In short
Notes on Episode: We Read Your Mail on AI-Proof Jobs and How to Fix Crime Labs
Podcast Overview
- Podcast Title: The Indicator from Planet Money
- Podcast Description: A concise show providing insights into economics, money, work, and business, designed for quick consumption.
Episode Details
- Episode Title: We Read Your Mail on AI-Proof Jobs and How to Fix Crime Labs
- Episode Description: The hosts discuss listener feedback about AI's impact on jobs, specifically software engineering, and a proposal for improving accreditation in crime labs.
Key Themes
- AI and Job Security for Software Developers
- Listener Insight: John Cox, a software professional, responds to a study indicating that younger software developers have seen a greater job loss (13% more) compared to older counterparts due to AI.
- Discussion Points:
- Experience Matters: Older software engineers possess skills to fix and maintain systems, making their jobs more secure.
- Vibe Coders: Newer developers lack deep understanding of code and rely on AI tools, which increases their vulnerability in the job market.
- Future Implications: Concerns about a shift towards software being treated as a disposable commodity, risking quality and security.
- Crime Lab Accreditation Issues
- Listener Insight: Brian Gestring proposes improvements to how crime labs in the U.S. are accredited.
- Discussion Points:
- Current State: Crime labs are often under-regulated, leading to inconsistent quality across states.
- Accreditation Oversight: A few private entities dominate the accreditation process, raising transparency concerns.
- Proposed Solution: Implement a universal accreditation system, funded by federal grants, to enhance the quality and accountability of forensic labs.
- Historical Reference: Mention of the FBI’s national DNA database initiative as a precedent for federal oversight.
Key Takeaways
- Job Security in Tech:
- Older software engineers leverage both traditional skills and new AI tools, thereby maintaining job security.
- There's a potential future risk of devaluing software quality due to over-reliance on AI-generated code.
- Forensic Science Challenges:
- The need for standardized accreditation in crime labs to ensure reliability and transparency.
- Universal accreditation could incentivize improvements in forensic practices, similar to past federal initiatives.
Engagement and Feedback
- Listener Interaction: The hosts encourage listeners to provide feedback and share ideas, highlighting the importance of audience insights for enhancing show content.
Closing Notes
- The episode combines listener feedback with expert discussions, emphasizing the dynamic interplay between technology, job security, and regulatory standards in critical sectors like forensic science.
Production Credits
- Produced by: Julia Ritchie
- Engineering: Kweisi Lee
- Fact-Checking: Sierra Juarez
- Editing: Patty Hirsch
- Show's Editor: Kicking Cannon
---
For further engagement, listeners are invited to send questions or comments via email at indicator@npr.org.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01NPR
0:11This is the Indicator from Planet Money. I'm Darian Woods. And I'm Waylon Wong. You know, Waylon, they say don't read the comments, but integrated listeners actually leave us with some pretty thoughtful ones. They do. We get a lot of emails, and actually we pipe those emails into a special Slack channel where we leave like a light bulb emoji for the ones that make us go, aha! Yes, and if they point out that we, I don't know, pronounced a local town wrong, that gets a grimace emoji. No, but that never happens, Darian. How dare you? Yeah. But today on the show, we sift through the listener mailbox to learn from you, our audience members.
0:49We'll hear why older software engineers may have more job security against AI. And from a forensic consultant on one idea of how to improve credentialing for crime labs. Crime labs? Well, I'm listening. We dust for fingerprints after the break. This message comes from Vanguard. Capturing value in the bond market is not easy. That's why Vanguard offers a suite of over 80 institutional quality bond funds, actively managed by a 200-person global team of sector specialists, analysts, and traders. They're designed for financial advisors looking to give their clients consistent results year in and year out.
1:29See the record at Vanguard.com slash audio. That's Vanguard.com slash audio. All investing is subject to risk. Vanguard Marketing Corporation Distributor. This message comes from Dell Technologies. Your new Dell PC with Intel Core Ultra helps you handle a lot when your holiday to-dos get to be a lot. Luckily, the Dell PC helps you get it all done. Get yours at dell.com slash holiday. This message comes from Warby Parker. Prescription eyewear that's expertly crafted and unexpectedly affordable. Glasses designed in-house from premium materials starting at just$95, including prescription lenses. Stop by a Warby Parker store near you.
2:11All right, it is time to open up the listener mailbag. Who did you pick, Darian? John Cox recently wrote to us about an episode where we talked about this eye-opening new study on the potential impact of artificial intelligence on the workforce. And for young people in jobs that were highly exposed to AI, their employment dropped 13 % more than their older colleagues since late 2022. and the study's authors found that younger software developers were taking a hit and they suggested that AI was a big part of this. At the same time, this was a bit of a puzzle because it didn't seem to be happening for the older software engineers.
2:51And it turns out that John knows a little bit about this. I work in a combination of software development and IT, but I've been in the software industry for about a decade now. John has a potential explanation for why more experienced software engineers are holding onto their jobs. For someone new coming on who does not really understand software, they might understand the tools used to generate new software. But if they can't figure out how to fix it, if it broke, that is much less valuable. In plainer terms, it sounds like there are vibe coders, as in people who are just writing without knowledge of code.
3:28They write a piece of software. What then happens with the more senior software engineers? Older engineers, more experienced engineers, are still required to fix and maintain systems. And John says if these same engineers are also comfortable using the new large language models like Claude Code and Copilot, that could make their job even more valuable. As I've been using some of these models, I try to carefully think about everything I'm doing and try to very carefully and prescriptively tell it exactly what kind of functionality I want, where I want it, how to go about organizing it. Major difference is that I can repair it if something goes wrong, and I have.
4:09And you're saying you've observed more senior engineers have to fix mistakes that are made by perhaps more junior engineers or VIVE coders? Yes, the ability to rescue software from a fire is extremely valuable. So AI can generate a lot of code, but fixing it requires experience. Yeah, take that, robots. Well, John says, although his job is secure for now, he can see a future where software is treated less preciously. What I see as a possible outcome is that we may start getting to a point where there's a large segment of the software industry that starts treating software as a throwaway commodity, not something to be maintained and secured and made into greater quality.
4:52This is kind of like the basis for those dystopian cyberpunk futures where there's some very big and powerful software that's very good, but software in general is prevalent and not very secure and not very stable. Well, that sounds terrible. I would like to live in an analog future. So you're throwing away your devices, Waylon? Well, let me put it that way.
5:19So, Waylon, what caught your attention in the inbox? Well, this one comes to us from Albany, New York. Brian Gestring wrote to us with a very interesting episode idea. It's about a problem and solution for accrediting crime labs in the U.S. And our producer, Julia, recently spoke to him. I've been a forensic scientist for over 35 years now, and I've worked in every aspect of forensic science, from being a scene investigator to being a crime lab executive. As a kid, were you interested in forensics? Did you watch a lot of Law & Order? Like, what led you to this? I'm going to date myself, but Law & Order didn't exist when I was growing up.
5:55Okay, so maybe more of a Sherlock Holmes guy. Brian writes us that in most of the U.S., crime labs are typically housed under law enforcement and or health departments. Brian says they often don't get a lot of attention. And over time, that's led to a piecemeal approach to how the industry gets accreditation. I started realizing that sometimes the guardrails for quality were not as strong as I thought they were when I was on the front line. So as I started moving up, I started looking and I started seeing gaps where things could fall through the cracks. And it's not gaps out of maliciousness or anything like that.
6:29It's just kind of how the field has evolved. Brian says standards vary widely state to state, and there are two private companies that provide the bulk of accreditation for forensic labs. Brian ran the numbers and found that one of those, ANSI National Accreditation Board, also known as ANAB, accounts for more than 90 percent of the accreditation business. I'm not saying they're doing a bad job, but I feel uncomfortable with two private companies and really one private company being the de facto regulator of all forensic science in the United States. We reached out to ANAB to ask whether they would be in favor of federal oversight, but they did not get back to us before our deadline.
7:07Brian says this raises issues of transparency and accountability. He wrote a paper called The Invisible Crisis Facing Forensic Providers in the United States about the lack of federal oversight of forensic labs. He believes forensics' quality problems stem from poor regulation, not bad science. What we really liked about this paper, though, is his ideas for solutions, including the idea of universal accreditation. Brian envisions a five-year window to accredit all crime labs using federal grant funding as both carrot and stick. He says we saw a version of this when the FBI launched its national DNA database in the 90s.
7:46The national DNA data bank came in. A law went into effect, a federal law, and it said that in order to access that DNA data bank, you had to be accredited. The FBI also provided some support for labs. Brian says the only problem was that some jurisdictions chose to only accredit the DNA portions of their crime labs, not their entire department. Brian says a national standard could help by incentivizing existing federal funding. I'm trying to migrate this idea from one end of the economy to forensic science and say we can start setting standards. And what that'll allow us to do is the concerns we have, we can now have a voice to fix them.
8:23Okay, so, Wayland, it all comes down to incentives. Number one economic lesson. And our listeners know this. Very thoughtful people. And, you know, we don't just get comments in our inbox. You can actually leave comments on Spotify episodes these days. Oh, yes, I'm well aware. One episode in particular about Gen Z and money trouble sparked a flurry of unhappy messages, and we did see those. Yes, we read all of your feedback. It makes us have a better show, so thank you very much. And if you want to leave us more feedback, you can send us a note at indicator at npr.org. This episode was produced by Julia Ritchie with engineering by Kweisi Lee.
9:03It's fact-checked by Sierra Juarez and edited by Patty Hirsch. Kicking Cannon is the show's editor and The Indicator is a production of NPR.
9:14This message comes from the Council for Interior Design Qualification. Interior Designer and CIDQ President Siavash Madani explains the value of having an NCIDQ certification. An NCIDQ certified interior designer must complete a minimum of six years of specialized education and work experience and pass the three-part NCIDQ exam. All three exams emphasize and focus on health, safety, and welfare of the occupants. It's really about the implementation of design. Good design is never just about aesthetics. It's about intention, safety, and impact. We take the responsibility of protecting the public seriously.
9:56The space needs to be functional, safe, and accessible. To learn more about NCIDQ certification or to hire a certified designer, visit cidq.org slash NPR. This message comes from Mint Mobile. At Mint Mobile, their favorite word is no. No contracts, no monthly bills, no hidden fees. Plans start at$15 a month. Make the switch at mintmobile.com slash switch. That's mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of$45 for a three-month 5-gigabyte plan required, equivalent to$15 a month. New customer offer for first three months only, then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra. See Mint Mobile for details.
10:38This message comes from Grammarly. From emails to reports and project proposals, it's hard to meet the demands of today's competing priorities without some help. Grammarly is the essential AI communication assistant that boosts your productivity at work so you can get more of what you need done faster. Just a few clicks can tailor your tone and writing so you come across exactly as you intend. Get time back to focus on your high-impact work. Download Grammarly for free at grammarly.com slash podcast. That's grammarly.com slash podcast.
From the publisher
Got a question, comment on a recent show or idea for an episode? Send us a message at indicator@npr.org.
Related episodes:
Tech layoffs, recession pop and more listener questions answered
Mail bag! Grad jobs, simplified branding and central bank independence
For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Fact-checking by Sierra Juarez. Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy




