In short
Odd Lots Podcast Episode Summary
Episode Title
The NYC Landlord Who Says the "Golden Age" of Being a Landlord Is Over
Hosts
- Joe Weisenthal
- Tracy Alloway
Guest
- Ben Carlos Thypin - Residential and commercial landlord in New York City.
---
Episode Overview In this episode, Weisenthal and Alloway explore the current state of the landlord business, particularly in New York City, by speaking with Ben Carlos Thypin. The discussion centers on the notion that the "golden age" of being a landlord is coming to an end and examines the implications of changing political and economic dynamics on the real estate market.
---
Key Concepts Discussed
Historical Context of Real Estate
- Golden Age of Landlords: The episode begins with a discussion on whether landlords have historically enjoyed a "golden age" characterized by rising rents and property prices.
- Market Dynamics: Thypin explains that the housing market was relatively flat until the mid-20th century when prices began to rise dramatically due to various factors, including governmental policies favoring homeowners over renters.
Political Shifts
- Changing Political Landscape: The conversation highlights a shift where tenants are becoming a more politically influential class, challenging the long-standing power of homeowners.
- YIMBY Movement: The "Yes In My Backyard" movement advocates for increased housing development to address supply concerns, contrasting previous policies focused on protecting existing homeowners.
Economic Factors
- Macroeconomic Changes: The hosts and Thypin examine how rising interest rates and increased operational costs are affecting landlords' profit models.
- Institutionalization of Rental Market: Discussion on how larger institutional investors are competing with smaller landlords and the impact of technology on operational efficiency in real estate.
---
Key Takeaways
- Declining Rent Growth: There is an expectation that rent growth will slow, influenced by increased supply and changing governmental policies.
- Tenant Rights Movement: A resurgence in tenant advocacy, including movements for rent control and tenant protections, is reshaping the rental landscape.
- Market Constraints: The landlord business is facing new challenges due to demographic shifts, political activism, and the institutionalization of real estate, which may not favor small landlords.
Risks for Landlords
- Operational Risks: Landlords face challenges from problematic tenants, rising operational costs, and the potential for decreased revenues as tenant protections increase.
- Exit Strategies: Thypin mentions his plans to exit the residential real estate market, suggesting that some landlords may need to reconsider their positions in the changing landscape.
---
Conclusion The podcast episode presents an in-depth look at the potential end of the "golden age" for landlords, driven by political, economic, and social changes. The dialogue emphasizes the need for landlords to adapt to new realities and consider their strategies moving forward in a rapidly evolving market.
---
Additional Notes
- Listeners Engagement: The hosts encourage listeners to consider the evolving dynamics of the rental market and the implications for both tenants and landlords.
- Future Outlook: The conversation ends with a reflection on how these shifts may influence the broader real estate market and investment strategies in the coming years.
---
For more insights, check out the [Odd Lots Podcast](https://www.bloomberg.com/oddlots) for previous episodes and additional content.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00You're being sold an AI future where you're obsolete or irrelevant. That vision is wrong. At Palantir, they're building AI that helps workers and unlocks their full potential. American workers are our nation's greatest strength. AI shouldn't eliminate them. It should elevate them. Palantir is here to tell their stories. From factories to hospitals, AI is freeing people from drudgery, letting them do what humans do best. Create. Solve. Build. Palantir, making Americans irreplaceable.
1:01of the supplier lifecycle, helping you deepen merchant relationships. Start fast, grow strategically, and scale at your pace with a modular toolkit you can flexibly deploy. Discover how at mastercard.com slash commercial acceptance.
1:27Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. I'm Joe Weisenthal. And I'm Tracy Alloway. Tracy, I'm not sure if you remember, but we did an episode recently in the outro and like someone tweeted about this. I think your final line was, it's pretty good to be a landlord. Like we were talk about rent and you're like it seems good to be a landlord i stand by it i can't believe i'm getting criticized throwing out these uh truth bombs it's good to be a landlord no i don't think it's even a criticism it's like sometimes the truest things are the obvious things that no one says directly and that someone just has like it seems pretty good and like rent prices as we've been discussing like they never seem to go down there are all kinds of tax advantages it seems like to owning real estate.
2:14It's hard to build more of it. It seems pretty good. It seems good. I guess my question is, was it always this good? And will it always be this good? Because, I mean, the reason we're talking about it is because it does feel like there is a backlash at the moment or more of a backlash. I guess landlords are never an especially beloved social class. But with prices being what they are at the moment, with rents going up, particularly in places like New York City, it does feel like there is this question of whether or not maybe the government, the state could do something to attenuate those higher rent prices.
2:50I guess there's like two questions to my mind about the sort of like whether it's good to be a landlord. And one is like, OK, we do know that like probably like rent growth is going to slow. And we talked to the guy from Apartment List, Chris Salviati, several weeks ago. And he's like, Like, OK, probably like rents are going to come down a bit, maybe, or flat or maybe not grow. But like that's just a cycle thing. Right. And then there's the question of like, is there something deeper that's not just about like the macroeconomic cycle, but is something going to like change about the business? And, you know, like one thing that I sort of still kind of believe in markets is that like if there's like alpha somewhere, if there's above market returns, it can't stay forever.
3:34Eventually, like, it's got to get armed away, right? I think maybe I'm a little bit more cynical than you. I think people will try to hang on to their price advantage as long as they possibly can. Yeah. No, I mean, I agree. It's just like, they can't be like some business that's just like permanently better than all the other businesses, right? Like, it's not how markets or capitalism are supposed to work. Like, capital is supposed to flood in or supply is supposed to come on. And eventually the returns from asset A on a risk adjusted basis should equal the returns from asset B also, you know, on a vol adjusted basis or something.
4:08Well, I guess this is where we start talking about real world constraints and policy constraints again. But yes, in theory, it should change. Right. And so we have been talking about real estate quite a lot. And I do think that in this sort of pandemic slash post-pandemic environment, lots of anxiety about real estate, not just high costs are a huge aspect of it, availability, the types of real estate that people want. And so it's a good question to how good has the landlord market been? And if we're in a period where a lot of things are changing, rates are reversing. I was about to say, I think interest rates are going to be the big factor here.
4:50Leverage, huge aspect of the real estate business reversing. Can the golden age of being a landlord persist if many other macro things and political things are changing? Is it still good to be a landlord? Is it still good to be a landlord? All right. Well, I'm very excited about our guest. We're going to be speaking with Ben Carlos-Typen. He is a real estate investor and broker in New York City, and he has a lot of views on this question and why maybe the golden age is coming to an end or will. So, Ben, thank you so much for coming on OddLots. Glad to be here. Thanks for having me. So before we can even ask the question, is the golden age of being a landlord coming to an end, we have to first establish, was there really a golden age?
5:36And I guess the question, the way I think about that, is it true that real estate owners, landlords, people who rented out their units, enjoyed a period of unusually high and stable returns? Yeah. So, I mean, first, I think it's important to make a distinction between different types of real estate owners. So there's residential rental landlords and commercial landlords and even homeowners. I'm going to talk today mostly about residential landlords and homeowners. And you are a residential landlord. I am a residential landlord in addition to being a commercial landlord. And I'm also a broker that deals with a lot of other residential landlords and investors on a daily basis.
6:17So what is this goal? Establish for us that there, in fact, has been a golden age. So I think in order to understand there's a golden age, you have to understand the history that preceded it. So, you know, there's this great paper by this professor, Katerina Knoll from the University of Bonn, that looks at the housing prices over time from 1870 to present. And she studies 14 countries, including the United States. And what she found is that up until around 1950, depends on the country, in the United States, it was probably the late 60s, housing prices were relatively flat. And then after that, they've exploded.
6:58And housing data, rent and otherwise, is notoriously difficult to capture because it's such a disparate distributed market. But that backs up with qualitative observations as well. So there's this great book that I recommend everyone read about the history of these New York City real estate families called Skyscaper Dreams. And there's a recurring theme in this book of sort of the residential, the families that specialize in apartment buildings, complaining about not being at getting as rich as quickly as the office developers or the office landlords because, you know, partly because of rent control, but it was just a sleepier business.
7:37So what changed in the mid 20th century? A couple of different things. We're all familiar, I imagine, with the story of like the subsidization of homeowners and single family homes in the suburbs. And, simultaneously, as that was occurring, in terms of the public's investment in the apartment business and rental housing, it shifted from public housing to private sector solutions, whether it's, you know, Freddie Mac subsidizing multifamily developers or even, you know, nonprofit developers. simultaneously with that land use controls were implemented to protect the investments of homeowners that that's sort of the the best the most generous way to describe it it also did things like enforce de facto segregation and and school segregation and all sorts of other less less noble things so in the late 70s after all this had happened for a decade or two What you had is this coalition form of homeowners and conservative interests, both business and otherwise, teaming up to pare back rent regulations where they existed, ban them where they didn't exist, and generally implement a set of policies that discriminated against renters either directly via things like a property tax policy or indirectly because most renters at that time were of some sort of market.
9:05marginalized status socioeconomically. So they also pared back the state's ability to regulate landlords, both in practice, but I'd say more crucially in terms of state capacity to actually effectively punish landlords for misbehavior. So for instance, in the original rent stabilization program in New York City, there was a way for the buildings, if they were violating certain standards, to be, their rents to be, you know, pared back and the state could take control of these buildings in a more assertive way that was then removed. So let's, you know, before I get to like the more specific consequences, let's talk about like what that actually created from a market structure perspective.
9:52Homeowners become this very powerful political bloc, their relative permanence increases their propensity to vote, and they team up with conservative interests to weaken the state. The idea that everyone becomes a homeowner becomes gospel and homes become used as investments. But this was always sort of a Ponzi scheme because you're protecting the investments by putting up barriers to entry. So one generation buys in, gets rich off of it, and then housing prices get too expensive so that the next generation can't buy in. Or if they do, they're buying in a much more vulnerable terms. Burdensome.
10:27You know, they're higher loan to values. The values themselves are arguably inflated. So all this leaves the rental market as a market with essentially unlimited demand, a growing pool of participants on the demand side. And, you know, unlike other utility markets, which is basically what housing is, it's vastly and wildly unregulated. So it would be like Enron in the early 2000s and late 90s that was just going wild on deregulated energy markets, except we've been doing it all over the country for decades.
11:21Silicon Valley is selling you a future where you're obsolete, or worse, identical. At Palantir, they're witnessing something different and revolutionary, From re-industrializing the nation's defense base to shipyard workers building faster and frontline workers boosting productivity, AI is transforming work across the nation. AI is not replacing American workers or flattening them into conformity. It's unleashing what makes each one irreplaceable. Their judgment, their craft, their creativity. When American workers become more powerfully themselves, they own the future. Palantir, making Americans irreplaceable.
12:29to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one-of-a-kind index, and lets you backtest it against the S &P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market.
13:12Can I just ask a really basic question, but like if you're a landlord, how are you making most of your money? Is it by getting the monthly rent or is it by building up a real estate portfolio and then selling it or flipping it at some point in time? Like what is the mix? And I know you made the point about the difference between mom and pop landlords versus the big corporations. Can you just talk a little bit more about the different business models? Sure. So partly that depends on the business model of the landlord, but also depends on the market. So New York City is much more of an appreciation-based market than a yield market.
13:49Whereas someplace in the Sun Belt might be more yield-focused than appreciation-focused. So in New York City, you typically make your money selling or refinancing or by generating scale. Scale obviously helps in every market, whereas in other less core markets, more of the return is in the yield. And this is a good segue into sort of the other dynamic that produced this situation is that we have this vast unregulated rental market. And simultaneously, we have an institutionalization of the business of multifamily. And this is kind of a broader economic trend that happened with corporations in the latter half of the 20th century and even with other sectors of real estate.
14:36So like 20 years ago or 30 years ago, the self-storage business was a very mom and pop business. But now it's this hugely institutionalized business. So this has happened in a particular acute way in multifamily because of just how big of a market it is, how longstanding of a business it is, and how relatively homogeneous the product is. Well, I was going to say, too, I mean, I know like if there is this inherent challenge of creating new units and we talk about like the, you know, the sort of barriers to entry, I have to imagine that scale becomes a very big advantage in knowing how to navigate these permitting certain like how do you do construction in New York City?
15:19the entities that have done it over and over and over again have to have a pretty significant advantage over a smaller, less institutionalized. I mean, I get there's a difference between developer and landlord, but it just feels like with all of these things, there must be quite a few advantages to scale on this type of stuff. Yeah. I mean, there's definitely a difference between landlords and developers, but I think your broader point is correct, which is, and this has been particularly enabled by technology, this used to be a very inefficient business. And the institutionalization has sucked all of the inefficiency out of this business through technology that has been implemented to price rents more efficiently, the disaggregation of functions.
16:07So historically, the apartment owners where everyone was sort of in the same company, and now all these different roles have been distributed into other companies. They're specialists that provide third-party services. It's become a business where everyone is getting their cut, and scale puts you in the best position to reap the benefits of economies of scale. So your argument is that a process beginning, I guess, in the 1950s of deregulation combined with institutionalization of the rental market starts to change the profit dynamics for landlords. Can you talk a little bit more about exactly how that happens and how it sort of develops up until, I guess, today?
16:54It's really demographic driven. It was designed to serve this growing class of homeowners, a growing class of college graduates enters the real estate business. Historically, it was a business that a lot of people without that much education could get into. and they start applying modern business processes to pricing units more efficiently, to operating the buildings more efficiently, just picking at every possible part of the business to extract profit out of it. That has served the industry very well, but it has not served, arguably, the greater public very well. And I think that's sort of where these dynamics that these twin dynamics of demographic change prompting policy and technology prompting institutionalization are now going to flip back the other way.
17:48And we're starting to see the beginnings of that. So I want to obviously like talk about this flip and some of the demographics and all that. But before you do, can you just expand? You made one point about disparate property tax treatment that you said, like put renters at a disadvantage. Can you clarify, like, what is in the code that is so advantageous to landlords? Sure. So as a general matter, around the United States, homeowners are viewed as the most important political block in any jurisdiction. And their property taxes are kept low, and particularly the increases in their property taxes.
18:28So municipalities really have very few levers for generating revenue in this country. So they need some place to make up the revenue. So as a result, apartment buildings start taking on a larger and larger share of the burden. This works different ways in different jurisdictions. But in New York City, for instance, buildings over 11 units make up an increasing share of the revenue for taxes. This also applies to commercial properties, whereas buildings of one to three units have artificial caps on the amount that their assessment can grow every year. And even buildings of four to 11 units, excuse me, four to 10 units also have caps, although albeit it's not as good as the one, the three families, which is sort of a reflection of the same political dynamic in that the people that, at least policymakers believed, own these small apartment buildings are closer to a voter.
19:27It's sort of your yeoman, your landlord, not the big bad landlord. So these groups have been given preferential property tax treatment and the apartment buildings and in turn their residents have been getting increasingly unfavorable property tax treatment. So the landlord business, what exactly are the risks that landlords are taking on and how should they be compensated for that? Because when I think of a landlord, it's like, okay, maybe you have a bad tenant who doesn't pay their rent on time. That's a little bit of a risk. But in general, it feels like there are a lot of protections around the business.
20:06And it also feels like there's a tendency for real estate prices to mostly go up, especially in New York. Right. So dealing with problematic tenants and also operational increases. So let's talk about the tenant side. The tenant side, that varies widely from landlord to landlord. So So our tenants, generally speaking, are pretty wealthy. I have never had to evict someone. And we rarely have issues. Whereas there's lots of landlords that have tenants that have a more marginalized socioeconomic status. And that's trickier. However, the demand for that is very high. And the yields that those properties trade for are generally higher.
21:00So landlords are compensated for that risk. And furthermore, with the institution and the growth of Section 8 rental subsidies, a lot of the rents being paid by marginalized tenants are effectively underwritten by the government. So how much risk is a landlord really taking on a Section 8 building from a tenancy perspective? From the perspective of operating expenses, as we talked about, property taxes are being constrained in some cases, but in other cases they are not. And that's where operational efficiency comes in. So operational costs are the most important costs for landlords to control.
21:44And in some ways they're in their least amount of control. So at least with financing costs, you have some decision over when you make that, when you incur that cost. But for, you know, fuel, maintenance, like you really don't, I mean, maintenance to a lesser degree, but fuel and other more recurring costs, you don't have as much control. So I want to ask about financing because, of course, you know, we sort of talked about in the intro, lots of things are shifting. And one thing that seems to be shifting is like maybe this 40-year steady decline in interest rates. Can you talk a little bit about from your experience, like your mix of like equity, borrowing, etc.?
22:23And if there is, you know, this like sustained reversal, what does that do to your economics? Well, it doesn't do that much or won't do that much to my economics because I'm going to get out of this business. But you're going to stop being a landlord altogether. I'm going to stop being that bad. I'm going to stop being it's not so much. It's bad. We can get into the reasons why further. But like, I think going forward, certain types of players in this business are going to make money, are going to make sort of above average returns. And the rest will make, you know, utility or bond like returns.
22:57And if I'm going to buy a bond, I'd rather buy tips. And if I'm going to invest, you know, I'd rather invest in real estate that is less management intensive than residential. Well, OK, just before we get because this is the heart of the question, why you want to get out. But before we get to that, were you staying in? Can you talk a little bit about the effect? So on financing, I think, as you pointed out, we've been coming out of this 40-year period where interest rates have been very low. And a lot of business models have been built on very cheap capital. And as a result, yields have become very low in certain markets, really most markets.
23:38And I think that's a particular challenge in markets that were depending on one of two things, regulatory arbitrage and appreciation. So we talked about the difference between markets in which the main component of the return is yield versus appreciation. The yield markets, they're going to not be as challenged from a sort of being able to sell for the right price perspective. Certainly some people will. But a market like New York City, that's a little more challenging because if you buy at a 5 % return and you finance that at a 3.5 % return, and you're assuming that you're going to be able to sell that at a four and a half, or you were when you bought it four years ago, that's not a realistic assumption anymore.
24:29So depending on your leverage level, you have a different set of options to either continue on or extricate yourself from that situation.
24:55Support for the show comes from Public. On Public, you can build a multi-asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto, and now generated assets, which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20 % year over year, You can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one-of-a-kind index, and lets you backtest it against the S &P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's.
25:36Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market. Paid for by public investing. Brokerage services by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA and SIPC. Advisory services by Public Advisors, LLC. SEC Registered Advisor. Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures available at public.com slash disclosures. The Chase, Inc. Business Premier card is made for business owners who make things happen.
26:09Designed for high spend and limitless cash back, Inc. Business Premier is a painful card with built-in flexibility. Get the buying power you need to make large purchases, cover unexpected expenses, and help your business grow. Earn a total of 2.5 % cash back on every purchase of$5 ,000 or more. Plus, earn unlimited 2 % cash back on every other purchase, giving you unlimited earned potential to invest cash back into your business. From innovation and technology to everyday expenses. Inc. Business Premier is the only business credit card with 2.5 % cash back on every purchase of$5 ,000 or more. and is part of a suite of credit cards from Chase for Business, designed to meet your needs every step along the way.
26:50Learn more at chase.com forward slash business card. Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. Accounts subject to credit approval. Restrictions and limitations apply. Cards are issued by JPMorgan Chase Bank and a member FDIC. Can you talk a little bit more about what you see changing now other than the higher interest rates? It's like, what is the mix that is going to pressure the rental business? Sure. So, you know, we have this, the demographic decisions, the demographic driven policy decisions that were made in the mid to late 20th century are now coming home to roost. You have this growing class of renters.
27:27You know, you have increasing rent burdens, evictions are destroying lives, just like foreclosures are. And I think most crucially, this crisis is now including people from that very powerful political block insofar as people of my generation and our generation, really, who would have been homeowners 30 years ago are now not going to be homeowners. Or if they are, they're going to pay much more for it and become homeowners much later in life and view it more as a housing cost stability vehicle. You know, there's this joke about the 30-year mortgage being a homeowner rent control. And I think that sort of logic is now seeping into the homeownership market and it's becoming less of a, slowly, becoming less of a gambling market.
28:12So you now have this big demographic of people that are concerned with rental costs. So this seems really key, which is that politicians have this idea of like what a good voter is, what a good citizen is like. And for years, that person was a homeowner. Right. And now the basic idea is that there is becoming a meaningful voting, politically influential bloc that is much more likely today to be a tenant than a homeowner than they were 30 years ago. And so the political winds are over time just like, oh, the voters, these like this ideal voter is not necessarily a homeowner. Right. And it's also, you know, that sort of new renter block is teaming up with the old renter block because it's not like we didn't have renters and they weren't organized before.
29:05It's just that, you know, politicians could sort of ignore them because they're of a marginalized background or because they are perceived to not vote as much or whatever reasons they came up with. So this is manifesting itself in two and a half different ways. One is the YIMBY movement, which for those who are not familiar is the Yes on My Back Yard movement, which advocates for building more housing, particularly in high demand areas. Arguably, it's a successor movement to the fair housing movement from the late 20th century. I was one of the founders of the biggest group that does this in New York City called Open New York.
Read the full transcript
29:43And in parallel, we have a resurgence of the rent regulation movement and sort of tenant protection movement broadly. broadly. And I think it's important to keep in mind that America is pretty unique in being a developed country and having vastly unregulated rental market. We have an unusually low home ownership rate, contrary to what people think. But unlike countries with similarly low home ownership rates, we typically don't have rent controls. So Germany has comparably low home ownership rates. They have rent controls. France has comparably low home ownership rates. Paris just reinstituted them.
30:24So, you know, we've seen this resurgence of, you know, rent regulation, and even in not just in places like New York and California, but in Minnesota, in even in Orlando, they had something on the ballot this last year. And I think this is a good segue in for both of these into how the consequences of institutionalization, because institutionalization has created real estate entities that are much better targets of organizing from a political perspective. They might not be, Blackstone might not be as vulnerable as your mom and pop landlord for organizing an individual building. But in terms of getting policy passed and creating a political coalition, it's much more compelling.
31:09This is interesting. You hear labor people talk about, actually, it's kind of good that Amazon is becoming a huge employer because if you can get unions into Amazon warehouses, that you've radically changed the American labor market. Or at least you have one identifiable entity to target, right? And so then if you have these big institutional landlords, then you have a... Right, I hadn't thought about that. You have a thing to organize against. It's also already sort of happening because you hear so much nowadays about institutional investors buying up single-family houses for rent or for flipping purposes.
31:44Right, and it's not like single-family landlords didn't exist before. But now we're talking about it because it's Wall Street. And the third, I'll get into the third one in a moment, but this is also a function of technology because the same similar technologies that made it easier for institutions to be created and organize themselves are now making it easier to organize among tenants. and you know historically if you if a bunch of people in different buildings all over the city had under different or were living under the same landlord like how are they going to find each other but now you know there's all this public data there's the you know the internet there's all different ways for people to get together and build coalitions that didn't exist before can i ask you you know you mentioned uh the imby movement we talked about some of this on a recent episode and you're a part of an organization.
32:40You know, I see all the tweets and stuff. Can you talk specifically about like how it's moving the dial, like beyond the tweets that it actually is affecting the economics of the business? Sure. I'll first talk about how it's affecting the politics. Like in California, you know, they've passed a bunch of huge laws. You know, they've banned single family zoning. They've upzoned, you know, commercial quarters all over the state. In New York state, the governor recently came out with proposals to build 800 ,000 new homes over the next decade, which is over double the amount that was built the last decade.
33:14And in terms of the economics of the business, I think what it's mainly changed so far is where developers are willing to take chances on trying to rezone. It hasn't so much changed the economics of the of your as-of-right typical day-to-day development because the imbium was very young and there hasn't been that much built yet. But now a developer might be more likely to take a chance on a rezoning in a rich neighborhood, which actually is going to be much more profitable for them than doing in a poor neighborhood, but was seen as very politically challenging because Open New York got Soho and Noho rezoned for housing, which people thought never would happen.
34:02So it's mainly changing the sort of political environment for participants in the real estate industry that are involved in development. And the actual economics of being a landlord haven't changed in a direct way. It's been more disparate, like you saw in the journal recently came up with this big story that everyone was reading about how rents have fallen over the country because so much supply is coming online. You know, the envy movement can take some credit for that. But, you know, it's also just these developers are responding to market signals that, you know, there's not enough supply. It feels to me like there's still a lot of institutional capital flowing into this business.
34:46I mean, certainly we've talked about, you know, the big players who are snapping up single family homes. And that's been a major talking point for a couple of years now. But why is it, why does the industry presumably still see the rental market as a profitable one? Like, there still seems to be a lot of interest and money flowing into the space. And presumably, it's coming in at, you know, the type of yields and values that we've seen in previous decades. I think the industry sees the industry, excuse me, the multifamily market for as a profitable opportunity for all the reasons we've been talking about.
35:23The demand is insatiable. There are controls on how much supply can be added. And it's a very capital intensive business. So it's a good way to deploy capital. I'm not suggesting that there's going to be some sort of crash. In fact, I think institutionalization will continue apace because institutions have a lower cost of capital than your mom and pops. and they have the economies of scale and ability to execute so that they can make money in this environment or in this sort of new environment that I'm positing. And they are one of groups, and I think just representative of the big group more broadly that's going to make money in this environment, which is that people that can actually add value.
36:10So institutions are adding value from scale. Operational efficiency developers are adding value from actually producing housing. What I'm, the people that I think are going to be the losers in this scenario or relative losers are landlords, you know, of which there are many that are really, have really just been riding rents and not really like adding much. Yeah, the purest rentiers in the market. Can you talk about the other prong when you say the return of sort of like tenants' rights, whether it, what is, is it rent control? Is it eviction restrictions? What does that look like in the year 2023?
36:48Can I tack on to that, which is you mentioned the tax code. And of course, there are a lot of tax benefits that are meant to incentivize home ownership. And I've often, this might be a weird question, but I've often wondered, why don't renters get some tax breaks? It's not really optional to pay your rent. No, I completely agree, Tracy. And the biggest expenditure of the federal government on housing is the homeowner's interest deduction or mortgage interest deduction. And there's various ways that that could be replicated, because I doubt it's going to be pared back, for renters. It could be universal section eight.
37:27It could be some sort of renter's tax credit. I don't know. But I think as this demographic shift portends political coalitions and change, that's certainly on the menu of things, just like Joe mentioned. What happens in where, in what order is going to vary widely based on the state. So in New York State, the big push right now is for good cause eviction, which is sort of a very light touch rent regulation. That passed in California in 2018. It passed in Oregon. They have it in D.C., a couple other places. They had a New Jersey since the 1970s. And that, so I think that sort of thing. Sorry, sorry, what is good cause eviction?
38:16Good cause eviction is basically defense in an eviction case that if a landlord, if a tenant defaults on the lease and the landlord has raised their rent by, this is defined differently in different places, an unconscionable amount. Okay. The tenant can use that as a defense for not being evicted. And this is particularly valuable theoretically in instances in which, let's say, the conditions in the building are really bad, a tenant complains, and then the landlord says, oh, I'm just not going to renew your lease. Or I'm going to give you a huge rent increase so that you don't renew your lease.
38:58That is a de facto eviction. Right. So that sort of soft rent regulation, I think, is going to become more prevalent. The Supreme Court could certainly change some of this. But in the main, there's many different ways that tenants' rights can be increased, whether it's some form of rent control to right to counsel to universal Section 8 or vouchers. And the point is that there's a growing political coalition to agitate for these measures, whatever they may be in a given political environment. So if you're no longer a landlord, well, first of all, how serious are you about that statement? And then secondly, what do you do instead?
39:44So I am still a landlord. This is not going to be a fire sale. And I will always be a landlord because we are still commercial landlords. But, you know, it's going to be an orderly liquidation. Because, you know, I don't, this is really a secular shift. It's not, this is not going to happen overnight. And plenty of people disagree with me. So they're welcome to buy my properties. I think we inadvertently like this episode is just call Ben. He has properties for sale. But I think from a brokerage perspective, I'll continue to work with players that I think either want to get out as a result of this dynamic or institutions that I think will benefit or developers.
40:25But what I'm most interested in and I'm working on a lot right now is trying to figure out ways to bet on this dynamic and short, essentially. Shorting the real estate business generally and apartments in particular is historically been very challenging because maybe you can short a REIT stock. But it's not that liquid of a market. And we're working on what we think are very creative ways to bet on this dynamic. Well, let me ask you, you said, OK, you're not really necessarily expecting a crash. But on the other hand, like, you know, and we talked about this in an episode several weeks ago with Conor Sen, this idea that like everyone just assumed it's always a winner for some of the reasons you described is just like this secular shift, people moving to the cities.
41:14It's always one. Even the great financial crisis didn't hit rent. Like if you think about like, well, what is the short case? How much of it is it that groupthink essentially within the sort of rentier class or the landlord class, just like refusing to see the writing on the wall? And is there just sort of I don't mean a bubble in the price sense, but a bubble in this sort of like thinking through that something could actually change in a way that we haven't seen in decades? I never want to underestimate the ability of flows to impact a market. You're speaking Tracy's language. That said, I think it's a question of whether it is who this is a winner for.
41:58And I don't mean tenants versus landlords. I mean within sort of the investment market. So if you're in the capital allocation business and you want to be a bond investor or a fixed income investor, I think multifamily is going to continue to be a great business. But if you want to earn these sort of bonanza returns that you've been earning for the past several decades without doing much work, then other sectors of real estate might be a better option for you or other sectors entirely. I just have one question and it sort of connects this conversation with the one we had with Chris Salviati about rents actually moving.
42:34What advice do you have for people who are trying to negotiate their rent with their landlord down, obviously, not up? Every situation is specific. So I'll do my best to generalize. But I think you have more leverage than you think, generally speaking. If only because a landlord, if you leave, a landlord probably loses a month of rent. So at the very least, you should factor that month of loss in rent and maybe even a broker into what you're negotiating for. All right, Ben, Carlos, Typen, thank you so much for coming on Odd Lots and good luck in your new endeavors. And I hope you timed the market well with this episode.
43:22Thanks for having me.
43:35Tracy, I thought that was really fascinating. And, you know, just this idea, it's like, yes, there's obviously certain like market changes, supply and demand, interest rates and all that. But also this idea of like political changes seemed really important here. Maybe not something that investors are really thinking about that much. Well, a couple of things there. So one, I think it's always like it's always a bit difficult to call a secular shift in something. But if you're going to do it, the sort of post pandemic environment when there does seem to be a lot of momentum behind, you know, the labor class versus the capitalists, that seems to be the time to do it.
44:12Well, and also it's like, you know, you and I rent in New York City and we probably know a lot of people, friends who are like professionals and have good salaries, et cetera, and who rent and who feel that like buying is very risky or unattainable or like put, you know, they can't haven't saved up for a down payment or for whatever reason. And it's like this idea that it's like, well, like this is like a very, you know, there's the traditional like sort of like more marginalized renter class, more professionalized. And so like this coming together seems like a very like potentially like powerful macro secular trend.
44:49Yeah. But the key thing, I think, is always going to be the policy and whether or not you do start to see those sort of institutional protections for renters like you do in some other countries. And I know, I think we've spoken about Germany and Austria before. We're going to have to do a Germany episode, aren't we? Oh, Austria. Austria, oh yeah. To why the Austrian rental market is so different to the US. Let's do that. And also that point about like, there is a big institutional face of landlords. I thought it was like super fascinating. So the way that like Amazon becomes a good, or Starbucks becomes a target of labor organizing, you start to have this similar dynamics with tenant organizing.
45:27Never underestimate the power of a scapegoat. Yeah, totally. All right. Shall we leave it there? Let's leave it there. This has been another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway. And I'm Joe Weisenthal. You can follow me on Twitter at The Stalwart. Follow our guest, Ben Carlos Typen. He's at SoBendito. Slide into his DMs. Make an offer on one of his buildings. But if you're listening to him making the bear case, I don't really know why you'd want to. Follow our producers, Carmen Rodriguez at CarmenArmin and DashBennett at DashBot.
46:02And check out all of our podcasts under the handle at podcasts. And for more OddLots content, go to Bloomberg.com slash OddLots, where we post transcripts, Tracy and I blog, and we have a weekly newsletter that comes out every Friday. Thanks for listening.
46:27Thank you.
46:56For merchant acquiring businesses like yours, this is a high growth opportunity waiting to be unlocked. With MasterCard's adaptive approach to B2B acceptance, you can enhance your infrastructure for high value payments and meet your customers' unique needs. MasterCard offers solutions and support for every step of the supplier lifecycle, helping you deepen merchant relationships. Start fast, grow strategically, and scale at your pace with a modular toolkit you can flexibly deploy. Discover how at MasterCard.com slash commercial acceptance.
47:54protect you, let My Policy Advocate tell you what it really says. Go to mypolicyadvocate.com.
From the publisher
For the most part, being a landlord, particularly in a major city, has been a good business to be in. Rents historically just go up — as do property prices. And there are multiple other ways to make money, as well. Plus, historically, politicians didn’t care much about the rights of renters, focusing much more on the concerns of homeowners. But the politics might be changing. And if the politics are changing, then the economics may change, too. On this episode of the podcast, we speak with Ben Carlos Thypin, a residential and commercial landlord in New York City, who tells us the golden age of being a landlord is over and why he plans to get out of residential real estate completely.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
