E81: Inside Seven Seven Six with Alexis Ohanian [Classic Interview]

11 Mar 2025 · 54 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: E81 - Inside Seven Seven Six with Alexis Ohanian

Podcast Information

  • Podcast Title: Turpentine VC
  • Episode Title: E81: Inside Seven Seven Six with Alexis Ohanian [Classic Interview]
  • Host: Erik Torenberg
  • Guest: Alexis Ohanian

Episode Overview In this episode, the host Erik Torenberg interviews Alexis Ohanian, co-founder of Reddit and founder of the venture firm Seven Seven Six. Ohanian shares his journey in the tech industry, detailing the inception and operational philosophy of Seven Seven Six, which aims to leverage technology to enhance venture capital operations and support for founders.

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. Background and Transition to Venture Capital
  2. Reddit Experience: Ohanian co-founded Reddit in 2005 and returned to lead its turnaround in 2014. His experience as an operator influenced his perspective on venture capital.
  3. Formation of Seven Seven Six: After parting from Initialized Capital, Ohanian launched Seven Seven Six in 2020, aiming to apply technology company principles to venture investing.
  1. Unique Operational Approach
  2. Tech Company Framework: Seven Seven Six operates as a tech company deploying venture capital, focusing on standardizing metrics and accountability, unusual in traditional VC.
  3. Cerebro Platform: The firm's software platform tracks activities, provides transparency, and allows founders direct access to the team’s network.
  4. Real-time Metrics: The firm publishes metrics such as response times to founders and tasks completed, promoting accountability and transparency.
  1. Founder Support and Engagement
  2. “Amplify” Feature: This allows founders to draft social media content for distribution through Seven Seven Six's channels, enhancing their visibility.
  3. Employee Incentives: All employees receive carry, aligning their incentives with the firm's success and fostering a performance-driven culture.
  1. Market Outlook and Challenges
  2. Evolving VC Landscape: Ohanian discusses the future of venture capital, expressing concerns about "zombie VC funds" and the need for operational rigor as the industry adapts to changing economic conditions, particularly in a higher interest rate environment.
  3. Relevance of Accelerator Models: He critiques traditional accelerator models, suggesting they may be less applicable today given the abundance of resources available to founders.
  1. Future of Seven Seven Six
  2. Fund Size and Strategy: The firm focuses on pre-seed to Series A investments with a fund size around $400 million. Ohanian suggests that while they will maintain their current strategy, alternative funding opportunities, such as incubation, may arise.
  3. Community Building: Seven Seven Six is exploring physical spaces for community engagement, reimagining co-working spaces to foster collaboration among founders.

Key Takeaways

  • Innovation in VC Operations: Seven Seven Six exemplifies how technology can transform venture capital operations, emphasizing metrics and accountability.
  • Founder-Centric Approach: The firm prioritizes supporting founders with tools and transparency, ultimately aiming to create a more collaborative and efficient environment.
  • Industry Evolution: As venture capital faces challenges from economic shifts, firms must adapt and innovate to maintain relevance and effectiveness.

Conclusion Alexis Ohanian's insights into the operations of Seven Seven Six reveal a forward-thinking approach to venture capital, emphasizing transparency, accountability, and the integration of technology. This episode serves as a valuable resource for understanding the evolving landscape of venture investing and the innovative strategies employed by emerging firms.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:03Welcome back to Turpentine VC, the podcast where we discuss the art and science of building successful venture firms, VC to VC. This week, we're releasing my 2023 interview with tech entrepreneur and investor, Alexis Ohanian. From co-creating Reddit in 2005 to becoming a partner at Y Combinator and launching initialized capital with Gary Tan, Alexis then launched 776 in 2020. Up ahead, we explore 776's unique positioning as a tech company that deploys venture capital and discuss how the firm operates. Let's dive in.

0:39alexis welcome to the podcast i'm stoked to chat with you about 776 thank you i'm hyped i'm hyped let's talk you can ask me anything as we say on reddit perfect perfect well let's get let's get in the weeds so while you were initialized you had one of the most successful runs of a fund with with your with your beginning fund and so let's talk about 776 in terms of why I started in a very crowded market, lots of other great firms, storied firms that have been on this podcast. What did you notice was the gap in the market or think about, hey, where did you want 776 to play given all the other funds out there?

1:18So started initialized with Gary back in 2012 and admittedly had no idea, no idea what we were doing. $7 million fund. You referenced the marks there. We've done pretty well there. And And subsequent funds are also tracking quite well. And so imagine it's now 2020, so eight years in, and I had just come back from Reddit. So I'd gone back as chairman in 2014, right at the end of that year to help lead the turnaround. That's where I met Caitlin and Lizzie, who would go on to join me and initialize. And then when we split that firm, started 776. six. And so I just come out of operator mode, right?

2:01Reddit was an 8 million a year revenue business in 2014. That's public knowledge. There was a tech crunch article about it. It was a 10 year old company making 8 million a year and had a lot of issues, a lot of challenges. And, you know, four years later, I was doing around 150 mil, you know, billion dollar plus valuation and team did a hell of a job. And I saw firsthand, learned a ton from Caitlin about what it took to create a high-performing tech company. Not just making a cool product people liked, but then scaling that and growing that and making a real business. And so when I came back to initialize full-time, I was investing during that period, but I wasn't operating.

2:37Gary was operating and really running the firm and hiring and everything. And I found a venture fund that I had co-founded, but one that ultimately wasn't in the vision of what I thought venture could be. And having done one turnaround already with Reddit, that's where I got all of my gray hair. I ultimately just didn't want to do that again. And it's always tricky with equal co-founders because you have a... Literally, this was 50-50 between Gary and I. And ultimately, I just said, look, the best thing I can do here is just split this firm. And I will do everything I can to make sure that Initialized is intact and we get a fund done and everything's great going forward.

3:26But I'm going to take the folks with me who I know can see this vision I see and can run at the speed I want to run, et cetera, and start 776. And so three years into that experiment now, the North Star, to actually answer your question, was, okay, I know how to do early stage investing, right? Done that pretty well. I know how to build billion dollar tech company. But what happens if we take much of the approach of building a technology company and apply that to VC? So what if we say all the time, we're a tech company that deploys venture capital? What does that mean? I'm the product guy. I obviously read it as the first thing I designed, but I spent all my time or a lot of my time thinking about and designing product to run all parts of our firm.

4:09That's Cerebro. And Caitlin is the people expert who spends a disproportionate amount of her time thinking about how we build a performance culture, how we create an environment for our founders so that they can be incredibly successful, how we build metrics into the work that we do. Early stage venture is hard because you don't really know you're doing a good job until eight, nine, 10 years later when you actually get DPI. So how do you develop talent in an environment where most people, if you ask most GPs at most venture funds, what is your team doing this quarter? They don't know. And think about that, right?

4:45There's no way we turn around Reddit if we don't know every quarter what our sales team is doing, what our engineering team is doing. If we don't have metrics, if we don't have alignment, even the people and culture parts of a business have ways to quantify a job well done. Why is venture the one industry where that is non-existent? It's not like we're that special. And the answer is because one, I don't think the culture has ever been there. And you have to have a certain amount of will to want that. And then two, you have to be willing to build the technology that creates that kind of scoreboard.

5:21And not everyone likes a scoreboard. I've always been on the sales side and the business side, in addition to the product side, where you just have metrics. either you have 30-day retention, you have lead conversion rates and dollars generated in a quarter, you cannot escape numbers and data. And it was always so wild to me in building Initialize that somehow that isn't a part of the culture of venture. And so we wanted 776 to be a firm that had that front and center. It's fascinating. As VCs, if we were investing in our own businesses, we wouldn't give ourselves advice like, hey, don't have a CEO or operate in the same way that the industry has operated for the last few decades.

6:07And so you're trying to take the founder approach of reinventing the category using software. I love that. I mean, it's nuts. Even the folks who say that they use software, and I've been trying to coach up our LPs, right? Even the folks that say they use software, I say, okay, the next question you need to ask them is what are usage rates? Like, okay, yes, you have software. How important is that software? How are you measuring? Is it daily active usage? Is it time spent? If it's a tool for your team, do they actually need to do this every day? The canonical questions of like, how upset would you be if this disappeared tomorrow?

6:50That is an obvious follow-up question in our business if you're getting a pitch and a founder is telling you, oh, they love our product. Imagine if we as early-stage VCs said, oh, great. Okay. Sounds good. Thanks. No. And yet, every single one of us is let off the hook. Even if we have that pitch of, oh, yeah, no, software is really important how we scale what our team does, just because poor LPs don't know. and I've actually gotten so fanatical with it. If you go to 776.com, you will actually see a real-time feed of all of the data of really what we've done for our founders in the last 365 days.

7:34Actually, here, I can show you it. It's on staging, so this data is not real, but you get a sense. So literally at a moment's notice, anyone in the world can see, okay, in the last 365 days, how many tasks have we done? There's typos in here. How many pitch meetings have we organized? How many intros have we made using our tools? How many times have founders drafted tweets for us that we posted or searched our network or messaged us? Our median response time to their chat messages. I mean, this stuff is cruel to put on the front door because now any founder of Note has the receipt. Now they can say, okay, well, here's a metric.

8:14Eric, here's a bar. Every other venture firm has the same website, which says the same thing, which is we're value add and here's the things we do. Bring the receipts. Let's go. Please. I want to know, is our average response time faster than our peers? I don't know because nobody else has the courage, the fortitude to track it, let alone publicly report it. And part of this was personal, Eric, because I had, gosh, I had folks, I've been, I was a lowercase C celebrity for creating Reddit just within the tech community. And then seven years ago, I started dating my now wife, Serena, who's obviously a worldwide icon.

8:54And I heard over those years, sometimes directly, sometimes indirectly, that founders would be warned, well, gosh, I hope you can get some of his time. That guy, he's out there. You see, he's posting on social. This was before every VC wanted to be a content creator. And I'd have to answer questions from LPs of like, do you really think you need to be posting so much on social? Do you really think you need to be building an audience there? Obviously, the tide has shifted a little bit 10 years later. But back then, one of the biggest criticisms or sort of digs was that this guy is busy doing his quasi-celebrity thing and he's not that serious.

9:36And I think the problem is, too, I have too jolly of a demeanor. And so it's one of these things where for years in so many roles, I just wish there were a scoreboard. And a couple of years into 776, I'm like, why am I hiding this? We share this with our founders. They see all these metrics. They see this accountability. They get an automatically generated report every quarter recapping what our firm has done for them. But I'm like, no, let's just put this on the front door. Why not? I don't care. And there's actually an Easter egg where if you click through, you can actually see just my statistics.

10:08So this is the aggregate of the firm. Everyone uses this all day, Cerebro. But you can just see my stats. So you can see my average response time to founders. You can see my median response time. I'm like, please, please. Because I realized only in the last few years that the missing link for me personally in my own weird ways was just never having a scoreboard and some way of saying, let's go. Talk whatever you want to talk, but bring some numbers. Bring some numbers. And there's a reason, Eric. It's awkward, man. We're three years in. We're 100 % on term sheets. Now, it will obviously at some point, we're going to lose a term sheet.

10:48And that's not paying the most. There are plenty of times our most recent deal, we were right in the middle of the pack actually on valuation. We've never lost a term sheet. And it doesn't matter if I'm sending it, if one of the other partners are, 100%. And my hunch is if we can continue to do it this way, I think it forces a lot of the folks in the messy middle. You're talking to folks who are doing the tier one legacy firms who manage billions and billions and millions of dollars, who are the brand names we all know. They're not going away anytime soon. Thankfully, they also don't have an edge at early stage.

11:26But they're not going away. They're going to keep thriving. Okay. But there's a messy middle of a whole lot of folks, zombie venture funds that don't have any leadership, that don't have anyone really checked in. There's a lot of folks who I think we're going to see start to roll over. And that's fine. I'll send them a retirement watch. God bless. It's just founders are hungry for the same accountability, frankly, that the free market expects of them and that we as investors expect of them. So it's coming. Change is coming, Eric. Yeah. No, I love the tracking and then the sharing because even in our industry, we don't even share outputs.

12:06People don't even share returns. firms have been around for 20 years. The public doesn't know how they've been doing. The people in the know know how they've been doing. And what you're doing is you're tracking sharing inputs, which is great because outputs take a decade or more to emerge. So I like that a lot. Hey, we'll continue our interview in a moment after a word from our sponsors. Hey, everyone, Eric here. In this environment, founders need to become profitable faster and do more with smaller teams, especially when it comes to engineering. That's why Sean Lenahan started Squad, a specialized global talent firm for top engineers that will seamlessly integrate with your org.

12:45Squad offers rigorously vetted top 1 % talent that will actually work hard for you every day. Their engineers work in your time zone, follow your processes, and use your tools. Squad has front-end engineers excelling in TypeScript, React, and Next.js ready to onboard to your team today. For backend, Squad engineers are experts at Node.js, Python, Java, and a range of other languages and frameworks. While it may cost more than the freelancer on Upwork billing you for 40 hours but working only two, Squad offers premium quality at a fraction of the typical cost, without the headache of assessing for skills and culture fit.

13:19Squad takes care of sourcing, legal compliance, and local HR for global talent. Increase your velocity without amping up burn. Visit choosequad.com and mention Turpentine to skip the waitlist. I want to zoom out a bit and just talk about this idea of software and VC is really interesting. People have tried it in different ways, right? Some people have tried sourcing because it's a question of like, how do you even deploy it? Where can you get leverage? Is it sourcing? Is it evaluating? Is it supporting? Why don't you explain kind of the idea maze of how you thought about, hey, I want to build a tech company that invests.

13:56What are the different things that you explored or tried or how did you end up on Cerebro? And then let's get into exactly what that is, how it works. Look, it was certainly informed by the... I was in the first batch of YC where there was nothing. It was just very haphazardly put together. But then the first bit of software Paul built was allowing people to schedule office hours with founders. And that was when I was a partner. So I was on that side of it. I saw how helpful it was. Sort of a rudimentary CRM. took those learnings into Initialized. And as we built that firm, we wanted to build that software.

14:33And we built a sort of V2, I'd say, the next iteration of that, basically a CRM. But the thing that I realized was, it wasn't until I actually queried the database and saw just how disproportionate the amount of work was, where I was like, Holy cow. I actually had no idea just how much time I was spending with our founders relative to other folks. But then also, as a manager, how do you know? How do you develop a performance culture? How do you give feedback? How do you do this stuff if you don't actually know where folks are spending their time? And this was where, again, there's no way you build a multi-billion dollar company not having that kind of performance culture.

15:20And so then I come back and I'm like, wait, hold on. We've just cracked the surface of what you could do if you built software from day one and then built a performance culture around that. And what does that mean? That means there's transparency about output. There's accountability to one another. There's accountability to founders. There's goal setting. There are things that, again, some people don't like this at all because this is a very different mindset for venture. but other people, thankfully the ones we've been able to attract, love it. And it turns out high performers love this. High performers love this feedback.

16:00They love knowing, okay, in the last two weeks, where did I spend most of my time? And was that aligned with my expectations for how I wanted to spend it? And that could be cut. That's cut. And again, because this is a full operating system, that's cut a few different ways. We can look at, right, were we spending our time between founders, internal team, third parties, and LPs. That's interesting. Gosh, I thought I was in fundraising mode right now. Why am I not spending nearly as many hours as I would have expected to be? But then it goes a step further, which is, okay, let's just look in the portfolio.

16:33Every investor segments out their portfolio based on a sort of rocket ship, like the folks who are doing really, really well, high conviction, going to return the fund, all the way down to the ones that are adrift. Now you're looking at your portfolio. Where did you spend your last two weeks or your last month or your last quarter? Are you spending it in the right parts of the portfolio based on their segmentation? The only way you actually can tell is if you are tracking it and if you are having those hard sometimes conversations among the team to say, hey, hold on. We said we were going to spend, we expected to spend 50 % of our time with founders that are in this section, we had 10 % last quarter.

17:16What happened? Or it's hard enough, and I'm speaking for myself here. These are the tools I wanted my whole career because I want to know, my God, this founder is taking up a disproportionate amount of time relative to others. And the ROI of that time, I'm still 24 hours in a day. I don't know if anyone has solved that problem, let me know. but I'm still hamstrung by that. And if I can build these tools that better help me adjust my day, I know they will help everyone on the squad and us as a team to better understand. And that's, again, that is the simplest version of how we think about it. But when we think about then the tools we built for our founders, I literally went to all the billion dollar CEOs that I had seated.

18:00And I said, what were the things that were most valuable that I did for you over the last 79 years? And I took that list. And then like any good product designer, I just resorted it based on frequency of mention and ease of building. And the number one thing was network and intros. They said, Alexis, your network is unmatched. Your ability to land successful intros unparalleled. That was amazing. And I'm sitting here going, okay, well, what is that? That's a database. And letting you search my brain, a database, is way better than actually getting on a phone and being like, Like, hey, Alexis, do you know someone at Twitter?

18:37Database is really good for those queries. My brain, terrible at it. So that was the first product in this reboot. It was just simply a network search. And that was pulling my personal CRM, which I obsessively kept for most of my career. That was about 35, probably 35, 40 ,000 contacts. And then another 15, 20 from LinkedIn that I aggressively exported. And put those together, make them searchable, click a button, request an intro, draft the email, boom. So that was the first version back in 2020. And again, it was just based on talking to my customers. And not just any, but the best ones. It's a power law business.

19:13So when a dozen... When two dozen billion-dollar company CEOs who I seeded say that this is important, that's who I'm building for. And we've expanded from that to the point now where once a company gets in our CRM through an email, through an intro, through a LinkedIn message, who knows. We have software to handle that flow. So the deal flow, everything through the pitch meeting, how we're... Feedback... Excuse me, we're ranking rating. This is to exercise the muscles of partners and folks on the team to just get better. And I'll tell you a specific way we do that. Because intuition is so important at an early stage.

19:53If a company... I think this is all software. If company, if pitch company becomes PortCo, So then six months after the pitch, we actually ask everyone who's in that meeting the same sort of characteristic questions about the founders. So Effective Communicator is one of the ones that we rank one to five. And we ask them, we don't show them how they ranked them six months earlier, but we ask them again. And then they rank them and put a little context. And then we show them how they decided based on those initial pitch meetings. And what's fun there is you're now, once you're six months into a founder, you actually kind of know what you got.

20:28And you could have someone who is amazing at a pitch and they're great in a pitch setting, but terrible communicating to you as investors, maybe problems communicating with their co-founders. We know that's an important attribute of a great CEO being able to speak clearly and thoughtfully and with conviction. But intuition is how you can tell, even in those handful of pitch meetings, that like, yeah, it's there, but I asked the right question. I get the slightly defensive answer, and that's a tell that you actually probably struggle outside of this pitch. But how do you learn that? Unless you get it wrong, and then you can catch yourself six months later to be like, oh my God, I got this so wrong.

21:10And then what do I learn? Building an organization, I can start to see with some data, it's limited, but at least some data, who has better instincts on this stuff. And this was inspired by a meme from YC. PG always used to call Jess a social radar. Because that early YC group, it was Paul, Trevor, and Robert. Not the most high EQ people. I think they would admit that. Not the highest EQ folks. But Jess came in with a lot of EQ. And it was like, oh my God, she's telling us who's a decent human. And so that always stuck with me because I'm like, okay, there are more nuanced ways to actually start to learn a lot of this stuff.

21:51And if you're building software in through this and you're building it with the intention of helping develop and get feedback, you can do a lot more. Anyway, it goes through the process. And then once they are in the portfolio, then it's about building their journey and building the relationship with us. And the iOS app exists because we're an RIA and I need all the messages to happen in one single place, which is helpful, which is in Cerebro. We even show people... Again, this is how... Just again, I'm nuts. Any founder who's chatting with us... Okay, I got to... God, I can feel the clock ticking in my head where it's like I need to respond quickly.

22:27So here's... This one's fine. Okay, there's nothing naughty there. Okay, so here's a founder. And you see at the top of her chat, she can see our median and average response times to her. Now, every founder sees that. And that's like 101 customer support, right? you'll get a response within six minutes. It's busy right now, blah, blah. But this is the founder knowing that we have such accountability to them. And this is also fun because then again, it's on the front door. I can tell you my average and median response time to every single founder. And again, it's just reiterating like, wow, okay.

23:00They're here for me. It's creating this kind of, I want to create this feeling for founders that this is the bad phone and this is where they can use for needs. And sometimes it's like, hey, look at this great thing that happened. And sometimes it's like, hey, do you know blah, blah, blah? And I need some more color here. And the Cerebra Entry didn't give me enough juice. Can we talk? It's creating that ongoing relationship, which is so important. And then now in the last year, we've started building more and more tools to actually help scale the things that matter most to our founders. And the biggest one, which is, I think, where you're driving and you're in the right direction here, is on distribution.

23:38where like, yeah, it's useful that we have millions of followers across my channels, my teams and the firms. But for an early stage company, being able to actually use that to say, hey, we just launched a new version of our app and here's the cool stuff. Check it out. Or hey, we just landed this big deal. Hey, check it out. Amplifying the content that they want us to talk about is very valuable because you're talking about millions of impressions basically for free for minimal work. So we built out this Amplify tool, which is essentially like a ghost writing tool, not too dissimilar from like a TypeFlee or Hootsuite back in the day, so that founders can actually draft tweet storms, LinkedIn posts, IG posts, all this that then get approved, edited and approved by us and then shoved out on our accounts on their schedule.

24:24So we have our own content team. They're using these tools to create the actual 776 content that we're putting out in the world. But then a founder can wake up at two in the morning and be like, oh, right. We're launching here tomorrow. Make sure to please amplify it. Cool. That... And it's been wild to see. We've had... It's been for the... There's probably 10 companies in the portfolio. Obviously, we have a leaderboard. There's 10 companies that are just ripping it. And what they all have in common is they all have excellent social content discipline. like it's in their DNA. Intro is the best one.

24:59You've probably seen intro stuff bubbling around. They're so effing good. And their head of social realizes, hold on, all my OKRs are geared towards signups and growth and all these things. And now here's another tool in my toolkit that literally no other investor on the planet has ever created that I will get to use. And that's been the hardest part is actually now educating founders about these things that they just don't expect because there is no precedent. And it's a great problem to have. But the difference between the 10 who have just instantly gotten it and are using it regularly versus the other 50 that should be and have tried a little bit here and there.

25:41I mean, these are good. These are all product challenges that I get to now improve. But this is where we want to go. I want to scale my time. I want to scale the team's time and be able to focus on the human parts of this job that are so much more important than coming up with a blank screen of being like, okay, how do I get this tweet started? And obviously, we're using AI to help with that too. Shameless plug for the AI revolution. We'll get into that in a bit. But just to make sure I captured it, my understanding of this rebar is from what you said is it's basically a tool for your founders to get access to your network and your distribution in a systemized, efficient, effective way.

Read the full transcript

26:25And also for them and you to track the work that you were doing, the response time, so that they have sort of the confidence that you'll get back to them, that you'll be helpful. They know exactly what you're doing for them, also your portfolio. And then it's also an internal tool for you to be able to run your firm better, to learn from your decisions, to learn how your team is operating. Did I miss anything there? Yes. I mean, for the last AGM, we do all our AGMs async. I recorded a 22-minute, and that was pretty crisp, but a 22-minute demo. So I'm not... That's obviously probably the most boring thing I could do right now.

27:03But this is an example of the quarterly investor update or investor update that our founders get. Cool. And it's just, whether it's intros one-to-one, intros at scale, that's our campaign tool. Social posts through the Amplify tool. And then all the other stuff every VC does of events and workshops and all that stuff. It's an operating system for a VC fund. And I think we, I'm still so embarrassed by it and it needs to get so much better. but we're, we're tracking in a way that's exciting. Cause it's, I have yet, you know, there's no founder out here. That's like, Oh, have you seen blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, venture firm.

27:49Right. Yeah. No, you're, you're pioneering here because there just isn't. And it's weird. Cause like creating Reddit, I had to hear about dig every fucking day, every day. How are you different from dig? How are you going to be dig? Why are you better than dig? Why do you even exist? There's already Dig. And so it's weird. And obviously, we buried Dig five years later. But for four or five years, it was incessant. And then this is just weird because there isn't. There's no Goliath from a product standpoint. And so we're not any less motivated. It's just weird. A couple years from now, what use cases or functionality have you not yet built in that you think could be a big opportunity?

28:31Where do you see it going? what's next for it. So if we look at the roadmap right now has probably two thirds of it is founder tooling. And I'd say there's some stuff which I wouldn't be surprised. Okay. There's every bit of it we can level up. We should be leveling up. There are other parts of it that have kind of arrived organically that are very interesting to me. So I'll give you an example. We didn't have a community three years ago because we didn't exist. Now that three years have gone by, we're super intentional about... Because we're remote first, we're super intentional. We bring people away from their homes to come in person.

29:20It's a high, high quality event. And our team does an amazing job, making sure it's worth everyone's time. That's so important to me. I got two kids. I'd rather be home with them 99 % of the time or playing Call of Duty with my boys. It needs to count to get folks out. And so now that we've started to intentionally build this community, that's been one area where folks have really asked for more to just better know how to connect with one another. That on the one hand is as simple as messaging. Obviously, I reproduced a type of very similar to Reddit forum called the Agora, which is for one to many community stuff.

30:02That's nothing as the Reddit guy. That's nothing new. But thinking about, okay, how do we create more serendipity as our founder community gets bigger that allow for these high value moments to happen between our founders? Now that... For instance, so I can give you a little of an idea. Now that WeWork is is it bankrupt now i i think there is there's an amazing opportunity here to reimagine what a we'd call it agora irl so the agora is what we call our our sort of reddit like tool online the agora in ancient greece was like the place where all people would get together if it was like a market it was like where you'd go to vote it was like the town square in ancient greece and we have that agora digitally but i i've talked a lot about doing an Agora IRL, where we reimagine what our offices would look like from first principles.

30:54And we say, okay, commercial real estate, quite affordable right now. We find some modest, dope spaces in New York, LA, San Francisco, probably Miami. And we create... WeWork did get some things right. But imagine a space, not that scale, but a place with large benches, powered by Envoy, shameless plug of a seed investment I made, where you can rent out meeting rooms, hot desks, there's some good coffee. And most importantly, you know that all the other humans who are there are either on the team of 776, in the founder community, or like allies of the firm. So it's all good. It's high quality humans, right?

31:34You go to WeWork. Reddit had a New York WeWork office right after I came back. And I got us out of there as soon as possible because the more time you spent there, the worst the company was going to do, just because it didn't really attract high-performing founders. And so imagine that. You have this Cerebro app now as also your key card to get in to your 776 Agora. So if you're in town, if I'm traveling to LA, if anyone on the team is, now you have a place to go where you know you can work. And it's going to be worth the time of being there because all the other humans are similarly motivated to just be doing dope stuff.

32:10So there's interesting ways we can start to layer on now that we actually have scale of community and founders are asking us for this. That again, I'm not trying to actually start another WeWork, but I'm trying to think through for a firm that doesn't have offices, I do think there is value to coming together as long as it counts. And so how do we build that in a way that makes sense with technology and our culture? So get ready for Agora's IRL. I love that. It's a really interesting idea. I love that you think about how to differentiate on how the venture firm operates itself. Because normally, when emerging managers or new funds come to market, they either don't differentiate or they maybe think about different, like specializing in a certain sector or something.

32:52But they don't really think about, hey, how does the VC firm run and how can we reimagine it for what the world looks like in 2023, 2024? This is not going to be a fun job in the next few years. VC, I think for a lot of folks, became a fun job that they could look forward to or almost like a quasi-retirement. And I'm so excited. Again, I'm a really weird individual. I'm 40 years old. I feel more motivated than I did at 20 starting Reddit. I am licking my chops about how much change is going to come to this industry. And it's already starting. But in these coming years, in a higher interest rate environment, in a place where there's a lot of transition that needed to happen, there was a lot of fat that needed to get trimmed in these funds and in the ecosystem.

33:44them. And that was part of the reason we leaned into becoming a registered investment advisor. I had... Every LP was like, that's dope. They're like, that's great. Because for them, it's all upside. And a couple though were like, but why would you do that? Venture capital is the... That's the Wild West. That's part of the fun. You don't have to get audited by the SEC. Why on earth would you take on more operational work? And again, helping... What really helped was having a founding partner like Caitlin who, because of her people and culture expertise on the executive side and the operational side, she likes that stuff.

34:20It's very much in her wheelhouse. And by doing it early, it's way easier than trying to do it way later because you have all your practices, you have all your culture, all that stuff is ossified. And then you're trying to revamp everything. That's where the pain is. So you do it early. And part of the bet was, I do think venture is going to have to, and I won't name names, but there were some firms that made some pretty bad and public calls. And look, that's part of the job where we have to take big swings. But then when you start getting under the hood and being like, where was the diligence?

34:53Where was this or that? And I'm knocking on wood here. That hasn't happened to me, but I look at this and I think, okay, well, more operational rigor is a good thing, especially in this line of work. We manage just under a billion dollars now and 9.3 % of it is my money. So this is my kids. This is my grandkids. More rigor sounds great to me. And I think having that alignment with LPs is also... Now look, I'm very lucky. I didn't have... Thankfully, I had a lot of liquidity events and we'll see what happens with this Reddit IPO. But I'm in a place now where most new fund managers don't get to be because they don't have the track record or the capital.

35:42But I'm going to take full advantage of it. Are you kidding? Of course.

35:49There's probably only a handful of anchor LPs who have actually put more money in because these are big institutions. But that's the kind of alignment I want. And I don't know, I feel very, very fortunate because the dozen folks we have here around the table are motivated by it and all come from operator backgrounds. So they're also thinking about it with a kind of naivete that's helpful because doing something because the way it's always been done should never be the place where you're starting in a conversation. Totally. So we have a sense for how you guys operate using software. Let's get more of a sense for how you think about fund size and where you fit into the market, right?

36:34We have a sense for what Benchmark does, right? Five equal partners,$450 million fund size or whatever their fund size is, and very concentrated series A, series B checks. We have a sense for how A, 16, Z operates, right? Massive staff, massive A, all stages, kind of this really big aggregator. have a sense for how founders fund operates. What's our mental model for how 776 thinks about fund size, portfolio construction, et cetera, place and market? So pre-seed to series A. We're even doing incubations now too. Love early stage. Seeds the bulk of it though. But I do think incubations are going to get some more love.

37:16And for us, it's actually a little unfair because, okay, founded Reddit, cool. But we also have deep people expertise. And so when you are incubating, practically speaking, what's one of the first things you're doing, right? Finding the right people to build out for that team. And so I think we're uniquely positioned for a few reasons there. But you can think of us, like I said, early stage from idea to series A. I am technically the sole GP when it comes to the ass on the line and the legal docs. But all four of us, that includes my three other partners, There's source deals, lead deals, run deals.

37:53And it just so happens, Caitlin, Christina, and then Chris are at different sort of experience levels as investors. Caitlin's already got a couple of angel investments that are billion-dollar companies, companies like Lattice. And she's got a few heaters from the first fund that are already tracking well. One of the things I really wanted to make sure we nailed at 776 was having, I talked about that performance culture, having an environment where folks are getting consistent feedback to understand how to be better as investors. I know I am decades away from hanging it up. I'm not going anywhere.

38:30But I already want to be thinking about succession because I think that's an area where plenty of venture firms have struggled and where it's part of the reason you have these zombie VC firms running around because the founders are gone and no one else has a track record or knows what they're doing. And it's just, it's tough. I already want to make sure we have this kind of development process for all the partners as we go, because it only helps the firm more for them to develop their reputations as great early investors, as great helpers of companies, et cetera. So it looks and feels a lot more, I don't know if collaborative is the right word, but I want to keep that energy while still having a mindset of, you know, you got to do your job.

39:14And at the end of the day, our job is to deliver outsized returns. And the nice thing is I can be a, I don't know, a beacon latest company we announced was score play. And that was a seed investment that my partner, Christina sourced led and one, I got on one call during the conversation, like she's not even a sports fan it's sports tech and like i own a couple of sports teams like i'm obviously pretty well connected to sports but it wasn't an alexis deal it wasn't an alexis pitch like i was a little bit icing maybe on that cake but she won that and that competitive deal being won by her especially the fact she's not a sports fan should probably make some folks really question like okay well like to your point earlier you know being a generalist fund that has you strong conviction about different sectors, different industries, certainly, but just comes from a background of operating.

40:10And as long as we have a great network of founders, we can win in sports tech, we can win in space tech, we can win in AI. It's also way more mentally stimulating because you get to just have to get smart about a lot of things quickly. And then I'll say the last thing too, I don't know how many firms do this. We have every employee gets carry. And why? Well, because again, the only way you're building a billion dollar business is if every single person at the company to the newest admin is incentivized. And you start to see this ripple effect where just by having everyone bought in and caring and feeling like there's upside, it makes everything better.

40:52It means the CRM is a little cleaner. It means the response time is a little faster. It means interacting with the founder is a little bit better. There's a lot of things that we can learn when a team is properly incentivized. And so how do you incentivize people to create that environment? And look, we're only three years in, so what the hell do I know? We'll do a follow-up interview in seven more years and we'll see how it's gone. Yeah. But you've figured out quite a bit so far. You mentioned pre-seed to Series A. What do you think about the accelerator market? Is that a game that YC has won and thus you didn't really consider doing something there?

41:27Or how do you think about the accelerator landscape in the end of 2023 here? No comment. No, I think it is... I've been on both sides, right? I think early on, probably for the first 10 years of YC, it was an intelligence test, right? 2005 to probably the mid-teens. And what's so interesting now is I don't think... I don't know if the accelerator model, because it hasn't changed much since 2005, is the right model for most companies in 2023. And there's a bunch of factors in there. But the bottom line is, I remember we got$12 ,000 from YC in 05 for Reddit. I raised another 60 grand at demo day.

42:20It was a different time. That was a good raise back then, by the way. And part of why YC was so important was because there was just no knowledge about how to do a startup, especially like a modern startup, because it was such a wasteland. And there were... I mean, I made tremendous mistakes as a first-time CEO, but I still made fewer than if I didn't have YC. But by comparison, the 21-year-old first-time CEO who graduates from UVA in 2023, she is so much better equipped than I was. So much. Just because of how much is so much more mainstream in terms of startup culture and how much you can just self-serve from smart people on the internet.

43:00Especially for pure software, there's just so much there. And then I think you just have to go back to asking that hard question of why. And I don't know if the math maths anymore for a lot of companies to do that traditional accelerator. And I've heard... I know all the talking points, but I do think we're due for another iteration. I don't know what it is. But it's just the math doesn't math for a lot of the exact founders you would want who are going to build billion-dollar companies today as it used to back in the day. And that's not just YC. That's across the board. It's going to take asking that question why enough times to really get to why should someone really want to do this.

43:41It is a hell of a time, though, to try to come up with what's next because the time is definitely now for it. And certainly with the secular shift that AI has brought on, we'll be able to build an app in our sleep in no time. Totally. It is the dream if you can figure out a way to at scale, get special economics and have a Coinbase every year. And trust that you're getting amazing founders. I mean, it's almost like a can't lose business model. But the market has gotten more efficient and the founders don't need it in the same way. So you have to find undiscovered founders. And that's why I think YC has gone internationally in many ways.

44:18But yeah. Oh, yeah. And I've said for a while now, if I could just invest in the YC international batches of the last decade, I'm sure you would have made a ton of money. Because it was that beacon in startup communities that just didn't have that. Then what's the next? Again, even that is starting to now not be enough of an edge. I don't know. It'd be interesting. Like I said, it's not going away overnight, but there is absolutely a room to innovate. Maybe that's what you're going to do. I mean, Village was a version of that. Yeah. We tried our own model and had some success with it, but didn't quite make a structural dent in the ecosystem.

45:04With OnDeck, I appreciate the pre-company. What did you learn from it? Yeah, a few things. So one is, I think the pre-company is the way to compete. You know, where I see gone sort of upmarket, you know, they used to maybe take people who were just talented in an idea, but as they got so, you know, so competitive, they can now have the luxury of waiting. Sort of the in-between phase before people have a company idea, or maybe even before they've left their job, if you can add a lot of value there, maybe help them find a co-founder, maybe help them find their idea, or just create sort of a supportive community that helps them, you know, sort of leave their, leave their company.

45:41So things like what South Park Commons is doing, the neck, the negative one space, I think is the, is the place to play. And the question is basically had that I haven't figured out yet is how do you get paid for the risk you take? Because, you know, you're going earlier and there's, there's more risk. And so, and maybe that leads to incubations, like what, like what you're thinking about in a more narrowly way, scoped way. So, so those are the things, the, the ideas I'm, I'm wrestling with. i think you're right one question i have is have you figured out a way to use software to get an edge as it relates to sourcing or evaluating um certainly you have you have on supporting i'm curious if you or anyone has figured that out or if that's possible it's at early stage i mean right there's no data on the companies or very very little because they've only been around some haven't done don't even exist yet others you know you've got maybe a few months worth the data six months, maybe a year, but then you're also wondering what's taken so long.

46:36Like I, it's, there's no data. And then if you are looking at data, I would just be so reluctant. I don't know. I mean, what are you doing? You're looking at what, where they worked and what college they went to. Like that's dumb. So, so I really, I'm very skeptical on using software to be this magic wand. Yeah. It's helpful at later stage. Sure. But I, I skeptical about it on early. the way that we'll go about doing it is through our network, which I know still opens up problems. Part of what I hope we can do is we're using software at the heart of this is to start discovering nodes in the network that we wouldn't have otherwise known about.

47:14Because we actually know who have been the most helpful people on our network because we track them. We actually have a thing in every note you can do slash thanks to give someone flowers. and and that's if you know anyone goes above and beyond you know for it could be it could be a caterer that gives us a bunch of free tacos it could be a founder that introduces us to another amazing founder we also know where we get introduced and all that stuff but like we really wanted to create a culture of gratitude where we can start to understand like who is really helping us out and the next version of that is to then understand of people who are high signal like who would they recommend?

47:52Who are people who are not in our network that they should know or that we should know that they know? And then we create an event where they get to bring their plus one. And it's some person who we don't know that they think we should know. And again, it's all software underpins, even the invites that go out and the acceptance rates and tracks, all this stuff in one place. I want to start to be able to map out the network so that over time, maybe we can get a little smarter about how we're sourcing folks. But right now, we're just very fortunate because there's just a ton of great founders who happen to want to meet with us.

48:27And we haven't had to hunt, let's say, like a lot of other folks do. But that's good. I don't want my team taking random pitch meetings with founders that waste the founder's time. Yeah. And so gearing towards closing here, it seems like your early success means you'll have your pick for what strategy you look at. But we've seen firms like Benchmark and USV stick to a fund size and a strategy and just rinse and repeat. And we've seen firms like Thrive and A6Z and others say, hey, let's actually step up. There's more and more great companies every year. Let's increase AUM and be more ambitious in that way.

49:06Obviously, they're both ambitious in terms of return profiles. When you look at fund five, let's say, or just the future of 776, what do you think it could look like from a fund size perspective? Or do you think you'll go outside of precede to A? Or what do you think is the future for 776? i eric i love dpi once you've had once you've had a taste of that juice you don't want to give it up and so i i think a lot of what we saw was a byproduct of zerp the zero interest rate phenomenon and and i don't know if the math maths in the same way right a larger fund size just means higher bar to make lots of money right and and i want everyone on the team aligned with one goal, which is DPI.

49:51And to that end, I don't think... I mean, we have a sweet spot right now of our core fund is around 400. And I think for early stage, reserving half for follow-on, I want to believe that's in the neighborhood of where we're at a few years from now. But I do think there's other opportunity through different fund types that are complementary that are also not a growth fund, to be clear. But there's some other interesting stuff, right? You talked about incubation. If there were a way to do the incubator accelerator model intelligently, I think you'd have to first... I think you'd have to figure out also just the optics of, well, are you doing every company?

50:45If you're not doing every company, why are you not? And so then if you're not, which is probably the most equitable one, you'd probably want it to be a separate fund vehicle so that it just stands on its own and it's got its own thing. But anyway, I wouldn't rule it out. I just don't want to be on here 10 years from now and you'll be like, aha. But generally speaking, I think for early stage in the next five, six years, it will be very hard to grow to the scale that we saw before. Because in this interest rate environment, in this environment, I don't know how the math, maths. The Founders Fund did a really impressive thing.

51:20We share a couple LPs with them. And when we heard the news, it's public now, that they were giving back money on that billion five early stage fund. We're not quite giving it back, but saying, hey, we're going to reduce this fund size, this money will go elsewhere. That was really great. That was a sober, smart move because a lot of us were looking around going, how in the hell do you have a billion-dollar early-stage fund? Even if... Let's say you reserve half of it, you're really putting$500 million to work in early-stage companies. You're trying to buy 10%. How big are those rounds? And then...

51:53I mean, how do you build a fund-returning profile in early-stage, let alone manage it and everything else. So I'm glad that sobriety kicked in. I don't see that changing over the coming decade. Yeah. No, maybe it's a great place to wrap. We're at the hour. Alexis, I really appreciate not just how you're innovating with 776, but how you're sharing it with the public or sharing with other investors listening in because you could keep all these secrets to yourself, but it's better for the industry if everyone's innovating and pushing the ball forward. So thank you for coming on and sharing your lessons with us.

52:29My pleasure, man. Dude, Eric, I've had GPs at all the tier one firms you talked about earlier. Call me up. They're like, let's get on a Zoom. I want you to talk to my product team. I want you to show us what you're building in Cerebro. I'm an open book. And again, we're a three-year-old firm. We haven't done jack shit yet. But the fact that the baddest in the industry are like, hey, we want to learn from you is a good sign. And like I said, I don't think I have all the answers. I think we're fortunate to be doing it in a different way at the perfect time. And so we get to come at this with fresh eyes.

53:01And I know the space just needs innovation, man. I mean, you come over here... This is why I try to talk young people out of becoming VCs or joining VC firms until they've done some stuff and built some stuff because this space is no longer going to be an early retirement job. And that's exhilarating for the folks who are hungry and want it. And it should be terrifying for the folks who don't, but Hey, that's good. Free market's a beautiful thing when it works like that. Amen. Great place to know. Thanks so much, Alexis. Thanks, Eric. Thanks for having me, man. Turpentine VC is a podcast from Turpentine, the network behind Moment of Zen and Econ 102.

53:39If you liked the episode, please leave a review in the Apple store or rate us on Spotify.

From the publisher

This week, we’re re-releasing Erik Torenberg’s interview with Alexis Ohanian. Alexis discusses his journey from co-founding Reddit to creating the venture firm Seven Seven Six, detailing its unique approach of using software to enhance venture capital operations and founder support, transparency, and accountability


— 


📰 Be notified early when Turpentine drops new publication: https://www.turpentine.co/exclusiveaccess  

🙏 Help shape our show by taking our quick listener survey at https://bit.ly/TurpentinePulse  


—

SPONSORS:

☁️Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is a single platform for your infrastructure, database, application development, and AI needs. OCI has four to eight times the bandwidth of other clouds and offers one consistent price. Oracle is offering to cut your cloud bill in half. See if your company qualifies at oracle.com/turpentine 


💥 Head to Squad to access global engineering without the headache and at a fraction of the cost: head to https://choosesquad.com/  and mention “Turpentine” to skip the waitlist.


—

LINKS:

Seven Seven Six: https://sevensevensix.com/


—

X / TWITTER:

@alexisohanian

@sevensevensix

@eriktorenberg

@TurpentineVC


—

HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE EPISODE:

  • Alexis Ohanian co-founded Reddit in 2005, helped lead its turnaround in 2014, and started Seven Seven Six venture firm in 2020 after splitting from Initialized Capital.
  • Seven Seven Six operates as "a tech company that deploys venture capital," applying tech company principles to venture investing.
  • Traditional venture capital lacks internal metrics and accountability systems that are standard in other industries.
  • Cerebro is Seven Seven Six's software platform that tracks all firm activities and provides founders with direct access to the team's network.
  • Seven Seven Six displays real-time metrics publicly on their website, including tasks completed, pitch meetings organized, and response times to founders.
  • Partners' response times to founders are tracked and made visible to create accountability.
  • The "Amplify" feature lets founders draft social content for Seven Seven Six's high-follower channels to gain distribution.
  • Every employee at Seven Seven Six receives carry to align incentives across the organization.
  • Seven Seven Six focuses on pre-seed to Series A investments with a fund size around $400M.
  • The firm has never lost a term sheet despite not always offering the highest valuation.
  • Seven Seven Six is exploring "Agora IRL" - reimagined physical spaces for their community as an alternative to traditional co-working models.
  • Alexis believes many "zombie VC funds" will disappear as the industry evolves in a higher interest rate environment.
  • Seven Seven Six registered as an investment advisor for greater operational rigor.
  • Traditional accelerator models may be less relevant today as founders have more resources available than in the past.
  • Alexis questions the viability of extremely large early-stage funds in the current economic environment.

More from "Turpentine VC" | Venture Capital and Investing

All 87 episodes
E81: Inside Seven Seven Six with Alexis Ohanian [Classic Interview]"Turpentine VC" | Venture Capital and Investing · 54 min
Listen in VO