How CoreWeave Sees the Market for Compute Right Now

8 Jun 2026 · 51 min · 20 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

AI inference compute market update through CoreWeave’s lens—why inference spend is rising, how demand is diversifying beyond AI labs/hyperscalers, and what constrains scaling (power delivery, data-center operations, financing).

Guests

Brandon McBee, CoreWeave co-founder and Chief Development Officer. Background: CoreWeave provides training and inference “neo-cloud” GPU infrastructure; McBee leads product/development and has overseen large-scale data-center buildouts and financing (CoreWeave reports 1+ gigawatt active power).

Key claims

(1) No inference pullback; “unrelenting demand” continues. (2) Customer mix shifted: now three buckets—hyperscalers, 9 of top 10 AI labs (excluding China), and growing enterprise clients. (3) Model routing and workload/model matching extend GPU useful life (H100/A100 longevity). (4) NVIDIA remains the dominant choice for inference and training; CoreWeave sees inference as >50% of utilization. (5) Main bottleneck is “powered shell” delivery (energized data centers), not land or GPU access.

Notable examples

Uber reportedly burned its 2026 AI budget in four months; a consultant claimed a client spent $500M in one month due to missing usage limits. Jane Street uses CoreWeave directly for inference of its own model (not via OpenAI/Anthropic). CoreWeave financing example: investment-grade, non-recourse HPC GPU financing at SOFR +225.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

The Rapid Evolution of AI Inference

0:33 to 1:31

Discussion on the fast-changing landscape of AI inference and spending.

“Wealth management, capital markets, investment banking.”

The Rapid Evolution of AI Inference

1:55 to 3:05

Discussion on the fast-changing landscape of AI inference and spending.

“Because it just feels like the moment we do an episode a few weeks later, it may be out of date.”

Corporate Reckoning with AI Spending

3:05 to 4:25

Examination of corporate reactions to rising AI compute costs.

“And we know that companies specifically are spending a ton on compute, so much so that CFOs around the world are getting sticker shock about their compute budgets.”

CoreWeave's Position in the Market

4:25 to 5:51

Brandon McBee discusses CoreWeave's growth and client base changes.

“But there were probably a lot of investment made in sort of like optimal model routing because some models are like 100th per query of what a frontier model is.”

The Importance of Efficient Model Usage

5:51 to 7:59

Discussion on model routing and cost efficiency in AI infrastructure.

“Well, I'm really excited to say we really do have the perfect guest.”

Diversifying the Client Base

7:59 to 14:01

Brandon McBee explains the shift in CoreWeave's client demographics.

“Where is this inference demand that everyone's been talking about?”

Jane Street's Use of CoreWeave

14:01 to 15:25

Learn how Jane Street interacts with CoreWeave for their model needs.

“That is Jane Street coming directly to us and using our platform.”

Shifts in AI Infrastructure Demand

17:01 to 19:34

Examine the changing demands of AI labs regarding infrastructure contracts.

“inference demand is booming, but model training is still important.”

Vera Rubin Architecture Explained

19:39 to 21:15

Understand the new Vera Rubin architecture and its efficiencies.

“Like your ability to advance your frontier model through accessing more infrastructure at scale holds.”

Demand for NVIDIA Infrastructure

21:18 to 24:56

Discuss the continued demand for NVIDIA infrastructure in AI workloads.

“I think that's kind of where you're getting to with it.”
Show all 20 chapters

Emerging Constraints in Data Centers

24:59 to 28:00

Identify the current constraints faced in building data centers today.

“We really don't see demands on a material basis for anything but that NVIDIA compute.”

Understanding Powered Shells in Data Centers

28:00 to 28:59

Learn about the concept of powered shells and their role in current infrastructure bottlenecks.

“Land usage, specifically, I wouldn't say is as much of a concern.”

Financing Challenges and Achievements

29:00 to 30:29

Discover how CoreWeave has navigated financing challenges and raised significant funds.

“We can't just make new electricians leveraging a supply chain, right?”

The Execution Gap in Power Delivery

30:30 to 30:55

Understand the critical execution gap between signing contracts and delivering services.

“And all I can say is there's an enormous gap between signing for power delivery in 2030 versus actually delivering that into billable GPU hours.”

Customer Diversification Strategies

30:56 to 33:01

Explore how CoreWeave is addressing customer concentration and fostering diversification.

“That gap is where our business sits and why it's been so successful.”

Trends in AI and Financing

36:37 to 42:00

Discuss the trends in AI financing and the evolving landscape of GPU compute.

“Because, like, this is the big story in markets.”

Understanding GPU Compute Non-Fungibility

42:00 to 45:52

Explore the concept of non-fungibility in GPU compute and its implications.

“And I think that this is well understood by our client base, by our suppliers, by third-party consultants like Sydney Analysis.”

Challenges in GPU Market Commoditization

45:52 to 50:00

Discuss the difficulties in making GPU compute a commoditized market.

“moving into Vera Rubin following that, like it's not getting easier to build, operate, provision, deliver these GPUs.”

Navigating AI Demand and Data Center Issues

50:00 to 51:38

Examine the increasing demand for AI and challenges faced in data center construction.

“there's no path to solving demand in the near term or even the medium term, frankly.”

Concluding Thoughts on Market Dynamics

51:38 to 52:06

Wrap up the discussion on the GPU market and its future.

“like the construction and all the components and getting everything in there.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Odd Thoughts is brought to you by VanEck. For years, investors basically forgot about real assets, energy, gold, and infrastructure. But look at what's driving markets now. Central banks loading up on gold, massive capex cycles, currencies doing weird things. These assets are at the center of it. RACS, the VanEck Real Assets ETF, is an actively managed one-stop shop for real assets spanning gold, commodities, natural resource equities, and more. Go to vanek.com slash R-A-A-X pod to learn more fun disclosures later in this episode.

0:55to work for you. Wealth management, capital markets, investment banking. Every business has an ambition. PayPal Open is the platform designed to help you grow into yours with access to business loans so you can expand and hundreds of millions of PayPal customers worldwide. Your customers can pay all the ways they want today with PayPal, Venmo, Pay Later, and all major cards so you can focus on the future. When you need a partner trusted by millions, There's one platform for all business. PayPal Open. Grow today at paypalopen.com. Loan subject to approval in available locations. Bloomberg Audio Studios.

1:38Podcasts. Radio. News.

1:51Tracy Alloway:Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. I'm Joe Weisenthal. And I'm Tracy Alloway. Tracy, I'm envisioning this future where like we have to do a state of the sort of AI inference market episode like once a month, you know, Like where it's like things are moving so rapidly and there's so much change either in terms of what models are using or what they're being used for, et cetera, that in the same way we would do like, you know, the occasional regular stock market episode or whatever, we would just do, OK, what are we seeing right now in AI inference trends? Because it just feels like the moment we do an episode a few weeks later, it may be out of date.

2:31We should just bite the bullet and do a weekly episode. Transform lots more into a market update on compute.

2:38Tracy Alloway:We could do inference. I don't know. We'll have to workshop. Odd inference? No. No. No, we'd have to. But anyway, this is like. Lots of inference. Lots of inference. This is like the story of the moment. And we know that, you know, a couple of years ago, everyone was sort of dabbling around with various things and experimenting and using AI. Like, oh, like write a poem for me about this, et cetera. That phase of AI is long over. And we know that companies specifically are spending a ton on compute, so much so that CFOs around the world are getting sticker shock about their compute budgets. And there was even a headline of like Uber saying like, OK, like$1 ,500 of max per employee, like don't spend more than that in a month on tokens.

3:25Tracy Alloway:So like this is a very fast moving area. Yeah, you're starting to get headlines about, I guess, a corporate reckoning with AI as more people experiment and spend money on it. The Uber headline that you mentioned, apparently Uber burned through its entire 2026 AI budget in four months, basically. And like what's more important is the COO was actually asking whether or not that was worth it, like whether they saw productivity gains or whatever as a result of that. The other very amusing headline that I saw, and it was citing an unnamed source. It's from Axios. So, you know. Oh, yeah. Not entirely sure it's true, but reportedly.

4:03It was a great headline. It was a great headline. An AI consultant told Axios that one of their clients recently spent half a billion dollars in a single month after failing to put usage limits on cloud. Yeah.

4:13Tracy Alloway:It's because everyone, it's like, oh, I just have a simple question. I want to look up our guest's title. I'm going to use the most advanced model to do that, et cetera. I have a theory, and we will get into this with our guests, that one of the things that will, and we've talked about this with Goldman's Marco Argenti, but one of the things I predict is that companies are like clearly, you know, they're going to keep using it more and more would be my guess. But there were probably a lot of investment made in sort of like optimal model routing because some models are like 100th per query of what a frontier model is.

4:47Tracy Alloway:Probably a lot of people don't know like what is the sort of like efficient frontier model usage. And so actually routing the query to the sort of most efficient model, I have a feeling we're going to see a lot of investment in that area specifically. Well, there's also just the question of whether or not the models get cheaper overall as they advance. Right. And we have seen some I think Nvidia has a new system or chip out or something that is supposed to reduce token usage. We can get into that as well. And, you know, we did that live episode recently with Ian Dunning of Hudson River Trading, and he said a lot of interesting things in that.

5:22Tracy Alloway:But one of the things he said is that the scarcity is increasingly like just the real estate component, finding a suitable place to plug in your GPUs, at least from his perspective right now. is as much, if not more so, of a challenge than securing GPUs themselves. Which is different to what it was like three years ago. Yeah. Yeah. So just like where you plug it in, we know there's all the anti-data center politics out there. So it's like, yeah, we got to take the pulse of this market. All right. Consider this our inference update. Yeah. Well, I'm really excited to say we really do have the perfect guest.

5:57Tracy Alloway:Someone we spoke to truly feels like eons ago. I think the first thing we ever connected with this company, they've always had a lot of chips. But I think the first time we ever linked up with this company was still in the era where people were excited about NVIDIA chips being used for like crypto mining and stuff like that. But we are now in this very different era. And this is truly like one of the companies of the moment. And that is, of course, CoreWeave, one of the so-called NeoClouds offering both training and inference services for all sorts of different AI workloads. I'm very excited to say back on the show, we have Brandon McBee, CoreWeave's co-founder and chief development officer.

6:32Tracy Alloway:So, Brandon, thank you so much for coming on OddLots. Appreciate being invited back, guys. And that was a fantastic intro. We look forward to hitting these topics today. All right. Here's my question. So we know that like at the tail end of last year and then in the first quarter of this year, everyone started using cloud code and just this clearly a key inflection moment for sort of like overall AI demand. And then we get into Q2 and suddenly the CFO is like, oh my gosh, we're spending this much on inference. We got to like figure things out just straight up. Like in the last month, whatever, do you see any signs of that happening yet of these companies, which are all like still AI, eager AI adopters trying to get a little bit of a handle and maybe slowing the rate of inference?

7:28Tracy Alloway:of the rate of growth. Is that happening yet? Yeah, I think you see headlines there that there are surprises of spend, et cetera. I'd say our interpretation of it is entirely look at the like authentic and foundational demand that is out there, right? Like all we're really doing is talking about how much consumption there is of AI and use for it. And I think that that was A real question in the market 12, 18, 24 months ago is, will there be demand for AI? Where is this inference demand that everyone's been talking about? And I think you're absolutely correct. January or so with this kind of like next group of models that were coming out, everyone all of a sudden and all at once said, this is what we've needed.

8:16Like, this is the real product breakthrough. but I think it's worth keeping in mind that product breakthrough was like for a limited set of people at the end of the day right we're talking like coding professionals some finance professionals but it's a relatively small group of people that are using infrastructure at this enormous scale and so where we see this moving towards next is broader enterprise use like likely not seeing this whole token mapping approach. And I think that that is unsustainable. But do we see adoption in other sectors and how this can continue to spread out? Absolutely.

8:56I mean, you know, on our end, I think we have 10 over$1 billion clients at this point. And our financial services client backlog is in the tens of billions of dollars at this point. And so So we're now talking about things outside of AI labs, outside of hyperscalers. And look, as you guys know, we support nine of the top 10 AI labs on the planet. If you exclude China and everything that's going on over there, like we have a lot of visibility into what people are doing and we're not seeing any pullback on what they're doing on inference today. If anything, it just remains this unrelenting demand for access to the best technology solution in the market for running artificial intelligence.

9:50And that's core solution in the market. Wait, say more about the customer mix now versus, say, three years ago. So you have hyperscalers, you've got startups, you've got various businesses. How has that, I guess, composition shifted over time? Yeah, it's shifted enormously towards a more diverse customer base, right? We got a lot of flack for this in our IPO, right? Like people were noting that we only had a handful of large clients, that our clients were like just the hyperscalers and AI Lab or two. And I think that we have made tremendous progress in driving diversification. So I'd say it's probably across three buckets today, right?

10:33We have hyperscale clients who continue to grow with us. We have AI lab clients. As I said, nine of the top 10 AI labs on the planet choose CoreWeave. And then we have this enterprise base. And the enterprise base just doesn't grab as many headlines as you would expect. This is not these massive multibillion-dollar contracts that are being signed. But I think in Q4 alone, we added twice as many logos to our client base as we had ever done versus any previous core. And that enterprise base is the one that's growing so much. And there was a point you guys hit on in the intro that I think is really worth acknowledging.

11:18And it was this concept of model routing. And the idea that not everyone needs just the latest model, that it's different types of models. I can hit different use cases. And this is something we've been talking about for a while, right? As it relates to the infrastructure side of things as well, right? Because you don't need that latest model for everything. And accordingly, you don't need the latest piece of infrastructure to support every single inference or training query that's out there. You can kind of conceptualize this matrix of different sizes of workloads relative to different sizes of GPUs.

11:55And all of a sudden that tells you, my God, like H100s could last six, seven, eight years. A100s are going to last longer. And it totally changes the entire conversation around depreciable life of infrastructure. As that was a really popular topic during 2025. People were saying like, oh, this stuff will last two years. It's worth zero afterwards. And like, we've never seen any semblance of that because of the point you guys are accurately making, which is users are going to need to find the way to use the appropriate model for their prompts. And that'll be solved by ModelRabbit, to your point.

12:38But that just further enables this concept that infrastructure is going to be used longer. And we see that every day in our portfolio, extending all the way back to A100s.

12:50Tracy Alloway:I just want to ask a specific question about the broadening out of the customer base. And you mentioned, for example, financial services clients. When you talk about, say, a financial services client as being distinct client from one of the major AI labs, does that mean what you're saying? So it's like I'm just making it up. Let's just say I don't know if these relationships exist. Let's say a city group has an enterprise license with an anthropic. Does that count as anthropic as a customer or city as a customer? And when you talk about this broadening out, are there essentially more types of entities who are building some type of model, not necessarily an LLM per se, but some type of internal house-specific model from which they want to run inference?

13:38It's a great question. The scenario you presented, anthropic would be our client. there. So what I'm highlighting, I want to correct a number I said earlier, our financial service clients, and this is direct to those financial services, they're approaching 10 billion in backlog. So this would be a good example of this and not something we made recently is with Jane Street. That's not Jane Street coming through OpenAI or Anthropik to get to us. That is Jane Street coming directly to us and using our platform.

14:06Tracy Alloway:For a model that they're building. So it's a Jane Street - Inference, right? It's training. No, no, no. I'm not saying setting aside training, but it would be inference of a model that it's Jane Street's model of something rather than Jane Street's contract and enterprise relationship with one of the major labs. At the end of the day, we don't know what exact workloads these entities are running, especially for entities like Jane Street. I would imagine that's highly secretive. But the point I would say is more that this is not them coming through an AI lab to us. They are interfacing with and managing the infrastructure directly on our platform.

14:48And that's a really important distinction as we grow this diversified client base. And again, I think that we've just done a wonderful job of executing on that over the past year.

15:25back to real assets. The Rax ETF is an actively managed one-stop real asset shop from gold to commodities to natural resource equities, adjusting as conditions change. Visit vanec.com slash raaxpod to learn more. And investors should consider the investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses of the fund carefully before investing to obtain a prospectus and summary prospectus, which contain this and other information. Visit vanec.com. Please read the prospectus and summary prospectus carefully before investing. Racks is distributed by Van X Securities Corporation Distributor. Hero Bread delivers the stacked sandwiches, loaded bagels, rich mac and cheese you love, just with a better protein to calorie balance that may help fuel you longer.

16:09Made with high quality ingredients, every bite lands soft and satisfying with up to 19 grams of protein, plus up to 32 grams of fiber per serving. Shop now at hero.co. Code iHeart for 10 % off. All figures per serving. See calorie info at hero.co. 34 to 48 % fewer calories than regular products. Calorie content has been reduced on average from 162 to 92 calories per serving. Data accurate as of 2-20-26. We believe in starting with your financial goals, not a formula. At Oppenheimer, we put the full strength of our longstanding expertise to work, understanding your life and your ambitions, and designing the precise strategies that build and protect your wealth with confidence across this generation and the next.

16:51Put the power of Oppenheimer thinking to work for you. Wealth Management, Capital Markets, Investment Banking.

17:00Tracy Alloway:As you've talked about including in earnings releases, and as you can just tell from these huge token budgets, inference demand is booming, but model training is still important. But in addition to model training, you say, OK, if you have a pie chart, the part that's inference is getting bigger. But I assume the training is also growing as well. But I'm curious from the perspective of, like, say, the AI labs, when they think about growth, has there been a subtle shift from investing to push the pure model frontier, having the absolute best state of the art model, versus investing in, say, better harnesses?

17:42Tracy Alloway:Because a big reason we're excited and all talking about AI right now is really the excitement that happened over with Cloud Code in the final quarter of 2025. And it's like, oh, this harness has really unlocked a bunch of capabilities. Has there been a shift in investment from rather than just the purest, most advanced model to let's invest more in tooling capacity and other things that allow companies and clients to get more juice from an advanced model? I don't think that we're exposed to that decision making with the AI labs as counterparties to us. The observation I would make in a behavior change for the AI labs is they want access to more infrastructure for longer duration, right?

18:34And I'll qualify that a little bit, which is a year, two years ago, we were signing three-year committed contracts. The type of contracts we sign are basically like take or pay contracts, which is the best way to finance the infrastructure that we are building for our clients. Last year, it was four-year contracts, right? They were saying, we want explicit access to Hopper for four years or Blackwell for four years. Now they're coming and saying, well, actually, we want it for five years. We don't want any interruption of use. We'll commit to the exact same economics throughout the full duration of the contract.

19:13You can't upgrade or change the infrastructure within it. You cannot cancel the contract. We want it for five years. And they want it at more scale, right? The deployments are getting larger and larger. So that's probably the best characterization we can offer on decision making that AI labs are going through right now as they look from an infrastructure perspective. It absolutely seems like tooling is important, but scaling laws are still holding. Yeah. Right. Like your ability to advance your frontier model through accessing more infrastructure at scale holds. And that will hold through Vera Rubin, we expect.

19:50And seemingly it's not stopping anytime soon. Oh, yeah. What's the deal with Vera Rubin? Can you explain that to us? Which aspect of it? What is it? Oh, yeah. Basically. Yeah. So it's just NVIDIA's next architecture that's coming out. The current architecture that we're deploying today is Blackwell. Blackwell comes, we deploy predominantly in a MPL-72 configuration, which was an entire architecture change from deployment. If you recall, Hopper came before Blackwell. Hopper, you could deploy these 42U racks, which was typically like eight GPUs in a server case. You would take it, plug it in, largely air-cooled as well.

20:31We ran some liquid cooling just so we understood the requirements of liquid cooling because Blackwell, for our deployments, is overwhelmingly liquid cooled in its deployment configuration. And instead of eight GPUs in a 42U configuration, it's in this larger 72 GPU rack. It's like an entire chassis that's being brought in, and it just looks entirely different in the data center. It's like this giant tower thing that you've seen in pictures floating around on EPS. So Vera Rubin will be the next architecture that comes out. And we've started receiving testing racks for Vera Rubin. The basic idea is like the new configuration makes the whole system more efficient, like more tokens per energy use and that sort of thing.

21:25Yes. Yeah. I think that's kind of where you're getting to with it. But that doesn't necessarily mean, going back to the point earlier, that everyone only wants the latest generation of GPU, right? We have massive demand for Ampere, Hopper, Blackwell, et cetera. And it just varies by use case, model, and type of client as well. Like I would qualify that AI labs are probably the ones who are lining up first to secure access to the latest generation GPUs. Whereas enterprise clients might be very focused on current generation, right? Like Hopper and Blackwell right now.

22:08Tracy Alloway:I'm going to be honest for a second. You know, I try to keep up on a lot of things AI related. I really do. And every single day. It's hard. The one thing I do not keep in my mind, if you asked me, I liked it in the old days when it was like 186, 286, 386, 486, Pentium, and then Pentium 2, et cetera. There was just this numerical sequence that I could keep track of in my head. And so if someone asked me, like Joe, like Vera Rubin, Hopper, Blackwell, what was the sequence? I'd be like, I got to be honest with you. I don't exactly remember. And I will prioritize that at some point. But speaking of silicon, so yesterday, Microsoft came out with a big, they're really, they want to be in the game, too.

22:51Tracy Alloway:They don't want to just be connected to the labs. They want to have advanced models, too. And apparently it's a good model. And they announced the MAI Thinking 1 model. But they said it's optimized on the Maya 200 chip, which is their own chip. And this is a thing which is even, again, going back to our recent conversation we had, even a place like Hudson River Trading is thinking about getting into the customized hardware game. How much juice for the squeeze is there of aligning the model with custom silicon from your vantage point? What we could offer is what we hear from our clients on that.

23:30And it's important to keep in mind, we can run any type of silicon on our platform. Right. We are entirely customer led in what we build. Like we don't go commit to CapEx and speculatively hope people come and use infrastructure. Right. Like we wait until a client says, we want you to go do this specific build. Here's what we want it to look like. And then we go commit to that CapEx. Right. It's more like a success based CapEx approach. And the client isn't asking for anything but NVIDIA infrastructure. And I think a large contributor to that is, I mean, they built this incredible ecosystem around their chipset.

24:11They have been dedicated to that for, I think, over 15 years at this point through the CUDA architecture. and nvidia from what we hear from our clients that platform just remains the most efficient the most scalable the most reliable uh set of infrastructure that is in the market right so i i think others there's always been i mean think over the past few years right there's always been talk like what is it but yeah this other silicon and these other chips and at the end of the day like people are still using NVIDIA infrastructure. They're committing to NVIDIA infrastructure for five plus year contracts in these billion, multi-billion dollar commitments, because they know that that is going to be a critical part of how they scale their business.

25:01We really don't see demands on a material basis for anything but that NVIDIA compute. And that's what we are building today.

Read the full transcript

25:11Tracy Alloway:Obviously, just to push back on this a little bit, and I'm not really in any position to push back. I can only relay what past guests have said in my own reading. So what one of our guests said is that absolutely, NVIDIA has the lock on model training, that if you want to train a model, that yes, NVIDIA chips are the only game in town. But that for inference, It's the really his view. This is Ian Dunning again. His view is there really were options. And then, of course, we had someone who was much more biased. We interviewed the CEO of Cerebros, the company that makes the gigantic plate and or sorry, the gigantic gigantic plate.

25:50Tracy Alloway:And of course he did. But I mean, of course, he was going to say, yeah, the the CUDA moat is vastly overrated for inference. It barely exists. Now, of course, of course, he's going to say that. So, like, you know, he's in a competitor. But we've also heard it from a user of inference. And intuitively, it makes sense like training is very complicated and all that stuff. But what you're saying is that from the customer standpoint, you see the demand for NVIDIA on both the training and the inference as being steady and that you perceive that advantage to be consistent through both aspects? So I believe in our last quarterly report, our CEO might qualify that inference workloads represent well in excess of 50 % of infrastructure utilization on our platform.

26:39Okay. It's the exact same infrastructure that we use for training as well. Going back to my comment of like, it's very fungible between those different types of workloads. Those customers are choosing NVIDIA to work with on inference. I think what you're going to see is people will want to try at small scale other types of silicon. But the reliable, proven and remains from our perspective, most efficient infrastructure to use is NVIDIA today. Does that change over time? Who really knows? But I think we've seen NVIDIA battling this concept for years and every year they show up and like they remain the de facto choice for AI infrastructure.

27:27I think we're going to be one of the first people in the market to see it because that will be a tone shift change from our clients asking us to run something else. That hasn't happened. OK, so have the constraints on your business changed at all? So three years ago, we were talking about GPUs and how hard they were to actually get. I imagine GPU, securing GPUs is still competitive, to say the least. But are you seeing other constraints emerge, like Joe mentioned in the intro, just land usage, just places to actually build data centers? Land usage, specifically, I wouldn't say is as much of a concern.

28:07Having a powered shell is the bottleneck today. and let me qualify powered shell. Powered shell is effectively an empty data center that is energized, right? It has all the power and associated components. I can come into it and deliver electrons into a rack. Has the cooling system built within it. Like it has the whole thing, right? Powered shell is the industry term for it. That is the bottleneck because of all of the supply chains that come into that, right? Like not only do you have electricity, do you have the land, et cetera, but you have the backup battery supplies, you have the transformers, you have personnel, right?

28:50Let's just think about the electricians for these sites and getting the accreditation on the electrician side to be able to participate in these bills. I mean, I think it's a five-year plus apprenticeship to be able to go through that program, right? We can't just make new electricians leveraging a supply chain, right? That's a trade that you can't really scale efficiently. So that is absolutely the bottleneck for us. And I think our peer set that's out there right now, access to chips. I think we have a phenomenal relationship with NVIDIA where we've just proven to be the best operator of this infrastructure on the planet.

29:30You know, a bottleneck that existed for us previously, I think, was access to financing. Yeah. Right. We all know. Doesn't seem to be an issue anymore. I would agree with that broadly, but that's years of work and execution that has delivered that ability for us. I mean, year to date, we've raised over$21 billion of financing for our business. You don't get to do that and just go from zero to 20 out of nowhere. And I think that's largely driven by our track record of execution, right? Our investors, our creditors can see this deep set of experience over the years of consistently delivering on these builds.

30:18I mean, we have over a gigawatt in active power at this point, right? Like a gigawatt at the data center level with GPUs delivered into clients. And I think that there has been kind of a misunderstanding in the market where people are conflating the concept that something on paper is the equivalent to being physically done and delivered. And all I can say is there's an enormous gap between signing for power delivery in 2030 versus actually delivering that into billable GPU hours. And that gap of execution is what has driven down our cost of capital so aggressively. That gap is where our business sits and why it's been so successful.

31:08I mean, that's the secret sauce is our ability to take these data center deployments and these customer relationships and deliver billable GPU hours into them.

31:20Tracy Alloway:You know, speaking of financing, I just want to say, you know, during last year, like maybe six months ago, that might have been the sort of near peak of the Michael Burry inspired. These chips are like in the last two years stuff. And one of the viral charts that you would see on Twitter was the CoreWeave CDS chart. Those have come way in. So it is it is, you know, I haven't seen those charts in a while. Yeah, that's right. That's the thing about CDS. No one ever posts charts of credit default swaps when they're coming. People love to post them when they're blowing out. They have come in. So, you know, that does speak to some of this point about these anxieties having been alleviated at least somewhat since the start of the year.

32:05Tracy Alloway:You know, it occurred to me like we're talking about credit default swaps or talking about financing. I'm sort of gearing up to write a big thing maybe, but I'm writing it in my head currently that there really are a lot of analogies between the business of data centers and the business of banking. And one of the things in banking, as we all learned from SVB, was the risk of industry and depositor concentration, that if you have all your depositors are either in like one depositor gets too big or all your depositors are in the same industry, then you have this risk of like correlated withdrawals.

32:41Tracy Alloway:And that's what obviously did in SVB. When you think about planning and you think about, OK, here's an investment, et cetera, how much does this come up sort of like thinking about, I guess, tenant diversification as something that you think about in your multi-year planning? It's a critical aspect of it, right? As I said earlier too, like this was a key criticism of us coming into our IPO last year, right? Where we had that customer concentration in our revenue and we have made enormous progress there. And I think the best way to think about it is we could take all of our unallocated capacity.

33:21And I say that very specifically, it's not unsold capacity, implying that there's no demand for it. It's unallocated. There's intense demand for it. We're figuring out where it should go. And that customer piece of it, I think, honestly, like we could allocate all that capacity to like single name clients, right? Like there is a pretty significant number of single name clients we can go allocated out into. But I don't think that is the business we are supposed to be building here. I think the business we are supposed to be building is a diversified cloud that is supporting the leading AI consumers and producers on the planet.

34:03I don't think we're supposed to be sporting just one or two companies.

34:22Missatisfying breads and pastas and want to add protein without going overboard on calories? stacked sandwiches, fully loaded bagels, noodles built for serious sauce. Hero Bread delivers up to 19 grams of protein. Think bagels and elbow noodles with nearly twice the protein of national bestsellers, but less than half the calories. Plus, you can get up to 32 grams of fiber per serving, a bonus when you're trying to stay full and fueled. So whether you're grilling burgers, building a serious sandwich, or digging into pasta, you're getting real flavor with a smarter protein-to-calorie balance. Hero makes loaves, buns, tortillas, bagels, and noodles with 5 to 19 grams of protein per serving that all go the distance.

35:01Shop now at Hero.co. Use code IHART for 10 % off. That's H-E-R-O dot C-O. All figures per serving. See nutrition info on Hero.co. 39 % and 61 % fewer calories than regular plain bagels and noodles, respectively. Calorie content has been reduced from 270 to 130 and 200 to 80 calories per serving for plain bagels and noodles, respectively. Data accurate as of 2020-26. We believe in starting with your financial goals, not a formula. At Oppenheimer, we put the full strength of our longstanding expertise to work, understanding your life and your ambitions, and designing the precise strategies that build and protect your wealth with confidence across this generation and the next.

35:42Put the power of Oppenheimer thinking to work for you. Wealth management, capital markets, investment banking. This is Jacob Goldstein from What's Your Problem. Business software is expensive, and when you buy software from lots of different companies, it's not only expensive, it gets confusing, slow to use, hard to integrate. Odoo solves that because all Odoo software is connected on a single affordable platform. Save money without missing out on the features you need. Odoo has no hidden costs and no limit on features or data. Odoo has over 60 apps available for any needs your business might have, all at no additional charge.

36:23Everything from websites to sales to inventory to accounting, all linked and talking to each other. Check out Odoo at O-D-O-O dot com. That's O-D-O-O dot com. When it comes to financing, can you say a little bit more about what changed to make the market more comfortable with this? Because, like, this is the big story in markets. It's just how much AI is now being issued through the corporate bond market. The equity market, as we know, is basically all big tech at the moment. What changed on the part of investors? Was it just pure return and performance? Or were there, I guess, efforts to make the contracts more robust or increase visibility into demand and that sort of thing?

37:09Seeing the inference aspect of it really emboldened investors. But that was really just January or maybe late Q4, where you started seeing this just massive inflection of demand driven by inference. For us, right, it's tough for me to speak about other companies, but for us, like why have we been underwritten at such scale and at a decreasing cost of capital? I think it goes back to that track record of execution, right? is just the market has watched us execute and watch us deliver on these contracts. And the way, and tell me if I'm going into too much detail here, but the way that we finance our business, you kind of break it into two broad buckets, right?

37:55You have parent co-financing and asset co-financing. And asset co-financing is where all of the GPUs get financed, right? It's where all of our client contracts sit. And we can take these financings and put them into SPVs, or we'll just call it a box, so to say. And you... Sorry, I'm sorry.

38:20Tracy Alloway:Keep going. Mentioning boxes is dangerous. Boxes on lots of connotations, but keep going. We put them into SPVs. And these SPVs, they have the infrastructure, they have the data center costs, and they have the debt agreements within them. And so you're able to pair this like five year take or pay contract to an amortization schedule on the debt. And you have the revenue come into the box, pay down the amortization schedule, pay down the operating costs of the data center. And it still contributes a it has a 25 percent contribution margin of profit up to the parent code. Right. Like these are highly profitable agreements down in the SBB stack.

39:06And so you take that SPV out to the credit market and say, look at this instrument. It's a discrete set of contracts with counterparties, like entities who want to consume GPU compute. You have the data centers within it, et cetera. And, you know, one of the latest ones we did was, as we call it, DDTL4. This was a investment grade rated, first of its class. No one had done this before for GPU financing, non-recourse HPC infrastructure financing. It got done at SOFR plus$225. That is a phenomenal cost of capital for us. And importantly, we were able to bring in the insurance charge of capital, which is a massive charge of capital out there that is looking to do allocations into the space.

39:55So we're kind of continuously making progress through these different stacks of capital and locking access to more and more types of investors. It's why you've seen us moving to the convertible note market and to the unsecured market as well, along with taking direct strategic equity investments. But for us, it's really important for the entire investor space to understand this business because this business largely didn't exist before. right like people weren't making loans into the hyperscalers to go credit these build-outs right it's on core weave honestly to be building this path into how do you finance the ai hyperscaler effectively and i think um we've just done a terrific job of it over the past few years

40:44Tracy Alloway:you used to be in a prior lifetime a trader right yes i was a commodity trader so i'm curious like There's a lot of interest in, and I don't know if it's going to materialize, in GPU capacity trading. And there's going to be a new contract. We recently interviewed the CEO of Compute Exchange, and they're very close to having something listed on the CME. From your perspective, because I don't have a view on this yet. You see, okay, a big AI company does a five-year contract. As you say, the duration is lengthening. We're going to lock this in. I don't know what the need is for tradable compute in that environment, etc.

41:24Tracy Alloway:What's your guess? Do you anticipate that there will be a sufficient ecology of hedgers and speculators such that there will be a liquid market for tradable compute? I think it's very much a timeline question that's out there. Short term, no. Let me offer why no short term and then I'd say maybe in the long term. Okay. And it all comes back to fungibility, right? If you think about gold, gold is defined by its chemical composition, right? And there's no question of what is gold and not gold, et cetera. Compute really isn't, right? And especially GPU compute. GPU compute today is not fungible. And I think that this is well understood by our client base, by our suppliers, by third-party consultants like Sydney Analysis.

42:21And it's this idea that an H100 deployed in one cloud doesn't have the same performance of an H100 deployed in another cloud. And the metrics that people use are things like good put or model flop utilization, MFUs. And there are these measurements of like how much more performant is one, the exact same GPU, by the way, versus another GPU deployed in another facility. And so in order for something to be commoditized, it has to be fungible, right? Otherwise, there's just too much, you know, murkiness and there isn't like an exact data point in there.

42:59Tracy Alloway:Can I push on that a little bit further? So, I mean, I think that seems like a reasonable view. Is the non-fungibility related to configuration of like how they literally like the configuration of the GPUs within physically? Like, what is it? Is it about power? I mean, I think they all like, you know, there are plenty of places that will say, you know, we have nine nines or however many nines you need in your industry or whatever. What is it, in your view, that would cause significant changes in the performance of an H100 in one cloud versus another? It could be in some part, configuration, right?

43:38We build everything to DGX reference spec, which is the most, outlined by NVIDIA, it's the most performant way to build, operate, and deliver GPUs. But the rest of it, honestly, is just how you operate the GPUs. And that is the core weave software stack. That is how do you keep these GPUs online, right? Like what happens if a GPU fails? Can you predict if a GPU is about to fail and swap in other infrastructure so that the client doesn't have downtime on that component? And there's an immense suite of software solutions and infrastructure management solutions that we have built to have the best good put, to have the best MFUs in the industry.

44:23And none of that is off the shelf, right? And so I wouldn't say it comes down to the strict components. That's kind of like a bare minimum starting point, right? Like you have to start in DJX reference spec. But where does differentiation come from there? I mean, that's the core lead product. you're describing right there.

44:42Tracy Alloway:By the way, Tracy, I'm just looking up. Terms of art, good put measures the fraction of peak hardware performance that the training job can extract. This is according to Google. And MFUs, model flops utilization, hardware metric for evaluating real-world efficiency of LLM's training. So two new terms. I actually hadn't heard of MFUs or good put before this. So I just learned two new terms today. We got to create a glossary. AI glossary. Yeah, we do. Brandon, when Joe asked you that question about compute markets earlier, you said it was a timeline question, which in my mind implies that it's inevitable.

45:18Like, it's just a question of how long it takes. But then when you describe the fungibility problem, it seems like this is an actual issue that will be very difficult to solve. Yes. I think that characterization is absolutely correct, right? Like, if you just take general commodity theory and i traded natural gas electricity agriculture products for over a decade like it suggests that it should become that at some point but what is the reality today the reality is this stuff isn't getting easier to operate right we've moved from these kind of relatively simple 42u air cold racks of hopper to these immensely complex blackwell deployments moving into Vera Rubin following that, like it's not getting easier to build, operate, provision, deliver these GPUs.

46:10It's getting more difficult. And I think until it starts becoming easier, you don't really have a path to commoditization. You will have to continue to prioritize working with the world-class and world-leading operators of infrastructure. That's where we sit.

46:29Tracy Alloway:First of all, this is helpful. And I like that we're getting multiple perspectives because I do think this is going to be like one of the big questions for financial markets. Because let's say if they took off, then you could imagine that might even improve financing conditions because then the lender can hedge against the price. Yeah. So like there would probably be some good things for the industry if this took off. So I appreciate it. It's good to have your perspective on this. Why is it – you know, I'm an inference – I am an inference user, by the way. So I made a little machine learning model in one of my hobby projects, and I provide inference over at Havelock.ai, or I'm a user of inference or whatever.

47:09Tracy Alloway:I have a model, whatever. Why is it that I— It would be impressive if you were providing inference. I'm trying to—I guess I'm a consumer of inference. I use a—anyway, why is it that I'm actually very easily able to get—now, not a huge allocation of, like, GPU access? So I was like, how do I train this model? It's a model called BERT that Google released in 2018 or 2019. I fine-tuned it for my purposes. And then literally using CloudCode, I was able to, in 10 minutes, sign up. I started using this company called Modal, and I was able to start training a model. I was surprised that there was like, and it didn't cost me very much and I have like no volume, but nonetheless, evidently there was a little GPU capacity out there that I could get.

47:56Tracy Alloway:And it cost me like$5 or something for the whole thing. Given what you always hear about, like a utilization is slammed. Why is it actually not that hard to find GPU capacity for someone like myself? You know, I think it's the scale difference right there. Finding ones or tens of GPUs, I think that's way more accessible out there. Okay. Our clients are focused on the hundreds of thousands of GPUs. I'm not there yet, but I'm not there yet. Not yet. I'm sure you'll get there. Yes. And that's where it kind of decommoditizes itself with scale as well, right? Like as you're in the hundreds of thousands component, there's just not that many deployments, right?

48:39It's handfuls of deployments at that size. But getting access to ones of GPUs, I think that there is a lot more ability to go secure that sizing in the market. So Joe and I are heading to Hong Kong very soon, and I expect that AI in China is going to be a big topic of conversation. How would you characterize, I guess, the difference between the U.S. and the Chinese market at the moment? I'm sure this is something you think about, even though you don't participate in the Chinese market directly.

49:09Tracy Alloway:yeah that that's tracy's asking for questions yeah that's basically like it's like questions that we can ask people when we're over there yeah that that's likely going to be my response tracy is like we just do not participate in that market um i think that there's opportunity for us to be expanding as you guys know we we operate in canada europe um i think moving uh further east makes a lot of sense for us but we're trying to be very methodical in the way that we expand so i unfortunately I'm not going to be able to help you with specific questions in that market, but I would imagine you're going to encounter a lot of the same things that you're seeing in the U S which is just insatiable, unrelenting demand for AI.

49:51And like, you know, we just kind of keep coming back to this is like, there is no solution in sight for being able to satiate demand, right? There's just too many supply chain. there's no path to solving demand in the near term or even the medium term, frankly.

50:09Tracy Alloway:You mentioned, so Tracy asked you about land use. You said that really was an issue. But like the first time we talked to you in 2023 or whenever that was, there was not a major growing movement of people who are just like anti-data centers in America. Maybe there were a few fringe people, but it was not something that was on the minds of politicians and activists and so forth. And you do see these headlines, you know, about some projects really having been shelved. There was like a big one. Northern Virginia is a huge hotspot for it. And there was a big project that was, they pulled the plug on due to some, they couldn't get an agreement with the local government.

50:46Tracy Alloway:That must affect you. What are you seeing in terms of like your capacity to build? How has it changed specifically in light of, or have you seen a change, would you be able to build faster in a world where this had never become a political hot button issue? I believe it has become that hot button issue. It's something that we're quite proactive about in market. And I think you just kind of go through the checks on the diligence process to make sure you're going through it correctly. I think that there's misconceptions out there, like water usage. Yeah, setting aside the misconception, like setting aside, I know, setting aside the whole debate about, but just in terms of like operationally, what's it changed for you in terms of your plan?

51:32No, I would say our greatest challenge is still just getting that delivery of our, like the construction and all the components and getting everything in there. Like that is truly more of the bottleneck that's in the market today.

51:46Tracy Alloway:Brandon, thank you so much for coming back on OddLots. We'll have you back next month for another market. No, or at least, or maybe in three years. Not three years. Yeah, not three years, but really. That's an eternity. Yeah, I know. Thank you so much. Thanks, guys. Appreciate it.

52:15Tracy Alloway:I'm very excited about whether compute features will take off. I think this is an exciting story. It's not the biggest story in the world, But it is actually a very exciting story. I've said this before. Even if you're not that interested in AI, this is a really interesting market structure story, right? It's basically the creation of a brand new market and poses all these interesting philosophical questions about how you do that. And I thought Brandon's point about fungibility, I mean, that is a real issue. And it does seem like it's a challenging one to fix at the moment. I don't know if it's inevitable in the future, but who knows?

52:54Tracy Alloway:No, no. I mean, it makes a lot of sense. This was also Lewis Hart's point that it's like, you know, it's in the word commodity, right? If it's not a commodity, you're not going to get a commodity market for it. And of course, a number of entities are betting that it will be commoditized. But if it's true that, like, you know, they're getting more difficult to work, that the technical demands on the inference provider, on the data center company are getting greater in order to get the maximum, you know, juice, then maybe it doesn't become commoditized. But I think that's like a fascinating question.

53:31But at the same time, like if you do see those efficiency improvements and new designs and things like that, you could imagine that like the demand is there for a standardized GPU as well. So I don't know. Like I'm really torn. It feels like it could go either way.

53:44Tracy Alloway:Well, and even in his answer, he talked about how they configure their own GPUs to a spec largely that NVIDIA itself has come up with. So in theory, like there is a spec that everyone can match to. So that's like a really interesting, that's a really interesting question. I also really want to do more on all of these. So Google has TPUs, Amazon has Tranium, Microsoft has its own hardware, maybe even Jane Streets and the Hudson River Tradings will have their own hardware. If they're not like I want to understand better why. Yeah. Right. Because like they presumably have some reason and they at least like the Microsoft will say, well, this will run better on our customized hardware.

54:32Tracy Alloway:I want to understand why that would be how much difference in performance is there and then the degree to which demand materializes from users for non NVIDIA silicon is like a really big question. Yeah. Why custom chips? Yeah. And what can you get out of that if you align model and chip to optimally work together? I have no idea, but I feel like it's an episode I would like to do. Yeah, we should. All right. Shall we leave it there in the meantime? Let's leave it there. All right. This has been another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Allaway. You can follow me at Tracy Allaway. And I'm Joe Weisenthal.

55:07Tracy Alloway:You can follow me at The Stalwart. Follow our guest, Brandon McBee, at Brandon McBee. Follow our producers, Carmen Rodriguez at CarmenArmandDash, Elbenet at Dashbot, KaleBrooks at KaleBrooks, and Kevin Lozano at KevinLloydLazano. And for more OddLots content, go to Bloomberg.com slash OddLots or the daily newsletter in all of our episodes. And you can chat about all these topics 24-7 in our Discord, discord.gg slash OddLots. And if you enjoy OddLots, if you want us to do an episode on custom chips, then please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, or you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad-free.

55:44All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.

56:21This is Jacob Goldstein from What's Your Problem? Business software is expensive. And when you buy software from lots of different companies, it's not only expensive, it gets confusing, slow to use, hard to integrate. Odoo solves that because all Odoo software is connected on a single affordable platform. Save money without missing out on the features you need. Odoo has no hidden costs and no limit on features or data. Odoo has over 60 apps available for any needs your business might have, all at no additional charge. Everything from websites to sales to inventory to accounting, all linked and talking to each other.

56:59Check out Odoo at odoo.com. That's odoo.com. Picture this. You're with your spouse at a seaside botanical garden. The moss hangs low, but your spirits are high. And you've never felt more in love. This is when it hits you. That Myrtle moment. It's the second everything clicks. When you realize Myrtle Beach is more than a getaway. It's right where you belong. Don't just daydream about it. Find your own Myrtle moment at visitmyrtlebeach.com.

57:38Paramount Plus is now the home of all your BET favorites. What? Yes! With all new episodes of Tyler Perry's Divorce Sisters. You've always liked a little drama. Plus a whole new world of movies like Gladiator 2. Now I will control an empire. Original series like The Chi. Just make sure we protect each other. And live sports like UFC. Welcome to the history books! New home, same family. Your BET favorites are now on Paramount Plus. Subscribe now. Thank you.

From the publisher

When we last spoke to Brannin McBee, the co-founder and chief development officer of cloud company Coreweave, his business was not yet public and sourcing GPUs was a key constraint on growth. But three years later, things look pretty different. CoreWeave IPOed and has been raising money in the bond market too, as well as signing more deals with chipmaker Nvidia. In fact, investors have basically been throwing money at all-things-AI. But there are persistent bottlenecks to further growth. Chip supply is still scarce, but so are transformers and electricity. In this episode, we catch up with Brannin on everything he's seeing in the market for compute right now, including leases, Nvidia's new Vera Rubin systems, demand for training versus inference, and the possibility of standardizing the market for compute.

Read more:
Trump Officials Worry US Loophole Let Chinese Firms Buy Nvidia Blackwell Chips
Broadcom Slides Most Since January 2025 on AI Outlook Miss

Only http://Bloomberg.com subscribers can get the Odd Lots newsletter in their inbox each week, plus unlimited access to the site and app. Subscribe at  bloomberg.com/subscriptions/oddlots

Subscribe to the Odd Lots Newsletter
Join the conversation: discord.gg/oddlots

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Odd Lots

All 682 episodes
How CoreWeave Sees the Market for Compute Right NowOdd Lots · 51 min
Listen in VO