In short
Using AI for personal finance safely; whether paying off a small mortgage harms credit; Section 75 credit-card protection for window/deposit payments; whether using American Express at small retailers is “moral”; plus a pension paperwork success story and a “downshift” shopping challenge.
Guests
No external guests. Host is Martin Lewis, with his researcher Rosie (leaving end of September) and a new researcher Isabel (joining next).
Key claims
AI can help mainly by spotting spending patterns and drafting questions/letters, but users should be cautious about data privacy, hallucinations, and relying on AI for investment/tax/pension decisions. Credit-score impact from paying off a mortgage is usually minor/trivial; affordability may improve. Section 75 covers card payments for goods/services costing £100.01–£30,000. A £10,000 deposit on a £40,000 windows deal likely isn’t covered. Splitting into two genuinely separate transactions/contracts may help. Use Amex if accepted; retailers choose to accept it.
Notable examples
Jan’s NHS pension was increased 20% after finding old pay slips; James considered keeping £1,000 mortgage balance to keep lender facility open; Mike’s £40,000 windows deposit scenario; Kate’s Amex rewards vs small-trader fees.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIntroducing the Questions
2:04 to 5:34
The hosts discuss the format of the show and introduce questions from listeners.
“Hello and welcome to this Question Time edition of the podcast.”
Using AI to Improve Finances
5:34 to 7:52
Discussion on how AI can help manage finances and the importance of data privacy.
“It will, of course, be one you read out, Matt, because we are nothing if not loyal to the format unless you break it by Easter eggs.”
The Importance of Trusted Sources
7:52 to 8:34
Understanding the need for reliable data sources when using AI for finances.
“Where should I draw the line to protect myself from data leaks or scammers?”
Practical Applications of AI
8:34 to 11:40
Exploring practical uses of AI in budgeting and financial management.
“And I think that is going to be the future.”
Cautions with AI Usage
11:40 to 14:00
Discussing the risks of using AI for financial decisions and data security.
“and you've got the basics of the law that you're happy with, getting to actually write the letter, it is perfect.”
The Role of AI in Financial Decisions
14:00 to 15:20
Explore how different levels of AI can assist in financial matters and the importance of verification.
“And certainly if you're doing financial stuff, you want to be on the highest level that you can possibly be on if you're doing important financial stuff.”
Mortgage Payoff and Credit Scores
15:20 to 21:00
Discuss the implications of paying off a mortgage on credit scores and future borrowing potential.
“Should we want to borrow again in future?”
Encouragement for Decision-Making
21:00 to 21:40
Understanding the importance of weighing options and having confidence in financial decisions.
“Yes, I think so, really, because you have to be careful these days.”
Understanding Credit Card Protection
21:40 to 26:20
Learn about Section 75 protection and how to navigate credit card payments for large transactions.
“I quite like a question where even though there's no firm answer, you sort of know you've given someone the confidence to go and take action.”
Technical Insights on Section 75
26:20 to 27:00
Clarifications on the specifics of Section 75 protection for credit card transactions.
“But I think you're thinking in the right direction on that basis.”
Show all 17 chapters
Success Story on Paperwork Management
27:00 to 28:00
A listener shares their experience regarding the importance of keeping paperwork for pension claims.
“A£30 ,000 and a penny transaction isn't covered by Section 75.”
Jan's Pension Success Story
28:00 to 33:42
Learn how Jan successfully appealed for a 20% increase in her NHS pension.
“Jan, you should have told him some word entirely different.”
Closing Jan's Call
33:42 to 34:01
Hear Jan's gratitude and the importance of keeping financial records.
“thank you for everything you do you're you talk such common sense oh thank you that's very kind thank you so much very much thank you bye bye you're gonna get a badge of course oh am i oh You are.”
Amex Card Moral Dilemma
34:01 to 36:25
Explore the ethics of using an Amex card at small businesses.
“I think we've got space for one more proper question.”
Downshift Challenge Insights
36:25 to 42:00
Discover the concept of downshifting for better budgeting.
“It said we would take a family and we would get their supermarket shop and then we would buy an identical basket of supermarket shopping down one brand level from what they normally got.”
Rosie's Departure and Isabel's Arrival
42:00 to 43:38
Learn about Rosie transitioning out of her role and Isabel stepping in as the new researcher.
“the other two women I live with, my wife and my daughter, they are both big olive fans.”
Thank You to the Audience and Best Bits
43:38 to 44:16
Hear gratitude for listeners and a teaser about upcoming best bits episodes.
“to the Question Time podcast but we are going to welcome Isabel as well.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.
0:30at Whole Foods Market.
1:00time episode where you are Esquires, our extremely savvy questioners. Get to ask me your questions on absolutely anything and everything, open brackets, within reason, close brackets. And this week, you asked me, can I use AI to improve my finances? And if so, what's the best and the safest way? We're in our 60s, is it better to not pay off our remaining small mortgage to help our credit score? Will a bit of fiddling give us Section 75 credit card protection on our new windows or are they too expensive? Is it wrong to use American Express at small retailers? Will it cost them too much? We've got a success.
1:38Jan says keeping my old paperwork as you suggested boosted my pension. Looking forward to hearing that one. And you asked me what products wouldn't I downshift on if I needed to save. Play the theme tune.
2:04Martin Lewis:Hello and welcome to this Question Time edition of the podcast. And of course, I am joined by the curator of questions himself, Sir Dr. Matthew Burnham. Esquire? I stopped and I didn't give you a professor either. Oh, what have I done this time? There's a conspiracy theory starting to generate about this podcast, Matt. Who's started this conspiracy theory? Is it you? It is Martin Mitchell, who was also mentioned last week. Now, luckily, for me, he is grassing you up. And he's doing it not via martinlewispodcast.bbc.co.uk, where people can get in touch with their questions if they would like to ask us a question and become an Esquire and maybe even get a badge if they're recorded on.
2:45Not via that route. He's doing it via my social media. And I feel he's right, because I think you may have censored his message if it had come to you. Absolutely. There's no doubt about it. This was Martin's message. Now, the first bit of it is slightly weird because he's saying it and it's about me and normally you would read that out and it sounds a little bit odd, but you know what? I don't trust you. So I'm going to have to read this whole message myself. Go on. Martin Mitchell, who is literally Team Martin, says, Thank you very much for the mention. It's awesome to be mentioned on the podcast.
3:15That has made my week. I've followed your advice for over a decade and without your knowledge,
3:19Martin Lewis:I wouldn't have known how to get a mortgage by myself, let alone hopefully fully paid it off almost a decade early in a couple of weeks. We need a round of applause for that, please. Can you add one? Absolutely. That's the good bit, Matt. This is where we're going. Right. He then starts to get a bit suspicious. He says, though with the removal of some of Matt's titles, I am concerned he might not let me onto the podcast to earn an ESQ badge in the future. I have my suspicions too. I am with you, Martin. He then goes on to say, Are you sure Matt and GDPR, Google Docs professional Rosie, weren't plotting to take over the podcast when she was in the Manchester studio?
4:01Is that not what it was about? There has been more and more of GDPR since coming from Manchester. Has there been surreptitians discussion about getting more and more of Rosie in? Because I noticed not only did you Easter egg her two weeks ago, you, even though I expressly told you to bleep her out, left her in as the Easter egg at the very end of last week's podcast as well. Yeah, I am guilty for that. I did do that. I did leave the end. Did we or did we not have a discussion about it was going to come out? We may have had a discussion. I think I may have said, actually, to be technical, I think I said, I'll try and make it work.
4:36And if I can't, then I'll keep it in or something to that effect. I don't think you said the last bit. Well, that's what I meant anyway. You said, I'll try and make it work. You did not caveat. Well, it was a very good, if you listen to the end of it, it's actually a really funny story. And Bleeping Rosie out, would have meant that the story would have made no sense. So it should have to be left in. And I thought it was really nice.
4:53Martin Lewis:Now, I should catch up those who aren't regular listeners. So you should become a regular listener. Then you won't need to catch up in future. The catch you up, GDPR Rosie. Rosie is my researcher who live fact checks the programme. But as I've said many times before, you don't get to hear Rosie on the podcast unless Matt breaks the format. Because Rosie's level of authority, the way she bestrides the entire podcast is too much to be represented by some simple audio file. It doesn't do it justice. Although, later on today, I do have some news about Rosie. I hope it's good news. I have some news about Rosie, and we'll talk about it at the end of the podcast.
5:32Shall we do some questions? Yes, let's get into it. So, first question. It will, of course, be one you read out, Matt, because we are nothing if not loyal to the format unless you break it by Easter eggs. Exactly. This one is from Tom. He has emailed it in to martinlewispodcast at bbc.co.uk. He says, dear gentleman and Rosie.
5:52Martin Lewis:Okay, nice. Nice. Gentleman, I like that. He says, I hope you take this as a positive, but I've not ever messaged a podcast, radio or TV show before. We do take it as a positive. We feel very flattered that you feel comfortable to do it on here. And we love it when people get in touch for the first time. So thank you very much. That we do. He says, the other day I got an AI pro account. so he actually said a different thing but I've subbed in a neutral a BBC-ified it so that we haven't given a specific product name he got a specific product but I have called it an AI pro account so just to say on that go on so the BBC has its rules on that now obviously people who listen to the podcast regularly will know I am naming products all the time it has to be editorially justified now clearly if you're saying these are the best rates then it's editorially justified but just naming an AI in the middle of a question I presume you're going isn't editorially justified and that's why you've, you know, written over it to an AI prep account.
6:49Martin Lewis:Yeah, exactly. There you go. It's worth people knowing. We like you to be, to let you behind the fourth wall on this podcast. He says, I had a play around by putting all of my bank statements from the last 12 months into it to see if it could tell me anything. Overall, I'm giving, I'm just going to hum that. Okay. You need to look at what your AI account is. Are they, can the AI train itself on your bank statements? There is a privacy issue there. and I think there are some questions, just a little note, occasional questions about putting your bank statements in and if it has details that either could be used to defraud you or details you wouldn't want to go anywhere else.
7:25Martin Lewis:I would be a little bit cautious with that. But do carry on. Okay, so he's already done it. Overall, I'd say that it's proved successful in identifying a couple of subscriptions that I've since binned off paying for itself. My question is this, how can I best use AI to help my finances further? I'm somewhat cautious to put any more personal details into it, but I'm sure if I gave AI access to, say, my emails or other financial information, could I maybe save more money? What are your thoughts on this? Where should I draw the line to protect myself from data leaks or scammers? Well, let's come on and just start thinking about what AI is good at and what it isn't so good at at the moment.
8:02Martin Lewis:I mean, the biggest problem with AI on finances for me is who is the source, right? It is going out. AI is trained on a vast amount of data right across the internet. It isn't necessarily trained on trusted sources. And when it comes to what you do with your money, you really do need a trusted source. Now, interestingly, I and many others, we're looking at, you know, because people want AI, how can we build an AI tool that only gets the answers from my website, for example? And I'm sure many other people are doing other similar things. That's not a plug going in there. And I think that is going to be the future.
8:37Martin Lewis:What you want is you want that huge, incredible, interactive, engaging facility of AI, but you want to know who is providing the answer that it's giving you. And I think that that's possibly where we will start to go. I mean, I even wonder, and I'm just musing to myself, whether we'll end up in an AI future. A bit like if we look at Alexa, the smart speaker, which now seems like a very old system when you compare it to the modern AI that you have. When you, on Alexa, different people could have their own Alexa apps. And I wonder if we'll get to a point where you go to the major AI platforms and you have different companies and products that have their own AI apps so that you can effectively limit the source that you're getting the information from when you're asking a question to someone who you want to get it from.
9:22Martin Lewis:But currently, I would be very careful with the source. I would always want, I'm much happier to get AI to check something I'm written or something I'm doing than to suggest it in the first place, because if you get it to suggest it in the first place, I'm just not sure that you can trust it. What AI is brilliant for, though, and what it can do far better than human beings can do is spot patterns. And so this is why, and I understand why you put your bank statements in there, because for budgeting, spotting patterns, spotting things that you're doing that you wouldn't necessarily notice that you're doing, it will be absolutely brilliant.
9:56Martin Lewis:The crossover cost between the AI and putting your personal data in though is a difficult one. It may be that you can find a way to put only the data that it would need without exposing your personal details or too much about your banking situation into the AI if it's going to be sending that off to be trained. And so just as an aside on that, artificial intelligence companies, when you put your information in them, they train future AIs on that information. So that information isn't effectively private. Now, there are modes where you can make it private and certainly many corporate clients tend to have AIs which have a no training rule, which would intuitively, I'm not an AI expert, intuitively feel more secure.
10:35Martin Lewis:Whether that is secure or not, I will leave for AI experts to get into it. So what else would I use AI for? I would use it for suggesting questions. I think that's where it can be really strong. I'm thinking of doing this. What questions should I be asking before I do it. I actually prefer it for suggesting questions than for giving me the answers, because the answers, often I would want more research. I mean, I'm happy for it to draft complaints and letters based on the information that you know is correct, but it is not a lawyer. Certainly the large language models most consumers are using are not lawyers.
11:15Martin Lewis:And many people, I've heard from many companies, they draft up what is a semi-legal letter using AI and they send it off and then the companies are going, well, this is just nonsense. So you have to have a little bit of knowledge and understanding that's going in there when you're using that. I would always, of course, use template letters and whatever else is out there on the internet that someone has researched in the first place for you, as long as they're legitimate sources ahead of an AI. But if you want to draft the letter and you know what you want to say, and you've got the basics of the law that you're happy with, getting to actually write the letter, it is perfect.
11:45Martin Lewis:Another place I think it's brilliant, and this is really, really useful, is if you've got a long terms and conditions sheet, let's say a travel insurance policy, and it's 22 pages long, I would just put that PDF into AI and then I would use that to question about the PDF. So all the questions you've got on it, put the term sheet into the AI and then ask the AI questions about the specific term sheet you've put in. I think that's a brilliant way for it to operate. Okay, what wouldn't you use it for? I definitely wouldn't use it to tell me what I should invest in. I definitely wouldn't use it for tax benefits or pension decisions without checking.
12:21Martin Lewis:And I definitely wouldn't, unless I knew it was a locked in secure environment, upload my entire financial life, because I think there is a risk of access to scammers. Now, I say that without real knowledge of what the, you know, how easy it is for a hacker to interrogate and get your financial details out of AI. But I say that without the knowledge to be able to say to you as well that it is totally safe to do so. So I think that is a legitimate consideration. And if you put in your insurance policy, for example, and you ask it a question, you need to double check it, don't you? Just in case it's had like a hallucination or anything like that.
13:01Yeah, it's important. You can double check it. But if you're on the policy terms and conditions, you can just simply say, can I do?
13:07Martin Lewis:So let's... Can I go skiing on this product? Would this cover me in the event there was another Icelandic volcano episode? Right. And then it would interpret it. And then my second question, what's given me an interpretation would be to say, please, can you tell me what the paragraph and clause that you got the information from is? And then I would go and read that exact paragraph and clause in the original term sheet. That makes sense. That's how I would do it. But this is this is the really interesting thing. We have these incredibly powerful tools, these large language models, and they are.
13:42Martin Lewis:And it's really interesting, though. I would also caution people, and I'm not trying to get you to upgrade or upsell within your AI. There is a massive difference between the answers you get on different levels of AI. And most people are on the quick or the instant version. And if you're on the quick and the instant version, that is designed to give you a quick, instant, may I say, somewhat flippant answer. Now, if you start to go up to your medium level or even your pro level, if you have access to it, as some people will have through work, the entire research base and what it's checking and cross-checking itself is much, much more rigid.
14:14Martin Lewis:And certainly if you're doing financial stuff, you want to be on the highest level that you can possibly be on if you're doing important financial stuff. And you always even then want to still continue to double check. I often use this phrase about debt. I might use it on AI too. AI, like fire, is an incredibly powerful tool and used right, it can bring light, but used wrong, it can burn. We've got James in Cornwall. Hi, James. Hello there. Hello, James. Welcome on board. What can we do for you? Well, myself and my wife, we have a small mortgage left on our property of approximately £10 ,500. And our six rate finishes at the end of this month.
14:58Yes. We are both in our mid-60s and we could pay the mortgage off. But would we be better just paying part of it off and keeping a small mortgage to help our credit rating slash victory? Should we want to borrow again in the future?
15:18Martin Lewis:Oh, it's a really interesting and a relatively common question, that one. Let me just delve into the last bit. Should we want to borrow again in future? If you're thinking you may want to borrow again in future, what type of borrowing are you talking? Are you talking credit cards? Are you talking loans? Are you talking potentially another mortgage or another property in future? I'm thinking more loans or another mortgage. OK, so, I mean, they're quite substantial. I think short answer. The impact on your credit score is pretty trivial. People often talk about an impact because, you know, they get the credit reference agency's credit score and they pay off their mortgage and they see their credit score drop by 20 or 30 points or so.
16:00Martin Lewis:and they go, oh no, I've ruined everything. But actually, often most forms of transactions will give you a short credit score drop when you're doing something like that. And it is only short term and it should bounce back to normal. The reason is simple is that many, I'm remembering, of course, that your credit score that you get from a credit reference agency isn't a real thing. It isn't actually a material thing. It's just a product they have to show you a loose indication of how a typical lender may see you. But lenders do tend to like having a mortgage is seen as a potential positive. So it can have a little effect, but I wouldn't think it would be that big of a deal because on the other hand, having no mortgage is an improvement for your affordability score, which is the other side of the same coin.
16:51Martin Lewis:They want to know, credit score looks at, is this a good citizen in terms of credit? Are they likely to repay and repay on time and to do everything right. That's your credit score. Affordability score, well, they might be a good credit citizen, but do they actually have the income to be able to repay the loan and the disposable income to repay the loan? So while it may be minorly negative for your credit score, and that's the one that people tend to focus on, it will be minorly positive for your affordability score. So for me, it's much of a muchness would be my honest answer on the credit scoring issue.
17:24Martin Lewis:If you want to get rid of your mortgage, get rid of your mortgage. If you want to drop it a little bit further and so that you're not paying interest on it and you have the cash enabled to do so, you might want to do that. I think probably the bigger issue here is, and having spoken to mortgage brokers about this, is that if you keep a facility open, because you are an existing mortgage customer with that mortgage lender, it may ease you getting a further advance if you wanted to borrow back on the mortgage in future, that they don't have to go through such stringent affordability rules because you're not a new customer or an existing customer just expanding your existing mortgage.
18:04Martin Lewis:Now, you might not want a mortgage with that company. All of those things are ifs and buts. I would think that would be the strongest argument for keeping some money on the mortgage for me. Yeah. I mean, that's what I'm thinking, because we had to jump through a lot of hoops when we got the mortgage. And because of our age, and now we're even older. How old are you? I'm just thinking 67. I'm not that bothered about your age in a nice way. That's nice for you, thank you. I think if you were in your late 70s or 80s, this could be more of an issue. You in your late 60s will still fulfil many lenders' criteria.
18:47Martin Lewis:I mean, your income is the issue, but your age is less of an issue for me at the moment. It might be in 10, 15 years time, I think. But carry on. Sorry, I interrupted you. No, that's the reason why I was thinking of keeping it, because I thought, as you just said, if it keeps you with a mortgage lender and you have a history and you have a history, a good payment history, then they're more likely to look on you favourably if you did want to borrow again. Yeah, and I think that makes sense. And that will, as you get older, you're still a very young chap at the moment. But as you get older, that will tend to have more of an effect.
19:23Martin Lewis:So you may well want to keep it open. And it would be worth talking to the mortgage lender itself about how much they would suggest that you do keep, you know, what's a reasonable amount to keep in there, whether you just pay it down to£1 ,000. But that's worth having the conversation with the lender itself, I think, about exactly how far. if I can give you the answer this tends to fall into those permission questions I tend to think where you sort of know what you want but you're just you're coming for permission to check that it really is sensible what you're thinking, is that fair? Yes I suppose it is really, yeah and if I give you my honest answer is in that I'm not really bothered if you do and I'm not really bothered if you don't if that makes sense I think it's a pretty fine balance and it isn't a big decision.
20:09Martin Lewis:And if you wanted to keep a grand, say, on your mortgage, keep a grand on your mortgage. It's not going to cost you very much and it will give you the ability, if you needed to borrow back from that mortgage lender, to be able to do it much more cheaply and easily because you should be able to pass. Sorry, that was wrong. And it's important. Don't edit this out, Matt. It will give you the ability to borrow much more easily, not necessarily more cheaply, with your existing mortgage lender. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I understand. that. That's the way I was thinking. But as you say, I just wanted to get your opinion on it.
20:43Martin Lewis:Yeah. And so my general opinion is, if that is your aim, it is a perfectly valid way to do it, and I'm not worried about it. Good. That's brilliant. Well, thank you very much. I hope that helps. I hope that helps. Sometimes just knowing, and actually, I think maybe knowing it's not that big a deal either way is also quite an important thing that can take some pressure off. Yes, I think so, really, because you have to be careful these days. You do. Good luck to you. I wish you all the best. Come back and we'll discuss what you do with it in 25 years' time. If I'm still going at this, that is. That'd be great.
21:16Thank you very much, Martin. Cheers, mate. Are you sitting there thinking, oh, I know what I wanted to ask him? Well, this is your opportunity. If you've got a question, then just send them in to martinlewispodcast at bbc.co.uk. And please do start them, Dear Martin. No, dear Matt. Dear Martin. Dear Matt. I enjoyed that last one. I quite like a question where even though there's no firm answer, you sort of know you've given someone the confidence to go and take action. So what do we have next for me, Matt? A question from Mike, who has emailed it in. He says, hi, Martin. Hi, Mike. No one else, just Martin.
21:54Well done. I had a question that I'm struggling to find a clear answer to. We're getting new windows and doors with a total cost of£40 ,000, requiring a£10 ,000 deposit. If I pay£10 ,000 on a credit card and then the company goes bust before installation, with the remainder of payments sent, am I covered under Section 75 protection?
22:14Martin Lewis:Have you got more to read, Matt? Yes. I just want to answer that question before we carry on. OK. Because that seems a distinct question. So what I'm hearing is you've got a new install of windows and doors of£40 ,000. You're putting£10 ,000 deposit on a credit card. If the company goes bust, would you be covered under Section 75? No. is my honest answer. Because the Section 75 law says if you pay for something or part pay for it on a credit card and the item costs between£100 and£30 ,000, the credit card company is jointly liable with the retailer. Now, the part pay is interesting. It means even if you put a penny on the credit card, the credit card company is jointly liable for the entire amount.
Read the full transcript
22:55Martin Lewis:But as many of you listening will have noticed, I said the maximum it can be is£30 ,000. So it's not the deposit that matters here. It's the total cost of what you're paying for. And this seems to be one transaction to me with a total cost of£40 ,000. So in that circumstance, I would say, no, I'm afraid I doubt you would be covered under Section 75 protection. Anyway, carry on. Okay. He says, I understand that once the full£40 ,000 is paid, we wouldn't have protection on one card. One workaround I wanted to check though, would it be legitimate for us to get two quotes, 20 ,000 for the front, 20 ,000 for the back windows, and then I pay for the front windows and my partner pays for the back ones on two separate credit cards.
23:38If the company went bust after installation or full payment or a fault developed, would we be covered then? I think two quotes could work, but they would need to be two separate service contracts. I mean, in common parlance, it can't be a fiddle. So if you put 20 ,000 for the front and 20 ,000 for the back, each with its own quote, each with its own invoice, each with its own contract, each with its own card payment, then each could be treated separately and you potentially could get Section 75.
24:08Martin Lewis:I would want a very good paper trail of all that in place my credit card firm, brackets firms, if there were two different firms, these different credit cards, fights it. And then you could take it to the ombudsman. But I think, you know, I've seen a lot of fighting over big Section 75 claims in the past. and I think if the credit card company knew that of this space it may well argue it's one transaction so you would need to do everything you can to make sure this really is distinctly and separately two transactions it could even be that you do it in two tranches I don't know if that's possible you do one lot of work and then once that work's done then you agree to do the second load of work and you keep them as properly separate transactions that's going on when I would say it would be covered now if you do get to that point and you are asked questions we must always be honest with the credit card company because it would be fraud to tell anything other.
24:58Martin Lewis:I mean, I always remember one case. I'm semi-making up these numbers now. So it doesn't really matter of a woman having read the guide I had. I think she put a£500 ,000 deposit on her kitchen on a credit card and the kitchen was£18 ,000 and the credit card company went bust. And then she obviously went for Section 75 and she went to the credit card company and the credit card company said, Matt... Said what? Well, what do you think they said when she asked for the money back? They said no. Of course they said no. Because they don't want to pay her 18 grand when she only paid£1 ,000 on a credit card.
25:32Right? So they said no. And then she followed up and went to the ombudsman. And the ombudsman ruled in a favour, made sure she got all the money and compensation.
25:39Martin Lewis:As I say, some of those figures may be slightly wrong, but they're in the right ballpark when we go there. So don't expect them to automatically play ball, but absolutely do go through to the ombudsman. Now, look, the best case scenario we have here is you put the money on the credit card, you pay the deposit. the firm that you're paying doesn't go bust, everything's absolutely fine and you never need to explore whether this worked or not. I think splitting it into two properly legitimate separate transactions, it genuinely have to be legitimate and separate, would give you a better chance of having section 75 protection.
26:09Martin Lewis:But I'm not going to give you a cast iron on that because ultimately it'd come down to an ombudsman decision on it and if they thought that this had been manipulated there is a chance they may rule against you and say that it doesn't count. But I think you're thinking in the right direction on that basis. Matt, I want to do a technical note on the back of that answer. Can you do it for me? I'll do it. Here we go. So my technical note, everybody, is just to be really, really accurate. Section 75 applies for a transaction over£100. So a£100 transaction is not covered by Section 75. A£100 and a penny transaction is covered by Section 75 and it includes transactions up and to and including£30 ,000.
26:55Martin Lewis:So a£30 ,000 transaction is covered by Section 75. A£30 ,000 and a penny transaction isn't covered by Section 75. Technical note, over. Now, Matt, if I'd fed in 10 of our past Question Time podcasts into an AI and I asked it at this point, what's coming next? It would say, coming next in the Martin Lewis Question Time podcast, Matt will present a caller to Martin. Because Matt tends to put callers into the even number slots. Would it be right? This week, it would be correct. See, AI does get some things right. Sometimes, yeah. It's Jan. Jan's in Mid Wales. She did tell me where she's from, but she said it's difficult to pronounce.
27:45and do you want me to try and pronounce where she's from in Wales? Yeah, hopefully you make a big mess of it and I can make fun of you for it. That would be great. I think, Jan, correct me if I'm wrong, Bilth Wells? That's very good. Oh, how disappointing, Jan. Where's my clap? Where's my applause? Jan, you should have told him some word entirely different. You should have told him, you know, he pronounced it Cardiff and then you could say, there's nothing like that. I wouldn't be so mean. I would. Some people are nice, Martin. Right, Jan. What can we do for you? Well, I'm coming on to tell you about my success.
28:20On a recent podcast, you discussed how long to keep paperwork for. I realised the importance of this when drawing my NHS pension four years ago. I left the NHS in 1992 and I reached the pension age in 2022. What did you do for the NHS, if I can ask? I was an administrator. I was one of the dreaded administrators. Well, thank you for making the place work. Yeah, that's what I did. So when the NHS pension people contacted me, I looked at what the projection was going to be. And I'd only done eight years in the NHS before I left to have a family. And I looked at the amount of money and thought, that's not quite right.
29:11So I went back to them and said, I don't think you've made the right calculation. And they said, oh, yeah, we have. Yeah, I said, no, you haven't, I said, because I perhaps unusually left the job I was in when I had my baby and went back to a lower paid job. Yes. And the NHS scheme at the time was your best pay, best 12 months pay in the last 36 months you were working in the NHS. So, no, they calculated it as being my last 12 months. I went to appeal and they said no. And I said, well, so I said, well, what information are you using? And they said, oh, well, whatever the NHS had sent them, which was based on just 12 months, 12 calendar months.
29:58Right. You know, starting on a March through to around to a March of financial year. And, of course, my best years were an August to an August. so um they they said oh why don't you go back to your nhs employer and ask them for more information your dog your dog is excited by this story yes very excited what's the dog's name the dog the dog is called bronwen bronwen oh great does bronwen always bark when you start talking money is this something you've trained is no no the postman's just arrived that's what So anyway, they suggested I went back to the NHS pays department. And unfortunately, that NHS pay department had disappeared a very long time ago with mergers and that kind of thing.
30:52So I couldn't get in and they didn't have any information to give me. And so they were saying, no, no, that's right. That's right. And I said, well, you're not. So anyway, I went to that box at the back of the wardrobe. which, you know, you tell us we should all have. And I found my pay slips from 1990 through to 1992, which was the period that it concerned, which gave me all the evidence to go back to them and say, here we are, these are my pay slips. And I went to appeal then, and the adjudicator said, yeah, you're right, they're wrong. And my pension was uprated by 20%. 20%, wow. Yeah. And that's real money.
31:38It was real money. I mean, it was only, I'd only been working for eight years, but I can tell you it made quite a lot of difference when you've got a small pension, when you get 20 % more. Absolutely. How wonderful. It was. I was very pleased with myself because I'm not very good at keeping paperwork, but I did put those payslips in a folder, in a box, at the back of the wardrobe. I've moved house. I've had three children, but I still knew where to find that box. So I was feeling quite pleased with myself.
32:08Martin Lewis:Well, very pleased to hear it. And yeah, so now I tend to talk about this. My whole thing is people always ask me, how long do you keep paperwork for? And the sort of the official rules, whether it's four or six years, depending on your circumstances. My answer is you keep the important stuff forever. It doesn't need to be paper. You just need to keep a record. You can take a photo of it. You can digitise it. You don't actually need the cupboard in the back of the wardrobe. Though if you choose to do it that way, that's absolutely cool. and the reason for this and I'm I talked before on the podcast was I'd written a blog way back when I can't remember 2010 or something that said basically we don't know what the future mis-selling scandals will be we don't know what the future problems will be and lack of paperwork because modern data protection says that firms should not be keeping more data than they need on you so often they get rid of old data but that is the crucial thing that you need to prove your case.
33:02And you are a brilliant example of that. If it wasn't for your slightly, let's call it data
33:09Martin Lewis:hoarding in a nice way. Yes. Your data hoarding has materially increased the amount of money you've got. And the problem when people say, what should I keep is, well, we don't know because we don't know where you'll need it. So as many sample pay slips, as many sample bank statements, as all the signing up to new product documentation that you can possibly photograph and store away in a secured way on your computer or if you want in a box in the back of the wardrobe you just never know when it's going to pay dividends later lovely story jan thank you so much thank you very much and thank you for everything you do you're you talk such common sense oh thank you that's very kind thank you so much very much thank you bye bye you're gonna get a badge of course oh am i oh You are.
33:53I am so pleased about the badge. The badge is coming. I will wear it with pride. Thanks, Jan. Appreciate it. Bye. Thanks, then. Bye-bye. Bye.
34:04Martin Lewis:So, Matt, we've done two callers. We've done two reads. I think we've got space for one more proper question. You want to squeeze one in? Squeeze one in. Oh, let's do it. Breaking the format over here. That was my squeezing in. I don't know what it means. That sounded weird. I have no idea what it was. So I don't know whether you should leave that in. Just carry on. Let's move on and pretend it never happened. This one's from Kate. She says, hello, a bit of an unusual question for you. We've recently got an Amex card, American Express, so we can build up our points for rewards and travel. We're trying to put as much of our monthly spending on it as possible and pay it off in full each month.
34:39Is that your best in full? And pay it off in full. In full! There we go. Carry on. I know Amex have higher card fees for shops than Visa and MasterCard, So my moral dilemma is, should I still use it in small local businesses as the fees will hit them harder and I feel bad because I want to support them? Or do I just accept that they take Amex, they've already accounted for the higher fees and just keep using it? What would you do?
35:02Martin Lewis:I would see it on the latter level. Many small retailers choose not to take Amex. Those who have chosen to accept it have chosen to do so and I'm sure would welcome your business. They have had to factor that in if they've decided to take Amex. Now, Amex used to have its local trader scheme, which was a£5 boost at Christmas if you spent on one of its small trader schemes. But I think, honestly, when I sum it all up, my answer to this is quite simple. If you want to use Amex and it's with a small trader and they accept Amex, just ask them, are you OK if I use Amex? I could use another card, but I get better rewards.
35:37Martin Lewis:Would you prefer me to use another card? If you're feeling it's a moral issue, have the conversation with them. I'm sure they'll welcome you being considerate enough to ask. Some may say yes, some may say it's no problem. Me again, interrupting after we finish recording because you know the drill. It's a BBC podcast. So I put this question to American Express and a spokesperson told me, American Express has a long history of supporting small businesses, including as founder and principal supporter of Small Business Saturday. Accepting American Express is a choice that an increasing number of UK small businesses are making, with the number doing so having grown by 67 % over the past three years.
36:12smaller merchants benefit from a dedicated single rate with no setup costs fees or hidden fees and that was a short one wasn't it that was a short one we did squeeze that in sort of an orange squeezing type thing there right i think we're already in a scan so aren't we yeah i think so i think we're already in a scan some funny territory have you gotten a scan some funny question for me to finish off with of course i do so after you've put your pitch out for people to send them in people are sending them in Good, I'm glad This one's from Constantine Dear Martin and Matt, he says I have a fun question for you both Martin, if you had to undergo a money makeover And drastically cut your costs What would you not be able to live without?
36:58He says, for me, it would be high quality paper towels And toilet paper I don't know why, but I've always bought the best I can afford And absolutely cannot bring myself to switch to lower quality versions
37:08Martin Lewis:Okay, so it's an interesting one So many, many years ago, I invented a thing called the Downshift Challenge. And I was doing it on telly. It's got to be over 20 years ago now. And the Downshift Challenge was simple. It said we would take a family and we would get their supermarket shop and then we would buy an identical basket of supermarket shopping down one brand level from what they normally got. So if they normally went for, you know, taste the difference or finest or whatever it is, we'd go for generic brand. If they went for generic brand, we'd go for own brand. If they went for own brand, we'd go for the savers brand.
37:38Martin Lewis:And the maths was quite interesting. On average, you'd find that by doing that, you would save 30 % on your shopping trolley. You know, so if you were spending 100 quid, you'd now be spending 70 quid. So that was the rough equivalent of one brand level down. And that equation still works today, though it can vary depending on where your start brand is roughly. And the experiment we then did was to get the family to try and see where they couldn't notice the difference. And the rule was, if you can't notice the difference, you go with the cheaper brand. If you can notice the difference, you go back to where you were.
38:12Martin Lewis:And roughly on half the products, they couldn't notice the difference. So it was a way of cutting 15 % on the family shop. I then went on, because it's television, to do double downshift challenge and to do various other things. And it's a format I don't do anymore, but I have seen other people take it up since. Shall I phrase it that way? But for me, it feels a bit noughties. So it's not something I do, although I still have, you know, still talk about doing downshifting. So I have been through this and I think there's nothing wrong with trying a brand level lower and there's nothing wrong as long as you can afford it.
38:42Martin Lewis:If you can't afford it, you have to go low. But if you can afford it with saying, actually, I do notice the difference and I'm willing to pay the extra for quality. Now, on mine, certain things, I'm totally with you on loo roll. Oh, yeah. Agreed. I want my nice loo roll. Agreed. I also, and I do drink colas, I can tell the difference on branded colas, right? And I can equally tell the difference between a main brand cola and its zero or max version and its diet version. Do you know, by the way, the difference between the diet versions and the zero and max versions? I want to say there's absolutely no difference.
39:21It's just a marketing thing. You would be wrong. Really?
39:23Martin Lewis:You would be wrong. Pray tell. So, here we go. When they originally wanted to bring out the diet, the no calorie drinks, the saccharin technology wasn't good enough. So actually, we're going to have to say the brands, actually Diet Coke is an entirely different recipe to Coca-Cola. Diet Pepsi, entirely different recipe for Pepsi-Cola. As saccharin technology improved, they then got to the point where they could basically make the main recipe of the drink and they could just replace the sugar with a sweetener. And that's what the zeros and max are. They're not 100 % identical, but they're basically the same recipe as the main one.
40:06Cool. I thought that was interesting. Matt's not finding that interesting. No, I do find it interesting. I thought you were going to carry on talking. Rosie, Rosie, Rosie's not in the studio with me as we'll discuss more in a moment. Rosie, can you give me, can you tell me, but we cannot be heard, Matt. Okay. Did you find it interesting? Rosie said she thought I'd told her it before. Isabel, and you'll discover who Isabel is soon. Isabel, you can't speak
40:30Martin Lewis:because we haven't made that decision yet. Isabel, interesting or not, you could do it with a hand gesture, a thumb up, a thumb down, or maybe a handy wobble. Thumb up from Isabel. Well done, Isabel. I'm glad Isabel's here. Rosie's going to say she's a sucker. Yeah. So I thought that was interesting. Anyway, there are also, I should say, places, I don't mind downshifting on baked beans, although I like a barbecue baked beans, there are places I would never upshift. Now, I'd never go for the top level on ketchup or mint sauce. Okay. If someone serves me a really posh mint sauce, I love my mint sauce, and I like that sort of hardcore, makes your mouth go, vinegary taste.
41:11Yeah, yeah. And if you get the posh mint sauces or the posh mint jellies, they don't have that because they're all meant to be smooth. I don't want it smooth. I want to be slapped across the face and poked in the eyes when I have my mint sauce. and the same in my ketchup. I want the cheap vinegary ketchup that really gives you a whack. Those are my... So, and yes, I know they're not very healthy, but I don't have too much of them, please. No need to write in about that. So yes, there are places I'd upshift and there are places I'd downshift. And I actually think the key is just to try and to experiment and to see what's out there and what works for you.
41:40The one thing that I... What's you? They didn't ask me, but I would tell you... I'm asking you. Okay. Tinned tomatoes. I would never downshift on a tinned tomato. See, I don't do,
41:51Martin Lewis:I don't like tomatoes. Oh. They're not in the olives, which are evil grapes and no one should ever touch. You don't like olives? He spies olives. Really? And both, the other two women I live with, my wife and my daughter, they are both big olive fans. I love an olive. And I just, evil grape, shouldn't be touched. You have to force yourself to eat them. I can't eat them. I don't believe in acquired taste. Why would I want to acquire a taste? If I don't like it in the first place, why am I going to force myself to get there? It's probably the reason I don't drink beer. There you go. I think we should stop that, Except I have to give the Rosie news.
42:22Oh, yeah. I hope it's good news. It is good news. It's good news for everyone, but it's also bad news. It's both. So the wonderful GDPR Rosie has been my researcher for the last year.
42:34Martin Lewis:And the way we work it, the way that we do it is it is a year long attachment to be a researcher with me. Someone comes off their normal job and they go on, they spend a year. And it's a brilliant way to sort of help someone progress in their career and give them a wider range of experience that comes on. and Rosie, who has been amazing, her year will be up at the end of September. Now, I'm talking about this now because we're taking a break and you're going to have some Best Bits podcasts for the next few weeks rather than some live podcasts. When we come back, Rosie will still be here, but also here, and she is here today in the studio with me, while Rosie isn't in the studio with me, is Isabel.
43:09Give me a nod hello, Isabel, because you can't speak because we have to have that decision. Isabel is nodding hello at all the listeners.
43:15Martin Lewis:Isabel will eventually, by the end of September, be taking over and Isabel will be coming on board and Rosie will be going back to her old job having done a wonderful and brilliant year and I'm very, very grateful to everything Rosie has done. So that's the news. Okay. Is that a shock? It's a shock. It's a shock. I knew Rosie didn't tell me. However, you know, Rosie is an integral part of the podcast. And always will be. Always will be. to the Question Time podcast but we are going to welcome Isabel as well. With open arms. With open arms. Well, I'm not sure that's like... Open ears. Open ears is far better yes when you're someone's boss you can't do open arms it doesn't work like that in the modern age we're not going to go there and so that's the news and yes to finish with that thank you so much to all of our Esquires thank you to everybody who's got a badge and if you come on live you question you get a badge and thank you for everybody who's listening there are going to be some best bits Matt you're in charge of the best bits have you worked out what the best bits are yet?
44:10Yes we've got a plan Are they basically all you? It's all me it's just my voice Okay so basically some Matt only question time podcast No, there's some good questions.
44:17Martin Lewis:They're just the questions, no answers. And then we'll be back full on in September. Thanks for listening, everyone. We really appreciate it. That's it for this week's Question Time. Don't forget to subscribe so you know when we release a new episode. And also do make sure you send in your questions if you've got them. You can email martinlewispodcast at bbc.co.uk. Just address it to dear Martin. Dear Matt. Dear Martin. Dear Matt. I do love that bit. And don't forget, if you come on the show, we'll send you an exclusive money can't buy, because frankly, there isn't a denomination small enough, Martin Lewis podcast question time ESQ badge.
44:58Who wouldn't want that?
45:15Martin Lewis is the founder of MoneySavingExpert.com. But of course, other consumer and price comparison websites are available. You can get in touch with Martin's podcast production team by emailing martinlewispodcast at bbc.co.uk. The offers and rates mentioned in the podcast are correct at the time of recording. However, if you are listening on demand, it's worth double checking as details can date. Remember to subscribe on BBC Sounds and leave us a review however you listen.
45:48Martin, I forgot to say. What? We've had a badge theft. What? I sent one out to one of our callers and I got an email with a picture and the package had been opened and its contents had been stolen.
46:06Martin Lewis:Hello, is that the Serious Crimes office? We have to report the theft of a badge. An Esquire badge. Yes, an Esquire badge. What are you going to do about it? Or what, you think I'm taking this joke a little too far outside of the envelope? Whee! But it is actually very sad. Are we sending that person another badge? Yeah, I've sent another badge, don't worry. But yeah, our first badge theft. So someone has a badge who isn't an Esquire.
From the publisher
In our Question Time podcast, Martin Lewis gives you answers on anything and everything, including: can I use AI to improve my finances, and if so, what’s the best and safest way? We’re in our 60s, is it better to not pay off the remainder of our small mortgage? Will a bit of fiddling give us Section 75 credit card protection on our new windows? Am I wrong to use Amex at small retailers? We have a success where keeping old paperwork, as Martin suggested on the podcast, boosted our caller’s pension by 20%! Plus, you ask Martin what products he wouldn’t be able to live without if he had to spend less. If you want to ask Martin a question, you now can! His Question Time podcast lets you ask Martin absolutely anything and everything (within reason!). So, if you’ve always wanted to know what his second favourite podcast is, how he feels about films that run for longer than three hours, or have a very complicated question about your finances, email it to MartinLewisPodcast@bbc.co.uk.
