725 - Torn from the pages of Squash Magazine

17 Feb 2026 · 56 min · 22 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Scriptnotes Podcast Episode 725: Torn from the pages of Squash Magazine

Episode Overview In this episode of the Scriptnotes Podcast, hosts John August and Craig Mazin explore how various news stories could be adapted into films. Topics discussed include an underground network delivering menstrual supplies, a millennial travel group, the U.S. hacking ISIS, and a fictitious college squash team. The episode also covers follow-up discussions on previous topics, listener questions about querying representation, and a bonus segment about physical media.

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. News Stories as Movie Ideas
  2. Underground Network for Menstrual Supplies:
  3. Story Summary: A 12-year-old girl in Minneapolis, named 'E', needs menstrual products but is in hiding due to her family's undocumented status. A network of neighbors helps to deliver supplies.
  4. Potential as a Movie: Discussion about the story’s potential cinematic qualities, the challenges of capturing the emotional depth of such a serious issue, and the universality of a girl's first period.
  5. Comparative Analysis: Comparison to Anne Frank's story in terms of coming-of-age under extreme circumstances.
  • Millennial Travel Group:
  • Story Summary: An article details a package vacation for millennials traveling alone, highlighting experiences that bond a group of strangers.
  • Movie Concept: The idea of a comedy centered around diverse type-A characters forming friendships through shared travel experiences. Themes of friendship, loneliness, and societal pressures are discussed.
  • Cinematic References: Draws parallels with films like "Bridesmaids" and "The Hangover".
  • U.S. Hacking ISIS:
  • Story Summary: Captain Steve Donald assembles a team to conduct cyber operations against ISIS, using phishing techniques to dismantle their network.
  • Challenges for Adaptation: Craig expresses skepticism about the cinematic potential of hacking scenes due to their inherent lack of visual action and tension.
  • Possible Narrative Angle: Suggestion to explore both sides of the hacking events to create drama.
  • College Squash Team Hoax:
  • Story Summary: In 1977, students at Whitman College create a fictitious squash team, leading to a series of humorous situations when they are invited to a real championship.
  • Comedy Potential: Discussion on the limitations of the prank premise and how it could be adapted into a more engaging story by adding depth and stakes.
  1. Follow-Up and Listener Questions
  2. On Modern Comparisons in Screenwriting: Discussion on the effectiveness of using contemporary films as comps in pitches, with a specific mention of "Get Out".
  3. Understanding "Undeniable" Writing: Insights into what makes a script stand out, emphasizing clarity, distinctiveness, and a strong point of view.
  4. Querying Literary Representation: Advice for a listener on whether to include a picture book they wrote when querying managers for representation of a feature script.
  1. Physical Media Discussion
  2. Bonus Segment: A light-hearted discussion on what to do with old CDs and DVDs, reflecting on the transition from physical media to digital formats.

Key Takeaways

  • Emotional Resonance: The importance of emotional depth in storytelling, especially for serious topics.
  • Cinematic Techniques: Recognition that not all interesting stories have clear visual action that can be adapted to film.
  • Friendship Dynamics: The evolving nature of friendship in modern society and its representation in media.
  • Value of Feedback: The hosts emphasize the importance of listener engagement and feedback in shaping discussions.

Conclusion This episode of Scriptnotes showcases the hosts’ ability to dissect contemporary issues and consider their cinematic potential while engaging with their audience through follow-up and listener questions. The exploration of various news stories and their adaptation possibilities highlights the intersection of screenwriting and current events, offering a unique perspective for aspiring writers.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Playing Connections

0:45 to 2:06

Discussion on making connections between seemingly unrelated topics.

“I have shelves full of CDs and DVDs that I will never use again, but I'm not ready to give them up.”

Skunk Spray Tales

2:06 to 4:06

John shares a personal story about his dog getting sprayed by a skunk.

“My little dog was, he obviously smelled terrible, but he was foaming at the mouth.”

Follow-Up on Previous Episodes

4:06 to 6:33

Discussion on listener feedback regarding previous podcast topics.

“First off with comps, which was one of our last episodes.”

Teaching Playwriting Insights

6:33 to 10:10

Matt shares his experience teaching playwriting and its challenges.

“and so I read zillions of scripts and wrote coverage on them.”

Email Troubleshooting

10:10 to 11:05

Discussion on resolving email issues with listener suggestions.

“he wrote playwriting with W-R-I-G-H-T-I-N-G.”

Box Office Insights

11:05 to 14:01

Analysis of upcoming trends in the movie business shared by a listener.

“Because there's not a word play writer, not a thing the way that screenwriter is a word.”

Follow-Up on Episode 722's Box Office Insights

14:01 to 18:01

Exploring audience analytics and attendance projections for the upcoming years.

“So I think between a couple of those there, we may have gotten the answer.”

Listener Suggestions for 'How Would This Be a Movie?'

18:01 to 24:04

Discussing audience-generated ideas for movie adaptations and their potential.

“But our listeners who are premium members got an email this past week saying, hey, we're going to do a new How Would This Be a Movie?”

Exploring the Minneapolis Tampon Run

24:04 to 28:00

An analysis of a poignant story about a girl's first period and community support.

“which immediately would be a terrifying thing to experience.”

Exploring Friendship Dynamics

28:00 to 29:05

Learn about the complexities of friendships during different life stages.

“Or her friends started having kids and she doesn't have kids yet.”
Show all 22 chapters

Cinematic Representations of Travel

29:05 to 29:56

Discover how travel experiences shape friendships and narratives in films.

“So a couple of different movies this is reminding me of.”

The Challenges of Portraying Hacking

29:56 to 31:14

Understand the difficulties in translating cyber operations into compelling stories.

“who you can quickly see becomes the villain.”

Analyzing the ISIS Cyber Operations

31:14 to 32:19

Learn about the strategic cyber operations against ISIS and their implications.

“I don't know that you need it because you're probably gonna want to just do your own thing.”

The Fake Squash Team Prank

32:19 to 40:05

Explore the comedic premise of a fake college squash team and its consequences.

“In the spring of 2016, Steve Donald, who's a captain in the Naval Reserve and a computer whiz, is ordered to put together a team to conduct cyber operations against ISIS.”

Reimagining Sports Comedy

40:05 to 42:05

Discuss how to innovate the sports comedy genre with new story elements.

“And you're just going to lose fast and you're obviously fake.”

The Sports Comedy Genre: A Cinderella Story

42:05 to 43:31

Explore the creative potential within the sports comedy genre, including references to popular films.

“And somebody, as a joke, because they're so bad, somebody as a joke just starts flipping the scores when they print them.”

Listener Query: Seeking Representation

43:32 to 45:20

A listener discusses their journey and questions about querying representation for their script.

“This is of all these, well, they're all execution dependent, but this one is especially execution dependent.”

Debate on Repeating Plots for Audience Attention

45:21 to 46:55

A passionate discussion on whether writers should repeat plot elements for viewers who may not be fully engaged.

“should writers repeat the plot three or four times assuming that most viewers are watching while on their phones?”

AI and the Risks of Disempowerment

46:56 to 49:49

An examination of a paper discussing how AI could undermine personal decision-making and agency.

“So, this is maddening, and it's not real.”

Toxic Positivity and Real Conversations

49:50 to 50:28

Reflections on the concept of toxic positivity in discussions and its impact on genuine communication.

“our internal determination of what we want to do, what we believe in, what is objective reality.”

In-Depth Analysis of 'A Day in the Life'

50:29 to 52:43

A fascinating breakdown of the creative process behind the Beatles' song 'A Day in the Life'.

“And there is a young man, he's British, And it's like a 20-minute video where he goes through how that song was first written.”

The Evolution of Documentary Filmmaking

52:44 to 54:14

Discussion on the changing landscape of documentary filmmaking in the age of digital media.

“because we just have the assumption like, well, this thing is wonderful and perfect.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01Hello and welcome. My name is John August. My name is Craig Mason. And this is episode 725 of Script Notes. It's a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters. Today on the show, let's play Connections. What do tampons, millennials, ISIS, and collegiate squash have in common? They all seemed obvious until you got to collegiate squash. Yeah, there's always one stumper. Yeah. When it does throw in something that just like knocks it all off. Yeah. Well, the answer is they are all topics in this week's installment of how would this be a movie? And boy, howdy, do we have a range this week.

0:38We also have follow-up and listener questions. And in our bonus segment for premium members, let's talk about shiny plastic discs. I have shelves full of CDs and DVDs that I will never use again, but I'm not ready to give them up. And I suspect I'm not alone. So I want to talk through the decisions about our physical media and what we're going to do with that. But first, we have another installment of This Week John Learned. And Craig, This Week John Learned that skunk spray is yellow, thick, and incredibly sticky. That's a thing that was different than what I expected. I had this image in my head that skunk spray was clear and it was thin.

1:19And first-hand experience, skunk spray is awful. And it is a chemical weapon. and it is a bear spray that comes from a small little creature. Oh, you mean the spray that comes out of a skunk? Yes. I kept thinking about this like bear spray, like the stuff you bring with you to spray to get rid of bears. Yes. What I learned this week is that they're much more similar than you would expect. My dog, Lambert, Lambert, who you love. Yeah. 10.30 p.m. on Monday night. You got skunked. Let him out in the backyard and did not see that there was a small creature there that Lambert took out after I realized, oh my God, that's a skunk.

1:56I didn't know there even were skunks in LA. You don't see skunks in LA. We didn't lock you out all the time. Yelled at Lambert to stay away. Lambert got hit straight in the face by the skunk. It was awful. My little dog was, he obviously smelled terrible, but he was foaming at the mouth. He was in misery. We were trying to clean it off of him. We're doing all the things. We're doing the hydrogen peroxide and the baking soda and all these things. Rinsing his eyes. So no damage to him? No. But this smell is... This smell is brutal. Yep. Cookie got skunked a few years ago, and it's like 20 baths later, you can almost not smell it anymore.

2:34It's that powerful. Yeah. Well, what's so surprising to me is that we got some of it off of him, and then he just wrapped him in a towel and carried him upstairs to the bath. But just in carrying him through the house, like, the house smelled like skunk. And, like, he didn't touch anything, and it still smelled like skunk. Well, yeah, famously, you can smell when a skunk gets hit on the road, Yeah. You can smell it from miles away. Yeah. It is crazy. I believe the chemical you're smelling is similar to the chemical that's added to natural gas so that you can smell it if there's a leak. Okay. But in much, much tinier, tinier.

3:09Yeah. It is fascinating that skunks have, I think, a unique defense system. Why? No other animals put that one together. Just skunks. Yeah. I mean, bless them for their ingenuity. Evolution did something really remarkable for them. Yeah. But it is crazy. And I would also say that I had this image in my head that obviously I thought it was a thinner substance. And what you see in terms of Pepe Le Pew, you sort of see the stink lines. And it's not quite that. It's more like it reminded me of the feeling after this most recent election when there was this feeling of constant dread. It's like a dread that is just sort of around.

3:51It's not like a high note, sort of like sickeningly sweet smell. It's like melting plastic and existential dread. To me, it's sort of like burning hair and hell. Yeah. But I also like, weirdly, when I'm driving on the road and I can't... In a distance, I like it. I kind of like it. Yeah. But up front, well, poor Lambert. Poor Lambert. He's recovering. He's going to go through a few baths. Yeah. One day it will end. Yeah. All right, we've got some follow-up. First off with comps, which was one of our last episodes. Zach wrote in, in episode 723, Craig said that he'd like to hear from younger listeners what newer comps they hear frequently.

4:32A recent title that I think deserves a mention is Get Out, which I hear constantly as shorthand for contained politically smart genre. That makes total sense. It makes absolute sense. And I'm angry about it because I hear it in my mind. I'm in the room now. And they're like, okay, so what we're looking for is Get Out, but with, you know, kind of Tom Cruise action. The problem with these things is they really just don't belong together most of the time. And the thing about Get Out is it's not shorthand for a contained politically smart genre. It's Get Out. It's a very specific film. It's a very specific story.

5:17but I completely see how they would use this one as a comp, yeah. Absolutely. The thing about Get Out is that it's the Blumhouse model of it. It's a small, basically one location contained thriller, but like most Blumhouse things you think about as being like, they're bloody, they're gory, the things, and the horror of Get Out is not the centerpiece of it. New. Yeah, yeah. Let's move on to Kristen wrote in about Undeniable. As an executive, all too often what we get is something that's half-baked or reads like a million other scripts out there. It doesn't have clarity or distinctive voice, or it's a perfectly fine idea, but it's not a great idea.

5:54It's not insightful in some way. I think that's what we mean when we say we want something to be undeniable. It's shorthand for, if you want to be noticed, write something noteworthy because most of what I read is forgettable. This makes complete sense. There are a lot of parts that go into these things. Remember that the person who's reading your script is not going to be the person who buys your script. The person who reads your script is the person who's going to be selling your script upstairs to someone they work for. And the name of the game is, I found this script, and this is great. And everyone goes, it is great.

6:30And then they make it, undeniable. Yeah. I was a reader at TriStar for a year, and so I read zillions of scripts and wrote coverage on them. And very few scripts where I get a strong recommend or definite recommend, because it was a risk. You had to say, you're going to read this, and say like, this is really good. Like there's no second. It's obviously a really, really good script and it's worth your time to do it. And that's really undeniability. Yeah, exactly. I think this is really important for people to hear. I'm just going to read it again. Half-baked, reads like a million other scripts out there, doesn't have clarity or distinctive voice, perfectly fine idea, but it's not a great idea or it's not insightful in some way.

7:13It's not good. It's not bad. It's just nice. Yeah. I'm going to Sondheim my way through this. But in short clips, so we can't, you know, get sued. Yeah. Follow up from Matt about two different episodes. Yeah, so we had talked about the Scott Frank school of writing and orality recently. Matt says, I'm teaching playwriting this semester for the second time. I've never taken a playwriting class, despite working as a professional one for two decades now. So when it came time for me to teach this damn class, I was so anxious, I just replicated the same cliche factory of unexamined conventions, and it was terrible and worthless.

7:49Then, last fall, I heard your Scott Frank episode and was just amped. So I threw everything out, and at my inner-city university with students from under-resourced schools and a wide range of background, we just ran that experiment each day. And despite teaching through the crippling indifference it seems we have to fight in so many of these creative classes today, it's been a blast. We are writing so much with a loose kind of jazz while still learning like really good scales, if that makes sense. I'm learning, they're learning, and we're doing it through writing, and they are amped. And this week, we used the orality tool to test some of our dialogue sprints, and the impact was huge.

8:27Some students began to experiment on what wasn't working and why these people sounded like they weren't talking. They started to make the connections or grow their taste for making imaginary people sound like real people, and it was just great. Well, there you go. Wow. It sounds like Matt's having a good time, but his students are really lucky to have Matt as their teacher. I mean, I think Matt's really lucky that he has us. Yeah. Because we brought Scott Frank on, and Scott was correct. And cranky Scott Frankie loves to tell the truth. And what I really appreciate about Matt is he's a teacher, and we have a set of hard opinions about how, generally speaking, the way we teach what we do for a living in this country is broken.

9:13And Matt had a choice and decided, yeah, I'm going to go for a different method. And I love, listen, anything where kids are suddenly engaged, where it's not work, but they are pushing forward, that's how you know it's going well. Well, he's also not talking about the theory of playwriting. He's just like, we're just writing a bunch of stuff. Yes, yes. Because you can't teach August Wilson how to write a play like August Wilson. That's the play he's going to write anyway. You can teach August Wilson, and this would be a very young August Wilson, about how to get to where he already can go. And you do that through practice.

9:55Practice. Not conventions and studying what was before and formats. But I write, you read, we discuss. Yes, that's how acting classes work. It's great. Yeah, yeah. I noticed in Matt's email to us, he wrote playwriting with W-R-I-G-H-T-I-N-G. And so it is a weird thing where a screenwriter doesn't have the G-H-T and a playwright does have it. Yes. But I was just looking up whether playwriting with the G-H-T is common or less common. And officially, the G-H-T tends to go away. We're not using that. What? Yeah. No. You would do it how Matt does it? Of course. Yeah. They're getting rid of the GH because plays are wrought.

10:44Plays are wrought. Like iron. They are wrought. And we just simply write. Yeah. So Webster's says it is more commonly without the GHT than with the GHT. Well, I can see how it would be playwriting without the GH. But then when you say playwright, you're going to want that GH. Yeah. It would be weird. Because there's not a word play writer, not a thing the way that screenwriter is a word. Well, I think plays are rot. Plays are rot. Rot. Last bit of follow-up is about our email issues. So last episode, we were talking through issues that we were having with Craig's emails not coming through. And we had a suspicion that our listeners might know the answer to these questions.

11:26And it seems like they did. So we have three different people writing in with different things to test and try. Okay. Jacob writes, I manage a few dozen domains and their email configurations, and if I had to put money on it, I'd guess your domain is missing an SPF record, or it's not set up correctly. SPF is basically a way of telling the recipient server, these email servers are allowed to send email on behalf of my domain. Without it, receiving mail servers tend to get suspicious and may flag messages as spam, newsletters, or block them entirely. So I'd strongly recommend adding SPF along with DKIM and DMARC.

12:05So recipient emails can verify that you are who you say you are. Okay. We'll have to check and see if I have boxes that do that. And what did Ian write for us? My wife has her own domain for her business, and sometimes she runs into a similar issue. It used to have to do with her hosting company because she used a shared grid service hosting package because it was not exorbitantly priced. I'm not an IT pro, but it basically means that your stuff is on a server with other people's domains. And if those people's domains are spamming people and they get flagged by the whitelisting services, her email could sometimes get caught up in that.

12:41So switching hosting companies was ultimately the solution. I don't think that's what's going on here. It's a very large company. So fortunately, Zach has one last thing that we can test. Great. Zach passed along a free deliverability tester that he's used before and has gotten decent results. It's mailtester.com. He says the name sounds super generic and the site looks dumb, but it works. All right, should I do it right now? Sure. Okay. First, send your email to this. Okay, so I'm going to copy it, I guess. And I'm going to send it from the address that's causing a little bit of problems. Now, I assume there's going to be some sort of response that's going to give me information.

13:29All right. I mean, this is exciting. Or not. Or not. Then check your score. Oh, I think it already knows what's happening. Do you want to share your screen so it can see? I mean, it's the picture of a rowboat rowing from a lighthouse to a palm tree with coconuts. It's very strange. My score is 7.7 out of 10. Good stuff. Your email is almost perfect. You're not fully authenticated. DMARC turns out to be the problem. Spam Assassin thinks you can improve. I have a minus 2.3. Okay, so now I know what to do. This is great. So I think between a couple of those there, we may have gotten the answer. Oh, that's exciting.

14:06You know, our listeners. Just the best, and again, we're going to praise our listeners as we get into our One Cool Things. We have another person writing in about a bonus segment topic. In episode 722 bonus segment, we were talking about what a big year for the box offices is looking to be. And someone wrote in with more information. And this friend says, if you're not familiar with us, we're part of the theatrical ecosystem, assisting those constituents with insights and audience analytics. So at the very end of episode 722, you shared a 2026 outlook for the movie business. If you're interested, here's a brief 2025 summary that we shared with our friends in the media.

14:43And so this is from Entelligence, E-N-T-E-L-G-E-N-S. Oh, like from the Ents. The Talking Trees. The Talking Trees. Well, this is going to be very good. Well, their roots run deep. And so that's... I mean, it took them years to put this together just at the end moot. Yes. So I think it's interesting just because it's a different way of looking at the same kinds of data. And so it looks like they are talking about attendance in movie theaters, sports, special events, everything like that. Whereas we are just looking at box office. They're looking at total attendance, which for 2025, they're saying 780 million seats attended.

15:23So 4.7 billion seats. Yeah. 780 million people. Yeah. And if you look at the big titles, they were the big titles. Minecraft, Lilo and Stitch, Zootopia, Wicked for Goods, Superman. But they can also talk to you about which genres ended up having the highest attendance. And look at this. The studios, Disney at 26%. Warner Brothers, 20%. Yeah. And it's getting sold. And it's getting sold. And of course, Warner Brothers has like the two top contenders for best picture made by great singular vision filmmakers. Yeah. Yeah. Sure hope that they let it be what it is. But this is fascinating to look at.

16:08Los Angeles is still the largest market, followed by New York. Dallas, of all things. Oh, yeah. I know Dallas is big. How about this one? Political, blue-red. This shocks me. Yeah. 56 % of movie attendance are by people who consider themselves blue or is it from blue states? And 34 % from red. My guess is it's based on market, but I don't know. That's crazy. Yeah. And pretty even spread among the ratings. Action, still the king at the box office, 40%. Animation comedy, 5.5%. Now I would argue that's because there aren't any. Yes, or because a lot of things that are our comedies we're labeling as other things because that's just what we choose to do.

16:52Yeah. Cool. Film format, 3D is about 6 % of the earnings here. I guess we can't really say box office, but they're saying 6%. That's higher than I would have guessed. 70 millimeter or 35 millimeter like shown on film. Each is less than 1%. Yeah. I wonder if 3D is all about Avatar. Maybe. Right, because he puts that out in 3D, right? Oh yeah, Yeah, it's really first, you're meant to see it in 3D. Yeah, I think that is entirely, Avatar had more foot traffic than any other movie, as they say, 30%. And overall male-female split, 50.1 % male, 49.8 % female. God. Which is? I love that. I don't know what the margin of error is, but I would imagine that's within it.

17:39Yeah, for sure. And there are slightly more women than men in the United States. That's also part of it. Yes, because the men keep dying. Yeah. Go to an old A-tone, just look around. Just that one guy. That one guy. No one talks to him. All right. So it was our listeners who wrote in with this great follow-up. But our listeners who are premium members got an email this past week saying, hey, we're going to do a new How Would This Be a Movie? And we would love your suggestions for articles for How Would This Be a Movie? Drew, talk to us about the response you got when you sent out that email. We very quickly got tons of responses.

18:17We got 40 in total. And a lot of them were really fantastic. Yeah. So I went through that, the longer list. And someone's like, wait, that sounds kind of familiar. And so two of the honorable mentions, one of them was Paula Dakin, who was in Witness Protection. We talked about that, episode 525. And it's a really good idea, which we talked about in episode 525. That's how good it was. Yeah. There was another one, which is about a mother who sent her, basically she and the kids were on a rowboat that got swept out to sea and she ended up sending her 14-year-old son in to swim to the shore for safety, which was like a four-kilometer swim.

18:52And he did it and saved them all. A ton of people wrote in with that one. Yeah. It was just too stressful for me. I don't want to, I don't want to even talk about it. I had palpitations just reading the story. Well, so like, what is that movie and just watching the kids swimming? It's an incident. It's an incident. It's a beat in a bigger movie. There wasn't going to be anything to talk about beyond that. But of the other 40, there were some really great ones. And I picked four of them that I think are going to be good topics for us to get into. Let's start off with how an errand for a 12-year-old immigrant in Minneapolis became an underground operation.

19:26It's written by Jasmine Gossard and Sarah Venture for NPR. It's sent in by Christopher Boone. Drew, can you give us the description? Sure. A 12-year-old girl in Minneapolis, who we only know as E, got her first period last month in January, 2026. E needed menstrual pads, but because E and her family are undocumented, she's been in hiding in their home for the last several weeks. So E calls her dad for help, but dad's at work and doesn't have a car with him so that he's not targeted by ICE. So her dad calls their pastor, who then calls a church member named Lizette, but Lizette's also scared to go out.

20:03So she calls the neighbor Ade, whose daughter Fannie is a US citizen. No, they're still scared. Adi and Fanny decide to get pads to E, traveling through back alleys to avoid agents and deliver the menstrual supplies to her safely. Two things. Minneapolis Tampon Run would have been the best sequel name to Cannonball Run. Yes. Back when, you know, the Burt Reynolds, Dom DeLuise version of this would be outstanding. We first have to just say how horrible it is that this is a freaking thing that we are even talking about at all, that this is happening is insane. Last night, I was walking in Lambert and I started, I think about Minneapolis and I started to weep.

20:43And I was like, why am I weeping? Like, what is actually going on? And it wasn't ICE specifically. It wasn't the horrible brutality and the killings there. Well, I think what was actually making me weep was the recognition that a whole community had come together with whistles and phones to document and stop and the sense of protecting people you don't even know. And that's, I was weeping for a happy reason sort of within all this. And this story reminds me of the ways that in crisis people come together. Yes, it's still infuriating. So I haven't gotten to be happy about the positives yet. I'm still in fury.

21:24But this is an interesting idea. I don't know if it's a movie, if only because there's a strange kind of clock on it. Yeah. So there is an argument that there is a movie where an undocumented, and in this case, child, I think is correct because the stakes get even higher when it's a child. An undocumented child has something that could be a problem medically and they have to wait and see. It does get worse. They have to figure out how to get her somewhere to adopt, and this is all in America. And I could see that. Like this would be a good episode of something. Yeah, I was thinking of The Pit or some sort of show that is taking place more in real time.

22:06Yes. But Craig, I would say the movie version of it, like this is a plot line in and it's sort of an Altman-esque Nashville kind of situation where a bunch of stuff is happening. It's all the same day, but this is one of the threads that's happening through that. Feels right. I think you're absolutely right. Like either it's episode of something or fit into a story that normally accommodates these kinds of things, or it's a thread line in a, yes, in a Magnolia-ish or Robert Altman-esque. Yeah. Parallel storylines. Yes, I could see that. It's disgusting that this is a problem. Well, the resonance with Anne Frank is obvious here.

22:44You have a girl on the verge of womanhood, terrified alone. She's going through normal development, adolescent development, in this incredibly extreme environment where she's hidden, where everything is just turned upside down. And that is compelling about this part of the story, but I think it's a bigger tapestry around it. And so, like, right now we're following just this young girl and the people who come to help her, but her father is a really interesting character. And, like, the universality of a girl's first period feels right. Yeah, and he's an important character note. He's a single dad.

23:20Yeah. He's a single dad, and I suspect probably either doesn't speak English or is limited in some way. He's not going to be able to just sort of casually and charmingly go about getting something and not feeling like he's targeted by the goon squad. And it is a fascinating story and with a really nice ending. Yeah. Also notable in the story is that E has no idea what's going on. Exactly. So there was not a conversation. She has no idea what's going on in terms of why she's bleeding. Correct. She has a sense of overall what's happening outside her door, but not what's happening inside her body.

24:03Correct. All she knows is she's bleeding and she doesn't even know why, which immediately would be a terrifying thing to experience. So there's been a lack of education there. And not only does someone have to get her menstrual supplies, they also have to explain what it is. Yeah. And how it's going to go. Yeah. Which in this story, in the actual original story, is the next day a nurse calls her and talks her through all this stuff. Yeah, that's a rough day. Yeah. Yeah, so shameful. Mm-hmm. Shameful. Yeah. Just outrageous. So I think there's something to do here. I think it's part of a larger story.

24:42Yeah. But I can absolutely see why we were sent this article. Let's completely shift gears and go to something much lighter. Oh my God, this thing. Millennial Travel Group. This is based on an article by Katie Weaver for the New York Times. I recognize Katie Weaver's byline, so I looked up and she's done a lot of stuff that I've read over the years. I went on a package trip for millennials who travel alone. Help me. This was sent in by Dr. Stephanie Sandberg. Drew, give us a description here. So Katie Weaver, who's a millennial woman, books a package vacation to Morocco through Flashpack. Flashpack.

25:18A company whose stated aim is to help people in their 30s and 40s make new friends. Katie's put in a group with 13 women who are all different flavors of type A. They go on a hyper-scheduled tour around Morocco. So they're sightseeing, cooking lessons, steam baths, goat feeding, ATV riding, glamping. It's all calibrated to create a group dynamic, which the company takes so seriously that it'll kick out anyone who throws the dynamic off. The group bonds together quickly and tightly and are relentless in their stated objective of fun and friendship. So one cold, wet, miserable day, the only way to have fun is to drink at a vineyard so the group gets exceptionally drunk.

25:55When Katie eventually returns home, she finds that the demands of her normal life are a breeze compared to the intense responsibilities imposed by the trip. Uh-huh. I'm going to say from the start, I think there is a movie here, it doesn't have to be specifically this article, but the idea of a bunch of type A women who are strangers going on a trip together, could be to Morocco, could be to anywhere, is a good idea for a movie. You have the diversity of people and types. You have a sense, I think Katie Weaver or a Katie Weaver type character is a character in this in the sense that she is both a participant, but also the journalist slash documenter of these things.

Read the full transcript

26:31So she holds herself outside of it and sort of is then forced into it. Weaver describes this sociological paradox. To have many friends is a desirable condition. To plainly seek to make friends is unseemly and pitiful. Millennials brought acceptance of the taboo around extending oneself in friendship, perhaps an aversion to participation inherited from their direct predecessors, Gen X, is particularly irrational given that millennials report feeling lonely often or always at much higher rates than members of previous generations. And yet Weaver herself says like, I am pathologically that person who will try to make friends with people.

27:05I don't understand. Like, so millennials have a taboo about reaching out, which is insane. And also, weirdly, millennials are lonely. Yeah. Like, if that's your taboo, then yes, you will be lonely. Also, don't put that on Gen X. We love having friends. We never did. We don't know taboo about making friends. And also, millennials aren't our kids. They're boomer kids. Yeah. I defend my generation. That said, what you have here absolutely is a movie. There's a bunch of different kinds of movies to make. Yeah, there are. I mean, one version is you've got a woman who is type A who had a group of friends that she has sort of started to leave because she is on a more successful track because she does feel so pitiful, whatever her weird millennial problem is.

28:00Or her friends started having kids and she doesn't have kids yet. And that's a factor. That's a thing. So she starts to feel like either I'm lonely or I need new friends. I'm going to sign up for this thing because this is a very like, Like, hey, I did a test and I got a good score. I win. She goes on this vacation. Meanwhile, her friends and their kids happen to also go on vacation at the same place, but like on the one beach over or something. And she's having her new friends and this type A maximum lifestyle. And over there, the other character who was like her best friend is like having a horrible time because her kids are sick and someone's barfing and they're crying.

28:41And yet they are each getting something valuable. And they're each also looking at parts of this going, this is horrible. And maybe it's better if the friends that we have are the friends we actually made because we're friends and not because we were in a program to make friends. Yeah. Intentional friendship is a real, own special flavor. So a couple of different movies this is reminding me of. bridesmaids, obviously, because it is about female friendship. But I was also thinking about a real pain. So we had Jesse Eisenberg on in episodes 6, 7, and 2, and that's all centered around a trip to famous Jewish sites with a bunch of strangers.

29:25Well, Holocaust sites, but also the town where his family grew up. Only famous Jewish sites. Yeah. I mean, some of them are infamous. Infamous famous, yes. But a group of strangers and of course his cousin as well. Yeah. Sideways, which is, you know, friends traveling. So that idea of like, okay, this is, the whole movie is about this trip and this travel and sort of what you've learned along the way. It's also a hangover. I mean - A hangover, yes. They get drunk and they go crazy. And there's somebody in charge of them who you can quickly see becomes the villain. There is a kind of bonding that occurs possibly through perfect people who have been selected because they're perfect people behaving extremely imperfectly together.

30:14And through that, actually, friendships are created. I was also thinking about David Foster Wallace's A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again, which is about him going on the cruise. And what is the conversation between his perception of what his role is there as a documentarian there and Katie Weaver's, who is actively trying to make friends? They're very different characters in similar situations. This last year, I went on a cruise with my family to Alaska. And so we started in Anchorage and went down to Vancouver. And because Mike and I are the people who will try to make friends, we went to one of the mixers and met a bunch of the solo travelers.

30:51And there's a whole community of people who go on cruises by themselves. And they will do it all the time. And they make friends on the cruises. And then they all plan to go on the same cruise again and again. And they love doing that. Nightmare Cruise people deserve to be loved also. Yes, they do. I think there's a lot of really good, rich space here. Yeah. You could use this article as a jumping off point. I don't know that you need it because you're probably gonna want to just do your own thing. And there's not, there aren't a lot of great specific characters that felt like, oh yes, that's somebody you want to pull through into your movie.

31:27Yeah, it's the sort of article somebody options so that they can feel like they have a project that they can get writers to come in on. It's such a producer thing to do. I can just see that. I've gotten sent articles like this. Well, someone will do it. And I can imagine this or essentially this idea becoming a movie 100%. And it could be a theatrical feature, but it could also be made for a streamer. Totally. Love it. Or it could even be like a limited series. You could do the Mike White version of this. And I've been - Well, yeah, I mean, I guess Mike White has done the Mike White Lotus of this version in a way, but I kind of feel like this feels like movie to me.

32:08Yeah, I think it's a movie too. I think it's a comedy. Yeah, I think it's a comedy for sure. Next up, switching gears even more radically, how the US hacked ISIS. This is an article by Dina Temple-Raston for NPR. It was sent in to us by Brian Naughton. Drew, help us out. In the spring of 2016, Steve Donald, who's a captain in the Naval Reserve and a computer whiz, is ordered to put together a team to conduct cyber operations against ISIS. At the time, ISIS is the first terrorist network to use the power of the internet to recruit and launch attacks. And after tracking them for months, Neil and his team learned that ISIS has just 10 core accounts they do everything through, from file sharing to financial transactions.

32:49So he presents this to his higher-ups, and they begin Operation Glowing Symphony. They use phishing emails to gain access to the administrator accounts one by one. They map the entire network. And then in a coordinated attack, they take over the 10 accounts, lock the administrators out, and take everything down. Then after the initial takedown, the task force shifts to ongoing disruption and high-tech psyops to cripple their organizing efforts, frustrate their users, and tank ISIS morale. Craig Mazin, what do you see here? What's interesting? What's challenging to you? All of it is interesting.

33:22None of it is a movie. It is so hard to make drama out of somebody going, okay, click, yep. All right, I deleted that. Click, yep. I blocked him out of his account. Click, yep. I could see this as a scene in a movie or like a moment where we're screwed. We don't know what to do. And someone's like, I know who to call. And these tough soldiers end up in a room with a bunch of nerds who are like, oh, this is what we do. but the problem with this kind of thing is it is impossible to portray on film the effort and ingenuity required it's because you can't sit there and go through hours of people going how do we break through their firewall and da da da and the ssi and you remember one day they do and they type things on a keyboard and it happens it is profoundly uncinematic which is why when we do show hacking in movies, it tends to be ridiculous and overblown because we're trying to make it cinematic.

34:27And so we have things on screen going rah, rah, rah, I think it's a great moment, scene possibility. I would not know how to make this a movie. Yeah, I'm a little bit more optimistic that there's a movie to be made here. I'm thinking about sort of what have I seen of hacking that truly is cinematic. And I think Mr. Robot is the best version of it I've seen. You have a very compelling character and what he's doing when he's click, click, click, typing, typing, typing, we quickly see what's happening, what the actual effect is. And that's why I think this can't just be from one side where we're just seeing what we're doing.

35:01I think you have to see ISIS's side and sort of what they're actually able to achieve and who these people are so that when we're doing things, we know who those people are as stuff gets frustratingly worse for them on the other side of this. That scene is awesome. They're really funny because they do it. And on the other side, someone's like, oh my God, what's going on with my password? John, my password doesn't work. Just restart. Yeah. So you need to see the same people who've done like, you know, a bombing and who've done like serious things and killing people. And then they just can't get into, they can't log into Instagram.

35:36I can't get my, I can't, who? Yeah, someone took my Insta. So the other thing this reminded me of a bit was the imitation game. So in that movie, Alan Turing has to figure out how to crack the Nazi codes. and that movie was successful in sort of physicalizing a lot of stuff that is otherwise an intellectual process. Yes. And so there's moments in just the story as written, which is like, he's going in on the whiteboard and he's actually drawing all the things. And it literally, he evokes the image of Charlie in, it's always standing in Philadelphia with the red strings of it all. And so that, sure, that's one little snapshot, but you have to then figure out like, who are the people that you need to do?

36:16to what degree is this a heist kind of mentality and that could be exciting which is like this is the plan but these are the things that kind of go wrong but because they are physically separated because there's not the there's the whole internet in between them it's the the stakes don't feel quite real enough I guess you know I recently saw House of Dynamite which Catherine Bigelow directed so brilliantly and that is a bunch of people typing into things, but it ends up being quite cinematic. And there may be ways to take some of that grammar into this. Well, so House of Dynamite, that's a good example of a kind of Altman-ish view of what happens over the course of, you know, one hour of real time, but divided among three different stories where there are quite a few different things.

37:05One of them is the president of the United States. The imitation game obviously had the great character of Alan Turing to explore and the difficulties in his life and how that impacted him. But the other thing about the imitation game is that what they were trying to break, the Enigma machine, to do it, they had to build this big physical thing that was awesome to look at. And it's accurate. With these dials, it was so cool. And the stakes, of course, were World War II. And no offense to ISIS, but they haven't World War II'd the world. They haven't yet hit Hitler status. So there's stakes, but if there were a great character in the heart of this, if Steve Donald, the captain of the Naval Reserve, was also a fascinating person with a challenging life story, then maybe you could sort of see how this could be a thing.

37:58Yeah, we're sort of like, you can't believe it's him, but it could only be him. That's an aspect that is, we don't know if that's true or not. And so that's why you need to do a lot more research beyond what we see in this story. Yes. All right. So that's three of our stories. Our fourth is completely different on another axis. So Drew, help us out on this fourth one, which is based around the best college squash team in history, James Zug, writing for Squash Magazine. There's a Squash Magazine. Of course. It was sent in by Dan Ziches. So in 1977, the student editors of the Whitman College newspaper start writing stories about how the university squash team is having this incredible undefeated season.

38:39Except the school doesn't have a squash team. This is a joke, and the editors try to make it as obvious as possible with ridiculous scores and matches against world champions, but no one at the school figured out it was fake or bothered to fact-check them. So they continue to write about this championship squash team and are eventually invited to a real squash championship in Calgary, Alberta, which the school administration gives them money to go to. They lose their matches quickly, and they party for the rest of the trip. When they come back, they report factually about their trip and thank the administration for the money and encourage them to support the drag racing team.

39:11In 1977, I loved the period setting of this story. There was a bunch of college kids just sort of pulling a prank that sort of went on too far. And then, of course, they get recruited into doing the thing. It's such a comedy premise and then a comedy consequence to have to go do the thing. A lot of stuff you're going to want to bend and change. But Craig, do you think there's a space here that's interesting for a comedy? No. No, only because the problem is you sort of put your finger on it, actually. You have a group of people that, as a joke, make a fake squash team. As it turns out, one of the guys actually played squash, I think.

39:47Yeah. But most of them did not. And then the joke is somebody believes you and puts you in a tournament. You have to go. And now it's kind of like a dodgeball, you know, underdog situation. But anyone can play dodgeball. That's why dodgeball worked. squash is a sport. Yeah. And you're just going to lose fast and you're obviously fake. And that's not fun to watch. Not fun to watch it. If you go and you're awesome and you end up losing, that's interesting. If you go and you stink, but you prevail, that's interesting. But if you go and you're just fake, what happens? Is flatlining lose and then you go home?

40:25I don't know. It just feels... Also, as pranks go, this is the most milquetoast sort of like mealy-mouthed prank. Like, you know what we're going to do? We're going to make a fake squash team. I know it was supposed to be like, oh, those scamps. But mostly I was like... Yeah, so I think what you're hitting on is that it's like a prank just for the sake of the prank doesn't feel like enough of a driving engine. There has to be something they're actually going for. And some of this reminds me of former scripted producer Stuart Friedel. One of the characteristics I love so much about Stuart is he will have a goal or like he'll see an opportunity and he will engineer things to achieve that opportunity.

41:07For example, Stuart wanted to sing the national anthem at a major league sporting event. And so he engineered the way for him to get to sing the national anthem at, I think, a minor league baseball game. And he did it. He figured out like this is an opportunity to do it. And so a Stuart Friedell type character who is driving this for a specific goal, which is not just sort of an inner ambition, but something he wants to achieve. You can imagine that being enough to get us to like why we're creating the fake squash team. Yeah. To win the girl, to do the thing, to get the scholarship, to do something.

41:41I could see where it's a little adjusted, where you have a squash team that is pretty bad. They want to be good. And you get all the different reasons why. My dad was a squash player. He wants me to be a squash player. Whatever it is. They're okay, but mostly they're in the cellar in their very tiny Division III, you know, college league. And somebody, as a joke, because they're so bad, somebody as a joke just starts flipping the scores when they print them. And they get invited to a tournament because of it. And they're like, we're going, we have to try. We can be better. You ever hear like, you play up to your competition.

42:23And then they have a chance to be a Cinderella story. And then, you know, and then of course, right before they're about to go into the championship match, somebody discovers that the records were flipped and they're disqualified and everyone's like, let them play, let them play. Bad news bears. And I could see that. Yeah, so I think we're talking about what are the interesting edges of the sports comedy genre And so we referenced Dodgeball, which is, of course, a parody of the sports comedy. Challengers is also sort of a parody of what a sports comedy is. Happy Gilmore, another great example of a movie that is a comedy that is existing because of what our expectations are of sports comedies, Bad News Bears, you referenced.

43:03So I think there's something smart you could do there. But this is just a very tiny little seed of an idea. and you'd have to really have characters who are interesting and have a good way to introduce the audience to like, what does 1977 feel like? Because you and I were little then and we have some image of what that's like. But in that pre-internet era, I can see them getting away with this because anything that was in print was like true. Of course. Yeah. This is of all these, well, they're all execution dependent, but this one is especially execution dependent. Like this either works great or it's like, oh, it's a nothing.

43:42So once again, our listeners totally stepped up. Thank you to our premium subscribers who got this email and sent us in these great suggestions for stories. I really loved talking through all of them. Same. Let's answer a listener question. Heidi has a question about querying reps. A few years ago, I wrote a feature script based on a quirky and obscure historical event. I rewrote the script as a picture book manuscript and sold it to a major publisher. The book's coming out this year. I've since revised the original script and now have a few more scripts under my belt. I think I might finally be ready to seek representation.

44:20My question is, should I send the picture book and the press kit with my script when I query managers? The illustrator the publisher chose is fabulous and the illustrations are quite cinematic. I'm wondering if it will serve as a sort of early pitch deck or I'll just seem hokey. I think, Heidi, yes, you have something that people can see, which is nice. Mostly, you want them to be reading your scripted material to get a sense of like, oh, this is who they're going to try to sell you as, as a person. But like the book is the thing they're going to send out to get people interested. And so, yes, you should send them the book.

44:53Of course, of course send in the book. If for no other reason, then it makes you legitimate. You wrote a book and a major publisher bought it and published it. Now you're somebody that is different than the just, hi, I'm a 23-year-old from Kansas and I wrote a movie that's mostly based on my life. And you go, fwap, into the other pile. This is different. It'll at least get attention. Yeah, I think you have to be crazy not to. Yeah. Fred sent in some rage bait. Here we go. should writers repeat the plot three or four times assuming that most viewers are watching while on their phones? Oh. Well.

45:34My. God. All right. I can see the color changing in Craig's face. Oh, my God. Yeah. I have heard about this. Yeah. Mostly in reference to Netflix, honestly. Correct. Netflix. And nobody at HBO has ever brought that up. Mm-hmm. Apparently nobody at FX has ever brought that up. I think Justin probably would have complained to me by now. This is not a thing. This is just the computer spitting out too much data and their pattern recognition. I mean, it's just pattern. This is faulty. This is faulty. People know when they're not paying attention that they're not paying attention. It's not like people don't pay attention to something then turn back to it and go, what's going on?

46:21This movie makes no sense. They're aware. They go back and watch the part they missed. This is silly. I hate it. I will never do it. No one should ever do it. It's gross. Why don't we also repeat the ending twice? Why don't we do that? Why don't we just repeat entire scenes? Let's do that. Yeah. Let's make soap operas. Let's make soap operas that also repeat within the episode of the soap opera. And everyone should always say their name when they talk to each other. So, John, as you know. Craig, I absolutely know what you're saying. Right, John? But let's rephrase it, shall we, John? So, this is maddening, and it's not real.

47:06It's not true. Also, we're saying Netflix here, but Netflix's biggest hit, Adolescence, that was not recapping what was happening moment by moment. You actually had to watch the screen and pay attention. and people don't mind paying attention to things. I don't think it was developed by Netflix either. So here's where I think that the reality is coming in here. If you're doing a competition show, if you're doing like a baking show, they are trained to repeat things again and again, like going into a challenge, coming out of a challenge. They're just constantly filling up with that kind of stuff, but not in the scripted dramatic stuff.

47:42Don't do it. No, don't ruin your story. Nope. Don't. Just don't do it. All right, it is time for our one cool things. Mine is a paper by Cornell University and Anthropic looking at disempowerment in the age of AI. And by disempowerment, it's where people sort of see control or see decision-making on certain axes. What I liked about it, and there's a little table chart, which I thought was the most useful part of the article, is a sort of summary and classification of kind of ways that people disempower themselves. So they talk about reality distortion, which is on a spectrum from none to severe.

48:23So if you're going to an AI, sort of like you're going to just look something up in a book, and you're just trying to get information and context and understanding that that's not disempowerment. But with increasing sycophancy, the AI is telling you like, oh, yes, you're absolutely right. Even if you're absolutely wrong, if it's reinforcing negative beliefs, that can be very, very bad. And there's a person in my life who has fallen down that rabbit hole and clearly is believing things that are not true because the AI is just telling them that they're right when they're clearly wrong. That is troubling.

48:57And that's a thing we need to be aware of. But they also talk about outsourcing decision making, which is basically like when my dog got sprayed by a skunk, I was looking up online to see, well, what should I do? Because that's an answer that I can find. There's an expert out there. but if I'm exporting more fundamental life decisions to this kind of thing, that is disempowering and it's taking away your own agency to do a thing. I mean, I think it's like, oh, I'm making a choice to ask something and to ask for advice, but honestly, you're giving up the insight and the self-determination of what is best for you.

49:33So I thought this chart was really helpful. The paper is good at looking at sort of what the issues are without providing good solutions to these issues. but we have to think about the guardrails that are beyond just like, let's not let AI take over all of our systems, but let's also not let it take over our internal determination of what we want to do, what we believe in, what is objective reality. Those were some really good observations, John. I think we're really onto something. Absolutely. I hate that. Oh my God, do I hate that. If anyone talked to me like that in real life, I would be like, what is wrong with you?

50:13Stop your toxic positivity. I hear the feedback. I'm happy to make that adjustment. Oh, gee, I'd be up. Yep. So I do have one cool thing. Please. You're familiar with the song Day in the Life by the Beatles from Sgt. Peppers. And there is a young man, he's British, And it's like a 20-minute video where he goes through how that song was first written. So it was initially written by John because the song has two distinct parts to it. And then there was this hole where John said, Paul, you put something in there. And then they began to record it. And while they were recording it, Paul then came up with his little bit.

51:02And they literally were like, okay, there's going to be 24 bars in this song where Paul's thing is going to go. So they record the whole thing. And then Paul, this is the part that blew my mind. Then Paul's to go in and do his bit. But back in the day, if he goes too long, he's going to overwrite. Okay. Literally on tape. So there was this very tense moment where he had to, and I went into a dream. La, la, la, la, la. So that part, that part's recorded. Went into a dream, had to like fit right there. And if it was like a little too long, it was going to mess it up. It was going to erase it, not over like erase.

51:46So there was all these like crazy things. And then getting the final note and how they got that final note was fascinating. how they were able to get an orchestra to play the way they did because they wanted an orchestra to just play crazy and classical musicians do not know how to play crazy. That's not a thing they do. It's just really well done. It's a fascinating history of how that song came together, literally down to the fact that I read the news today, he blew his brains out in his car and then 4 ,000 Holes in Blackburn, Lancashire. Those were two articles in one day in a newspaper that John read and he goes, I'll take that one and I'll take that one.

52:30It's pretty remarkable, but there's also some really good footage of them doing it all together. It's just a great analysis of a song that deserves analysis because it's very complex. Yeah, I love any sort of explainer video that really dives deep into how an artistic work was created because we just have the assumption like, well, this thing is wonderful and perfect. And until you know the actual genesis of how it got to be there, it just looks like, oh, well, this person was clearly just a super genius. And you'd see like, oh, there were actually many steps along the way and there was collaboration and there were decisions that were made and reversed and other things.

53:06Song Exploder is a great podcast and video series that also talks through a lot of other songs. It's just fun to watch people solving problems that today are not at all problems. Yeah. So like that final note, they've got six different pianos and they're all hitting versions of and the problem they had was getting everybody to hit exactly at the same time. And it was like a little off. They wouldn't take it. I think it took them nine tries. Now, hit one, record, hit one, and you would never have that problem of like, fit your lyric in here or you erase. It's wild that that's the way it worked.

53:45And it's awesome. I think it's also worth noting, just like there's really frustrating things about YouTube and the short form video and sort of how it's destroyed our attention. But short form video like this is also just an amazing opportunity to sort of see how things are put together. And the fact that somebody made this video, that wouldn't have been possible in a normal TV documentary way. It's like you can have very specific channels and focus on very specific interests. And that's incredible. Yes, it is a great feeling going into something that is documentary and knowing I'm going to get the thing I want and then I can go away and do something else.

54:25As you were able to know right from the start, like how long is this video? Do I have time to watch this now? Yes, yes. All right. That is our show for this week. Scriptness is produced by Drew Marquardt and edited by Matthew Cilelli. Our outro this week is by Gloom Canyon. If you have an outro, you can send us a link to ask at johnaugust.com. That's also a place where you can send questions like the ones we answered today. You'll find transcripts at johnaugust.com along with a signup for our weekly newsletter called Interesting, which has lots of links to things about writing. The Script Notes book is available wherever you buy books.

54:57So thank you for continuing to buy the Script Notes book. You'll find clips and other helpful video on our YouTube. Just search for Script Notes and give us a follow. You'll find us on Instagram, also at Script Notes Podcast. We have t-shirts and hoodies and drinkware. You'll find those at Cotton Bureau. You can find show notes with links to all the things we talked about today in the email you get each week as a premium subscriber. Thank you to our premium subscribers. Thank you. Both for what you sent us in solutions to email problems and great articles to discuss. You make it possible for us to do this each and every week.

55:28You can become a premium member at inscribnotes.net where you get all the back episodes and bonus segments like the one we're about to record on CDs and DVDs and what the hell we're going to do with all these plastic discs in our homes. Craig, Drew, thank you for a fun show. Thank you. Thank you.

From the publisher

John and Craig gather our listeners' favorite news articles and ask, How Would This Be a Movie? Stories include an underground network delivering menstrual supplies in Minneapolis, a millennial travel group, how the US hacked ISIS, and a fake college squash team.

But first we follow up on modern comps, email issues, teaching screenwriting, and what it means to be undeniable. We also answer listener questions on querying reps with a published book and whether writers really need to repeat the plot for a second-screen audience.

In our bonus segment for premium members, what do we do with all our old CDs and DVDs? We weigh the pros and cons of physical media.

Links:

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode here.

More from Scriptnotes Podcast

All 53 episodes
725 - Torn from the pages of Squash MagazineScriptnotes Podcast · 56 min
Listen in VO