In short
Podcast Notes: Uncapped #9 | Qasar Younis from Applied Intuition
Podcast Title
Uncapped with Jack Altman
Description
Conversations with people I admire about things I’m genuinely interested in.
Episode Title
Uncapped #9 | Qasar Younis from Applied Intuition
Episode Description
This episode features Qasar Younis, Co-Founder and CEO of Applied Intuition, a software company focused on accelerating the adoption of safe and intelligent machines. The company, valued at $6B, has raised $602M since its establishment in 2017 and serves critical roles in commercial and defense sectors.
Key Background on Qasar Younis
- Former Partner and COO of Y Combinator.
- Founded a tech firm acquired by Google.
- Worked as an automotive engineer at General Motors and Bosch.
- Educational background includes a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Kettering University and an MBA from Harvard Business School.
Key Topics Covered
- Radical Pragmatism
- Roots of the Automotive Industry
- Complexities of Being Dual Use
- Fostering an Intrinsically Contrarian Culture
- Evolving with Your Work
---
Timestamps Overview
- (0:00) Intro
- (0:31) Psychology of starting a company
- (17:04) Love for the automotive industry
- (22:54) Autonomous vehicle landscape
- (25:45) Deep partnership with customers
- (28:49) Complexities of being dual use
- (34:44) Culture being intrinsically contrarian
- (40:01) Gen AI and humanoid robotics
- (42:28) More noise than signal in investing
- (44:14) Evolving with your work
- (47:43) Companies working as a state in time
---
Discussion Highlights
- Psychology of Starting a Company:
- Reflects on the challenges and motivations of starting a company, particularly for someone with previous experiences in established companies.
- Emphasizes the importance of feedback and re-evaluating preconceived notions.
- Passion for the Automotive Industry:
- Shares a deep-rooted love for the automotive industry, influenced by family connections.
- Discusses the significance of understanding the historical context and complexities within the automotive sector.
- Autonomous Vehicle Landscape:
- Describes the current state of the autonomous vehicle industry and its potential growth.
- Discusses the partnership dynamics with customers and how Applied Intuition collaborates deeply with them.
- Being a Dual Use Company:
- Explains the complications of operating in both commercial and defense sectors.
- Highlights how the dual-use nature allows for technology to be subsidized through non-defense applications.
- Contrarian Culture:
- Describes the company's culture as contrarian, emphasizing the importance of independent thinking and debate.
- Discusses the decision-making processes that allow for flexibility and responsiveness to market conditions.
- Artificial Intelligence and Robotics:
- Discusses the future of Gen AI and humanoid robotics, expressing skepticism about current business models in the space.
- Acknowledges the potential for intelligent machines across various sectors beyond just automotive.
- Investment Landscape:
- Talks about the noise versus signal in investments and how the current environment affects decision-making.
- Discusses the challenges of discerning valuable investments amid trends.
- Personal Evolution:
- Reflects on personal changes throughout his career and the importance of evolving professionally while staying true to oneself.
- Emphasizes the balance between maintaining high standards and ensuring a supportive work environment.
---
Key Takeaways
- Radical Pragmatism: Emphasizes taking practical and well-considered approaches to business decisions.
- Thorough Understanding of Markets: Importance of knowing the automotive and defense markets deeply before entering or innovating within them.
- Building Relationships: Strong customer partnerships are crucial for success, particularly in complex industries.
- Contrarian Thinking: Challenges conventional wisdom and encourages a culture of debate and constructive conflict to drive innovation.
- Long-term Vision vs. Short-term Hype: Awareness of the long-term journey and the necessity for deep understanding in technology markets.
---
Conclusion
This episode of "Uncapped" with Qasar Younis offers a deep dive into the complexities of building a tech company in the automotive and defense sectors. It underscores the importance of pragmatism, partnership, and a contrarian mindset in navigating the challenges of entrepreneurship.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00So number one, I love the car business in the way that I've never loved, you know, any other, like, is it beyond a business? Why do you love it so much? I mean, I came to US and GM money. So I'm sure there's an emotional, you know, component that I like my uncle was a General Motors Engineer. He bought us the tickets that we came to the America on and then supported us. All right. Thanks a bunch for doing this. You're one of the CEOs that I look up to the most, but there's no content about you online. Wow, I have a steeply flatter. When I started this, I was like, I'm saying I've got to get you.
0:28Oh, yeah, he'll, every single one right to him. So I want to start with when you began working on this company, you were at a place where you had already started a company that was like, probably really hard, you know, you went to Google and then you were like the COO at YC and you had this comfortable, good job. Yeah. You already knew that starting a company is pretty brutal kind of sucks. And you started one anyway, which is very different than like a 22 year old starting a company who's just like, bright eyed and doesn't know how hard it is. But you decided to, so can you talk about what was the psychology for you when you began working on the company knowing that you could have, you could have gone and ran it.
1:05You see firm, you could have gone and been a COO at a public company, probably like you had a bunch of options. Why did you do that? Yeah, I, uh, first thing is I didn't quite know because the first company had it was three years, but it was like this. And did it full time for a while, then there's a part time, et cetera. And it was like, I'm going to fail. There's a Chicago. It kind of failed quietly and literally didn't know anybody. I mean, my co -founders from that company know us, but like we didn't raise a dollar. It was just, you know, your, it's like a tree falls in the forest. Okay. If a company dies without raising money, and no one even knew it existed, was it really a company?
1:34Okay. And the second one was 10 months when it was acquired by Google, and it was a good outcome for us financially. We were like three poor, you know, kids. Uh, and so, um, it wasn't really have the grind. 10 months is nothing. It's not. You blink and you're 10 months is done. So, uh, partly I didn't know, but I knew just from the YC experience that there were a lot of people. A lot of smart founders that went out and did all the right things and still failed. And so, uh, I think for me on a YC, even when going to YC, originally the way that I got into YC was as an employee was my co -founder here at Peter Ludwig and I, we're doing a Robotaxi company.
2:11And I met some of these Sequoia partners and they were like, we don't think it's a good business. And so I was like, oh shit. You know, you take that advice. But one of the my superpowers is I take feedback. Like that is like, I listen and I really reevaluate my preconceived notion. And all the way to when I started my career in automotive, you know, I was knee deep and automotive and I moved over to Silicon Valley software extremely pragmatically. And you know, we say often all of our values can be reduced to medical pragmatism. The way you're radically pragmatic in any of these, let's say, inflection point decisions is having a clear right understanding of what is what you're good at.
2:49What the market is saying to you about the thing you're going to do and then where they could be wrong possible. So when these Sequoia guys says specifically, one person said, we'll give you the money to you and Peter do a Robotaxi company. But I don't think it's a good business. To me, it was like, okay, I got to really listen to that feedback. And what's a PG's program house and said, oh, what do you think? And he said, well, you should consider joining YC. And my wife at the time was pregnant with our son and he's like, don't start a family and they start about the same time. And I also listened to that advice.
3:18And then in terms of the true inflection point of leaving YC, which is leaving Google was a tough decision because it was a great job. It was the first time to me. And also people forget what Google, like today people at Google, like 14, 15 years later is very different than Google at that time. At that time, you know, in videos in your bankruptcy, Apple had come out with this MacBook Air. Wasn't Apple today and Steve Jobs is still alive. Yeah, Google felt really strong then. It was the apex predator. Who else was there? Facebook is under 1000 people. 2010 Facebook was a tiny company, relatively speaking, is this small company.
3:53And so as like Google is the D company to work at and there was really no number two. Everyone was trying to work in Google and everything. So, but it wasn't that hard to leave because I think I've never emotionally felt that I wanted to be an employee forever. Like that, that was a part of it. Also working with Paul and working with Sam. These are like, you know, I'm not that smart, but I'm smart enough to know that these people are exceptional. And so like getting the exposure to those people, I think it was really important and like made the transition. Leaving why I see those actually the more difficult decision because there's a reason that you said, fundamentally, I think it came down to I always felt one I already thought of, like, you know, my view was go in, learn a bench and try to do the third company.
4:36And then like I enjoyed the work and then that was actually what made it more difficult. But really was like, am I an investor or am I a founder? Yeah. And that clear delineation is investors are lone wolf, you know, they're great. Their great investors are kind of like thoughtful, academic, independent, contrary to some, you know, to maybe even to a fault. Those are like really great investors look like. And then the best founders are actually super opinionated and they're almost like difficult. Yeah. And I think I'm more difficult today to be with than any time in my career. And I'm seeing the manifestation of who I really am.
5:16Yeah, it's an unfortunate thing that I think a lot of the great founders happen to be very disagreeable. I happen to be like a very agreeable person, which I think, you know, it makes your life easy, but I think to build, you know, really iconic companies a lot of times you need to be willing to just do a lot of stuff that's uncomfortable and tell people their work's not good enough or you don't care if, you know, other people want to do it this way or doing it that way. And I think like, you know, I would say my two, you know, many faults, but two kind of glaring faults in my, you know, disposition of my, is one is I do work a lot, almost to a degree, which is, you know, I used to say all the time, I want to be the person that works more than anybody you've ever met.
5:57So I'm creating that identity. You were always that way. Yeah. Even before this company. Yes. It goes grew up poor. So it's like deep in my, like, you know, I don't say this as like some sort of like back padding, but I had to do it myself, paid myself undergrad. And as my parents, they didn't have the abilities and the means to provide. So I had to do that and then same thing with grad schools. So it's always been on my own back. And you know, always in the relatives, like an Arna Schwarzenegger saying where he says no one's really doing it themselves. They're doing it with the help of other people.
6:25But in the sense of, you know, that that that sense, but going back to that inflection point of choosing to leave YC one is so working all the time. That actually made people uncomfortable. A Google made people uncomfortable. Let's know why I see because you're kind of year on a bunch of CX CEOs and founders. And they all work like all the time. But at Google, I remember people asking me like, why do you work so much? And I was like, oh, I guess there's like the wrong way of doing it. And the second thing is having really strong opinions. And I just can't let things go. If I think something is doing done wrong, I will be, you know, take my deep breaths.
7:00And I just, I just can't not say I think that's the wrong strategy. And I think when you're not the boss, that is very difficult to work with somebody like that. Did you think about it as like you were at a point in your career where you were like, it was your last moment to like pick a path. And you were still kind of a stem cell. You could have gone and been an investor. You could have been a founder, but was there like a function in your mind of like, I need to make my choice now like for good basically. I think that, you know, you're basically your mid -thirties are a very important point in your career because you're old enough to basically get whatever job or you have enough experience to know like what you're good at and what the market wants.
7:39But you're also not the point you're, you got 20 years, how do you, where you can really, that's the, you know, the way that I think about life and I've talked about this inside of applied is you kind of get like these, these post -it notes. Each post -it notes is five years. So how many of those do you get? Yeah. Six? Yeah, maybe. Eight, maybe if you're lucky. You get a right, what you're going to do in this. So, you know, Google was one of them. Why combinators was one of them. Harvard Business School and Automotive Engineer. Yeah. I'm running like, I'm already four post -its out. Yeah. Right?
8:09I'm already four post -its out. Yeah. And that's before, that's after you're in the adult. Yeah, and ideally if you do, you know, work that really matters. One of those post -its is going to be a 15 year post -it. Yeah. And so then you really don't get that many. You really don't get that many. It's funny. I'm 35 and I just did this, you know, starting, you know, being an investor after having been a founder. Yeah. And I had a lot of these similar background thoughts because I do think that there's this mid -career moment where you know enough and you're in a situation where you can kind of set yourself up in different ways.
8:36But you still have a lot in front of you and yeah. Yeah. And so at that time when I decided to between deciding to leave OIC and actually leaving OIC was like a four or five month period where I told Paul and Jessica, hey, I'm going, which is August of 16. My last day was December 31st, 1960. I had that time and their view was like, hey, maybe you don't want to start a company. But maybe you don't want to leave, you know, the way the OIC works is the next bad starts in January. So it's like, oh, this is already rolling. So think about it. In that time, the real first was like funds actually reaching out and thinking, you want to work at a fund.
9:08And I think just because I'm a rational person was like, okay, let me talk. Is there something there? And ultimately, like, it was never going to be, you know, in recent Horowitz, you know, it's not going to be Client of Perkins, you know, or whatever, you know, coastal units or whatever the firm is. And and also had a good gig at YC. So it's like, why would I step into a parallel kind of thing? So that didn't quite make sense. It was like, oh, start a fund or start a company. And I really explored those things. The thing that ultimately tipped me Peter, my co -founder, having an idea that actually I really, and then it wasn't a 50, it wasn't like a definitely, this is the right thing now.
9:43Yeah, but at the time it was like 70, 30 call or something. 51, 49. That close. Yeah, super, super close. Super, super close. I've started this company and started a fund. Yeah, super, super close. And I think like, like it's a hindsight, the narrative is going to be very easy. Like I was an automotive engineer and I would do software and, you know, AI for illegal intelligence, machines, cars, trucks, tanks. It seems so obvious. Yeah, at the time it's not like that. It's funny because you probably could have started a fund. You would have made some killer investments and then you'd tell a story that in that parallel universe about how it was always obvious.
10:13It's always what you should have done. Exactly. So your brain just rationalizes the reality. But I can tell you the empirical thing that I knew, the thing that I do in those fundamentals, I enjoy this more than anything I've done. And I, you know, like next year will be extremely difficult to watch. I say this, like this job has been easier than working at YC, working at Google, working at Bosh. Even at the beginning. Yeah. Wow. Because for me, the thing that bothers me the most, and you have to kind of really know yourself. And this I know about myself, this is the people I'm with, that's the dominant thing.
10:45If I have tension with the people I'm with and I have like, you know, we're not in, you know, harmonious. I have, you know, if that just grinds my, you also have much more control over everything as a CEO than as a VC. That's one of the biggest things I've noticed. 100%. Flipping is why I used to have control over everything and now I don't. Yeah. And which is okay. But that's like a huge difference. And so if you're, but the control comes to the cost. Of course, nothing is free. Of course. So now you have the responsibility that comes with it, which is, did you hire the right people? Are you picking the right?
11:16You know, you're making decisions every day, which are always in the gray zone. And one of the key homeworks of apply that we just, we talked about it just today earlier as that. It's like decisiveness, decisiveness, decisiveness. You've got to make decisions as a leader without all the information. And then by the way, they got to be right. Yeah. A lot of times when someone like, I feel like when people start their, and that's a hard piece of advice though. It's very hard. Yeah. When people start their companies in their early 20s, let's say, versus their mid 30s, oftentimes, I think the story is, you know, in the early 20s, there was a lot of iteration.
11:51There was a lot of wandering in the woods. And on the fourth thing, boom, they realized that Airbnb was a thing and, you know, the cereal and whatever. Yeah. And then a lot of times when people are later in their careers, it's like they saw the whole movie. And I think you did see the whole movie. Yeah, yeah. Absolutely. How important? Why see was huge in that. Yeah. You just see the, you see a play again and again and again. And you knew, you knew how a company was built, but you also knew what this market and this product were made because of how you grew up. And so I'm guessing part of what got you 5149 in the direction of starting applied was that you felt pretty confident that there was a real business to build here.
12:24Yeah. And Peter, my co -founder, I mean, we have a tremendous relationship. And I think, you know, our parents live a quarter mile from each other in Michigan. Yeah. Which is kind of, so the foundation was just crazy strong on both of those. And we shared values. I think, like, you, and as you get older, you start realizing, these are my people, did not my people. Like, you, that, that, that starts, starts happening as well. And like, my people broadly speaking are, you know, Michigan people, they're sending well people. It's the less the, you know, I would say the, like, I could never do a consumer company.
12:51It's just not, we're kind of like Detroit guys and we kind of, you know, grew up in factories. I mean, literally work for many, many years of factories and go to the General Motors Institute. It's just a very different, and it's not obvious when you talk to me. Yeah. I'm just a Silicon Valley guy. I worked at YC and worked at Google. Like, that's not, you would say, what were you talking about? That's not where you came from. Yeah, but that's not where I came from, right? And so, where I'm Silicon Valley is being an immigrant, that's very Silicon, being an engineer, that's very Silicon Valley.
13:13But the other things are not, which is like being very Midwest. And that way, like the Mark and Dresden, the, you know, we get along a lot. He's similarly from the Midwest, Peter, similarly from the West, and you can send some of us tray and you can send some of these, these values. But just in terms of, again, back to that inflection point, for me, where, where, where, where, you know, the Peter thing kind of goes over the other personal things going over. It's not obvious, but once you're in it, then it was like, oh, this is my thing. Like I can just make all these decisions. And you're saying, you know, in the early, or the early phases, more difficult than the later phases, I think it's been similar.
13:48And it has different sets of problems. One thing is true is now, again, hindsight, I think my skill set is just way better being a founder. Product design engineering, those are your bread and butter of being a product company, running an organization, you know, I had that experience. So, yeah, now it seems like it was the right idea. How much has the movie played out similarly compared to, you know, what you thought it would be on day one? I think shockingly to like to what our plan is. I mean, we, we, so unlike other folks, maybe 20 year old founders, we like enumerated. Like, there's a great Napoleon line, which is like he talks about how people think he's a great field marshal that he's, when he's in war and his memorise, he writes that he was in battle, that he would make these decisions.
14:35And I just studied the battle field way better than anybody else. And I just thought through the permutations of if then this will happen. And we did a lot of that. So we're like, we're going to start this thing. If this works out, the other competitors are going to react this way or the in -house team are going to do this. And then we're going to do that. Like, and then the crazy thing is like, you're like, you just thought harder than other people almost? Yeah, one of my first engineering managers had this thing. We were working at a Flip V6 engine plant in Flip Michigan. And he had this sign above his desk, which said, no problem can withstand the constant onslaught of thought.
15:11And like 25 years later, you know, I think about that like every second day. And so there is like, and I don't know if that's right or wrong. Well, it's funny because you know, the, you know, every plan is good until, you know, it meets reality or whatever. It's actually like a very different lens on that, which is one is like, you know, think about it, but not until you get out into the real world, will you know? And this is actually saying, no, think about it hard. And if you think hard enough, then you'll know. Yeah. And if you have an experience, this is an experience matter. It's what not to be in 20 and being in the 30 year old is better because you can just look at other companies.
15:40Like what? Like, again, it's going back to that whole thing of like, being very clear, buoyant about what you're good at, what you're not good at, how the market is going to naturally react to something product like this in the market. Do you have as much of a vision on the next 10 years right now as you did on the first 10 years when you started or do you have less clarity today than you did then for some reason? I would say more now, mainly because when we were starting, there was a lack of confidence that it would actually do that. The business would open. And just for everybody to get on the same page of what our business is, we have three, you know, rough areas.
16:15We have engineering tools. We have operating system and we have autonomy. So we do this thing. And that is just like there is a company, Microsoft's had the same thing from 1975 to 1982. They were tooling company, then they got an operating systems and they got an application like office and stuff like that. Today's Microsoft is very different. So we're really talking about Microsoft from 75 to let's say 95 or something like that or 2000. But then they're all in PCs. We're all on cars and trucks and tanks and jets. But it's the same concept. You have software that you, you know, tools and software and applications that sit on top of these pieces of hardware.
16:51That's somebody else in manufacturing, somebody else is making. And so, you know, that you already see that's being informed. Like that's not, we're not coming up with this as a student of history. You know, that absolutely plays into our strategy. Where are we right now in just like the landscape with auto and general and automotive? Yeah, I mean, I don't know when to say, well, come up, but it's tear of season right now. And, you know, the car business, so I know I love the car business. And in the way that I've never loved, you know, any other like business, beyond a business. Why do you love it so much?
17:24I grew, I mean, I came to the US and GM money. So, just as an emotional, you know, component there like, well, it goes to General Motors engineer, he bought us the tickets that we came to the America on and then supported us. And then I went to the General Motors Institute and it paid for my college and I worked with General Motors and I worked at Bosch both in the US and in Japan. And then I spent some time in Germany as a student. And so I didn't know the industry. And you love like the cars or the people or the engineers, the cars, the whole thing, the cars. I like the cars and the engineering that goes into the cars.
17:51So, you know, like there are not a thousand YouTube channels on, you know, databases. There are a thousand YouTube channels on cars. And every sub -brand of car has their car, they're Subaru car clubs and there's, you know, Civic, like everything that you can think of. There's, you know, jeeps, people who go out and, you know, off -roading. So it's a giant car. Are you more likely to go deep on like a really cool engine or like a supercar? Both. I mean, great engines are in super cars. So I mean, I absolutely like it. But you like the whole thing. Yeah, I like the whole thing. I mean, I can tell you the history of the Ford Mustang or the Porsche 911.
18:25And I can tell you the difference between a GT2 RS versus a GT2 RS. And, you know, all the players in the ecosystem, I just love it. I mean, that's why you go to GMI as a 16 year old. You're like, I love cars. And where am I going to go to work on cars? I go to the General Motors Institute in Flint, Michigan. What was that? So different about it than any school. Yeah, I have like no, I mean, I grew up in St. Louis, Missouri. Oh, yeah, yeah. I have no frame of reference on this. So, so it is a fascinating school. It was started a hundred years in 1919 when General Motors didn't have enough engineers.
18:56And they basically started the school in order to get more engineers. You could imagine if the Bay Area doesn't have enough AI engineers, for example, a company that's super flush with cash would start an AI Academy as an example. And then that just existed. The difference about GMI and other schools is you work half the time, you go to school half the time. Resonates for the poor kid like me because I can immediately start working. So you and unlike other co -ops like at Waterloo and some other places, you have one company that's with you for those five years. And then they pay you like, you know, at increasing rate.
19:25And by the time you're in your 50 year year senior, you're making almost an engineer's salary and you're almost doing an engineer's work. And since it exists for a hundred years, it's a very well oil machine. Like you don't go in and they're like, what's an intern? They're like, when you leave on a Friday, there's a chance there's a GMI kid on Monday from the opposite section coming in picking up your work. So there's continuity. So it's a very industry. It calls a West Point of Automotive. It is really an industry school. Does this exist in other industries in the same way? I have a point exists.
19:56I have a point exists. Part of me wanted to go to West Point. I just love that regimented structure as well. It just spoke to me. But yeah, so when you go into that world, you can imagine the guys who are at GMI. And it's almost all men. There was a desire to make it a gender balance school. It's like literally like 90%. And it's in Flint, Michigan. And you have to do this corporate co -ops. So they already filtered like a very particular type of person. And so you started at 16. You started at 18. But I started working at General Motors at 18. Which is kind of a crazy thing. But you become an adult real fast.
20:37And the biggest thing that you learn is, oh, what happens in the office? It's super different than what you're learning. I would learn fluid dynamics. You learn thermo. You're like, what are you thermo at work? At work, it's like people are trying to get promoted in a project. And this like, you know, Pontiac, that's going to get launched as Corvette program. And you're like, oh, this is like super different. And that was also very telling and informative to me. But the macro point is, when Peter and I started this company, we thought we, like other people, must know the car business. It's such a giant business that live in Silicon Valley.
21:09Tesla is right there. And like eight years into the business, like very few people actually understand the car business. And then as we got into defense, and then we got into construction and mining and trucking, you just realized that these ecosystems are actually quite far from each other. Defenses become a bit closer to Silicon Valley because of a couple of, you know, strong companies like Andral and Palantir and stuff. But generally speaking, they're still kind of different ecosystems. And I think one of the secrets that we had in getting that flywheel going is we understand the market so well.
21:36I mean, the joke we used to make is like we forgot more about the car business. And most, if the founder was to enter in, I mean, he's like, Peter's childhood, his father was a chief engineer and radar for one of the big suppliers and working general motors. There's just no way to catch up. He's like, every, he's like, every dinner he had growing up, every, every mail adult mail and Peter's family worked in the car business. As an engineer. So when you go to barbecues, you have every dinner you talk about this supplier, Takata's going under what's having TWTRWs getting bought by the ZF and what does that have to do?
Read the full transcript
22:08ZF just, you know, like you just all this stuff. It's kind of like if you grew up in Cupertino. Yeah. And but you know, Silicon Valley is in center of the universe. Fast forward to like 2075. Silicon Valley is just another thing. But you grew up in everybody works in the business. Yeah. It is not a cool business. It's just everybody works in it. Yeah. And then by the way, in car business, it's because it's also consumer. Totally. So you know, you sit in cars, people rent, you know, I worked on a 69 Mustang on over a summer, you rebuild an engine. So when you do that kind of stuff, it's like, it's like true passion.
22:36Oh, yeah. I remember I'd meet people who would come from like Kansas and they were like, it's like, you know, what, why'd you move to Warren? And they're like, oh, to work in GM. And you're like, what? You moved across country. I'm just here because I was, you know, I was like, this is my dream. And then that's when you meet people in the Bay Area who are like, moved across the world to work in the Bay Area. But there's some people who are just born here. And it's a little more strange. So like, where are we in, like with cars today, obviously, like, there's a ton of intelligence that's being added, obviously in San Francisco, you can feel it, you can also just see it, you know, you buy a new car, you can feel that they are updating quickly.
23:07What's like the, the landscape and the latest? I think generally cars are still pretty dumb. I mean, if you look at a parking lot, there's just not a lot of intelligent. Most cars are still a mechanical electrical system. They'll have some connection to your phone. They're mostly dumb. And our vision of the future is every moving machine will be intelligent. That is the world that we see itself driving is like just one small part of that. Part of that intelligence. Yeah. It's part of that intelligence, but it's not the whole thing. Yeah. What are the other big parts of the, I don't know if you think of it as like, you know, different pillars of it, but like, obviously mobility is a big part of it.
23:42The end cabin experience. Yeah. So if you're in a tank, if you're in a fighter jet, there's already a lot of work in order to make the war fighter more efficient in their executing tasks, but that integration can be way tighter. And I think defense in the future right now, defense is still typically one person with one machine or a small group of people with one machine. And I think in the future, it's the opposite where it's one person with lots of machines. And that's like, you see the early versions of that through swarms of drones, but I think that is going to be prevalent and kind of the future.
24:13And so the machines are the ones that can be at risk rather than the human operator. Is that like you're prompting a swarm that can now do swarm level things? Is that kind of what you mean? Yeah, absolutely. And but the human is still relevant and making ultimately a lot of those decisions, especially when you're talking about taking lives. Would that have an on a construction site that like one person is coordinating between, you know, a digger and an excavator? It'll have a lot of trouble. It's still far from that. It's so far from that. So you asked what are the subcompetents? So one component is, you know, the thing that you just autonomy, the other component is interaction with the machine.
24:43The other component is literally just the guts of how to run software on these things. It's that seems so trivial to us, but these machines are typically built by lots of sub companies that will assemble all these parts together into a truck. And they're so the typically the OEM, the original equipment manufacturer, the Skanyas, you know, the biggest, a trading group, biggest commercial trucking company in Europe. They're assembling parts, but some of those parts are getting from other folks. As we go into the future, those, you're going to be de -fragging of those parts because it's partly in electrical power -train, and partly just because you're bringing all this compute that exists throughout the whole vehicle into a centralized compute.
25:23Once you have a beefy central compute, you can do a lot more things with it. You can interact with it. It can run, you know, models on it. And suddenly it's more intelligent. And so then you can do more intelligent fleet management. You can do all of the things that you would kind of normally expect. Just think about it, just the dumb car, or the dumb tank, becoming more like your phone. So I remember when I was, you know, in the surprisingly early days of lattice, but definitely as things, you know, progressed, our customers weren't just like, we just want some software, we have the whole plan.
25:55They were like, we also want to help making the plan for how we're going to do performance management or whatever. And as listening to you talk, I'm imagining that when you're talking to one of your customers, they're not just like, we know the spec, you give me the parts I'm good to go. But our rather like, can you help me get into the future? And so I'm wondering out loud about like, what is your relationship like with these customers you work with? Because I'm guessing that extremely deep. You're thinking all day about what they could be doing that they might not have even thought about yet.
26:24And then you're like partnering with them in a different way. I mean, like in the, a lot of the word partner gets sort of around like basically. But I can see it for this company. Yeah, it's like we, because we do the software side, they do the hardware side. And so they're bringing a set of expertise that we don't have. It's not in our, in our company. And so it is very much like, let's do product planning. To some of the people ask us like, late stage investors ask us, you know, how, you know, is it easy to replace you guys or what is it? It's like, we are as deep in these companies as you possibly.
26:53You're like, I would guess some people on your team and some people on your customers team feel like actual teammates. Yeah, and it's extremely intimate. You're working on just giant projects. Yeah. You know, when you're making a new truck, that is thousands of engineers that work together. Those are like, if you ever think how complex it is, open the hood of your car. Yeah. Every little screw has a team behind it. That's to make sure that that whole thing and that screw with that weight is. It's crazy that we can make a car. Honestly, it's unbelievable. Yeah. It's unbelievable. It's the most complex thing that humans make at scale.
27:27Yeah. We make rockets. More than an iPhone, I guess. Yeah. Which is like the other big like, you know, thing that you always look at. I'm like, wow, I can't believe we have an iPhone. But I've also can't believe. Yeah, but an iPhone is like, I would say, you know, one tenth the complexity, maybe one 50th. Totally. Like it's just like a new flight on the highway at 75 miles an hour. And you don't think twice like this thing is going to like the wheels are not going to fall off. What about employees? Like is that another big thing that you have to educate people on? Because like, you know, a lot less.
27:53Yeah. The employees because they're, they're our employee base comes from really two big pools. It's the traditional Silicon Valley, Genswy, you know, engineer or AI software. You know, background Stanford, Eeks, Berkeley, and that's what they're that's that that group that we all know. And there's a whole other group which are like the automotive defense construction mining trucking folks. And they don't really miss looking. So you have to educate them. This group on how to work like Silicon Valley, directness speed efficiency, et cetera. And this group on, you know, safety, criticality on how these markets move, how these markets buy.
28:29Like what does a vehicle lifecycle look like? And it's not as hard as you would think because you're just in it all day. Yeah. Whereas an investor or a partner, you know, for them software is going to be needed for investor. And this is like a new area altogether. Yeah. Because you have to like learn two categories and it's learned software and AI. And they've learned like vehicle manufacturers. Yeah. And then there's a lot of errors. Aside from cars, you also mentioned tanks, mentioned the military. And so obviously like there's like a big dual use thing going on here where you're both in work true dual use company, the government and commercial.
29:03And so like what is that like how different is that? What is it required from you to build a dual use company that's working with both arms like the way you do business must be completely different. So you're just for everybody who does not in the business system, a little bit education. Because you have companies like an androle who is really working primarily in defense and they might work in multiple countries and things like this and multiple let's say domains. But they are working primarily for a very specific vertical, which is the defense market company like us. We are working cross bunch of verticals and the defense vertical is will use the same products roughly that we have for the other verticals.
29:42But it's not only made for the defense vertical. The pros of that is you're essentially subsidizing these very expensive tech technologies through non defense uses. And then you augment them for the defense, you know, there's there are specific things that the defense ecosystem has. I think the future is more dual use companies to be very honest. I think Palantir is a great example started as more of a defense oriented company does a lot more commercial work now. So I think that's just I think you're going to see more and more of that. You see a big boom in defense tech investing. I think the thing that a lot of people will recognize once you get into the defense ecosystem is there's limitations there too.
30:22It's not like this endless market with no competitors. I mean, there are there's really mature competitors there. There's emergent competitors there. And then it's the pot of money isn't as big as people think they hear these big numbers like trillion dollars. But that money is used for labor, literally soldiers that's used in supply chains and logistics. And then some is used for technology. But there's like a lot more cars than tanks. You know, there's some like a level numbers you could just look at and say like, okay, like it's not. Yeah, the spending is humongous obviously, but it's probably tapping in the specific budgets.
30:52I mean, the automotive industry, global automotive industry is 3 % of the world's GDP. Wow. It is the biggest of the industrials. And the industrial is one of the biggest markets period. And so when you add defense and construction mining, all these other things, that's like five ish some percent of the GDP. So for our, I think the magic trick that we're playing as a do use company is how do you build things that can work across these different verticals. You know, without a lot of augmentation and then that makes everything cheaper. And that's a, you know, that's kind of and the companies have done this before, but our automotive suppliers before our defense suppliers before they'll overlap each.
31:27They'll make something for, you know, one type of vehicle and then they'll actually resell it for another type of vehicle. Does your own work change as you know, you know, as you work with the military or whatever, because you know, obviously, you got to know more about the government, you got to know more people to government. Yeah, like what does that change for you? I'm also now curious after that to ask about like what have you learned? What do you think about, you know, the tariff situation? Yeah. What do you think about just like the overall like climate at the moment? Yeah, so I mean, I've said this many times for our repeated, which is, you know, I think American tech companies, small and large, are for maybe obligated is too strong of a word.
32:00But, um, I think nothing comes up and obligated like you're almost obligated to help the US government. If you're a citizen of this country, you get the benefits of being a citizen of this country. And you, it is such a privilege to say, well, I don't want to work with defense or the government. It's like, well, you are getting a lot of the upside of being an American, right? So at some moral or ethical or mission foundation, we believe it's important for the company. And this is, you know, we started a defense work a year after we started the company. So it's not a recent proclamation. And it was less invoked than I think now it's no longer controversial, frankly speaking.
32:37So I think that that that that has a, but the defense ecosystem is very different. How you, you know, allocate dollars, how you talk to the DOD. So we do all that stuff, including all the way to, you know, having facility clearance, having cleared engineers and cleared senior executives who can work on top secret things. You don't really have that in trucking. Like it is now don't get me wrong. The trucking industry as example is very nationalistic. It's very global. It's very competitive. But it doesn't have the same connotations. Now for other countries actually trucking and construction mining and cars are like their defense industries.
33:11To Italy, Ferrari is a big deal. You know, to Hyundai, Hyundai to Korea is a big deal. Toyota to Japan is a big deal. Renault to France, right? It's gone yet to Sweden. These are, I mean, not only there's like some motor emotional thing about Renault and France, there's a jobs program involved. In Valley, when we forget this very thing that exists in defense and construction money. In the Valley, we just have the top part of the pyramid, which is highly paid engineers and the support staff that are around it. And these other industries of a giant, you know, workforce. So you got the executives and the engineers and they give a huge labor pool who builds this stuff, maintains this stuff, takes this stuff to the field.
33:51And so the, you know, when a factory opens up, that's three to five thousand families who now have a way of living. So that we understand the defense context. You know, this senator wants this new plant in their, you know, state or their district. But actually exists in all the commercial industries as well. Where a new factory goes is actually a big deal. That's why you have these tax incentives. So for us, we've just had to become way more sophisticated about working with the government. It is its own complete. It's its own universe. It's very different. I want to talk about it for even founder listening.
34:30I wouldn't walk into the defense vertical like with some casualness. It is, it's, it's, it's its own universe. It's not like building a B2B staffs out. No, it's just a very, the way that things are bought is very, very different. Yeah, actually, I want to talk now about like the company and culture and management as a company that is simultaneously deeply Silicon Valley and also deeply, you know, other parts of America. I remember during COVID that you stayed, I think, pretty much in person five days a week. We've been a person, as long as the government has allowed us. We have been a person by the way.
35:09I feel like the, I think I remember you telling me once that like the day you were allowed to get people back in with Matt. And then you asked, you're back. You were back. And like everybody else was like freaking out, you know, and you know, going remote. Because COVID is a conspiracy theory. No kidding. Should we go to the next? Let's do conspiracy theories next. I would like to show that. Yeah, I mean, I think there was that, you know, you're down in sunny Vale, taking like five hours to get down here. I mean, you're saying this, this is look like a, so I mean, look where we are. Look where we are.
35:32Square footage you have. I know where we are. This is sunny Vale, I think. Yeah, I mean, you, and you probably, I mean, now it's called due defense, but I bet you knowing, you know, just the climate we've lived through, I bet you didn't feel, you know, so great to be supporting. Yeah, at some point in Silicon Valley in history. So you've done a lot of these things. And so I guess I'm curious what the common threads on the culture have been to be a Silicon Valley company that's also like a little anti Silicon Valley. A little anti Silicon Valley. Yeah, yeah. I think it's the same Walton in his great book made in America.
36:02And he says one of the things he says he's always swim against the street. Like just as an instinct swim against the street. And so I think that's really that which is like if everybody does the thing, it's, it's probably like priced out somehow. So if you're trying to build a company in San Francisco, you're priced out in the sense of there's other companies like you. There's not a lot of companies like in San Francisco and Sunnyvale, but there's a lot of good engineers everywhere from San Jose all the way up to like, let's say, Berlin, a red or we have, you know, big double digit percent of our workforce comes from San Francisco down in Caltrain.
36:33So I think that's a part of it. It's like some of it's just skepticism of the mainstream, but really it's like how do you carve your own path? And then we're very first principles thinking so we just debate it out. Take the COVID example. I'll give you that. You know, it sounds like we had this clear void of view. The way we made that decision is we had I think it was four or five different meetings. The early applied people, the parents, the new grads, SF people. It was like this like we had and they're all like the discussions of let's say five to 15 people and the discussion was should we go fully remote or should we go back in office or should you do hybrid?
37:10And I, you know, I did the GitLab investment OIC. So I'm not against a remote like at some fundamental dogmatic radical pragmatism. That's the name of the game. And so the whole discussion can boil down to we originally were like hybrid. Nobody wanted to be fully remote. That was across all the groups, the new grads, the parents, nobody wanted to be fully remote. So we're like a hybrid or full time with the hybrid group. And we have customers come on site all the time. We do interviews every day. So then we were like logistically hard to do interviews only Wednesday Thursday Friday. Well, good CTO comes from, you know, from Toyota.
37:43They're not going to tell you they're just going to come to whatever one hour slot that they have available when they're in Silicon Valley. And so then we're like well, and then we have offices everywhere else. We have on both sides of the time spectrum on Munich. You know, when we do all hands, we have to do them at 2 p .m. Because in Tokyo and Korea at 6 a .m. and in Munich, it's 10 11 p .m. Depending on the time zone. And it's like, so you're really covering the full spectrum. It's like the three corners of the world right in terms of time zones. And, and so all of that led to, okay, we're probably in office.
38:13And then it was like, well, we should probably be in office as a consistent thing. And all these principles are true here. They're probably true in Germany. They're proven to other places. And so we made the decision. What we didn't do is what did was everyone else thinking. What's everyone else going to do? If there is a version of that, I mean, I say this like kind of tongue in cheek. We're like, whatever the big companies do, we should do the opposite of. So like whatever Google does, we should like to do the opposite of that. And ironically, before Google was never remote, and then there were all remote.
38:39And so we just were always flipped to that. You know, I think we had a bit like when we started the company, we very seriously consider being a remote company. Yeah. How do you feel when you see things as a sort of like a, you know, intrinsic contrarian? How do you feel when you see the world come around to you? Does it make you any easier? Are you like I told you so? You know, if there's a person that I'd love to emulate, if I could, if it's Andy Grove. You know, I mean, we as a company and part of onboarding for managers, we read high output management. I mean, that's a favorite management. Yeah.
39:08And so you know, and then like we, you know, at the joke I make to, again, like these are kind of weird things. Like joke I make is like, the engineer is like, where to call it, where a college shirt? Because the norm is to not wear a college shirt. So you almost, so I think you're contrarian almost just to push the principles that you pull so dearly that everyone should be casual or everyone should be formal. Like whatever it is, you're just pushing it. And then in that, you know, in that, in that conflict is when you actually discover what the truth is. Without that conflict, you're living these assumptions.
39:36And then you don't know what the truth is because you might think something slightly different than me. So a core part of our culture is like, just debate, debate, debate. Say which one your mind. Let's have that currency. That doesn't mean it has to be disrespectful. It doesn't mean that it's a culture of constant yelling and, you know, you don't have to do that stuff. But I think there are like, get along cultures. And then there are cultures are like actively pushing each other. Yeah. And we're definitely in that category. Do you have any like contrarian beats you're on right now? Like, I mean, what's the most contra, I mean, yeah, I think, I mean, this is the macro stuff.
40:09I mean, because macro being this month, this year, this time, you have big, you know, amount of investments going into broadly, gen A, I specifically in humanoid robotics, look right now in this, in this universe. You know, I mean, I just think where's the business models? Because when you take applied intuition as an example in 2016, 2017, lots of companies getting funded in autonomy. Billion dollar raises were the, were the, were the craze. Because autonomy was a hot hot thing. All the tech currents list everything was all autonomy, autonomy, autonomy. And now it's like, you know, self driving is some, like, almost out of, it's coming back.
40:42These are way more starting to flood San Francisco. But I think like the point about saving humanoid robots or gen A. I companies, I think maybe they're really, I don't know if this is true. It's truly so I don't know if this is true. So I can be completely wrong. Probably the really good ones are going to emerge in four or five years from now. Because you're just going to, the ecosystem is going to learn a lot about the space. And then the most important thing to learn is what the business model is. Right. I would think based on how you spend your time, you would think that we will end up with very smart humanoid robots though.
41:10Yeah. So you believe in the product happening. You just don't believe there's a good business there yet. It just has to be found. Yeah. What they might even exist. It might even exist in a company that's for all funded right now. It just has to be discovered. And the reason you think that is because you're like, why should I build a humanoid when I could have a counterpillar or I could have like a machine in a factory doing a purpose built thing? Yeah, exactly. It's just first principles. Even though we had one of those Chinese unitary. Why do I need a human shaped robot? Though it's so emotional, we had them on the office with the Chinese team here.
41:42And they're showing that it's like really the whole company like gathers around. I mean hundreds of people. It's like a celebrity. We've had Mark and Reese's, we've had Sam come. And you didn't have as many people as this humanoid robot. You can't discount that to fool you as an engineer or as a founder. And do thinking something is actually a good thing than it not. So just like step back and have that debate. I was like, what really is the thing here? And I think for applied, we did that. We believe in autonomy. We built a horror and a zombie business where you can give the tools to all these people to build.
42:19And so then you're kind of abstracted away. So I think there's some version of that in the companies. By the way, our trying to do the applied play in humanoid as well right now. So the ecosystem gets more more sharp. I feel like when I talk to people on like Wall Street, whether it's like at a hedge fund or like a goldmine or something, I feel sometimes surprised that actually public investors are, you'd think that they are short term minded and they're not is my experience. And I think actually in some ways, I think there might be like a U shape where it's like early stage investors think very long term.
42:51Real like public investors think very long term. And maybe it's like the growth investors that are like the most short term minded because they're just getting taught to think about like how long to liquidity and what's my mark going to be there. I think it's all over. I don't, I think the brain wants to find that pattern. I don't think there, I think there's a lot more noise than signal in there. I think I've, you know, I've certainly met seed, you know, folks who are like trying to flip their money by C .R .C. And are just looking at the mark up because they want to get the next fund raised.
43:20So they're, you know, optimizing to invest in what is going to get marked up. Which by the way is not a bad strategy because I know it's specific investor who's that's their strategy and done exceedingly well. Their view is just like ride the hype. Interesting. Because the hype is going to get funded again. Yeah. And then if you had, it's the old classic question, what, does a company make money or does money make a company? Yeah. The reality is if we're starting to humanoid robotics companies and I raised 3 million, you raised 250 million. Yeah, that's a better audience. You're better on, you're going to win.
43:49And everyone thinks you're going to win. Yeah. Employees think you're going to win. The customer think you're going to win. The target who. And then I self -fulfilling. Yeah, exactly. And then so like it's in a self -fulfilling. No, absolutely. So I don't think that I think I've met late stage investors that are like, you know, I can see that they're going to dump on when the public comes to this public because they're just looking for that 20 % bump. You know, return. And then you met like, you know, early stage investors that won the double. I don't think that's true. Do you think as the jobs changing, it's making you change too?
44:17Like, do you think that doing this job changes who you are? And the reason I'm asking is because I felt like in a lot of ways, I mean, I think whatever work we do change us in some ways. But I felt like there were so many things about, you know, last was not as big as applied, but you know, there's hundreds of people and, you know, you just experienced a lot of those things. And I felt like it was very hard to not be. I think in many, many more good ways than bad ways. It changes your psychology, your behavior. Like it does update your software a little bit. Yeah, I am not removed enough for myself to have that objective third party view.
44:53I'm sure I've changed without a doubt. And this is impossible, not too based on the surroundings. But I can say, again, maybe it's like rationalization you never know. I feel more myself today than I've ever felt. That's great. Yeah, I mean, it's like, I feel that's a huge privilege. That's amazing. Yeah. And we're just like settle into yourself. But that's going to be a long way to go. Yeah, maybe that's a good thing. You're getting old. It's like, you just come to peace with like, these are things I'm good at. These things are not good at. For me, I'm like, even just like having kids takes a little bit of the edge off of just like, I don't really care about all this.
45:28There's a list of things that I used to care about that I don't care about anymore. Yeah. And I guess there's just a lot of things about getting older that update that. Yeah, there's a one thing that reminded me that is I, that I want to repeat, which in my last co -founders had this line where he said, Michael Mahtt, and he said, no matter how successful you become as a founder or venture investor, whatever, if your kids don't like you, you're a failure. Yep. And that just like for me, I think 10 years ago that would have kind of made sense. It's to me, it's like, I know that is so true. There's nothing more true than that.
46:00So true that didn't even belong in this conversation. And I want to interject and because I believe it's so absolutely true. Then that Gandhi line of what's true, truth is what stands the test of time. So when we are, we will all die. When we're hopefully we make it to 80, 90, we're laying in that bed, you're not going to think about this fucking podcast. You're not going to think about the fucking podcast. That was a good podcast though. Yeah. You just go watch it one more time later. So what are you going to think about? You're going to think about your kids. You're going to think about, oh, I had a good working career.
46:26You know, I had a good relationship with my parents. Well, you know, that's the thing you can think about. You know, everything else is kind of grays out. And so I think becoming more okay with the professional stuff and being more successful like, hey, I'm going to always give direct feedback. Yeah. Like that's just going to be who I just cannot lower my bar. I ask on a weekly basis of my team. Am I just being too, you know, pedantic? And one of the team members on our team is, whenever an engineering leads, he said to send us a whatsapp. I don't know if I'm just being an asshole here. And I'm actually just, he goes, no, no.
46:59You are your only role in this company is to maintain that bar. And we maintain that bar. Everything else. All the products we'll get taken care of. All the, but you listen to your lower bar. Everyone becomes more mediocre. And so I think you as a founder, as not only, you know, you as starting an firm, but anybody out there who's starting to think, you have to kind of figure out like, as the company changes, are you becoming more of yourself or are you becoming less of yourself? Then you kind of ideally want to orient that to more of yourself. And then you become more comfortable. And yeah, but it's not easy because I think your brain is rationalized.
47:29One thing is absolutely true is what's the parallel universe where applied intuition fails. We raise $10, $20 million. We never, my part of work fit. We might be partnering together with a venture fund. Who knows? I've been great. I'm still, I would rather work out than that. On the last note, on that topic, four founders, because obviously, you know, you saw a bunch at YC. You've been doing your own various success. That's the one now. You're angel invest. What are the things that, you know, when you find yourself talking to a founder, what do you focus on most with helping people or advising right now?
48:02There's a book called Intithin Air, which is about this fated Everest climb. And it was a journalist who wanted to just talk about Everest tourism. And he ends up being in this trip where 16 climbers ultimately died of Blizzard. It was a worst single campaign incident. And in this Blizzard, when he gets hit, he's coming down the mountain. And there is a Japanese climber. And she's going up the mountain. And he sees base camp. He's like 100 yards. I just got to make the tents. And I live. And there's people who fall in up. And all this is because everyone's lacking oxygen. So everyone's kind of in this delivery estate.
48:40So he's going down the mountain towards the camp. And this woman starts pulling on him and says, no, no, the camp is that way. And he's like, no, the camp is right there. And he goes, I looked in her eyes and you can see that she was gone. And I make a decision. Am I going to die too? Or am I going to leave her? Obviously, left her. She dies. I meet founders all the time. We're going up the wrong side of the mountain. Oh, wow. And you're just like, this company's not going to work. So what do you do? You tell them, but they can't because we all have to believe that you're doing the right thing.
49:13So hard about that is as a founder, so many people are telling you you're going up the wrong mountain. And when you're going up the right mountain, there's going to be people telling you that you're wrong. There's people telling you that you're wrong. Yeah. Still, I think you might be still. I can't tell if this is working or not. Who knows? That's the thing. That's the thing. It's working. It's working is a state in time. Yeah. It's not a permanent state. And there's a lot of headfics right now available with like a new paradigm and everything like that. And I think, I think, so I find myself often talking to founders and having that conversation.
49:44I think it's not easy to start a company. It's really, really hard to stop a company. Yeah. Does it do you then end up in a contentious conversation or is it usually just like I disagree and move on? I think you can only tell a founder. I mean, almost always an investor in the company. Yeah. And I'm saying, hey, like I'm not telling you because it's in my financial interest for you to stop this. I know you have six million in the bank. This isn't what it looks like. Yeah. And I think the crazy thing, you know, and there's a lesson to be taken away. We're applied. You know, again, there's a parallel universe that doesn't work.
50:16But it hasn't been hard. Yeah. Yeah. It's like the, it's been pulled out of you the whole time. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Actually, this is something to YC's credit that I really, I mean, there's many things. YC's credit. At this point, I give to them strongly, which is they will tell founders pretty directly if this isn't working. And I think a lot of investors aren't willing to have those kinds of conversations with founders because we've gotten to a place where everybody knows that, you know, screw, you know, screw the haters. The cancer unit is maintaining a list of the people who passed on the company.
50:44And when it crosses 100 billion. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, at our next podcast, that's what we're going to do is we're going to go through a few years. Yeah, because I can just again, to on the VC side, it's very hard. If you're looking at a series A company and you're passing, do you don't know if it's the right decision? Yeah, probably. So why? How are you like, you're like, I'm not going to invest, but you might actually be on the right for sure. 100%. It is very hard. All right. Well, I got a lot of your time here. This was awesome. I really appreciate it. Thanks for. It went by flash. It was fast.
51:13That's what could be. Thanks, bunch.
From the publisher
I had a blast sitting down with Qasar Younis, Co-Founder and CEO of Applied Intuition, a company that’s on a mission to accelerate the world’s adoption of safe and intelligent machines. The company builds software that makes it faster, safer, and easier to bring autonomous systems to market. Last valued at $6B, Applied Intuition has raised a total of $602M since its inception in 2017 and plays a critical role in both the commercial and defense sectors.
Previously, Qasar was a Partner and COO of Y Combinator, the renowned startup accelerator that has invested in companies like Airbnb, Coinbase, Cruise, DoorDash, Stripe, among others. Prior to Y Combinator, Qasar founded a technology firm, which was later acquired by Google, and worked as an automotive engineer at General Motors and Bosch. Younis has a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Kettering University (formerly known as General Motors Institute) and an MBA from Harvard Business School.
We covered:
Radical pragmatism
Roots of the automotive industry
Complexities of being dual use
Fostering an intrinsically contrarian culture
Evolving with your work
---
Timestamps:
(0:00) Intro
(0:31) Psychology of starting a company
(17:04) Love for the automotive industry
(22:54) Autonomous vehicle landscape
(25:45) Deep partnership with customers
(28:49) Complexities of being dual use
(34:44) Culture being intrinsically contrarian
(40:01) Gen AI and humanoid robotics
(42:28) More noise than signal in investing
(44:14) Evolving with your work
(47:43) Companies working is a state in time
---
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/uncappedpod
Twitter: https://x.com/jaltma
Email: friends@uncappedpod.com




