716 - Personality Typologies

16 Dec 2025 · 1 h 7 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Scriptnotes Podcast Episode 716: Personality Typologies

Overview In this episode of the Scriptnotes Podcast, hosts John August and Craig Mazin are joined by screenwriter Mike Makowsky to discuss various aspects of screenwriting, historical dramatization, personality typologies, and the current landscape of the film industry.

Guests

  • Mike Makowsky: Screenwriter known for *Bad Education* and the new series *Death by Lightning*.

Key Topics and Discussions

  1. Dramatizing Obscure Historical Events
  2. Focus on James Garfield's Assassination:
  3. Discussion on how to dramatize lesser-known historical events.
  4. The chaotic political environment surrounding Garfield's presidency is highlighted.
  5. Mike Makowsky shares insights on adapting the story from the book *Destiny of the Republic* by Candice Millard.
  1. The Importance of Finding Unique Stories
  2. Finding Great Stories in Obscure History:
  3. The hosts discuss the importance of uncovering lesser-known narratives that can resonate with audiences.
  4. The journey of *Death by Lightning* in getting produced is explored.
  1. Personality Typologies in Writing
  2. Examining Personal Writing Practices:
  3. The discussion shifts to personality typologies and their impact on writing.
  4. The hosts explore systems like Myers-Briggs, Enneagram, and Gretchen Rubin's four tendencies as tools for understanding character motivations.
  5. Personal Insights:
  6. Makowsky shares his obsessive writing habits and how they influence his creative process.
  1. Industry Trends and Changes
  2. Warner Bros. and Netflix Merger Speculations:
  3. The hosts discuss the implications of Netflix potentially acquiring Warner Bros.
  4. Concerns about the future of theatrical releases and the cinematic experience are expressed.
  1. Listener Questions
  2. Various listener inquiries are addressed, including the adaptation process from page to screen and the challenges writers face when transitioning their work.
  3. Discussion around writing with physical limitations and how to manage back pain while writing.

Notable Quotes

  • "It's a sort of tabula rasa where you're like, you actually get to present, hopefully in a compelling enough way, a story that people really don't know anything about."
  • "Telling people to not use opioids does not work. That is useless. We know that for a fact."

One Cool Things

  • Mike's Recommendation: *The Good Lord Bird* - A historical drama that creatively presents the life of abolitionist John Brown.
  • Craig's Recommendation: Discussion on developments in opioid vaccination as a potential solution to the drug crisis.

Conclusion The episode emphasizes the importance of storytelling, exploring new narratives, and understanding personality typologies in both writing and collaboration. The discussions provide valuable insights for writers and industry professionals navigating the complexities of screenwriting and production.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Hey, this is John. Standard warning for people who are in the car with their kids. There's some swearing in this episode. Hello and welcome. My name is John August. My name is Craig Mason. And you're listening to episode 716 of Script Notes. It's a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters. Today on the show, how do you dramatize the untold aspects of an historical moment as a limited series? No, Craig, we're not talking about Chernobyl again. This time, it is the assassination of U.S. President James Garfield and the chaotic, dysfunctional political system surrounding it.

0:36We'll also discuss personality typologies, those systems for categorizing what makes people and fictional characters tick, plus listener questions. To help us do all that, we welcome back Mike Mikowski, who joined us last time on episode 448 in 2020. Thank you for having me. Welcome back, Mike. Good to be here. Yeah. Yeah. Blast from the past. I love this. Yeah, it was a COVID Zoom. It was COVID Zoom, yeah. Back in the COVID days, yeah. Back in those days. You're a screenwriter whose credits include HBO's Bad Education, which is what we talked about. Which we loved. Which we loved. And Death by Lightning is your new series.

1:06The Garfield Assassination series is now out on Netflix. And it's just terrific. Congratulations on it. Thank you so much. Yeah, so I want to talk about the production of it, the intention of writing about this obscure president and what happened there. Oh, how dare you, by the way? Obscure. Obscure. And also just the notion of limited series because they're increasingly hard to make. And so we'll talk about that. In our bonus segment for premium members, I want to talk about coaching trees. And this is an article that we found this last week, which was about which TV shows, writers' rooms generated the most other creators of TV shows.

1:40So there's like a... Oh, that's interesting. Yeah, so it's a branching sort of... Like Sid Caesar, our show of shows was sort of the ultimate. Absolutely, that's sort of the iconic one, but there's many other ones along the way. And maybe just talk about sort of what the culture is in those shows that allows for so many writers to grow out of them. But first, if anything's going to grow or change, it's going to be in a new ecosystem because as we're recording this, which is sort of two weeks ago for our listeners, Netflix is apparently buying Warner Brothers. Craig, how do you feel about that?

2:06Well, it's interesting. I work at HBO. HBO is owned by Warner Brothers. So I think everybody was sitting around going, well, it looks like David Ellison and Paramount are going to be buying Warner Brothers. And then Netflix and was it Universal? Yeah, Comcast Universal. Yeah, Comcast Universal. And then it turned out that Netflix was the one that came out on top. Now, the thing is, we kind of don't know. We kind of don't know. You all got the email from Netflix as subscribers, right? They were like, we did it. And yeah, they did it in the sense that the board of directors agreed to sell the company to Netflix.

2:44But there will be some significant regulatory issues here. And apparently, this is another horseshoe effect where the far right and the far left are very excited to join hands to try and block this sale. Yeah, it's also worth remembering, like you were here with us in 2020, the universe conspires to do weird things. And so like anything that seems like a given or granted is just gonna often will not happen the way you expect it to happen. Yeah, that's exactly right. It's far above my pay grade to be able to speculate what is gonna happen here. Yeah, so I think the only thing I would come back to like as sort of ground truth is that I'm really concerned about the theatrical, the idea of making theatrical movies.

3:22Because Netflix - If you're only really concerned, you're not concerned enough. So I just want to state like a sort of basic foundational principles is I genuinely believe that movies, by which I'll define as being roughly two hours of experience of a narrative that is filmed, I think they belong in theaters first. And the actual experience is crucial. And once they've made their money there, then you can release them for purchase or for streaming. and the goal should be to maximize the value out of each individual title and then reach the widest audience possible. And that sounds so basic, but it seems to be so forgotten in all of this.

4:05It's not forgotten. I think it is rejected. I think Netflix has rejected that theory completely. Yeah. They put things in theaters now for a week or two to mollify the filmmakers that they want to attract to their not theatrical experience. So they do give Greta Gerwig or Rian Johnson a little taste. Yeah. Helps them qualify for the Oscars and so forth. But really, they just want it on their platform. And I'll make a few predictions. Yeah. Because unlike Mike, I do not have the humility of understanding when things are above my pay grade. These are above my pay grade. I don't care. I'll take some sort of - Here to promote a Netflix show today.

4:47Absolutely. 100%. So, well, most shows are Netflix shows. And even more shows are about to be Netflix shows. If this goes through, right? If it goes through. So if it goes through, I think Warner Brothers Theatrical is toast. And I think the only question is, what do they do with HBO? Because you don't buy HBO to not have HBO. That would be crazy. So, because that's, there is, I mean, the worst possible view is that Netflix bought Warner Brothers for the library alone. and now they will just make Lord of the Rings shows and Harry Potter, which HBO is already doing. But HBO is one of the only brands that means something in our ecosystem.

5:31So prediction is that they actually keep an HBO app. It won't be HBO Max anymore. It can finally just go back to being HBO. Because what's one last change? And it will be a bundled app with Netflix that you get for free as part of your subscription, and HBO will live as a little island. But it'll obviously all be owned by Netflix, and then when the Emmys come around, HBO, Netflix will win all the time. All of the Emmys. Constantly. It's them, and then FX picks up a few here and there. That's my prediction, but... I can see that happening, and so we should acknowledge that as we're recording this, there's a lot of public statements about, oh, no, we're going to maintain Warner Brothers as an entity, and they're still releasing this theatrically.

6:14They also said that about Fox, and Fox exists kind of in name only. They are making movies. And that was Disney that likes making movies. They like making movies. I think what Saranda said was something like, yeah, you know, we're going to, you know, we'll take a look at it and then, you know, as things evolve, we'll reexamine. It was just sort of like, no, no, no, we absolutely won't use this gun pointed at this head to shoot it. I just, it's a bummer. It's a bummer. It's a bummer. And it's not that I don't like Netflix. I subscribe to Netflix. I watch Netflix. Netflix makes great shows. like Death by Lightning.

6:47They make a load of great shows. They do. It's just that I also like going to the movies, and that's an area where I disagree with them. And I know that when somebody like Rian Johnson says, you must give me a theatrical release, clearly he does too. We all want a theatrical release for things like that. I'm not stupid enough to root for one corporation over another. They're all corporations. But it will be interesting to see. And it's going to take, what, 18 months? Is that what they're saying? Yeah, it's going to be a while before we sort of know how to... So this will be the fourth corporate parent that I've experienced at HBO since I've been there.

7:22And I've only been there since 2015. That's crazy. Yeah. All right. We will not be able to resolve the Netflix of it all, but we can talk about something much more local, which is the Script Notes book. So as we're recording this, we don't have the actual sales figures, so we don't know how it did. It's opening week, but it did really well. And so we're really happy with the launch of it. And thank you to everyone who pre-ordered it. Thank you to everyone who bought it the first week. Thank you for everyone who came out to our live show to buy it there. Everyone who posted about it, that's awesome.

7:48So Drew has been reposting a lot on the Script Notes Instagram. Yeah. Basically, anytime I open up the app, there's five or so people who have posted about it, which is great. Yeah, so we're resharing those stories. Thank you to everyone who's left a review on Goodreads or Amazon, because those will help us get the word out about the book. So one thing that's come up frequently, and Mike, you have your copy of the book in front of you, people say like, it's lighter than you're expected to feel, that it feels light in your hand. Do you notice this? So light. And I have to compliment to Binding as well.

8:15It's a beautiful looking tome here. It is a gorgeous book. And so I want to talk a little bit about sort of like why it feels lighter in your hand because it's one of the most consistent things we've heard. It's like, Craig's like, oh, did it make out of Palsawood? Is there something strange about this book? And so I went down a rabbit hole and I did the math. I did some research on it. So it actually weighs kind of about what it should. And so if you compare it to another hardcover book that's the same size. So I have Atomic Habits, which is a bestseller that's also the same number of pages. It weighs more than that, which it should because it's physically wider than that.

8:54So it's 24 % bigger by volume, but only 13 % heavier. So there's something, it's a little bit different than you sort of expect. But mostly the effect is that it's called the size weight illusion. And so it's what makes your, your brain makes predictions about how much it thinks something should weigh. And so this is actually a documented phenomenon. I'll put a link in the show notes to it. But, and Craig, you like psychology. This is sort of your alley. I love psychology. So your brain makes predictions about how much something should weigh so that as you're reaching for it, you have an anticipation about sort of how much force you're going to need to use to lift something.

9:25And so that's based upon visual information. So what you see, its size, its thickness, it's apparent material. It's based on semantic clues. And so you have a sense that a brick should weigh more than a book should weigh. And then just prior experience with similar objects. I think that's mostly what is throwing people off about it is because it looks more like a textbook and we have a sense of how much a textbook should weigh and it just weighs less than a textbook. But why does it weigh less? It's a different paper stock. I think it's mostly what it is. This is the standard hardcover book paper stock where as opposed to a textbook has that glossy paper and that glossy paper just weighs more.

10:01There's an area called expectology, which is the expectation factor. And when you make a prediction error about how much something should weigh or what it should sound like or feel like, you get this moment of cognitive dissonance. And I think that's kind of what's happening with the book. Well, to me, it still feels like when you pick it up that it's one of those fake books that you open and it's hollow and then you put your keys in it or something. Absolutely. Yeah. You store your hooch in the air, you store your secrets. Yeah. But, you know, also who needs a heavy book? Holding a book actually is annoying after a while when you're reading it.

10:34Where do you think people are going to read this, John? Like physically in space, where are they reading this? Well, as we talked about from the very start, I think it's an ideal bathroom book. Absolutely. You're sitting there. You are in the toilet. You're on the toilet and you're getting smarter. Yeah, as you're doing it. Yeah, I always wanted to be one of those books. Yeah, it's so good. For me, growing up, my D &D manuals were those books. Oh. Do you know who we had in our bathroom growing up? Reader's Digests. So good. Yeah. Did they even make that anymore? I think, I suspect Reader's Digest still exists.

11:03That's a good question. You know, I remember there was the word power. It pays to increase your... And then there was like laughter is the best medicine. A hundred percent. It was so clearly meant for old people because there were ads in it. And I recall they were always for like phenomint or Aspergum, basically just arthritis medications. I'm like an eight-year-old sitting on the toilet reading books for 80-year-olds. It was nice though. I learned. They do still exist in print, but it seems like it's a bigger, it's like a magazine size. I remember them being smaller. It should be a little folio size.

11:37Oh my gosh. That breaks my expectation, and therefore, I hate it. Therefore, I hate it. We also have some follow-up about Orange Books. So Mick wrote in. On a recent episode, you referred to the Script Notes book as The Orange Book. As a former Nickelodeon writer, producer, and longtime listener, I feel a duty to mention that on my first day at the network in 2001, the creative director handed me a copy of The Orange Book. This incredible tome is a creative guide to all aspects of Nickelodeon's brand. It's legendary amongst Nickelodeon writers and producers, and it takes its title from the famous orange splat logo.

12:14I fear that you may be served a cease and desist order by the Bikini Bottom Business and Legal Affairs team over your claims to the term The Orange Book. And they sent through a photo of The Orange Book, their copy of The Orange Book, which still remains. I couldn't find a copy of, like, a PDF of it online, but I found some other materials sort of referring to it and sort of drawn from it. And it looks like a really good brand design book. And I will say that Nickelodeon at its peak, you clearly understood what Nickelodeon was. It was a very consistent sort of space. The same way Disney is a very consistent sort of branding.

12:44So good on them, but also don't sue us. I don't think I've ever reflected on how odd it is that the cable children's channel that was, I guess, at one time the best or the peak was Nickelodeon. and Nickelodeon is the most old-timey word ever. It's also a word I can never spell properly. I keep wanting to do it like a C-H rather than a K or the L-E as opposed to the E. Yeah, that's Nickelodeon. That's different. Yeah, but Nickelodeon? Yeah. I mean, it's a word like Chariot where it's like just lost all reference to what it was really meant to stand for. Yeah, it's a very strange thing. It's something that they would never do now, but see, it worked.

13:31It worked. Children don't know what an actual Nickelodeon was. Oh, God, no. What, the five-cent thing that you would play the silent movie in while you stuck your face in it? And in 1920? Yeah. I guess. I also feel like they, at some point, just shortened it down to Nick and they don't say Nickelodeon very often. Nick, Nick, Nick, Nick. Nick Jr. Nick at night. Yeah. We have more follow-up about breaking in into your 30s. Anne writes, after spending my 20s and early 30s working in rock and roll concert production, I was in need of reigniting my creative side. With a stack of writing samples and a surprising number of contacts I'd unearthed, I moved to Hollywood at the age of 35.

14:10To support myself as I navigated this new world, I began temping at the studios as an assistant and quickly discovered that my age and experience were an asset. I became known for being able to parachute into high-level executive offices and keep everything flowing smoothly. I found my home in the Disney Touchstone film division where I rotated through executives while I inhaled the script database and watched the movie making machinery in action. I don't know if what is left of the studio still uses temps, but if so, this is an avenue that the person who wrote in earlier should explore. Yeah, temping is a thing we didn't talk about in that, and it does make sense.

14:44And so I think the original writer was saying like, oh, I want to get a writer's assistant job. I want to do this kind of thing. I said like, that's a challenging way in. What Anne's describing, which is sort of being that temp who actually knows what they're doing and can just like show up on the day and make stuff work and happen, that's great. And I would say a lot of these companies do have sort of internal temp pools or sort of floating workers. And that feels like a really smart choice. Yeah, that was the first couple of jobs I had were temp jobs. Yeah. I think we've talked about, do they still have like the Friedman Agency, the temp agency just for entertainment business?

15:17I think it still exists. Live Google. F-R-E-I-D. Yeah, Friedman. Yeah, Friedman Personnel Agency, it seems to still exist. Yeah, so a place like that could make a lot of sense and also gives you a chance to just see a bunch of stuff. Because if you're just at one desk at one studio, you're not seeing a bunch. But if you're floating around, you can have a chance to read a bunch of things. Also, the expectations of ability to do stuff as a temp are pretty low. Basically, just like keep the lights on is probably a lot of it. So that may help. Yep. You can easily exceed expectations. All right. On the subject of exceeding expectations, we have Mike Makowski here.

15:52Your show is delightful. full. So it details the assassination of James Garfield and the man who assassinates James Garfield. Spoiler, he's going to die. But I want to first just start with a fundamental question. Why? Like why make this show? It's based on a bestselling nonfiction book. It's not called Death by Lightning. How did it come upon your reading list and what made you want to make it? Yeah. So about seven years ago, I was at the Grove Barnes and Noble at the buy two, You get one free table. And I needed a third book. And I picked up this book about the Garfield assassination, Destiny of the Republic by Candice Millard.

16:28And first I, you know, obviously made sure it was the proper weight. Yes. And, you know, I made sure that, you know, from a semantical perspective. Yeah. It looks like a book. In your hand, it felt like a book. Yeah. Yeah. It wasn't orange. So that was, you know, it didn't conflict with Nickelodeon or anything. Yeah. Sounds nice, to be honest. I would get sued, you know. But I read the back cover, and I think I had known that James Garfield had been assassinated. I dimly recalled that fact. It feels like Jeopardy information, yeah. But that's the reason I bought the book. I was like, I think I want to be on Jeopardy one day, so let me educate myself.

17:04I felt very embarrassed that I knew nothing about our 20th president. To me, James Garfield, his name evoked a little more than a very anonymous bearded portrait on a wall sans any real context. And the book sat in a pile for a couple months to get up the juice, to read the James Garfield book. It wasn't necessarily a priority for me. And I wound up reading the book eventually in one sitting, which was atypical for me. And I found it not only propulsive, but very moving and tragic and crazy and absurd. I kept having to go to Wikipedia, like every five pages to make sure that this historian in Kansas wasn't making all this shit up because it seemed way too crazy.

17:51And so I will say that the show is, you say absurd, but also it's funny in ways that you wouldn't expect it to be. You know, I found myself laughing a lot at this book that's not written with any real explicit levity or mirth, but there's a deeply ingrained situational absurdity to virtually all of the proceedings. This man should never have been president. He was nominated for president against his will, ostensibly. James Garfield shows up at the 1880s Chicago Convention for his party to nominate an entirely different candidate. And his speech is so profound and presents such a strong vision for the future of our country that someone stands up in the rafters and chats, we want Garfield.

18:30Exactly. Which is so crazy. And in many ways, Garfield was this poster boy for the American dream. He was a outspoken progressive advocate for civil rights and civil service reform and universal education. He was largely self-taught, grew up in abject poverty, just like the right man for the job. But, you know, he was not a popular figure prior to stepping on that stage and delivering an Obama in 2004 level speech where everyone's just like, well, who the fuck is this guy? And eventually the voting reached a deadlock because no one could agree on a candidate. There were a lot of warring factions within his party at the time.

19:10And on the 36th ballot, Garfield is accidentally nominated for president. But there's a version of that which is essentially Conclave, because that's sort of the underlying... It's very much like an American Conclave. I mean, I wrote the show long before Conclave existed, but I remember seeing that in theaters last year and being like, oh, that's just like, it's very similar. So you're reading this book and you have to make a decision like, okay, you want to do something with it, but when did you know like, oh, this is probably a limited series versus a feature? Like what were your next steps after reading the book?

19:41Yeah, I think instantly. I mean, you know, again, I read the book. I found myself laughing a lot. That's not normal for me. But my tone tends to be a little bit more darkly comic. And I think the fact that I was laughing a lot led me to believe, like I think that this is indicative of my voice and my perspective. And I don't know that other people would necessarily receive this story in the exact same way. but I think I should try and pursue this thing. So I ended up getting the historian Candice on the phone and pitching my heart out to like, please let me adapt this. And she was like, yeah, okay.

20:18And I ended up optioning the rights to the book myself because there wasn't anyone that was going to pay me to write a James Garfield show. Anytime that I told, well, whether it was my agent or executives that I was friends with, that I wanted to write a limited series about the Garfield assassination. They were like, good luck. Like no one, people weren't lining up for that. Yeah, let us know when you actually want to work. Yeah, my agent was just like, like, do you hate money? Like, do you despise me? Do you despise me? But at the same time, you probably understood that that's why the show could work because nobody's expecting anything.

21:01and then you go, surprise, there was this entire thing under your nose that is extraordinary. So you're sitting on a gold mine. That's kind of a good feeling, actually. Well, that's the great joy of Chernobyl. Chernobyl was obviously very instructive for me in a lot of ways, but it was a five-episode limited series about a subject that on the surface, most people probably wouldn't think that they would be terribly interested in. Then they would assume that any telling of that story would be a little bit dusty or didactic, like a history lesson. And, you know, to be able as a writer to create an interest where there was none before, I have absolutely no illusions that most people are going to want to readily watch a James Garfield show or learn a ton about James Garfield.

21:51Certainly in the 150 years since his death, there hasn't been a ton of interest in him. That's good news though. That's good news. Right. It's a sort of tabula rasa where you're like, you actually get to present, hopefully in a compelling enough way, a story that people really don't know anything about. I think it's wonderful. That's so exciting. It is exciting. And when we think about the choices of what we're going to do, it is true that if you say, I want to do a story about James Garfield, everyone's going to either laugh or make fun of you. There's a lot of jokes about like him hating Mondays or my agent still loves lasagna.

22:29keeps calling him Andrew Garfield by accident, and just stopped correcting him. That's all fine. But the problem is, if you say, I want to adapt blank, and it's something that they would be excited by just because of the subject, it's been done. It's been done a million times. What's the point of saying, you know what I want to do? I want to do a story about Vietnam. Oh, yeah, the Vietnam War. I know about that. That's a thing that people like. Yeah, and that's why we made 400 movies and shows about it. but finding something like this that is this little hidden gem. And we know that oftentimes these are the things that just seize people.

23:07I'm thinking of Scott Frank's Queen's Gambit. Yeah. I want to make a show about people playing chess. The metrics for how few people who engage with the Queen's Gambit have actually even played chess before is pretty fascinating, right? Like, you're, again, you're creating an interest where there was none before. And these, from a marketplace perspective, these are, as I know you know from Chernobyl, like incredibly difficult propositions, right? No one's lining up. There's no like ready-made comps for what you're trying to achieve. You're not trying to make the next Stranger Things that ends up being a pale imitation of Stranger Things.

23:42Like it is a wholly original proposition and that is really scary and it ends up being incredibly difficult and 99 times out of 100, like you don't get to actually follow through with it, which is heartbreaking. Right. It feels in many ways like we got to pull off this incredible heist by getting this show made. You're saying we, but so you were just off writing this by yourself. So you wrote the, so what will happen next? Yes. So I spec'd the pilot script and it was immediately - So you said pilot, but you knew it was gonna be four episodes, five episodes? I originally intended for it to be six and for a number of reasons, it ended up becoming four prior to ever being written.

Read the full transcript

24:20But I wrote the pilot script as a proof of concept because again, anytime I told people I wanted to make a sort of darkly comic and subversive take on the Garfield assassination, they were just like, no, fuck you. So I wrote the script. I was super proud of it. And then just through the different machination, I mean, it took about a year, but it ended up getting in the hands of our mutual friends and the producers of the show, David Benioff, Dan Weiss, and Bernie Caulfield, who gratefully fell in love with it and were able to champion it at Netflix and at least get Netflix to agree to let me write a second episode.

24:55It was a development process that lasted, you know, about three, four years ultimately because I had to jump through every conceivable hoop imaginable over there. Like I wrote a 70 page Bible after the second episode. I ended up writing four more episodes, then condensed those back down to two more episodes. We had a director, the director fell out, we got another director, we had to cast the two leads. We were in Budapest scouting for the show, backing into a start date, and we weren't actually greenlit yet. Again, I feel like we just sort of slipped in under the wire on this thing. I was going to congratulate Netflix on their impressions and their risk-taking.

25:37Now, I'm going to pull back a little bit just because it does sound like they really put you through it. But then again, HBO put me through it too. Nobody's just going to casually go, oh, yeah, here, make this thing that's probably just going to run in social studies classrooms. They are going to put you through it, which I understand. And I have to assume, based on Budapest, that budgetarily, you guys, you did not have a lot of wiggle room there, I'm guessing. Yeah, you know, whenever people ask me how the show got made, I hold up like the one Doctor Strange finger from the Avengers. I don't know that there were multiple paths to get this James Garfield show made in 2024 when we shot it.

26:19And I'm extraordinarily grateful to Netflix. I don't know that anyone but Netflix would have made this show at all. And we had a slate of executives who were also extremely passionate and grew extremely passionate about the show. But even that only really gets you so far. No, we had to pass a lot of litmus tests in order to ever see the light of day. Can we talk about Budapest? Because one of the things I was sort of surprised about, but I realized, like, I have not seen that era of American history very much on screen. And Budapest, I suspect, like, had buildings and places that actually looked like that in a good way.

26:54I'm sure there was a lot of visual effects to sort of create the depth behind things. It looks great. And you also have scenes with 500 extras in them, which is just very difficult to do in the US or even in Canada to sort of get that sense of scale. So that's all really helpful. But it's also challenging just being in Budapest for six months or so. Yeah. And it was funny. I got married. And two weeks later, I was in Budapest for five months. Yeah. And now I'm getting divorced. No. No. We're good. She's finally out of here on air now. No, Kara got a line in the show, which she was thrilled about.

27:28She's crowd woman number one. Oh, nice. She came out for one week and she was feeded as a queen. Boo. Boo. well congratulations on the show I'm just so happy that it exists and that it got made I remember Dan and Dave talking about sort of like oh yeah we're doing this crazy Garfield thing and they didn't say like it'll never get made but like it was clear like this is going to be a hard lift to sort of get there and I'm not sure anyone but them could have really mounted it I love that they did that and Mike and I would pass each other in the halls over at Formosa Sound where I was mixing the second season of The Last of Us and he was mixing Death by Lightning and that's where I found out that this was a show about Garfield.

28:08And I was kind of, just to give a little salute to my dearly departed dad, he was an American history teacher and he loved Garfield. He loved Garfield. He thought Garfield was, you know, one of the only good presidents of that era. And also just as a musical fan, I love Stephen Sondheim's Assassins and Charles Guiteau's song is the best song in the show. It's the best. I need to go back and re-listen to it. I've seen Assassins, but I don't know it off the top of my head. Because he's crazy. Yeah. So I don't know that we've actually, Charles Guiteau is the guy that assassinated Garfield, who is a very fascinating character in his own right and is sort of this like perverse fun house mirror image of Garfield in many ways.

28:53These are two guys who operate at opposite ends of the American social spectrum on one end. Again, you have this poster boy for the American dream who falls upward accidentally to a presidency just based on strength of character and merit. And Goteau, who also grew up in abject poverty. Loser. But like worshipped Garfield. As soon as he heard about Garfield, he was like, this guy gets it. Like - I deserve a job from him. Right. I need to do everything in my power to get this man elected because once he's elected, he's going to see that the two of us are kindred spirits and he's going to appoint me to an ambassador ship to Paris.

29:26But Goteau, unlike Garfield, had failed abjectly at everything that he had ever attempted. He was a failed lawyer, a failed public speaker, a failed newspaper editor. He had spent a couple of years at America's first ever free love commune, the Oneidas. And he was kicked out. He was the one guy who couldn't get laid at the sex commune. He refused to do the manual labor required of him. So the women on the farm would call him Charles Get Out. Charles Guiteau. But once Garfield is elected, it's the first time in Guiteau's life that he's ever put his energy into something and succeeded. in some warped way and derives so much of his own self-value from Garfield.

30:07And there's this weird toxic parasocial obsession quality that feels so modern. It feels incredibly modern. It feels like, you know, there's a pre-social media time, but you recognize, oh, I see. There's that, rather than sort of retweeting him, he's like, I'm gonna shake his hand and therefore like we are best buds and I know him. And yeah, so it's interesting to watch that. Once he's rebuffed by the Garfield administration, and he just sort of descends into madness and becomes convinced that his way to matter and to etch his name in the annals of American history in a positive way is to save the country from James Garshaw.

30:41Well, he's etched his name into the annals in the strangest way. We all know the name Charles Gatteau, just not for the reason he wanted. I'm very glad that you made the show. I hope it's doing well. And I would urge people as they're listening to this, if you have some thing that you're obsessed with in history, I hope that you're pulling out of this what something that, you know, the most important thing that I think Mike said about the genesis of this is how he became passionate. Yeah. And he felt like, ooh, I can't wait to tell people about this. And if you start telling people about these things and they go, oh, oh, you got something.

31:21If you start telling people about these things and they're like, no, no, that's pretty much as boring as I thought it was, then you don't. But follow that, at least that initial thing is very exciting to find something that we haven't seen a million times. I mean, it was, James Garfield was my Roman empire for about seven years. And to anyone that would listen on the street, I would sort of pull them off with the lapels and be like, James Garfield's the most fascinating story you don't know. And yeah, like I had a birthday cake one year that my parents made for me with Garfield's face on it. They were just like, when are you going to stop talking about James Garfield?

31:52But it's incredibly, like, what a privilege to be able to help reintroduce this man to modern audiences. And in the process of my research, I went to Ohio. He's the only president who is not interred or cremated or buried. His coffin and his wife's coffin are on twin pedestals in their crypt in Cleveland. Great. At their memorial. and anyone can go and like spend time with Garfield. Obviously, the coffins are behind Rod Iron Gate, so you can't touch the coffins. But, and I went there in 2019 when I was first starting to do research on this. And for the full hour that I was down there, I was the only visitor, which felt crazy to me.

32:40Like, that sounds about right though. No, to you, it seems crazy. But to everyone else listening, like, no, that makes sense. I'm routinely the only person at Buchanan's grave. That just happens, you know. Buchanan? That's not a good one. No, it's not. It's not bad. It's just fully bad. Oh, that was... And as a bonus, I also get to tell the story of Chester Arthur, who is Garfield's vice president, who later... Nick Offerman. Nick Offerman. Yes, our buddy Nick Offerman, who is just like such a dream. And of all of the characters in the script, I wrote Chester Arthur with Nick Offerman's voice in my head.

33:18Which makes it so easy. I was just saying this the other day. If you can just sit there in your mind and go, well, it seems to me that you're not, and you just start slipping into the cadence. You're like, I know what to write. I know how to do this. Yeah, it does help. He was so great. I'm so glad that he said yes. So Mike, the first time I met you was on Zoom because you came on for HBO's Bad Education. And then post-pandemic, you and I met up for coffee. And we sort of got to talk a little bit. And at that coffee, we were having a conversation about sort of your writing practices, your thing.

33:48how you do stuff. And I think I noticed this in the Bad Education script is that we talk about sort of how much things look on the page and how you want a good looking page. But your pages were all the margins were exactly identical so each line was the exact same length. There was a precision that I worried was like a little bit, was overkill because you're not making the best choices on words if you're actually worrying about the character length. And I said, I asked whether you'd ever consider talking with somebody about sort of your writing practices and things like that. And we had a little conversation about that.

34:16How much are you comfortable sharing sort of what you've done in the meantime? Yeah, I don't know that I was, I didn't know we were talking about this but sure. So we had coffee a few years ago and you guys have done however many episodes of Scribd Notes. Yeah, 714. 16, yeah. 16. And I have a very, very specific way of writing and I think it's a sort of like low-grade OCD where a lot of people don't like orphans or open lines. I think I've taken it to a kind of obsessive level and I just, I think I showed you a sample page from something that I was currently working on. I think probably Death by Lightning.

34:52Yeah. And I was like, have you seen this before? And you looked up, you looked at it for about 30 seconds and then you looked up at me and you were like, are you in therapy? And I was like, I'm not. And you ended up introducing me to my therapist who's also, you know, a frequent guest on this podcast as well. Dennis Palumbo, episode 99. And so, sort of a famous episode for our listeners, which we talk about psychotherapy for screenwriters and sort of like specific things that writers may benefit from therapy. And so it wasn't helpful. And so again, especially if you feel like sharing or don't feel like sharing, I'm just curious because I feel like we have other listeners who probably have similar sort of things that they're working on.

35:31Here's how I feel about writing. And I probably spend about 50 % of the time that I write making sure that the lines fit correctly for me. And sometimes that means sacrificing a really great line, but it also leads me to over-scrutinize every word in a way that I think actually does ultimately improve the writing. Nothing about my writing process is passive, right? And it needs to fit a specific way. The one sheet that I do do, I don't fuck with margins at all, but sometimes I will reduce the space between two words from a 12 to a 10. Wow. Just manually. I spend a lot of time obsessively just making sure that the dialogue looks like blocks and that there's not just one or two words hanging over.

36:23And I didn't always used to be this way. It's actually, it's grown more cute as I've gotten older, which I think is a little bit worrisome. Yeah. But it's also become like a, almost like a good luck talisman. Like I want to present the best looking aesthetic version of a script because I do believe that there is a subconscious quality to reading a script. And if it just looks sloppy on the page, for at least for me as a reader, like it does sometimes affect how I read. I mean, I wonder if, as I listen to you, I think a couple of things. One, that's crazy. Yeah. But two, so what? Because you're good.

37:03I guess whatever helps a good writer write, we are not perfect. We all have our things. And it is, as you mentioned, maybe there is a theoretical better version of a script you write that is less concerned about these things. but you don't write that script because you are concerned about those things. If the script is good and you need to not use the letter Q for some reason, what do I care? We're all crazy. What we do is a kind of insanity and we all have our weird things. It sounds to me like maybe you've made your peace with it and you accept that it's part of your process and it's a good thing for you.

37:44Yeah, it's never felt crippling. And then, you know, once you get into production and there's just the realities of like, you know, you start talking about the actors and then you're like, you know what? It's just, I don't think, I don't think I'm so hobbled by it, but I do think, you know, in those early drafts that it does help my process to over scrutinize and be a little bit obsessive with the words that are in the script. And yeah, I'm probably insane, but when I first spoke to Dennis, my therapist of about three years now, you know, I showed him a sample page and he was just like, do you feel like it helps you?

38:17And like, Like, do you feel like it makes you better at doing this? And I think at least in the short term, it does. In the long term, you know, we'll see. But for right now, it's definitely like, I think it leads to a more thought out product. And one that I do think from an aesthetic perspective, like it is helpful to be presenting something that looks clean. It may not really matter to anyone but you. But that's fine. But it does matter to you. Exactly. And so I want to go back to my initial instinct when I saw your page. I said like, my concern was like, this may be getting in the way of you doing the best work that you know how to do.

39:04And so here you articulate that you feel like this is a helpful way for you to get that best draft that you feel good about that feels like it is your work. then I totally get respect that. And it sounds like Dennis provided a perspective on sort of like, is this helping or is this getting in your way? And that's gotta be the crucial question. It's like, is this helping you do the work that you want to do? Or is it a thing that is stopping you from doing the work or distracting you from doing the work? And it sounds like you believe at this moment it's helpful, but you're also mindful that at some point it could be not helpful.

39:34It has to be. I mean, you know, I've never run a writer's room or really been in a writer's room. like, you know, when you're collaborating with other writers, yeah, you'd have to throw that in the garbage immediately, that notion that your script should look like someone else's, you know, because it won't. I'm not that crazy. And also, there are a lot of people who are listening to this podcast who are looking at their own scripts in their own pages or listening to a three-page challenge. And we're talking about how it looks on the page. And we're talking about Widows and Orphans some, but also just like how lines are broken up and sort of, and how this all feels.

40:09And I want to make sure that in the conversations that Craig and I have about the pages that we're looking at, no one is taking it to an unhelpful extreme. No one's going, like, being so obsessed with it that they're not actually focused on, like, what the words themselves actually are, which is, it sounds like it is for you a tool to really help you inspect, like, what are the word choices you're making, not just, like, is it exactly 60 characters long? Yeah, but, you know, I think every word has a cost to it, so So hopefully it leads to a tighter draft, you know, and... It leads to a draft. That's, you know...

40:44It leads to a draft, that's the crucial thing. As long as it leads to a draft. That's your... It's how it comes out. That's how it's organized with you. It's... Our brains are complicated. And I, like, one of the things I've been really working on for myself in this area of, I don't know what you'd call it, you know, human growth and enlightenment, um, is understanding that the process that I follow to make stuff is flawed because I am flawed. Uh, and that's okay. That's standard, right? Standard issue, human being, not a God flawed, but it works. It's just the flaws are part of it. You have to kind of accept it and you can call the flaws at that point, not flaws, just characteristics.

41:27You don't actually get to write anything if it doesn't go through the machinery of, and I also want it to look like this. It's the same thing. You can't separate them. When you get to a place where you're like, I actually don't like this. This is holding me back now. It just feels like a bad habit. Then you become aware and then it is recontextualized and perhaps it is teased apart. But if it never gets teased apart, if you spend the rest of your life turning things to make them fit, if the scripts are good, this is how you do it. So you said bad habits. And I think I often say is that early in my career, I felt like I had a lot of bad habits and I, at some point stopped labeling them as bad.

42:11They're just my habits. They're the way I do things. And that's actually okay. And so like some of my procrastination is just sort of my habit. And it's like, I can't fix it because it's actually just how I work. And that's also okay. But if at a certain point, like it does get in the way of how I work, then I need to really stop and examine them and see if there's a thing I can do to not fall into that pattern again. Yeah, no, I mean, it's actually incredibly helpful to talk about this with you guys. And in no way would I recommend that anyone else do what I'm currently doing. I'm not preaching the gospel here.

42:42It doesn't sound like fun. No, it sounds like you. To me, it's a version of problem solving and puzzling in a way that, you know, it's an added component to the way that I write. And I think that at times it ends up leading to something beautiful. And other times I do have to sacrifice my first blush best line and maybe I find something better. And hopefully, you know, if I'm ever on this podcast again, you know, we can check back in and see if I'm still doing it. But right now it's proved, I would say, mostly helpful and not too bedeviling. It seems like it's been incredibly helpful, actually.

43:20So sometimes people will talk about these issues and they will put them under, you know, kind of, oh, I know I seem a little OCD about this. And we tend to concentrate on the O, which is obsession. And I think it's the C, it's compulsion that is far more frequent among people who do what we do in a large sense because we're compelled to do it in the first place. It is compulsory. and then there are these kinds of compulsions that occur as part of this compulsory behavior of writing. Yeah, I mean, I think all screenwriters are bound by this. We're all compulsive. We're all a little crazy. We're all neurotic.

43:58Like we would have never, we're all in our heads, locked ourselves in rooms and written these things in a vacuum. Like there is a compulsion there and sometimes that comes out sideways, like in my case. But, and we all have different processes and it's helpful to be able to talk about it, especially with two guys like you. You are not alone. And to say that we are all idiosyncratic in our own idiosyncratic ways would be an understatement. This is actually great for people at home who may feel sometimes like they're weird. Yes, writing is a weird thing to do. Imagining that you're 12 different people who are all disagreeing with each other is a weird thing to do coming up with these scenarios all the time.

44:39And what we do is weird. It is neurologically weird. how could you not, as part of the neurological weirdness, have quirks? And to the extent that, you know, you can accept those quirks as long as, you know, as John says, they're not things that you don't, if you don't feel a great need to get rid of it, you know, then you and Mike McCaskey have something in common. And me and John. Next thing I want to talk about is typologies. And this came up because my husband, Mike, I was describing to him, this person I needed to work with. and some frustrations I was feeling about sort of our working relationship.

45:15And Mike said like, oh, well, she's a questioner. I'm like, what does it mean? And it's like, oh, sort of Gretchen Rubin's four tendencies. There's a questioner. And it's like, he brought this up before. He's like, I will show you the chapter on sort of how to deal with a questioner. And so he showed me the chapter in the book. I'm like, oh, wow, that's exactly right. You've precisely diagnosed why I'm having a challenging time with this and sort of what the best strategies are for getting into consensus with this person. So I want to have a general conversation about sort of personality archetypes, the ways we sort of sort people both in the real world and also our fictional characters because I think there's this instinct that you should be able to neatly categorize all these people and their personalities and their types.

45:55Craig, you and I have talked about Myers-Briggs before, but in addition to Myers-Briggs, there's Enneagram, like the big five, you hear about the four behavioral types from DISC and these are the four tendencies from Gretchen Rubin. I remember I read a book in high school when I was buying all the screenwriting books called The Writer's Guide to Character Traits. Sure. I don't know if you guys have ever heard of that one. Is it orange? I'm sorry. I'm frantically. Is it light? No, it was blue. I'm frantically trying to Google it right now, but maybe we can't. Blue books are out. Orange books are out.

46:25Absolutely. But I remember like an early book I read was like sort of like the gods in every man or the goddesses in every woman. And basically it was talking about sort of her personality types that way. And I'd love to have a discussion about sort of to what point is it useful and to what point is it just astrology and it's just like sort of you're just randomly assigning labels to things. Oh gosh. Yeah, I don't... You don't think of your characters in terms of like a bundle of attributes that sort of fit neatly together? I don't think so. Yeah, I tend to adapt. I adapt a lot of true stories and I definitely gravitate to characters that have similar misguided impulses to one another.

47:01but I wouldn't say that I try to be too prescriptive by sort of assorting them into boxes. Greg, have you ever tried to do Myers-Briggs-y on any of your characters? Hell no. How they approach things? No, no. I mean, I remember, you know, everybody kind of goes through a phase where, I don't know, Melissa's family was super into Myers-Briggs but I never thought that it was particularly interesting. There's probably a character type called person who likes character types and that they get value out of this But yeah, I bet there's a large number of our listeners or at least a sizable percentage who really want to neatly be able to categorize things.

47:38And that's part of the process. You can try, but you try. You this is not I I personally don't think this is a good because it's it's post it's post. It's not pre right. So writing is about creating somebody. And when you are introducing characters to an audience or a new relationship in a story to an audience, they need to see the birth of it and they need to see people discovering each other. And as they discover each other, they should be changing each other. We tend to look at people when they're in moments of change. These things are sort of, this is who you are, not changed. And it's kind of simple and they tend to go over the same things.

48:16And really, as far as I could tell, these things exist to sell books. To sell books and to do workshops to understand your co-workers and things like that. You know, like, here's the thing. I'm fascinated by people who aren't like me. and I'm also fascinated by people that are fundamentally not like me. It is interesting. I don't necessarily know if the people I've liked the most as I've gone through my career have been a certain type. My guess is no. I think generally what I seem to be attracted to is intelligence and there are intelligent people in all of these. I mean, you and I are not the same personality type.

48:51Did you know that? I did notice that. Somehow over like the last 15 years, I have noticed that. It's funny. And yet we do have a significant degree of overlap in terms of our desire for logic, our desire for... But also you're smart. I mean, the bottom line is you're smart. That's what I go for. I like smart. And I like smart people who are so wildly different on all these scales. And when I meet somebody that has like my characteristics, who's just sort of dull, I don't need to hang out with them. There's a thing we're developing internally for... So we make Rider Emergency Pack, which is sort of like, you know, as you get stuck in a story, sort of ways to navigate out of a jam.

49:27And the thing we've been working on is a version that is sort of more sort of character archetype-y, but rather than being sort of ex post facto, it's like ways of thinking about, if someone has these two characters together, what kind of character would have that? And so what would a nurturer explorer kind of feel like? What kind of character is that? And sort of useful storytelling, like thinking tool, but it's not meant to be sort of like, oh, you have to have this exact mix of characters in order for it to work properly. To what end do you think D &D character classifications? Oh, yeah. Like, I feel like I am constantly referring to characters as, like, chaotic neutral.

50:04Yeah, the alignment charts, yeah. The alignment charts are fun, but again, post-facto fun. Yeah. In and of themselves, they're pretty blunt tools, and there's also quite a bit of fuzziness, you know, between some of them. Here's where I imagine it could be useful. None of us, you know, traditionally work with a group of other writers, but I could imagine as you're having a conversation about sort of a character or, like, a new character or introducing sort of like how it fits together, rather than trying to apply an exact label to them, look at some of the spectrums that they sort of lay out there.

50:35So to what degree are they introverted or extroverted? To what degree are they rebelling against external expectations or are they sort of intrinsically motivated to do certain things? How agreeable are they? To what degree they want to challenge authority? Those are useful conversations to have, but rather than sort of reduce them to one little label, I think you're probably better off. Yeah, no, I'm not going to go. That's right. Cool. Let's answer some listener questions. What does Julia in Oxfordshire ask us? I'm a novelist who teaches creative writing. I would be interested in your views on what someone with IP like a popular novel should look out for when people start circling.

51:10What's the ideal journey from page to screen and what's the nightmare? So I've had a couple of adventures with like adapting books or you're dealing with a property that's sort of becoming popular. And I've had good experiences and bad experiences with authors in that situation. I won't talk about the bad experiences, but my Arlo Finch books came out at the same time that Children of Blood and Bone by Tomi Adeyemi came out. And it's been interesting watching that development cycle because that came out in 2017, and the first movie version is only coming out next year, 2027. So it's like a 10-year journey.

51:44And looking through the number of times it sort of got set up and then fell apart and then got set up and going again, as the author, I should say, you just cannot know when a thing is actually going to happen, and when it's all going to come together. Mike, you bought this woman's book, optioned this woman's book, and it took years. Yeah, and at no point did it seem like a certainty that it would ever actually make it to the screen, even two years out or a year and a half out. I would say that talking with authors whose books have been optioned or purchased for adaptation, you have to treat it as like, this will probably never happen.

52:21And just sort of make peace with that. and you won't have the kind of control over it that you do over your own book. It's just like, your kid is going off to college and it's just gonna become its own thing. Yeah, I know. I think a lot of authors have really challenging relationships with the eventual product and so many other times. I mean, some of the greatest books of the last 10 years, books that maybe in a different era would have readily been ripe for assassination. Wow. Ripe for assassination. Wow. Stunning. Or I didn't slip there. For adaptation. I recently went on like a big Barbara Kingsolver kick over this past year and reading books like the Poisonwood Bible or Demon Copperhead where you're just like, these are some of the best books of all time.

53:02Like, why hasn't this been made as a... You weren't the first person who ever thought of doing it. It's hard to get things made. Yeah, it's just really, really, really difficult. So I would encourage Julia Nosferchire, if someone's circling your book, you might think like, oh, a director would be fantastic. Directors attach themselves to 19 ,000 things and none of them ever happen. finding like if a Mike Michalski approaches you who is a writer who's obsessive, who can actually sort of do the thing is generally a better choice. I tend to classify myself more as compulsive than obsessive. Well, I'm sorry about that, yes.

53:32Well done, Terry. I don't want to mislabel you or put you on the wrong spot. But yes, if I call you, please say yes. I agree. Let's answer one more question. Oh, here's one from Marco about writing with a bad back. Oh, yeah. Craig, you may have an opinion about that. I remember you mentioning back injections for pain. I'm turning 50, and right when things are finally starting to go well career-wise, my back decided to revolt. I can barely sit for more than 5 to 10 minutes without serious pain. The price of 15-plus years glued to a chair, I guess. I have scoliosis, facet joint arthritis, mild anter...

54:06Anterial ascensis. There we go. Oh, boy. A couple of disc protrusions, probably the usual writer's cocktail. Surgeons say it's not bad enough for surgery, so I'm stuck in this frustrating in-between zone where something could be done, but hard to figure out what. Did you ever find something that actually helped? Do you have specific physio or exercises or a special chair? Any professional tips would be a lifesaver. Pretty sure many of the Script Notes audience might be in the same boat. Craig, you and I were talking about this just like backstage right before the curtain opened at our live show.

54:36And you were about to get another injection. Did that happen? Did it help? I'm due. I had to make the appointment, but I'm going to be having it when I'm back home right after Christmas, right before New Year's. In between Christmas and New Year's, That's back injection season. It's going to be lovely. Well, first of all, Marco, I certainly sympathize with you. Yes, you're in your 50s and yep, this is how it's going. And you already had issues. Scoliosis has been there almost certainly since you were a kid and just gets worse over time. Anterolysis is not fun and any arthritis anywhere in your back.

55:09And disc protrusions, that's really the worst of it because that starts to push on the nerves all around. And that's what the pain is. the pain is nerves. It's not bones. It's not the rest of it. It's the nerves. So yes, physical therapy can help. There are some stretches that I do every morning that seem to help. And I would not suggest you do those because those are for what I have, which is spinal stenosis and in a spot. And I don't know what stretches would be good for you, but I think physical therapy, it could help. Pretty much every single back doctor in the world suggests that you strengthen your core muscles, which I would do if I had them, but I'm pretty sure that my abs have actually dissolved.

55:51I don't think I have abdominal muscles. I basically don't have a butt muscle or an abdominal muscle. And those are the muscles that they want you to strengthen, your glutes and your abs. So that is something that they will always recommend. I do use an Aeron myself and it works very nicely for me. My body conforms to it and it feels good. The special chair you should use is the one that It makes you feel the least pain. But back surgery is kind of a nightmare. Yeah, if you can avoid that, I would avoid it. So PT for sure, strengthen the ab, core and butt, and find a chair that is okay. And if you need to sit up in bed and write in bed, you write in bed.

56:35What can you do? A friend of mine with back issues swears by peripheral nerve stimulator implants. And so basically once a year, they implant a little thing that basically keeps stimulating those nerves until your nerves just go like, oh, well, this must be normal. There's actually not a problem. But it's a hassle to do and you can't get your back wet for a while and things like that. So there are other alternatives. I would just encourage, and Craig, I want your opinion on this too, for Marco, this person says it's not bad enough for surgery. That shouldn't be the last person you go to. That shouldn't be the last word on things.

57:10There may be other solutions out there. and don't assume that you have to live in pain. Well, as we get older, we will all be living in pain. Pain's coming. You hear that, Murkowski? It's coming. Oh, no. But there are levels, of course, and there are remediations. The other thing that they sometimes will mess around with is radiofrequency ablation, where they use radio waves to kind of fry the nerve tips. Didn't work for me, but some people have gotten relief from that. But I don't know where you live, Marco, but in Los Angeles, Cedars-Sinai has a pain center. So that's where I go. And it is a building full of doctors that are there to deal with pain.

57:48And the good news is that they have never suggested to me that the answer is opioids. So don't worry about that. They're not gonna turn you into a junkie, but they really do concentrate on how to alleviate pain and to get to the root of it. And it's been good for me. I get basically two of these shots a year and they work pretty well. So, yeah. Let's do our One Cool Things. Craig, your One Cool Thing looks like is related to opioids. It is. Opioids on my mind. So, I'm here in Vancouver. The guys here on the podcast who see me on my Zoom thing can see lovely gray slate, rainy Vancouver behind me.

58:25That is standard. Vancouver is a fantastic city. It has a brutal opioid problem. Anybody who lives or works here in Vancouver knows that there are about, I don't know, six, seven straight blocks of East Hastings that are populated almost exclusively by people who are using drugs and primarily fentanyl and also now some sort of tranquilizer thing, like another veterinary tranquilizer. It's bad. So the fentanyl epidemic is at this point just become the problem everywhere. And there is an effort now to create a vaccine. So you guys have probably heard of Narcan, which is naloxone, the thing you spray up.

59:12Oh, you're at a party, you see somebody go and they thought they were injecting heroin. It was fentanyl. They're dying. You spray this in their nose. It blocks all of the opioid receptors in the body and can help keep them from their central nervous system plummeting to zero. So the issue, of course, is that that has to be administered after the fact. but what they're working on now is, they call it a vaccine. It's really more of a prophylactic. And the idea is they give you, they inject you with something that binds to the fentanyl molecule, but along with it has a larger chunk of protein that keeps it from crossing through the blood brain barrier.

59:54So basically it can't go anywhere. So it can't hurt you. It just runs around your bloodstream doing nothing. and that's for, this would be for people who are like, hey, look, I do use this drug, but I don't want fentanyl. I just want heroin. I don't want fentanyl. It sort of protects you against the thing that might kill you. There are issues that this could create. I can imagine. For instance, then people are like, I want fentanyl. I got the fentanyl vaccine, but I really want to get high off of fentanyl. I think I'll just take twice as much as they normally did to overwhelm this. That is a potential danger because one thing we do know about people with substance abuse issues is that they're incredibly persistent and clever.

1:00:39The other issue, of course, is if you ever did need some sort of surgical intervention or something, if your blood-brain barrier is blocked from one or more methods of anesthesia, you may have a serious problem. But it does feel like, given how bad it is out there, something like this might be a good mitigation solution. So it's a very interesting thought because we do, here's what we absolutely know. Telling people to not use opioids does not work. That is useless. We know that for a fact. So let's see, maybe the fentanyl, quote unquote, vaccine will gain some traction. Great. Mike, do you have one cool thing to share?

1:01:26Yeah. You know, in adapting this true story from the annals of American history and then trying to make a show that appeals to more than just the 2 % of people that would pick up a book about James Garfield, but also to like the other 98 % of people who are quite certain at the outset that they do not care about James Garfield and, you know, making a show with a little bit more of like a modern engine behind it. Like, there are a handful of other shows and films that have done it well, a small handful, one of which is a show called The Good Lord Bird from 2020. I don't know. It's so good. It's based on this incredible James McBride book, and it's about John Brown, the abolitionist, and his reign on Harbors Ferry in 1859 that, in many ways, preceded to the Civil War.

1:02:15it's adapted by Ethan Hawke who plays John Brown and Mark Rochard and it's so funny and weird and incredible and it's one of the best adaptations that I've seen in a really, really long time and I think very much is of a piece with Death by Lightning, hopefully and is just a show that I thought was really, really remarkable and that I wish more people still talked about because it's great. The Good Lord Bird? Yes, it was on Showtime in 2020, which was probably one of the reasons. It's probably Paramount Plus, I would suspect. Oh, that's a great question. I don't know. I hope it's available somewhere.

1:02:54Good Lord Bird. Let's do a little quick live Google. Yeah. Good Lord Bird. It looks like it's on Prime, but I don't know. It's really, really great. Great. Like, would recommend it to anybody that likes my show and would want to do another, you know, historical deep dive. and, you know, it's very different from what you would expect it to be. Like, it is rollicking and funny and strange. Looks like it's on Apple TV and that's about that. Oh, no, I see Prime Video. Yep. So I think you got Amazon or Apple TV. Good choices. Both of which will be purchased by Netflix Warner Brothers within days. But Ethan Hawke is so, so good on the show.

1:03:34And David Diggs is there. He plays Frederick Douglass. That's great. And again, that was peak TV. and so much was being made. It was so hard to just find an audience for anything, especially if it wasn't on HBO or Netflix, but even Netflix stuff disappeared. My one cool thing is a show that was made for Canada, made for Crave TV, is now available in the US on HBO Max, called Heated Rivalry. Gay people know what I'm talking about because every gay person is obsessed with the show. Every gay person? Well, every gay person in Los Angeles or New York City. Basically, everyone on my Instagram. Everyone on your Instagram.

1:04:10No, it's Matt Hedges, probably. What I admire so much about the show, so it's based on a book by Rachel Reed and it's created and produced and directed by Jacob Tierney, who I want to get on the show at some point. The show is about professional hockey. And so it's these two hockey players and their romance between them. What is remarkable about it is like, remember, Craig, we had Rachel Bloom on the show talking about sex on screen. And sort of like, you know, why we're not seeing good sex on screen. And like the show just does it and delivers it in a really good way. And so there are sex scenes that are actually narratively important, really well shot, and story happens during sex scenes, but you just don't see it.

1:04:48It's not just like a little bonus you put on there. It's like, no, it's like the sex is the point and the story purposes are happening during it. So just incredibly well made. Don't watch it with your family. Don't watch it with your kids. Don't watch it on a plane. Don't watch it on a plane. It's unapologetically smutty in a great way. So I just really respect sort of like that they were able to make this show and put it out there in the world. So he did Rivalry. Where is it? So it's HBO Max in the US and it's just really, really well done. Yeah, so Crave is the HBO output channel up here in Canada.

1:05:21So typically it's HBO shipping things to Crave, but I like that Crave is shipping something back. Yeah. So it's shot in Toronto, but set in many places around the world. and clearly I made smart choices in pulling in sort of kind of the horniness of Challengers, the tennis show, but it's actually sort of making that subtext text and really nicely done. All right. Great. That is our show for this week. Script and Institutes by Drew Marquardt, edited by Matthew Schlelli. Our outro this week is by Luke Foster. If you have an outro, send us a link to ask at johnaugust.com. That's also the place where you can send questions like the ones we answered today.

1:05:59You'll find transcripts at johnaugust.com along with a sign up for our weekly newsletter called Interesting, which has lots of links to things about writing. You'll find clips and other helpful video on our YouTube. Just search for Script Notes and give us a follow. You'll also find us on Instagram at Script Notes Podcast. Please keep sending through those posts about the Script Notes book. Those are delightful. We'll continue to repost those. We have t-shirts and hoodies and drinkwear. They're perfect for the holiday season. You'll find them at Cotton Bureau. You'll find the show notes with the links to all the things we talked about today in the email you get each week as a premium subscriber.

1:06:27Thank you again to all our premium subscribers. you make it possible for us to do this each and every week. You also get the first emails about live shows and other stuff that's coming up. You can sign up to become a premium subscriber at scriptouts.net. You get all those back episodes and bonus segments. You get Mike's episode from 2020. You get the Rachel Bloom sex episode. All those things. And bonus segments like the one we're about to record on coaching trees as sort of like the growth of one show leads to showrunners of other shows. We'll talk about that after the music. Mike McHouse Thank you so much for coming back on the show.

1:07:01Thank you guys so much for having me. It was a blast. Thanks, Mike.

From the publisher

John and Craig welcome back screenwriter Mike Makowsky (Death by Lightning, Bad Education) to ask, how do you dramatize a historical event that no one's heard of? They look at the dramatic engine behind the Garfield assassination, the long journey Death by Lightning had to getting made, and the importance of finding great stories in obscure history.

We investigate the peculiar habits and compulsions of our own writing practices, and see how personality typologies can help figure out what makes our characters tick. We also follow up on a certain orange book, breaking into Hollywood in your 30's, and offer our thoughts on the impending sale of Warner Bros.

In our bonus segment for premium members, which TV shows had the best "coaching trees"? We marvel at the writers' rooms that launched the most successful writers today.

Links:

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode here.

(9:00) Scriptnotes: A Book About Screenwriting and Things That Are Interesting to Screenwriters (Unabridged)

More from Scriptnotes Podcast

All 53 episodes
716 - Personality TypologiesScriptnotes Podcast · 1 h 7 min
Listen in VO