Should we vote for all judges?

1 Apr 2025 · 9 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Episode Notes: Should We Vote for All Judges? | The Indicator from Planet Money

Summary In this episode, the podcast discusses Mexico's upcoming judicial reforms allowing citizens to directly elect federal and state judges for the first time in June. This change, championed by President Claudia Sheinbaum, aims to combat nepotism and enhance judicial integrity, although critics argue that it may undermine the court's independence.

Key Concepts

  • Judicial Reform in Mexico: Transition from appointed judges to elections.
  • Impact of Judicial Independence: Concerns over how these reforms might affect judicial capability and impartiality.
  • Economic Implications: Potential legal uncertainties could deter foreign investment.

Background

  • Judicial reforms are rooted in concerns from the 1990s about elitism and nepotism within Mexico's judiciary.
  • Historical Context: Attempts to professionalize the judiciary during the presidency of an economist.
  • Corruption Concerns: Estimates suggest about half of federal judges have relatives in the judicial system.

Political Dynamics

  • Current Leadership: President Claudia Sheinbaum and her predecessor, AMLO, have been vocal about reforming the judicial system due to perceived corruption.
  • Critics' Perspective: Some analysts argue that the reforms are an attempt by the government to diminish judicial power, as AMLO faced opposition from the judiciary during his presidency.

Changes in Judicial Elections

  • Election Process: Judges will be elected in two rounds, with half in June and the other half in 2027.
  • Candidate Qualifications: New regulations have lowered the barrier for qualifications, inviting a surge in applications (nearly 50,000).

Concerns and Reactions

  • Experts vs. Public Voting: There's skepticism about whether the public can adequately assess the qualifications of judges, especially for complex legal matters.
  • Economic Risks: Ratings agencies like Moody's have warned of potential downgrades in Mexico’s credit rating due to judicial uncertainties that could affect foreign companies.
  • Government Response: President Sheinbaum believes concerns are exaggerated and that the reforms will enhance judicial integrity.

Potential Consequences

  • Impact on Trade: With 30% of Mexico's GDP tied to trade with the U.S., the reforms could risk economic relationships.
  • Judicial Quality Concerns: The debate centers around whether newly elected judges will possess the necessary expertise to handle intricate legal cases.

Conclusion This episode of The Indicator highlights the significant shift in Mexico's judicial landscape and its implications for the economy and governance. While the intention behind these reforms is to democratize the judicial system and reduce corruption, there are deep concerns about the effectiveness and impact on business confidence and judicial quality.

Related Episodes

  • [SCOTUS: De-facto pro-business?](https://www.npr.org/2022/08/24/1119307426/scotus-de-facto-pro-business)

Production Credits

  • Produced by: Julia Ritchie
  • Engineering: Jimmy Keely and Robert Rodriguez
  • Fact-checked by: Cooper Katz-McKim
  • Editor: Cake and Canon
  • Production: NPR

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01NPR

0:11Over the last few years, we've heard a lot about investment in manufacturing booming in Mexico. This was a big deal a couple of years ago when the country became the United States' number one trading partner. Banks and credit rating agencies are now warning that Mexico's growth could be in jeopardy. And it's not just because of the ongoing trade war. They're pointing to judicial reform. Joining us today to talk about those reforms is our researcher and fact-checker, Sierra Juarez. Nice to have you on this side of the mic. Thank you, Darian. It's so nice to be here. So starting this year, every single judge in Mexico, both local and federal, will be elected by the people instead of appointed.

0:56Yasmin Robles-Cortes is one of those judges, and she says the changes are going to be challenging. We aren't politicians. We aren't trained for that. Today on the show, the debate over judicial reform in Mexico. Why is it happening now? What could the consequences be? And how uncertainty over this big change is creating an unsettling business environment in Mexico and potentially threatening its commercial relationship with the U.S.

1:28This message comes from NPR sponsor Capella University. Learning doesn't have to get in the way of life. With Capella's game-changing FlexPath learning format, you can set your own deadlines and learn on your own schedule. That means you don't have to put your life on hold to earn your degree. Instead, enjoy learning your way and pursue your educational and career goals without missing a beat. A different future is closer than you think with Capella University. Learn more at capella.edu. Support for this podcast and the following message come from Recorded Future. Every day, millions of cyber threats compete for attention, but only a few truly matter to your business.

2:11As a leading threat intelligence company, Recorded Future cuts through the noise with precision intelligence. That's why top banks and governments trust them. Because security leaders don't just react. They foresee spotting the signals that others miss and acting before threats become setbacks. Recorded Future. Know what matters. Act first. To really understand what's going on in Mexico right now, we need to look back to the 1990s. Back then, Mexico had an economist as its president, and he wanted to make the judicial branch more professional. David Lopez is an attorney. He also wrote the English language textbook on Mexican law that everyone seems to use.

2:52Mexico altered its judicial institutions to increase judicial independence, to increase the quality of the courts, and to increase the discipline of federal judges. But there were critics of the system. They said that it allowed the judiciary to continue to be pretty elitist. The fear was that a lot of wealthy or well-connected people were ending up in judicial positions. They then favored their wealthy or well-connected friends, both in their judicial decisions and their hiring practices. One estimate from Itam University in Mexico said that, yes, about half of the federal judges in Mexico have at least one family member working in the regional court system.

3:35And it's worth mentioning the researcher behind that study said the numbers alone weren't evidence of nepotism per se. Either way, this is the historical context for what's happening today. So both former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, better known as AMLO, and his protege, the current president Claudia Sheinbaum, said the system was rife with nepotism, not to mention corruption, and reform was needed. Amlo pushed through the policy change to elect judges in his final days as president last September. And since he left office, Shane Baum has been enthusiastically rolling it out.

4:13This is the defense of the people of Mexico. For justice, for honesty, for integrity, and for eradicating Mexico of what has caused so much harm to our country, which is corruption. Nepotism is corruption in the judiciary. David says there are questions, though, on whether combating nepotism is the real reason behind the reform. Instead, he points to Amlo's prickly relationship with judges when he was president. He continually ran into issues with the judiciary, the federal judiciary in particular, so that many of the social reforms, political reforms and legal reforms that he wanted to bring into existence, he met opposition.

5:02UMLO and the political party he founded, Morena, are popular in Mexico. They have the majority in both the House and the Senate. Claudia Shanebaum is part of the party too. David says UMLO chose to wield that power. He decided to use that political power to essentially eliminate his largest opponent, which is the Mexican judiciary. Starting this year, citizens will vote on judges from state-level positions to the Supreme Court justices. The elections will take place in two rounds. Half of the country's judges will run in June and the second half will run in 2027. The idea is to democratize the judicial system and have judges reflect regular people instead of a fancy judge calling the shots.

5:50Yasmin, the federal judge we heard from earlier, is planning to run. She says under the new system, she'll be running against some people with lesser credentials. In the final stage of my class, there were about 1 ,800 or 1 ,900 people registered, and only 30 of us made it. Access was so limited. You had to have very good grades. Now they've changed it, and it's good enough to have an 80 % in your undergraduate degree. Even the requirements for a Supreme Court judge have changed. They've lowered the grading requirements, but have added a three-page essay explaining why you want the position and are asking for a few references from neighbors or colleagues.

6:33And as you might expect, they got a lot of judge applications, nearly 50 ,000 of them. Everyone wants to be a judge. This could be a new reality TV show, just saying. So from there, the list was whittled down through a screening process and a random lottery chore. A big portion of the final 4 ,000 candidates are actually current sitting judges like Yasmin. They're automatically put on the ballots if they choose to run. I know that in some parts of the United States, the public can vote on local and state court judges. And when I go to vote, it always takes me forever to read up on everyone. That's one of the reasons that the U.S.

7:09and basically every other country doesn't allow the public to choose judges at the top level. David, our legal expert, says there is an argument for experts making those decisions. I think that when the founding fathers were creating the federal judiciary, they felt that the voters may not be the best persons to decide on the qualification of federal judges. Another argument is that it helps shield judges from voters if they make unpopular but constitutionally sound decisions. And so the big question is, will voters choose judges who have the training and expertise they need, especially when it comes to antitrust, intellectual property and tax cases, which can be very complicated?

7:56Most of the experts I spoke to said it's way too soon to say for sure. Still, fear of the unknown has already done some damage to Mexico's reputation. We spoke to Moody's, who warned that a downgrade to Mexico's credit rating could be coming soon, partly because of the reform. The ratings agency said the judiciary used to help balance out the will of the president in Congress. But without a good safeguard, they could pass what Moody's has called radical legal changes. It says some international companies won't want to take on that much risk. Mexican President Shane Baum said these worries are way overblown.

8:37No American entrepreneur or any businesses in any other country, nor Mexicans, have anything to fear about the judicial reform. On the contrary, we are cleaning up the judiciary. For her part, Yasmin worries that the judicial overhaul creates more problems than it solves. It wouldn't benefit us as Mexicans. And I'm telling you this not as a judge, but as a citizen. it could create devaluation of the peso. We have to create the legal certainty that ensures investment can come to the country. Meanwhile, the U.S. ambassador to Mexico says that the reform is threatening the historic commercial relationship between the two countries.

9:19Either way, with Mexico's trade with the U.S. at 30 % of its GDP, Mexico has a lot to lose, whether from the issue of judges or from the ongoing trade spats.

9:34This episode was produced by Julia Ritchie with engineering by Jimmy Keely and Robert Rodriguez. It was fact-checked by Cooper Casper-Kim. Cake and Canon is our editor and The Indicator is a production of NPR.

From the publisher
Mexico is gearing up to directly elect federal and state judges for the first time this June. President Claudia Sheinbaum says the new system will combat nepotism and increase the integrity of the courts. But critics see it as a naked attempt to dilute the court's independence. Today on the show, how Mexico's judicial reforms are creating angst for businesses at home and abroad.

Related episodes:
SCOTUS: De-facto pro-business?

For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.

Fact-checking by Cooper Katz-McKim. Music by
Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy

More from The Indicator from Planet Money

All 542 episodes
Should we vote for all judges?The Indicator from Planet Money · 9 min
Listen in VO