Sports Media’s Winners (and Losers) of 2025

10 Dec 2025 · 47 min · 16 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Sports media’s “winners and losers” of 2025, focused on sports-business personalities and major industry shifts (streaming/talent, sports rights spending, and college sports legal chaos).

Guests (backgrounds)

  • John O’Ran (host; Puck sports correspondent).
  • Julia Alexander (streaming/media expert; co-host of The Real Room).
  • Eric Gardner (courts reporter; known for covering sports legal matters).
  • Dylan Byers (writes for In the Room; co-host of The Real Room).

Key claims / notable examples

  • David Ellison (person of year, per Dylan): rapid sports-rights expansion after acquiring Paramount; stake in the NFL; UFC deal (~$7.7B over seven years); potential Warner Bros. Discovery acquisition to compete with Amazon/Netflix/YouTube.
  • Pat McAfee (person of year, per Julia): YouTube/ESPN live-stream model; community-driven personality branding; College GameDay ratings and YouTube success; legacy networks licensing creator-style talent.
  • Judge Claudia Wilkins (person of year, per Eric): NCAA restrictions on athletes’ name/image/likeness and compensation; downstream effects on amateur sports; ongoing lawsuits and multi-forum regulation (courts, NLRB, state legislatures).
  • Mark Shapiro (person of year, per John/Dylan discussion): WME/TKO executive who secured UFC via Paramount and sold WWE PLEs to ESPN (~$1.6B total).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Notre Dame's College Football Omission

2:06 to 4:43

Discuss the fallout from Notre Dame's exclusion from the playoffs.

“But before we get to our sports media personality of the year, today is Wednesday, December 10th, and here's what I'm watching.”

Person of the Year Discussion

4:50 to 7:56

Dylan discusses David Ellison's impact on sports media.

“We're going to focus on the person of the year as far as sports business is concerned.”

Overpaying for Sports Rights

7:56 to 13:47

The conversation examines the implications of paying high prices for sports rights.

“That being said, you referenced a seven-year, $7.7 billion deal for the UFC, more than doubling, really blowing everybody else out of the water.”

The Rise of Pat McAfee in Sports Media

14:57 to 18:32

Discussion on Pat McAfee's influence on the sports media landscape and audience engagement.

“Well, first, I'd like to commend us all on not just picking David Allison because he was also top of the list for me, too.”

Legacy Media's Shift Toward Talent

18:33 to 20:28

Exploration of how legacy media is adapting to new digital trends and talent-focused strategies.

“And I think he is the example that everyone is chasing, including Fox with their deal with Dave Portnoy of Barstool to a far less successful extent.”

Comparing Media Personalities

20:29 to 22:44

A comparison between Pat McAfee and other media personalities, focusing on their styles and audience interactions.

“right two questions replicating it two questions actually first for you Dylan for is this unique to sports like you know the news business better than anybody I know, where can we see a Pat McAfee of the news business?”

The Impact of Licensing Deals

22:45 to 24:40

Discussion on how licensing deals and the authenticity of content are shaping sports media.

“The other, Julia, McAfee doesn't exist in a vacuum.”

Chaos in College Sports

26:39 to 27:02

Discussion on the current instability in college sports and the role of AI.

“is the official beer sponsor of the FIFA World Cup 26.”

Chaos in College Sports

27:04 to 28:08

Discussion on the current instability in college sports and the role of AI.

“for free entry, entry deadlines, prizes, and details.”

The Impact of AI on College Sports

28:08 to 29:55

Explore how artificial intelligence is reshaping the landscape of college athletics.

“But I also picked it for a different reason.”
Show all 16 chapters

Judge Wilkins' Rulings and Their Significance

29:55 to 32:46

An in-depth discussion on the implications of Judge Wilkins' legal rulings on college athletes.

“So take us through Judge Wilkins' rulings.”

Challenges Facing College Sports Governance

32:46 to 36:22

Examine the complex legal and organizational challenges in college sports today.

“All I do know is that 10 years from now, things will look radically different than they do right now.”

The Media Landscape in Sports Rights

36:22 to 40:01

Insights into the evolving media rights landscape for major sports leagues.

“I have very fond memories of my Maryland Terrapins representing the state of Maryland in the Poolan Weed Eater Independence Bowl a couple of years ago.”

Mark Shapiro's Negotiation Strategies

40:01 to 42:01

A look at Mark Shapiro's impactful negotiations in the sports media sector.

“Like I said, you have big time sports that are still going to get paid.”

Mark Shapiro and the Future of Sports Media

42:01 to 45:00

Explore the potential future of sports media and the strategic moves of Mark Shapiro.

“But his ability to recognize that and strike while the iron is hot is great.”

Thanksgiving and Show Closing

45:01 to 46:20

Acknowledgements and reflections on the engaging discussions and the Christmas party.

“Thank you so much for joining the varsity again, two weeks in a row.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Ready to level up? Chumba Casino is your playbook to fun. It's free to play with no purchase necessary. Enjoy hundreds of online social games like Blackjack, Slots, and Solitaire anytime, anywhere with fresh releases every week. Whether you're at home or on the go, let Chumba Casino bring the excitement to you. Plus, get free daily login bonuses and a free welcome bonus. Join now for your chance to redeem some serious prizes. Play Chumba Casino today. No purchase necessary. VGW Group. Void word prohibited by law. 21+. TNCs apply. And we're live from the living room as Doug eyes up the matchday spread.

0:34Eriq Gardner:He's reaching for the Buffalo wing. Perfect. Hang on, what's this? Oh, he's going for a can of Pepsi too. Incredible. What a finish. Sensational combination. Look at the delight on his face. There's no doubt about it. It just tastes better. Matchdays deserve Pepsi. Food deserves Pepsi. Grab a pack of Pepsi Zero Sugar for today's match. It's poetry in motion.

1:04Eriq Gardner:Congratulations. You made the varsity, the podcast. My name is John O 'Ran and I am Puck's sports correspondent and the host of this pod. And today we return with what I like to call Puck's super friends for another year in review show. Three of my Puck colleagues will join me today to argue about who should be considered the sports business personality of 2025. If you remember, in last week's episode, we hashed out the top sports stories of the year, and today, it's all about the people. We're going to be joined by Julia Alexander, who knows more about the streaming business than just about anyone else I know.

1:42Eriq Gardner:Eric Gardner is also here. Eric is the country's best courts reporter, and I'm really hoping that he does not bring up the 85-point drubbing that I suffered during our fantasy football matchup last weekend. Then there's a great Dylan Byers. Dylan writes Puck's private email on the news business called In the Room, and he hosts, along with Julia, the great podcast, The Real Room. You're really going to like this one. But before we get to our sports media personality of the year, today is Wednesday, December 10th, and here's what I'm watching. And for me, it's all about Notre Dame and its omission from the college football playoff.

2:19Eriq Gardner:Personally, I think Notre Dame should have gotten in, but that's not why I'm interested in this story. If you listen to the reaction from the school, there's going to be some fallout from this decision. Fighting Irish athletic director Pete Pavacqua went on the Dan Patrick show Monday and put the ACC on blast. Pavacqua accused the ACC, the conference, for attacking Notre Dame while supporting Miami's inclusion in the CFP. Notre Dame, of course, is a partial member of the ACC while Miami is a full-time member. Here's what Pavac said. He said that the ACC heads on, quote, permanent damage to their relationship.

2:56Eriq Gardner:It raised a lot of eyebrows here that the conference was taking shots at us, he said. Now, look, I've known Pete for a long time. NBC hired him eight years ago to run the sports division. And here's the thing about Pete. He doesn't fly off the handle. He chooses his words carefully. Honestly, he's probably the most measured voice that I've ever covered in the business. And by measured, I mean not really quote-worthy. He's a really good guy to hang out with, but whenever we went on the record, he wouldn't want to mix things up. So when someone like Pete Bavacqua uses words like permanent damage and accuses the conference of taking shots at us, it's especially meaningful.

3:40Eriq Gardner:Now, ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips, he responded to Bavacqua's comments with a statement that called Notre Dame a valued member. And he said that the ACC never suggested that the CFP should snub Notre Dame. But here's what I know. It's never a good sign when two sides argue with each other in the medium. It certainly does suggest that this relationship has been damaged. Permanently? We'll see. But it's clearly in a really bad place right now. I mean, it's easy to see why Bavacqua is peeved. In the week before the CFP selection, the ACC pushed Miami over Notre Dame on several social posts. And according to The Athletic, ACC Network showed Miami's win over Notre Dame, get this, 13 times.

4:26Eriq Gardner:Notre Dame has been associated with the ACC for the past 11 seasons. It generally plays five or six ACC teams per season. And my sense is that we should all continue to watch this space because this is an arrangement that could undergo serious changes. But for right now, let's get to Puck's super friends, Julie Alexander, Eric Gardner, and Dylan Byers. Another roundtable with my Puck colleagues, Julie Alexander, Dylan Byers, Eric Gardner. We are doing a year-in-review here. We're going to focus on the person of the year as far as sports business is concerned. And Dylan, I want to start with you, your person of the year.

5:10yeah without question it has to be david ellison and um i think anyone who follows the the business the industry of media which julia and i talk about every week um knows just how quickly and aggressively he has moved into this space uh with an incredible amount of capital obviously and a great deal of ambition and that is has had um particular ramifications on the world of sports because by virtue of acquiring Paramount, he immediately bought a stake in the NFL. He moved very quickly to make a deal with UFC. Now he's potentially on the cusp of acquiring Warner Brothers Discovery, which could bring more sports rights into the portfolio.

5:55And this group has talked on another episode about the value of sports in the ecosystem and particularly the value of sports in both cable bundle and in streaming. He somehow has a plan to keep both of those things going at the same time for the foreseeable future. That's part of the strategy. It's not just streaming. And I think that's very meaningful to sports partners. And you look at these deals he's done, you look at how much money he paid for UFC, I think 7.7. It shows a real intention here. Again, real ambition to sort of be a player in this space. Part of the David Ellison thesis with acquiring Paramount, again, potentially WBD, is can you take all of the legacy media assets and can you roll them up and make them competitive with some of the new entrants who have also had a profound effect in the sports space?

6:57Obviously, Amazon, Netflix, YouTube. If he can do that, that is a real, that's a, that's a real meaningful player to have at the table for the Roger Goodells and the Adam Silvers of the world. You know, as, as we move towards, you know, several years down the line, of course, towards the next wave of rights negotiations. So I just think, look, part of the story of Hollywood and the contraction of Hollywood is that you've got people coming along who claim they might be a savior, claim they're going to change the game. We're all very familiar with the David Zaslav story. It doesn't always pan out the way that they hoped that would, but you look at a guy like David Ellison, he's here to play, not just for, he's not flipping houses the way that Zaslav is.

7:41He's here, he's got a long game ahead of him, and I think he's going to be a very meaningful player, not just in the Hollywood space, not just in the media space, but certainly in the sports space, in the sports media space, I think for a long time to come.

7:55Eriq Gardner:you know dylan i always hesitate to say that anybody's overspent for sports rights because in my entire career the number always seems ridiculous and then by the end of the contract it's like oh what a bargain uh they ended up getting right you remember when the nfl sold 1.1 bill 110 billion dollars where i wish it was 1.1 110 billion dollars worth of media rights deals i was like no what can get higher than that and then the nba comes along like not a year later and that looks like it's undervalued. That being said, you referenced a seven-year, $7.7 billion deal for the UFC, more than doubling, really blowing everybody else out of the water.

8:37Eriq Gardner:And every other media company is chirping in my ear about, you know, they're never going to make any money off of that. It's a way overpaid for those rights. Again, I don't know if they did. We'll find out in seven years if they did or not. Does it matter if they overpaid for those rights though? is this like certainly it's something that uh paramount and uh under ellison can afford it certainly sent a message to everybody else in the in the business of a we're open for business uh does does it matter that if they overpaid yeah well first of all complaining or trying to point out that someone overpaid for something usually is the sour grapes of the losing party who couldn't Who other couldn't pay or just made a different sort of calculation.

9:22But I guess you have to think about this. You know, saying that anyone overpaid for anything, right? Saying that Brian Roberts overpaid for the NBA, saying that, God, like Eddie Q overpaid for F1, saying that David Ellison overpaid for UFC. you could certainly make the argument that that's true on a sort of like quarterly earnings projection, right? Or looking at like how long this might take to materialize and everything that needs to go right based on present day economics. Totally. But if you, again, if you pull back and you think about what is the future media landscape look like? Amazon, YouTube, Netflix, all playing a different game, all living in an entirely different stratosphere with different business models in which the media is just a small bit of the business.

10:12It is almost just the marketing piece of their business, right? How do you gain entry into that if you are not a Silicon Valley player? There's a lot of content and there's a lot of legacy affiliation among fans and audiences built in to Hollywood. And so the strategy is, can you come along and again, can you take that and can you level that up to compete? And so if the price of doing that is a$7.7 billion deal, right? Or is potentially overpaying for Paramount, overpaying for Warner Brothers Discovery, overpaying for everything, does it make sense? Well, again, you have to look at how much capital you have.

11:04And if you're David Ellison and you're the son of Larry Ellison, I'm not suggesting that they are by any means stupid with their money. I don't think Larry Ellison got to where he is by being stupid about money. But you can afford to make certain calculations that are based off of future value where you're not so vulnerable to, again, that sort of like quarterly thinking or annual thinking.

11:31Eriq Gardner:I do find it interesting, though, that they have Jeff Schell. David Ellison has Jeff Schell, who used to be at NBC, of course, and was at Fox before that. Yeah. Big sports fan. Somebody that, in my world, understands the value of sports rights and it's consistently invested in sports rights. And so the idea that, you know, they bid on UFC and then they're going to sort of take a powder and see what else happens. I suspect, you know, baseball's rights are up in 2028. I always reference Jeff Schell as being a season ticket holder to the Dodgers, the seats right behind the dugout, in fact. So I can see where this is going to be, you know, step one of a multi-step process.

12:19Yeah, it is. It's just, it's not, look, there is one thing, again, we talked about this in the previous episode. There's one thing that everyone in this business, whether they're on the old side of it or the new side of it, seems to agree on, which is the value of sports. And again, they come at it with different calculations about value and about what it can do for their business and how meaningful it is to one sort of business model versus another business model. But we all sort of agree as media becomes more fragmented, as people are spending more time, you know, for lack of a better word, around on like TikTok or Instagram, like what are the monoculture moments?

12:58What are the things that bring people together? It's sports. It's live. And I think everyone in the game recognizes the value of that. And again, you think about, okay, well, what is fair market value for something like a UFC or for the NBA or MLB or anything like that? I think you also have to take into account what happens if you don't have that, right? What happens if you lose out on those assets? And then how do you gain entry into the future competitive landscape if you're not holding any of those assets in the portfolio? I think that's the calculation you make. I think it's why these companies tend to spend more money than I think immediately makes sense when you're just looking at the hard numbers.

13:46Eriq Gardner:Dylan, let me take a quick break. We're going to come back. Julia, I'm going to get your person of the year.

13:55Fourth of July savings are happening now at the Home Depot with select appliances starting at$398. Plus, get free delivery on appliance purchases of$398 or more. No membership required. Upgrade your kitchen with a modern and sleek GE profile refrigerator featuring hands-free autofill for the perfect pour every time. And make Laundry Day easier with two-in-one washer-dryer combo innovation that completes laundry in about 90 minutes. Shop top brand appliances now at The Home Depot. Offer valid June 17th through July at the U.S. only C-Store online for details. History That Doesn't Suck is a legit, hard-hitting American history podcast told through entertaining stories.

14:31As we approach America's 250th anniversary, now might be the time to go back and learn how we got here. With more than 200 episodes, you can bend your way, decade by decade, defining event to defining event from the founding into the 20th century. Join me, Professor Greg Jackson, for History That Doesn't Suck, an Odyssey podcast. Available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.

14:56Eriq Gardner:So we're going to go from Dylan talking about sports rights and paying so much for sports rights to Julia talking about one of the most expensive sports talents that's out there. Your person of the year. I'm dying to hear you defend this one. Well, first, I'd like to commend us all on not just picking David Allison because he was also top of the list for me, too. my person of the year is Pat McAfee. I think it's impossible to talk about the current sports media landscape, the future sports media landscape, where investment in personalities is coming from, the push for companies like Disney and Fox and Netflix and others into kind of the sports-adjacent media podcasting space without talking about Pat McAfee.

15:51Eriq Gardner:so so talk to me in terms of who pat mcafee is is he a tv star is he a youtube star does it even matter what he is that's the exact right question it doesn't matter pat mcafee who hosts a three hour ish as he will tell you live stream on youtube with the first two hours also available on ESPN is, in my opinion, the future of what sports media looks like from a personality standpoint. He is a former NFL player who's better known for taking his shirt off and singing school cheers and diving into pools at the University of Miami. He's better known for the gimmicks he brings to college game day with the 30-yard kick for students to win money.

16:40he's better known for his drama than he is for anything else and all of this can be spun as a negative right when it was the aaron rogers covid anti-vax moment a few years ago it was a negative it was this idea of people asking why should pat mcafee have a platform on espn why is he worth the i think 85 million correct me if i'm wrong john dollars that uh the 85 million dollars that ESPN was giving him. Why is he the face of College Game Day? And then you look at the results, right? The ratings on College Game Day are up. His YouTube channel is incredibly successful. He has a built-in audience that follows him from platform to platform.

17:22And the thing about Pat McAfee that I think is most important this year is that this was also the year that everyone decided video podcasts were the future of television. I mean, case in point, right? Like this idea that all of these different networks were looking at the authentic relationship that podcasters and live stream hosts had with audiences that who were never going to sign up for cable, but who they were very, very much trying to corral into being paying subscribers to their own platforms. You can't really do that with content alone. Sports has the advantage of live sports and ESPN obviously needs live sports.

18:01But if you're looking at that type of shoulder their programming, it's less so the five, six guys around a desk, right? You have a Stephen A. Smith, you have a Greenberg, but for the most part, what people really want is to build a community around their favorite superstar. And so if you watch a Pat McAfee live stream, as I do almost every single day in this office, the comments are active. He's responding to them. There are inside jokes that feel like the perfect bridge between television of yesteryear and the YouTube creator sphere of tomorrow. And I think he is the example that everyone is chasing, including Fox with their deal with Dave Portnoy of Barstool to a far less successful extent.

18:42But he really feels like the outstanding example of what sports media will look like. And I think it's very difficult to replicate. Can I, John, can I just jump on something Julia was saying there? The other thing about Pat McAfee, and Julia and I talk about this all the time, Pat McAfee now is shorthand for the entire a change that's happening across the media industry, which we love to talk about here at Puck, which is about that the talent is the market unit, right? And you build franchises around the talent. And just to see legacy media players like ESPN and Fox understand, and we're going to see this happen in cable news too.

19:22We're going to see it happen at CNN and MSNBC. Just understand that these digital digitally native you know youtube creators creators on any social media platform and saying um these these people are have figured out what the audience likes and and it says they get to dictate the terms of the deal but we want a piece of it and so even if that means licensing the content and letting them do whatever they want to do and letting them get away with things that ESPN wouldn't let its own talent get away with. That is the game that they have to play. And that is indicative of a change that is going to happen just across the media industry, more broadly speaking.

20:08And so, Julia, that's exactly right. McAfee is the sort of like the first mover in a space that is really redefining how these legacy networks, whether it's news sports what have you approach talent and and gain audiences and maintain a stake despite the fact that their industry is in decline all right two questions replicating it two questions actually first for you Dylan

20:39Eriq Gardner:for is this unique to sports like you know the news business better than anybody I know, where can we see a Pat McAfee of the news business? Does that exist right now? Well, you're already seeing ways in which, if you look at the New York Times, you're seeing ways in which they've gone in and talked, sort of at The Athletic, brought in YouTube creators and are sort of, they're sort of dipping their toe in the water there. I know that those conversations are happening in the cable news space. I know that if you look at businesses like, anything from, like, let's take MSNBC, for example, you talk about a punch bowl, which covers Congress day in and day out, you talk about more sort of opinion, or analytical companies like Pod Save America, or the Bulwark.

21:37Are there conversations happening that say, Well, look, no one is watching MSNBC at 1 p.m. or 2 p.m. on a Tuesday afternoon. Could we conceivably do a McAfee-style deal where we license the video feed and bring that in? I mean, I don't want to break the fourth wall here, John, but you're on NESN right now, right? Like someone decided that the work you are doing, you are at the top of your game in covering the business of sports. and that is valuable to an NESN. You're going to see that happen across the industry because the audience and the audience engagement is more meaningful and because the economics, frankly, are just better than that sort of old school model of hiring a bunch of people, trying to build them up, putting a ton of makeup on them, doing a heavily produced round table talk where no one says anything of interest because all the people who have something interesting to say have gone out and joined the pucks or the sub stacks of the world.

22:43Eriq Gardner:I feel like I have to give a shout out to Sportsnet Pittsburgh as well as Nesson. Yes. The other, Julia, McAfee doesn't exist in a vacuum. I mean, you mentioned Dave Portnoy. In sports, other people that have gigantic contracts like Stephen A. Smith, he seems different than from McAfee to me. or a Scott Dan Pelt or somebody who else is in sports that is similar to what McAfee does? In sports specifically, I don't think there is anyone who can do what McAfee does. And I'll give you a good example of how that translates into a more old school product for a new school audience. Look at what McAfee does on college game day.

23:29He is standing up on chairs. He is singing songs. He is doing he is he finds a way to put a smile on people's faces who are normally kind of just standing there. And, you know, they're excited because they're college kids and they're drinking and they're excited for what the game is going to happen. But they feel like McAfee is one of them. Doesn't take much. And I think if you look at the difference between him and Portnoy, Portnoy leans into being the heel. He leans into being the guy that people watch, but they don't necessarily want to hang out with. McAfee's big advantage, which he has learned from some of the most popular creators, is that he wants is that athletes want to hang out with them.

24:08Coaches want to hang out with them. But college kids want to hang out with them. And the ratings on college game day on the linear side are through the roof. The ratings on the linear side for McAfee on ESPN are increasing. So there is, to Dylan's point, a linear audience who's tuning in. It's not just the YouTube audience. But I think the more important thing that McAfee is doing is increasing the value of these licensing deals to other platforms. And so if you look at what Bill Simmons is doing with Netflix, which is bringing some of the Ringer shows over, if you look at the reported Gary Linkler, I always get his last name wrong, deal with the Rest is Soccer, where he is reportedly going to have a daily kind of show during the World Cup on Netflix.

24:49they're trying to find ways into these creator-athlete-adjacent spaces that they think will bring an authenticity for fans who don't necessarily just want to watch SportsCenter. And if you look at what Stephen A. Smith is doing, he's going in the opposite direction, where Stephen A. Smith is part of his contract. Yes, he's getting a report at, I believe, $100 million from ESPN over the next several years to be still the face of that network. But he also is focusing on his YouTube channel, where he's talking more about politics, and he's leaning into the Stephen A. Smith brand. And I think to Dylan's point, the biggest lesson we have in media and sports media is just one of the largest parts of media as a whole is this idea that talent is synonymous with brand.

25:31And the brand of talent goes far beyond what it used to be. It's no longer just being known for a show or a network. And so I think that's the lesson for a lot of these other networks trying to compete with McAfee is that they need to find someone who can both encompass the brand but can also be a standout star on their own.

25:51Eriq Gardner:I'm going to take one more quick break. We're going to come back. Eric, we're going to get your person of the year, sports business-wise. A great choice, in my opinion. We'll be right back.

26:07We are live from Fetty's house. Guests are gathering around the TV, even with a big storm outside. Are we worried about the feet? Nope, they have Xfinity Wi-Fi. Get reliable fiber-powered gig Wi-Fi with Peacock included to stream the beautiful game this summer. Xfinity. Imagine that. Restrictions apply. New gig internet customers only. Actual speeds vary. Offer for Peacock Premium with ads currently at$10.99 a month value and limited to Xfinity internet members with newer upgraded gig speed or faster service. Activation required to access content. Peacock must be activated within the first 90 days.

Read the full transcript

26:32Management of existing subscriptions may be required to avoid multiple subscriptions and duplicate charges. Third-party billed subscriptions continue until canceled. Hey, it's Bill from the Bill Simmons Podcast. FIFA World Cup 26 fans, listen up. is the official beer sponsor of the FIFA World Cup 26. Michelob Ultra is giving away$1 million worth of FIFA World Cup 26 tickets and prizes. Enter now at MichelobUltra.com slash superior access slash FIFA World Cup 26. Michelob Ultra FIFA World Cup 26, superior access, no purchase necessary. Open U.S. Residence 21 Plus begins on December 1st, 2025, ends on July 31st, 2026, multiple entry periods.

27:02Visit www.miclobaltra.com slash superior access slash FIFA World Cup 26 for free entry, entry deadlines, prizes, and details.

27:08Eriq Gardner:So one of the stories of the Puck Cinematic Universe as John Kelly likes to say regarding our newsletters is the chaos that is involved with college sports. And that is my lead into you, Eric, to talk about your person of the year for 2025 sports business is. Judge Claudia, welcome. So, so yes, this is for obvious and not so obvious reasons. The obvious reasons are the chaos in college sports. We're, you know, we see massive realignments. We're seeing, you know, compensation wars among athletes and coaches. Just it's such instability right now in college sports. I mean, I remember a time when the Pet.com ball used to mean something.

27:59And these things, it's just, you know, like, I don't know where we're going to be three years from now. It just seems like every year things are transforming in college sports. But I also picked it for a different reason. And this one's not so obvious. I think that artificial intelligence is a hugely important topic in our realm. And I fought long and hard about, well, how has AI impacted sports? And to a lesser degree, it has. I don't think that AI, you know, we're never going to want to really watch, you know, AI robots play against each other. It's probably not going to be sports rights bidding wars over, you know, humanoids playing.

28:50But what it does do is it opens up a lot of free time for the rest of us. There's going to be a boom in amateur sports. It's going to be a re-examination of the worth of universities. And for all that, I'd say that, you know, her rulings have not only shifted the business of college football and basketball, but I'd argue are having massive downstream impacts to amateur athletics. And so as everything kind of gets reordered and as, you know, there's a newfound reflection of, you know, the worth of four-year universities and as, you know, amateur sports bubbles up, who has the power, who, you know, can restrain someone from licensing their name, likeness, and image?

29:40I would suggest that her rulings are going to become more and more important in the coming years. And we're just at the beginning of a massive shift in this arena.

29:55Eriq Gardner:So take us through Judge Wilkins' rulings. What specifically were some of the rulings that she came up with, and how were we seeing that play out in the college field? Yeah, I mean, the first rulings had to do with the restrictions on what college athletes could do as a condition for participating in college athletics. So the NCAA and the leagues would tell these students that if you want to play in our sport, you have to pretty much give up your rights to compensation. You have to sign over your name and image and likeness. And it wasn't at first directed. They weren't saying like colleges have to pay these athletes.

30:40What they were just saying is that, no, this is an antitrust problem. And they couldn't stop the athletes from doing stuff on their own. And there's been all these follow-up rulings about how far this goes like what what are rules that you know uh you know can be uh justified for competitive reasons and what are rules that that can't be uh followed uh and and that's just led to you know one big decision after the next and you know now we're kind of like floating into this this arena where you know a lot of you know the powers that be in the in the college sports world have been very reticent to regulate because they don't want to get brought into court.

31:25And that led to, you know, big settlements between athletes and, you know, the lawyers representing them and all that. But, you know, we're still at kind of the beginning stages of this. And, you know, and there's still, you know, dozens of lawsuits that go on over things like, you know, inducement to to to to pay athletes and, you know, you know, trying to get them to switch schools in random moments. What happens if an athlete's promise something and then and then and then the college or the NIL collective changes their mind? I mean, there's just a lot of of headaches and problems. You know, can students unionize?

32:09That's another big one. Are they employees? You know, for the ones who are at state universities, you know, what are, you know, what can we do about the state laws that don't let, like, you know, state employees unionize and all that. And it goes on and on and on. And so, you know, we're at like, you know, the midstream of all this, but there's still lots of problems to figure out. And, you know, some suggest that that's going to take legislation at the federal level. You know, but I don't know what the answer is going to be. All I do know is that 10 years from now, things will look radically different than they do right now.

32:52Eriq Gardner:You just listed about a half a dozen issues that are paramount in college sports right now. You picked Judge Wilkin as your person of the year. Are these issues all going to be solved in the court of law? Are they going to be solved in Congress? Are they going to be solved by the Big Ten and the SEC coming together to create their own rules? How do you see this playing out? See, that's part of the problem here is that no single person has control over this. Part of it's going to be solved in federal courts, but some of it's going to be solved at the National Labor Relations Board, and some of it's going to be solved at state legislatures.

33:40And some of it's going to be bargains between collectives of universities and collectives of players. And right now, everyone is kind of, you know, kind of scrambling in the dark for a way out of this. And no one's really kind of figured it out yet. I would say that, you know, Claudia Lickens is at the forefront because her decisions were formative. And she still, you know, oversees a bunch of very important cases. But absolutely, this, you know, legal strife that's happening in all, you know, necks of the woods. And, you know, I would not want to be like a general counsel at one of these universities right now.

34:22You're just dealing with problems left, right and whatnot. They just keep coming up.

34:29Eriq Gardner:I am totally flabbergasted by college. Just in terms of I almost have never seen an entity like college sports beg Congress to get involved and save them from themselves. And you're seeing that consistently across across colleges. And I think it's because, like you said, it's the Labor Relations Board or it's judges or it's, you know, a rogue conference or maybe a rogue school within the conference that's trying to set a new precedent. And it's it's it's becoming increasingly difficult for people to to corral all of that. Yeah. And I mean, one thing that I would point out is that, you know, we've spent a lot of money on college basketball and college football.

35:14especially the men's programs. And, you know, we have we still have something on the bus called Title Nine. And so, you know, we're trying to like reorder everything on the fly. But there's still, you know, statutes out there that men and women sports have to be, you know, invested at an equal level. You know, and colleges are faced with all these differing priorities at the same time. And it's just a trouble spot and on top of that like i said you know we're entering this age of ai where you know a lot of people are kind of you know kind of reconsidering the worth of of a four-year university when there's not like ample white-collar jobs out there and so you know i think sports and the kind of socio-economic elements of of college kind of go hand in hand and uh you There's going to be a lot of things that shift in the next few years.

36:17I'm very interested to see where this all heads.

36:21Eriq Gardner:What was the name of the bowl that you shouted out? I have very fond memories of my Maryland Terrapins representing the state of Maryland in the Poolan Weed Eater Independence Bowl a couple of years ago. A big victory. I said the Pet.com Bowl. I don't know. There were some funny names for college bowls. I remember waking up on New Year's and getting excited about the 15 games that I had to watch. It didn't matter who was going to be the national champion. Now it seems like it's completely changed. Now it's all about who's making the playoffs and talking about the Pat McAfee's. There's ample content out there for the talking heads to discuss who's in and who's out.

37:07It's just a completely different realm than it was 20 years ago when, you know, we I was just, you know, excited to watch some two random teams not necessarily playing for much in the Peach Bowl or whatever.

37:22Eriq Gardner:I'm going to move on to my person of the year for 2025 is David Ellison and Jason. It is Mark Shapiro, who is, of course, the president of WME Group and TKO. and um you know one of my biggest stories that i'm that i've been covering for the past probably two years and certainly i'm going to be covering for the next five years is that they're going to be halves so the nfl when they come up with their rights they're going to break the bank you know they're a half uh the nba they're going to break the bank you know or they did break the bank. And they certainly have Big Ten, SEC. And then you have sort of the have-nots.

38:08Eriq Gardner:And I think you saw that this year when Formula One was going out and it was trying to find a buyer. And it ended up with a pretty good deal with Apple. But that was certainly after every linear TV network ended up passing on that. And so within this environment, you have Mark Shapiro, who I think could sell ice to Eskimos. And he had the rights to the UFC. And it looked like he was going to have to split up UFC among two, three, maybe even four different networks, which is something that consumers always detest, sort of having to find their different sports on different platforms. And he ended up getting Paramount to agree to a seven-year,$7.7 billion deal, which is really a factor of great timing because David Ellison had just taken over CBS and Paramount and he needed to make a splash.

39:11Eriq Gardner:And that was a splash. So that was great timing. But then he turns around and he has a WWE package of PLEs, sort of, you know, all of the WrestleManias, the pay-per-view events. And he ends up selling it to ESPN for a five-year deal worth, I think,$325 million per year,$1.6 billion for that WWE package. And so as I'm writing about the networks that are really tightening their belt and saying no to different rights, here he comes with UFC. Nobody's going to confuse the UFC with the NFL and with the NBA. And somehow he was able to figure out these massive deals. We might look back on 2025 and that Paramount UFC deal as a high watermark, not for all sports rights.

40:09Eriq Gardner:Like I said, you have big time sports that are still going to get paid. But where would you put UFC? In the upper middle? Certainly not at the top. and he was able to work out what was a really rich and great deal for his company, which nobody should have doubted because he's also the one that negotiated, to your point, Julia, Stephen A. Smith's big deal as well. So he knows how to negotiate. If I need somebody to negotiate for me, I'm calling Mark Shapiro or Nick Khan. I'm going to get them out there to try to work that out. but I just think what Mark Shapiro has done with TKO and WME Group has been really worth a shouting out for 2025.

41:00Eriq Gardner:I want to throw that out to you for comment, Dylan or Julia. Oh, sure. Yeah, I mean, look, here's what I'll say. It is rare, I think, if you're a seller, It's rare that you have an opportunity where, one, you've got David Ellison entering the market, willing to pay a premium because he needs the assets. He's trying to make a splash. And at the same time, you've got other players who recognize it's the through line through this entire conversation. You need to have sports rights. You need to have some piece of it. And so the question is, you know, these things get locked up. NFL gets locked up.

41:42NBA gets locked up. Some people get priced out of it. and you say, what can you have? Can you have WWE? Okay, let's go. Let's take it. That is a great market. And Mark's sense of timing there, I mean, some of it's just fortuitous to be sitting on those rights at this particular moment when people are hungry. That's great. But his ability to recognize that and strike while the iron is hot is great. And in the process, I just have to say, he also earned himself what is probably the most glowing profile that's ever been written in the Wall Street Journal of any media executive. I went through that article twice trying to find one critical word about Mark Shapiro.

42:26So kudos to him for that. But yeah, it's just a really good prediction.

42:30Eriq Gardner:I was going to go on to the prediction bets afterwards and try to put some money on him to be the next CEO of Disney. It's certainly in the conversation.

42:45he also benefits from what i keep referring to as the severity of barbelling in culture and this also leads to kind of rights to your point john there are big must-haves right the nfl the nba less so than it was 20 years ago but certainly still today and then there's the have-nots but the have-nots can also be rethought of as niche or just ones with heavy amounts of of fans in a small concentrated market. And the thing about UFC and WWE specifically is that these are the type of events. We talk about the, you know, eventification of sports that Netflix is interested in. These are the type of events that draw significant brand sponsors that do feel like monoculture in a period of fragmented, dismediated, kind of delineated audience attention.

43:39And these are the type of events that if you monetize correctly can be extremely valuable at a smaller cost than having to go into some of the bigger leagues where there's increased tonnage. Where it's harder to convince advertisers, certainly not impossible, but harder to convince them that they need to be on every match in hyperlocal markets. And so I think if you read the tea leaves of what David Ellison is trying to do as someone who has a lot of other sports where there is the ability for regular season advertising and built in fandom, if he can lean into having more events and Mark Shapiro suddenly shows up and says, I have something that I think has a growing base and can certainly be eventized in a new era.

44:22I think that becomes a really savvy deal for someone who's thinking about what the future of audience participation in sports looks like, who's thinking about betting, who's thinking about how to broach broadcast audiences and streaming audiences, and how to do it all in a way that shows to the rest of the sports and Hollywood players that he's willing to spend money. And so when Mark Shapiro looks at exactly who wants that type of deal, David Ellison is kind of the perfect partnership. And so I think it was a win-win on both sides.

44:56Eriq Gardner:Julia, that is the perfect final word. I could do this every week, guys. Thank you so much for joining the varsity again, two weeks in a row. I'll see you guys all at the Christmas party, Christmas party, I hope. Dylan, are you coming over for that? I will be in New York that week, and I will try to get in just in time for that. Hey, sincere thanks for taking the time. I know how busy you three are, so I appreciate it.

45:30Eriq Gardner:That was great. We have David Ellison, Pat McAfee, Judge Claudia Wilkin, Mark Shapiro. That's a great foursome. I really want to thank Julia, Eric, and Dylan for taking the time to join me this week. These types of conversations, honestly, they could go on for hours. They do go on for hours on Puck's internal Slack channel. So I had so much fun with this, and I really hope that you did too. More importantly, though, I want to thank you for listening to The Varsity, an Odyssey podcast in partnership with Puck. I also want to thank the executive editors from Puck. That's Gobby Grossman, Ben Landy, John Kelly, the great team from Odyssey, Bob Tabador, and Patrick Antonetti.

46:10Eriq Gardner:And don't forget our new partners from Nessun. There's Greg Poth and Mark Malaka. If you like this podcast, make sure to sign up for my newsletter. It's also called The Varsity. Head over to puck.news and use the code word, The Varsity, all one word for a 20 % discount. And I will see you on Sunday.

46:35reason with the sun. Trust us. We've tried. This summer, it's time to put that angry ball of fire on mute. Columbia's OmniShade technology is engineered to protect you from the sun's harsh rays that can burn and damage your skin. The sun is relentless, but so is our gear. Level up your summer at Columbia.com to spend more time outside and less time slathering on aloe lotion. You're welcome. Columbia. Engineered for whatever.

From the publisher

Puck superfriends Julia Alexander, Eriq Gardner, and Dylan Byers reunite with John to debate the sports-media class of the year: David Ellison muscling into the rights wars, Pat McAfee cementing himself as the on-air talent north star, and the rest of the industry’s biggest winners of 2025.

Explore how prediction markets skirt state authority and pose risks to consumers at AmericanGaming.org/predictionmarkets (http://americangaming.org/predictionmarkets)

To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Varsity

All 140 episodes
Sports Media’s Winners (and Losers) of 2025The Varsity · 47 min
Listen in VO