In short
The episode compares (1) why Saturday night sports are drawing bigger audiences due to Nielsen counting more “out-of-home” viewers, and (2) the ongoing Disney vs. YouTube TV carriage dispute, arguing it’s not a typical cable fight because YouTube’s incentives and leverage differ.
Guests
John Arand (host; Puck sports correspondent) and Julia Alexander (Puck media writer; regular on The Grill Room with Dylan Byers; covers streaming/media negotiations).
Key claims
- Nielsen’s increased “out-of-home” measurement makes Saturday marquee events (e.g., MLB World Series Game 7) more attractive to networks.
- Disney/ESPN disputes with YouTube TV are driven by money/price and may last, but resolution is likely because sports rights are too valuable to keep bleeding subscribers.
- YouTube TV is strategically important to YouTube for owning the TV viewing “consumer journey,” ad/CTV monetization, and product integrations (“ingestion”).
- Disney’s leverage is stronger on VOD/YouTube content than in live-TV carriage alone; a “go dark on YouTube” threat is discussed as a potential pressure tactic.
Notable examples
- World Series Game 7: 27M viewers; ~5–6M out-of-home.
- YouTube TV fights with Fox/NBC/Univision cited as prior resolved disputes.
- NFL Brazil game on YouTube with creator “Watch With It” simulcasts (including iShowSpeed) framed as a tech/creator monetization experiment, not fan-creation.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Shift to Saturday Night Sports
0:00 to 0:24
Discussion on the changing dynamics of sports viewership on Saturday nights.
“Hey, it's Bill from the Bill Simmons podcast.”
The Shift to Saturday Night Sports
2:36 to 4:50
Discussion on the changing dynamics of sports viewership on Saturday nights.
“And once again, I want to focus on baseball.”
YouTube TV and Disney Negotiations
4:50 to 6:45
Examining the ongoing negotiation issues between YouTube TV and Disney.
“OK, now let's get to my puck colleague, Julia Alexander.”
Content Value and Industry Leverage
6:45 to 12:10
Analysis of how the value of content impacts negotiations in the streaming industry.
“Justin Connelly for the Disney is in an enclosed office and nobody's allowed to talk to him.”
Consumer Behavior in Streaming
12:10 to 14:01
Exploration of consumer behavior and choices in the current streaming landscape.
“Advertising dollars are a fraction of what you get from affiliate dollars, but they're out selling against, you you know, ad buys and the idea of, you know, you need to be on YouTube.”
Consumer Choices in Streaming Services
14:01 to 19:18
Explore consumer behavior regarding YouTube TV and competitor platforms amidst carriage disputes.
“and they don't want to go through the hassle of putting in so many credit cards and managing subscriptions.”
YouTube TV's Strategy and Market Position
20:24 to 28:00
Discuss the strategic importance of YouTube TV in the evolving landscape of broadcast and streaming.
“They invested a couple billion dollars in NFL Sunday ticket.”
The Evolving Landscape of Streaming and Content Partnerships
28:00 to 36:50
Explore the importance of content partnerships between major media companies and YouTube in the current streaming landscape.
“And they kind of still are on the VOD side, but they've managed to move past that.”
YouTube's Strategy in Sports Content
37:41 to 42:00
Discuss YouTube's current approach to sports content and its implications for audience engagement.
“Third-party build subscriptions continue until canceled.”
YouTube's Experiment with NFL Games
42:00 to 47:20
Discussing YouTube's strategy to use NFL games to increase engagement and explore audience behaviors.
“But they don't have significant audience in certain age demos who are opening up YouTube all the time.”
Show all 11 chapters
Analyzing YouTube's Sports Strategy
47:20 to 50:55
Examining the implications of YouTube's sports viewership numbers and creator involvement in live events.
“He's like, look at my numbers on YouTube.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Hey, it's Bill from the Bill Simmons podcast. FIFA World Cup 26 fans, listen up. As the official beer sponsor of the FIFA World Cup 26, Michelob Ultra is giving away$1 million worth of FIFA World Cup 26 tickets and prizes. Enter now at MichelobUltra.com slash superior access slash FIFA World Cup 26. Michelob Ultra FIFA World Cup 26, superior access, no purchase necessary. Open U.S. Residence 21 Plus begins on December 1st, 2025, ends on July 31st, 2026, multiple entry periods. Visit www.micelobUltra.com slash superior access slash FIFA World Cup 26 for free entry, entry deadlines, prizes, and details.
0:30Study and play. Come together on a Windows 11 PC. And for a limited time, college students get the best of both worlds. Get the Unreal College Deal. Everything you need to study and play with select Windows 11 PCs. Eligible students get a year of Microsoft 365 Premium and a year of Xbox Game Pass Ultimate with a custom color Xbox wireless controller. Learn more at windows.com slash student offer. While supplies last. Ends June 30th. Terms at aka.ms slash college PC.
1:05congratulations you made the varsity the podcast my name is john arand and i am pucks sports correspondent and the host of this pod and today you're going to become privy to a conversation that typically occurs on pucks slack channel my colleague julia alexander probably knows more about the business of streaming than anybody else. Julia is a regular on Puck's media podcast, The Grill Room with Dylan Byers. She also helps to write on The Varsity and on what I'm hearing to private emails that come out of Puck. And I'm happy to have her here on this one. This should be fun. But before you get to Julia Alexander, today is Wednesday, November 5th.
1:47And before I get into what I'm watching these days, I need to deliver some news about this very podcast. The varsity is headed to TV. Yes, we did a deal to spread our show onto a platform that's been in decline for a decade. And not just any channel. It's a deal with an RSN, and we all know how those go. Seriously, I'm excited to partner with Nessun, who's going to produce video for a twice-weekly program that's going to run on Nessun and Sportsnet Pittsburgh on Mondays and Wednesdays at 6 p.m. Video from the show is also going to be on Nessun 360, the Nessun Nation Fast Channel, Nessun's YouTube page.
2:27But this podcast, regular listeners, don't worry. The audio version of this pod is still going to be available wherever you podcast. So now to what I'm watching. And once again, I want to focus on baseball. Or more specifically, Saturday night's Game 7, which had an audience of 27 million viewers. Okay, I know. It's a Game 7. It's a World Series. It's Shohei Ohtani and the Los Angeles Dodgers. But I am utterly fascinated by the idea that Saturday night has become a destination for big-time sports. It never used to be. In fact, TV executives have always viewed it like a wasteland. It's always the least viewed night of the week.
3:14I mean, people go out on Saturday nights, And that has meant that TV executives historically have never wanted to put marquee games on Saturday night. But there's been a big change that has made Saturday night much more desirable to these TV networks. And that deals with the way that Nielsen, the ratings agency, counts viewers. I mean, people are still going out on Saturday night. But over the past year, Nielsen has started counting those viewers, called out-of-home viewers, much more than they have in the past. So Fox and MLB felt much more relaxed about putting Game 7 on a Saturday night because of those 27 million viewers who watched Game 7, about 20 % of them, 5 or 6 million, watched out-of-home.
4:04And that is a significant number. So while the new focus on counting out of home viewers has really helped all sports viewership, I mean, why do you think every sport is seeing its biggest audience in years these days? It's especially evident on Saturday nights. I mean, just look at the numbers for ABC's Saturday Night SEC package of college football games or the NFL Saturday Night Playoff ratings. League and networks no longer feel like they have to dodge Saturday nights anymore. And that's a real sea change in the business. And before I hear from people pointing out that the World Series moved Game 7 to Saturday night to avoid the NFL, yes, of course they did.
4:42I know that. Believe me, you can't find another sport who would try to take the NFL on head to head. The fact is, Saturday night is now a destination for big time sports. OK, now let's get to my puck colleague, Julia Alexander. Okay, we're taping this podcast on Tuesday and there's no YouTube TV Disney deal. There doesn't appear to be a YouTube TV Disney deal in the offing. One might come in the next couple of days. This has been a negotiation that's surprised me at every single level because all of the issues that YouTube TV has dealt with in its fights with Univision, and its fights with NBC and its fights with Fox, all of which happened over the past three months.
5:33Those have all been solved. This battle with Disney comes down to money and it comes down to price. And historically, I've been covering this stuff for so long. Historically, when it comes down to price, it means that they're going to meet. They'll meet in the middle or they'll meet little bit towards one way or the other. These two haven't met in the middle. They don't appear to be close to meeting in the middle. And again, I don't even know what my question is here, Julia, but every time you cover these types of disputes, you talk to people involved with the disputes and they say it could go on for weeks and then it's solved within hours.
6:18And so I'm used to that and I'm used to being snowed, but it does appear that YouTube has the will and the money and the lack of commitment to content. And what I mean by that is like, they're all tech guys over there. It's YouTube is a tech company, basically. And this could be a fight that goes on for a while. It could be one that gets solved by the time people are listening to this. But you have a story in the varsity that came out on Tuesday that sort of walks into this. Take me through how you view this. Well, I think, too, in this case, as you know, John, as you've reported for weeks and months at this point, YouTube also has the advantage of having Justin Connolly now, who knows the weaknesses of Disney's business and the advantages of Disney's business.
7:10I have to jump in here. Justin Connelly for the Disney is in an enclosed office and nobody's allowed to talk to him.
7:20That's good. That's good. He goes to the water cooler. People have to turn their back. You know, perfect. Perfect. No, in all seriousness. But yeah, he they they have committed that he he is not going to be part of these talks at all, either internally or externally. I would imagine like you're in an office that there has to be something going on, but I don't want to speculate that they're breaking the contract. Okay, so it's an even playing field, except that, as I outlined in my piece, carriage disputes, to your point, John, have always been relatively equal playing fields in terms of the value of content on the business.
8:01And what I mean by that is if you are Disney or NBCUniversal, the money that you got paid by the cable companies, by the distributors for the content you have allowed you to then invest in further content. So it allowed you to kind of build this business because you had this money flowing in from the cable companies who needed it. And on the other side of the equation, the cable companies were willing to pay for the content in order to have something to sell to consumers. And so there was an equal weighted leverage. And you could argue that, you know, having Monday Night Football is going to be a more prescient leverage on Sunday night if you're in a negotiation, let's say Disney and DirecTV.
8:40But relatively speaking, the terms were one to one. And with YouTube TV and YouTube at large, and this is what I really want to get into with you, that's just not the case. Because although the fight right now is between Disney and YouTube TV, although the fight last month was between NBCUniversal and YouTube TV, we're talking about a product under Google, you know, a$3 trillion company who posts more than$102 billion in revenue in a quarter alone, who makes the vast majority of its advertising revenue outside of Google search through YouTube, the main platform. YouTube TV is a nice component to owning the consumer journey, but they don't necessarily need this piece of the puzzle.
9:26They like having it. I think they want to use it for further product integrations down the line, but they could have this fight go on and on. And so the argument I've been thinking about, which feels a little insane because it's like completely out the lines of a traditional carriage dispute, is if you're Disney or if you're NBC uni and you know that YouTube and YouTube TV are going to have further leverage because they make more money at the same time that Disney and all of them are losing more money on the pay TV side, isn't it about time to consider the approach to YouTube? How about going dark on YouTube at the same time that you're pulling content from YouTube TV?
10:04That's where I think we need to get more creative. And we meaning the legacy industry that I am not a part of. I don't know why I said we, But that's where they need to get more creative as opposed to just viewing YouTube TV as a standard cares dispute because it's not. I think one of the unique aspects of this dispute, of all these disputes, I mean, YouTube TV has gained a reputation in the business. I mean, these types of disputes have happened for decades with Comcast and with Charter and DirecTV. So this isn't unique to YouTube, but their negotiating stance and how they're trying to just really change the business is as rankled a lot of these networks.
10:48I've talked to several network network heads. Well, affiliate heads, people that do that do these for a living. They go into these discussions and they're kind of shocked by the demands that YouTube have because they're not legacy distributors. They're trying to keep their costs down and they're trying to, again, change the way that they do business. And if you're Disney or Fox or NBC, you're saying like, wow, a$3 billion or excuse me, billion that I wish$3 trillion company is trying to keep costs down. Like, like give me a break. So your point of this overall big, bigger YouTube play, they do need content.
11:37The thing that I'm looking at is whether the leverage here is starting to change a little bit because YouTube can withstand consumer defections up to, well, again, a$3 trillion company can withstand a lot of consumer defections. how much does ESPN depend on those 8 million subscribers, most of whom are hardcore sports fans, which is why they went to YouTube TV first. And, you know, they're out. Advertising dollars are a fraction of what you get from affiliate dollars, but they're out selling against, you you know, ad buys and the idea of, you know, you need to be on YouTube. You need to be on YouTube TV.
12:26You need to be on all of these things because the ESPN app isn't going to account for anything more than that. And so I'm not ready to say that the leverage has changed. I don't believe it has changed. I still do believe that the Cowboys and the Cardinals game on Monday night caused a ton of defections. The Eagles-Packers game this upcoming Monday night is going to cause even more defections. Another weekend of SEC football is going to cause even more defections. And at some point, if YouTube TV wants to keep this business going, I think that's where the real leverage lies. But one of the aspects that I'm looking at is whether or not the leverage is just at least slightly changing to where ESPN needs YouTube more than, say, it needed Comcast in the past or Charter in the past or something like that.
13:17Oh, yeah. And you can look at the potentials, right? And there's so many different potentials in this scenario because it's easier to cancel your virtual TV cable service like a YouTube TV than it was to exit out of a Charter plan back in the day. And so it's easy for people to say, I'm going to cancel YouTube TV. I'm going to sign up for the ESPN app. I'm going to sign up for Hulu Live or Fubo, which are, of course, also Disney. They might say, I'm going to keep my YouTube TV. I'm just not going to cancel it. And I'll sign up for some kind of one month trial of another one and see if this lasts that long.
13:52Consumers and streaming are extremely intelligent. They're frustrated and they're fragmented, but they're smart. And they know that these things will probably resolve. and they don't want to go through the hassle of putting in so many credit cards and managing subscriptions. So in terms of how impactful this is on anyone's bottom line, still like to be determined overall. But I think if you look at - I will say, let me, if I can jump in real quick. Yeah, of course. I think you're totally right. These disputes have happened for decades. And so there is a, you have people that are consumers that, okay, if I leave YouTube and then go back to Xfinity or Comcast, they're going to have this problem down the line.
14:34I may as well just stick here. The problem with YouTube is that they're just coming out of a period where they had this problem with Fox. They had NBC, who fights with nobody, was putting out messages to consumers saying, we might go black. They dropped Univision. Now they dropped ESPN. And so with consumers, it might be taking a look at YouTube TV and saying, you know, these guys are game for a fight and they're using us as pawns. I'd rather go to a DirecTV stream or, you know, Hulu plus live TV and just take my chances there. I'm curious to see if the data reflects that consumer distrust. And I don't see it currently.
15:17I don't think people are going, oh, I don't trust YouTube TV anymore, in part because it's so easy to go back and forth between things. like if you were canceling your cable service back in the day and then signing up for new cable. So, I mean, it was just like it was a tremendous pain. You're like, if I'm doing this once that we're done, it's like moving a house. Like I'm never doing this again. We'll just stick with it. So the threats of the blackouts felt more severe. These feel like annoyances and they absolutely annoy customers and customers are over it. You're seeing Disney, I think, really smartly in this carriage dispute use their stars like Greenberg and Stephen A.
15:56Smith and even their meteorologists out in Chicago who've got huge followings. I didn't see the meteorologists. That's a good one. Yeah, people are sending them to me. And according to my Chicago friends, it's a big deal. And they were posting these 15 second, looking into the camera, very YouTube creator style videos saying, we are sorry that we're no longer on your YouTube TV. It's not our fault. It's this$3 trillion company who doesn't want to give us the money. The thing I keep going back to is if you look at how more and more people are engaging with sports in general, it's something I write quite a bit about.
16:32It's not that they're not watching live sports or they don't want to. I think that gets misconstrued. People absolutely want to watch live sports and live games. And we see the numbers from the World Series. We see numbers from football every week. We know that people want to watch it. What we are seeing happen increasingly is that people are willing to fill in the time with their first sports fans with short form content, which happens on YouTube. They're watching highlights on YouTube. They're watching certain things that are happening on YouTube. There's some really crazy stats out from a bunch of different data firms.
17:05One example is that close to 80 % of sports content that was uploaded to YouTube in the first half of 2025 in the United States was uploaded as YouTube shorts, right? So that's a space where YouTube, by the way, lags behind competition like Meta with Instagram and Facebook and TikTok. And so that's a really big area of growth focus for YouTube. It's something that Neil Mohan, the CEO, talks about constantly. It's something that Sundar Pichai, who's the CEO of Google, specifically calls out on earnings. They know it's a place where they want to grow. Sports are central to that. These sports uploads are coming from leagues and teams and fans, but they're also coming from ESPN.
17:44They're coming from Disney owned and NBCU owned and other properties. And so there's this this this game I play out in my head, which is if you're going to target YouTube TV because it's something you know you need. I agree to 100 percent, John. They need the money coming in from YouTube TV. And I think YouTube absolutely wants to work with Disney in some capacity. But Disney's leverage, like all the other content creators, is not just on the live TV platform. It's on the VOD platform. It's where they are also uploading content there. And so because carriage disputes, which to your point are absolutely about money, they're just about money, but are also at this point ideological because it's no longer an equal playing ground of direct TV needs Disney as much as Disney needs direct TV.
18:31instead it's disney really needs youtube tv and youtube tv like kind of needs disney like they're like it's a product that google's like whatever about for a while that we did it was staffed by a team of like 10 like like it was not necessarily a huge play to google if you can go in and say we need to attack where we have our leverage across this entire ecosystem then i think it becomes a really interesting play of disney and others understanding that youtube is core to the future of their business, but it does not mean that just because they're more reliant on them, they have to just play by YouTube's rules all the time.
19:06Yeah. If I can push back on one thing that you said, I would say that YouTube TV, it certainly needs ESPN and it needs Disney. Google doesn't need Disney. And I want to dive into that a little bit. Let me take a break and come back. And why did they even launch YouTube TV? That's my question for you.
19:35This summer, serve up the cookout classics, Oscar Mayer hot dogs and Heinz mustard. Grill up a dog, add classic yellow mustard, or loaded Chicago style. We all know it's not a cookout without Oscar Mayer and Heinz. History That Doesn't Suck is a legit, hard-hitting American history podcast told through entertaining stories. As we approach America's 250th anniversary, Now might be the time to go back and learn how we got here. With more than 200 episodes, you can bend your way, decade by decade, defining event to defining event from the founding into the 20th century. Join me, Professor Greg Jackson, for History That Doesn't Suck, an Odyssey podcast, available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
20:24so when youtube tv launched uh when i forget when that when it was probably like six seven years ago eight years ago um you know it was it was a low-cost outlet and it was it seemed to me to be a way for google to ingratiate itself with a lot of these uh program networks you know the disney's the foxes cbs uh paramount um and uh and nbc universal. Since then, they've seen it grow. They invested a couple billion dollars in NFL Sunday ticket. And so they're investing in this. You write all the time, and I'm fascinated by this, the most watched TV channel by far is YouTube on TV, if you consider that a TV channel.
21:11Why are they involved in this old school distribution company in this era of cord cutting when people are trying to shed the bundle? It's a twofold answer. One is that Neil Mohan, who's the current CEO of YouTube, he was a head of product of YouTube for a very long time. He's a big TV guy. He was a bigger TV guy than the last CEO of YouTube, whose name I'm forgetting, Susan Wojcicki, who unfortunately passed away. He's always been the TV guy. And he views the future of YouTube as a through-line consumer journey in which he wants to own the experience of watching live TV because he thinks that is central to just being in the space that people are using their television sets every single day.
22:02because he believes that that then creates a stronger through line to YouTube the app on TV sets, which was where they can sell higher CTV ads. They can bring in better brand deals. They can dominate more time spent. So there's, you know, you're just cutting out attention from other competitors. And then you can also then further integrate aspects of the product business into these different situations. So an example I give in my piece is it's not a far-fetched idea. So when you look at the deals that YouTube TV is making, you think about NBC Universal, the thing we keep hearing again and again is ingestion, right?
22:41People really, really want, let me take that back, Patrick, three, two, one. The thing we keep hearing a lot about in these deals is ingestion. And what ingestion means is that YouTube TV will be able to show and play content from like Peacock or Disney Plus or Hulu directly within the YouTube TV app. So you're not clicking on it and then it opens a separate app. It just plays within it. And part of the reason that they want to do this is a better experience for users. They pride themselves on that. But part of the experience also is that it gives them access to the content to learn off that content, data from the content.
23:16They might be able to then take aspects of it and introduce really eccentric product opportunities, like creating a short out of it that you can then scroll through. Maybe you're watching sports shorts on the side while ESPN plays in the background. This is something that ESPN itself seems to be wanting to build to within its own app. So the more that it can have access to this content, the more that it can really just create one destination product for all of TV. And I think they view having live TV as a really important business to that. Because otherwise, to your point, John, it doesn't make a lot of sense.
23:52Why be in a business where you are reliant on media companies who demand quite a bit of money when you have people from around the world, teenagers from around the world, uploading content for free to your platform that is driving significant ad dollars? And also, I get stuck on just the idea of YouTube as a brand is a brand that people love. They go, They watch clips and they like it. Comcast is a brand that consumers hate. And Charter, well, not Comcast, maybe Xfinity. People hate their cable company and they always have. I remember talking years ago with a distributor from an affiliate guy from one of the networks.
24:40And they're like, we can't, the PR doesn't work into these guys because nothing that you say publicly affects them. They're used to being called out on everything. Well, YouTube, in this dispute, you're seeing a lot of a pox on both houses. And this has to be new for YouTube. Like, wait, who hates us? Why would you hate us? Like, we're trying to keep costs low and give you the best viewing experience that you can get. Like you should love us. Right. And at some point, these are humans that are that are running these these companies. At some point, I would think that I don't like that. I don't like having YouTube, the brand, be associated as a cable company that that basically a utility that consumers hate.
25:31And so that's having YouTube decide to get into this is a similar thing when ESPN did the UFC deal. And then they had to handle the UFC pay-per-views. And I think their first UFC pay-per-view, there were a couple of glitches that happened. And I got called up by a couple of distributors. They were like, guess what? They can't blame us now. Now they're the ones that the consumers are furious about. And you're seeing it even with the ESPN app, people talking about what a bad experience this is. I keep getting knocked off and it's not a bad experience because of Comcast or DirecTV. It's a bad experience with the ESPN brand.
26:12So having YouTube wade into that, it shocks me a little bit. From your lips to God's ears, that's how I feel about streaming in general, which is streaming technology is very difficult. Like it's it's part of the reason that Netflix is half quartered in Silicon Valley, right? Like they are a tech company who understands it. Same with YouTube in San Bruno. But I think also, you know, I said this once to someone at YouTube pretty recently. It's a remarkable change in narrative around YouTube over the last decade. Ten years ago, nobody wanted to work at YouTube because it was a nightmare platform.
26:50Every single week, the headlines about YouTube were like, there's terrorist content on here. There's weird stuff of targeting kids on here. Like there is radicalization happening on here. Every headline was a negative one. And the best thing that happened to YouTube over the last five years was the Nielsen Gage coming out and the YouTube TV win. And so all of a sudden, this company went from being like, we're a platform where you've got some questionable creators making content that people really love. And I don't want to take away from that. They've always been a big platform. People love going to YouTube.
Read the full transcript
27:21They didn't necessarily love YouTube. and now the YouTube story is we're TV. We're the best part about your TV experience. Whether you want to watch a 90-minute podcast, whether you want to watch a 45-minute Mr. Beast video, whether you want to watch an NFL game, whether you want to watch live TV like CNBC or whatever it might be, we are the most joyous way to watch television and that means we'll get more CTV ad dollars, we'll get better brand deals, we'll have the higher number of subscribers coming in. But this is new. YouTube for a while was a cesspool and they were known to be a cesspool.
28:00And they kind of still are on the VOD side, but they've managed to move past that. And so when you ask, like, why is this important to them? I think they like being the company that people think of and associate with. Oh, I really enjoy watching TV with YouTube, whether it's YouTube TV or YouTube. And I think that is important for the Disney's and NBCU needs to keep in mind, because although they are going to be almost entirely reliant on the YouTube ecosystem over the next decade, there's no question whether it's the VOD side, whether it's the VMVBT side, whatever direction it takes, they're going to be more reliant on the dollars that come through it as their own pay TV businesses kind of decline and their streaming businesses kind of they're still struggling to figure it out a little bit.
28:44Knowing that it's important to YouTube to be the place that consumers love to watch TV, in part because of the content that these media partners upload directly to the VOD platform or license effectively sell to YouTube TV, gives you the advantage of saying like, you're going to give us the money that we deserve, in part because you're $3 trillion company, but in part because we know if you don't have us, people will just go elsewhere or they're just going to associate YouTube again as this negative thing in their mind that they have to go to. And that's not a place that they want to be. To your point, John, that turns them into a cable company.
29:24One of the reasons I love working with you, Julia, is I think that we complement each other very well. I started covering cable back in the mid-90s and I am a TV nerd. So my opinions, that's where all my opinions are rooted. You are somebody who knows the streaming world as well as anybody that I know, frankly. And that's how your opinions are rooted. So that's why this next question is going to be my favorite. It's predictions. How is this all going to end? And I'm going to start. And as that is a preamble, I still believe Monday Night Football and the NBA and the SEC are very powerful levers for ESPN.
30:13I can't imagine. I wouldn't be surprised if this posts on Wednesday and there's a resolution already by the time this posts. I wouldn't be surprised by that. But my prediction is it's going to be fixed before this coming weekend, because I just don't think I don't think YouTube. Let's say they get past this weekend. Then there's the next weekend. And then there's a weekend after that. I mean, these sports don't end. And so at some point they're going to have to say, like, OK, I'm tired of bleeding customers. I've got to come to it. And my prediction is because according to both sides, ESPN is giving them a rate that's in line with what the bigger distributors are getting.
31:02All the ingestion questions and everything, those have already sort of been answered. I mean, there's a standard rate that's already out there. I have to believe that they're going to be able to come to it this week. What's your prediction? You know, what's funny is I was at a party last night, a very like media party, and I was talking to an analyst and the question they asked was, what do you think ends first, Disney, YouTube or the government shutdown? And I was like, I wish I could say it was the government shutdown, but I think it's going to be Disney, YouTube. because I agree. Everything you're saying, John, I completely agree with.
31:40And the only thing I would add is that, and maybe I'm coming at this as a little too far, but I think Disney and all them need to go one step further because I think their content is so, so important to YouTube TV, especially right now, especially with the SEC and with Monday Night Football and Basketball back. Like it's the high time that people watch television. It's getting cold in parts of the I'd say it's people are staying home. Like this is when they watch TV. It's very important to YouTube TV for that reason. But Disney's content for everything you just said is also so important to YouTube.
32:15And so it's like you have to take this one step further because YouTube TV is going to get what they want. I imagine this. They're probably going to get some kind of skinny sports bundle. They're going to get some form of ingestion because in part NBC Universal set a precedent right with that NBC, like sports network thing they're launching, that's going to carry Peacock. Like they're kind of already there. And I suspect YouTube TV will point to that and say, like, you know, we're doing this with your partners. They know they want the skinny bundle in order to compete with the direct TV and the Fubos.
32:46And they'll say that it's competitive thing, which I get. But Disney shouldn't lose sight of the fact that they have the advantage in the content. They have the advantage of the content right now and they have the advantage across YouTube TV and YouTube. And so when this comes up again, because it will. That's all. In three years. I mean, if they do a three year deal, it will happen three years from now. It's like at that point, the business is going to look so different that in order to really hammer home how vital these differentiated media companies and their assets are going to be in a YouTube centric universe, you have to consider YouTube on top of YouTube TV, even though it doesn't feel like it is associated with the carriage dispute as a sole thing.
33:31It is what Google cares about. It is what Neil Mohan cares about. And so that's where you have to attack on top of YouTube TV. Because again, we're just talking about a YouTube-centric world and YouTube TV is part of it, but it is not it. Let's dive into that for a quick second. Let's say they take McAfee off of YouTube and you can only see him on TikTok or wherever, Who knows where? YouTube has billions of hours of content. Does that affect YouTube.com? It doesn't necessarily affect overall share of viewing. And I also don't think it would be like McAfee being taken away because he has his own stuff.
34:07He just licenses to ESPN. I think it affects the fact that Disney has whitelisted advertising. They bring in strong brand deals. They are the type of content that YouTube likes to point to having so that they don't get questions about all the, for lack of a better term, jittier content. It is the thing that they point to and say, we love our brand partners. Neil Malhun says this all the time. We love our brand partners. We're reliant on our brand partners. Our brand partners are reliant on us. And so I don't think that Disney, by the way, should like yank their channels. In no way would they do that.
34:44But if you're going to have a blackout, have a full-size blackout. Okay, we're not going to go here. college football, college game day, they streamed on the ESPN app, but they also put it on X under McAfee's channel. It's got like 2 million, 3 million views. And keeping in mind that a view on X is far different from a view on YouTube and neither are comparable to an average viewer by Nielsen standards. The fact that people are like, I'll watch it here. I don't care. Like, that's fine. That type of stuff does affect YouTube where it's the consumer change of, oh, I don't have to go to YouTube for this.
35:16I can go elsewhere for it. That type of fundamental behavior that YouTube has spent two decades trying to train, they don't want to lose and they especially don't want to lose it to high profile events like sports. And so I think if Disney were to say we're going to go black on YouTube, we'll just private our channels for 10 days, like however long the blackout lasts, you know, three, four days, it's just going to show the ideological stance you're taking, which is we understand that your business, YouTube and is the dominant business in this industry. But we understand that we are a core component of it.
35:50And so we deserve to be respected as such. The game day strategy that ESPN employed, I was so fascinated by that because, again, in terms of is the leverage changing? Was this a fact that ESPN needs to get game day in front of a lot of people because they sell a lot of advertising around game day? Or is this a fact of like, let's be honest, The pregame show is a Barker channel for the content that comes on later in the day. And it's just a way to nag and remind the YouTube TV customers, you are not getting this content. I suspect it's a little bit of both, probably more of the latter, using it as a Barker and a needle to YouTube.
36:29Let's stick with YouTube when we come back. I do want to talk about their sports strategy because I have no idea what it is.
36:42Heat up your 4th of July at The Home Depot with our wide variety of grills under$300 and make every gathering one to remember. Give your outdoor space a glow up. Whatever your budget is, the savings on seasonal plants starting at$5. With the grill fired up and your backyard set to perfection, you'll be able to invite friends and family over to kick off the party. Start celebrating with low prices guaranteed at The Home Depot. Prices may vary by store. Exclusions apply. See Home Depot.com slash price match for details. We are live from Fetty's house. Guests are gathering around the TV, even with a big storm outside.
37:18Are we worried about the feet? Nope, they have Xfinity Wi-Fi. Get reliable fiber-powered gig Wi-Fi with Peacock included to stream the beautiful game this summer. Xfinity, imagine that. Restrictions apply. New gig internet customers only. Actual speeds vary. Offer for Peacock Premium with ads currently at$10.99 a month value and limited to Xfinity internet members with newer upgraded gig speed or faster service. Activation required to access content. Peacock must be activated within the first 90 days. Management of existing subscriptions may be required to avoid multiple subscriptions and duplicate charges.
37:41Third-party build subscriptions continue until canceled.
38:11after premium sports. They have packages that look a lot like TV packages, but they're okay with that because it brings people into the Amazon walled garden, so to speak, in order to watch the NFL and the NBA and go over to England and you have the Premier League and things like that. Apple TV, who knows what they're doing? They say they want it from end to end and they do have MLS from end to end. They have F1 from end to end in the United States, but then they don't have it anywhere else. So it's not really end to end, but they do come out and say that they want to control and own everything.
38:54YouTube, they've been kicking the tires. They've been part of a lot of these negotiations. They haven't really, other than Sunday ticket, they really haven't stepped up in terms of nabbing a rights deal. If you were to say what their strategy is as it comes to sports, is there one? Is it forming? How would you answer that question? I think they're still in the experimental crawl space. So if we think about Netflix's crawl, walk, run. They're kind of in that crawl space. I think the interesting thing about YouTube, and I've watched this play out, I know you've watched this play out, I'm sure Neil Mohan has watched this play out, is that they don't really need to be in it.
39:42You think about leagues like Bundesliga saying we're going to give 20 games experimentally to a couple of YouTubers and they can stream them on YouTube. YouTube doesn't have to do anything with that. They get the games. They're like, great, we'll put those games in our top select tier, which is their top advertising tier. We'll make strong money off those games and we don't have to bid anything on it. And I think you're seeing that happen with some rugby. And these are like smaller leagues, Bundesliga being the biggest one, smaller leagues where players and leagues are kind of talking to YouTubers and they're saying maybe we move over here in some capacity.
40:14If you're YouTube and you're like, people are doing this anyways, maybe we just wait out and see what we don't have access to. So the NFL being a good one, that is really high value that we think we can sell strong ads on or that we think we can then simulcast this with our top creators to really bring this in and bring in strong ad dollars and brand deals for this game. Maybe we compete in that space a little bit, but they don't have to do any of it. And I think that goes back to what I was saying earlier about if you look at just the amount of sports content that people watch on YouTube, I think the recent stat that Mohan gave was 35 to 40 billion hours of sports viewed last year.
40:55And it was like up 30 % year over year on TV sets. Now it's just YouTube. Like people don't need to watch live sports on YouTube. They're watching all these other sports on YouTube. They're watching sports content. They're watching whatever it might be. And so I think unlike, you know, the traditional media companies, even the Amazons and the Apples where they're saying this will bring people into our ecosystem and we don't have anything like this. And this is really how we're going to sell subscriptions and potentially place ad dollars and do all that. Like YouTube doesn't have to. They can, but they're like, why would we if the YouTubers are doing it themselves and people are already watching more sports content on YouTube than anywhere else?
41:33And so I think their strategy right now is, OK, well, what do we need within sports and why do we need it? And the only answer that I can think of is that we often overestimate how many people, especially in the United States, use their TV sets for YouTube. And I know it's a crazy thing to say because we see the Nielsen gauge every month where YouTube's growing on TV sets and we see that they have the largest share of viewing time. But they don't have significant audience in certain age demos who are opening up YouTube all the time. And so the argument about having sports exclusively on YouTube is that it does force people to open the app.
42:15It does force people to think about YouTube as a passive viewing experience. It does encourage people then to spend more time on the app and watch other creators and shoulder content. And so that's the only reason I could see them potentially doing it is if they really wanted to move much faster and much further into the CTV space. And they would do so using sports. But unlike every other company who has an incentive for being in sports, that incentive is pure sub growth, pure engagement or pure advertising play. YouTube doesn't need help with any of that. So they had the Brazil NFL game from earlier this year.
42:49And of course, immediately afterwards, the NFL said they were thrilled. And I think Neil Mohan said he was thrilled and everybody was happy. What's the real story? My question isn't necessarily, were they happy? What did they learn from that? How were they looking at that? Were they looking at sheer numbers? Were they looking at it from a tech standpoint? Like, let's make sure that we can do this. What's your impression of that? It was experimental in terms of how will people watch on YouTube versus how will they watch it elsewhere? where so the the key distinction was the simulcasting streams that what youtube calls watch with it was the different creators like i this creator named i show speed who has 45 46 million subscribers very well known for his live stream so he's someone who already has an audience built on his live streams the question that youtube had was if we can splinter this game or access to these games across, say, 10 to 12 creators.
43:48And if we can sell specific ads and brand deals to those channels, not just because of the NFL, but specifically those creators in the NFL, can we actually monetize having an NFL game three or four different ways while encouraging people to think of YouTube as a place to watch longer form television, to tune in for passive viewing? So for them, the number of people who are going to watch, by the way a game on a friday evening uh between two teams it was like fine right it was the chargers i think the chargers and the chiefs it's fine it was whatever um it was patrick mahomes and and and travis kelsey is married to the most famous person in the world patrick mahomes patrick but but i say it's a i say by the way as as a saints fan who's going like one in 17 this season.
44:39So like, but the game itself, I think was less interesting to YouTube than what they could do with it from a tech standpoint and from a creator standpoint that would get advertisers really excited. I think the lesson for Roger Goodell and you tell me, because, you know, Goodell in the NFL much more than I do. I think the lesson for him was just because you put something on a platform that is universally available and accessible does not mean you create new fans. It's not going to mint new fans because they have access to this thing. The people who tuned into that game, people are going to tune into football.
45:12Yeah. I don't think the NFL looked at that as, as we want to create new fans. I mean, the NFL, uh, shortest way for growth in terms of media rights for the NFL is to establish an international package of games. Uh, and, and, uh, once they establish that international package of games, there are companies like YouTube or Netflix or even Apple TV that span borders. So if they were to sell that to a package of international games to, say, ESPN, ESPN only has it for the US. Then they would have to sort of go out and sell it territory by territory. And this is a way to get these big, huge streaming companies involved, spending upwards of a billion, billion five, I mean, who knows what, on these packages and it's a very easy way to get in.
46:04So for, for the NFL, this to me is so much less about, well, you said experiment is it was an experiment, but it's less about creating fans. And it's more about trying to get YouTube and Neil Mohan hooked on the NFL. Like, look at this engagement you got because what, what creates more engagement than, than a live NFL game. And I don't think it worked. Like, I don't know if Neil Mohan walked away from that thinking we need more NFL games. That's what I was wondering, because you mentioned all the creators that the numbers that I saw were less than if they weren't watching along the side, like if they just kind of went on and did their own thing almost, it seemed.
46:43Yeah, iShowSpeed, he was one I was most curious about because of all the ones who were live streaming. He was the one with a built-in live stream audience. The rest of them were tangential sports creators, but who are not known for live streams. so I was like that audience might tune into the VOD after or whatever the edited version of that video becomes but I show speed I was like you know he his audience expects this and I think he averaged throughout that game I'm gonna get the numbers wrong but like let's say that the let's say his normal average was 80 ,000 I think in that game he averaged like you know 82 ,000 it was not a substantial amount of people more people who were tuning into it and I think like that's the takeaway if I'm you know Mohan I have about sports which is I could spend a hundred million dollars whatever this game's gonna cost me like I could spend it or I could not and it's not gonna hurt me and by the way the NFL and the teams and ESPN or whoever has that game are just gonna upload the best clips to YouTube anyways and I thought about this and it sounds it's gonna sound um totally unrelated, but it is 100 % related with when Jimmy Kimmel returned and people were like, wow, look at the numbers he has on YouTube.
47:57And that's what he touted. He's like, look at my numbers on YouTube. And it was that moment where we had this huge debate about, you know, ABC and Jimmy Kimmel and people watching him on TV and linear ratings. And Neil Bohan's like, they're watching him on YouTube. Like, we don't even have to do anything. They just upload it. Like, and it's fine. And we don't have to even be in conversations with Disney about any of that because it's there and people are going to watch it the next day, like with 15, 16 million viewers. And I think that's the big thing for Neil Mohan, which is we don't have to do anything.
48:28We like having the YouTube TV side. We like potentially being in the sports conversation. I think potential conversations around something like NBA League Pass or Sunday Ticket, where it's a little bit more subscription focused and kind of niche. I think he's more interested in understanding owning that relationship. But he doesn't need to own anything in sports or anything in entertainment because people are just putting stuff on the platform anyways. Another aspect of that, you referenced just the international and those international numbers. And I don't, again, like you, I don't have them in front of me, but they were much, much smaller than I was expecting them to be.
49:06I mean, it was, it was generally a U S audience watching an NFL game that happened to be played in Brazil. You would I think that YouTube would have, for an international audience just from Brazil, would have had a couple million signing up for it. You and I talked about this. This was months. This was before even the NFL game happened on YouTube. And I remember saying to you, we were talking in a pitch meeting, so some behind-the-scenes stuff here at Puck. We're in a pitch meeting. And I said to you, I'm really excited about Amazon and the NBA. And I said to you, the reason I'm excited, and it was the same reason I was excited about YouTube and the NFL, is they can finally prove this thing about the international audiences.
49:45Like, actually, if the only thing hurting the international audience is, you know, it's more difficult to get access to a game, maybe to your point, ESPN has to partner with like another cable network or a broadcaster. Like they have to figure out how they're going to do that internationally. If the only issue was accessibility and availability to younger consumers, then the games themselves should have had higher international numbers. And I haven't seen anything on Amazon yet, of course, so I'm not speaking to that. But to the point about YouTube and international numbers and your point, John, about them being small, that was I wasn't surprised.
50:16I was like, yeah, there may be an audience here and there may not be. And I think like, again, Friday night game, the hours suck for the European side. Like there's a ton happening that is different from the Netflix games on Christmas Day. But I looked at those numbers and I thought you can put something like on YouTube. It does not mean that people are going to necessarily tune in because it's on YouTube. Julia, if I don't end this podcast here, we're going to go on for another hour. I'm sorry. This is, by the way, when Julia mentioned our pitch meetings, this is exactly how it goes. We just start talking.
50:53I appreciate you stepping in and doing it. I love what you're doing with Dylan on the grill room. It used to be Dylan Byers' grill room, and now it's Dylan Byers and Julie Alexander's grill room. How are you handling interviews? Are you going to be doing it one by one, one-on-one or one-on-two? We've been doing joint so far, and we're trying to decide if we're going to add a second interview to the week. But I think I really like, as a fan of the grill room, listening to Dylan interview. I think he's a masterful. He's like listening to you or listening to Matt Bell and our colleagues, you know, you guys are just so masterful at it.
51:32And I love listening to him. So I kind of hope that it's just going to be Dylan most of the time with gas. And I come in if it makes sense to because I love yapping with him, but I love listening to him interview. Yeah, well, download the grill room. Excellent podcast from Dylan Byers and Julia. And Julia, thanks a ton. And I will see you in the next pitch meeting. Thanks for having me.
51:58All right. My main takeaway from this is that YouTube TV and ESPN are going to get a deal done. It's going to be in the next couple of days, maybe a week, but they are going to get a deal done. But one caveat that you should know, I have been wrong about this at every turn. I thought that they were going to do an extension. I thought that they were going to get something done before Monday Night Football. I thought they were going to get something done immediately after Monday Night Football. None of that happened. So they're both dug in right now. But the tide of games from ESPN, it has the NBA, it has the SEC, it has Monday Night Football.
52:43That keeps coming every single week. And at some point, YouTube's going to have to say, we're going to get this deal done if they want to stay in the distribution business. So I want to thank Julia Alexander for taking the time to come on The Varsity. More importantly, though, I want to thank you for listening to The Varsity, an Odyssey podcast in partnership with Puck. I also want to thank the executive editors from Puck. That's Gobby Grossman, Ben Landy, John Kelly, and the great team from Odyssey, Bob Tabador and Patrick Antonetti. If you like this podcast, make sure to sign up for my newsletter, also called The Varsity.
53:19Head over to puck.news and use the code word The Varsity, all one word, for a 20 % discount. And I will see you on Sunday.
53:54and support every step of the way. Shop up to 45 % off site-wide right now during the 4th of July VIP access sale at blinds.com.
From the publisher
Julia Alexander joins John to discuss how Nielsen’s new out-of-home viewership data is reshaping Saturday night sports programming, and what it means for the leagues and networks chasing live audiences. They also dig into the YouTube TV–Disney standoff—pitting Disney’s content library against YouTube’s deep pockets—and explore YouTube’s broader sports ambitions, from user-generated highlights to international scale.
To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices
