In short
Sports media and legal battles—(1) the Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery merger facing state AG challenges in the US and possible UK intervention, (2) FIFA World Cup ticket resale lawsuits and FIFA’s ticketing policies, and (3) the Chicago Cubs’ fight over Wrigley Field “sight line” rooftop viewing rights across the street, including a long-running precedent-based legal dispute.
Guests
Eric Gardner, legal analyst and sports-law columnist for The Varsity/ Puck (writes weekly on law and sports).
Key claims
State AGs leading merger challenges is unusual but likely part of a broader trend; the merger likely won’t be stopped, but could be delayed and become costly enough to force remedies. FIFA is partly responsible for resale failures because FIFA controls ticket authentication/allocation, even if StubHub faces the clearest current liability. Cubs’ rooftop dispute turns on “information/control” analogies and property/vantage-point rights; a 19th-century Michigan case involving a barn stand was cited.
Notable examples
World Cup 2026/2034 rights uncertainty (hydration breaks, Saudi timing, 48–64 team expansion); Live Nation monopoly precedent; NBA v. Motorola pager updates; Cubs vs rooftop owner (Irish immigrant holdout); 1880s/1800s Wolverines barn-stands case.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOExploring Upcoming World Cups
1:41 to 3:40
Discussion on the upcoming 2030 and 2034 World Cups and media rights.
“I have my eyes on the 2030 and 2034 World Cups.”
Paramount-Warner Brothers Merger Analysis
3:40 to 7:16
Insights into the Paramount-Warner Brothers Discovery merger and state involvement.
“In the intro, I mentioned that you do a column every Monday for the Varsity private email that Puck puts out, the email on sports.”
State AGs and Merger Challenges
7:16 to 11:16
Eric Gardner discusses state AGs challenging mergers and potential impacts.
“If you remember a few months ago with the Live Nation case, the federal government cut a deal and then the states nevertheless went forward and led a trial that led to a monopoly verdict.”
Concerns Over European Regulations
11:16 to 14:00
Discussion on European regulation impacts on the merger.
“By the way, this illustrates to me completely why you are such a brilliant legal mind.”
World Cup Ticketing Controversy
14:03 to 17:10
Explore the issues surrounding ticket reselling and FIFA's role in World Cup accessibility.
“Okay, so I'm going to put words in your mouth again.”
The NFL and Ticket Reselling Dynamics
18:12 to 23:49
Discuss the implications of ticket reselling for the NFL compared to FIFA.
“Well, you're so good about sort of spinning your stories forward.”
Wrigley Rooftops Legal Battle
23:49 to 28:00
Uncover the ongoing legal disputes over rooftop ticket sales at Wrigley Field.
“Yeah, I think it's a more complicated situation than people in the industry sometimes kind of frame it for the public.”
Legal Battle Over Rooftop Views
28:00 to 31:50
Explore the ongoing legal disputes between the Chicago Cubs and rooftop owners over sight lines and property rights.
“And that led to all sorts of litigation, antitrust cases, and attempts at injunctions and all that.”
Commercialization of Sports Experiences
33:00 to 39:56
Discuss the impact of commercialization on sports experiences and legal precedents.
“In your story, you referenced a NASCAR F1 race where you have a balcony on an apartment.”
Antitrust and NFL Media Rights
39:57 to 42:08
Examine the implications of antitrust laws on NFL media rights and ongoing legal challenges.
“but still they can come to some sort of truce.”
Show all 12 chapters
Discussion on Lame Duck Session and Legislation
42:08 to 44:21
Exploration of the potential for college sports legislation to pass during the lame duck session.
“And, you know, there's an opportunity for people to gripe at the fact that, you know, some playoff game is on a streaming platform that they're not subscribed to.”
Impact of Legal Issues on Sports Landscape
44:23 to 46:11
Analysis of the legal challenges and implications for sports, including antitrust exemptions.
“Uh, so I think that, you know, if we're going to see something, uh, it's much more likely to happen kind of in November and December than, than anytime else.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Eriq Gardner:The Varsity Podcast is presented by MLB. The National Pastime will be celebrating America's 250th birthday with a summer full of special promotions and events, including MLB All-Star Week in Philadelphia. Fans can find more information at MLB.com slash July 4.
0:23Eriq Gardner:When others hear noise, T. Rowe Price interprets market signals to find investment opportunities. That's the power of active ETFs from T. Rowe Price. Their portfolio managers approach data from multiple perspectives, analyzing trends and conducting deep research to give you their curiosity-backed active management expertise. Learn more about their active ETFs at TROPrice.com slash explore ETFs. Exchange-traded funds ETFs are bought and sold at market prices, not NAV. Investors generally incur the cost of the spread between the prices at which shares are bought and sold. Buying and selling shares may result in brokerage commissions, which will reduce returns.
1:04Eriq Gardner:T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc.
1:10Eriq Gardner:Congratulations! You made the varsity of the podcast. My name is John Aranda, and I'm Puck Sports Correspondent and the host of this pod. And today, I'm going to chop it up with my friend, Eric Gardner. We work together at Puck, and I have to tell you, Eric is one of the smartest legal minds I've ever come across. He also happens to write a column every Monday on the law and sports for the Varsity's private email. And let me tell you, he never runs out of things to write about. Happy to have Eric here. But before we get to Eric Gardner, today is Wednesday, July 15th, And here's what I'm watching.
1:46Eriq Gardner:I have my eyes on the 2030 and 2034 World Cups. Yes, those are the next two World Cups, and the U.S. media rights for those two tournaments are open, and they're going to be negotiated in late fall or early winter. Now, there's been a lot of speculation so far about who's going to bid and how much these rights are worth, but I'm here to tell you nobody knows. Seriously, I've been talking to a lot of people about this and they really don't know. Okay, let me amend that a little bit, actually. We do know that Fox will bid for them. Fox has the rights right now and loves the World Cup. Netflix almost certainly will bid too.
2:26Eriq Gardner:Netflix bought the Women's World Cup rights and grabbing the men's tournament makes a lot of sense for Netflix as well. And you can bet that others like Disney, Telemundo, YouTube, Apple are also going to show a lot of interest. That seems pretty obvious. The problem is that none of them know exactly what they're going to be bidding on. None of them know at all what they're going to be bidding on. Will these games have hydration breaks? Most Americans think it's a no-brainer, but FIFA is not made up of most Americans. That's a$200 million decision right there, and it is not a foregone conclusion.
3:01Eriq Gardner:What about the 2034 World Cup in Saudi Arabia? The last World Cup in the Middle East was four years ago, and FIFA had to move those games from the summer to right in the middle of NFL season. That's another decision that's worth at least a couple of hundred million dollars. Also, how big will the tournament be? It expanded to 48 teams this year. FIFA has said it could go up to 64 teams. How do you come up with a bid for a tournament when you don't even know how big it will be? As one media executive told me, I guarantee you nobody who's bidding has any idea what they think it's worth. Okay, now let's get to Eric Gardner.
3:43Eriq Gardner:Eric Gardner, great to have you back. So many topics that we can choose from. In the intro, I mentioned that you do a column every Monday for the Varsity private email that Puck puts out, the email on sports. and you never run out of topics to discuss. Every time you file, it's like, okay, what are we going to talk about now? Because there's always something going on. But I want to start, and this is a fast-moving situation, so let's not talk specifics about the Paramount-Warner Brothers Discovery merger and the fact that the states are sort of looking to derail that or at least slow it down somewhat.
4:33Eriq Gardner:The federal government already said okay to this merger. It seems like something that should sail through. How much of a potential impediment is this for that merger happening? Yeah, I mean, that's what everyone's trying to figure out, even those involved in the transaction. You know, the key thing is that the Justice Department had a way to hold up the transaction by, you know, asking certain questions, demanding certain information. And there was a set schedule that would happen. You know, the states look like they want to challenge it, but they are going to have to get a court to agree to hold up the transaction.
5:17They're going to file a lawsuit and ask for an injunction. And then it's up for a court to decide whether they have a likelihood of prevailing in the case and the balance of harms and whether it makes sense to hold back the merger now or whether it's impossible for the merger to go forward and then maybe unwind it later on. but nothing is for sure at this moment.
5:49Eriq Gardner:The thing about what you write about, there's always precedents, and we're going to talk about the Cubs case later on where you bring up a precedent from the 1800s. What was the year that you brought up? 1856, I think it was. Yeah, yeah. It's probably one of the older ones. What's a precedent here? Is there a precedent where the states go after a business transaction or a business merger similar to this? Well, you know, states have long signed on to briefs that have challenged mergers, but they haven't really traditionally played the lead in challenging mergers. Usually it's been the federal government that does that sort of thing.
6:37You know, the difference now is the perception that the Trump administration is playing favorites, that they're cutting deals based on lobbying and all that. Plus, there's key sensitivities around the particular assets of this particular transaction, in particular, the news assets. And that gets into a very kind of political flavor. So the fact that states are doing this is certainly a little bit unprecedented. but I don't think that it's going to be the last merger that they will step forward on. If you remember a few months ago with the Live Nation case, the federal government cut a deal and then the states nevertheless went forward and led a trial that led to a monopoly verdict.
7:33So I think that they're kind of learning in real time how to prosecute these cases. They're organizing amongst themselves. They've been hiring outside counsel to handle cases of this flavor.
7:48Eriq Gardner:When you first heard that the states were going to do this, I'm curious what your initial reaction was. And I'm curious how your initial reaction has changed or everything sort of has confirmed in terms of where we are right now. Well, John, you'll be no surprise. You won't be surprised to learn that I kind of predicted this. You know, I did see the state AGs intervening on this pretty early on. So that didn't really surprise me. I mean, there are certain small things that did kind of surprise me. For instance, You talked about the Justice Department kind of, you know, blessing the merger. But, you know, what usually happens in instances like this is that, you know, they'll get the clear, but usually the DOJ won't issue like a full-throated statement that says, you know, the merger is pro-competitive.
8:53That was certainly unusual and kind of surprised me. you know the the fact that this has become such a political football is certainly something I certainly expected that and that's one of the reasons why I thought that that's you know state AGs in California and New York and maybe some of the more liberal states would would step forward but to the extent to which you know this is the rhetoric has grown and all that you know certainly I suppose, you know, you know, surprised me a little bit.
9:31Eriq Gardner:On a scale of like one to 10, 10 being this is in peril and this is going to kill this merger. And one being, yeah, this is like not even a speed bump in the road. What is the level of peril right now for the merger?
9:47I don't think that the merger is in danger. I think that the question really is, you know, how much delay it's going to take. And, you know, how costly that's going to be, because at a certain point, it gets to be so costly that, you know, the states may have leverage to force some divestitures. You know, maybe they can force David Ellison to sell off CNN to rescue, you know, the broader part of his merger deal. So, you know, there's certainly, I guess, posturing when it comes to those initial wins, which are going to lead to, you know, appellate battles. You know, I've seen some signs in recent days about, you know, how Paramount is, you know, looking all the way up to the Supreme Court on this case.
10:41And, you know, they hired, you know, one of the most prominent appellate litigators out there. And, you know, they're talking about, you know, resetting kind of the, you know, the big precedent for how these merger cases are measured. so you know I think that everyone's thinking both the long game and the short game ultimately I'd be shocked if this merger doesn't go through but I definitely think that there are some key battles ahead that will kind of define what sort of win it will be because it might not be as so clean as you know the transaction proceeding as is
11:22Eriq Gardner:By the way, this illustrates to me completely why you are such a brilliant legal mind. Because for every lawyer, there's not one lawyer that I've ever interviewed where I give them a scale of one to 10 that actually answers within that scale. We try to be. But everyone tries to kind of be like, be carefully. Yeah. The answer still told us a lot. The lawyerly way of kind of like, you know, weaseling, you know, in the middle there. So there's also some potential like little fires happening over in Europe. Is that anything to be concerned about? Well, I think most of Europe is going to be fine. I think that the European Union is busting the deal.
12:11There might be some minor concessions that they get. The key that I've highlighted is the UK, which kind of came out of nowhere on this. The UK has a kind of weird process. You know, in other jurisdictions in the world, you file paperwork, you wait for approvals, and then you get blessings, and then you close the merger. In the UK, it's, you know, it's kind of like informal talks. And then if there's some problem that gets worked out at the end. And that's how it figured to go here, except for, you know, the UK, you know, culture, you know, secretary, who's kind of in the midst of her own kind of political dance.
12:58She, you know, announced that she was minded to intervene on this. you know she talked about you know new legislation that could be brought forward and so suddenly there was a scramble to kind of figure out whether this would hinder the merger in any way we still don't have answers to that uh you know that might be figures to be settled in the next couple weeks um i i don't expect it to um you know delay the merger but it's it's possible and i i don't think anyone should ignore it. I think there's going to be a lot of attention and buzz towards the state AG stuff domestically this next week because it's the most tangible.
13:43It's a thing that reporters can read and understand. The UK thing, by contrast, is very abstract, but we shouldn't forget about it because it does have the potential of interfering. Whether it will or not is another question, but it's certainly something to watch.
14:03Eriq Gardner:Okay, so I'm going to put words in your mouth again. It sounds to me like these are all things that are somewhat concerning, but in terms of just delaying the inevitable, which is a merger that eventually is going to work through. Do I have that correct uh yeah more or less i mean i might use more hedging language than you did but but but uh it's a close approximation of where i feel yeah um i want to ask uh skip to the world cup um have you caught world cup fever have you been watching oh i've been i've been you know obsessed with it i've watched almost all the matches it's uh it's uh i you know i do work and I have the game on in the background.
14:48It's been great. I actually really do enjoy the World Cup.
14:53Eriq Gardner:Well, you had a story that's been out there about sort of the ticket resellers getting sued because they're selling and they don't actually have the tickets to sell. And it seems to me when I first read that story that it was a problem with the ticket resellers. like but you in your story and you made made it sound like this is really a fifa problem much more so than like you know say a stub hub problem or something like that i think it's a fifa problem i don't necessarily know whether it's a like a fifa legal problem like a legal endangerment or something like that because it sounds like to me like they're on on solid ground but the fact is that they've made this event so very expensive to attend and quite inaccessible unless you're willing to go through hoops and go through the process and pay the fees and all that.
15:56StubHub really was trying to figure out, is there some way we can manage the situation so that people can resell their tickets and all that. So you can kind of understand that. The problem is that it raises issues when it comes to authentication and when FIFA changes how tickets are allocated and all that. Unless you have buy-in from FIFA, the resell platforms don't exactly work. And so I think it's totally fair to attribute some blame to that to FIFA, not just StubHub. Now, whether or not that's a legal problem for FIFA is less unclear. It's certainly a legal problem for StubHub right now because they're in court with aggrieved ticket holders saying, hey, you promised us one thing and we didn't get it.
16:53As for FIFA, like I said, they may be on safer ground legally, if not morally.
17:09Eriq Gardner:This summer, I'm shopping the small space solutions that America waited 250 years for at Bob's Discount Furniture. Bob's has everything from retro chic bedroom sets with plenty of storage, party-ready dining sets in four fun colors, stylish and space-conscious Bob-o-pedic sofas to feature-packed power recliners that let me kick back all summer long. So when you're ready to snag latest trends in small space styling, stop in or shop online at Bob's Discount Furniture, where America shops for furniture. Hey there, it's Jill Schlesinger. I'm launching a new show. It's called Money Moves, and your money is going to move.
17:46Eriq Gardner:We're going to help you make better financial decisions. We're going to call out the BS you're finding all over social media. We're going to give you actionable guidance to make your financial life clearer, less stressful. We're going to answer your financial questions and take the mystery out of your financial life. Follow and listen to Money Moves with Jill Schlesinger wherever you get your podcasts.
18:12Eriq Gardner:Well, you're so good about sort of spinning your stories forward. If I'm the NFL, why don't I take FIFA's position? Why am I sort of seeding the ticket reselling market to somebody like StubHub, right? Yeah, I mean, it's a little different, just the way that the member organizations are set up and one's international, one's domestic. Tickets are different than, say, television rights. It's easier to separate out television rights with tickets. It's a license, basically. you know, there's disclaimers on it and all that. So we're talking about different markets here. But certainly, yeah, if the NFL wanted to assert more control over the product, if teams, you know, wanted to assert more control over the product, they could, you know, probably, you know, take some lessons here and try to capture more of their resale value.
19:20and you know I would be surprised if that actually does happen now the the stories are
19:28Eriq Gardner:not quite heart-wrenching but they're they're terrible stories you know people that have traveled to Mexico so they have plane fare they have hotel fare they have you know this sort of vacation fare with the full expectation that they have then tickets for the game that they're they actually traveled to see and then they go and look and again the tickets have been recalled or There were no tickets to start with. It seems like I'm actually surprised it's gotten to this point. It seems like, again, I'm not a legal expert, but it seems like an open and shut case to me. Like, you know, StubHub, you know, provided a platform that had these tickets available and the tickets weren't available.
20:09Eriq Gardner:It seems like this is something StubHub. You say it's open and shut, but then there'll be defenses premised on the fine print of the waivers that you signed when you clicked by. I love the fine print. Whether this belongs in open court or whether it belongs in arbitration. Like at the end of the day, maybe they are at fault and they do owe something. But the question is, do they owe a whole entire class action of people? Why is there damages here? Is it the damages for one ticket or is it damages towards thousands of consumers? And so it's more complicated than did they do legally wrong. The question really is are they going to get punished to the extent that they change practices or not?
21:05Eriq Gardner:You know what I still don't get a sense of? Is this unique to the 2026 World Cup in North America? Or is this a suggestion of some change in ticketing policies or in ticketing resale values or something along those lines? I definitely think FIFA changed ticketing policies as far as I understand things. For 2026, they incorporated dynamic pricing and limited demand and they had different kind of release strategies. and they, you know, definitely intended this to make this a very expensive event. And you know what? It's been a very successful event. It's been well attended. You know, it's gotten a lot of eyeballs.
21:52You know, at the end of the day, I think that they will regard this as a smashing success and will continue, you know, these policies moving forward. So, you know, for all the, you there are out there, FIFA can say, hey, those are problems with the resellers. They need to get on board with our kind of program. And I think that everything that they've done, they will feel emboldened by. Yeah.
22:25Eriq Gardner:And I have such bad news for consumers or for sports fans. is FIFA, there are all these complaints about the cost of tickets, and they are absurdly high to me. But you're watching most games. You see empty seats in those stadiums. The stadiums get filled by raucous fans that are out there. And FIFA had two things coming. One is the U.S. sports market is so mature that they knew they could charge a higher ticket price than they could in other markets that they go to. And secondly, you hear this complaint from owners, like anybody involved with the business of sports, is that they sell tickets and then they watch the resellers sell them at a multiple of that.
23:20Eriq Gardner:And they're like, why are we allowing somebody else to make that much money off our ticket? We should be we should be putting we should be selling the ticket at that high price, just like they do on Broadway or just like they do for the ballet or things like that. So so so this whole story that that you are writing about with the FIFA tickets and, you know, the reseller just not having it available. It hits so many of different themes within the sports business to me. Yeah, I think it's a more complicated situation than people in the industry sometimes kind of frame it for the public. I mean, on one hand, yeah, it's easy to blame scalpers and resellers and say they're, you know, you know, they're taking advantage of consumers.
24:04And, you know, they're the reason why ticket prices are so high. On the other hand, you want to, you know, be able to give people the ability to, you know, dispose of their tickets if they buy them and can no longer make the event. You know, you want kind of like latitude and freedom there. So, you know, I think, you know, honestly, I've always, you know, felt more antipathy towards to kind of the systemic scalpers out there, the ones that buy up like thousands of tickets, you know, the second something opens for sale and then resells them. But, you know, I can distinguish that from just having a reselling platform at large, because I definitely think that there are, you know, good needs for that.
24:57You know, I think I think, you know, there should be kind of, you know, a change, a changing of ticket control in the marketplace. I think that's a that's a good thing to have.
25:10Eriq Gardner:A final question on this topic. Why did you decide to write that? There are so many legal stories out there that deal with sports. Why did this catch your fancy? A couple of reasons. One, it was just very timely. Everyone was talking about World Cup. And the other reason was that a lot of people were asking me about this. They just couldn't believe that, you know, FIFA has this reputation of being like, sorry to put it so bluntly, but corrupt. And so a lot of people, you know, were, were asking me, you know, uh, you know, can FIFA get away with this? Is, is, is this, is this kosher? Um, and so, you know, it was, it was something that I was paying attention to and, and just trying to, to try to frame it the best that I could.
Read the full transcript
26:04And it felt like a good time to do it.
26:07Eriq Gardner:you had a story uh in the varsity on monday of this week uh that i i found fascinating and it's about the wrigleyville it's about the cubs and the uh the buildings across the street that sell access and not quite access but sell sight lines so that you can you can look in i've been on those buildings a bunch of times it's a great experience i love it and it's a very unique to to uh Wrigley as well. That's a moving through the courts. The Cubs have been wanting to shut that down for as long as I've been writing about this. You said that they, in the story, they had a 20-year deal where they sort of like kind of didn't quite bless it, but didn't fight it.
26:52Eriq Gardner:But now they're fighting it. What's going on there? Yeah, I mean, we're talking about more than a quarter century coming to its conclusion here, the final chapter. And it's pretty exciting. Yeah, to back up for a second, there was a time when this was seen as a civic convention, you know, culturally important, and the legislature lusted in all that. And the team didn't like it, but they begrudgingly went along with it. They made this 20-year deal. And then they worked with the rooftop owners in exchange for, I guess, a cut. And so everything was peaceful. But then the team changed hands. The Tribune Company sold it to the Ricketts family, and they hated the arrangements.
27:48And so from day one, they were trying to figure out a way to get out of it. And so they started putting up screens in the outfield that obstructed views. And that led to all sorts of litigation, antitrust cases, and attempts at injunctions and all that. And the team was mostly victorious there. And one by one, all the rooftop owners kind of sold out. They said, oh, we can't win this. But there was one holdout. and for the last few years the Cubs and this one holdout have been you know duking it out you know going through discovery uh you know taking depositions and trying to kind of research the the genesis of it and now they've teed up this you know big uh you know great legal uh case about you know who actually owns the sight lines and and you know it looks like we're going to get like a great conclusion where a judge is going to have to come in and give an opinion that stands the test of time.
28:52Eriq Gardner:Yeah, I've been on those rooftops. I love being on those rooftops. It's an, as you wrote, it's an Irish immigrant that owns one of the rooftops. So, of course, I'm supporting that as well. But I do have to tell you, this is sort of having covered media, like that what what you know the what's happening on that field you know that that's that's worth a lot of money you know it's i i can i can see that the the club's point on this uh take me through like why like for for for the owner of the building across the street like what what is their case on this yeah so it's i mean the legal perspective is kind of interesting because there's been a lot of free rider cases out there.
29:40And so if you frame the case as, you know, like, who has the ability to capture what's going on in the game, you could see this as being kind of like a different, you know, version of, like, who has the right to broadcast a game? Or, you know, there was a case between the NBA and Motorola at the end of the 20th century where, you know, Motorola was providing pager updates on what was going on in the game. And that led to this whole case about, you know, who had the right to information flowing from the game. And so in that framework, you could see the team is kind of having the upper hand, because if you kind of treat that as control over information from the game, then everything else looks like kind of unfair competition.
30:30Now where the rooftop owner comes in is they say, hey, you're putting on a game in public view, and we have a property right, and we are completely within our right to sell access to our building. As long as we don't go too far and misrepresent things here. You know, our view belongs to us. You know, you don't own our view. It's our view. It's our vantage point. You know, you can't block us from, you know, seeing Lake Michigan. And if you're going to, you know, play a game within our sight lines, you can't, you know, there's only so much things you can do there. And not only that, but, you know, the city legislature has recognized this and they quasi-sanctioned it.
31:35And so before you do anything that messes with that, you've got to be conscious of that too. So that basically is their case.
31:52Not all electric vehicles are designed the same.
31:55Eriq Gardner:Toyota Electric is built to work for you. Grounded in years of proven engineering, it feels intuitive from the start. The Toyota BZ for smooth, everyday driving. The BZ Woodland for all-terrain capability. The all-new CHR for an instant, responsive drive. It's not just electric, it's Toyota Electric. We make it easy. Toyota. Let's go places. Imagine you're finally cleaning out your gutters when the smoke alarm starts blaring from inside. Smoke billows out of the window. ADT's affordable DIY systems are built for those moments where everything can change in a second. They're easy to set up, customizable, and help keep your home safe with 24-7 monitoring.
32:38No one wants to feel unsafe at home, and with ADT, you won't.
32:41Eriq Gardner:ADT prioritizes your peace of mind with the most company-operated monitoring centers in the industry. With the ADT Plus app, you stay in control from virtually anywhere. Don't wait to prepare for an emergency. When every second counts, count on ADT. Visit ADT.com or call 1-800-ADT-ASAP.
33:03Eriq Gardner:In your story, you referenced a NASCAR F1 race where you have a balcony on an apartment. you know that and uh i was trying to come up with creative scenarios here yeah well it is like like i i bought into a golf course community and there's a pga tournament on mike on my golf course i i like i can't watch it out of my backyard are there other leagues that would be interested in joining in with the cubs or interested even in joining in with uh with the the um um apartment building owner, not apartment building owner. I imagine that after a ruling comes, there might be appeals. And once it gets onto appeal, it'll be interesting to see, you know, who's going to file a friend of the court brief on behalf of the Cubs.
33:55You know, will there be other sports organizations that do so? And will property owners stand on the other side of things? it's an interesting question because you know I you know although this is kind of a unique thing I can't think of you know other baseball stadiums that you know that have this problem
34:16Eriq Gardner:in our backyard in Camden Yards you have hotels like that that I guess they're not charging people at that which is there I think their vantage point isn't isn't enough that that they can actually follow a game enough so that it replaces the experience of buying a Camden Yards ticket. I mean, for the Chicago Cubs, I think those rooftops kind of compete with them for tickets, and that's the problem. But - It does. I've been in a luxury box inside Wrigley, and to call it a luxury box is hilarious. It's so cramped and, you know, across the street. That's a lovely experience. It's, you know, the sight lines aren't quite as good, but, you know, of course.
35:05Eriq Gardner:But, you know, everything is a little bit more open and spacious and, you know, not 100 years old. We were talking before about, you know, FIFA and, you know, kind of, you know, taking every commercial advantage when it when it comes to the event. And you can definitely see, you know, as these leagues are trying to grow, as teams, you know, try to commercialize everything, to, you know, commercialize kind of the, you know, periphery experiences. So that once they have, you know, sold every ticket within a stadium, they move on to everything surrounding a stadium. Or F1 is a perfect example because they do the races in Las Vegas on the streets.
36:01And so you talk about hotels overlook those streets. You could certainly see crackdowns happening and them really trying to control the inventory of the experience of being there. And so, yeah, I think this case travels.
36:25Eriq Gardner:Yeah, and it's the whole push and pull. And this is with the tickets, too. Like, you know, the owners want to make as much money as they can. They're running a for-profit business. And there is still the sense that, you know, it's part of the fabric of the town. The Cubs are Chicago. It's part of the fabric of the town, for goodness sakes. And so you can see that push and pull happening a lot in all these cases as well. I do want to quiz you, though. You brought up a case from 18 – what was it? Was it 1886? Do you know it off the top of your head? I think – was it 1867 or something? Something very close to there.
37:10Yeah, well before either of us were born, Eric. Yeah.
37:16Eriq Gardner:What was that case and how does that apply? Yeah, it was the team in Detroit at the time, the Wolverines, they were in the National League at that time. And this was at a time before big stadiums were built and they were playing on fields that might resemble where high schools play or something like that. And this was a dispute with someone who owned a barn and who had put stands on top of his barn. So he was charging people to, you know, basically climb up and watch the game from the top of his barn. And the team rushed to the court to get an injunction on this. And this case went all the way to the Michigan Supreme Court and kind of refused the team's efforts here.
38:09um you know it's it's it's amazing that that that something like this has been dusted off you know 140 years later but uh but it really is like kind of one of the precedents here
38:23Eriq Gardner:precedent is precedent eric uh do you have any kind of sense at how this is gonna shape out i mean i i it'd be a mistake to bet against the team they they're just the like the big powerful, you know, body here with lots of lawyers. But, you know, this Irish immigrant is no sludge. You know, he has lawyers and, you know, his briefing has been fairly impressive. And, you know, he's certainly stubborn. A lot of others backed out. He's stood and, you know, His arguments aren't terrible, so I wouldn't bet on him happening, bet on him winning. But who knows if he can at least maybe push it past some rejudgment, if he could convince a judge that maybe there are triable issues here and that he should go to trial.
39:20Maybe the team reflects and says, you know, we don't want to go before a jury on something like this. and maybe he can kind of push his way into a settlement where he can get another couple decades worth of views on this. Or maybe they can come up with an arrangement. He says the team is demanding concessions that would make it impossible for him to profit off of his enterprise. Maybe there's room there for some give and take where the Cubs back off a little bit on what they're demanding, but still they can come to some sort of truce.
40:05Eriq Gardner:Last time I had you on this pod, Eric, I think we spent the full time talking about the NFL. And they have the case going through, the Sunday ticket case going through that could change. It's going through the courts right now that could change the way that they sell their media rights moving forward. We have Congress increasingly taking a look at the NFL and bashing them and trying to take out its antitrust or taking a close look at its antitrust exemption. Nobody's actually threatened to pull that away anytime soon. But things have been relatively quiet from my perspective on things. What's your perspective?
40:48Yeah, I mean, certainly. I mean, it made a lot of noise about a month ago. And it will make noise in the future. I think that this is kind of like the quiet period where people are waiting for things to happen. A couple of, I guess, what we're waiting for is one is that Ninth Circuit opinion, which, thanks to you, I am refreshing my Ninth Circuit website at 12.30 p.m. Are you tired of me asking you what's happening with that? What's happening with that? No, no, no, no. No, the second it comes out, you will know sooner than almost anyone because you will be getting a text message from me. But until that happens, the legal ground isn't shifted.
41:35As far as legislation, you can imagine that there's a lot of unresolved things that Washington hasn't gotten to yet. And the NFL situation isn't very high on their list of priorities. You know, perhaps there will be some sort of sports antitrust package that, you know, rolls in the lame duck session after the midterms when, you know, the NFL is on. And, you know, there's an opportunity for people to gripe at the fact that, you know, some playoff game is on a streaming platform that they're not subscribed to. But until then, I think that things are going to quiet down a little bit until things blow up once again.
42:32And they will. Trust me, they will.
42:34Eriq Gardner:yeah i i want to talk about that lame duck session because there's a also the college sports bill that that's sort of going through that uh my uh political sources say like has no chance of moving through except for possibly during the lame duck session because who knows what's going to happen there right what uh in the lame duck session like how how real is that possibility that either one or both of these could sort of get through there? Well, I mean, the way I see it is that lame duck sessions are often good for catching up on things that were left undone because the politics were too hot, or they're good things at, you know, sometimes there's a bipartisan consensus on certain issues, but they kind of fell in the pecking order.
43:32And I think maybe college sports and legislation on the sports front maybe falls into that category where there isn't necessarily a political divide on a lot of these issues. It's more about, you know, the wherewithal and the timing and there's so much to be done um so you know could could we guarantee it happens no but you know if some you know if ted cruz or you know someone powerful um decides that it's something that that should happen it could move quickly um you know we'll just have to see but the you know the thing is that
44:15Eriq Gardner:if it doesn't go through in the lame duck then it just it goes back to square one both of them Let's go back to square one. Yeah, it could be reintroduced in the next Congress. But I think actually it stands a better chance of passing in the lame duck session than it does next year when there'll be competing priorities, when maybe the Democrats will have taken one or two chambers and will have, you know, all sorts of anti-Trump agenda points on their list. Uh, so I think that, you know, if we're going to see something, uh, it's much more likely to happen kind of in November and December than, than anytime else.
45:01Eriq Gardner:So you cover the sports legal landscape. Where do these fall in terms of your priority list? Is it, is it at the top? Cause it's the NFL or is it just kind of like going so slowly that it's in the middle? it's near the top not just because it's the NFL and everyone cares about football but because you know these are legal issues that are going to impact the sports landscape at large you know the way that you know teams allegedly conspire with each other and and you know it gets to so many different issues you know I mean going back to baseball for for instance I mean, baseball has an antitrust exemption, but there's doubts about whether the antitrust exemption will continue to exist.
45:53They're in the midst of a labor dispute. And if there isn't a deal that's made, that's probably going to provoke litigation, antitrust litigation. So there's all sorts of different connective pieces. And so it is a good starting point for a lot of them.
46:16Eriq Gardner:Eric, always great to talk, man. Thank you very much for doing this. We'll see you in the Slack. My pleasure. Okay, time for the acknowledgments. Thanks to Eric Gardner for joining this week. Thanks to you for listening to The Varsity, an Odyssey podcast in partnership with Puck. Thanks to Puck's executive editors, Gabi Grossman, Ben Landy, John Kelly. Thanks to the great Bob Tabador from Odyssey. and a special shout out to Greg Poth, who did Yeoman's Duties for Nessun today. If you like this podcast, sign up for my newsletter. It's also called The Varsity. Head over to puck.news. Use the code word TheVarsity, all one word for a 20 % discount.
46:52Eriq Gardner:I will see you on Sunday.
47:00Eriq Gardner:Look around. Every car you see is probably on AutoTrader. New cars, used cars, electric cars. As for flying cars, Well, we're ready when they are. If you see a car you like, find it on Autotrader. That's our kind of thing, Autotrader.
From the publisher
Puck’s legal expert Eriq Gardner joins John to work through a docket’s worth of sports media legal battles—from the looming challenges to the Paramount-WBD merger to the NFL’s ongoing antitrust case. Plus, a long-simmering dispute between the Chicago Cubs and the rooftop owners over sightlines into Wrigley.
