In short
Whether U.S. Treasurys are truly “risk-free,” and how U.S. borrowing affects interest rates, the economy, and who will buy new Treasury issuance.
Guests
Mary Childs, former Bloomberg News reporter (intern in 2009; stayed ~6 years), later at Financial Times and Barron’s, then NPR’s Planet Money (twice-weekly economics storytelling). She hosts Mary in America and previously wrote The Bond King and co-hosted Planet Money.
Key claims
“Risk-free” is a baseline fiction; Treasurys are supported by the financial system and the dollar’s centrality, but rising debt can raise borrowing costs and crowd out other borrowers (e.g., mortgages). The Treasury market’s stability is crucial globally (e.g., Japan’s large Treasury holdings). Crises/catalysts force repricing; otherwise investors delay pricing risk. Fed backstops can create moral-hazard concerns.
Notable examples
interest payments surpassing defense spending; U.S. debt crossing ~$40T; Japan yen intervention tied to Treasury holdings; “basis trade” hedge-fund demand created by banks selling Treasurys and buyers using futures.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIntroducing Mary Childs and Her Podcast
0:45 to 1:41
Discussion on Mary Childs' new podcast and her background.
“And we talk a little bit about that because I kind of wanted to hear, well, how do you find these people in the first place?”
Exploring the Concept of Risk-Free Treasuries
1:41 to 3:56
Discussion on U.S. Treasuries and their risk-free labeling.
“Today, I'm thrilled to be joined by Mary Childs.”
The Safety of Treasuries and Economic Implications
3:56 to 6:38
Analysis of the safety of Treasuries and implications for the economy.
“mix of guests is, is exactly that is because I both have done a lot of work over the 15 years I've been doing this.”
The Impact of National Debt on the Economy
6:38 to 11:38
Insights on growing national debt and its economic effects.
“Most of the time, it's kind of like, you know, in the dark, no one's paying attention that closely.”
AI's Role in Economic Growth and Workforce Changes
11:38 to 14:00
Exploration of AI's impact on productivity and workforce dynamics.
“We're getting to a point where the headlines are getting louder about unsustainability.”
Population Trends and Economic Growth
14:00 to 15:00
Explore how declining birth rates and AI may influence economic growth.
“And in 2080, the global population peaks.”
Treasury Market Interdependencies
15:00 to 17:20
Discuss the interconnectedness of the Treasury market and global economies.
“I mean, you saw this with the Japan, the yen intervention in August, where it was necessary or a priority for us to do that because Japan's the biggest holder of treasury.”
Investor Concerns About Debt
17:20 to 19:00
Learn about how concerns over national debt affect investor behavior.
“I mean, it changes, but there's only so much.”
Crowding Out and Inflation
19:00 to 21:20
Understand the concept of crowding out and its economic implications.
“Do you feel like there needs to be a crisis of some sort?”
Response to Economic Crises
21:20 to 22:40
Examine if a crisis is necessary to change economic trajectories.
“Because the answers are actually pretty straightforward.”
Show all 18 chapters
The Role of Hedge Funds in Treasury Market
22:40 to 24:40
Discuss how hedge funds engage in the Treasury market and their impact.
“We have insurance companies, regular bond investors, people who have bond fund, PIMCOs, if you will, and people and hedge funds.”
Market Structure and Fiscal Issues
24:40 to 26:00
Differentiate between fiscal problems and treasury market structure issues.
“I mean, look, not that many hedge fund managers are that talented anyway.”
Federal Reserve's Role in Treasury Market
26:00 to 28:00
Analyze the implications of the Federal Reserve's intervention in the Treasury market.
“And from a global headwinds problem and whatever else?”
The Balance Between Safety and Risk in Markets
28:00 to 29:24
Explore the tension between market safety and moral hazard in financial systems.
“Or you can say that's exactly why it's safe, because the Fed can go and do that.”
Treasury Bond Market Practices
29:24 to 31:06
Discuss the implications of the Treasury's bond-swapping practices and market liquidity.
“And I was like, oh, my God, that's true.”
Quantitative Easing and Market Interventions
31:06 to 32:46
Analyze the effects of quantitative easing and market interventions on interest rates.
“It's sort of like, that's like the treasury trying to do its own form of forward guidance and like, create an action.”
Insights from Conversations with Economists
32:46 to 36:13
Reflect on the differentiation between knowledgeable economists and mere talkers.
“If you're a listener who's not like in this field and just a dork and you want to go find...”
Philosophical Perspectives on Market Ethics
36:13 to 39:18
Examine philosophical insights on market ethics and their impact on decision-making.
“I mean, has there been anything where you feel like you've changed your own mind since starting?”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02We all need to make smart decisions with our money. The Long Term Investor podcast shows you how by distilling complex financial matters into easily digestible lessons. And now here's your host, chief investment officer at PlanCorp and the author of Making Money Simple, Peter Lazaroff.
0:21The Long Term Investor Host:Welcome to The Long Term Investor. Today, I am welcoming back Mary Childs, host of the new show, Mary in America, which has quickly become one of my favorite podcasts to listen to. If you know Mary in the past, you may know her from her book, The Bond King, or when she co-hosted NPR's Planet Money. But her new show, Mary in America, is just so fascinating. She has such a wonderful group of guests. And we talk a little bit about that because I kind of wanted to hear, well, how do you find these people in the first place? But then we dive into a problem. Well, maybe not a problem, but a question that I know Mary and I are both passionate about, which is U.S.
1:00The Long Term Investor Host:Treasuries routinely being described as risk-free because no investment is literally risk-free. So we talk a little bit about how government borrowing becomes an economic problem, how it can raise borrowing costs throughout the economy, and who will buy the next wave of treasury issuance. As always, you can find detailed show notes at thelongterminvestor.com. And if you've been listening for the past few weeks, you also know I have a new book myself coming out, The Perfect Portfolio, there is a link at the top of the episode description to learn more about that. And now without further ado, here is my conversation with Mary Childs.
1:40The Long Term Investor Host:Welcome back to The Long-Term Investor. Today, I'm thrilled to be joined by Mary Childs. Mary, thanks so much for joining the show. Thank you for having me. Excited to be here again. Yeah. Welcome back, I should say. Last time you were here, we were talking about The Bond King, which you have beautifully displayed up on your bookshelf. Oh, sorry. I'm blocking it with my mic. It's really pretty, though. We can still see your name of the book. That's what matters. That's right. You are the Bond Queen, as we've previously established. Look at that. There we go. Perfect positioning. Thank you. You are now the host of Mary in America.
2:13The Long Term Investor Host:But for people who aren't familiar with your work, maybe just before we dive in, give people a quick background on yourself. All right. I'm going to do my resume really fast. so I started at Bloomberg News in 2009 as an intern and then I stayed there for six years and loved it and went to a bunch of different desks and got to report on a bunch of different things most notably the bond market obviously and then I went to the FT and Barron's and then from there I went to Planet Money at NPR which is the twice weekly economics podcast at NPR and it's very narrative very storytelling and very like for normal people to listen to which was a really nice balance from the like heavy institutional work that I'd done before.
2:54And now I'm doing my own thing, Married America, available wherever you get your podcasts.
3:00The Long Term Investor Host:Yeah. Tell us about that. I mean, because Married America, I mean, I can hear a lot of your past work when I listen to shows, but it's you have such a unique group of guests. So if you're not, if none of you listen to Mary's show, first of all, you're going to love her after you listen to her for like 30 minutes to an hour now. But the, you know, like, tell me a little bit about the show? Like, why did you start it? Like, what is the goal? What are you going for here? I think it really is just, I always have these questions about how the world got this way, why we are the way we are, why we've got this structure around us.
3:34And honestly, whether it's working, like, I feel like it's very healthy to reevaluate all the deals that we made or the deals that someone before us made and see if they're still working and if it's the way that it should be should being in pretty big quotes. And so the the luxury of the show is that I get to basically follow my interests and answer my very sincerely motivated questions. So the odd mix of guests is, is exactly that is because I both have done a lot of work over the 15 years I've been doing this. I think I need to update that number, but something like that, that I like feel like at this point, I know who's good and who's going to tell me the truth and who's like spinning.
4:14These are like kind of strongly held opinions at this point for a lot of people, especially the names that you would see on the regular outlets. And so it's sort of like, okay, I'm not going to call the person who everyone else calls. Because, you know, sometimes that person is actually not that aware of the mechanics or the, you know, the kind of underlying invisible infrastructure. And so my interest is like, so granular, very often, I'm just like, I want to know literally what is the one thing that's causing this, the mechanical thing that's causing this. And that very often leads you to some, some person that, you know, people haven't called before or that is less well known or, or that I've had on planet money 50 times.
4:53The Long Term Investor Host:Well, I feel like I'm going to use an overused like analogy, but it's like you want someone who knows how the watch work, not just who can tell time. Is that fair? Oh my God. That's so good. Isn't that, that's a saying, isn't it? Oh, I feel like that's a saying. Um, I did not come up with that. So I can't wait to hear you use it on the show. And I'll be 100%. Yes. I don't even need the attribution because definitely not mine. But tell me, so like you, your questions, I think, is what also has made you a great host, great reporter in general. You know, the book that we referenced is sort of like a journalistic piece in many ways.
5:28The Long Term Investor Host:But like, what do you feel like you're most drawn to investing? Like, what are these things that kind of get you fired up? Well, I think I love understanding structures and I really love talking to the person who built the structure. So those people don't always want to talk because if their structure is like not doing well, they don't really want the call. They're hiding from you. Yeah. Yeah. They're like, please not today. A different day would be maybe better or never. And I understand and respect that, but I will keep emailing them, which is also another talent I was born with. yeah it's a lack of shame really i you know like normal people would be like it would be impolite to send a fourth email and i'm like hey i mean you every author knows that you have to get shameless eventually because you're just asking for favors left and right i imagine because you're publishing and you've been a journalist for so long and you're interviewing people so often that you've gotten where you are without a little bit of the like you learn to lose it pretty quick yeah yeah and the less shame you have as a reporter honestly the better you are so um yeah it's regrettable because you can become a there's a tipping point where you kind of start losing the being a person part but um but yeah kids yeah yeah it's like there's a balance you kind of want to keep an eye on that um but I think I like aberrations I like when things go sideways and things break because I think that's when you actually the lights come on and you can actually see what we have been operating with.
6:54Most of the time, it's kind of like, you know, in the dark, no one's paying attention that closely. It seems to be working fine. You don't got to think about it. And when something goes wrong, it's like, oh, that pipe. Oh, no one remember, like we haven't looked in this corner. I mean, same thing in your house, right? It's like you've never opened this closet. And then you're like, that has been sweating this whole time. Oops.
7:15The Long Term Investor Host:I feel like, you know, what I was really thinking that we would talk most about probably fits the bill exactly of what you're talking about. I mean, really at the intersection of your interests and your reporting in the past is the bond market and the treasury and the risk-free rate. So treasuries described as risk-free, you know, in your opinion, what exactly is supposed to be risk-free? It's such a charming phrase, isn't it? It's so sweet. We all know that that's not real. There's no such thing as risk-free. We know that. We cannot get away from that. And yet, we needed something to base everything else on.
7:55And so is it a fair proposition that the U.S. government will never default, will never miss an obligation and therefore is risk free? It's probably pretty good. That's probably the best we're going to get, right? I don't have a better idea, really. So in part because the dollar is at the center of the global financial system, too, it makes it easy and kind of fluid for everyone to just agree with this premise. and treasuries as a result of, you know, Bretton Woods, but also bank regulation, but also the result, like every single part of the way the dollar touches people's lives. It's become the the treasury market has become the most important market of all and and kind of where everything prices itself, because if you have a rate that's the risk free rate, then you can know that how to price something that's a little bit more risky.
8:45If this is zero, then let's add a little bit more.
8:47The Long Term Investor Host:you gotta have some baseline and i as we're saying the word risk-free or words risk-free out loud and it was a wonder who who came up with that phrase do we right no i don't think we know really someone should get credit for that um i think it was a group project and i think at this moment if you tried to find them they would hide that's that's probably true so you said something interesting though so do you feel like people consider treasury safe and if you're like listening to us rather than watching us. I'm doing a lot of air quotes today, it turns out. You know, are they safe because the financial system has been constructed to make it safe?
9:23The Long Term Investor Host:Or is it because, I mean, the U.S. government, I think from a credit worthy standpoint, historically has been a relatively safe bet. Really safe. You can get into like whether that's changing over time. But do you think like currently the risk free thing sits more on the financial system being built around it being risk free? Oh, great question. I think it's like a, it's not quite a chicken and egg. I think it started that we were like, oh, we've got this, this great thing that's like always working. And then things, I mean, we used to have LIBOR, really, you know? Yeah. So I think it's like LIBOR and its spawn, if you will.
9:58Now, it's the same idea of like, I need, I need to ground myself. Everything is relative. And so I need something to compare everything against. I need a starting point. It's like a blank slate of paper. Otherwise, blank sheet of paper, blank slate, either one, both. Yeah. And I need to write something down. Where do I start? And so because treasuries, you know, it just became it was such a stable place. It's not you're not taking that much risk. So you're not getting compensated that much for it. And if you think about any corporate borrower in the history of everything, it's probably going to be riskier than the U.S.
10:33government for now. You know, right. Maybe that's changing.
10:36The Long Term Investor Host:I mean, yeah, your likelihood to get paid back. I mean, people will like point to it. Yeah. There are corporations out there where you're like, wow, that that that does seem pretty stable for some amount of time. Not many hundred year bonds out there. I mean, there are a few. But some of these corporations, I don't know that I would personally bet on any given corporation existing in 100 years. right yeah you look at the data like the 26 000 u.s stocks or so that have existed since 1926 and how many have eventually go bust and how much turnover there is at the top 10 and how many of those go bust yeah i'd have a hard time doing that but yeah in general it's a great bet uh that we'll be able to pay our interests we'll be able to make good on it but we're getting to a place and i mean one of the things that i've heard you say and i couldn't agree more like people turn the debt into like a political issue.
11:28The Long Term Investor Host:Like we could, so maybe we could have a quick disclaimer, at least on my end, I pledge not to be getting political here. I just want to talk about like the economics of it. We're getting to a point where the headlines are getting louder about unsustainability. I mean, what do you feel like, what are your opinions on what it's like actually going to mean for a country that is borrowing too much? And we haven't really even talked about that's dollar denominated, but we can get there if you want. I know everything's relative, isn't I mean, I think, OK, the things that you can say now that are scary, we spend more on interest than we do on defense as a country that loves defense.
12:04Yeah, that's crazy. Yeah. We the U.S. total debt just surpassed 40 trillion, which everyone freaked out about. But I'm like, 39 was before that. I don't whatever. I'm really struggling with the math of that. Everyone really maybe it's the over the hill element. I'm not sure. So I think that it does start to become a drag on an economy. There's a lot of research and no real answers as to when you want to have an economy that's growing faster than the rate of interest. And the rate of growth is faster than your interest rate. And that's that if you don't have that, if it flips, you're in trouble.
12:41and it's very we have ai growth right now which is really fantastic and very lucky um i mean you can debate no it's very lucky i fully agree yeah yeah yeah can you imagine if we didn't i mean
12:54The Long Term Investor Host:don't imagine full of lucky stuff but like yeah i mean the u.s economy specifically um but you would argue the world economy to some extent because so many things you obviously wasn't alive and an investor, you know, 50 years ago. But I read about it and it's hard to find. I mean, we just became so interconnected because trade agreements were great. But now it just feels like financial markets are so connected to our success and failure. I have a harder time painting a doomsday scenario in my mind, where if like the US is going down that everybody else doesn't go down with it. I 100 % agree. Yeah.
13:30The Long Term Investor Host:I mean, I hope I'm wrong to some extent, like diversified investor Sure, we'd love to see like not everything fall at the same time in the same degree. But, you know, the AI thing was wildly lucky in general. Yeah, I think I think it's been a few thoughts. I'm like overwhelmed by how many different things. Me too. I actually forgot what I was going to say because I was like, oh, wait, there was something else fun I wanted to say. I have eight things. Yeah. I need to be writing this down. I think AI was super lucky in its timing. And my sincere hope is that, you know how we have a fertility cliff coming?
14:00And in 2080, the global population peaks. And it's like you can say, oh, it's just an immigration problem all you want, but it's not every country is on this trajectory of fewer births. Maybe it will align perfectly with AI reducing the total number of jobs. OK, and it'll it'll just be painless and perfect and no one will suffer. That's my goal.
14:21The Long Term Investor Host:However, economic growth is basically productivity gains and workforce changes in growth. So like, yeah, yeah, I guess you're saying if we're not going to have growth in the workforce, we could just have so much productivity that there's all the growth. The productivity gains typically show up in labor force reduction. Yeah. And that's going to be naturally happening anyway because of fewer kids. We're tracking now. Okay. Yes. We're going to get it. Same page. Yeah, I think the sustainability question, well, the question of if everyone goes down with us is unfortunately pretty good. If everything collapsed tomorrow, yeah, we're so intertwined.
14:58Everyone is so deeply invested in the treasury market. I mean, you saw this with the Japan, the yen intervention in August, where it was necessary or a priority for us to do that because Japan's the biggest holder of treasury. So if they started to sell their treasuries to get themselves out of their own bind, then we would suffer and we simply can't have that. So basically everything relies on the treasury market, like being very strong and stable and all of our institutions are oriented around protecting it, which is really nice. and we might see that get a little tested one day.
15:33The Long Term Investor Host:Yeah, maybe not all at once, but gradually. I'm sure not all at once. It's not, yeah. I think one of the things, so you and I probably have to think about this question from different perspectives. Like I often will have a client come who's just concerned about the debt. And as a result, they are worried about just being an investor, period. And there's, you mentioned some of the statistics you mentioned of like debt relative to growth or like our interest payments being greater than defense spending, like there are different implications for the economy. There are different implications for the stock market.
16:05The Long Term Investor Host:I'm one of those, like the economy and stock market are different things. And then there's like the impact of us humans, uh, you know, like your mortgages look different as a result. Uh, your auto loans look different. The job market could look different. Um, when you think about these things and you think about this pie in the sky sort of breaking down, if you're painting pictures in your head, like what's the one of those angles or is there a different angle that you spend time thinking about? I think that crowding out is real. And I think that it's its own inflation where explain crowding out for all of our people.
16:38The Long Term Investor Host:That's OK. Crowding out is the idea that the U.S. government is a borrower like any other in a way it has to come to market. It's reliant on the interest rates that it's charged in the market from bond investors. And that's life. And so when they come to market, when the government comes to market to borrow, those bond investors are looking at the government, but also every other potential borrower sitting there. So there's Meta who wants to fund a new data center and there's Microsoft and there's, I don't know, this Campbell's Soup, whatever. And you're like, well, why would I lend to the U.S.
17:06government at four point whatever when I could lend to all of these beautiful, so great companies that I love so much and so dearly who have great proposals for their growth for a little bit more? And so basically, the U.S. government's always competing. and in that same way if the U.S. government is paying higher interest rates if you and I are coming to market same market and we're like I want to borrow a mortgage I need to buy a house I need a 30-year fixed rate mortgage you're also in line next to the U.S. government if they're paying more that means that in order to compete and to get that borrowing you also have are going to have to pay more in interest that's crowding out so basically it becomes like there's just like not a finite supply of money in the world, but there's only so much demand for debt.
17:52I mean, it changes, but there's only so much. And so in a, especially like in the near term. And so there's this sense that like, if the US government is spending more and more in interest, getting charged more and more in interest, it crowds out other types of borrowings, and it makes you pay more for your mortgage, as you mentioned, and it makes it just, it's a drag on the economy. So I think that that is, to me, that feels pretty real. And that gets kind of diffused throughout the economy in an inflation-like way?
18:20The Long Term Investor Host:I think that is probably the angle that most people don't think about. And I think it's probably one of my favorite angles I've heard from you in the past. Yeah, no, no. I mean, look, I know what questions I'm asking. I know. You're like, Mary, say the one that I like. Yeah, right. Give me the correct answer, Mary. I know you believe it. It's good that I'm cooperating, though. Yes, you're, you know, all of your years of hosting other people make you an excellent guest because you know that you have a job to do here. And I sincerely just think these things like this is actually. For sure. No, no, no.
18:51The Long Term Investor Host:Look, I followed your work for a long time. I think this is what this is a topic I think that you've always shown a lot of interest in. Hence, we're talking about it. Let me ask you this. Do you feel like there needs to be a crisis of some sort? Like, does there have to be a crisis to change the trajectory? No, absolutely not. I mean, we don't tend to change our trajectory before a crisis because it's less fun. We're like having fun doing it the expensive way, you know? So until there's like a, I always say rubber meets road. If you have a better, like, I don't know why that's like the one that makes perfect sense to me.
19:21But, you know, in the mortgage crisis of 2007 through nine, it was people failing to make their interest payments, right? Or sorry, their mortgage payments. They just bought a house that was too, the mortgage was too big. The mortgage payments ballooned because we loved to do that back then. And people owned too many houses. People couldn't make those payments. And so there was this like actual trip wire. And once that happens, that's when you start to see, well, shit hit the fan. I got it. I got a different metaphor. That's when you start to see the actual the actual change. And you have to confront reality because I feel like there's this weird thing about the investor base.
19:55I don't know if this lands with you, but like very often I feel like you investors really don't want to have to consider. We always talk about the market pricing things in and like predicting things and incorporating that into an efficient market, like all the information is already accounted for. Sure. But at the same time, if something's like maybe not going to happen, we really don't want to have to deal with it. We do not. Like, it's too hard to consider that the Treasury market might be risky. We're not going to do that unless we absolutely have to. And it would be expensive to do that if you don't have to.
20:25So, of course, like put that off until the moment that it's necessary. but there is a weird, not denial, but like a willful, like, I'm going to just, I'm going to wait until the last possible second to price this in. I don't feel like it. So crises help us, or they're catalysts. They let us actually reevaluate our structures. That being said, I'm so hopeful that if we like holler enough about these things and we prioritize and we understand to some degree the gravity of what would happen, it's impossible to understand because it's like too large. But if we can appreciate that we don't want to make treasuries be risky, then we need to do something.
21:03And that maybe we can do it.
21:05The Long Term Investor Host:So like inflation or financial repression, I mean, those are ways where perhaps we're not defaulting in the technical sense, but people start to feel it. And then it becomes a political issue that politicians can address without losing their office. Because the answers are actually pretty straightforward. word. Raise taxes, cut spending. I'm so sorry. In my opinion, until there's like a presidential election where people are really running on the platform and that's what the whole election's about. Yeah. I would assume that everyone just keeps their head in the sand because even a bond vigilante in a world where treasuries blow up.
Read the full transcript
21:40Yeah.
21:40The Long Term Investor Host:Would those people would be uncomfortable too. Like they sort of, it's one thing to be a bond vigilante for a small entity against a small entity. Right. When the country is, is just a place that you can go and you can go to another place. Yeah. But when it's the United States, it's a different story. I agree. And there's all these buyers. I mean, who are let's go there for a second. Like who buys U.S. government? So we just got we got to 40 trillion dollars, which like I was surprised. We'll get to 41 trillion dollars, everybody. Breaking news. We are breaking news here. Yeah. Yeah. And then after that, my favorite number, 42.
22:11The Long Term Investor Host:Oh, why is that your favorite number? It's from my childhood of reading The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Oh, gosh. Yes. The secret to the universe, of course. Yeah, the meaning of life. Duh. Yeah. Okay. Well, so who is going to buy the next trillion dollars of U.S. debt or the next two trillion dollars of U.S. debt? Okay. So the normal buyers, the buyer base, we have central banks, of course, they love to buy treasuries, central banks around the world. We have pension funds, endowments. We have insurance companies, regular bond investors, people who have bond fund, PIMCOs, if you will, and people and hedge funds.
22:51We also have hedge funds doing the basis trade, which has opened up a whole new room of buyers that are willing to buy the US government debt.
22:59The Long Term Investor Host:Yeah, let's talk about that for a second. Like educate everybody on what is the basis trade and like where it came from and like what's going on right now. Oh, I didn't prep for this. Oh, that's okay. Well, then we don't have to do that. Let me just think if I can do it well right now. I mean, a lot of times because it's like banks had to get rid of like they they had to hold different assets and as they couldn't buy the or they couldn't use like the futures as collateral yeah they wanted to sell treasuries they wanted to buy to hold fewer treasuries because it got more regulatorily expensive and annoying to hold treasuries and so like they're like a lower yielding thing relative to the other things that they could be holding for the same basic um capital or like regulatory accounting and uh so they were like all right i don't want these treasuries anymore so they sold them but then And there are all these like institutional bond buyers, the PIMCOs of the world again, that need to have exposure to bonds.
23:51And it's cheaper to buy those in futures and get the exposure without having to actually buy the bond today. And so they want to they want to buy futures. And so this sort of like selling treasuries from the banks plus buying futures from the institutional bond buyer world created this like weird gap that hedge funds could step into and just pick up that difference. and I the most pleasing way to think of this as for me in reporting this out has been to think of it as like a janitor like they're just mopping up that difference and in doing so it's created this kind of extra room like fiscal room for the U.S.
24:26The Long Term Investor Host:to borrow and I assume the hedge funds all just say hey we're liquidity providers the janitor they're like we're here to support our country that's what hedge funds are famously incredibly patriotic I'm just kidding they don't care I love But I was like, wait, is she serious? But I also see laughing. I was just trying it out. I love it. It didn't fit. Yeah, it doesn't fit. We'll return it. I mean, bless them. They're not anti-America. No, no. As long as it profits. I mean, look, not that many hedge fund managers are that talented anyway. Don't let them hear you say that. They're all super smart.
24:58The Long Term Investor Host:I just can't handle that. Yeah, it doesn't always translate to returns. Correct. Maybe that's the nicer way to put it. isn't it like there was some study that jeffrey gunlock cited to me once that i never found um that it's like even an optimal portfolio would have a like 10 year period of underperformance or something over 100 years i made that number up but it's like there's a great paper called like even god would fail as an active manager where like you know like even if you know the perfect set of securities you'd have to like live through such a terrible period in order to achieve those, which, you know.
25:31I love that. Even God. I wonder what he has to say about that. Sorry, she.
25:35The Long Term Investor Host:Yeah, that's right. Or they, who knows? We don't know. Yeah, but I'm surprised that we haven't. We'll find out. Yeah, right. Yeah, it's a good paper to Google. It's not an academic paper, but it's on Alpha Architect's website from like five or six years ago. I think it's pre-pandemic. Nice. Okay. So, Mary, we're kind of like talking a lot about like the market structure of this? Like, how should we distinguish a fiscal problem from a treasury market structure problem? And from a global headwinds problem and whatever else? I don't know. I mean, it's hard to say. It's all of this stuff gets mashed up.
26:14It's like very annoying that people don't come into the market and say, I'd like to buy at this rate because these are the things I'm considering and in what weight I'm considering them. That would be very helpful as a journalist if they would
26:24The Long Term Investor Host:just say so well there's that board that the treasury presents to what's their team back is that what it is there's like 12 members and they get like feedback on what's super cool to be on it it's like all the market participants exactly i sort of do but like that's sort of what they do but yes no no other big buyers other than that but they're not telling us also that's correct that is true they must have india's of sorts yeah yeah i mean if you call them each of the members and you're you befriend them they will but it's very slow i i want a more like when you submit your ticket. I want a label.
26:55I want you to have to force rank the reasons why you feel this way. If I'm selling, it's because I'm concerned about future inflation. Growth has been too good. The U.S. economy is way too resilient and I'm freaked out. Is that why you're selling? Is that why interest rates are going up? Or are you worried about like, I don't know, institutional credibility? It looks like courts are being funny. It looks like I can't rely on whatever the administration is going to do tomorrow. I feel that was more of a 2025. I feel like with like a stuff, I feel like that's come off a bit. Um, but you know, I don't know.
27:26The Long Term Investor Host:Like today rates are rising. You could argue because earnings are there and growth looks okay, but you know, so it's easy to tell the narrative and this is why people are able to like weaponize the debt as a political like tool is you're able to basically tell whatever story you want and then just point to the debt. Is that a fair takeaway? I think that's right. And yeah, I think that's exactly right. Let me ask you this kind of still more like market structure based, like the Federal Reserve, when they step in to buy treasuries, you could argue on one hand that the treasury market needs it. Otherwise, it won't work.
28:01The Long Term Investor Host:Or you can say that's exactly why it's safe, because the Fed can go and do that. How do you feel about that? Oh, I love it when people avoid saying moral hazard. Thank you. But then I always say it. I don't know. I find it to be one of those phrases that's meaningless until you really know it. And then it's too late to be useful. I think I struggle with this because I don't have a good answer. I agree. I want I think the Fed is great as an invention. I think that we have fewer financial crises. I think we have way more predictability. I love that it's better than it was in 1873. I don't love moral hazard.
28:40I don't think it's great to have individual profits and socialized costs. I think that's collectivized costs, if that word's upsetting. I think that's bad because I don't want to pay for some random dummy running around the market taking risks that he shouldn't when because and he's like happy to take them and take even more than he would have otherwise, because he knows that the Fed will just bail him out. Like that's not a real market. You're not taking real risks if that's the case. So Jeff Mellie, formerly of Barclays, now at NYU Stern, and it has a trifecta or trilemma that he's presented.
29:09That's you can have stable markets, stable banks or moral hazard, but not all three. And then I was talking to a financial crisis expert the other month and he was like, you know, if you don't have any financial crises, you've overdone it.
29:22The Long Term Investor Host:But too safe. Like it's too safe. You need to. And I was like, oh, my God, that's true. If you're a regulator from like the Fed's perspective, whoever, and you have no financial crises, you have broken your market. That's not what it's supposed to be. That's interesting. I like that. Capitalism, capital markets necessitate losses. You got to have them. You got to break stuff to grow. Yeah. I think I'm anti moral hazard then. I think I, I know I didn't expect that either. Uh, by the way, just because like I have gotten this question a couple of times, I want people listening or watching us to know that when the treasury is out there buying bonds and like kind of swapping out old bonds for new bonds.
30:02The Long Term Investor Host:That is different. To be honest, I don't know how I feel about the fact that they need to do it so much. I don't know enough, to be honest, but that's like not a new thing that. That's a great point. I've been doing it for a while. I think they doubled the size. So people like, oh, they're trying to control interest rates. I actually don't think that is what it has to do. But you're hesitating to. So, well, I mean, you must not have an opinion on it because you might jump in and tell me the answer. But no, I mean, I think this is just how you get off the run securities out of the market and you just like create liquidity.
30:35The Long Term Investor Host:Like there's nothing wrong with those securities and they've been doing this in the past. But you basically have securities that won't trade. Like one of the things that's so valuable about our debt markets is that liquidity. Yeah, everybody can trade them. And so if you have some out there that you can swap, I don't know really what the tax cost is to the taxpayer. of a like plumbing move in your view it's like why don't we take out this like four and a half year or this like nine and three quarter because nobody's like trading these around and so i'm under the impression that this has been a practice for quite a while i think again you can politicize a headline however you want when you when the deck comes in play and i think that happened a little bit uh well it's paired with rhetoric isn't it where he's like i wish the rates would go down it's like well well that's exactly and so like they're you know just like they don't want forward guidance.
31:24The Long Term Investor Host:It's sort of like, that's like the treasury trying to do its own form of forward guidance and like, create an action. Yeah, it's like, if that guy won't do it, I will. Yeah, because quantitative easing, which I'm not trying to confuse the listeners and viewers, like quantitative easing is when the Fed does it. The treasury that is like swapping out, you know, old treasuries for new treasuries, they, you know, quantitative easing, most of what I've seen has shown, like it probably didn't have that big of an impact on rates quantitatively, but the story of it like got people to behave differently.
31:52The Long Term Investor Host:And so in that sense, yes, perhaps like the doubling of these, what do you call them? Treasury swaps? I don't know, though. I feel like all of the recent interventions, my feeling based on the market is that it's not all of them are kind of evaporating. And it's like because of all of the fundamental things are still the same. Yeah, it's a big nothing burger. It's a big nothing. Yeah. And it seems I mean, if I were Scott Bessent, I would be I think this is what he's doing I would be looking through my little books of like what can I do like it's a spell book you know but it's really just a history book right right what lovers do I actually have here what did the Dutch do once upon a time you know they have that now they didn't used to have a book of financial crises but they do at the Fed now in the New York Fed like when Tim Geithner got there he was like let me see all the other crisis handling and there just wasn't there was like a book that had nothing in it and he's like where's the book and they made it oh that's amazing it's called the doomsday book oh it's a plenty of money i know i'm trying to pitch it but i left so it's like so i know people at thest louis fed i'm gonna ask that about that yeah yeah it's very cool they just finished it inst louis but we do have a federal reserve bank ladies and gentlemen so yes we do fred is like the best like people like us one of the best contributions the fed has ever made is like this data set, Fred.
33:14The Long Term Investor Host:If you're a listener who's not like in this field and just a dork and you want to go find... It's a person named Fred. I'm sure there's a guy. They have these great t-shirts that they made and they sold out so quickly. And so I told my buddy, I'm like, hey, what's a guy got to do to get a Fred shirt? He's like, well, I can get you a sweatshirt. I'm like, it's like August. Oh, shit. I want the sweatshirt. Well, I will put in... I'll text this guy later and be like, hey. Is this crooked? Am I asking for favors? Sorry. No, I don't. I mean, I think, you know... For a Fred t-shirt or Fred sweatshirt.
33:41I feel like if you are...
33:42The Long Term Investor Host:So I think we're all okay. So let me kind of take us off of the dead a little, but more back to your show and all of the economists and policymakers and academics and thinkers that you've interviewed over the years. You sort of alluded to the fact that there are some people you like talking to and there's some people you don't. That's true. That's true. Which is true of everybody. I'm not going to tell you who I don't like talking to. I'm not going to do it. But I mean, like, how does somebody signal that they genuinely know what they're talking about rather than just kind of being confident and sounding certain about a small topic?
34:20Granularity and being able to answer questions. So very often in my career, I have approached people with a very sincere, good faith desire to understand what's happening and been like, but why is it like this? Why is this happening? Why is it this going to that? And they give me like a stock answer or a pat or they answer a slightly different question or they just give me the 30 ,000 foot view and then I keep trying to drill down and it just doesn't work. That signals to me very clearly that there's nothing there. There's not, they don't know. And they've never, maybe it's not their job to know and that's fine.
34:49I've talked to a beloved and well-respected and brilliant, enormous fund manager, but he's like the talker guy. He's not the actual investor guy. And I was like, hey, can you tell me what's going on with this and such bond? And he was like, oh, I have no idea.
35:06The Long Term Investor Host:He has like a set of talking points. I mean, I know people like that. And they're the face of like a huge institution. But yeah, they have a set of talking points. That's a full-time job. And it's not that person's job to know the granularity and the latest thing that happened on this one random bond that's in their giant portfolio. And that was educational for me. That's really good inside baseball for people who probably hear more from that person than the type of people you're interviewing. I'm kind of curious. So you're maybe, would you say, 10 or 12 episodes in on the show? I can tell you.
35:38I should be able to tell you. I'm just going to open YouTube here. I will also say it's also sort of over time you hear people. And if they're saying the same things and predicting the same crises over and over, and the crisis never happened.
35:52The Long Term Investor Host:That's all they know. Yeah. And is their logic coherent? Yeah. Then you're like, oh, I don't think this is a real. Okay, let's see. If you have a hammer and everything's a nail sort of situation. Yeah. Okay. It looks like I've done 15 so far. Look at you. I'm in on the ground floor of Mary in America. You all can be too. I'll never forget. But let me ask you this, Mary. I mean, of the conversations you've had and the questions that you've been exploring or examining, maybe not even for the first time, but just continuing to with your guests. I mean, has there been anything where you feel like you've changed your own mind since starting?
36:26Oh, great question. I did have the philosopher Deborah Satz on as almost a doctor to come on and fix my brain. because and I do this with some regularity with philosophers because I live so happily in markets and I find such solace in the clarity of the trade-offs that we evaluate and how we talk about things like it's just the reductive conversation like I find that very comforting because it's it's clear and it's simple and I can I can live there and philosophers don't let me live there there are costs to thinking this way and um apparently it's not how to live a life and I struggle with that.
37:08And the most pure distillation of this is that Al Roth, the Nobel Prize winning economist and absolutely charming, wonderful person, has very thoroughly convinced me that we should make markets in human organs. So not all.
37:19The Long Term Investor Host:The very first episode of your new show. It was great. I love it. I think he's amazing. Thank you for watching. Yes, of course. He's like, if we allow people to buy and sell kidneys, people who need kidneys to live would be able to get them way more easily. There would be more kidneys to give to those people or sell. And I, as a practical matter, find that very hard to get out of that logic. Debra Satz is the sort of compliment to Al. She's across the campus at Stanford. They are in literal dialogue. She is thanked in his most recent book. She's like, you should not buy and sell some things. There are some things that just should not be marketized.
37:54And I didn't believe this until I had her on. And she was talking about, for example, I don't know if you know the famous Haifa daycare study experiment, I guess.
38:02The Long Term Investor Host:No, I don't think so. It's okay. So daycare in Haifa was trying to figure out what if they were running an experiment basically to see how parents would react to different incentives and if they could make them stop being late for pickup. And so they started charging, you know, this many dollars for every minute that you're late. This is a very normal thing that people do here. I've paid my share of late fees at pickup at daycare. Yes. It's very embarrassing. Yes. And people who got charged were like, oh, fantastic. I'm just paying for more daycare. They viewed it as like, I have absolved my debt here.
38:35I have paid for this time. Like, this is just an exchange. And in doing so, it actually, when they tried to reverse that structure, it had permanently changed the way that the parents interacted with the daycare. Something was like undoable there, which I was like, I didn't realize that that would be the case. And she's like, when we buy and sell apples, the apples don't change and they don't change us. But other things change and change us. And I was like, holy shit.
39:05The Long Term Investor Host:I love that you are ending us on that because neither you nor I solved any of the debt questions, nor did we give anybody anything actionable. but hopefully they learn something from the nuances of two relatively, I would like to think relatively unbiased sources. I think that's right. Everybody listening and watching to us do check out Mary in America, just a phenomenal set of guests. Mary, you have helped elevate the guest level of my show, which is no knock to the other guests. We love all of our guests here on the long-term investor, but I appreciate you being here and to everybody watching, like subscribe, comment to all the things, you know where to find Mary now, Mary.
39:44The Long Term Investor Host:We'll be in touch. We'll talk soon. Thank you so much for having me. This was so fun.
40:13This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a basis for investment decisions. Clients of PlanCorp and BrightPlan may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this podcast.
From the publisher
Get behind-the-scenes stories and access to subscriber-only webinars when you sign up for updates about my new book, The Perfect Portfolio: www.theperfectportfoliobook.com
-----
U.S. Treasurys anchor the global financial system—but what does "risk-free" actually mean when federal debt and interest costs keep climbing? Mary Childs, host of Mary in America and author of The Bond King, joins me to examine the hidden machinery behind the Treasury market and what could put its stability to the test. We also explore how Mary identifies genuine expertise and why some parts of life may not belong in a market at all.
Listen now and learn:
► What must remain true for U.S. Treasurys to deserve the label "risk-free"
► How rising government debt could reach investors and households
► Why hedge funds and the Federal Reserve matter to Treasury-market stability
► How Mary distinguishes genuine expertise from confident performance
Visit www.TheLongTermInvestor.com for show notes, free resources, and a place to submit questions.
Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (https://thepodcastconsultant.com)
Disclosure: This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.
The commentary in this "post" (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Plancorp LLC employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Plancorp LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Plancorp LLC or performance returns of any Plancorp LLC client.
References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.
Please see disclosures here.
