In short
TBPN Podcast Episode Notes: "Vibe Rounds, Tech Ecosystems, Foreign Money in US Venture Funds"
Episode Overview The TBPN (Technology Brothers Podcast) episode discusses various pressing topics in the technology and venture capital landscape, including the recent turmoil at OpenAI, the concept of "vibe rounds" in fundraising, and the implications of foreign investment in US venture funds. The conversation is filled with insights on the role of leadership in tech, the changing nature of venture financing, and the geopolitical dynamics affecting the tech ecosystem.
---
Key Topics and Discussions
- OpenAI's Recent Turmoil
- Executive Departures: Discussion around the recent exits of key executives from OpenAI, including the chief technology officer.
- Fundraising Chaos: Insights into how the timing of these departures coincided with a fundraising round, raising questions about the company's stability.
- Employment Contracts: A clause that may incentivize former employees to remain silent about negative experiences to retain equity.
- Public Perception: The evolving reputation of Sam Altman as he faces growing skepticism from the AI community.
- The Concept of "Vibe Rounds"
- Definition: "Vibe rounds" refer to fundraising rounds based more on narrative and perceptions than on solid product market fit.
- Comparison with Excel Rounds: Discussion around the difference between vibe rounds (driven by narrative and conviction) and traditional rounds based on Excel metrics (quantifiable financial performance).
- Successful Examples: Case study of Harvey, a legal AI company, demonstrating how strong narrative market fit can drive high valuations.
- Foreign Investment in US Venture Capital
- Concerns About Foreign Money: The episode highlights the scrutiny surrounding foreign investments, particularly from China and Russia, in US tech companies and the implications for national security.
- AngelList Case: The discussion includes a potential FBI investigation into Hone Capital's ties to the Chinese Communist Party and how foreign investments could expose sensitive data about startups.
- Technology Ecosystems Across Regions
- San Francisco vs. Other Regions: A comparative analysis of the startup environment in San Francisco, New York City, Europe, and China.
- Creative Destruction: The idea that while some regions may be facing turmoil, this could lead to new opportunities as established players falter.
- The Future of European Tech: A critical look at how European regulations may stifle innovation compared to the more dynamic environments in the US.
- Cultural Dynamics in Venture Capital
- Founder Conviction: The importance of founders' confidence and conviction in their ideas when raising capital, especially pre-product stage.
- Discussion on Cash Flow: The misconceptions about cash flow businesses being easier to establish in competitive markets.
- Role of Psychedelics: A light-hearted discussion about psychedelics and their perceived influence on creativity and conviction in the tech industry.
---
Key Takeaways
- Leadership Matters: The effectiveness and public perception of leaders in tech companies can significantly impact their organization's success.
- Fundraising is Evolving: The trend towards vibe rounds indicates a shift in how investors evaluate startups, emphasizing narrative and founder charisma.
- Geopolitical Awareness: Investors and founders must be mindful of the implications of foreign investments, both for company health and national security.
- Diverse Ecosystems: The tech landscape is not uniform; it varies greatly by region, with each area facing unique challenges and opportunities.
---
Conclusion This episode of TBPN underscores the complexities of the current technology and venture capital landscape, highlighting the interplay between leadership, funding strategies, and the broader geopolitical context. As the tech ecosystem continues to evolve, listeners are encouraged to be aware of these dynamics as they navigate their entrepreneurial journeys.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Welcome to Technology Brothers, the most profitable podcast in the world. You read the Wall Street Journal today? Of course. Yeah. OpenAI. I need my copy. OpenAI is in there. What are they, are they covering the departures? Not the first, yeah, it's interesting because OpenAI, I mean, the chief technology officer quit yesterday. There's like rumors about a fundraising round, a bunch of executives left. So it's like kind of a chaotic moment. I saw somebody's take that I think was totally on point is the way that OpenAI is like employment contracts are set up, is if you talk poorly about OpenAI after you leave, they're just like, OK, this is our equity.
0:41You get your equity cloud back. So if you wanted to make a statement about how fucked up things were while still holding on to your equity, you'd leave right in the middle of the fundraise. Right? What sends a bigger mess? Because if you're like, let's say we're running a - Well, that's not different than, but that's not the same as actually violating that clause. No, that's what I'm saying. If you wanted to make a very large public dramatic statement about something being wrong at OpenAI, but you couldn't say that. Oh, but you couldn't say that because... You would leave in the middle of a fundraise.
1:10But if you want the equity, why would you want to hurt the company? I mean, it's not, you know, you could argue that somebody could say, I want no part of this, but you still want to kind of keep... Get the money. I hate that. That pisses me off so much. That's like that fucking guy from Meta, from Facebook, who made this huge bag and then was on Netflix. Tristan, you know this guy? No. He was in this documentary called The Social Dilemma. He was like, oh, yeah, it's so bad what Instagram has done to this generation. It's so bad. And he's just sitting there from montage. Yeah, exactly. He made so much money.
1:45And it's just like, I actually love that clause. I think that clause is interesting because if you are seriously... Are we an Excel character right now? No, no, no. This is what I actually believe. I love that clause because if you were actually terrified of AGI and you were like, holy shit, this stuff is going to kill everyone. Yeah. What the fuck is it? Your equity is worth zero. Your equity is worth nothing. So you're going to just be like, yeah, go for it. No, I think it's much more of a statement on Sam's character to leave during the fundraise. Which is. I don't know. I mean, like, I hear what you're saying, but it's just weird because it's like, it's like, it's this half measure.
2:27Like either you'd want to just be like, let me, like I want the value of this stock to be as high as possible. Therefore, let's find the chillest place for me to get out because like I am tired, right? So I do want to leave, but I don't want to fuck over the company at all. So let's figure out a way to get out. And I thought it was originally interesting that they launched this, like all this stuff broke the same day that Zuck had the big meta announcement. I think it was timed. Well, yeah. I mean, it's like bury your news. Try and bury your news on a day when something else bigger is happening, right?
3:03And OpenAI historically has been really, really good about releasing information, like front running, like putting their AI announcement the day before Google's, right? So they clearly know when the other things are happening. Has Lucy ever been approached by OpenAI? I mean, maybe she can't say that. Does she work with them? Which Lucy? Sorry. My company? No, no, no, no. They've definitely worked at Lucy. Of course, of course. They do massive shipments. Lulu. Lulu, not Lucy. Lulu. I mean, I think Lulu is working with SSI. Got it. Ilya's company. Yeah, yeah, there you go. Because she's on, like, the Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross crew.
3:38Right. Although she's, you know, like, has a bunch of different companies and stuff. Yeah. But when I initially saw that all this was breaking right then, I was like, okay, maybe they're trying to kind of bury this news. I mean, obviously it didn't really work because it's on the front page of the business section. Which every self-respecting person reads daily. Well, I mean, you know, like the meta platforms announced deals with celebrity actors to use their voices in a new artificial intelligence assistant. That's B4. And the open AI stuff is B1. So it did break through. That's the way I thought they were framing it initially.
4:18It was like, let's try and get this news out the same day that something else big is happening in tech. We know that this Facebook thing is happening. But, I mean, then again, like there is one narrative where it's like the whole company is falling apart and everyone's leaving. But then there is another narrative, which is like great, great man theory of history. Maybe you just need one person. Executive teams turn over all the time. They often turn over in the midst of financing rounds because it's like, okay, we're actually changing what the business is going to be doing. We're going a different direction.
4:47So like, yeah, we are wiping out a bunch of the staff. I don't know. I'm not ready to say like it's so over. No, it's the thing that's most, the thing that makes it the most interesting is how opaque it all is. Like nobody, even seemingly insiders don't actually know what the fuck's going on. And to have that many billions of dollars in a company and nobody can figure out what's going on. and there's this broader public back. Like Sam went, you know, a year ago it felt like Sam was, he was on top of the world, right? Like he was, everybody was like, was in his comments like worshipping him on every single post, like, you know, this like sort of tech demigod and now it feels like that has certainly snapped back.
5:43Like at least the AIX community is deeply against him at this point. Yeah. And a lot of it has to do with the open sourcing and commitment to the developer community and a lot of different stuff. Yeah, and it's funny. I feel like one of the first critiques of Sam was how he would give those interviews where it genuinely felt like he was just lying, but like with a very straight face. And he's like, I own no equity in OpenAI. And it's like, who knows what's actually true? I actually was curious and I tried to do some digging and people were like, yeah, from what I can tell, it's like legit. Yeah, yeah, no, it was legit, but there was always the soft power element.
6:31And there was always the question of like, could he get equity eventually? In the for-profit shift, there's this discussion of getting him, you know, what will effectively be like$10 billion dollars of equity in the for-profit and so to me if you actually think about his sort of game theory is like let me come in sort of run the company get so much control and power and influence and not have equity while it's still this non-profit structure and then flip it into a for-profit structure and get equity then right like it almost is like it almost is like well if you were always doing like why is there even a discussion of you getting seven percent of the company at$150 billion valuation if you never wanted it and it was never a motivation in the first place.
7:13But it was kind of, if Sam had come in and taken a huge stake in the company in exchange for taking on the CEO role while cucking Elon, then there would have been like a lot of, there would have been probably even more. Now he can make the argument where it's like, well, the board just really wants me to be properly incentivized now that we're a for-profit structure. It's only right. and now the next time you know he's up in front of the senate what's you know getting grilled they're going to be like so what you know what changed like i thought you just were doing this for humanity and now all of a sudden you have your you know yeah it's interesting i i wonder like i i always wonder like how seriously people believe like super intelligence is right around the corner and the the revealed press that's a few thousand days away it's a few thousand days away now, it used to be a few quarters away.
8:04It's kind of shifted so much. And that informs your decision and your actions so much. And there's a lot of revealed preferences versus stated preferences. A lot of the doomers are like, oh, 99 % chance that AGI is going to kill us all, but yeah, I'm still investing in bonds because I want my 401k. Exactly. And it's like, okay, well, it doesn't seem like you believe that. It doesn't seem like you're really taking actions that are consistent with what your stated beliefs are. Like maybe you're just trying to like, you know, get attention. But I do think like even internally at these research organizations, like they might have shifted their views.
8:44Like it's totally possible. I was talking to somebody about Jensen Wong and like how NVIDIA has done a lot to like kind of get around the chip bans and whether or not that was like un-American. because they're like American companies will buy 100 % of NVIDIA's supply right now. Yeah. So the fact that they are taking any TSMC line time. Yeah, that's what he's saying, right, is we're still deeply supply constrained and we'll be for the next. Everyone is like, yeah, like NVIDIA could very clearly just make a statement saying like, we're only going to sell to American companies and I'm going to call up Oracle and Elon and Zuck and Google and all these people and just say, I have 100 % of my supply, you guys better take it all, and they would.
9:28And so it's not an economic consideration. It's more like this long-term diversification. You want to be more of an international company. And so if you really, really believe that AESI, AGI is around the corner, it's going to be this super bioweapon level, super critical geopolitical thing, then putting it in the hands of the CCP is very dangerous. but if you deep down actually just believe that it's just like it's just spellcheck like it's just it's just like a useful tool like yeah then then as just like a libertarian normal person it's like yeah like why would you respect the spirit of the law like you're only going to go after the letter of the law and like the chip band says it can't have this much memory bandwidth and so you'll go one point under that and like that sounds treasonous if you believe that AGI God is coming but it doesn't sound treasonous if you're just selling spellcheck right yeah yeah and so it was It's a very, very interesting discussion.
10:20And I think that's happening at a lot of these labs. I think that a lot of the labs are starting to change their view from like, okay, well, we thought we were just gonna like nail the algorithm and get God, and we wouldn't even be able to process it. We got entry level white collar work. Exactly. And so, and so, and so like, and not just that, it's like also God might be like decades away, right? Even a few thousand days, that's a full decade. And you gotta do a lot in between, and also just the scaling laws and all of the different things. Yeah, we talked about this, but the few thousand days away sounds way better than 10 years.
10:56Than 10 years, which is exactly what it is. If you just assume a few is three, you just do the math and it's like, okay, that's a decade. And we've been hearing about self-driving cars a decade away and then it took a little bit more than that, it took like two decades and so it's still not even here. And then the actual build out and roll out of these things, it takes forever too. like yeah i was disappointed disappointed to see when you said you shared this earlier that tsmc is slandering podcast bros oh yeah called they called alt-minute podcast bro as if it was some type of like attack yeah which i didn't i had to reread it a few times yeah to get their meaning i was confused because that's kind of the highest food chain in the yeah it's in the tech Podcast bros, people that can navigate Excel without their mouse, venture capitalists after that.
11:51Then founders. Yeah, right. But, yeah, it's sort of interesting.
12:01If you would think that TSMC knows what they're doing, right? Yeah. Do you think that they're seeing through all the narratives and just being like, bullshit? Because that's kind of what it sounds like. Yeah, yeah. In that one interview clip where they kind of talked about, I have fours too, if you will. I'll take four. Thank you, sir. um uh yeah yeah in that one interview clip they they are talking about like you know sam coming in and saying like we need like 35 more plants and like you know if you go back to the history of morris chang and tsmc like just getting that one plant up was like immense risk and required like massive government uh you know intervention to i hadn't realized but i guess the arizona plant is actually producing product.
12:56I didn't know that, but I mean, it makes sense. The question is just like, what process is it on? How small are the chips? Because we, I mean, America does have plenty of chip making capacity for the much larger, the stuff that goes in a toaster and a washing machine. Global Foundries and a few other companies have like... Autonomous toasters are going to be... Yeah, but it's when you get down to the really important iPhone chips and stuff that's in the GPUs. It gets really, really difficult. But yeah, I don't know. Speaking of AI, there's been a lot of talk about, we can do this later, but there's been a lot of talk about the AI that Elon is applying to the X algorithm and whether or not it's good for the world or good for the user experience.
13:46And the question is, is it actually AI or is it 300 people in a room just looking at videos and hitting a button that says degenerate or like or like or like good for society and they're just going like this you know and and then they're just like feeding those videos right because you you you remember early tiktok days when tiktok the algorithm was like getting good and you you i remember going on it never never i don't think i've ever posted anything there but i remember going on it and being like wow i'm like kind of shocked that they would feed me that video with how little I've used it. Like it was so on the nose.
14:25Just pausing a little bit on like, oh, there's a car in the background. The next video is a car video. Then the next video is the deepest dive on a car you've ever seen. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It knows I'm a car guy. Yeah. Just like that. And I remember at the time there was footage coming out of these effectively like farms in algorithm farms is how I would describe them. Right. Where It's just like people in rooms just like sorting like videos like manually. I mean, there's a little bit of that. I mean, mostly it's just like how much time is spent on this particular thing, how much time are you hovering over it.
14:56But yeah, it's like, no, of course. But it's funny to imagine Elon getting so, his dopamine rush, his engagement, right? Like he's all about like the metrics. He wants to put points on the board. and so you can see him just like dialing up the degeneracy to the point where he's like he walks into the room they're like sir we can't we can't go anymore like we're already showing the people fighting in the streets like and he's like more and it's like showing like like racial crimes like he's just like more and they're like 11 put it to 11. I mean yeah it's unbridled but I mean I think that's the only thing that will turn the business around really.
15:41I think this nice little garden that we had in tech Twitter, it was truly like the tech community was subsidizing that. Because Twitter was never particularly profitable. The business never really worked that well. Yeah, and what's funny is how much of the market cap was oriented around how much people loved the product. It was something when I discovered Twitter, yeah when I credit Twitter with massively accelerating my professional development from the lens of I was able as a 21 year old in the school you know it was at UC Santa Barbara it's not a tech school I didn't know we had a technology management program that I was in but it wasn't like everything we were studying in school was like 10 years behind right so it was like I could go on Twitter and and the biggest thing for me was like picking up the vocabulary of the industry so that when I would go meet somebody I knew what they were talking about even if I'd never done the thing yep and so to me I credit Twitter with accelerating my career like you know five years something like that because I just felt like I was I felt like I was a part of it just because I was even even though I was just like kind of soaking it all in I wasn't even a part of the conversations.
16:57And unfortunately, so I think that a lot of their market cap was just the fact that the technology industry and many other industries just love the product. It's like you don't want to short Twitter. It's kind of like this option value on like the value of the network because it had like world leaders there, the Pope, but then also every journalist who's posting every news story is breaking there. Like there's just like something, everyone felt like there was going to be some sort of value to come out of that yeah and the big critique was like you guys don't ship anything everything's broken nothing like works like the dm suck and elon's like okay you guys want change like i'll give you some i'll give you some change yeah and then it's we're like oh actually like like i still type in twitter.com on my browser and every single time i get this pang of like sadness but yeah i mean i think there's there's something interesting where it's like he clearly bought it because it was like the festering hive of scum and villainy in the sense that like every cancellation campaign started on Twitter.
17:58Yeah. It would usually, like the anatomy of a cancellation campaign would usually be like someone figures out that they don't like this tech CEO or whatever. Then they go back, they dig up some tweet where they're like, capitalism is good. And then some like tiny like communist account quote tweets is like, actually capitalism is bad and then gets like a thousand retweets. And then all of a sudden there's like more people piling on, more people piling on, a real like back and forth fight. And then the low tier journalists can start reporting on the backlash on Twitter and they can start saying, oh, well, like, you know, how are they going to respond?
18:36There's been this uproar on Twitter. This person needs to like talk about this. And then once the low tier outlets are reporting, then like the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post can like report on like the crisis that's happening. And Elon just completely killed that by like kicking a lot of people off, de-amplifying thing, community notes. Like there's so many different changes that he made, just chaos. Yeah, there's a bunch of - Got rid of the blue checks. Like, so like there wasn't this moment where it's like, oh, well like a blue check person amplified this hate, like this hit piece on my company or like - That was particularly devastating for me because I got my blue check and had it for like three months.
19:12Me too. I had the same thing. I had the same thing. I was like, really? And then Elon just gave it away? Yeah, gave it away. I was like, damn it. Yeah, I think a big, I don't think that, I don't know how virtuous the decision was as much as it was, I believe there's a factor there, right? I'm not going to psychoanalyze Musk. Like, the logical decision to buy X is, one, there clearly was always a lot of potential, right? And if you're worth hundreds of billions of dollars, if you want to make another hundred billion dollars, you have to take these colossal bets. Buying Twitter and trying to make it half as big as Meta is a pretty good way to try to do that.
19:59Who knows if he'll be successful. So there's the purely financial. And if you overpay for something but then make it ten times more valuable, you didn't overpay. You paid a fair price. It was just risky. The other factor is it being like such a critical comms channel for all of what Elon's doing, specifically Tesla, right? Like the whole, there was years where people were like, Tesla doesn't spend money on marketing. Tesla doesn't do this. And it's like, okay, they ended up like, like their marketing channel was Elon spreading the gospel, being Elon. And there was a lot of value in making sure that that always stayed the same, right?
20:44Yeah, I think that makes sense. I think I'm a little bit more pilled on the psychoanalysis side of like, if there was going to be a communist revolution, it would have started on pre-Musk Twitter. That's right. And he would be the first one to go. And so there's a little bit of self-preservation there. Yeah, yeah. No, and that's the thing is that the real answer is probably not that he did it for one specific thing yeah probably made like one of the smartest business minds the smartest business mind probably of the hundred years ish that we're on this earth yeah and he made like a very calculated decision across a bunch of different parameters parameters and he's fine if people think it's because of one of those reasons but really like you usually don't make a decision just for a single reason yeah yeah yeah and then i do think like he's he's been successful in kind of like just destroying the like cancel culture like boiling pot like it really served as like the kindling but everyone was hoping that it gave other vcs a permission to so yeah he kind of like canceled dystopia but i think everyone now is like we're waiting for utopia yeah and it's like maybe we're not going to get that maybe it will maybe the answer was just like yeah maybe the town square is always going to be chaos.
22:09Exactly. Exactly. It's going to be a lot more chaotic and maybe that means everyone uses it a little bit less or at least like the high signal. Like the people that are having a really bad time right now are not the normies on Twitter. Like the normies on Twitter are like, oh, I'm getting like even more entertaining junk. It's like that meme with the guy hitting the bong while these two people are fighting. Exactly. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Getting high off the algo and just... There's a lot of people that are in that boat and the people that are upset are like this very small niche like tech Twitter community that was very interested in like sharing links and like meeting new people and like amplifying small accounts and stuff and like all that stuff is kind of going away.
22:48Party around go-to-market strategy probably would have worked, but been much less effective. Yeah. Where there was a time where if you understood the algo and you had the right people around, you could dominate the timeline for an entire day. Yeah. Genuinely dominated where like you could open, you could make sure that when people opened the app, they would see your stuff three, four times in a single session. And I miss those days. That's why we're creating our own channel here. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I think there will continue to be hacks. Totally. Especially in... Like an Excel work. Chaos is a ladder.
23:24Chaos is a ladder, right? And I see a lot of chaos, and I see a lot of opportunity. But yeah, I mean, there will be a lot of sludge. The Thread Boys existed beforehand. They've clearly amplified in the new era, especially with the rev share stuff but then also just like the i think what's really thriving is like the the culture war politic it's also because we're going into an election so it's even hotter than ever but that type of stuff like i think there's a lot of people that don't want to see that stuff at all and so going back to the ai thing what what i would love is like i don't want to go in there and every time there's a new trend like there's this like hippo mood dang have you seen this thing yeah yeah i i like i have no desire to see any of that like and i could put in like a block keyword but like what if somebody just shares a meme with a picture being like this is cute well then i'm seeing it anyway yeah and then and then you're kind of not in the in the in the meme sort of network but then daniel uh daniel shares like and then mo dong is left open ai yeah exactly okay and then now a little bit yeah i i basically just want to tell i want to i I want to talk to the algorithm.
24:32And I think that that would be the most interesting thing. The cool thing would be if, and who knows if this will happen, but if Elon could some, I invested in that company, Farcaster, which is like a decentralized, you know, and their whole vision was like, hey, you build one network, and then other people can build network, specific networks effectively on top of the network, right? Like, so if we could take the Twitter social graph and all the mechanics and build effectively our own service for that like you could bring back OG tech Twitter to some degree right yeah it probably wouldn't be that hard like you know to I mean it would be hard but yeah if you the social graph is still there all the users are there they're just not being coordinated in the same way yeah there's this theory of like the algorithm store or you should be able to pick your algorithm or whatever.
25:23But I actually would prefer to just basically talk to the LLM, like Grok, and tell it, hey, cool it with the - Yeah, that's why I don't - The political, social, the culture war stuff. I wanna see less of that. I know that it's grabbing my attention, and so you're getting this signal that that does retain. But I want you to push back on that in the way that basically I found that not interested does that work it doesn't work doesn't work like I've experimented with it where every single time I've seen something about Diddy I just click and say not interested post and the next time I open the app still see there's something else yeah so you the only thing you can do is is is is effectively mute that word but then what if somebody posted a picture of baby oil.
26:16Exactly. It needs to actually, and that's the issue with Grok is it's a completely useless. It's completely separate. Like what I want to do is I want to every morning, like have something scrape every tweet that would be in my for you page and my following page and scrape all those tweets out and then run those through an LLM that says, would John like this based on what we know about him? And I've, and I've told it a lot about what I like and express those opinions. You can sometimes do this when they, like, when you initially onboard, they ask you, like, are you interested in sports or technology?
26:49And then they tell you, like, you should follow Cristiano Ronaldo or whatever. Yeah. But, like, that's not enough. Like, I want to have a much more rich conversation and then have the LLM, like, kind of score each one based on my individual expression of that. I'm surprised that social networks haven't adopted that because every once in a while. I think it's really expensive. Interesting. I think actually, right now, all it's doing is just like, this is recommended to, this tweet has high retention. When someone sees this tweet, they click on it, they read the comments, it's a good tweet. The average time they spend on a tweet is a minute or 10 seconds.
27:33If it's one second, then don't show it to anyone. And so they just blast this out. And there's a little bit of fit where it's like, okay, we know that you like a little bit more of this, that, more like this. But it's not customizable in any way. Yeah. And really what I want to do is just, like, print out all of them, have an AI do that. But until, like, that becomes affordable, the next best thing is I just ask my secretary to print out tweets for me. And I just read it on paper. Yeah, yeah. And so I have a bunch of these here that my secretary printed out for us to look through. Did you get a chance to look at any of these?
28:09Oh, you were talking about your favorite. You would have missed this tweet if you had your mute button on. Because it's about Diddy. Yeah, thank God I didn't mute it. Yeah, I think this tweet... Read it out first. Put Diddy, SBF, and Eric Adams in the same cell and make A16Z invest in whatever company they come up with. This hurts because it feels like there's a reality where one of these people would raise from Andreessen. After the fact. No, it's more like looking at the Adam Neumann thing. Adam Neumann came out probably a generational entrepreneur and deserves to come back and raise a bunch of money because even though there were some issues with how WeWork was ran, that guy just willed something into existence.
29:04that um and i never had a i never understood that the adam newman critique in general because i'm like all right he took a bunch of ugly office buildings and used you know my yoshi son's money to make them beautiful and cheap and like available to everybody like how could you hate this guy right um these three these three i think yeah yeah harder to harder to defend i mean like the Diddy story has become like he's like a murderer now. He's a murderer, a rapist. It's like insane. No, he's... I actually haven't looked into the Eric Adams stuff. I haven't looked at it enough either. What's funny is that it's not like A16Z invested in FTX.
Read the full transcript
29:47They specifically didn't. And it was because there were so many obvious conflicts, right? Like anybody that would look at, hey, the most prolific crypto hedge fund that does the most degenerate, crazy shit that is antithetical, that is basically manipulating all these markets, also wants to own the biggest exchange. We should fund the exchange. What could go wrong? But you know who this is, right? Dan Toomey, do you know who this is? No. So he works for Morning Brew. He has a YouTube channel. He's like this comedian. Oh, he does some of those videos. And he's much more like a video creator than an insider tech person.
30:27I don't think he's done a startup. I think he kind of comes from like the comedy standup like video world. Now he's done a lot of research and he actually understands things like really well. But it's just funny that like he frames it as like, oh, this is something Andreessen would do when like, I think it's just because like they're a big name or something. It was kind of interesting. Like that's what he picked because like. No, I read it as the, oh, you're kind of making a play on Adam Neumann. But like. Oh, yeah. Okay. Well, no, because that's the most high-profile company that Andreessen has.
30:59They went back to after. Went back to a founder who had had a fall from grace.
31:07Bizarre. No, but Andreessen doesn't get enough credit for not doing FTX, right? Yeah, totally. Because you know they were pitched it. Of course. Over and over and over and over and over and had to have said no. It's not like it was an issue of price, right? Yeah. Because that's not the. And their fund was already so scaled. Yeah. that was an intentional decision which is why from an investing standpoint you always have to ask yourself why am i the one that is doing this deal right like why are all the there's the market's not perfectly efficient but it's pretty efficient right and so anybody who is backing ftx i mean well andreessen has their multi-billion dollar crypto fund and has a mandate to be in every important company.
31:52Yeah, yeah. Why did they not do it at any point? Yeah, that's interesting. I don't think Founders Fund did it either, right? Yeah, I mean, the team always talks about, like, yeah, there were a bunch of red flags. But there was another thing. I mean, some people passed. I mean, obviously, like, the best people passed just because they clocked SPF as, like, a fraud. but other people passed because either they were already in Coinbase or what's that? Binance. So if you're in those you might be like I don't want to do FTX as well. People always figure out how to do yoga. Oh he's building a finance super app.
32:33It's not an exchange. Yeah it's true. And then yeah I mean there's a bunch of stuff there. I think that But this reminds me of another story that I don't think is printed out but is worth covering. It came out yesterday that the FBI is probing this group called Hone Capital for ties to the CCP. And I think it was between 2016 and 2018 AngelList took$80 million in sort of direct investment from Hone. under the conditions that Hone could get full visibility into every syndicate happening on the platform and presumably all the data associated with those, which, as you know, is DEX, financials, you know, other, you know.
33:29Basically, so, like, that to me is, like, the biggest story in tech right now. And there's enough people that have vested interests and angel list i think it's generally great for the innovation ecosystem and is like a positive platform and force but that to me is um potentially one of the first stories of a series of stories around foreign money and venture that will just continue to yeah drop i always i always wonder about the actual impact of that stuff though totally because it's like i i was i was joking about like imagine you're some spy and you work your way up and you know you wheezy your way into a big venture firm and you're like oh yeah i'm with like the top dog like i i'm seeing everything i'm seeing everything and then the gp is just like the future is nfts and you're like god damn it i will never bring honor to be weapons yeah like like yeah okay so they steal the code to the the monkey pictures it's like it's like like there are a lot of companies where actually the ip is not that valuable it's stolen like yeah but i'll give you a story that is relevant so deterrence defense tech startup yeah was speaking with a high profile rolling fund gp on angel list And because deterrents will be doing sort of stuff that's critical to national security, we need to know who your end LPs are.
35:09And so we pressed said GP on who their LPs were, and he basically had to say, I don't know. I cannot verify that they're not, that it's not Russian money, CCP money, et cetera. Yeah. And I independently verified with another. Probably won't run this, but I independently between you and me, I independently verified with somebody who work with the fund who was like, yeah, there's Russian money. Like, yeah, 100 percent. Yeah. I mean, at the same time, I get that it's a bad look, but like, I mean, I barely have the cap table to my own investors. No, but if the problem is if some if that money gets invested into the company, it damages the company prospects.
35:50Right. Right. Purely brand and optical? Or do you think there's actually a path to, okay, I have some small - USG being like, hey, we don't want to work with a company who's end investors. Sure, sure, sure. Yeah. That's just, that can damage the company. I just have trouble because like most investors, it's like you take a small check from them and you never hear from them again. And then a few of them, it's like, okay, they got some information rights. Like maybe they get like a P &L. Yeah. Or like maybe they get a cap table once in a while. But it's like they're never getting access to like the Git repo.
36:22They're never getting access. Like they don't have any, they're not badged. Like they don't get to go in the company. And so like I get that it's like a huge problem and like a big thing in like the abstract. But I feel like even if you found like six degrees of separation, there's some like, you know, Russian or Chinese money in something. Like, I don't know that that's as dangerous as we think it is, as opposed to, like, the more obvious thing of just, like, there's an employee who's been compromised and just has access to the whole network. Right. Like, that might be what we actually need to be worrying about, like, more.
36:56I would say the other... And then there's also, like, the Chinese and Russian money. There are expats. There are people who are just rich kids over there who, like, want to play in this market. They want to YOLO. they want to leave or they or they like america and they're just like not actually aligned of course they could be turned of course there could be spies like like that that definitely happens and that is an that is an issue i would say that yeah i would say one again uh all this information is possible to get in numerous different ways right like if you want to find out about a company, almost any company, any tech startup that is like pre-seed through series B right now, you or I could get their most recent fundraising deck by the end of the day if we actually wanted to, right?
37:47And for 99 % of companies, it's a bad idea to even copy it. For the next order or magnitude of companies, it's like, okay, so... you know maybe there is something there but like just having the deck isn't enough to really like create some sort of like geopolitical advantage there's just a lot of steps to like actual like you know shifting the geopolitical balance again it's going to blow up and it's going to be really it's going to be a really big like brand issue and it's going to be something that people really have to fight through and like work through these questions it's tough for it's tough for AngelList because founders already are not generally super excited about their deal going on that platform because of the information issues just getting a thousand people.
38:34And Carta had a similar thing where they were like kind of selling data or something. Carta was... They were trying to do secondary transactions, right? Private market or cap tables should inherently be private and owned by the company. And Carta was leveraging that information to catalyze their secondary market, which was the entire reason that they were going to be a$10 billion company. Because if they become like the NASDAQ or secondaries, that's about it. Yeah, like massively. They can make 5 % on every trade. They're huge blocks of trades. You could be facilitating billions of dollars of trades a year.
39:07If it worked, it would have been... Much more valuable than just a sales product. Yeah, the people that are like, who's investing in Carta at an$8 billion valuation? It's like, well, if you can be the platform for secondary transactions and get 5 % rate on everything, like you're such an unbelievably large business it's insane um but yeah i don't know do we know who like do we know who was running home yet like is this guy there's some dude who's like running around right investing he probably was very well loved because he's like you get two million for your fund you get two million for your fund we're backing your next syndicate deal right like it's really like money is like a way to make fast friends in the valley right yeah that's true everybody loves a loose lp um what else should we uh should we do this one uh oh yeah that's great i mean uh so it's funny i've dm i have no idea do you i actually don't know who's behind the account at all i don't but they seemingly came from like finance twitter and like just inserted themselves because like yeah it's one of these things where it's like it might not even be a girl totally totally who knows um but good good posts so sophie says i think we can do away with seed series a b etc either a round is a vibe round or an excel round and then matt turk says uh something like this with the midwit meme and the midwit meme is just at the early stages vibes in the midwit is excel it's all it's all vibes and i mean we're certainly seeing that with with like vibe rounds getting done in the seed stage and then also vibe rounds getting done and you know tens of billions and beyond the tens of those are the real vibe rounds yeah do you think do you think it just all comes down to the founders of ability to create a vibe round at any point in time is it always better to have a lower cost of capital through a vibe round?
41:06Vibe round feels like inflated valuation, like higher multiple. When I hear 100x revenue multiple, that sounds vibey. I think a better way to look at it is, does a company have product market fit or narrative market fit? And you actually get crazier multiples for narrative market fit because it's all just... And so an example being, if you have product market fit and you have 2 million of ARR and you're adding a million of ARR every three months, you could probably go out and raise at like 60, right? Because somebody's like, okay, like this is, you know, great momentum. This thing's working. If you have narrative market fit and like venture capitalists are sort of applying this lens to your business, which is like, this is a crazy new market and a crazy team and they're just going to figure it out.
41:58You can also get the 60, right? And so I often think whether it's truly like a PMF round or a vibe round, they get done in a similar range. If the caliber of founder is relatively equal, the real crazy multiples come when it's both, right? When you have the product market fit and the narrative market fit. And I I'd give the example of that company, Harvey, which has, they're the legal AI company. And, you know, they have probably 10 million of ARR or tens of millions. I don't actually know. I think, like, people talk about their metrics, but it's sort of unclear. But the narrative market fit, which is that LLMs are going to dominate the legal industry, is so strong that why would you not do this round at 800 million, right?
42:52like just crazy multiple because yeah yeah they're the category winner and like the narrative tracks and it's not like the early days of llm development where i mean what open ai probably made no money for like eight years right it was incorporated in what 2016 or something like that like as a non-profit for that reason and like all of those labs didn't really have products that anyone wanted to buy for a very long time right even gpt1 gpt2 like they had apis even the first gpt3 It was like kind of cool, but no one could figure out a way to like really incorporate it in a product Yeah, there was a company this company copy.ai Yeah Rocketed to like 20 million of air because they've kind of figured out how to actually figured out how to how to leverage the API and it was Great and I think they had to completely pivot because people just started using chat GPT Right, because it did exactly that for way less money.
43:47Yeah, there was another one to some sort of writing assistant and I think it had like one of those personal names, like not Harvey, but it was like a human name. Yeah, so I think Vibe Rounds or Excel Rounds is right, but the way to look at it is to say, is this a product market fit? You know, sort of like we're doubling down on this like momentum, like actual business traction, or is it narrative or is it both? And that's the crazy stuff. Yeah, there does seem to be like a certain type of founder that you can just like will a Vibe Round into, like Adam Newman to your point earlier. Well, it's category dependent, right?
44:20But right now, if you're... Because, yeah, I mean, WeWork was not in some AI megatrend, right? There was no megatrend in, oh yeah, of course real estate in 10 years is going to be completely different. Whereas the legal profession, it's pretty consensus that the tools are going to get better. Who's going to be the winner? What will the market structure be? There's a lot of questions there. But you can clearly build a thesis around that. Whereas saying that the real estate market is going to be dramatically different in 10, 20 years, that's not an optimal assumption. I think the WeWork was an incredible product, partially because it was venture subsidized.
44:59The fact that you could pay$300 a month to walk into a beautiful space and have a desk and have coffee and snacks, they were just not charging enough. right and then you combine that with incredible positioning around and storytelling from adam around what does this actually become we work is you know a dominant brand within all within everyone's daily life right like something that is the whole vision of apartments and offices and yeah um you know it was easy to buy into that when he was adding a new we work every two days and I'm sure the retention when it was really cheap was great and, you know, people loved the product.
45:42And, you know, I think so, again, that's him. He was forcing the narrative. But the product market fit was real. Yeah. He was able to, like, sprinkle the vibes on top. Yeah, I think it's funny as founders, really convincing founders. The most convincing founders convince themselves first. and then by nature of being 100 % convicted, they, like Breslow's a good example, right? Breslow, when he goes out and pitches, is 110 % convicted in what he's saying. So much so that other people are like, this sounds crazy, but like, this guy's convinced and he's gotten this far, so like, why would you not bet on him, right?
46:28I think that wears off eventually. You think it wears off just because you become jaded because as you get further in your career, you realize, wow, I was 100 % convicted about that particular thing, and it didn't pan out, therefore maybe I should be less convicted about the next thing. I think it wears off on a founder-to-founder level. Nobody stopped believing in TK. Imagine what Uber would be today. It would probably be Waymo. I think they have a partnership now or something. but you know. I wonder if there's anything that you can do to like upregulate conviction almost like the it's like the inverse ayahuasca thing you know.
47:10Yeah. I mean I guess for some of the psychedelics like it does seem you know there was kind of that counteraction to well like Steve Jobs took psychedelics and he came back like extremely you know you know focused and and and probably more aggressive about, you know, I know the truth. I know that like this product is the right one. And he was like, you know, unwilling to accept a plastic, you know, like a plastic screen on the phone. Like it had to be glass because like, that's what he like knew to be true. Meanwhile, the Apple designers today are like, we're gonna put the camera off set from the back of the phone so that people have to buy a case, which is going to increase our AOV by 6 % and drive meaningful.
47:58Where it's like, oh, you made a phone that doesn't sit flat and the camera lens sits on the, like. Yeah. So, yeah, I think the topic of psychedelics is a funny one because I do think that the technology industry has for a long time benefited from it, but it actually went too far, right? yeah and yeah the whole ayahuasca by itself i think will be studied like to me that's like the overdosing on lsd of our generation where like a lot of people use lsd and you know experience some range of benefits from it right the psychedelics might have just straight up been weaker back in the jobs days yeah he might have been taking like one tenth of the dose that like some tech middle manager takes on some ayahuasca retreat yeah like turbo fries their brain or whatever yeah the funny thing about the average i've always always avoided it had no interest in it and fundamentally like you know would have had had plenty of opportunities where i could have and opportunities where i could have chosen to do something like that.
49:12But once people understand the actual nature of an ayahuasca retreat, most of them involve going with 120 to 100 strangers and sitting in a room. And the stories I've heard of people saying like, yeah, I was in a room with 100 people. Everybody's laying in a cot, throwing up having an exorcism the funny thing is is people end up ultimately losing themselves so much that that i've heard of uh men starting to masturbate in these sort of like group things i know these two girls that run a popular health podcast in la and they were approached by this uh they were approached by this company in costa rica that said hey come come down and experience like you know it's it's on us it's comped and they were they were telling me the story they were like yeah a bunch of like half the room was throwing up 10 of the room was just masturbating and and i was like oh my god i'm so sorry and they were like no no it was incredible i was like i was like uh and what did you get out of it you come these people come back and they're even more lost like it seems like it sends you down this um turbo fry i think i think mark called it turbo frying yeah it was a land shark who he posted like the screenshot of land shark saying like you know you get your gigafry your brain turbo normies get their get their brain gigafried because they're like they're not settled spiritually and they go into this and that's the The thing with psychedelics, if you are incredibly mentally stable and fortified and you do these things, it can have a positive effect in terms of helping you see things in a new way.
51:06You have to imagine that. I mean, I don't know exactly Jobs' timeline for this stuff, but it's possible that he had already created a billion dollars of value and created some of the greatest advances in computing history ever. And so going into that, you're probably pretty confident. You're not like, where's my place in the world? He's going into that experience thinking, my place in the world is to create great technology, and I'm really fucking good at it. And so I'm just doubling down on that when I come out of this. And psychedelics help you see things from new angles. That's the best way that I think for somebody that hasn't ever tried them to look at it is like you're looking at an object.
51:48like you're looking at a computer and your entire life you've looked at it one way and psychedelics help you view it from like this way yeah and you're just like okay what if we you know made the whole back structure clear so you could see into the machine right and it's like that becomes an iconic feature of the product but it wasn't like steve went into a cave and then invented computing right like it was like he didn't come out with like the circuit board yeah it was more so I think he deserves credit for things like design and deeply prioritizing the user and coming and thinking about products in new ways and delivering elegant versions of that right I do have a friend who is already like one of the most aggressive people I know and has always been and he did acid one time and he and I was like oh what was that like he's like yeah like stuff like you know wiggled around but my number one takeaway was that I need to be more aggressive it just makes you more of you yeah yeah i was like that's the opposite of what you normally hear about where it's like oh i was like it's so at peace with the world like you know i need to like think completely but it's like i need to be even more aggressive it's like yeah already one of the most aggressive guys okay should we talk about uh turner's tweet i kind of like this one you see this tech tech ecosystems right now sf our most important startup is imploding NYC, our mayor just got indicted for corruption.
53:16Europe, we are banning AI. China, VCs are suing all the founders. Des Moines, Iowa, we'd like to buy 50 % of your company for 50K. I think it's great. I mean, it's pretty much... Did you see the chart of the Chinese startup formation? How it just fell off a cliff and no one's starting companies there? Yeah, because they can clot. So for those that didn't see it, basically if your company fails, they can come after all of your personal assets, which feels fairly communist, which makes sense. Makes sense. But yeah, I mean, I think it's like that's why that's what makes technology beautiful, right?
54:00It's not just like people like try to blunt put tech in a single bucket. And even to people that aren't in the industry, if they ask me what I do, I say I'm in tech. right and then they have an idea of what that means but tech is so different in different like you it's surprisingly like different in different locales right like it's still operating yeah if you the real alpha the real alpha is to go to the midwest and just start offering slightly better terms yeah i'll give you 50 on 500 yeah 55k yeah 50 percent yeah i mean the funny is that like these are framed as like they're all in chaos. Like it's all bad news everywhere.
54:46Like everything's falling apart. But I read this as like you have to be in a major American city. I would choose SF in New York where one startup is employing and the mayor is getting indicted versus banning AI, BC suing founders or clearly like capital markets that are just like, you know, defunct, basically. It's like, yeah, like SF, I don't even know if I buy the imploding narrative, but like if it is, that's a lot of opportunity. That's maybe creative destruction or creative disruption. Maybe there'll be, you know, other - Time for us to go join OpenAI and climb the ladder. That's the long-term.
55:24What's your long-term vision for Technology Brothers?
55:30COO, CMO of OpenAI. Yeah, a more hostile takeover. you know they always talk about like the the you know sam altman and if you drop him on the island he could become like the cannibal it's like no i could even do it better i could do it better the knife yeah um yeah who knows but i i do think that uh there's this tendency to latch on to headlines and just everything behind the headline in every single one of those cities there's amazing companies that are hitting their stride finding you know i don't know except in europe except in europe europe seems in a lot of shambles shambles it seems we it's time to colonize europe yeah they colonized america well i was i was trying to colonize it i was joking about like yeah like either in germany or or france like yeah france specifically like you know it just seems like authoritarianism is on the rise like they're banning free speech they're banning like they're arresting paul durov the telegram guy and it's like yeah every every 80 years like america has to go in and like clean clean it out clean house clean house like like we gotta go all right this was a fun social experiment exactly there's only one form of government that actually works yeah and we're here to yeah yeah let's reinvade we've we've brought democracy we've exported democracy it's the greatest export right it is free markets and democracy yeah but sometimes people forget that yeah yeah yeah what else was on the docket today What else do we have?
57:05I had a funny moment today, or a funny moment this week that you'll appreciate. Yeah. Somebody asked me about Excel and blah, blah, and they were like, yeah, I really thought that I've been working on a pouch concept. I think that it could be really good business to just get to like 40 to 50 million in cash flow. Yeah. And I was like, yeah, yeah. I mean, that's like cool story, bro. I was like, you're going to go into one of the most cutthroat competitive industries seven to eight years behind Lucy. And then just think that you're going to like ride to like cash flowing some asset from zero as there's all this money coming in and like turmoil.
57:51while and it made me think of something that i think is a topic yeah that that more people need to understand is like there's this attitude within like the like startup founder of like i'm going to try to find these like easier ideas and usually usually they land on ideas that are perceived to be easy for some reason which is like okay i get a plastic thing yeah put nicotine pouches in it and I just start selling it and I'll get to like 40, 50 mil and just cash flow it. It's not a venture thing, but like, and there's this idea too that for some reason, cash flow businesses are easier to build when it's like, okay, would you have been able to get, you wouldn't have been, Lucy wouldn't have been able to survive without venture capital to get to the where it's possible.
58:44And so I think it's like, it's probably a topic that will, I mean, I just see it come up all the time where people are trying to find easy ideas. The exception in the tobacco category and the nicotine space is just straight up being illegal. There are companies that cash flow a lot because they just break all the laws and they just don't do anything. But they're very short-lived and there's no equity value. I think when people think like a cash flowing asset, it's like, oh yeah, it'll cash flow for a long time. Not like, I mean, like all the vape businesses. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. A lot of these, a lot of these vape businesses like popped up overnight.
59:24Yeah. Just like completely broke whatever rule was in place. And it's like, well, you know, big tobacco isn't going to break that rule. Juul isn't going to break that rule anymore. Like has been, you know, like if there's a flavor ban, they can just move around it or whatever. But yeah, it's, it's. Yeah. So that, that was something that came up multiple times this week where founders were just searching for what they perceived to be an easy idea because it was very tangible. And then you're just like, no, well, you know, you know that this is like going to be extremely difficult on all these dimensions.
59:57And you've had a, and in that situation, I was like, best in class team with Lucy that's been executing on the same vision for almost closer to a decade than a first year. And so that was funny. And then the other thing that came up that I think is funny, the text that I sent to a buddy was, real men raise pre-product. Because I have a friend who's starting a new company. And he's done well previously. He's hiring engineers for the new company, but he hasn't raised yet. And I was texting him wanting to invest. And he's like, yeah, we're going to wait until we get to some revenue traction. I was like, God, like it's so soft.
1:00:42Just like, you know, like, and that's again, like the vibe round versus like the traction round is like, I'll give you the valuation that you will get when you have the traction. I'll give it to you now. But like, just fucking sit, like send it, send it. Yeah. Like be a man, like raise. Like if you have conviction, have some conviction in your idea, raise pre-products. Like it's soft to do anything otherwise. like the venture economy depends on people going full send yeah yeah you're hurting the economy i always i always laugh thinking about this uh this conversation that uh mark andrewson was having with king griffin and he's talking about like his earlier funds and how he was like kind of trading his own money and then he like scaled up the fund raised got some lps like got some meat bigger and bigger and now you know he still owns like a huge amount of it but he was just like you know mark and yeah obviously as you know like you know if you don't if you don't get some capital behind you like you don't go very far and he just said it like it was just like such a truism and like it was just such a funny like disregard like anyone who's like oh bootstrapping like yeah it's like no no no like not if you want to play in his league yeah it was just like it was just like Yeah, like obviously you need capital if you have a good idea and are moving quickly and want to like actually win and play some like deeper, bigger game.
1:02:10But the myth of like, oh yeah, a lot of ventures burn out, therefore some sort of lifestyle business must be easier or something. I've never liked it. Yeah, the issue when people analyze bootstrap versus venture businesses is they'll be like, look at this business. It was bootstrapped and it sold for a billion dollars. Yeah. and they're like look at this company this company had to raise 300 million dollars to get to a billion dollars discounting the fact that the bootstrap business took 30 years you know like they're like look they were able to bootstrap and it's like yeah you'll be 70 years old like uh um so anyways real men i'll just end this podcast
From the publisher
TBPN.com is made possible by:
Ramp - https://ramp.com
Eight Sleep - https://eightsleep.com/tbpn
Wander - https://wander.com/tbpn
Public - https://public.com
AdQuick - https://adquick.com
Bezel - https://getbezel.com
Polymarket - https://polymarket.com
Follow TBPN:
https://TBPN.com
https://x.com/tbpn
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/technology-brothers/id1772360235
https://youtube.com/@technologybrotherspod?si=lpk53xTE9WBEcIjV


