In short
Ezra Klein argues Democrats must avoid “oppositional mirroring” and rebuild a “big-tent” coalition to prevent democratic rupture under Trump’s authoritarian instincts. He revisits his controversial Charlie Kirk assassination column, then connects it to broader liberal strategy: coalition-building, strategic discipline, and reviving Obama-style politics of aspiration and balance.
Guest backgrounds
Ezra Klein is a New York Times columnist and podcaster; previously a blogger, Washington Post columnist, and co-founder of Vox. He wrote Abundance and a biography of Barack Obama. Host David Remnick (The New Yorker Radio Hour) interviews him.
Key claims
Political violence is violence against everyone in politics; liberals should still engage opponents’ “practice of politics” without endorsing their views. “Deplorables” rhetoric severed political community and helped Trump win. Democrats should compete in places like Kansas/Missouri/Ohio with unconventional candidates and repolarize safely over 4–12 years.
Notable examples
Charlie Kirk’s Utah assassination and memorial; Obama’s Boston convention speech; Hillary Clinton “deplorables”; Trump’s “I hate my opponent” at the memorial; Susan Collins and RFK Jr. as coalition-expanding models.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOEzra Klein on the Democratic Party
0:01 to 0:57
David Remnick discusses Ezra Klein's views on the future of the Democratic Party.
“Summer was built for relaxing, and I'm ready to do just that right down to my wardrobe.”
Ezra Klein on the Democratic Party
1:03 to 1:16
David Remnick discusses Ezra Klein's views on the future of the Democratic Party.
“That's quince.com slash radio hour for free shipping and 365-day returns.”
Ezra Klein on the Democratic Party
1:25 to 1:52
David Remnick discusses Ezra Klein's views on the future of the Democratic Party.
“For years now, New York Times columnist and podcaster Ezra Klein has been at the center of debates over the future of the Democratic Party and what liberalism's political priorities ought to be.”
Trump's Political Tactics
1:52 to 2:28
Discussion about Trump's approach to political opposition and media.
“He's claimed that it's illegal for the press to be critical of him.”
Reflecting on Political Violence
2:28 to 3:26
Ezra Klein reflects on his thoughts regarding political violence and its implications.
“I spoke to Ezra Klein about his perspective on the perilous moment that we find ourselves in today.”
Debating Politics After Violence
3:26 to 4:22
Discussion about the implications of political violence on discourse and politics.
“I think you got to separate a couple of things here.”
Community and Political Divisions
4:22 to 6:36
Klein discusses the erosion of community and political divisions in America.
“They were certainly winning on social media.”
Trump's Influence on Politics
6:36 to 8:00
Examining how Trump has changed the political landscape and party dynamics.
“I think something that's very alive for me is a feeling that we are not that far from national rupture.”
Obama's Political Aspirations
8:00 to 9:09
Discussion on Barack Obama's aspirational speech and its impact on politics.
“The other thing I saw, to be honest, was a political opportunity.”
Building Political Coalitions
9:09 to 14:00
Exploration of the importance of coalition-building in politics.
“said about it, that that wasn't a statement of here's the condition.”
Show all 29 chapters
The Challenges of Competition in Politics
14:00 to 17:20
Exploring the need for Democrats to compete in traditionally red states and the implications of pro-life Democrats.
“They've just accepted places where they cannot compete.”
Rediscovering Barack Obama's Political Approach
17:20 to 18:58
Examining the open-palmed politics of Barack Obama and its relevance today.
“I don't think it's an accident that the last two Democrats to win nationally and serve two terms had this very open-palmed approach to politics and were very good at balancing these different forces and dynamics in them.”
The Legacy and Backlash of Obama
18:58 to 23:08
Discussing the mixed perceptions of Obama's legacy and the rise of backlash against him.
“Talking to people who don't often hear from us, you have to win in the attentional sphere right now.”
The Work of Politics and Building Coalitions
23:08 to 25:19
Highlighting the importance of political engagement and coalition-building for the Democrats.
“But how is this rupture to be prevented?”
The Work of Politics and Building Coalitions
27:09 to 28:16
Highlighting the importance of political engagement and coalition-building for the Democrats.
“their own so businesses can keep up with requests without losing their personal touch.”
The Work of Politics and Building Coalitions
30:06 to 30:19
Highlighting the importance of political engagement and coalition-building for the Democrats.
“Cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at mintmobile.com slash NY radio hour.”
Ezra Klein's Political Background
30:44 to 33:14
Klein shares insights about his upbringing and early political influences.
“I'm speaking today with New York Times columnist and podcaster Ezra Klein.”
Journey into Blogging and Journalism
33:14 to 34:21
Klein discusses his transition from blogging to journalism and his unique perspective.
“We did not receive the New Yorker or the New Republic.”
Understanding Washington's Political System
34:21 to 37:58
Klein elaborates on the misconceptions of the political system and party influences.
“Somebody told me recently they think of my work as a cerebral children horse for emotional ideas, which I don't think is wrong, actually.”
Klein's Influence and Perspectives
37:58 to 40:18
Klein reflects on his influence within the Democratic Party and his views on politics.
“I want to go back to the question that I raised before about your influence in the Democratic Party and how do you feel it and not feel it?”
Mission as a Podcaster and Writer
40:18 to 42:05
Klein shares his mission and approach as a podcaster and writer in today's media landscape.
“I think you have to know what you're good at doing.”
Ezra Klein on Barry Weiss and Media Polarization
42:05 to 46:21
Ezra discusses Barry Weiss's influence in media and the shifting dynamics of political commentary.
“I try to take seriously questions that I don't love.”
Ezra Klein's Commitment to Journalistic Institutions
46:21 to 47:29
Ezra explains why he values being part of journalistic institutions over going solo.
“and journalist Ezra Klein we'll be back with the conclusion of our conversation in just a moment The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Lisa.”
Ezra Klein's Commitment to Journalistic Institutions
47:50 to 48:52
Ezra explains why he values being part of journalistic institutions over going solo.
“Your living space is your sanctuary, and you want it to feel like an expression of you, right?”
Ezra Klein's Commitment to Journalistic Institutions
50:40 to 51:04
Ezra explains why he values being part of journalistic institutions over going solo.
“Cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at mintmobile.com slash NY radio hour.”
The Future of the Democratic Party
51:04 to 56:01
Discussion on the state of the Democratic Party and potential leaders like AOC.
“Greater than 50 GB may slow when network is busy.”
Assessing AOC's Presidential Prospects
56:01 to 58:06
Discussion about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's potential candidacy and her support base.
“In the last two weeks, there have been stories about AOC, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and what the future might hold for her, either running for Senate or even president.”
Identity Politics in Leadership
58:06 to 59:16
Exploration of identity politics and its impact on candidates Buttigieg and Harris.
“And Kamala Harris just admitted in her new book that the reason she didn't select Pete Buttigieg as her vice president was that he's gay.”
A Lighthearted Conversation on Burning Man
59:16 to 59:41
A humorous exchange regarding the experiences and perceptions of Burning Man.
“I mean, you know, you might have depths and multitudes inside of you that I don't know.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00WNYC Studios is supported by Quince. Summer was built for relaxing, and I'm ready to do just that right down to my wardrobe. That means I'm reaching for easy, elevated essentials from Quince time and time again for beautiful pieces that are a delight to wear. Think 100 % European linen pants and shirts, so breathable, so effortless to throw on, and starting at just$34. And the softest tees ever. You'll want to live in them all day. And if you need a little something extra at night, Their lightweight cotton sweaters are perfect for just the right amount of cozy. And even better, everything at Quince is priced 50 to 80 % less than similar brands.
0:34They work directly with ethical factories and cut out the middlemen. So you're paying for quality material and expert construction, not brand markup. And Quince goes way beyond clothing. Quince has incredible options for everything from home goods to travel to skincare and supplements. And their jewelry? I have been wearing the Quince Huggy Hoops with absolutely everything. Such a fun little pop of elegance that works everywhere from the boardroom to the boardwalk. Make your summer wardrobe easier. Go to quince.com slash radio hour for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. Now available in Canada, too.
1:04That's quince.com slash radio hour for free shipping and 365-day returns. Quince.com slash radio hour. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour, a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. For years now, New York Times columnist and podcaster Ezra Klein has been at the center of debates over the future of the Democratic Party and what liberalism's political priorities ought to be. Klein's perspective is getting even more scrutiny these days as we're in the midst of a volatile national debate over free speech and the very stability of our democracy.
1:51As we speak, President Trump is demanding prosecutions of his political enemies. He's claimed that it's illegal for the press to be critical of him. And he's routinely used threatening and dehumanizing language to discredit his opponents, whom he admits he hates. He did not hate his opponents. He wanted the best for them. That's where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponent. and I don't want the best for them. I'm sorry. So how should Trump's critics and opponents handle this onslaught? What can they do to win back the voters that deserted them in last year's presidential election? I spoke to Ezra Klein about his perspective on the perilous moment that we find ourselves in today.
2:42Let's start with what happened when Charlie Kirk was killed. you pretty immediately published an essay in the Times that, of course, condemned political violence, comparing it to a contagion or the danger of a contagion. And you praised Charlie Kirk's willingness to debate. You called it, quote, practicing politics the right way. That was the phrase that resonated everywhere. And since that terrible event, the assassination of Charlie Kirk in Utah, Tom, we've seen how Trump and the MAGA movement at times has planned to use his death in a serious crackdown on the opposition. As your thinking about this evolved, how do you look back on that column?
3:22What did you get right? And how maybe has it been misinterpreted? I think you got to separate a couple of things here. Sure. My view is that in the, let's call it 12 hours after somebody is publicly murdered, it is a good time to sit with people in their grief. And I believe very deeply that when you commit an act of political violence like that, it is an act of political violence against everybody who participates in politics. I said in that piece, and I believe, right, that on that stage that day, Charlie Kirk was practicing politics. He was up there. He was arguing with people. I've heard people say, well, he's not really debating to find the truth.
3:59And of course not. He's a very, very effective practitioner of politics. He's trying to persuade people. He's trying to create content that will work in our attentional sphere. And I think something that we liberals have to reckon with is he had been winning. He and the people like him had been winning. They had been beginning to win on college campuses, and there's a big Gen Z swing towards Donald Trump. They were certainly winning on social media. You can disagree. I disagree with him profoundly and still, you know, find things in him to think that there's meaning to make out of it. I don't actually find this to be a complex part of it.
4:39The critique of it was that you were for sure engaging with his practice of politics, of meeting people where they are, but maybe underselling what Charlie Kirk represented in terms of his positions about race, about, quote, Jewish money funding and anti-whiteness agenda, about his views about LGBTQ people, all kinds of things. what is your sense of his particular politics with all due respect and sympathy for a i think we totally agree a horrific a horrific act of assassination i think this is a weird critique genuinely like you you know human beings david if in the moments after a murder or death do you go people and tell them exactly what you thought of the person they just lost is your like relationship to people who you're in community with.
5:34And I do believe myself to be in a political community with people who cared about and loved Charlie Kirk, even as much as I'm very much on the other side from them. Would you go to people like that when they've just watched somebody be killed? So Ta-Nehisi Coase, for example, wrote a piece in Vanity Fair making very clear what had been a collection of statements from Charlie Kirk that was quite representative. Did you think that was unfair? No. I mean, I don't, not to me, right? Like, I virtually agree with Tom Hasse on every view he has. And Tom Hasse's on my show this weekend. I agree with the things that you just said.
6:13It's bad. I have, as I wrote in my second piece, I have poured virtually every ounce of myself into preventing everything that Kirk poured himself into creating. I think that for more people than I had understood, the sense that we are in any way in community together, the sense that we are still in a place where we are all practicing and doing politics has already eroded. I think something that's very alive for me is a feeling that we are not that far from national rupture. So many things that we like to say it can't happen here have already been happening here. And who do you blame for that?
6:50I mean, I blame Donald Trump quite specifically for that. And I think that the way he has acted in the aftermath of Kirk's murder has been a exhibition of virtually everything that is wrong and dangerous about him. I'm in 100 % agreement with you. I watched a lot of that memorial service. What did you think of it? I saw two remarkable things. I saw the widow of Charlie Kirk get up and do an extraordinary thing, a woman whose world has been shattered, whose family has been shattered, who's lost the husband she adored. Forgive, forgive the person who killed them. I mean, I don't know that I could ever be capable of that.
7:29And then who spoke later? Donald Trump got up and he said, I hate my opponent. I can't be like that. And it wasn't just rhetoric. It wasn't a tossed off comment. It was true. And that, that really struck me. There is some part of him, I think, that would thrill to the possibility of an excuse to crack down. They're already trying it in many ways. The other thing I saw, to be honest, was a political opportunity. I think a politics of hatred is a weak politics. And a lot of people desire for something different. I found myself thinking a lot recently about the speech through which Barack Obama rose to power.
8:16The pundits like to slice and dice our country into red states and blue states. Red states for Republicans, blue states for Democrats. But I've got news for them too. We worship an awesome God in the blue states, and we don't like federal agents poking around in our libraries in the red states. We coach Little League in the blue states, and yes, we've got some gay friends in the red states. there are patriots who opposed the war in iraq and there are patriots who supported the war in iraq we are one people all of us pledging allegiance to the stars and stripes all of us defending the united states of america at the boston convention speech i think a lot of people now have almost given up on that politics and i also think that uh well you remember what obama said about it, that that wasn't a statement of here's the condition.
9:12It was an aspirational speech. Yeah. Aspiration is very powerful in politics. And I, both because I am genuinely worried about rupture, but also because I'm genuinely determined to try to be useful in making our politics better and having people who I trust more holding power, I think we should not engage in oppositional mirroring where whatever the other side does, we do, right? You hate me? Oh, well, you know what? I hate you. Do you see that on the liberal side that there's a lot of mirroring of that? I see on the liberal side that one huge strategic mistake we have made for well over at least a decade now, let's call it, is yes, oppositional mirroring.
10:01Not on the word hate, right? That's a specific thing with Trump. How would you illustrate that? So let me give you an example. Sketch it out, yeah. Obama was a very, very effective politician. And he's a very effective politician because he was very good at containing opposites inside of him. You wrote a biography of him. You know this about him better than just about anybody. So he was very good at having a sense that if you're going to push the country, you also need to create space in yourself, in your political movement, in your rhetoric for the disagreement, for the concern, for the pushback.
10:34And so he was this generationally capable political balancer, right? Like sort of holding both our liberalism and our illiberalism inside himself. After him, I think this began to break down. So Trump rises and you have, say, the Hillary Clinton deplorable speech. You can put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables.
11:01Right?
11:04The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic, you name it. Now some of those folks, they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America. The worst word in that is irredeemable. I agree. Right? That's really, when you talk like that, a severing of political community. What begins to happen is Trump then wins, which I think is taken as truly shocking. is you begin to see the, and this is not even a painting, this just literally happens. The Democratic Party begins to take on the opposite positions of Trump in many ways. So Trump is the most anti-immigrant president of our lifetime, right?
11:47Not just in his wanting to decide to build a wall, but emotionally anti-immigrant. The Democratic Party becomes much more pro-immigrant, right? If you're going to build a wall, we're going to debate legalizing, decriminalizing illegal border crossing. But that wasn't true across the board. There were a lot of differing positions on immigration. There were, but almost everybody on that stage except Joe Biden and Bennett. And not expressed with a similar, much less equivalent hatred. I agree that Donald Trump is very unique in the way he radiates hatred. And I think you know this even as you're pushing me on this.
12:25if you talk to people on the right, and I'm not talking about Donald Trump or people at the top of politics. I'm talking about the people in my life who ended up voting for Trump that they felt in these years profoundly rejected. I do think this politics of deplorables was very real. There is certainly people, right, who don't agree with the things I believe in the world, right? They began to feel that the Democratic Party genuinely didn't like them. And one of my strongest, most strongly held views about politics is that the most important question for a voter is not whether they like you, but whether you like them.
13:06If they're going to trust you with power, the first thing is not whether they agree with you. The first thing is just whether or not they feel you like them and will take them into consideration. But do you think any of that was centered on Obama himself? Oh, there's no doubt. Why? But I think Obama— Because of his character? Because he was black and foreign to people. but then I'll ask you this question. Do you think Obama would have won in 2016 if he could have run again? I do. So there you go. Politics is about power. Yeah. And I think people have missed this. Politics is not about self-expression.
13:38There's room for that. It's not just about a dispassionate analysis of ideas. There's room for that. It's a lot of what I do, a lot of what you do. Politics is about building coalitions capable of winning power and making the decisions you need to do to do that. So I said recently in a podcast with my colleague, Rush Dow, that I feel that there's been a lot of fatalism among Democrats, right? They've just accepted places where they cannot compete. And I said that I want to see, you know, real decisions being made to try to compete in Kansas and Missouri and Ohio and then in red states, right? Meaning better than that.
14:11I'd like to see us running pro-life Democrats again. When Obamacare passed, 40 House Democrats were pro-life. People got very upset about that. I get why. But I think it's worth thinking about this. Has it been bad for the Republican Party that Susan Collins, who is nominally per choice, wins in Maine? Has that been a weakness for them? Has it been bad for the Republican Party that Donald Trump welcomed RFK Jr. and all of his voters, everybody who liked RFK Jr., Joe Rogan all the way down into their coalition? No, it has expanded their power. Trump built coalitions when he thought it would serve him.
14:47He is, among many other things, that he is a ruthlessly political animal. And I think there are things to take seriously in that that we have begun to demean. I hear you. The problem is, the difficulty is, is juggling these plates all at once. Sure is. Right now, you're talking the language of conciliation and broadening the scope and the tent temperamentally and politically of the Democratic Party. I hear you on that. At the same time, you have – I think we agree on this. You have a president who, in fact, is uniquely authoritarian in his instincts and it would seem in his policies as well. And to do those things at the same time, to fight that battle at the same time is hard to do.
15:38It seems almost irreconcilable temperamentally within the Democratic Party. I mean, I think some of this reflects the absence of right now a leader in the Democratic Party can sort of make decisions on behalf of it. But to me, these two things are the same thing. If you're facing Mitt Romney, you have margin for loss. If you lose, it's a shame, but it's Mitt Romney. Nothing that bad is going to happen. If you keep losing to MAGA, then at least under the way I look at the world, terrible things are going to happen, truly terrible things. And the risk of catastrophic things happening, the risk of what we understand to be the American political system cracking into something else becomes very real.
16:21So if you think – hold on. If you think the threat – if you think the threat is that bad – You're asking for a certain kind of equanimity within the democratic party. No, I'm asking for strategic discipline. What's the difference? It means that what I'm saying we should do is we should take on an approach to politics that we think will expand our coalition such that we are not always within two points of losing to Donald Trump or the people around him. And if that means doing things that are uncomfortable, yeah, if a war or a battle or a project – I mean when people get terrible diseases, they don't take the medicines because they enjoy the side effects.
16:59They do it because it might work. So who would you – who exemplifies this temperament of leadership and of the way he or she looks at the world? I'm not sure I have the person right now. I mean, in some ways, I think I am saying we should rediscover the politics of Barack Obama. This is The New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick, and I'm speaking today with the writer and podcaster Ezra Klein. Now, Ezra, you just said that we need to rediscover the politics of Barack Obama. Tell me a little more about that. I don't think it's an accident that the last two Democrats to win nationally and serve two terms had this very open-palmed approach to politics and were very good at balancing these different forces and dynamics in them.
17:41And that doesn't mean, by the way, that their presidencies, their power, their assent did not drive many people on the other side crazy. Clinton, in ways that, in retrospect, look ridiculous, drove the right crazy. I mean, you remember the conspiracies about Vince Foster and all the rest of it. And Obama, by virtue of who he is, no matter how conciliatory he was, by virtue of his identity, by virtue of his skin color, by virtue of his name, he drove the right nuts. Are you happy with how present or not Barack Obama is in the national conversation and debate? No. I think we could use more of his leadership and voice right now.
18:19Look, I've said this on my show. I'll say it on yours. I wish he were more out there. But I think that he is still playing by the rules where it is – I mean increasingly less. He's starting to do a little bit more. But I think he's still playing by the rules wherein it would be unseemly for a former president to take a very public role. I also think he believes if he does that, he will choke off oxygen for the next generation of democratic leaders to rise. But I would like to see Barack Obama on Joe Rogan. I would like to see that in the end of the election. And I think we both know that he would do it in a second.
18:53I can't speak for him, but I think so. I think it would be good for him to be in places. Again, this is a very big thing for me. Talking to people who don't often hear from us, you have to win in the attentional sphere right now. And there are very few people who can do it as well as he can. Barack Obama, who was a hero of liberalism at a certain point in time, now takes a lot of criticism from the left or the left-left, depending on how you look at it. I wonder how you look at that phenomenon now. So I've been thinking actually a ton about this. How does Obama go in a pretty compressed number of years from nearly an impossibility?
19:35the very act of his election seeming like a pivotal moment in the country to many people to by the end of his term i mean still by the way the most popular national level politician in america today it's very easy i think to overstate you know the obama backlash he's doing better than any other figure this is why i like to see him out there more but i think it reflects a couple things. One is I think it reflects that the hopes that his campaign aroused in people were not capable of being delivered upon by either the pros of actual governing, you know, through Congress and the filibuster and all these blockages.
20:21He did a lot. I mean, the Fordham Care Act is not a small thing. The Dodd-Frank financial reforms are not a small thing, but it wasn't enough. And so there was a letdown. And then he's followed by Trump. And I think the Obama legacy looks different to people because it seems to have ended not in, you know, this arc bending towards justice. You know, he's succeeded by Hillary Clinton and she gets things done. You keep sort of building a new era in American politics incrementally. Instead, it's followed by very rapid regression. And I think, you know, one of the ways I view politics is that the communication mediums upon which it happens are very, very determinative in what then becomes powerful and popular and energetic.
21:12And I think that the move to social media and algorithmic media, it was really a move towards a style of political communication that is somewhat hostile to the liberal project. The deliberative, open-minded, thoughtful on the one hand. On the other hand, mode of discourse that Obama is good at. He's bad at Twitter. You ever read Obama on Twitter? It's bad. It's not his thing. Trump is good at Twitter. And so I think that it all gets taken for granted. it actually is a sort of remarkable experiment what we're doing here. And the idea that a country this big and this diverse— Nationally. Constitutionally.
21:50No, I'm in here on this podcast. I see. The idea that a country as big and diverse with as much political argumentation and division as we have, that we actually would live together, that we can make this work, that would keep getting better, that a black man with a middle name who's seen could get elected. Doing the work of democracy, doing the work of politics, that's actually amazing. and I think he wasn't able to keep that story going and nobody kept it going after him but I do think there is a lot of power in actually reconnecting people at this moment when I think they feel it, I certainly feel it like, oh this could break, we could just break this, somebody like Trump could just break this one of my deep, I mean there's a lot I disagree with Trump on but one thing I really find offensive about him and I would say this about J.D.
22:40Vance now too, is I don't think they believe in this project anymore. I'm not sure they did or actually J.D. Vance at one point did. I think for Vance, there's something, a more kind of scarily ideological structure around that. I think he's very influenced by people who believe America was lost at some point in the past 50 years. They differ on exactly when it was. And you need some kind of counter-revolution to restore it to the heritage Americans who are really supposed to have ownership over this. they i mean i think there's a profound contempt and anger that radiates from both of them and i think that they both intend trump in his intuitive way vance in his more systematic way to instantiate that into policy and power and things can get really bad when you attempt to do that and so how do you defeat that in other words we began our conversation with a endorsement of the ability to sit down with people who you disagree with ferociously, not over tax policy, but ferociously on fundamental things.
23:44But how is this rupture to be prevented? This is the work of politics. And one thing I believe is we've begun to demean the work of politics. One thing I am worried about is I actually think – a little bit on both sides, but it's particularly true for me in the Democratic Party is that work. That work of building political coalitions around disagreement, of sitting in that kind of disagreement has become seen as often something quite akin to betrayal. So I'm interested to see who Democrats run in 2026. And I would like to see in places where it has become very hard for Democrats to win, very unusual candidates.
24:23I would like to see them trying more things. So Graham Plattner in Maine is an interesting – try to do that from an economic populist perspective. But Maine is not a red state. So I don't think – that's not what's going to win you in Texas. You see James Tallarico in Texas. He's kind of an interesting candidate. Who are they going to run in Kansas? Who are they going to run in Missouri? Sherrod Brown in Ohio is a very strong candidate. it, I do think over a four, eight, 12-year period, we need to repolarize this country in a safer way than we have, right? Not this sort of system, anti-system polarization.
24:57And that means mixing up the parties a little bit again. The sense that you will need to build bridges right now to survive that maybe are not the ones you most prefer building, I think that's very real. And I think that requires us to see the work of politics as honorable work, even when it includes a lot of compromise and a lot of working with people who we have very, very deep disagreements with. But you're trying to build power and you're trying to do good things with that power.
25:29I'm speaking with Ezra Klein, columnist and podcaster of The New York Times. This is The New Yorker Radio Hour. More to come.
26:04WNYC Studios is supported by Monarch. When I think about my relationship to money, the phrase that comes to mind is superstitious dread. As a freelancer, my income is, shall we say, variable, and that can be scary. My financial education as a child was mostly limited to my parents yelling about it, so as with most scary, unpleasant concepts, my lifelong tactic has been avoidance. I'm aware that this is no way for a grown-up to act, and that's why Monarch has been a game-changer. Monarch helps me face my fears by putting all my income and spending information into one place and making that information easy to digest, even for me.
Read the full transcript
26:37The diagrams make it crystal clear where my money is going. It really demystifies the scary things like setting financial goals and budgets. I can ask its AI assistant questions like, can I afford this vacation or this fancy jar of face cream? It's like having a financial advisor in my pocket, and that's helped me reach my most important financial goal of all, banishing the fear and getting my money on track. Write your own money story with Monarch. Use code NEWYORKER at Monarch.com to get your first year of Monarch Core half off at just$50. That's 50 % off your first year at Monarch.com with code NEWYORKER.
27:09WNYC Studios is supported by Decagon.
27:39their own so businesses can keep up with requests without losing their personal touch. Decagon plugs directly into your existing systems so agents can get live quickly. And because workflows can be updated using natural language, teams can make changes themselves without long engineering cycles. That means less time spent managing workflows, more time focused on customers, and measurable ROI within weeks. Once live, agents can pull up-to-date information, take action on requests, and understand the context behind any conversation. Decagon helps power millions of conversations every day for brands you know and love, including Avis, Affirm, Fanatics, and Aura.
28:14Ready to transform your customer support? Go to decagon.ai slash newyorker to get a personalized demo and see what Decagon can do for your team. Check Decagon out at decagon.ai slash newyorker. That's decagon.ai slash newyorker. I'm Emily Flake, cartoonist at the New Yorker. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Bombas. Summer's here, and we are living for all things outdoors. Whether your thing is jogging, heading to the beach, or grilling in front of your stoop, Bombas makes your comfiest summer staples so you can make the most out of all your summer plans. They've got a whole line of pro-level, sports-specific socks for golf, yoga, the gym, and socks for every kind of runner.
28:52I personally do not run if I can help it, but I walk everywhere. And if I don't get my 10 ,000 steps in, my phone will yell at me. These socks are so soft and cushioned right where I need it, whether I'm doing a power saunter in the park or just running a million errands. Plus, they're airy, sweat-wicking. My feet feel as good after a long day of pounding the pavement as they did when I left the apartment. Head over to bombas.com slash radio hour and use code radio hour for 20 % off your first purchase. That's B-O-M-B-A-S dot com slash radio hour. Code radio hour at checkout. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Mint Mobile.
29:28There are things in life that you don't want to be transparent, like your swimsuit or your search history. But when it comes to your wireless bill, transparency is everything. That's why Mint Mobile's wireless plans have no gimmicks and no gotchas, just high-speed data and reliable coverage on the T-Mobile 5G network. And right now, all plans are$15 per month, even unlimited. Choose from three, six, or 12-month plans and say goodbye to a monthly bill. You can even bring your current phone and your number. To get your new wireless plan for just 15 bucks a month, go to mintmobile.com slash NY radio hour.
30:05That's mintmobile.com slash NY radio hour. Cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at mintmobile.com slash NY radio hour. That's it. There's no catch. Upfront payment of$45 for three months,$90 for six months, or$180 for 12 months. Plan required$15 per month equivalent. Taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only. Greater than 50 GB may slow when network is busy. Includes up to 20 GB hotspot. Capable device required. Availability, speed, and coverage varies. See mintmobile.com.
30:43This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. I'm speaking today with New York Times columnist and podcaster Ezra Klein. Now Klein might be just 41 years old, but he seems like he's been part of our political culture and conversation for a pretty long time. He was a blogger, then a Washington Post columnist, a co-founder of Vox, and now he's, of course, a writer and podcaster for the New York Times. He's also the co-author of a recent best-selling book called Abundance. Most recently, Klein has drawn the ire of some progressives for a column that he wrote about the assassination of Charlie Kirk, in which he praised the late conservative activist for practicing politics, in his phrase, the right way.
31:28But in addition to the news of the day, I also wanted to spend a little time getting to know what shaped Klein's thinking, what shaped his liberalism, and his way of talking with both allies and opponents. I think a lot of listeners, and myself included, want to know a little bit more about you. You've... Do they, David? Well, they're trapped, so they're going to. You have gotten a lot of attention in the last few years. Very often I will read about people in the Democratic Party wanting to know what Ezra Klein thinks or the influence you have within the Democratic Party, positive or negative, about the potential shutdown in Washington that may be coming around the corner.
32:17So I want to go back. Tell me a little bit about your family background and your political family background. What were the politics in your house? So I grew up in Irvine, California. The district I lived in did not elect a Democrat to Congress until Katie Porter in 2018. That was our first Democrat we sent to the house. My father's a professor at UCI, now retired. Taught what? Mathematics, which I am not good at. I used to joke that I'm good at math for a journalist, but not for the son. That's not saying much. It's not. So my dad's a mathematician. My mother worked with children and was an artist.
32:57They are both thankfully alive and healthy. My house was mostly Democratic. But members of my family in recent years, some of them less so. Some of them a lot less so, in fact. But it wasn't a highly political house. We did not receive the New Yorker or the New Republic. We got the LA Times, watched nightly newscasts. There wasn't talk radio. It wasn't a highly political house I grew up in. You had some political enthusiasms early on. You worked for Howard Dean. Oh, yes, when I was in college. So I got into politics. So my brother, my older brother, was a lawyer, environmental law, and used to take me to protests in L.A.
33:40where he lived. What kind of protests? Farmworkers' marches. Not the only kind, but he had a lot of great work there. So I did get into politics, but I primarily got into it through blogging. I became a blogger back when nobody knew what that was. This is when I was a freshman in college. And I got into blogging in 2003 and just loved writing about politics, reading about politics, thinking about politics, debating it with people. When I began to read you in little venues early on and then you arrived, to me, the first self-branded journalist that I knew of when you were doing Wonkblog at the Washington Post.
34:20A simpler time. Well, but an innovative person and at the same time had an analytic cast of mind when it came to politics that a lot of journalists just don't have. How did that develop? And do you accept the premise? Somebody told me recently they think of my work as a cerebral children horse for emotional ideas, which I don't think is wrong, actually. What are they getting at that you think is true? I would say I don't think this is my reputation anymore in the way it was in the WonkBlog days. But the idea that I was this cool, detached calculator of a reporter or journalist, I mean, the reason I care about these things is I care.
34:59I feel incredibly emotionally compelled by the stakes of politics, whether or not people get health care, whether or not we go to war, what kinds of people are in power. That these things are shaping our lives, whether we want them to or not, is a central, almost physical reality. we all have to face. And understanding them is one of the few ways to try to face it. But kind of like a Marxist or a certain kind of conservative of a different sort, there is this systemic look at the way things work. When you were younger, when you were 28, still at the Washington Post, you used to give a talk that was called Why Washington is Horrible in Charts, in parentheses.
35:39The main point being that we focus way too much on individuals and maybe not enough on Washington as a system. Tell me what that was about and how much has it carried over to your thinking today. That speech, which I think was either from or became my book, Why We're Polarized, which was my first book, which is sadly relevant at the moment, was about the way you needed to understand these as structures and institutions that had rules and internal logics. So, for instance, we have this functionally false idea of how our political system works based on the founders' intentions, which is, oh, we're a system of checks and balances, right?
36:19We have three co-equal branches that will jealously guard their power and prerogatives from one another. Well, that was the intention of our system. In fact, what we have is two political parties that are not mentioned anywhere in the constitution because they were not predicted or anticipated or hoped for. that compete across those branches. So right now we have a Republican-controlled Congress cooperating with a Republican-controlled executive branch. I would say cooperating with a Republican-controlled Supreme Court. Unless you have built into the way you are looking at politics, the influence and fundamental centrality of parties, which our system does not do in any rigorous way, you will not understand either how it works or how it doesn't work.
37:03In the Senate, right? It's just – maybe less so now, but it was certainly a mainstay of political reporting that we just treated everything as the president should be able to get this done. And if it's not getting done, well, what's the president doing wrong? But the filibuster was being used constantly. And unless you understood first that that was a new fact about American politics, the filibuster was rarely used. and unless you could kind of see why that had happened and then realize, oh, it's actually very hard to get to 60 votes in the Senate and in this time of polarization, it's hard to get bipartisan cooperation.
37:39I think it's important. I think it is part of our duty, our like on some level sacred duty to give people a true account of why things are happening. And that requires understanding the systems in which people operate because most of us, for better and for worse, reflect the systems which structure the logics of our lives. I want to go back to the question that I raised before about your influence in the Democratic Party and how do you feel it and not feel it? When this began being the way people saw me, it was really around Biden leaving the ticket. Right. But what I will say about that whole process where in early 2024, around the time of the Super Bowl and the Robert Hur press conference, I did a series of pieces basically saying this is going to be catastrophic for this then 81-year-old to run again.
38:29He's not up to it. But also, there is still things. The big problem to me at the party in that point was fatalism. Well, we have no choice to run because there's nobody but Biden because otherwise it'll be Kamala Harris and she'll lose, right? That was the quiet whisper response to anybody who thought Biden shouldn't run. From Biden's people. From that world of people, yes. And I one thought Harris would be a better bet and I think would have been a much better bet if he had left the ticket much earlier. But two, I believe we should have had an open convention and that if he had left early in the year or with some months to go.
39:04Even with only 107 days left on the clock. He could have left before that. No, no, without question and should have. But considering - By the time he left, there was not time for it. It was too late. It was too late. He had waited too long. When I did that series of pieces, I would say they were not influential at all. Biden gave a good State of the Union and everybody thought I was an idiot. And like, that's just where the situation sat. what changed the situation was reality. It was Joe Biden getting up in that debate and falling apart. Making sure that we're able to make every single solitary person eligible for what I've been able to do with the COVID, excuse me, with dealing with everything we have to do with, look, if we finally beat Medicare.
39:50You know, I don't see this as some remarkable campaign of influence I ran. I think I was seeing reality a little bit. I think I was seeing it clearly. But by the way, voters had seen this long before I said anything about it, right? The supermajorities of the public had said for a long time Biden was too old to run again. And I helped create a little bit of permission structure for people to admit that when reality interceded and it was no longer something that could be denied. Would you ever go into politics? No. Absolutely not. I think we're making a Sherman statement. I'm making a Sherman statement.
40:21I think you have to know what you're good at doing. I think I'm good at doing this. Tell me a little bit about this. What is your sense of your mission as a podcaster, as a writer, as somebody who makes public appearances? What is your sense of mission? I mean, my sense of mission is simple. I have values and beliefs about how the world should work and what would make the world better. and I try to persuade people of them, but I also try to explore them in an honest way. But I do this because I care about where things are going. I'm not dispassionately observing from the sidelines. I am emotionally, intellectually, spiritually involved.
41:07But what I'm doing and the way I'm doing it has changed a lot over the years in ways that I can follow more through intuition than through some framework. You know, the version of me that was writing Wonkblog and telling everybody about healthcare aging in one chart is not what I'm doing on my podcast now. My podcast is a forum in which I'm not primarily trying to be persuasive. Over time, I think it has persuasive elements, but it's mostly other people talking. I have a lot of people on who I disagree with. And I think it acts as a space in which certain kinds of conversations can be had. and then can be put into conversation with each other.
41:50And that matters. In my column, I'm more prescriptive, right? The, what goes into eventually the book Abundance comes more from the column. And that's me trying to understand the world and trying to find ways to confront things in it that I find puzzling or unnerving. I try to take seriously questions that I don't love. I don't try to insist the world works the way I want it to work. I try to be honest with myself about the way it is working. You are an important figure at what I think is still today the most important news gathering organization on earth, the New York Times. But it's also one that everybody has opinions about.
42:30And recently, Thomas Chatterton Williams just wrote a book about the summer of 2020, which was dramatic in a lot of quarters, including the New York Times. Barry Weiss left and created Free Press. How do you look back on that? So I wasn't there. Yeah. So I just really don't know what happened internal to the Times at that time. What's your opinion about Barry Weiss' increasing influence in what seems to be she's about to be a very important figure at CBS? Yeah, it seems like she's about to take over CBS. What do you think? I mean, my thing about Barry, and I've been on her show, and I have a lot of admiration for how good she is at what she does.
43:10My disagreements with Barry, I think she's asymmetric in sympathy and generosity. Tell me what that means. Like, I've thought their work on, say, starvation in Gaza has been really bad. I think the whole thing. Spelling out. Yeah, they've done this whole thing like, well, a lot of the kids who have died and have been reported on, well, they had secondary conditions. And yes, when you starve a population, the people who die first will be the most vulnerable. That's not exculpatory. That did not feel to me like there was overwhelming evidence of how bad things were in Gaza. And I felt that they were trying to whitewash it.
43:45What I see her doing is trying to do something that used to be somewhat more common, which is try to self-consciously be what she would define as the center. And I see them tacking back and forth around that. So they're much more sort of pro-Trump, I would say, when he's running and Democrats are in power. But then now that he's in, it's like, oh, no, they're the vandals. And it's a little bit more to me like the old New Republic, things they used to do. Like when I came into Washington, I felt there were more – actually, it's funny. When I was a blogger, this was something we all used to complain about all the time.
44:22All of these organizations that we felt were using this concept, this amorphous concept of the center as a positioning device. That instead of sometimes being guided – That it was a dodge. No, that it wasn't a dodge. It was navigational. They weren't dodging. They were just kind of – there were a lot of politicians like this and a lot of players like this who had felt like their politics were hewing to some idea of the center as opposed to a very, very consistent set of views and principles. And as media polarized, many fewer places are doing that. And I think Barry saw a market opportunity in that.
45:03Is her center what I think is a center? No. but I recognize a lot of editorial skill there. You are now in a position, I would imagine, Ezra, that if you decided, you know what, I'm going to go out on my own. I'm going to do a podcast called The Ezra Klein Show and I'm going to get a staff of X, Y, and Z and probably you could make, you know, a great deal more money than you do now. Why is it important for you to be at The Times as opposed to out on your own? I believe in journalistic institutions. When I went out and did Vox, I was trying to build an institution, not just go out on my own and capture the most of my revenue that I could.
45:42I think that the mix of the news is exciting, and I'm committed to the news as an industry. I don't think the thing I – I think if you carve out all the national politics, et cetera, then it's much harder to also have the foreign reporting, the local reporting, the cultural reporting, right? All the things that make up the bundle. and those are the things I often care about and I think I'm just in this way it goes to the way I look at the world but also does me I think I'm an institutionalist I like being at institutions and I admire them when they are doing good and I want them to succeed because I think we need them I'm speaking with the political commentator and journalist Ezra Klein we'll be back with the conclusion of our conversation in just a moment
46:36The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Lisa. Summer is all about long days that should be lazy, but somehow never are. Between work, family, and trying to fit in some fun, by the time bedtime rolls around, I am wiped. And at the end of a long, hot day, nothing feels better than slipping into my new Sapira mattress from Lisa. I can't even tell you the difference upgrading to Lisa has made in my life. I'm falling asleep faster, staying asleep longer, and waking up refreshed and ready for another long summer day. From the very first night, you'll feel the difference. Lisa mattresses are meticulously designed and assembled in the USA for exceptional quality, and they back it all up with free shipping, easy returns, and a 120-night sleep trial.
47:14And Lisa works with local nonprofits across the U.S. to donate thousands of mattresses each year to families in need, with over 43 ,000 mattresses donated to date. Plus, they're committed to eco-friendly materials and sustainable manufacturing practices, and partner with organizations like CleanHub to help remove harmful plastic waste from the environment. Go to Lisa.com for 25 % off select mattresses, plus get an extra$50 off with promo code NEWYORKER, exclusive for my listeners. That's L-E-E-S-A dot com promo code NEWYORKER for 25 % off select mattresses, plus an extra$50 off. Support our show and let them know we sent you after checkout.
47:47Lisa.com promo code NEWYORKER. WNYC Studios is supported by Wayfair. Your living space is your sanctuary, and you want it to feel like an expression of you, right? But unless you're working with an unlimited budget, sometimes that's easier said than done. And that's why I love Wayfair. I don't think there's a room in my house that doesn't have a little something from Wayfair. With their breathtaking selection, shockingly affordable prices, and incredibly easy delivery process, making MySpace feel like me was a snap. Wayfair offers everything you need for your home, yard, or office. Seating, grills, appliances, storage, lighting, rugs, decor, and so much more.
48:22And if working at Allen Key isn't your thing, they can handle delivery, installation, and assembly. You just pick what you want and they deal with the rest. With over 20 million five-star reviews, you can shop with confidence. See real customers, real homes, real feedback before anything hits your cart. Especially in the summer months, my porch is truly my happy place. I like to have my coffee in the cotton weave chair hammock and then read for a bit on the gorgeous wooden porch swing. Both Wayfair finds. Do I sleep in a Wayfair bed frame at night? Actually, I do. And I'm not mad about it. Ready to upgrade your home for way less?
48:52Head to Wayfair.com right now to shop all things home and get your space ready for less. That's W-A-Y-F-A-I-R dot com. Wayfair, every style, every home. I'm Emily Flake, cartoonist at The New Yorker. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Bombas. Summer's here and we are living for all things outdoors. Whether your thing is jogging, heading to the beach, or grilling in front of your stoop, Bombas makes your comfiest summer staples so you can make the most out of all your summer plans. They've got a whole line of pro-level, sports-specific socks for golf, yoga, the gym, and socks for every kind of runner.
49:26I personally do not run if I can help it, but I walk everywhere. And if I don't get my 10 ,000 steps in, my phone will yell at me. These socks are so soft and cushioned right where I need it, whether I'm doing a power saunter in the park or just running a million errands. Plus, they're airy, sweat-wicking. My feet feel as good after a long day of pounding the pavement as they did when I left the apartment. Head over to bombas.com slash radio hour and use code radio hour for 20 % off your first purchase. That's B-O-M-B-A-S dot com slash radio hour. Code radio hour at checkout. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Mint Mobile.
50:02There are things in life that you don't want to be transparent, like your swimsuit or your search history. But when it comes to your wireless bill, transparency is everything. That's why Mint Mobile's wireless plans have no gimmicks and no gotchas. Just high-speed data and reliable coverage on the T-Mobile 5G network. And right now, all plans are$15 per month, even unlimited. Choose from 3, 6, or 12-month plans and say goodbye to a monthly bill. You can even bring your current phone and your number. To get your new wireless plan for just$15 a month, go to mintmobile.com slash nyradiohour. That's mintmobile.com slash NY radio hour.
50:44Cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at mintmobile.com slash NY radio hour. That's it. There's no catch. Upfront payment of$45 for three months,$90 for six months, or$180 for 12 months. Plan required,$15 per month equivalent. Taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only. Greater than 50 GB may slow when network is busy. Includes up to 20 GB hotspot. Capable device required. Availability, speed, and coverage varies. See mintmobile.com.
51:18This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. And today I've been speaking with Ezra Klein. On his podcast and in his columns for the New York Times and in his book Abundance, he's been making a case for how the Democrats can reemerge from the political wilderness. But some of his ideas have invited their fair share of detractors as well. I spoke to Klein about the deep divides within the Democratic Party and whether the party can overcome its divisions and disarray in time to mount a real challenge to the Republicans' dominance of the federal government, both in the midterm elections a year from now and then in 2028 for the presidency.
52:02Let me ask you about an institution that we were talking about earlier, the Democratic Party. You talk a lot to people within the Democratic Party, leaders of the Democratic Party. It looks like a mess at this point. You have some promising people. What makes you say that, David? I just conjured it out of thin air. In New York City, it looks like Zoran Mamdani is going to be the next mayor of New York City. If I read you right, you have ambivalence about Mamdani. or have you come around in some way? No, I don't think I've ever had a particularly different – I mean, I wrote a piece during the mayoral primary where I said I thought Brad Lander was the best choice.
52:45But I think Momdani is like an amazing political talent. I agree with him on many issues. My concerns about Momdani really just have to do with can he first get the revenue he needs for a very, very pricey agenda? And can he – I mean, he's talked a bunch about abundance and done interviews with my co-author, Derek. You know, can he actually rebuild the government such that he can achieve the kinds of things he wants to achieve? And what is going to happen when the Trump administration moves into a confrontational mode with him? Because I think they will, right? They're going to want to break him, send, you know, escalate ICE raids, send in the National Guard here, occupy New York City.
53:25He's inexperienced as an executive. New York City is a very hard thing to run at the best of times. He has not run much. But I don't think of those as terrible demerits to somebody. You could have said some of the same things about Barack Obama on one level. And we're just going to have to see how it plays out. I think it is genuinely strange the way the leadership of the Democratic Party has treated him. It's extraordinary. I have never – The state chairman I think is still on the sidelines. At this point, you know, they – I have just not heard an account that makes sense. If they're trying to keep it at arm's length, it will not work.
54:06He is going to be the mayor of New York as a Democrat. Saying that they're friendly to him but not endorsing him is not going to save them from being painted by what he does. on the other hand to all the people who are inspired by him and like him they look feckless I've said this on other shows I would on some level respect it more if they don't want to endorse him if they think he'd be a bad choice then they should say that but this weird ambivalence dance they're doing is I just think much more bizarre well the ambivalence I assume comes from a kind of fear of his popularity and his talent I don't think it comes from there where do you think it comes from I think they They are afraid that he will open up gigantic surfaces that they will have to defend and will have trouble doing.
54:53I am truly horrified at Israel's conduct in Gaza at this point. I think it's – I mean, I think we're well past war crimes. I think we're, you know, we're into something generational. but Mamdani's promise to say direct the New York City police to arrest Netanyahu the moment Netanyahu steps foot in New York City say to attend a UN meeting which I think Netanyahu would probably love this confrontation I can understand as would Trump I can understand why the Democratic Party's leadership is just afraid of what might combust right Israel is a very hard issue for them. It splits their base very badly.
55:34So I can see if I like squint. I don't think what they're afraid of is talent. I think they're afraid of something that goes off the rails that they're then trying to defend. But I just don't think what they're doing makes sense. I think you have to accept – one thing I've been saying about the big tent of the Democratic Party is the theory of having a big tent doesn't just mean moving to the right. It also means accepting in the left. And Momdani is going to be one of the left's standard bearers. In the last two weeks, there have been stories about AOC, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and what the future might hold for her, either running for Senate or even president.
56:15When you think about her, do you see her as a potential president? I don't know. We'd have to see how she performed in a primary, what her agenda was, what her campaign looked like, how she performed under that kind of scrutiny. I think you have to see her as one of the people who is a serious contender for that role. She would naturally inherit Bernie's lane in most of his sport. So he doesn't have full control over supporters, of course, right? Some people might have liked him who wouldn't like her. But I think the anti-oligarchy tour they were doing was in certain ways the passing of the torch from him to her.
56:52And so Bernie has been incredibly powerful in Democratic primaries and has come very near winning in 2016 and 2020. And I think that you have to assume that she would just start with a more solid base of support than all but a couple other people. When I've seen the early polling, and you should be extraordinarily skeptical of 2025 polling for a 2028 primary. I'd be skeptical of it in 2027. Fair enough. But she is polling behind only Buttigieg and Newsom. This in polls where Kamala Harris is not included. And so you're looking at somebody who starts out with one of the clearest lanes because so many other candidates are going to be competing in the non-Bernie lane.
57:38And so it'd be pretty straightforward how you would imagine her winning the primary. You were describing Obama before and his talents, but also his more capacious ideology. Who's in that lane? I don't know that we know it yet. I have not seen – probably the closest person in the way he thinks about politics is Buttigieg. But whether or not Buttigieg can do what Obama was able to do, and I mean part of what made Obama such an extraordinary force in the Democratic Party was his support for black voters. which Buttigieg really struggles with. And continues to. And Kamala Harris just admitted in her new book that the reason she didn't select Pete Buttigieg as her vice president was that he's gay.
58:26And that would have been, I don't know. Really? She says that in the book? Too much identity in one ticket. That was her, yes, that she would have gone for Buttigieg. I've not read it yet, but that is interesting. How do you mean interesting? It's just interesting. I'm surprised she said that. So, we are at the close of our conversation, but I have to ask you a crucial question. You go to Burning Man? I have been known to go to Burning Man. Would I enjoy it? No, David, you would not. You sleep on the ground, that sort of thing? I mean, you could do it in different ways. You could take an RV. You could go to what's called a plug-and-play camp.
59:02I mean, I think it's an amazing thing for anybody to see once. So, you might enjoy it in the sense that— Once a philosopher, twice a pervert, as they say. Yeah. Applies probably better to there than most places. No doubt. So I would hate it. I mean, you know, you might have depths and multitudes inside of you that I don't know. But when I see the musicians that you profile, they're not the ones who play there. No, I hear you. I hear you. Yeah. I don't think they could sleep on the ground either. In fact, most of them are under the ground. Ezra Klein, thank you so much. David, really appreciate it.
59:40Ezra Klein is the co-author of Abundance and the host of The Ezra Klein Show. I'm David Remnick, and that's our show for this week. Thanks for listening. See you next time.
59:53The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker. Our theme music was composed and performed by Meryl Garbus of Tune Yards, with additional music by Louis Mitchell. This episode was produced by Max Balton, Adam Howard, David Krasnow, Jeffrey Masters, Louis Mitchell, Jared Paul, and Ursula Sommer. With guidance from Emily Botin and assistance from Michael May, David Gable, Alex Barish, Victor Guan, and Alejandra Deckett. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported in part by the Cherena Endowment Fund.
1:00:34My name is Madeline Barron. I'm a journalist for The New Yorker. I focus on stories where powerful people or institutions are doing something that's harming people or harming someone or something in some way. And so my job is to report that so exhaustively that we can reveal what's actually going on and present it to the public. You know, for us at In the Dark, we're paying equal attention to the reporting and the storytelling. And we felt a real kinship with The New Yorker, like the combination of the deeply reported stories that The New Yorker is known for, but also the quality of those stories, the attention to narrative.
1:01:16if I could give you only one reason to subscribe to the New Yorker it would be maybe this is not the answer you're looking for but I just don't think that there is any other magazine in America that combines so many different types of things into a single issue as a New Yorker you know like you have poetry you have theater reviews you have restaurant recommendations, which for some reason I read even though I don't live in New York City. And all of those things are great, but I haven't even mentioned the other half of the magazine, which is deeply reported stories that honestly are the first things that I read.
1:01:53You know, I'm a big fan of gymnastics and people will say, oh, we're so lucky to live in the era of Simone Biles, which I agree. We're also so lucky to live in the era of Lawrence Wright, Jane Mayer, Ronan Farrow, Patrick Raddenkief. And so to me, it's like I can't imagine not reading these writers.
1:02:15You can have all the journalism, the fiction, the film, book, and TV reviews, all the cartoons, just by going right now to newyorker.com slash dark. Plus, there's an incredible archive, a century's worth of award-winning work just waiting for you. That's newyorker.com slash dark. And thanks. you
From the publisher
The author and podcaster Ezra Klein may be only forty-one years old, but he’s been part of the political-culture conversation for a long time. He was a blogger, then a Washington Post columnist and editor, a co-founder of Vox, and is now a writer and podcast host for the New York Times. He’s also the co-author of the recent best-selling book “Abundance”.
Most recently, Klein has drawn the ire of progressives for a column he wrote about the assassination of Charlie Kirk, in which he praised the late conservative activist for practicing politics “the right way.” He’s also been making a case for how the Democrats can reëmerge from the political wilderness. But some of his other ideas have also invited their share of detractors.
Klein tells David Remnick, “I try to take seriously questions that I don’t love. I don’t try to insist the world works the way I want it to work. I try to be honest with myself about the way it’s working.” In response to criticism that his recent work has indicated a rightward shift in his thinking, Klein says, “One thing I’ve been saying about the big tent of the Democratic Party is the theory of having a big tent doesn’t just mean moving to the right; it also means accepting in the left.”




