#959 - Green Shoots or Rising Risk? with Darius Dale

25 Jan 2024 路 42 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT 路 Add to Claude

In short

Real Vision Podcast Episode Summary

Episode Details

  • Title: #959 - Green Shoots or Rising Risk? with Darius Dale
  • Date: January 24, 2024
  • Host: Ash Bennington
  • Guest: Darius Dale, founder of 42 Macro
  • Sponsor: NGRAVE - a secure crypto wallet provider

Overview In this episode, host Ash Bennington interviews Darius Dale, who provides deep insights into the current state of the U.S. economy and financial markets. The discussion focuses on recent market rallies, macroeconomic indicators, and their implications for inflation and investment strategies.

Key Points

Current Economic Landscape

  • Macroeconomic Model:
  • Utilizes a macro weather model to assess asset market trends.
  • Key indicators suggest:
  • Growth: Trending higher but expected to decline over the next year.
  • CPI: Expected to continue decreasing.
  • Unemployment: Anticipated to rise.
  • Sales and Earnings Growth: Sales growth trending lower while earnings growth is expected to be higher.

Market Outlook

  • Asset Class Projections:
  • Stock Market: Neutral outlook
  • Bond Market: Bullish outlook
  • U.S. Dollar: Neutral outlook
  • Commodities: Neutral outlook
  • Bitcoin: Neutral outlook
  • Investment Implications:
  • Current conditions suggest baseline returns and volatility.
  • While risks are elevated, it remains a decent time for risk-taking.

Inflation Dynamics

  • Key Concepts:
  • Immaculate Disinflation: Rapid disinflation observed despite expectations otherwise.
  • Sticky Inflation: Emerging signs of persistent inflation that may not conform to past trends.
  • Last Mile: The final transition to meet inflation targets may prove challenging.

Market Risks

  • Potential Challenges:
  • Lower-than-expected rate cuts by the Federal Reserve could negatively impact markets.
  • Signs of persistent inflation could lead to a reassessment of rate cut expectations, potentially ending the "Goldilocks" market condition.

Global Economic Indicators

  • Emergent Green Shoots:
  • Positive signs in major global economies, including the Eurozone and Japan, may contribute to global growth.
  • The discussion on global liquidity and its implications for U.S. growth.

Addressing Viewer Questions

  • Darius addresses various audience inquiries regarding:
  • The impact of PBOC policies on global liquidity.
  • Small caps and market concentration trends.
  • The probability of soft landing scenarios in the U.S. economy.

Conclusion

  • Darius emphasizes the importance of adaptive strategies in navigating current market dynamics while advocating for a focus on data-driven investment approaches over rigid predictive models.

Key Takeaways

  • The resilience of the U.S. economy is a central theme, with mixed signals from various macroeconomic indicators.
  • Investors should remain cautious but also prepared to capitalize on emerging opportunities as global conditions evolve.
  • Continuous monitoring of productivity and inflation metrics is essential to navigate the landscape effectively.

Future Outlook

  • The episode concludes with a call for vigilance as the market enters a potentially pivotal period influenced by upcoming economic data releases and geopolitical developments.

For more detailed insights and to follow Darius' research, listeners are encouraged to visit 42 Macro's website.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Hey, everyone. Today's Real Vision Daily Briefing is sponsored by Engrave, maker of the coldest hardware wallet, Zero, and stainless steel, backup, graphene. Engrave brings you the highest security in a touchscreen experience to safely manage all your crypto offline. Enjoy a 10 % Real Vision discount in engrave.io shop with the code Real Vision. Now to the top analysis of today's markets.

0:35Green shoots or rising risk? Welcome to Real Vision Daily Briefing. It's Wednesday, January 24th, 2024. I'm Ash Bennington, joined today by Darius Dale, founder of 42 Macro. Darius, welcome back. Ash, it's a pleasure to be back, man. Thanks for having me. It's always a pleasure to be with the Real Vision gang. It's always great to have you on the show. Darius, it's been a minute since you and I have done one of these together. Bring me up to speed. Big picture, where are we right now? All the key variables that you track over at 42 Macro. Big picture, what's happening right now? Well, let's just hop right into the charts, my friend.

1:09So Brian, can you throw up a slide number one, our macro weather model? This is the tool, one of the primary tools we use to determine how long what asset markets are, what asset markets are going to price in, in terms of how long that's going to last, and what it's likely to transition to based on the, you know, sort of the critical variables in the economy that we're all trying to observe and predict. So we'll start with the left side of the table in the real economy cycles. Growth trending higher. It's expected to inflect and trend lower over the next 12 months. Headline CPI is trending lower.

1:36It's expected to trend lower over the next 12 months, according to consensus estimates. The unemployment rate is trending higher. That's expected to trend higher over the next 12 months, although it may not. The implied sales growth rate is trending lower. The implied earnings growth rate is trending higher. The sovereign fiscal balance, the nominal GDP ratio is trending higher. And the dollar real effective exchange rate is trending higher. Transitioning to the right side of the chart, where we show the financial economy cycles within our principal components of macro, we have our 42 macro net liquidity model as well as our global liquidity proxy trending higher.

2:06So those are obviously positive. Despite that, credit growth, both domestically and globally, is trending lower. Interest rates are trending sideways. The two-year nominal yield spread continues to price in. Rate cuts, and that's trending lower. Aggregated dollar positioning is neutral. Aggregated treasuries positioning is extreme bearish. aggregated commodities positioning is at extreme bearish levels, and aggregated equities positioning continues to be neutral. So when we backtest each of these factors on an independent basis and relay those back tests back into each of those asset classes in the middle of the page on an independent basis, we're coming up with a neutral three-month outlook for the stock market, a bullish three-month outlook for the bond market, a neutral three-month outlook for the U.S.

2:46dollar, a neutral three-month outlook for commodities, and a neutral three-month outlook for Bitcoin. And so what does that mean? Neutral just means you should expect baseline type returns and baseline type volatility in that particular asset class over the next three months. Whereas the bullish signals suggest you should expect higher above median returns in that asset class below median volatility. So it's still a decent time to be taking risks, albeit less bullish than it was a month ago when I was last on the program. Well, there you have it. Risk asset markets neither outperforming nor underperforming, performing roughly at trend based on your analysis.

3:16Darius, one of the cool things about what you guys do at 42 is that you break down all of these variables. So you can give it, I guess you call it a weather forecast, right? The weather report. You can look at all of these different variables. You can look at them over time. You evaluate them the same way week to week, month to month. So you can get consistency across them. Obviously, a lot of data that you gave us at the top of the show. That's the big picture. Let me ask you this. What of all of those variables or a couple of them do you see being the most salient, important, grabbed your attention either for good or ill based on that report you just gave us.

3:49Where's your focus on those? Absolutely. So my focus is always on what's changing at the margins. And if you look at the current signals, the thing that's changed the most at the margin or most recently is the sovereign fiscal balance to nominal GDP ratio. We went from a negative trend in that particular statistic to a positive trend in that particular statistic. And so what that ultimately means is the fiscal impulse went from being positive to now it's starting to be slightly negative at the margins. It doesn't mean the budget deficit is going to, you know, budget surplus, but obviously we're getting less budget deficits on a trading basis.

4:19And ultimately, that is taking some of the resiliency out of the economy vis-a-vis the income support we've seen in the household sector. And it's taking some of the resiliency out of the economy at the margins vis-a-vis some of the capital investment support we've seen in terms of the private sector. So in terms of the corporate sector. So things are, like I said, getting less bullish at the margins, but again, still not in terms of still not seeing anything out there that should be a big cause for concern. Tarius, for folks who don't have your macro background, break that down, explain it, talk a little bit about what the transmission mechanism you see there is and what's happening underlying.

4:52In other words, how is that becoming less bullish at the margins? Yeah, absolutely. So one of the things, so you obviously can't see these charts, but how the system works is it backtests excess returns and relates that express return back onto those three-month composite outlooks. And so ultimately what happened in the most recent weeks when that signal inflected to positive is that we went from a positive excess return signal for things like the stock market and things, for the stock market, for instance, to a negative excess return signal from that particular variable. This is a dynamic stochastic system that allows us to sort of move forward in time without having to make independent projections for all these different principal components of macro.

5:31It just allows us to actually just accept it as is and now cast what that ultimately means for asset markets. And it's done a great job of helping our clients stay on the right side of market risk. So what's happening in that variable with regard to deficits specifically? Yeah, so the budget deficit on a trending basis is now trending higher. So we used the sovereign fiscal balance as a percent of nominal GDP had been trending lower throughout 2023. I'll just throw a couple statistics at you. You know, in June of last year, the budget deficit was$835 billion higher than it was in June of 2022.

6:04Now, that incremental delta has downshifted in recent quarters. In December, it was around$320 billion higher on a nominal basis. So, again, the fiscal impulse is shrinking now. It's still positive, but it's shrinking, and it ultimately means the economy is getting slightly less resilient from the perspective of income support for households and from the perspective of support for capital investment for the corporate sector. So this is a comparison of two flow variables, Darius. You're looking at the rate at which the U.S. federal government is overspending, hence deficit, relative to the amount of growth in GDP that the U.S.

6:39economy is producing. 100 percent, 100 percent. And one other flow variable, not to diverge from this topic, but I think it's a very important discussion we need to also have here, is this bounce we've seen in productivity. So if you go back to late October, early November, when we pivoted bullish, was kind of projecting and expecting this sort of soft landing trade to really take hold. Back at that time frame, we got a data point, one of the more important data points that I've seen in recent quarters, which is we finally broke back to positive growth in productivity. And the reason that's important is because historically, in order to have a soft landing in the economy, you need two of these three things to happen.

7:17You need sustained trend or above trend productivity growth. You need the Fed to cut interest rates and pivot and try to support a soft landing outcome with monetary policy. And you need trend or above trend sort of government expenditures and investment in the economy. We have a trend and above trend government expenditures and investment in the economy. We have an outlook for Fed rate cuts, which are already being priced in the markets, by the way. So we have already gotten the rate cuts, if you think about it, from a financial condition standpoint. And we finally got the third shoe to drop, which is a trend of trend growth in productivity.

7:49So the probability of a soft landing has risen dramatically in recent months. And obviously, asset markets have priced that in. But when we think about what the go-forward outlook is from the perspective of the economy, we're not really seeing too many negative things on the horizon, at least not yet, that suggests this current Goldilocks top-down market regime needs to transition to something more bearish. Let me ask you this. You talk about what's happened in terms of financial conditions with the forward pricing of the implied or expected rate cuts. So let me ask you this. You say we've already gotten those rate cuts in terms of their impact on financial conditions.

8:23What if we get fewer rate cuts than we already got? In other words, what if the market has priced this more dovishly, more aggressively than the Fed actually follows through on? Yeah, no, 100%. I think that's the biggest market risk. And ultimately, I think that's something we're going to have to deal with as investors as we progress throughout 2024. It doesn't necessarily mean you need to put the trade on now. But at some point, our market signals will tell us, hey, it's time to put gains in this Goldilocks trade that we call for and ultimately start to pivot to something that's more bearish.

8:51If you think about it from a distributional standpoint, the modal outcome of the distribution of probable economic outcomes is very clearly a soft landing, at least according to our research. We pump out 125 slides of macroeconomic content every month in our macro scouting report. But the second most probable outcome is a no-landing scenario, a scenario where growth does not slow fast enough or to a low enough level that allows inflation to drag down back towards 2 % or thereabouts. And ultimately, we do see elements or emergent signs of sticky inflation in some of the inflation data. It's not permeating throughout the inflation data in a way that will be very obvious to the average market participant yet.

9:30But if you roll the clock forward three, four, five months into the summer, particularly once we get past the kind of accelerated deceleration that many analysts, including ourselves, are expecting in shelter disinflation, once we get into Q3, perhaps even Q4, it's going to become clear in our opinion that there are elements of sticky inflation that are becoming more obvious to consensus. And that will be the catalyst for asset markets having to price out some of those rate cuts. But in our opinion, you don't have to rush to put that trade on because, again, we're not getting market signals that are confirming of that just quite yet.

10:03Hey, everyone, we're going to take a quick break right now to hear a word from our partners. We'll be right back with more of the day's top analysis on the Real Vision Daily Briefing. Have you ever wanted to trade Bitcoin but haven't dared try? With Plus500 Futures, you can trade crypto without the hassle of opening a wallet. With just a few clicks, you can register and start practicing with their free and unlimited demo. See a trading opportunity? You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks. Feel ready? You can move to real money with as little as$100 once your account is approved. And the great thing is that in addition to crypto, Plus500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments.

10:39S &P 500, NASDAQ, gas, and much more. Explore equity indices, energy, metals, Forex, and beyond. With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade anytime, anywhere. Experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for with Plus500. With over 20 years of experience, Plus500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit us.plus500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves the risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify. Plus500, it's trading with a plus.

11:15All right, I got to ask you this tangential question. as someone who's had to make macroeconomic slides for a living. When you say 120 slides per month, is the model pumping out some of those numbers for you, I hope, doing the heavy lifting? No, no, no. This is fundamental research on the economy, connecting the dots on the economy, which I think is my core competency, alongside, obviously, building a kind of metric problem. When do you sleep if you have to do 120 slides of original research every month in addition to fine-tuning the models? Look, what's that saying? If you do what you love for a living, You never work a day in your life.

11:48And I'm definitely living that, living my dream here at 42 Macro. We're doing a lot of great work for our clients, helping them maximize upside capture in bull markets and ultimately minimize downside capture in bear markets. And, you know, we invest very differently in 42 Macro. It's a lot more systematic. It's a lot more momentum-based than the average investor who's out there consistently trying to pick tops and bottoms. And at the end of the day, they're, you know, be my guest, do that. We can support you with our research. But ultimately, we found a better mousetrap that's been delivering superior results for our clients.

12:15Yeah. Yeah, and once you have the framework built, I guess from there, it's just doing the work, right? Once you've got the model, you can at least be consistent across quarter to quarter, month to month, week to week. Absolutely, my friend. Absolutely. Let me ask you this. Growth. It seems like the watchword from your recent analysis is currently resiliency. How long does that resiliency last? Yeah, so, you know, I love the word resiliency because that kind of doves down to what I think our next topic should be, which is where the resiliency or the upside surprises and growth may come from in 2024.

12:45So go back to summer of 2022 when I was on this program with you and Maggie, kind of espousing and helping investors understand our resilient U.S. economy theme that we authored back then. And ultimately, and obviously, that was the key variable, the key theme that allowed investors to either make money in 2023 or either significantly underperform, if not lose money from getting squeezed to the high heavens throughout 2023. So that was our theme. It ultimately materialized in asset markets. When we look at where we are today here in January 2024, we have another theme that we've authored and we ultimately believe may create some upside surprise in asset markets throughout 2024 as well.

13:22Obviously not in a linear straight line, but we do believe there is upside risk to asset markets based on economic variables. And it has nothing to do with the U.S. economy. It has everything to do with the global economy. You know, we're seeing green shoots globally. If you throw up slide two, Brian, we got the preliminary January PMI data out of the major economies this morning. You're seeing bottoming and green shoots in places like the Eurozone. You're seeing bottoming and green shoots in places like the UK. Japan is starting to reaccelerate. Even at the bottom there, you got the global PMI starting to bottom and take higher.

13:55Now, we're not calling for a significant acceleration in economic growth, but if you look at our models in terms of our projections, where we go on slide three and slide four, Brian, you can just kind of rifle through those. You know, the major economies in the world all have a, you know, kind of 60 to 65 percent chance of seeing a acceleration in growth over the next six to 12 months, which obviously means they have, you know, kind of a 30 ish percent chance of seeing a deceleration in growth. So, you know, we're seeing emergent signs of green shoots in the economy that can contribute to upside surprises in global growth that ultimately may, you know, support asset markets vis-a-vis a lower dollar, more global liquidity, and ultimately just better earnings, outlooks, expectations, revisions, all that kind of good stuff.

14:35And there's the grid model that you can see right there on the screen that you guys are famous for doing over at 42 Macro. Let me just get in one more question because I know we've got a ton of questions coming from our audience. And I want to ask you this because it's some important themes in what you're writing about, which is inflation. And I want to ask you not just for your inflation outlook and for your characterization of where we are today, but for you to define three key phrases, immaculate disinflation, sticky inflation, and last mile, the last one of which I think is going to be an important concept as we try and get from where we are now, 3.2 some odd percent down to the target.

15:06Yeah, absolutely. So immaculate disinflation is this aggressive disinflation that we've obviously observed across many of the inflation statistics, the most important being core PCE, super core PCE. Core PCE is tracking around 2 % three-month and six-month annualized. We're tracking around 2.5 % or 2.6 % if you look at three-month annualized, six-month annualized for super core PCE. So that immaculate disinflation just means it shouldn't be happening based on where we are in the broader business cycle, based on where we are in the labor market cycle. You typically, inflation is the most lagging cycle within the economy.

15:42It typically breaks down multiple quarters after a recession begins. So the fact that we've seen so much disinflation almost back to target with respect to core PCE suggests that it's essentially mono from the heavens. And this is one of the many reasons why asset markets outperformed most investor expectations last year. When we talk about sticky inflation, as I mentioned, there are emergent signs of sticky inflation. If you look at things like the three-month annualized rate of change of supercore CPI, median CPI, trim mean CPI, those numbers are all in the 3.5 to 4 % range still. And more importantly, not continuing to decelerate, in our opinion.

16:20So that's suggesting to me that what we know about inflation, at least historically, that it tends to break down well after a recession begins. you know, we're starting to see some stasis and some stickiness in inflation that suggests some of these broader, more well-observed measures of inflation may not continue that immaculate process. And then lastly, in terms of that last mile, that's what we mean by the last mile is that, hey, you know, we've gotten a lot of good news on inflation. But at some point, if we're, you know, if history proves correct and the models prove correct, we're probably going to no land on inflation relative to where the Fed's sort of targets are relative to where consensus has inflation projection.

16:58But again, in my opinion, it's a negative risk factor for markets. We just don't necessarily believe you need to put that trade on today like most folks would otherwise have you do. Terrence, let me ask you one follow-up. And this is a real big picture question. Maybe it shows that I'm obviously not following this as closely as you are. But my question for you is this. Do you ever wonder, worry about, wonder about or worry about the predictive power of the models for inflation when what we've seen here is so completely unprecedented, so completely off the charts. It's like CPI, PCE, PPI, whatever chart you look like.

17:30It's like the Angry Birds chart. It's literally like this parabola. It goes up and then it crashes down. I mean, it's something that we've never seen before. We've never seen a model that has this kind of gyration in it in terms of the data set getting just pushed around. Is there some risk of hysteresis, some risk of the predictive power of historical models not playing along because the data set that we've seen historically is just so completely off the charts. Ash, you absolutely nailed it. And this is why our entire investment process has pivoted for better towards an observation and momentum-based process, whereby we're trying to take advantage of momentum in key economic variables and ultimately take advantage of momentum in asset markets with our positions in portfolio construction.

18:11We used to, when I started the firm and for most of my 15-year career on Global Wall Street, would base my entire portfolio construction and asset allocation recommendations on my predictions. Where do I think inflation is going to be? Where do I think growth is going to be? What do I think the Fed or policy is going to do at some time horizon and therefore let me put on trades today? In our opinion, that process there, this positioning for predictions, in my opinion, that's the number one reason most investors have significantly underperformed asset markets over the last two and three years. And it goes back to what you just said, Ash.

18:45Most models, if you think about how investors and economists forecast growth, forecast inflation, they fall into one or two camps. They're a DSG model or they're an autoregressive model. Both of those models broke substantially in the COVID area. Obviously, we had the shutdown and lockdown of the economy that created a lot of volatility in the base rates in the time series. But we also had significant fiscal and monetary stimulus that created a lot of additional volatility in the base rates for some of these models. So this is why so many economists were wrong-footed. So many investors were wrong-footed on thinking about growth or thinking about calling for a recession last year.

19:21This is why so many economists and investors missed the surge in inflation going back to 2021 and 2022. It's because they're using broken models and broken tools. And ultimately, their entire investment process is anchored to those broken models and broken tools. That's why we've pivoted at 42 Macro to things like the weather model, which are more observational tools. Things like our global macro risk matrix, which now casts a top-down market regime. It's more observational rather than predictive. And it's done us a great job in terms of helping us stay on the right side of market risk. Yeah, and of course, you look at some high-frequency variables that give you the ability to do things in real time.

19:54100%, my friend. Yeah, really interesting stuff. Yeah, totally. All right, Darius, as you know, you're a superstar here at Real Vision. So we literally have almost a full page of questions coming in in the first 15 minutes of this show alone. So before we do that, let me just ask you, any other charts you want to get to before we jump in and start taking the year? We can just rifle through them. Brian, if you could rifle through slides five, six, seven, and eight, where we show growth expectations for the United States, for the Eurozone, for China and Japan. And what I circled on those charts, each of those charts, is the growth estimates over the next one, two, perhaps three quarters.

20:27And you see for each of these major economies, we're talking about like zero to one percent growth per quarter over the next, you know, kind of over the next two to three quarters. And so in our opinion, we think the hurdle for upside surprises to global growth, including the U.S., is actually quite high. Or actually, the hurdle is low. The probability of seeing upside surprises and growth in 1H 2024 is actually quite high. So in our opinion, I think that, again, represents an upside risk to asset markets. Because, again, you still have investors who are using those broken models and positioning for the output of those broken models.

21:03They're still in the hard landing camp. And then some of them are still in the no landing camp. and they may be forced to chase us off landing camp higher, particularly if we get to the next two weeks of data points. We got a lot of data points coming over the next two weeks, not the least of which is that productivity discussion we had, non-unit labor costs, the employment cost index, obviously the jobs report's coming as well, GDPs tomorrow, PCEs on Friday. So if we can get through the next couple of weeks of critical economic updates and not, oh, I forgot the quarterly refunding announcement next week as well.

21:30But we get through all that and we're still in Goldilocks. People in the no landing camp, people in the hard landing camp will be forced to capitulate in a way that they probably never had done in their careers. And in terms of the no-landing camp, they'll be forced to capitulate because of central bank activity restricting monetary policy and therefore tightening financial conditions, a rebound effect. Bad news. Good news is bad news. No, not quite that. More in the sense that they're just not receiving any confirmation from the observed data in the economy that suggests their positions are going to be right.

22:00Obviously, asset markets are moving away from those positions. positions. So if it stays Goldilocks, in other words, you don't see too much over here. If we can get to mid-February, if we can get through the first or second week of February, and we're still in Goldilocks, there's a very clear runway for Goldilocks to persist well into the spring. We're going to take another quick break to hear a word from our partners. We'll be right back with more of the day's top analysis on the Real Vision Daily Briefing.

Read the full transcript

22:27Interesting, really interesting stuff. I always enjoy talking about these models. They're really cool. With that said, you ready to jump in, take some viewer questions? Always, my friend, always. I'm a high dive. All right, first one. Darius, how liquidity injection by the PBOC, People's Bank of China, would impact global liquidity? And could it be inflationary? Shifting gears here, obviously, from the US to China. Any thoughts on PBOC liquidity injections? Oh, so yes. So the PBOC, I want to say they've authorized a 50 basis point triple R cut that's going to unleash about somewhere around$200 billion thereabouts into the Chinese financial sector.

23:04So that's obviously a positive risk factor for global liquidity from the perspective of the fungibility of money across borders. China's a closed capital account, but they still find ways to get that money off borders, not the least of which, if there's money growing faster in China, faster than they are overseas, you typically see overseas retained earnings, which inflate the global liquidity proxy there. What was the second half of the question? I think it was just about what's the, do you see liquidity injection from PBOC and what's the impact? Could it be inflationary globally? Yes, it could be, but typically it's not.

23:37What causes inflation, I mean, that's a loaded statement. Economists have really no clue what causes inflation, but we think we know. Sorry, we know what's correlated and co-integrated with inflation. And the things that are correlated and co-integrated with inflation, liquidity is not necessarily one of those variables. It's highly co-integrated and correlated with asset market performance, but it typically is not correlated with the real economy outcome. So it can be, but it's unlikely to be because what we found, this is going back a few years ago, when we outlined the structural liquidity trap that China is in and had reopened into, one of those elements of that structural liquidity trap is understanding that the Chinese current account and all the flows that China used to get from its current account have dwindled.

24:20And as a function of that, the growth of the PBOC's balance sheet has primarily come from monetary-type tactics, lowering the RRR, things of that nature, and asset purchases. And because of that, the renminbi has become kind of at risk from all that incremental monetary stimulus. And so in our opinion, if China really steps on the liquidity spigot, it's more likely to see a significant, we're more likely to see a significant decline on the Chinese yuan that would obviously be disinflationary for the global economy. And I should have said, by the way, that comes from the macro butler, that question, in case I didn't say it at the top.

24:57So Darius, this is reserve rate requirement. This is the primary monetary policy tool that PBOC uses, kind of like our federal funds rate. Different mechanism, but similar impact in terms of creating liquidity. Yeah, I don't want to say primary because they have a mixed bag. They have a big bag of tools that they use at any given time. You got the triple R, you got the prime rates, you have obviously the balance sheet itself. You have the China uses administrative tools to force banks into lending credit for specific sectors of the economy. There's a lot of stuff that they do and have done in recent quarters.

25:27The problem with China as it relates to the Chinese economy is there's obviously just a structural oversupply mechanism in terms of the capital side of the economy and obviously the property side of the economy, which is roughly 30 % of GDP. and they have really not done anything to address that structurally in terms of fixing with all the ails there. You're still obviously observing deflation there. Next question comes from Roger Bose. Should I take some uranium profits here? Obviously, we should say not personal financial advice, but broadly, what do you think about the price of uranium? I actually have not paid attention to uranium, so I don't want to give a BS answer out of my neck here.

26:01So we'll skip that Sorry about it. Sorry, bud. Always appreciate that. J &J LTD, does Darius have a view on RRP and BTFP ending? Obviously, this is a reverse repo rate bank term facility program. This is one of the lending programs to support the broader macro economy. Darius, thoughts? 100%. I have a view on that. Everyone and their brother, sister's uncle has a view on it, and they think it's going to be a bearish factor for markets. So I'm going to take the other side of the trade. That's my view. Obviously, it's not a good thing from a liquidity standpoint, but we have to forget, liquidity is not just the BTFP, the reverse superfacility, the Treasury General account.

26:41Liquidity is this broad global thing with many moving parts and many kind of fungible dynamics that could obviously offset that at the margins. We're not making a call that it's going to offset that, but it certainly can be offset if you're seeing the PBOC China. China, they're launching a$200 to$300 billion RRR cut in February, which obviously can offset that at the margin. So it's our view that this is a tired kind of topic that I think has kind of been bastardized across Global Wall Street, which is basically Twitter now. So we would take the other side of the trade because clearly there's still some dry powder from the perspective of the reverse people facility balance.

27:17There's definitely some dry powder from the perspective of the Treasury General account balance. And oh, by the way, we're in a general election year. neither the Fed nor the Treasury Department wants to do anything good or bad to upset the apple cart, you know, in terms of creating negative outcomes for financial markets or in so much just creating two positive outcomes in financial markets. So in our opinion, we think a lot of this hullabaloo around the ending of the BTFP might just be that. We had a question about that and I think we're going to end on it because it's such a good question. Our next question comes to us from Stephen Worrell.

27:49Hi, Ash and Darius. I hope you're both doing well. DD, any thoughts on the BOC, Bank of Canada, discussion to hold rates today. Do you think they will wait for the Fed to lead? Any thoughts on the Canadian economy? Thank you. Thanks, Stephen. Oh, yeah. So the Canadian economy is doing, it's kind of like most of the global economy where it looks like it's bottoming and basing and starting to accelerate. And those earnings, or sorry, not earnings, and those growth expectations in Canada are actually quite low as well. If you look at our grid model projections, Canada has about a two-thirds chance of an acceleration in growth over the next 12 months.

28:21And inflation should be pretty stable over the next six to 12 months as well. So this is one of those places where I think the markets are telling you exactly what they should be telling you right now, which is you should be expecting better than expected news globally from the perspective of global growth, certainly relative to where we've been over the past four to six quarters. Next question, Bo Nito, Darius, China is in the tank. How can we be optimistic moving forward when the number one global exporter is so weak, Bo asks? Yeah, that's Bo, my friend, Bo, my friend. That sounds like a terrible back test, my friend.

28:56Just pull up a chart of the S &P and then overlay that with a chart of the Shanghai Composite. Look, it's not the driver that the narrative implies it is. Obviously, for many years of my career, China was this big driver of incremental global demand, particularly on the commodity side. But that all kind of stopped in the early 2010s. China hasn't really been this big driver of global incremental demand. You know what the big driver of incremental global demand is? It's right here in the United States of America, baby. We got Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, CHIPS Act, Inflation Reduction Act. Oh, you're home because of COVID?

29:33Here, here's like$1 ,000. That's where the incremental demand of the global economy is coming from, in our opinion. And a lot of the accumulated savings from a stock perspective that we see on the household and corporate balance sheets is still there. You're talking about$4 trillion,$4 plus trillion on the household side in terms of checkable deposits and currency. You're talking about over$2 trillion of checkable deposits and currency on the corporate sector balance sheet. Both of those numbers are roughly 5 % of total assets. That 5 % ratio for each of those, respectively, is the highest ratio we've seen in either time series since going back to the mid-1950s.

30:07So we're flush with cash and can continue to spend, can continue to invest. So when you think about where the incremental demand for the global economy is going to come from. You got to think about it from right here from the perspective of the US. All right, Darius, after a series of international questions, here's one about the good old US of A. It comes to us from G Blackburn. And the question is, are small caps dead? And I'd like to add a point on that. Are small caps dead from G Blackburn? But also, does it scare the hell out of you to see this kind of concentration in the Magnificent Seven and TechSox more generally?

30:40Yes and no. Markets go through periods where they're extremely concentrated and they go through periods where they're obviously not so concentrated. Obviously, the higher nominal GDP environments for the global economy tend to create a little bit more, a little bit less dispersion in terms of concentration. And when you have lower nominal GDP environments globally, or you have significant US outperformance, we tend to see more dispersion, more concentration. So I'm not concerned about it as a market risk factor. Just by the way, just go back and look at 2023. Was concentration a bad thing? No, you want it to be concentrated.

31:13You want it to take advantage of some of those trends, resilient US economy, immaculate disinflation, obviously the uptrend in global liquidity and domestic liquidity that we call for. So some of these things, I love getting on Real Vision and answering these questions because I hear that they're coming from a place of narrative. And the reality is there's nothing wrong with being a narrative-driven investor. I just think it's a harder thing to do consistently well than actually adhering to what's actually happening in the economy, being Bayesian about that six days a week like we are here at 42 macro.

31:46Yeah, so interesting. Such an interesting point. Jason Yoakam, Darius, which is a larger factor that could weigh on the Fed's decision to cut rates, increased volatility in the Middle East, Ukraine, et cetera, that might push commodity prices higher and in turn inflation or reduced domestic and global productivity that damages the probability of a soft landing? Boy, this is such a great question, Darius, because I just don't see any macro headwinds from global geopolitics being priced into anything. No, it's because it doesn't really matter. I mean, it's obviously a really unfortunate situation what's going on over there.

32:27But from the perspective of the global economy, from the perspective of asset markets, it really has not had material impact. Now, it may eventually have material impact, but obviously thus far, it is not. In terms of specifically answering the question. If you wanted to do a probability assessment of which one will matter more to the Fed's decision-making process, productivity potentially slowing and creating more pressure on corporate margins that may force them to accelerate cost increases, or what's going on in the Middle East and potentially accelerating commodity prices, I'd say that's probably a 99 % versus a 1%.

33:01The Fed is focused on these kind of core first principles, econometric dynamics. And the reality is one of the reasons why that productivity data point that we got in late October caused me to go, oh, I think it's time for a soft landing trade. The reason it caused me to do that, us to do that at 42 Macro, is because when you have higher productivity, you can sustain higher levels of wage growth without creating margin pressure for corporate America. What does that do? That means there's less pressure on corporates to fire people and there's less pressure on corporates to raise prices as a function of that higher productivity environment.

33:35And so we can obviously share the charts on that next time I'm on. But the reality is this is why asset markets are, if you look at the S &P, for example, at an all-time high. If you don't understand those kind of first principles, core macroeconomic fundamentals, you probably should partner with somebody that does. Here's a great question and a really interesting one that comes to us from Kirk. What do you use or focus on for sentiment readings, to which I would add, if at all? Or is that something that interests you or not? No, we have six days a week. We update our positioning model at 42 macro.

34:09So we use a variety of indicators to focus on sentiment. So I'll just kind of list them. We look at non-commercial net length as a percent of total open interest across the four major asset classes. So stocks, fixed income, dollar and commodities. We look at the growth rate of cash in terms of money market fund exposure. That has just historically been a good sentiment indicator. We look at the AI bulls, Bayer survey and the spread between those particular surveys. We look at the AAI allocations, stock bond, cash allocations. We look at trends and realized volatility as a proxy for systematic investor positioning.

34:42And then we look at market evaluations too as an obvious kind of sentiment-based indicator. And so we're refreshing our positioning model on a daily basis. And one of those positioning model signals that helped us kind of orchestrate this soft landing trade back at the beginning of November was we saw a ninth percentile reading in the AAI bulls bear spread relative to his historical time series. That matched the median reading that we've observed at all the major market troughs going back to December 1987, October 90, September 98, March 03, March 09, et cetera, et cetera, all the way through October 22.

35:16We got to the same level in terms of that AAI bulls bear spread. So it was an obvious signal to us because we are refreshing that model six days a week on a Bayesian basis. It stuck out like a sore thumb and allowed us to pivot alongside the positive quarter of the refunding announcement we got that week, the positive productivity data point we got that week, and ultimately the positive surprise we got out of the bank in Japan that week. So that was quite the week. But if you're not sitting here being Bayesian six days a week, we highly suggest you partner with someone that is. Great question from Kirk, and obviously a great and highly detailed answer there, the individual inputs.

35:49Final question for you. This one comes from Roger B. I saved this one for last, Darius. It's seven words long. It's an incredibly short question, but boy, profound implication in it. Roger wants to know, does DD think the Fed is independent? Ooh, I'd rather have some beers over that one. Yes and no. Yes and no, right? I think they don't want to be truly independent because ultimately at the end of the day, I genuinely believe in their heart of hearts that institution wants to produce positive economic outcomes for America. They want maximum employment. They want stable prices. And they're working like hell to do that.

36:28I know plenty of people that work at the Fed. I can't confirm or deny if we meet with them. But I think those people definitely want good outcomes for the economy. And with respect to independence, I think they are working with other agencies like the Treasury or the, what's the one that bails out the banks? Sorry, I'm blanking on the name. FDIC. I think they do work with those institutions, the federal home loan banks, et cetera, to try to produce those positive outcomes. So technically they're not independent, but I think they're not independent from the perspective of they're actually looking to produce good outcomes and not to pull strings in a nefarious manner, which I think a lot of people on Twitter think they are.

37:06Yeah, very, very well said. Where data meets conspiracy theories. Well, look, man, Ash, even a question like this, if we can wrap up on this, it's our job to make and save money in financial markets. It's not our job to pontificate about society, about the Fed, about this, about that. If you're not doing, if what you're doing when you wake up and open your account or you open your client's account as an institutional investor, if you're not making and saving them money, you're wasting time. Go work out. Go hang out with your family. That's probably a better use of time than talking about things like this.

37:40And boy, by the way, are we ever going to get into this in the next nine months here with the election coming up? Because look, that's what we're doing here at Real Vision. Everybody's got an opinion. Everybody's got a view. But at the end of the day, what matters is what's the impact on markets, on risk asset prices, on the economy, on your portfolio? And 100%. And then go back and just look. And by the way, the last thing I'll say, go back and look at the last few election cycles. The Fed was doing a lot, every single one of them. In 2020, they were doing a lot. In 2018, they were doing a lot.

38:11In 2016, we got the Shanghai Accord. What did we get in 2012? Actually, no, we got QE3 in 2012. In 2008, we got ZERP and QE1. So every time there's an election, the Fed is busy in both directions. So we can't assume that because there's an election, the Fed's not going to cut interest rates according to what markets to price it. Yeah. Tarius, you hit it out of the park as you always do. Thank you so much for joining us. Always a pleasure, man. Thanks for having me. And I appreciate the Real Vision gang. Great questions. I always love being here. It's looking forward to next time. Thanks, Tarius.

38:41Looking forward to it. Before we go, RV is giving away free NFTs for all new Real Vision members. The PreMint is open right now. The Mint opens on January 25 and runs through February 1st. To be eligible for the Mint, you have to open a freemium account. On top of that, you get access to our new platform. So head to realvision.com forward slash RVNFT. That's realvision.com forward slash RVNFT and sign up. Thanks so much for watching or listening to Real Vision Daily Briefing. We'll be back tomorrow, same time, same place. See you then, everybody. Have a great night. Hey, everybody. Today's Real Vision Daily Briefing is sponsored by Engrave, maker of the coldest hardware wallet Xero and stainless steel backup Graphene.

39:28Engrave brings you the highest security in a touchscreen experience to safely manage all your crypto offline. Enjoy a 10 % Real Vision discount in engrave.io shop with the code Real Vision. Have you ever wanted to trade Bitcoin but haven't dared try? With Plus 500 Futures, you can trade crypto without the hassle of opening a wallet. With just a few clicks, you can register and start practicing with their free and unlimited demo. See a trading opportunity? You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks. Feel ready? You can move to real money with as little as$100 once your account is approved. And the great thing is that in addition to crypto, Plus500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments.

40:09S &P 500, NASDAQ, gas, and much more. Explore equity indices, energy, metals, Forex, and beyond. With a simple and intuitive platform, you could trade anytime, anywhere. Experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for with Plus500. With over 20 years of experience, Plus500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit us.plus500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves the risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify. Plus500. It's trading with a plus.

From the publisher

馃敟 Get 10% OFF in NGRAVE's shop with the code "Realvision" http://realvision.com/ngrave
Darius Dale, founder of 42 Macro, joins Ash Bennington to discuss the recent market rally, the relentless U.S. economy, and what the current combination of market and macro dynamics means for the inflationary landscape. You can find Darius' insightful research here: https://42macro.com
This episode is sponsored by NGRAVE, maker of ZERO, the world鈥檚 only crypto wallet with the highest security certification. of the coldest hardware wallet ZERO and stainless steel backup GRAPHENE. NGRAVE brings you the highest security in a touchscreen experience to safely manage all your crypto offline. Enjoy a 10% Real Vision discount at realvision.com/ngrave. with the code REALVISION
Elevate your brand with Real Vision. Connect with us at partnerships@realvision.com to explore advertising
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Real Vision: Finance & Investing

All 984 episodes
#959 - Green Shoots or Rising Risk? with Darius DaleReal Vision: Finance & Investing 路 42 min
Listen in VO