Overly Friendly Emails and other marketing pet peeves

31 Mar 2025 · 9 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: Overly Friendly Emails and Other Marketing Pet Peeves

Podcast Information

  • Title: The Indicator from Planet Money
  • Description: A bite-sized show about big ideas that helps listeners make sense of today's economy in less than 10 minutes.

Episode Overview

  • Episode Title: Overly Friendly Emails and Other Marketing Pet Peeves
  • Description: This episode features three advertising experts discussing their pet peeves about current advertising practices, focusing on how brands communicate and engage with consumers.

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. "Your Cool Friend" Marketing Tone
  2. Highlighted by: Joe Burns, Strategy Lead at Quality Meets Creative
  3. Concept:
  4. Brands are adopting a tone trying to portray themselves as relatable and friendly, resembling a "cool friend."
  5. Example: J. Crew’s email about a simple order felt overly enthusiastic and personal.
  6. Critique:
  7. This approach has become common, diluting its effectiveness and distinctiveness.
  8. Originated from brands like Wendy's that adopted a snarky, witty tone on social media, making it a generic marketing strategy.
  1. Generational Labels
  2. Highlighted by: Sir John Hegarty, Co-founder of Bartle Bogle Hegarty
  3. Concept:
  4. Generational labels like Gen X or Millennials are seen as marketing stereotypes that exclude rather than include diverse consumer identities.
  5. They are criticized as simplistic and not reflective of the complex nature of consumer behavior.
  6. Quote: "Generational labels are just horoscopes for marketers. They are lazy."
  1. Digital Advertising Double Standards
  2. Highlighted by: Katie Keating, Creative Director at Fancy
  3. Concern:
  4. Advertising standards on platforms like Meta, Google, and TikTok restrict straightforward discussions about women's health and sexuality.
  5. Phrases like "S-E-G-G-S" instead of "sex" illustrate a culture of shame surrounding women's bodies.
  6. Critique:
  7. There's a perceived double standard in how men's health topics are presented compared to women's.
  8. A call for more nuanced and human-centered reviews of content policies to avoid censorship of essential conversations regarding women’s health.

Conclusion and Final Thoughts

  • The episode concludes with a discussion about the importance of variety in branding and marketing. Sir John Hegarty emphasizes that brands should strive to differentiate themselves rather than conform to generic trends.
  • The conversation highlights a broader theme of marketing practices that often prioritize relatability over authenticity, leading to a homogenization of brand voices and approaches.

Related Episodes

  • [How to make an ad memorable](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-indicator-from-planet-money/id1320118593?i=1000647314314)
  • [J. Screwed](https://www.npr.org/2020/05/22/861378110/j-screwed)
  • [The Gender Gap Series: The Problem With The Pink Tax](https://www.npr.org/2019/08/15/751440592/the-gender-gap-series-the-problem-with-the-pink-tax)

Additional Information

  • Fact-Checking: Sierra Juarez
  • Music: Drop Electric
  • Follow: [TikTok](https://www.tiktok.com/@planetmoney), [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/planetmoney/), [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/planetmoney), [Newsletter](https://www.npr.org/newsletter/money)

This episode provides a critical examination of contemporary advertising practices, encouraging brands to embrace individuality and authenticity while addressing issues of inclusivity and representation in marketing.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This podcast discusses Google and Meadow, which are financial supporters of NPR. NPR.

0:16So the other day, Adrian, I bought some extremely ordinary pants. They were plain Navy chinos from J.Crew. As opposed to unusual pants? They were not going to win any awards for novelty. Okay, so you were in the market for some classic, you know, preppy American clothes at reasonable prices. Yeah, J. Guru's slogan is heritage made modern. And so it surprised me that when my order arrived, I got this email. Subject line, best news ever, your order has arrived. Psst, check your mailbox, doorstep, wherever. And there were three exclamation marks here. We hope you really, really love it. Wow, that's like a uncomfortably personal tone to take from a marketing email.

1:01It would make sense if it was like selling ice cream or something, but it was just kind of incongruous to what I thought the brand was about. This is something that I've been calling your cool friend, TM. So brand strategist Joe Burns thinks J.Crew is part of a wider plague. It's a tone of voice, a type of personality that more and more brands are adopting. They're trying to make it feel that, you know, they're just relatable. They're your friend, but slightly cooler. The coolest one of your friends is what they want to be. Your cool friend, TM. Well, this is the indicator from Planet Money. We're your cool friends.

1:39I'm Adrian Ma. And I'm Darian Woods. Also your friend. Questionable, though, whether I'm cool. The pervasiveness of your cool friend, TM, is starting to grind Joe Burns' gears. And maybe yours, too. That's why today on the show, we are looking at three pet peeves in advertising. Our guests will vent and come up with some new ideas after the break.

2:28your way and pursue your educational and career goals without missing a beat. A different future is closer than you think with Capella University. Learn more at capella.edu. Support for this podcast and the following message come from Recorded Future. Every day, millions of cyber threats compete for attention, but only a few truly matter to your business. As a leading threat intelligence company, Recorded Future cuts through the noise with precision intelligence. That's why top banks and governments trust them. Because security leaders don't just react. They foresee, spotting the signals that others miss and acting before threats become setbacks.

3:07Recorded future. Know what matters. Act first. This message comes from Grammarly. From emails to reports and project proposals, it's hard to meet the demands of today's competing priorities without some help. Grammarly is the essential AI communication assistant that boosts your productivity at work so you can get more of what you need done faster. Just a few clicks can tailor your tone and writing so you come across exactly as you intend. Get time back to focus on your high-impact work. Download Grammarly for free at grammarly.com slash podcast. That's grammarly.com slash podcast.

3:45So advertising rant number one. Every brand speaking like it's your cool best friend. Joe Burns is the strategy lead at the ad agency Quality Meets Creative. You go back 10 years, you'd have brands like Old Spice being this kind of crazy dude on a horse. Look at your man. Now back to me. Now back at your man. Now back to me. Sadly, he isn't me. You'd have one of my favorite brands, The Economist. You know, they had this really austere tone of voice with, you know, it kind of sounded like an MBA grad who's read a dozen books before breakfast. Good evening. Good evening. It's Henry Kissinger. You know, brands used to have a tone of voice that was designed to be distinctive and to cut through and to be really noticeable to consumers.

4:31Yeah, and then came social media and the rise of your cool best friend, TM. All of this, I think, started off with the likes of Wendy's. So Wendy's on Twitter were one of the first brands to really employ this tone. Around 2017, Wendy's ditched its polite corporate voice on Twitter and kind of went off the rails. It roasted customers and started talking trash to McDonald's in the comments. Yeah, so like a customer would tweet, is it shameful to be eating Wendy's food while sitting in a McDonald's parking lot? And Wendy's would tweet back, you're probably raising the property value, TBH. Is this cool or is this just kind of like snarky?

5:09It's snarky and cool. Now, Joe, he says he isn't criticizing the pioneers of this voice. But what I do feel like is that this tone of voice has become so pervasive, it's kind of become the new generic, and it's lost its cool edge because every brand starts to speak like that. Joe thinks this kind of witty tone became popular with brands because it boosts its ability to get shares and likes and reposts on social media. What does immediately very well, it tends to be that relatable tone of voice. The problem there is you're already talking to an audience who's engaged with your brand, but there isn't necessarily the data that backs up that that tone of voice is going to also work for new customers too.

5:53Well, thank you, Joe Burns. And next we have our second marketing gripe. This one is from a legend inside the advertising industry, Sir John Hegarty. My market, well, I have a number of marketing gripes actually. He co-founded the advertising agency Bartle Bogle Hegarty. They've worked on everyone from Levi's to Nike to Ikea. And among his many marketing gripes, generational labels. This whole Gen X or Gen Y or Millennial, you know, is just marketing nonsense. Because it excludes, it doesn't include. And I think once you exclude, you're failing ultimately your shareholders. In fact, John doesn't think there is such a thing as a Gen Z or a baby boomer.

6:40He says this is just a marketing invention. So he does not believe that we should think of Gen Z people as digital natives who can't focus, or millennials as burnt out and unable to buy a house. We're talking about billions of people after all. So, you know, these are just stereotypes, he says, not market research. I've seen you've written that generational labels are just horoscopes for marketers. They are. They are. They're just an excuse. They're lazy. They aren't about thinking about how do I create a product that people admire and has value in it. And now for our final marketing frustration.

7:22Our guest, Katie Keating, is creative director at an ad agency called Fancy. And for her, this is more than a bugbear. She feels really strongly about the advertising gatekeepers at digital platforms like Meta, Google and TikTok. She says they won't allow brands to talk about women's bodies in a straightforward way. This kind of algo speak has started to show up lately where brands will have to, instead of saying sex, they have to spell it S-E-G-G-S or segs. Or instead of saying vagina, they say down there. And all of these things that will ultimately just tell women and culture at large that these things really should be censored and should be kept in the dark and are kind of shameful and shouldn't be talked about.

8:14But they really are normal aspects of everyday life for women. And what really irks Katie is that she thinks there are double standards for men. I mean, if you think about all the, like, erectile dysfunction ads that are, you know, everywhere all the time, all at once, just being, like, super direct. And women just can't, we just can't do that for ads. We asked Meta, Google, and TikTok for comment. They all said they allow for ads for a wide variety of women's health products. But they also had policies to avoid sexualized content. And none of them want pornography to be advertised. I think that that's actually very valid and we don't really want to have that.

8:58I think that there has to be a way then to have human beings review the work and make sure that it's not offensive in that way, that it's not a piece of dangerous content. I think the problem becomes when we are told that women's bodies and women's health is dangerous. And I think that in and of itself is actually what's dangerous. This year, six women health-related companies in the UK and Europe called for an investigation by the European Commission into the digital platforms for this alleged discrimination. And to some extent, this issue is about tech companies taking an easy path. following what all other digital platforms do.

9:47It's really kind of a herding behavior that is a theme across all of the three marketing pet peeves we've heard today. Whether it's shadow banning women's sexual health products, or adopting a your cool friend brand voice, or using generational labels. Sir John Hegarty is an evangelist for blazing a different path. Look at a forest. Are all the trees the same? Are all the plants the same? Nature understands. It wants variety. It makes you look again. It makes you see. And it has a functional value. It's in the same way a brand is. So what great brands try and do is say, no, this is different from everybody else.

10:29So maybe your dweebish friend might be the next thing. What do you think, Adrian? You've hit on a pioneering marketing concept. I can certainly play to type there. Darian Woods, your dweebish friend, TM.

From the publisher
Brands trying to be your best bud. Generational labels. Gendered double standards.

Today on the show: three advertising experts bring their three pet peeves in advertisements.

Related episodes:
How to make an ad memorable (Apple / Spotify)
J. Screwed
The Gender Gap Series: The Problem With The Pink Tax

For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.

Fact-checking by
Sierra Juarez. Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy

More from The Indicator from Planet Money

All 542 episodes
Overly Friendly Emails and other marketing pet peevesThe Indicator from Planet Money · 9 min
Listen in VO