocations. Because when I first started, it was just, you know, really complicated, my portfolio. And he said, look, what's the point? You could have done something much simpler and probably got better returns. And I realized he was right. So that's why I switched. And it was a simplicity, I think, which also was very helpful for me because I was never second guessing myself and thinking, you know, I should put more into this, less into that. It's just one thing I can use. Kind of like your red button, you know, it's just one button to press, more money in, and that was the only choice.

2:36Yeah. Every time I've ever tried to experiment or have a portfolio that does something a little bit different, I always tinker with it to my own detriment. Individual stock picking. I recently tried to put together a little bit of a dividend portfolio because I was thinking oh this might be fun to do and I would every day I was looking at it thinking should I buy that should I sell that whereas a VWRL or a global broad index has always been just really simple really easy for me to stick with I've never been tempted to mess with it basically yeah I just find it's just psychologically it's easier to live with because you know what you've got it's easy to track you can just say if someone says what's in your portfolio you can just say oh this is it and I know exactly what's in it i'll never forget that so yeah i think it was just better from a behavioral point of view that was the biggest reason for me i think so why has the behavior changed i think my circumstances changed i think that was the big reason uh i reached my number so i knew i had enough and of course the three things you're thinking about when you think about your allocation when you have a portfolio is, have I got the risk appetite for this?

3:43You know, am I happy taking a loss? What's my emotional reaction to a loss? And then you've got your risk capacity, which is your economic ability to take a loss. If it goes down 10%, 20%, is it going to affect my quality of life? And then the third thing is the investment horizon. So the investment horizon still long you know so that wasn't the reason the risk capacity again you know i've still got income from pension craft and it's doing very well so i don't really need the money so it wasn't because of that it was purely the risk appetite i just didn't like having 100 equity it's just not something that sits comfortably with me it's sorry go on mate yeah i was just gonna say so before you changed your portfolio you were just one fund is that correct or you and well i mean You know, it's just one global equity exposure.

4:34But because I had different platforms, I had different things on different platforms. So I just usually go for the cheapest fund, which gives me roughly the right exposure on the platform. Stylistically, you were global index, but you just had a few different versions of it. Exactly. And they're all pretty much the same. They're highly correlated and there's not much between them. So on Vanguard, you've got to use their funds. So I had VHVG, which is developed only. but then on other platforms like invest engine and trading 212 i could have acqui which is a very cheap global equity fund that traps tracks the msci all country world index so i mean those were my choices fwrg was another one which is a footsie all world tracker but if you plot them against each other almost indistinguishable even when you like i'm global all cap on vanguard um i've got FWRG and then VWRL because I like to reinvest the dividends myself.

5:27Most people would go VWRP, which is the accumulation. But like you say, even ones where it's like, so the all capital includes smaller companies, all capitalization, all sizes. They're still pretty big businesses, but whereas VWRL won't. And then you've got your one that's only developed. So it doesn't include the emerging market economies. But if you plot them on a chart, they all basically look the same. so it does maybe there's points in time where there is a difference you would need a significant emerging market outperformance for a period of time because they're all a feature of the fact the american market's done well that's why they've all it's such a dominant theme in the in the funds that just dominates everything yeah uh and the concentration that you get right now so it's a kind of fun experiment if you build your own little portfolio a global market cap portfolio and just build from the biggest to the smallest so start with one the biggest nvidia apple whatever and then work down to number 10 and you plot that portfolio's returns versus one of these MSCI global indices again it's really close you don't need that many to track uh I mean obviously it gets better the more you add but that's why you know once you get to EM which is like 10 percent of the market cap of the world it's not going to move the needle that much you know maybe for you to because you're going to live a lot longer than i am so if you invest now and india becomes like china or even a developed country which it may do over your lifetimes then yeah it'll move the needle but for me you know by the time i pop my clogs it's not i doubt that's going to happen so but if you're young yeah i think there's a case to be made for em so your your um de-risking though coincides with a period of the market where people are nervous about concentration risk within global equity so that that point you just made about take five businesses and it's made that is the global index essentially um was your decision because of current market conditions or was it because oh i've got i've hit a number that is enough regardless of what the market is like at the minute i'm i'm dialing down oh yeah i mean it was very much that i'd reach my number and whatever the situation was even if we were in a blistering rally i'd have done what i did because look, I know how equity works because there are periods of incredibly good returns, but then you get these 40 % peak to drop falls.

7:48That's inevitable, you know? And I just didn't want that. I just didn't want to live with it. And I knew it was coming at some point. It's a guaranteed thing that it will happen at some point. We don't know what the trigger will be or when it'll be. And I just didn't want to live with that. And I didn't need the risk, to be honest. So I think the goal here is to reach your target and to achieve what you want in life and that's you know the goal is what you're getting towards the portfolio is the means of getting there and for me really I just didn't feel I needed the risk to get to where I needed to be.

8:23How have you worked out that number but I really want to ask you is how have you worked out what you want in life because I'm still trying to figure that out myself and it's like give me Give me some wisdom, please. It's funny because I made a video about this and I showed me in a Lambo thanks to AI when I had big gold chains. So it made me think of you, T. We should have done a joint video. Is it not that one you parked outside? Yeah, that's the black Lambo out there, yeah. And I just thought, you know, that's just so not me, you know, driving along in my Lambo with my gold chains. And I also had a video of me with Teddy, my dog, walking in the woods.

8:59And that's me, right? And that's a very cheap hobby. And I don't really want that much out of life. And I find that bling is not what makes me happy. And I think you reach a certain point in your life when you realise what does and doesn't make you happy. Some things, I mean, you think it's going to make you happy, like buying something or becoming some member of some community that you think is really aspirational. And then when you get there, you think, you know, these people are assholes or, you know, this thing that I bought, it doesn't make me happy at all. so for me it was pretty much coming to that realization and that point in my life when I realized what it is I actually wanted and for me fortunately that's very very cheap things but you've always I mean like from what I know about you and I obviously I know you from the conversations we've had I don't know you like personally very well but you've always pursued had a clearer idea of kind of what you wanted even when that's gone against the grain right because you gave up your your city job to pursue YouTube even though it probably wasn't a sensible thing to do so you always seem to have had a bit of a an idea of that more so than i feel like i do for myself well i've heard other people say the opposite like i started off your ex-wife but started off in academia i thought i wanted to do physics astrophysics and then i moved into biophysics and then i did um i went to study cognitive psychology at oxford you know i did neural network modeling which is really interesting now what was happening with ai you know i kind of get an insight into it because of that.

10:31So I kind of drifted in that sense. And then I went into banking. But then banking, I kind of found what I was looking for, I think, because it was so interesting and finance applied the maths for something really practical. So I think I've picked up a lot of tools along the way, you know, intellectual tools, money, you know, because if you work in banking, it's a side effect often, which helped. But you build up the richness over the course of your life. And I think if you're intellectually curious, you fill your kind of intellectual bag as you go. And those tools come back again and again and again.

11:07Weird stuff that you learn when you're doing physics and you just think this is useless. But then suddenly, you know, you realise, oh my goodness, this is exactly what I studied, you know, 20 years ago. Weird links that you would never guess. So things like the Black-Scholes equations, right? It's just like diffusion sorry what is that okay so how you price how you price derivatives there are these kind of differential equations that help you price derivatives like call and put options but these come straight out of the same physics the same equations which govern how fluids flow so things like that you know i know it's so weird and then things like vector embeddings like when i was at oxford we were studying neural networks so we teach these neural networks how to take a word and make it plural right sounds simple right so dog dogs pig pigs but then you've got irregulars yeah like child children you know where does that come from and then kids have to learn all this crazy stuff so we taught these neural networks and they'd make the same mistakes as kids and then we'd have to work out how the neural network did it so we had to work out these representation spaces think of it like an embedding yeah where you represent the meaning of something it could be an image could be a sentence and now that's exactly what these ai models use these embeddings and this idea of meaning so you know all of this stuff it's all connected together it's just so beautiful and that's what i mean by filling your intellectual bag as you go along a lot of this stuff resurfaces and i just think that's fascinating and you continue to do that now right you've said openly, I'm in my retirement.

12:47This is my retirement job, basically. So was it as binary as I've hit the number, or was there like a catalyst or a moment where you thought, oh, it's time now to make this change? I think the market kind of made up my mind. I mean, I'd written a lot of tools for our community members to work out their number, like Monte Carlo simulation, where you kind of work out given the randomness of markets am i going to hit my target if i've got a certain amount of money how long is it going to last if i draw out this amount using this rule these rules so i knew based on those tools of course you try your own situation out when you're building the tools so i knew i was i was getting close uh and then i actually reached it because there was just an unbelievable equity rally and it happened almost precisely at the time when i put you know gone full into equity.

13:43After that, it just kind of went crazy. And then, you know, I reached the number. And at that point, I kind of realised that that was enough. I mean, there's never enough, right? It can always have more. But it's a question of, if I stop today, could I pay my bills and live a lifestyle which I'm comfortable with? And that's the point where I just thought, yeah, I'm there. how did you calculate your number that you needed and when did you come up with it well for me it was you know what income do i need to live based on the lifestyle that i want so that's the starting point and then you think about well do i want to die with zero in which case i can withdraw more every year your withdrawal rate can be higher or do i want to leave money for my kids when i die in which case your withdrawal rate is lower because you've got to keep the pot constant in real terms.

14:36So inflation can't eat away at it. So for me, I thought probably die with zero. Although, you know, if there's money left over for my kids, good. People use the 4 % rule, which is like a very, very approximate thing. The way to think of it is imagine you've got a tank of water, right? And if you're pouring in 5 % of the tank every year through equity returns or bond returns, and then you're draining four, well, on average, the size of the pot, the size of the tank will remain constant so that's where it comes from it's based on the returns people expect the tank is on a boat that's going like this and sometimes a lot sloshes in as well i mean that's the other weird thing yeah um so there's volatility yeah so that's why you have an excess you have to build in an excess um and obviously the sequencing risk you have to think about that but there are nuances but that's a good starting point so i knew i was about there based on the income I needed and based on the 4 % rule.

15:32And then I had all of these simulation tools like the Monte Carlo simulation. So I knew from that that I'd be fairly confident that I'm not going to run out of money. And I had the income from PensionCraft, which meant that I probably wouldn't need it at all, right? Because I don't want to retire. I enjoy what I do. I think for some people, they hate what they do. And I think it is unfortunate that we are in this kind of situation where they hate their life, essentially. You just think, I don't want to get out of bed every day. And I'm really lucky in the sense that, you know, I love what I do.

16:06And that is a privilege. You know, I love it. But yeah, that income is going to be there for as long as I can be bothered to generate it, I think. So for me, it was a fairly low risk thing to do. And I didn't need the risk from the portfolio. And it's quite risky in running a business. You know this. It's kind of, you don't know what's going to happen in the future. But the predictable cash flows or income from your human capital allowed you to have a more risky approach in the market, basically. Yeah, you can think of it like an annuity. Because you were like redeeming your human capital through pension craft at a level that was higher than you thought.

16:41And that allowed you to go, I'll take more risk in the stock market. Prior to that, when it wasn't going well, were you more cautious? Oh, yeah. Yeah, yeah. So when I started off, I'd say that there are kind of three phases to the investment journey for me. So walk out of the investment bank into the sunshine and, you know, I had a family. I had a wife that wanted an income, understandably. And I had two kids which needed an income. But like I say, I had six years of money. So I had a fairly long runway. But I was very cautious because at that point I had zero income, right? Nothing. So I used other parts of my human capital, physics and maths.

17:21and I was driving around Buckinghamshire teaching these kids about electrons and and you know difference of two squares you know mathematics but that essentially allowed me to have time to make the videos so that was very cautious you know I'd come out of a fixed income world so bonds so I had a lot of bonds in my portfolio but my attitude initially was quite arrogant I think you know I'd been at the investment bank I thought I knew it inside out but markets tell you always you don't know anything yeah you might think you do but you don't and you've got to be humble uh but but anyway initially i was quite cautious then i started doing the research for the videos and i started to see you know the dimson marsh staunton stuff equity returns being amazing long term um and then i started to take a bit more risk and then i think you know i reached the point where where pension craft really took off and i I can take a lot of risk.

18:20And then I went, you know, single global equity fund. So those were the steps. And then I reached enough and I thought, well, now I can de-risk. Yeah, we had Moshe Molesky and we've had Bill Bernstein on as well. Similar, they're kind of you as a stock or a bond thing. And it's good for the audience at home listening. If you have a number but you haven't hit it, but you have a fairly stable job that you think those incomes will persist, you can take a fair bit of equity exposure on the other side. because you have stable income. And that's what you did. You reflected that in your portfolio allocation.

18:54And then now you've hit the number, you come back down the other side in terms of you ramp away from the equity exposure, which has a chance of being volatile. But that's not because you think you're going to stop pension craft anytime soon. You're still going to potentially have that income. Yeah, it's like a perpetual bond or a kind of annuity to your business. If you're a small business owner, freelancer or sole trader, then I want to tell you about one of my favourite finance tools in the world, Xero. It's accountancy software and we use it across all of my businesses. So this podcast, my channel and the newsletter.

19:27Xero is great because it makes accounting as easy as it can be and I say that confidently because of my mum. I wanted to get her involved in my business to help with bookkeeping and accountancy tasks like creating invoices and filing receipts and she said she would do it but only if we use Xero because she had experience with it from her previous business and absolutely loves it. Your tax returns can be filed directly from within Xero as well, which is especially important with the changes to making tax digital. But what I like most is how easy it is to see what's going on across my businesses.

19:56Revenue, profit, cash flow, all the stuff that I need to be on top of. So if you're looking for accountancy software, you should 100 % check out Xero. You can get 90 % off for six months by going to xero.com forward slash making money podcast. There's a link in the description for you as well and a QR code on screen. The only thing more annoying than an ad slot is compliance. Facts, but both are crucial. Compliance often gets in the way of scaling a business because as you grow, you need to prove you're compliant with various rules and regulations for other businesses to work with you. This is where our partner Vanta comes in.

20:31They automate compliance with security protocols like GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 27001 and SOC2. Compliance is one of those things that you have to do to have a seat at the table, but it takes time, effort, and lots of money, which is why we love Vanta. Vanta saves you up to 90 % of the time it takes to prove you're compliant with these standards, and on average, half a million dollars. If proving your compliance is something that you need to get done, you can get started at vanta.com forward slash making money. There's a link in the description, and we've also put a QR code on screen. Okay, so the portfolio now, it's gone from 100 % equities, which is one of a few different global funds, they just track the global stock market.

21:12You've now dialed that down. What is the equity position in the portfolio now? So equity is now 60, and then the fixed income side is 40. And, you know, so I still get some of the upside if markets go up, like they have recently, you know, I think that's great. But if they go down, I can rebalance and I get some of the extra juice because you're buying at a lower price for the equity. So, you know, you get the equity rebalancing benefit as well, which you don't get if you're 100 % equity. I'm sure you have backtested it. So is a rebalancing strategy more efficient? Does that generate an excess return over just being all invested at once?

21:53It depends. It does generate a small positive revenue longer term. I mean, there's mixed research on it. It depends also on what you've got in the bucket, right? Because if it's highly correlated, like if you have, say, high yield credit combined with equity, they tend to fall together. So that wouldn't work. But if you've got commodities, cash, fixed income combined with equity, there you get much more alpha because they're uncorrelated. The things that make one asset class freak out and say, I'm going to crash, that wouldn't affect everything in the portfolio. So it's just that rebalancing effect.

22:30I guess the presence of higher rates helps that argument as well. In the previous environment of very low interest rates, you were leaving money out of the market in somewhere that wasn't generating much of a return, probably a negative real return. You might even argue that they're negative real returns now. One of the tools I've written is really cool. It's got the bond yield curve. These are the individual bonds, which the UK government issues. It's got the yield on each one, which is roughly the return you receive on it, based on how many years to maturity. And it's like a living thing. I've got this animation tool, so you can click on play, and you can watch all the bonds kind of jiggle around.

23:06If you go back to 2022, it's all flat and low. And if you put it in real terms, it's below the curve, it's negative. And then suddenly in 22, 23, you get this huge inflation spike, the central banks raise rates, and it starts going like that and it starts twitching and then you get this massive shift upwards to like 4.5 to 5 percent which is where we are today which is normal right the situation we were in previously was abnormal and it had been there for so long that people forgot but i think now with fixed income like you say you earn a pretty good income can you if you think about the return and the risk that you're taking to generate it is the uk government going to default on its debt no they're not so when you see a bond sell-off you just think oh nice i can be paid half a percent more than i was last week because people are freaking out great how so how often do you rebalance and how do you rebalance well not very often i think that's the other take-home from the the research on on on rebalancing you know once a year is probably enough if there are periods when you have big crashes then you can rebalance more frequently but it's very little work and nowadays is a lot of the platforms, they just have a button where you can literally just click on it and it rebalances it for you.

24:21So it's so easy to do. But it does incur a trading cost, so usually it's a good idea not to do that very often. So yeah, once a year is pretty good. Yeah, I think so. And then, you know... So if you see a big crash, you don't go, oh, I need to go rebalance. You just... Not immediately. No, just give a couple of weeks, see what happens. And trading 212 will constantly tell you that it's out of balance and you want to rebalance. But, you know... You don't have to. Well, you incur FX fees, potentially, if you're buying foreign instruments And yeah, you might just over trade, essentially. And you want to leave it as much as possible, really.

24:51Yeah. So the idea of moving away from the equities is simply so that if the stock market was to drop significantly, you're not 100 % exposed to that. By dialing in a 40 % bond equity or fixed income, sorry, I know you're a specific type of bond, which we'll get onto in a minute. Do you know what kind of impact that will likely have in terms of dampening and the returns, how much lower the returns will be as a result? Yeah, I mean, it scales roughly linearly, not exactly because of the correlations. But if I have 60 % of the equity exposure, I'll get 60 % of the return long term. So am I happy with that?

25:30Yeah, because I've worked out that that'll get me to where I need to be, because I'm there already. So it'll just get me deeper into okay territory. But if there is a huge fall in the equity market, I could live off the 40%. If I had zero income tomorrow, I could live off that for quite a long time because it's a fair old chunk of money and I don't spend that much. So I think that's the way to think of it. Is it linear on the way down as well? Do you reduce the impact by 40 %? Roughly, yeah. I mean, if it's just a one-off shock, yeah. So I just take 60 % of the hit rather than 100 percent have there not been periods where bonds have moved in in depth with equities especially recently yeah and this is what worries me and that affected my choice of the bonds i chose so you're right i mean usually bonds and equity they go in opposite directions so good economic news good for equity bad for bonds bad economic news good for bonds bad for equity that's the usual situation but there are certain things which are toxic for bonds and equity So inflation is one of them, because inflation is like the mortal enemy of bonds, because you've got a fixed income, and inflation gobbles away a little bit of it every year.

26:44Equity, inflation above 5 % usually means that equity de-risks, so the price to earnings multiples fall. So both fall together if you get inflation spikes. So high inflation regimes, the hedge breaks. Bonds don't hedge equity. whereas normal conditions when inflation is reasonable you know two three percent that's the sweet spot the correlation breaks breaks down it's negative or zero and they hedge each other so what worries me is that these kind of situations where we get inflation spikes seem to be becoming more frequent so we got the huge one after covid when we switched the global economy off and on again.

27:27And that was a hugely inflationary period because governments were printing money. We had supply chain issues, which pushed up prices. So it was a perfect storm for inflation. And we had double digit inflation. But then we've had this situation where we've got tariffs from the US. Also, we've got the Strait of Hormuz being shut. And again, we've got an inflationary shock. So it seems as if the world is moving towards one in which these supply shocks are more frequent. And if that's the case, then the bond equity correlation isn't as reliable, being negative and being a good diversifier. It always seems after a shock as well, it takes a while for the inflation to kind of work its way out of the system.

28:08We have that kind of sticky core component in the UK that was the after effect, plus further shocks. So I feel like even if there wasn't the shocks, we would still have a higher baseline inflation rate right now than we would have had prior to the big surges, the 10 % that we saw. It seems to be we're in a higher inflationary environment just in general. I think that's true. And if you look at the numbers for services inflation in the UK, you're right, it didn't come down. Chocolate inflation, 17%. That never came down. I was really upset about that. So is Laura. Well, they just took all the chocolate out of it.

28:40You're just eating palm oil now, aren't you? Every time I go on and see a Cadbury's advert, but the comments are amazing. Like, boycott these bastards. They ruined our chocolate. You're so right. I mean, the services inflation has been very high in the UK, and it was just coming down. That was the beauty of it. If you listen to the monetary policy meetings, which, of course, I do, it was so exciting, because you were finally seeing the bank saying, oh, we've finally licked it. You know, services inflation is coming down. Wage growth is slowing down. It's still positive in real terms. But so it was like we were finally getting there and growth was improving.

29:16And then suddenly you get this straighter for muz thing. And if there was one thing that would scupper the UK economy, it's oil. Because to first order, you know, we ship in oil, we ship out services. That's the UK economy. You know, China's the workshop of the world. We're the office, right? And the worst thing you could have done is switch off the oil supply. And that's what happened. so it's going to have stagflationary effects in the uk we'll have higher inflation we'll have lower growth and it's really awful but it will be temporary you know i think eventually we will recover but you like you say it's going to be a an impulse a shock but even if you went back to the previous oil prices today it works through the economy and it's going to be higher for a while because you get higher inflation which initially in the oil prices you see at the petrol pump would be the most immediate example but then you get the service-based economy demand higher wages because they're like, well, now I've got to pay more to heat my house and fuel.

30:12So you get that wage spike and then all the prices are the other way. So it's not just spiking over. It ripples through, doesn't it, to every part of the economy. So we get this elevated inflation. And people anchor, right? They see the price of petrol at the pump and they think, oh, my goodness, numbers are going up. You know, the prices are going up. My wage has to go up as well. Yeah. And I think rightfully so. And I'm always wary about saying that, you know, people asking for higher wages is a bad thing, even if the guy in charge of the Bank of England was begging people not to ask for wage growth.

30:45But it is an effect. And like you said, we'd only just started to see the end of the last one. And now we've got another shock, which means we might see another couple of years of sticky core inflation in the UK again. How did you combat that then in the portfolio? Because I know if you're worried about it, you wouldn't have just gone, oh, well, I'll ignore that point. You see, what I went for was a money market fund instead of a longer duration guilt fund. because the way fixed income works, bonds, get ready on the button, is you've got duration. He's already slacking on it, to be honest. You gave him a definition of something before and I was like, he didn't get a word of that.

31:20I was like, he shouldn't do do do do do do do do do. No, not stagflation. You hit it before. What was it for? There was a definition. Black Shoals. Black Shoals and then you were like, yeah, derivatives. I'm like, yeah, yeah, yeah, derivatives, yeah. But this is one of the best things about coming on the show. When I talk about bonds, I just watch his, glaze it's just like it's like watching a man die yeah slowly die yeah over four episodes like when you keep bringing me back to kill me again he's digging me up and burying me again every time okay anyway so uh duration yeah so you've got short duration bonds and you've got long duration bonds right so it's almost like a different asset class but shorter duration bonds If interest rates increase, hardly affects them.

Read the full transcript

32:09Long-duration bonds, they are all over the place. The volatility is like equity. So in the UK, my community always jokes that TR73, which is like this 2073 maturing bond, it's got this incredible volatility. And we call it old man's crypto. Because if you want to take a punt on rates, you buy TR73. If you think rates are going to go down, you buy TR73. You can't short it. But if rates are falling, that's what you do. But that's really sensitive. Rates increase, that thing tanks. So in 2022, 23, they looked like meme stocks selling off. You know, they fell about 80%. But now, you know, the yields are higher.

32:51So I think those kind of crashes are less likely. But I didn't want to take that risk. I was taking risk off the table. I knew I couldn't call which way yields would go because there was a lot of uncertainty with Trump as president, new government in the UK at that time. So for me, I just went for a money market fund. And at that point, short term bonds were giving you more income than long term bonds, which was weird. The curve was inverted. Since then, the curve has now turned back to being normally upward sloping. And since the war with Iran, what's happened is the whole curve has shifted up.

33:29So now it is the case that you'd be better off with a gilt than you would with a money market fund. So money market funds earn roughly the SONIA rate, the sterling overnight index average rate, which is currently roughly bank rate, which was falling, but now looks like it may not be falling, again, due to the inflation shock. So, you know, you're earning pretty good money with it. It's very, very, very low risk, because they only buy very, very, very safe things. It's very boring, which is what I want. so that's what i've got no duration risk very little credit risk very little income but a reasonable income are there not bonds that track the rate of inflation when i make that linkers yeah yeah wouldn't that be something if in your 60 40 portfolio then if the inflation goes up then your bond your returns give me the bottom oh mate break yourself you thought you dug him off on you okay you sitting comfortably no i mean i bought some linkers for this very reason but what's weird about linkers is they bake in an expected rate of inflation it's called a break even so let's say you're going to be investing money for five years you think inflation is going to be three percent okay well if that's the case then what's the break-even rate for the linker if it's four percent then inflation in your belief system is not going to be high enough to pay for the inflation linker so that's that's the problem you've got to understand a shock to the upside you need to think it's going to be more than they expect it to be in order for the link even yeah and the break even will be based on a forecast of whatever it they think it should be or is it just based on market dynamics it could just be that people don't want to buy linkers you know or a big part of the linker market step back like insurance companies supply and demand exactly but it is you i mean people say that it's the expect the market expectation about inflation whether that's true or not is kind of irrelevant it's just based on what you believe right anyway my belief was wrong for my linker i thought i was earn about seven percent when i actually bought it it was just on the kind of tail end of the very high inflation period i thought it would be stickier than it was i was wrong and the market told me i was wrong by making less money than i thought so i made about six i thought i'd make about seven so you've got to be right right you've got to be right and you've got to know what's baked in so inflation linked bonds protect you against unexpected inflation normal government bonds protect you to against inflation that's expected so there's some of that baked into those two and equity is the best uh hedge against inflation longer term because businesses have pricing power exactly they can put their prices until it reaches about five percent inflation at which point they they derate so they provide you with limited uh inflation protection but beyond that five percent six percent inflation equities start to suffer as well usually is that everybody hurts at that point is it like a five six percent or above there's nowhere really to hide the linker would have done okay exactly because they wouldn't have but it's only you can't buy a linker after the event or you can buy the source of the inflation so if the source of the inflation was oil you could buy oil exposure if it was industrial metals it could but you could buy those you know i mean there are various ways you can hedge for that and you know commodities are one way to do that you can get commodity exposure which limits the damage to your portfolio so that's another way to do this is to hedge via commodities but you don't have any commodities in your not in the core no but i've been experimenting with that yeah this is what you do you say i'm 100 equity so i've just got a million experiments a bit of gold a bit of crypto i've got this i've got that it's just an experiment is there a circumstance that would make you change the bond allocation, as in move away from the money market fund into a gilt or something?

37:31Oh, yeah, yeah. I mean, we're in there now. I mean, that's why I think this yield curve tool is cool, because you can see that it's a living thing. It changes day to day. And if there's a bond sell-off, then yields get higher, right? And then suddenly, all of those bonds are above the dashed line on my graph for what you earn with a money market fund. So at that point, you're better off switching into gilts. So we're kind of there now. And I am tempted to switch. I think it could get even higher on the yields. For example, if there's a political change in the UK, but let's say there was a change in government, well, eventually there's going to be a change.

38:06And the government is much more spendy. In other words, they say, oh, you know, this debt to GDP thing, that was just made up anyway. You know, we're just going to carry on to 120%, 150%. It'll be fine. well if that happens well the yields then would you know they'd go up a lot so that could be another a point at which to get more exposure so there are lots of reasons why i might switch and at the moment we're kind of reaching the point where i'm thinking yeah there are quite a few guilts now where i'd be better off than you know getting a money market fund why would you be better off with the guilt just a higher return higher return so let's say you buy it today you lock in 4.5%, say, for the next two years.

38:50Whereas with a money market fund, it just picks up whatever rate the Monetary Policy Committee thinks up that week. And that can change over time. So you earn a variable rate. Do you think, for someone who's not into the bonds as you, do you think a money market fund could just suffice if they would get a good enough return on that long term to have that as the component. Yeah. I mean, in the UK, we're kind of blessed in the sense that we have a high short-term interest rate. A lot of people say it's bad, and it is for the government because they have to borrow at that rate. But for us, it's great.

39:24You know, I speak to people in Europe where the rate's 2 % rather than 4%, you know, in the UK, 3.75. So yeah, I think we're in a situation now where a money market fund's pretty good, simple, they're very cheap, the fees are about 0.1 for the cheapest and so simple right you just put your money and that's it if you go for the income version it's always worth a quid it just throws out cash flows every so often if you buy the accumulation version it just looks like a bank account where it just trundles upwards yeah mine goes up and then drops and you get like a dividend if it's a rampy one yeah that's the income version yeah yeah yeah i love it it builds up like a ski slope and then just drops and then a few days later you get your payment and that's yeah it's i think it'd be a bit unnerving for someone if they weren't expecting it because it just suddenly disappears the value i've had people call me and say what the hell's happened you know i thought this was safe but then you actually look zoom out on the y-axis it's just loads of those it's literally going reflective of the rates it's like a penny above one yeah one pound or yeah yeah but you see like a little movement in the past and then from 2020 it's like oh yeah because of the rates went high when the rates were low it was hardly visible wasn't it it's like a heartbeat suddenly kicking out yeah yeah no i mean i look you put you kind of got me into them which i'm sorry no no i mean it's it's a really good way to park business funds um at a good rate as well we do that you know or to have a bit of kind of like emergency funds and things you know i separate money in different places i put tax money i don't want my tax money anywhere near my business money but i need places to keep capital and the money market funds are really good for that i think and you know when it's business cash it can be it can be quite a lot of money you know where that falls in every quarter or whatever um so yeah and you can sell at any time and you're just up that slope so you've generated your return it's something like you're missing out that's right i mean you don't miss out it's just kind of accumulated income i do think they're a bit counterintuitive because to people they look like a stock like the charts and stuff so i think people need to wrap their heads around what what the version is they're buying and what that will look like on the chart before they go into it otherwise you might get a shock yeah the rampy ones are the income ones and the accumulation ones are the slowly upward moving ones yeah so would this would the slowly upward moving ones have gone steeper at the time the rate so it would have looked like a more aggressive climb that's right that's right so when interest rates were zero it's just flatlining and you just think why would i buy something like that and there isn't a good reason other than capital preservation but then when income rates are higher then yeah the slope is just high yeah so for our audience where do you get a money market fund and where do you get a bond well a lot of the platforms now offer gilts uh so for example hargroves has them interactive investor has them free trade now offers them free trade offers them trading 212 no no free trade are the first of like the neo kind of newish brokers the discount brokers they offer all of them i think at the moment it's just liquid ones uh but interactive investor gives you all of them and you can trade them electronically so once you know the ticker tr73 whatever that's the old man's crypto yeah but you get the shorter ones like uh tn28 whatever uh you just type in the ticker and you just buy it like you would with the stock and they trade on the london stock exchange so you can check out the prices if you want to uh you just search for the ticker again so it's pretty easy and money market funds are just like buying a normal fund you buy them on a broker most brokers have some on their different ones yeah vanguard's got two uh which are oeic's so if you're on an etf only platform you can't buy vanguards a lot of people buy ic open-ended investment company so it's just a fund an oik yeah i mean it's just a fund uh and some platforms have them some don't if it's etf only you can't buy oiks but erns is it erns is another one that's the one i think that one has a bit of duration in it okay so yeah but csh2 is the etf that a lot of people buy that's from a mundi it's a smart cash fund but that's an accumulation one yeah so that's that's that's a frequently used one raw london has one which is again a fee of about 0.1 percent the fees tend to be very low because the income's low what would they be described as if you were reading them sometimes it's under fixed income sometimes like on vanguard's platform there's only one money market fund so if you tick that category it's like one fund that pops up and they've got both flavors income and accumulation um both flavors yeah it's 0.1 a good fee yeah i think 0.1 is the lowest i know of royal london's is 0.1 csh2 i think is 0.1 or 0.12 so yeah generally the fees tend to be quite low you wouldn't pay a lot for that because it's such a simple product awesome uh a lot of our audience would have heard about the 100 minus your age rule.

44:11So, I mean, I'm 25. So if we did 100 minus my age, it would be 75. So 75 % in equities, 25 % in bonds or safer assets. How do you feel about that rule? I'm not actually 25. I'm 26. Oh my God. How do you feel about that rule? I'm disgusted you're so young. I'm not. I'm 38. Okay. I could have passed for 25. I'm glad that you believe me. See, this way you're getting back on. I wasn't going to say anything. I can see the gray hair, mate. Do you know how many of them I snipped out and got my missus to snip out this morning and you can still see them? So getting to be a full-time job for her. She's like, I need a salary to cut out all these grades.

44:49But I think, yeah, the rules that people come up with, yeah, okay, you want to take less risk just before you retire. I think that's a given. There's something called sequencing risk where if you're just about to start drawing on the money, so you have to sell stuff in order to eat, well, you don't want to have to sell things after they've crashed. So at that point, you want things which don't crash, which would be things like cash, money market funds, shorter duration gilts, maybe even global bond funds, you know, non-crashy things. Because then if equity markets fall 40%, well, you can eat the safe stuff until equity markets recover.

45:27So you can avoid the sequencing risk. The way to think of it is you're kind of scooping off a fixed amount of stuff, right? So if you're taking, say,£40 ,000 every year is what you're selling from your portfolio. If the size of your portfolio is halved, then the percentage you're withdrawing that year is going to be higher than it was before it shrank. So that means you're depleting the portfolio much more quickly. So that's why you want stuff where it doesn't shrink, so you can allow equity to snap back up. But if you are starting out your investing journey, say you're 20, and I mean do you think 20 years should be 80 % in equities you I mean you've just gone from 100 % equities recently and you're not 20 so do you think 20 years should be even do you need to be 20 % in in bonds it depends I mean it's some people I speak to they're very nervous so for them they probably wouldn't want to be 100 % equity because they will see a 40 % peak to trough fall at some point and they could be a nervous wreck if that happens or they may even sell you know the worst possible thing you can do.

46:30So I think that's really important. It's about risk appetite as well as risk capacity. So your risk capacity is very high because if the portfolio went to zero tomorrow, it wouldn't affect your ability to live, your quality of life, where you shop. But it would affect your ability to sleep, perhaps, because you'd be really upset. So I think the emotional side of it shouldn't be underestimated. So I think you could be 20 and have 50 % equity, 40 % equity. It really depends on the person. Really, it's about finding a portfolio you can live with. And for different people, I think, they have different levels of risk that they can stomach.

47:09But if you went back and you were 20, would you be 100 % equities? I think so, yeah, knowing what I know. Yeah, knowing what you know and being comfortable and having all the knowledge. I think rules sell books, don't they? So like, you know, the X, Y, Z rule, people are, oh, what is it? I'll click on that, I'll watch that, I'll consume that. I think, you know, 100 minus your age, the idea that every year you die at one point is probably a bit broad. And I think for a lot of people, so for example, me, in my early 20s, I probably would have been quite risk averse because I would have thought, I'm just going to mess this up.

47:40So I might have had a higher exposure to bonds then. But then in my mid 30s now, I'm like pretty comfortable in my view. I've been around the mill and I know that I can earn money. So I'm like 100 % equity. So you might - And you've got your kid, I assume, in 100 % equities. Yeah, I have. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, because he's got the longest time horizon. Yeah, but he might then take it over at 18 and be like, I don't want to lose this money. There's a bit of money here, but I don't want to lose it. So the 100 minus your age thing doesn't really work in that capacity. And would my son's point of birth be 99 % equities, 1 % bonds?

48:11Like, why? Yeah, why? It's just an odd. So I do think that rules of thumb are good, like the 4 % rule, but they don't normally survive a landing, do they, when they're in the real world. And it depends on rates as well. like in the 19th century, rates were really good. So if you'd have bought fixed income in the 1800s, actually it wouldn't have been a bad allocation at all. So it just depends on markets and where we are with yields. It depends on lots of things. But I think risk appetite is a really important one. And I think some people do some crazy stuff. Like, for example, there's the idea of the reverse glide path.

48:44Have you come across this? Where instead of ramping down the equities, you get older, you start off with very low risk. So you start off with 20 % just as you retire to avoid the sequencing risk. And then you re-risk. So you start increasing your risk as you get older. And actually, the back test shows that that works very well. I like that. I like it. So at the point of a time when you have 20 % equities, and then you start. Well, I mean, I'm just pulling a number out of the end. And then you start every year. So you avoid that taking a bite of the apple as it shrinks thing. But then you dial it back up because then you might be retired for 30 years, It's 40 years.

49:22So that's actually quite a long investing time horizon. So you want that equity exposure. I've never heard that one before. Yeah, you live to 125 and you're like, Jesus. Yeah, no, I sit here often think I would like to be quite high equity exposure in retirement. But then as you say, if you've got enough, why bother? Because it might mean that you don't sleep at night. Because on paper, it works if you get the average return of the market. but the year that it drops 30 40 percent and that stays down for three years you might then have three years of your precious retirement where you can't do anything and you're stressed and that's not a time you want to be stressed now the yields are higher you know four or five percent for a guilt which is very low risk i mean the risk of default is very low and if you hold them to maturity you don't worry about yield curve movements because you've locked in the rate of return your real worry i think is inflation because that can eat away in which case you buy linkers you know so some of the people buy inflation linked bonds some of our community have got like huge inflation linked bond portfolios because they're really you know kind of like inflation isters they really believe it's going to kick off those are linkers yeah those are linkers yeah do you um do you have any anything else outside the core portfolio allocation do you have a cash buffer like emergency funds anything like that um i do have a little bit yeah i mean just sitting in a in a bank account.

50:43And, you know, sometimes I put stuff into cash savings. But usually that's fairly minimal. You know, that wouldn't tide me over for that long. Maybe, you know, six months, something like that. But there is some buffer. But you're not in drawdown, are you? So when you, at the point you hit drawdown, where you start spending the money, how are you going to approach it then? Well, I think the way people usually do it, and the way I'll probably do it, is, you know, you set aside a certain amount of money for that year so you kind of locked in whatever it is you're going to get and then you withdraw that as you need it as an income um so that's probably the way i'll do it and a lot of a lot of these platforms that's the way it's worked out you've got a separate account a drawdown account like physically it's another account or virtually you know you just tag this as drawdown and then that's what you withdraw that year yeah most of miloski we had it on and i talked to him about a three-year waterfall strategy or whatever.

51:40And he was like, yeah, it's a placebo. Yeah, he's like, yeah, no. It'll survive. 90 % of times it won't work, but you go for that, Damien. You're like, oh. Yeah, he was more into the products where they basically cap your upside, ETFs with a capped upside, but a capped downside. And he said that these are much better products for dealing with sequencing risk. Oh, interesting. So capped and flawed. Yeah, so, you know, it can only ever go up by a max of 10%, but it can only ever drop by a max of 10%, say. So you give up the upside in years when it goes up 20%, but you don't feel the full downwards force.

52:18But, I mean, he was very bullish on these products, but I looked at them, and they're not very widely available in the UK, and they're quite expensive, and they're quite niche. They're very profitable for investment banks. I can imagine. I can imagine. I mean, whenever I hear about this financial engineering stuff, I'm always a bit wary. I just try to keep it vanilla, simple. As long as you understand the risks, I think that's probably best. I'd rather keep the upside. I kind of like that, that you can have up crashes. Because if you're going to be taking the risk, I want the up crashes, right?

52:50Yeah. I mean, over a 30, 40-year period, you're going to get some years where it's up 20 % because that's what tends to happen. The variance of returns is wild. the average rate of return of 10 % occurs hardly ever. You get these plus 20s. The next year you're going to be like, we're going to have a great year this year because we've just made 20%. My mom constantly tells me my pension is more now than it was when I started and we've been living off it and stuff. It's like a magic pot. Yeah, a magic money machine. Yeah, the government should get one of them. Yeah, so, okay, what have we got next, T?

53:23Okay, yeah, yeah. So I've changed my opinion probably over the period I've been making content. I was very much, I'll probably stay 100 % equities the whole life and I'll have a cash buffer. I now concede that if I got to enough and I've spoken to enough people that are older than me with wisdom of, you don't really want to be dicing with it when you've got enough. Why bother? Do you think people like me and the wider personal finance community focus too much on the equity side and not enough on the safe stuff. Safe. Yes. It's just unbelievable how little content there is on bonds. I mean, you look on YouTube, nothing.

54:04I mean, I'm a sole voice, right, talking about guilt. Why is that? I mean, it's not because it's a bad investment. You never learn about them in school. You know, stocks are kind of understandable. A little slice of a company, you get all the upside. It's a perpetual instrument. and yet bonds so useful nobody understands them you know everyone thinks they understand stocks i don't i'm still on to three years in i'm still trying to figure out figure it all out but it is complex right i don't think people do truly it's definitely simpler than bonds i think yeah but it shouldn't be because bonds in theory are simple it's a bit more tangible i think you know you see the we even though i'd actually say a stock is almost more abstract than a bond you have like the personalities and people and the talk that goes around the stock market that means like people can see a share of tesla and they see elon musk and they can draw a line between that a bond feels a little bit more abstract you see i'd push back on that with a bond you know what you're going to get you know on this date i'll receive this cash flow you know on this date i'll get my money back now that is incredible i think that's pretty tangible with an equity you've got no idea what you're going to get you don't know if it's going to exist as a company in 10 years time with a bond it's set in law that you get paid those yeah but you get like yield curbs and coupon rates and i think these yes yeah you just get excited i think people just then go like i don't know what what what's going on here and the fact that you can have a certain return if you hold it to maturity but in between that point it can be all over the place and that can probably feel not as safe as you say and it doesn't feel as isn't as liquid as stocks right depends i mean for gilts for gilts they're very liquid for corporate bonds yeah i mean where bonds are issued by companies yeah that's less liquid there was a video on youtube called if you don't understand bonds you don't understand money and it was like a young bloke who sat there and said basically all of you were obsessed with the stock market i'm going to explain why bonds are the most important financial instrument on the planet and he just breaks it all down in a really good way so maybe check that out i will um and because i think that that got like a lot of views i think a couple million views um so there are people fighting the bond fight with you it's not just you on a hill you've got you've got a partner in crime there but yeah i i don't know i don't know what it is why maybe it's because like we kind of internalize the thing that you're seeking a return and you want to grow your money and the stock market has the best chance of growing your money and when you describe a bond people probably just think oh it's a bit like a savings account or something so i'll just use one of those or i don't know why they don't have the same sexy sexy like oh i can't get rich off bonds but i could get rich off the stock market kind of some bond trained traders get very rich off bonds but they can do tricks that other people can't it's funny i was listening to the ft podcast one that was just launched it was interesting they were talking about turner you know the artist yes and he was a bond arbitrageur really he did bond arbitrage in the i don't know 1800s i guess maybe even earlier but he realized that there was a risk-free profit you could make from government bonds and you can make almost like i think it was three and a half percent difference between two different instruments so you know you buy one you swap it for another and it's risk-free but people didn't do it because they thought it wasn't a gentlemanly thing to do so he didn't think that he just did it he made a lot of money doing it do you do you think you were born 150 years too late you would have just been absolutely finessing the market in the previous life i would have loved to be able to do that but interesting right an artist who's into bond arbitrage who knew it's probably a bond arbitrage who got into art because he was so rich you know he could i mean was he successful in his while he was alive as i think he was successful as an artist but he wasn't born into wealth and a lot of the other artists thought it was quite ungentlemanly because they were all rich anyway that's right yeah whereas he taught he talked about it as well which uh which was uncouth apparently yeah i mean he found a money machine if you've got if you can just farm a safe three percent yeah nice you you mentioned before about the 40 drawdown um and you said you know that it will happen um do you think would you one soon the thing is i don't know i know it will happen i don't know when so i think for me it's about being ready for it whenever it happens you know my grandmother always used to say romen at my age you have to keep your bags packed because she was like 70 um so i i think that's the way to approach it you've got to keep your bags packed for the next crisis and you never know when it's going to happen and if you're in about to enter drawdown well then you better have your bags Do you think, like from an equity perspective, obviously we can talk about it all day as an interesting talking point for the world, but do you think from an equity investor's perspective, it's just kind of part of the ebbs and flows of the globe and it's not something that they should be overly worried about as long as they've got a long time horizon for investment?

59:07Yeah, I mean, if you're accumulating, these kind of crises are great. You know, for you two, brilliant. You're buying equities now at a depressed price. Well, not anymore. Not really. Briefly. what you were and maybe again, but it's good for you. So I think, yeah, this is just another crisis and a long history of crises, which eventually evict the equity market. But things snap back, you know, that's just the nature of the investment. You've just got to get used to the idea that something will make them fall 40%, 50%. And you've just got to get used to that idea. And if you haven't, if you're not comfortable with that, then just de-risk a bit.

59:44if the market doubles tomorrow would you feel bad about the fact that you do risk i think so i mean i'd have 60 of that so you know that's still pretty good would i have wished i'd have done more would i wish i'd have had something levered yeah maybe but you know i have played with levered uh funds you know i did like crazy three times nvidia versus tesla so long nvidia short Tesla. And I was just a wreck when I did it. It was in my fund portfolio, but I was checking it every day, every hour. And I was nervous. And I just didn't understand why Tesla wasn't selling off, even despite all the negative news flow.

1:00:24Eventually, it did recover, but it was after I closed down my trade, because I was just a wreck. And Laura was saying, look, you're spending too long on this. And she was right. So it was a bit like being a gambler in that sense. It's just not my nature to do that kind of thing so would i have fomo yeah probably does it feel boring now do you feel kind of out of the market a bit no i mean i still have the exposure so i still feel uh worried when markets fall but i think it worries me less than it did it did feel like things were toppy and it did worry me yeah it surprises me that it worries you when you're so stoic and you sit down and say oh you know it just is what it is i think also the news flow just made me quite depressed just reading what's going on in the world all the time it just feels as if every generation you think that the world's going to be better than the previous one and for our generation it was true you know when i was a kid we grew up with nuclear weapons we had the ussr and you know things were you know when i grew up people would quite openly call you a in the 70s and and now you get to the 2020s almost the 2030s and it feels like we're going back to that world where we've got these blocks of people that hate each other both within our country but also between countries and it just feels like things are going quite divided yeah and it's sad to see and that depresses me perhaps more than what's going on in market yeah it does feel like we've taken a bit of a step backwards in politics as well and we can't finish on that can we i was gonna say we're out here like showing them like the power of friendship so like you know me and damo yeah showing the world that you know it's all about love yeah but um he keeps coming trying to kill you yeah he keeps trying to kill me dig me up depress me i really i know what you mean though i mean you've got trump and you've got like a lot of people it's like you're either this or you're that you're left wing you're right when you're republicans oh yeah screw the rich Screw the poor, it's immigrants, and it's a lot of that.

1:02:27But I don't know. I think overall, the younger generation I've got more faith in, like Gen Z, I feel like they're kind of like, oh, we need to protect the planet, we need to do more things. I've always felt very lucky that I live in a crazy time of, not the nasty stuff, but in terms of development of technology and the things I've seen, the Silicon Age almost, and the fact that, you know, I've seen the development of computers in my lifetime to the point of I used to record songs on a tape player and now it's like abundant music in my pocket at all points and all the things that are iPhone and that.

1:03:03And anyone would have said, you lived in a miraculous time of development. And just as that's kind of like flatlining, they go, there's AI. And like, that's wonderful. I've been coding with Claude. Claude is amazing. Like every day I code with Claude. Yeah. And I feel like a god. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, you are. You are. No, but I mean, between like 1066 and 1700, it was just flatline misery. Do you know what I mean? It was just nothing. I mean, there was stuff, but it was a grind in existence and there wasn't much development and people's lives didn't really change or improve. It was just kind of like this.

1:03:41Whereas we've just hockey sticked and then we're about to find a whole new gear in this thing. You know, I was at a dinner last night speaking to some tech people and they're obviously a very like you know they drink the kool-aid of of the ai but they're genuinely sitting there going this is going to change everything about how we do our business we are like ripping up our whole business because of this stuff and i'm just like this is amazing yeah it's interesting the people it's affected it's the people who used to be the well-paid people right so lawyers coders well now coding almost anyone can do it i mean Not everyone can do it well, but you can be so much more productive.

1:04:19Now, if you've got AI, you can write what a whole team of developers used to be able to do. In fact, I reproduced a lot of what my team at the investment bank could have written over the space of months, over the space of a few days. Don't say it too loud, because I think what will happen is the cost to access these services will shoot up dramatically. When people start going, I'm making so much money off this thing. Are you? We need a slice of that. basically it'll get to a point where the economics are it costs just less than a person to hire do you know what i mean and then you'll have to hire someone to code it yeah or to prompt it so but i think that i think the point at which i realized how important it was was when i was speaking to a client i do coaching sessions one-to-one and they sent me what their ai had done and they said is this research okay so i find that quite often now which is that people send me the ai research and they want me to look over it to see if it's done something sensible so you've still got that human trust i think where people don't trust the ai maybe as much as they could i think there's still a role for people like you and me and i think you know the word ai slop tells you that people don't want to watch ai stuff they want a human who had to sweat to generate that video and it is blood sweat and tears if you create content isn't it i mean We know that.

1:05:40And people appreciate that. And they like the kind of human aspect of it as well. But I do think there's lots to be excited about. Oh, yes. I think we live in a miraculous time. I think hopefully in a couple hundred years, I look back at this moment where we lived and go, this is where everything started, basically. They were living in the Stone Age before this moment. And I'll still be there. 2 ,000 years old. Terminator demo just chilling out. Buy a global index fund. Yeah, yeah. Still 100 % equities. Still 100 % equities. Thank you so much as always, mate, for coming on. Great pleasure. Thanks for always.

1:06:23I can't do it with a bee above my head. No, your dish is going in it. You melt. You being a melt. Look, there's the bee. Where? Oh, it's right near you, mate. Stop it. Well, he has a hissy fit. I'll just talk to you about Roman's episode. Love having him on. and um are you all right i don't know where the b is but it's on your shirt bro don't do that i'll end up hitting you by mistake we spoke about ai and retirement in that and actually our ai tool that we've been building we've recently introduced some retirement components to that so if you want to check out check it out and look at things like um can i afford to retire when should i retire blah blah blah we'll leave a link to that below for you there it is you didn't just do that when i'm running away from a bee did you i'm not running away from a bee man i've got work to do

1:07:16We are sorry, but the new retirement feature for the AI isn't quite ready yet. We just had to keep that ending in just to show how much of a melt tea is. You can still get help with your money today, though, from the rest of the AI. We've left a link in the description and I'll let you know when the retirement planner thing is ready. and a little reminder just before you go if you've got five minutes it would be great if you can fill out our survey which you can find in the description normally this is where we'd say this isn't financial advice and it really isn't but if you want to speak to a good financial advisor then we might be able to help we've partnered with a few advisors to offer a range of services from one-off flat fee guidance to ongoing advice i'm actually using the guidance service to sort out my finances.

1:07:58If you'd like to understand your options, there's a link in the description where you can answer a few questions and then book a free call with my colleague Will, so you can figure out what might be right for you. This episode was produced by Ruth Edwards, and it was filmed and edited by Ben and Jack at Flowspire. See you next week.

From the publisher

Ramin Nakisa from PensionCraft is back. Like me he’s spent years explaining why investing 100% in global equities works. But recently, he changed his portfolio, cutting his exposure by almost half. What changed? And what might make him change his mind again?

💬 Get personal help with your money from our AI

Sorry, the retirement features aren’t quite ready yet (we had to keep that ending!) but you can still get help from our AI here: https://makingmoney.email/AI

❓Survey - how are you saving for your future?

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://makingmoney.email/survey⁠⁠

🎉 Sponsors

Vanta - Get your company secure and compliant: ⁠https://vanta.com/makingmoney

Xero accountancy software - get 90% off for 6 months: https://referrals.xero.com/makingmoney 

–

If you purchase a product or service using one of the links above, we may receive a commission. There will be no additional charge for you. Remember investments can fall and rise - and past performance is no guarantee of future results. Other fees may apply. Your money is at risk.

This is not financial advice. The reason it’s not financial advice is because it’s not tailored to you. We explain the principles of building wealth but if you want personalised advice, it’s worth speaking to a financial advisor. As with everything financial, please do your own research. We really encourage that because no one cares more about your money than you and if you learn the basics then it will change your life.

More from Making Money

All 184 episodes
⁠I Was 100% in a Global Index Fund Until I Realised ThisMaking Money · 1 h 10 min
Listen in VO