In short
The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway: Office Hour’s Best of Business
Episode Overview In this episode, Scott Galloway presents the first part of a special three-part series titled "Best of Business." The episode features discussions answering listener questions about brand advertising, ethical considerations in big tech, and the role of founder CEOs in startups.
Key Themes
- The Diminishing Returns of Traditional Advertising
- Scott's Take on Advertising:
- Contends that advertising is indicative of companies with undifferentiated products.
- Suggests that if a company relies on advertising, it may point to a lack of product quality or uniqueness.
- Emerging Trends:
- Many successful tech companies, like Netflix, leverage social media as free advertising instead of traditional paid media.
- Traditional advertising remains stagnant, while digital platforms like Google and Meta grow, taking market share from traditional firms.
- Future of Advertising:
- Galloway believes traditional advertising is becoming less effective and will continue to decline as companies shift towards digital and performance-based marketing strategies.
- Ethical Considerations in Big Tech Employment
- Comparison of Amazon and Meta:
- Both companies offer strong employment opportunities but have different ethical implications.
- Meta's impact on social issues, such as misinformation and mental health, is viewed negatively, while Amazon's criticisms focus on monopoly practices and treatment of small businesses.
- Decision Factors for Job Seekers:
- Suggests prioritizing personal career interests, geographic preferences, and potential for professional growth over ethical concerns.
- Emphasizes that ethical issues may serve as tiebreakers but shouldn't overshadow personal career benefits.
- The Role of Founder CEOs in Startups
- Challenges for Founder CEOs:
- Many founders are innovative but lack operational management skills, which can hinder growth.
- Galloway argues that recognizing when to step back and allow experienced operators to take over is crucial for scaling.
- Advice for Founders:
- Encourage founders to acknowledge their limitations and be open to delegating responsibilities.
- Suggests that in order to ensure long-term success, founders should be willing to give equity to new leadership to foster a sense of ownership among their teams.
- Self-Reflection for CEOs:
- Founders should evaluate their capacity to lead as their company matures and seek to bring in skilled management when necessary.
Key Takeaways
- Advertising Effectiveness: Galloway questions the sustainability of traditional advertising and indicates a shift towards more innovative marketing strategies.
- Ethical Employment Choices: When choosing between large tech firms, individuals should weigh personal career growth over ethical considerations, which can often be subjective.
- Leadership Transitions: The successful scaling of startups may require founders to step aside for more experienced business operators to take charge, emphasizing the importance of self-awareness in leadership.
Conclusion The episode provides insights into the changing landscape of advertising, ethical dilemmas faced in the tech industry, and the challenges of leadership in startups, offering a blend of practical advice and thought-provoking commentary for business professionals and aspiring entrepreneurs alike.
For future questions or discussions related to business, career, or life, listeners are encouraged to reach out via email at officehours@profgmedia.com.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Support for this show comes from Strawberry.me. Be honest. Are you happy with your job? Or are you stuck in one you've outgrown? Or never wanted in the first place? Sure, you can probably list the reasons for staying, but are they actually just excuses for not leaving? Let a career coach from strawberry.me help you get unstuck. Discover the benefits of having a dedicated career coach in your corner. Go to strawberry.me slash unstuck to claim a special offer. Welcome to the Prop2Pod's Office Hours. Today, we're kicking up a special three-part series. Uno, dos, tres. Series. That's right. featuring some of our favorite Office Hours moments, best of business, best of career, and best of parenting.
0:46Not good business or good career or good parenting, but the best of. In today's episode, we start with best of business, where we'll answer your questions surrounding the brand era, big tech companies, and their ethical responsibility, and when a founder CEO should step down. So with that, first question. Hi, Scott. Matt here, and a big fan of your podcast. I've followed you for a while, and one of your enduring takes has been that advertising and building brand through paid media is a dying business strategy. Outside of some companies seeing hyper growth without big media budgets, mainly in the tech sector, most major firms continue to increase budgets.
1:18And those tech companies are now some of the biggest advertisers in the world. Even Tesla, famously averse to advertising, is now paying for media to try to differentiate versus the growing EB market. As someone who also falls this closely, there's been a golden age of advertising effectiveness research from professors like Byron Sharp showing the value of paid media. I would be curious how much of your successful ProfG Media business is supported by advertising. I work in this space, so I'm obviously biased, but curious if you've amended any of your opinions here. Thank you for all you do, and go Gunners.
1:52Go Gunners. I love that. Look, I make these provocative statements that if you're advertising, it means your product sucks. and I've also said, and this is I think more true, if you constantly are having dinner with strangers, it means you're selling an undifferentiated product. So if you're in the services business and your job is to have these faux relationships with people, it means you're all selling the same damn widget and you're dependent upon relationships. One of the things I loved about, I started a brand strategy firm and basically we were good at what we did, but there were a lot of good firms out there in a brand doing brand strategy.
2:24And the way we got business is I would develop sort of these proxy father-son relationships with the CMO or the CEO. And I found it just fucking exhausting. They were really interesting, wonderful men. And they were all men. This was in the 90s. But I'm an introvert and I just found it difficult. I vacationed with clients. I mean, it was just so much. But anyways, I do think advertising is sort of a tell for a company that doesn't have a truly differentiated product. And I would push back that the tech companies, yeah, they advertise a lot, but as a percentage of their top line budget. They don't.
2:57And, you know, Netflix uses, I met with Ted Serrano, the CEO of Netflix, and I said, why wouldn't you start a TikTok competitor? I still, by the way, think they should partner with an AI firm and buy a hopefully divested TikTok. But he said, no, we use TikTok as free advertising. It's amazing. We give them a certain number of clips and it's fantastic marketing for us. And they don't spend a lot of money, I don't think, on marketing. And I think the companies that, the companies that have added the most shareholder value over the last 10, 20 years have a few things in common. One, they're typically asset light.
3:27Why build a factory when you can just design the chip, NVIDIA? Why invest in expensive real estate when you can just create a platform and take fees? Airbnb, why buy and maintain cars when you can just create software, a thick layer of software on top of them? That's Uber. They tend to have recurring revenue streams that are more predictable, like a software company. But also, I have found they tend to be less reliant on advertising. And the thing about advertising, one of the reasons Google killed, largely killed the traditional ad business, and I think it has, Google loses or gains the value of IPG, WPP, Publisi, and Omnicon every day.
4:07Those guys used to be the big swinging dicks, and now they basically work and they beg for the crumbs off of the Google and Meta cookie, if you will, is that those companies have difficult times finding attribution or building it. Basically, all the research that Condonast or IPG does all leads to one place. You should spend more money on our advertising, right? And it's kind of bullshit. And it's kind of a model where the lack of attribution was both the sin and the opportunity in the sense that brand building is difficult to reverse engineer to specific sales. So there's been a dearth of it, which probably means it's going to offer higher ROI and direct response advertising, specifically meta and alphabet with their unbelievable targeting.
4:48I mean, well, you only have 70 % of your budget in digital marketing. It should probably be more. I mean, every year these companies just take more and more share of an industry. Advertising is a weird industry. It's always like one and a half percent of GDP. It doesn't go below that. It doesn't go above it. So this is not a growth industry, but you have some companies that are growing 20 and 25 % a year, everyone from meta and alphabet to TikTok, which means they are sucking the oxygen out of the room for the other folks. Does that mean traditional-based advertising and brand building is going to go away?
5:19No, but it's going to be a shitty place to work or invest. If you're absolutely in love with it or you're scaling and have senior-level sponsorship or you're rounding third, then by all means, stay there. But if you're younger, don't love it. I just think it's going to get more and more difficult for the traditional advertiser slash brand building complex. And this is from someone who made a really good living preaching about brand. I think things have generally changed. I think we've moved from a brand era, and I don't want to call it an innovation era, to a supply chain era. Most of the big, big advances in shareholder value, in addition to being asset light, recurring revenue, lack of advertising, have been supply chain.
5:56So, you know, my brother, I just, and I'm a professor of brand strategy. I think the era of brand, the sun has passed midday, and Don Traber has been drawn and quartered. Thanks for the question. Question number two. Hey, Scott, this is Sean from Seattle. Love the podcast. Thank you so much for taking my question. I recently fielded offers from Amazon and Meta and got into a debate with friends around which was less ethically problematic. Given the contentious business practices and societal implications associated with both companies, do you truly believe there is a distinction in choosing one over the other for ethical reasons?
6:34Can someone really sleep better at choosing to work at one big tech company over another. We'd love to hear your insight. Sean, this is the mother of all good problems. And so let me be clear, both firms from an employee perspective are great firms. I would say probably a third of my kids, and when I say my kids, my students, would go to work for big tech. And at one point, 20 % were going to Amazon. And the people I know that went to Amazon described it as intense, unforgiving, and very rewarding. Meta has a fantastic reputation in terms of how they treat their employees. They pay them really well, a lot of investments in human capital.
7:13Around the ethics, I think your first priority is to develop economic security for you and your family. And I think big tech is good for the world. I think if we had a button we could press and make big tech vanish, we would not push that button. We are net gainers from big tech. The problem is with the word net, and that is we're net gainers some pesticides. We're net gainers from fossil fuels, I still believe. But we choose to have emission standards and an EPA. I would argue at this point, meta is probably a net negative, whether it's teen suicide, self-harm, self-cutting among girls, election misinformation.
7:52I mean, these guys really are mendacious fox. And Amazon might be mendacious fox, but the implications of that are monopoly abuse and small retailers go out of business and bigger retailers or greater employers might have gone out of business faster than they otherwise would have. But they're not spreading conspiracy theory. They're not spreading anti-vax information. And some of it might not be that the people are any less or more ethical. It's that they're just in different businesses. So if you really got to the point where it came down to who was less bad or more ethical, I would say you'd probably choose Amazon just by virtue of the fact that they're in the business of e-commerce and cloud versus media.
8:35Having said that, I think most likely you should probably make the decision based on what's best for you personally. Do you wanna live in Seattle? Do you wanna live in the Bay Area? Where do you think you'll have senior level sponsorship? Where do you have a better rapport or relationship? Do you believe currently or that you'll develop with who you'll be reporting into? What does the career path look like at each organization? I find with decisions like this, you don't want to listen to a podcast or that is yours truly. You want to build a kitchen cabinet of people and say, okay, these are the offers.
9:08This is the opportunity. This is the division. You know, what do you think? And then at the end of the day, you'll probably ignore all those decisions and just go with your gut and make your original decision. So these are personal decisions. I would say the quote unquote ethical stuff, if you will, is a tiebreaker, unless it's something that really weighs on you. Corporate America, these are platforms for making profits and folks in the media and people such as myself, I think play a role in holding them accountable and trying to urge our elected officials to put in place the regulations such that there's guardrails around these companies.
9:45But at the end of the day, they are going to do whatever increases their profits, full stop, that's just what they do. But anyways, like I said, let me end where I began. This is a great problem. Congratulations to you. Offers from Amazon and Meta. Jesus. Jesus, man. Good luck to you. That's fantastic. We have one quick break before our final questions. Stay with us.
10:11From Pushkin Industries, I'm Jonathan Goldstein, and Heavyweight is back. The new season is bigger than ever. Bigger hopes? I keep waiting for this moment when he says, Mom, I get it. I'm sorry. Bigger dreams. Tom Hanks wants to meet with you. This is a real chance. And bigger heartbreaks. I thought it would be my movie moment. And maybe he would even whisper in my ear, I've always been in love with you. Check out new episodes of Heavyweight on Apple Podcasts.
10:51When you're looking for a person to go on an adventure with, you want someone who can roll with the punches. You want someone who won't give up halfway through. And if you're given the option, you probably want someone who smells like coconut and pink jasmine. Dove Aluminum Free Deodorant is your partner in adventure with 72 hours of freshness and odor protection. It's also free of aluminum, baking soda, and parabens. so you can give your underarms the same level of care you give the rest of your lovely self, body and mind. With scents like cucumber and green tea, dragon fruit and coconut cream, and yes, coconut and pink jasmine, Dove Aluminum Free Deodorant offers freshness that won't leave you stranded.
11:32So the next time you're setting out to explore the world, don't forget to invite Dove Aluminum Free Deodorant along for the ride because you were made for adventure and your deodorant should be too. The search is over. An aluminum-free deodorant that won't let you down. Find your one true Dove. Choose Dove aluminum-free deodorant for 72-hour freshness and odor protection. Buy online at dove.com or at a retailer near you.
12:02Welcome back. Question number three. Hi, Scott. My name is Melissa in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. I'm a four-time CMO in B2B SaaS with 30 years of experience and many startups. I saw your recent post about the probability a startup will be successful by the number of attempts. I've been part of startups that have been very successful and some that have been total flops. One thing I've noticed that is critical to success is the founder CEO. Many founder CEOs are not always strong business operators. They can be great ideators and innovators, but many don't seem self-aware of their shortcomings as operators.
12:45What are your thoughts about when a founder CEO needs to step aside to bring in an experienced team of business operators to drive the company's next level of growth? Thank you for considering my question. Love you and love the show. Well, Melissa from North Carolina, I love you. That's a really nice thing to say. This is a tough one because you're exactly right. Entrepreneurs have role models as they should. And they look at Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, who are unicorns. They're a rare species. And that is, if you think of a company as an idea is letter A. And then the startup, getting the initial seed funding, hiring and firing a group of people, like hand-to-hand combat for the first 20, 30 people.
13:27And that's what you have to do with the first 20 or 30 people. and working around the clock and sharing a vision and being just sort of irrationally passionate and a little bit crazy, if you will, that's kind of A to D or E. And then the company leans in or discovers something that is differentiated and is a real product that's generating more gross income or has positive gross margins. You don't need to be profitable, but when you sell a widget for a buck, it should be at least on a marginal basis. And that is the cost to deliver that incremental consulting engagement or that incremental piece of software or that incremental whatever it is widget that you have positive gross margin to say, okay, if I hire enough people here, I can start to scale and I can build an enterprise and maintain some culture and show that this is more than just a practice.
14:13So the ones that succeed oftentimes never get to scale. And that is their practice. Typically, a small group of people in the services industry are great at PR or great investment banking or great at a specific product or service. And the people who started the company are selfish and think that they're the real innovators and they don't want to share in the upside of people to scale the company. And so whenever I meet with people that have a great company, 20, 30, 50 people, and they're wondering why they can't scale, I'm like, it's usually because you are too fucking selfish and don't realize that people want to have a nice life like you and you need to give away large chunks of the company.
14:46If you want people to act like owners, which is the key early in a company, You have to make them owners. Anyways, back to your question. Most CEOs think they're Steve Jobs or Bill Gates and they can go A to Z. And key part of self-actualization and also success is recognizing, as I did fairly early, quite frankly, as a CEO, that about the time we get a CFO, about the time we have someone in HR, it is time for me to step down as CEO and become kind of the thought leader, the person that is responsible for driving new business. I really enjoy that. play a big role in strategy, but somebody needs to be Mr.
15:23or Mrs. inside and basically run the company. And I was always a fan of giving them the CEO title. Why? As a founder, my objective was always to build shareholder value and get economic security for me and my family, which is Latin for get rich. And titles are inexpensive. So I was always up for giving away the CEO title. I've never been the CEO of a company when I've left. Typically within three to five years, I find someone that is outstanding that I want to retain, and I give them 5%, 7%, 10%, 15 % of the company and say, congratulations, you're now the CEO. And this is kind of what I'm responsible for, and this is what you're responsible for.
15:57A lot of founders never come to that conclusion. Now, the question is, how do you nudge them to that realization? That's a tough one. A board? I don't know how you tell someone to be more self-actualized and that they have limits on their capabilities and we'd all be better off if you brought in someone to run this organization that isn't you. It's a difficult one. Typically, that's the kind of conversation a board should have with the founder CEO that used to be very common in the 90s. Essentially, it was thought there are absolutely no founders that are good enough to be CEOs. So what happened was a guy like Steve Jobs was immediately assumed to be crazy, and we need to bring in the gray-haired old guy from Pepsi, John Scully, and let him or her run it.
16:40Things have changed so dramatically. The pendulum has swung so far to the other side because of the return of Steve Jobs and people like Mark Benioff and Bill Gates that are able to build a company from A to Z and be outstanding CEOs. You should assume if you're the CEO, you are not Bill Gates. You should assume you are not Steve Jobs. I apologize I don't have a direct answer for how to convince possibly your CEO to step down. But the fact you're thinking that way means you're going to be or you're probably successful and can kind of gauge whether or not this company has the right stuff to get to the next level.
17:14And again, CEOs out there, you know, search your feelings. Are you really the person to get to the letter M? Cash in. Cash in. Recognize how awesome you are. And if you have the ability to bring in somebody who will be outstanding and complement your skills, by all means, hit that bit. Thanks for the question. That's all for this episode. If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to officehours at proptamedia.com. Again, that's officehours at proptamedia.com.
17:49The Florida Michelin Guide has recently added five new Greater Fort Lauderdale restaurants to its list, bringing even more culinary magic to the destination. The culinary scene is a melting pot of global flavors, all rooted in the destination's vibrant community spirit. From international cuisine to locally inspired dishes, it's the perfect time to celebrate the rich flavors, innovation, and passion driving greater Fort Lauderdale's evolving food scene. And their dining scene is taken to the next level with spots that you can access by boat, combining delicious meals with the laid-back coastal vibe that defines the destination.
18:26These waterfront restaurants offer the perfect mix of great food and a one-of-a-kind dining experience, where the stunning waterways are as much a part of the ambiance as the culinary delights. Go to visit lauderdale.com slash restaurants.
From the publisher
Today, we’re kicking off a special three-part series, featuring some of our favorite Office Hours moments: Best of Business, Best of Career, and Best of Parenting.
In today’s episode, we start with Best of Business, where Scott answers your questions surrounding the brand era, big tech companies and their ethical responsibility, and when a founder CEO should step down.
Music: https://www.davidcuttermusic.com / @dcuttermusic
Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice
Buy "The Algebra of Wealth," out now.
Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod:
Threads
X
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




