The truth about investing - Patrick Boyle

1 Jul 2024 · 1 h 22 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Notes: Making Money - The Truth About Investing with Patrick Boyle

Episode Overview In this episode of Making Money, hosts Damien Jordan and Timeyin Akerele engage with Patrick Boyle, a former hedge fund trader and prominent finance YouTuber. Patrick shares insights from his extensive experience in analyzing market data, predictions for the next decade in investing, and weighs in on the economic effects of Brexit on the UK.

Key Guests

  • Patrick Boyle: Ex-hedge fund trader, finance educator, and YouTuber with nearly 750,000 subscribers.

Themes and Discussions

  1. Patrick Boyle’s Background
  2. Transitioned from traditional finance to YouTube, emphasizing his analytical approach to investment.
  3. His videos often blend humor with serious finance topics, making complex subjects more accessible.
  1. Investing Insights
  2. Quantitative Investing:
  3. Focus on data-driven analysis rather than traditional accounting methods.
  4. Uses statistical relationships to predict market movements.
  5. Discussed his journey into quant investing, emphasizing the importance of understanding data and the historical context in finance.
  • Market Predictions:
  • Speculates a potential shift from growth investing to value investing in the upcoming decade.
  • Highlights the risk of overvalued growth stocks, emphasizing the need for a more cautious approach.
  1. Economic Context
  2. Brexit and the UK Economy:
  3. Patrick refutes the notion that Brexit is solely responsible for the UK's economic troubles.
  4. Points to broader issues such as productivity deficits and market discounts compared to US and European stocks.
  5. Discusses the impact of under-investment in infrastructure on overall economic performance.
  1. Behavioral Economics
  2. Examines human psychology in investing, particularly how emotions can lead to poor decision-making.
  3. Discusses the importance of recognizing biases in both retail and institutional investors, leading to misallocation of investments.
  1. Trends in Technology and Investing
  2. Discussed the parallels between current trends in AI and historical investment bubbles.
  3. Cautions against the hype surrounding new technologies leading to unfounded valuations, akin to previous market bubbles.
  1. Investment Strategies
  2. Recommends investing in index funds for most people due to simplicity and effectiveness.
  3. Emphasizes the importance of risk management and understanding personal investment goals.

Key Takeaways

  • Investing Strategy: A wise investor should consider a balanced approach focused on long-term sustainability rather than chasing trends.
  • Market Awareness: Understanding historical contexts and market psychology is crucial for making informed investment decisions.
  • Brexit's Impact: It is essential to analyze economic factors comprehensively rather than attributing blame to singular events like Brexit.

Final Thoughts

  • Patrick Boyle's perspective provides a grounded approach to investing amidst market fluctuations and emerging economic challenges.
  • The conversation encourages listeners to approach their financial education with curiosity and skepticism, urging them to conduct their own research.

Contact Information For personalized financial advice, listeners are encouraged to reach out to the Making Money financial adviser service: [financial advisors](https://makingmoney.email/financial-advisors-audio).

---

*This episode is part of the Making Money podcast, where listeners can gain insights into building wealth through better financial education.*

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01You know what I love, Damo? Things that save me time. You don't have YouTube premium, mate, so I just don't believe that. Granted, I'll give you that one. However, I've got one for you. A great time saver in personal finance is Money Week magazine. They spend a lot of time distilling the biggest stories in personal finance down into consumable chunks, so you don't have to scroll and scroll. They give practical tips on savings, investments, pensions, the UK economy, the global economy. It's like your five a day, but for finance. If you want to give Money Week a try, you can get six issues in print and the app absolutely free by visiting moneyweek.com forward slash money.

0:34After your trial, you'll save an extra£5 a quarter on the subscription, which is exclusive to Making Money listeners. And that's moneyweek.com forward slash money. But there's a link in the description if you just want to click that.

0:49In fact, I try not to make videos about him because almost all of finance YouTube is just people talking about Elon Musk. Patrick Boyle is an ex-hedge fund trader and one of the biggest finance YouTubers in the world. Famous for his very dry wit, he has nearly 750 ,000 subscribers and his videos have got millions of views. Patrick has spent decades looking at data and using it to try and predict what's going to happen. And I think it's his analytical take on everything from India's economy to Elon Musk that makes Patrick so popular. We talked about everything, from whether these famous funds really live up to the hype, his success on YouTube and whether Brexit is actually to blame for the UK's economic troubles.

1:26I look at some of the big stocks within the S &P and you kind of think, well, I'm not sure that I want to own that one. Yeah. What about crypto then? What about it? Well, how much have you got?

1:43I do think personally that you are probably one of the biggest finite YouTubers on the planet. And I think a lot of - That's slightly frightening to me to think of, because I always think of myself as still sort of a small channel. Yeah, you certainly are. And we'll get into that. I think my favourite episode that you ever did was the one where it was like, why Elon has to buy Twitter? And you were sat on a beach in a suit. And for the whole video, I was like, is that a green screen? That's the comments are just filled with this. Someone analysing, they're like, well, you can see the actual beach in the background through his glasses.

2:18He couldn't have done that with a green screen. I think the audio was so good that it was, there was no like seagulls or whatever. Your audio was great. But I was like, you've packed a suit, gone on holiday and you're sat on a beach. Well, no, I was on holiday and all of that kicked off. And actually it's funny, it was a conversation with Darren from How Money Works. And we kind of joked that the thing should just be that I'm always in a suit, like no matter what, always in a suit. And so even like I've done sponsored videos, you know, for like workout apps and they're like, can you show yourself working out?

2:52And I'm like, I will, but only in a suit. Well, did you see Lex Friedman's in the jungle? You know, Lex Friedman, the podcaster? And he's got his suit on. And I was like, Patrick did it first. I was like, I think you set the trend there. Yeah, it was actually, yeah, it was just a joke with Darren from How Money Works. And it just kind of turned into a thing where, yeah, I was in Cape Cod and, you know, the topic came up. It was really interesting. It was kind of good content, I felt, from my channel. and I just thought it would be really funny to do that and also not to say anything about it, you know, like not to like in no way act like there's anything unusual.

3:29And the best bit was there was a guy in the background fishing and I just, when I watched it afterwards, I was just really hoping that he would catch a fish because like how funny would it be like some guy like fighting with some big fish in the back? He's wrangling like a massive or like a license plate or something like this. Yeah. Yeah, and it's a great example of your dry wit as well, which I think people love, don't they? Yeah, well, it's a funny thing because finance is often such a serious topic. And I think that often puts people off. Like they think, well, gosh, you know, am I going to sit through a long drawn out discussion on like real estate in China?

4:06And I think if you can lighten it up, do lighten it up. There's some topics that I can't. Like if you're talking about like a, you know, a financial disaster in some country, you can't then go on and sort of make jokes about it. You know, that wouldn't be right. But in, you know, many of the videos, there just is something kind of, you can find little comical bits. Elon Musk provides no end of gag for you. Yeah, I mean, you know, a funny thing is that people say to me, like, you must really hate Elon Musk. And it's like, not really. Like, he's, in fact, I try not to make videos about him because almost all of finance YouTube is just people talking about Elon Musk.

4:48But he is entertaining. There's no way around it. There's some people who take it really seriously. One of my favorites was the, what do they call that thing? The Vegas Loop. Hyperloop? No, it was supposed to be... It's one of those things where it was sold as being amazing and it kept getting downgraded. And then it was just hooking your Tesla on a hook and dragging it through a tunnel. Yeah, I mean, it was basically a Tesla in a storm drain. with some, you know, RGB lighting. And the funny thing is there were some people, like there's a news channel and the woman's like, this is amazing, you know, and it's kind of like, you know, it had been sold that the cars would do 155 and they were doing sort of 30 and they were getting into traffic jams and so on.

5:32And I don't know, it's just, it's funny, you know. He has a habit of pitching something as revolutionary and then just basically creating something we've already got, which is like, you know, subway systems, underground subways. Yeah, but worse, but significantly worse. Like there's a channel called Thunderfoot, and he joked that the biggest improvement you could make to the Vegas loop would to be put one of those little, you know, those children's trains that they all sort of sit on. Yeah, that don't move and then they just go up and down. You could just put a little train system inside it and it would haul 10 times as many people, you know.

6:06Well, we're going to get onto the YouTube stuff, but I want to start at the beginning because you come from a traditional finance background, which is actually kind of rare in the finance YouTube space, which is funny. But can you take us back to why you started in finance? I think it was in the 90s pre.com bubble. Was that right? Yeah, yeah. I guess I started in 97. And it's one of those funny things. I found it rather interesting. At the time as well, there was a lot going on in markets. It was pre the dot-com bubble, but there was just a lot going on. There were all these new companies. The internet thing was starting to happen.

6:43And actually it was even just that computers had kind of come to Wall Street. And if you were, you know, I would have been kind of what, like 21 years old at the time, straight out of university. I knew how to do some stuff in Excel that the 40-year-olds in the office didn't know how to do. And so you sort of looked like a bit of a genius and you could add a lot of value in the office. You know, right click, there's a chart and everyone goes, how did he do it? And so, you know, I found the world of finance interesting largely because I just, I like the stories of the companies. I like even just trying to understand what's happening in the world, understanding how things relate to each other.

7:24Because that's really the complex thing is that, you know, you often have competing technologies or just, you know, new and old things, one replacing the other. And it's fascinating to work out, you know, how does this work and how does it change? And therefore, it kind of, it then even leans into kind of studying up on history and so on, because, you know, history isn't always the best guideline, but it's the best one we'll have. It's the only one we've got to look at, right? So you focus in the quant or quantitative side of investing, which is pretty complicated. Could you just define what quant investing is, first of all, please?

8:03Quant investing is, it's a way of investing, but instead of accounting based investing, which is what most of the world does, it's a way of just analyzing price movements or even just, you can't even do quant investing with accounting data, but you take the accounting data and analyze it and sort of try and prove statistically whether a relationship exists and whether a likely price move can be expected based upon the data you're looking at. So it's very much data-driven investing. So you're analyzing large data sets? Yeah. Well, it can be large or small. It can really be anything. You can start out as simple as if someone says you should buy cheap stocks.

8:48You can look at the price earnings ratios of stocks, get 100 years of data, and just look at whether you'd bought the cheapest half of the set or the most expensive half of the set, what would your returns have been? So it's really just trying to learn lessons from the data. Yeah. And you said with Richard Coffin, with the plain bagel, sorry, you have to constantly come up with new ideas and research because as soon as your idea gets out there, it's no longer announced. Well, it's very much, it's even that there's always, there's more and more people coming to the market every day with greater and greater skills, and they've got new tools for analyzing.

9:30And so you're always looking for a new thing. There are some signals I have that still work, and they're sort of 20 years old. That's kind of rare, though. A lot of the time, you have stuff, it's really good, it works for a while, then it stops working as other people work it out. Most signals, if you think about it, trading-type signals, like anything short term, there's only so much volume that can be thrown at it, right? Because if you find a way of finding cheap stocks and you start buying those cheap stocks and other people start buying them, well, then they're no longer cheap. And so the market changes as you interact with it.

10:10And as other people find the stuff you're finding, they interact with the market and change it as well. More complicated than value investing, would you say? It depends. It's actually, it really was just a thing that I worked out that I could do. And I often say that to people is sometimes people come to me and they say, like, how can I do exactly what you do? And it's like, no, no, don't, don't, you don't, shouldn't do me. You should say, you know, this is, there's a big world of finance. I have certain skills that other people don't have. And if I lean into those, I can do well. And it just, I'll tell you, the real reason that I got into the quant thing was just I was working in markets in the late 90s.

10:53I still had hair and looked awfully young. And the problem was it was sort of hard to get promoted when you look like a teenager, which I did. And so I sort of thought, well, gosh, you know, these older guys, they've all had this experience. How do I get experience? And it started with just reading a lot of books because fortunately in the late 90s, you know, half of the Barnes and Noble was filled with investing books because the market was doing well. And so I could get all these books and read them. And then it really became a matter of trying to work out what worked and what didn't. And it was really as simple as sort of I had moved from Ireland to the United States, didn't know that many people, had a brand new computer.

11:37And I thought, well, I can just test this stuff. Like if someone says value stocks are better than growth stocks or vice versa, you know, I can take them on their word or I can build a little spreadsheet. And so to me, I just had this huge urge to build spreadsheets to understand things. And then there's a point at which at least, especially back then, because you could only put so much data in a spreadsheet, you then learn like little coding tricks and things like that to add more data and understand things a little bit better. And then, you know, you think like, gosh, well, I'm getting answers, but I need to know, how strong is this answer?

12:18Is this just an artifact of the data or is it real? And that drew me into statistics. And once again, you can go to the bookstore, get a load of books. I had studied statistics in university, but it didn't seem very real to me. They often teach you calculations, but they don't tell you why you're doing the calculation. And so So once I had a good use for the calculations, you dig out the books and you go, oh, this is useful. You know, I can tell whether, you know, I found a thing, but is this thing random or not is sort of what statistics tells you. Yeah, because in your book, you have this quote that I thought was interesting.

12:57Luck is a misrepresentation of the idea of probability. Many strange things such as frequent of luck or surprising coincidences can be explained by probability. Do you think then that with enough data, anything could be predicted? Is that what you're saying there? No, I don't believe that. Because once again, you're sort of always driving, looking in the rear view mirror, but it's because it's the only thing you can see. I don't believe the future is predictable, but I think that you can make the decisions that a wise man would make if you use the data. And if you, so many people, they sort of approach a problem with a pre-decided upon opinion, like they're sure that it'll go this way.

13:43You know, my old boss used to refer to it as results-driven research, you know, where you've got the answer and then you torture the data till it agrees with you. Well, I think if you approach these problems and you just say, well, gosh, I've no idea, like I think it might work this way. Let's see if it does. And that's really the best thing. And most of the research you do will find nothing useful. You know, you'll throw away 90 % of your research and then 10 % of it you'll focus in on. And if you pull one good signal out of that, you're doing really well. Do you have varying degrees of confidence in your conclusions or do you always have like a standardized way?

14:25You're like, okay, obviously there's room for error, but I'm 80 % sure that this is... This passed all the... Yeah, past all my personal. With my trading research, there's just a, you know, there's sort of a minimum quality that would make something usable or not usable. In terms of videos, my goal is never really to tell people what to do. And that's not sort of the, this is not investing advice disclaimer. It's actually that I like the idea and I think my viewers like to think for themselves. And so I'll sort of say, well, you know, here's a bunch of research. This is what it shows. and I'll often leave people to conclude an answer for themselves.

15:06And then you look in the comment section and there's often quite different conclusions. People will, often it's sort of amazing, like the experts that will show up in the comment section and they'll tell you all sorts of new things and so on. And it's, I think, for me to sort of pound the table and tell people this is the way the world is and you should invest in this thing. Even in the real world, why would my quick analysis to put a video together give you an answer as to how various securities will perform over various holding periods? And that's always the problem even with listening to someone like videos that sort of say my top 10 stock picks.

15:48The problem is they might tell you like today these are my top 10 stock picks. But the problem is tomorrow they might read a news story that scratches one off the list. and they wouldn't put out new video out. And even two years later, will they come out and say, well, now I'm done with my, that video is just gone. And so if you're going to follow someone like that, the problem is that you're not getting the updates you would need to really work with them. So I don't have a goal. And actually all of the channels I like the most are the ones who people like Richard at the Plain Bagel, he doesn't try to force his opinion on you.

16:27he'll sort of say, this is my perspective. I think it's useful. You know, I might be right, I might be wrong, but this is sort of, you know, what my research has led me to believe. And I think that's good and useful and honest. So I talk about buying a global index fund inside of a tax efficient account, because I think it's the most accessible type of investing that people can do simply, you know, but do you think from a professional perspective that there are better styles of investing if you are capable or have the time to do them? Well, that's what it's usually down to is how much of your time do you want to devote to it?

17:03Because I've spent 20 years investing, trading, and I think I have good usable ideas. But the problem with that is that, especially when I was running a fund, I mean, I was 12 to 15 hours a day in an office at a computer, you know, analyzing and studying things and trying to find an edge. And should someone do that at home or would they be better off, you know, working a normal job and buying an index fund? Odds are they would do better, you know, get a job, you know, and even if you, you know, even if this thing outperforms you slightly. And then there's all taxes and all sorts of problems. Like for most people, you know, often the simplest investment strategy is the best.

17:52And it also has to be something they can stick to. And the problem with complex strategies is you always, you know, even the best strategy will have its ups and downs. And often people really pile in at the highs and they cut all exposure at the lows. And so it's very rare. Actually, there's a great book by Jack Schwager called Market Sense and Nonsense. And he looks at not the returns of funds, but he looks at some of the best returning funds and the returns of the people who invested in them. And people usually underperform the funds they invest in. And the reason this is, is that they get huge confidence after there's been a positive run and they add money.

18:35And then if it has a down week or month or year, they take their money out or they half their position. They basically trade the trader and they end up often horribly underperforming a very high quality investment. Saw that with Cathie Wood's ARK fund, even after the run, but everyone bought after the massive run. Everyone bought after the run. And I think only now are people really getting out. Like I think that the AUM, or not the AUM, but the inflows, the AUM fell as the stocks fell in value. But the, you know, the redemptions weren't that high last time I looked at it, which was surprising.

19:14But is she in the business of fee collection? So she would have made a lot of money over that period just through the assets and the management, surely? Oh, she'll have made a fortune out of it. Yeah. I mean, you know, Cathy's up. Yeah. Cathy's doing all right. Yeah. I mean, who was it? Was it, sorry, I'm going to butcher them. Is it the Magella Fund or the - The Magellan, the Peter Lynch's Fidelity Fund. Peter Lynch, but that return, say like 20 % a year on average or something. But the average person in that achieved like six because of what you said. You do see that kind of thing. Like, I don't know with that fund specifically, but yeah, it just is a problem.

19:48You know, obviously the thing with Cathie Wood's fund is it's really volatile. So that probably gets even more magnified. Like that's even, that's kind of why people lean towards sort of lower volatility investments is they get scared out a little bit less, you know, because if something is really volatile, it, you know, it's an emotional nightmare to invest in and thus, you know, people panic. But yeah, I don't know. I think it is, it's hard for people to make an investment plan and to stick to it because we're filled with all of these biases and everyone is like even professional investors, whatever it might be, all have the same biases and make the same mistakes that everyone else does.

20:30Even you? Oh, yeah. I look back and there's loads of things I could have done differently. What's the worst thing you've done? Oh, not even horrible things, but even a good example would be that I worked at a trading desk during the credit crunch, and you had a front row seat to watch the financial world ending. you know. And, you know, if you ask the guys on the trading desk, like, do you want to buy, you know, do you want to go long the S &Ps and sit on it for the next 15 years? Not many would have said yes. But equally, it's sort of a funny thing, because when you're in a role like that, you're sort of already long the market anyhow, because your career is going to do better if the stock market rises than if it falls.

21:17And so you'll often find a lot of financial professionals don't own, they don't have as much stock market exposure as it might be wise to have, simply because they work in the markets and they think, well, the day the stock market sells off horribly is also when there'll be job cuts at work and it's when my house will fall. So it's compounded problems all coming at the same time. That makes sense. Yeah. So yeah, interesting. Like you say, they're long on the market by being in that career, because if the market performs well, unless they're a short seller or they're betting against the market, say.

21:51There's one thing about your work, you're clearly into finance history. I know you've made videos on like Ponzi and these kind of schemes. And there's so many echoes between those videos and then modern like FTX and things like this. Yeah. You've said to me there that you look at the past because it's all we've got. You can't learn from it. But why do you think normal people don't learn from the past to the point where common scams can just be rinse repeated every 10 years? I think that a good con artist is a good con artist. They know how to trigger emotions in people. I think people also want to fall for stuff.

22:31In fact, it was interesting. The video I made on Ponzi, one of the things I thought was interesting was just the context of the time, because you might say, well, why would people fall for the... There were all sorts of scams in the 1920s. And it was a period in which amazing things had happened, right? Like the Wright brothers had sort of a couple of bicycle mechanics had made a thing fly. And now there were planes that would travel all over the world. There was electricity was suddenly available. All this stuff was happening. And then if someone turns up and tells you they have a magical way of making money, you kind of go, well, gosh, there's a lot of magic happening in the world right now.

23:11And so I think people were not necessarily suckers, but they were in a world that was changing so rapidly that maybe you're more willing to believe the unbelievable than at other points of time in history. Do you think that AI is a similar kind of transformative narrative that might lead people to be suckered into things? Well, there's a lot of AI nonsense right now. Like whether you believe that the, you know, firstly, everyone, when they think of AI, just think of chatbots or, you know, things that'll make an image, which is really just the most noticeable thing. Like within, we'll say, pharmaceutical industry, or even within finance, we've been using versions of, you know, we've been building towards AI for many years because that's what quant trading is.

23:59It's trying to build a machine that can trade investments well. But, you know, I think there are echoes of the dot-com bubble. Like in 99, a huge number of companies, like they'd be, you know, I don't know, a brick manufacturer or something like that, and they'd rename themselves, you know, Bricks.com or something and get a boost in stock performance. And I feel that, you know, there's data I saw a while ago of the number of companies that had mentioned their AI strategy on an earnings call. And it's like, do they have AI strategies or is the salesman just using ChatGPT to write his pictures? Even Apple have conceded, haven't they?

24:40But they call it Apple intelligence. You know, they've been rebranding it for themselves as far. But similarly, isn't like, I think the Microsoft one, what's it called? Copilot is just GPT-4. Yeah. So, yeah. But a lot of companies, like, because I think, like you said, why do people fall for the same scams? Whenever there's new technology like carbon credits or AI or crypto, that's when people take advantage of people's lack of knowledge on the new thing. Yeah. And people want to see modern as well. you know, like if someone came to you and pitched an investment scheme that was based on like a coal mine or something like that, you'd kind of go, oh, I don't know.

25:18Well, if it's tied to AI or, you know, electric airplanes or something like that, you kind of go, oh, well, that sounds high tech. I want to be, you know, I want to tell the guys down at the pub I invested in that. And it's contagious because in venture capital companies that don't even have an AI aspect, they see other companies getting funding for AI. So they might be like a juice company and they're Like, oh, and we have an AI aspect that helps you tell what flavor juice you have. And it's completely irrelevant and not necessary, but they added it so they can get funding easier just to have an AI aspect, but it's got nothing to do with their business.

Read the full transcript

25:51So people kind of incorporate these new technologies to try and look modern and ahead of the curve. Yeah, and I think it's funny because actually the other day I was listening to the Odd Lots podcast and they had a woman on who was, it was all about how a Zempick would affect food companies, you know, because if people are no longer - Eating. Well, or sort of binge eating on, you know, Fritos or whatever. I saw 5 % of like fast food company profits are at risk or something. Yeah, well, that was kind of what they were talking about. But they had this woman on and she was very interesting in many ways, But the company she worked for, I think, had some sort of AI thing for working out like new flavor ideas.

26:39And she said, well, you know, it's interesting because many of the flavor combinations that work well in AI didn't really work in real life. And she said, I think people just like the more traditional pairings. And it's like, it might be that people like traditional pairings or it might be that we've had thousands of years to sort of taste whether milk goes well with coconut. You know what I mean? We've mixed everything together. Tuna and watermelon isn't going to float. And no matter what the AI says. It's funny because I do think there are problems that might require an awful lot of iteration.

27:18And therefore, a machine will do that faster than a person will. But there are certain flavors. I don't know. I mean, I'm sure they have some science that I know nothing about and I'd be an idiot. at being negative about it. But it only surprises me so much to hear that an AI bot isn't as good as someone who eats at saying what tastes good. Yeah. They've got no ability to taste the thing that they're recommending. So AI is one. I think there's a quote, isn't there, that we underestimate what tech can do in a year, or overestimate what it can do in a year, underestimate what it can do intend. Yeah, yeah.

27:56Well, that's an interesting thing. It's funny, I was listening to Hidden Forces, another podcast, on the way here, and the guy, Dimitri, was talking about how the world had changed from the 1990s. And it was interesting because his idea was maybe more that the way people behave and the vibe has sort of changed. But in terms of overall technology, I look at, if you get in a car from 1995 or a car from today, like, you know, the big difference is that the new one has sort of a computer screen in it while the old one had analog readouts. But you wouldn't be awfully confused and there's not sort of massive improvements.

28:40I think the biggest is go to a gig and see what the crowd looks like and everyone's holding up a phone. And I think that speaks to the biggest change we've seen in our lifetimes. Yeah, well, just that we have these everything machines, you know, and it is amazing. And yeah, I think, but it's interesting in terms of like, yeah, the mobile phone is definitely a huge change over the last 20, 25 years. But beyond that, you know, there's sort of, there's often this idea that we'll have a Jetsons-like feature. And then it's sort of the same as it was. But instead of a camera, we have a phone. Instead of a book, we have a phone.

29:15Instead of, you know. Yeah, and everything machine is perfect. Dictifor and all these, you needed 50 devices. Compass. And now it's all, yeah, compass. For every time you need to know where North is. It's like everything's all in the phone. Yeah. Yeah. What about crypto then? What about her? Well, how much have you got? That'll be a big zero. No, I find it very interesting because what's interesting about crypto is there's a bunch of people trying to sort of reimagine the financial system to say, if it hadn't been built the way it has been built, you know, which is often off of a history of, you know, paper certificates and things like that.

29:54Could we build it better? And I think that's really interesting. And just in terms of how money is moved, how it's settled, all that sort of thing is interesting. But in terms of like, would I put my savings into it? No. I think it's not really of any interest to me on that front. Do you think there's something then that retail investors, normal people that are listening to this could learn from your quantitative or quant research? Is there anything that they could apply? Not necessarily, because a lot of my stuff is just about predicting short-term moves in markets. And in truth, with that kind of research, you don't necessarily need to believe or care that much about the...

30:39Actually, there's a very good book I read about a year ago about Jim Simons. I forget what it's called. I made a video about it, actually. Great book, but one of the very funny examples was of an investor who came into Renaissance Technologies and they were asked for an explanation. One of the traders, I think it was Mercer, came out and said, well, let's say if Chrysler stock was doing this, that, and the other, and he kind of made this big example around Chrysler, a stock that hadn't existed in like five years. And it sort of shows that a quant investor isn't really that interested in the name of the company or what it does.

31:23It's more interested in sort of its statistical properties. And are you doing this analysis on individual companies or are you talking about home markets? For me, different people do it differently. I was very index-based. I care a lot about liquidity. So basically the thing that makes, and I care about taxes. So futures are kind of a good product for short-term trading, just for US tax reasons, and also just for liquidity. It's very, you know, the size I've traded, it's very hard to move the futures market. And is a lot of it behavioral then? So usually the way it will work, you know, there's a mix where I've sort of tried just to throw a computer at the market and see what it pulls out.

32:13And then I've originally, I tried to just think about what people would do and whether, you know, basically a behavioral idea and see if it works in markets. I found the former idea to be a little bit better. You know, essentially, if you look for market moves that might cause people to make mistakes, there might be an opportunity in there for you. Because I think most of the time, investors in markets are very rational. And once in a while, something really strange happens. And that's when they sort of fall back on instinct. And often in that instinct period, sort of herd behavior occurs. And if you're looking to find repeatable trading ideas in market, you're basically looking for herd behavior.

33:11Okay. Okay. It's interesting because you say that the market's rational, but you watch a YouTube channel and it often focuses on the irrational aspects of the human condition, doesn't it? Yeah, well, that's sort of what's interesting, isn't it? Like, I think what I often look for and what I'm drawn to both in terms of just like what draws my attention is unusual things that maybe need a little bit of explanation. Like one of the videos that kind of the first big video I had on my channel, it felt big at the time, I think it got 20 ,000 views, was when oil prices went negative. And people say, well, what's going on?

33:46And I say, oh, I can explain that, you know. And so, yeah, I guess I'm drawn to sort of unusual examples or odd things that happen and sort of how they fit within finance theories. I worked for a property company before I was, like a few jobs ago before this. And we had a series of clients that were traders and they worked in oil futures. And they were the guys that made 700 million in 10 minutes. And then they've all disappeared. Because the Americans, I think, said that they wanted to do them for, I don't know, they bet that the oil prices would go negative and they made a lot of money in a day.

34:21It's an interesting thing because, you know, what really just happened was that, you know, the way futures work is oil has to be delivered for West Texas Intermediate has to be delivered to a facility in Cushing, Oklahoma. And an awful lot of oil had to be delivered in a couple of days time. And they realized that there was no room for it. You know, the tanks were all full because COVID had happened and planes weren't flying, cars weren't being driven. And so there was really, the oil, of course, is intrinsically valuable, but the cost of storing it was greater than its value. And that's why the price went negative.

35:01So it's a storage problem, not an oil problem. It was a storage problem, yeah. And even just the idea of pipelining it to somewhere else, you know, these pipelines get, well, and they get booked, you know, months and years in advance. So you can't quickly come up with, you know, if you're receiving a couple of super tankers of oil, you can't quickly, you know, find a place to put it. So you mentioned a second ago the ex-hedge fund or you did have a hedge fund. Yeah. Would you describe your hedge fund as successful? Yeah, yeah. I mean, you know, we were in business. When did we launch? Around 2012.

35:36And I sold the business in, I think, around 2018. and then I kind of stayed on as a director a little bit longer. Did you enjoy it? Were you happy when you sold it or did you miss it, like staying as a director? It was a very funny feeling. Initially, my plan was actually just to relaunch it. You know, it was part of moving from, I lived in the UK and was moving to the US and I thought, you know, you can't manage a UK fund from the US. So the plan was to sort of relaunch in the United States. And then, you know, there's sort of non-competes and things like that. And basically when it came time to relaunch, I didn't really want to anymore.

36:23Well, no, it was even just, you know, small children, you know, you're going to get on the road, you're going to pitch to investors. You're going to... And running a hedge fund is quite different to being a trader. and I really like research. I really like trading. When you're running a hedge fund, you're kind of managing people. You're meeting with investors. You're doing almost everything but the thing that you are most interested in. He said you've got like 200 people that have funded it. Each one wants one day of your time of year and they've all given you 200 million quid. So you've got to give them that day.

36:57So that means I just spend the whole year flying to meetings and I don't ever actually do the... No, because you hire a marketing person, but no one wants to speak to the marketing person, right? So the marketing guy just sets up meetings for you. And yeah, I don't know. It was an amazing experience and it was really intense. Like we worked so hard, but then when you take a year off, I almost wonder if this would apply to many people that if you take a year off, you kind of look around and say, what do I want to do? And it might be something different than what you're doing. COVID did that, right?

37:35Yeah, I think so, yeah. That made most people stop. And then loads of people were like - Yeah, and even consider where they wanted to live and all sorts of things. I don't want to do this anymore. How you want to live, where you want to live, what you want to do for a job. Yeah, yeah. You just kind of had this room to breathe. You get off the treadmill for a second and you think, oh, why the fuck am I running on that thing? Yeah, because often there really is just that, you know, inertia in life, you know, where, yeah, it's, you know, it's probably worthwhile every once in a while to pause and ask yourself, you know, is this, because actually if you had asked me in like mid 2018 or 2017, I would have told you I'll do this till the day I die.

38:11You know, I really, like I loved trading. I loved research. I still love all of that stuff, but I didn't necessarily find I was doing it. And in many ways, you know, building a business is very exciting and it's a different thing, but in a way you're kind of building, building with this idea that you'll get back to the thing you used to do. You never got back to it. You never do, yeah. Do you take this approach throughout your whole life, like research, everything you do, or is it just financial? I don't know. So if you're picking schools or, you know. It's funny. I think I'm an analytical person, you know.

38:46Like I think, you know, most of us sort of are the way we are. And I think if you can line up a type of work that works well with your nature, you'll probably do well at it. Last time we recorded, Tamein, you were having some real dramas with your accountant. So how's that been going, mate? They're sacked. So drama sorted. They're a big corporate firm. They didn't really reply to my emails very quickly, like took a week or two at times. And they charged me way too much. I mean, I've got pretty simple taxes and yeah, they were charging me thousands. They saved me some money, but yeah, I had to move on.

39:21Slow and expensive. Pretty much, yeah. This is one of the reasons that we're really happy to be partnering with TaxApp. It's a tech platform that makes self-assessment simple. Whether you're self-employed like me, a freelancer or a director like Damo, big dog. Instead of sending endless emails, bills and spreadsheets to your accountant, you just connect your bank, answer a few questions that are only relevant to you and your tax return can be ready in as little as 15 minutes. TaxApp is really easy to use and it's HMRC recognised software. So it's safe, secure and legit. The price is also decent.

39:50So if you're self-employed with one income stream, it's just£89 as a one-off fee. no big accountancy fees and we also have a discount code of course if you need to file a self-assessment this year give tax app a try we've left a link in the description and use the code money10 for 10 % off your first tax filing that code is money m-o-n-e-y one zero so mr carolet i hear you are a salesman elite salesman yes one of the best they say i've got a little bit of experience in the game yeah i could say i've done a few deals uh bill a bill what what would your compliance team say about you they will say that i am always nagging them and that um essentially i just have i have beef with compliance i love the team compliance slows down all my deals because every time i get to the finish line they've got to check documents kyc uh gdpr and it's just a nightmare it slows the deal down by like two three weeks it's always on both sides as well as sometimes it can be blocked on the other side exactly well that's where today's sponsor can help.

40:48Indeed. Vanta helps companies of all sizes get secure and compliant fast and they stay that way. They do it by automating compliance with over 35 security and privacy frameworks like SOC2, ISO 27001 and HIPAA. Yeah all of them and this saves businesses so much time and money. According to a recent IDC study Vanta customers save over half a million dollars a year in costs. Not bad. And they also help you complete security questionnaires up to five times faster which is great because everybody hates filling out forms. If you're a business that needs to prove security and compliance, visit vanta.com forward slash making money to sign up for a completely free demo today.

41:26That's vanta.com forward slash making money. There's a link in the description though, so you can just click that. So, you know, you obviously do a lot of research on your channel now as well. So it's kind of similar. And you said to Richard Coffin at Playing Bagel that 90 % of what you did when you were in the quant side was research. Yeah. Yeah. This thing about doing something that you're good at, I would say that maybe one of my talents is I'm a good communicator. I'm good at people will say, oh, I'm relatable. And in the finance world, we struggle with that. But then the research side is something that I've kind of had to push myself into, if that makes sense, to make the content good.

42:04Because I have a desire for it to be good. It's not something that's naturally come to me. Yeah, yeah. But even still, I guess, if you are researching it, Because sometimes I'll start work on a video and I'll be, you know, digging into it, not just this is boring, you know. And if I don't find it, it might be an amazing topic, but if I don't find it interesting, I'm not going to communicate any enthusiasm for, you know, because sometimes you just sort of feel like, gosh, you know, I do a video a week. It's time to work on a video. But, you know, there are times when there's nothing that really grabs your attention, you know.

42:42And that's going to be hard, you know, but luckily there's so much happening in the world. So what do you do in times like that? Do you just not make the video look for something else? Well, it's interesting. Well, I have, I keep a list in my phone of like often I'll just be out and about and I think, oh, that's a bit interesting. And I'll just put a note down. And so if I don't have, you know, if there's nothing like really gripping in the news or whatever, I'll dig through. And often I look through that list and it's ghastly. You know, you think it's a great idea. at the time and you're like, I think I know why I didn't make that video.

43:16But other times you, because often what I look for is not so much just to tell people the news because they often know the news. I think it's to say, here's the thing that's happening, which is timely this week, but more interesting, here's like an idea from finance that if you know this, this can sit in the back of your head and it'll be useful to you for years to come. So sort of, I guess, a meal for a lifetime tied in a meal for a day. I think as well what you do well is, if I use an example of, say, Silicon Valley Bank and the collapse there, there's a lot of hot takes and people saying this happens.

43:57And then you go, no, actually, this is what's happening. This is how it could affect the system. This is why it's important or why it's not important. You know, So you have that finance view on it that many creators will just rush to repeat the headlines. And you can tell they've just skimmed the FT and are spitting out what they've read there. It's funny, though, because there are some creators, like I'll sort of expect them to have... The funny thing with YouTube is that you're slightly incentivized to put up fairly clickbaity thumbnails. And there's some people and I'll see their thumbnail and I'll be like, oh, what an idiot.

44:31But then if you click on the video, you're like, I actually did a pretty good job at that. I think you also, though, you create the audience long term. So for you, I think, you know, you could probably put out anything and you're going to get a couple hundred thousand views because people trust you, your research, your style. I'm the same. I can, instead of going like, why the S &P 500 is going to crash, I could say, should you buy a global index or the S &P 500? And that video will get a load of views because people, the audience know, they trust. I think people who rely on clickbait go down a path that they can never get out of.

45:05Yeah. Well, and often the problem with relying on clickbait is that often the thing that will sort of drive people's emotions the most is very negative. You know, so it's sort of, yeah, like you say, I mean, if you look at some of the big finance YouTubers, like a lot of their thumbnails are sort of the world is ending. But every day for the last, you know, 10 years they've been saying that. And, you know, I think it does work in that people sort of see the flames in the thumbnail and they kind of go, oh, I need to know this. But after a while, like if you've watched a few of those videos, maybe you lose interest in sort of the same thing over and over.

45:44You get desensitized. You're like, okay, like the last four videos you said at the end of the world and the world's still going and now you're making a new video. I also think the long-term finance audience wants to learn. They don't want to see the world burn. You might get like the passive viewer who goes, well, yeah, clicks on that. But what you want, like you said, maybe off camera because T was too busy messing about, is you want an intelligent audience that wants an intelligent conversation and they're going to show up every week for years, right? Yeah. Well, actually, sometimes like, you know, I'll run into someone, you know, an awfully smart person that I have a huge amount of respect for.

46:18And they'll say, oh, I love watching your videos. And I'm like, gosh, you know, because I don't, you know what it's like. Like you put out these videos and a number, you see a number of views, but you don't really know who these people are or kind of what it means. How do you feel about the success of your channel? It's funny because I, as I was saying to you earlier, I'm often surprised like when someone will say to me like, oh, you have a big channel. And I guess I know a few people who have bigger channels than me. And so I still think of myself as kind of a small YouTuber. There's always a big amount to.

46:50Yeah. And so, you know, I have friends like, you know, Coffezilla, who is, you know, he puts out a video, it gets 3 million views, you know, the biggest video I've ever had. In fact, actually, an interview that I did with Coffezilla a few years ago probably got more views than almost any video on my channel, you know what I mean? So when someone says to me, oh, you have a big channel, I'm like, well, have you seen this one? That's one of our guests, Tim Armou, said that. He said that you always, whenever you're in a new room, you're like, oh, I'm a millionaire, but he's got 10 million. And then the guy with 10 million is like, oh, he's got a billion.

47:23And then the guy with a billion is like, well, he's got 20 billion. So you're always looking at the next stage up. But do you ever do quantitative analysis on your channel? Not really. Like for yourself? Yeah, it's very funny because I never know. Every video I make, I'm an optimist and I always think it'll do really well. And then there's some that do awfully well. You're the opposite to me. I guess I'm enthusiastic. You know, when you hit the upload button, you're like, well, you know, I think that's decent. And then, but I know. That's terrifying for me, that process. He hits the upload button and turns off all the lights and puts a blanket on his hand.

48:01He's just like, everyone hates me. The world hates me. Yeah, hide behind the pillow for a little bit. And then I come out and everyone's like, oh, I'm like, oh, it's okay. But the thing is, I can never gauge, like when a video does awfully well, I'm like, I really don't know how. And there's some of the videos I put up that I really like that didn't get many views at all. And I can never under, you know, I have no instinct for what people will want to see. So I just put up what I find interesting. I think you have to separate yourself from views being the measure of success because they're not.

48:30It can be so random. Yeah. Timing as well. You know, how do you know that you might release a video and then that hits the news somewhere else? And I think most YouTubers, once they get past a certain point, realize that views are a bad metric of success in a way. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean, you always want, you know, you don't really, you wouldn't go to the effort of making a video if you thought that no one would watch it, you know, that would be insane. But... You did that at the start though, right? Kind of actually. It is true, yeah. Well, early on, a lot of my videos were sort of to help out my students because, you know, I teach at two universities here.

49:11And often as exam time approaches, you know, I'll get these emails and they'll say, you know, can you explain implied volatility to me again? And I start typing, you know, and then you start sort of, you know, if you get three of those, you copy and paste and send the same text to three different people. But I thought, well, gosh, you know, I could just explain it once quickly and here's a link and that would work better. And so actually amusingly, when I got to the end of, you know, probably my first year or so of, and it took me about a year and a half, maybe two years to even get a thousand subscribers on YouTube.

49:48And at that point, I thought, well, I've done what I came here for. You know, I've got the links I can give to the students. I'm done, you know. What do your students think of, I mean, it must be quite odd for them, right? You know, I don't think, amusingly, I would bet that most of them haven't really heard of the YouTube channel because a lot of an awful lot of international students, you know, so they, you know, they're from China, they're from India, like the Chinese students, they don't have YouTube. actually a funny thing though is about a year ago one of my students told me that there's whatever the chinese version of youtube someone has like overdubbed all of my videos and uploaded them there so that's kind of funny you're just all over wechat or something like this yeah yeah i mean it it seems it seems mad to me that they they wouldn't know do you what do you think of the space as a whole before you answer that question i i remember when you came into when you started to blow up And it felt a bit like the chatter in the personal finance community was almost like when the ETF for Bitcoin came out.

50:49It was like, here's an example of mainstream adoption of what we do. You know, in the sense of you're from a traditional finance space, you ran a hedge fund, and then you started a YouTube channel. It felt like the traditional finance world was taking us that space seriously. Well, it's interesting as well, because I guess there are, you know, like Ray Dalio has a YouTube channel, but it's kind of, it's very produced. Highly stylized. Yeah, and it's kind of, it's more like TV and just, it's sort of like corporate. While I think the thing that people like about YouTube is that there's a real person there talking to them.

51:25And, you know, I think, yeah, there are, of course, like, you know, really big kind of important people on YouTube. But often, I think it's almost a mistake sometimes if you make it too much like television, because television is designed to be sort of watched and it's about separation in a way. It's sort of there's on the stage and off the stage, while YouTube always feels more like a friend telling you things. Or even, you know, listening into this conversation, like I imagine people at home, they're listening and it's almost like they're kind of down at the pub with friends talking about something and they don't get to talk very much.

52:05but um you know there's there's a much more natural feeling to this than than we'll say a traditional television we get traditional people in here from traditional media and they come in and go oh it's an actual house and i'm like well of course it is to me it's like why wouldn't it be but they think maybe it's a set that's made to look like a house or something like this but yeah it seems obvious to me to be low budget almost because i'm a consumer of youtube yeah the best thing i like when i see a creator is going back to their old videos and seeing that journey. Yeah, yeah. Well, it's so interesting how, it's funny though, because there's a few things that possibly make you good at YouTube that a lot of people can't pull together because you might be really good at telling a story, but not good at, you know, working a camera or working the microphones, doing all of this stuff.

52:55And I think it's hard, like I just happened to like be a bit of a hobbyist photographer and had a decent camera around the house when I got going and things like that. But even, you know, the microphone, like in the early days, my sound would be awful, either way too quiet or loud and clipping and all sorts of problems. And the thing that used to make me laugh is that people would say like, get yourself a decent microphone. It's like, I've got 12 decent microphones. I just don't know how to use them. Yeah. What do your peers think from traditional finance about what you do now? Do you speak to any of them?

53:30It's funny because I think most of my friends wouldn't even really know that the channel exists because I don't really think about it or sort of talk about it that much. Because, you know, my main focus, I teach at the university. I do even like a lot of online classes for the university. So I'll actually, that's what's quite cool is I've got like a good sort of streaming setup, you know, because of my YouTube studio to do teaching. But most of my friends, I bet most of my friends don't even know that I do this. But the channel's a big thing, right? You say your focus is the university thing, but the channel is a big business.

54:06But I think it's a niche thing once again. Like I think, you know, there's people, like I said, there's people who know it and they sort of, if they've watched a lot of the videos, they know it and they think it's great. But if you haven't, you know, it's entirely off the radar. Every video you do fills out 10.02 arenas. So, you know, it's niche, but it's, you know, Drake only filled it three times. So I think it's, the scale is massive, right? And it's international. Well, actually, a funny one was a little while ago, I put up a video that it's the best performing video I've done on the line, you know, the linear city.

54:45in Saudi Arabia. And that really quickly hit like 2 million views or something like that. And that week I went to my guitar lesson and the teacher was like, I saw you. And I was like, what do you mean? And he's like, you have a YouTube channel. So that kind of, I guess, went outside the finance niche into just kind of broader YouTube. Did you ever get scared? How do you mean? I'm not just scared of like the possibilities season of growth and like being in the deep ending like wow now everyone knows who i am and well only now that you're saying it yeah yeah i feel like the bigger youtubers get like the more i didn't sell a hedge fund so i'm still trying to pay the bills maybe perhaps a bit more comfortable so it's a bit more chill actually it's funny because um you know over the weekend i was talking to a guy who has a big podcast and uh it's funny because my wife had been on a plane and she noticed that, you know, you look around on the airplane of what entertainment people have, and a number of people had his podcast on.

55:51And I was like, you know, your podcast is way bigger than I thought it was. And he's like, yeah. Now, while we've got you, what I would like to talk to you about is if we could zoom out a bit, maybe leaning on your research, is a little bit about the UK economy and your views. You say you dip in and out of the UK. Yeah. You made a video where you looked at, I think it was a Goldman Sachs paper, which basically pointed out that the UK, amongst its peers, was doing pretty badly. Yeah. Yeah, there's a number of struggles. It's always complex as to what causes problems. And people, for various reasons, it's very easy to say it's definitely because of Brexit, but it would appear to be something other than that.

56:39There were a number of papers I looked at. One, I'm trying to remember who wrote this one, but British stocks have maybe underperformed. The underperformance began around the time of the Brexit referendum, but it's so uniform. A way of thinking about it is that if Brexit was definitely the issue, there would be some companies that were heavily impacted by Brexit, and they should do horribly. And there's other kind of British companies, but they're so international that they're mostly unaffected and they should do fine. While actually you find that the discount is fairly broad based, like that all of the companies have sort of started trading at a discount about US and European companies for some reason.

57:32And some of it is, you know, there's kind of been maybe a little bit of a productivity deficit in the UK over the last maybe 20 years. And this has been talked about for quite some time. British businesses are not investing as much. Maybe they underperform and maybe the uncertainty associated with Brexit. In fact, that's partially even why I wanted to move from a UK-based fund to US was just that it wasn't very obvious that I'd be able to sell internationally post-Brexit. So you look at these things and you think, well, maybe the reason, although Brexit itself is not necessarily the cause, maybe it sort of put a bit of a scare amongst business people and they backed off on making any big plans and the lack of plans has possibly hindered the UK economy.

58:31But nonetheless, it would still appear that British stocks are trading at a discount to, even when you adjust for sectors and so on to American stocks. You talk about tools. I'm going to point to, I say it all the time, but the internet speeds here. So I've got shockingly bad internet where I live up north. Yeah. Copper wire, it's below what they deem as a minimum requirement in terms of speeds. Do you think lack of investment in infrastructure, that could be the thing? That is exactly the type of thing that will hold people back because productivity is just basically how much work can you get done in a given time.

59:09And, you know, what are the tools? You know, you give a person a computer, they could do more work than they can do without one. And, yeah, I think, you know, that sort of thing, you know, and a whole bunch of little things like that could be what has been holding the UK back a little. I drive to my local Tesco's car park to get the signal to upload videos to the channel. Do you really? Wow. That's how slow it is. Sitting there for an hour with a meal deal. Oh, it's funny because I have quite fast internet. And a while ago, I worked out that when I plugged my, I used to just, you know, wander around the house with a laptop.

59:47And I worked out when I plug it into a router, I get about 10 times the speed that I get on Wi-Fi. And then I realized if you match, if you have all of the correct cables in your house, you get even faster internet. So then rewired every cable in the house. So I bought Starlink, which is Elon, your favorite guy. And what he didn't really mention was the upload speeds are terrible, which is a function of a signal being sent up down from a satellite. I know. Starlink is kind of an interesting thing because it's basically a Wi-Fi router in low Earth orbit, right? And what's interesting about that is that when not many people use it, you'll get decent upload and download speeds.

1:00:34But the more people who sign up, the slower it'll get over time. And even it's a very funny thing because when you think like two thirds of the planet is covered in water, most of the satellites are hovering over areas where they're doing next to nothing. And then even in terms of who can afford to pay for an expensive internet service, it's kind of Western Europe and the United States. So it's a very interesting thing where an awful lot of the satellites are kind of... It would be amazing if you're like a farmer out in the middle of nowhere. And I think at the moment in big cities, you're probably still doing okay with Starlink, but should mass adoption occur, you'll probably see slower speeds.

1:01:20It's certainly not cheap either. It was sold as it would be very cheap. It's not. It's£110 a month I pay, I think, for it just to have an okay download speed, which is nowhere near as fast as fiber. And then like you say, the people I know who've got it are like, they've gone traveling in their£100 ,000 van around Europe and they stick one on the roof. They're like rich people. It's not like helping people in Namibia get online. No, no. Well, yeah, that's kind of the problem is that it doesn't, it's, you know, who knows what will happen in the future, but it seems it would struggle to serve a mass audience, I think.

1:01:56So the future point now that you mentioned, what do you think will happen in the future? The next 10 years, like what kind of trends or themes do you think will dominate investing? One thing I think is possibly that we'll see a reversal from growth to value, and that's just based on the fact that in the very long run, both styles of investing seem to perform about the same. You mentioned growth and value investing. What do you mean? What's the difference between the two? Well, it's kind of two historically quite different approaches to investing. Growth investing is finding companies that are really ramping up, like their sales, the size of the business is really growing fast.

1:02:38And people invest in that to sort of own the new thing. You can think of like when computers first came out or like Apple when the iPhone came out, massive, massive growth. And so people jump on growth with the idea that that momentum will continue and maybe that that company might end up owning the whole category, the way a high percentage of phones, we'll say, are still made by Apple today. Value investing is, it doesn't need to be the opposite, but it tends to be, where it's based on the idea that you just look at the expected cash flows from a business. So you're trying to find good value or basically cheap stocks.

1:03:19And so that will involve analyzing the accounts and just saying, well, we've got a whole of stocks here. These ones you get, you know, the next 10 years worth of earnings you get for this price while you're paying a much higher price for earnings of other companies. I'll take the cheap ones. And so that's value versus growth. Awesome. Thanks. Do you prefer either style? Historically, I've been a growth investor. I think that growth has outperformed for so long at this point that it seems unlikely to me that it just kind of can't do it forever. Also, it's worth noting that even when growth does work for a long time, it's often different companies, you know, because companies go through these phases of huge growth and then they become mature companies and you might then be swapping them out for new high growth companies.

1:04:11But I just feel that really over the last kind of 15, 20 years, there's been almost no performance in value investing. And it seems to me that if you're a little bit nervous that markets seem toppy or expensive, rather than going to cash, I'd say maybe take on some of these value stocks that haven't performed. And thus, if a bubble bursts, they shouldn't necessarily burst because they were never inflated to begin with. But really, since the credit crunch, all of the growth has kind of come from what they, now we call the magnificent seven, and it used to be the FAANG stocks. But if you look at European or British stocks, they really haven't done much since the credit crunch.

1:04:56Most American stocks have not done much since the credit crunch. And it's been this sort of handful of tech stocks. And I would think that going forward, it's probably likely that we see a resurgence in maybe some of the overlooked sectors. Do you think rates are a big factor in that? Interest rates as in discount cash flow? Yeah, I mean, it's a huge, Which, because the reason, well, one of the reasons, you know, also these tech firms have, because rates were low, they had a ton of money thrown at them and they were able to do stuff with that. So that's a positive. But then on the other hand, when you have a company where all of its earnings are kind of 10 or 20 years out in the future, when a dollar in 20 years time is worth a dollar today, which is what you get in a zero interest rate environment, well, that's a very valuable company.

1:05:46When you start discounting things at 5%, even right now, there's very much that feeling that people are still saying, when will rates go down to normal? And look at a 100-year chart of interest rates. We're not high at the moment. And so should rates stay higher for longer. You know, a lot of these sort of less, I don't know, there's some of the Silicon Valley companies that like, you know, these Uber, you know, I made a video called Blitzscaling that looks at companies that essentially aim to grow and not really worry about making money. And when you look at that kind of a business, like it's a very unusual environment we've been in when that has sort of been the stuff to invest in over the last 20 years.

1:06:40And it slightly entertains me when, you know, you'll see these sort of Silicon Valley thought leaders and they'll kind of, they'll say, I'll give you business advice as to how to, you know, become very wealthy and blah, blah, blah. And they're advising you to start up a business that requires huge amounts of capital that generates no return on investment. You know what I mean? Like it just, the stock price goes up. But for most people, like if you want to start a business with your own money, you probably want some sort of return. You know, you want it to pay you. Yeah, you want cash flow. You want positive cash flows that you can reinvest and pay yourself with.

1:07:16Or you get the guy from SoftBank to think you're the man. Yeah, well, even, yeah, like WeWork's a great example. But even it's been pointed out, you know, the big story at the moment is whether Tesla shareholders will vote for Elon's pay package or not. But Elon's pay package is more than Tesla has ever made in earnings. I know it relates stock price, not to the earnings, but there's many Silicon Valley businesses like that where in terms of the cash flow they've generated, it's negligible. It's all of the wealth just came from stock price. And that works. Well, it can happen in this sort of zero interest rate or really declining interest rate environment.

1:07:58But there is a point at which, if you owned 100 % of a business, you'd have no interest in the fact that you have to keep putting money in and nothing ever comes out. While if it's publicly listed or if VC investors will keep giving you more money for it and sort of keep marking it up, well then yeah, you're a billionaire and you've got a food delivery app and there's 20 other food delivery apps that are all the same. So where do you see that going? like in the, for example, Tesla, for example, like where would you see? Well, Tesla is a profitable company. And, you know, the thing is the people who buy the cars really like the cars.

1:08:39I don't think it's, you know, I do think it's an expensive stock, but it's not in this group. But there's many of these, it's funny because many of the kind of hot VC stocks at the moment are versions of things that we saw back in the late 90s that kind of, you know,.com bubble and someone said, you know, I can, like there was a great one, what was it called? Cosmo.com. And it was kind of Deliveroo, but in the late 90s. And they would get anything from a store until you could kind of order a CD from them and they'd go to a store, buy a CD, bring it to your house, you know. And obviously that's not a good business to be in.

1:09:22like if you're paid sort of 50 cents and the guy on a bicycle is like going all around. You need slave labor. Yeah. Well, you need people to just keep bidding up the stock and you can pay the guy on a bike with stock rather than with cash because there's no cash coming in. And those things really flared out quickly. Like I think one of the biggest sort of boom and bust stories, there was a British one called Boo.com. And I think they raised like a billion pounds or something like that. And I think they wiped it out in a couple of weeks. Like it's a crazy story. I'd have to look it up, but it was kind of one of the crazier ones.

1:09:59But today, you know, many of these companies are five, six years old and they're still not cashflow positive. And, you know, should they increase prices in order to be cashflow positive, they're competing with someone else who'll keep prices low. So I don't know how that ends. Twitter never made any money, did it? No, it occasionally was profitable, but I think the best year it ever had made about a billion dollars, you know. And so it's not, yeah, I mean, it's a great example of a company that sort of was culturally important, but as a business, you know, if it was wholly owned, you would never want it.

1:10:38Like more money has gone into Twitter than has ever come out in terms of cash flow. But for the VCs, does the model work because they get to dump it on the market? it. It's almost like a great afford area. The funny thing is they used to dump it on the market and they don't really anymore. Like in the late 90s, like during the dot-com bubble, basically two guys and a computer would sort of slap a name on the door and they'd say, we're going to sell dog food on the internet. And there'd be an investment banker knocking on the door and they'd say, shall we go public next week? And it's like, can I get a second computer?

1:11:09And there'd be a huge valuation and then it'd be gone six months later. While now companies are staying private for much longer. And it's sort of interesting because will the VC investors be left holding the bag? Because we'll say if there is, if retail, retail investors do seem to get excited about certain types of stock. In recent years, like some of those space things like Virgin Galactic got people very excited. A lot of the SPAC stuff. Yeah, like kind of stuff that sort of seems futuristic and kind of hypey. But you have to wonder how like sort of the fifth line, you know, food delivery app is going to do or, you know, the version of Uber with a different local.

1:11:56You know what I mean? Like you have to wonder, will, you know, there's sort of this thing where they need to find a bag holder. And the truth is the current environment, like we still do have, you know, we've got sort of Bitcoin at 70 grand. We've got, you know, GameStop pumping last week. I haven't looked at how it's done today. But, you know, retail is still willing to sort of buy stuff that seems exciting to them. But there's many times, it took Google a long time to go public because people have been so burnt by the dot-com stocks that you said, like, it's a search engine. They go, no, no, no.

1:12:39I bought Yahoo, thank you. A-O-L, no thank you. But in the long run, there's no way around it that a business that doesn't make money isn't a very good business. And, you know, maybe some of these things can pivot into something profitable, but not all of them, I don't think. In the reverse, then, if a few businesses drive most of the market returns as outliers, but VC are holding these businesses pre-IPO for longer, does that mean we'll just see less value available for investors like myself, say, who buy indexes? Because by the time the business gets to the index, it's been through its growth stage.

1:13:21So the old idea of an IPO was an IPO was to raise capital, to grow a business. Well, now it's an exit for sort of founders and VCs. So it's quite a different thing. Like it's a later stage firm that there's an argument that it's towards the end of its growth phase. And actually, that's even an interesting thing. this. Aswath Damodaran did a bit a while ago, where he talked about how long companies grow for, and you'll see people building models for many, you know, sort of businesses that are hyped right now, and they'll say, well, you know, it's going to keep growing sales at the same rate over the next 10 years as it did over the last 10 years.

1:14:02And Damodaran points out that it's very unusual for a company to be in like hype or growth for maybe more than five or six years. You know, A company just matures at a certain point. And yeah, I guess if the VCs are wise enough to get out as the growth is starting to dry up, well then, yeah, maybe the retail investor becomes the bag holder. But many of these are still private. It certainly feels like retail are bag holders. IPOs are a disaster whenever I look at them. Yeah, yeah. Well, it's, yeah, I guess it just, it's a very different market to a decade. ago. And so, yeah, it's sort of hard to work out what's going on in terms of, but I still think for an investor, I very much lean towards, when people ask me, what should I do?

1:14:54I kind of think buy an index fund. But I do think there's once in a while, there's a few companies and I won't say which ones, but I look at some of the big stocks within the S &P and you kind of think, well, I'm not sure that I want to own that one. And, you know, and even actually there was kind of the funny thing a couple of years ago when GameStop and what's the other one, AMC really pumped. And I think they got jammed into like sort of a mid-cap index or whatever. And it's kind of like it's a bit unpleasant if you're sort of a mid-cap index investor and you just want sort of, you know, you want sort of reasonable companies.

1:15:34Instead, you've had a bunch of stonks dumped on you. Yeah, meme stocks have just risen in. Even like Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy, because of the Bitcoin holdings, it can just jump up and down on it within the indexes. Yeah, actually that's such a fascinating one because if you look at a long enough chart of that, you get to see kind of how the current, because often people say to me, it's crazier now than it was during the dot-com bubble. and actually a long chart of, what's it called? Micro strategy. Because he's been going for a while. Well, because he was a dot-com bubble stock to start with.

1:16:11And then he became, sort of did nothing for a good, I don't know what, 10 or 15 years and then became basically a Bitcoin ETF. And you could look at that and kind of say, well, yeah, as crazy as Bitcoin is, it's not really as crazy as some of those dot-com stocks were. Yeah. It's not repeating itself. It's just kind of echoing. Yeah, it's interesting as well. I think even the crypto thing was interesting because during the real kind of bubbliness of the COVID market, in a way like a lot of the crypto almost was, because when people would say, you know, traditional investors would say, well, stocks are expensive, but they're not that crazy.

1:16:49And it's like, well, it's because there's this sort of escape valve that's crypto, you know, where the kind of, you know, the most risk seeking money goes to crypto. So in a funny way, if crypto hadn't existed, maybe we would have seen the stock market get much bubblier. But there was sort of this, you know, this pressure valve. Yeah, well, you've got like blue chip Bitcoin, as they call it. And then there's like pancake flip, like, you know, there's like these crazy things that are doing a thousand a day percentage or whatever. And there was some serious amount of risk being taken, wasn't there?

1:17:23Yeah, yeah. How come you never did any quantitative research into Bitcoin? You know, I've made a ton of videos that don't say that they're about Bitcoin, but they sort of are. Because during the kind of really peak Bitcoin thing, if you were negative about it, they'd all sort of pile into the comments and attack you. So you couldn't really say too much. But I made a number of videos just about kind of the history of money. I made a video about John Law, the man who invented paper money, which is a fascinating story. I made the Ponzi video. I made videos about the sort of, what's it called? Essentially in the United States, it's actually perfectly legal to have your own form of money.

1:18:16They call it private money. And so I made a video about that because for quite a while in the United States, I think the smallest banknote that was made was maybe$1 or$5. I forget. But back then, that would have been a couple of weeks worth of income, right? So in fact, the federal dollars were sort of used as savings in banks. But if you wanted to spend money, you need something smaller than that, like to buy a newspaper with, and you just get basically a token from your local bank. And those things, you know, the bank might go bust or whatever else, or if you moved, you know, more than a certain distance from that bank, no one would accept it.

1:18:58But it was a fascinating thing. And so there's money, like both sides kind of have a little bit wrong in that maybe traditional finance people often think that money has always been what it has been forever, which is not at all true. Or they think it was just gold, but that's not really true either. Or then there's the kind of crypto people who think that they're doing something that's never been done before. But throughout human history, we've really worked out ways of sort of exchanging value with each other. Tokenizing value. Seashells and things. Yeah. And that's even an interesting one because I lean on that as a version of the proof of work thing with Bitcoin, because it used to take about a day to polish one of those beads out of a seashell.

1:19:50And therefore, if you were paid with one of those, you were really being paid with something that a lot of work had gone into and it wasn't easily counterfeited. And so there's all sorts of stuff. And even a lot of people often think that historically everything was barter, that you'd sort of go down to the store with a chicken and exchange it for a loaf of bread. But often it was much more favors, like where you'd sort of help your neighbor with something and they'd provide you with some food from their farm or something like that. And yeah, I mean, the world of moving money around has been, it's complex and it's always been complex and it will continue to be.

1:20:35And that's why you can't rule out entirely the idea of a functional version of non-government money, which could be crypto. But equally, there's a very interesting and complex history of that stuff. Yeah. No, I just want to say thank you so much for your time. Thank you for having me. Bye. Yeah, no, no, no. You're welcome anytime. Hey guys, did you know that we summarized all of our episodes in a newsletter? You can find a link in the description. And please remember, this is not financial advice. Like we say a lot on the podcast, investments can fall and rise. In fact, it's pretty much a guarantee.

1:21:13Past performance is no guarantee of future results. So your money is at risk with investing and other fees may apply. As with everything financial, please do your own research. We really encourage that because no one cares more about your money than you. I'm Damo. I'm T. This was an episode of Making Money from Our Company Most. It was filmed and edited by the team at Flowspire, Jack and Ben. It was produced by Ruth Edwards and brought together by Will Stollerman. What about Ruth and Toothless a Dog? Yeah, shout out them too.

From the publisher

As a trader, Patrick Boyle spent decades looking at data and using it to try to predict what’s going to happen. Now he is an ex-hedge fund trader and one of the biggest finance YouTubers in the world. He explains what he thinks will happen over the next 10 years in investing and whether Brexit is really to blame for the UK’s economic woes. 

🤝 Get 1:1 help with your money from our financial adviser service

⁠⁠⁠https://makingmoney.email/financial-advisors-audio⁠⁠⁠

🎉Sponsors

MoneyWeek Magazine - Try it for free:

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://moneyweek.com/money⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

TaxZap - Do your tax return / self-assessment:

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://makingmoney.email/taxzap⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Vanta - Get your company secure and compliant: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://vanta.com/makingmoney⁠⁠⁠⁠

Odoo - Apps to run your business: ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.odoo.com/r/MM1⁠⁠⁠⁠

📈 Investment platforms we use:

Trading 212

Watch this video where Damo explains how to get the most from it:⁠⁠ https://youtu.be/BVVZhrM0LVQ⁠⁠

Get a free share worth up to £100 when you sign up for a new Invest or ISA account and deposit at least £1.

Use the code ‘MM’ or this link:⁠⁠ https://www.trading212.com/join/MM⁠⁠

InvestEngine 

Get up to a £50 bonus when you invest at least £100.

⁠⁠https://investengine.pxf.io/daOD2Q⁠⁠

Vanguard

Minimum investment of £500 or £100/month.

⁠⁠https://www.vanguardinvestor.co.uk/

--

If you purchase a product or service using one of the links above, we may receive a commission. There will be no additional charge for you. Remember investments can fall and rise - and past performance is no guarantee of future results. Other fees may apply. Your money is at risk.

This is not financial advice. The reason it’s not financial advice is because it’s not tailored to you. We explain the principles of building wealth but if you want personalised advice, it’s worth speaking to a financial advisor. As with everything financial, please do your own research. We really encourage that because no one cares more about your money than you and if you learn the basics then it will change your life.

More from Making Money

All 184 episodes
The truth about investing - Patrick BoyleMaking Money · 1 h 22 min
Listen in VO