Why the US chose not to have a passenger train system like Europe

1 Dec 2025 · 9 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

```markdown Podcast Episode Summary

Podcast Title

The Indicator from Planet Money Episode Title: Why the US chose not to have a passenger train system like Europe Episode Description: Explore the reasons why the United States does not have an extensive passenger train system like Europe, Japan, or India, while still having a notable freight railroad system.

---

Episode Overview

  • Hosts: Waylon Wong and Stephen Basaha
  • Guest: Alan Zaremsky, railroad engineering professor at the University of Delaware

Key Themes

  1. Comparison of Train Systems
  2. Differences between U.S. and European train systems.
  3. U.S. focuses significantly on freight rail, whereas Europe prioritizes passenger rail.
  1. Underlying Reasons for Limited Passenger Trains in the U.S.
  2. Geography and Density:
  3. U.S. cities are spread out compared to densely populated European cities.
  4. Coast-to-coast train rides would take significantly longer than flights.
  5. Profitability of Freight Rail:
  6. U.S. freight rail industry is valued at approximately $80 billion, making it highly profitable.
  7. Companies prioritize freight over passenger services due to profit motives.
  1. Conflict Between Freight and Passenger Trains
  2. Challenges of sharing tracks between freight and passenger services.
  3. The inherent conflict arises when introducing more passenger trains, potentially diminishing freight capacity.
  1. Political and Financial Challenges of Expanding Passenger Rail
  2. Historical context of Amtrak and the delays experienced in rebuilding services post-Hurricane Katrina.
  3. Discussion on California's high-speed rail project facing cost overruns and political complications.
  1. Need for Continuing Dialogue
  2. Acknowledgement of the need for passenger trains despite the challenges discussed.
  3. Suggestion of a "corridor approach" for effective passenger rail systems.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Freight vs. Passenger Focus:
  • The U.S. rail infrastructure is primarily designed for freight, influenced by economic factors and geographic spread.
  • Revenue Generation:
  • Freight trains are highly profitable, which affects investments in passenger rail systems.
  • Government Subsidies:
  • All forms of transportation in the U.S., including highways and rail, receive government subsidies; however, this is not a widely accepted practice for passenger rail.
  • Successful Models:
  • The Northeast Corridor (Washington D.C. to Boston) serves as a successful example of passenger rail efficiency.
  • Brightline's expansion in Florida and potential in California demonstrates attempts to enhance passenger rail services.

---

Conclusion

The episode emphasizes that while the U.S. has significant limitations in passenger rail compared to other countries, there are potential pathways to develop a more robust system. The discussion highlights the necessity for continued exploration of solutions and investments, particularly in densely populated regions.

---

Related Episodes

  • [What happens when railroads get hitched](https://www.npr.org/2025/08/21/nx-s1-5508248/what-happens-when-railroads-get-hitched)
  • [How three letters reinvented the railroad business](https://www.npr.org/2023/03/09/1162333378/how-three-letters-reinvented-the-railroad-business)

--- ```

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01NPR

0:11This is The Indicator from Planet Money. I'm Waylon Wong. And I'm Stephen Basaha. And this is one of my favorite sounds. Chugga, chugga, chugga, chugga, choo, choo. That sounds specifically, Waylon. That specific train sound is the new Amtrak line between New Orleans and Mobile, Alabama. I got to be on that first train ride this summer. And looking out the window, you know, at the sparkling Gulf water, the marshlands, I couldn't stop thinking about this nagging question so many Americans have. Why can't we have more trains like this? In other words, why can't the U.S. be like Europe? And it's not just Europe, but also countries like Japan and India.

0:59They all have extensive passenger train systems to get from city to city. On today's show, why the U.S. chose not to have the same. And we learn why U.S. railroads could still be worth bragging about. Support for NPR and the following message come from Warby Parker, the one-stop shop for all your vision needs. They offer expertly crafted prescription eyewear, plus contacts, eye exams, and more. For everything you need to see, visit your nearest Warby Parker store or head to warbyparker.com. This message comes from Vanguard. Capturing value in the bond market is not easy. That's why Vanguard offers a suite of over 80 institutional quality bond funds, actively managed by a 200-person global team of sector specialists, analysts, and traders.

1:48They're designed for financial advisors looking to give their clients consistent results year in and year out. See the record at Vanguard.com slash audio. That's Vanguard.com slash audio. All investing is subject to risk. Vanguard Marketing Corporation Distributor. This message comes from Charles Schwab. When it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices, like full-service wealth management and advice when you need it. You can also invest on your own and trade on Think or Swim. Visit schwab.com to learn more.

2:24Our conductor into the world of railroads today is Alan Zaremsky. He teaches classes on railroad engineering at the University of Delaware. It sounds like you're going to be asking me the classical questions of how come the U.S. railroad system is not as good as Europe, which is sort of the classical misunderstanding of what's going on. Misunderstanding? Oh, I look forward to being corrected. I get that question at the start of every one of my classes. OK, so imagine I'm that young undergrad sticking his hand up being like, why can't we have these nice passenger trains like Europe? Let's start off with the fact that the United States has the best freight railroad in the world.

3:04Best freight railroad in the world. That's great news if you're a cargo container full of presents for good little boys and girls. Or coal for all the bad ones. Oh, yes. The U.S. has more railroad tracks than any other country, including China, which has extensive rail systems. But those tracks are almost exclusively used to transport goods, not people. Why do we have so much freight train traffic and business in the U.S.? OK, now we're getting into the underlying basis of your question. OK, the United States, for a variety of reasons, has chosen to put its emphasis on freight transportation. Europe has put its emphasis on passenger transportation.

3:51So this was a choice. And one reason for that choice comes down to density. Europe, by comparison, is packed in with lots of cities not too far apart. The U.S. is vast and spread out. A coast-to-coast train ride would just take forever. New York to Los Angeles is 3 ,000 miles, even if you're going at 200 miles an hour. Which our trains are not. But even if you did have built an investor system, you're still talking about a day and a half to two days. Versus, you know, six hours on a flight. Yeah, so you could have a multi-day train ride between L.A. and New York. Or you could have freight trains.

4:29Or maybe we should call them money trains. Freight railroads are extremely profitable. And in fact, if you bought railroad stock, well, take Warren Buffett. Warren Buffett bought the Burlington Northern Santa Fe. Now, Warren Buffett is no fool. The U.S. freight train industry as a whole is worth about$80 billion. That's nowhere near as big as the U.S. banking industry. but it is around the size of the U.S. baking industry. The baking industry? How many loaves of sourdough can you fit on one freight train? Anyway, these railroads are also owned by publicly traded companies, and it makes sense these businesses would pick the more profitable option.

5:09But, you know, couldn't they just share the railroads, passenger and freight trains, kumbaya, taking turns? The answer is yes, we can, but there's an inherent conflict. Okay, so not much kumbaya. Like, take that Amtrak line between Mobile and New Orleans. Passenger trains stopped running between those cities because Hurricane Katrina damaged the tracks 20 years ago. And it's taken until this summer to come back. That's because during those past two decades, Amtrak spent a lot of time fighting and negotiating with railroad owners who said it would hurt their freight business. You can't run as many freight trains as you can, which means railroads suddenly are losing money.

5:48You were telling me, though, that these freight trains are so profitable. And yeah, they might lose some money if a passenger train is sharing the tracks. But is it really that much money that they're losing when they're making so much money, like you're saying? OK, now you're getting into a classical socialist versus capitalist argument. Oh, I don't think I'm making a socialist argument here. Yeah, what the railroads would say is it's our duty to our stockholders to maximize our profits. What you're saying is that there's a societal benefit for you allowing to ride the passenger trains. It has some value.

6:26And how do you reconcile that? Now, it is worth mentioning that pretty much every version of transportation in the U.S. is subsidized from cars to flying. Yeah, and you don't hear many people tossing the socialism label at interstates. The U.S. and state and local governments all spent just over$300 billion on highways in 2022 alone. And when it comes to trains, there is some sharing of the tracks. Pretty much every Amtrak train is riding on private railroads. And if you're one of those private railroad companies, one or two passenger trains on the line each day isn't that big of a deal. But if you want to run a true passenger rail system, okay, like they do in Europe, which means you want to run a couple of trains an hour, you want a train running every half hour, then now you're not talking about two trains a day.

7:15Now you're talking about 20 to 30 trains a day. And all of a sudden, you're talking about cutting the freight capacity maybe in half. Okay, whole different option. Why not just build new railroads? Leave the freight trains alone on their tracks. And while we're at it, let's make them high-speed rails, too. California has been trying to do that for nearly 20 years to connect San Francisco and L.A. But it's been bogged down with political issues like where the train should and shouldn't cut through and stop. Allen says there's also another serious challenge here. One of the problems with California high-speed rail is that it's turned out to be much more expensive than anybody expected it to be.

7:54Yeah, the California project was forecast in 2008 to cost$33 billion. Last year, it was estimated to cost nearly four times more, according to the Fresno Bee. So summing all that up, it's a lot of reasons passenger trains just aren't as common in the U.S. compared with Europe or Asia. U.S. cities are far apart, passenger rail is just expensive, and it would just slow down the money-making freight trains. When you tell that young undergraduate with their hand up with the Europe versus U.S. question about passenger train and you give them all this, Do they lower their hand and say, thank you so much, professor.

8:29My eyes have been opened. I understand. They lower it and say, we still need passenger trains. We understand. It's not a simple issue. I'm not saying we don't need the passenger trains. In fact, Alan would like more passenger trains. He just doesn't agree with the simple idea that Europe has great trains while the U.S. has a lousy railroad system. Where does that leave us? The corridor approach. The corridor approach. A train corridor is a simple stretch of railroad connecting a few large metros, ideally not too far from each other. We actually have a very successful passenger rail system in the Northeast Corridor, Washington, New York to Boston.

9:12If you want to travel between Washington, New York and Boston, the majority of the people still travel by train. It's an efficient, effective system. More than three quarters of a million people ride part of the Northeast Corridor every day. And the private company Brightline is building a corridor between Las Vegas and Southern California. The company already launched a South Florida line back in 2018. It's just not exactly profitable, at least not yet. But Alan says passenger trains are almost never profitable, not even in Europe. Those trains are supported by taxpayer dollars. So if the U.S.

9:47really does want a big passenger train network, it has to be willing to pay for it. This episode was produced by Angel Carreras with engineering by Sina Lofredo It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez Cake & Cannon is our show's editor and The Indicator is a production of NPR

10:09This message comes from the Council for Interior Design Qualification Interior Designer and CIDQ President Siavash Madani discusses why certified professionals know that good design is more than just how something looks. Being NCIDQ certified means you've qualified to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public in the spaces that you design. Good design is never just about aesthetics. It's about intention, safety, and impact. So an NCIDQ certified interior designer must complete a minimum of six years of specialized education and work experience and pass the three-part NCIDQ exam. All three exams emphasize and focus on health, safety, and welfare of the occupants.

10:54Being NCIDQ certified means that you've proven your knowledge and skills through rigorous exams and are recognized as a qualified interior design professional. Learn more at cidq.org slash NPR.

From the publisher

Why can't the US be like Europe, Japan or India—countries that all have extensive passenger train systems? On today's show, why the US chose not to. We learn why, despite this, US railroads could still be worth bragging about.

Related episodes: 
What happens when railroads get hitched
How three letters reinvented the railroad business

For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Fact-checking by Sierra Juarez. Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.  

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy

More from The Indicator from Planet Money

All 542 episodes
Why the US chose not to have a passenger train system like EuropeThe Indicator from Planet Money · 9 min
Listen in VO