In short
Planet Money Episode Summary: "What's THAT got to do with economics?"
Episode Overview In this episode of Planet Money, hosts Sally Helm and Keith Romer take on an intriguing challenge: to connect seemingly unrelated and obscure topics submitted by listeners to the economy. The episode explores various topics, including polyamory, dark matter, and the symbolism in the works of Hieronymus Bosch, demonstrating how diverse aspects of life can relate to economic principles.
---
Key Themes and Discussions
- The Challenge of Connecting Topics to Economics
- The hosts introduce the episode by highlighting Planet Money's tagline: "Wanna see a trick? Give us any topic and we can tie it back to the economy."
- Sally Helm embraces the challenge and invites listeners to submit obscure topics for exploration.
- Polyamory
- Listener Submission: The first topic, polyamory, leads to a discussion about its economic implications.
- Economic Connections:
- The hosts discuss the financial arrangements and complexities within polyamorous relationships, including shared expenses and household dynamics.
- Expert Insight: Mindy Marks, an economics professor, explains how economic conditions influence relationship decisions, noting that in expensive cities, people are more likely to cohabitate.
- The rising cost of living may contribute to the growth of polyamorous relationships, as they allow for shared financial responsibilities and childcare.
- Dark Matter
- Listener Submission: The second topic, dark matter, prompts a deeper philosophical connection.
- Key Points:
- Dark matter is defined as an unseen force that influences gravitational pull, mirroring invisible economic forces that affect market behavior.
- Expert Insight: John Campbell, a Harvard economist, discusses how economists sometimes reference "dark matter" to describe unobservable forces influencing economic phenomena, cautioning against its vague use in economic models.
- Symbolism in the Works of Hieronymus Bosch
- Listener Submission: The final topic involves connecting Bosch's artwork to economic concepts.
- Artistic and Economic Analysis:
- Bosch’s famous "Garden of Earthly Delights" features symbols of greed and societal dynamics.
- Expert Insight: Alden Hackman, a hurdy-gurdy maker, explains the economic symbolism in Bosch's work, highlighting the historical context of begging licenses for the poor in medieval Europe.
- Art historian Mark Meadow discusses how Bosch's influence created a niche market for similar artistic works, illustrating the evolution of the art market from patronage to commercialism.
---
Key Takeaways
- Interconnectedness of Topics: Diverse subjects, from personal relationships to astrophysics and art, can have underlying economic connections.
- Economic Influences on Society: Economic pressures significantly shape social structures, including family dynamics and artistic expression.
- The Role of Invisible Forces: Both dark matter and economic metaphors illustrate the complexity and often unquantifiable aspects of their respective fields.
---
Conclusion This episode exemplifies Planet Money's mission to connect everyday topics with economic insights, demonstrating that economics permeates all aspects of life, no matter how obscure the topic may seem. The hosts successfully navigate the challenge, revealing the intricate ways in which economics influences personal relationships, scientific phenomena, and artistic expression.
---
Production Details
- Hosts: Sally Helm and Keith Romer
- Producer: James Sneed
- Editor: Molly Messick
- Fact Checker: Sierra Juarez
- Engineering: Kwesi Lee
- Executive Producer: Alex Goldmark
---
Listeners are encouraged to continue submitting their own obscure topics for future episodes, establishing an ongoing dialogue about the intersection of economics and everyday life.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This message comes from Bonterra. Your nonprofit's mission is big, but your team is small. With fundraising software from Bonterra's Network for Good, you can focus on changing lives. Big impact, less stress. Learn more at BonterraTech.com slash NFG. This is Planet Money from NPR. Keith Romer. Sally Helm. I recently noticed something that I have never noticed before. And it is that Planet Money has a tagline. Yes, we have had that tagline for, I'm going to say, two years now. I missed it. Well, it's like a little description of Planet Money that you can see in Spotify or Apple or whatever. It says, want to see a trick?
0:45Give us any topic and we can tie it back to the economy. Exactly. And Keith, as you and I have been discussing, that, what you just said, is a big promise. A very bold, very public promise to all of our listeners. Any topic. We said any topic we can tie to the economy. It is like a gauntlet we have thrown to ourselves. And Keith, you know I can't resist a gauntlet. It's almost a character flaw how much you love gauntlets. I just, I love them. So I decided, all right, let's do it. Let's put out a call to our listeners, get them to send us their most obscure, esoteric topics so that we can try to tie those topics back to the economy.
1:27What could go wrong? Hello and welcome to Planet Money. I'm Sally Helm. And I'm Keith Romer. Today on the show, Sally Helm tries to find the big economic lessons in some subject matters that seem very far from the economy. And you help me. No, I do not, Sally. I see my role in all of this more as kind of judge and jury. And I got to tell you, Sally, I've got the list of topics right here. There's some doozies. All right. It's going to be fun. This message comes from LinkedIn ads. One of the hardest parts about B2B marketing is reaching the right audience. That's why you need LinkedIn ads. You can target your buyers by job title, company, role, seniority, and skills.
2:09All the professionals you need to reach in one place. Get a$250 credit on your next campaign so you can try it yourself. Just go to linkedin.com slash nprpod. That's linkedin.com slash nprpod. Terms and conditions apply. Only on LinkedIn ads. This message comes from The Economist. Introducing The Economist Insider, a new video offering providing unprecedented access to The Economist journalists. Twice weekly shows will feature in-depth debates and discussions with The Economist senior editors as they share expertise and analysis to make sense of an increasingly complex and dangerous world. More at economist.com slash insider.
2:52Okay, Sally, we recently put out a call to our listeners, asked them to send us their most obscure, most challenging topics, and they sent us like a hundred ideas for things they wanted to see you tie back to the economy. A hundred is a lot. I'm not going to make you do all a hundred. Thank you, few. Because honestly, there were some kind of gimmies on the list that I did not choose. For example, number 22 on our list, water. Water. I could have found so many economic lessons about water, like states fighting over the Colorado River. There have been these massive floods in Central Europe. Have you heard of farming?
3:30Water would have been an easy one. Yes. So I also did not choose for your challenge number 29 on our list of topics, Stradivarius. We literally have already done an episode about this. Today on our show, the Stradivarius. How much of a brand is real and how much is in our heads? That story showed us that, yes, probably a lot of a brand is in our heads. Economic lesson from Stradivarius. But some of the topics were more difficult. I have chosen three of them for you to tackle today. The first one comes from listener Paula Papa Gomez. Polyamory. Polyamory. Okay. I mean, I know about it. It's a setup where, like, instead of being in a romantic relationship with one other person, someone's in a romantic relationship with two or three or four or however many people.
4:19Yeah, I feel like it is kind of in the zeitgeist right now. You read a lot about it. My financial advisor, it turns out, he is polyamorous. Oh, well, economic connection. Boom. Done. Next. No, not boom. Not done. Not next. I should not have even brought it up. Sally, this is where you go off and find a more convincing connection between polyamory and the economy than my financial advisor. All right. I'm on it. Okay, so while this time-passing music is playing, I'm going to tell you, the listener, how this is going to work. I want you to imagine Sally out there for hours and hours working the phones, the Google machine, searching for the very best economic lesson embedded in the idea of polyamory.
5:00Then, when the music stops, she will, through the magic of audio, reappear with her answer. And I will, you know, sit in judgment and tell her whether she succeeded or failed. I'm back. You seem changed. You know, I've seen things. I've experienced things. I've learned. I've grown. Well, great. What have you learned? What have you got about polyamory? All right, Keith. First, let me tell you about Jennifer C. Martin, Ty Simpson, and Daniel Martin. They live in Richmond, Virginia, and they are a polyamorous trio. A thruple. Actually, no. Oh. We prefer V as opposed to thruple. Yeah. People assume that we're a thruple all the time, but I date Ty and I date Daniel.
5:42Daniel and Ty don't date each other. It's a V as in like the letter V. Like if I'm at the bottom of the V, then the two others go out. But they don't connect like a triangle as in a thruple. Got it. V, not a thruple. Yet Jennifer and Daniel were married with two kids before Ty entered the picture. And now all five of them live together. A decision that they made, Keith, not just for emotional reasons. A lot of it was financial. I think, you know, that the economy was definitely a pretty big factor and, like, the upsides to living together that I started to think about it in a new way. Polyamory is not just about love, Keith.
6:23Okay, say more. Cost of living was a big factor in Jennifer and Ty and Daniel taking this relationship to this different level. And for them, this all goes way beyond, like, roommates splitting the rent. We are all entangled financially now in ways that are almost too complicated to discuss. Me and Ty have several credit cards together and we do the utilities together. And so I'm on the bank account with Daniel, but not Ty. Recently, they even all bought a house together and Jennifer had saved up for the down payment, but it was Ty and Daniel who ended up on the mortgage. It is so tangled up that they don't even always know exactly who is doing what anymore.
7:07Ty and I are on a car loan together as well. Oh, you are? Are you just finding that out now? No, he's wrong. We started it going that way, but then we flipped it. Okay, so I can see that, yes, their relationship is more about money and finances than I would have thought at first. But still, like, what's the broader economic lesson? Great question. I thought you might ask. So I called up Mindy Marks, an economics professor at Northeastern University who has studied, like, adjacent topics here. And she said, number one, you can just back up and think about relationships generally. There is a lot of evidence that all of our dating and marriage and relationship decisions respond to economic conditions.
7:55Like people are more likely to cohabitate and move in quicker in expensive cities than cheap cities because the benefits of economies of scale are larger. Or because they're so in love. Or because there's a lot more love in New York City. Also possible. And Mindy said, look, there's not great data yet, but Polly Amory does seem to be modestly on the rise in the United States. And she said she can see some ways that the economy could be driving that. It feels like you're getting warmer. So rising cost of living, rising housing costs, obviously. But Mindy says there could be another more subtle economic advantage to polyamory.
8:34She told me, think about this particular class of jobs. Jobs where employers really want their employees to work long hours. Claudia Golden's done a bunch of work on this. It's not true for every occupation, but it basically has to do with labor market specialization. Right. Newly minted Nobel winner Claudia Golden. Her big idea here was basically that there are different kinds of jobs. We've talked about this on the show before. In some jobs, you can work your eight-hour shift, then someone picks up where you left off, no problem. But that if you are, on the other hand, maybe a corporate lawyer and you're writing a super complicated legal brief, you can't just hand that over to somebody else mid-sentence and let them take over.
9:15Right. And so in those jobs, employers are willing to pay a lot for you to keep working. 70 hours, 80 hours a week. Like some jobs in this category value extra hours so much that they will pay more to have one person work 80 hours a week than they would have two people working 40 hours a week. And if you think about the implications of that for a traditional family unit, like two parents, kids, it can get tricky. The economic pressures are pushing towards having one person focus in on work and one person, you know, focus in on home. So like a couple could go into their marriage with both of them planning and wanting to work.
9:55But then one person, most often the woman, winds up dropping out. And so bringing this all back to polyamory, if you think about adding a third person to the relationship, the calculations change. You could be like, well, if we had a third person, then I could still go to work 40 hours, have time with my kids and then have this other person in the relationship who's also picking up the sort of missing household production. Jennifer and Daniel and Ty are V. They do all work. And they did confirm that having three of them makes child care a lot easier. I'm sure you've heard the joke that, you know, monogamy in this economy.
10:36Do you guys kind of feel like you're like, how do monogamous people do it? I mean, a little bit, yeah. So there you have it, Keith. Polyamory, it's not just about the romance. It is all tied up with economics. Sally Helm, not bad. I'm going to give you a passing grade on that one. Well done. Thank you so much. Are you ready for challenge number two? All right, bring it. Okay, the next term I need you to tie to the economy comes from listener Patrick Kenney, and it is dark matter. Dark matter. All right, physics. Exactly. Space. Yes, I'm going to need you to tie that to the economy. All right. I'll do my best.
11:12Cue the music that tells us the time is passing and Sally is out in the world. Okay, Sally's pounding the pavement. She's at the Science Space Observatory. Maybe she's in a rocket ship. I don't know. I'm back. Did you, in fact, go to outer space? I did. Oh, that's great. I didn't, actually. I didn't. Come on, Sally. Anyway, what did you find about dark matter? All right, Keith. Well, the first thing we have to do here is understand what dark matter is. And a definition of it recently made the rounds on the internet. It was from a surprising source, NBA player Victor Wembenyama. Wembe. Seven foot four, plays for the San Antonio Spurs.
11:50He was somewhat randomly asked about dark matter in an interview. I like these kind of questions. Those are different. Dark matter is like a mass. We can't see, but we know it's there because it's got influence on gravitational pulls and the speed of gravitational orbits. And we can't see it, we can't observe it, but we can observe its influence. So this is dark matter. Very sci-fi. I did reach out to Victor Wembenyama to see if he could tell me more about dark matter. How'd that go? Did he get back to you? His rep got back to me, and unfortunately, he declined an interview. So I went to prominent astrophysicist Sandra Faber of UC Santa Cruz.
12:38And I checked Wempy's definition with her. Oh, totally correct. Congrats to him. You don't need me. We do actually need Sandra Keith. And look, okay, a key thing about dark matter is that we do not observe it directly. But we can tell that there is something out there in galaxies exerting this gravitational pull. And here is maybe one way that I can tie this back to the economy. First, you need to know, Sandra Faber told me that without dark matter, the theory is galaxies would like fly apart. If we took the dark matter away, galaxies would be unstable. So dark matter is necessary to hold together the present order.
13:25Sandra also told me dark matter is truly everywhere. There's dark matter in my office. There's dark matter in your office right now. These particles, they go through ordinary matter like a knife through butter. They just, you know, zoom right through it without leaving any trace. So like, OK, sure, Keith, when we think of the economy, we think of the visible matter, which includes container ships, iPhones, Fed Chair Jerome Powell himself. But dark matter is also always there, flowing through those container ships and iPhones and Fed chairs. And it is keeping the known universe functioning. So, like, can we not argue that on some level, the entire economy only exists because of dark matter?
14:13I mean, yes, on some level we can. But like that's maybe too big. It's like matter is everywhere. So it's the economy. OK, fine, fine, fine, fine, fine. Here's another try. I went looking for times when economists have used the term dark matter somehow within economics. And one that kind of struck me as interesting was on page 93 of a 163 page PowerPoint presentation from 2008. Sally Helm. The presentation was by economist John Campbell. He teaches at Harvard. And he told me economists kind of have their own version of dark matter. Economists sometimes explain phenomena in financial markets or the macroeconomy by reference to mysterious fears, thoughts, beliefs that may be in people's heads.
15:04And sometimes to make their models work, economists will point to one of these invisible forces, a force that isn't terribly well defined. So John was using dark matter as a kind of cautionary metaphor. I think it's become a shorthand for a situation where an economist seeking to explain some phenomenon invokes a force that is measurable only through that one phenomenon. And we should be very wary of that. Like in this case, in this lecture, John was talking about models that tie stock prices to our fears about rare disasters. And he's saying if you're going to invoke an invisible force like that, fear, you got to try to button it up as much as you can.
15:50Like at the very least, go looking for its effects in multiple places. Like how does our fear of disasters affect not just stock prices, but also maybe how much people are saving for retirement or something. Basically, John is saying, fellow economists, be more scientific. I mean, it sounds like this is getting into this kind of ever-present anxiety for economists, like how much economics is in fact a science. They can get kind of tortured about it. It's true because they want to be super empirical, but they are also always dealing with like fuzzy human beings and their feelings. Which are hard to count.
16:26Exactly. And John was very quick to say, look, economics is not a hard science in the way that physics is. The difficulty for economists is that our theories are simply not as good as the theories in physics. They're not as predictive. They're not as precise. They're not as universal. We must be appropriately humble about what we can say as economists. OK, so in astrophysics, dark matter represents this stuff that scientists can actually quantify. But John is using dark matter to talk about the parts of the economy that economists can't quantify. So it's like an inverse metaphor or something. I admit I'm not making a perfect parallel here in what I've brought you.
17:08But all right. OK. What about this? So both economists and astrophysicists are trying to use these two simple words, dark matter, to draw a line around a big invisible category of things that are hard to pin down. which I think is kind of beautiful. It's getting very 3 a.m. dorm room in here, Sally. Stick with me. So one of the valuable things that scientists can do is describe what we do know about the world but dark matter in astrophysics is an example of how it can also be important for us to account for things that we don't fully understand and can't see directly. And economists need to try to do that too.
17:51So how'd I do? I mean, did you tie dark matter to the economy? Galaxies would fly apart, Keith. Sally, I am going to give you a grade of complete. You'll not have to repeat the course. You. But do not put this on your grad school applications. All right. I'll take it. But you're not done. I have one last topic. It is my favorite. Oh. For this one, I actually called up the listener who sent in the suggestion. His name is Carl Ford. He lives in Washington, D.C. My challenge was to connect economics to the symbolism of the works of Hieronymus Bosch. And why did you choose that? Because Hieronymus Bosch is really trippy.
18:34Oh, no. Yeah, Hieronymus Bosch, famous painter from the late 1400s and early 1500s. I asked Carl to describe Bosch's works for you. You know how in a dream, you know, like when you're dreaming overnight, you might dream about a squirrel, you know, that talks. And then, you know, Abraham Lincoln shows up and gives you relationship advice, you know. His paintings are like a Renaissance version of that. Yeah. Well, thank you, Carl, for this very difficult challenge. Oh, you're welcome. Thanks, Carl. After the break, I guess symbolism in the paintings of Hieronymus Bosch and how that connects to the economy.
19:15I believe in you, Sally.
19:20This message comes from Schwab. Everyone has moments when they could have done better. Same goes for where you invest. Level up and invest smarter with Schwab. Get market insights, education, and human help when you need it. This message comes from NPR sponsor Charles Schwab. When is the right time to sell a stock? How do you protect against inflation? Financial decisions can be tricky, and often your own cognitive and emotional biases can lead you astray. Financial Decoder, an original podcast from Charles Schwab, can help. Join host Mark Reepy as he offers practical solutions to help overcome the cognitive and emotional biases that may affect your investing decisions.
20:03Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com slash financial decoder. Support for NPR and the following message come from Edward Jones. What does it mean to live a rich life? It means brave first leaps, tearful goodbyes, and everything in between. With over 100 years of experience navigating the ups and downs of the market and of life, your Edward Jones Financial Advisor will be there to help you move ahead with confidence. Because with all you've done to find your rich, they'll do all they can to help you keep enjoying it. Edward Jones, member SIPC. This message comes from Whole Foods Market.
20:42it. Save on delicious sweater weather favorites with 365 brand and see hundreds of yellow sale and low price signs storewide. All right, Sally Helm, your last assignment for this episode was to take the topic symbolism in the paintings of Hieronymus Bosch and tie that to the economy. Correct. So as you mentioned, Hieronymus Bosch is this enigmatic painter from the late 1400s and early 1500s. He lived and worked in Europe in what is now the Netherlands. His most famous painting is called The Garden of Earthly Delights. Yeah, I'm pulling it up right now. Okay, so this is a triptych. Triptych? Triptych.
21:21Yep, triptych. Three panels. Three panels. On the left side is what I guess is the Garden of Eden. There's a white giraffe. There's a naked Adam and Eve. Looks great. In the middle, there's a lot of, there's like a kabillion naked people. There's horses. There's a sort of thing with spikes sticking out of it. And on the right side is hell. And there are naked people, but they're having a tough time. There's an ear with a knife sticking out of it. Good luck. Thank you so much. So at first glance, I would say the symbolism in this painting looks to be all about like sex and nature and religion. There's fruit, there's cavorting, but there is some money in the painting.
22:01All in the third panel, hell. Oh, yeah. I see. So there's a man pooping coins into a hole. Is that what you mean? Uh-huh. But that's it, as far as I can see. Okay. Well, actually, no. Do you see the big tan-colored instrument kind of like in the middle of the hell panel? Uh-huh. And there's like a nun inside of it playing a triangle? Yeah. And do you see, if you zoom in, do you see how on top of that instrument, there is a man holding a bowl with what kind of, it's like a golden bowl with what looks kind of like one coin on a string? Oh, yeah. Yeah, and his eyes are blacked out, so I guess he's blind.
22:36What's going on there? So that instrument is called a hurdy-gurdy. It is sort of like a mechanical violin that you play by turning this crank. And I was curious about that man holding the golden bowl and the golden coin. Because, like, it seemed like there was some money symbolism there that maybe I wasn't getting. And luckily, I found a person who could tell me all about it. His name is Alden Hackman. and for many years, he ran a business with his wife, Callie, making and restoring hurdy-gurdies. We're really not doing it very much now. We've moved on to something slightly less profitable or more profitable.
23:10I meant to say more profitable. It's hard to find something that's less profitable than building hurdy-gurdies, sadly, but there it is. I mean, Sally, that sounds kind of like the opposite of an economic connection. What are you talking about, Keith? This is our first economic connection to Bosch, supply and demand in the market for medieval instruments. Demand is weak. Anyway, I was here to talk about symbolism in the paintings of Veronymous Bosch. And because Alden is an expert in hurdy-gurdy's, he totally knows his painting, and he knows about that guy on top of the hurdy-gurdy with the golden bull.
23:41So Bosch placed all the musical instruments in hell, and along with them, he placed the guy who is turning the crank on the instrument, who's a beggar, and he's very thin, and he has a begging bowl. Okay, so that's the golden bowl. What's the deal with a golden coin hanging on the string? Yes. So Alden said that is basically a license to beg. These licenses were a thing in the Middle Ages across Europe. Beggars were starting to exist more and more because of various forms of social upheaval. And they'd get this official license to beg for money in like a particular city or state. So for example, communities might give them to veterans who had been injured in war.
24:25It was essentially the medieval version of the Veterans Administration where they said, all right, we took your leg, so now we're going to give you a living whereby you've been granted the right to beg by your lord or by the king. And these beggars would play the hurdy-gurdy as like a noisemaker to attract attention. So we have here a story about medieval economics, where to solve this problem of war veterans and poverty, states created this regulated form of welfare, that license to beg. All right, this is promising. I loved that fact. But I did wonder if we could make like a bigger point here.
25:04I mean, this is one beggar lying atop one hurdy-gurdy in one Bosch painting. So I called up an art historian, Mark Meadow at UC Santa Barbara. And he was like, oh yeah, there's money in some of Bosch's paintings, of course. It maybe symbolizes greed. We could talk about that. But... And I was sort of racking my brain for how one gets to the economy with Bosch. I sort of went in a different direction with this. Mark said, OK, at the time Bosch was painting, the art market was mostly based on patronage. Someone would commission a painting and an artist would paint it. But then, after Bosch's death, that begins to change into something maybe more recognizable to us.
25:46Like a market where artists are basically making paintings on spec and then hoping someone will buy them. And one thing that they start doing in that world is making art in the style of Bosch. That kind of immersive experience, it's almost like a kind of Where's Waldo way of looking through images, is something that other artists realized was endlessly appealing to viewers. There was a market for it, and so they began producing images like that. And that's the chain reaction that has continued on. Bosch was so influential that he inspired all these other artists to make Bosch-like work, starting way back, like mid-1500s-ish, and continuing to now.
26:34A Hieronymiconomy? Keith, exactly right. The cat up here, it's from Garden of Earthly Delights. Keith, that is the voice of Roberto Benavidez. He is a sculptor in Los Angeles who makes these amazing and beautiful piñatas, including many which are creatures based on the paintings of Hieronymus Bosch. He showed me some of them on a video call. So this is a figure from the painting as well. He was holding up a berry to the bird. So I just switched the berry to a star pinata. And it's actually piercing his hands. So I gave it a little bit of a stigmata. So it's called stigmata pinata. Roberto sells these pinatas for thousands of dollars.
Read the full transcript
27:14He works full time as an artist. You know, I'm still using imagery from that time period and from those paintings to create an economy for myself. So, to summarize, symbolism in the paintings of Hieronymus Bosch had an economic impact by creating a niche in the burgeoning art market of the 1500s and 1600s. And it is, in fact, so powerful that it is still employing working artists in our economy today. Sally, that was like nine connections between Hieronymus Bosch and the economy. Thank you. Yeah, well done. Full marks. You win. You pass. Thank you, Keith. And to celebrate, Great. I give you Alden Hackman playing his hurdy-gurdy.
27:54And with that, now we are done.
28:13Listeners, thank you for sending us these obscure topics. Keep sending them in. We might do this again some other time. This episode was produced by James Sneed. It was edited by Molly Messick and fact-checked by Sierra Juarez. Engineering by Kwasi Lee. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer. Special thanks to Peter Arnotti. I'm Sally Helm. And I'm Keith Romer. This is NPR. Thanks for listening.
28:43Support for NPR and the following message come from Edward Jones. A rich life isn't always a straight line. Unexpected turns can bring new possibilities. With a hundred years of experience navigating ups and downs, Edward Jones can help guide you. Let's find your rich together. Edward Jones, member SIPC. This message comes from Michelin. More than a tire company, Michelin is an innovation company. Now taking on space, developing an airless wheel for space exploration. Motion for Life. More at michelinman.com slash y hyphen michelin slash innovation. This comes from NPR sponsor Sierra. How businesses connect with customers defines their brand.
29:30Sierra is the platform for building better, more human customer experiences with AI. No stock answers, no Holt music, just real solutions fast. Visit sierra.ai to learn more.
From the publisher
That is the bold promise in Planet Money's tagline. And we believe the show does live up to it. Over the last year, we've told stories about breakdancing, rum, pagers, buffets, colors, and heartbreak.
But then one host wondered: what if we really held ourselves to that promise? What if we challenged ourselves to find economic meaning in the most esoteric and far-flung topics imaginable?
That's when we turned to you, our listeners. And boy did you deliver. You sent in ideas so obscure, so banananas, so guaranteed to stump and bamboozle that our host maybe started to regret her life choices...but she was resolved to give it a try.
This episode was hosted by Sally Helm and Keith Romer. It was produced by James Sneed. It was edited by Molly Messick and fact-checked by Sierra Juarez. Engineering by Kwesi Lee. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.
Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy




