Has Bitcoin (Really) Outshined Gold? ft. Maleeha Bengali

23 Dec 2024 · 45 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Real Vision Podcast Episode Summary

Episode Details

  • Podcast Title: Real Vision: Finance & Investing
  • Episode Title: Has Bitcoin (Really) Outshined Gold? ft. Maleeha Bengali
  • Hosts: Ash Bennington and Maleeha Bengali

Episode Overview In this episode, hosts Ash Bennington and Maleeha Bengali, CEO of MB Commodities Capital, delve into the interplay of macroeconomic factors, asset allocation strategies, and the ongoing debate over Bitcoin versus gold as a store of value. The conversation covers a broad range of topics, from U.S. equity markets to commodities, and the implications of government policy on financial markets.

---

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. Market Dynamics and Macroeconomic Trends
  2. Accommodative Policies: The Federal Reserve's actions have kept markets liquidity high, benefitting risk assets.
  3. Central Bank Approach: Current Fed policies could be overly stimulative given inflation and growth concerns.
  4. Economic Outlook: Discussion on whether the U.S. economy could face recession or a slow recovery amidst rising debt and pressure on productivity.
  1. Asset Valuation and Investment Strategies
  2. U.S. Equities vs. Other Markets: U.S. equities have performed well, but valuations are high. Comparisons made with Europe and China regarding growth potential.
  3. Debt Overhang: The U.S. faces increased debt levels, with questions on how long this can remain sustainable.
  4. Asset Allocation: Discussion on where to invest, with recommendations to consider inflation-hedged assets like gold and silver versus traditional equities.
  1. Commodities Analysis
  2. Oil Market Trends: The current low demand for oil despite OPEC's production constraints; discussion on potential price movements and demand from China.
  3. Copper as an Investment: Emphasized the long-term demand for copper due to electrification, contrasted with immediate market pressures from China's economic situation.
  4. Precious Metals Outlook: Projections for gold and silver as safe-haven investments amid economic uncertainty.
  1. Bitcoin vs. Gold Debate
  2. Bitcoin's Market Position: Maleeha argues that Bitcoin is still a speculative asset but could gain more institutional acceptance.
  3. Comparative Value: Discussion on how Bitcoin and gold serve as hedges against fiat currency debasement, with gold viewed as a more stable investment.
  4. Investment Horizons: Insights into the expected performance of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies against traditional assets.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Market Sentiment: Investors need to balance their portfolios between equities and commodities, considering macroeconomic indicators and potential inflation.
  • Focus on Quality Assets: Gold and silver may provide better returns in uncertain economic times versus traditional equities.
  • Volatility of Cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin and other digital assets carry high volatility, necessitating a cautious approach for investors.

---

Final Thoughts

  • The episode highlights the complexities of navigating financial markets in the current economic climate. With inflation concerns and central bank policies at the forefront, investors must carefully consider their asset allocations and the potential risks associated with different asset classes.
  • The ongoing debate about Bitcoin's place relative to gold serves as a reminder of the evolving financial landscape and the importance of ongoing research and informed decision-making in investment strategies.

---

For more insights, listeners can subscribe to the Real Vision Podcast for free and may explore additional resources provided by the platform.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Hi, everyone. I'm Raoul Pal, the CEO and co-founder of Real Vision. Here at Real Vision, we're committed to give you the best knowledge, tools, and network to help you succeed in your financial future. If you're enjoying this podcast, please take a moment to give it a five-star rating. It truly helps us continue to bring top-tier content. Thank you so much.

0:28Welcome back to Real Vision. I'm Ash Bennington. Today, I have the pleasure of speaking with Malia Bengali, founder and CEO of MB Commodities Capital. Malia, welcome to Real Vision. Thank you, Ash, for having me. It's a pleasure. It's a pleasure to have you with us. Before we get started here today, don't forget, tickets to our in-person crypto gathering in Miami are now up for sale. Head over to realvision.com forward slash CG2025. That's realvision.com forward slash CG2025 to get yours. Malia, a pleasure to have you with us on the show. Let's talk a little bit at the top about your shop and what you do.

1:06Thank you, Ash. So I'm the founder of MBA Commodities Capital. It's a hedge fund of macro relative value cross-asset hedge fund looking at commodities and equities. We launched it about four years ago, and we're right now in the process of raising capital in the U.S. as we got our SEC registration. I also run a consulting advisory platform called MBA Commodity Corner, which people probably know me better for, which basically talks about opportunities and how to look at the commodity landscape in terms of how to trade and invest, because it's changed so much over the last few years from just being a physical operation to looking at macro, micro, and physical.

1:38And that's how we sort of navigate. And that's what a fund does. We look at interesting opportunities across the post of assets to really pay that cross-asset discrepancies as we see them develop over time. Milya, talk a little bit about your outlook, your framework from a macro perspective of how you see markets and how you invest in them. So that's a really good question because very topical for 2025. Taking a big step back, we think the markets have been very accommodative. I think the central bank and policy has been very loose. One can argue it's probably been a bit too loose given the framework of inflation and where growth has been heading.

2:12We have a very big meeting tomorrow, of course, and the Fed is expected to cut interest rates. But just taking a step back, I mean, it has been quite supportive. You know, we had a couple of scenarios in 2020 with COVID and a lot of bank failures in 2023. But every time we had a sort of obstacle, the Fed has been injecting the market with liquidity. And I think that's very important because risk assets in general, especially the ones linked to a fiat currency debasement, have benefited from that sort of liquidity injection. So taking that macro backdrop, but not Trump coming into power, talking about pro-business and more deregulation, more stimulative growth, a Fed that's quite accommodated can actually help boost risk assets.

2:49But the question really is which risk assets, right? Because we try to look at that sort of liquid framework as to which asset class has the tightest demand supply balances from a commodities point of view, because not all commodities are the same. And I think that's where it gets really tricky, because people often talk about value and commodities that does not really exist. Value is meaningless if you have too much of supply, no matter how cheap it is, it'll stay weakened. Or in case in point, we can talk about more of that later on. So our job here is once we get a very constructive macro framework, whether it's bearish or bullish, how do we drill down into commodities and how do we drill down the individual equities related to those commodities to get the best bang for your buck effectively?

3:27So let's talk a little bit here about you mentioned at the top of the show, fund is cross asset. Talk a little bit about U.S. equities. You mentioned this idea of currency debasement. This is something that we hear increasingly, unfortunately, these days. Talk a little bit about where you see U.S. equities as a benchmark for performances of other asset classes and how you allocate across them. So U.S. equities have been the best asset class right now for the last couple of years and they continue to be. So the big debate is do we want to get involved in Europe or China outside of U.S.? But the question is the growth is coming in the U.S.

3:59We have about 2%, 2.5 % GDP growth and a very sort of contained inflation policy. Whereas the question in China, we've seen a systemic issue, and they have a massive issue with the debt and consumer domestic demand. So one can argue, given the transparency and liquidity, there's still more valuation upside in the U.S. equities. But it's quite expensive. So the question is, where do you actually go and put your money, park your money? Taking a step back in terms of why we are sort of in this pro-fiat currency debasement story, which is a secular theme, we have so much. You know, before, like 10 years ago, we would print$1 to get maybe$0.80 of growth.

4:33today that$1 is getting negative growth. We need to bring so much money to get the same level of growth. And now U.S. debt is, you know, we're trading at post-World War II highs right now. How much more, seemingly, can the Fed do right now? And what levels? Well,$2,$3 trillion can be nothing. We could be talking about in the orders of$5 or$10 trillion if there's another sort of financial collapse or crisis. And, you know, so the U.S. economy is slowing down, but how do we get that sort of productivity to pick up? And that's the key topic for next year. Is the U.S. able to engineer some sort of growth recovery that offsets the debt?

5:04Or will the Fed be, you know, chasing to sort of printing more money or lowering rates and stoking inflation? So we're really on a cusp of something very big happening next year. And it's a very delicate dance between this stable growth and low inflation. And I think one of those will be out of the bag. We did the view that inflation is going to come back next year, effectively, along with, you know, central bank be forced to cut rates to save the employment market, the labor market. And I think that could get very tricky. But then from an asset point of view, you can see some great investment opportunities So I think equities, we talk about this thing called the last decade.

5:36They can do well. But the question is, do you want to be in something that will give you a better bank for your buck? U.S. equities may not fall as much as other equities. But if you're not investing in, say, Bitcoin or gold or silver or something else, those are inflation-protected assets, you might be losing out. And that's big debate if you have a client as to how to be positioned next year. Where do you sort of see asset classes doing well next year based on that backdrop? Hey, I hope you enjoyed the episode. If you want to dive deeper and really dig into what's going on and how to understand it, then grab my everything code PDF for free.

6:07Just hit the link in the description below. You're going to love it. I'm sure it's going to really help you. William, we're going to talk about commodities in just a second here. But you said three things that really perked up my ears on the U.S. equities analysis. And I was wondering if you could give a little bit more color around some of those points. Number one, the increasing debt overhang here in the United States. Number two, the law of diminishing return with liquidity in terms of the amount of liquidity flowing into the system and the growth that comes out on the back end. And number three, the price of U.S.

6:37equities as a price to equity, excuse me, a price to earnings ratio. Talk a little bit or whatever method that you use, whether it's CAPE or straight PE, talk a little bit about those three points. Debt overhang, diminishing return in growth from liquidity. And finally, ultimately, how you view and how you price U.S. equities. So from a valuation perspective, we can argue that we are trading on a very high multiple. You know, these stocks are trading on 20 to 30 PE times plus. But if you take a step back and take the seven stocks out of the index and look at the last 493 members, they're trading a lot cheaper on a PE basis 19 times.

7:13But then, even if you look at from a 2000, you know, a lot of people do this analysis in terms of we are not trading at a much higher peak. But it's not really an apples for apples comparison because today the earnings being generated by these companies is a lot higher than you were back in the dot-com bubble. But also the forward 12-month earnings revisions are actually moving up higher. So earnings are picking up, which is why we're seeing money getting more concentrated to these large similar age names. So you can argue that it is looking expensive, but compared to what the earnings are doing, there could be still further room because this is such a big secular theme.

7:43The big question is the broadening rally. Do we see value in the rest of the index? And I think that's the question people are having. Do we want to belong to them or not? But right now there's no evidence because these are highly-level companies that need a very big pickup in economic growth cycle. to justify being long-term. Value is there, but the question is, has the economic cycle peaked or are we just slow, you know, accelerating? And the jury's out. We don't really know. But there are some warning signs coming in terms of the labor market or productivity. The consumer's holding up, but we spoke about retail sales.

8:13They've just been borrowing money and, you know, cheaper price and discounts. The consumer's not that strong. The market's very much a two-tier economy. So when we look at the entire index, it's very important to talk about which stocks in the index are expensive and which stocks are cheap. And going back to now in terms of how much money the Fed can print, I mean - Let me just ask a quick follow-up question there, Boyd, because I want to dive a little bit deeper here on this idea of concentration risk from two different perspectives. One, on the valuation basis of those seven companies, but two, also on this idea that you see the largest cap tech companies in the United States increasingly growing their They're increasingly growing the role that they play in the U.S.

8:53economy on a fundamental basis rather than a valuation level. Talk about what concerns that gives you and how significant they are as you look at the other 493 stocks. There's a huge concentration risk right now. So if you break the companies down, I mean, Apple, Amazon, Meta, Nvidia, all of these have some very different business prospects and fundamentals going forward. Nvidia is a good thing to talk about right now. We talk about how much demand there is for their chips, But then there's also competition issues, right? We've seen Microsoft and these other companies sort of combating it in terms of how much pricing power.

9:25You're pricing in five years full returns on today. So the question is how much growth is already priced in? That 50 % K-car returns, we are known. Obviously, the same sort of step up going forward. You can argue probably not. So it's plateauing. The stock is actually at a good level, but it's sort of plateauing in the remaining week. Whereas something like an Apple hasn't seen growth for the last few years. It's more like a U.S. bond proxy that does a massive buyback, and that's all getting the stock to do really well. It's become effectively US bond market proxy, which is quite interesting. But then something like an Amazon or Google has a lot more earnings upside as well.

9:55So it's quite individual for each company, but we are seeing earnings of matching up with the price gains. If there was a reason where we did not see earnings catch up to those price stocks, you can argue that this is getting a bit inflated. So like I said, there's selective value in the large caps. And right now the market wants to be in large caps or small caps. But the big call for next year will be at some point rotation out of those large caps into small to mid caps. But like I said, that's a big call on the U.S. economic recovery and do you see, we talk about the soft landing or recession.

10:23Has the Fed been able to avoid the recession altogether magically or are we going to see hiccups into next year? And there are a lot of like some of you look at a lot of cross-satting signals and there are pockets of signals like, you know, red alarms going off right now. And it's quite touch and go into as to how we get out of it. And I think that's going to depend on how you allocate your stocks. Do you want to be defensive? Do you want to be cyclical? but right now the market's all in. Household contribution in terms of investment in the equity market right now is not the 40%. We are at a point in the cycle where everybody's all in, all long U.S.

10:55equity markets right now. So you can argue, what is the sort of risk reward asymmetric if you take a Ray Dalio approach and want to be long bonds and gold, that's probably a lot better. Have you ever wanted to trade Bitcoin but haven't dared try? With Plus500 Futures, you can trade crypto without the hassle of opening a wallet. With just a few clicks, you can register and start practicing with their free and unlimited demo. See a trading opportunity? You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks. Feel ready? You can move to real money with as little as$100 once your account is approved. And the great thing is that in addition to crypto, Plus500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments.

11:31S &P 500, NASDAQ, gas, and much more. Explore equity indices, energy, metals, Forex, and beyond. With a simple and intuitive platform, you could trade anytime, anywhere. Experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for with Plus500. With over 20 years of experience, Plus500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit us.plus500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves the risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify. Plus500, it's trading with a plus. There's a better value proposition rather than being in equities. And I think like we talked about, there could be very well a situation where equities do nothing, but other assets do a lot better.

12:11So you need to think about your opportunity and cost as well. And you asked a little question about, you know, how much impact a dollar of stimulus does now versus a few years ago. You were on 2008. I remember I was by Merrill Lynch at that time. You know,$150 billion got us out of Lehman's crisis. During COVID, the government is printing $150 billion a day. So you can imagine the level of money that needed to solve a crisis. every year gets more and more. We printed four, five trillion during COVID. What's going to happen when we get the next hiccup? And it's going to get worse and worse. The window between crisis is getting shorter and narrower and narrower because we see a lot more hiccups.

12:482023, the market's did really well, but we saw Silicon Valley Bank. We saw Credit Suisse. We saw so many things sort of impact the market. And that's just an effect of the system that's very highly levered. We see these massive sort of swings of 20 % up and down. And eventually, you see a lot of back-end liquidity being injected by the Treasury and the central banks. And that supports asset classes. But then again, it's going to the main indices, going to the large-cap stocks, not really going to a lot of the other sectors. Well, and that tees it up perfectly, actually, for the question of the potential benefit that hard commodities might see in a period where you have these challenges with purchasing power.

13:25Talk a little bit about the fundamental thesis for commodities vis-a-vis of U.S. equity markets that we just covered. So from a liquidity point of view, if you argue that we're in an accommodative commodity cycle, the Fed actually is cutting interest rates right now. And if anything, it's going to be injecting liquidity to keep the backdrop supportive. That is pro-commodities. It's pro-risk assets. But then you can argue, why haven't commodities done well this year? Because then you sort of drill down into each individual commodity. Let's look at oil, for instance, right? Oil is something that we spoke on a lot.

13:56We're trading that with$70 a barrel of rent, which has been the same price three years ago. We went up to 135 during the Ukraine crisis and came back down. But we've always argued for the last two years, there is no shortage of oil. We have OPEC plus sitting about three to five million barrels per day of oil on the sidelines, waiting for China demand to come back to inject that supply back in the market. So how can the market do well when demand has been muted? We're seeing a secular shift away from diesel in LNG and other sort of electric vehicles. China demand this year, just to let you know, is actually down 400 ,000 barrels per day versus OPEC calling for up 1.2 million pounds per day is the reverse.

14:32So how can, and they're just waiting for China to come back on back of this bazooka stimulus, which is not happening. So oil is going to be cheap. We argue oil should be trading in the low 50s because if OPEC didn't hold this, you know, barrels off the market, there's no reason for oil to be in 70s. So that's oil. So the question is, do you want to be long oil? You know, a lot of people have been long and wrong, and it's a waste of capital. It's about how you predict some sort of a demand surge. Copper is a different story, right? So copper is very much predicated on the China economic cycle, the property story.

15:01Near term, 40 % of copper demand comes from China. But the longer term, the 2030 onwards, you can talk about electrification and all the secular needs of copper. So copper is one of the commodities we like from a base metal point of view on the long term. But near term, it's plagued by China's systemic decline. It's very sensitive to the yuan. It's very sensitive to China's economic policy. So once again, if you're parking your money in copper, how long can you afford to go loan before it makes money, right? And then you saw breaking each commodity down. So we try to look at the commodity market that has the most tightest demand supply balance.

15:31And what NBCC does is we stress test various GDP scenarios and then some various macro scenarios on the dollar, the yield, interest rate policy, and then which one gives you the tightest balance? That's the one you belong with the most conservative scenario. We like gold and silver. We love precious metals over base metals because, yes, you get a bit of a slowdown in silver in terms of industrial demand, but then given the backdrop of central bank policy, QE, potentially more rate cuts, inflation. We haven't spoken about inflation yet. You know, the last three months I've seen inflation take up.

16:03These are commodities that do really well, and the demand supply actually, it's not like we're running out of gold and silver, but the inherent demand from central banks all around the world buying gold assets or silver and individuals trading it to protect the inflation, we see a massive tailwind. So every commodity, like back in 2008, 2010, people just bought commodities in general. But it doesn't work that anymore. You have to be very selective and be allocated to the right commodity for the right macro backdrop. And that's what we really are trying to do here. All right. Let's talk a little bit about gold.

16:31Obviously, gold is a topic that's on a lot of folks' mind right now, trading on my screen, 26.41 an ounce. Talk a little bit about it. Very different chart than when you look at WTI or copper. So copper has a great year this year. It's a very boring commodity all of last year. And this year, it's up about 30%. Actually, it was up about 37%. And until the election, it probably fell about 10%. So gold is done really well. Now, gold is sort of the stepsister of Bitcoin, you can argue, or the other way around. Everybody wants to be along Bitcoin because that's where all the sexy returns are effectively.

17:00But in a sense, the two sides of the same coin. It's about fiat currency debasement. It's about basically dollar, just all these currencies being like paper money and inflation coming back. Now, we like gold. It may not go up 40%, 50%. But in terms of a hedge, it's a true store of value and a hedge against your currency devaluation. So gold is pulled back right now because the dollar has been strong. There's a lot of talk about as to how much will the Fed cut and how soon will it cut. And there's some nervousness around the Fed cutting probably a bit too much. We think the Fed's probably overcut right now.

17:32There's no need to. And that's why the U.S. bond market's gotten a bit sort of nervous the last few weeks. You've seen the back end of the 10-year curve trading close to 4.4%. And as the dollar's been higher for longer, that's what is putting pressure on silver and gold in the very near term. People are very concerned. So there's a bit of a risk-averse move towards gold and silver right now with the higher dollar. And I think next tomorrow's meeting would be very important if the Fed manages to convince the market that they're done cutting rates and take a more data-dependent approach rather than just being frivolous and just cutting rates ad hoc.

18:02The market would probably like that sort of stability. But taking a step back, that's a near-term issue for gold versus the dollar strength and yields being stronger. But from a medium perspective, we love gold and silver. We think it's got great value. We can see it north of 3 ,000 next year. There will be a time next year when we go through a hiccup in the economic cycle and the Fed will be forced to act or inflation will really go back up and surge higher. And that's your cash-to-interest scenario. We expect it to do really well. You used the word frivolous with regard to the FOMC. How concerned are you about that and what risk do you see for price stability?

18:35So the Fed really has a dual mandate of employment stability and inflation. Employment has been very contained right now, so there's no reason for them to cut. During the summer, we had very negative data due to some season adjustments, some Boeing strikes. The Fed got a bit nervous, and they cut rates in September. Fine. But there was no reason to cut rates again in November, and there certainly is no reason to cut rates again tomorrow, particularly because your federal funds rate or normal GDP growth, we are not really that tight. We're not restricted. So there is no reason to cut rates. The labor market is holding in.

19:05Inflation is actually ticking up. So why is the Fed so determined to cut rates? The reason is because the U.S. debt interest expense is trading close to, what, north of a trillion dollars a year will be paying just an interest expense. The Fed is looking for any window of opportunity to cut rates because that is a huge burden on them. Plus, you have consumer demand. You have a lot of these banks selling all these health-to-maturity assets. That's causing a lot of pain for them. They're marked at zero right now. They're marked at far, even though they're sitting on these losses. But the banks are unable to lend out.

19:32So the Fed really is looking for an opportunity to ease the pressure on them. But it can't do it too soon because inflation, which is now averaging about 3 or 3.2 on a core PC basis, will come back to bite. So this is the dilemma. But the bar for the Fed to cut rates is a lot lower than the bar for them to raise rates, even though they should be thinking about keeping rates higher for longer to contain that inflation. But that's really where I use the word frivolous because, you know, there really is no need. And the bond market is throwing a tantrum right now. We have rallied from 3.6 % on the U.S.

20:0210-year yield, all the way to 4.4 % on the back end since the Fed cut rates. So the bond market is going the opposite direction of the Fed's doing. And this must be concerning them because once they lose control of the bond market, it's game over, right, for the Fed. So there's a lot of debate as to why they're doing this and is this the right time. So talk a little bit about that across the yield curve, twos and tens. Talk a little bit about what you see markets doing, if that's something that should be perceived as putting pressure. on the bond market and there being an open question around that policy?

20:33So the bond market, we've seen it inverted for the longest time. And just until recently, we've seen it uninvert. And in economic balance, that means that when the bond market uninvents is when the recession actually starts. Now, we have yet to see if a recession actually does start. But the back end is pretty much talking about how the Fed's about to make a policy mistake. So they need to actually look at that really well. You've seen now the 10s and 2s trading, I think about 15 basis points right now on an un-inversion basis. This is trading before negative 40 basis points. So that's a big move in the back end versus the front.

21:03And that's something a lot of investors are keeping an eye on because we also looked at the three-month versus the U.S. tenure, and that's gone positive for the first time in a long time. And historically speaking, when that goes positive, usually a recession hits. So are we on the cusp of a recession that's been so delicately avoided for all of this year? Or are we about to see a resurgence in growth? And I think there's two schools of thought about that. We delayed the inevitable. But the situation right now is we have a lot of debt. The balance sheet stretched. What can we possibly do to get what will Trump do to get productivity to really offset that debt surge?

Read the full transcript

21:36Or will inflation come back to bite? Right. Well, how optimistic are you about the Trump administration being able to control the glide path of forward deficits in terms of their capacity to actually cut government spending? and therefore the amelioration effect that that would have on the longer-term debt glide path. I think I'm very positive on the administration in making good concrete steps towards lowering the fiscal deficit, but I'm not sure how much they'll actually be able to get it done. We're talking about, you know, Vivek Ramosami is talking about$2 trillion of cuts, but a lot of these are tied to Medicare and Social Security.

22:11How much of that is going to be possible? I'm not sure about that. We might move a step in the right direction, but tariffs are another sort of proposal right now, these are just sort of negotiating tactics. I'm not sure Trump's going to go and enforce 20 % to 40 % tariffs, but maybe more to just get them to move more on their side. So the question really is no. In short summary, I think the fiscal spend is going to be hard to contain. Just in the last 100 days, we've added a trillion to the debt, just to give you a number in reference. So the U.S. economy is so used to this fiscal surge that I think it's going to be very hard to contain it unless we see a massive sort of growth slowdown.

22:45But then you're talking stagflation, which is a massive issue for risk assets, right, next year. So we're seeing the glass of half full. I think Trump has all the right talking points, but how much he manages to get done in terms of regulation and business policies with a lower debt balance is going to be interesting. The other thing is Treasury financing. We know Yellen did a very good job last year pivoting by all the Treasury issues going to T-bills versus the back end, which really caught a lot of people in the back foot. And that sort of, you know, avoided a big sort of mess up in the bottom market.

23:13But going forward, cut percent may not be as generous and issue that many T-bills. So she was quite clever in sort of avoiding that sort of collapse in the back end. But if we have to refinance the U.S., you know, Treasury is going to fund most of the U.S. deficit, that's not bullish risk assets also. And that's another issue. Who's going to fund that deficit? Yeah. And when you look at this on a debt to GDP basis, I mean, in my lifetime, We've gone from about 35 to about 120 where we are right now, off the peak of around, I guess, around over 130 during COVID. But the general trajectory for debt to GDP ratio over the last 50 years has just unfortunately been up into the right.

23:56Absolutely. And a lot of people say, hey, it's always gone up. Nothing's broken. Why would it break now? And that's a very good point, right? So we talk about economies of scale. At one point, there's a bubble burst. We don't know. It could be two years, three years, five years. But we do look at valuation and risk assets and we sort of break it down. But then the window is getting narrower and narrower, right? It's all about investing. It's all about risk reward. So if you sort of see a valuation upside of just 5 % and maybe 20 % to 30 % downside, one has to sort of scratch their head and go, right, why am I investing in equities where I see better value in bonds or I see better value in gold or Bitcoin?

24:28And that's really what investors are doing today. They start reallocating their risk and deciding where to be invested. or even today, putting your cash in the market right now, maybe we're a bit defensive, getting 4 % to 5 % is still decent value, preserving your capital, then to be involved and be invested at these returns. There is the year when Santa Rally and the market's going to go up to 6 ,200. Those are just short-term gains. But going into Q1 or 2025, there are tons of risks to be mindful of from a risk-reward perspective. Well, let's talk a little bit about time horizons on some of the assets that we've looked at here today.

25:02Specifically, I'm interested in oil, copper, and gold. Talk a little bit about your time horizons in terms of your view of those risk asset prices. So the oil market, we look at from a one-month, three-month, and six-month basis. So we are quite pragmatic in terms of, because the commodity markets, they work on a spot. Whether you have it or you don't, if you have too much of a commodity, it can go to negative, right? That's why we talk about commodities having no floor value. And when people talk about it being cheap, I sort of laugh because there is nothing as cheap or expensive. You know, if you need to put your lights on, you're going to pay whatever money you need to put your lights on.

25:33And that's how commodities work. So from an oil market point of view, we see the loadings right now from Asia to, sorry, from Saudi to OPEC to Asia and the demand supply. If you look at all the barrels of the market, obviously, OPEC is in a bit of a pickle right now. They've been waiting for the longest time for China to come back and they're losing market share. They've pretty much been holding the fort in terms of these OPEC cuts. they've taken the brunt of the share of the cuts, waive a price to rally above 90 and then to release their oil. That plan never happened. They were meant to have these voluntary cuts, you know, just for a few months.

26:04They ended up being like a year and a half. So the question now is they're lowering their prices to attract their barrels into China at the cost of Russia. So there's a bit of a power struggle going on because some of the other OPEC members really want to pump as much as they can as they've invested in capacity for the last few years. So why should they hold back when this is their crown jewel? Whereas obviously, Saudi and some of the bigger members want them to be a bit more restrained to keep prices stable. So from that perspective, there's all those dynamics. But from a flow generation, so we're looking from a one-month, three-month, and sort of see the demand.

26:35Because when the loadings happen in China, they're usually on a six - to eight-week basis. So we can sort of see where demand is going to be. And China this year has been very price opportunistic. They're not growing their demand. But when prices dip below 70, they just sort of load up and put in their warehouses. So yes, there's demand. But China's become very price sensitive, unlike 2008, 2009, when they just went in and bought every barrel because they needed to. So China's being a lot smarter about playing the oil market. And that's why our thesis on oil demand and supply is so predicated on the fact that the demand is just not there.

27:06We are very muted, and we've seen OPEC lower their numbers every single month of the last six months because they're so off-site. I think the last adjustment OPEC did was they took the Chinese demand down to 400 ,000 from 1.2 million barrels per day because they've just lost out. So that gives you that perspective of the short term versus the medium term. Of course, we can talk about oil from a two-year basis, but that's not how it trades. Oil trades and what we need in the next few months. And that's how it actually trades. Copper is very similar. We look at sort of price demand based on how much inventory is on the COMEX, the Shanghai Exchange, what are LME warehouses doing, what the demand supply is.

27:44Obviously, dollar, macro, and yuan are very important for how currency and speculative trade are to trade the copper market. But our horizon is mostly tracking. We have this quantitative model where we track all across as a signal. So we use a host of signal indicators to see what demand is in the macro markets to pinpoint what will be in the actual physical markets. So when we see these discrepancies, we have these ratios that track forward demand and into our price. And we see these things blow out, the conversion diverge. And that's where you see the opportunities. You know, in the oil market, we look at refining margins.

28:14It's a very good indicator in terms of what actual crude oil demand is going to be. But the average person that's 2H oil will not know what naphtha, jet fuel, or kerosene or distillate is doing. It's crazy how people just look at oil, but they don't understand what drives oil. And it's margins. It's demand. And it's solely fastest of the product market. The product market is determined the demand for oil, not OPEC or other things. They're just self-managing supply based on a certain demand scenario. And we know that we look at people like Goldman Sachs or Jeff Curry. These guys are really smart guys.

28:43But most sell-side guys extrapolate a linear demand. We dynamically look at the economic cycle, track demand as it's actually printing, and then filter that back into the commodity market to see what the supply demand deficit is going to be. Because assuming a flat 1.5 % growth, you can assume, right, oil is going to be in shortfall, but that's not how it works. If three months from now we go through a GDP, a negative 1%, that's going to impact the oil market. So we are constantly tracking demand live on a quarterly basis to see where the shortfalls are and then trading, buying long or selling short based on sort of discrepancies.

29:15I think that's the true edge in terms of trading on a quarterly basis. What could change your view on the demand side in terms of your view of the forward price outlook? Today, if China comes out to their detriment and announces a$20 trillion yuan stimulus package, if they announce in the order of$20 trillion, nothing less than$10 trillion is going to get the market moving. If they announce that, close your eyes and buy everything. The question is what's going to happen to the currency? The yuan is going to probably collapse and probably go$8 or$9 versus the dollar. But yes, China needs to do a very, very, very high bazooka stimulus and a fiscal stimulus for the market to start chasing old commodities because then they're doing that.

29:51And then they need to reassess, right? But that's a very difficult number for them to do and actually predicate on the dollar. China has been hamstrung by the dollar strength. And I think that's another reason why they're waiting for the Fed to cut rates or sort of lower the dollar so they have a bit more breathing room to do the bazooka stimulus. But no, that's what's going to change. We look at European demand. Europe has another systemic problem. We've seen what's happening in Germany and France. So from a demand perspective, China is the only one that can surprise us if they come up with that number.

30:18And then, but on that basis, copper is going to rally a lot more than oil. Sure, oil is going to go up, but there's so much supply that is going to be contained. So if I had to really buy this thing, I'll still buy gold and silver and copper. It'll do a lot better than oil. So the question is, the rising tide lifts all boats, but it's about alpha capture as well. So rising tide lifts all boats, but not equally. But not the cycle, because the demand supply is a lot balanced. five or ten years ago, all commodities went up, iron or steel, because we were this massive global synchronization of urbanization of China.

30:48But now the cycle has become a lot more mature. Some pockets of commodity markets like steel and iron, there is no shortage or oil. Copper is a bit tighter because you just can't take copper off the ground. You have to have these projects from 10 or 15 years ago. So if you see a demand surge from China housing and from electrification, copper in a very short time period will get very tight, whereas oil, you can open the tap. So it's about that window of opportunity where before we had no sources of supply, but now we have an ample source of supply and invasion across the board. So you've got to be a lot more selective.

31:17So like we said, we look at the macro framework, which is important. Once a macro takes green light and the micro gives a green light with the technicals, that's your, we call it the holy trinity, right? Then you get in, just go all into that commodity because you get a massive force that goes up for that commodity. But if you get a very strong macro and weak micro, something like oil, the price says nothing, right? And that's sort of interesting paradox here, this idea that because producers of oil have been so effective at being able to bring on additional swing capacity, that in fact, it actually mutes the price move relative to copper, for example, when we're talking about commodities, because of the inability to extract more copper from the ground as rapidly and to be sensitive to those cyclical demand.

32:01Absolutely. You know, because oil is just, you put the taps zone and you get either US shale oil, you can switch it on and off. You have Saudi oil, a lot of spare capacity sitting there. We don't have a lot of copper's spare capacity and the demand picks up. It's very hard for Freeport or Antiforgasso to find new copper mines. These take years and years. And one argues that if you believe in the pure electrification story and how copper is going to be used for the next 10 years, you can argue that companies need to invest more for the future. You're absolutely right because there could be a shortage.

32:27But that's a 10-year long story. A lot can happen till then. Whereas something like the oil market, you can We talk about, Trump is talking about drill, baby, drill. For the U.S. oil market, shale, we're having about, what, 13.2 million barrels per year of production. They're producing all they can. There's no need for them to go and produce more. There's just too much oil right now. And if they want to be incentivized, the question is, either prices fall really low for them to stop drilling to support the prices, or they go a lot higher. But they are very comfortable. And this is all this talk about peak oil and the U.S.

32:55shale running out and effectively OPEC being the marginal source, swing producer. So U.S. oil dynamics changed since the shale revolution. I think that's something that Saudi and OPEC need to realize is that they are no longer dependent on those barrels. And U.S. policy is very different based on their resource independence, effectively. Right. And I think that's why the oil markets change so much. So, Malia, we talked a little bit about time horizons on copper and oil. Let's do the same with gold. What time horizons are you examining it over? over? And what are those analyses across the time rises?

33:29So for gold, right now, the next one month is something can be a bit tricky based on the higher dollar and the bond yield market. But on a six to 12-month basis, all of next year, we have very bullish gold. So for gold, we take a longer 12-month time frame because it doesn't really have a very small physical short-term market, right, as oil and supply demand. Central banks are buying gold. We've seen China in November add to the gold reserve. So there's exactly a tailwind for gold. But like I said, the things that annoy gold are probably the higher dollar and it's a risk-off situation. So gold, we have a six-to-one-month view and we like it.

33:59Silver, again, is based on a six-to-one-month view as well. Near term, we see a lot of value sub$30 right now. And once again, if, you know, Fed's foul says the right things tomorrow and says, listen, we're not going to be cutting rates, you know, willy-nilly and it supports the bond market, silver's going to fly, right? So we love the risk of bond right now, effectively on those assets. So we have the view on a six-month basis, but from a near term, The upside versus downside is very compelling for both of those commodities. And like I said, in terms of asset allocation, where would you be invested?

34:26Probably more in those assets than equities per se. You could probably have a small allocation to equities, but I think better more in the commodities and the bond markets. There's much more value there. Well, yeah, I see the words, says the right thing in double quotes as you say them tomorrow from J-PAL. Absolutely right. I mean, obviously, you know where I'm coming from because, as always, his press conferences can be, you know, with the amount of time he clears his throat, you can sort of take a step back and know that he's quite nervous. And I think the Fed really has been led by the bond market this year.

34:55They've constantly flip-flopped their strategy all of last year when inflation data actually has been inflationary. They should be raising rates and they became too dovish last year because the bond market's calling for it. And now the bond market is pretty much called, excuse my French, BS on them since the movement of September. The Fed's going to go backtrack and be like, right, we're done cutting rates right now. So they're really hostage, taken hostage by the bond market. And that's what they've been doing. So these meetings are getting a bit boring because they're just tracking. And the Fed has always played one function.

35:21They only react. They have never preempted. If they ran true analysis and numbers, they'd be able to predict what the future has been doing. They would not be cutting rates and raising rates the way they have been. For the longest time, they got inflation wrong. There was transitory. Inflation was never transitory, right? If we had 200 years of pain and they cut too soon too fast, and then the economy was going to recession because every time we saw such an aggressive rate rising campaign, we always went to recession. And then what did they do? They're doing QT on one side, but they're injecting liquidity by the banking sector on the other side.

35:49So there was, you know, it was like in the markets couldn't do anything but go off. So we talk about QT, but all of 2023, the Fed injected liquidity in the markets. So this is why, you know, this question of going back to fiat currency, the problem for every, the solution to every problem is printing more money. And the question I have for people right now is where is this money coming from? And in what size? And what does that mean for paper money? Because that's the only thing that stands out for me. Jeez, boy, where is it coming from? What's the price? What are the externalities that result from it?

36:22And to what degree are we getting, as you pointed out earlier, a role of diminishing return coming off that? You mentioned some price levels there on gold. As I said earlier,$26.38 right now on my screen. You mentioned$3 ,000 as a potential target for 2025. What time horizon is that across? So we love gold around$26.25 right here. Right now, we can see it. So a lot of people are talking about 25, 40 on the 100-day moving average. But from a six-month basis, we can see gold getting to 3 ,000. So all of next year, our target is 3 ,000. We could probably get there in the next three months. If we get this out of the backdrop where bonds value, the market gets worried about stagflation or inflation coming back, we could get there very soon.

37:02But we see a lot of value go to probably once it recaptures the 2 ,700 level, the technical traders will probably start chasing the CDS and start buying more gold. Right now, we have a few people trying to trade on the backdrop. Gold is looking technically weak, but we're not really worried. We like gold. Even though it pulls back a couple of dollars, we think there's much more upside into Q1 and Q2 next year. Like I said, Q1, Q2 can be a very interesting point where the market sort of reassesses its view on the economic cycle, the dollar inflation. And I think that's where you can get a lot more money coming to gold.

37:31What a great conversation. I know that our listeners and our viewers are really going to enjoy this one. We covered a lot of ground here, macro commodities, equities, bond market. Final thoughts, key takeaways that you'd like to leave our listeners and our viewers with today. So the issue we had is, I ask you a couple of my clients, is Bitcoin, crypto, right? How do you view Bitcoin? And is it a commodity? Is it a digital asset? Do you want to invest in it? I know we've seen numbers from BlackRock talking about 1 % to 3 % allocation to Bitcoin. And I keep telling my clients, it depends on your investment horizon and your mandate.

38:05If you have a lot of risk in your fund, of course, you can invest in Bitcoin. It's a great asset. And as we see more and more institutions adopt it, it's going to take you there. But the volatility, if you can't weather the volatility of 10 % or 20%, 40 % moves, you can't be in it. So it all boils down to you may lack a certain proposition, but being long gold and silver is very different than being long Bitcoin. I can invest probably 10 % of my fund in gold. Would I put 10 % in Bitcoin? Probably not. Would I want to? It's a different story. So I think the evolving nature of Bitcoin and Ether and these crypto assets will play a very important role for precious metals and commodities going forward as to how to make money in commodities.

38:42And that's the conversation we're having with our clients right now. But in terms of the bigger framework of dollar, interest rates, central bank policies, and where inflation is going to come back, I think once you take that backdrop, there are only a few assets to invest in. The question really is how much do you want to be exposed to that? So this is the debate for next year. I think the question we leave with our clients is, are you in a period where you see GDP re-accelerate, i.e. we don't even have a landing, we just sort of take off again? Or do we see stagflation, which is a very real possibility, or just inflation and seeing massive slowdown?

39:12And if that happens, how would you be allocated to your assets and how would you protect your capital? Because the key is to protect your capital and not just chase, you know, the few stocks that people have been doing right now, the concentration, the leverage, the amount of zero DT options right now. the game has changed, the players have changed, and the volatility is enormous right now. That's actually alternate. But a lot of people invest in passive indices, and passive has done really well for the last 10 years. And that's another question for us. Will it do well in the next 10 years? And I think the economic cycles change every 10 or 15 years, and people need to think about active allocation rather than just being passive.

39:46Malia, when you pivot there to crypto, there's no way I'm going to be able to wrap without asking you more follow-up questions there. And now that we talk about it, listen, you mentioned 40 to 60 % drawdowns. How about 60, 70, 80, 90 on Bitcoin? We've certainly seen that. But then again, on the flip side, you've got that log scale upside growth that you see during those breakouts. Obviously, a highly volatile market, quite fair and reasonable to point out, but also historically enormous, enormous gains in that sector. I'm curious how you think about it as a macro hedge fund and as a cross-asset macro hedge fund specifically, how you think about that in terms of your allocations?

40:22And are you limited to looking at just Bitcoin or are you looking a little bit further down the stack in terms of those digital assets? So Bitcoin, if you look at today, how it's trading versus the 2012, the 2016 halving cycle is going to be more of a mature asset class. And that's a good thing because if funds like us or even some of the big institutions, you can allocate capital because you can probably rather the 20, 40 % rather than halving and quadrupling in like a space of three months. So Bitcoin is going to be a mature asset class. the rate of change is getting less and less right now.

40:51So it's not going to give you maybe the 80, 90, 100 % returns as it did that much. But that's a good thing because you can allocate capital in a much more confident, reasonable way. So yes, the answer to that question is that we can probably invest a lot more money to Bitcoin. For something like Ether or Solana, you can argue that you can probably invest a lot less, right? Because these are still quite speculative compared to Bitcoin. And that's going back to the Trump's proposal about a National Bitcoin Reserve or the Michael Saylor strategy, you know, more and more institutions diversifying.

41:16Bitcoin is becoming more mature, and that gives you the confidence to invest or at least allocate some part of it because it's the truly only asset. But you have to remember something. It's a risk-on asset. Back in August this year, we saw the dollar-yen trade unwind massively by 20%. In one morning, Bitcoin was down 20%. So as much as you talk about store of value, you have to be very cognizant of the fact that it is still a very leveraged asset to liquidity. So if you see a macro cycle, Raul talks about this all the time, GLI, the Global Liquidity Index, right? If you see liquidity being withdrawn from the market globally, that's going to affect Bitcoin rather than the macro be on your side.

41:49So you need to track liquidity because that's the key for all of these assets, especially the leverage ones. William Bengali, what a fantastic conversation. I hope you'll come back and join us again here at Real Vision. I look forward to it. It would be my pleasure. Definitely. Thank you so much for joining us. By the way, I should say, don't forget, tickets for our upcoming in-person crypto gathering in Miami are now up for sale. Head over to realvision.com forward slash CG2025. 2025, that's realvision.com forward slash CG2025 to get yours. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Have a great afternoon, everybody.

42:21If you like this episode, I'd love for you to head over to realvision.com forward slash join for a free membership. Start your journey today to unfuck your future. Just one click away. Have you ever wanted to trade Bitcoin but haven't dared try? With Plus500 Futures, you can trade crypto without the hassle of opening a wallet. With just a few clicks, you can register and start practicing with their free and unlimited demo. See a trading opportunity? You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks. Feel ready? You can move to real money with as little as$100 once your account is approved. And the great thing is that in addition to crypto, Plus500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments.

43:01S &P 500, NASDAQ, gas, and much more. Explore equity indices, energy, metals, Forex, and beyond. With a simple and intuitive platform, you could trade anytime, anywhere. Experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for with Plus500. With over 20 years of experience, Plus500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit us.plus500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves the risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify. Plus500. It's trading with a plus.

From the publisher

🔥 *Get Raoul Pal's free PDF report:* https://rvtv.io/3YOZZUe.

👉 Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading but haven’t dared try? The futures market is more active now than ever and Plus500 Futures is the perfect place to start. Visit us.plus500.com to learn more.

Ash Bennington sits down with Maleeha Bengali, CEO of MB Commodities Capital, to examine how markets will respond to the Trump administration’s policies, the impact of the latest OPEC+ decision on energy, shifting dynamics in copper, and whether bitcoin has truly eclipsed gold as a store of value.

📣 This episode comes to you thanks to Plus500. Plus500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments—S&P500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin, Gas, and much more! 

Explore equity indices, energy, metals, forex, crypto, and beyond.

With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere—right from your phone. Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures trading you’ve been waiting for.

See a trading opportunity? You’ll be able to trade it in just two clicks once your account is open. Not sure if you’re ready? Not a problem. Plus500 gives you an unlimited, risk-free demo account with charts and analytic tools for you to practice on.

With over 20 years of experience - Plus500 is your gateway to the markets.

Visit us.plus500.com to learn more.

Trading in Futures involves the risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify

🍌 Get your Banana Zone swag at the Real Vision merch store: https://shop.realvision.com

About Real Vision™:
We arm you with the knowledge, the tools, and the network to succeed in your financial journey.

Elevate your brand with Real Vision. Connect with us at partnerships@realvision.com to explore advertising possibilities.

🔥 Get 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘 𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗘𝗦𝗦 to Real Vision https://rvtv.io/3Y4t5Pw

Connect with Real Vision™ Online:
Twitter: https://rvtv.io/twitter
Instagram: https://rvtv.io/instagram
Web: 🔥 https://rvtv.io/3Y4t5Pw

Disclaimer: https://media.realvision.com/wp/20231004185303/Disclaimer-1.pdf
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Real Vision: Finance & Investing

All 984 episodes
Has Bitcoin (Really) Outshined Gold? ft. Maleeha BengaliReal Vision: Finance & Investing · 45 min
Listen in VO