In short
Podcast Summary: Turpentine VC - E49: Long Journey's Strategy for Chasing "Magically Weird" Companies
Podcast Overview Title: Turpentine VC Host: Erik Torenberg Guest: Lee Jacobs, Founder & Managing Partner of Long Journey Episode Description: This episode covers Lee Jacobs' journey in venture capital, his experiences in early-stage investing, and his firm’s unique focus on “magically weird” companies.
---
Key Themes and Discussions
- Introduction to Long Journey
- Founding: Established in 2020 by Lee Jacobs, Cyan Banister, and Arielle Zuckerberg.
- Investment Focus: Pre-seed and seed funding with a values-oriented approach. The firm aims to invest in companies that seem "weird" or unconventional at the time of investment.
- Lee Jacobs' Journey
- Background: Transitioned from running a company to investing in others starting in 2013.
- AngelList: Became the first to launch an AngelList syndicate, allowing him to leverage the platform for larger investments.
- Breakthroughs:
- Early success with Descomplica led to significant investments.
- Lessons learned about finding undervalued opportunities and trusting one's instincts.
- Investment Philosophy
- Magically Weird Thesis: Companies that are perceived as unconventional often yield the highest potential returns once their value is recognized.
- Independent Thinking: The firm prioritizes independent judgment and decision-making over following trends or popular investments.
- Operational Strategies
- Team Building and Decision Making:
- Emphasizes the importance of having a cohesive team where each member can contribute uniquely.
- Lee’s leadership style allows team members, particularly Cyan and Ariel, to explore and express their ideas freely.
- Venture Partner Strategy: Collaborating with experienced operators to leverage their insights and networks enhances investment opportunities.
- Challenges and Growth
- Fundraising: Discusses the difficulties of early-stage fundraising and the importance of building trust with limited partners (LPs).
- Evolution of Fund Structure: Transitioned from a small fund to over half a billion dollars in assets under management (AUM) by expanding investment strategies and focusing on both early-stage and opportunity funds.
- Values and Mission Orientation
- Core Values:
- Chase the Magically Weird
- Be a Bubby: A nurturing, supportive approach to working with founders.
- Treating LP money with care (Not Monopoly Money).
- Mission Orientation: Emphasizes the importance of aligning personal and firm values with broader social causes, enhancing motivation and commitment.
- Future Vision
- Long-Term Goals: Aims to build a lasting venture firm that continues to support innovative businesses for many years.
- Competitive Landscape: Acknowledges the competitive nature of seed funding and the necessity of maintaining a unique value proposition.
- Notable Investments
- Companies mentioned include:
- Crusoe Energy: Aims to harness stranded energy for AI infrastructure.
- Together AI: Provides tools for utilizing open-source LLMs.
- Other notable investments that showcase the firm’s diverse portfolio.
---
Conclusion Lee Jacobs' approach with Long Journey stresses the importance of individuality, resilient values, and the courage to invest in unconventional ideas. By focusing on a unique investment philosophy while nurturing a strong internal culture, Long Journey aims to carve out a distinctive niche in the venture capital landscape.
---
Timestamps Overview
- (00:00) - Intro
- (01:54) - Founding Long Journey and Early Investments
- (13:30) - Scaling the Fund and Decision Making
- (32:32) - Core Values and Mission Orientation
- (44:15) - Portfolio Construction and Key Investments
- (47:18) - Wrap Up
---
Additional Links
- [Long Journey](https://www.longjourney.vc/)
- [Lee Jacobs on Twitter](https://twitter.com/leejacobs)
---
This markdown file captures the essence of the podcast episode, highlighting key discussions, themes, and takeaways relevant to the venture capital community.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Welcome back to Turpentine VC, a podcast where we discuss the art and science of building successful venture firms, VC to VC. Today's episode is with Lee Jacobs, the founder and managing partner at Long Journey. Lee leveraged the AngelList ecosystem to his advantage, becoming the first person to launch an AngelList syndicate. In the conversation ahead, we discuss how he founded Long Journey with partners Cyan Bannister and Ariel Zuckerberg, their venture partner strategy, and how they identify magically weird companies. Let's dive in. Lee, welcome to Turpentine VC. Thanks so much for joining the podcast.
0:37Thanks for having me. It's exciting to be here. So Lee, first by way of introduction, talk about Long Journey and what makes you guys special. And then we're going to get into your sort of evolution as a firm and how you came to be where you are. Yeah. Long Journey is a collaboration between me, Cyan Bannister, and Ariel Zuckerberg. I founded the firm with Cyan in 2020. Before that, I was an angelist and had been investing really since 2013. but the first institutional fund was in started in 2020. And yeah, and we are a pre-seed seed fund really focused on, you know, we're very values oriented.
1:14And the first value on our website is our thesis, which is to chase the magically weird, which means that we think the best companies look pretty weird at the time. So historically, you know, through my track record and Cyan and then the rest of the team, we've been really good at finding things that we think most people are a little afraid of investing in. We think that are, that is interesting and takes a little bit of courage to invest in and then they become great things. So yeah, that's our fund. So Long Journey itself has been a long journey. You mentioned starting 2020, but that's really on top of what you've been doing throughout the 2010s.
1:49I know you had a bunch of different investing efforts that you got off the ground and had some success with. So why don't you take us a tour of how this actually came to be? Because a lot of people look at people who have big funds and even people who didn't start a massive company or plow in a ton of their own money into it, they ask, how did they do it? And you have a really interesting story. So why don't you tell your journey? Yeah, I think it's really methodical and step-by-step. I always say it's like one foot before the other. So yeah, the way it started is I had started a company and in 2013, I decided that I didn't wanna run the company anymore.
2:26I wanted to focus on what I thought I was good at, which was finding really smart, passionate people but like my co-founder, helping them get set up and doing that multiple times over. And to me, that meant investing, business models investing. I think one general theme was like, I wanted to do something and then I was very, I organically tried to solve that problem. And as you said, we now are slightly under half a billion dollars in AUM. And it started with$150 ,000 LLC that I raised from family and friends in 2013. And so I raised$150 ,000. It probably took me about a year to raise that money.
3:01I did something kind of crazy, which was I invested in three companies out of that fund, which talk about really concentrated. You know, it's a pretty concentrated strategy. And I got lucky. I invested in a company. It was called Descomplica. It's one of the leading tech companies in Latin America. That company started to grow really quickly. And then a very hot Series A came together. And I was like, man, I have this like$700 ,000 allocation in the company. How am I going to fill this in one week? It took me like six weeks to fill the allocation, just the$150 ,000 fund. And then Naval at AngelList announced syndicates.
3:37And I thought, wow, this is pretty interesting. I should give it a try. So I was the first person to do an AngelList syndicate in 2013 for Descomplica. And it really changed my life. It went from scraping together and trying to figure out how to get LP dollars to writing a$700 ,000 check in under a few days. It was raised in a few days. So that was really the first breaking point for me, which was like, okay, I can really leverage this AngelList ecosystem. I can continue to find interesting investments. And then I had the ability to write bigger and bigger checks. That was like the first real step.
4:09And then eventually I ended up working for a guy named Mark Triggerman at NHS Capital. And I think he noticed that I was good at identifying really interesting companies for others. I spent about a year with him. I learned a ton from Mark. Mark and I have very different strategies. He's kind of like the Warren Buffett of early stage investments. He does about two deals a year. We do a little bit more than that at Long Journey. But I learned a ton about how to think about... Really, the number one thing I learned from him was like, I remember him telling me something like he was excited about a company and he said, I really hope no one else likes this company.
4:43And it's a little bit counterintuitive because at the time, most people are like, well, is this a hot company? Is this going to be like an A16Z or Sequoia round? But Mark was like, I really hope no one else likes it. And I was like, huh, that's pretty interesting. And so I really understood that lesson that what you're really trying to find are gems, things that other people see that you see that other people don't. And that's where Alpha is from. So that lesson was really important to me in the beginning. And then after about a year with Mark, Naval asked me to come and join him at AngelList.
5:11And the idea was that I would start the first version of what became Long Journey at AngelList. And Naval was just looking for more people like me, more people that had access to deal flow, but didn't necessarily have the capital. So my job was to go find the next generation managers. And then at Angelus, I started the first version of what became Long Journey. So that fund was called Edelweiss. In that period, we recruited a guy named Brian Balfour, who was the VP of growth at HubSpot, now runs Reforge, Elaine Wary, who sold Mebo to Google. And the three of us came together and started the first version of the fund.
5:45And initially, it was a lot of Tom and Elaine's money, a very little bit of my own. But the same thesis, It was just like, go scrap and find things that we thought were independently interesting, that we didn't really care if other people thought were interesting or not, and make investments. In that period, we invested in Loom, which just sold to Atlassian for a billion dollars. We invested in Crusoe Energy, which is, I think, one of the leading AI infrastructure business or one of the leading AI infrastructure business companies. We invested in Payjoy and a lot of really great things in that period.
6:14So that was sort of the period when I was at AngelList. And that's where I met Cyan. and Cyan, I know you know Cyan. She's an incredible human being. Not only is she brilliant, but she's just a free thinker. Someone who, again, has the courage to invest in things when other people think that they're silly. And she's one of the best track records of all time as an angel investor. So she did Uber and the Seed, SpaceX in 2007, Andurl, just an incredible, incredible track record. So we became friends while I was at AngelList. And then she went on to go to Founders Fund. So at Founders Fund, what Sian would say if she were here, she'd say, look, when you're at these big funds, what you end up getting over and over again are the same deals.
6:57Everyone's sending you the hot Sequoia deal or the hot Andreessen deal. But the deals that I would send her, like Crusoe or Pipify or Mindbloom, which is a psychedelic medicine company, were things that no one else was sending her and were independently interesting. And I think you asked a really good question about a lot of people who have these$100 million funds and plus had a big success before that. And I think if I look back at what I had to do, I just always focused on what I thought was independently interesting. I wasn't in the hot deal flow. So I had to kind of go make it up on my own.
7:29I had to go find things that I thought were interesting on my own. And one of the challenges, and we're sort of getting back to sort of where we are with fund journey now. But one of the challenges of the job right now is that we actually do see a lot of the hot deal flow, the things that everyone else is investing in, and having the wisdom to discern what is actually intellectually interesting for ourselves now and making an investment decision. Because if a lot of people like a company, it doesn't mean it's bad necessarily. But before, I didn't have that luxury. And so what we look for across our team, across everyone that we invest with, is really independent thinking.
8:06And I think you know Justin Mayers from Kettle and Fire and now TruMed. He is an important part of our team. He's a venture partner. He sends us really great investments. And he is the consummate independent investor. He just likes something and then he makes the call. So that's a key thing that I've learned along the way. So Cyan and I became really common co-investors when she was at Founders Fund. And then when Cyan decided that she wanted to go back to her roots as an early stage investor, You know, as you get bigger and bigger at places like Founders Fund, and we are huge fans of Founders Fund, we think they did, you know, independent non-consensus investing, you know, right from the early days.
8:43But as the fund got bigger and bigger, you know, Cyan's role of, you know, they wanted her to write bigger and bigger checks. And that just wasn't her DNA. So she called me up and said, hey, let's work together. And this is in 2020. So that's when we really got Long Journey off the ground. We raised, you know, a$35 million fund. in that period. And at that point, we didn't think we were just like, look, we're going to run the same strategy of investing in great companies. We weren't ready to lead yet. We wanted to kind of sort of understand what that motion looked like. And then with the fall-in fund, we raised$85 million early stage fund and$85 million opportunity concentration fund to go and lead pre-seed and seed rounds and then concentrate in our best companies.
9:26You were full-time investing from when? I would say 2017. Yeah. So the 2017 to 2020 journey, I remember, you know, you were investing, you did some great companies, you had other sort of part-time partners. But I guess talk about that. I understand, I guess, why you talk about the co-founding in 2020, because that's when Cyan joined and you have a shared journey. But you've been doing this for some time. And some people don't appreciate sometimes how long it takes to really, like, get established. So take us through that journey before you had the first institutional. Yeah, man. $150 ,000 was that first little thing I raised.
10:06And then I went back to my LPs and they were like, what are we investing? We kind of forgot about that. So I had to start over. And so then I was just able to do Angelus syndicates. And so one after the other, and it was hard, man. I mean, the thing about... Look, I love Angelus. But the thing about doing these SPVs was that you're selling on both sides. You have to convince the founder to let you into a company and say, Hey, by the way, I'm not sure if I have the money yet. And then you have to go on the other side and tell the LPs that there's this company, but you can't meet them. And please trust me, invest in two days.
10:36So it's really a hard thing to do. So yeah, those SPVs were very hard in the early days, but you had to sort of... With Mindbloom, which is another one of our large success stories. It took about nine months to raise the SPV to do the seed investment in that company. One company through it like nine months. And you just kind of just have to keep going and believe in yourself. I don't know what else to say. I believed in what Dylan was building. I believed in the importance of the medicine and what psychedelics was for the world. And I just was willing to just keep making calls. And eventually we found some good LPs for that.
11:12And we ended up that round. And it's a good example of like the company could have taken money from other people, but you know, it was, it was weird at the time. Psychedelics was quite weird at the time. So yeah, it's, I, there's a, there was a lot of different bumps in the road, but I appreciate you saying, you know, you just have to put one foot in front of the other and just keep going. Hey, we'll continue our interview in a moment after a word from our sponsors. How deep do you go to seek out an answer to a question? Maybe you've spent hours clicking the source links on an obscure Wikipedia page, or maybe you're even the type of person who checked out the entire shelf on the topic at your library.
11:44If you're nodding along, then check out GiveWell, an organization that researches questions about global health and philanthropy, even if a satisfying answer might require years of reviewing studies, talking to experts, and over 300 footnotes. GiveWell has now spent over 17 years researching charitable organizations and only directs funding to a few of the highest impact opportunities they've found. Over 125 ,000 donors have used GiveWell to donate more than$2 billion. Rigorous evidence suggests that these donations will save over 200 ,000 lives and improve the lives of millions more. GiveWell wants as many donors as possible to make informed decisions about high-impact giving.
12:19You can find all of their research and recommendations on their site for free. You can make tax-deductible donations to their recommended funds or charities, and GiveWell doesn't take a cut. If you've never used GiveWell to donate, you can have your donation matched up to$100 before the end of the year, or as long as matching funds last. To claim your match, Go to givewell.org and pick podcast and enter econ102 with Noah Smith and Eric Torenberg at checkout. Make sure they know that you heard about GiveWell from econ102 with Noah Smith and Eric Torenberg to get your donation matched. Again, that's givewell.org to donate or find out more.
12:56For the fund before the 2020 fund, was that a rolling fund? Where did that capital come from? And at what point did you realize, hey, I should probably get a partner here? Because there were a bunch of people trying to do solo GPs. Some people were able to raise a bunch of money. Yeah. What was that like? Yeah. So we had a committed pool of about$2 million or so. And then everything else we did was via SPVs. So we invested about$10 million in the period from, let's say, 2015 to 2020. And at the time, we were, you know, Brian was part-time. Elaine was part-time. Elaine runs Dandelion Chocolate.
13:33Brian was running Reforge. and I was an angelist and then I went full-time. I mean, look, I've always been pretty ambitious and I knew that I wanted to, you know, honestly, like being a small fund and being$2 million or$10 million is not going to pay the bills. You're not going to be able to live off of that for very long. So you had to kind of scale the ambition of the project. And I always knew that, you know, I guess at one point I kept noticing like we would invest in a company like Mindbloom, for example, or Crusoe. And then all these other people would invest a lot more money into these companies.
14:06And over and over again, these things just started getting marked up. And I sort of got the confidence. I was like, huh, we could write way bigger checks into these companies and we should. So I think that's another good way of thinking about the way that I've evolved the fund. It's been very organic and bottoms up. It was like, look, we have invested in these great companies over and over again. So we've gotten some good feedback there. We think we are early to a lot of these things. So we could be taking much larger of an allocation in the company? And then what's the right capital strategy and the right fund strategy for doing that?
14:40And that's how we kind of decided, okay, we're ready to raise this institutional fund. And having Cyan come to me and say, look, let's work together was, it's funny. I don't know if this is true in your life, but I have these things where I kind of know they're going to happen already. I knew that Cyan was going to ask me to work together because we just had such great, amazing energy together. And so when she asked me, I was like, I kind of knew you were going to ask? And the answer is yes. So that's kind of how the beginnings of the institutional climb started. So how do you guys split or make decisions?
15:11It was interesting because Cyan is someone, here's my outside read. Cyan has more investment experience. She's obviously done phenomenally well, but she's also kind of an iconoclast, right? And an iconoclast, you know, they create incredible things, but they also sometimes like to do things their own way. So how did you think about, okay, if I bring this person in, there's lots of opportunities that that enables, but that also changes the dynamic of the firm of it. It's not just my own shop. Now I have a partnership. Am I CEO of this? Am I not CEO of this? If there is no CEO, what does that mean for how decisions get made?
15:49How did you think about that? So I'm the CEO and have been throughout. And I think that's what Sian wanted. She didn't want to have to go and do the institutional thing herself and go. She could have raised from LPs based on her track record, but that's not what her zone of genius is. Her zone of genius is finding really incredible people and making quick decisions and investing in great companies. And so I was willing to do the work of going out and raising capital and kind of providing some leverage for her. And, you know, I think one of the things that as I reflect back at this journey is the number one thing that I care about from the team is that I have to admire the people that join the team.
16:26And so Cyan is incredible and hard not to admire. Ariel is the same. We haven't talked about Ariel Zuckerberg. We can talk about that in a minute. Everyone who joins us is someone that I personally admire. And then the next step is like giving them space to be themselves. And so with Cyan, we actually refer to her as Dennis Rodman. So I don't know if you've seen the last dance. I know you're a basketball fan, so you probably did. There's a moment when Phil Jackson, basically at the beginning of the playoff run, Dennis Rodman goes to Vegas. And everyone's like, oh man, Dennis is in Vegas. And Phil's like, don't worry, Dennis will be back.
17:02And just sometimes Dennis needs to go to Vegas. And so I think that's true for Cyance. He needs to sometimes go and experience the world in a way that doesn't look like everyone else. but man, does she come back with such incredible investment ideas and such incredible things. And so I think I've done a really nice job of providing her the space to be herself. And that's something that I really try to do with everyone across the team. How do you stick to the center of what we do and have really strong values? And we should talk about our values, because I think that is the fundamental thing that keeps us all together in our mission orientation.
17:37But then how do you add pieces to the puzzle where you admire them, you know, they're great at what they do, but you also allow them to do their best work. So, you know, Sian jokes that she likes to go to random conferences. Like she went to a toilet paper conference at some point recently. And I was like, okay, go, go to a toilet paper conference. That sounds great. And then, you know, the next thing, you know, six months later, there's a company that's working with toilet paper and Sian's an expert on toilet paper. And so, you know, how do you like, that's the, that happens over and over again.
18:08So you let people follow their curiosity. So yeah, I think, you know, for me, I'm really ambitious. I know that I can't do this alone. So you have to create leverage by adding really talented people and letting them work within a system. Let's get to Ariel because I'm curious, besides sort of all the attractive, the qualities that make Ariel an amazing partner, how did you think about who you wanted to complement you and Cyan with? What were the skill sets or expertise or personality? I love the quote that our mutual friend Hunter Walk said when Ariel joined. He sent an email to Ariel and he said, oh, you went from being the weirdest person at Cotu to the least weird.
18:50And I was like, oh, we nailed it. That's exactly what I was looking for. So, you know, Cyan and I are true and form, like early stage investors. Ariel has been trained, you know, she learned diligence from John Doerr. She spent a bunch of years at KOTU. So she knows, you know, how the more traditional funds do Series A and B investing. And as we thought about our portfolio and as we thought about the great companies that we'd invested in over the years, we knew that there was an opportunity to do follow-on investments in these great companies. And at the stage in which we were going to do them, we were going to be later than seed.
19:23And Ariel was the perfect blend of that. She still has the values and mission orientation. And I think to her is very strange and weird in the best way. But she has this traditional venture background that really complemented us. And so that's why she was the perfect person. And it's really been fun for all three of us to work together. How do you think about where is Long Journey in 10 years? There's lots of different firms that have taken different paths of growing and scaling. Some do multiple funds. Some remain generalist. Some do multi-stage. There's lots of different examples. How do you think about which examples make most sense for you, given your team and your ambitions?
20:06Yeah, I think, look, I want to have this firm be something that is lasting. And as an institution that I hang up, whatever the equivalent of investor cowboy boots are, that this thing is going on for many years. So I want it to last. You know, from where it goes, I try to think in increments, like we said earlier, like I scaled from the small practice that we were doing to the$35 million fund because I saw that there was a business opportunity to do that. So whenever we think about what the next fund size looks like, we think from our value, which is it's not monopoly money. We really care a ton about the LP dollars that we're raising, the causes they're supporting, and to treat those dollars as if they were our own.
20:51In many cases, they are ours. So when we raised the Opportunity Concentration Fund, we saw that there was a great opportunity to invest in some incredible companies at a stage that was later. And then so the question then became, okay, like what size check do we want to be writing into those companies? What's the right portfolio? The number of companies you want to get where you can have enough concentration, but have enough diversification. So every new fund, we sit down and think, okay, where is the market telling us there's a business opportunity? And so I try not to predict these things, but over the course of the 15 or whatever years I've been doing this, we've been quite good at finding where there is alpha.
21:29So I think we will continue to be ambitious and continue to grow. And we've really scaled our AOM, you know, like I guess from$35 to under half a billion dollars in four or five years now. So I think that that trajectory may not be the exact same, but it has to make sense for our LPs and everyone involved for us to grow on a step-by-step basis. Hey, we'll continue our interview in a moment after a word from our sponsors. Talk us through your journey with building an LP sort of based in ecosystem and the different types of LPs that you've gotten involved over time. Yeah. I mean, look, as you said earlier, I didn't start a billion dollar company.
22:10I didn't work at Sequoia. So in the beginning, you will take money from whomever will give it to you. And that's sort of the way it is in the very early days. And there are some people that, you know, I really want to call out a guy named John Brooke, who's one of our venture partners, he founded Pocket. He brought his brother and his family into that first little fund, that$2 million fund. And that's going to be an incredible fund. So he'll be paid for that risk. But he took a bet on me and saw something that was there. And so I would put him into like a family office or the high net worth individuals.
22:42So that's like often the first bucket of people that will bet on you in your first fund. And then over time, it's gotten more and more institutional. We have some of the best LPs in the business that have made incredible investments in the iconic venture funds at this point, but it's a process. You start with the folks, you look, you got to get into the game. You got to build up a track record any way you can. And so any advice I'd have is like, whatever fund size, like you can get off the ground, get off the ground, you know, start there and then build up a track record. And then over time, the institution and others will come to invest in the things if you keep doing what you said you're going to do.
23:21So at this point, we're quite institutional. And I'm really proud of that because as I said, we're trying to create a lasting foundation that will be around for long after I'm gone. And when you say institutional, are you referring to endowments or which kinds of institutions? Yeah, we have foundations, endowments. You're right in saying that LPs look very different. So there are very wealthy billionaire folks that have run an institutionalized family office practice. We certainly have those. We also have endowments and foundations. It is interesting. Talk about the opportunity fund. Do you think that is something that more funds should be doing?
Read the full transcript
23:58Or how did you think about that as opposed to just a growth fund? Talk about the growth cons there. Yeah. Look, as I said, it's always step function-wise. And so we didn't go out and say, okay, we're ready to lead growth deals. So we're ready to go compete with, I don't know, who's the best growth investor there is and start leading deals. That's not in our DNA and that's not who we did. But we did think we have proprietary access to early stage companies that other people don't appreciate yet. And these things are ready to grow at a new inflection point, whether we can write a free or five or seven million dollar check into the businesses.
24:35And so that's how we decided to raise what we really think of as a concentration fund. And now, actually, we've actually combined the vehicles into one fund. So we have the same amount of capital, basically, between an early stage and opportunity fund, concentration fund, into one vehicle. And I actually think that's the more natural thing because the dollars should compete with one another. But I'm not upset about doing a concentration opportunity fund. I think it'll be a great fund. And it was born out of what we saw in the market was that this real opportunity to invest in these great companies that were not seed businesses.
25:10but now I think putting them together makes a ton of sense because you know, the dollar should compete with one another and allows us to do more, be more flexible and be more nimble. If the market changes at the early stage, which I think it's going to be very hard for a lot of other fund managers to raise early stage funds these days, there may be more opportunities to put more capital into those companies. Or if we get, you know, we have some companies now that are looking like there'll be multi-billion dollar businesses. So at some point we have to say, okay, Maybe we should put back up the truck and concentrate into those companies.
25:43Having it in one fund, I think, is the more natural thing. That makes sense. And are you a believer in generalist funds? I guess, like, have you been tempted at times to create specialist funds for certain asset classes that were emerging? Or where do you stand on sort of the generalist perspective? In general, I think everyone should run the strategy that's best for them. So there's investor, there's product market fit. I think there's investor strategy fit. That said, I have a strong bias toward generalist funds because if you look back at the history of this business, Peter Thiel, John Doerr, Moritz, they've been generalists.
26:21I think that's because thesis orientation tends to be backward facing instead of forward facing. I'll steal what Brian Singerman said on stage the other day at Upfront. He said, if there's a name for a category, it's probably already late, too late. And so I really think that's true. So that's why our thesis of Chase the Magically Weird allows us to invest across certain areas, but always with the lens like, is this weird at the time? And so when we did an AI investing, and we invested in the seed round of a company called Together AI and the seed round of Crusoe and many others, those businesses, AI was not hot.
26:59AI was not a thing yet. Obviously, people knew what AI was, but it's not where we are today. And so I think you end up staying here in a thesis, going and looking for those things, and then you may be too late. So I'm a big fan of being a generalist. That makes sense. Talk a bit about your venture partner strategy because that's something that you've believed in for a long time and have gotten a lot of leverage from in different ways. So talk a little bit about what you guys do, how you operationalize it, and some of the thinking behind it. So it really came out of this operator angel concept out of Angelus, where the realization that we had at the time was that the best deals and the best companies were going to go to other founders and people that were in the game as they got started.
27:47And so now you're seeing a proliferation of scouts and this has become a thing, but it was not an obvious idea in 2015 and 16. And that's where it started. So I went out and found the best people that I thought were really great at helping companies, but also had good deal flow and a good eye. So Brian Balfour is an incredible example of that. He's been known for incredible growth, his growth writing, but also having the leverage in the platform of Reforge was important. So we banded together and I think we've been extremely generous with how we compensate these folks. Because the concept is, is these people can go raise their own fund.
28:23They can go raise a 10 or 20,$30 million fund and force it to the hard. But people that we look for, that have the track records that we look for when we do this, can. And so you have to sell them and show them that there's a lot of leverage in being part of the group. So Justin, for example, or Pascal, when they have signed up for our venture partner program, they were like, great. I get access to Cyan and Scott. Scott is Cyan's husband and part of our extended team. He's an advisor to the fund. Gets access to my deal flow and gets access to Cyan's deal flow. And so they have to believe that it's better together than going on their own.
28:57And so I like to tell people that the venture partners on our website are not just random people. There's a few funds out there. One of my friends is on a website of a fund and he actually had no idea. So that's just an example of like, you know, some people talk about advisors. These venture partners are like people we talk to every day and are a core part of what we do. And we give them fund level carry. We don't believe in like, oh, go like go find something and then go fight for everyone else for like your deal. That doesn't work. We get paid by fund level carry. Our LPs care about how the fund goes.
29:28I want our venture partners to be incentivized in that way. And that's really important. And so, yeah, the last thing I'd say is like we talked about earlier, what I'm looking for is independent judgment. People that are investing in things that they truly believe in, that it doesn't matter what else anyone else is doing, and have had a track record of doing that over and over. And then Justin has an incredible track record. Pascal Levy-Garboa is another venture partner who was the first check at the checker early in Notion, has an incredible early stage track record. But, you know, he's not famous.
30:01is just does the work. And that's what I really love about him. I asked one of your historical venture partners why they chose the path as opposed to kind of just doing their own thing. And they said that the carry was equivalent to what they thought they could raise on their own. And they didn't have to do any of the fundraising work. So that's a compelling offering. Totally. Exactly. So you can't have a lot of those, obviously. So you have to pick very carefully. And yeah, that's how it works. You alluded to it earlier. Talk more about on the values level, how you guys think about it. Because most or a bunch of venture firms have people problems, right?
30:47Because there's often no CEO and people don't know how to make decisions. And then it's hard to leave because sort of the way that vesting works. And yet you guys all really love each other. So what makes long journey work so well? Yeah. So I like to think of values or something that you live by, but you don't necessarily know that you had them until you sort of call them out. So it's actually, it was Henry Kravis who founded KKR, who asked Cyan and I, I think two years or so, he said, tell me about, the only thing he wanted to know about us was what our values were. We were sort of taken aback by that.
31:22So we sort of stumbled through the question, but then we sat back and said, okay, this really matters. We actually have these values and we need to be able to articulate them. So we went through a very hard process. And I think people ask me, what's something that I'm surprised by that I know now that I didn't know before is how much this actually mattered. Values can be something that people say, oh, we're going to put them on the wall. They're going to be cool. People are going to point to them. But they actually are the fundamental thing that drives people together. So Chase the Magically Weird is the first one.
31:51It's our, we talked about it. It's the North Star for what we look for in investments. You look back historically at the best things we've ever done, the one theme, and this is true, I think, about Naval and all these great investors, that the companies look quite weird at the time. So we've really institutionalized that. We also do magically boring businesses run by crazy people. So think like Carter or Flexport. But that's like the fundamental first value. Another important value that I really love is to be a Bubby. So a Bubby, I always loved the story. It wasn't the Zuckerberg or the Jacobs that came up with being a Bubby.
32:25It was the banister who's not Jewish. And being a bubby is basically like a Jewish grandmother. So that's how we interact with our founders. We try to be really loving and open and caring, but also tell them how it is and tell them and be stern about it. So that's like another core value. And then we talked about it's not monopoly money as well. So those core things are things we really, really believe in at the firm. And then something that I think is another thing that I didn't realize and didn't fully appreciate when I started and now that I do is how much mission orientation matters. Something we really talk about a lot is like, how do we don't lose our soul?
33:04You said that all of us get along. You're right. We're very close. And as we start scaling and adding new people and all these things happen, like the thing that we really care about is like, how do we not lose our soul? And so Sian and Scott have had an incredible impact on me personally around this. And I think it becomes the general thing that all of us are tied to. So they've done really well. Obviously, they've invested in some iconic companies. Scott was the first investor in PayPal. It's first board member. Postmates, he invented AdSense, which is not that well known. I mean, he doesn't need to work.
33:36The same, of course, for Cyan is true. The reason why they work as hard as they do is because the mission orientation they have. Their money and the things that they're excited about into the world are going to go to the causes they support. And so they have very particular causes that they care a ton about. And that's what they work for. And so Sayan, during the course of the last few years, she said, Lee, what is it for you? And I didn't really have a good answer. I honestly didn't have a good answer. And then October 7th happened. And the things that were implicit all along become obvious. And for me, I realized that I care a lot about the Jewish people and that I want to stand up for that cause.
34:16So, you know, hopefully when many of these funds do extremely well, I will do well by the Jewish people and contribute to those causes. And it's something that I've started to do. And frankly, since I made that commitment, our portfolio is going like crazy. We've raised more money. I mean, it's just really pretty incredible. So once you have this sort of centerpiece, I now know what makes Sian and Scott incredible what they do. It is finding this mission and just saying, you know, like I like to ask myself, like when something's really hard, I'm like, oh, well, I know now I'm doing it. It's for Israel.
34:50It's for Israel. I say that's like it's a joke, you know, like for the Jewish people. And I'm not saying people should all be pro-Israel or not. I'm saying people should find that thing and find that thing for themselves and make it and tie it into their work because that's how they're going to do their best work. So I don't know if that answered your question, but it was a long-winded way to say mission matters. it's really interesting because you know for many people especially in their 20s right they're motivated by money they're motivated by sort of status you know they're just trying to make it right and then you get a little bit of that and some people get hooked and need it forever but some people get enough you know especially you know food funds in and they're you know someone like say and has been doing this for so long i've got to right and it's like okay now i have that now it's not motivating enough to just work for that need a bigger mission and so it's interesting to see people like transition to something like that to make it more durable and long term yeah i think it's true i have this idea of like standards inflation so once you get to something you're like well this is all i need i didn't get this and then the standards inflate and so it's there's a there's probably some chart you can show that you know whatever the ratio of standard inflation is.
36:04And I think that is the treadmill that you can be on. But if you find something that you really care about, it's just, it doesn't work that way. It's sort of one of my coaches would say that it's an infinite game. Zooming out, what is something unique about your approach to venture or fund building that we haven't covered that you feel our audience should know? Yeah. I mean, I think my belief is that venture has become, I like to think of it as like the Hollywoodization of the industry, 2020, 2019, you know, there was just these heydays where people came into the business trying to make a lot of money, frankly, like they were just very, and nothing wrong with money.
36:43We're all capitalists. We love money. But I think we lost a little bit of that risk-taking appetite, the ability to like have the courage to put your name on things that were weird and out there. And, you know, I think if you look, if you listen to sort the origin story of Sequoia, the origin story of Founders Fund. I mean, Sequoia in particular, those people that were doing venture were outcasts. They were very weird. It sounded like a crazy thing. Now it's become sort of a thing that everyone wants to do. Everyone's got these funds. And I think that that ends up doing is it ruins. I think it's bad for returns because I think this business is supposed to be about investing in things that are out there and weird and then you know, getting paid for that.
37:25So I think frankly, what I've noticed is people will invest in the things that they think are marked up, going to be marked up quickly. And that's like a short-term optimization. They've been paid for that short-term optimization, but I would give people the advice, like if they want to get into this business, like stick to your guns, do the things you believe in. And over the long run, over the long journey, things can work out. And I think that's like a very important thing. So when we think about what we do at long journey, we think of it as old school venture. We are willing to take risks on things where others aren't.
37:58We validate those investments. I mean, often what will happen is because of our reputation, we'll make an investment and other people on the sidelines who didn't, weren't sure if they should make the investment will come in. I think it's a really important thing to do. We do for our founders. And so over and over again, that's the, that's what we want to be known for. We want to be known for the folks that have the courage to put our names on things when maybe it's not cool to do that. To that end, how do you think about competing at seed? It's very competitive, right? The SUSAs, the first rounds, all these firms have been around for longer and thus have had more success over a longer period of time.
38:35How do you think about establishing yourself? Because of your thesis, you're sometimes or maybe often chasing things that other people aren't chasing, but sometimes you are, right? You mentioned the beginning. So how do you think about competing? Yeah, absolutely. There are moments when we're competing. I think at our fund size, in terms of like what, and this is another way that I think it's important to have grown organically at our fund size. If you look at our team and the breadth of experience, there's no one else that has that. I mean, if you think about the companies that we've been a part of, the experiences we've had as operators, like there is no other fund that has that at our fund size.
39:15And so that's how I think about it. It's the breadth of experience. I mean, Scott was the first investor in PayPal. We've, I think, been a part of about 40 unicorns at this point collectively. So that's how I think about it. And what's your model of how you partner with entrepreneurs to the extent that anything is distinct? What is your SLA to them? Or what is your understanding of when a company takes long journey money, what should their expectations be about how long journey will work with them in a way that's perhaps distinct? Yeah, this is back to the concept of be a Bubby. And actually, the next level down is we don't talk about value add internally, really.
39:54We talk about being hospitable. We're very hospitality focused. So you know Mike Wang. He's an incredible experience designer, incredible. He's our head of platform. we really think about how do you create situations in which founders are going to be able to think out of the box and to take on their business challenges in a new lens. So Mike did this fun thing where Sian's barber is this guy that does Guernic Paltrow's hair. And we actually designed a barbershop. So we had him come in and cut hair for founders and other investors and people in our community. We designed this really fun concept of a barbershop.
40:33And it just gave people like an ability to like to for other founders and other investors and other people to talk in a setting that was not normal what i hate about like any vc event i'm sure you've been to them is like a boring dinner where you just talk about the future of ai like that is like we've all been to that dinner and that's just not valuable to the founders i'm value to anyone that's there we like putting people into positions where it allows them to really think about their business challenges in new ways so we're very oriented around doing events that do that and And we've had companies get started out of the things that we've started.
41:06We've had breakthroughs in businesses occur in these types of scenarios. More specifically, it really just depends on the business. I like to think of it as like, in general, if a company needs a lot of help from their VC, they're screwed. I mean, that's just kind of our generalized thought. Like if they think we need to run the company, like that's probably not a good sign. That said, like all of us, I said earlier, have incredible experience running companies or being part of these businesses and can be strategic. So we try to do this in a push mentality instead of pull. Like we do not require a certain amount of meetings from us and things like that.
41:41We try to let the entrepreneur show us where the problems are and then solve them in a bubby and hospitality sort of way. Another thing I would say is what Mike likes to say is we like to be like the spiritual center for our founders. So we really care about coaching and giving people sort of the spiritual guiding light to how they can write a company. And that's sort of what I was talking about, like the mission orientation. We want the same level of care and mission orientation that I have to the founders that we back and help to kind of let that come out and let them authentically be themselves.
42:15That makes sense. And for the fund size and companies per fund or per year, how did you guys land on those numbers? How do you advise other fund managers on how to think about those things? So Ariel, Ariel is a nursing mother. So it's important when I say this, it'll make sense in a minute. We were just talking about like what our portfolio construction was. What's the shape? Is it a, is it a, is it a triangle? Is it a pyramid? And Ariel said, no, no, it's a nipple. And that's actually, I thought pretty dead on. So we have kind of this wide base of, of companies that we invest in. And that's the 30 or 40 core investments we make.
42:56And then we have a very concentrated top to the nipple, if you will. And so that's, we believe in the founders fund mentality of concentrating on your winners and kind of being ruthless about making sure we have the dollars to do that. So that's how we think about it. So I tend to think that our, as I said earlier, like our experience and breadth, we have really great deal flow. So we have this opportunity to have a little bit of a wider base than someone like Mark Sugarman, for example, who's an incredible two deal a year kind of person. And then once they start progressing and they really hit inflection points, we try to pile capital into them.
43:29And that's really worked. We started owning a good amount of a lot of our companies now because we've decided to, you know, to double and triple down into those things. And as we build up that nipple. Yeah. And just on that note, what are some of the biggest long journey companies, the portfolio that people should, you know, have their eyes, you know, focused on? Yeah, I think, I think Together AI is going to be an$100 billion company. I think Crusoe is going to be a$100 billion company also. These are just core fundamental infrastructure for this AI revolution. And both of them are taking very different paths.
44:06Crusoe, in the case of they really are solving the energy problem. So what they do is basically go out and get stranded energy, whether it's natural gas that's burned off in flares or solar that doesn't make sense to put into the grid. And they create mobile data centers that are now powering the AI revolution. And that's a business that is run by a guy named Chase Lackamiller, who knew that energy was going to be a huge part of the future of compute. He knew that in 2017 and 18. And then Together is a really important infrastructure player for open source LLM. So, you know, when Viple told us about the business, you know, OpenAI was starting to proceed, but no one really took open source LMs seriously.
44:55And now they're obviously a huge thing. And Viple makes it really great and easy to use, train, do inference on your own models with compute and then the inference technology to use your own models internally. So I think those two businesses are going to be wonderful. I think there's a lot of other stuff like Rainmaker and others that are, and TruMed, of course, which is a really special company run by Justin and Callie. So, yeah. Yeah, that's a great overview. And, of course, you love all your children equally, but you've been investing for a long time now, so some of them are further along. Let's wrap on that.
45:29Lee, I appreciate you coming on and sharing the journey of Long Journey because there are a lot of people listening who one day want to build something like Long Journey. It's a relatable aspiration for folks. So Lee, thank you for sharing your wisdom and entrepreneurs who are listening. Definitely reach out to Long Journey. Lee, any plugs? Where can people find you guys online? Yeah, we're longjourney.dc and I'm Lee Jacobs on Twitter. Excellent. Lee, thanks so much for having me on the podcast. Thank you. Thanks, Eric. Talk to you soon. Turpentine VC is a podcast from Turpentine, the network behind Moment of Zen and Econ 102.
46:04If you liked the episode, please leave a review in the Apple Store or rate us on Spotify. Thank you.
From the publisher
In this episode of Turpentine VC, Erik interviews Lee Jacobs, Founder & Managing Partner of Long Journey. Lee shares his journey from early investments and his experience with AngelList to co-founding Long Journey with Cyan Banister and Arielle Zuckerberg. He discusses the firm’s unique focus on investing in "magically weird" companies and emphasizes the importance of values, mission orientation, and building trust in LP relationships. Lee also opens up about the challenges and rewards of early-stage fundraising, Long Journey’s operational strategies, and their vision for building a lasting, meaningful VC firm.
--
This show is produced by Turpentine: a network of podcasts, newsletters, and more, covering technology, business, and culture — all from the perspective of industry insiders and experts. We’re launching new shows every week, and we’re looking for industry-leading sponsors — if you think that might be you and your company, email us at erik@turpentine.co.
--
RECOMMENDED PODCASTS:
🎙️1 to 100 | Hypergrowth Companies Worth Joining
Every week we sit down with the founder of a hyper-growth company you should consider joining. Our goal is to give you the inside story behind breakout, early stage companies potentially worth betting your career on. This season, discover how the founders of Modal Labs, Clay, Mercor, and more built their products, cultures, and companies.
Spotify:https://open.spotify.com/show/70NOWtWDY995C8qDqojxGw
Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/id1762756034
-
ECON 102 W/ NOAH SMITH
Keeping econ entertaining - Noahpinion author Noah Smith and Erik Torenberg break down business news and politics every week.
Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/id1696419056
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6q7Gn5lP8TTtBPuV1NJSGs
--
SPONSORS:
☁️Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is a single platform for your infrastructure, database, application development, and AI needs. OCI has four to eight times the bandwidth of other clouds and offers one consistent price. Oracle is offering to cut your cloud bill in half. See if your company qualifies at oracle.com/turpentine
🛠️ Building an enterprise-ready SaaS app? WorkOS has got you covered with easy-to-integrate APIs for SAML, SCIM, and more. Join top startups like Vercel, Perplexity, Jasper & Webflow in powering your app with WorkOS. Enjoy a free tier for up to 1M users! Start now at https://bit.ly/WorkOS-Turpentine
💥 Head to Squad to access global engineering without the headache and at a fraction of the cost: head to https://choosesquad.com/ and mention “Turpentine” to skip the waitlist.
--
LINKS:
Long Journey - https://www.longjourney.vc/
Lee Jacobs on Twitter - https://twitter.com/leejacobs
--
TIMESTAMPS:
(00:00) Intro
(01:54) Founding Long Journey and Early Investments
(03:28) Breakthrough with AngelList Syndicates
(04:09) Joining MHS Capital and Learning from Mark Sugarman
(05:04) Building Edelweiss at AngelList
(06:47) Partnering with Cyan Banister
(09:26) Challenges and Successes in Early Investments
(10:12) Doing SPVs at AngelList
(11:28) SPONSORS: Oracle | WorkOS
(13:30) Scaling the Fund and Bringing on Partners
(15:41) Building the Team and Decision Making
(18:56) Adding Arielle Zuckerberg to the Team
(20:17) Lee’s Vision for Long Journey
(22:26) SPONSOR: Squad
(23:54) Building an LP Base
(25:19) Becoming Institutional
(25:48) Opportunity Fund vs. Growth Fund
(27:43) The Generalist Fund Approach
(29:12) Venture Partner Strategy
(32:32) Core Values and Mission Orientation
(38:14) Lee’s Unique Approach to Venture Capital
(44:15) Portfolio Construction and Key Investments
(47:18) Wrap




