UP512 Other People's Money: APEX, the athlete investor trend, Red Bull Ventures, Baller and TGL

23 Oct 2025 · 56 min · 17 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Apex Capital’s “athlete investor” sports investment model (“other people’s money” episode), including how funds are sourced and deployed, Red Bull Ventures’ new LP commitment, and case studies like TGL (Tiger/Rory’s golf league) and other sports-tech ventures (e.g., Baller).

Guests (backgrounds)

Antonio Caccarino, founder and CEO of Apex Capital; former sports-born investment operator focused exclusively on sports. Matt Rogan, co-host of “Other People’s Money.”

Key claims

Apex was initially funded 100% by athletes; now athletes are ~5% of the fund by capital but remain central to Apex’s “DNA.” Athletes add diligence, industry validation, and credibility beyond marketing. Agents increasingly act as 360 advisors, but athletes’ wealth managers handle portfolio allocation. Red Bull Ventures is a $200M corporate venture pool investing in sports tech to integrate with Red Bull’s ecosystem. Apex’s TGL investment thesis is long-duration (Apex runs a 10-year fund) with returns via media, sponsorship, franchise growth, and asset appreciation.

Notable examples

Athlete investors named include Carlos Sainz, Lando Norris, Rafael Varane, Marcelo, Mark Cavendish, and Demi Vollering. TGL is discussed as a gen-Z, TV-first golf product with ESPN prime-time and sponsorship/hospitality plus potential betting-related appeal.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Day-to-Day Life of Antonio Caccarino

1:26 to 3:00

Discover what a typical day looks like for the CEO of Apex Capital.

“Unofficial Partner Substack newsletter, which comes out on a Thursday every week.”

Understanding Apex and its Investors

3:00 to 5:06

Get insights into Apex's unique approach to sports investments and its athlete investors.

“deploy only in sports and to make sure that we are driving the future of the sector and connecting the best investors with the best investment opportunities in sports for the better of the fan.”

The Role of Athletes in Investment

5:06 to 6:28

Learn about the importance of athletes' involvement in funding and decision-making.

“Cyclists like Mark Cavendish and Demi Wollering, one of the best female cyclists currently in the world.”

Geographical and Financial Dynamics of Athlete Investments

6:28 to 7:55

Explore how geographic location and financial status affect athlete investments.

“Money is, you know, just an issue for me in terms of just generally, but the understanding of finance.”

The Role of Athlete Agents in Investment Decisions

7:55 to 13:27

Understand how athlete agents are evolving to support athletes with investments.

“There's that they're really deploying capital.”

The Evolving Role of Sports Agents

14:00 to 17:00

Explore how agents are adapting to the investment interests of athletes.

“I think you use the wealth management phrase in terms of managing low risk stuff, high risk stuff and a whole portfolio.”

Investment Strategies in Sports

17:00 to 20:30

Learn about the changing landscape of athlete investments and capital allocation.

“We wanted to, that was for us the strongest industry validation that we would get.”

Red Bull Ventures and Sports Tech

20:30 to 24:30

Understand Red Bull's shift towards investing in sports technology and startups.

“They've indirectly been investing in sports for many years through obviously marketing budgets, but also a lot of team ownership.”

The Intersection of Sponsorship and Investment

24:30 to 28:00

Discuss the blurred lines between sponsorship and equity investment in sports.

“And then obviously, if this grows, we also benefit on the equity appreciation side of things.”

Investment Strategies in Sports Ventures

28:00 to 29:59

Learn about the complexities of managing investments in sports and the different funding strategies employed.

“So Aston and Martin, you have to have a relationship you manage over there and then the Red Bull relationship somewhere else in the Ventures Fund or am I over-egging that complexity?”
Show all 17 chapters

The Ambition Behind TGL and Its Revenue Streams

30:00 to 36:38

Understand the goals and revenue sources of TGL as it seeks to engage new audiences in golf.

“That is kind of what we are targeting today but it is true that all of these investments including Alpine were definitely on the minority side.”

The Evolution of Individual Sports and Athletes' Power

36:39 to 40:42

Explore how athletes in sports like tennis and golf are shaping new economic models and relationships within their sports.

“And that, I guess, can go one of two ways.”

Disruption in Sports: The Case of Live Golf

40:43 to 42:00

Delve into the challenges and dynamics of disruption in sports, focusing on Live Golf and its implications for traditional sports organizations.

“Because I guess Kings League can live with the Premier League, right?”

The Impact of Live Golf on Traditional Leagues

42:00 to 43:24

Explore how Live Golf is pushing traditional leagues like the PGA to adapt.

“But then it's really hard to topple them because they've just got history and various things that fans actually want.”

Building Global Superstars in Sports

43:24 to 45:35

Discussion on how sports need global superstars to attract audiences and investment.

“And after a while, we've got other stuff to do.”

The Role of Female Athletes as Investors

45:35 to 48:24

Insight into the involvement of female athletes in investment and sponsorship.

“So I think at the end of the day, golf will survive.”

Challenges and Opportunities in Women's Sports Investment

48:24 to 54:04

An analysis of the risks and potential of investing in women's sports.

“where the perception around women's sports has changed.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00People always love to know the names of Formula One drivers like Carlos Sainz, Lando Norris, football players like Rafael Varane and Marcelo, the Real Madrid legend. Cyclists like Mark Cavendish and Demi Vollering, one of the best female cyclists currently in the world. Surfers, skaters, MotoGP, riders, you name it. It's a really broad range of athletes, more than or almost 200 now from 17 different sports. That was Antonio Caccarino, who is founder and CEO of Apex Capital, who is orchestrating what might be one of the most interesting experiments in sports investment. It's best known for involving athletes in the investment process.

0:43But as we see, that isn't just what's going on here. So we get into the detail of what the Apex Fund is, where the money comes from. We mentioned Red Bull, which is a recent piece of news. Red Bull as in B-U-L-L. they have come in as a significant investor in the fund and then we ask where the money goes so this is part of a conversation that we've been having on unofficial partner and particularly in other people's money where we talk about the flows of money and where the money is coming from where it's going we are joined by my regular other people's money co-host matt rogan as you'll hear there's a lot in here and i think you'll enjoy it if you haven't heard the other episodes from other people's money, I can put those in the show notes for you.

1:25Or you can read about it in the Unofficial Partner Substack newsletter, which comes out on a Thursday every week. And it's very good, I hear.

1:36So first of all, I'm going to say hello to Matt Rogan, my old mate, Matt Rogan. Good afternoon. Good evening. Yeah, looking forward to this. And we've got Antonio from Apex. Thank you. What's a day like for you? Before we start talking about all the big stuff that we're going to talk about give us what's the day job from your point of view give us a bit of biography so people know who who you are of course well i think i'm a founder i'm a i'm a ceo but also let's say the day-to-day leader of the business here i wouldn't say there's a typical kind of day because we're at the beautiful time that we are with sports um a lot of curiosity a lot of appetite from investors, a lot of companies out there searching for capital so they can innovate and grow and not just on the venture space, but also teams, leagues, sports properties out there, which means I spend a lot of time on the plane.

2:29So there's kind of the traveling side of my day to day, which is probably half of the year I'm traveling. And then there's the other sort of day to day, which is on the grounds and the office, just making sure that while we are raising capital and investing, we're also building the right operation to do things differently. I think the beauty about what we do and how we do is that we were born out of sports. We were not kind of an investment company that decided to invest now also in sports. We were born out of sports and we set up an investment business to deploy only in sports and to make sure that we are driving the future of the sector and connecting the best investors with the best investment opportunities in sports for the better of the fan.

3:17of of of the athletes of of the stake of any stakeholder to be honest in sports so so i have my my role as a ceo and i have my role as a as a as it was hopefully as a visionary in the sector that needs to make sure to convince now other type of investors that have never invested in the sector to to trust that there's a big business opportunity here so so yeah i would say there's two hats to what I do. So explain then what is Apex and just again in very simple terms where is the money coming from for the fund and where are you spending it? Just give us a bit of oversight over that. Yeah so we are a sports investor.

4:07Our foundation before kind of speaking to the investors that we deal with today, which are more and more the kind of classic investors that a lot of investment managers out there speak to family offices, high net worth individuals, institutionals, fund of funds, pension funds potentially as well. I think what we did differently was our first investors were the athletes themselves. That was my initial vision. And that was how I believed that we would build industry knowledge, how we would build brand equity for Apex as an investment firm so people would really trust that when we are saying that we're comfortable in taking sports business risk, we really are because we have the athletes.

4:49But when we say we have the athletes, we have their capital, their involvement, their network, their industry insights. And I think that is key to our DNA and to our foundation and one of the main reasons why we really grew very quickly over the last few years. but who are the athletes that we're talking about there just give us a give us a sprinkling of the names so that because it feels like that's that is a point of difference when people talk about apex they quite often go very quickly to the athletes putting the money in on the on the investment side so let's just give us an idea who the who that is people always love to know the names i mean we're we're very open about it and so are them so happy to to name a few Formula One drivers like Carlos Sainz, Lando Norris, football players like Rafael Varane and Marcelo, the Real Madrid legend.

5:42Cyclists like Mark Cavendish and Demi Wollering, one of the best female cyclists currently in the world. Surfers, skaters, MotoGP, riders, you name it. It's a really broad range of athletes, more than or almost 200 now from 17 different sports. I would say a bit more European based in terms of where they're participating, because obviously that's where we are from and kind of where we saw a bit more the opportunity because there were that kind of athlete entrepreneur movement was already happening in the US. but more and more global a lot of u.s based athletes kind of joining um joining as well our athlete network investing in our fund or a fund that we are soon to to launch um in our deals and some exciting new names from the u.s will also be announced so we can really truly make it the best and and and strongest global athlete network investing in sports in the world okay so So, again, forgive me because Matt always gives me a sort of side eye because I ask really stupid questions.

6:55Money is, you know, just an issue for me in terms of just generally, but the understanding of finance. So just give me a sense of, so what role do these athletes play? Is that, I can see there is a marketing appeal to the famous athlete names. Just give me a sense of what's the deal from their point of view? Are you giving them a, are they leveraging their fame? And that is an appeal to other investors to come on board because you've got famous people investing. And that's a sort of quick way of establishing, I don't know what it would be, trust in the fund, that the fund is going to happen. And it's going to, there's real money involved here.

7:35Because there's a lot of, someone like me, I get loads of press releases from funds and people venture things popping up. Just give me a sense of the role that the athletes play, why that is central and why would they go with you? Yeah. So in terms of their role, we can kind of look at it in three ways. There's that they're really deploying capital. It's on something that they understand. And for them, that rational decision into I'm investing with Apex in their fund or in their deal in a sector like sports gets them more comfortable in terms of they know what risk they're kind of taking. They can, when we're showing them the thesis of a fund or what a company does, if it's a particular company they're investing in, I think they can easily understand what their business does and have a view.

8:28And for them, like any investor that gives a sense of comfort and potentially be able to take more or less risk, something for sure that in other sectors, it's harder for them to do so. That's kind of critical to get them motivated in saying yes. Obviously, whenever we deal with athletes, many times the agent, the advisor, whoever is close to them will get involved. But the decision ultimately is up to them. And many times it's driven by them. So I think that's quite unique. and with that then you obviously get their involvement so they help us a lot in diligence so when we are looking at a lot of new businesses and new sports you know nothing better than the athletes themselves to kind of on an industry perspective give you a lot of opinions around that sport around the fans around the sport around the stakeholders yeah they are born in born in a particular sport and spend their entire lives there from a young age into mature athletes that most of them are.

9:24So that industry validation is also key. And then there's a third pillar, which is obviously as well, the commercial value, right? That is the reality. You know, if I'm investing into a social media business and Mark Zuckerberg is an investor of mine, if I mention it, that will give credibility into the deal, right? Same thing if I'm investing into a sports business and a tier one athlete is also investing in that business, it makes much more sense than if they were investing in a restaurant or in anything else. So that association of them as investors with capital into something that makes sense, that they understand, is also obviously critical into attracting then potential future revenues, other investors, and just positive awareness into the transaction, which is also key.

10:17And I've got just one more before I hand it over to Matt. So just give me a sense of, I'm just getting the geography of the thing before we get into detail. So if I'm Marcelo or Lando Norris, whoever, I'm giving some money. I don't know what the average sort of deployment would be by athlete. Is that a, what level of funding are we looking at here? It's, there isn't an average one. It depends on the phase of the career. It depends on obviously what sport they're from. I mean, it's hard to say, but it's definitely, it's enough capital for them. For us, it's critical that it's enough capital for them to get them involved.

10:56Worried. But in a good way, you know. Yeah, yeah. It's not, yeah. Okay. So it's significant enough for them to get their attention. They're rich people. So your job then is to return better than alternative investments, obviously, index funds. They could put the money elsewhere. So their knowledge and understanding of sport has pointed them towards you. you're a sort of vehicle that I understand it would, from their point of view, they're in sport as opposed to Heinz beans or whatever the options are. Then you can then start to say, yes, how much role do they want and how much can you give them in that sense?

11:40That also obviously depends on, on the athlete and the phase of the career that they're at. Right. you would assume that younger athletes that are at the peak of their career and fighting for the Formula One World Championship or that next contract that they might, obviously, in terms of time, there would be less than potentially, you know, a Varane or a Marcel or someone that is on the later stage of their career where they're really thinking post-career and how actually something like this can play a fundamental role there. But the involvement is always there. I I mean, they're always a call away.

12:15If we are looking at something on the e-sports side, I will call all our athletes and I'll get their view on where it's at, on that particular business or on more of a macro perspective on the sector. They will always pick up the phone and give their opinion. But obviously, if they've got more time, if they can travel with us somewhere, then they will do so. And then if obviously they're at the peak of their career, they're probably not. So there is always involvement. That is key. It's not an obligation. Obviously, at the end of the day, their LPs were GP. They invest, they trust. But obviously, there's an element of why they're investing, why we prefer them, and why they invest with us beyond that typical kind of wealth management decisions that they make.

12:55Because those are distant to them. That's done on really kind of an asset preservation standpoint. With us, we're taking a little bit more risk, but also in a sector that we understand better. so we can also learn, so we can become entrepreneurs, so we can feel more than just a check or a face on a PR stunt because that's normally what ends up happening with them. And with us, they are much more than that, and that's what they appreciate. Okay. Matt? We're good. We talked, Antonio, in an earlier podcast in this Other People's Money series about the changing role of athlete agents. in terms of going from the maybe negotiating a transfer once every three years just to keep the money rolling in into more of a holistic support for athletes.

13:47So do you find that most of the agents you're dealing with to almost a proxy financial advisors as well now? Do you find them sort of taking a bigger role on in terms of helping them manage? I think you use the wealth management phrase in terms of managing low risk stuff, high risk stuff and a whole portfolio. or do you find yourself talking to somebody completely different on that conversation for sure they you see a big step up in terms of their involvement particularly again the younger kind of set of agencies and agents much more 360 maybe 30 years ago their role as you said was let's negotiate that next contract and make it the best possible yeah maybe 15 years ago it began And next to that, it was, let's also find brands that want to do a commercial deal.

14:41And now there's kind of that third pillar of investments, projects, future, because a lot of these athletes are brands. And that brand needs to stay relevant also post-career. So how to do that? And I think agents need to adapt to that. They are not financial advisors. So I wouldn't say they are kind of involved in that wealth management structuring of their portfolios, but they are key in saying, no, we think this would be good for you. We think this in getting involved with Apex, knowing you is something that you will like. And let's obviously then bring in your financial advisor to understand today how much we should allocate with Apex.

15:26but so that kind of economic decision is then done with with their wealth manager or financial advisor but they they do play a role in in in in designing that apex is is something that is important for for the athlete and they should do again if if it's within the athlete's kind of dna right some athletes really don't have an entrepreneurial dna they don't care for them is about squeezing the lemon as much as they can during their career and then we see and some are already really thinking post-career. Some realize that there's actually 24 hours in a day and you can do a lot of other things. And they look at the US and they look at a lot of the great examples of US athletes that have done great investments and gotten involved and asked questions and are not afraid or kind of stepping outside their comfort zone to do it while they're still peaking.

16:18Some athletes are realizing that and agents that see that in their clients will obviously push for that. And hopefully more and more of these agents start to see that Apex is a great partner for them. And we have amazing relationships with a lot of the big agency groups out there, not just individual ones, but also the AMGs, the CAAs, the Boasermans. We have great relationships with them. We bring them deals. They bring us potential clients. They bring us ideas. They bring us industry validation. In many cases, they actually have their own pools of capital, which they can also invest with us. And it just kind of brings the ecosystem tight and i think that makes kind of our investment proposition as a whole stronger it's interesting isn't it i mean we one of the things we also talked about on that last podcast was increasing private equity investment in the agents themselves so you sort of got private equity owned sports agents being brought deals by private equity sort of and that whole ecosystem sort of beginning to to work in a one would argue a slightly more mature way do you do you notice any preference amongst it so i'm assuming the athletes are a relatively small percentage still of most of the checks you write and you might have family funds as you say or other institutional investors putting money in as well um and so if you're if you're looking at an investment say of a one of your larger ones into a rights holder for example is there an ideal percentage of athletes percentage of sort of equity from yourselves percentage of debt for example that you might look to put into a deal or do you dial up and dial down the various bits of investment you're putting into something depending what you think it really needs i mean that's a great question for sure when we started our first deals and even our first commit commitments into the first fund that we launched it was 100 athlete capital because that's we wanted to validate it.

18:14We wanted to, that was for us the strongest industry validation that we would get. So for the first two years, we spoke to no other investor other than athletes. We knew that we would be on the smaller check sizes, but we hoped that we would be on the larger size in terms of value creation into the companies that we were investing in. Today, that has changed. Today, obviously, the athletes probably represent maybe 5 % of the age we have. Yeah, okay. and that will probably keep decreasing. They still represent an important percentage of the number of investors that we have, which would also keep decreasing.

18:52But they will always be critical to our DNA. So I wouldn't say there isn't, I wouldn't say there is kind of an ideal threshold. I mean, for us, it's always important that whatever they're investing with us is meaningful for them. So obviously that's, it is a real investment. but then at the end of the day we're scaling you see a bunch a lot of institutional capital flowing into sports the apollos the cvcs the aries the tpgs you name it so they start to invest on smaller things and we need to make sure that we we can do larger checks so we can keep competing and keep delivering the what we can and what we we are best at doing in sports and and for that we need other types of investors but we hope to never lose that athlete DNA.

19:42So for us it's about making sure that in every deal that we have, we have athletes. So we're now launching a new fund where athletes will represent definitely a very small part of but we will always give priority to athletes if they really want to invest. So we are much more flexible in minimum investment amounts for a particular share class we might create for them, as long as obviously we feel that they will keep adding value, they will keep getting involved, they will keep providing everything that they have always provided to us. So in terms of the, see, recently September, you, and I'm just going to read it from your press release, Apex, the sports-focused investment firm backed by 100-plus world-class athletes, today announced the final close of its elite performance fund led by a cornerstone commitment from Red Bull Ventures.

20:31that's b-u-l-l not b-a-l-l so red bull ventures the recently launched investment arm of one of sport's most iconic brands etc etc so just give us a bit of context on this what's happening there why have red bull coming give me a sense of who what it is and then what you want it to be yeah so as we all know red bull is probably one of the strongest brands in sports in the world they've Sports has been their biggest platform, right? They've indirectly been investing in sports for many years through obviously marketing budgets, but also a lot of team ownership. We see what they've done with Formula One.

21:11We've seen what they've done in football, what they've done with other kind of... And rugby have recently just bought Newcastle, haven't they? A lot of these adrenaline and freestyle sports. So they've owned and operated a lot of sports assets. But what they've never done is actually invested in early stage venture. So sports technology, sports innovation. They've obviously indirectly been around it because they've always been in the forefront of that. But really investing into startups, investing into sports tech is something completely new. So they set up this Red Bull Ventures, which is a 200 million pool of capital from their own kind of balance sheet to invest in just that.

21:50So then obviously, one, they see it as a very interesting area for returns for them. But second, they see that the more involved they are with a lot of these technologies, the more they can guarantee that they can integrate a lot of these young businesses and ventures into their ecosystem. But as any smart kind of corporate venture should do, if they're getting into something new, even though sports is not new, the venture space is, they should do it with people that initially should do it with people that have been doing it. And this is what our Elite Performance Fund has been doing for the last three years.

22:24And Apex has a business for the last five years. We've been investing in sports venture, in sports technology, in emerging leagues like TGL, like Baller. And that's exactly what Red Bull want to see. But their first decision was to invest in the right partners, the right funds, so they can obviously get access to that deal flow, learn with us, and then obviously bring all that synergies that an Apex and a Red Bull can have. So that's the purpose of that. For us, it's incredible. with a partner like Red Bull. When we thought about going beyond athletes and obviously into the corporate and institutionals of this world, we thought of a lot.

23:00But Red Bull was always kind of one of the ideal partners we could imagine. And getting them still in our first fund is obviously a great validation of what we're doing, but also of the industry as a whole. It's sort of interesting because it's almost... There's a line here, I think, between sponsorship and investment. And obviously there's a question because in the past, I imagine they're writing massive sponsorship checks and a lot of the tech is being developed on their dime, but they're just the bank. They're just giving the money in return for marketing assets and whatever. Now, this is not a new thing for them.

23:42Obviously, they've got into team ownership for a long time, but it feels like that's a shift from just writing the checks to actually having returns or the chance of returns built in? Is that part of trying to get in the heads of Red Bull's strategies? For sure, but this is not new for them. They have been investing in IP for longer than many brands that we see now. We see LVMH now putting a lot of money in sports. One of the biggest kind of sponsorship deals with Formula One. They didn't get any kind of equity involvement there, but they got involved with Red Bull then in Paris FC. So you see a lot of brands thinking, why are we just going to put in exactly a check when we can actually get a bit of equity?

24:32And then obviously, if this grows, we also benefit on the equity appreciation side of things. I think Red Bull was a pioneer in doing that with Formula One, with ownership there, with a lot of the things that they've been doing in football. So I think now it's just a third layer, which is going into the venture and technology side of things, which is where the other companies are not there yet because they're now for the first time considering the team ownership or the equity at team and IP level and league levels started to happen. But Red Bull have always been doing that. And I think it's exactly that.

25:06Why not get some equity and take ownership since we are going to be so critical in driving revenues? Because at the end of the day, a lot of sports businesses, sports properties out there, before they get really, really strong media value and they can monetize on media rights, they're doing it on sponsorships. They're doing it in a commercial value. So, you know, what you first said, the relationship between sponsorship and investment has always been hand in hand from the beginning of sports. If you look at, flip it the other way, from an athlete perspective, Red Bulls always seem to me one of the coolest brands for an athlete to have as a sponsor.

25:44Whenever I'm in an airport lounge, I pick up that Red Bull magazine that's just got advertorial about all the athletes that they partner with. British Surfer, I think, is on the cover of the last one from September. And so if you're a surfer with a limited career lifespan, say, and you can either pick up an amount of money a month for Red Bull for three years that you're at the top of your game, or you can help them co-invest in a product that might have a longer life period and actually extend your working relationship with someone like that where you're both invested in the same thing, albeit to different levels of financial exposure.

26:18It's quite interesting because it sort of deepens the relationship with the athlete and the brand potentially as well. So I don't know how many of your 100 athletes are already partners with Red Bull, but I'm sure you've got a few people queuing up to sort of put themselves in front of the Red Bull organization as well. Yeah, 100%. And I think there are two, right? They were the first movers in creating their Red Bull academies, in creating, in betting in athlete IP and giving them support. I mean, at the end of the day, the media powerhouse that Red Bull have been able to build kind of outweighs whatever you might believe and think about the Red Bull product today even, right?

27:01We're in a stage where the level of rigidness around how we see what is healthy and what is not healthy is stronger than ever. So the Red Bull kind of original product might not be considered as healthy as maybe it once was or as actually sports-like as it once was. But when you think of Red Bull, you think of healthy. You think of sports. You think of risk-taking. You think of lifestyle, you think of everything that's where the world is going today. So and that is driven through the media house that they've been able to build by betting on the right IP from the beginning. And that's athletes, but that's sports properties as well.

27:46I'm guessing you probably have that. Also, that tedious process that every business, including my own back in the day, had to go through, though, where you sort of have to start erecting Chinese walls and structure and things, because Red Bull would love all the technology that Aston Martin, you've got a piece of as well, right? So Aston and Martin, you have to have a relationship you manage over there and then the Red Bull relationship somewhere else in the Ventures Fund or am I over-egging that complexity? I think you mean with Alpine, we're invested. Yeah, yeah. Sorry, Alpine. Alpine, let's say that right now Red Bull is not very concerned with Alpine is doing on the performance.

28:25side of things. No, but that's definitely something we obviously need to manage. But that's why we invest from different kind of buckets. We are an investment business that has different strategies, different focuses. And obviously, every time we're looking into a deal, we need to understand kind of the legal framework and what conflicts of interest might arise. But at the end of the day, one thing is having Red Bull Ventures as an LP in our venture fund, which invests in sports technology. Another thing is our investment into Alpine, which comes from a different bucket, which is our growth and private equity vehicle.

28:57And I'm guessing some of most of the private equity work, I'm right in thinking that you're probably taking minority positions as distinct from the sort of venture fund that's majority and that needs different things from your team as well. Yes, correct. Up to now, most of our kind of growth private equity have been on minority stakes. That is kind of slowly shifting due to the fact that we have more and more capital in the management and obviously more kind of institutional capital, which is pressuring for us to kind of grow in terms of ownership stakes. We are not in the hunt, let's say, through that fund for buyouts.

29:38So we're not looking to acquisitions, but we are definitely now doing more strategic minorities, which is 20 to 40 % equity stakes where we get governance, get a lot of control over the business and the commercial side of things. but we are happy to kind of let that team or league be run on a sports side by the sports people that have been doing it. That is kind of what we are targeting today but it is true that all of these investments including Alpine were definitely on the minority side. Can I ask you about TGL? I'm really interested in it because we did a thing at the Open Championship this year at Portrush and we were talking about the sort of audience and market fit of golf essentially and you can imagine that at the open it's a goal for the big g it's a you know the traditional top top of the market etc great event the market fit to the audience works obviously when you drop below the the majors and the rider cup we just had golf looks very different in terms of the fit between the audience particularly its audiences it's changing so we're in this live golf moment and tgl appear you know was a response to that and tomorrow sports is the is the umbrella organization.

Read the full transcript

30:51When I listened to, who was it? George Pine of Bruin Sports Investment. I was quite taken by how high betting was in his assessment of TGL. It was quite interesting how he saw betting being central to the business model, which he sort of took me by surprise. Can you just talk to me about TGL, the ambition of it, and the revenue, where you see the money coming from TGL or for TGL? Yeah, so the first thing I want to say there is, even though it might appear so, TGL was not a response from PGA in regards to Live Golf. when we were pitched when we first heard and you know and this was a couple months or even a year after the initial conversation i'm sure between tiger and rory and the founding team of tomorrow it wasn't even out there so even though it did seem like pga's response it really wasn't the foundation and the reason why TGL came about was to bring media value and new audiences to golf so they it is everyone is realizing that golf is is a huge global sport with growing levels of mass participation from new new audiences really post-covid right people love to go out there you see younger people you see more and more women playing the game but the reality is that it is a very, very tough, or it was at least a very, very tough product or sport to watch on TV.

32:34You need to really love it. And even the people that really love to play it, find that hard time to watch maybe beyond the Ryder Cup and a few others. So the reasons behind it is let's find a whole disruptive new way to really engage with golf as a media product, it's a tv product let's make it really gen z focused let's make it dynamic let's let's let's gamify it let's put potentially the the betting angle as well where obviously there's a lot of things that happen a lot of different parameters around an entire game of golf that can actually make it quite appealing as a betting product as well but more importantly let's bring media value to golf so so today what the big revenue ambitions and realities behind tgl are are are media they have done a very interesting they were they announced tgl with a prime time agreement with espn which is you know which is quite unique for a disruptive new sport because it is but it isn't golf right even though it is true that you have tiger and rory and a lot of these huge you know stars playing it from the beginning which i'm sure helps but the reality is that it is a new concept a lot of sponsorship revenues as well it's it's a it's a much more compelling way for potentially for for brands to to come in as sponsors and bring their clients and bring in hospitality because on in a golf day it's it's a huge there's 18 holes it could be windy it could rain it could be too hot.

34:12And there you can really make it much more entertaining and much more obvious and guaranteed for a lot of these sponsors to bring in their clients and to show another level of hospitality to the game of golf. So in many ways, the revenue streams are actually quite traditional compared to other big sports out there with media, TV, sponsorship, and in a certain way as well, ticket selling obviously the arena is limited so it's very kind of hospitality and and premium level focused but there is a level of obviously ticketing and and hospitality there and then obviously it is possible and they have been quite good in in bringing in defied approach to it which you can bring in in betting and a lot of kind of less obvious revenue streams that uh that were never associated to the game of golf and i would with egl you can but just on the runway then of getting a return from something, an investment like that.

35:11I can see franchise money coming in. There's lots of rich people investing in the teams and whatever. And I get it. There's a question of how that correlates with your fund. So if you're looking at a three-year fund, how does the sort of outlook of an investment like TGL calibrate with that? Do you need it to make money quickly for your fund to generate a return to keep your shit your investors happy yeah so actually our fund is a 10-year fund which is it's first of all very typical to to let's call adventure early stage investing i think sports even kind of more mature private equity strategies into sports should have should be close to the 10 years because you need time you shouldn't have pressure to exit or that because even those exit dynamics around a new sector in terms of investment and in terms of institutional capital.

36:07We'll take time to build it. So next to dynamics, there's a lot of different ways where they will come, but it isn't guaranteed and nothing worse than having that pressure and capping your upside. So we have a 10-year fund. So with that, obviously something like DGL just makes a lot of sense. We came in the foundation. Obviously we've seen all the growth through the franchise sales, through the great media rights deals with the great sponsors they brought in through the success of season one and now preparing for season two the set the cell of now the seventh franchise at almost twice what the first initial six franchises went for and and the business is actually quite operationally cash flow positive obviously we the business keeps investing in technology and making sure that it's it's really at the level that everyone wants and in the tv product but that's kind of a business decision but at the end of the day it's it's it's quite uh you would be surprised positive in terms of what the business already from day one is generating but at the end of the day there's also a big kind of asset appreciation that we're all playing here with with bringing the right partners at the franchise level for every team as the right broadcasters and as the right sponsors the way golf's playing out where there seems a generation of golfers who rather than simply sort of maximize their tournament exposure whether that's on live or pga tour or whatever to maximize the amount of revenue they're bringing in very traditional sort of looking outside that and saying how can we bring entrepreneurial protect ourselves from the longer term and so on and then you contrast that with where tennis is right now where you have a large number of the top players frustrated with their relatively minimal proceeds from Grand Slam tours.

37:55And that, I guess, can go one of two ways. Either there's a different kind of relationship negotiated between the players and the traditional entities, or they say, OK, we're going to do something else. Even if it complements the rest of the calendar, I'm Carlos Alcaraz, I'm going to create my own exhibition series to maximise my income outside of the traditional tennis infrastructure. um how do you imagine i guess the sort of those sports that individual sports that aren't necessarily team sports will play out do you think that individual characters will start to drive completely different economic models for the the golfs and the tennises and the and the athletics and so or do you or where the athletes bring parties like yourselves in and just go it alone or do you think there will be a happy compromise where maybe the Grand Slams and so on do actually find a way to absorb some of these new ventures and crack on in just a brave new world?

38:53Yeah, I think that tennis is a good example comparing to maybe where golf was five years ago, for sure. I think for sports like tennis, like golf, which are already very, very global with a lot of history, culture, and heritage. I want to believe that what will happen is there will be potentially fears of disruption, but the same way that PGA in many ways listened to the golfers and endorsed and supported TGL and then obviously maybe as a reaction then to live, changed a little bit on how players are treated and maybe tennis could do the same. I think tennis has also a very kind of it's at a phase where it's a bit political and it's a bit complicated but you do see more and more players kind of getting together and speaking and wanting kind of understanding how strong their names are and wanting something different.

39:58So I do think that ATP will have to react to that. I don't see a new kind of like a live golf going within tennis and forgetting what is ATP and players getting together and starting something. But I do think obviously that ATP needs to change in certain ways to adapt to how the younger generations want to consume tennis, how the younger players want to adapt to it. Young players are more and more stars. They are more and more brands as we talked about in the initial of the start of this conversation. So they have that power to kind of change things. So I think that I see that going more that way than kind of creating a new concept around tennis on its own.

40:44Because I guess Kings League can live with the Premier League, right? Baller League can live in football ecosystem. TGL can live in a golf ecosystem fairly straightforwardly. Exactly. But those are kind of complementary. But football was working well, right? I mean, things can be perfect, but football wasn't where tennis is today. For sure. It's quite hard, isn't it? The disruption story in sport. It's quite interesting when you look at the strength of the incumbent, the rights holders, and the moat that they have, and how underrated quite often that is. The disruption story is quite exciting.

41:22But Live Golf is, I think, a really interesting case study for the sports business because of how difficult, how much money it has to you know almost unfathomable amounts of money that they've spent and still go on spending and we know obviously we know all the arguments about it's not just about return it's about saudi statecraft all of those things but actually when you look at it it's even a and i would i can say this you can't but a sort of the accusation towards the pga tours of complacency you know and that's that's always the accusation of the incumbent rights holder and You see that all over in rugby and cricket and, you know, every sport.

42:02There is a dissatisfaction. But then it's really hard to topple them because they've just got history and various things that fans actually want. And it's, as you say, you made a really, really good point there about complementary disruption almost. I don't know if that's the right phrase, versus absolute head on. And one argument is that actually Live Golf and various iterations in different sports are essentially, if you're the rights holder, that's sort of external research and development that's going on. You can go and test the market for new products. And if it works, OK, we'll do it. Yeah.

42:45And it's what you're saying. PGA were too comfortable, right? Why did, even if they got certain signs that things needed to change, at the end of the day, they didn't need to because, yeah, if you don't like it, yeah, don't play for it. Don't play. And so they just have too much power. And like anything in the world, too much power can always be dangerous and people get complacent. And then businesses and industries and sports properties, in this case, don't adapt to what the new fan wants, what the players want, because they don't need to. that's why I think whatever your view is on live golf they are the the start and the creation of live golf will at the end they ultimately benefit the game of golf is that that put pressure into the pga adapting is it that at the end of the day certain ideas around live golf are actually much more entertainment focused that it's what will actually attract different audiences into a sport at the end of the day these businesses have to be sustainable you see it's fascinating that because I think there's, I can absolutely, there's part of me that wants to agree with you about that.

43:51The other bit is that I wonder when you step back and you put yourselves in the, in the, through the eyes of sponsors, the banks, the sponsors and the media companies, quite often when you're at a golf tournament, people just talking about live and this, this frustration with, it's just stuck. The market is stuck. And after a while, we've got other stuff to do. If they don't sort it out, it's like boxing over a period of time. I mean, just sort of, okay, well, I used to know who the heavyweight champion was. Now I don't, and I don't care anymore. And that's sort of the danger is that you get this stasis.

44:25The market is just not going anywhere because both sides are fighting amongst themselves. And the fans turn around and say, you know, I'll go and watch something else. I can't, I'm just, when you've sorted it out, I may or may not come back. That's the sort of the big problem, I think. Oh, yeah. nothing worse than not knowing what to watch and how to watch something but on the other side I think golf is just also too big, it's not that there's an alternative to golf, I think people will maybe for a couple of years they might lose interest but then if eventually things are figured out and a new star comes around then people will follow what sport needs and particularly for media value for real TV audiences you need stardom, and speaking close to us closer to us if you look at formula one that's what liberty were able to do through through drive to survive through a lot of the decisions that they made was they made the 20 drivers on that grid global superstars the moment that that happened then eyeballs went through the roof when i was to go through the roof and it's not just in terms of tv you know live audiences but also social media engagement and younger demographics unlocked women unlocked into a sport that never happened the moment that is done brands can justify the crazy sponsorship dollars that started to flow um media rights deal particularly for example in the u.s went from pretty much zero to to record deals and then you know then then the rest the rest is history and everyone knows the 20 drivers in the grid and they are now also doing their own deals that maybe some of them five years ago nobody knew who the guy that was fourth and fifth in the grid and now everyone follows the guy who's last because he's so at the end of the day if if sports have that they will always survive turbulence so i think obviously one of the reasons why tennis is also shaking things around even though it's because now you have a new fight between alcaraz and sinner and that is driving audiences and that's obviously what gives comfort to potentially investors and and accelerates what the ATP needs to kind of do and change to then monetize these audiences.

46:44So I think at the end of the day, golf will survive. The risk is if they lose stars, right? And if there's no golfer that is a global start, then obviously that can be a driver. And maybe that will be a result of this PGA-led fight. But at the end of the day, I think they'll figure it out and the game of golf, broadly speaking, will actually benefit from what they've tried to do and then maybe will succeed, but obviously in a different way than what they initially envisioned. One final thing maybe to throw in, I was really pleased when you talked about your investors getting involved, that you have some female investors, female world champion cyclists, for example.

47:28And one of the problems we find, frankly, even in this podcast, is the looks of investment in sport is finding a representative group of people from the industry prepared to talk about where the sport is going that isn't entirely male, right? So if you take the hypothesis that the athlete audience is better paid, the male athlete audience is better paid than the female athlete audience at the moment, how do you create conditions in Apex that female athletes, even if their paychecks aren't as big, can invest and can provide meaningful value? because if I look at the 10 most impressive business people I've had the luxury of working with in the 35 years of my career, the reality is six have been athletes and three of those have been female.

48:18So how do you capture the female view and the female market in all the investment you're doing? Yeah, I think we're living already in a phase where the perception around women's sports has changed. I think the first stakeholders to realize that are the brands themselves. Women just as a consumer consume clearly different than men. Women athletes, maybe because they are consumers, maybe because they need to, because on the salaries they're obviously at different levels, they are much more proactive dealing with brands and in their brand deals and and engaging and working for them in in that way do you find that too in the way they engage with you 100 100 i mean we're different right men are are more binary we're more women in general they they prepare more they are more structured they they're more risk averse but when they actually decide something they like to think about things i mean i'm obviously generalizing but but there is that element of difference between men and women and i think in the investment side we clearly see that in a lot of the good things and i think brands see that and i think the fact that brands see that and that's actually 50 behind nike are are are women that actually just that's why you already see a lot of the sponsorships and commercial deals that women and female athletes are doing are actually getting closer and closer to men so and and and and that's why i think through through that growth in the sponsorship deals that they're doing.

49:54Obviously, they have a bit more capital and that's how they potentially can invest with us. On the salaries, I mean, obviously, the sports is not there yet. And I don't think it's a question of fairness. It's a question of also just business. At the end of the day, we looked at a lot of women's leagues and there's definitely a growth of eyeballs. But the moment you put a paywall, it can just kill it football as we know it took 100 years to get where it is you cannot expect and you shouldn't pressure women's game to in 10 years build that because then there's also kind of an exponential view into it so it's normal and since media rights are one of the biggest revenue streams in football it is only normal that on the women's side it's very small so it's hard to justify the salaries that were, you know, obviously it's growing.

50:43But I think then when you look at the sponsorship side, that's a different thing because 50 % of the consumers of these brands, if not more, are women themselves. So I don't think, I think now it's slowly starting to balance. And obviously that's why we're seeing the growth that we're seeing on the athlete and on the sports side. We really invest in it. We're very bullish and definitely working with female athletes as investors is a great experience. and we really, really pushed for it. And we're very happy to come to it with some very strong female athletes. And how many of your investments are female-focused properties?

51:19So right now, purely female, there is no investment done yet. I mean, we invested in Venezia Football Club. There is a female team. So I wouldn't say also purely male. There's TGL maybe, But we are really focusing on a particular transaction just in women's sports that we've been working for over a year, which hopefully we can announce soon. Okay. Just on that women's sport question is interesting. So something like Mercury, we had Victoire on, who's the principal at Mercury. And I'm trying to sort of work out what the thesis is. I understand it. They want to buy women's football clubs or the women's teams of existing clubs.

52:03Do you see that? Are they too early or are they wrong in that assessment? I wouldn't say they're too early. I mean, they're very early, which obviously you need to be careful. And obviously, in many cases, sometimes an element of when you're the first mover is you're doing the first mistakes and you don't survive. I think they have that risk. But I don't think if they make the right choices, I don't think I think it could be early enough, but also at the right time. Their model is exactly that in the first European-based kind of network of women's football clubs that they can obviously then build its own IP, but as a whole, also Mercury 13 build its own IP and all the synergies across the platform, which I think makes a lot of sense because a lot of these teams are so small that on its own as an investment, just very tough to justify.

52:56but at the same time it's a very big challenge to run six, seven, eight of these teams that are just starting effectively. It's not that you need to restructure and join the marketing department of this one with that. Some don't even have an understanding of basics around how to run a club, how to manage the transfers, the players, the infrastructure and then eventually their first use of funds actually needs to be getting a stadium so it's like investing in 10 startups in a world it's really a venture approach maybe 2 or 3 will result but that's fine when you explain that you're a venture fund and you tell your LPs that you know 2 will work 8 will fail but as a whole we will win in this case Mercury 13 is tough to say that because they cannot say that 8 of the clubs will go bankrupt right so So there's a level of risk and a huge executional pressure that they have.

53:56But on the other hand, if they do things well, as they have been, there's a huge opportunity to be the first mover at the right time around the women's game. Okay. Listen, I've really enjoyed that conversation. Thank you. Matt, this sort of joins in quite a lot of what we've talked about over the course of the series, isn't it? There is quite a lot there. And I like this idea that we keep bumping back into, which is about the money flowing to the athlete and then what happens then? And what's the sort of liquidity in the market? That's creating liquidity in other investment markets, which, again, this is all part of that bigger story.

54:36And it's a similar conversation. You mentioned the agents being one of the things that PE is buying up. But this is a sort of feels like an offshoot or a different part of the equation. I agree. I think we're in sport, we're slowly starting to understand the skill sets and support needed for investments of different types of different sizes at different times. And it's just fantastic to hear increasing enlightenment on the role that athletes can play in that. They can extremely focus, can handle pressure. Remember Gareth, who is an elite 800 meter runner, I set two circles with. They have a pitch, used to come in smiling and say it's race day.

55:16right they have so much to bring to bear and it's it's nice to see us being a bit more enlightened about the role they can play beyond just signing a check okay right fantastic antonio thank you so much for your time really enjoyed that and good luck with all the the ventures to come keep in thank you guys and love the opportunity to speak

From the publisher

Joining Richard and Matt Rogan is António Caçorino, founder & CEO of APEX, the sports fund manager known for its roster of over 70 athletes across 15 sports and 30+ leagues. Famous names attached to the fund include Formula 1 drivers Lando Norris (McLaren), Carlos Sainz (Ferrari) and Valtteri Bottas, footballers Raphaël Varane (Manchester United/France), Christian Eriksen and Mason Mount (Manchester United), Jan Vertonghen, Daley Blind, Luuk de Jong and John Stones (Manchester City).

The Portuguese investment company has deployed capital in elite sports ventures such as TMRW SPORTS, the company behind TGL golf, technology companies Playsight and ScorePlay.

Other investments include Baller League, €23 million ($24.1 million) in series A funding into the creator meets football startup. 

Unofficial Partner is the leading podcast for the business of sport. A mix of entertaining and thought provoking conversations with a who's who of the global industry.
To join our community of listeners,
sign up to the weekly UP Newsletter and follow us on Twitter and TikTok at @UnofficialPartner

We publish two podcasts each week, on Tuesday and Friday.

These are deep conversations with smart people from inside and outside sport.

Our entire back catalogue of 500 sports business conversations are available free of charge here.

Each pod is available by searching for ‘Unofficial Partner’ on Apple, Spotify and every podcast app.

If you’re interested in collaborating with Unofficial Partner to create one-off podcasts or series and live events, you can reach us via the website.



More from Unofficial Partner Podcast

All 85 episodes
UP512 Other People's Money: APEX, the athlete investor trend, Red Bull Ventures, Baller and TGLUnofficial Partner Podcast · 56 min
Listen in VO