UFC on Paramount+ and Netflix’s Big Bet on Sports Streaming

4 Feb 2026 · 44 min · 19 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

How streaming platforms are reshaping live sports and advertising—UFC’s 7-year, $7B Paramount+ deal (and Netflix’s live-sports-driven growth), plus the BBC’s YouTube expansion.

Guests

Chris Stone (community lead) and Nick Meacham (CEO) of Streamtime Sports. No external guests mentioned.

Key claims

  • UFC on Paramount+ delivered major early reach: ~4.96M average minute viewers, ~5.93M peak concurrence, ~7M households reached; “largest Paramount+ live event.”
  • Pay-per-view economics have weakened; streaming plus ads may be the sustainable model.
  • Netflix Q4 results show advertising revenue more than doubled to $1.5B+ and paid subs rose to 325M; Netflix credits live sports for “disproportionate excitement and sign-ups.”
  • BBC should be “where people are,” so it’s creating YouTube-first programming (up to 50 new channels) including Olympics content.

Notable examples

  • “Steve Bradbury” (Australia’s short-track win) and “Miracle on Ice” used as sports-viewing context.
  • UFC comparisons: Khabib vs McGregor 2.4M PPV buys; Paramount+ subscription math vs PPV revenue.
  • BBC Match of the Day: linear down 10%+ in 12 months while digital rose, implying audience migration to YouTube.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Discussion on Winter Olympics Events

0:45 to 4:15

Chris and Nick discuss their favorite Winter Olympics events and memories.

“have you heard of Steve Bradbury nope oh so basically he was this Aussie he actually was one of the best in the world for a while.”

Reflections on Past Olympics Hosts

4:15 to 6:06

The hosts reflect on previous Winter Olympics and their host cities.

“They don't look that steep on screen, but with the way they use drones these days, he talked about the fact that it could be a whole different viewing experience, which I'm quite excited about.”

The Fun of Watching Olympics Events

6:06 to 6:49

Chris and Nick humorously discuss the experiences of average people at the Olympics.

“I'm a bit gutted I'm not going to go, but it just kind of crept up on me.”

Transition to UFC and Paramount+ Deal

6:49 to 8:14

The hosts transition to discussing the UFC's new partnership with Paramount+.

UFC Streaming Data and Comparisons

8:14 to 10:10

Discussion on viewership numbers and comparisons with previous UFC pay-per-view events.

“There's usually a party involved with it.”

Economic Implications of UFC's New Model

10:10 to 13:55

Chris and Nick analyze the economic impact of UFC's shift to streaming from pay-per-view.

“Look, it's interesting because I did see that those numbers that they shared were platform viewers.”

UFC's Audience Impact and Future Prospects

14:00 to 18:15

Explore UFC's significant audience numbers and implications for Paramount Plus.

“You said the average minute audience was about 5 million, pig households 7.”

Comparing Pay-Per-View and Subscription Models

18:16 to 20:44

Discuss the challenges of comparing UFC's pay-per-view to subscription revenue models.

“And slightly off-piste, Nick, but I'm curious to know, was the movie The Goonies also a classic in Australia?”

Netflix's Performance and Sports Integration

20:45 to 23:00

Analyze Netflix's recent growth attributed to live sports and subscriber increases.

“They're talking about the Q4 revenue was up 18 % year-on-year.”

Future of Sports Streaming and Advertising

23:01 to 26:31

Evaluate the potential for Netflix to expand its sports offerings and advertising strategies.

“But yeah, I can't watch long-form content now with an ad break randomly inserted in the middle of some sort of scene.”
Show all 19 chapters

Mergers, Acquisitions, and Netflix's Strategy

26:32 to 28:00

Discuss the implications of mergers like Warner Brothers for Netflix's future strategy.

Analyzing Netflix's Subscription Growth

28:00 to 29:53

Learn about Netflix's subscription growth and consumption issues amidst revenue increase.

“But actually, they only had a 2 % increase in consumption hours in the second half of last year.”

Media Business Audience Challenges

29:53 to 31:09

Discover how media businesses face challenges converting audience growth into revenue.

“the kingpins of the industry, basically.”

BBC's YouTube Strategy

31:09 to 32:18

Explore BBC's strategic partnership with YouTube to engage younger audiences.

“What's really interesting here is they've entered a strategic partnership in an attempt for the platform, or I should say the public broadcaster BBC, to reach more younger and global audiences.”

BBC's Content Creation for YouTube

32:18 to 35:02

Understand how BBC plans to create content specifically designed for YouTube.

“you know, media producers and things like that, this is the best way to do this.”

Revenue Generation and Audience Engagement

35:02 to 37:23

Learn how the BBC can generate revenue through YouTube while serving local audiences.

“I think the argument was that this is a UK paid by taxpayers.”

The Future of BBC's Digital Strategy

37:23 to 42:02

Examine the implications of BBC's digital strategy and its impact on content distribution.

“So I'm intrigued to see what all those different ones look like and feel like once they're up and running.”

Reflections on Industry Changes

42:02 to 42:46

Discussion about the evolving landscape of sports streaming and personal sentiments.

“Maybe, maybe, maybe, you know, I just had to get through it a little bit.”

Upcoming Events and Guest Preview

42:47 to 43:34

Preview of upcoming episodes and events, including a special guest appearance.

“And then I will say, you know, we're going to do a double pod drop next week.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:04Nick Meacham:Hello, everyone. Welcome back to the next episode of Streamtime Sports. My name is Chris Stone, the community lead joined as always by our CEO, Nick Meacham. Now, Nick, it's an exciting time. The Olympics will be coming up soon. I don't know if it'll have officially started by the time this podcast is released, but certainly within a couple of days of that. Do you have a favorite event, Nick? I feel like the Summer Olympics always gets maybe a little bit more love than the Winter Olympics but are there any particular winter Olympic events that stick out to you I can't imagine Australia being particularly great at the winter Olympics but maybe that's maybe that's a

0:37Chris Stone:wrong assumption of my part it's not a wrong assumption we've had a couple of moments over the years that have uh caught the chorus the country by surprise I would say uh starting with have you heard of Steve Bradbury nope oh so basically he was this Aussie he actually was one of the best in the world for a while. And he made the final of this short track, ice skating, where the speed skating, where they would go around in the tight circle that they do. And that particular year, he basically fell way back, like last by a mile. He was almost just coasting around in the final. It was almost a bit embarrassing watching it, going, oh, this is a bit of a shame.

1:17Chris Stone:And then at the end, everyone crashed into each other, and then he crossed the line with gold. And so you saw the second place, third place, everyone was like literally crawling on their hands and knees. It was on the final turn. And he just went past without even having to try and skate. It's a famous thing. It's like doing a Bradbury basically is what we used to call it in Australia where everyone basically falls down in front of you and you somehow get a win. So that lives on in Australian folklore, particularly around the Winter Olympics. And we've had a couple of others as well. We had a couple of good, what do you call it?

1:52Chris Stone:Like jumpers, basically. they were ski jumpers that could do all the acrobatic tricks um so that that was another one of our our sports but for me in terms of watching biathlon i'm pretty bit of a fan of these days because of uh its coverage here um freestyle skiing is pretty cool luge i think is pretty fun to watch actually look at the list of them i think i like them all the only one i'm really curious is is what the hell is ski mountaineering that's a new one apparently that's joined the winter olympics mix i'm intrigued by well i came up uh you know watching

2:25Nick Meacham:cool running so the bobsled is always going to be something uh that i enjoy watching um and then the other one as well is the ice hockey i know that price sounds a little bit uh too simple but i think one of the things arguments i'd make is with baseball and with hockey so major league baseball and nhl is playoff style hockey and playoff style sort of knockout competition those sports is really great and you know obviously the american in me there's always the you know the the famous miracle on ice and you know the the u.s versus the canadians and i don't even think the russians are there a lot in the olympics anymore but like there is something about knockout style ice hockey that um i think always ups the ante a little bit and is always good exciting good rivalry

3:08Chris Stone:so um what's actually quite big uh here in sweden anyway and probably most of the nordics is the they have the world championships for ice hockey every year uh is it every year and they also have the juniors and those competitions are massive because i guess because sweden's got a chance of actually getting a decent result so the patriotism behind it is definitely definitely a thing and i love the blend you get between like the nhl professional players and everyone else a bit like you do with basketball i suppose yeah so i'm a big fan of watching ice hockey because anyone can win at any particular time.

3:41Chris Stone:At the same time, it's always dominated by the big few teams. But I more enjoy those sports that I never get a chance to watch. I do that with the regular, the Summer Olympics as well. But yeah, the tobogganing or not tobogganing, God, the bobsledding is definitely one to watch. And I think I was listening to the Sports Pro podcast where Steve McCaskill was talking about the technology improvements around broadcast and so forth. So it could be a real spectacle to watch it because you start to get a better feel for how steep those tracks are that they operate on. They don't look that steep on screen, but with the way they use drones these days, he talked about the fact that it could be a whole different viewing experience, which I'm quite excited about.

4:24Nick Meacham:Yeah, I think as well, it feels like the last couple of Winter Olympics, maybe I'm not paying off attention, haven't maybe been in the correct time zone. So to be in Italy will definitely help. It feels like the last couple of Winter Olympics have been not necessarily viewer-friendly for us in the UK in terms of being able to do that. So, I mean, we talk about it all the time, you know, how much do time zones impact things. But that certainly at least make it a little bit easier, more accessible. I certainly know when we're in the office at SportsPro, there will be a screen that just has the Olympics playing nonstop.

4:54Chris Stone:That is no doubt. And I'm just trying to remember, Kay, do you remember what was the last Winter Olympics host? I think I do.

5:01Nick Meacham:I thought it was in... Japan. Or is Japan the one after this one?

5:05Chris Stone:So it was in Beijing. Oh, okay. So I did remember. I thought that was the case, but then I had to have a quick look. Had a quick doubt, yeah. It was a bit, yeah, a random one. But when Russia hosted it, they hosted Sochi. Correct. I actually had to go to Sochi for the Sport Accord event many years ago before they were hosting it. I think it was in 2014. and what i did know when i was flying there is that actually sochi is a summer beach town beach resort and they basically also made it into they tried to make it into a winter resort that's one of the reasons they um they took that on i have no idea how well it went but i'm pretty sure the temperatures were not the best when they hosted it there that so definitely some random destinations because beijing obviously has hosted the summer olympics uh in 2008 as well yeah i

5:52Nick Meacham:think that's maybe why i didn't think beijing is i knew they'd have the summer so i did actually know that about Sochi, that it was actually a summer destination. But yeah, I do think things being in Italy will certainly, selfishly for us in the UK, just make it a little bit more accessible.

6:06Chris Stone:I'm a bit gutted I'm not going to go, but it just kind of crept up on me. I didn't even think about it. And next thing you know, about three weeks ago, I heard people starting to talk about it. And, oh, okay, well, I've already got plans. I'm actually on holiday in the middle of it. So hopefully, I mean, on holiday in the middle of it skiing. So I'm hoping I can get to in my quiet time look at how i should be doing it versus how i am doing it on the slopes yeah yeah well like

6:30Nick Meacham:you said i think we mentioned in the summer olympics and it should be the same for the winter olympics probably even more for the winter olympics they should always make just one average person compete in every event just to give you a standard of like how bad you actually are compared to what you think you could do if you saw it on tv i would love that though imagine

6:45Chris Stone:there'd be some pretty uh frightening injuries happening someone trying to go down some of those ski slopes uh yeah love the double black diamond runs that that exists that uh you see those guys speeding their way down on so uh you hear that i'd love that concept what i will say is you and

6:59Nick Meacham:i've had the conversation is it like is it time to delete twitter and we're not even going to talk about twitter but i'm just going to use this as the is the segue i sent you what i thought was a really class a tweet which was there's this common you know meme video of this guy in a really fancy restaurant and he's doing the whole swirling the wine glass taking a sniff to look really posh and basically it was that video and the caption was me finally watching UFC legally for the first time um and it just it was a perfect tweet um because I totally got the reference and it is to have to do with the fact that after uh the deal that we've talked about for a long time with Paramount Plus and their seven year seven billion dollar deal with the UFC has finally come to fruition um and we've seen it in the flesh and they had their very first event but it was just it was funny that the initial reaction i saw on social media was people just being like it's a bit weird not watching this on a pirated stream i mean that's definitely a good message for the

7:59Chris Stone:executives that they've made potentially the right decision there uh look i think it's the initial numbers show that they've had immediate success by moving on to a platform like paramount so i think everyone will be pretty happy with what those numbers are which we can run through in a second but it goes to show just i think people for a long time now have just been finding ways to go watch content and they're quite happy to take the cheapest and freest way available even if it means doing it illegally and we've seen plenty of examples like that and i think when looking at some of the numbers that did come out in the ratings it really was a proof case to me how mainstream ufc and indeed martial arts is i was quite shocked by at the

8:37Nick Meacham:scale of them yeah well some of the numbers as you say uh the live average minute attendance which i probably need a refresher on what that specific stat is was 4.96 million viewers approximately peak concurrence was at 5.5.93 million and total households reach was just over 7 million by those numbers have been the largest event in paramount plus history for live events and reportedly reached more homes than any ufc event in nearly a decade and just to give some context to this i did some research thank you chad gbt on what were the most pay-per-view buys in ufc history um so khabib versus mcgregor was number one ufc 220 2.4 million buys so essentially half the number of viewers um that they reported um the next one was poyer versus mcgregor 1.8 million and then it goes 1.6 1.6 1.6 now obviously we know these things when you're buying pay-per-view, it's very rarely just the one person watching it.

9:39Nick Meacham:There's usually a party involved with it. But in terms of essentially double the number of households that reported from a streaming perspective. So to your point, it does give a bit of a context for where that is. I think one of the difficult things about this conversation that we'll get into it is it's not quite an apples to apples comparison because one of the other things as well is just the advertising and all that. But to your point, there were good numbers behind it from what we get from the initial reports. And who knows how many people were watching that with friends?

10:10Chris Stone:Yeah. Look, it's interesting because I did see that those numbers that they shared were platform viewers. They weren't doing any sort of ratings count where they have an average amount of people watching a view like Nielsen would. So those numbers actually are even better than they sound. Now, it's difficult comparing them with a pay-per-view, right? Because pay-per-view, obviously they're getting so much more revenue per user and per buy that you can't really compare. However, looking at some of those events you referred to, well, McGregor was the top four out of those fights. And then the one after that was UFC 100, which I think we're in 300 and something now, right?

10:49Chris Stone:342? 342. So that's years ago that they were reaching those sort of numbers. So really what those numbers show to me is that the pay-per-view bubble had definitely burst. They weren't getting anywhere near what they were many moons ago. Because if they were, I don't think they would have moved away from the pay-per-view approach. And that's why they had to take this step. Because the economics otherwise, for what they were generating for UFC 220 at 2.4 million buys, just smashes what just happened out of the park. But that is more the exception. and you almost have to like ignore those and look what the average was for everything else underneath that McGregor era and then you can see that they had a big gap to overcome so it's uh I think it's firstly I did a quick review of this um but did I well did you have any comments on on what I said there because I had some numbers on other events as well that I want to share

11:40Nick Meacham:yeah well I mean I try to do just some fun maths like totally just pull some stuff out and I think a UFC fight pay-per-view used to be$80 a fight. So if you did the math of the 2.4 million that did the Khabib versus McGregor fight, that comes out to about$190 million. So you're talking about a big, big, big, massive event. And I did some math. The subscription plan that comes with ads on Paramount Plus is$8.99. So if you multiply that by the 5.93 peak viewership, that only gets you$53 million. So you're only talking about a quarter of the money. If you did the full one without the ads it comes out to 13.99 a month which gets you to 83 million so to your point significantly lower than what would have been from a pay-per-view fight but what i try to get chat gpt to do was give me the average number of pay-per-view fights from ufc 100 onwards and you know it gets a little murky because obviously ufc only shares when the stats are in their favor but they're like they're like realistically 2.4 is the high end 500 000 is probably a bit more realistic which brings you out to about 40 million per event, which means this would have gone above what that average one was.

12:47Nick Meacham:So you kind of have to balance out the really mega events with the low-end events. And then the question becomes, to your point, Nick, are you better off and just more secure by having that reoccurring check that's going to come in without having to have a McGregor carry those major events, event in and event out?

13:03Chris Stone:Well, yeah, look at the examples you've shared are obviously of the yesteryear. They weren't delivering those anymore. They weren't achieving those numbers. And in fact, most signs are pointing to in boxing, they're moving away from pay-per-view. So the writing's been on the wall that that model is going to keep deteriorating. So those economics, I mean, they're best case because obviously there's loads of people on free plans and people aren't just buying for sports. But it gives you a bit of a sense of how big the gap was for the pay-per-view day, the glory days. Look, this was a good way for them to secure their future.

13:34Chris Stone:And this is one UFC event, right? They're going to be having so many more on the platform, I think outside of the UFC's core events as well, that they'll have a lot more content to share. And it's clearly been a needle mover for Paramount. I'd be interested to see if they ever share any data on how many new subscribers they achieved as a result of that. That's obviously going to be the real benchmark for this. But looking at some of the numbers, I thought it'd be worth having a little look at to try and get a comparison on how significant these sorts of numbers are. You said the average minute audience was about 5 million, pig households 7.

14:08Chris Stone:Well, for context, I did a bit of my own research, Chris. Here we go. So an NBA game, like national televised game, a regular game gets about 1.4 to 1.8. Playoffs get between 3 to 6 million. And NBA finals get 10 to 13. Now, think about the NBA finals. I think the NBA finals number 10 to 30 is actually a better comparison because at around six, 7 million people, I would estimate that if you did, you replicated the Nielsen kind of ratings approach that that number will be much closer than you would think there. A couple other sports just to like you again for a comparison, WNBA was the big games were doing one to two million this year and the finals do 1 million.

14:57Chris Stone:MLS, a couple of hundred thousand on linear. Playoffs for NHL, 1 to 2 million. MLB, playoffs, 4 to 7 million. So what does it tell us? I think what it just tells us, it tells me, I think it tells me this, is that those numbers are real, really significant. It really emphasizes that UFC is a mainstream product. Now, the question is, will they be able to keep it up? is the sport enticing enough that this isn't just novelty value driving these audiences and it's going to keep sustained or even grow because if it's going to grow, then wow, UFC is going to put up some serious numbers and its popularity is only going to continue to skyrocket.

15:40Chris Stone:You made the comment before you went into some of the statistics.

15:42Nick Meacham:In the report I saw, it was claimed that a million new signups took place within 24 hours of the fight with which they are largely credited. in that i mean there'll be some people that just sign up that have no idea but like they do think there's an emphasis behind that so i guess the question i was going to ask you nick is you know fill in the blank if you're a paramount plus and you've made this seven year seven billion dollar investment after the first fight you are feeling what feeling feeling rosy feeling pretty positive

16:08Chris Stone:i think i'm feeling pretty pretty confident that this is on the on the right track i can't think of what they would have expected that would be surpassed these numbers realistically for something that, I mean, obviously American numbers are the focus. I've not seen anything. I follow a lot of the different sports channels and I'm not seeing like huge, huge overemphasis on the marketing of this, but granted I'm not in the US, so maybe they've just been done doing in a more targeted fashion. So I think they should be very, very happy with these first numbers. But again, there could be a bit of a halo effect or it could be a bit of a novelty effect, but I'd be surprised if they don't see these numbers continue on, at least for quite a while from here onwards.

16:47Chris Stone:So fair play to everyone involved. It seems like, I'd say, as a starting point, they should be pretty happy with how the economics might play out from here.

16:55Nick Meacham:And I guess just the other question around that, and one of the other reasons why it is going to be difficult to compare the pay-per-view to what Paramount is doing is the role of advertisement. You know, we can, you know, make a rough guess at how much they're making based off what the subscription prices are. But what we won't know is necessarily what they're making from an advertising perspective. And we're going to talk about Netflix after this. They've been very public about how much money they made off of advertising. But, you know, just sort of it will be difficult unless Paramount decides to talk about that.

17:25Nick Meacham:Kind of what the difference is between, you know, the pay-per-view is the really high number. But we don't know what advertising is going to do to make up the difference in that gap that we won't know. And I know there's some fans complaining about the advertising. And Dana White very much said, you're paying$8.99. You used to pay$80. quid like you're gonna have to expect something for those guys to make their money back yeah get

17:47Chris Stone:back in your chair and sit down and otherwise put you a fork out the extra cash yeah i i think that there's always going to be a behavioral change that people have to deal with understanding that this is now going to be there after years of dealing with a super clean uh experience by pay-per-view but uh i think they know why it's well it is right to basically call everyone out i think that message uh will will ring through pretty quickly to all fans who have been paying through the nose for basic access to these events for some time that you know what i'm okay with this actually and uh yeah fair play them i am intrigued to see how much uh revenue that it does generate that's that's the number one i think the number one focus point of all streamers now is how much more money they can generate from advertising is it going to be 20 30 percent more is it going to be more than that um but for these big events these big tentpole events these big live sports events that's what advertisers are really keen on spending big money on now so i I think they'll be leaning more heavily into this as they go with bringing big brands to the table and spending big on advertising through those major events.

18:49Nick Meacham:And slightly off-piste, Nick, but I'm curious to know, was the movie The Goonies also a classic in Australia?

18:56Chris Stone:I'm familiar with the name of it. I've not seen it myself. So it could be a user error or an ignorance error, but I've not seen it. But I'm familiar with the name.

19:07Nick Meacham:Well, it is a classic in America and would definitely recommend it. Carl's definitely old enough. He would enjoy it. But basically one of the quotes from that is Goonies never say die. We had a podcast earlier where we talked about, is this the end of pay-per-view? Because not only UFC, but we saw what DAZN was doing with Riyadh Seasons. um you know we sort of like this may be the end of pay-per-view goonies never say die it's one event we got to see where it goes but like his pay-per-view is it dead you know now that we've actually seen it in action a little bit are we going to reserve judgment well i mean

19:41Chris Stone:we all the easy answer is to say we reserve judgment but i think this is a pretty good success story is about as successful as i think that they could have possibly hoped for to date and if they continue to get the advertisers backing it well on alongside the subs then this should they should make it pay for paramount's investment i think so uh i think there's a lot of confidence that this is the right approach i think where pay-per-view might still play a role is for all those smaller tier events they can't generate the advertising funding and don't have a deal with someone like a paramount how do you get access to those things that you know there's lower demand sports but there might be small buckets of people that do want to get access to it and i think that's where pay-per-view still plays a role um particularly at like grassroots sports level uh and indeed i think for fight sports uh as well but at the top end i think you'll continue to see for the near future um big moves out of the pay-per-view space as long as they

20:34Nick Meacham:can sit get advertisers lining up to spend yeah well a competitor to paramount plus because there's the ongoing saga of what's going to happen with warner brothers is netflix netflix also came out with their q4 numbers which you know again you use the word rosy it sounds like they're pretty rosy on things. They're talking about the Q4 revenue was up 18 % year-on-year. Net income was up 29 % year-on-year. Paid subscribers went from$300 million to$325 million, so an increase of$25 million to that. Advertising revenues more than doubled, exceeding$1.5 billion, which is what I was referencing about how much is that advertising money doing things.

21:13Nick Meacham:And I guess one of the things that came from this is Netflix did largely credit the introduction of live sports, helping to drive some of those numbers, particularly subscriber numbers, as well as the advertising numbers. So I guess, Nick, I suppose you're not in a position to necessarily agree with Netflix, the one with the numbers and all that. But do you think that sports should be given as much credit as it has been for some of the growth that it's all in 2025?

Read the full transcript

21:35Chris Stone:I mean, they're the ones with the numbers, and it sounds like it has. The quote they used was, it's delivered disproportionate excitement and sign-ups. That sounds pretty good to me. Look, they've been trying to supercharge their advertising business for some time. And since they've started investing into live sports, they've seen a pretty big bump in that revenue. And they are crediting live events, sports, as a big part of those live events, to much of that. A question for you. Do you have Netflix? And do you get served ads on Netflix? Because I don't. I'm obviously paying through the nose for it.

22:09Chris Stone:But I think I've been signed up for so long, I haven't paid attention now to what they're charging me.

22:13Nick Meacham:I think I'm in the same boat as you, which is I have Netflix. I've never requested it. So I think it just naturally just bummed me up to whatever that tier is. So I get the ads when I watch the live sports, but that's just like the nature of live sports. So I don't get it when I'm watching on-demand content.

22:29Chris Stone:Yeah, that's because I've noticed now watching Prime, I get served ads. Yep. And they're quite quick. They're like six-second ads, a bit like YouTube style in terms of their pace and turnover. But the other day I watched TV Theater, which is like the Channel 4 here in Sweden, and it was the free service. And my God, the ads breaks were so painful. I just can't go back to watching with full-blown ad breaks anymore. It just felt so wrong. Well, that's what all the big platforms want to hear, Nick.

22:59Nick Meacham:They want to hear that you'll pay the extra ad-free subscription.

23:03Chris Stone:Well, that's it, clearly. but I do remember seeing some numbers that Netflix shared a while back and I can't remember if, and I don't know if these still exist this way, but they were actually generating, once they launched the advertising product, they were actually generating more income from the people that weren't on the premium tier, but for the ones that were on the hybrid of advertising and subscription. Now, I don't know if that's still the case and maybe I misread the numbers, but I thought that's an interesting anecdote just to think if they can get that pricing model right, make it more enticing for someone to subscribe and actually make more money through advertising.

23:33Chris Stone:that's a nice little win for them. But yeah, I can't watch long-form content now with an ad break randomly inserted in the middle of some sort of scene. It just doesn't work for me. So, but look, back to Netflix, I think they've got to be, they've come out actively, they're saying that they're thrilled with the results, both from driving subscribers, but also driving up ad revenue. And that's the name of the game. And at the moment,

23:57Nick Meacham:they're still just doing events. They've not done anything with any sort of seasonality long term. But as you're reading through the tea leaves, is it difficult to imagine the idea that like the next time the NFL has their cycle coming around, which I believe they have the option to actually break their current deals. I think in like 2028 or 2029, they don't even have to see it all the way out because of what they talked about, specifically from driving subscriber numbers and then talking about the boom of the advertising. Does it feel like it's inevitable at this point that like they are going to stop doing just the christmas games the you know the small stuff and they're just going to flat out just go for it well i think about the ones that are currently

24:39Chris Stone:spending today you think about nbc and peacock as an example and they've got these different ways to maximize the value out of the rights to say the nfl or the nba as an example i feel like because they need that linear platform for quite some time to get the maximum value out of audience for non non-events-based, non-needle-moving things that those other platforms, and they're still struggling to make it work for profitability's sake. I used to think we're a while away until they really go all in on one of the premium top-tier American sports at scale.

25:12Nick Meacham:But who can write them off now?

25:15Chris Stone:Whatever they do, it seems to turn to gold. And if they can continue to build out their advertising machine, then I think them plugging in more and more longer-term deals where they can build the right sort of dynamic with an advertiser to spend on a whim if they bring in something new to the table. I'm more interested, though, to see what they do outside the U.S. now. Will they start to transfer this model and this success into other markets like Europe? Because it feels like they've got mainstream visibility and subscriber bases in a lot of the key mature Western markets. There's uncertainty and challenges in most of them around live sports in particular.

25:53Chris Stone:Yet they haven't made a real move for localized or semi-localized approaches on rights there of anything of significance. So, you know, there's the TF1 deal in France where they're going to be producing, distributing the linear TF1 broadcast in France to Netflix subscribers. And they will have probably some live sports on that. So will that turn into something for them to test out to say, hey, there is really an appetite here that we can transfer for regular season activity? i just can't i think they'll make a move at some stage and the economics are going to get more and more favorable for them to make a move at some stage but but i would say final point is that still these markets i'm referring to they don't have a lot of those events based style relationships um we're talking mainly league based stuff and that's not their raison d 'etre at the moment around like their sports approach so it would probably be something like i don't know the olympics or the grand slams or something that might be more appetizing for them to take on

26:54Nick Meacham:perhaps i'm not sure makes a ton of sense nick and yeah we i don't think we've seen much in europe and just to almost take things step back and i referenced at the beginning there's sort of this ongoing thing about you know the cash offer um to param or to warner brothers and paramount plus trying to fight for back and forth i know this is going to be sports adjacent because it's not just about the sports element of it but when you're thinking about the businesses as a whole particularly like netflix what do some of these moves tell you in terms of maybe what their their actual objectives are and you know sports will only be one part of that larger strategy but it just you know these are not small moves when they're talking about the the acquisition of warner brothers and everything that comes with it you know maybe just what yours what you think is i guess the end game for some of these really big mergers and acquisitions well there's a couple of

27:43Chris Stone:things we're to think about one is that netflix have actively said also their biggest competitor right now is sleep so that's one thing to consider uh then there was an interesting stat that came out of these numbers, which I think paint a bit of a story here, that a lot of positivity around revenue. Basically, they're getting more bang for their buck out of each and every consumer than they ever have, right? But actually, they only had a 2 % increase in consumption hours in the second half of last year. And you think about the growth of revenue, that means that as an aggregate and the growth of subscribers, that means on average that less people are on a per person basis are actually consuming content on the platform.

28:22Chris Stone:So for me, it looks like they do have to, looking a little bit further ahead and they can afford to do this, what moves can they make to ensure they continue to be the Netflix of entertainment, be that destination that everyone's going to press on them remote controls or on their smart TVs as a first port of call, not the second or third, which some of their other competitors have right now. And so that's why the Warner Brothers Discovery move, I think, is something they have been considering. I'm not an expert. There's lots of people who know about this type of thing. And I do know that they don't have a lot of sports actually in that deal.

28:58Chris Stone:So it is more about just the titles and the studio that Warner Brothers have. But I imagine this is a little bit of how they ensure they've got a really good long long runway of great content to keep building up consumption because they are acquiring audiences but it does feel like the consumption is floundering just a little bit nothing so it's not all roses and i i marry that up with sports you think about all the nfl matches they've had and all these other live sports events they brought they had black friday where they had sports all day long with golf and then then the nba and then the nfl and then for numbers have only got that marginal, that sort of marginal nature.

29:39Chris Stone:And think about the length of an NFL match. It's four hours long. I would have thought consumption would have been up way higher as a result of this. So I don't know. Maybe I'm reading too much into that stat, but I kind of feel like that's something that's showing that they've got a little bit of a consumption problem they need to address to make sure they continue to be the pioneers, the kingpins of the industry, basically.

30:00Nick Meacham:Yeah, well, you're not the only one with that concern. You know, friend of the pod, you know, she's been on before and she's been at several sport for events. Marion Roche, she had a LinkedIn post, which basically raised that point. And it was interesting. I was reading through some of the comments. Some people are sort of, hey, if the dollar signs are up, don't worry about it. And I think her response is a little bit more on your side, which is, you know, that the two things have to be viewed together and whether or not the engagement numbers are actually a forecasting that the money numbers might actually come down if people aren't engaging.

30:31Nick Meacham:And it was interesting to see that back and forth. So Nick, you aren't the only one that has that thought or saw that statistic and said, hold up a second here.

30:38Chris Stone:Well, it's good because Marion's very smart. And if she thinks it, then I feel validated by their speculation. But look, I think anyone running a media business these days, there's not always that linear nature between audience and revenue. Like sometimes you've got it at points where you might be growing the audience and then you've got now got the audience. Now you've got to turn that into something, right? well in netflix's case you know those those at peaks and troughs of having the content and then having the customer and then turning into revenue yeah they're not exactly linear it's therefore they might have to predict a little bit okay these are little signs we have to get in early and make sure we're mitigating that oh there's lots of speculation about why they're buying more of others just to screw over the other competition as well but i i'm not i'm not close enough to it to comment on that best defense is a good offense nick that's something the Cincinnati Bengals have taken it seriously.

31:27Nick Meacham:The last story we're going to talk about, Nick, and it's one that we've spent a bit of time, and we're going to spend time throughout 2026 talking about YouTube specifically, is here locally in the UK in the partnership that was reached with the BBC. What's really interesting here is they've entered a strategic partnership in an attempt for the platform, or I should say the public broadcaster BBC, to reach more younger and global audiences. This doesn't just include the BBC, just simply uploading more content onto YouTube. This is BBC saying they are going to make content specifically for YouTube.

32:01Nick Meacham:YouTube first programming, talking about over the next 12 months, expect up to 50 new BBC YouTube channels. They've already said that the upcoming Olympics, which we referenced at the top of the show, will have exclusive content that is designed for YouTube. There's also some interesting things around training where YouTube's basically going to work with the BBC to kind of tell them, you know, media producers and things like that, this is the best way to do this. You know, I think something like the statistics where the BBC currently has 15 million subscribers to its YouTube channel, BBC Sports has 900 ,000.

32:33Nick Meacham:But then Barb, the agency over here that, you know, monitors digital content said that It's 52 people are on YouTube in the UK, which is, I think, just over 60 million populations. Almost the whole population of the UK is on YouTube. So they want to get on it. So, Nick, we know we've talked about the BBC does have a bit of a unique commercial proposition, given the way the TV licensing works here. But just what you're already pretty positive about YouTube. what i guess you know scale of one to ten how much does this pique your interest that the bbc is taking such a it seems like a significant step to invest in this new platform i don't want to say new platform the bbc is just so much older than youtube you know got to give it a little bit of

33:18Chris Stone:credit yeah just a little bit but no i get your point it's a new platform to them in terms of really leaning into it i thought was most interesting about the announcement that they were going to create new and dedicated content for the platform i don't think it's entirely really surprising that they want to create something that's more attuned to YouTube consumers and streamers and perhaps younger audiences, given the nature of the platform. But initially, I thought, well, BBC could just tomorrow start distributing UK relevant content on the platform and they'll be hitting new audiences. I mean, look, it comes back to BBC, with BBC, it comes back to what is their goal and their objective of an organization?

33:56Chris Stone:Because it is unique. It isn't like other platforms. My understanding of it is they are funded by the taxpayer through the TV licensing model primarily and to basically their raison d 'etre, again, I think I've used that more than once on this podcast already, but is to service and serve the UK audiences with great content, credible source, et cetera, and serve their audiences, serve their people that are paying them, even though it's compulsory, with the content they want to get served. Now, by ignoring YouTube, and YouTube is now the most, as you pointed out, the most consumed platform in the UK, I feel like by not being there, that they are doing their taxpayer a disservice.

34:43Chris Stone:They're not being where they are. In the same way that they need to have a website on the internet, I think you kind of have to think about YouTube in this vein as like, they've got to be there. If YouTube's the new TV, which some people say, then you have to be where people are consuming, not expect people to leave where they are where they typically are day-to-day to go find you on a different place and location now i have seen some pushback and negativity around i have too yeah and i just felt like um there's more of an existential question around big tech social media that is probably fueling that negativity but in my view until something happens otherwise around around that, they should be absolutely all in on serving their content through those channels to ensure they're maximizing the value that they're due to be serving to UK audiences.

35:32Chris Stone:So I think it's not only a no-brainer, I can't really understand the negativity or pushback other than people do like to be contrarian and the risk is otherwise no one's going to be consuming their stuff as decline is happening so rapidly on cross-linear.

35:46Nick Meacham:Yeah, the pushback I saw did have to do with the big tech angle, but it came more to, and this is probably where we talk about sometimes it's difficult to separate politics from sports and everything else, is that YouTube is an American based company. I think the argument was that this is a UK paid by taxpayers. How does that ultimately feel if some of that money is then ultimately going to the US was essentially, I think, the pushback I saw, which I mean, I get, but I think to your point as well, like if it is justifiable in the service that it's providing to the local taxpayer. You know, that's just the cost of doing business, I suppose.

36:22Chris Stone:We're looking at it another way is that they obviously get a revenue share. I'm not doing a big, I don't want to do a big sell on YouTube, but I get the logic to some extent. The revenue they generate on YouTube will be shared. You know, YouTube take a cut, right, of everything they generate. Thinking about it the other way around is that by BBC leaning into their platforms, sorry, having 50 plus channels available on YouTube, is they'll now be able to generate revenue from global audiences in a way they've never been able to do before. Now, the economics around YouTube are not strong from a programmatic advertising perspective, but they're just opening up.

36:57Chris Stone:So one of the biggest and best producers of content, definitely in the UK, if not the world, is now going to be available globally. They're going to be able to generate a whole bunch of income that they wouldn't be able to do otherwise. And I think that's not an insignificant part, which should offset some of the fact that they're giving money to a US-based business. So I think it's not only it's a no-brainer, I think they have to be super committed to this as an approach. And I am intrigued to see what and how different their new content, this exclusive content they are creating, and also how much of their existing legacy stuff for Linear and their traditional streaming channels is going to be used also on those platforms.

37:37Chris Stone:But 50 different channels is a lot. So I'm intrigued to see what all those different ones look like and feel like once they're up and running.

37:46Nick Meacham:It'll just be interesting to see what it looks like from a user experience because, you know, I've got BBC iPlayer, so I'm familiar with what that platform looks like. I've also spent plenty of time on YouTube. You know, is it going to be some sort of hybrid? Are they going to build something bespoke or is it simply going to be just your standard YouTube channels? Like I would be curious to know how ingrained that partnership will be in terms of just the outlay of things. How will it look? You know, what would feel like its own BBC channel? or is it going to just kind of be existing? So it will be interesting to see like even those layers of the user experience, how that'll differentiate from what exists with BBC's existing digital platforms and then what YouTube already has on its platform.

38:23Chris Stone:Well, a couple, yeah, absolutely. A couple other things just to flag or to mention is that for those that aren't familiar and outside of the UK, so the BBC isn't able to serve advertisements to UK audiences. So on those platforms, it will be ad-free on YouTube. So the revenue creation will happen from outside of the UK from an advertising standpoint. I think that's just worth mentioning. And look, I've seen YouTube's top figures all shouting about it through every social channel possible because this is the biggest validation, I suppose, for YouTube to say, everyone come to us, work with us. We're the place where you need to be.

39:04Chris Stone:Channel 4 has already leant into this quite heavily. They've probably been very much one of the pioneers in broadcasters leaning into YouTube and broadcasting content on the platform, making it available there. So I think YouTube will be shouting about the fact that BBC has joined them to this level for quite some time and be pushing this in everyone's faces. And the other final bit I was curious to see if it was going to be connected with, which I haven't heard any mention of it, is remember they launched that primetime channels concept? I've heard nothing about that since. so I don't know if that's been a bit of a flop for them for whatever reason because it sounded great on paper but maybe they're just going to look into creating their own channels like you said and just build a network of them that they can use to target different audience segments I guess.

39:52Nick Meacham:So I'm sure you two will be hoping the answer to this question is yes Nick but do you see this as the first of several steps that'll look similar like this to the other public broadcasters taking this similar approach. You know, I guess that's the next question is, you know, what's next? Do other people follow this? Because I don't think the BBC will be the only people having an existential crisis about where audiences are. And to your point, do we want to fight the effort to make them come to us or do we just go to where they're already at?

40:25Chris Stone:It's a great question. And I think it's almost inevitable that we will see others follow. Again, YouTube's probably worked really hard to get a deal done with BBC so they make this commitment, whether it's the education, whether it's the commercials, etc., because they'll use it as a case study to then sell into each and every market they exist in. I posted something on this the other day. It was off the back of Steve's story around Match of the Day numbers. I don't know if you saw that, but basically Match of the Day, it's the BBC's premier highlights show that's been running for generations.

40:57Chris Stone:Decades. decades yeah that and that they've had that on their linear channels historically um and they've also got it on iplayer and the bbc's website app etc the numbers um numbers on linear have dropped by more than 10 in just 12 months right so that's dropped by 770 000 viewers um and the website is now it's gone by about 20 odd percent i think to 1.5 1.69 million depending on which statistic you're using. So my point there is the numbers have gone down by about 770 ,000 on their own digital channels. It's gone up by probably about 300 ,000. So that's an incredible rate of decline. Positive that the digital numbers are going up, but at 770 ,000 dip, that means they need to find those audiences from elsewhere.

41:50Chris Stone:And that's why YouTube is clearly, given what we said about the barbed numbers is that's where they are so that's why they have to lean into that and i'd expect them to put more of their sports content on the platform like match of the day is inevitable it would end up on youtube in the future maybe they can't do it at the moment though because of the

42:05Nick Meacham:existing rights agreement would be my guess yeah we'll see but again another really interesting story um something for us to follow through 2026 and yeah we we said it'd be a big year we said it'd be an exciting year you know nick what we were i was a little pessimistic at the start of the year You heard the first podcast, but you know, some rosier things coming up. Maybe, maybe, maybe, you know, I just had to get through it a little bit. Maybe I was just going through some stuff. Maybe I didn't get enough sleep with the newborn Nick, but you know, it's a little bit more positive to that.

42:29Chris Stone:Well, there's, there's lots, there's always lots of things going on at the moment. I remember having a bit of a lull about one or two years ago. I'm like, Oh, is this, there's not much going on. It's like pretty, pretty basic sort of storylines. And now there's all sorts of little nuances happening in the industry, which makes a lot more fun to talk about. So I'm all, I'm all here for it.

42:46Nick Meacham:Awesome. Well, Nick, it was a pleasure as always to get to chat with you. And then I will say, you know, we're going to do a double pod drop next week. So if you're listening, this will be another one coming out in just a couple of days. Basically, our most ever watched guest will be back, Mr. Dan Rayburn. So I don't think that's, you know, spoilers or anything like that, Nick. But yeah, double pod next week or this upcoming week as you're listening to this.

43:07Chris Stone:Absolutely. We'll be doing a preview to the Super Bowl. And also we're going to be meeting in person for our next Stream Time event. I'll be heading to London for that, which we're hosting at TikTok's offices. and we'll have DAZN, TikTok and a few others on stage there talking about how to monetize social. So lots to talk about. We'll share some of that either. For sure. Some of that content and some highlights from that with you all following that event.

43:33Nick Meacham:And thank you, everybody. We'll catch you next episode.

From the publisher

After signing last year’s historic 7-year deal, UFC 324 became Paramount+’s largest single streaming event, marking the platform’s biggest live event to date. It also represented the first UFC major event to move away from pay-per-view.

 

In this episode, StreamTime co-hosts Nick Meacham and Chris Stone dive into how Paramount+ should be feeling after their first UFC event, key takeaways from Netflix’s Q4 results, and YouTube’s groundbreaking partnership with the BBC.


Key Topics:

  • Should Paramount be pleased with the numbers from their first UFC event? 
  • Did streaming perform well enough to justify UFC ending their pay-per-view model? 
  • Is it appropriate to credit live sports for Netflix's subscriber and ad-revenue growth? 
  • Does Netflix have a consumption problem? And why isn't sports solving it? 
  • Why is the BBC partnering with YouTube? 
  • Will other broadcasters follow the BBC's digital distribution strategy? 

More from StreamTime Sports

All 74 episodes
UFC on Paramount+ and Netflix’s Big Bet on Sports StreamingStreamTime Sports · 44 min
Listen in VO