In short
The hosts and guests argue that “woke” politics has returned “with a vengeance,” using the aftermath of Cambridge academic Jason Arday’s suicide, UK immigration/sexual-violence guidance for asylum seekers, and a US “woke” culture-war debate involving Candace Owens.
Guests and backgrounds
- Francis Foster (host).
- Winston Marshall: host of “The Winston Marshall Show.”
- Tom Slater: editor of Spike.
Key claims
- They argue Arday was a fraudster who lied about achievements; his death is treated by left-wing activists as “saint jason” martyrdom, shifting blame from Arday to the press.
- They claim journalists were pressured (police knock) and that left media incentives encourage “apologies” that chill scrutiny.
- They cite a Home Office leaflet telling asylum seekers it’s illegal to rape and guidance about sexual violence, claiming it proves authorities knew the risk.
- They argue foreign nationals/selected nationalities have higher rates of sexual offending and that benefit access for foreign nationals should be restricted.
Notable examples
- Trafalgar Square vigil attendance allegedly exaggerated (30,000 claimed; capacity said to be 10,000).
- Nathan Kofnas suspended at Ghent University; J.K. Rowling calls him racist.
- Jess Phillips clip about “catcalling” analogy.
- Afghan rape cases and “no recourse to public funds” visa rules.
- Discussion of DEI/benefits and “no access to benefits” policy debates.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Tragic Case of Jason Arday
0:45 to 2:30
Discussion on the life and tragic death of Jason Arday and media's role.
“We'll talk about the Candace Owens, the great debate between Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson.”
Media's Reaction and Accountability
2:30 to 4:25
Exploration of media's accountability and reactions following Arday's death.
“I, in my very unscientific kind of method, thought maybe we're in the low thousands there.”
Vigil and Public Perception
4:25 to 7:00
Discussion about the vigil held for Arday and the public's perception of him.
“and there's a professor at Plymouth University who is also covering this called Dr.”
Consequences of Lies and Fraud
7:00 to 9:40
Examining the consequences of Arday's life of lies and the impact on his family.
“about that whether Nathan is or isn't later on.”
The Role of Media in Academia
9:40 to 12:20
Discussion on how media influences academia and public narratives about individuals.
“Okay, no one would really give a shit, right?”
Misinformation and Press Intrusion
12:20 to 14:00
Exploring the claims of misinformation surrounding Arday's story and press intrusion.
“There was a copy of today's newspaper and a reassurance that he was being treated properly by his captors.”
Media Ethics and Responsibility
14:00 to 14:40
Explore the ethical responsibilities of the press in reporting sensitive stories.
“It was just information which was put out there.”
The Consequences of Public Scrutiny
14:41 to 17:24
Discuss the implications of public scrutiny and apologies in media narratives.
“If you look at just the reporting that went into Jack Grove's Times Higher Education piece, he put together a 97 page dossier.”
The Role of Media in Elevating Public Figures
17:25 to 19:16
Analyze how the media's portrayal can transform individuals into political symbols.
Redemption and Apology
19:17 to 21:49
Examine the concept of redemption and the power of apologies in public life.
“As a counter example, I was thinking of Jonathan Akin, who was a member of John Major's cabinet, who was convicted of perjury.”
Show all 28 chapters
The Dangers of Mental Health Stigmas
21:50 to 23:06
Discuss the stigmatization of mental health issues in relation to public criticism.
“And actually, that would have been a great story.”
The Return of Woke Ideology
23:07 to 23:48
Reflect on the resurgence of woke ideology and its implications for discourse.
Race Realism and Its Critiques
23:49 to 27:38
Engage in a nuanced discussion around race realism and its societal implications.
“got a black person who's done wrong, who is a saint.”
Assessing Public Figures and Racism
27:39 to 28:00
Consider the implications of labeling individuals as racist and the complexities involved.
“speak to Nathan Coughness, particularly having not sat down with him or not read his work in any detail.”
Debating Race Realism and IQ
28:00 to 29:58
The discussion explores the complexities of race realism and its implications.
“He has become the kind of central villain of this story, even though it's also the press in general being dragged into it.”
Controversy Surrounding Jason Arde
29:58 to 31:14
The hosts analyze Jason Arde's credibility and the surrounding controversy.
“And if it turns out that Nathan Kofnus told a racist joke in a pub 33 years ago or whatever, then that doesn't really matter.”
Asylum Seekers and Crime in the UK
31:14 to 34:26
The segment discusses a leaflet issued to asylum seekers regarding legal expectations and cultural behaviors.
“Let's move on, though, because I don't think this is super important to carry on.”
Government's Role in Immigration Issues
34:26 to 36:24
The hosts critique the government's handling of immigration and crime statistics.
“like the idea that you could just even producing this leaflet doing the graphics for it coming up with these nifty little one-liners.”
Crime Rates Among Foreign Nationals
36:24 to 39:27
The discussion focuses on crime statistics related to foreign nationals in the UK.
“Now, foreign nationals are about one in five in Britain are foreign nationals.”
Cultural Attitudes Towards Women
39:27 to 42:00
The hosts examine cultural differences in attitudes towards women and related issues.
“We also run an enormous Enough campaign teaching men in the country about how their behaviours could be perceived, whether that's stalking behaviours, harassment behaviours, harassment in public.”
Hypocrisy in Cultural Conversations
42:00 to 43:50
Exploration of the hypocrisy surrounding discussions of rape culture in the UK versus attitudes in Afghanistan.
“upon contact with terra firma in the UK.”
The Left's Dilemma on Cultural Critique
43:50 to 46:05
Analysis of the challenges faced by left-leaning commentators in addressing cultural differences and sexism.
“But I don't imagine the New Zealanders or like you said, Germans or, you know, people from other societies that have similar attitudes to women's rights and so on are likely to massively ramp up sex offensives in the UK.”
Debate on Foreign Nationals and Benefits
46:05 to 48:20
Discussion on the controversial topic of foreign nationals claiming benefits in the UK and implications for citizenship.
Financial Implications of Mass Immigration
48:20 to 54:40
Examination of the financial strain on the UK due to mass immigration and the need for policy reform.
“In the situation our country finds itself in, we're going to have to be a little bit more strict about how this is done.”
Engaging with Audience Feedback
56:00 to 56:48
Learn how the hosts encourage audience interaction and feedback.
The Rise of Conspiratorial Thinking
56:48 to 1:00:49
Explore the shift towards conspiratorial narratives in American politics.
“and then you have the sort of Andrew Tate, Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens wing, which are increasingly becoming these rabid conspiratorial lunatics.”
Post-COVID Distrust in Institutions
1:00:49 to 1:04:50
Discuss the impact of COVID-19 on public trust in institutions and its effects.
“And as a result, everyone's like, well, the obvious thing can't be the obvious thing.”
The Charisma Factor in Public Figures
1:04:50 to 1:08:09
Understand the role of charisma in promoting controversial figures and ideas.
“I mean, he's a particularly kind of pyrotechnic, spectacular example of this, you know, the turning the frogs gay, et cetera.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Francis Foster:Hello, everybody, and welcome to a very special new show that we are doing, rounding up the news of the week. Joining me, of course, is Francis Foster, but also a very good friend of the show, Winston Marshall of the Winston Marshall Show and editor of Spike Tom Slater. Great to have you guys. Looking forward to having this chat with everybody. We've got three stories that we're going to focus on this week. We've got Jason Hardy and the fallout from his tragic taking of his own life. We'll talk about the debate about illegal immigration, particularly there's the conversation the Home Office has very helpfully put out a leaflet saying it's wrong to, it's illegal in fact, to rape.
0:39Francis Foster:I don't know if you guys were aware of that. Also benefits for foreign nationals, we'll talk about that. And finally, has the right, particularly in the US, gone full retard? We'll talk about the Candace Owens, the great debate between Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson. All of that coming up very shortly. But first of all, let's start with Jason Ardey. This was a Cambridge academic, clearly a fantasist, made all sorts of claims. He was a top-level marathon runner. He didn't speak until he was 11, didn't read until he was 18, but went to Cambridge, became a PhD. And when all of this stuff was revealed, he got a lot of media attention, let's put it that way.
1:17Francis Foster:In fact, he'd had a lot of media attention before this, but now the media attention turned negative. And he tragically took his own life. Indeed. And he tragically took his own life. And now, apparently, the media killed them. Tom, you've obviously covered this story. Are you responsible? Well, apparently so. I mean, I woke up on the day after to find out that I was actually guilty of murder. There's been lists doing the rounds on social media. Has anyone seen this? Because there's nothing sinister, is there, about throwing up lists of journalists you dislike? And they're actually openly calling for embarrassing professional or personal information about us in order to give us a taste of our own medicine.
1:55Yeah, I found the meltdown after Jason Arde's tragic death to be almost much more revealing and disturbing than the whole Jason Arde scandal in general. Like people will be aware of the amount of lies that he told, the plagiarism accusations. A lot of questions were asked about how the hell did someone like this end up at Cambridge University? Why did no one notice that all of these wild claims about kind of Herculean athletic achievements as well as, you know, a remarkably, a remarkable kind of string of personal crises which wouldn't really have passed the sniff test. But what's happened since is, first of all, the idea that just reporting on or criticising public figures is tantamount to driving them up to the bridge and pushing them off, which I think is really, really disgusting.
2:40thing and also just a complete rewriting of history i went to that vigil in trafalgar square on monday night and it's as if these people either haven't been paying attention or just doubling down on this kind of myth of saint jason in order to bash the press so it's we we like to think that we'd escaped like peak blm a few years ago peak woke a few years ago but it's back with an absolute vengeance now and they've chosen as their champion again a man whose story ended in very tragic fashion but isn't hardly the sort of unimpeachable victim of a racist press that he's being made out to be winston how many people were at the vigil oh how many people i mean these claims with 30 000 are to be frank complete rubbish i mean everyone knows that there is a kind of inflation of numbers at every demonstration every organizer does it regrettably um i think someone pointed out that you couldn't even fit 30 000 in the entirety of trafalgar square and we were just up on the area just outside the steps of the National Gallery.
3:35I, in my very unscientific kind of method, thought maybe we're in the low thousands there. I'm not 100 % sure, but it wasn't 30 ,000, that much I can tell you for something.
3:44Konstantin Kisin:I think the official capacity for Trafalgar Square is 10 ,000. You can't fit more than 10 ,000 people in that space. Yeah, so the stand up for racism, all these people on the Ardy side of the argument, claiming there's 30 ,000 is absolutely and kind of fitting in this whole story. I've covered the show. I had Nathan Kofnass, who was the former Cambridge fellow who revealed the story on Substack. Actually, there's people who've revealed this story about Ade as early as when he started at Cambridge. And I point to Simon Webb here, who's a YouTuber who goes under the name History Debunked. So this has been covered for some time.
4:23And there have been journalists like at The Times, Jack Grove, and there's a professor at Plymouth University who is also covering this called Dr. David Harris. And before we sort of, you know, this story is crazy because it's sort of, it's pulled down a whole infrastructure, not just Cambridge, but individuals like Simon Baron-Cohen, like Novara Media, and we're going to get into that. But I think it's just worth pointing exactly what the tragedy is because you mentioned tragedy constant. this is a man who spent his entire life lying and his lies caught up with him he was a career con man he was a fraudster now I don't take any joy in saying that we all fought short of the glory of God I don't purport to be without sin the the real villainous thing though the thing which I think is actually an evil thing was what happened at the end it's not just that he committed suicide is that rather than face the consequences of a lifetime of lying and fraud, fraud, which, by the way, he might have had legal pushback against, you know, I don't know, and we can't tell now, but I think technically some of the stuff he's done is illegal and he could have faced consequences there.
5:39But instead of doing that, he decided to abandon his children. And so now there are two children who are going to be fatherless. And that, for me, is a terrible thing. And that's the real tragedy for these two children. And that's where my personal sympathies and empathy lies. And that's the core of this story, which has now become a saga. A saga so much that even yesterday, Nathan Kofnass, who has moved from Cambridge to Ghent University, was then suspended at Ghent University, not just by anyone, though, by a trans gynecologist professor and rector who was formerly called Dave de Sutter and is now Petra de Sutter and was also a member of the Green Party in Belgium.
6:27So it's just the most absurd saga that never seems to end. I mean, by the time this episode goes out, I'm sure there'll be new developments.
6:37Francis Foster:Francis? So I think one of the things that's really actually interesting about this case
6:43Konstantin Kisin:and one of the things that people don't discuss about enough is that a lot of people on the left of people who are pro Jason Arde will make the claim that it was exposed by a racist professor Nathan Kofnast or a racist academic. And we can talk about that whether Nathan is or isn't later on. But what's really interesting is, well, the mainstream media wanted to expose this, yet they had a pervert, well, a literal knock on the door from the police effectively silencing them and by the way this isn't not that it would matter in the slightest this isn't the daily express that we're talking about this isn't even the daily mail this isn't really the times this is the times educational supplement and everyone can drink now as somebody who used to be a teacher and actually used to read the times educational I'm constantly smiling.
7:36Konstantin Kisin:Yeah, you know, you've got to lean into the brand, Tom. But, you know, as somebody used to read the Times Educational Supplement week in, week out, pretty much cover to cover, it's not exactly the most right wing of publications. And this is a very, very powerful example that if you silence the press, what you ultimately cannot do is silence the truth because eventually the truth will get out. And if it's not going to be legitimate sources, quote unquote, then it's going to be somebody speaking about these sources that you do not like. Ultimately, the truth about Jason Arday, who also he wasn't just a professor, he had a professorial chair, possibly the highest achievement in academia.
8:24Konstantin Kisin:That is the role and that is the position that that man had. And when you are on at that level and you do not deserve to be at that level and you are a fabulous, it will come out. And unfortunately, it came out in the manner that it did. But it wouldn't have happened in this way if we hadn't have silenced the press last year and in the years before that.
8:50Francis Foster:I think the real reason it wouldn't have happened is if this guy, you know, people say he's a vulnerable guy. Again, there's no way for us externally to judge that. Perhaps he was, perhaps he wasn't. If he wasn't promoted way beyond his remit, way beyond his station, and if we didn't live in a world in which people are given things by virtue of the skin color they have, the various abilities of disabilities and so on. And putting him in that position seems to me set him up for this, not least because Stephen Edgington, who we've had on the show, who everybody will be aware of, He wrote a great article detailing how for six years, the mainstream media pushed Jason Ardy into this position, into the position of being this media star.
9:36Francis Foster:Like if he'd just been an obscure Cambridge academic who, thanks to DEI, got pushed into a position where he taught apparently very badly and people didn't feel that they were getting their money's worth. Okay, no one would really give a shit, right? But the problem is, once you elevate this person into question time appearances, into appearance on all sorts of media platforms, into being held up as this great bastard. I mean, there's this great clip, we're not going to play it today, but of Jason Hardy talking to James O 'Brien, which he absolutely does O 'Brien like a kipper and just tells him how amazing O 'Brien is and how brilliant he is and how wonderful he is.
10:12Francis Foster:And O 'Brien is sitting there, you know, and I think he says, oh, it's great that it's the end of the episode because otherwise I'd be crying. so he went around getting all these opportunities and then people go why has he got so much media scrutiny look to be honest with you i think winston myself and actually all of us have been on the end of media scrutiny um you know and it's not necessarily super pleasant when people are saying things about you invariably when you are in the in the limelight in this way a lot of the things people say about you are not accurate and not entirely fair that just tends to be what happens but if there's substantial basis for the claims that people are making that's sort of the thing that really matters and the one other thing I wanted to add is as well it seems to me like one thing that has happened since his taking of his own life is we've actually built an incentive structure which encourages people in that situation to do what he did that's what I see here because if you're someone who is caught out doing something in public that you shouldn't be doing and you get a lot of negative media attention then you you have this now apparently this one trump card where people who've been covering your story fairly fair accurately and fairly will then come out and say oh my god i was so wrong and we actually have a clip of aaron bastani who you know we respect and he's been on our show many times from navara media and and And there was someone else from Navara Media as well who did this mea culpa struggle session.
11:45And it's just worth seeing what this incentive structure creates in the reaction of the media. I wish I could ask Jason for his forgiveness for what I said, but I can't. What I can do is ask for the forgiveness of his friends, colleagues and family. Now, they might not want to forgive me. That's their right. That's the point. Forgiveness is theirs to give, not mine to take. It's about them, not me. Professionally, I erred, but ethically, and that's what I really care about, I really screwed up. I can't make amends, obviously, but I'm going to reflect on my behaviour in all of this and how I can use my energies more productively, more productively to cover those issues our audience really care about, those stories that really matter, and on how I can make a difference for the better, not the worse.
12:39Francis Foster:it's interesting i do wonder if if say a story about a right-wing academic say nathan kofnas for example if nathan kofnas was involved in plagiarism and fabrication of of claims etc would that be a story of interest to navara viewers and would would aaron have that same reaction do you think tom no not at all i mean also it's worth pointing out that despite the fact that we've seen these kind of hostage video style apologies. I mean, all Aaron blessing was missing. There was a copy of today's newspaper and a reassurance that he was being treated properly by his captors. And I like Aaron, he's a smart guy.
13:16And there's also someone who's kind of reliably interesting on the left, which is quite a rare thing if we're being honest these days. But not only is that kind of spectacle so pathetic, it's also so out of whack with what it is they supposedly actually did. Navarra didn't cover that story particularly extensively. I mean, Aaron there, if I'm right in saying, is apologising for one tweet that he posted in which he referred to Arde as a con man, which to be honest, is more or less an accurate description. That's one of the things about all of this, which is really concerning to me is that there's often kind of spasms of anger with the press.
13:50There's some kind of scandal. There's some kind of horrific tragedy. Press intrusion might be brought up. The occasions on which the press will just not tell the truth. this is you know hardly new what's happening now is that the press are being accused of murder demonized smid for telling the truth for doing their jobs for doing what cambridge and simon and schuster and all the other kind of elite institutions that are they had any contact with should have done which is to do a basic sniff test to look into the claims about his life and his academic record that he had been making and that's what makes it so so sinister i think i I mean, you've got activists saying that there was misinformation posted about Jason Arde.
14:35There wasn't. It was just information which was put out there. And it's often being presented as if this was kind of scandal mongering, like there were just rumors about Jason Arde and that the press with no thought to his state of mind were just circulating it. If you look at just the reporting that went into Jack Grove's Times Higher Education piece, he put together a 97 page dossier. He had academic experts pour over it. he had people run it through software all the kind of different steps this was a really overwhelming case and i think bless them but at navara media i don't know what's going on there other than is this audience capture or is this just being caught up in the middle of one of these sort of moral panics basically that we find ourselves in but um well i think maybe this would not be the same
15:17Francis Foster:some of the details were different you know to maybe to steel man their position you know if you if you feel that you've contributed to someone taking their own life and you genuinely feel responsibility i mean there is this kind of slightly moronic in my opinion view uh online which is like never apologize well no like if you've done something wrong definitely apologize because it's a decent thing to do but the problem that i see is like you said i don't think aaron or navarmi did anything wrong aaron did talk about this story but he was right to talk about this story so to then apologize this is what i mean by saying you're giving people a trump card by encouraging them to effectively take their own life in a situation where they're facing fair scrutiny because i think that's a really important point because we are presenting the taking of one's own life almost as a rational response to public criticism yeah that's a really dangerous road to go down really it's naturally going to chill the press as well are we saying that you can't go after a politician or a prominent person in public life public intellectual because of what might happen.
16:22I mean, that's a really chilling precedent to say. I don't know why more people would recognise it.
16:26Francis Foster:Well, listen, you've had your fare of shit from media and online and all the rest of it. What do you think about this? And I've issued public apologies. I've definitely got opinions about what I might, I can speculate about what's happening behind the scenes in Navarro media. I'd add to, just on what Aaron Bastani seems to be apologising for, which is, as Tom rightly says, it's not necessarily even an opinion, but let's take for the sake of a of argument it's an opinion that he had that our day was a con man does that mean that aaron bastani is no longer going to publish op-eds is that it are navarra media now only going to publish facts no more opinion i mean fantastic i'm thrilled if that's the case um but uh i thought you were pro free speech mate i'm pro free speech but uh even navarra media test my uh patience a little bit there but it's put himself in a situation I'm not sure how he can get out of it professionally at what point it can he and can't he report on things he's kind of created a trap for himself it's gonna be very curious to see how that plays out and as for the apology now I did issue an apology and I this is five years ago now it's about i tweeted about andy no's book when i was still in mumford and sons and i upset everyone around me because they were of the mindset that this was sort of evil and i was contrite because i was like maybe i don't know everything here and i was sorry that the people around me had been hurt now it might of course speculating here about bastani but it might be the case that a lot of people at Navarra Media are very hurt and upset and and it might not be reasonable that they're hurt and upset they might be hurt and upset but for completely the wrong reasons and he probably is their friend and not only that it'd be a component that the core fan base of Navarra Media won't be happy with the position that he took because it seems to be that they are from that it's it's coming from the kind of far left you know these are openly socialist communist woke people there's another curious thing about navarro media which is that they spent the last six months repositioning themselves as against identity politics and against woke but now they're doubling down now they're going like full woke and because it's not just bastani the editor as well was literally crying giving an apology so uh navarro media what they do next is is extremely curious well i think the thing that's really interesting about
19:03Konstantin Kisin:this as well is that whenever somebody dies in these types of circumstances they get elevated and they no longer become a person anymore they become a political symbol not only they become a political symbol but they sort of achieve sainthood which is how you talk about how people talk about jason arday like he was this decent honorable man who was hounded to his death he did nothing wrong and then this is ultimately tragic and all responsibility no responsibility is at the hands of Jason Arde because he is the saint he did nothing wrong and all of the responsibility is at the hands of the press and the thing that's also really interesting about this is you see these apologies coming from Navarra media and the reason is is because this shows that there is still a civil war happening at the left in the left where you have the more rational actors like Aaron and you have the hyper progressives the more radical and I thought that the more sane members of the left in the UK like people like Aaron were starting to gain some traction were maybe even starting to win that particular war but what we've seen with that abject capitulation at navara is that the lunatics unfortunately are still very much running the asylum and indeed tom made a really interesting point about um well what about mine yours was a
20:38Francis Foster:bit shit mate but tell us about venezuela
20:46tom's point about the example and and frankie's point about the example that uh of what our day, whose responsibility this is here. As a counter example, I was thinking of Jonathan Akin, who was a member of John Major's cabinet, who was convicted of perjury. And he was sentenced to 18 months, I think. I'm not sure exactly how much of that he served, but he certainly went to prison and came out of there. I think he then became a vicar, a prison rector or something like that. Anyway, that's the sort of redemption. I believe in redemption. And I also believe there was possibility for redemption for our day.
21:21And to do that, he should have apologized because he was the one who did the wrong thing. And sorry, wrong thing. Countless wrong things. I mean, I've counted well in 60 plus occasions of unverifiable or verifiable lies that he said. So I mean, they're absolutely outrageous. There was a way out for him. Who was it who was around him saying, you know, stick in there. You did nothing wrong. The press are evil. Well, no, they should have said, sorry, you've actually screwed. I love you, mate. You've screwed up here. You shouldn't have lied. There's a way out, though. You can apologize. And actually, that would have been a great story.
21:55And unfortunately, what's going to happen instead is he's going to be held as some sort of martyr for the left. You can say them at the vigil. What were they saying? They were saying rest in power. And they've lynched him. I mean, the people on stage, DEI grandma Diane Abbott was saying stuff like, you know, he's been, it's a racial murder. No, they're making them to a victim. And there was another redemption, an actual Christian redemption way out of this that could have been the example for society would have been so healing. It would have been great.
22:24Francis Foster:yeah i think that's a really important point perhaps to wrap the segment up on which is suicide is a temporary permanent solution to a temporary problem and the answer in the situation where you find yourself under fair scrutiny for something you've done or a series of things you've done there's always another way and that way is to admit fault apologize and by the way francis and i were joking about it you know before this tragic uh end to the story his book if he'd wrote a book after all of this whatever the book was about would have sold millions of copies you know like your life isn't over just because you're being criticized in the media and i think that's a really important thing to say it's like there is always a better way and taking your own life is just never the right answer and you know if you aren't in that situation for whatever reason ask for help talk to people don't just sit there bottle it up and and then do the thing that he did uh in summary though i think it's interesting because um as we discussed it feels like the the woke movement really petered out and like francis was saying he did make a good point uh as grudgingly i will admit which was about the fact that actually it felt like the bastani's of the left were winning of and i read aaron bastani tweets most of the time oh this is a solid point you know it's a very reasonable logical point he's made there but we are now back to where we were in the summer of 2020, not scale-wise, but in terms of the framework, which is you've basically got a black person who's done wrong, who is a saint.
23:55Francis Foster:And now we talked about Nathan Kofnus, the person who was one of the people who exposed this, who is now being fired and hounded by the very same people that say hounding somebody is wrong. And that seems to me like we've actually gone full circle and we're back where we started. But anyway, let's move on. By the way, if you No, let's not move on. Winston would like to say something else. I think we should actually just focus on Nathan Kofnus because what's happening to him now is actually a big deal. So he's been suspended and there's significant questions about him. And the thing that was most curious to me was J.K.
24:29Rowling coming out and saying, no, he's a racist. Now, I had Nathan on the show. I really drilled into this. he calls himself a race realist which is which would be interesting to ask you guys whether you think race realism is racist and jk rowling certainly thinks it is but she hasn't explained why she thinks it is what did it and that's curious from jk rowling because she's a gender realist right so uh gender and race are not the same thing you can't change gender you can't change your chromosomes race obviously you can't change race but over several generations you would races are diluted whereas you can't dilute out of a of your sex right so they're not the same thing but it's it's fair to say that there are differences in different races and most famous of all proponents of this is charles murray and his famous book the bell curve and it's also the case that politicians, most famously Lee Kuan Yew, have referred to this in making policy.
25:34And with the case of Singapore, it was relevant to treating Malays differently because they had different results compared to other ethnic groups like the Chinese. And so he was like, right, we need to invest more in education for the Malays. And so that's basically what Kofnus' point of view is. Now, having interviewed him, and you can watch my interview of him, you can tell me if you think he's racist. I didn't think he was. Going into the interview, I had generally been of opinion that race realism isn't probably technically racist, but most of the people who engage in it seem to be a bit icky to me.
26:10So my sort of feeling was, it's just a topic I'm not really interested in. I don't see the point in why. Curiously, Kofnus was actually arguing where he thinks affirmative affirmative action or you might call it sort of positive discrimination or as the woke call it DEI might actually be preferable because there are different outcomes for different groups because of differences in IQ differences in various things and whether it's genetic whether it's cultural there's there's mo it's multivariate anyway I wanted to ask you whether do you think race realism is racist? And that's a question here.
26:50Over to you, Tom. I will make it, I will make it free, because I know we do want to move on. I like you, Winston, whenever you see someone particularly preoccupied with this topic, the red flags go up to a certain degree. It's not something that I've put loads of thoughts or reading into. I've been pretty kind of persuaded by a lot of the criticisms of that perspective. People like Wilfred Riley, I know you've had him on the show, guys, as well as he writes for Spikes, has talked about how much this is actually just sort of cultural which is then transposed onto this idea of race and people make this like neat comparison between those of us who are kind of trans skeptical why aren't you interested in this race and IQ stuff I think they are quite fundamentally different things for the reason that you say I mean gender isn't a spectrum race is it's one example but there's so sometimes at the very least I'll say that um I remain to be convinced by those kinds of people I do sometimes wonder about their motives although I wouldn't speak to Nathan Coughness, particularly having not sat down with him or not read his work in any detail.
27:46One thing I will say is that having been at that vigil, he was the only one who's being named from the platform over and over again. So I'm not surprised at all that he's faced these professional ramifications. I think they could easily also be kind of personal security ramifications as well. He has become the kind of central villain of this story, even though it's also the press in general being dragged into it. So if I were him, I would be pretty concerned at this moment.
28:10Francis Foster:yeah i've so nathan engaged with me over my uh fandom of thomas soul and he disputes a lot of the claim that thomas soul makes about the importance of iq and the hereditary nature of iq uh i've read a lot of the stuff that he's written my understanding is it's a fairly contested area of scientific research so nathan represents a world view within that and you're right to say I think that people who like to talk about this stuff are invariably dodgy, but there are exceptions. And I actually suspect Nathan is, he strikes me as a sort of Asperger, you know, just obsessed about the black and white truth of the matter type of thing.
28:50Francis Foster:And somebody can be interested in the truth to the point where it's kind of that autistic people tend to get very often into this position. So this is actually one of the ironies of the case, because he's actually more autistic than Arde. Yeah. And he's getting more attacks. But I have to say, while it's an interesting conversation and we can talk about it, it's not my impression that Nathan is racist. And I think the answer to is race realism racist is not necessarily, but often is adopted by racist people. And there are measurable differences in IQ, but we don't necessarily fully understand what they're down to.
29:27Francis Foster:Nathan would argue it's overwhelmingly hereditary. other people would point to Jews arriving in America having very low IQs and within a generation or two having pretty above average IQs. Again, Nathan will have his own explanation for that. But to me, I actually think we're playing the woke game here, which is we're saying, well, if you're criticizing Jason Ardy, it really matters what your views are. No, what matters is, was Jason Ardy a fantasist or was he not? Was he lying or was he not? That's what matters here. And if it turns out that Nathan Kofnus told a racist joke in a pub 33 years ago or whatever, then that doesn't really matter.
Read the full transcript
30:07Francis Foster:And it's not relevant to this discussion, is my view. I disagree. It's absolutely the case that when it comes to the story of our day, that stands on its own two feet and should be deliberated and thought out and understood in its own two feet. But there are many offshoots to this story, which are themselves important stories. And the treatment of Nathan is an important one. And I don't particularly want to do episodes on race realism, but it's a side story that's now being talked about because of this. And it's important to understand why the left are villainizing him. There's other sides of this story.
30:45For example, Simon Baron Cohen. You've had him on the show. Cambridge University, friend of Jason Arde. he was also he's also the the director of the autism institute or whatever it is called at cambridge he was defending our day fiercely now it seems to me that that itself is a story right because simon baron cohen should know that our day i mean was not telling the truth he's indefensible and not only that it seems almost certainly the case that our day didn't have autism at no point has Simon Baron Cohen said in his various BBC interviews I've heard that he himself diagnosed Arde it seemed that it was on his CV or self-diagnosed but he's laying down his reputation at the feet of Jason Arde it's done unbelievable damage to
31:39Francis Foster:We've gone away from your point of disagreement with me here though my point was they're going to attack Nathan Kofnas no matter what because they can attack him to blame him and others for covering the story instead of blaming themselves for elevating Jason Hardy to his position. That's all I'm saying. Let's move on, though, because I don't think this is super important to carry on. More importantly, lads, we're all men here, and I don't know if you know, but rape in Britain is illegal. Is it? Yeah, it is. Francis looks very surprised, mate. Your teaching career is coming into a whole new light here with that revelation.
32:16Konstantin Kisin:Not guilty on all charges. Thank you.
32:19Francis Foster:Not guilty is not the same as innocent. But anyway, so I don't know if you know this, but it's illegal in the UK. Also mutilating the genitals of children apparently is as well. This is a leaflet. We can probably throw it up on the screen. That's been issued to asylum seekers in the UK, which has understanding behaviours and expectations for asylum seekers. And some of the guidance is stuff like you probably shouldn't rape people. And this is absolutely fascinating because we have for a very long time, of course, been told that there is absolutely no reason to suggest that people coming here from other countries, which basically, I think it's fair to say, treat women sort of as a second class cattle.
33:06Francis Foster:They may have a slightly different attitude to sexual behavior. And in fact, some of the crime statistics, of course, do bear that out. But what this leaflet is showing is while they are telling us that diversity is our greatest strength and, you know, no human is illegal and all the rest of it, they actually know that there's a problem. And they always did. I think that's so clear. For a while, it's probably tempting to think that they were just blind to this, that when they rebuffed the suggestion that if you imported thousands upon thousands upon thousands of men from a country like Afghanistan, entrenched culture, misogyny, rampant sexual violence, that all those issues would just melt away as soon as they stepped foot on the white cliffs of Dover.
33:46It was tempting to think they were just really naive. This proves that they knew all along and they just let it happen anyway. And it's a grim kind of progress that we've witnessed over the course of the past 24 hours because after years and years of whenever you would raise these concerns, whenever victims would raise these concerns, you would have an establishment which would just say, shut up, that's not true, this is misinformation, you're being racist. now I think because we've had this steady drumbeat of stories in the press there was one just this week of two afghans who raped a woman at knife point in a park when she was on a first date with someone absolutely horrific story now they can't really get away with that so the answer is okay okay I hear what you're saying let me have a word with them that seems to be the kind of plan here like the idea that you could just even producing this leaflet doing the graphics for it coming up with these nifty little one-liners.
34:36Did no one in the room think we could just not let them in? We could just send them back when they come in. I don't want to sound simplistic, but surely that thought passed their mind at some point. So yeah, it's confirmed a lot of what we knew already, but bloody hell, in what fashion?
34:54Konstantin Kisin:I think also, I mean, look, Kemi Badenoch has spoken many times about talking right and governing left, which is effectively gaslighting. The Conservative government, over the period of 14 years, gaslighting the nation on many things, but particularly when it comes to immigration, promising the immigration would be lowered. It wasn't lowered. Not only was it not lowered, it increased. Illegal immigration increased. Keir Starmer talking about smashing the gangs. The gangs weren't smashed. Not only were the gangs not smashed, it looks like they're even more profitable than they have ever been. And this is just another example of government lying to us.
35:35Konstantin Kisin:And my concern is, number one, these horrendous crimes that are happening up and down the country and the fact that this type of late leaf would need to be produced. But there's just something far deeper going on here, which is this is damaging our institutions and our trust in government. What is going to happen to our democracy when people go, you know what? What's the point in even voting? you're not going to do anything that you say you're going to do all you're going to do is not do the thing and even worse going to lie to us and as a result of your lies and your actions innocent people are going to be hurt and have had the most heinous crimes inflicted upon them so why should i vote for you and then once that happens which we're pretty much really close to we're in a very very very dangerous place societally and it's terrifying you know when
36:31Francis Foster:we decided to do the show france said i'm going to be the comedic voice i'm just going to keep up light-hearted and do the banter thanks for that mate
36:43what were your thoughts i i was just looking up some facts before about the propensity for crime amongst foreign nationals. Now, foreign nationals are about one in five in Britain are foreign nationals. They are, sorry, they're about 10 to 15, sorry, 10 to 14 % of the adult population. What's actually, this is a side point, but amazingly difficult to get accurate numbers on foreign nationals in Britain. We actually don't know who's in our country. That's deliberate.
37:13Francis Foster:They deliberately don't collect that data. Yeah, well, we don't know how many illegals there are. There's as little as a million, as many as 2 million. But if we take the rough projections, foreign nationals account for 14 to 15 % of known convictions of sexual offences. they are account for 26 to 28 percent of convictions when it comes to sexual assault on a female and 21 to 22 percent of rape on a female age 16 or over so way higher proportion convicted let alone perpetrating and you know those who are not being convicted than the actual proportion of the population that they represent but also it's more specific to some nations I I don't hear much about sort of German rapists, but we do hear a lot about Afghans.
38:05You know, was it Wayne Broadhurst, the guy in Uxbridge who was murdered by an Afghan? There was the Rhiannon White, the woman who was murdered by a migrant. And it's very specific countries they're coming from. The UK specific evidence on Afghan crime, and this is from the MOJ. it's that they're 20 times higher than a British likely to commit sexual offense than a British national 20 times higher and in Germany the rates are not as high as that but eight to ten times but the data is better in Germany so of Afghans recorded suspect rates of roughly 1700 to 2500 hundred per 100 ,000 compared with 160 to 270 per 100 ,000 for German nationals.
38:54So eight to ten times. Basically, certain countries, there is a higher propensity for this kind of crime. And of course, they don't talk about that. The Labour left, they can't talk about that. Instead, they say all men. It's a problem with all men. But actually, no, specifically, it's much worse for these people from these certain specific cultures because not all cultures are equal, believe it or not.
39:17Francis Foster:And we actually have a clip of Jess Phillips, the Labour politician, talking about this in exactly the way you described. I understand that it's interesting because it's to asylum seekers. We also run an enormous Enough campaign teaching men in the country about how their behaviours could be perceived, whether that's stalking behaviours, harassment behaviours, harassment in public. That was to everybody in the country. We also have started a process of ensuring that boys and girls in schools undertake education around the expectations of happy, healthy relationships and actually the dangers of a lack of consent, for example.
40:01So this is just one example of a preventative measure. I understand people are interested because it's asylum seekers. At the exact same time, the Home Office ran a multi-million pound scheme for men across the entirety of the country.
40:19Francis Foster:What is this? I get it. Yeah, go ahead. Sorry, go ahead. Was that Jess Phillips is a repeat offender where this is concerned. Is that clip there? Mm-hmm. So we went back in 2015, 2016, in the wake of those horrific sex attacks in Cologne committed by very recently arrived North African and Arab migrants, you know, thousands upon thousands of cases. And she likened it to women getting catcalled in Birmingham for Friday or a Saturday night. So this kind of pivot that always takes place. It's like the left's version of all lives matter to a certain extent. You're trying to talk about something very specific.
40:54and they have to generalize. They have to kind of shift the goalpost. They have to pretend that there aren't specific problems with specific groups and specific cultures. You know, when you see those signs up on the tube saying that if you press your genitals against a woman at rush hour, that's not okay. Who do we think that is for? It's not for British citizens. It's not for people who might have been of migratory background but have been here for a couple of generations. It's for people who are coming in from cultures, which again, in any other context, people would willingly admit have backward reactionary attitudes towards women.
41:28I mean, the treatment of women in Afghanistan, for instance, is something that a few years ago you would be accustomed to reading a kind of panicked Amnesty International press release about it because of the ingrained culture of misogyny, child marriage, forced marriage, the likelihood that if a woman is raped, she's more likely to be punished than the perpetrator, all of those kinds of things. It comes like dead last. Georgetown University did a kind of table for women's equality of a hundred and something countries they looked at. It comes last for every conceivable measure of women's wellbeing.
41:58And yet again, the idea is that that will just disappear upon contact with terra firma in the UK. And it's particularly strange because everyone will remember about 10 years ago, there was this really, frankly, dumb conversation that was going on about rape culture in the UK. So there was this idea that lads mags, page three, dapper laughs were essentially creating a permissive attitude amongst British people but white working class Brits in particular towards sexual violence. And yet when you're confronted with something like Afghanistan, which I think is fair to say has a rape culture or a permissive attitude, or certainly very backwards attitudes towards this particular issue, suddenly you get crickets.
42:37So in some case, I think it just, it shows the hypocrisy, but also shows the desperation that even when this stuff is staring them in the face, they have to pivot. You just think if they could just let this go, particularly the Labour Party would have so much more credibility. They wouldn't be hanging on to power in the way that they have been, but they can't let it go. And the psychology of why is really interesting to me.
42:56Francis Foster:Well, yeah, it violates their sacred dogma, doesn't it? Because what they will always want to do is a pretend that all cultures are the same, but even more importantly, when they invariably forced to admit that some cultures are different, they can't quite make the connection between a culture being different and the people who come from that culture being different. So we can admit that Afghanistan is a patriarchy because we hate patriarchy, but we can't admit that men, young men who come from a patriarchal society will tend to have sexist misogynistic and frankly rapey attitudes to women uh some of them that's not to say that all of them are like that but in terms of the prevalence of those types of views and that type of behavior it's incredibly more uh incredibly obvious and winston was talking about the crime statistics of foreign nationals i actually think it's really important to make the distinction that he then went on to make because you will have lots and lots of places around the world from which people have come here.
43:53Francis Foster:But I don't imagine the New Zealanders or like you said, Germans or, you know, people from other societies that have similar attitudes to women's rights and so on are likely to massively ramp up sex offensives in the UK. But you do see that for people from certain regions of the world. And it's not by accident. It's because the places from which they come have a different attitude to women and if you are a woman who's ever traveled alone to those parts of the world you will know this from your direct experience and it opens people's eyes and when they do that in a very obvious way there's another contradiction in the concept
44:31Konstantin Kisin:no i was just going to say like do this little thought experiment imagine those stats applied to white men what do you think the guardian headlines would be i would guarantee they would run that story all day, every day, three times at breakfast time. But they simply can't do it. And do you know why? It's because anybody who talks, let's imagine Aaron Bastani decided to talk about that story openly and honestly on Navarra Media. Aaron would have to release a video every day apologizing. Because that's what happens in the left when you go against your own team or one of their supposed mantras. You can't do it.
45:14Konstantin Kisin:Even when you tweet something as innocuous as saying Jason Arday was a con man, you can't do it. And if you do do it, you've got two options. You either apologise or you get kicked out by your own side. What's it going to be? And that's the dilemma everybody on the left faces.
45:32Francis Foster:One last word on this before we run. there's another logic fallacy or contradiction which is that if all men it's a problem for all men in britain already not just foreign nationals then that implies that it is our culture to sexually abuse women and so actually these people don't need a pamphlet because they are just the same as all the other men so it's like not necessarily not necessarily in in the first place uh well the other issue of course with immigration there's been a big debate this week is finally after many years and i've been advocating for this obvious policy for years now uh there is uh apparently a debate in the uk i don't know why it's a debate it's a self-evident thing that needs to be done about the fact that foreign nationals in britain should not have access to the benefit system and uh the reform party and also i think restore have both uh been talking about this i believe the tories have now adopted it as well so effectively the entire center center right is now come to around to this position which as i say i think is eminently sensible but there's now a debate we're having a debate about people from whether people from other countries should get taxpayers money in the uk and i'm just i don't really we seem to just this is the thing that seems to happen in our country now every week where we just have some sort of moronic debate about something that is incredibly obvious and i say this i'm going to use my privilege, you know, immigrant privilege here, as someone who lived in this country as a foreign national for many years, it would never have occurred to me to even attempt to claim benefits, not least because the visa you get in your passport when you come here says no recourse to public funds.
47:17Francis Foster:But apparently, once you get on indefinitely to remain, or once you get onto other forms of visas that you can have in this country, you now have access to the benefit system you can live in social housing if you're an asylum seeker we just pay for you to to do whatever it is you need to do dental appointments and so on how is this even a debate no it is yeah isn't it because when you talk to people if you said kind of thought experiment you move to another country could be somewhere in europe could be somewhere more far flung would you expect in relatively short order to be able to just go on the dole they would be like of course not the assumption would be if you couldn't support yourself you might go back to the country that you came from you might find some other way of supporting yourself it's uh particularly kind of british mania we have in this particular area and it does speak to the fact that just the idea of citizenship has just been so diluted and degraded it should mean something of course it should also mean that people are able to join it provided that they've contributed provided that they've integrated all of those all of those things that basically everyone agrees with but um the fact that just by being here or just by being here for a certain amount of time that this kind of automatically kicks in is such a casual way to think about joining a country or being part of a country and it's also just completely destroying any sort of faith or support in the welfare system people need to feel like when state funds or when taxpayers funds really are being doled out that they're being doled out for the right reasons into people who you can kind of think of as part of the we of a country as soon as that breaks down and this is why i think labor should recognize this being they are the kind of premier welfarist party the whole basis on which that kind of system has public support just corrodes i think that the one wrinkle in all of this is because people got so used to indefinite leave to remain there probably will be a lot of people who for all intents and purposes are integrated are part of the national community have got kids with a british partner just never bothered to make that extra step towards citizenship who might get kind of caught up in the mix of all of that but broadly speaking i completely agree citizenship has to mean something yeah and i have friends like that tom but there is sorry to interrupt but i have friends like that and there is an obvious solution there which is okay look we understand you maybe wasn't weren't that keen for whatever reason it takes a bit of money it takes a bit of time etc etc.
49:37Francis Foster:In the situation our country finds itself in, we're going to have to be a little bit more strict about how this is done. So please apply for a British nationality. We'd be happy if you've lived here for 20 years and fully integrated. Go for it. That's fine. Winston Francis, thoughts?
49:54Well, so just on some details, because this is worth just highlighting. So there's about 1.26 to 1.3 million people in Britain and in the UK on Universal Credit. They are claiming over£10 billion a year. And so those are non-UK or Irish nationals, right? So of the 7.5 to 9 million foreign nationals in the UK, 1.26 to 1.3 on Universal Credit, another 620 ,000 are on other benefits, which means that there's something like one in four foreign nationals in the UK are on some sort of benefits. And I mean, it's extraordinarily high. And they're claiming over 10 billion pounds a year in a country with three trillion pounds worth of debt, and we're spending 100 billion on debt interest each year, right?
50:51So just for some context there. As for how this came about, I'm trying to understand this, like, did we become more lax that why is it that this is has become the case and actually we've actually always been quite strict on who can claim such benefits and this goes all the way back to the poor laws where you had to have legal settlement in a parish if you wanted to claim benefits it goes through the old age pension act in 1908 and and it continues what's changed is not that the law on who uh can claim it. It's changed as how many more people have become within the defined, defined as settled. And so as you say, whether it's Assign Seeker, indefinitely for Remain, or various different settlement where they can apply it.
51:40This has jumped, that's what's actually changed. And it's jumped massively. Since 2020, in 2022, there were only 900, I mean, I say only 900 ,000 is extraordinarily high number, but there are 900 ,000. So 400 ,000 more people on universal credit since 2022. So it's because of how they claim to be settled. And so they pass through the hoops that way. So that's the big change as far as I've understood it. Now, where there's, I think, maybe a debate is if they're paying national insurance rather than if they're paying just their taxes, income tax. national insurance like is there an argument there that they should have some sort of claim on on the pension that would come from from that I think that there is an argument I would take the same position was that if you're a foreign national you don't you still have to pay for the privilege of being in our country but you don't get to enjoy the benefits unless you become a citizen so there's an incentive to become a citizen actually buy into the system and and probably be a part of it But there's also, I guess, the argument is that maybe employers should be given a relief where they don't have to pay for the pension of employees if they are foreign nationals.
52:55And that might ease things for employers. I don't know. So that seems like a small detail to get bogged down in. The big headline, though, is that we've just let anyone in and become settled.
53:08Francis Foster:Well, this is really the problem with mass immigration, right? is you can have a very relaxed posture towards many many many things until you bring in millions of people in a very short space of time in which case the entire system completely breaks down not because the rules were actually bad necessarily in and of themselves but because they're incompatible with a fraying society with plummeting levels of social trust and and all of the other the consequences that ensue when you have millions and millions of people. And by the way, Tom made the point about the Labour government. Let's be honest, this all happened under the Conservative government.
53:47Francis Foster:This is not a left versus right thing. It's a stupid versus not stupid thing. And I'm glad finally that there are some non-stupid people in the politics are waking up to this reality. What do you think, Francis?
53:59Konstantin Kisin:Well, I think what this is, is, look, let's put it in real world terms. We're broke. This country is absolutely broke. In real terms, since 2020, our currency has lost 40 % of its value. We've got 100 % debt to GDP ratio. We can't afford to do this anymore. It really is that simple. So we either deal with the fact that a few people are going to start kicking and screaming, calling everyone racist, or we're going to do essentially things that are bringing in policies that are needed to prevent us from going bankrupt as a country. That is where we are. And the reason we are bankrupt as a country, and we spoke about it with Peter Hitchens on our interview in Trigonometry, is because we have been delusional for far too long.
54:54Konstantin Kisin:We've been delusional about immigration. We've been delusional about public finances and public spending. We've been delusional about the issue of men and women and there's a whole host of subjects that we have been delusional about and you know what you can be delusional for a bit you can you know have the occasional period of your life where you know what you go reality doesn't matter i'm gonna kick back and relax you know and just live a life where reality doesn't apply to me but the problem is is when you're doing that eventually you're going to be like that bloke who's in his mid-40s goes you know what don't need the wife mate don't need the kids gonna go to the strip cup i'm gonna live life i'm gonna be who i am it's gonna be great well eventually you're gonna wake up one day realize you lost your house the wife and the kids and all of a sudden realities come home to roost and unfortunately the uk at the moment is in danger of living in a bedsit with a bottle of whiskey for company it's not based on my own life by the way
55:55Francis Foster:you should have an intimate knowledge of this situation man
56:02Francis Foster:exactly uh well guys we're gonna overrun a little bit because i do want to cover this final story before we do though i just wanted to say if you're watching this and you've enjoyed it uh there's two things we needed to do number one we haven't got a name for this show uh so give us your funniest most outrageous ideas and we'll play around with them and see if we want to run with them number two if you've enjoyed it tell us in the comments tell us what you thought what you like what you didn't like what you'd like us to improve obviously smash the like button obviously subscribe anyway gentlemen speaking of delusions one of the things that i've been covering for a long time is the ongoing derangement on what i think is mostly the american center center right basically you have in america sort of normal rational right-wing people and conservatives and then you have the sort of Andrew Tate, Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens wing, which are increasingly becoming these rabid conspiratorial lunatics.
57:01Francis Foster:And you saw this, I don't know if you watched the great debate. It was very popular between Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson, in which they discussed who really did murder Charlie Kirk. Now, obviously, the trial hasn't happened, so we can't make any factual claims. And one thing I will say about our beautiful country is one of the things I have really appreciated during this time is mortising that we have laws which prevent people from commenting on ongoing trials and thinking, fuck me, what a great idea this has turned out to be. Because if you look at what's happening with the Charlie case over there, you're going, oh, my God.
57:33Francis Foster:But anyway, setting aside the factual stuff, there is just this now thing in America on the right where it's like Israel is the new Russia now. so if anyone's done anything if you know someone's got elected that you don't like it's israel if something which used to be russia of course you know 10 years ago um and and and so and you saw andrew wilson asking candace owens in this debate you know what is your evidence for these things that you're saying that erica kirk is complicit in the murder of your husband and her evidence was basically well my audience likes it that is you know in the summary of what she said she said I'm entitled to think this and clearly my audience is engaging with this what do we think is going on that's incredible isn't it I think you more than anyone else Constantine have been instrumental in not just pointing out but mocking the brain rot that is Candace Owens at this point so you're doing God's work but that is concern but it has been grimly fascinating hasn't it watching a sort of spiral into conspiratorialism naturally what's at the end of every conspiracy theory the Jews loosely dressed up as Israel these days but we know what it is they're talking about I just found it, it was like kind of stare, watching that debate, it was like kind of staring into a parallel universe where up is down, left is right.
58:44What is the basis of evidence for any particular claim? Doesn't really matter. She would talk about intuition, gut feeling, anonymous sources that you just have to take as read. I mean, she was claiming what the, not only did, was Israel and potentially Erica Kirk complicit or involved in the murder of Charlie Kirk, but also that the French foreign legion were trying to kill her, presumably because of a campaign against that bloke that Emmanuel Macron married. Like, all of this stuff is just totally unmoored from the way in which we usually think about things. And it would be funny if it wasn't so tragic because it does seem to have a constituency now.
59:19And one thing that I think is really interesting about the kind of conspiratorial mind, as you see summed up in someone like Candace Owens, is that it presents itself as very questioning. I'm just asking questions is the cliche. I'm entitled to my opinions. I'm entitled to dissent. But it's also, it's based on a level of kind of certainty that you don't get in normal life. I mean, most times when a court case makes its way through and someone is convicted, it's beyond reasonable doubt. Broadly speaking, people think, even though there is some doubt there, we've come to the conclusion that the evidence weighs in a particular direction.
59:51At the beginning of that debate, she said that she was 0 % convinced that Tyler Robertson was the killer. And that's its own form of blind faith in a strange kind of way. So, yeah, I think we are going to get more of it. We're probably going to get more of it over here in the UK. It just hasn't quite filtered over just yet, it seems like.
1:00:08Konstantin Kisin:Do you know what? When I was watching it, number one, my primary thought was, I want every minute that I've spent watching this and I want it reimbursed to me. Number one. Number two, you look through the comments. The comments are fascinating because you're going, oh, right, literally doesn't matter what Candice would have said. Her audience would have backed her to the hilt. They were utterly delusional. And number three, I kept thinking this. This would not have been anywhere near as popular before COVID. I think COVID basically gave an entire generation of people brain rot where nobody trusts institutions.
1:00:46Konstantin Kisin:Nobody trusts government. Nobody trusts the law or the police. And as a result, everyone's like, well, the obvious thing can't be the obvious thing. I mean, it's the French Foreign Legion. I mean, that's mental. i mean who knows where was the last time you heard about the french foreign legion it's insane i mean israel i'll be like all right that's a bit hacked i mean give her credit mate
1:01:13Francis Foster:at least she's come up with some new theories yeah some new material exactly yeah she's she's she's gone up a level but it's just an interesting thing you say you know post-covid people have lost faith in institutions that's understandable and look there's good and bad and there's some institutions that are good and bad etc but how do you go from having no faith in institutions to now having faith in the intuitions and dreams of candace owens because you don't have to go there right you could just say well clearly you know we will lie to about the origins of the virus clearly in their attempt to prioritize public health they downrank the importance of truth and therefore misled us about you know the side effects of the vacuum or whatever whatever it is but you don't then have to go into the derangement on the other side.
1:02:00Francis Foster:But a lot of people seem to be making that leap, Winston. I just want to start by saying, actually, my resentment on this issue is you, Constantine, for choosing this topic, this four hour long video that I suffered through two hours of, generally a horrible experience. It reminded me of all the negative experiences with women I've had in relationships but without any of the positives bundled into one and sort of a woman who doesn't in any point engage with the logic of the argument but does everything to sort of run circles and just so you have this Wilson lad who's shaking in frustration I was shaking in frustration it's so insufferable listening to her and in that particular conversation and I'd also note that this is a woman who has been doing medieval blood libel for the last, as early as summer 2024.
1:02:56So this is a woman who's a bit nuts. But if I can push back against all of you, Tom, you're saying there's a sort of increased constituency for this kind of thought. Actually, at the political level, these kind of people don't seem to be that popular. People who are adjacent in their thinking right i think of fishback in florida who is not done well i think of uh thomas massey i think of uh marjorie taylor green that they might not actually think the same as candace on these specific issues but there's a bundle of people who have a sort of similar type of view and actually at the polls it's not working and so then we come to think of who is actually engaging with this stuff is it actually americans i mean i'm sure there's a considerable amount of people in America, but is it people around the world?
1:03:46Is it when it comes to the anti-Israel stuff, is it actually people in the Middle East? Is it, you know, there's no doubt that there's worse anti-Semitism in Britain in my lifetime. I'm not denying for a second that it's terrible here, but how popular it really is. It's not. Have you guys actually got a sense of that? Like, can we actually say legitimately this is a mainstream thought or this is a really popular of thought in America right now?
1:04:14Francis Foster:I think it's hard to deny that there are a lot of people in America who are interested. I mean, when Joe Rogan says he's interested in Candace's perspective on this, you kind of go, Joe loves conspiracies. He always has done, etc. And this was the other point I was going to make. By the way, I think you're right. A lot of Tucker's audience has been demonstrated to be from Muslim countries, not in America, and a lot of Candace's own audience as well. but a lot of it is in america you're right that it hasn't had the impact uh politically um but i've forgotten what i was going to say about the the yeah i've forgotten what i was going to say about what i forgot what i was going to say um yeah good but no it is especially especially because of the fact that um we've got conspiratorial thinking everywhere now though i mean if you made oh tom i'm sorry this is what i was going to say this is what i was going to say to winston's challenge sorry mate it's not new though is it because look how big alex jones was at one point talking about stuff like this and sandy hook and whatever there's something in the american psyche and you guys know how much francis and i love going to america but i think i've said this before i think it's the flip side of the american dream which is if you live in the society where like anything is possible and it's amazing well like anything is possible you know maybe the french foreign legion did kill charlie kirk together with erica kirk for the benefit of benjamin netanyard do you know what i mean like and and maybe maybe the one thing we probably don't appreciate enough is how exciting and enjoyable it is to engage in this sort of thinking because it makes life special it makes you special you have this unique insight francis has made this point very often this is often what drives a lot of these conversations sorry to interrupt tom no not And off the back of that, I think that's one part of the appeal, certainly of Alex Jones, when he was really at the height of his pomp and before he got kicked off of various platforms, was that there's an element of this which is enjoyed as a form of performance as well.
1:06:10I mean, he's a particularly kind of pyrotechnic, spectacular example of this, you know, the turning the frogs gay, et cetera. But even with Candice Owens, when you see her actually on her own show, it's a kind of, there's an element of drama to it. There's an element of performance. and as you say there is also it maps on to something which has always existed in american society certainly in the 20th century which is this appetite for conspiracy theory um to a certain extent it's almost recreational for some people you notice like they kind of get into it get into a particular theory move on to another one so sometimes it's not taken literally but it is by many people taken quite seriously maybe it's because of that hostility to the state that they have on a much higher level than certainly a lot of european countries have it's hard to work out where it sort of comes from but also it goes across the political spectrum now which is the point i was going to make which is that you make the point constant about how we've gone from everything that goes wrong every assassination every murder it suddenly becomes russia's fault we've now flipped to israel but you know the russiagate scandal showed that that was just liberal left conspiracy theorizing and yet and the thing that was much more dangerous about it was that it passed like the Martha's Vineyard dinner table test.
1:07:21Whereas what Candace Owens is talking about, or certainly what Alex Jones is talking about, is going to get you laughed out of the room if you're at a newspaper or on Capitol Hill. So I think there is still the extent to which you've got conspiracy theories and you've got the kind of acceptable conspiracy theories. And in a way, it's the latter camp which can be more dangerous because it is taken with a lot more credence, it looks like.
1:07:41Konstantin Kisin:Well, also, America is the country of cults. if you think about a lot of the most famous cults, a lot of them were in America. And what does every cult have? It has a charismatic leader who basically talks bollocks but does it in a charismatic fashion. And everybody goes along with them, whatever the cult is and whatever the message is. And basically, Candice is an online version of that. She sits there, she talks about bollocks, but because she does it in a way that is engaging and people find it entertaining, they go along with it. I think it really is that simple.
1:08:14Francis Foster:that's a really good point what's interesting to me though is the embrace of the stuff i mean hunter biden to me is an incredible conundrum not him himself he there's nothing super interesting about him but he's now sort of being embraced as like this voice of and i just you take for some reason there's this thing about where you take some of the most personally reprehensible human beings on the planet and then they go on these conservative massive shows and are presented as being like a valid person to talk to i mean hunter biden is famous for slapping around hookers while snorting cocaine off their asses like what is what is that why is that why are we listening to him maybe we should interview him trigonometry is what i'm saying
1:09:03Konstantin Kisin:yeah i look i think charisma is is is a we don't talk about it enough charisma is so important it's so important for spreading a message it's so important if you are a public person in any sphere and if you are very charismatic you can basically sell what's the famous adage he's so you know he's so good at selling he's so charismatic he can sell ice to the eskimos i mean that's what that's what candace is doing sometimes the most obvious explanation is the correct one well and also cult leaders like making money candace was paid something like 300 grand for this interview i don't know how much andrew wilson was being paid they were certainly doing ads throughout it i have my money i think i think it was he kind of threw the gauze she is paying her she paid her 300 grand yeah yeah and by the way like you said sorry to interrupt just to just to add to your point the stream has now got five and a half million views and there's youtube ads all the
1:10:09Francis Foster:way through it yeah excellent well next week it won't be winston and tom it will be candace owens and andrew wilson joining us on this show because clearly that is that is what the people want and it is our job to deliver it gentlemen uh it's been an absolute pleasure thank you for your We have overrun massively, which is a great strong start. Thanks all for being here. Make sure you subscribe to The Winston Marshall Show. Make sure you subscribe to Spike. And, of course, subscribe to Trigonometry. And we will see you next week while we will all try to be slightly more cult-like and charismatic.
From the publisher
Triggernometry is proudly independent.
Winston Marshall - https://www.youtube.com/@winston_marshall
Winston Marshall X - https://x.com/MrWinMarshall
Tom Slater - Spiked - https://www.youtube.com/@spiked
Tom Slater X - https://x.com/Tom_Slater_
Join our exclusive TRIGGERnometry community on Substack! https://triggernometry.substack.com/
OR Support TRIGGERnometry Here:
Bitcoin: bc1qm6vvhduc6s3rvy8u76sllmrfpynfv94qw8p8d5
Shop Merch here - https://shop.triggerpod.co.uk/
Advertise on Triggernometry: https://trigger-brands.com | or enquire at marketing@triggerpod.co.uk
Find TRIGGERnometry on Social Media:
https://twitter.com/triggerpod
https://www.facebook.com/triggerpod/
https://www.instagram.com/triggerpod/
About TRIGGERnometry:
Stand-up comedians Konstantin Kisin (@konstantinkisin) and Francis Foster (@francisjfoster) make sense of politics, economics, free speech, AI, drug policy and WW3 with the help of presidential advisors, renowned economists, award-winning journalists, controversial writers, leading scientists and notorious comedians.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices




