An economist answers your questions on love

25 Oct 2024 · 10 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Notes: The Indicator from Planet Money - "An Economist Answers Your Questions on Love"

Overview In the final installment of "Love Week" on *The Indicator*, economists provide insights on relationship dilemmas faced by listeners. The episode features economist Tim Harford, who answers questions about love using economic principles.

Key Themes and Concepts

  • Game Theory in Relationships: The concept of anticipating and responding to choices made by partners is explored, particularly in the context of dating and financial decisions.
  • Economic Surplus in Love: Relationships can be viewed through the lens of economic surplus, where one partner may gain more than the other, yet still find happiness in the relationship.
  • Communication and Negotiation: Addressing and discussing financial responsibilities within relationships is crucial, especially in cases of disproportionate income.

Summary of Listener Questions and Responses

  1. Question from Bob:

*What should I do if she doesn't love me as much as I love her?*

  • Tim Harford's Insight:
  • Bob is experiencing a situation where he is receiving the majority of the "surplus" in the relationship.
  • Harford encourages Bob to reframe his perspective, as he is in a favorable position, potentially giving him a reason to feel grateful rather than sad.
  1. Question from Anita:

*How to deal with disproportional income and responsibilities in a long-term relationship?*

  • Tim Harford's Insight:
  • Referencing Gary Becker's theory, Harford discusses the traditional specialization of roles in relationships.
  • He acknowledges that modern dynamics often challenge this theory, as women increasingly occupy higher-paying roles while still handling disproportionate unpaid labor.
  • Harford suggests that Anita should communicate directly and negotiate responsibilities with her partner.
  1. Question from Caroline:

*Is it rude not to offer to pay for half of a first date?*

  • Tim Harford's Insight:
  • This scenario is analyzed through the lens of game theory, where Caroline’s intentions and her date’s expectations interact.
  • Harford discusses the signaling involved in dating norms and encourages Caroline to consider her priorities regarding the outcome of the date.
  1. Question from Hannah:

*How can I express my love in a novel way after being in a long-term relationship?*

  • Tim Harford's Insight:
  • Emphasizing the importance of actions over words, Harford refers to the concept of "cheap talk" in economics.
  • He suggests that Hannah focus on demonstrating her love through meaningful actions rather than simply repeating verbal affirmations.

Conclusion

  • The episode uniquely combines economic theories with advice on personal relationships, providing a humorous yet insightful perspective on love.
  • Harford’s responses encourage listeners to apply economic concepts to their romantic lives, fostering better understanding and communication.
  • "Love Week" wraps up with a light-hearted acknowledgment of the ongoing "cuffing season," keeping the mood festive.

Related Episodes

  • Trying to fix the dating app backlash
  • How American heiresses became Dollar Princesses
  • Why the publishing industry is hot (and bothered) for romance
  • It's Love Week! How the TV holiday rom-com got so successful

Production Credits

  • Produced by: Julia Ritchie
  • Engineering by: Kwesi Lee
  • Fact-checked by: Sierra Juarez
  • Edited by: Kicking Cannon
  • Theme Song: Grant-Lee Phillips
  • Artwork: Kaitlin Brito

For more insights, check out other episodes of *The Indicator from Planet Money* on platforms like Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01NPR.

0:11You know, Waylon, we turn to economists all the time on the indicator for their expertise and their insights on so many topics, right? from interest rates to international trade. That's right, Adrian. So we thought, why not turn to economists for their love advice? It is love week on the indicator. Yes, and our co-host Darian Woods recently went to an economist get-together at a bowling alley in Pennsylvania. True story. He asked attendees for their tips on love. Ara Karazian, I'm an economist at Square. A key principle of economics is that people make the best decisions with the best information.

0:52And I found that to be true and love, too. Daryl Fairweather, chief economist at Redfin. So there's this great movie, I highly recommend it, called Who Can Play That Game, starring Vivica A. Fox and Morris Chestnut. And in the movie, Morris Chestnut starts, you know, stepping out, flirting with other women. And they look at A. Fox. Instead of getting in a fight, she uses game theory. She starts flirting with other men, throwing that in her guy's face. And that's what wins him back. So I think economics can really help you kind of understand how power works in relationships that way and the power of outside options.

1:27Cardiff Garcia, editorial director of the Economic Innovation Group and former co-host of the Indicator from Planet Money. It's a great podcast I hear. Yeah, it's all right. It's all right. All right. What's one thing that economics has taught you about love? About love. Oh, God. How much time do you have? This is The Indicator from Planet Money. I'm Adrian Ma. And I'm Waylon Wong. On our final installment of Love Week, we ask listeners to send us their most pressing relationship questions to pose to an economist. After the break, friend of the show Tim Harford answers your questions with sage economic wisdom.

2:10This message comes from LinkedIn ads. One of the hardest parts about B2B marketing is reaching the right audience. That's why you need LinkedIn ads. You can target your buyers by job title, company, role, seniority, and skills. All the professionals you need to reach in one place. Get a$250 credit on your next campaign so you can try it yourself. Just go to linkedin.com slash nprpod. That's linkedin.com slash nprpod.

2:41This message comes from NPR sponsor HP. Easily search through personal files, gain valuable insights, and make smarter, more informed business decisions. Unlock the future of work today with the HP AI PC. With the right tools, work doesn't have to feel like work. To learn more, go to hp.com slash AI PC. This message comes from Amazon Business. Free your team from time-consuming office tasks with smart business buying tools. Enable buyers to find and purchase items fast. Learn more about the technology, insights, and support available at amazonbusiness.com. This message comes from Grammarly. From emails to reports and project proposals, it's hard to meet the demands of today's competing priorities without some help.

3:51Tim Harford is host of the Cautionary Tales podcast, and he also writes a column for the Financial Times called Undercover Economist. Tim, you ready to answer some relationship questions? Yeah, I was born ready. And, you know, I'm 51, I have three children I haven't dated since the 1990s. So yeah, knock me out. Okay, our first question comes from Bob. Dear Economist, what do I do if she doesn't love me as much as I love her? So is there anything we can do here, Tim, to kind of reassure Bob? I mean, we could just sort of shed a little tear. That was so sad. But well, okay, if she doesn't love him as much as he loves her, but she's still perfectly happy to be with him, then that's great.

4:36He's actually getting the best half of this deal. You're the one who should be happy. We economists call this surplus. Of all the surplus from that deal, you're getting 95 % of the surplus. So you win. So really, the situation Bob is describing is a situation where he is totally winning at this relationship. So actually, why am I feeling sorry for Bob at all? We should be giving Bob a high five. He's in a great situation. He just needs to reframe it. I hope that makes you feel a little better, Bob. Our next one comes from Anita in California. And she writes, Dear Economist, My partner of a decade makes a significantly less amount of money than I do.

5:17We have a young child now, and it's made the burden even more disproportional on me because there is a lot that I have to shoulder financially and also in terms of actual care. How do people deal with disproportional income and responsibility? When I heard Anita's problem, it made me think of Gary Becker. So Gary Becker was a great economist, won the Nobel Memorial Prize for applying economic ideas to other non-economic parts of life. so discrimination, crime, but also to the family. And Becca had this big idea that families might specialize. So you'd have one partner who would work really hard and get really good at their job and get paid a lot of money, so you're maximizing the family income, and the other partner would work really hard on unpaid labor and get really good at cooking and cleaning and childcare.

6:14And it sort of makes sense if you're living in, say, 1970. But now in the 21st century, what we have is quite a lot of women in Anita's situation where they're the ones who have got the high-paying job. They're working really hard. They've got really valuable, marketable skills, and they're earning most of the family income. And yet somehow, despite the predictions of Gary Becker's theory, they're also doing a disproportionate amount of the childcare and the housework. Because it turns out there's more going on here than just economics. There's all kinds of social pressures and traditions, and we still live in a sexist society.

6:49So it sounds like it might just require Anita to sort of communicate directly and even negotiate these responsibilities with her partner. Yeah. Which is not going to be easy, right? Because sometimes advocating for yourself in that way disrupts this kind of lovey-dovey romantic equilibrium that we like to imagine that we live in, but sometimes life is difficult. Sadly, yes. Okay, let's move on to the next question, which comes from Caroline. She writes, I, a heterosexual female, always used to reach for my wallet at the end of a first date, though admittedly, mostly to give my date the opportunity to look chivalrous.

7:32But in the past several years, I've noticed more and more of my dates actually take me up on my offer to pay half of the date to the point that I've actually stopped reaching for my wallet altogether. Is it rude for me not to offer to pay for half of a first date? This is such a fantastic question. So I'd like to think about this in terms of game theory. So game theory is the study of basically how you're interacting with people. You're trying to make an optimal choice, but they also have a choice. And so you're trying to anticipate what their choice will be and they're trying to anticipate what your choice will be.

8:06So that's game theory. So there's a little mini game here, which is who pays for the first date. And what she's trying to do is signal that she's willing to pay for half, but she doesn't actually want the signal to be picked up. She wants the guy to pay for everything. Of course she does. She's thinking like an economist. Why would you want to pay for stuff that you could have for free? So the question I think she really faces is, does she want to kind of win the date so to speak and get get the guy to pay for the for the food or does she want to generate valuable information like to discover whether this is the kind of person who is going to insist on paying or not and well which is the more valuable it really all depends on how often you expect your first date to turn into second dates to turn to third dates and so on.

9:02Here's another question from our listener, Hannah. Hannah writes, I've been with my lovely partner for almost six years now. Having been together so long, the words, I love you, are a bit less impactful than when we first started dating. It's taken the place of saying, good morning, or see you later. How do I express how much I love them in a novel way? Economists are all about judging people by their actions rather than by their words. I mean, in economics, we have this concept of cheap talk. I mean, you can say whatever you like, but what actually matters is what you do. And what you do signals the kind of person you are, signals your preferences, signals everything that matters.

9:45So I think it's very clear that Hannah needs to demonstrate her love for her partner through her actions. Far be it from me to explain what those actions might be. But I mean, just to throw an idea out there, something my wife and I do every month or so is to arrange a surprise for each other. But however you do it, it can't be with words. It's got to be with actions. There you go, Hannah, straight from an economist. I love it. Well, you say that, Adrian, but who cares what you say? What I care is what you do. Well, what I'm doing is thanking you, Tim, for providing your economic insights. It's Tim Harford.

10:28Thank you so much for coming on Love Week on The Indicator. Always a pleasure. Thank you. Waylon, I cannot believe that Love Week is over. I know. It's bittersweet. But cuffing season has only just begun. You know what? You're right. Let's play our theme song one more time to get people in the mood. Love Week was produced by Julia Ritchie with engineering by Kwesi Lee. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez and edited by Kicking Cannon. Thanks to Grant Lee Phillips for our theme song and Caitlin Brito for episode artwork. The Indicator is a production of NPR. It's Love Week. It's Love Week. It's Love Week.

11:12This message comes from The Economist. Introducing The Economist Insider, a new video offering with twice-weekly shows featuring in-depth analysis and expertise to make sense of an increasingly complex and dangerous world. More at economist.com slash insider. This message comes from Vanguard. Capturing value in the bond market is not easy. That's why Vanguard offers a suite of over 80 institutional quality bond funds actively managed by a 200-person global team of sector specialists, analysts, and traders. They're designed for financial advisors looking to give their clients consistent results year in and year out.

11:52See the record at Vanguard.com slash audio. That's Vanguard.com slash audio. All investing is subject to risk. Vanguard Marketing Corporation Distributor. This message comes from NPR sponsor Charles Schwab with its original podcast on investing. Each week, hosts Lizanne Saunders, Schwab's Chief Investment Strategist, and Kathy Jones, Schwab's Chief Fixed Income Strategist, along with their guests, analyze economic developments and bring context to conversations around stocks, fixed income, the economy, and more. Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com slash oninvesting or wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher
We ask economists for their expertise all the time on The Indicator, so why not their tips on love? On our final installment of Love Week, we ask economist Tim Harford to answer listeners' relationship quandaries, from paying for a first date to alternatives to saying, 'I love you.'

Thanks to Grant-Lee Phillps for composing our Love Week theme song and Kaitlin Brito for artwork.

Related episodes:
Trying to fix the dating app backlash (Apple / Spotify)
How American heiresses became Dollar Princesses (Apple / Spotify)
Why the publishing industry is hot (and bothered) for romance (Apple / Spotify)
It's Love Week! How the TV holiday rom-com got so successful (Apple / Spotify)

For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at
plus.npr.org.

Music by
Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy

More from The Indicator from Planet Money

All 541 episodes
An economist answers your questions on loveThe Indicator from Planet Money · 10 min
Listen in VO