No Mercy / No Malice: Apocalypse No

0:00When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use Indeed Sponsored Jobs. It gives your job post the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people with the right skills, certifications and more. Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show will get a$75 sponsored job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast. That's Indeed.com slash podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Need a hiring hero? This is a job for Indeed Sponsored Jobs. Where is Daredevil? I'm not here. Don't miss the return of Marvel Television's Daredevil Born Again.

0:38So what's next? We're gonna take this city back. In an all-new season, now streaming only on Disney+. They're hunting us. It's time we started hunting them. I can work with them. This should be tons of fun. Marvel Television's Daredevil Born Again, now streaming only on Disney+. Morning decisions. How about a creamy mocha frappuccino drink? Or sweet vanilla? Smooth caramel, maybe. Or white chocolate mocha. Whichever you choose, delicious coffee awaits. Find Starbucks Frappuccino drinks wherever you buy your groceries. I'm Scott Galloway, and this is No Mercy, No Malice. AI could transform society, but fears of a future defined by jobless growth are vastly overstated.

1:29Apocalypse No, as read by George Hahn.

1:58George Hahn:I don't believe will happen. The AI job apocalypse. Every generation gets its machines will take your job panic. This one just comes with better PR and a bigger balance sheet. The AI job apocalypse isn't data-driven. It's narrative-driven, engineered by people who profit when you're scared. Fear is the product. Capital is the outcome. I believe that, similar to every other technological innovation in history, AI will inspire job destruction that will result in an increase in productivity, profits, reinvestment, and, wait for it, jobs. The relevant question isn't how many jobs we'll lose or gain.

2:50George Hahn:It's whether the velocity of disruption will overwhelm that period of adaptation and recovery. There are three scenarios. The AI bubble bursts, AI delivers as promised but on a slower timeline, and AI disruption comes faster than the market can adapt and respond. Recently, Anthropics CEO Dario Amodi warned that 50 % of entry-level tech, legal, consulting, and finance jobs will be completely wiped out within five years. Last year, he told Axios the white-collar bloodbath could spike unemployment to 20%. In 2023, when the AI narrative felt more optimistic, Elon Musk said, there will come a point where no job is needed.

3:47George Hahn:AI will be able to do everything. In 2021, a year before launching ChatGPT, Sam Altman wrote, The price of many kinds of labor will fall toward zero once sufficiently powerful AI joins the workforce. Translation, AI is an extinction-level event for workers, according to those who benefit most from AI being an extinction-level event. Their story is as old as the Industrial Revolution. In narrative economics, how stories go viral and drive major economic events, Nobel Prize-winning economist Robert Schiller argued that fears about machines replacing human labor contributed to 19th century economic downturns.

4:40George Hahn:Later, science fiction reinforced the narrative, feeding the incorrect belief that automation caused the Great Depression. Fears about the rise of computers exacerbated the double-dip recession of the early 1980s. The danger, according to Schiller, isn't labor disruption, but the narrative's negative feedback loop. The economic hardships created by a temporary recession or depression are mistaken for the job-destroying effects of the machines, which creates pessimistic economic responses as self-fulfilling prophecies. I believe we have the makings for the kind of self-fulfilling prophecy Schiller warned about, as AI washing masks inflation, tariffs, and overhiring.

5:32George Hahn:Consider tech workers, the supposed canaries in the coal mine. Net technology employment in the U.S. grew from 8.7 million in 2020 to 9.6 million in 2023 and has remained flat since then. Not great, but by no means apocalyptic. Oracle, which laid off 18 % of its workforce in March and is projecting negative cash flow until 2030, isn't capturing AI efficiencies, it's trading people for chips. Last month's announcement that Meta would cut 10 % of its workforce fed AI anxiety, but in reality, Meta is returning to its 2021 headcount. Microsoft's 7 % layoff target would reduce its headcount to 2022 levels, but even after those cuts, Microsoft would still have 47 % more workers than it did the year before the pandemic.

6:38George Hahn:Since XAI's 2023 founding, its headcount has grown to an estimated 5 ,000 people. In March, Musk announced that Tesla would increase headcount, adding, The following month, Tesla laid off 10 % of its workforce due to poor sales. What we're seeing isn't the prelude to a job apocalypse, but a low-hire, low-fire labor market where unemployment rates for tech workers and everyone else are converging around the Fed's target rate of 4%. Catastrophizing is a narrative device the hyperscalers deploy to divert capital flows to them and justify their capex. Every new technology in history has gone through a similar arc of creative destruction.

7:36George Hahn:I don't see why AI is any different. As economist Joseph Schumpeter observed in 1942, economic progress in a capitalist society means turmoil. So far, the turmoil attributed to AI has been more hot air than hard data. Last fall, I wrote that America is one big bet on AI, as the MAG-10 account for 40 % of the S &P's market cap. Since ChatGPT launched in November 2022, AI-related stocks have registered 76 % of the S &P 500's return, 87 % of earnings growth, and 90 % of capital spending growth. If AI sneezes, the rest of the economy will catch a cold, i.e. plunge into recession. Based on Schiller's analysis, we'd likely blame AI.

8:38George Hahn:Nevertheless, according to Ernie Tedeschi, chief economist at Stripe and former chief economist for the White House Council of Economic Advisors, layoffs come in recessionary bursts rather than the moment technology renders a profession obsolete. Widespread displacement of travel agents didn't happen immediately during the dot-com boom, Tedeschi wrote. Rather, it was the bust that drove displacement. When the economy recovered, however, professions rendered obsolete by technology didn't return to pre-downturn levels, but the profession doesn't entirely disappear either. Travel agents still exist, though they're more sensitive to future downturns relative to the broader labor market, suggesting that as jobs gradually disappear, more workers pivot.

9:40George Hahn:Maybe there isn't a bubble. Or if there is, maybe it doesn't burst. Bubbles are visible only in retrospect. Assuming the velocity of recovery outpaces the disruption, new efficiencies will lead to increased productivity, resulting in rising margins, funding new businesses, employing people in jobs that didn't previously exist, expanding growth. This is Jevons' paradox. When a resource becomes dramatically cheaper to use, we don't use less of it. We find a million new uses for it. If that sounds painless, keep listening. In March, Anthropic published the most detailed empirical map yet of AI's penetration into the labor market, finding that in business and finance occupations, AI could theoretically cover 94 % of tasks tied with occupations in computers and math.

10:44George Hahn:Pain is on the horizon, as tasks that can be automated will be automated during the next downturn. But the tasks professionals perform have never been fixed, according to Eldar Maximoff, an accounting professor at Arizona State University. After the release of the first electronic spreadsheet in 1979, people predicted accountants would face mass unemployment. Instead, after adjusting for population growth, the number of accountants increased 4x over the next 40 years. In every major occupational group that adopted computers heavily, Employment grew faster than in groups that did not, Maximoff wrote.

11:32George Hahn:Computers eliminated specific tasks within jobs, but the resulting cost reductions created so much new demand that the occupations expanded overall. Looking at AI, he concludes that the future of every knowledge profession hinges on a single question. Is human demand for analysis, oversight, and assurance elastic? I believe it is. Case in point, computer programmers. They're coding less and thinking bigger, according to journalist Clive Thompson, who interviewed more than 70 programmers in Silicon Valley and at small firms across the U.S. As he noted, a coder is now more like an architect than a construction worker.

12:26George Hahn:One executive Thompson interviewed put it this way, I have never met a team at Google who says, you know, I'm out of good ideas. The answer is always, the list of things I would like to do is nine miles longer than what we can pull off. But as the cost of execution drops, new demand will likely come from areas that previously didn't have access to programmers. Several developers suggested that the number of software jobs might actually grow, Thompson wrote. An untold number of small firms around the country would love to have their own custom-made software, but were never big enough to hire, say, a five-person programmer team necessary to produce it.

13:17George Hahn:The most frightening scenario is one in which AI disruption outpaces recovery velocity, hits every sector simultaneously, and encounters little pushback from policymakers. But this ignores that societal tumult usually isn't due to unemployment, but people who are working yet still hungry, resulting in a loss of economic dignity and narratives to assign blame. If it sounds as if we're already there, trust your instincts. Inside Silicon Valley, the vibe is bleak. As Jasmine Sun wrote in the New York Times, Most people I know in the AI industry think the median person is screwed, and they have no idea what to do about it.

14:08George Hahn:Worse, many say that artificial general intelligence, a technology that may never materialize, will create a permanent underclass. That belief is fueling a last chopper out of Saigon mentality, where people see a limited window to build wealth before AI and robotics fully replace human labor. I believe this is a consensual hallucination. techno-narcissists have over-indexed on the rapid advances in AI capabilities while completely ignoring everything else. AI's popularity is correlated to wealth, with only those earning more than$200 ,000 per year viewing AI as a net positive. That's not a reflection on AI, but yet another signal that the incumbents, the old and wealthy, have successfully hoarded opportunity.

15:11In other words, the AI jobs freak out

15:15George Hahn:is the latest act in America's ongoing wealth inequality drama. The Gini coefficient is how economists measure inequality. Zero indicates everyone has exactly the same wealth. A score of 1.0 means one individual owns everything. In the U.S., we're higher than 0.8, about the level seen when the French began separating people from their heads. The real disruption won't come from AI, but from the public watching arsonists sell smoke detectors and call it innovation. The AI job apocalypse isn't an economic forecast. It's a marketing strategy. We're not witnessing the end of work. We're watching the monetization of fear.

16:16George Hahn:Life is so rich.

16:32favorite foods from the forces of seedy oils and sketchy ingredients with cooking oils salad dressings and mayo all powered by the good fats from 100 pure avocado oil and simple delicious ingredients chosen foods security program on spreadsheets new regulations piling up and audit dread it's time for vanta vanta automates security and compliance brings evidence into one place and cuts audit prep by 82 less manual work clearer visibility faster deals zero chaos Call it compliance or call it compliance. Get it? Join the 15 ,000 companies using Vanta to prove trust. Go to Vanta.com slash com. This podcast is brought to you by Carvana.

17:17Selling your car should feel like one less thing on your list, not one more. With Carvana, it is. Just go to Carvana.com, enter your license plate or VIN, and get a real offer down to the penny. No back and forth, no surprises, just an experience you can trust. Like your offer? Accept it. Schedule a pickup, and we'll come to you with a check in hand. Your car. Your timeline. Your terms. Visit Carvana.com to sell your car today. Carvana. Delivery fees and terms may apply.