In short
A “Question Time” money advice episode covering UK car finance redress (whether certain agreements are covered), credit card cashback tactics, incorrect cashback categorisation by a bank, online retailer returns terms that may breach consumer law, and a feel-good story about a child learning what interest is.
Guests (callers/featured people)
- Margaret (email): asks about Ford Finance “Ford Options”/similar agreements and the car finance misselling redress scheme.
- Julie in Cheshire (caller): shares success teaching her 9-year-old (Niamh) about interest using a Revolut savings account.
- Ben in Manchester (caller): asks about adding a partner as a second cardholder to maximise Lloyds Ultra 1% cashback across two years.
- Anthony in Devon (caller): reports Monzo cashback miscategorising a local mechanic as a high-street retailer.
- Paul (email): asks how to force a retailer to correct illegal online returns information.
Key claims & notable examples
- Car finance redress covers PCP/HP (not leases) from 6 Apr 2007 to 1 Nov 2024; discretionary commission arrangements (banned 28 Jan 2021) plus other commission-related issues; you can’t know if you were missold without complaining.
- Credit cards: second cardholder spending is legally the primary cardholder’s debt; limited cashback offers can be rotated between partners if the offer still exists.
- Monzo: after notifying them of cashback miscategorisation, consider formal notice/complaint if they don’t fix it.
- Retailers: statute overrides terms; online returns must follow Consumer Contracts Regulations (14-day cooling-off; delivery charge refund rules); Martin offers to escalate if Trading Standards is slow.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOAsking Questions and Suggestions
2:23 to 5:30
Discussion on listener questions and suggestions for podcast names.
“Welcome to our Question Time edition of the podcast where you can ask me anything and everything you like.”
Car Finance Redress Scheme Explained
5:31 to 11:16
Detailed explanation of car finance agreements and the redress scheme.
“Matt, what's your first question for me?”
Success Story from a Listener
11:17 to 14:01
A listener shares their success in teaching their child about money.
“And it's for those who've complained, you will hopefully get your payout within 2026.”
Teaching Kids About Interest
14:01 to 17:24
Learn how to explain the concept of interest to children using relatable examples.
“but you've got to do them every day consistently.”
Understanding the Value of Money
17:25 to 19:42
Discover the importance of teaching kids the value of money and how to save effectively.
“I'll tell you how I would describe interest.”
Listener Call: Youngest Podcast Fan
19:43 to 20:50
Hear a delightful listener story involving financial lessons learned by a nine-year-old.
“So I'm going to make sure everybody eats.”
Discussing Pocket Money Strategies
20:51 to 21:40
Explore the debate on whether children should be paid for chores or responsibilities.
“A lot of that whole idea about giving pocket money of pay is something I've talked about before because financial education is a big thing.”
Cashback Credit Card Strategies
21:41 to 24:16
Learn how to maximize cashback benefits by strategically using credit cards.
“I have a question for the part I was hoping you could answer.”
Listener Call: Cashback Dilemma
24:17 to 28:00
A listener seeks advice on handling cashback received from a bank error.
“I think it's a minimum£3 ,000 on the card in order to get any form of cashback on it, but that's the whole point.”
Cashback Mystery: Handling Errors with Monzo
28:00 to 32:00
Learn how to effectively address cashback errors with your bank.
“We're not going out of our way to spend there.”
Show all 12 chapters
Consumer Rights and Retailer Accountability
32:00 to 33:45
Understand consumer protection laws and how to address retailer violations.
“take care cheers cheers speaking of the sensible friend you would ask Matt what's your next question?”
Engaging Listeners: Creative Nicknames for Contributors
33:45 to 40:10
Explore fun and creative suggestions for naming podcast contributors.
“So if you've paid extra for fast delivery, you don't get that back, but if you haven't, you get that basic whatever.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.
0:30the highest B2B return on ad spend of major ad networks. Spend$250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get$250 credit for the next one. Just go to linkedin.com slash broadcast. That's linkedin.com slash broadcast. Terms and conditions apply. Hi, this is Alex Kantrowicz. I'm the host of Big Technology Podcast, a longtime reporter and an on-air contributor to CNBC. And if you're like me, you're trying to figure out how artificial is changing the business world and our lives. So each week on Big Technology, I bring on key actors from companies building AI tech and outsiders trying to influence it, asking where this is all going.
1:07They come from places like NVIDIA, Microsoft, Amazon, and plenty more. So if you want to be smart with your wallet, your career choices, in meetings with your colleagues and at dinner parties, listen to Big Technology Podcast wherever you get your podcasts.
1:24Martin Lewis:The name's Bond. Bank and Building Society Bond. Licence to save. We're going to hear exactly how it works sometime this month. The following day there was a penny, which seems so insignificant to this little person. It was a free penny. Do I just leave it as it is or are they going to come clawing the money back in a few months' time? Hello and welcome to the cunningly named The Martin Lewis Podcast. I do wonder what that's going to be about. This is our question time episode where you get to ask me your questions on absolutely anything and everything. Open brackets within reason, close brackets.
1:56Martin Lewis:In this week's pod, you ask me, is my car finance agreement covered by the misselling redress scheme? Can my partner and I couple up to ramp cashback offers? I've told Monzo it's overpaid me. It's done nothing. Do I get to keep the money? What can I do about a retailer that keeps displaying the wrong returns info online? And we've got a lovely success story involving a nine-year-old doing jobs for money and a bit of singing too. Not from me, don't worry. Play the theme tune.
2:39Martin Lewis:Welcome to our Question Time edition of the podcast where you can ask me anything and everything you like. Here's the brackets within reason, close brackets. And of course, joining me and putting the whole thing together is the one, the only, the curator of questions, Professor Sir Matthew Burnham Esquire. Boop, boop, boop. I'll do it for myself. You didn't notice. You missed out Doctor. I did miss out Doctor. Oh, I noticed straight away. Okay, do you know why I missed out Doctor? Go on. What did you forget to bring to the studio that's causing you more difficulties in your production? I knew you'd mention this.
3:16Martin Lewis:So I left my laptop at home. And you've been fiddling around and been a little bit not quite sure where you're going because of that. Yeah, it just throws you off. A little bit less efficient. So I'm afraid I didn't feel you could have your doctor in your title. My honorary doctorate has been revoked. You've kept your honorary professorship. You've kept your honorary knighthood and your honorary esquireness. And just to clarify for everyone listening, they are all honorary. None of them are real titles. No, I wish they were. They are titles within the canon of this podcast. That's quite a good way to phrase it.
3:50Yeah, it is. Quite a nerdy way to phrase it.
3:52Martin Lewis:Well, it's also within the canon of this podcast, a nerdy way to phrase it. Now, I know what many listeners will be waiting here is for any updates on the suggested name for people who are contacted and either get read out or call up the show. Have we had any suggestions in? Loads. Yes. Loads. Okay, give me them, give me them. I'm going to give you my instant reaction. I promise I haven't heard any of these before. I'm going to do this live on air. Or should, no, I tell you what, we're a proper podcaster who's meant to be doing serious stuff. We're going to save this till the end. Are you sure?
4:24Do you want one now? All right, one. One, okay. So we've got Kiara. She says, Savvy Sally's. Ooh. She's also given a few others. Budget Conscious Questioners.
4:36Martin Lewis:BCQ. BCQ. The brilliant budget conscious BBCs. Yeah, no, not doing BBCs. No, spreadsheeters. I like spreadsheeters. Put that one on the spreadsheet. Okay, or inquisitive money-saving experts. I don't think we can use that one. No, we can't. There's trademark issues and all types of compliance cross-promotional issues that go on with that. Go back to the first. Savvy Sally is very interesting. Savvy Sally. I'll tell you why Savvy Sally is very interesting because, again, regular listeners, and we're going very niche, will know about Rosie, who works for me on the podcast. Well, Rosie is here this week, but because Rosie isn't going to be here next week, the wonderful Sally is going to be filling in for Rosie.
5:13Martin Lewis:And Sally is actually in the studio with me, and you've just suggested Savvy Sally, which does put it quite high up the list. Yeah, so we've got our own Sally. Give me another shake whether you think it should be Savvy Sally. Sally is supporting Savvy Sally, but she's biased, so I'm not sure I'm going to take any notice of that, frankly. So, right, we're going to do the rest of those at the end of the pod. Shall we start with a proper question? Let's do a proper one. OK. Matt, what's your first question for me? And who's it from? This one is from Margaret. She's emailed it in. MartinLewsPodcast at bbc.co.uk.
5:43She says, hello. Hello. No, no, Martin or Matt. Just hello. That's fine.
5:47Martin Lewis:She says hello. It's polite. Hello, Margaret. I have had several new Ford cars over a number of years and have always used Ford Finance on a fixed term contract, which gives me the choice of changing my car to another new Ford car during or at the end of the agreed term. keeping my car or giving it back. Does this type of contract using Ford Credit fall into the car finance redress scheme? Probably is my answer. It sounds to me like it's Ford Options, which is a sort of PCP or HP agreement depending on how they've worked it. And the two types of agreement that are covered under car finance redress are personal contract payments and higher purchase, PCP and HP.
6:27Martin Lewis:So if it's what I think it is, and obviously I can't go any further than if it's what I think it is. To my ears, it sounds like it should be covered. And let's remember there are up to 14 million agreements that are likely due a typical£700 car finance payout. And we are going to hear the regulators' redress scheme. We're going to hear exactly how it works sometime this month, sometime in March. Now, when they say we will do this in March, it could last until Tuesday the 31st. I mean, they could be doing this at five o 'clock on Tuesday the 31st. I wouldn't be surprised or maybe the Monday before unlikely this Friday, but possible this Friday.
7:10Martin Lewis:That's how these things tend to work. So what's this all about? Well, this is the fact that in three different ways, people, the regulator believes people may have been missold car finance. Those three different ways in a nutshell. The big one is what's called discretionary commission arrangements, DCAs. that's where the interest you paid was increased to pay the dealer or broker an extra commission. Now, they were banned on the 28th of January 2021. So that is only for agreements before that. The other two types can be for agreements after that, which is contractual ties, basically where a broker didn't tell you it was working primarily with one lender.
7:47Martin Lewis:So an example would be, yeah, we're going to put this to a panel of lenders, but then only went to one lender. That lender wanted your business. So they only told you about that lender's business. and the other one is literally based on the rates of the commission. If the commission was above a certain level, it's deemed as unfairly high. Now, the most important thing you need to understand in all this and the counter logical thing and the thing that confuses people is there is no way to know if you were missold without complaining. So to know if you have a complaint, you have to complain. Which is, I don't know, I can't tell you because, you know, this is probably 40, 45 % of car finance agreements.
8:28Martin Lewis:But the whole point is it wasn't disclosed. You just don't know. So you have to put in a complaint and you can do that free. There are free tools online that will do this for you. You don't need to be going paying anybody to do it if you're going to go through the regulator's redress scheme. If you wanted to go to court, you'd probably want to pay somebody. And therefore you can do it yourself. So let's just go through the are you likely impacted checklist. This is for motor vehicle finance. So that's cars, vans, motorbikes, camper vans, but not caravans because they don't have a motor. The eligible date is any finance agreement from the 6th of April 2007 until the 1st of November 2024 is the last date.
9:05Martin Lewis:But I need to be honest, you are far more likely to have been missold if it wasn't in the last few years because they were improving their behaviours in those last few years. Although you could have been, but it is less likely. The finance types, as I've already mentioned, are PCP and HP. If you leased a car, that is not covered in this. Now, this is primarily for vehicles for personal use, although if you're a sole trader or a small partnership there and you got it for work, it could be covered if the finance is under 25 grand. if you've paid the vehicle off or you no longer own the vehicle irrelevant you could still have a claim this was about the finance agreement you took being missold to you whether you still have the car or not whether you still have the agreement or not is irrelevant if you were missold you were missold and if the owner has passed away then the primary beneficiary of the estate or the executor of the estate can claim on their behalf and if you had multiple eligible car finance deals deals with the same firm, you can claim.
10:04Martin Lewis:If you had multiple eligible car finance deals with different firms, you can claim, but then each one would need to be a separate complaint because you're going to different firms. And the reason you want to get the complaint in, and I've done lots about this and I will be doing more when the announcement comes out, the reason I'd suggest you complain is this. While under this mass redress scheme from the regulator, firms will be tasked with trying to find everybody who had car finance and was missold and getting in touch with them. It is going to be far quicker to get your payout if you've complained.
10:36Martin Lewis:They will definitely know your address and be able to track you if you've complained, as opposed to if they're trying to track you and you've moved house and they can't contact you. And also, they may not have details of old finance agreements, but you may have those details and therefore it's best to complain and get that in touch. And there is a new tool on the Equifax app. It should always be free if you're paying, you haven't set it up right, which can try and find old car finance agreements. back to 2007 for you. So hopefully that gives you a start. There are some great guides online where you can go through this in detail and free tools available, but that who is eligible.
11:07Martin Lewis:I turn what was a relatively short question into a very long answer there. Yes, you did. Maybe I was trying to broaden it for everybody listening. Hopefully it makes sense. And we'll know way more detail within weeks. And then this is all going to start. And it's for those who've complained, you will hopefully get your payout within 2026. If you haven't complained, unlikely in 2026, probably sometime in 2027 if they're trying to find you. So, Matt, we move from car finance into a caller, I am guessing. Who do you have for me? Into a caller with a success. Julie in Cheshire. Hi, Julie. Hi, Matt.
11:48Martin Lewis:Hello, Julie. Hi, Matt. Whereabouts in Cheshire? As a Cheshire man, whereabouts are you? Which part? I'm in Fredsham. oh oh now that we're already doing very well i know frodham very well well when i was growing up frodham was a village i think it's a town now but it is we're a market town it used to have the widest village street i think was the widest village street in in the uk uh because i grew up about six seven miles away from frodham which is not very far when you live in that part of the world i was in delamere forest so i was very near you yeah very near yeah we've been up to delamere a number of times it's beautiful right so it's lovely to have you on what what did we do what's the success well um i thought i would tell you about my my success with my little girl um and changing the way we look at money i suppose um so i i grew up in quite a deprived household so money was a big issue for us um and i was explaining to matt some of your stories um hit home quite hard for me it means I've got a bit of a difficult relationship with money and I still check pounds per pence when I you know go and put butter up in the in the market and I don't need to do that anymore so it was quite important.
13:06Martin Lewis:I think that's not a bad relationship with money I still do it too and I don't need to do it either I think there's something there's something about keeping your wits about you there's a difference between you can afford it and you don't want to be ripped tough yeah that yeah i think that's fair i i think i find it a little bit controlling i suppose but i don't want my children to have that opinion um and but in the same respect they're growing up in a very different world to me so i don't want them to think that money's no issue either which is easy done when uh when you know everything kind of gets paid for you so um we we've always given the children a bit of spends if they do the part so if they're helping out but it's always been a bit haphazard.
13:48So this year, we decided to give our nine-year-old some chores and said to her, right, if you do all your chores each day, you can earn a pound. If you've completed all of your chores all week, we will up that to£10, so we'll give you the extra£3, but you've got to do them every day consistently. So she's like, okay, well, you know, not really understanding money properly, I suppose, so we'll give this a go. By the Sunday, and we made a sit-up, top a cha-cha and so on it's like right well there's your seven pounds and actually you'll get this three pound for free basically just for doing your job bit like a brucey bonus i suppose
14:27Martin Lewis:bonus for good work yeah it's a performance related bonus i love it direct correct yeah so um so this went on for a couple of weeks but she listens to your podcast in the car with me all the time um it is quite fun what's her name a lot of the topics neve neve um hello yeah Oh my God, she will explode. So she listens to the podcast and obviously a lot of the topics go overhead, but we were listening to one on interest specifically. And she was like, what is interest? I was like, how do I even begin to explain this? Fascinating question from parents. What did you say? I want to know. So what I said to her is it's money that the bank gives to you because you're letting them look after your money.
15:16It's quite a difficult one. And the money that they give you depends on how much money you have in your bank at any one time. She's like, well, I don't. She has got a bank. But as far as she's concerned, she's like, well, I don't have a bank. My money augurs in my pot. I've got a pot full of pennies that adds up. So what we'll do, we'll open you a bank. So I've been listening to the podcast about all the different children, savers and so on. And we do have an ISA for her. We've got an ISA for both of us.
15:43Martin Lewis:Can I just tell you, I have such a big smile on my face. Please carry on. So we've got another daughter, my eldest daughter, Robin. She works and she's got her own bank and she deals with her own money now. But we said to her, look, we'll open you a bank. So we opened a Revolut account, which has a reasonable interest savings account attaching to it as well. It's about 3%, isn't it? Yeah, 3%, yeah. but they pay their interest daily. Nice. So we put in some birthday money that she'd had, put all the pennies together and cashed them all up, and I took the pennies and gave her the cash, and I've got to deal with the pennies, the bag full of pennies.
16:25Martin Lewis:Oh, someone in the supermarket's going to love you. Oh, I know, I know. I'm not sure I'm going to love it, but anyway. So we put all the money into her bank, and there was just short of a couple of hundred pounds once we'd totted it all up and put it all in for her. and she's like well what happens now when do I get this interest and I'm like well it doesn't quite happen immediately but let's you know see over the next couple of days so there's an app that comes with a Revolut account and when we logged in the following day there was a penny one penny which seems so insignificant to grown-ups but to this little person it was a free penny a penny that she didn't have yesterday and not given by mummy and daddy and given by the bank given by someone else yeah she earned it So, yeah, so by the following week, she tipped over and she got two pieces.
17:14It was like a revelation. But now it's just going to sit there making her extra money and she doesn't have to wash any pots for it.
17:23Martin Lewis:That's brilliant. And let me give Niamh a couple of tips from me. I'll tell you how I would describe interest. I would say interest is the price of money, which sounds very strange. But this is what happens. When you save in a bank or a savings account, you're actually giving them your money and you're allowing them to use it as they want to use it while they're holding on to it. And they can use it to make money. They can use it to lend to people. They can use it to invest in companies and all of those things make them money. But they're making money on your money. So they have to pay you because that you are allowing them to use your money while they look after it for you.
18:08Martin Lewis:That's where the interest comes from. That's the price that they have to pay to use your money. And interestingly, there's another thing we talk about that's called debt. And that's where you owe someone money, which is almost exactly the same thing, just the other way around. That's where you go to your bank and you say to them, I need some money to buy something. Can you give it to me? Can you lend it to me? And when they lend it to you, they then charge you because you get to use their money. But here's the difference. Normally, when we give our money to the bank, they give us three or four percent.
18:48Martin Lewis:And I'll leave your mummy and daddy to talk about percents to you. but when the bank gives us money it will charge us 18 or 19 percent so you are always far better to save up for something that you want rather than to have to borrow it in advance and you won't be able to borrow now you're way too young but this is a good thing to learn when you're older and one thing you could practice now is instead of when you have your money and you're doing brilliantly putting it all in the bank i think it's absolutely fantastic but when you have your money in the bank you always have two choices you can buy lots of little things with it but then it doesn't grow or you could have an idea of a big thing you want to get later something that'll be really exciting and you keep it in there and you have your money and you have the money given to you by the bank and then you get to have the big thing quicker i think neve sounds like you're doing absolutely brilliantly well done and thank you for listening to the podcast you are probably our youngest regular listener sorry i was talking to your daughter not to you there no no she loves it she absolutely loves it um and she loves the same tune she sings the same tune for us as well Does she?
19:48Martin Lewis:Can we hear her sing the theme tune? I got food. Oh, you got it. I got to pay. So I go work, work, work every day. I got mouths. I got mouths. I got to feed. So I'm going to make sure everybody eats. Oh. That was fantastic. I didn't know you had it. That's wonderful. Matt, was that you playing it in? How did that just work? It's magic. It's the magic of the podcast. Okay, that's two producer points for you there, Matt. Thank you very much. Oh, Julie, thank you so much for calling. What a lovely feel-good way, just in the run-up to Easter. That's absolutely wonderful. Thank you so much. And please send my best wishes to your brilliant daughter.
20:30Martin Lewis:Daughters. I will do. Thank you so much for your time. I do appreciate it. That's a pleasure. Thank you for calling. We love that story. Thanks for everything you do. But we're going to have to put it out as a challenge now. Do we have any younger regular listeners than nine? We would love to know. Do get in touch. Martin Lewis, podcast at bbc.co.uk. Thanks, Julie. Thanks, guys. Bye. Now, just one quick note on that. A lot of that whole idea about giving pocket money of pay is something I've talked about before because financial education is a big thing. And obviously, as adults, we have to go out to work mainly in order to get money.
21:02Martin Lewis:And I think the idea of pocket money of pay enables children to start to understand that sense and gives them a sense of the value of money. You know, if I've spent half an hour to get this pound, half an hour doing whatever it is, tidying up the kitchen table, whatever you've chosen them to do, That starts to breed that understanding of the value of money much more quickly and getting it as a concept. And I think it works well. The really big question, and I'll leave it up to you, is do you reward them for doing things that they're supposed to do anyway, such as tidying your bedroom? Do you get paid for tidying your bedroom?
21:33Martin Lewis:Or is that your own responsibility? The choice is up to you as parents. It's an interesting one, though. Matt, I don't know if we can top that, so let's just do a question. OK, a good one, though. Honestly, it was so good. A good one from Ben in Manchester. Martin. Buenas tardes, he starts. Buenas tardes. Martin and COQ Matt. Got it, right? Curator of questions. Curator of questions. Yes, not the other thing. I have a question for the part I was hoping you could answer. I've just signed up for the Lloyd's Ultra credit card to get the 1 % cash back for the first year. And there's an option to add a second card holder.
22:12If I add my partner as a card holder to my account, Would they be able to set up their own Lloyd's Ultra credit card in a year's time and add me as a card holder to their account? I basically want to maximise the 1 % cash back on my card this year and then next year we can have another 1 % cash back on their account. Would that be a legit way to maximise the 1 % cash back for two years on two different cards? Thanks for your help over the years. I made over£1 ,000 last year switching banks with a burner account, which will be a nice bonus towards our Spanish wedding later this year.
22:45Martin Lewis:Oh, well, first of all, congratulations on your wedding to come, Ben, and to your fiancé. How brilliant for the two of you. OK, so, yes, theoretically, absolutely the right thing to do. If you are in a trusting relationship, and that's very important, and clearly you're about to get married, so you're in a good place. I hate to be the one to say it, but not all relationships always work through financially in the right way for people. so it is something once you start to link your finances you need to take that as a very clear decision that you're both understanding because especially with a credit card there's no such thing as a joint credit card your your your partner would be the second card holder everything spent on that card is legally your debt not their debt there is no and i've been asked this question you know i'm not saying it's going to happen to you at all you've got a marriage coming up it's all going to be wonderful but let's we have to do this properly I've been asked the question many times you know my partner's just spent this on or my ex-partner spent this on the second credit card it's their debt do I have to pay it yes it's your debt that's the law that's how it works so you need to be very aware of that with those caveats done let's assume everything I hope is all rosy wonderful and you're both happy with it at which point absolutely when you have a limited period offer on a credit card like a 1 % cashback or similar, you've got the Amex Everyday card, which is similar.
24:09Martin Lewis:There you get 5 % cashback for the first five months. It's currently boosted up to that. It's tiered rates afterwards. It's only for higher spenders because you've got to spend, I think it's a minimum£3 ,000 on the card in order to get any form of cashback on it, but that's the whole point. One of you getting it, putting the other as a second card holder to use up that time period. And then when it ends, the other one of you getting it and swapping it the other way around, has long been a strategy I've advocated. The only issue with the Lloyds card is, of course, there is a chance that in a year's time, they may no longer have that offer.
Read the full transcript
24:44Martin Lewis:So on the Lloyds card, you get 1 % cash back on all spending for a year. You also get it in the UK and abroad. It also gives you near-perfect exchange rates. So it is, for those who aren't in debt and don't want debt, because you're going to pay the card off in full every month to make sure there's no interest, it is one of the top-picked cards for spending UK and abroad. And it's easy because you can have one card that you do both in the UK and abroad, set up your direct debit to repair it in full. But there is, of course, a chance it won't be around for your partner in a year. But that isn't actually any risk.
25:11Martin Lewis:You've lost nothing. You might have lost a slight bit of convenience that you could both have a card each rather than having a second cardholder. But still, if you're working your finances together, it doesn't matter. You'll get at least one year, 1 % on it. And if it isn't around in a year, you've lost nothing, so you may as well give it a go, would be my answer. With all the caveats, we talked on the pod with Adrian recently about financial abuse and economic abuse as part of domestic abuse, which is why I'm very mindful on a question like this that I have to put those caveats in, though I hope in your circumstances it's all irrelevant.
25:40Martin Lewis:Thank you for your question, Ben. So, Matt, I don't know why I make it like I'm some great, enormous clairvoyant because I can predict what you're going to do because we do have a format. That means it's a caller. It is a caller. Obviously. Obviously. But hey, I'll take the credit. I knew it. I knew it. Every time. It's Anthony in Devon and he should be there. Hi, Anthony. Hello. Hello, Martin. Hello, Matt. Nice. Well done. Correct order. Thank you. And the way you said it, Anthony, I know you had thought about what you were going to do there and making it the correct order, the Martin, then the Matt.
26:14Martin Lewis:Am I right? Absolutely, yes. Boo. No, regular listener, Matt. We never boo. A regular listener, if somebody knows about our entire who goes first, Martin or Matt, then they're a regular listener and we should be applauding them. Hooray. especially as you got it right. So Anthony, what can I do for you? So I've got a question relating to cashback. Now I bank with Monzo, have done for many years, was one of their first customers and was given kind of early access to their original products in exchange for giving kind of constructive feedback on their services and their tech. And one of those things was, you know, when you get a transaction appear on your app, there's a little logo for the retailer next to it and things like that that'd be wrong you kind of iron them out um and yeah you're always product testing to them volunteer product yeah yeah so so so that's basically an example um our local mechanic who we've been using for for years um has a very similar name um and the initials of the owner to a well-known high street retailer so when I went and got my MOT or whatever um the logo for the retailer would um incorrectly appear next to uh the transaction for our local mechanic so I fed that back maybe half a dozen times um and they're a much bigger bank now so they haven't really got time to to sort out little things like that so that it's not really I'm getting this is you know there's a there's a WH Smythe near a WH Smith type thing.
27:43Martin Lewis:Is that what we're talking? Yeah, kind of like that, which is absolutely fine. These things happen. It's an independent garage. Until a few months ago, Monzo started offering cash back at the well-known high street retailer. We shop there anyway, my wife and I, and we're happy to get the cash back from there. We're not going out of our way to spend there. But what we did notice is that when we went to get our servicing done or repair or new tire cashback would also be added to the transaction for the local mechanic and i would say over the last few months and we've got two cars within our family so once you add up mot servicing repairs breakdowns new wipers etc we've probably gained about 50 or 60 pounds in cashback just for those transactions so my question really is what do we do do i keep telling Monzo of their mistake.
28:39Is it down to them? Do I just leave it as it is? Or are they going to come clawing the money back in a few months time once they realise what they've done?
28:47Martin Lewis:Clearly, I don't know, is the honest answer, because this is a one off situation. You have done the right thing because you've notified them that they are giving you the cash back in error, and they have not rectified their error. That in itself does not stop them coming back in future and clawing the money back. Although I think it would be somewhat disingenuous if they did. because you've notified them and this is their fault. My instinct, and it's only instinct, and I sometimes say this on Question Time, maybe rather than considering I have any expertise in this, I would consider me, you know, your mate in the pub who's generally quite good with these issues, and I'm going to give you an answer in that tone rather than in the this is what you should be doing tone because it's simply, it's not a precedent I've seen.
29:37Martin Lewis:I would contact them one more time. I would say I am formally notifying you that you are making a mistake in this cashback categorisation. I would like you to formally acknowledge receipt of this. If you are going to want to claw it back, please do it now. If you don't respond to this, I will consider this money to be mine and you incapable of clawing it back in future, as I have notified for you. and therefore I feel I am perfectly entitled to spend it. And I would give them that and I would put on that, you know, I would need a response within 28 days or give them some timing so that you have formalised this, you've notified this.
30:17Martin Lewis:I think if you were to do that and Monzo were not to respond, I mean, you're never going to take it this far, but let's play it to its nth degree. And then you were to make a formal complaint to the ombudsman about it that you had notified them and therefore, you know, If we're playing, and it's only 50, 60 quid, let's not get too much, but therefore their behaviour isn't treating you fairly because it's giving you uncertainty of finances because you don't know if that money is yours or not. I think you might actually have a chance of winning at the ombudsman if you did something like that. Now, while you wouldn't take it that far, I would hope a company like Monzo, which tries to be strong on customer service, would get the point that if it comes back in a year and you say, hold on, well, here's a copy of what I sent you.
30:58Martin Lewis:I tried twice. You didn't respond. I think they'll probably let you keep the money. So I would probably just do something formal to protect myself. And hopefully that will do enough. But that is that is a this is what I would do answer as opposed to this is definitely what you should do, Anthony, if you know what I mean. What do you think of that? Yeah, it sounds sensible. I mean, yeah, giving them a bit of notice, you know, with 28 days is great. Otherwise, it's going in the holiday pot. But I'm sure I'm not the only one this has happened to. There's going to be more retailers out there they're making the same mistake with.
31:31Martin Lewis:No, and listen, you're actually being going way above board. I suspect most people would simply go, great, thank you very much, I'll keep that, I'll keep my mouth shut, which is always a little bit dangerous because then you have got a greater risk of them coming back. And it's the inconsistency and the uncertainty which is always difficult in finances. So I think you put this in, you can sleep very well at night that morally you have done absolutely everything right. And that's the way I would go. What an interesting question. Thank you so much, sir. alright pleasure take care cheers cheers speaking of the sensible friend you would ask Matt what's your next question?
32:09ok this mouse is so
32:16Martin Lewis:ok you ready? I'm ready now the reason there's a laughter in Matt's voice is he will have cut this out or you might put it in he just as he was trying to move to the next question he just went oh, this mouse is just so... And that's what you forget, forgetting your laptop. I'll remember it next week. All right, what's your next question? I have a question from Paul. He has emailed in. He says, hi, Martin and Matt. I have a question about stubborn retailers who ignore UK consumer law. I've been looking at the returns policy for an online store. Their policy explicitly states that sale items are non-returnable and that delivery charges are non-refundable.
32:53As a loyal listener, I know this is a direct breach of the Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013, which gives online shoppers a 14-day cooling-off period and the right to a refund on standard delivery. Correct. I've contacted the company twice to point this out, but I've been met with total silence. I even reported them to Trading Standards via Citizens Advice, but weeks later, the misleading information is still live on their site, potentially tricking thousands of shoppers out of their refund rights. My question is, when the official channels like Trading Standards feel like a slow-moving black hole and the company ignores you, what's the best way to actually force a retailer to update their terms?
33:31Is there a nuclear option for consumers to protect others from being misled by illegal T's and C's? Love the show, Paul.
33:38Martin Lewis:Oh, thank you, Paul. And well done for trying to protect other people as well. That's exactly the spirit of what we want to do. So you are absolutely right. If you buy something online, unless it's personalised or perishable, then you have a 14-day no-fault right to notify them that you're returning it, and then another 14 days after you've notified them in which to send it back, and you should get the basic delivery charge back. So if you've paid extra for fast delivery, you don't get that back, but if you haven't, you get that basic whatever. If it was free, it was free, but if you paid a pound, you get the pound back.
34:08Martin Lewis:So you are exactly right. Now, this is something I've been campaigning on because we did a review of 400 different brands, found 30 of them had incorrect returns information on their website, where they were giving you worse rights than were available that you have under your law, under the statute. And statute overrides any terms and conditions that a shop has. Of those 30, we got 28 corrected because I went very public on it. And two of them, by the time they got round, again, I'm afraid it ceased trading, which I think is endemic of probably some of the problems they're having in the business, that they couldn't have the compliance and lawyers in place to get it right.
34:45Martin Lewis:So, look, just a slight note about trading standards. I'm a big fan of trading standards, but we massively under-resource trading standards. There is not enough money given to them. They do struggle to deal with things. I think that's a real problem because you're right that those people who are policing fair rights for consumers need the resource to do it. So if they have been slow, I'm not going to berate them for it because I know that I just think it's a massively underfunded organisation. And that's a real problem rather than the brilliant officers who work in trading standards trying to do a good job.
35:15Martin Lewis:Is there a nuclear option? Well, without self-aggrandising, I think you're probably doing it. It's probably me, to be honest, if trading standards aren't going to work. So get in touch, Paul. If you can send us the details, I will have a look at it. and maybe we'll see if we can get that company together with your great research and my, I have a large reach, see if we can embarrass them into getting it right for consumers. I think that's the best answer I can give you. I haven't gotten it another way.
35:42Martin Lewis:OK, and now, normally where we do a funny, I think we should start doing all the names of what people have suggested, that those who get in touch and either have their question read out or come on as a caller are going to be called in future. What else have you got? What did we have before with Sally? Savvy Sally. Savvy Sally's. Okay. I'm not going to say any more, but I realised afterwards we can't do that because we can't use the acronym. No. So let's do some other things. Let's see what else people have suggested. Matt emailed in, not me. Okay. He said, I strongly vote against the use of QT for the name of someone that has helped contribute to the podcast.
36:21The main problem is that it isn't interchangeable for the meaning of the acronym question time. For example, I'm not a question time. Fortunately for you, I have a name that exactly 3.1415, nine times better. It's on a similar theme and does describe the person, a question time pioneer. The best part is the Latin Greek acronym for this suggestion, which is, of course, QTPI. Thank you for your consideration.
36:45Martin Lewis:I'm not sure I can be saying QTPI on air. Why? But I would like to congratulate Matt for the quite extreme nerddom that was involved in his suggestion. I mean, that scored high on the nerd score in a very positive way. So I'm not sure I can use it, but I did enjoy it. He did also say, I'm pleased to announce I didn't use AI for this idea. Well done. Mel in Farnborough, she says, Martin's Benefaction Askers, which you could shorten to MBAs. I quite like MBAs. I do quite like that. Okay, that's going, put that on the spreadsheet. Okay, Merlin Farmer, MBAs. Let me highlight that on the sheet so I know.
37:21And also, I've got a subtle eye.
37:22Martin Lewis:I've got Rosie and Sally here with me. I'm watching their reactions at the same time as well. So it's like we've got a mini panel going on. Charlie, he says, Martinis. Because as an avid follower of the podcast and your work, he considers himself a groupie, a bit like a Swifty. Also, when I think of a martini, I think of James Bond and definitely looks like Martin is auditioning to be the next 007 in the podcast artwork. Nice. Yeah. Martini? The name's Bond. Bank and Building Society Bond. Licence to save.
37:57Martin Lewis:Anyway, Rosie and Sally are looking with groans in their eyes now in slight disgust. I don't know, maybe a little bit of vomit in the mouth on the back end of that. So there we go. I think it's very nice, but I can't say it. Okay. I couldn't. I mean, if I start calling people martinis, it's not good. You could imagine what the tabloids would make of that, couldn't you? Right, I've got a couple more. I'll run through them quickly. Frugaliter, combination of Frugal Inquisitor. That's from Miles. I like that, but we've discussed before that it's not a full frugal. No, we're not frugal. We like it.
38:30Martin Lewis:But I'm loving it. And everyone who sent one in, thank you so much. Go on, keep going, keep going. Stephen, M &M Smarties, other chocolate is available. or a Smartin collectively Martin Smartins could be and then the acronym is savings money and regular travel insurance nerds I do like Smartins but I think it runs foul of the I'm not sure I can say it one Smartins, Martin Smartins Rosie's not a fan of Smartins Rosie's got a slight grimace on for that one sorry I liked it though Kate says Martin's interrogateers partly because interrogateer is fun awkward to say and partly because It's our job to interrogate Martin with questions on absolutely anything and everything in brackets with a reason.
39:12Yeah, I mean, there is some logic in that. Spreadsheet it. OK. Put it on the spreadsheet. OK. Tom has emailed one in. He says, when they send a question, you're sending a Martin Lewis SOS. So you become a graduate of the Martin Lewis SOS, the Martin Lewis School of Sad Farts.
39:33Martin Lewis:It's not on the spreadsheet, but it made me laugh. No, I like that one. It's good. We've just called everyone sad farts, haven't we? Sad farts, yeah. Dalbir from Rugby, he says... Probably should be your last one, because I think we're probably going over the envelope now. We are. Money-saving amateurs or MSAs? Yeah, but actually, some of you are quite professional. True. Some of them are very good. I mean, I have to say... And I want to go back. I've decided... You've persuaded me that it shouldn't be QTs. Okay, good. But I think there's still the one... The other one is MPC. MPC. That was a podcast producer, Simon, wasn't it?
40:05What was that one? that was Martin's Podcast Contributors. I quite like MPC. That was Simon's suggestion.
40:12Martin Lewis:Rosie's just shown me one. Whose is that? Robin Bristol. Can you do the top one in Robin Bristol? I quite like that. Yeah, Rob says MCC, Martin's Curious Callers, which is said with a silent C, they're called MCs, like the fast-paced rappers. Yeah, but I like MCC, which is the Marylebone Cricket Club, which is what they call at Lord. No, it's not niche. It's one of the biggest sports in the whole world. Niche. It's not niche. Ask podcast producer Simon. Oh, he loves cricket though. Exactly. He'll be like MCC. I quite like MCC. Okay. Add it to the list. Put it on the spreadsheet. It's on the spreadsheet.
40:48Martin Lewis:Put it on the spreadsheet. Okay. I think that's where we finish. We're going to do, we'll take some more of those before we make our decision. We will make our decision after Easter. So we'll do a few more of those next week if that's all right, Matt. Yeah. So send them in to martinlosepodcast at bbc.co.uk and address them to dear Martin. Dear Matt. Dear Martin. Dear Matt. We're getting good at this, aren't we? We are.
41:10Martin Lewis:That's it for this week's Question Dime. Don't forget to subscribe so you know when we release a new episode. We put out a new Question Time episode each Monday alongside the podcast with Adrian on Thursdays. Aren't you lucky? Two doses of money-saving tips and tricks a week. Do ensure you send in your questions to martinlewispodcast at bbc.co.uk and I've secretly recorded this when Matt isn't about. So there's no dear Martin, dear Matt. It's just dear Martin.
41:53Martin Lewis is the founder of moneysavinexpert.com. But of course, other consumer and price comparison websites are available. You can get in touch with Martin's podcast production team by emailing martinlewispodcast at bbc.co.uk. The offers and rates mentioned in the podcast are correct at the time of recording. However, if you are listening on demand, it's worth double checking as details can date. Remember to subscribe on BBC Sounds and leave us a review however you listen. I got bills. I gotta pay.
42:49So you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience. It's why LinkedIn ads generates the highest B2B return on ad spend of major ad networks. Spend$250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get$250 credit for the next one. Just go to linkedin.com slash broadcast. That's linkedin.com slash broadcast. Terms and conditions apply. Hi, this is Alex Kantrowicz. I'm the host of Big Technology Podcast, a longtime reporter and an on-air contributor to CNBC. And if you're like me, you're trying to figure out how artificial intelligence is changing the business world and our lives. So each week on Big Technology, I bring on key actors from companies building AI tech and outsiders trying to influence it.
43:29Asking where this is all going. They come from places like NVIDIA, Microsoft, Amazon, and plenty more. So if you want to be smart with your wallet, your career choices, in meetings with your colleagues, and at dinner parties, listen to Big Technology Podcast wherever you get your podcasts. Thank you.
From the publisher
In our Question Time podcast, Martin Lewis answers your questions including: is my car finance agreement covered by the mis-selling redress scheme? Can my partner and I couple up to maximise cashback offers? I’ve told Monzo its overpaid me but it’s done nothing, can I keep the money? What can I do about a retailer that displays the wrong returns info online? Plus, we have a lovely success story involving a 9-year-old who’s doing jobs for her parents for pocket money! If you want to ask Martin a question, his Question Time podcast lets you do just that! You can ask him questions about absolutely anything and everything (within reason!) – so if you’ve always wanted to know which chocolate he prefers, how many sudokus he can solve in a day, or have a very complicated question about your personal finances, email it to MartinLewisPodcast@bbc.co.uk.
