In short
Podcast Summary: Is This a Trampoline Landing? With Vincent Deluard
Podcast Information
- Title: Real Vision: Finance & Investing
- Description: The podcast provides insights and expert analysis in finance and investing through interviews with industry leaders.
- Episode Title: Is This a Trampoline Landing? With Vincent Deluard
- Episode Description: Vincent Deluard, Director of Global Macro Strategy at StoneX Group, discusses his "Trampoline Landing" theory, inflation forecasts, and equity market outlook.
Key Concepts and Discussions
Introduction to the "Trampoline Landing" Theory
- Definition: The "Trampoline Landing" concept describes an economic scenario where, instead of a severe downturn, the economy bounces back after a dip.
- Current Economic Indicators: The Atlanta Fed's GDP nowcast suggests a 4% growth rate, contradicting earlier recession predictions.
Factors Influencing Economic Momentum
- Fiscal Stimulus: Discussion on the significant role of fiscal spending, especially after COVID pandemic relief measures.
- Noteworthy programs include:
- Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)
- CHIPS Act
- Inflation Adjustments:
- The Social Security cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) had its largest increase in 40 years, adding $100 billion annually into the economy, primarily benefiting low-income retirees.
- Adjustments to income tax brackets are providing indirect fiscal stimulus by preventing "bracket creep" during inflation.
Inflation Outlook
- Current Inflation Trends: Deluard anticipates a second wave of inflation driven by fiscal measures and gradual adjustments.
- Expectations for CPI:
- Forecasts suggest potential CPI increases due to rising commodity prices and base effects.
- The speaker predicts a possible upside surprise in upcoming CPI reports.
Long-term Economic Predictions
- Inflation Stability: Deluard believes inflation will stabilize at 4%–5%, influenced by factors such as:
- Lagging healthcare costs that have shown deflation.
- Changes in consumer behavior and spending patterns.
Equity and Treasury Market Analysis
- Bearish Equities: Deluard expresses a bearish outlook on equities, suggesting that the current momentum may not be sustainable.
- Treasury Yields: He predicts that Treasury yields could rise, particularly the long end of the yield curve, due to lack of buyer interest and potential events that might disrupt market equilibrium.
Investor Psychology and Market Perception
- Recency Bias: Investors may be too optimistic about a return to low inflation, overlooking the potential for ongoing inflationary pressures.
- Long-term Cycles: Discussion on historical cycles of inflation and interest rates, suggesting that current investor sentiment may be misaligned with long-term economic realities.
Key Takeaways
- The U.S. economy is experiencing a rebound termed as a "Trampoline Landing," defying recessionary forecasts driven by fiscal stimulus and adjustments.
- Inflation is expected to remain elevated, influenced by both fiscal policies and consumer behavior.
- Investors should be cautious of recency bias and the potential for ongoing inflation as opposed to a return to historical low rates.
- Deluard's perspective signals a critical need for investors to reassess their strategies in light of changing economic dynamics.
Conclusion This episode of the Real Vision podcast provides insightful analysis on the current economic landscape, emphasizing the importance of understanding fiscal stimulus and its implications for inflation and market behavior. Vincent Deluard's theories and predictions are valuable for investors navigating the complexities of today's financial environment.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00If you've been considering futures trading, now might be the time to take a closer look. The futures market has seen increased activity recently, and Plus 500 Futures offers a straightforward entry point. The platform provides access to major instruments, including the S &P 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin, natural gas, and other key markets across equity indices, energy, metals, forex, and crypto. Their interface is designed for accessibility. You can monitor and execute trades from your phone with a$100 minimum deposit. Once your account is open, potential trades can be executed in two clicks. For those who prefer to practice first, Plus500 offers an unlimited demo account with full charting and analytical tools.
0:45No risk involves while you familiarize yourself with the platform. The company has been operating in the trading space for over 20 years. Download the Plus500 app. Trading in futures involves the risk of loss. It is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify. Our story begins in 2014, after the largest financial crisis the world had ever experienced since the crash of 1929. Since then, we've made it our mission to democratize the very best financial intelligence. We broke the story of Bitcoin in 2014 before the general public even knew what it was. We've made award-winning documentaries and series about some of the most important economic and geopolitical events of our time that have amassed millions of views across platforms.
1:31And we've spoken with investing legends about trends years before they played out. Here at Real Vision, we don't follow the news, we make the news. This week on social media, we'll be showcasing some of the most important pieces in our history, unlocking some of them for you to watch for free, and sharing important takeaways from them that will be useful for you in today's markets. So be sure to tune in. We also have a very special offer just for you guys. To learn more, simply click on the link in the description or scan the QR code.
2:23Is this a trampoline landing for the U.S.? Hi, everyone. Welcome to this extended Real Vision Daily Briefing. With me today is Vincent Deloard, Director of Global Macro Strategy at Stonex. Hi, Vincent. It's great to see you again. Happy to be here and very happy that you used my trampoline landing moniker. I'm trying to get that to trend on Twitter. And, you know, every bit helps. Thank you. We're going to do our part. All right. That's exactly why we chose it. And we're going to explain that for folks in just a minute. But just a reminder before we dive in, the second half of the show, today's extended.
2:58So we're going to go for an hour. We have so much to talk about. But the second half is exclusively for Real Vision members. So if you want to stay with us the whole time and you're watching on YouTube or listening in, go ahead and scan the QR code and jump on some of the incredible trials that we have right now so that you can do that. We want you to stay for the whole thing. So Vincent, the concept of a trampoline economic landing is something that you came up with and you've been writing about it. What do you mean by that? And why do you think that best describes what's happening in the U.S.
3:29economy right now? In terms of meaning, I think it's kind of self-explanatory, right? I mean, you jump on the trampoline and instead of continuing your downward momentum, you bounce back. and yeah that's that's how the best way I could describe the economy I mean you know a year ago you had all the serious economies and the banks you know kind of out recessioning each other out and oh the recession is going to hit and the commercial real estate and the regional banking crisis and kind of all these doomsday call and then you know well maybe it's not going to be a hard landing you know maybe it's going to be a soft money and then a no lending.
4:13And today we have Atlanta Fed GDP now cast at 4%. If I'm not mistaken, that's more than last quarter. So it is a trampoline lending. The recession that all these supposedly informed people expected turned out to be an economic reacceleration. And I would argue that it was entirely predictable if you paid attention to the right data in the right way. Yeah. And certainly over the last couple of weeks here, a lot of people have been talking about some of the fiscal stimulus and the fiscal side that most people just seem to either have forgotten about or they weren't sure how effective it was, or it seemed to have sort of fallen off the radar, but it's been making its way through the system.
4:58And I think you also think this has a lot to do with the momentum, correct? Yes. Many kind of have to go back to Keynes and Econ 101 and the power of fiscal spending. I think we've been a bit insulated from that maybe for 40 years. We spent our time focusing on central banks and thinking that central bankers were gods and thinking that, you know, all you had to do was watch a Fed funds rate. And that would tell you all the yield curve. That's another good one to know what the economy was going to do in six to 12 months. And it turns out that, you know, when you give people money, especially people who don't have a lot of money, they spend that money.
5:40And as that money gets spent, it creates economic growth. that should not have surprised anyone before this kind of odd era that we were into. I mean, I don't know if you want me to go into the sources. Well, you know, I think what's interesting is, and I highly recommend reading Vincent's research because it's always spot on in terms of detail, but also kind of thinking outside the box. The things that you listed, and maybe just rattle through them, is when you say that, When we say fiscal and you talk about when you give people money they'll spend, I think a lot of people were thinking about those sort of COVID payouts, the kind of one-off, stimulative, emergency measures.
6:22And since we're moving away from COVID, maybe that's why people kind of forgot about it. You pointed to things that are different and were part, I think, and it's interesting. And I want to hear about the staying power from that. So what are some of the things, fiscal things that you're looking at? And inflation reduction, that's part of it. that people have also now been saying, hang on a second, we're spending money on infrastructure in a way that we haven't in decades. What are the things that you're looking at? Yeah, definitely the IRA and the CHIPS Act are part of it. But I think most economists had that.
6:54Right. I agree. On their bingo cards. You're absolutely right about the COVID stimulus, kind of, you know, a lot of the CARES Act stuff. The ERC was kind of dropping off the cliff. but you had a second wave that I think people did not quite understand coming from the inflation shock of 2022. You have a tremendous amount of payments in the U.S. that are indexed on inflation. Most important of them is Social Security. I mean, you have 67 million people between retirement, disability, and survivorship. And we have the largest cost of living adjustment in 40 years. That was announced, by the way, October 13th.
7:39The day the market made the low, and we announced this, I think, 8.7 % cost of an increase. I mean, that's a lot. Social security goes out about$1.2 trillion every year. So you're going to almost put 10 % of that. That's$100 billion in people's pocket. And these checks, they hit every month. Right. It's not like a one-off payment bonus. That's what I think is really important about paying that out. Yeah, and they go to people who will spend that money, right? Because your average social security beneficiary is kind of working class, doesn't need to save, doesn't need to buy a house. Last year, he's been squeezed a bit by inflation.
8:18So, hey, that extra$100 he gets every month, that goes straight into the economy. The exact opposite of what you see for 10 years, you try to stimulate the economy by giving more money to Jeff Bezos with the wealth effect. That doesn't work very well. But when you give money to people, that works. So, COLA is one of them. And then the second, which I think a lot of - Cost of living adjustment, that's the acronym that you hear. Cost of living adjustment is referred to as COLA. Yes. And the second that a lot of people missed was the adjustment to the income tax brackets. And this is very much the same idea.
8:51So that's to avoid something that's called bracket creep. So when you have high inflation, basically the value of everything goes up, like price, wages. So if you wouldn't move the tax bracket, you would fall off, you'd pay more in taxes, right? because 150 ,000 is now 200 ,000, so you're in the highest bracket. So what the IRS does is that every year, also in October, same time, based on the observed inflation, it's like, okay, I'm going to raise my brackets for next year. So October 18, the IRS came out and said, okay, we're going to raise it by about 7.1%. And that applied in January 2023. So pretty much everybody who's not in the highest bracket, because the highest bracket doesn't have a top, effectively got a 7 % tax rebate.
9:37This is money that we, American taxpayers, used to send to the Treasury every two-week pay period, and we don't have to do that. So you have all your 67 million retirees plus all the Americans who are working who are enjoying almost double-digit growth in their nominal income. At the same time, inflation is falling. I mean, I think it's going to come back, and maybe we'll get to that later, but effectively went from 9 % to 3 % inflation. But the adjustment for this year was based off last year's inflation. So there was kind of lag effect between when the inflation hit and when the compensation for the inflation hit.
10:13And I think this is where a lot of the stimulus came. And then after that, you're absolutely right to mention the IRA, the CHIPS Act. The thing about this big, you know, I can't remember, the number was something absurd, like$370 billion for the IRA, right? I mean, at the end of the day, it's just like, yeah, throwing a couple extra hundred, you know, just for show. But you can't spend$370 billion. That's physically not possible, right? So you have to spread it over time. Given the way public policy works, there's, you know, long and variable lags for fiscal policy as well. So a lot of that spending starts to hit.
10:50It's already in 2022, but it starts to hit in 2023. The chip stack, you can certainly see it. I mean, all the fabs being built all across the country, right? I mean, Texas, in Ohio. And these are huge projects, like$20,$30 billion projects. So you have all these sources of stimulus sitting at the same time. And again, this is direct spending. This is not, you know, like QE where, you know, you replace, you know, long-term bonds with short-term bonds or short-term bonds with bond reserves where you're actually just swapping to. Financial engineering at the margin. No, this is good old, you know, dig a hole and, you know, pay people to dig it and at night refill them.
11:31I mean, this is this is changing stuff. And yeah, when you when you do this in the economy, that's already running at potential where people still want to spend them. Yeah, you get some impulse out of this. Hey, everyone, we're going to take a quick break right now to hear a word from our partners. We'll be right back with more of the day's top analysis on the Real Vision Daily Briefing. Have you ever wanted to trade Bitcoin but haven't dared try? With Plus 500 Futures, you can trade crypto without the hassle of opening a wallet. With just a few clicks, you can register and start practicing with their free and unlimited demo.
12:05See a trading opportunity? You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks. Feel ready? You can move to real money with as little as$100 once your account is approved. And the great thing is that in addition to crypto, Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments. S &P 500, NASDAQ, gas, and much more. Explore equity indices, energy, metals, forex, and beyond. With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade anytime, anywhere. Experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for with Plus500. With over 20 years of experience, Plus500 is your gateway to the markets.
12:39Visit us.plus500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves the risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify. Plus500. It's trading with a plus.
12:55Yeah, I think that's really important because we've everyone sort of saying, how did we how did everybody seem to miss this? Because the calls for recession have been so persistent, so steady. And it was really characterized as, OK, well, we just don't know the lag from the Fed policy when those rate hikes will hit. It's just delayed. There have been offsets. But now you're hearing more and more. And that helps me understand maybe why people miss this and why they seem so surprised that we haven't seen more of a slowdown or more of a recession. And just a couple of comments from the audience who's listening.
13:37And Jonathan pointing out construction stocks are close to all-time highs. Jordan's saying it's pretty crazy all those years of QE just push assets higher. But really, we should have just been fixing bridges and potholes. I mean, there is that argument. You should require right there. I'm going to fix the bridges and let the billionaires, you know, alone. Yeah. Yeah, it should have been obvious from the start that, you know, the wealth effect benefits the wealthy, not that you get more bang for your buck fixing bridges than, you know, buying bonds. Absolutely. Apparently, a lot of economies thought otherwise.
14:16Yeah. So and now the staying power of this, because this is the important point, I think here when we're talking about that now, the IRA and some of that that chips spending, that massive number, you said it will take years and years to deploy. And there's always the chance. I think we all know how Washington works, that another party or something else comes in power deficits. Maybe people rethink that. And maybe you take some of that away or maybe you somehow figure out a way to claw some of that back. But when you're talking about this other stuff, it has staying power, talking about cost of living adjustment, index inflation, hard to find, figure out how they're going to take away money from seniors and Social Security.
14:57So that's probably pretty sticky, right? Well, yes and no. I mean, because really what matters is the impulse, right? It's the delta, right? So, of course, it's going to be, you know, it's going to be sticky, right? I mean, retirees are the largest consistency, you know, they will get their callers. But what matters is the size of this year's COLA versus last year's COLA. And keep in mind that it tracks inflation with a one-year lag. Okay, so it'll move with inflation, but right now it's in the economy. I think right now the estimate for next year's COLA is around 3%. That's what the League for American Seniors estimated came up last week with that number.
15:35So if we are what I expect, which is a rebound of inflation, and I think we see that in data tomorrow already, and then we kind of go to where I think inflation really should be, which is 4 % or 5%. I think that's where it's always been. You'll actually see retirees get a net real income loss next year as opposed to the kind of like 5 % real gain that they have. Same thing for the bracket story that I was mentioning about. Same story, right? The brackets in 2020 for your tax liability for 2023 will be based on inflation in 2023, which is going to be much lower. So it could be that if inflation re-accelerates, we'll have the bad kind of bracket creep where you go in the high bracket because inflation is higher than what the IRS had anticipated.
16:23So in a weird way, and I've spent, I don't know, hours on Twitter and podcasts arguing with all these recessionists this year, saying, no, this is not going to happen. You guys have it wrong. And I've always been kind of the lone bull on the economy. I suspect that I'm going to be more bearish on the economy than the consensus starting in January, February. Now, we'll get into 2024 with a lot of momentum, I think. But that momentum is going to slow. It's going to hit the brakes. And it could be that, you know, just at the time when the quote-unquote smart guys finally get it, the economy actually slows.
17:00because they i mean i'm not questioning the fact that you know the raising the headphones rate from zero to 5.5 percent in in 15 months i mean yeah at some point that's going to take a bite uh now i will say maybe you can go to into it later but there has been a weird stimulative effect at the beginning of this higher rates uh for the the fed's balance sheet effectively um but again And the delta was enormous this year because we went from zero, the Fed paid nothing on its liabilities until the first hike in March of 2022, to now they pay 5.3%. They have like$5 trillion in bank reserves and a reverse repo facility.
17:40So$5 trillion times 5%. That's$250 billion. The Fed is just writing checks to people. I mean, this is the GDP of a medium-sized country that the Fed is just literally at the end of the month. just crediting every bank balance with that money. So that was hugely stimulated this year because we went from zero. Next year, if we have the rate cuts that the market seems to price in, that impulse is going to be negative as well. Yeah. Okay, I want to put a pin in that because I want to come right back to that. But just very near term, both Colin and Christopher are asking, what do you expect for tomorrow's CPI?
18:21Do you think it's going to be in line? Do you think it's going to be weaker or hotter than consensus? This is very short-term right now, right? Yeah. I mean, making this kind of short-term forecast is the best way to look like a fool, and I will volunteer. And please keep in mind that I'm taking the hit here, so I'm going to say it's going to be hotter. I think consensus is for 0.2 % month over month and then three-ish year over year. I have a model that just looked at base effect and energy and it's probably going to be closer to 0.3 0.4 month of a month and then a reacceleration like 3.3 3.4 year over year um I'd have to run the exact numbers but basically the intuition is pretty simple right I mean base effect of right so June 2022 was the peak and then actually on a sequential basis dry 2022 was lower like this was the actual month of a month drop so we went from very negative base effect to very positive as far as inflation goes.
19:22Two, commodity prices. I mean, gasoline prices are very high. I live in California, about five everywhere. And that's a big short-term driver of inflation. And then third is the weakness of the dollar that probably will lead to some important inflation. So all in, I think we see a little bit of an upside surprise. I'm not sure that the market will entirely freak out because everything that I've kind of explained, I think eventually even the Wall Street economists will be able to understand that. And then, you know, oh, it's Bayes affected. So I think we surprised the upside. I don't think, and it's a huge upside.
20:03It's not crazy, though. Like a surprising upside, but within reason of what people are thinking about. I think for now, we still kind of have this narrative of the soft landing And that's kind of dominant. And, you know, I think we can withstand maybe one more month. But my view is that after that, it keeps going. And then that's kind of when we have the problem, maybe in the fall. So this was my next question. So what is your outlook? If we move just past the immediacy of this week's numbers, what is your outlook for inflation? So we've got all this momentum in the economy. And I'm holding the thought that you're going to get bearish next year.
20:38We'll get into that. But we've got all this momentum in the economy. What happens? what does that mean for inflation? It sounds like it would stand to reason that inflation is going to be problematic and we're going to see a resurgence because we've got all the strength in the economy, right? Yeah. Yeah. I mean, that's, in a way, my view about inflation is that we've reset at four or five percents. And we've been there, if you look at like the super core, the sticky, the trimming stuff, it's been there for about a year. Like the spike to 9 % was not very real right it was the oil shock the russia invasion the use car the plane tickets and then that took us down as well right but in reality maybe it was six percent last summer now it's around 4.5 uh and then that is my view that you know we will reset there that is actually a good thing for for the inflation target so i think that's where we want to go um in terms of of factors that i would stress so other than the short-term stuff we talked about the base effect and the energy prices, one area that I think people don't look at enough is healthcare.
21:41So according to the BLS, the price of healthcare in the U.S. has declined for nine straight months and is now cheaper to get cured in the U.S. than it was last year. So we have a deflation in healthcare. Sure as hell doesn't feel like that. I know. My premium went up by 15 % this year. I had my insurance. And I actually checked. Maybe I'm just unlucky. But no, I went to the ACA website, all the guys, the Obamacare that offer plans, it's up by a median 11 % this year. And it makes sense. I mean, the cost of everything has gone up tremendously. How could healthcare, which is mostly labor, how could that go down?
22:20I mean, we have these shortages of nurses, of doctors. Obviously, the big pharmaceuticals always know how to make money. I mean, healthcare is usually higher. How could that be? It's lower. And it's the same kind of mechanic. okay as in shelter you know like all the deflation is right now they love to point to shelter and owner's equivalent rent and it resets every year so it's lagging and blah blah blah blah blah okay fine i i mean i i can do that too but look look at how the bls looks at healthcare inflation you'll see the exact same dynamic annual resetting of prices because a lot of that negotiate rate and then instead of measuring the actual cost the it's imputed from the profits of insurance companies, which have been completely skewed over by COVID because for a year, no one went to the doctor because we were scared to have COVID.
23:13So we have this massive distortion that have created artificial deflation in the healthcare CPI, and that's 10 % of the index. So if you have 10 % of the index in deflation, if we go back to, let's say, 5%, that's 50 basis points added to the CPI. If we get that, there is no way we can get to 2 % on a sustained basis. We're going to take another quick break to hear a word from our partners. We'll be right back with more of the day's top analysis on the Real Vision Daily Briefing.
23:44So I want to bring up a clip here because this is along the lines of what we've been talking about all week. Tony Greer sat down with Kevin Muir this week and had a great conversation about all of these topics. And Kevin expressed concern that the market psychology is too anchored in the past. Let's have a listen to a clip from that, and then we'll talk on the other side. I just want to contrast this and think about it in terms of 1982, when Volcker came and he broke the back of inflation, nobody wanted to own bonds. And the reason they didn't want to own bonds was because they were convinced inflation was coming back.
24:23and because they were convinced inflation was coming back, they kept the real rate, meaning the rate of bonds over inflation, extremely high for a long, long time. So you could earn positive real rates by buying the bond market because everyone thought it was coming back. Okay, it took many, many years for that kind of persistent real rate to decline. I think we have just the opposite right now, Tony. I think that we people continually underestimate how persistent inflation will be. And I think that that's why we're seeing people rush into the bond market back to the sentiment talking that we spoke about.
25:04They keep rushing back in there and they keep remembering the old era, the old era when rates went to 1 % or 0 % and how much money they made that way. So we are going to have persistent kind of over-optimism about bonds. And if you want, you can't just be short bonds. It doesn't quite work that way. Really what you want to be is long inflation.
25:30And that full conversation is available on our website. If you are not a member, you know what to do. Scan the QR code, O 'Brien has put a bunch of info in the chat for you. So, Vincent, are investors too quick to assume that we're going to revert back to a low inflation environment? Yeah, first off, great, great clip with Kevin. I mean, you know, fantastic guy. I mean, he's been in that higher for longer. His economy is stronger than you think camp at a time when it was not cool. So I... Kindred soul. Yes. You've been suffering together. He's also the nicest person. And so I'm very happy. And then, of course, I'm going to agree with what he says.
26:13I mean, he gets it right. I mean, you know, we drive in the rearview mirror, right? In the early 80s, people were traumatized by inflation and they kept interest rates too high for too long. And we're doing the exact opposite. Yeah. And it's interesting to bring it up, I think, because that part's about not just the data, about the psychology, how hard it is to turn psychology, turn that recency bias when that's all you've known. And in fact, Andreas was very honest about that when I asked him to my colleague, we were talking about this in a recent, I don't know if it was academy sessions or, and I said, what's the risk to your forecast or what do you worry about?
Read the full transcript
26:52And he was like, listen, I've only lived, you know, based on his age, I've only lived in an environment where we've had this low inflation, low interest rate, could I be experiencing recency bias myself? Sure. So I think everyone has to check. That's an interesting angle to think about. Yeah. And again, I mean, I was just thinking, as Kev was talking about, these cycles of inflation. So you mentioned 82, right? So it's 42 years since 82, right? Then you add on, you subtract on over 42, that gets you to 1940. That was the bottom for years. the prior one it's it's amazing that you know these very long cycles when it comes to rates and inflation you know that back then you know we're just coming out of the great depression it was obvious that inflation is going to pick up we had a world war for god's sake like the entire world was throwing bombs at each other and yet point yields are ridiculously low and then after that after world war ii they start going up for 42 years and then down for another 42 I mean, it's funny how sometimes the story rhymes.
27:57I think we are at the dawn of one of these very long-term cycles. And at each one of these turning points, most investors get it wrong because, as Anderath mentioned, all that they've known is the old world. It was inconceivable for someone in 82 that inflation would fall to 2 % on its own, that would have negative yielding debt. I think in the same way now, it's inconceivable for a lot of the bond market that inflation will not go back to 2%, but instead will hopefully stabilize at 5%. I'm going to ask you about that hopefully a little bit later. So what does this mean if inflation is going to remain elevated and we're in this reset now to something closer to 4 %?
28:43What is your outlook for treasuries? Well, I mean, I've obviously been a big bear on treasuries for a long time. I feel a bit better about them now that we repriced quite a bit. I mean, I was vivid in March when we had a Silicon Valley bank crisis and the futures market was pricing cuts yesterday. I think the Fed missed the mark there. I mean, they just thought that it was a second policy mistake. It was a third policy mistake. It was keeping the accommodation for too long, calling inflation transitory, and then getting freaked out by what turned out to be a non-event. Anyway, so in March, it was awful.
29:27Now, I look at the two-year getting close to 5%, the front end of the curve. I still think the Fed is going to do one more hike, and then it's going to keep the fear of another hike live. They need that for a liquid reason. and they need to basically empty the RRP into the TGA. So I think that's why they need some slope up front. But, I mean, we're talking like 10 basis point gap on the front end. The bond market is, at least the short-term market, is not delusional the way it was for months ago. On the long end, I still think it is delusional. I think we can go to 5 % very easily. I actually think we will get there, and we'll get there in a couple days.
30:04I don't know when that's going to hit, but when it hits, it's going to be like the guild market. You'll see, you know, 30 basis point up, three days in a row because of some sort of a liquidity event. So the longer I'm bearish, and I'm especially, what I'm especially more than rates actually is the inflation break-evens that seem off to me. I think that maybe the best way to play that is with inflation swaps, because I think that's where the market is most delusional. Like the real rates have come up quite a bit, but it's the inflation expectation that seems too low to me. That's really interesting.
30:40and a little bit terrifying to think about that happening. And you think it would be like an event that would spook the market. Yeah. I keep thinking about what happened to Liz Strasse, the latest prime minister in the UK. The market is very tense. She announces this big blowout budget and all the pension funds. I mean, I'm sure British pension funds are not the only one with improper duration hedging and lots of hidden leverage in the system. There's never one cockroach. This is true. Somebody who lives in New York City can attest to this is true. And we have very bad liquidity at the long end.
31:32And we have had for a long time. I think there's a Bloomberg Liquidity Index at the long end. It's very bad. the volatility at the long end is pretty bad too which is indication of lack of market depth and i think we've been avoiding that to some extent by freezing it right we put all all the treasury assurance was at the front end you know basically that yellen's been running the debt on bills which you could argue from a taxpayer standpoint it's awful right because the curve is very so you should be tapping that long end the reason she's not tapping it she prefers to pay one one percent or more is because she knows that if you tapped it there wouldn't be a buyer um so yeah the the the liquidity is bad uh the issuance is they're gonna have to move the longer i mean the treasury just announced actually that that they would start you know hitting that 10 23 year again um and i doubt that we'll see a lot of buyer at this duration also another problem that's been freeze is the regional banks right so for a couple years we stuffed treasuries down the throats of our regional banks and banks in general you know buy them they're this free you can why why why why then of course svb blows up but then we freezed it with the btfp like uh the um bank term funding uh protection facility uh where we basically told the banks hey don't sell your long-term treasuries put them at the fed you get cash par value for a year but there's still that overhang of long-term treasuries that the banks have so i see a lot of possible sellers and there's no, I don't see an obvious buyer for long-term treasury debt at a time when insurance is going to spike.
33:09Okay, that's a super important point and concept. I just want to ask you though, before I let our YouTube audience go, I think it was Jonathan, no, Alex, sorry, Alex Morgan said, there will be no rate pivot until something breaks. So there is this concept that if you have an event like a guilt type event here, where you start seeing treasury rates, that will be something breaking and that the response won't just be that you get this spike in yields, but the response will be like, oh, the Fed's coming in, yields are going to fall because now we're back to cutting and the Fed to the rescue, the Fed pivot.
33:50Do you not see that playing out that way? A little bit, but I see it with the balance sheet, not the rates. Because, I mean, if we see the long-term yields go to 5%, cutting the Fed funds rate by 25 bps is not going to do anything, right? You're going to have to start using the balance sheet, which is probably what the Bank of England did. So I think the first route to drop will be quantitative tightening, so stopping, because this is where the equity problem comes from eventually. The fact that We have not only$150 billion in deficits every month, but we have$100 billion in treasuries maturing that the Fed can let's roll over the balance sheet.
34:28So I think that's where it comes in. You stop that, and then maybe you do some sort of a twist or reverse twist. I don't even remember. We had so many operations at this point of life. And they're all very creative. Exactly. Your yield curve is like a knot. Yeah, so they would use tools, whether existing ones or new ones they come up with on that side, as opposed to just cutting that rate. So you're not going to see it play out the way that we were used to back in the day. I think that's super interesting. All right, we're going to jump over for members. Like I said, if you want to come with us, and you should because we've got a lot more good stuff to cover, just hit one of the links that Brian put in the chat.
35:08What's up, revolutionaries? Thanks for tuning in to the Real Vision Daily Briefing. For more content like this, head over to realvision.com and get unfiltered access to the very best, brightest, and biggest names in finance. Have you ever wanted to trade Bitcoin but haven't dared try? With Plus500 Futures, you can trade crypto without the hassle of opening a wallet. With just a few clicks, you can register and start practicing with their free and unlimited demo. See a trading opportunity? You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks. Feel ready? You can move to real money with as little as$100 once your account is approved.
35:43And the great thing is that in addition to crypto, Plus500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments. S &P 500, NASDAQ, gas, and much more. Explore equity indices, energy, metals, Forex, and beyond. With a simple and intuitive platform, you could trade anytime, anywhere. Experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for with Plus500. With over 20 years of experience, Plus500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit us.plus500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves the risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify. Plus500. It's trading with a plus.
36:19Thank you.
From the publisher
SAVE 60% on 3 months of Real Vision Essential 👉 https://realvision.com/last-chance
Vincent Deluard, director of global macro strategy at StoneX Group, joins Maggie Lake to discuss his "Trampoline Landing" theory, why he sees a second wave of inflation coming, and what's making him so bearish equities. In the second half of the show, Vincent explores whether the U.S. has peaked and where to find value in international investments.
You can find more of Vincent's work here: https://marketintel.intlfcstone.com/MIPublic/Landing
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
