

Live from Wimbledon women’s singles final preview, debating Linda Noskova vs Karolina Mukhova, match competitiveness, who wins, and broader Czech tennis development; includes a related segment on women’s doubles finalists Gabby Dabrowski and Luisa Stefani.
Matt Futterman (The Athletic; Wimbledon reporter contributor; tennis writer).
Futterman is a long-time tennis journalist covering major events; he joins this Wimbledon preview show tradition and discusses match tactics and player histories.
Mukhova’s serve and temperament should help her hold serve and manage nerves; she’s viewed as the “best pure tennis player” and has figured out decision-making/tools (example: choosing one power tool in a Gauff tiebreak while injured). Noskova’s simpler, big-serve game could suit a final if she settles; both are first-time finalists, reducing experience-gap risk. Czech tennis success is attributed to early point-construction creativity and less specialization (examples: Krejcikova/Vondrousova era shifting to Mukhova/Noskova; children playing games/sets early).
Mukhova beating Coco Gauff 6-2 in the semi; Noskova’s slice out wide and 15 double faults in a prior US Open match yet pushing to three sets; Dabrowski’s breast cancer treatment timeline and grass connection; Dabrowski fundraising $20 per game for 1 in 3 foundation.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes.
Discussion on the women's final featuring players Nozkova and Mukova.
“Thank you for calling the Bombas Comfort Line.”
Discussion on the women's final featuring players Nozkova and Mukova.
“And we are here mostly to dissect and debate Linda Nozkova and Karolina Mukova.”
Hosts debate the potential competitiveness of the final match.
“but how confident are we that it's going to be competitive and a good match today?”
In-depth analysis of Nozkova's and Mukova's playing styles and strengths.
“But I actually am not even sure that will be the case.”
Discussion on the role of experience and nerves in high-stakes matches.
“I think in the end that that won't happen because of her ability, well, generally her ability, but also that serve.”
Comparison of Mukova's playing style to other players and its effectiveness.
“I've always felt that there's nobody who can...”
Hosts share predictions and scenarios for the outcome of the final match.
“Is that why you could also make the case for Noskova?”
Discussion on past finals, players' future potential, and career trajectories.
“Like everybody likes Zinda Noskova, but she's younger.”
Final thoughts on the players' readiness and potential outcomes of the match.
“And particularly because she'd made it very clear she wanted to stop because she wanted to eventually have a baby if she could, and she'd put that off and all this sort of thing.”
Discussing key players in the women's final and insights into their playstyles.
“row and matt texted me saying annoying that mukova could not count as a player lower than 14 to win the slam this year.”
Learn about how Gabby Dabrowski copes with pressure in her matches.
“Capturing value in fixed income isn't easy.”
Hear the emotional story of Gabby Dabrowski's battle with breast cancer.
“about the women's doubles final and in particular one of the women's doubles finalists, Gabby Dabrowski, who plays with Luisa Stefani.”
Understand the personal challenges faced by athletes beyond the court.
“I mean, I think we forget sometimes that, you know, we watch these players and all of them have stuff in their lives.”
Get predictions from the hosts on the outcome of the women's singles final.
“I've said in two sets, it could easily be three.”
Get predictions from the hosts on the outcome of the women's singles final.
“Hey, it's Hannah and Paige from Giggly Squad.”

Get the gist, explore an idea or ask about something said.
On The Tennis Podcast, what are the key points of this episode?
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.
0:00Thank you for calling the Bombas Comfort Line. Bombas make socks, slippers, tees, and underwear made with the highest quality materials. Press 1 for comfort, 2 for style, 3 for donation. You chose style. Bombas is styles for whatever you enjoy. You can run in Bombas, lounge in Bombas, dress them up, dress them down, but always give back in Bombas. Because with every item purchased, another is donated. Bombas, comfort worth calling for. Go to bombas.com slash audio and use code audio for 20 % off your first purchase. That's B-O-M-B-A-S dot com and use code audio.
0:32Matt Roberts: AI is only as powerful as the platform it's built into. That's why it's no surprise that more than 85 % of the 14500 use the ServiceNow AI platform. While other platforms duct tape tools together, ServiceNow seamlessly unifies people, data, workflows, and AI, connecting every corner of your business. And with AI agents working together autonomously, anyone in any department can focus on the work that matters most. Learn how ServiceNow puts AI to work for people at servicenow.com.
1:16Matt Roberts: Hello and welcome to the Tennis Podcast live from Wimbledon and presented by Barclays, the official banking partner of Wimbledon. And this is the first of two shows today. A two-pod day. David's absolute favourite. It is your women's final preview show. And we are here mostly to dissect and debate Linda Nozkova and Karolina Mukova. And a few other bits and bobs as well. And joining us to do that is The Athletic's Matt Futterman. It's becoming a bit of a tradition, Matt, that you join us for this show. You're not sat next to the sick man of Europe this time.
1:50Catherine Whitaker: No jelly beans today.
1:53Matt Roberts: We try not to remember. the trauma of last year too vividly. Hopefully no jelly beans and no double bagels. Well, that is kind of where I wanted to start. Before we get into who's going to win, where are the battlegrounds going to be, how confident are we all that this is going to be a good match? That we aren't going to get... Okay, love and love is extreme and unusual, and I don't think anybody would predict that, but how confident are we that it's going to be competitive and a good match today? Well, I sort of take heart in the fact that before the semis, they hit together on center court and they took a picture after and apparently it was like a good vibe.
2:42So I'm kind of thinking that maybe even though they're going to be doing that walk and into that quiet, fancy room with all the people around, maybe they'll just sort of feel like we're just going out to have another hit on center court here and that'll chill them out also both of them are first timers no one's facing a six time Grand Slam winner who was undefeated in Grand Slam finals so maybe they sort of feel like they're with a real peer there instead of a David and Goliath situation
3:19Matt Roberts: Matt I'm imagining it already feels quite different to last year for you Very different Matt's conscious He's got some colour in his cheeks
3:29Catherine Whitaker: And I'm confident it's going to be very different to last year I think Matt's absolutely right There's no big experience gap this time Between them in terms of Grand Sam finals I know Mukava's got one under her belt But it doesn't feel like Anissimovic Shiontek did in that sense also like Noskova who is the more inexperienced one I'm pretty confident she's going to hold serve a few times right that's like her best shot her biggest weapon on this surface and that's very different to Anisimova who you know struggles with with the serve sometimes and certainly did in that final so I just think Noskova can can certainly like get get holds on the board and and keep it close that way, even if she's the more nervous of the two with the slight lack of experience.
4:18Catherine Whitaker: But I actually am not even sure that will be the case. I think she's got a great temperament to handle this occasion, and I think she's going to really show up. And I think Mukova's going to have to sort of handle her game.
4:31David Law: David? Now, you may remember last year at this bench, I feared a 50-minute final. and yes I am quite pleased with myself that I got that right but I was very displeased that it ended up being right because it was obviously a shame I do have, on the subject of whether it's going to end up competitive or not I do have one small concern in the back of my mind and that relates to Linda Noschkova freezing and playing the absolute worst type of player to make you freeze somebody who can put slices low and ask questions and be consistent and play a grass court game we saw we saw mukha came out come out and win a 6-2 set against koko goff on center court just a couple of days ago occasionally i feel as good as nashkova is occasionally i've seen and not turn up in matches.
5:32David Law: It's occasional, but I've seen it. And that would be my concern. I think in the end that that won't happen because of her ability, well, generally her ability, but also that serve. I think she will probably settle and be able to get behind a couple of service games and be okay, but I'm reserving that slight concern in the back of my mind that this could end up very, very quick and one-sided again in the favour of Mukulat. In terms of who's going to win, we've all got the right to change our minds.
6:05Matt Roberts: I might be changing my mind. I don't know. I want to hear what you have to say, Matt. What do you think is the single most likely scenario for this final? Well, I always go back to, not always, but I feel like the last time I was on the show was after Madrid. And we were talking about who was in our mixes for the French Open. and I was talking about there being maybe a dozen players or something like that. And I think, Catherine, you asked me, is Mukova in your mix? Sounds like something I would ask. And Matt Roberts said, Mukova's always in Matt's mix. And yeah, I kind of think she's the best player in the world, or the best tennis player in the world.
6:52And I realize that's a loaded phrase on this show because I don't mean it in the Mahatch way. Because, you know, I feel like...
7:03David Law: This is a name we haven't heard from. Right, because I feel like when you say that about him, we're talking about, like, well, of course he's not. He's a crazy person. He's such a low-key bird. I've actually retired that. Right, I know. But having said that, like, for several years now, I think since that French Open, I've always felt that there's nobody who can... who's a better pure tennis player than Mukhova. So I'm going to go with the pure tennis player on the court where Mary Carrillo says the best athletes win. So then given that, why hasn't she been...
7:40Matt Roberts: There's a reason why she hasn't been winning slams, right? And what is that reason for you? And why don't you see it being a reason today? I think a lot of it is health. I think a lot of it is also that situation that people talk about of having so many tools and not knowing exactly what to use at the right time the actuality problem she has a lot of decisions to make and I think that's been pretty hard for her and I think we've seen over the last really six months that she started to really figure that out and sort of focus it. And I think the purest sign of it was in the tiebreak against Goff when she was hurt.
8:29And she said, okay, well, I have this power tool and it's really the one I have to use right now because I can't play long points. I'm too tired. I got a stitch in my side. And that's what she did. She made a great decision. She got rid of all the other tools. And that's why I feel like she's got it figured out today.
8:56Catherine Whitaker: Is that why you could also make the case for Noskova? In that in a big match like this, if, to David's point, she can overcome any nerves. And if Noskova can settle, her game is less complicated. She's got fewer decisions to make. And if you're going to struggle to make those decisions, if that's going to come, it might come in a grandstand final. I am predicting Muka to win. I think ultimately she can outmanoeuvre and maybe outplay Noskova. And she's so hardened by all the wins she's had here against those Grand Slam champions to get to this final. And beating Goff in the way that she did. But I do think there's a scenario where Noskova's uncomplicated, no fuss tennis, big serve, get the first strike in, the hands to handle what Muka does throw at her.
9:48Catherine Whitaker: I think there's a scenario where that tennis is better suited to a grandstand final if she can settle. Do you know what I mean?
9:56Matt Roberts: Absolutely. Definitely. I woke up this morning. I know we were joking on the show last night about this equivalent show three years ago and it being our worst show of all time and our desperation.
10:07Catherine Whitaker: No, we weren't joking. It was our worst show of all time. It was quite a lot of competition.
10:12Matt Roberts: To expunge it from the internet. But I did just wake up with a feeling of like, oh, this is the same. Like everybody likes Zinda Noskova, but she's younger. I think everybody feels okay, sort of willing Mukhova to win because of everything Matt described. She's kind of low-key, everyone's favourite player. she's had all these injuries it feels like she's been a bit cursed she's older who knows how many more chances she'll get i feel like everyone's like this is the one you know and that feels so much like jabber and von drosheva three years ago to me and i just have trauma from that i can i can
10:55David Law: i see the parallel that you're drawing i don't i don't can't quite remember how old on shabber is but it doesn't feel, this feels like the start of something with Karen Inomukova to me because she's never had a run. She's never had a run of fitness and I suppose that is probably why the concern might be because for all we know this may be the one uninjured window that she's going to get. I really hope that's not the case. I really hope that's not the case. That's all I can say. But it feels like it's the start of her career to me rather than something she's got to get in before she has to retire.
11:35David Law: Because of canister. Yeah, I know she's 29, but she doesn't look old in any way. She looks like she's got another six years of top-level tennis to me when I watch her play. And I don't feel as though, a bit like Federer, it doesn't look like it takes a kind of grinding toll on her body. She's had physical breakdowns, but I don't see that she's trying to eek one out before she can finish the sport. And with Jabir, it did, certainly the second time, it felt like, oh my word, we're in a race against time here for her to get this one. And particularly because she'd made it very clear she wanted to stop because she wanted to eventually have a baby if she could, and she'd put that off and all this sort of thing.
12:24David Law: in terms of coming out and freezing I don't really have that concern for Mukovo also I mean I suppose there are similarities to draw I think between Noshkovo and Rybakken in terms of game style there is a chance that your lovely game just doesn't have time to settle because of the power but I do back Mukovo against anybody's power I just feel like her hands are good enough. I think she's a more consistent player than Jabir. I think Jabir is an instinctive player, who actually the second time she reached the final, I think she's actually in the route to it, because I think she beat Rebekah on the way to that final, didn't she?
13:06David Law: And I felt like, and I think she might have been Sabalenka even as well. At that time, she'd established more of a base to her game than she did in the first year. but ostensibly she is still kind of a not like a trick shot artist but she's just instinctive I think Mukava is I think she's the ultimate player I agree with you I feel like put it all together and she can do more than anybody else and and I think she's worked out how to do it now
13:35Catherine Whitaker: I've got another uh Matt Futterman receipt on Mukava by the way from our I dug out our WhatsApp chat i hope you don't mind me airing this it's very it's done a lot of airing private whatsapp chats it's going to look good for you i think i wouldn't i wouldn't do it otherwise monday the 13th of april we'd just done a q a show yeah and we'd been we'd been given a stat that someone outside of the top 14 keeps winning majors on the on the women's side it's happened many years in a row and matt texted me saying annoying that mukova could not count as a player lower than 14 to win the slam this year.
14:10Catherine Whitaker: Maybe she would have dropped a couple of spots by Wimbledon. She would have been my choice. Feels like it has to come at some point. Futterman said if she gets to the second week and she's playing the big name she'll be playing well. I have a weak spot for great athletes especially on slippery surfaces. All true. It's pretty good stuff. All true.
14:33Matt Roberts: On the great athletes thing I had a chat with your colleague Kiva earlier this week who covers Wimbledon but mostly covers football and she had just been watching Karolina Mukhaver I think for the first, certainly the first time live and she was so taken with her and she said look I cover football mostly and she is the one that looks most like a footballer out there in terms of her movement and it just looks so right seeing her on the grass I'm sad to bring up football after moments before going on air I invited Matt over to my flat to watch the England game tonight and he asked if it would be acceptable for him to support Norway if you're sensing atmosphere here that is why folks um but i loved that point from her about i mean the movement is just it's both graceful and balletic and so strong and athletic is at
15:25Catherine Whitaker: the same time isn't it and her father was a goalkeeper right right and like i think her brother made a brother played professionally too and like up at the net that's that's the most like goalkeeper-y that tennis gets, I think. She just feels like, I don't know, whether it's Luka Modric or Perlow, that hub player in the middle of the field, the ball goes into that player. That player is so calm with the ball, even if there's four people running at them, and then just looks up and sort of like sends the perfect ball outside, moves up, gets the ball back again, does the same thing. I mean, you just sort of, that's what she's always reminded me of just that sense of calm and the one thing where I think is different from Jabor when we were talking about that Jabor wore that first player from Africa, first Muslim player, she wore all of that in a very very heavy way and Muka and Nascova whoever wins is going to be like the 86th Czech woman to win Wimbledon It's not really that big a deal.
16:34You know, there's no groundbreaking here. It's groundbreaking for them. But there's no first thing. There's no example. There's no playing for all the little girls in North Africa. I mean, which was really like a huge thing that she talked about a lot and can be very empowering. But at times can be a bit too much.
16:56Matt Roberts: You did a great piece about that this week. Checkmate. I mean, the title wrote itself. this all Czech final I mean obviously part of what's going on here is the tradition you know champions make champions you've got to see it to be it and all that kind of thing Novatova is clearly where it all started Mandlikova, Novotna, Kvitova, Pliskova reached a final here Krojikova, Vondroshova, Siniarkova in the doubles it is an extraordinary list of players from a country of just 11 million people but there's more to it than that isn't it Like they are doing stuff different over there. There is stuff that other countries can learn from what the Czech Republic are doing.
17:39Yeah, that's what they tell me. I will say I haven't, you know, embedded for six months in Czech tennis. That's the next step. And seen this up close. Yeah, I kind of would rather like do embedding in like, you know, Portugal, Portuguese tennis or something like that. Just, you know, for the beaches and stuff. Oh, I think they find out what they're doing wrong.
18:00Catherine Whitaker: No, no, no, no. It's just a ruse for me to get a nice six months in Portugal. But if it's Czech, so be it. It's fine. I've been to Prague. Love it there. but what I mean what Martina told me is that she lives in Florida so she sees a lot of coaching in Florida and she spends time in Czech Republic still or has been back there enough and she said what's really important is most of what she sees in Florida is children sitting in the court being fed balls by a pro who's standing next to a basket and so they're learning how to really bash a very clean ball. And Czech kids are just playing games and sets and matches from a very young age.
18:52And there's a real emphasis on point construction and creativity and having lots of tools and playing all over the court because your skills change from the time you're 6 to the time you're 20. and that sort of skill acquisition has really sort of revealed itself on the court the last couple weeks with, I mean, not just these two who made the final. I think it's worth noting that Kretzikova beat Barton Kova, who's like Mukova 2, and Mukova 2.0, and then Mukova beat Kretzikova. I mean, they were beating each other. And so I think that's one thing that's really important. All of these women will tell you about all the other sports they played growing up.
19:41That's huge, isn't it? Yeah, I think it is. It seems like there's a lot less specialization. I mean, just sort of anecdotal evidence. And beyond that, I think it seems to me from speaking with them is that they haven't gone to academies. They've been in normal school. I remember Valentovo last year. I was interviewing her and she was really worried about getting, it was at the French Open, she was really worried about getting home because she had finals coming up for her, I think, junior year in high school or something like that. I mean, they're doing this sort of balancing act and kind of being treated as normal people, even though they're these outstanding athletes instead of, you know, what I'm most familiar with in America is everybody's homeschooled.
20:28Everybody is playing only one sport.
20:30Matt Roberts: All your chips are on one thing for the whole family from the age of like 12. Right. And as someone who has real problems with point construction, I can assure you, I can assure you there is a lot of hitting, there is a lot of standing at the baseline and, you know, having dolls fed to you.
20:47Catherine Whitaker: There was a piece that Mary Carrillo sent to us this week by Joel Drucker on a similar theme. And he talked about, you know, the lineage of Czech tennis and everything. and there was a scene in that piece that Joel describes watching Mukhova on the practice court in Indian Wells and he's seen people practicing coming and going and it's all, kind of to Matt's point, it's all repetition. They're all hitting the same shot over and over again but Mukhova's returning serves and every return she's hitting is different. It's a drop shot, it's a drive, it's a floaty one on the baseline, it's cross court, it's down the line.
21:23Catherine Whitaker: She's practicing all the returns not just trying to get in a rhythm hitting one and that sense of creativity I think is, I don't know, I think it's particularly prevalent in this era of the Czech players actually as well. I think there was a time when it was Kvitova and it was Pliskova and it was that big first strike tennis that would take the racket out of your hand with Krejcikova and Vondroshova and now Mukova and even Noskova I think is underrated in her creativity. That seems to all be there with them I just thought that led on nicely from what Matt was talking about in terms of point construction and seeing the court rather than just sort of hitting the ball repeatedly.
22:08Matt Roberts: We've done enough editions of Tennis Relive to know that I'm sure whoever loses today will be told by the winner in their speech, don't worry, you played great, you'll be back here and you'll win it one day. That very often doesn't happen. How confident do you feel that whoever doesn't win today will have a good chance to come back and win again one day?
22:36David Law: I am confident that Noshkova will.
22:40Matt Roberts: Because she's got time on her side.
22:42David Law: I really hope she doesn't have a bad experience. I hope she doesn't have an Anissimova. Funny enough, when we came out of that final... Is that what we're calling it now? Yeah, well, yeah, because that was so bad. But she's the poster person for putting that behind you and going and doing it anyway. The way she reached the final of the US Open, I think it was extraordinary. But I would worry for a much younger woman like Noskova if she had a really bad experience. I just wouldn't want that. I don't want that for any player. for Mookova I'd be a little bit concerned that she didn't, for her that she should win this honestly I just think she's that good and she's in her prime right now she's ready mentally, game wise, everything is there and if she then didn't win I'd be a little bit concerned that she would have doubts I don't know whether that's accurate, that's just my concern
23:49Matt Roberts: huge news for Natasha's Vareva that we're now calling it an Anisimova well
23:55David Law: Vareva had a good 30 years of it
23:58Matt Roberts: now she can hand it over yeah what do you two think
24:03Catherine Whitaker: yeah I think I probably agree with David on that like just purely for age reasons you know Noskova is she's very young she's the youngest woman to reach the women's final since Bouchard in 2014 She's only 21. If she wins it, she'll be the youngest champion since Kvitova in 2011. And I do think the sport generally has sort of woken up to how good Noska is this tournament. But I think everyone's been sleeping on it. I think she's really good.
24:39Matt Roberts: Except for Matt Roberts.
24:40Catherine Whitaker: I think she's really good. And I think she can come back here and win. It was a year ago, Catherine.
24:46David Law: Matt and I were looking at her previous women on record and her losing to Anissa Mova in that match he was sitting at is the one that turned Matt from, yeah, she's good, into, oh my word, she's really good.
25:00Catherine Whitaker: Yeah, she can hurt you in so many ways, you know, with the serve, with the ground strokes.
25:06Matt Roberts: And you're right, her variety, her toolkit is underrated a bit like Sabalenka's often is because she has the power as well. You think of her as just a big, flat power hitter, but there's a lot there that she can fall back on.
25:21Catherine Whitaker: And I still think her movement can improve, and I do think that's going to be huge for Mukova to try and get her moving side to side. You know, it's similarly to what she did to Osaka. You know, I think the problem Mukova, I think, might have is that Noskova can handle the set-up shots that Mukova can play to try and then drag you wide in a way that Osaka, with her lack of hands, couldn't really do on the grass. But yes, to come back to the question, in terms of trying to win a Wimbledon after this one, I do think Noskova, just because she's got so much more time on her side, I take the point about how Muka doesn't feel like she's coming to the end of her career, but Noskova really is at the start of it.
26:08Matt Roberts: That all sounded very Jabir von Droshevary.
26:14Matt? Yeah, I think they can both. Absolutely. I see no reason why not except Mukherjee's health. It's always going to be a concern.
26:25Matt Roberts: Is it a concern today? How worried were you about the physical state she was in two days ago after that semi-final? I mean, I just thought Goff had sort of wore her out, but I thought it seemed like it was exhaustion and a cramp from... Yeah, that's what it looked like. And there's enough time. And the stress, too. Is that not a worry for today? Stress, heat, and exhaustion? Yes, but I do think the points are going to be so different. And the goth experience is different, isn't it?
27:01Catherine Whitaker: I don't know. It's a lot to come back from that. Yeah. I mean, you mentioned the goth experience. I was at the Goff-Nascova match in Madrid I was sure I was like okay here we go again this is where she folds and granted Goff was she had just had the food poisoning the not food poisoning, the virus the shrimp tacos that weren't
27:27Matt Roberts: that weren't shrimp tacos she had survived the match with that and this was two days later and they were playing She was not in peak health. Still, she was deep in a third set. I think it went to a match tiebreak, didn't it? And Nascapa prevailed. And you've mentioned how that's one of the hardest things to do. Granted, it wasn't at a grand slam. But it was a pretty big match, and it was pretty impressive. It got to the end. it got tight and she didn't buckle as I'd seen her buckle in stressful times in the past.
28:07David Law: Today's show is brought to you by Vanguard. To all the financial advisors listening, let's talk bonds for a minute. Capturing value in fixed income isn't easy. Bond markets are massive, murky, and let's be real, lots of firms throw a couple of flashy funds your way and call it a day, but not Vanguard. Vanguard bonds are institutional quality. Institutional quality isn't a tagline. It's a commitment to your clients. It means top grade products across the board. Vanguard's been in the game a long time and their scale gives them a serious edge. They're able to invest across all kinds of sectors, maturities and geographies, which means they can spot and act on opportunities that others might miss.
28:51David Law: So if you're looking to give your clients consistent results year in and year out, Go see the record for yourself at vanguard.com forward slash audio. That's vanguard.com forward slash audio. All investing is subject to risk. Vanguard Marketing Corporation Distributor. Thank you for calling the Bombas Comfort Line. Bombas make socks, slippers, tees and underwear made with the highest quality materials. Press 1 for comfort, 2 for style, 3 for donation. You chose style. Bombas is styles for whatever you enjoy. You can run in Bombas, lounge in Bombas, dress them up, dress them down, but always give back in Bombas.
29:31Because with every item purchased, another is donated. Bombas, comfort worth calling for. Go to bombas.com slash audio and use code audio for 20 % off your first purchase. That's B-O-M-B-A-S dot com and use code audio. One second, you're enjoying your day off. The next, your phone buzzes. A window's been broken at home. You're miles away. In one second, everything can change. That's why ADT's professionally installed security systems monitor your home 24-7. They're backed by the most company-operated monitoring centers in the industry, so you're always supported during an emergency. When every second counts, count on ADT.
30:07Visit ADT.com to learn more.
30:12Matt Roberts: Just before I get your final predictions, Matt, I wanted to ask you about another piece of yours that I read this week about the women's doubles final and in particular one of the women's doubles finalists, Gabby Dabrowski, who plays with Luisa Stefani. Favourite team of David and Matt. David's trying to get Stefani as a nickname off the ground. I'm quite happy to ditch it. Not actually believing in portmanteaus.
30:37David Law: I only say that to try to, you know, be one of the guys. I don't like it really.
30:44Matt Roberts: OK, well, we're in this now. We can debate this at a later date, But it's an incredibly moving piece with Gabby Dabrowski, who I think most people probably know the headlines of her individual story. She's a two-time Wimbledon finalist, never won the title here. And when she played here two years ago, we now know that she was in the middle of treatment for breast cancer. She had had two surgeries. she took she then took a break as approved by her doctors before having radiation treatment that started in the august of 2024 so that she could play wimbledon and compete in the olympics where she won a bronze medal with felix auger aliassime and at the time everybody knew she was coming back from something but it wasn't until months later that both the tennis world and even people that were quite close to her for example her you know her mixed doubles partner that she won a bronze medal with that that they discovered exactly what she was coming back from and and I hadn't realized the role that Wimbledon and the grass plays in her story and that the extent to which the story is still ongoing for her yeah I had the opportunity to speak with her I think we were in Miami actually and I mean it was one of those sort of professional and personal worlds colliding my wife had just been diagnosed with breast cancer and and then all of a sudden I was having this interview with Gabby Dabrowski and we started talking about what had happened two years ago and she said she said I don't know how familiar you are with breast cancer and I said well Gabby you're about to get a little more than you bargained for in this interview and uh because it was really just like sort of days after my wife had been diagnosed she had not had surgery yet and we spent a good while talking about me in that interview and she was incredibly sweet and supportive and you know like tell your wife to call me if she needs anything I mean she you know like really great and uh yeah it was pretty emotional for me certainly um and she's talked about it a fair bit but you know what we ended up moving towards as she sort of talked me through her recovery because it's kind of crazy when you think about how quickly and i think she had i mean she ended up having to have two surgeries because they didn't get everything on the first surgery so uh and by the way a tip of the cap to the wta which provides annual checkups for its players that generally take place in Miami because they have a lot of space there, they have suites, and it was in that annual checkup with a WTA doctor that they spotted this and they said, I think we need to get you followed up on that.
33:38And within days she had been diagnosed. But moving on from that, she had to have two surgeries. I think the second one was sometime in May, and it was just like weeks after but I mean she got off the plane here she still couldn't quite lift her arm on the toss and she was going to play I think it was Nottingham and you know sort of found a way and day by day got better and better but just loves the grass and sort of always feels her game here feels like it really suits her and there's just like this deep emotional connection and so having done that story I know we're not supposed to root for people I had my eye on every one of her matches and what was happening as I was sort of watching her advance through the draw and yes, I'm absolutely thrilled that she's in the finals they lost that final two years ago but it's just so amazing how quiet it was it wasn't just like journalists who didn't know Felix Ogeria's team didn't know she had just had breast cancer surgery and he was her partner at the Olympics.
34:48And, you know, she announced it in December and she got like, you know, and I think he sent her, you know, one of those texts with the bicep emoji. I mean, you know, just it was really kind of incredible what she did. And it's great that she's, you know, speaking so publicly about it right now. She really wants to raise awareness. she's donating she's donating a lot of money with I think each game she wins
35:15Matt Roberts: $20 for every game I've got this from your piece Matt $20 for every game she wins to the 1 in 3 foundation which gets its name from the global statistic that a third of all women over the age of 15 have experienced some form of sexual or physical abuse she's already raised over$10 ,000 which equates to about 2 years of training in communities to help prevent violence against women Yeah, so she's doing great things on the court and off it. And yeah, just someone to, I think, to really admire and look up to. And she's still, she's in remission, but she's still undergoing hormone treatment. She's experiencing menopause type symptoms.
35:54Matt Roberts: She's in a Wimbledon finals still receiving cancer treatment. Yeah, it's not easy. I mean, I think we forget sometimes that, you know, we watch these players and all of them have stuff in their lives. Some of them are battling illnesses and injuries themselves. Some of them have parents who are sick. Noskova's mother died of cancer. She's going to walk onto the court with that. We've talked a lot last year about Anisimova's father dying suddenly. So this is a sport where you don't leave your baggage necessarily in the locker room. You're going through stuff. And I think it's something that is good to remember when you're saying, you know, oh, God, how did they make that?
36:42What a terrible decision to hit that shot. I mean, there's stuff going on. It's not that easy. It's a hard job.
36:48Matt Roberts: That's very powerful. Look, these two were already rooting for Dabrowski and Stefani. Apologies to Modanovic and Joao Hanyu. I'm sure their time will come. They've reached the final without dropping a set. So it's looking good for them. Thank you for sharing that, Matt. The time has come for predictions. David, you're up.
37:12David Law: I think Mukovo will win. I've said in two sets, it could easily be three. I don't feel emphatic about this because I think Noszkovo is really, really good. And I think she definitely has the skill and the tools to be a major winner. But I think Mookova comes out and shows us why we all are misty-eyed about her when we watch her play tennis. And all the stars have aligned for her to finally be injury-free, I think. And at the right age, she's just beaten Coco Gough, which is the ultimate in three sets and in a tie-break. So I think Mookova just puts on a show today. Matt?
38:00Matt Roberts: One of the Mats? I think I'll go with Mukova in three, which probably means Noskova will win in two. You're not this Matt, don't worry. Generally, that's what happens. It's Matt behind the camera. Although yesterday, my prediction was six sets. Right. Zverev and Sinner, so. Well, Matthew's prediction was Ferry in three, so. You've already got more credit in the bank. He's the new Red Team. this mat
38:33Catherine Whitaker: so hard I've gone back and forth I'm going to go Mukava I feel a little bit like Charlie Ackleshare when he switched at the Australian Open and regretted it I'm going to go Mukava I just think the level she's playing at the people she's beaten to get here I like David's idea of it's kind of it's her time and I think the game can can nullify some of what Noskova brings I think she can get her moving side to side yeah I'll go Muka
39:13David Law: Just watch out for that slice out wide serve there from Noskova which is really one of the revelations of the tournament for me seeing that on grass, seeing it in person
39:22Matt Roberts: Muka should, I mean not that there's much you can do about it when she hits her spots but these two know one another's game. I mean, they played doubles together in Paris 2024, didn't they? Like, she will know about that serve big time.
39:36Catherine Whitaker: And that serve is going to be a factor. When they played at the US Open last year, it was a three-set win for Mukova. Noskova had a bad serving day, hit 15 double faults in that match and still managed to push it to three sets. I would expect her to serve better today and for Mukova to have fewer looks. Also, Mukhova needs to up her serve. She didn't serve that well against Goff. Which is horrible. It was quite a low percentage. It's crazy. I think she was 41 % in the first set, which she won. Right. It's crazy that she won that set. Yeah, Goff really wasn't punishing that second serve in a way that I think Nozkova can.
40:12Catherine Whitaker: I feel like this whole show I've been giving reasons why Nozkova's going to win, and yet I've picked Mukhova. What am I doing?
40:20Matt Roberts: And now if I don't pick Nozkova, we're very much in a 2023 Wimbledon preview, Wimbledon final preview situation honestly my head is saying Noskova and my heart is saying Mukova I am a heart person I'm a vibes person
40:40Matt Roberts: so I want to say Mukova but for the sake of not having to expunge this beautiful show from the internet I will say Noskova thank you does that make you feel better? it does
40:54Catherine Whitaker: I really appreciate that
40:56Matt Roberts: I don't want to plunge Matt into an illness again ok there we go 3 for Mukovo 1 for Nozkovo I just want it to be a great match please not love and love is that too much to hope for sometimes it is but please not love and love yeah I really just hope there feels like there's time in this match for them both to settle, get their teeth into it get over the nerves however much you're able to get over nerves in a Wimbledon final. 4pm local time for that final. Before it at 1pm the men's doubles final. We'll be back with another one of these preview shows tomorrow at midday looking ahead to the men's singles final.
41:38Matt Roberts: And of course we'll be back tonight and tomorrow at the end of play to talk about what we have just seen. Matt, thank you very much for joining us today. Thanks for having me. You've enhanced this show greatly. It's been an absolute pleasure. and thanks for all your work this week that has really enhanced, I hope, our reporting on this tournament. Hello to Phoebe, our wonderful mascot for this Wimbledon fortnight. Hello to our mascots, Bodie, Maisie and Roger. Hello to our top folks and executive producers, Greg, Chris and Jeff. We'll save the shout outs for later. Do join us then. We are part of the Athletic Podcast Network and we'll speak to you after the women's singles final.
42:21Hey, it's Hannah and Paige from Giggly Squad. We all know finding the perfect pet treat for your cat can be as tricky as dating in the city. But we've got you. Try Temptations Cat Treats, America's number one cat treat brand. Their Temptations Crunchy Cat Treats are the crunchy, outside, soft, inside treat your cat will love. Butter and Daphne are obsessed. Plus, they're 100 % complete and balanced and under two calories per treat. Seriously, nine out of 10 cats find Temptations treats irresistible. Make bonding easier with Temptations cat treats. Cats can't resist. This episode is sponsored by Michael's, your destination for all things birthday parties.
43:04We just had Lucky's first birthday, and it was so great to be able to go into Michael's and get everything. Of course, I knew they had craft supplies there, but I didn't realize how expansive their party supplies were. And Michael's really is where you can go to get everything for a party, whether you're planning a kid's birthday or even an adult celebration. They've got over 4 ,500 party supplies, more than 60 different themes, and prices starting at just 99 cents. Plus, they've recently lowered prices on hundreds of items. We found adorable decorations, balloons, everything we needed to pull the party together without making a bunch of different shopping trips.
43:37Plus, I always have a good time going to Michael's. I love shopping there. I could just browse the aisles forever. But if you're short on time, like I always seem to be, you can also get same-day delivery or buy online and pick up at the store. They even offer free helium inflation on select balloon styles, which is such a lifesaver, and it was for our party, truly. So if you've got a birthday coming up or just a celebration, remember, Michael's Everything to Celebrate Anything. Visit Michael's in-store or shop online now.
Catherine, David and Matt are joined by The Athletic’s Matt Futterman to look ahead to this afternoon’s women’s final between Karolina Muchova and Linda Noskova.
We discuss both players, analyse the match up, and give our predictions.
Matt F also talks us through his articles on how Wimbledon plays an important role in the history of Czech tennis and Gabriela Dabrowski’s cancer journey.
For ad-free listening and bonus content, Become a Friend.
Check out our new merch shop!
Talk tennis with Friends on The Barge!
Sign up to receive our free Newsletter (daily at Slams and weekly the rest of the year, featuring Matt’s Stat, mascot photos, Fantasy League updates, and more)
Follow us on Instagram (@thetennispodcast)
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.