In short
Podcast Summary: This Cultural Life - Rose Tremain
Episode Overview In this episode of *This Cultural Life*, host John Wilson converses with Dame Rose Tremain, a prominent British writer known for her extensive body of work, including 17 novels and numerous short stories. Throughout the discussion, Tremain reflects on her personal experiences, her relationships, and the influences that have shaped her writing journey.
Key Concepts and Discussions
Early Life and Influences
- Father's Influence:
- Tremain discusses her father, Keith Thomson, a playwright, whose unsuccessful career inspired her interest in storytelling despite his lack of encouragement for her to write.
- She describes a distant relationship with her father, noting that he left the family when she was ten, which contributed to her sense of loneliness.
- Mother's Role:
- Her mother sent her to boarding school at a young age, showing little interest in her academic ambitions. This lack of parental affection led to feelings of neglect that influenced her creative imagination.
Education and Encouragement
- Schooling:
- A teacher named Ida Robinson recognized Tremain's potential and encouraged her to pursue higher education, which was thwarted by her mother's opposition to her attending Oxford University.
- University of East Anglia:
- Tremain later attended UEA, where she met novelist Angus Wilson, who played a crucial role in her development as a writer by encouraging her to pursue her writing ambitions.
Writing Process and Inspirations
- Samuel Pepys' Diary:
- The diaries of Samuel Pepys significantly influenced her novel *Restoration*, with its themes of materialism and societal change echoing the experiences of the 1980s.
- Diverse Settings and Characters:
- Tremain's novels span various historical periods and locations, with characters often depicted as outsiders, reflecting her interest in exploring marginal perspectives.
Themes in Literature
- Gender and Identity:
- Tremain touches on the themes of gender and identity in her works like *Sacred Country*, which explores transgender experiences, as well as the challenges faced when writing about subjects outside her direct experience.
- Cultural Reflection:
- Tremain's works often comment on societal issues, such as economic migration in *The Road Home* and the representation of marginalized voices.
Recent Works and Creative Philosophy
- Latest Short Story:
- Tremain’s most recent work is a short story titled *The Toy Car*, illustrating her continued engagement with storytelling.
- Creative Drive:
- Tremain reflects on her creative process, emphasizing her enjoyment of writing as a vital aspect of her life. She notes the importance of balancing multiple projects and allowing ideas to mature before committing to them in writing.
Takeaways
- Forgiveness and Understanding:
- Tremain emphasizes the importance of understanding and forgiving parental shortcomings, suggesting that these experiences shape creative expression rather than hinder it.
- Writing as a Reflection of Life:
- Through her discussions, Tremain conveys that literature serves as a tool for understanding and reflecting on life, both personally and socioculturally.
- The Challenge of Authentic Representation:
- The conversation raises significant questions about the ethics of representation in literature, particularly regarding writing experiences outside one's own.
Conclusion Dame Rose Tremain's insights into her life and writing career provide a rich tapestry of personal narrative, creative inspiration, and reflections on the literary world. Her journey from a lonely childhood to becoming a celebrated author underscores the transformative power of storytelling and the complexities of personal and cultural identity.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:06Welcome to This Cultural Life, the series in which leading artistic figures choose the most significant influences and experiences that have inspired their own creativity. I'm John Wilson and my guest in this episode is the author Rose Tremaine. Having written 17 novels and five collections of short stories over the last 50 years, she's one of Britain's most prolific and popular writers. She was one of only six women on the inaugural 1982 grant a list of best young British novelists, alongside Martin Amis, Ian McEwan, Sarman Rushdie and others. Her fifth novel, Restoration, was nominated for the Booker Prize in 1989.
0:44She won the Wet Bread Prize for Music and Silence in 1999 and was awarded the 2008 Orange Prize, the precursor to the Women's Prize for Fiction, for her novel The Road Home. Having already been made a CBE in 2007, she became Dame Rose Tremaine in 2020 for services to writing. Her most recent work is a short story called The Toy Car.
1:09Rose Stramane, welcome to This Cultural Life. Thank you. Your first choice of creative influence for this programme that you've chosen is your father, Keith Thompson. He was a playwright, although from what I gather not a particularly successful one. What did he write about, first of all? I never read his plays because I was deemed too young to read them and he left my family when I was ten. So I've never read his plays, but they were called, I think, At that time, it's sort of drawing room comedies. And playwrights like my father were really wiped off the scene when writers like Arnold Wesker...
1:48John Osborne. ...dated story John Osborne. I mean, he didn't see it coming, bless him, but it did come. Well, the arrival of the angry young men. Yeah, and it was quite right that that happened. It was a sort of old-fashioned format that he was following. But nevertheless, he was a very hard worker, and I grew up for the time that he was in the family. My sister and I were always told, you know, be quiet, Dad's working, and we'd hear the tap, tap, tap of the typewriter. And all my life I've associated that with something good. So it's endeavour. That is a purpose. With an honourable endeavour.
2:24I sort of grew up with the idea that that was a miraculous thing to do and it was only later I understood that it had never really worked out for him. But I think that was a thing that I've carried forward into my whole life, really, that writers who sit in a room all day are doing something admirable, something honourable. That's really fascinating that you don't know what the work was like. You know... I have an awful suspicion that it wasn't marvellously good. Right. And do the plays not exist in print? Or have you not tried to look for them? My relationship with them has been so complicated, John.
2:59I haven't ever gone down that road. They probably do. I don't know, really. Did he talk about literature with you? Did he instill a love of reading? My sister and I used to read girly comics. School friend, I don't think that exists anymore. And he was really amused by those. We were kind of incarcerated in the nursery with a nanny. And he used to come up to the nursery and read comics. And they really amused him. But I don't remember him ever, ever reading stories to me. And I just know how important, I mean, I have a daughter and grandchildren now, reading stories to children is so important.
3:36I don't ever remember either him or my mother doing that. So at the time, even when you were growing up, the relationship with him was quite distant then? I think it just was in those days, you know. I've tried to be forgiving about my parents because they had been through the war. You know, he fought in the war, my father. He wasn't actually wounded, but I think he'd had a fairly terrible time. And I think by the time I was around, And the parents just, they just wanted to have a good time. They wanted to feel free. They wanted to feel that life was returning, that they could go where they want, do what they want.
4:13They had endless affairs with different people. It was almost like a sort of strange sort of musical beds going on, as I learned later. And the children, me and my sister, were just sort of in the way, really. They weren't focused on our needs in any way. They were focused on their own needs. And I think one has to be forgiving of them a bit, given that they'd come out of the war. And your father left the family home when you were, what, 10 years old? I was 10, yeah. And he remarried. Yes. Did you continue to see him? No, that was a huge sadness in my life, actually. I did see him once or twice as I was getting into my 20s.
4:55But he married again. he had four more children and I think as I understood it I think a very happy second marriage but it was a bit of a devastation in my life because I had rather adored him even though at a distance little girls and their dads I mean it happens, doesn't it? It's awful to say at the age of the dynamic that he remains an enigma I mean he represents from the way you describe him almost an absence he wasn't there but a sadness as well still? Yes, I think it was for many years a slightly neurotic sadness. But I really am of the belief that if those things we carry around from childhood, that if you're kind of strong enough in your own life, that there comes a moment where you can say, enough.
5:40You know, I've carried this weight. I've blamed them, if you like, for things that I've done or not done or sufferings that I shouldn't be undergoing. You can endlessly blame the parents. and I came to a moment I think in my 40s where I thought enough that's what happened in your childhood Rose and you've just got to get over it you've got to get over it it still I'm ashamed to say still sort of sometimes comes back as things do that you've experienced very strongly in childhood they come back don't they even you know however old you live they come back well you still obviously feel it very deeply and I'm really intrigued why you've chosen your father as this formative influence given that you didn't see him very much.
6:22He left when you were very young. You don't really know anything about his plays and yet it's what he represents in that room writing. So it's the idea of writing. It's the idea, absolutely the idea. And I think there was a sense as a little girl, I didn't know how I was going to go about doing it, but that that was where I would go. What about your mother? What was your relationship with her like? Well, again, I think she was not centred on the children. there was a rather strange moment because she sent both me and my sister Jo off to boarding school as soon as we were well I was sent at 11 and there was the goodbye moment at Liverpool Street Station she had a great friend called Pam McKenzie whose daughter was my great friend Jane McKenzie and Pam McKenzie and my mother came to see me and Jane off at Liverpool Street Station and kiss, kiss, goodbye, you know, us in our little grey uniforms, not wanting to leave really.
7:25And then I heard them turn around and say, oh, good, now we can get on with life. Like we were in the way it relates to them, feeling that they had come through a lot of suffering and that what they rode now was a period of calm and happiness for them. But they didn't really think about what we needed. Did you feel like an inconvenience at that point, do you think? I'm not sure. I'm not sure. I think that one of the sort of tragic human dilemmas is that we go on forgiving our parents, don't we? We keep forgiving them, trying to love them, trying to make them love us. And sometimes it really, you have to sort of say, well, this isn't working.
8:08But no, I think when you're that age, when I was 10, 11, I think you just accept what is. And looking back at that time and that lack of parental interest or affection, what do you think that did for your creative imagination at that age? If you're already sort of formulating ideas of creativity, of writing specifically. If you have parental neglect, you feel very lonely. and I discovered quite early on, I think in the sort of first few months at school, that actually writing, going into another world, was a miraculous way of curing loneliness. It was totally absorbing. And these little plays and stories that I wrote when I was at school absorbed me absolutely and utterly and I think were a huge kind of baffle against loneliness.
9:01Because you could create people around you. Other worlds. I mean, it's this other world thing, isn't it?
9:13Was there anybody in particular at school who encouraged that? There nearly always is behind a writer. There's nearly always some lovely forgotten person who doesn't get many mentions. But in my case, it was an English teacher called Ida Robinson, who was referred to as Robbie. There's a wonderful image that I have held all my life of her. She was very thin and she'd been at Oxford. We're talking about the 1950s here. And this wonderful image I have of her was that it was so cold in the school and there was just no money, I think, for heating the classrooms. So in winter she used to teach wearing a fur coat.
9:52It was a slightly ratty coat. It was so cold in those rooms that we used to wear fingerless gloves. This is in rural Hertfordshire, isn't it? Rural Hertfordshire. What was it, an old manor house or something? Yeah, it was a very beautiful Jacobean house, actually, which had been turned into a school and I think is now a golf course. But, yes, Ida Robinson, or Robbie as we called her, I think she understood all of us amazingly well. And she kept saying to me, you know, work on your stories. She was very keen on us doing pictures of the things we wrote. And I think, actually, this sounds like a small thing, but I think it's rather counted with me that being able to see really vividly the people that I'm trying to invent, being able to actually see them, I sort of get the feeling with some writers that they haven't seen their characters well enough and so they're not enabling me to see them.
10:46And I often wonder whether my ability to see characters sort of doesn't come with the idea that all through my childhood I was encouraged to do pictures of what I was writing. What were the academic ambitions at that time? Well, you know, this was a sadness to me because going back to Ida Robinson, Robbie, I think she saw that I was sort of clever and that she wanted for me what she had had. It was quite, even in the, we're talking about the late 50s now, quite rare for, you know, women from those little private schools to get to Oxford. She said, we'll put you on what you call the Oxford path, which would have entailed, obviously, staying on at school, you know, doing A-levels.
11:30She said, I was amazingly happy at Oxford. You will fit in very well there. You will learn so much. You will break away from your parents. So I went home and told my mother, who by then married somebody else, that I would work towards Oxford. And she said, oh, no, no, no, no, absolutely not. She mentioned the word blue-stocking. I don't want a blue stocking for a daughter so she wouldn't be budged on this she took me away from school when I was 16 sent me off to Switzerland finishing school finishing school, can you imagine? and how were you finished there? I made some good friends I made some wonderful friends and I learned French and French became very important in my life actually Well, you don't usually write directly about your life in your fiction, but one of the recurring settings is France and Paris in particular.
12:26And you studied at Sorbonne for a while. How had you got to the Sorbonne in the first place? Well, the place that I'd been sent to by my mother was a little glorified secondary finishing school called Mademoiselle Anita's for girls. but I had a wonderfully kind of anarchic friend who was at the Sorbonne called Miranda and Miranda said to me, oh, this is ridiculous, you shouldn't be there. Why don't you just discharge yourself? So I did this. I marvel at my own daring that I could just do this without telling my parents and I remember this was the autumn term and the minute I got to the Sorbonne, I thought I'm in heaven here, you know, student life and the Boulevard Saint-Michel.
13:16We're talking about 1960. Miranda and I had various lads used to go to jazz clubs and it was just a sort of blur of wonder, really. There was a sort of backdrop hum of Edith Piaf and Charles Aznavour and Juliet Greco. I remember, you know, being dark. I thought, I want to look like Juliet Greco. With the eyeliner? Yeah, I've never given up the eyeliner, actually.
13:54Your next choice for this cultural life, Rose Tremaine, is going to the University of East Anglia and meeting the writer Angus Wilson, who taught there. So were you already an admirer of his work? Did you know his work? Yes, I did. His novels are very unfashionable now. They're almost like the way a 19th century novel is constructed. there's huge amounts of description and place setting and huge amounts of sort of throat clearing before the story happens. But I was in the early 60s, 1963, a great admirer of Angus Wilson then, and I read somewhere that he was teaching at the University of East Anglia.
14:32And I thought, you know, having missed the Oxford path, so-called, that I really needed to get to university and start again after the follies of Paris and sort of get myself on a path to work. I was broke, you know, apart from anything else. But my mother actually did pay. There were no fees for students in those days, but she gave me a little allowance which would enable me to be a student at UEA. So she was supporting you in a way, having discouraged your academic ambitions originally. And having gone to the Sorbonne, I presume that was a help in getting to University of East Anglia. Yes, I think it was.
15:11And these were early days at the University of East Anglia. It was very small. But yes, working with Angus Wilson was just wonderful. He was a wonderfully infectious, funny... Very flamboyant, wasn't he? Flamboyant. Wore very colourful clothes. Colourful clothes and bow ties, sometimes chaparelli pink bow ties. But he was a fantastically inspirational teacher. He was teaching the 19th century novel, mainly Dickens, particularly Dostoevsky. He adored crime and punishment. This is a novel which is absolutely deep in my heart from that moment of him bringing it so much alive. There's a terrible moment where one of the impoverished characters, the wife of a minor character called Mrs Marmoladoff, takes her children and she dances for money on the bridge, in the cold, in her rags.
16:00And Angus is reading this. He'd stop the seminar every now and then and read you this passage in his quite high-toned voice. And I can hear him reading this and then weeping. He thought, this is so tragic. This is terrible. This is how sad it gets. So it was sort of an osmosis thing that happened to me with Angus that I actually understood, I think, really deeply for the first time that literature was not sort of something out there that was just being done by other people. It was life. It was a way of talking about life. It was a way of understanding. And you could feel it. You could totally, totally feel it and see it.
16:42And it would do two sort of conflicting things, that it would take you out of your own life into the world of Mrs Marmoladoff. But the experience of reading, it would also inform how your life might change. So it's doing these two wonderful things. And I think I learned that in Angus Wilson's seminars. Was he only teaching about other people's writing or did you show him your writing? I mean, did he encourage you to write? I did. I thought, do I dare to actually, you know, the student who goes cringing up to the tutor? And for a long time I didn't dare. And I think friends said to me, oh, go on.
17:18He may not like it, but you'll get some feedback anyway and he might help you make it better. So I did. And he said, yes, dear. Yes, yes, good. You must keep on with this. And he did an amazingly generous thing when my first novel came out, which was quite a while later. 1976, he wrote a very praising puff on the cover of the novel. You know, he had no need to do this, but perhaps he was the first person who believed in me seriously. And so when I did manage a first novel, he was very pleased in a genuine way. This was your first novel, Sadler's Birthday, which was published in 1976. 76, yes. I've got a note of the cover blurb.
18:04He says Sadler's Birthday is as far from the stereotype of a young woman's first novel as it can be. What did he mean by that, do you think? I think what he meant is that I wasn't writing about my own life and this is how my career has gone on. It's taking lots of diverse subjects and most of them quite outside my experience. Sadler's Birthday is about a servant in a big country house who inherits the estate and then can't cope with all of the expectations and the responsibilities. Jack Sadler woke up in what had once been the Colonel's room. Now, like the rest of the big house, it was his. They'd had a wing each, the Colonel and his wife Madge.
18:46They'd like to meet at mealtimes in the dining room, listen to the news together, or play a game of gin rummy. But several doors divided them while they slept. Everything he could see from this window belonged to him. You're in his head all the time, And I think that's what impressed Angus. So he encouraged you at UEA to start writing. And the creative writing course then is now extremely famous for producing great writers. And people like Ian McEwan and Kazuo Ishiguro are among the alumni. But in a way then, you were the precursor. You were the first student to be taught creative writing there in a way, weren't you?
19:24Well, yes. He's on record as saying that actually it was in response to the work that I'd shown him that he thought this was a good idea. He'd done a couple of semesters at Iowa in America where they were ahead of us in thinking that creative writing was something that could be taught. As you know, you can teach musicians, you can teach actors, and he was always thought, well, you can't teach writers, which indeed is true, but you can teach them to be better. I think he understood by the time I left that this might work in this country. And, of course, he was lucky enough to get Ian as his first student.
19:56There was no formal seminar room. I think they used to meet in the Maid's Head in Norwich. And then Ish, Kazuyo Shifuguro, he was the first one in a class. And the programme took off from there and then Mark and Bradbury joined it. And then you taught there later. You did some creative writing teaching there. Yes. And I think you've sort of answered the question already, but I was going to ask about that idea of whether creative writing can be taught or whether it's innate talent and then you draw that out from your student. I think that's right. I really do. You can't make a writer. from scratch?
20:30It's such a complicated question that isn't it because one of the things is that writer has got to want to be made I mean I taught there for 8 years so I had a lot of different kinds, types and quality of student there including some marvellous ones like Andrew Villa and Tracy Chevalier and some who were just never going to do it but I think that is right, it's not precisely teaching. The nearest I can get is that you become a really deeply thoughtful editor. Editors aren't always thoughtful, but you become one of the deeply thoughtful kind who really will spend the time delving into what this work is doing and how it could be better and where the weaknesses are and where the strengths are and what the strengths are.
21:21And is that what Angus Wilson had done for you? Yeah, very much so. So if he was the first person really to take you seriously as a writer and encourage that, and you were starting to take yourself seriously as a writer, did you ever send your father any of that work? Yeah, yeah. But it was really difficult. He couldn't respond to it.
21:46Couldn't or wouldn't? I don't know. I don't know. He just wouldn't, I think. I don't know. I mean, maybe he saw me actually starting to make a little headway in a career that had been so disappointing to him. I guess for any father-daughter, that's difficult. I mean, I do understand that. But no, he couldn't really get with it, which was sad. I mean, as I said to you, children go on wanting to please their parents. I went on sending in the books, and then eventually I didn't send them anymore. What did I hope for? I mean, what did I hope for? I don't know. Fatherly pride? Yeah. He was never going to give that.
22:36Never. Never. Do you think he was jealous?
22:44Maybe. Maybe. I don't know. I can't say what he felt. Something strong, I think. But what it was, I don't know.
23:03Your next choice, Rose Tremaine, is reading the diary of Samuel Pepys, which you say directly influenced your bookish shortlisted 1989 novel, Restoration. Were you already planning a novel set in England in the reign of Charles II when you read the diaries? Yes, I was. It was the time of Margaret Thatcher. What I thought I wanted to write was a novel about materialism in our contemporary world from the kind of hippie socialism of my time in Paris that we'd manoeuvred ourselves into a position where everybody was kind of furious about making money and buying property. And, you know, it was a great sort of materialistic age.
23:44And I thought, that's what I want to write about. And then I understood a thing, which is that novels are very slow to write. and even slower to publish. So by the time you believe you've caught a sort of zeitgeist at the moment, the zeitgeist is long gone. And then I thought, I wonder if I looked around history for a moment where things change in a sort of in a clap of thunder like they changed, it seemed to me, when Thatcher came in. And I found the restoration of Charles II where, you know, all the previous years had been the interregnum and the emphasis on hard work, on duty, no show, no bling, everything kind of dark, severe, hard work, dedication, patriotism, all those things.
24:33And then when the king comes back, it's like everything kind of explodes. There's a great sort of clap of laughter. And back comes the theatre, back come the palaces. I also read that one of the things that King Charles II did was to select promising suitors for the various mistresses that he had at the time and pay them money or indeed give them estates, as happens to my man, Robert Merrivel. Which is your central premise of the story. The protagonist of Restoration, an invented character, Robert Merrivel. He's a kind of a bit of a self-deluded buffoon in a way, isn't he? Trying to extend he's a physician but arrives at court promising to, who is charged with curing the king's dog, has got some ailment, and he succeeds in doing that and gets the king's favour.
25:20Is there much of Pepys, Samuel Pepys himself, in the creation of Merrillville, do you think? Huge, absolutely huge. The Pepys diaries, I mean, they're wonderful as a kind of an absolute wraparound of what that age was like. January 23rd. To the king's house, and there saw the humorous lieutenant, A silly play, I think. Here, in a box above, we spied Mrs Pierce, and Nip took us all in and brought to us Nell Gwynne, a most pretty woman, who acted the great part Celia today, very fine, and did it pretty well. Because he's so honest in the diaries, there are many, many moments where he's sort of endeavouring to be serious, and he finds his thoughts wandering.
26:03I mean, like, he's in church, and he's not paying attention to the sermon because he's thinking about the decorations to his dining room. and the fact that he tells his diary about all his failings and his foibles and his lusts and his ambitions and his disappointments and his exceeding love of the king, which he knows is sort of vaguely inappropriate, but the Stuart King's not to be trusted. Yes, I think I could not have written Restoration without a great immersion in the Pepys diaries. I am, I discover, a very untidy man. Look at me. Without my peri-wig I am an affront to neatness. My hair, what is left of it, is the colour of sand and wiry as hog's bristles.
Read the full transcript
26:47My ears are of uneven size. My forehead is splattered with freckles. My nose, which of course my wig can't conceal, however low I wear it, is unceremoniously flat, as if I had been hit at birth. I can imagine that creating a rogue like Merivelle must have been great fun as a writer. He's colourful, he's sort of rumbustious. The other important thing is he's written in the first person. So do you have to get into character to write a character like that? Very interesting with that because I wrote 30 or 40 pages in third and I thought, why? This is quite an interestingly promising story. Why isn't it working?
27:24It seemed to me to be just inert and sort of boring. And I set it aside. I know this story can work. I know it can work. I know this character can work. And I thought, actually, what I have to do is just set aside all my anxieties about going into first-person narration. I knocked off a couple of pages, and I realised I was enjoying myself so much. I do think this is the thing about writing, what's kept me going for goodness knows how many years, that you do need to enjoy it. Not all the time. You can't enjoy it all the time, but there need to be moments where you think, yes, this is fun, the character's amusing, There's a way to go with him.
28:05Where will I take him? I had no idea where I would take him. When I started off writing that character, it begins as a physician and then he's sort of fatally lured, lured away by all the wonders at court. And I thought, actually, by the end of the book, he'll come back and he'll be the sort of sober man or relatively sober man that he is at the beginning. And then I realised, when I'd written about, I don't know, 20 or 30 pages, I thought, actually, the man I've written will never do that. He will never do it. He will go on kind of making errors, laughing, not taking life seriously, being seduced by all that that restoration period had to offer.
28:45So then I had to completely redevelop the shape of the book. You are so well known for the range of your subject matter, from restoration period England to the Danish court of the 17th century in a book called Music and Silence, and wartime Switzerland in the Gustav Sonata. What is the process of research when you're preparing a new book? Do you have to do it all before you start? Or do you come up with the story, the characters, the plot, and then research as you go along? I think it very much depends on what story you come up with. I mean, to take a novel that I set in 19th century New Zealand called The Colour.
29:22I was in New Zealand, in the South Island of New Zealand, and I was so struck by the landscape. I'd never been there before. and on an afternoon, Richard and I went to a little museum dedicated to this 1860s gold rush in New Zealand and it was a lot of pictures of the gold miners in their moleskin trousers and their hats and then sitting to one side, there was a picture of a woman, one woman on her own, wearing a black dress with a little white collar and I thought, what was she doing there? That's my story. It's a woman who finds herself, by some means, I don't know what the means were, caught up in this terrible gold rush.
30:01And I started making notes for this on the plane, literally on the way back from New Zealand. But to answer your question, then I thought, well, I know nothing about it. I've got the beginnings of a story. But then I had to do all the research and really find out about how the gold rush worked, what it looked like, who lost their fortunes, who made them, what it did to the landscape. Was the land stolen from the Maori, which indeed it was, you know, or bought for a pittance. So all the research began then. But I had to sort of, in a way, set the original story aside and then see what I could find in the research that made it feel right or made it feel not right.
30:40With that story, it's quite interesting that it was a visual inspiration. It often starts with an image. You know, somebody I've seen waiting at a bus stop or a bird landing on a wall or an image. I never know when it's going to come. and I just sort of, as my life has gone, I've just sort of thought, well, just hope it keeps coming. I don't think there's anything else I could do. I used to say to my students at UIA, and I think this is not bad advice, when you get an idea, don't go straight from the idea to the writing. Let it sit. Let it sort of... Marinate. Marinate, yeah. I talked about the diversity of theme and location and time, do you enjoy this sort of time-shifting aspect of your work, the fact that you can find yourselves in such different times in history?
31:34Yeah, it's like having a new companion. Oh, so I've got somebody who is living in southern France, or I've got somebody who actually is in Switzerland during the war. Obviously, then I have to inform myself, I have to do the reading. But the new companion becoming more visible, becoming more interesting is a good feeling. Many of the characters are outsiders as well, people on the margins. Do you think they're the sort of people that you are drawn to or is there something of you in those characters? I'm not sure that I know the answer to that. I think your point about the margins is absolutely right.
32:07I think that I'm made quite uneasy by novels which are about the characters that we know, are about the real people that we know. It works much better for me to come into subject through somebody who is invented, who is a minor character. Merivelle is a minor character in the court of King Charles, but we learn quite a lot about, or anyway, a version of King Charles through the character, but it isn't pretending to be history. So the minor character in any story, it can bring a distance upon the real characters that perhaps nobody's seen before. Restoration is one of your most successful novels.
32:46It was nominated for the Booker Prize in 1989, losing out to Kazuo Ishiguro for the remains of the day. Yeah. I mean, great to be on the Booker Prize shortlist. Was it disappointing not to have won? Yes, no, but, you know, prizes. I think Ishii's book is a marvellous book, you know, so it's tremendously exciting to be on a Prize shortlist. And, yes, it still feels exciting, but I remember going to see Jim Crace when he had failed to win the Booker with the novel called Harvest. He was completely cool. He was having a nice time. And I thought, that's the way to be. Let's be cool. You were Booker Prize Judge twice as well, weren't you?
33:24Yes. Did you enjoy that process? Well, the reading is horrendous. I'm not quite sure. I mean, I started to lose my eyesight. The first, my eyesight used to be really good. Now I can't see anything. I have about five different pairs of glasses. Well, because you had to read so many books. Well, it's like 130 books. Yeah, I think I read this year. It was 156 they read. So the reading burden is terrible. What is fun are the meetings. And when you've actually got through most of the reading, then those that are quite fun arguing about books is always something I've enjoyed. What about the idea of literature as a competitive sport, though?
34:04Some people would say it's a bit unedifying. What, that we shouldn't have prizes at all? Or you shouldn't be judging one book against another because they're all so different. They're all so different and we all have different opinions and things we like. and you could get many of your guests around this room who would probably never agree on the things that we all liked. So it is a bit sportive. But maybe it adds colour and we live in an age where reading is sort of on the slide, isn't it? If prizes and the giving or not giving of prizes wakes people up to the idea that books are really kind of absorbing and fun.
34:37They can be. Did you see the recent comments by Roddy Doyle, who was the chairman of this year's Book and Prize panel, and said that many of those 150-odd books were just not very good and he couldn't understand why they'd even been submitted. Well, I get sent books all the time for endorsement. I mean, I get two or three a week. And to be honest with you, I'm with Roddy Doyle. Are there too many novels published every year? Yes, there always were. I remember Michael Holroyd saying this to me just about the time that Restoration came out and I thought, oh, don't say that. Am I one of the ones that shouldn't be there at all?
35:10But now I think, yeah, far too many. And every living person thinks they can just go away and write a novel, it seems to me, which is not true. In a time of kings, an ordinary physician came to court. Restoration was also turned into a movie starring Robert Downey Jr. as Robert Merrillville. And Meg Ryan was also in it and Sam Neill was playing Charles II. I'm just going to reveal to listeners that you rolled your eyes as I started that question. first of all how involved in the film were you? Not. At all? No, the boys who made it were very sweet to me at the beginning and then they just sort of abandoned me but they abandoned me because they abandoned the story.
35:55The point about the story is that it's actually it's a novel about friendship and they wanted to turn it into a romance which it isn't and I think they had wonderful actors and no disrespect to any of the actors actually and Downey Jr was very good, very funny but it could have been so much better if they'd sort of understood what it was about. Or asked your opinion? Or was that not part of the deal? Was it just sort of sell the rights and let them get on with it? I didn't think it was but when they saw that my opinion of the first script was not very good they didn't want to talk to me anymore.
36:28You say Restoration started thematically. You were thinking about Thatcherism and those attitudes of the day. Some of your books seem ahead of their time thematically. Sacred Country from 1992 is about a girl who wants to be a boy and undergoes gender reassignment surgery. And The Road Home is about an Eastern European economic migrant who arrives in the UK. Both of those issues, of course, are very current. They're very, very now. Do you ever consider whether if you were writing those books now, you would have to approach the stories in a different way? Oh, definitely. I don't think I could write them now.
37:05I think it would be considered a really difficult and betraying thing to do because I am not those people. But Sacred Country was interesting. It was 1993, and yes, it's about a girl who actually believes she's a boy. I'd read Conundrum by Jan Morris, which is a fine narration of that dilemma. I thought, actually, I wonder if I can write something which is going the other way. the girl who wants to be male and I went to talk to people at the Gender Dysphoria Trust but people said to me at the time when I was embarked on it they said oh it's such a marginal subject why are you writing about this and I came up with all sorts of reasons the main one being well there's probably a kind of another person inside us all that we sometimes see but seldom see but feel that we are from time to time and I think I'm writing about that as well.
38:03It felt to me to be completely valid to be writing about it, but I think now I would just be cancelled for writing about it. Because you didn't have direct experience of that situation. Does that worry you, though, that, I mean, authors, or you seem to suggest that authors need to have some kind of licence to write about specific situations and experiences? I never did, but I'm being told that now. and we've all been told that in the last, what, five years, would you say? Or maybe a bit longer, is it? I mean, we've been told that we can't write about certain things and I just have to accept and maybe choose a little bit more carefully.
38:42I think actually if you go into history, people don't mind. It's not hurting anybody now or it's not offending anybody now or it probably isn't. I don't know, maybe even that. I mean, yeah, there have been historians cancelled as well, haven't there? So I don't know. They're strange times. They're strange times. We're only supposed to write about what we know, what we've experienced directly. Well, interestingly, your most recent novel, Absolutely and Forever, which is a kind of a rites of passage novel about a girl's first love affair, feels like it's closer to your own life than much of your previous work.
39:19Is that right? Does it reflect a kind of a teenage love affair that you'd have? Yes. It was actually a teenage love affair that was had by a friend of mine. It was while we were still at school. And then, exactly as happened in the book, he was sent away to Paris and he fell in love with a Greek girl, Marita. So my friend's life was sort of put on hold by that. I mean, she'd seen a pathway for herself at a very, very young age and it was suddenly taken away. I've been wanting to write this story for ages and then I thought a lot of experiences of my own could sort of come into it. Alongside the novels, you have published several collections of short stories.
39:57What is the difference for you in writing in those two forms? The short story is quite a difficult form. I do think it is. Harder than the novel? Yeah. Talking about it one day, I called it petulant. And by that I meant it kind of insists on its own shortness. But it's also in a sort of rather cross way, insisting that it be about something moving and interesting and enduring. So I think that what the short story does, it slightly turns readers into critics. I think when we read a novel, we surrender to the novel and we can even surrender to the moments where it digresses and different baggage comes in.
40:35And the short story can have none of that. It just needs to be absolutely as net and clear and arrow-like and it needs to chop us down. So I think the ideas that present as short stories are in their essence different from the ideas that present as novels. with a story, if I get an idea for it, I tend to hit it like that. Straight away. It doesn't matter if you're in the middle of a novel at that time. No, no. I actually quite like having two or three projects going on at the same time because we're not the same every day, are we? You know, I can face that today. And what drives you on creatively?
41:08Well, it's maybe good not to analyse that too much. I mean, David Hockney's on record as saying, well, you know, I get up in the morning and I start work. I loved it when he said that. I thought, yeah, yeah, yeah, that you do. David, start work. So I think that's my case, get up in the morning, start work. Like your father did. Yeah, I guess he did. He spent most of his evenings going to nightclubs I think, so maybe he didn't get up that early. But that's the thing, it's just the pursuit of the next story then. Yeah, I think I'd feel very lonely if I didn't have one on the go. It comes back to loneliness and companionship again, doesn't it?
41:46Well, there you go, there you go, yeah. Rose Tremaine, thank you so much for sharing your cultural life with us. Thank you, John.
42:01Well, I do hope you enjoyed my conversation with Dane Rose Tremaine, who's just one of many award-winning novelists who we've had on This Cultural Life, including Bernadine Everisto, Margaret Atwood, Ian McEwan, Zadie Smith and Salman Rushdie, to name just a few. You can hear them all on BBC Sounds or wherever you get your podcasts internationally. And please do subscribe to the series so that you never miss an episode. From series producer Edwina Pittman and me, John Wilson, thank you very much indeed for listening to This Cultural Life.
42:36As part of Limelight from BBC Radio 4, this is The Betrayed. The story of a family torn apart by a political extremism sweeping across Europe You see this guy in the red t-shirt? I'd allowed myself to believe that this moment would never come Do you remember the looters outside the sports shop last year? The one guy who'd let a scar slip? I think that's him My brother Frank, standing with a group of angry men, shouting abuse at the police Is it the same guy? I now knew that Frank was an anti-immigrant activist Listen to the whole series right now, first on BBC Sounds.
From the publisher
Dame Rose Tremain is one of Britain’s most prolific and popular writers, having written 17 novels and five collections of short stories over the last 50 years. She was one of only six women on Granta magazine's inaugural 1982 list of the best young British novelists, alongside Martin Amis, Ian McEwan, Salman Rushdie and others. Her fifth novel Restoration was nominated for the Booker Prize in 1989, she won the Whitbread Prize for Music And Silence in 1999, and was awarded the 2008 Orange Prize - the precursor to the Women’s Prize for Fiction - for her novel The Road Home. Having already been made a CBE in 2007, she became Dame Rose Tremain in 2020 for services to writing. Her most recent work is a short story called The Toy Car.
Rose Tremain tells John Wilson how her father, a largely unsuccessful playwright called Keith Thomson, inspired her childhood interest in storytelling, although he never encouraged her to write. She recalls how she first started writing fiction to help her cope with loneliness in a household where there was little parental affection. Rose recalls how it was a teacher at her boarding school who first recognised her ability and encouraged her to apply for an Oxbridge university place, only to be dissuaded by her mother, who sent her to a finishing school in France instead. She credits the novelist Angus Wilson, one of her English Literature tutors at the University Of East Anglia, for giving her the confidence to write her first novel. She also chooses The Diary Of Samuel Pepys as a major inspiration on her 1989 Booker-shortlisted novel Restoration, which was later turned into a Hollywood film starring Robert Downey Jnr. and Meg Ryan.
Producer: Edwina Pitman



