John Brennan, Former C.I.A. Director, on Being Targeted by Trump

0:00This show is supported by Odoo. When you buy business software from lots of vendors, the costs add up and it gets complicated and confusing. Odoo solves this. It's a single company that sells a suite of enterprise apps that handles everything from accounting to inventory to sales. Odoo is all connected on a single platform in a simple and affordable way. You can save money without missing out on the features you need. Check out Odoo at O-D-O-O dot com. That's O-D-O-O dot com. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Amazon Music. With Amazon Music Unlimited, you can listen to music, podcasts, and now audiobooks, all in one app.

0:38This includes popular titles like Project Hail Mary, one of the most beloved adventure stories by Andy Weir. I have been listening to this audiobook and constantly looking for any pockets of time during the day to turn it on and find out what will happen next in the story. So whether you're catching up on a podcast, listening to your favorite playlist, or, like me, getting lost and a great audiobook, it's all right there within the Amazon Music app. Amazon Music. Music, podcasts, audiobooks, all in one app. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Viking, committed to exploring the world in comfort.

1:12Offering destination-focused small ship experiences on all seven continents, with a shore excursion included in every port and programs designed for cultural enrichment. And every Viking voyage is all-inclusive, with no children and no casinos. Learn more at viking.com.

1:32This is the New Yorker Radio Hour, a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker. Welcome to the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. John Brennan is, or was, a career CIA man. He did daily intelligence briefings for Bill Clinton. He held senior CIA positions under George W. Bush. And Barack Obama made him director of the agency. Brennan's tenure included the controversial drone program, as well as the infamous Steele dossier on presidential candidate Donald Trump. We first went through Russia, Russia, Russia. It was all bullshit. At the very end of his tenure, the CIA compiled a report on Russian interference in the 2016 election.

2:21And after that report came out, Donald Trump revoked John Brennan's security clearance. Now, as the Jeffrey Epstein controversy is roiling this administration, the Russia investigation is back into the headlines. Trump's Justice Department has opened up a criminal investigation of John Brennan, and James Comey, the former FBI director, is also being investigated. The FBI is investigating Brennan for allegedly lying to Congress. James Comey and John Brennan, now under criminal investigation related to the Trump-Russia probe. Do you want to see these two guys behind bars? Well, I know nothing about it other than what I read today, but I will tell you, I think they're very dishonest people.

3:07I think they're crooked as hell. And maybe they have to pay a price for that. And I believe they are truly bad people and dishonest people. So whatever happens, happens. I reached former CIA director John Brennan last week, and he was speaking from a hotel room.

3:29Are you on the road somewhere? Yeah. I'm in an area that you are very familiar with and grew up in. I'm in Saddlebrook, New Jersey, right now. Because I think you have roots in... I'm a Hillsdale boy. Right. Hillsdale, Paramus. I guess you were born in Hackensack. I was, you, somebody slipped you a little Wikipedia or something. No, I'm an intel officer. Yeah, I was going to say you know more than that. Well, I grew up in Hudson County, so this is the area where I'm from. Do they use Wikipedia in the CIA? I'm sure they do. I see, I see. You've been having a hell of a week. I've been having a hell of a life and career.

4:05This is all very interesting. Do you feel under the deluge of the press in the United States in a very direct way? Well, it's hard not to when he routinely throws out your name in these various press conferences and other settings. So, yeah, I know that I am somebody who he focuses on a fair amount. So I never expected this to happen. Here I am eight years removed from my professional career and retirement. Well, let's begin with the election interference case of 2016. This has been litigated, investigated, discussed ad nauseum. But now you're under investigation by the FBI and you're being accused of lying to Congress.

4:52Accusations include claims that information about Russian electron interference that people say was unverified was included in a 2017 intelligence assessment. Why is this being brought up again now in the year of our Lord, 2025, almost a decade later? Well, simple answers. I don't know. It's up to the individuals involved here to say exactly what is motivating them. But I will point out that, yes, I've seen reports in the press that I'm under investigation, but I've not heard anything from the Department of Justice or the FBI or the CIA or the Office Director of National Intelligence. No one has contacted me about anything.

5:34So I know there are a lot of assertions and allegations that have been put out there publicly. And over the course of my career, and including since I retired from the government on January 20th of 2017, I have very willingly appeared before congressional committees, both in open and closed door hearings. I've answered whatever questions individuals might have. I haven't had to be subpoenaed. I've done all this voluntarily. I've spoken openly about what happened in the 2016 presidential campaign season, what we did when we pulled together the intelligence community assessment. So I feel very comfortable and confident that what we did was appropriate, consistent with our authorities.

6:20That's why I'm willing to speak out, including to you, about this. Why they have resurrected this, disinterred it after eight years, I think is more politically motivated than substantively grounded. this intelligence community assessment and the work that we did in 2016 when the Russians were interfering in the election has been looked at and reviewed and scrutinized over the years by years-long investigations in terms of the Durham investigation, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Review, the Mueller investigation also looked at the Russian interference. And all of these have basically validated what happened in terms of Russian interference and validated the way we handled the production of the intelligence community assessment.

7:12In fact, as I recall it, and I follow this very carefully as somebody who's very interested not only in American politics but in things Russian to say the least. As I recall, some of the biggest criticism leveled at the Obama administration is that they took their time and were, if anything, overly deliberative about releasing information so as not to interfere with the election. Well, that's right. When I briefed Obama in late July of 2016 about what we had discovered about this very broad and worrisome Russian influence campaign that was directed by Vladimir Putin, and in the subsequent months leading up to the election, he made very clear to us, he wanted us to try to uncover everything the Russians were doing.

8:09but also not to do anything that would in any way interfere in the election. So we took great steps, extraordinary procedures to try to protect a lot of this information and not have damaging reports released before the election. And including the reports, as the intelligence community says, that the Russians favored Donald Trump in that election. So we were very, very careful to do our job to make sure that we were informing the national security team and President Obama about what was happening. But at the same time, we didn't want to become involved in any way, even unintentionally, of having an impact on that election.

8:56When was the first time you became aware this time around that Donald Trump was going to come after you? And have you felt repercussions in terms of your personal safety? Well, I think pretty early on and maybe even before his inauguration, he was sending signals about what he was planning to do during Trump 2.0. and even before the inauguration some of the professional affiliations i had um evaporated because people were concerned uh that trump was going to retaliate against me and if i was um affiliated with their companies that they would be hurt um that your presence would scare them away.

9:51Right. Or that would be a deterrent to anybody who wanted to remain on favorable terms with Donald Trump. So there has been professional impact. I think this is intentional. Clearly, there's been reputational harm in terms of things that have been thrown out there, these specious allegations. And unfortunately, I think a lot of the followers of Donald Trump who tend to be rather expressive and even using violent terms, it's a concern. But again, I've been in the Washington arena for the last 45 years or so. I know that intelligence and intelligence officials can frequently be used as political footballs by those who really are, you know, not concerned about others.

10:49And this, I think, is the most unfortunate chapter, the most tragic chapter, I think, of the long history of, you know, the recriminations that somebody in the White House decided to engage in. These are very nasty and mean-spirited, you know, allegations that can really have unfortunate resonance among certain quarters and potentially cause harm. You have been lumped in with James Comey as sources of these renewed accusations. Trump recently accused Obama himself of treason when it came to intelligence reports about election interference in 2016. All of these accusations fall well outside of the five-year statute of limitations for federal crimes.

11:40How is it possible to even launch this investigation now? And what do you divine is the purpose of it all? Well, for people who might be politically motivated making these referrals to the Department of Justice, I don't think they worry about statute of limitations or what is right and appropriate and consistent with the law. And, you know, there have been, you know, some testifying that I've done within the past five years that they could point to. It's not lost to me that there is a real coincidence in timing between these allegations and the challenges that Donald Trump is facing right now related to the Epstein files and other things.

12:22So is the motivation to put something out there that the MAGA base will respond to because it's trying to show that the deep state was a real problem, and they're finally going to have some accountability here. So, you know, unfortunately, right and wrong doesn't have anything to do, I think, with what's going on right now. You know, I've pointed out a number of times that, you know, what it appears that the Trump administration is doing, it's following the, I think, some of the political theories of Carl Schmitt, the German jurist and political philosopher of the 1930s that really served is the basis for a lot of thinking of the Nazi party, which is, you know, if you're, especially if you're going to go after the liberals and the progressives, don't worry about right and wrong, you know, or good and bad, whatever.

13:10You want to do everything possible that's going to vanquish your enemies. And so you lie, you cheat, you misrepresent, you push out disinformation, you do everything possible because, you know, especially liberal progressives are not going to reply in kind. And do you feel that that is a fault of liberals and progressives, that they don't fight back in kind? I think it's certainly a vulnerability. And I think, you know, some of the liberals and progressives right now are wondering whether or not they should continue to play by the Marcus Day-Quinsbury rules. You know, as the Republicans now are thinking about redistricting the congressional districts in Texas to be able to gain more seats, you know, now some of the Democrats in California and New York are saying, well, maybe we can do the same thing to offset that.

13:52It really is quite worrisome from the standpoint of trying to protect the foundations of democracy. When you have individuals who really don't care about doing the right thing, they're just going to do whatever allows them to, again, prevail and to win against their enemies. I'm speaking with John Brennan, former CIA director, and will continue in a moment. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour.

14:43WNYC Studios is supported by Monarch. Hi, my name is Emily Flake, and I'm a cartoonist for The New Yorker. I've been living the freelance life for over two decades, and if there's one thing I've learned, it's that financial savvy is not among my skill set. I can write you a joke or draw you a picture, but balancing my bank account might as well be sorcery. That's why the Monarch Personal Finance app has been a lifesaver. Monarch has taken my chaotic money picture and given me a clear picture of where my money is going, where I can budget better, and how I might even save a little? Revolutionary.

15:13It's like having a financial advisor in my pocket. It sends weekly updates that help me keep track of spending, easy-to-read diagrams, I do love a visual, and even has an AI assistant that can answer questions like how much did I spend on streaming services, and can I afford this skincare kit? Monarch's bill split even makes it easy to sort out the check at the end of the night with friends. It takes the guesswork and the anxiety out of my finances. And who couldn't use a little more clarity in their lives? Write your own money story with Monarch. Use code NEWYORKER at MONARCH.COM to get your first year of Monarch Core half off at just$50.

15:45That's 50 % off your first year at MONARCH.COM with code NEWYORKER. WNYC Studios is supported by Hero Bread. Okay, I love bread. But sadly, I love bread more than bread loves me. I can handle gluten, not to brag, but bread seems to hit my waistline like cake. Furthermore, I seem to have become a person who cares about her fiber and protein intake, and bread just wasn't helping me with those goals. That's why I was so excited to learn about Hero Bread. Look, I've messed around with low-carb breads and baked goods, and most of them taste more like a cardboard box than something you'd actually want to eat.

16:19but not Hero Bread. Their sliced white and seeded loaves taste like actual bread, without the hit to the scale. And they help me meet those fiber and protein numbers. And Hero doesn't just do bread. We're talking tortillas, buns, bagels, plus fun new options like Hero Noodles, 32 grams of fiber, 12 grams of protein, and just 80 calories per serving, if you're a numbers person. And limited edition treats like lemon poppy seed scones and pan au chocolat. All keto-friendly, all packed with fiber, all high in protein and low in sugar, and most importantly, all delicious. So stop chasing your fitness goals by eating cardboard.

16:52Hero Bread is offering 10 % off your order. Go to hero.co and use code NEWYORKER at checkout. That's code NEWYORKER at H-E-R-O dot C-O. WNYC Studios is supported by Wayfair. One of the things I love most in the world is cooking for my family and friends. But if you could see my kitchen, you might have concerns. Chaotic would be a polite term to describe it. So believe me when I tell you that my recent Wayfair finds have worked miracles. The kitchen baker's rack and three-tier countertop organizer have tamed that chaos and made my kitchen a beautiful place that is so much easier to work in. Who knew I'd been cooking on hard mode?

17:31Wayfair can breathe new life into your home or office with furniture and decor that's built to last and prices that help you make a space you love without breaking the bank. They have a huge range of options for every budget, and Wayfair Rewards members get 5 % back every day. You can see real customer feedback and photos, so you get to shop with confidence and feel good about what you're buying. So whether you're beating back kitchen chaos or just looking for a rug to pull the room together, Wayfair is here to help. Join Wayfair Awards today to get 5 % back on every purchase and start saving on your next home upgrade.

18:02Head to Wayfair.com to shop all things home. That's W-A-Y-F-A-I-R dot com. Wayfair. Every style, every home. Wayfair. Every style, every home. WNYC Studios is supported by Quince. Autumn is right around the corner, and those back-to-school vibes have me excited for a reset, starting with my wardrobe. And that's why I'm heading to Quince. Quince is all about quality over quantity. They focus on everyday staples you'll reach for again and again, like ultra-soft organic cotton tees and premium Mongolian cashmere sweaters. Are last year's basics looking a little threadbare? Quince has you covered with premium denim and tailored chinos that start at just$60, but wear like a luxury brand.

18:46That's because everything at Quince is priced 50 to 80 % less than similar brands. They work directly with ethical factories and cut out the middlemen. So you're paying for high quality, not brand markup. And Quince goes way beyond the wardrobe. They've become my go-to for everything from home goods to skincare and even luggage. I just got the Voyage Nylon Split Travel Bag. It's got so many thoughtful touches and pockets galore. And it's perfect as a carry-on item or as a weekend bag for a quick getaway. I love it. Upgrade your everyday. Download the Quince app for app-exclusive offers or go to quince.com slash radio hour.

19:18Get free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. Now available in Canada and the UK, too. That's quince.com slash radio hour.

19:33This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick, and I'm speaking today with John Brennan, the former director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Brennan served in the CIA for nearly 30 years and under six presidents. Under Brennan, the CIA issued a report on Russian interference in the 2016 election, which was quite a damning report to Trump and the people around him. But Trump was never indicted. Now the Justice Department under Trump is opening a criminal investigation into John Brennan. And this is while Trump is claiming that Barack Obama could be guilty of treason and more. I'll continue my conversation with John Brennan.

20:17I want to ask you a question about some of your decisions after being at the highest level of national intelligence. And that is to some extent to become an overtly political person. to go on, in particular, a great deal, MSNBC, and be overtly political and have quite firm opinions about Donald Trump and much else. That's not something that all past intelligence officers allow themselves to do. Tell me about your decision to do that. Why? First of all, I disagree with your characterization. I'm not overtly political. I'm overtly outspoken, certainly. Throughout the course of my career, and I'm not a Republican or a Democrat, never been registered with either party.

21:05While I was director of CIA, it was the Democrats in Congress and the Senate who were calling for my firing and resignation. And ever since I retired, and even before I retired, before Donald Trump's inauguration in 2017, he equated CIA officers with Nazi Germany. to me, a real disparagement of the women and men of CIA. And I felt an obligation to push back against those characterizations. And I've spoken out over the course of my retirement about things that I believe are important. And I'm a private citizen. Throughout my professional career, I defended and worked hard to defend Americans' right to freedom of speech.

21:47Well, I don't believe that just because I served, you know, as director of CIA in these positions, it means that I have to, you know, bite my tongue when I see the foundations of our government, the democratic foundations of our government being torn down. And the six presidents I worked for, you know, I didn't agree with all policies of any of them, but I respected their integrity, their attempts to do what was in the best interest of the United States. With Donald Trump, there are things that he has done. When he takes the side of Vladimir Putin against the considered judgments of the U.S. intelligence community, yeah, I speak out.

22:24When he continues to just misrepresent the facts and speak dishonestly, yeah, I speak out. So, again, I know it's hard for people to believe that I'm not political. I'm not. But I am someone who served in this government for well over 30 years. I've seen how government needs to function. I believe that the government is really in place to be able to serve the best interests of the people of the United States. U.S. intelligence has always had an extremely close relationship with Israeli intelligence, among other agencies, but extremely close. Do the events of the past year, year and a half, give you pause about that?

23:07I am just devastated by what I've seen happen over the last year and a half in Gaza, in the West Bank, in Israel. Obviously, the horrific, awful murderous attacks of Hamas were the trigger. But the Israeli response in Gaza has been way over the top. Intentional killing of civilians. not that they're targeting civilians, but the disproportionality of the willingness of the Israeli military to kill innocent Gazans because they're going after Hamas operatives, that is wholly inconsistent with the laws of war. And I think it's just criminal in terms of what has happened and the starvation that is going on and the choking off of humanitarian assistance.

24:06Again, it's a very complicated situation. I can understand how difficult it has been for the Israelis to work this and to try to free those remaining hostages, and every effort should be made to do that. But the devastating military operations, the killing of 60 ,000 or so Gazans, I think that number, and there seems to be a lack of appreciation for that number of people. Can you imagine 60 ,000 Israelis killed? What the outrage, the uproar would be? But unfortunately, I think that too many governments, including our own, that have been willing to, you know, chastise the Israelis and say, no, you shouldn't do that, but not take firm action.

24:58I mean, just sort of tut-tut and then move on. Yeah. You know, not even a minor slap on the wrist. You know, OK, they might, you know, pause, you know, military weaponry. Those are that's U.S. military ordinance that's being dropped there. I mean, ordinance that's been, you know, manufactured in the United States. It's U.S. weapons systems that are forgiven. The critique, as you know, that you would get in Israel, in some quarters anyway, would be, you know, that's interesting. But what about the firebombing of Dresden, Hiroshima, even some of our actions in the Middle East in recent years during the battle against ISIS?

25:36Do you take that as legitimate criticism? I think it's legitimate argument about the appropriateness of dropping nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, of the bombing of Dresden and other things. You know, in war, yes, war is hell. But so many innocent lives have been snuffed out. And I think without looking at really what the alternative would be. Now, there are arguments as to why we dropped the bombs, you know, it saved the lives of U.S. forces and so on, and same thing in Dresden and so forth. But I think the tremendous capabilities of weapon systems these days, it makes it too easy to opt for that.

26:23You know, if the most powerful weapon you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. And what is happening to the Palestinian people, you know, is just awful. And this is the culmination of many, many years of maltreatment, mistreatment, of avoidance of dealing with the underlying issue about Palestinian rights. So then I return to the question, do you think the United States should have the kind of relationship that we've traditionally had with the Israelis, whether it's in terms of military cooperation, intelligence cooperation and all the rest? Well, you know, the intelligence agencies and military services take their direction from the White House in terms of what they should or shouldn't do in terms of the boundaries.

27:21If I were the White House, if I were the president of the United States, I would sharply limit what it was that we were doing with the Israelis. I would also take very strong measures to get the Israelis to stop these just ruthless and brutal military operations that are leading, that have just destroyed Gaza. Gaza was not a good place to live even prior to all this. It is now just rubble. And looking at those pictures of starving and death by starvation is exceptionally, exceptionally awful and painful. But Netanyahu just seems to be ignoring the reality of what's happening on the ground there.