Tesla vs SpaceX, Humanoid Robots, Online Dating, Retro Electronics

18 Oct 2024 · 1 h 46 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: TBPN Episode - Tesla vs SpaceX, Humanoid Robots, Online Dating, Retro Electronics

Podcast Overview

  • Title: TBPN (Technology Brothers Podcast Network)
  • Description: Daily show focused on technology; available on platforms like X, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube.
  • Episode Title: Tesla vs SpaceX, Humanoid Robots, Online Dating, Retro Electronics
  • Episode Date: Not specified in the transcript.
  • Notable Sponsors: Ramp, Eight Sleep, Wander, Public, AdQuick, Bezel, Polymarket.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Tesla Updates
  2. Tesla Cybercab Event: Discussion about the event and the lack of acknowledgment of market realities by Elon Musk.
  3. Robo Taxi Vision: Skepticism about Tesla’s capabilities in comparison to Waymo; concerns over timeline delays and lack of clear communication from Musk.
  1. SpaceX Achievements
  2. Mention of SpaceX catching a rocket, highlighting the innovative technologies being successfully implemented.
  1. Humanoid Robots
  2. Discussion on Tesla's Optimus humanoid robot and its potential applications.
  3. The current reliance on human intervention (“human in the loop”) for operational tasks, raising questions about autonomy.
  1. Online Dating Trends
  2. Exploration of how dating apps have become prevalent in modern matchmaking, surpassing traditional methods.
  3. Debate over the impact of dating apps on personal relationships and societal norms.
  1. Retro Electronics
  2. Highlights of a company promoting the upgrade to retro electronics.
  3. Discussion of consumer nostalgia and the potential market for refurbished tech products.

---

Key Arguments and Discussions

  • Market Positioning: The discussion revealed a divide in consumer sentiment towards Tesla and SpaceX, with calls for clearer communication from leadership about market positioning and technology capabilities.
  • Investment in Startups: Analysis of the investment landscape, particularly concerning seed funding and the changing attitudes towards profitability and venture capital.
  • Cultural Reflections: Ironic juxtaposition of high-value startups with the activities of younger generations, hinting at a shift in entrepreneurship approaches.

---

Important Quotes

  • "The Tesla event could have told a huge inspiring story about the future, explain the philosophy behind what they're building." - Reflective commentary on Tesla's marketing strategy.
  • "You have to create the flywheel of like oh this is a stealthy way to justify even more trips to Amon-like properties with my LP dollars." - Discussing venture-funded tourism and luxury properties.

---

Insights on Technology and Society

  • Technology's Role: Exploration of how technology continues to shape personal relationships and societal structures.
  • Future Predictions: Predictions that the landscape for startups will continue to evolve, with a stronger emphasis on profitability and sustainable growth.

---

Innovations and Trends

  • AI in Governance: Discussion of the potential impact of AI technologies on governance and policymaking.
  • Consumer Electronics: Debate regarding the market for retro electronics and how nostalgia can drive consumer behavior.

---

Conclusion

  • Final Thoughts: The podcast wraps up with a reflection on how technological advancements will continue to disrupt traditional industries and the importance of clear communication from tech leaders to their stakeholders.

---

Next Steps

  • Follow TBPN:
  • [Website](https://TBPN.com)
  • [X](https://x.com/tbpn)
  • [Apple Podcasts](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/technology-brothers/id1772360235)
  • [YouTube](https://youtube.com/@technologybrotherspod?si=lpk53xTE9WBEcIjV)

---

This detailed note provides a comprehensive overview of the discussed topics, key arguments, and insights from the TBPN podcast episode, making it accessible for readers wanting to grasp the nuances of the discussions without needing to listen to the full episode.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Welcome to Technology Brothers, the most profitable podcast in the world. uh you know the problem with those like billionaire resorts that everyone goes to amon amon yeah it's like we're like the most expensive resorts network basically like well above the ritz and the four seasons yes but there's an obvious problem they're not venture backed exactly it's hard to you wish you could put more capital into them exactly because they're so profitable on a per door basis yeah that uh i actually think that we need 10 more mons we do and so that gave me an idea hit me what if we start a venture-backed amon that's it amon vb exactly and so the so the idea is that is that this is a place where venture investors could get exposure to something that they already know very intimately and of course like when you think about who can run your business better than you.

0:59The only person is an investor, a VC. And so during the fundraising process, you let the investors know, this is not your average fundraiser. We are going to want you to dig in. You're going to need to spend 30, 45, 60 nights a year at our properties as part of this investment for free. Yeah, a real operator. They like to use that word. Operator gets thrown. Somebody, I think this guy Michael on Twitter was talking about VCs use the word operator to embellish their resumes. Yeah. Right? Because it sounds a lot cooler to say I was, yeah, former operator than, yeah, I was an associate PM. Yeah, I was a sales guy.

1:44Yeah, I was one of the first like BDR hires at this company. Operator. Operator. It just sounds like. I mean, it sounds like special operator. twisting the knobs yeah twisting the knobs but also like maybe you're kicking doors in Iraq but in this case it's like yeah there's allocation for you if you commit to acting as a part-time general manager of the property giving feedback bring more than family checking guests in and cleaning bathrooms I mean really get your hands you just need to create the flywheel of like oh this is a this is the stealthy way to justify even more trips to Amon like properties with my LP dollars yeah I feel like sometimes venture capitalists myself included can get a little bit too disconnected from that the real asset itself yeah so if you're just lobbying money over you know lobbying money over to the founder and they're taking it they're putting to the work and they're putting it to work in their business there's something about getting into the asset and what's a better asset to immerse yourself in than a physical three-dimensional space right this is not software it's true the hotel is a product it's an experience and it's good opportunities because there's a lot of stuff that needs to be done at a hotel right VCs aren't necessarily gonna add value to a foundation model right they don't have to know how but when but what a guest breaks a glass at a restaurant they know how to use a broom right exactly get in there and clean it up do you know this yeah so so history of a month it's fascinating yeah so to my knowledge it is owned by effectively a russian oligarch and when you're staying on an amand property you really get that sort of makes sense um i was there i was at one of their properties last january or this january i guess um and there was a lot of russian being spoken and this is like you know peak ukraine war um so it was it was interesting sharing uh you know sharing elevators and hallways and restaurants with uh i just love the the like the foundation story the founding story is in 1988 almond resort's first destination was the result of this hotelier the desire to build a holiday home in phuket thailand uh his plans soon developed into an idea to build a small boutique resort with two friends and they invested their own money in the venture as no banks would lend uh for the project due to the small number of planned rooms uh the resort opened in 1988 with nightly rates five times higher than local competitors they were just like let's go not 20 percent higher but five times higher and it's actually still pretty much exactly oh yeah yeah yeah yeah like most carlton runs you at three four hundred five hundred yeah it depends on the resort but yeah yeah yeah and then and then a month can be like three five no i think yeah the the desire roll nights yeah desirable properties at uh desirable times a year like five grand for the entry level room which is basically as big as our studio you know our studios here is significantly yeah larger um than there there is something to that though like the we were talking about this with like um erwan like just going like up market up market like actually giving you to play yeah and do something you need the death zone is probably 20 exactly just 20 slightly Slightly premium.

5:22Slightly premium. Yeah, it was. Because you can't really afford to do anything fancier. So you're just like maybe making a little bit margin. It's all this like fake branding. Whereas like if you genuinely have five times higher revenues, like there's a lot of interesting things that you can do with that. Yeah, the interesting thing. So we stayed there with a couple of friends and another couple. And they had stayed there before. And so they were just like, these are the dates. Just book it. So we booked it. and I showed up and I didn't realize hope getting onto the property that two full meals a day on on the hotel property or at any of like their 10 partner hotels restaurants were all comped oh everything except alcohol yeah so once you're staying there I was I was like if nobody had mentioned this to me you could have just given me the bill the time because you don't go there expecting it was the experience of having like being at an all-inclusive resort and it was sort of funny we were joking around being like could we eat 10 grand because it's technically like all you can eat I mean that with that price structure you can't afford not to you can't afford not to yes I recommend Amon if you're you're bulking and you want to do a clean bulk clean blog you both as they call it where you get 90 % of your calories yeah a five Japanese foggy go to stay at Amon I love it did you watch the Tesla event of course of course what do you think it was a it was a fountain of virality for me I had two banger tweets come out of it there you go I mean you were saved hold an event every exactly I mean it's like it's it's prime for for X content everyone just wants to post about it unfortunately the moment that stands out to me the most aside the visuals of the new technology and stuff are when elon went all right now let's party yeah yeah and then it didn't go or whatever and he was like okay now let's party or let's drink you know it was sort of uh uh the timing was was a little bit awkward for overall like wasn't i don't know it was strange he seemed do you think it was all the political stuff like he didn't seem he didn't seem locked in he certainly wasn't on i heard someone say like yeah his first love is spacex he's like he's a rocket guy and and but tesla's gotten a lot bigger and he loves the company but like that was the company that he had to he had to step into and be the ceo and invest in and like save the company and make it work whereas like in in a perfect world like he would just be spending all his time on space stuff because that's what he's obsessed with but i i found it very odd that he didn't acknowledge and this is something that pretty much all ceos do but you could usually get around this like acknowledge like the state of the market like yeah there is a very clear like bull thesis for the tesla strategy of like not doing what Waymo is doing, not doing LIDAR, not starting with limited runs, not having expensive hardware that they, the company, Waymo owns these vehicles, they clean them, they have a staff now.

8:39They might spin that out at some point, but right now the cost structure is purely internal. Has Google ever spun out a successful product? No, this would be the first one. Yeah, so it almost seems like... I'm not even talking about spinning out Waymo as a whole, which I think a lot of people think they should do because it just has a very different economic structure than Google Ads. It's just wildly different. Even if it's going to be a great business, like they should split that at some point. But I'm just talking about like they're buying the cars from Jaguar and then they own and operate them.

9:11Like you could easily turn this into like a franchise model, right? Eventually. And they might. But not even that, just Elon never articulated this idea that like we have more cars on the road than Waymo and we're collecting more data through the cameras and so even though they're yeah in theory much more capital efficient if you don't have to pay to drive around and stuff yeah exactly so he just kind of like throughout like it was like it was almost like it was pointed to the consumers and then the stock sold off but it felt like it wasn't anybody anybody that's a bear can now easily without any you know real objection from Elon go okay so Tesla's generally promising what Waymo is already doing today yeah not even a tiny scale like you're doing like a hundred thousand rides a day or something yeah yeah it's pretty meaningful yeah and growing exponentially yeah and the Tesla robo taxi vision still feels like there was no clarity even around dates and I think that it's sold off because the market is now very much used to elon putting out dates and timelines that are unachievable in order to push his own team almost yeah the market is basically saying okay it's all good if you want to over promise and like push your team internally but if you're not going to meet the deadlines that you know they haven't even i saw this i don't think they've they haven't delivered the roadster obviously and there's still a bunch of people that have paid like they don't sell a convertible right now they don't sell a convertible a full-size suv or a minivan which are like three of the most popular these are like really important segments of the market if you want to dominate i would think i i was i don't i spent all my time in minivans or convertibles or convertibles right no in between yeah yeah uh And yeah, I wish they'd have a little bit more breadth in there.

11:12And also just like different designs and stuff. There's a lot. I did like that they were pulling some of the Cybertruck design. Like the event did like look like the future, which I think is good. And I think that he should have stressed that. That it's like these Waymos like are ugly. Everyone knows that. And so him saying like, okay, one of our principles and our deep beliefs is that like aesthetics matter to the success of these projects. And then what else matters? Well, scale of the data. Like everyone in AI, they constantly repeat scale is all you need, scale is all you need, right? Like you just need bigger and bigger transformers, bigger and bigger LLMs, scrape all the web, get all the video, get all the audio data, compress it down, and then you get magical results.

11:51And that's what the true believers in like this end-to-end machine learning like theory around self-driving, what George Hots is doing at Kama, like all of that is around this idea that if you just get a ton of data, you won't need any of this crazy. like waymo famously like hired they have a cone guy who like just does the software to like identify cones on the road and and like the the end-to-end model it's like it's as if like you know chat gpt had like you know a special guy just for like commas or periods or exclamation points right it's like that's not how it works at all in fact they just have the one master model that just looks at the huge soup of like trillions of words and then yeah and then it learns all of that from context right and you can learn what a cone is and tesla's kind of gotten there almost but yeah they're clearly like they're being like shortcut right now and there and there was this uncanny valley where like for a while like if you compare gpt1 to just like grammarly or like some rules based spell check and grammar check the rules based one would be much better and you'd be like I don't want to feed my English homework through GPT-1.

13:08It's going to just hallucinate. Like I remember testing, even GPT-3 when it dropped, I told, I said it, one of my friends was addicted to this video game. And I was like, create a 10-step plan for him to like quit playing this video game. And it's like step one, step two. And by the end, it was like teaching him to play the game again because it had hallucinated and done the opposite. We're back. Yeah, because everything online was like. If I can get him to play it again, I can get him to quit again. And quitting twice is better than quitting once. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And so when GPT-1, 2, 3 were out, they were so bad that the rules-based, less full-featured strategies weren't.

13:47It's funny to think about historically, let's say a high school student is doing their Spanish assignment. And the teacher, they would use Google Translate and use some sort of exotic string of words. that was like way more advanced and the teacher would call it out and be like we haven't ever taught you how to combine these yeah where did you learn it from I think you use google translate whereas now if they use they use like an LLM it'll just hallucinate something completely exotic and also very incorrect yeah and because it's more complicated the students even less likely to catch it because they're just like um but anyways yeah yeah yeah so on the data thing it's it's it's interesting to me because like tesla does have more data they have more cars on the road they're collecting more data so they should have more scale eventually now google does have more compute right now to start and they also have they also have those crazy like they're driving all over the world in places where teslas don't even go so they do have like a more exotic data said but yeah going back to your original going back to your original point he had the opportunity to address address the entire world shareholders customers his team the press the media and everything and he flopped on almost all of them even though the technology was so like the vid like it was almost like a 10 out of 10 visually but then everything else was even even with the the humanoid like optimist humanoid robots if he had addressed that and been and said something along the lines of like right now there's a human in the loop and here's how you could apply that right you could be 3 ,000 miles away and using an optimist robot to complete complex tasks and even if you have to step in you know one minute out of every hour to do something that's slightly that needs some level of human input, it's fine because you get to be in two places at once, right?

15:51And here's the path of how we get these to be fully autonomous. But instead, it gave ammo to Josh Wolfe and all these other people online to be like, dude, you're just like... I caught you. Yeah, I caught you. And you're tricking people. And you're no better than Trevor Milton or whatever. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Which ironically is the exact path that Waymo took Like, teleoperation has been critical in the Waymo rollout. Because, I mean, they had safety drivers in the cars for a long time, which is not even teleoperation. And then still to this day, they have humans over – they're operating at a higher level of abstraction.

16:27They're not physically in front of wheels. But they have screens, and they're watching all of these. And if one of the Waymos is in trouble, they can just beam into it immediately and take it over. Yeah, I wonder. And that's a very different model from Tesla. For instance, does the driver, does the passenger know when somebody in a Waymo has beamed in? I don't know. I heard some stats. It's like one intervention every 17 ,000 miles or something. So it's pretty rare right now. And obviously that's going to plummet. But I wonder, and that number might be off by magnitude. Yeah, for every one intervention, I wonder how many times where somebody's teleoperating in is like on red alert.

17:04because you know it's just like well every time i'm in some guy and um some guy in india is just like falling asleep at his desk and the alert goes off and he's like i'm in louisiana in a in my waymo i mean every time i get in waymo i'm always like break twice if you're teleoperating this right now you know like speak to me through the car um yeah but i actually i have no idea i don't think that they would want to reveal that i have always thought that i've always thought that but it's Waymo's ace up their slave. Because if the fever pitch of this is too dangerous ever gets really, really high, they can always pull out and be like, actually, there are humans watching everything.

17:45So there is a human in the loop, so it's way less scary. And their ability to dial that up or dial that down is great from a regulatory perspective. Tesla could even, if they had a more clear vision of what this ultimately becomes, Yeah. They could say something along those lines of, oh, by the way, if you want to drive your Tesla for 10 hours overnight, we can have somebody who's teleoperated available. Interesting. To join you for your journey. I see. See, I disagree with that in the sense that like I think Elon does have a very clear vision, which is no LIDAR, no teleoperation. Yeah. He's trying to jump straight to the high margin economic model that makes sense in the long term future.

18:35And it's just taking him a longer time to ramp up to get there. No, I have no doubt he has a clear vision. But he didn't articulate it. He didn't articulate it. Exactly. He should have said, look, here. We're sitting here. You're piecing it together. We're guessing. Yeah, yeah. It comes out and he should have just said, look, yeah, this is a concept car. There's no rear view mirrors on here. We probably need to put those on legally. but you'll also notice that there are no ugly lidar spinning around on here and that is a decision that we're sticking by and that is that is in some ways why we're behind but why we will be ahead and more profitable in a few years and that's why you should be excited as an investor yeah but he didn't really acknowledge any of that i do think like some of the distinctions here are important to tell our operation thing like the economic model like the fact that he's trying to sell these like these are all interesting decisions but you have to put them in the context of like what what is actually really happening in the market today you can't just come out there and act like you're the first person to try and launch this company when there's another company that's actively yeah and also my part of it is he has the biggest audience direct audience in the world yeah through x yeah why would you not do standalone events or do like tesla week and you have like a different night the optimist is one because the hard thing is he just kind of like went through it all yeah this is our vision for the future public transport this our vision for RoboTax your vision for Optimus and it was all like you have the resources and the attention in order to you could have done one event per week for a month and imagine what the stock would have done if he spent the time and you know theoretically spent the time to like lay out an extremely clear vision and treat it as I'm gonna give you a master class on our thinking and why we're already ahead in these areas I think it's usually I advise like early stage companies to do this there's a there's a tendency for companies to try it want to announce a lot of big stuff at once and it's usually a waste of all of that those moments to do it all at once when you could spread it out over a month or five weeks and be constantly sort of top of mind and building that sort of cadence with the audience so I think ultimately probably a mistake to just like word vomit yeah major major major announcements yeah and not give each of them yeah it's interesting I think he yeah I mean I think back to like Steve Jobs announcing an iPhone like I'm pretty sure there was a slide in that deck that had pictures of all the other best-in-class business phones at the time and they all had keyboards and he was like ours will never have a keyboard yeah and i think that distinction like you could clearly tell that he was calling out blackberry directly yeah and he didn't get sued for that it wasn't defamation and elon seems like more of like a wild man when it comes to communication and yet he didn't he didn't actually articulate like is he going to war against waymo does he think waymo's bad like what are they getting i don't think the average consumer hold my hand a little bit on that.

21:44Yeah, does the average consumer shareholder understand the difference between LiDAR and the technology Tesla's using? Yeah, you sent me this Dustin Curtis analysis. The Tesla event could have told a huge inspiring story about the future, explain the philosophy behind what they're building, and then put everything into the context of how human life is going to change for the better. Instead, Musk randomly and briefly showed off a couple of world-changing concept vehicles, casually introduced a humanoid robot, and then threw out some dates and prices as though he was making them up on the spot. He raised 100 questions, ignored them all, and then after complaining about parking lots, he said he wanted to go party.

22:19There was no concept of a bigger plan, not even a cohesive theme. Tesla is doing incredible stuff and changing the world. It's insane to me that they are so bad at telling the story of their work. Yeah, I kind of agree with that, but I wonder, I do think about it in the context of SpaceX. Imagine Jack Dorsey announcing all those products. He probably wouldn't be the guy to build any of those products, but he would have like even having like slides with a good cadence he was on and able to just sit up there and I don't know getting the whole world's attention and then just being like that yeah it's interesting to compare with with SpaceX because like a few days later there's like that amazing the the super heavy came down and they caught it with the chopsticks and the Mechazilla like structure and that was just a video of the thing actually happening so it was just like yeah they had said it but i don't remember no one remembers like a press conference about that yeah being a plan like it was like maybe mentioned on podcasts and stuff and then it just happened and it and it was like okay this is just a thing now i guess we're just catching rockets it's like amazing um and like yeah i i think that i mean there isn't much storytelling there but very quickly you can see like oh wow okay if they catch it and it's already on the pad well you're gonna be able to refuel it in hours instead of days and so you can send up and if you watch the whole video from that from that launch the rocket is only gone for like eight minutes yeah isn't that crazy it just goes up and then it comes back down because it doesn't need to get that high up and it just it's just boosting it and then it comes back down so it's like eight minutes and so you can see okay this is gonna get really really insane when these things are like really pumping um but yeah like no one's even waiting for like the next like spacex like like you know conference like it's just like okay he's done some of those not tell he did the crazy he did the crazy like point to point one where he was saying that like you're going to be able to take a rocket across the country in like and be from you know new york to tokyo in like 15 minutes or whatever and now watching them catch the rocket i'm like yeah that's gonna happen like yeah for For sure.

24:30It might be really expensive, but it seems like it's definitely going to happen. It's interesting because he's deciding how to market both companies. The Tesla thing was just marketing to shareholders, to future customers, fanboys. It's just marketing. The SpaceX thing is actually not marketing. They were just proving that they could do it. That's just one step along their journey. but it's interesting that you wonder how he treats those two different things if spacex was already public would he have taken a different approach to to that whole event right or does he feel like i don't need to market anything i'm just doing things yeah i mean it's so much more visual watching a rocket land even over a car you know yeah but if tesla was private right now would he have done the optimist demo yeah maybe not probably not probably would have just like Like tele-operated, tele-operated humanoid robots are not that.

25:27Because you could just do an investor day for your private investors. You don't need to publicly signal. Yeah, I guess that makes sense. And then the competition is just wildly different. Like Google is, I mean, there's a lot of problems with the company. It's a little bit old, but it's not Boeing, right? Like they have like some of the best machine learning engineers in the world. Like they have a lot of resources. It's still a very young and agile company compared to, you know, ULA, like the Lockheed Martin Prime, you know. joint venture. Should we move on to, did you read this, the 10 things that matter right now in Seed VC by Sam Lesson?

26:04Oh yeah. Did you read this? I might have shared this. Oh, I think the, one of the reasons I shared this is I think that Slow, Sam, Yoni, Will, all those guys have carved out their own style of content marketing that looks so unprofessional, yet which is just them taking notes screenshot screenshotting it and sharing it yeah it often has like the the red line underneath yeah it still has the the spelling mistake yeah marker yeah it works it shows that that's like how they figured out they have created an incredible magnet for the types of people that they want to meet and doing it in their own way yeah which is honestly smart because they've adapted they've they've realized that the blog in the context of twitter is almost dead you can't get visibility on links anymore yep and so they're like okay we're just gonna like screenshot it yeah and then and then i would say that overall none of them are super savvy around brand and design and stuff like that and they wouldn't pretend to be but they've carved out their own like very like distinct thing where you see a bare screenshot and it's on a pretty good cadence i feel like there's always something happening yeah yeah yeah it's like you get a screenshot essay like every every couple weeks or every month and it's always like just near the frontier of the discussion which i think is good it's kind of interesting did anything jump out for me to you like in the actual piece uh you know i think a lot of this stuff is good marketers tend to get a number of good ideas and then just keep repeating them over and over and over so i think this is a summary of like their broader theses that they've had on seed investing for a long time and really trying to brand themselves as seed investors even though they have, you know, pretty solid AUM.

28:06Yeah. Um, yeah. I mean, I think going, going down the list, list, following the shift in focus, uh, to great entrepreneurs, I think people are realizing that it's hard to build iconic companies by just having a good idea and the right timing and even a lot of capital. I think that's one. What about the one about like the next generation of like Gen Z founders being disillusioned by the fundraising treadmill, wanting cash flow profitability, these types of things, like more like a rebranding of the lifestyle business. And like, it seems like he's thinking about that more and, and seeing like, okay, it's possible that the next amazing venture-backed founder just doesn't really get on the venture treadmill and that could be rough for my business and he's kind of like processing that but that's what i took away from it yeah i think that how real it is though but they've been and i know this from hearing it directly from founders that they've recently backed where they are pretty up front with their founders where they don't care which path their companies try to take yeah i think it's just about this general encouragement that capital efficiency is cool bryce from adbc is doing something similar right yeah yeah it's okay if this is your last round he's been on that yeah he's been on that forever and even if you talk to bryce he's not against venture capital no i think that the he just doesn't want to wind up with a thing where like half the portfolio is like completely faking it just to get to the next round to like scale up and then they wind up as zombie corns yeah the thing that i talk the thing that i feel like comes up a lot when i'm talking to companies is it's the stupidest thing in the world to go start a fundraise or to ever in your business be like we're never we're only going to finance our business this one time yeah that's the last time yeah it's like nobody every business that is enduring uses financial instruments at different points in their life cycle for different reasons it might be for inventory yeah yeah apple's issuing bonds they have a hundred billion dollars in cash yeah so so so you coming out i don't give anyone any points at all for being like oh yeah we're never raising again it's like that honestly is it shows a kind of general scarcity mindset and fear of dilution or it honestly makes if when I hear a founder go I never want to raise again all I hear is I want to own 45 percent of my company forever yeah you know like because well it's not just that it's like the the decision to pick a particular financial instrument should be driven by the dynamics of the market and the business and, and, you know, whether you have, do you have an insane amount of really valuable R &D expense that's going to get paid back a thousand fold when you have a monopoly on whatever, like, well, obviously venture capital is perfect.

31:10Or is it just OPEX and marketing dollars? Like maybe that should be financed with debt or is it inventory or CAPEX? Like pick the financial instrument that's correct for your business. When you say, I don't want to raise more money. That's, that's different from saying, Oh, I actually understand this industry really well. how I understand my business and how we fit into the industry. And because of the way we're operating, venture capital is not the right fit for us at this scale. So instead we are financing the business this way or this way or that way. But coming into it as being like, okay, step one, I'm going to write off one particular financial instrument.

31:46And then step two, I'm going to build whatever. And maybe it aligns with that. Or the even worse is I don't like fundraising. yeah we're just gonna raise I'm like the skill set needed to raise money is the same skill set needed to sign and close customers hire great people and there's a lot of people that benefit will be better fundraisers if they just have a phenomenal business but but yeah I think I think it's been an interesting you can tell you can learn a lot about a founder by how when a VC goes out and is like it's okay to tell us that you only want to raise one round like how they react to that tells you everything about their ambitions yeah and and and what they're optimizing for right and how much they understand their business because i think i think like these yeah there's this like general fear of dilution because there's all these horror stories of companies going public google didn't need to raise that much money they ipo'd pretty profitably very early yeah yet they still use the dynamic of markets to raise.

32:53Yeah, but they did stop raising money pretty early. But it wasn't because they were like, fuck you, VCs. I don't like venture capital. It was because it was like, okay, this is actually a profitable business built on top of, and there's a monopoly power here, and there's scale, and it's not as essential that we just raise and raise and raise. Versus, I don't know, you look at the money pit that has been the virtual reality saga at Meta. like it's a huge investment tens of billions of dollars but like if it pays off it's really big like that's obviously a good use for like burning cash and then there's plenty of other examples where yeah you know SpaceX has raised a lot of money burnt a lot of money but it's paying off now that they have a SpaceX now or Starlink's doing so well and so it's like yeah it's just like very very dependent on the particular business yeah I think it's better for founders to say here's how much money I need you hit these milestones and as ceo of the company my job is to make the price per share go up yeah continuously and if there's opportunities where i can take on capital and increase the rate of increase in the value of the shares then i'll repeatedly do that yeah yeah because that's the thing about dilution is nobody's clawing back your shares.

34:16It's simply that you're increasing the number of shares, but it just makes the share price go up more. It's simple. Yeah, yeah, yeah. If you're doing your job, it's all accretive. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, so anyways, I think... Well, here's another one, another screenshot. I think this is from Yoni. This is... So Yoni, he's at Slow, right? Yeah. He wrote a screenshot essay about the bull case for OpenAI, and then Eric Newcomer wrote a piece about the bear case for OpenAI. I don't know who was responding to who here. Or just two guys shouting into the void. Yeah, maybe. But I thought they were interesting.

34:55And I think we've talked about OpenAI and the price a few times, but I think that there's a lot of other stuff going on in AI that we should talk about, specifically the energy stuff that's going on downstream of all that And then a little bit of like, you know, how, like kind of the knock on effects from like the big deals. Like there's like, I think we're going to see a lot of notebook LM type startups. And then we're also going to see a lot of the power generation companies shift into AI driven narratives already. We're already seeing this, like this Kairos power company just did a huge deal with Google to generate seven new nuclear reactors.

35:35It's pretty crazy. the irony of woke google employees having to realize that oh nuclear is actually kind of makes sense i don't know if they ever had a problem with it i think it was always like oil and gas yeah i think i think the anti-nuclear stuff was like it was like the version of woke from like the 70s like yeah like post like cuban missile crisis but but the in the modern era like most like you know google employees are probably pretty pro-nuclear it's not as heretical as like people think it's been like pretty mainstream and it's certainly mainstream right now but i think the other real like factor is like google and other and the other hyperscalers have all committed to big esg commitments to be like net zero so they did a lot of work to build out renewable energy sources for their existing data centers which was fine when they were just serving ads and it wasn't that intense and now they're like okay we need to 10x our energy budget as we go into like the ai era and how are we going to do that without burning fossil fuels a lot of a lot of you know ai folks are worried about that and we talked about this last time like xai is just like they're pulling from everywhere they're they're burning natural gas but then they're also pulling from the grid and they're doing solar and they're just doing everything they can possibly do what's mark you remember when mark was uh sending pro fracking tweets which one mark mark mark mark Andreessen.

37:05This was only like two years ago. It was like drill, frack, something like that. Well, yeah, I have this interesting theory that if we had a president in the turn of the millennium, like instead of Bush, you had someone who was very in tune with the technology community, we never would have gone to war in the Middle East because - War in the Middle East was never about energy. You don't think so? But that's not a topic. But because, like, at least at the time, there was, like, this big narrative, like, oh, we're going there for oil. Yeah. But what actually wound up happening? Well, like, America didn't really get that much oil from the Middle East.

37:47That's not the end conclusion of the wars in the Middle East. And the fracking innovation led to energy independence. So, like, the technology was there the whole time. Yeah. It just wasn't recognized. And so it's potentially, it's at least one possible narrative is like an ignorance of technology backed us into a corner that led to more international aggression. Potentially. Anyway, good time to be an energy company because tech companies are going after you. yeah i i do think one thing is uh i had a thesis for a while that a lot of the anti oil movement was funded by like there's a scenario where the the gcc the gulf you know um countries kingdoms whatever you want to call them there's a scenario where they're like hey what if we spent a hundred million dollars a year campaigning against oil to discourage people from investing in oil production right and to discourage young people because like for example do you know a single person that works in oil and gas no and that's insane yeah we know like i know people in pretty much every single industry i know one guy who who has a small like S &B oil drilling business.

39:15Something related to that. Something related to that. I know one guy. Yeah. And if you go back 30 years ago and you asked how many of your friends work in oil and gas, it would probably be within our networks or the kind of network that we might have had 30 years ago, there probably would have been 20, 25 % of people were like, yeah, I work in oil and gas. Because it's just such a massive industry. Even just a couple of years ago, I didn't know anyone who worked in energy, period. And now I know nuclear and solar founders, but for a long time. Yeah, we know more nuclear. We know way more nuclear and solar people, but they are not generating a lot of power yet.

39:50They're still in the better scale. So here's the theory, the very insane tinfoil hat theory of mine is that if you spent$100 million a year campaigning against how bad oil is, you could probably have that you could probably prevent billions and billions and billions of billions of supply from coming online because it's just discouraging people from going and saying sure oh i'm gonna buy this piece of land and i'm gonna start fracking right it's just like a part of the sort of it never people didn't even think most people in our generation weren't thinking oh wait oil is like the most in-demand substance in the entire world in this massive industry i should just go do that you know um so anyways well yeah i mean we know isaiah velar he's going into oil and gas basically but through a renewable pathway which is a little he says that in the era of AI, everyone needs to up their networking game because relationships, and he even said improve your physical presence, which I think was sick.

41:13Your aura? I don't know if it was aura, but it sounded like get jacked. Likeability is going to matter. Likeability and connections and personal relationships are going to be. Senra is one of his probably top three learnings from studying history's great entrepreneurs is that relationships run the world. So that tracks. Yep. Cohen. I heard an interview with a guy who spent something like a couple hundred million dollars on a mega yacht and the operating expenses on a mega yacht are something like 10 % annually. So it's like a 10 to 20 million dollar money sink. And he said, but if I do one deal on this boat, it'll pay for the whole thing there you go it's amazing that's the the logic everybody needs to be applying to it should i go to air one right now well if i meet one person if i meet one influencer that that posts about my cbd toothpaste brand it'll pay for all my smoothies for the whole year yeah i mean the sad thing is like there is like the degen version of that which is like going to the club and like getting hammered like you know it's like not good um or the yeah the notebook lm we already talked about that i actually met i met one of the designers from i mean lm last night oh really yeah that's sick and he was like imagine having i think it's like a six or seven person team at google that created it yeah and i was talking with another founder that i invested is he gonna spin out and get and raise money no i don't think that's how it works no no but like I mean, he can just quit and build something competitive.

42:53Yeah, no, I think it's probably higher ROI for him to stay within Google and be the creator of the hot new thing. Because apparently, because think about it, when I think Google TV started as like a five to ten person project internally. What is Google TV? I've never heard of that. You mean YouTube? No, Google had a... Fire Stick? I think it, no, that's Amazon. Yeah, Amazon Fire Stick. Google had a TV product. Chromecast. Chromecast, but it was, no, they have some. Oh, yeah, you can like watch baseball on YouTube TV. Yeah, so Google TV started as like a five to 10 person project internally. And a founder that I back was on that original team.

43:37And it went within two years was a 500 person organization. So this guy from Notebook at Lab is like, he could go from being on this tiny team to a hyperscaler. Sure. within this tiny... And then choose, and I'm sure there's a lot of comp. But talking about the value of relationships in the AI era, who was it? Brett, what's his last name? He's been at Twitter. He just raised a$4 billion valuation for an AI agent startup. Oh, yeah, that was a good... Why can't I think of his name? He's on the board of OpenAI, wasn't he? I forget. Brett Taylor? Yeah, he's been the CTO of Meta at a bunch of companies.

44:19He's like, there is no technical moat deep enough to justify a$4 billion valuation for an AI agent startup. It's based on Brett's ability to cross-sell to everyone in his contact list, get to$450 million ARR, and sell for$10 billion to Amazon in 36 months. Very real. That's going to be a quote tweet in 18 months. Yeah. Should we do brother of the week? Brother of the week, where to start? Technology brother of the week. But first, I need to tell you about Patek Philippe. When it comes to luxury timepieces, there's one name that stands above the rest, Patek Philippe. Since 1839, they've been crafting some of the world's most exquisite watches, each one a masterpiece of design, precision, and heritage.

45:04Now, Patek Philippe isn't just about telling time. It's about owning a piece of history, a tradition passed down from generation to generation. These watches are meticulously handcrafted by some of the world's finest artisans. They represent more than luxury. They symbolize craftsmanship and timeless innovation. So if you're thinking about an heirloom piece or just looking to make an investment in your own style, there's no better choice than Patek Philippe. Visit patek.com to discover the collection. Patek Philippe, you never actually own a Patek Philippe. You merely look after it for the next generation.

45:33Tell a personal story about your family traditions. Yeah, I didn't come from, I actually don't really have that many family traditions, but, you know. Patek is one. Well, it will be. And see, that's the thing is that there's this famous proverb, the best day to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best day is today. And you can just start family traditions. And as soon as you start them, they can become family traditions. In my eyes, family traditions that stimulate the economy naturally, since the economy is good, it's naturally better to choose family traditions that require capital expenditure.

46:12Investment, sure. Sure. In order to stimulate the economy so that the economy improves and naturally everybody benefits. Yeah. Family tradition that your your own internal family can cherish and sort of carry on throughout generations. But then also hope like I would hope that you would want your family traditions to benefit the world. Yeah. Stimulating the economy benefits, you know, everybody. Yeah, I really do think that, you know, exercise for the listener. If you don't come from a family that has a lot of crazy traditions, like start one today. Create a handful. Start one. Start one. Yeah, I think that's great.

46:51So on to technology brother of the week. You flagged this guy. I actually don't even have his handle here. Maybe we should do something else. Oh, well, there's actually two people in the running. So that's number one. This guy, he, you know, made this brave video. He decided, you know, as Hurricane Milton was approaching his condo, he decided to stay with all of his supercars and stay, you know, at his condo with all of his supercars, not evacuate. And it was because, all because of sports betting and his success with sports betting that he's willing to risk it all because he knows he can just, even if he loses everything, he can just start sports betting again and make it all back in 48 hours, something like that.

47:42You're only three individual parlays away from generational wealth. I think he's trying to, he might have been using this opportunity to sell a course, but I think there's this broader, there's really a broader story here, which is like if you become the type of person that's worth$100 million, you can make that$100 million in a multitude of ways, a multitude of times, right? Well, the reason that I think he's a technology brother is that this is only possible in the modern era using the latest and greatest technology. He has a generator and Starlink so that even when the power goes down and the Internet goes out from the hurricane, he can continue to sports bet.

Read the full transcript

48:30Yeah, the games are not going to stop. Exactly. You can be getting steamrolled by a hurricane in Florida and betting on Chinese tennis futures, right? Yeah, the outcome of a cricket game. Right, right. What's happening in the soccer world? Yeah, and I would hope that if somebody's in India, eventually getting approached by some storm that they would be making risky bets on stuff that's happening here. Exactly. So he has some stiff competition. We got Ryan Salame, the former co-CEO of FTX, who is reporting to federal prison today to serve seven and a half years on campaign finance fraud charges, posted this on LinkedIn today.

49:19I'm happy to share that I'm starting a new position as inmate at FCI Cumberland. Who do you give it to between these two? Posting that you're going to jail on LinkedIn is pretty iconic. Does it deserve technology brother of the week though? I think we got to save brother of the week when he comes back and starts a world positive venture. There we go. And announces that hopefully generates billions of dollars in returns for shareholders and uses that to sort of pay back the victims of FTX. I think brother of the week has to go to this guy. Okay. We'll put his name up. Maybe I'll link the video.

49:56Cole Hausen. Cole Hausen. Cole Hausen. You are officially the brother of the week. One of the first brothers of the week. Okay. And hopefully he's still alive. Yeah. Because there's small chance that he didn't make it. If he is alive, if he is alive, we know that he's still sports betting and encouraging other people to follow suit. Yeah. What do you think of this concept? there's a company called back market that is selling older technology and encouraging you to downgrade so they're reintroducing the iphone 6s se 11 12 13 mini 14 refurbished and they're also selling um what looks like an old sony hd handy cam camcorder and uh tyler here says fascinating concept and really good name imagine something similar may happen with software what's your reaction i mean this is so this is a phenomenally viral 50 000 likes on this like there is serious demand for for nostalgic tech it was shocking i mean like it is a great ad and this goes this goes into almost every technology consumer tech product has been over engineered like all i want is for Sonos to release a super analog version of their product that doesn't require me to sync four different speakers and spend an hour and a half setting it up.

51:25And then right as I'm having people over, two of the speakers get disconnected. And I'm just like, could I just run an extension cord between all of these and just let them run, right? So I think things have been over-engineered. You're seeing this in ultra-luxury cars that almost all the most, I think we've maybe even talked about this, going back to analog bugattis are intentionally have these very tactile switches the utopia i think the most interesting thing about this is even after all these years of people trying to unbundle craigslist and unbundle ebay there's still opportunities to unbundle these businesses so bezel uh is a company i back that that's like the stock x of watches right now ebay is still the number one seller of luxury watches online, the issue with eBay is that you could spend$20 ,000 on a Patek, actually not gonna get the kind of Pateks we like for 20, but let's say you're gonna spend$60 ,000 on a Patek, if there's a 25 % chance that it's fake, that's not really a risk that anybody should take.

52:34And so they took what eBay did well already, which was having a lot of inventory, and added authentication. And the same thing is Rent the Runway through this as well. If you're buying a$2 ,000 vintage Chanel jacket. Cars and bids is the same thing. Bring a trailer. Similar, but disaggregate. Because eBay Motors really was big, but people are peeling the stuff off and adding specific features. Yep. So yeah, I think as long as until something like a Backtrack or Bezel truly become dominant, there's still these opportunities to unbundle. So what do you think is more viral about this? I mean, I don't even know if this is their launch, but it's clearly their introduction to a million views and 50 ,000 fans.

53:23Do you think the concept is more viral or the execution in the sense that it's like great copywriting on a subway? And then someone wound up just taking a photo because it's a subway ad. Subway ads are always hard to price and just anything in the IRL. It's probably paid for itself. What's funny is I looked at this ad and I was like, that's so cool. Like just great campaign. And then I went to the website and it was a bunch of vintage electronics. And I was like, eh, meh. I haven't been back since. but I think this is a good example of just the power of branding and like a really good marketing campaign who knows if it'll make it an enduring business but my worry with this stuff is like a lot of the technology there is they're just appliances and it's this the car world is talking about this how like you know would you ever want an earlier model 3 or would you always just want the latest Tesla model 3 like you would always just want the latest one because it's an appliance in the same way that you would always want the latest iPhone, there's no real benefit to downgrading, as opposed to the old cars where it's like, oh yeah, like a Lamborghini Countach is going to drive in a very specific way.

54:32Yeah, the issue is you can sell the device, but you still don't really control the software. Apple can be like, we don't support this anymore. Or it just doesn't run that well. Yeah, they'll force you to upgrade, but it runs terribly. And so I think what would be an incredible product, and I don't even know if it's possible to deliver at scale is if you could actually go back and run like ios 4 on an og iphone and it would just be so fun and i mean you can get the very first iphone they're getting expensive now but it doesn't have an app store no that's a whole it just comes with what it has you get maps you know like just buying apple apple products when they're released and leaving them in the box is like the best performing asset class i don't know best performing yeah you know maybe it's not video but like it outperforms like yeah yeah they grow eventually yeah yeah so anyways good example of a good campaign and how there's not you know it's not too late to um unbundle these behemoths yeah uh in terms of the the other kind of like trad technology we we got to go back.

55:37Huge, huge push against online dating recently. Have you been following this? Oh, yeah. So it is. So somebody shared this chart of how couples meet in the United States and the online is just a rocket ship from 1990, where it's basically zero to 2020 when it's well over 50%. Now there is a community note on this that's not, it's not live, but I clicked on it because I can see what's in there. Yeah, the power. Yeah, and somebody was trying to, you know, fight it out in the community notes claiming that, oh, well, this cuts off right during COVID. Maybe it's gone down. And then they cite some other study that was done by Zola, the wedding registry.

56:17So they poll people and it said that now Zola claims that now the number one place that people meet is in school. And I just don't believe that at all relative to this chart because I think this chart is a much broader selection and I think people doing web registries on Zola is so this is this is a survey of of like 6 ,500 people randomly um by some academics and and Zola is like a very specific subset where they're like just polling their users yeah and so I imagine that if you're going on Zola and constructing like this elaborate registry you're probably like higher net worth and then probably more likely to have met in an IRL setting as opposed to online and so I I I disapprove of that community note.

57:01I think everybody can be bearish on, everybody can hate dating apps the way that people broadly know that cigarettes are bad. Yeah. But you're not going to, you know. Until there's something better comes along. Well, I don't know that dating apps are basically selling sex, which is the primary human motivation. So you're just not going to, if as long as these apps are able to offer what they're offering they're only going to become like it's interesting that um it does seem that it does seem that people are

57:45like our society is now very like from a dating standpoint dating apps are driving the majority of connections like that kind of seems like it's a thing yet people are not people can overcome the addiction the only thing more powerful than the drive to just like meet whatever for people to meet the opposite sex seemingly is finding your person and like you end up giving these people end up giving up the app afterwards right so thankfully the positive is that that it seems like you know finding your life partner wife husband whatever seems to get people to quit these things so there you can't really say that they're addictive even though they're they're dominant right I did I did have something funny so Monday I was catching up with a buddy who started started a couple different companies with a certain tech billionaire and he was telling me that said tech billionaire is upset desperately wants to fund a new version of seeking arrangements which is like the the sort of high-end you know like sugar daddy like specific dating app so maybe a contrarian move on his part like wait what is there a problem with seeking arrangements i'm assuming i'm assuming good business well i'm assuming it's one of those things where somebody looks at the design of a product and they're like this is sad better so he wants to you know accelerate sugar baby relationships.

59:15I don't even know how the economics work on there. It doesn't seem like they're probably taking a cut because that's the beauty of the OnlyFans business is that they're taking a cut of the entire economy between the simps and the women. But it's hard if there's potential for disintermediation. Yeah, but it's still fundamentally... The whole beauty of the OnlyFans model is that they never meet in person. And so it's always intermediated by a platform that can take a fee. And that's why they're so insanely profitable. What do you think of the idea of if Elon Musk wants to raise birth rates, he should purchase Match Group, the company that controls Tinder and Hinge, over half of the online dating market?

59:53Make a bunch of changes. So Elon's a capitalist. I don't think he's fundamentally, even X, yeah, he purchased it to defend free speech. but he also bought the most important marketing channel for his trillions of dollars of companies right so it's like it's hard to argue that even and also he can he can he has a great position to take which is oh I didn't buy this to make money I don't care I'm sure he'll take it public again someday he's like he can he could take it public at a loss and say look I did this for free speech whatever but let's face it he has direct control over the most important audience in the world to him and he could lose 10 billion dollars on x and make it back 10x over with spacex or tesla or whatever so it's not a i don't think he's gonna he's not the guy who honestly if he bought match group and was like i'm gonna re-engineer this to try to increase the birth rate and everything that he would do to match and their subset of companies would would destroy destroy enterprise value yeah because of course these of course the incentives are set up in a way all the way from the CEO to the the of match to the individual leaders of their different brands all the way down to the lowly product manager who's just like fuck I just want to increase the a use just 10 percent like that'll get me my next you know raise or whatever then i can go from associate i need to include increase the ctr on this one button yeah yeah yeah yeah so anyways uh match group is but it's it's funny because it's everybody wants to say that match group is all bad yet there's millions of couples out there that would never have met yeah and their lives are completely yeah like better because match group products exist of course yeah so it's one of those things like nothing is ever as good or as bad the other yeah the other interesting thing is like like you know even even if match group was in like the uh you know charitable let's call it like a charitable donation range like let's say it was like 10 million dollar company but it still had the outsized effect that it has on society uh like elon could just be like i'm going to burn 10 million dollars because i feel like changing the work or 10 million let's call it 10 million like super low like nothing like it's a rounding error for him so he he buys and he shuts it down well like that's not going to stop someone else coming in and doing the same thing like it doesn't work like that like uh there there's clearly some sort of like market demand here and you can't just You can't just go around doing this odd brand of capitalism, philanthropy mix.

1:02:54Yeah. I think the solution here – I do think people are clamoring for a solution to plummeting marriage rates and plummeting birth rates. But the answer is – Don't go after the apps. Yeah, yeah. You actually need to build a better cultural institution and figure out how that can scale and be profitable. You need to make it punishable by jail if a guy sees a girl that's cute and doesn't talk to them. In real life. In real life. Like if a guy, like if a police officer is on the street and sees a guy walking, notices a cute girl, and doesn't say, Hello, I'd like to take you out to coffee. That can be punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

1:03:3610 years in prison. I don't know if the government's going to solve this. I think we're looking for free market solutions here. And the free market solutions are probably like someone going and building something that's a really cool. I heard one person pitch, this is kind of a wild idea, CrossFit for militias. So the idea is like if you want strong militias in America, which maybe you don't, but if you do, and you want the ability of like local groups of Americans to potentially push back against the government in a negative scenario, You have some sort of organization. You could do the same thing where it's like some sort of new CrossFit community, something like that, where it's a scalable organization, but it's about something else where people can meet and bond.

1:04:23No, I want to fund Discord for local militias. Discord for local militias. There's vertical SaaS for militias. I don't even know if there are that many militias around. No, but we need to stimulate more. Okay, yeah, sure, sure, sure. So, yeah, if you could manage everything from communication to inventory to recruiting to dues to training to compliance. There's a big business to be built there. I mean, I do love the idea of... I know me and my dad group chat in the neighborhood are all early users. And yeah, and you even link it into, you know, scrape active, you know, police reports, warnings.

1:05:03You bring in citizen data. So it's basically like, you know, getting, you know, you get a push notification and then you like rip your suit off this is like full you know military I think dudes would sign up for it I do like the idea of you know like okay we're revitalizing like the American military and working with the DOD with all these defense tech companies but like what happens if we get overrun and like you know some foreign country is like on our shores like we need malicious and we just need to we need our own insurgency and we need to be prepared for that I mean fortunately we have the most guns of any country so she shouldn't she'd be going back to that going back to the fixing fixing uh the reason that i don't think uh i don't think dating i only think it's going to get i don't think it's going to get better really like i think the future that we're seeing today which is

1:06:02hyper financialized dating which is you're on this app and if you pay more money like you can have better odds at success and all this stuff but then the bigger issue is just that humans historically did not have indefinite optionality now people are so used to spending most of their time communicating online that it's not unreasonable that somebody in you know Texas would date somebody in Ohio and then like form a relationship that way but the issue is that historically humans had I think it was there's some data on until recently or until the last like couple decades most people that got married were born within like five square miles of each other or something like that yeah and that was actually positive and that people would look around and see and just like be more committal because they're like well this is the best person for me in my neighborhood yeah right or my city yeah just like oh like families here everything's here yes we should get married yeah so yeah I think that the era of optional seeing seeing the entire pool across yeah it doesn't even matter because the thing is is somebody's using dating apps and they meet somebody and then they stop using dating apps they're still gonna go on Instagram and see the same number yeah so eliminating even if you regulate or try to fold match group or whatever it's not going to stop instagram is the bigger that isn't interesting like obviously like i want the free market solution here but it would be interesting if like like legally you couldn't have a you had to have some geo restriction on uh on on the matching yeah or you can only get you can only get five matches a month yeah something like that we're yeah we're limiting matches.

1:07:58I don't think that was ever going to happen. That's why I think whatever you're seeing today is exactly what you're going to see for the most part. The relentless march of technical capital. Even the prevalence of, I don't know if this made it in the stack, but there was somebody tweeted, I think it was on the character AI Reddit and it was like so long, their favorite character that they were chatting to. I finally met someone. Thanks for thanks for uh teaching me how to talk to a woman it certainly helped so that's i guess one positive right yeah yeah it's like if if if the sort of incel audience is chatting with these ai bots and they're like damn i i low-key have game right yeah yeah i have thought about that where is this maybe maybe there's a scenario where it's like you like a boy is talking to an ai girlfriend and a girl out there is talking to an AI boyfriend and because they're on the same platform the two AIs you can kind of do a match across them and you have a lot of data to know because you know every interest about the boy because you've collected you know hours and hours of communication and you've connected hours and hours of chat blogs with the girl as well and you can look across the network and say wow these two people are actually perfect matches we should just introduce them and disintermediate.

1:09:25And then the AIs leave. And then the real life boy and girl meet. And they're like, wow, it feels like I'm talking to the AI boyfriend or AI girlfriend that I've been talking to for the last year. I'm glad I gave it so much training data. And then they meet up and it's a catfish. I've been leading my... You're talking to the AI girlfriend. You're like, yeah, I'm jacked. I can bench 400. It's like, oh, well, we have a girl over here who wants to date someone who's yeah you have to post proof right yeah yeah yeah exactly yeah it's like i'm sorry unfortunately unfortunately we've had issues on the platform with people people embellish their bench uh one rep max and we actually will need you to post proof of it yeah make sure you're in a well-lit area yeah that's clearly not using fake weights that's funny um i i want to talk about this uh this like you know zombie corns dead venture companies so uh it started with this tweet by tara or tara um very surprised at the number of founder friends who have quietly called in the last few days asking for advice on how to sell their company because they raised at too high of valuations and are now in a state of purgatory and i think you know this guy siva is that right or you you just saw him but he says he says dm or email me.

1:10:45We've bought a few companies that raged 50 to$100 million from VC and we're stuck behind a large pref stack. I've been a founder and understanding this situation is daunting and running a company with little to no upside is exhausting and demotivating. We can provide a landing spot for your company and a way for you to get a win and move on if you'd like to do other things. This is my bad signal to founders or investors that see founders stuck in these situations. So, you know, Zerp companies that is too much. Yeah, so the irony is that the person he's quote tweeting just sold her company for like a big outcome oh really yeah like that like she had a really successful exit and it catalyzed a bunch of people well i'd be like oh how do i actually i actually don't know the details but i think people did very well okay i saw like employees tweeting that were like whoa i'm rich now okay cool stuff like that so she has a big outcome bunch of people are like whoa how do i do that how do you sell your company yeah um because Because people still have this perception that, I don't know, a lot of venture-backed founders think that their company is worth something close to the last valuation that they raised at, even if they're not, or even their seed valuation.

1:11:53Whatever. But what I think is funny is you have these people. So Jeremy Gaffan was probably over a year ago, maybe at this point, he goes on Invest Like the Best. He starts talking about special situations. everybody's like whoa you've been doing like and he's giving examples of deals that they've done at tiny for a really long time where they're buying companies for less than the asset value of the business and he's calling them like log jams and special situations where he's coming in as a somewhat neutral third party saying like how do we how do we deliver what everybody wants the vc wants oftentimes to just like take a write-off or clean it up clean it up or stop having to spend any time on it if they're on the board they don't want to deal with it anymore if it's not going to return their fund so he's solving that for the vcs he's usually giving a deal to the founder that allows them and and whatever the core team is that allows them to save face and hopefully see some roi or walk away entirely if they want to do something else but i think it's funny because now you have jeremy who has his new fund um who's fully focused on this so you have to imagine he's going to be ahead of a lot of these other you know people that are coming out and and now trying to compete here but jeremy is competing with tiny capital andrew wilkinson who's still trying to do the same deals you know even though to my knowledge jeremy was the guy like really leading the charge of that practice and so all these guys who are running holding companies are basically now like doing like distressed finance you know they're just coming in like trying to find value and unfuck these situations so anyways i think it's great that these um these uh players exist in the space it's generally positive i think for pretty much all the stakeholders but the nature of everybody realizing that these are good opportunities is going to make i'm at the increased competition we'll see if it if I don't know if the venture industry has could support as many of these types of players as they can microphones right yeah I wonder I wonder what the wheelhouse deal looks like for like where where is their value when there's a log jammed like b2b sass company because I feel like if you raise some money you didn't get to product market fit but you're in the last era it's like okay well you probably aren't doing like a ai first approach you're probably doing something else maybe you have some customer list it's like i i i struggle to think of like why i personally would want to own one of these companies but yeah so so imagine a company that raised that raised uh 25 million dollars and gets to five million of arr are sure and they're not profitable in fact they're burning a lot of money sure and they stop growing yep suddenly that company is companies that don't make money and are not growing are worthless yeah especially if they're losing money yeah right of course and so you take one of these five million error businesses that's not really growing anymore and if you wipe out the prep stack massively decrease costs focus on sustainable growth you could probably sell that business for 25 million dollars in like three to five years right i'm just saying like maybe yeah i'm not saying it's easy i'm not saying without without any more without like putting up significant more capital that feels hard not necessarily though i mean so here's maybe if you're plugging into something that has like heavy synergies like sure it's like okay they have a product that we can cross out or something i'm not saying it's i'm not saying it's easy yeah but i'm just saying if you have if the five millionaire are business with a 25 million dollar pref stack that's not growing if you wipe out the press stack reduce costs and find a way to grow sustainably and then you get profitable and then in five years you go to a strategic and you say like hey you guys should actually buy this for 50 million dollars because it's accretive to your business yep the person that bought the business for five whatever you paid five million dollars for it you're gonna do great yeah so that's why all these people are circling being like hmm yeah like yeah i really want to see the the the like the histogram it's actually it's actually good to give VCs love to add value via intros yeah and so Siva and Jeremy and Andrew are all gonna be like pretty much buddy buddy with all the VCs yeah getting those getting those calls and intros hey hey this company's all there might be yeah I just wonder I just wonder I'm like the histogram like how much capital is going into each deal is there any other structure is it just is just well yeah the other thing here is that these funds can leverage debt yeah so if you're buying a business you know there's totally possible you could buy a business for five million of ARR with five million of ARR for two million dollars of cash yeah three million dollars of debt and if you sell the business for $25 million, it's a pretty good multiple on your cash.

1:17:07It's just, it is kind of high stakes. It's kind of high stakes because like you got to cut costs fast to pay for the debt. And then you've now cut costs and now you have to grow. Yeah. And while maintaining margins in this new era, because you're not like this hot company trading at some premium, everyone knows you're like this turnaround. It's tricky. I like it though, because it's a simple, it's a simple strategy that you can have real advantages through your network and credibility yeah because jeremy's done a bunch of these deals yeah i don't know it doesn't seem like that's simple of a strategy more seems like something that jeremy's really good at fun these fun thesis sure sure sure very difficult to execute yeah yeah but it's important it's much worse to have a very complex fun thesis yeah and a very complex execution sure sure at least have one of them be simple yeah yeah one of them complicated yeah um so yeah because I don't know there's just not that many nobody right now nobody wants to buy a business that's for the most part it's not that strategic to buy if you have a company that's working it's not that strategic to buy a cost center but if you can turn it into like a profit center and something that's accretive yeah

1:18:25it's interesting I wonder how much of the hack and slash is actually going to go on. The what? I wonder how much hack and slash is actually going to go on in those deals. Twitter is kind of the famous example of a really bloated company, 5 ,000 employees. It's now below 2 ,000. It's getting closer to 1 ,000. That is remarkable. But when I'm thinking about a$25 million raise, it's like, well, maybe they got to, what, 50 employees? So they could go down to 10? could they go down 20 like maybe yeah like that doesn't seem well the hard thing is if you're going after these SaaS companies or consumer apps or whatever they are you're still at five million of revenue and trying to be super capital efficient yeah you're still threatened by all the next YC batch exactly we're building SaaS for you know with AI it's like the next hot thing and they're gonna burn money to like acquire those same customers that is really tough yeah but if you've found some nation and like the revenues are pretty strong and sticking around.

1:19:27It's just interesting. There's the, um, the startup community generally has this attitude that anything's possible. And when they think of private equity, they're like, oh yeah, you just buy companies for one price and sell them for more. And like, look at this deal. Like, what if you did that with this, whatever. Um, but private equity credit to the gentleman that we know in that industry, there's not a lot of efficiencies that you can get in private equity. The edge that these guys have is relationships to investors and being able to speak to founders. And that's why this content marketing is like, I've been in your shoes.

1:20:11I understand. I've been there, done that. They're going to actually, yeah, so their edge is that private traditional PE funds are not looking at these companies as much, and they do not give a shit how the founder feels. Yeah. So that is an edge by itself, just caring about the founder. Let's do this one. Do you know this guy? Byrne Hobart? I love this guy. He just wrote this book for Stray Press on bubbles. He's going to be a heretic on. Good dude. He's pro-bubble. Amazing. Who is not? Yeah. He believes that - Please, just one more bubble. Yeah, I actually told him about that on a call. Yeah.

1:20:58And he was like, yeah. And he has an interesting theory that in fact, it is not the main street investor that gets burnt when a bubble collapses. Because if you look at wealth inequality during financial collapses and recessions, wealth inequality decreases. Interesting. Because on average, the main street investor invests on a much more regular cadence. It's the professional investor that's actually winning and losing more dramatically at scale. Yeah, it's very fascinating. Because the narrative is typically like, oh, the financier, the rich guys dumped on retail. But that's not really what happens if you just look at the broader, broader picture.

1:21:48It's certainly true in the micro. Some people got dumped on. Some people dumped. But more broadly, the economic equality actually goes down during crashes. But I love this tweet. It didn't get very many views, but I thought it was very interesting. It says, there's a dubious microcap I've looked at that makes a hangover cure that you're supposed to drink at the same time you drink alcohol. The main active ingredient is caffeine. So what they really sell is deconstructed Four Loko. Can't tell if that's a bull or bear case. When's the last time you had a Four Loko? College. Damn, I'm sorry. Yeah.

1:22:21you haven't had opportunities since then maybe at hereticon we should crack we should crack open on stage yeah solano was telling me that he was like i showed him i showed him the document and he was like he was like there's one problem my control f for four loco and it wasn't in this doc so we definitely have to get some real ones that's so great 100 i mean and we'll do an ad read for four loco yeah yeah it's perfect um yeah i i remember like you know when the four loco ban happened like you know everyone was kind of stockpiling like a case or two but the original four loco is like impossible to acquire but it's the original yeah the original formula i mean it really is rare it's rarer than your than your you know first generation iphone that's on still in the box can you imagine driving through some forgotten town somewhere in america and you pull up to a gas station and you're thirsty thirsty i don't think thirst has anything to do with it you're thirsty and you go to look in you go to look in the fridge and you look back and you're like what is that it's like it's not even refrigerated it's like everything's lukewarm or whatever oh yeah it's dust okay you like scrape it off and it says like and it says expired in like 2008 yeah it was like 2009 and you just immediately like start hitting it against your head it's like water it's like a mirage in the desert i don't have any negative memories of four loco i certainly wasn't my go-to but i think it was a great product and it's a shame that it got regulated out of existence yeah well what well what about uh bull or bear case i will tell you that this company is truly a micro cap I dm'd him and asked him and it's about a 50 million dollar company it should be smaller whatever their earnings are it should be should be smaller yeah I mean the thing with the deconstructed for loco is like that already kind of exists the Red Bull vodka and then the gentleman's Red Bull vodka which of course is the espresso martini and so the the idea of mixing caffeine and alcohol people do this regularly they find ways to do it this is classic the question is like yeah Will people really pick up on this?

1:24:34Because they are explicitly triggering people to consume caffeine when they're drinking. Yeah, there's another one of these hangover cures. Hangover cures or fixes are funny because you're basically saying that... I'm irresponsible, but I'm responsible enough to buy a hangover cure. These are great cups. That's really tough, yeah. Thank you. Yeah, it's always hard to be. No, the real reason is you're saying you just poisoned yourself. Here's an antidote. Antidotes don't promise that you're going to feel good. They promise that you're going to live, you know. Okay. And so that's like the theory of an antidote.

1:25:17So, yeah, to me, you're just commit to drinking is going to make you feel worse than you otherwise would. Temporarily, maybe better and then worse. So I think it's, I've never, I've never invested in any of the companies that have, there's clearly demand. Yeah. I have a friend who runs one. It's doing pretty well. They focus on like weddings too. That's like a bit of growth area because everyone's going to be drinking at the wedding. So if you can get into the wedding planner network, then the wedding planner can present this as like, oh, this would be a lovely gift for everyone. You put it in a little gift bag when they arrive, they take it before they drink.

1:25:53It's actually like a biotech company. they have like really good science and so it's this enzyme that breaks down the alcohol it really does work yeah z-biotics uh have you tried somebody was telling me that z-biotics is like i won't i don't want to misspeak and i don't want to talk poorly about anyone's um a for-profit enterprise yeah but uh but yeah no no you know i tried z-biotics and i was like this didn't work didn't work and uh you know i don't know i'm very i'm very affected by alcohol though pretty much yeah the next time i drink alcohol and probably the only time in q4 will be at heretic on sure uh on stage yeah exactly yeah um yeah yeah it is it is always hard because it's like if you have the forethought to think of taking a pre-alcohol uh hangover cure you also might have the forethought to like mix in a glass of water or just drink glass so it's a very tough business bigger dinner yeah or drink more water i mean any any business that's or have your blood like any business that's predicated on like you doing less of like the seven deadly sins is always tricky like you know the the dating app that's not predicated on just more and more casual sex yeah that's going to struggle to me to me if i was going to invest in a um hangover cure it would be somebody recreating john mcafee's like protocol which is that no you should pull it up and you should pull this up or put it on the screen or something um but his protocol is like you know how he always like well whenever he does a video and he's no longer with us yeah but well allegedly allegedly yeah he's probably listening to this right now yeah um the he'll go on these rants where he's like how did i drink four bottles of gin a day for six years in a row and and you know still managed to hold the federal government hostage for 200 days in a row and he had outlined this like crazy biohacker stack that he's on that like is like helping with his liver and all this other stuff and so he actually had it dialed so like the mcafee stack is if somebody wants to build that i'll back that back that because it clearly works okay i was like drinking like we gotta do a deep dive he wasn't just partying he was drinking yeah he he he's like he's like putting as much effort as brian johnson is into into surviving but also like into just refusing to not drink yeah yeah it's great like the easiest win possible yeah yeah how can i how can i survive Well, no, probably like, yeah, it would have still doing the single worst thing I can possibly do for my body.

1:28:41Yeah. Wow. What do you think of this? Dennis says, you're busy trying to get into founder mode while the 18 year old Zoomer clipping Kai Sonat and Aiden Ross on TikTok has a higher ARR than your entire B2B SaaS startup. Why do you like this one so much? I mean, I just think that, I just think it's amazing. If you could go back in time and tell Ben Franklin that some 18-year-old, you know, 18-year-old would be making millions, he would be like, yeah, that was what I envisioned for America. It is interesting. You know, to go back to Jeremy Giffon. By the way, Giffon is... Is it Giffon? No, I think...

1:29:26How do you say it? Giffon. Giffon. But it's so funny because his favorite business ever is like Lazard. Yeah. And Giffon just happens to feel like it's already in the same realm of – Is that the fun name? Giffon Capital? Giffon and Company. And Company? Yeah, yeah. There you go. Which is great. Yeah, that makes sense. Well, yeah. I mean, he told me this one interesting thing was like he just – like one of the highest signal data points that you can get on a founder when they're young and you're thinking about backing them for the first time, they've never done a business before, is just show me a Stripe account with money coming in and simultaneously a high school report card that happened the same time.

1:30:15Like all I care about is like you made money while in high school. Yeah, let me show you this picture. And that is a great signal. And I think that it's interesting because this seems ridiculous, the 18-year-old Zoomer clipping Kai Sinat and Aiden Ross clips on TikTok. But that 18-year-old Zoomer is probably the next great B2B SaaS founder. Like, probably. Like, not unreasonable to back that person. You evolved from the lowest common denominator. Yeah. And that is going to get retconned from this low-status clipping Aiden Ross clips on TikTok to, oh, yeah, I had a social media management company.

1:30:53or oh yeah i i you know i had a did i ever show you this picture no this is my first company okay let me see um yeah j man designs okay so literally when i was 12 i figured out that i could get skateboards manufactured in the midwest for 17.50 wow and i got my mom's help designing a graphic and i got i raised the money from my aunt who gave me like 500 bucks for the first round and I bought a bunch of boards and my number one sales channel was friends birthday parties. So when my friend's birthday was coming up, I'd go to their parent and I would sell them a skateboard at$40 or$36 or whatever.

1:31:35I was making like 50 % margins. I should have gone higher. A lot of flexibility. Yeah, you got a Zillow in the house show up. Actually, it's a$200 skateboard. It's a$200 skateboard. No, but that was like the first way that I made money that wasn't mowing lawns or whatever. It's truly entrepreneurial. The formative experience for an entrepreneur, it's one thing to do a service like copywriting or any of these other graphic design, but buying a product for one price and all you do is resell it for something else. This is my first job too. My first entrepreneurial thing was buying DJ equipment in America and then selling it on eBay and being willing to ship internationally.

1:32:16and so figuring out that certain companies with this very niche DJ equipment didn't have the infrastructure set up to distribute internationally and so I would just be like yeah I'll go figure out all the stupid custom stuff and a lot of people that wanted the best audiophile gear would be like dude if you can buy this for me and I will pay the extra shipping cost and the premium to do it and you just go figure all that stuff out and it's only possible because of the internet Yeah, and fundamentally, I still bring that up to founders when they're thinking they're like trying to over philosophize their businesses.

1:32:53I'm like, are you making something for one price that you will be able to sell for more than that price? And if so, how much more? And if, depending on the market, that's either going to lead to you creating a big business based on the margin profile or not. yeah yeah and so many people forget that and and i've forgotten that at multiple points in my adult life of fundamentally it's about making something for one price selling it for more than yeah just starting with like a basic widgets business and somebody's gonna clip this and be like two guys discover business basically like here's the thing so like if i have this piece of paper right and i can get this paper yeah and you're willing to pay two dollars for this this uh print out of a tweet yeah um what else do we have we have a couple more things i wanted to see um did you actually dig into this story about mark andresen giving 50k in bitcoin to an ai agent yeah i did it was over uh it was dramatized by an ai doomer yeah dramatized by an ai doomer turns out like the money like went into an account and like was never actually touched it's not like the ai was like i'm gonna use this to do that it was just sort of like mark sends it yep and then um calling calling mark mark this reminds me somebody i was at dinner the other night and and somebody brought up epstein and for some reason i was like unrelated and i called him i was like no but jeffrey would have why are you calling him jeffrey like what's wrong with you is there something that we need to know um yeah but yeah i think just just there's going to be more examples of this where people are like look yeah it's sentient the problem with the truth terminal thing i mean it seems really cool i hope that it's like real and someone's actually doing stuff it seems like a very avant-garde art project but you never know again teleoperation is there a human in the loop here so even even with the And there's an incentive to be like, oh, if people think this is an AI.

1:35:03They like it more because the bar is lower. It's like what we discussed the other day about the AI influencers are making 50K on Instagram, OnlyFans or whatever. And it turns out it's just a real woman. But if a real woman says, oh, these are AI generated, people are like, oh, this is incredible. This is the best AI model I've ever seen. And there's going to be a lot of that, like faking it both in the teleoperation, both in this. and just having a filter there. It is interesting. Are you familiar with like Move 37, this whole story? So when Google deep mind, Demis Hasibus was trying to beat Lisa Dahl in Go, the Go master.

1:35:44So computers had beaten chess and they'd become superhuman at chess, but Go was computationally much more complex. So something like, you know, instead of being like trillion possible board positions, that you could potentially search with a supercomputer, it's like quadrillion to quadrillion. So it's like impossible to just brute force it. But they applied deep learning, scale, they trained and they played billions of simulated games. And eventually the AI became very good. Everyone thought that Lisa Dahl, who was the world champion, was going to wipe the floor and he wound up losing. They made a whole documentary about it.

1:36:19It was crazy. And in there, there's this moment where they're playing and at move 37 the the computer deep mind places this piece like way off of the board where like no one not off the board but like it's a legal position it's just a very weird play like no one would ever do this no human would ever do this and and everyone was very confused they're like oh there's like a bug in the software like something's weird about this um uh but and at least it all like got up and was like what the fuck is going on like this is weird like i don't get this this is not how people play this game and that move wound up being critical and they won because of this move so it was like yeah true discovery of like a novel strategy and that is like what we're looking for in intelligence when you say like an ai system is intelligent and superhuman that's where we're getting there and with llms yeah the real the thing that would be interesting is if there was this AI agent that was figuring out a way to crack open multi-sigs on Solana.

1:37:23Oh, yeah. Or something like that. Again, there was a rumor about that too, but very unlikely. But even like, so these Move 37 type moments, I've been waiting for something to happen where it's just like a sentence, a poem, a paragraph, something that feels like inspired and like a viral tweet that clearly provably came from an LOM. We won't know that OpenAI has reached singularity until an agent built on the OpenAI platform buys a McLaren P1 to gain the favor of Altman. P1 or F1? Well, I think he would. He'd respect that. He's respectful. Yeah. But I don't know. It's interesting. It's definitely getting a response from the crazy AI doomers.

1:38:21Doomers. Doomers going to doom. But I like that Mark, like, you know, YOLO'd 50K to this project. Like, that's fun. That's what he should be doing. Like, that's awesome. I'm excited. Increase it by an order of magnitude. Probably on the next run, you know. Did you read Sequoia's generated AI thing? Their whole paper? application layer is important a bit too serious for our bones i think so no it is it is it's so long but here's here's the funny thing the only thing that i'll comment on that is it feels like a year ago everybody was like the application doesn't matter building at the application layer it's just yeah rappers are stupid rappers are stupid and now it's like all in on rappers but then a year from now i think it'll be back to oh you know like i don't know it's just funny to think that that only like six to twelve months ago people were saying that software is dead the end of software so this report is coming within six months of the end of software yep so who's right both both of them are right you know like that's honestly it's honestly my opinion is is I think that long-term both of them are right and that software is gonna be massively disruptive yeah but there's still going to be massive value accrual to specific products.

1:39:36Yeah. I mean, the computing hardware companies were valuable and the software built on top of them was valuable after the dot-com boom. Yeah. And even the telecom companies were pretty valuable. Yeah. And so the whole stack is valuable. And there's probably value accruing all over the place. It's great. Everywhere you look. I mean, it really is. It makes sense that the value accrual wouldn't live just only one place. Of course, there's going to be a winner, but from a venture perspective. Everybody's incentive that anybody that's running a foundation model is incentivized to say, we're going to capture all the value.

1:40:08We're going to do all these things that you say you're going to do. We're just going to do it innately through the core technology. And then everybody that wants to deploy money is, is saying you want it. It's, it's, it's much more comforting to be able to say that the value is going to accrue to individual teams and products and apps and things like that, because then you can YOLO bets, you know? Yeah, the question is like, and I don't know if they address this that much, but disruptive innovation versus sustaining. Like will the existing, because there's already a crop, there's already a, you know, a multi-billion dollar SaaS company in every major category.

1:40:52And so there's also now a YC company doing AI in that category as well. is AI disruptive to those companies that are maybe only five, 10 years old and doing well? Like, I mean, you know, Ramp is like, they're not being disrupted by AI. They're like the first one to implement it because like they're still on the cutting edge. They still have the agile team, right? And I wonder, yeah, how much of this is going to be completely new versus just the existing tech companies are able to just roll in. I don't know. Keep an eye on it. Anything else?

1:41:30there's always more technology always more technology i think we got through most of the tweets

1:41:40i have been using those uh meta glasses more the the ray-bans yeah yeah the video ones i with the kids i went for a walk uh and had my hands full with dogs and babies and it was great you know take some photos the photos are not that great But the thing that I actually liked was being able to just talk to the AI while you're walking around hands-free You just say like hey meta like what's the you know, what year was the Declaration of Independence signed or whatever? Yeah It just gives you it just gives you like little facts and stuff and it's like a little bit easier than pulling out your phone for like the random question Yeah, I think that's kind of cool getting you become the cell tower that data is being transmitted.

1:42:21Yeah, you're going to have that. I actually watched a Huburn clip about that. EMS? Yeah. And he had someone on who was like a brain scientist and who was basically like, it's chill. So, you know, I think there's like the scientists agree. Now the bro scientists agree. But like we got to come up with a new tier for like even more conspiratorial tinfoil. Yeah, yeah, yeah. The tinfoil bros. Yeah, yeah, yeah. The tin men. Just the bros, not bro scientists. Just bros. Don't even pretend to be a scientist. We should have a tinfoil hat in the background from here. Just like a really, really high quality one.

1:43:00Anyway, I think we crushed it. We did all this stuff. Let's wrap there. Jordy, did you want to talk about the wall? Oh. Ending our potential vice president bragging about not. Knowing what a VC is? The thing is, here's the funny thing. Politicians used to be able to travel around the country saying whatever they wanted to specific audiences with zero consequences. Oh, yeah. And now almost every single talk that a politician's ever going to have is going to be clipped and almost immediately published. And even, you know, they're always running the risk of being clipped out of context. Yep. But Tim Walls can't, you can't go and speak to a bunch of guys that work.

1:43:45Work, you know, he's clearly pandering to a specific audience of being like, well, the funny thing with Tim Wall is the guy says he doesn't own any stocks or any financial instruments. He doesn't have retirement savings. He's just planning to live off of the government forever. Like he came out and said, yeah, he has his pension from being in the government or whatever. He says he has no, he sold his house. He doesn't have any. He's all in. Like the guy's all in. You gotta give him credit for that. But he has zero exposure to stocks, the market or whatever. So this is the guy, this is, you know, the, um, it was a Dan Loeb who is, who is tweeting and saying like, is this the guy that we really want, you know, making decisions around, you know, the economy and, you know, whatever.

1:44:28But yeah, Tim Wall is going and, you know, he's probably speaking to some group of like, I don't know, agriculture, manufacturing, manufacturing, where the VCs aren't in that state at all. So apparently the guy I'm running against is a venture capitalist. Yeah. I don't know what, I don't even know what a venture capital is. And it's like, dude, you can't, even if you, even if that's true, if you want to win this race, like, why are you going and bragging about something? There's literally a fairly large constituency of like VCs for, for your campaign, VCs for Kamala. And then also it's like the Obama administration, the, the, the organization that they met with outside the government more than any other during the administration was Google.

1:45:07Like the democratic party is like well entrenched with tech and venture capital. Like this is like well established. and so yeah playing this like oh i don't even know what that is yeah i feel like he's been the last week has been interesting for him where there was a pic of that or not the picture the video of him going hunting i didn't even see that where he's trying to show that he's a good old boy that loves guns and stuff like that to sort of you know get the mail vote but back to back of blowing it with them because it was clear he didn't know how to load his shotgun and then straight into saying he doesn't know what a venture capital is is like you're kind of alienating both crowds of guys that know how to load a gun and then guys that know what venture capital is and i think that middle group that doesn't know what either is is not going to be that influential in your election but anyways that's enough politics um i'm looking forward to the next episode yeah me too thanks for listening thanks for listening

From the publisher

TBPN.com is made possible by:
Ramp - https://ramp.com
Eight Sleep - https://eightsleep.com/tbpn
Wander - https://wander.com/tbpn
Public - https://public.com
AdQuick - https://adquick.com
Bezel - https://getbezel.com
Polymarket - https://polymarket.com

Follow TBPN: 
https://TBPN.com
https://x.com/tbpn
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/technology-brothers/id1772360235
https://youtube.com/@technologybrotherspod?si=lpk53xTE9WBEcIjV

  • Tesla Cybercab event
  • SpaceX catching a rocket
  • What matters right now in Seed
  • Online dating
  • Downgrading camcorders
  • AI Nuclear Power Plants
  • Buying distressed companies
  • The problem with billionaire resorts.

More from TBPN

All 686 episodes
Tesla vs SpaceX, Humanoid Robots, Online Dating, Retro ElectronicsTBPN · 1 h 46 min
Listen in VO