In short
Interview with Miranda Weeks, great-great-granddaughter of George and Jenny Sodder (Sauter), about her ongoing investigation into the 1945 Sodder children disappearance and related family tragedies around Christmas.
Guest background
Weeks is the great-great-granddaughter of George and Jenny Sodder; her great-grandfather was Joe Sodder, the only son not at home the night of the disappearance. She began researching after reaching out to Sylvia’s daughter (also named Jenny) for documents.
Key claims
Weeks says the 1950 fire marshal report is less credible because she found newspapers indicating the fire marshal was not present on Christmas Day. She claims the threat to burn the house and destroy the children came from George’s former employer, Forenzo Giannullo, after George refused insurance demands. She argues the case is arson/murder, not accident, citing multiple physical and witness details (e.g., cut telephone wire, missing ladder, fuse-box comment, reported fireballs on the roof, and undetermined fire cause).
Notable examples
She also discusses Jenny’s sister Alma Cipriani’s 1948 drawbridge car crash in Cortez, Florida, which she calls suspicious based on newspaper accounts and an inquest that cleared the driver quickly. She highlights the family’s extensive billboard campaign (first billboard reportedly in 88+ newspapers across 32 states).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOMotivation Behind the Investigation
2:29 to 4:06
Miranda discusses her childhood motivation to investigate the Sodder case.
“But without further introduction, here is my interview with Miranda Weeks.”
New Discoveries in the Case
4:06 to 5:33
Miranda shares significant leads and discoveries she has made.
“But really, you know, I've always wanted to look into this case.”
The Threat and Insurance Issues
5:33 to 7:54
Details about the insurance threat related to George Sodder.
“that I have talked about elsewhere, but there's one that I have not talked about anywhere else.”
Alma Cipriani's Mysterious Death
7:54 to 9:10
Exploration of the tragic car accident involving Jenny Sodder's sister.
“No, I think I'm just sitting here kind of like, wow.”
Suspicious Circumstances Surrounding Alma
14:59 to 18:03
Exploration of the suspicious circumstances related to Alma's death.
“Weight loss by HERS is not available in all 50 states.”
Efforts of George and Jenny Sodder
18:03 to 20:28
Discussion on the efforts made by George and Jenny to find their children.
“So I've unfortunately run across that a lot.”
Misunderstandings in the Case
20:28 to 22:14
Addressing common misunderstandings and misrepresentations of the Sodder case.
“to understand that this wasn't a typical kidnapping.”
Challenges with Official Records
22:14 to 24:38
Analysis of the issues surrounding official records and documentation in the case.
“And I mean, to your point, we know that most child abductions happen, you know, by at the hands, I should say, of somebody who knows the children.”
Researching Historical Evidence
24:38 to 28:00
Insights into the challenges and methods of researching historical evidence related to the case.
“And the next thing I know it's five hours later.”
Researching the Case: Challenges and Support
28:00 to 29:40
Explore the difficulties Miranda faces in researching her family's case and the support she receives from the true crime community.
“And I haven't had a chance to go through everything I found yet.”
Show all 37 chapters
Navigating Conversations and Perceptions
29:40 to 32:00
Miranda discusses the importance of having a supportive partner and the unique challenges of discussing her family's case.
“And, you know, they've been helpful in talking things out, being able to talk things out with them and be able to, you know, one of my friends actually, she's the first person that I told about Alma's accident.”
Social and Political Climate Impacts
32:00 to 35:00
Discussing the societal and political factors that may have influenced the Sodder case.
“And for me, I always felt like that meme of like the guy in front of the board with the strings, like, are you seeing what I'm seeing?”
Theories on the Fire: Arson or Accident?
35:00 to 39:40
Exploring the key evidence that supports the theory of arson in the Sodder family's case.
“You know, and I think everybody wants to know, is there like a consensus within the family about what happened?”
Speculations on the Fate of the Children
39:40 to 42:00
Miranda shares her beliefs on what happened to the Sodder children after the fire and the implications of their fate.
“At the bare minimum, it's arson and murder, right?”
Unpacking the Fire Incident
42:00 to 43:20
Exploring the inconsistencies in the fire incident and the perceived threats.
“But I just don't understand how people can ignore the threat and think that it has nothing to do with it.”
The Emotional Impact on Families
43:20 to 45:00
Discussing the emotional response of families affected by violent crime.
“there's a certain audience in true crime that always views families, you know, affected by violent crime as too emotional to the point where they can't think logically.”
Public Perception of Grief and Logic
45:00 to 46:40
Challenging assumptions about grieving families and their logic.
“Like, I'm not placing blame on him at all, but I'm saying that, you know, we never know how we are going to react in a situation.”
Revisiting John Sauter's Actions
46:40 to 48:20
Analyzing the actions of John Sauter during the fire incident.
“And I'm like, for one, do you not think that she thought about that for the rest of her life?”
The Challenge of Historical Accuracy
48:20 to 50:00
Discussing the difficulties in maintaining accurate historical narratives.
“talk to George and Jenny because they were inconsolable and weren't worth talking to.”
The Role of the Internet in True Crime
50:00 to 51:40
Exploring how the Internet has influenced the Sodder case and public interest.
“Like I said, it's certainly one of the most infamous cases in true crime.”
Access to Information: A Double-Edged Sword
51:40 to 53:20
Examining the advantages and disadvantages of digital information access.
“And I really think the answer just comes down to that I have the most free time.”
The Weight of Family Legacy
53:20 to 55:00
Discussing the burden of exploring a cold case on the next generation.
“But in terms of, you know, fighting for answers and broadcasting it, it feels very kind of new with the Internet and with social media.”
Addressing Misinformation in the Case
55:00 to 56:00
Clarifying misconceptions and misinformation surrounding the Sodder case.
“Like that, it just blows my mind sometimes that I'm doing it.”
Understanding the Sodder Case
56:00 to 56:48
Exploration of misconceptions around the Sodder fire and its aftermath.
“But, you know, I'm willing to stick it out because, you know, that's what they deserve.”
Debunking Myths and Theories
56:48 to 59:25
Discussion on various theories surrounding the Sodder children's fate.
“No one saw children at the window or smelled burning flesh.”
Challenges of Being a Family in True Crime
59:25 to 1:02:18
Insight into the emotional struggle of families linked to true crime stories.
“And, you know, I don't think that they would have needed any outside influences to make people do what they wanted.”
Seeking Justice and Truth
1:02:18 to 1:06:34
The search for truth regarding the Sodder case and the hope for justice.
“And you're like, hey, man, like I never wanted to be here.”
How to Support the Quest for Answers
1:06:34 to 1:10:04
Ways listeners can help in spreading awareness of the Sodder case.
“at this point, could be brought forward.”
The Importance of Caution in Case Research
1:10:04 to 1:10:53
Listeners are encouraged to approach information about the Sodder case with caution.
“And obviously, I will do anything I can to help, and I think my listeners will too.”
Facial Recognition Software Findings
1:10:54 to 1:12:48
Discussion of facial recognition results regarding pictures related to the Sodder case.
“Before we end, is there anything else that you wanted to say?”
The Mystery of the 1946 Picture
1:12:49 to 1:14:50
Exploration of a mysterious picture linked to the Sodder family and its implications.
“Because, you know, the writing on the back of the picture, there's so many theories on it and there's nothing concrete.”
Misleading Information Circulating Online
1:14:51 to 1:17:48
Insights on the challenges of verifying the authenticity of information about the case.
“to be the house I've seen pictures that claim to be all like there's one picture of 10 kids but they're all super blonde and that gets circulated as the solder kids even though every single solder kid had very dark hair.”
True Crime and Media Representation
1:17:49 to 1:20:15
Discussion on the portrayal of true crime stories in media and its impact on families.
“It's so hard to discern what's real and what's not, especially nowadays and with AI.”
Ethics of Profit in True Crime
1:20:16 to 1:24:00
A conversation on the ethical implications of profiting from true crime stories.
“And oftentimes you are contractually obligated to stay silent on that.”
Ethics in True Crime Media
1:24:00 to 1:25:50
Explore the balance between storytelling and respect for victims' families in true crime.
“Like, I don't think that you should be able to profit off of somebody else's tragedy, if that makes sense.”
Personal Reflections on Family Tragedy
1:25:50 to 1:28:09
Discuss the emotional journey and challenges faced by families of unresolved cases.
“But, you know, I think what I see in you right now is like what I saw in myself in that, like, I had to have a million people tell me like, hey, like, you're a part of this too.”
Inspiration and Community Support
1:28:09 to 1:32:15
Understand the impact of community support and inspiration in sharing family stories.
“Like always makes me tear up when people say that.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00You survived the Miami weekend, nailed the speech, and maxed out your credit card in the name of friendship. Now you've got one hangover, four pastel dresses, and zero reasons to wear them again. Sell them on Depop. Just snap a few photos and we'll take care of the rest. And you at least get some of your dignity, money, back. Someone on Depop wants what you've got. Start selling now. Depop. Where taste recognizes taste. It's baseball, but so much more. Go bananas for Banana Ball with ESPN on Disney+. The greatest show in sports... Are you kidding me? ...is the phenomenon everyone's talking about.
0:42The trick play to the plate. Catch the Savannah Bananas and other fan-favorite teams all season long with select games streaming with ESPN on Disney+. Let's go! U.S. residents, 18-plus only. Select Banana Ball games available to all Disney-plus subscribers. Terms apply. Voices for Justice is a podcast that uses adult language and discusses sensitive and potentially triggering topics, including violence, abuse, and murder. This podcast may not be appropriate for younger audiences. All parties are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Some names have been changed or omitted per their request or for safety purposes.
1:23Listener discretion is advised. My name is Sarah Turney and this is Voices for Justice.
1:35Today, I'm bringing you something very special. As you know, I covered the infamous case of the Sodder children a few years back, and I was actually able to connect with the great, great-granddaughter of George and Jenny Sodder. Her name is Miranda Weeks. She's now investigating the case for herself, and was kind enough to join me for an interview that I'm going to play for you today. You'll hear about her investigation, including a brand new development that she's never shared anywhere else. We discuss the case, her theories, being a family member in true crime, and of course, how you can help.
2:09Now, before I play the interview, I do want to draw your attention to this episode's description. There you'll find a link to Miranda's Facebook group, a petition to create a flower garden for the Sodder children, and her email. She's asking for anyone with tips, pictures at the billboard featuring the Sauter children, or anyone who may have questions to email her. But without further introduction, here is my interview with Miranda Weeks.
2:37My name's Miranda Weeks, and I am the great-great-granddaughter of George and Jenny Sauter. their son Joe was my great-grandfather, and he was the one that was in the Army at the time and was the only one that was not there that night. I mean, obviously, it's been a very long time, and I would love to know, and I'm sure so many people would love to know, you know, what motivated you to personally become involved in the investigation? I've wanted to look into this since I learned about it as a kid. I actually remember telling telling one of my best friends when I was around eight that I was going to grow up and that I was going to solve it.
3:20I used to spend a lot of time with her grandparents, and one day I was telling her grandfather, who was basically like my grandfather, the story because, you know, as a kid I didn't realize how widely known the story was. I thought it was just, you know, a family thing.
3:37and once I finished telling him the story my friend said yeah and Miranda is going to grow up and she's going to solve it and he he her grandfather looked at me and he laughed and he said kid they've been trying to figure that out for decades they're probably never going to find those kids and that was the moment I decided I was going to prove him wrong unfortunately he's he's no longer with us, but I know he would be proud of me if he was. But really, you know, I've always wanted to look into this case. I just never knew where to start. And then a year ago, I decided to reach out to Sylvia's daughter, whose name is also Jenny, because I had a question about something that I had read.
4:20And she ended up offering to send me all the documents that she had that I didn't even know existed. And originally, when I decided to look into it, And my goal was to try to find the kids because I figured, you know, technology is so much more advanced than it was now and it might be a little easier to track them down. But once I read through all the documents she sent me, I realized that what I had grown up reading about it was only a fraction of what had actually happened. and that's when my goal changed and I decided that I needed to try to correct the narrative as much as I possibly could and I learned that it was George and Jenny's wish that this story be told long after they passed and I just want to make sure it's told correctly.
5:15Yeah I love that I think that you take so much care with this case I mean it's your family and I'm sure everybody wants to know you know what the most significant leads or discoveries memories are that you've made so far? Okay, so there's three that I want to mention. There's two that I have talked about elsewhere, but there's one that I have not talked about anywhere else. It'll be the first time I'm talking about it today. So firstly, I was able to determine that the fire marshal was not actually there on Christmas Day, even though he said in his 1950 Fire Emblem Report that he was. I was not able to find a single newspaper that stated he was there that day, but I was able to find three different newspapers, two that were published on December 26th and one on December 27th that all stated that nobody could reach a member of the Fire Emblem Marshal's office.
6:15He actually did not show up until December 27th when he intended one of the coroner's inquests but I don't know where that inquest was held so I don't know if he actually went to the property at all until that year like like soon after the fire happened and then this is something I was necessarily discovered by me but it is something that I didn't personally know until I started my research which is that it wasn't the insurance man that made the threat, but it was actually George's former employer, who was a man named Forenzo Giannullo. He's the one that sent the insurance salesman, who was also his friend, to try to get George to not only raise the house insurance, but also to get life insurance on his whole family.
7:03George refused, and then Forenzo showed up and made the threat. And the full threat was, I see you have refused to take out insurance and refused to sign the papers to settle Mrs. Sauter's father's estate. Your goddamn house is going up in smoke and your children are going to be destroyed and you are going to be paid for the dirty remarks you've been making about Mussolini. Prior to my research I had only heard the second half of the thread. I had never heard the first line and Forenzo was also the beneficiary of the house insurance and he had it raised just two weeks before the fire without telling George, and he was paid out after the fire.
7:49Before I get to the third one, do you have any questions about that? No, I think I'm just sitting here kind of like, wow. Like, surprising but not surprising, if that makes sense. Yeah, there's so much to this case that you read it and you just roll your eyes, honestly. Yeah, yeah. No, I mean, obviously, I think the work that you've done is incredible, and I am just honored to be able to listen to what you've done. Oh, I'm honored that you're letting me speak about it, honestly. And what I want to talk about next, I'm really excited to talk to you about. So I was able to find out that this may or may not be related to the kid's disappearance, but I think either way it's still worth talking about.
8:43And it's that Jenny's younger sister, Alma Cipriani, died in a car accident on December 21st, 1948 in Cortez, Florida. But once I did some digging, it doesn't really seem like an accident at all. I'm not going to mention any names besides Alma's, since this was officially ruled an accident, but I still think what happened to her deserves to be talked about. Whether it's related or not, it's still another tragedy that Jenny had to endure around Christmas, and just for transparency, this all comes from newspapers published during that time, because no official documents on the accident still exist.
9:28So Alma was 32 at the time of her death, and she had been in Cortez for about two months prior to her death, but it's unknown whether she planned on living there permanently or if she was just getting a house down there to like visit in the winter. So around 10 45 p.m. on December 21st, 1948, the car she was riding in went speeding across the Cortez drawbridge until it went through the open draw and the car sank 18 feet in the water. So this drawbridge was a turn style one, which means the bridge tender would have to walk to the middle and turn a wheel to make the road parallel with itself and then turn the wheel again once the boat or the barge passed through.
10:11According to the bridge tender, the car was coming awfully fast towards him and he knew it wouldn't stop in time. The car went off the edge and traveled about 60 feet in the air before hitting the other side and sinking. The driver, who was a local man from Bradenton, which is the island across from Cortez, was able to jump out of the car before it hit the water, but Alma was not. He only suffered lacerations to his right hand and face. A local 18-year-old was able to jump down and retrieve Alma's body from the car. he was finally successful on his second attempt and he told a local paper that the car had been flipped upside down and that her body was floating freely inside the car he would tell a local paper that he believed that the car had been raised before the recovery it might have been difficult to find the body he pulled her out through the opening on the driver's side and brought her to the surface where she was unable to be revived what exactly he meant by opening in the driver's isn't clear, but if the driver had jumped out, then it would stand to reason that he had to open the door to do it.
11:20And she was in the water for no more than an hour before her body was discovered. And according to an article published on December 22nd, her body was supposed to be kept at a local funeral home until a coroner's inquest could complete an investigation. But according to her death certificate, her body was sent back to West Virginia on December 23rd, just one day after she had passed away. And according to a paper published on December 23rd, the inquest had been deferred pending further investigation, but a date for resumption had not been set. The coroner's jury, which consisted of six unnamed men, finally met on January 5th of 1949, and they cleared the driver of any wrongdoing.
12:08Eight witnesses were called to testify, but the driver was not called, nor was he even present at this inquest. They decided that the crash was caused by the warning system being inadequate. The warning system consisted of a chain with a lantern on it placed 20 feet from the edge of the draw opening. It apparently only took the jury a few minutes to make this decision. They claimed it was hard to see the warning system because it was dim and because a rise in the bridge obscured it until you could get close to it. However, they did not mention in the inquest that there were also warning lights on the upper structure of the draw, which were higher enough up that you would have been able to see them regardless of the rise in the bridge.
12:49The coroner's jury did not make any suggestions on how to fix the warning system, and in fact, the warning system wouldn't be updated for another five years. And also during the coroner's inquest, a man stated that he had heard Alma scream before the car went off the draw. However, he was on the opposite side of the bridge behind two other cars when it happened, and this man also just so happened to be the circuit court clerk. The bridge tender, who was much closer to the car than the clerk, did not report hearing any screams, and I dug through newspapers and searched Cortez Bridge car accident from 1922 when the bridge was built until 1953 when the warning system was installed and this accident was the only one in 30 years where a car went through the open draw the only other car accident on the bridge where a car went into the water was in the 1930s when a couple hydroplaned and went through the side railing and their car had been completely submerged for 45 minutes, but they were still in their seats when divers went down there to get them.
14:00And reminder that I just said that Alma's body was floating within the car whenever they went to go get her. This episode of Voices for Justice is sponsored by HERS. Between diets, workouts, and endless advice, it's hard to know what actually works for weight loss and what's worth your time. That's why HERS offers access to an affordable range of FDA-approved GLP-1 medications that now includes the WeGoV pill and the WeGoV pen. You'll connect with a licensed provider who will determine if treatment is even right for you. And it doesn't stop there. Weight Loss by HERS goes beyond medication by offering access to 24-7 messaging with your care team.
14:38HERS really does make it simple to find an approach that fits your needs and your budget if eligible. It's weight loss designed to work with your life. Ready to reach your goals? Visit forhers.com slash crime to get personalized, affordable care that gets you. That's F-O-R-H-E-R-S dot com slash crime. 4HERS dot com slash crime. Weight loss by HERS is not available in all 50 states. Wegovi is the registered trademark of Novo Noro Disc AS. To get started and learn more, including important safety information, Wegovi clinical study information and restrictions, visit 4HERS dot com.
15:18I mean obviously that's extremely interesting and I mean of course unfortunate but I would love to know like you know what do you think all of that means why do you think it would happen that way I mean obviously it seems extremely suspicious to me I I don't know I I mean obviously if it's connected to the kid's disappearance, then maybe she found something out that she shouldn't. And, you know, whoever was involved decided that she needed to be gotten rid of. If it wasn't connected, I really couldn't tell you. But either way, it just, it seems incredibly suspicious. Like, I, once you look at everything, it does not seem like it was an accident.
16:12Yeah, no, I totally agree with you there. And, like, what are the odds that so much, like, so many of these incidents are happening to the same group of people? It seems astronomical. Around Christmas. Yeah, yeah. What is it about Christmas? I know. Like, I don't know. And it's only three years. It would have been, you know, that Christmas would have been the three-year anniversary of when the fire happened. I mean, it sounds like someone might be trying to send a message, right? Yes, I do believe that as well, yes. And I will say that I, you know, was told that Jenny Sautter did also find it incredibly suspicious.
16:54She may not have had all the facts that I do, but either way, she thought it was a suspicious accident. yeah i mean that's crazy i'll have to look i mean obviously i think that you've done incredible research i my first thought is like i need to look into that um but i have no doubt that you found everything out there because you're just incredible yeah and you know i i can send you all the um the newspaper clippings i found um and like i said unfortunately there's no that i i've been able to find so far there's no official documents on the accident because it was ruled an accident So if they did write anything down as far as the coroner's inquest, then it doesn't exist.
17:37But I've learned that it's fairly common for older cases such as this, if they're closed, for them to not keep anything on it. So like the West Virginia State Police, whenever they gave all the documents to Sylvia, it was because they were purging old closed cases that they didn't, you know, feel like they needed anymore. So I've unfortunately run across that a lot. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Those paper documents, especially, you know, they get lost. There's floods, there's fires, there's, you know, corruption. um it's just it's so tough yeah and like it's it's rough because you know we'll probably never know what what actually happened like why they decided to target her you know whether she was actually alive when the car went into the water you know there's there's so many unknowns here But like I said, regardless, something obviously happened to her and it's never been talked about before.
18:45And I feel like she deserves to be talked about. Yeah, no, I love that. Her story deserves to be told. And I think it's really important to ask these questions and dig as deep as you can. Yeah, exactly. I did want to ask you also, of course, you know, with this case, I keep calling it like larger than life. It truly feels that way. I feel like it's, you know, not only one of the oldest, but one of the most infamous cases in true crime. So I want to ask if you feel like there are certain aspects that have been misunderstood, overlooked, or just like misrepresented in general. I feel like the efforts that George and Jenny went through to find their kids aren't talked about enough.
19:29Like, you know, everybody knows about the billboards because it was up for decades. but you know one thing I was able to find that I had never known is that the very first billboard was published in at least 88 different newspapers across 32 states with three additional newspapers in Canada and this would have been in 1953 and that's just the ones that are available online. So I'm sure that the number of papers is really much higher than that. They did not let the fact that the local officials refused to help them stop them from trying to find their kids. And they were basically gaslit for the rest of our lives.
20:18And they still never gave up. And they still always had hope that they would see their kids one day. I also think that people need to understand that this wasn't a typical kidnapping. I think when most people hear that word, they automatically think that the kids were taken by force, which would be really hard to do with five kids. So I can understand when you think of it that way, how it can seem impossible. but I think in reality they more than likely knew whoever took them and went with them willingly either they were told ahead of time that they would be picked up that night or when they went out to go do their chores they were convinced to go with this person I think in either scenario they were probably promised some sort of Christmas surprise and you know what kid doesn't love a surprise, especially around Christmas.
21:21And also, I think people need to understand that while there was technically an official investigation done, it was not done very well. Other than the Department of Public Safety report taken on Christmas Day, there aren't any official documents until the 1950 fire marshal report. And that was really only done because of the pressure that George and Jenny and their hired detectives were putting on the local officials. And since we know that the fire marshal wasn't there that day, that makes any reports from them far less credible than they were if he had been there that day. Yeah. I mean, I think one of the most powerful parts of this entire story, this case, is how much their parents did work for them.
22:14And I mean, to your point, we know that most child abductions happen, you know, by at the hands, I should say, of somebody who knows the children. So all of that lines up for me. And of course, all these officials and their, you know, wackadoodle stories about what happened on the day. I mean, that all makes perfect sense to me. Wackadoodle is one word for it. That's for sure. I'm trying to be kind, right? I'm like, ah, wacky. No, listen, I get it. There's so many times that I've read something in the official report and I just have to close my laptop and breathe for a little bit and go do something else because it just will make my blood boil.
23:01Yeah, well, and it seems like after all this time, you know, what is there to lose with just, you know, getting the official story out there, maybe clearing a few things up? Like, I feel like it would be a win for any department. Like, nobody's going to come back from Mussolini days and start, you know, enacting revenge. At least I don't think so. No, and exactly. And I don't feel like what happened back then should not reflect on what's happening now. Like, obviously, we're living in two completely different times. Like, it was so much easier. I'm not saying that, like, there aren't corrupt, you know, departments now.
23:45There obviously are. But, like, back then it was so much easier to get away with stuff because, you know, you didn't have a digital footprint. Like, everything that I have was typewritten. and once you you know typed it out and you sent it that was it unless you made a copy yourself you had to trust whoever you sent it to to send it back to you um and that's so many of uh the reports and whenever they would send it to somebody they'd be like when you're done with this please send it back to us so we can have it for our records okay well what if that person didn't send it back. What was the plan, you know?
24:27Yeah. Yeah, no, that's a great point. Absolutely. I feel like there's just an endless amount of rabbit holes in this case, unfortunately. You poor thing. I can't even imagine what it's like sorting through everything and knowing that there's still so much missing. So many rabbit holes, so many. I think I've learned to figure out which ones are worth digging into now and which ones are worth just like holding off on because, you know, it's, I can, I can tell myself that I'm going to sit down and then I'm going to research for like an hour. And the next thing I know it's five hours later. And I am like so far from where I originally wanted to research.
25:16So yeah, there's definitely so many rabbit holes to go down, but I, it, you know, I could probably make a whole book on the rabbit holes that I could go down. I mean, I would read that book. I would read that book. Gosh, I think it's definitely one of the most complex cases, you know, when it comes to forensics, when it comes to the theories, it's just endless, absolutely endless. Yes. And there's so, and you know, there's, I have a lot of official documents but like I've said there's so many missing like they'll reference like writing somebody and receiving a reply but you know they don't include the reply in the file or I have letters that say oh a meeting happened and there was a court reporter there that wrote everything down, but I don't have any, like, evidence of them writing anything down.
26:19I mean, and it's entirely possible that they didn't write anything down. There's, I have one letter where they try to say that what exactly happened in this meeting couldn't be written down. Okay, why? Why could you not write it down? That doesn't make any sense. It's more like you just didn't want to write it down because you don't want to be held accountable. Yeah, I mean, that's a bad excuse in my book. Yeah, gosh. And again, I think, you know, the detriment is having to deal with paper records so much in this case. And just, you know, so many different, you know, styles of record keeping, you know, which back in the day could be, you know, writing notes on the front of a paper file or, you know, a post-it or whatever.
27:09Like, it's, there was like no rhyme or reason, no organization. And of course, you know, no digitizing anything. Yeah. And, you know, I actually, last time I was in town, I ended up spending more than four hours at the courthouse going through all the law books and stuff that they have because I'm trying to like chase down a lead. But and, you know, these are all super old, super thick, dusty books. And I'm I probably pulled like 20 of them off the shelves. And I just went through and like pulled a book, took a picture, pulled a book, took a picture, just like rapid fire. And I haven't had a chance to go through everything I found yet.
28:03But, you know, since I don't live there anymore, I, whenever I go, I have to, you know, take the opportunity to get as much information as I can since a lot of this is not online and the courthouse does have stuff they have some things from that time period but most of it was sent to the archives and none of that is digitized either and you can't email them a request for it you have to write them a letter and then you have to mail that letter So the process for this stuff is not as easy as it would be if it was a modern case. I mean, yeah, absolutely. And you've done so much, you know, traveling, digging through these records, you know, and I have to ask, like, is there anyone else that you've consulted with, like PIs, researchers, you know, anything like that?
29:01And if you have, have they helped? No, not at the moment. just because I'm kind of limited and what I can do financially. But, you know, if anybody hears this and wants to help me out for free, you're more than welcome to reach out to me. I, not official researchers, but I, you know, I have met, I have made some friends with people that also do like podcasts and stuff. So they do know how to research and they research similar, similarly to how I do. And, you know, they've been helpful in talking things out, being able to talk things out with them and be able to, you know, one of my friends actually, she's the first person that I told about Alma's accident.
29:58And because before that I was like, I'm reading through it and I'm like, okay, I'm going to talk about this publicly and people are going to think I'm crazy. So I was able to run it by her first. And she was like, oh, no, that makes perfect sense. So being able to speak about this with people outside of it has been really helpful for me. Oh, good. I love that. I know that the true crime community, if you will, you know, can be a double-edged sword. So I'm really glad that you've had that support. And I feel like, you know, when you're a family member in a case like this, sometimes, at least in my experience, sometimes I feel like I can be crazy.
30:40And I'm like, do you see what I see? Or like, am I just like overthinking this because I'm so close to it? No, yes. And that is exactly me. And, you know, my boyfriend does hear everything that I find, but he isn't as familiar with true crime as I am. So like he doesn't have that mindset. He just kind of listens and lets me talk it through. So while it is helpful to talk to him, it's especially helpful to talk to people that, you know, are familiar with true crime and are able to come from it, come into it with that point of view. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, and bless his heart for listening to everything.
Read the full transcript
31:29I love a supportive partner. I love that you have that. oh yeah bless his heart for sure because i can go on a ramble sometimes as you should as you should and you know sometimes i get a little heated and he'll have to be like breathe calm down i'm like i know i know i know yeah yeah no and it really does help because i think you know like i was saying like you can just like hype yourself up almost and you know And for me, I always felt like that meme of like the guy in front of the board with the strings, like, are you seeing what I'm seeing? And it's like, so it's nice when people are like, yes, you're not insane.
32:14Exactly, for sure. Well, and of course, you know, we have to slide into theories and asking about, you know, and I think for me, it feels, you know, pretty apparent, you know, what happened there. But this case, I think, has really divided people on the Internet. So I want people to hear directly from you. You're a family member. You have reached research this case probably more than anybody else on this planet at this point. so I just want to hit like the heavy hitters you know do you think that there are any you know social or political things that may have been involved in this case I'm not too certain on the political climate aspect of it but socially I think that the social climate in the town at the time was definitely stacked against them you know his former employer and his family were very important people back then, and they owned a lot of the buildings in Fayetteville at the time as well.
33:17And in 1951, George and Jenny had stated in a letter to the superintendent of the Department of Public Safety and said that we could not hire a lawyer in Fayetteville because all of them were afraid they would be put out of their office buildings if they took over our case. And not to mention that five of the six members of the coroner's jury had personal connections to Forenzo, and his first cousin was the foreman of the jury. And they had connections going back to the 30s with several members of those involved with the investigation, including the prosecuting attorney and the fire chief. And they were also, they were in a lot of, like, town clubs, like Rotary Club, and, you know, they were Freemasons as well.
34:11And they knew at least two men that worked at different newspapers in 1945. I've probably gone through at least a thousand newspapers at this point, and I'm not even done. Holy cow. You know, there's something about these cases that become generational. I think this case by nature, unfortunately, is generational, right? But what I mean is, you know, these cases I so often see just get passed down generation after generation after generation. And it just, I just wish you could have all the answers. oh me too but you know I've had to accept that that I'm not going to get all the answers I could I could probably also write a book on the questions that I'll never have answers to unfortunately just because of how old this case is and you know everybody that was involved has passed away at this point and like I like I keep saying there's so many documents missing but and You know, I just got to take what I can get, really.
35:20Yeah, no, absolutely. You know, and I think everybody wants to know, is there like a consensus within the family about what happened? Like, you know, accident, arson, and is there a theory that you subscribe to? Oh, 100 % arson. Um, you know, there's so much that points to arson and nothing that points to it being an accident. You know, besides the fact that Frenzo Giudolo had threatened to burn the house down and then raised the insurance without telling George, you also have the fact that the telephone wire was cut 14 feet in the air and two feet away from the pole. The ladder that was usually kept next to the house was found 70 feet away from the house over an embankment.
36:10Shortly before the fire, a man had showed up and pointed to the brand new fuse boxes and said they were going to start a fire someday. And a passenger on a bus saw balls of fire being thrown onto the roof as the bus passed the house. And you know how anyone can look at these facts and still think it could have been an accident is a little wild to me. I mean, and all of these things were mentioned in the fire marshal reports as well. Different officials also repeatedly admit that the cause of the fire was undetermined, and they only stated it was due to faulty wiring because the fire was spotted in the room with the telephone.
36:56And they try to claim that there was accelerants in the basement. Like they try to claim that he kept stockpiles of coal, that he had tires down there, that he had gas down there. But George insisted that none of that was true. And I mean, even if it was, it still wouldn't have made the fire hot enough to burn all five of the kids' bodies. My personal theory is that the plan was to take the children and burn the house down since Gidula said in his threat, your house is going up in smoke and your children are going to be destroyed, and since he raised the house insurance two weeks before the fire without telling George.
37:42I think whoever took the children off the property that night was known and was trusted by them. And I've found that Jenny Sautter believed the same way based on interviews that she did. She even told a newspaper that she believed the kidnappers must have been familiar to the children because if it was a stranger, the children would have screamed and nobody heard any screams that night. I think I mentioned this earlier, but I personally believe that they were told to stay up late that night because the person had some sort of surprise for them. I think that they were then taken to a house in Smithers and told that their family had burned up in the fire and that their older brother had died in the war and that they were essentially orphans.
38:32What happened to them after that? I think there are two possibilities. Either they were killed shortly after being spotted at the Charleston Hotel or they were sent to Florida and then shipped out of the country. Unfortunately, I don't believe Maurice survived. Maurice was the oldest boy. He was 14. Survived either way since he was not spotted at the hotel with the rest of the kids. If they were shipped out of the country, like I said, I don't think they were kept together and I don't think that they were sent to the country to, you know, be adopted out. I think that Betty could have been since she was five.
39:17It would have been a little easier to put her into a new family. But as for the rest of them, I don't. I think they could have been sold into, you know, into slavery or something like that unfortunately yeah i mean that that could make total sense to me absolutely as horrifying as it is unfortunately yeah you know it's as much as i hate to say it it's almost better to to believe that they were killed shortly after versus what could have happened to them if they weren't you know what i mean yeah and i mean if the motive is revenge right why keep the kids alive i don't often uh tell people what my personal theories are in cases but i'm right there with you um and and i've had this debate with like other podcasters right you know is an accident or is it arson and i'm like how can you not see that it's arson um i feel like you know if this were to happen in modern day it would be just so clear.
40:27So and there would be no argument. At the bare minimum, it's arson and murder, right? Like if you assume that the kids did die in the fire, they didn't. I'm going to say that right now. But if you assume they did, then at the very least, it's arson and murder. How you can point this to be an accident, I don't know. But to your point about it happening in modern times, you know, we've kind of discussed this. I can't remember her last name, but Chloe and then her brother's name was Gage Daniel. You know, they at first didn't think that that was arson. They thought that it was an accident and that, you know, the kids had burned up, even though they found the remains of the family's bird.
41:14Yep, yep. No, absolutely. And I mean, just if you think about like the true crime brain, if you will, especially in today's society, you know, like there were threats made, there are witnesses who say that, you know, somebody was throwing fire onto the roof and then this happens. I don't understand how a certain sect of the true crime audience doesn't see that as suspicious and just sees it as an accident. And I have to wonder If it's almost placing blame on the parents, you know, I feel like that's the most common argument I see is they just couldn't accept that their kids died in a fire. And it's like, how are we forgetting about all the other evidence that stacked up against them?
41:59I think any reasonable parent would do exactly what they did. oh exactly and you know every retelling doesn't always have all the facts in it but at least everyone i've seen has stated that there was a threat to burn the house down and most of them mentioned the ladder missing uh and and the um the telephone wire being cut so i just don't understand, like, if the threat hadn't been made, but the other things had happened, okay, maybe you could explain them away. Maybe. But I just don't understand how people can ignore the threat and think that it has nothing to do with it. That's what doesn't make sense to me.
42:49Like, if you take all the other stuff and you're like, okay, you know, maybe one of the family members had moved the ladder and didn't tell anybody. Or maybe the telephone wire was burned and it just looked like it was cut, but they couldn't tell. But, you know, the threat is really what points to me that, you know, that it couldn't have been an accident. Like I said, I just don't understand how people can ignore that. You know, I might have a hot take here that might get me in trouble, but I feel like there's a certain audience in true crime that always views families, you know, affected by violent crime as too emotional to the point where they can't think logically.
43:34And I think that that happens often in this case. Again, it goes back to like the parents are just grieving and they're not being reasonable, which I think that argument doesn't hold, you know, because they did this for decades. You know, they were fighting for these kids for decades. You can't tell me. Yeah, exactly. Until they died, right? Like, you know, I could see if it was all emotion, no logic, maybe that going on for a few years. But until they die, like at what point would you expect logic to take over that emotion? You can't assume that people are having that level of emotion for that long.
44:18Does that make sense? Yes, it makes a lot of sense. And, you know, the same people that like to ignore the threat being made also like to bring up that in the Department of Safety report, they say that John Sauter, the oldest, told them that he had went in and shaken the kids awake. and you know I I don't know for sure he could have said it um or you know they they could have you know misrepresented what he said because you know we don't know what exactly what was happening in the situation we don't know if they just said hey tell us what happened and this is what he said or if they asked him questions like well why didn't you go wake him up why didn't you know why did you just run down the stairs but we also got to realize that John had just returned from fighting in World War II nine days before like he literally just got out of fighting in a brutal war and I can't even imagine what was going through his head in that moment and I you know, I can imagine him saying that, but just because he's, you know, all these thoughts are running through his head, like, you know, my siblings are dead.
45:39Why did I not help them? You know what I mean? Like, I'm not placing blame on him at all, but I'm saying that, you know, we never know how we are going to react in a situation. And he later on says that he didn't say that and that they actually just called to the kids. They didn't go shake them awake. But, you know, the people, so many people like to point to that and they're like, well, why, you know, why did he say that? But they don't think about what he was going through in that moment, if that makes sense. Yeah, 100 percent. You know, I think that people always have assumptions about what they might do or, you know, what they think others should do.
46:22But once you're in that moment And once it's happening, you know, I think that like there's no telling. Yeah. And I see so many people that are like, well, why did Jenny yell upstairs to her kids? Why didn't she go up there and get her kids? I would have gone up there and gotten my kids. And I'm like, for one, do you not think that she thought about that for the rest of her life? I mean, it wouldn't have mattered if she went up there anyways because they weren't up there. but do you not think that she thought about that for the rest of her life and you know in in the moment when she you know woke up and saw the fire they weren't thinking you know anything else they weren't thinking their kids were gone they weren't they weren't even thinking that it was a huge fire they just thought that they were going to be able to put it out quickly and then go back to bed they never imagined that their entire house was about to burn down and you know I'm sure after that they constantly thought about how they could have done things differently that night but like that's that's not helpful and and placing blame on them is not helpful either like you know it whether she went up there or not does not change the fact that the kids were not up there and that they were taken.
47:43You know, if she had gone up there, I mean, it would have, she would have been able to be like, oh, well, they weren't up there, but I'm sure officials would have just, you know, dismissed her anyways and been like, well, you just didn't see them or something like that. Yeah, no, I think that that's a great point. And especially, you know, when you look at the year that this happened, right, it would certainly be common, I think, for any law enforcement official or, you know, fire marshal, whatever, to be like, she's the mother, she's hysterical, and just call it a day. Well, and, you know, even though the fire marshal wasn't there that day, that he said that in his 1950 report, he said that he showed up that day and that he did not talk to George and Jenny because they were inconsolable and weren't worth talking to.
48:32That's basically what he said. Yeah, it's just insane. Who wouldn't be inconsolable? Who wouldn't be hysterical after losing so many children? Yeah, so many children, your entire house, everything that belonged to those children. They literally had to start over completely. Their whole house burned down. And while they did find some things in the ashes, like they didn't find anything that, you know, any, any, I mean, pictures weren't as common back then. But, you know, any pictures they had taken of the kids when they were little, anything like that is, is, was completely gone. And, you know, back then, once something was gone, it's gone.
49:22You know, there was no digital backup. You, there was nowhere else to go to, to get those pictures. So, you know, they did have a lot to deal with in the moment. So, of course, like you said, why would you not be inconsolable? I'm sure I would have been too. I feel like you've answered so many of the questions I had left on my list, which is fantastic. So I kind of wanted to, while we're talking about it, you know, what do you think the interest in this case, the Internet in general, like what role has it played? Do you think that they've been helpful? Has it been overwhelming? Has it been not helpful?
50:01How do you feel about it? Like I said, it's certainly one of the most infamous cases in true crime. I would say helpful, but also harmful. You know, because this story has been circulated so much, but each retelling is different. because, you know, rumors get spread or, you know, somebody runs it through chat GPT and they tell them this is what happened. And, you know, I try to and I have so many friends, including my one of my old college professors. She will tag me anytime she sees somebody post about this. And I'm so thankful for her when she does that. But whenever I see them, I always, you know, make sure to comment on there and tell them who I am.
50:55And I tell them that, you know, unfortunately, there's some inaccuracies, but you know, I'm not upset about it. It's not their fault that there's not accurate information out there, but I would be happy to help them fix it. But you know, of course, I have people arguing with me because they've followed the case their whole lives and they think they know everything about it. And I'm bringing out new information and they just can't understand why this is the first time they're hearing about it, which I do understand. But, you know, and people, I've had people ask me why I am the first person to be public about it, like, so long after.
51:40And I really think the answer just comes down to that I have the most free time. and I'm also, you know, I mean, I'm not super comfortable speaking publicly, but, you know, I'm more comfortable than I would say most of my family is. We're a lot, we're pretty much a family of homebodies, you know, like, so, but, you know, it has also been helpful. I, you know, answering people's questions really helps me think through things and it also helps me figure out what I need to elaborate on whenever I'm telling the story myself, just to help people understand the case better. What I will say has been really helpful is websites like, you know, newspaperarchive.com, which is where I've found so many of the old newspapers from back then.
52:36And like I said, probably like a thousand newspapers at this point. And, you know, everything, not everything, but having a lot of stuff digitized and having searchable databases has been really helpful. Yeah, I always say, and I feel like it's like, people might think it's a cop-out, but it's all like a double-edged sword. It's good. It hurts. Some people are great. Some people are not so great. And I mean, you know, to the point you were making about you, you know, the first person that's been, you know, really media facing in this case, I feel like that's kind of a newer thing. You know, for decades, maybe people might write a book about what happened to their family.
53:20But in terms of, you know, fighting for answers and broadcasting it, it feels very kind of new with the Internet and with social media. Like most cases don't have somebody like you researching and telling the story like that's the norm. So, I mean, I think it's great that you're coming forward. And, you know, I wish more families would do it. I understand why they don't 100 percent. But I think that there's so much value in that. Like you're the only person that, you know, a family member might let into their attic to look at a box of documents, for example. That's not going to happen for an everyday person.
53:56So that's why you have information that not everybody else has, because naturally these families, your family has more information on this case than anybody. Yeah. And, you know, I also think it's just, you know, since my part of the Sauter family didn't have firsthand knowledge and like I said, we didn't know that these documents existed for a long time. So like, I'm sure that members of the family just thought like, you know, what could I do? You know, like George and Jenny were vocal for the rest of their lives and nothing happened. And, you know, I don't put any blame on any of my family members for not speaking out about it.
54:48Like, I don't blame them because this is a tough thing to do. You know, sometimes I'm like, man, it hits me all at once where I'm like, man, I am really looking into an 80-year-old cold case that was ruled an accident. Like that, it just blows my mind sometimes that I'm doing it. So like I can't blame everybody else for not wanting to do it. Oh, 100%. Well, and the bottom line is, is that nobody should have had, you know, nobody should have to do this. In a perfect world, I think every family that's affected by true crime would just want the authorities to come in, solve it correctly so that they can heal and move on, right?
55:34Or, you know, I understand with missing persons, it's not that simple. But you know what I mean? Like, the ideal world isn't 80 years later having, you know, a grandchild so far removed, come do all this legwork. nobody wants that. And to your point, you know, those parents, I mean, they just did the most. And yeah, I feel like it's just such a hard situation. Yeah, it can be for sure. But, you know, I'm willing to stick it out because, you know, that's what they deserve. And, you know, sometimes I wish that they had access to the things that I have access to now. Like, I think if they had the technology that we have now, this case never would have went as long as it did being, you know, considered a closed case.
56:35Yeah, yeah, 100%. And I mean, you know, of course, while you're here and everybody's listening, is there anything that you want to clear up? Like something that you always hear about the case that's just completely incorrect? um well i mean the biggest and obvious one is that they didn't die in the fire um i don't even consider it a possibility and it's not just because i'm a family member it's just so inconceivable to think that the fire was hot enough to turn five children to ash but still leave behind things like fabric and a stove and a part of a book and undamaged coins and, you know, and no one heard screams.
57:20No one saw children at the window or smelled burning flesh. And this isn't just the family. Like there were people that, there were witnesses that showed up once they heard the fire was happening and nobody at the scene was able to say that they, you know, saw any indication that the kids were in there. And I think the fact that the lights were still on and the doors were unlocked when Jenny woke up is the biggest indicator that they never made it back inside. From what I've been told, Marisa and Martha, who were the two oldest, were incredibly responsible, and they would not have gone to bed without doing what their mother had told them to do first.
58:03Also, I hear these a lot. The kids did not set the fire for themselves and run away. George and Jenny did not sell them or send them out of the country for a better life. They weren't being abused. You know, it does really break my heart to look through the comments and see people blaming Jordan Jenny. I think it really diminishes all the work they did. And, you know, this is coming from someone who never got to meet them. And I can't even begin to imagine what it's like for, you know, my family members that did know them and did get to spend time with them for them to have to read these awful things they're being said about them.
58:51um i also don't i know that a lot of people think the mafia was involved i don't i think that the mafia theory is the easiest for people to believe because it just kind of ties everything together neatly like everything you can every part of the story you can just be like oh well yeah the mafia would have done that. Yeah, the mafia would have done that. But, you know, like I said earlier, the genudalos were incredibly well connected. And, you know, I don't think that they would have needed any outside influences to make people do what they wanted. Yeah. I mean, I think all that is extremely fair.
59:40Extremely fair. And like I said, I just, I think it's so powerful to hear from someone like you and to clear those things up. I mean, I don't think that you would have any motive to lie. You know what I mean? Like there's, there's absolutely no motive for you to be deceptive in this case. You just want the truth. I think that that's very apparent. Yeah. You know, and I have had, I have had people in Facebook comments with, which like, I, I don't care what people have to say, but I've had people be like, well, you're, you're just doing this for the money. And I'm like, I don't know what money you think I'm making, but.
1:00:15What money? What money? It's, I feel like that's so common in true crime. And I don't really know where people get that perception from that people like you, people like me are paid for things like this. When in reality, it usually costs us money and we're happy to spend that money. But of course, whenever you try to say like, hey, I'm not making any money, then they just like fight back harder. And I always feel like it's like just not worth it. Like just, you know, like I love talking about ethics and true crime as a whole. But when it comes to comments like that, like I usually just don't respond.
1:00:58Oh, yeah, I usually don't. I mainly go through the comments just because of how long it has been with this the incorrect story being circulated and I always want to be able to answer people's questions genuine questions like you know I know there are some people that genuinely care about the case they just don't have access to the right information so I always want to be available for those people but sometimes I do I do love to argue sometimes and especially if people are gonna start saying slanderous things against George and Jenny, then, you know, I will fight back. But I agree. I have learned when to fight back and when not to fight back.
1:01:52Yeah, I know. I totally get it. And I mean, honestly, I respect every family's choice to do whatever they want with their case in terms of speaking out. I just I don't know. Maybe I've like lost my my fight for trying to specifically answer those questions for people. I just I don't know. It's so hard, I think, being a family in true crime, because not only do you have to defend like every single aspect of the story, but then they make you defend yourself. And you're like, hey, man, like I never wanted to be here. Do you think I like signed up for this to happen to my family? Like I'm just trying to help.
1:02:29Like I just want to be like, can you give me a break? like? No, for real. I even had somebody, they were like, well, if you were a decent person, then you would turn all your information over to the FBI because it's their case anyways. And I'm like, what are you talking about? The FBI has never been involved in this case. They said that if the local officials would invite them, they would be glad to, but the local officials wouldn't. so I'm not sure what you think the FBI is going to do about an 80-year-old case that was closed. Right. You're like, I wish. I would love for somebody from the FBI to get involved.
1:03:10Like, you know, how about they do this instead of me? But you bring up a really good point. I wonder, I mean, I'm assuming that everything's closed, but is this case open, like, anywhere in any department? No, nobody, there aren't even any departments that have any documents on it anymore because it was closed. So like everything has already been gotten rid of. The only people that have the documents are me and their granddaughter Jenny and anybody that she has sent the documents to um but yeah no it's it's still closed I would I don't exactly know how to go about it I I would like to get it reclassified um not necessarily reopened although it might be the same thing just because I don't expect anybody to really investigate this because there's not really anything to investigate like you can't interview anybody you can't look through evidence like everything is gone but I would like it to be reclassified just so it's not ruled as an accident anymore because a lot of people point to that they're like well that they investigated it they ruled it an accident.
1:04:37And I'm like, okay, they said they investigated it, but they didn't. So, you know, I think if we could get it, you know, reclassified, even just undetermined, like that, that would be cool with me. Do you think that there's a piece of evidence out there that exists that could give us a definitive answer on this that would make everybody say, okay, this definitely was arson. As far, like, if the kids grew up and did have families of their own, then obviously DNA would be the answer. And the number one question I get is, have you submitted DNA? Yes, I have submitted DNA. Other members of my family have as well.
1:05:26uh since i'm so far down the line it's less likely that i would be a viable match but we i do have you know um relatives that would have been closer to them that have submitted dna so you know that that's the obvious answer but i don't know realistically i think it's too late for this case to really be solved. So unless, you know, someone has the, like the, the original, um, fire marshal case file, uh, we don't know, like the fire marshal doesn't have, have it anymore, and we're not entirely sure if it was gotten rid of or what. Um, but you know, if somebody happens to have that or, you know, if the people that did it happen to write their confession down somewhere and it's just sitting in somebody's attic.
1:06:29Other than that, I really don't know what, at this point, could be brought forward. Yeah, I mean, I think that's fair. And you just never know. Like, people go into their attics and find documents or somebody's about to pass away and they're like, hey, I maybe didn't tell you about this. I feel like we see older cases like this solved all the time or at least get more answers. So I don't think it's totally, you know, out of range of possibility. I think that there's still, you know, a lot that could be discovered. It just it's hard. Are people keeping secrets and for what reason? You know, what was retained?
1:07:11But yeah, I mean, I'm a firm believer that there's always hope, which I, you know, I do want to ask, you know, best case scenario, best case scenario, what does justice look like for you at this point? I think that really all that matters to me now is getting the truth out there. And, you know, it's important to me and to Sylvia's daughter, Jenny, that people know that Jordan and Jenny were so much more than what happened to them. You know, they were kind, they were caring, they were strong-willed people that still cared about others despite what was done to them. And I think the fact that they stated that they would be willing to waive prosecution just to learn what happened to their kids speaks volumes about the type of people they were.
1:08:07You know, they were not, I mean, I'm sure a small part of them was interested in getting the people that did this, but the bottom line was that they just wanted their kids back. That's all that, if that's all that happened, and even if they couldn't, even if the kids were dead and they could just learn that, like, that's all they wanted was to know what happened to their kids. And I think, you know, really what justice to me would just be making sure people know that and making sure that they tried to get justice, but they basically weren't allowed it. I always like to end things on how we can help.
1:08:59How can my listeners right now help you? Is there a way to help you or is it just sharing the story? just continue to share the story um and you can also join uh my facebook group um it's just the missing solder children uh i'll that's where i'll be putting any updates i um may have and where i'll also share you know any coverage that i would recommend listening to that um would be accurate uh i just ask that everyone bear with me while i try to figure it out since i'm you know just one person. I would also really love to get a flower garden for them somewhere in Fayetteville. Their granddaughter, Jenny, still has the flowers from Jenny Sautter's original memorial garden, and she's agreed to donate them if I, you know, can make it happen.
1:09:54I'm still trying to work on the logistics for that, but at some point I would probably have a petition for people to sign just to show that, you know, it isn't just the family that thinks George and Jane deserve something, that it's more than that. I love that. And obviously, I will do anything I can to help, and I think my listeners will too. Yeah. And, you know, I wouldn't recommend going and buying anything on this just because, like I've said, a lot of stuff isn't super accurate. So I would just be, I would be cautious about that because I know that whenever people learn about a case, they want to, you know, dig into it as much as they can.
1:10:41And I would just suggest that you be cautious about it. And, but like I said, my Facebook group, I'll, you know, anything that I recommend that you listen to slash, you know, read will be posted on there. Yeah. I mean, who knows better than you? I think that that's perfect. Before we end, is there anything else that you wanted to say? Any questions? Again, anything else we can do to help? Absolutely anything. Oh, you know, there is one thing I forgot to mention as far as what I have uncovered. So you remember the older man picture that was sent to Jenny in 1967? So I was able to run that picture and the picture of the younger Louis through Amazon's facial comparison software.
1:11:35And first, just to test it, I took pictures of my dad from around the same ages, and I made them black and white and ran them through. And it said that it was, you know, because obviously it's not going to be 100%. It said that it was an 80 % chance that it was the same person. Well, when I ran the older man picture and the picture of lewis it was a less than one percent chance that it was the same person uh so which was you know a little rough but i i kind of suspected that um you know it it is very heartbreaking thinking of jenny because you know she fully believed it was him She fully believed it.
1:12:18She had it framed. She put it on the billboard. So that's, you know, so tough to think about. But I think more than likely it was just sent by a detective that just wanted more money. And, you know, unfortunately that happened. And they did have some good private detectives, but, you know, they also had some bad ones as well that just wanted, you know, money from them. And I think that's what happened there. But in a way, it's, you know, a good thing because that picture just was another rabbit hole to go down. Because, you know, the writing on the back of the picture, there's so many theories on it and there's nothing concrete.
1:13:04and, you know, that's just one less thing that I have to consider in, you know, in the grand scheme of things. Yeah, absolutely. I think eliminating a possibility, you know, can be extremely helpful even though it is, you know, painful. Yeah, and I will also say, you know, George and Jenny thought that they saw a picture of Betty in a magazine in 1946. And there are pictures floating around that claim to be the picture, but the reality is that we do not know what the picture is. It's believed that we know that it was sent in 1946 because Marion, their oldest sister, she wrote a letter in January of 1947 to a school in New York asking about the girl in the picture so it's believed that they when they saw the picture they ripped it out of the magazine and they only kept the picture because in the letter she did reference a specific news or newspaper a specific magazine which I was able to track down and buy a magazine from 1946 Can you believe it?
1:14:25It's crazy. But and there's nothing in it that mentions the school that she wrote to. And there's not anything resembling Betty in that magazine. So it's believed that they didn't remember what the magazine was. But we do know it was seen sometime in 1946. but you know just it really any picture that you see circulating like I've seen pictures that claim to be the house I've seen pictures that claim to be all like there's one picture of 10 kids but they're all super blonde and that gets circulated as the solder kids even though every single solder kid had very dark hair. So, you know, I would just be cautious when seeing stuff like that, because just because, you know, like I keep saying this, this story has been circulated for so long.
1:15:30And, you know, people just want to add whatever information they think will get people to read it. And so just be, you know, super cautious in believing stuff like that, unless it comes, Like, I hate to say don't believe it unless it comes from me, but you get what I'm saying. Don't leave things that, you know, every random person says. Like, I got tagged in one thing that every single thing in it was wrong. And they even quoted me as saying something that I, for one, never said, and two, never even talked to whoever this person was, you know. Oh, I hate that. Yeah. Well, unfortunately, my family has had to deal with that for the past 80 years.
1:16:22So. Yeah. I wish more people knew that sometimes people just straight make things up. Just absolutely make things up. And, yeah, it's hard, right? Because how do you balance that? Because if you just say, like, come to me for all the information, people are like, but also, like, again, you have all the information. I don't think there's a person that exists with more information than you, other than maybe somebody who was, like, firsthand involved in the crime. Yeah, for sure. You know, yeah, and, like, I've— tend to not believe things that are only mentioned one time. Like I read one article that said that the family dog went missing and was later found in town.
1:17:13And when I asked their granddaughter about it, she was like, I've literally never heard that before. So, you know, like I said, people just like to add stuff just, you know, because they think it'll, you know, help push the story for whatever reason, which sucks. I don't understand that mindset, but, you know, unfortunately, it does happen. And especially with this case, because of what all is on the internet, it's so hard to tell what is legit and what isn't. Yeah, absolutely. It's so hard to discern what's real and what's not, especially nowadays and with AI. And I could go on about that forever.
1:17:58But yeah, I think you make a lot of great points. And I think everybody should join your Facebook group. Oh, and I'll also say, people bring this up to me a lot too. History's greatest mysteries on the History Channel did one about this. It's not great, unfortunately. laurence fishburn really let me down on that one um but yeah oh yeah it you know it i do appreciate that they focused on the kidnapping aspect more than it being an accident i i will i will give them credit for that. But it's, I know, it's the coverages that I know have the majority of the same information that I do, and they still misrepresent it.
1:18:58That's, you know, if you are covering the case and you don't know, you don't have access to the same documents I do, then I don't fault you for getting stuff wrong because, you know, it's easy to do because there's not accurate information available out there. But if you knowingly get stuff wrong despite having the correct information, that's when I get a little irked about it. And I think that's fair. You know what I mean? I don't think any family in true crime is expecting perfection, right? We all make mistakes. I've told my sister's story wrong. I'm sure you've gotten a thing or two wrong.
1:19:39It happens all the time. But, you know, I spend a lot of time dissecting really these specials, like on the History Channel, right? And I think people don't understand, like, there's a reason why it's not just a news broadcast. Like, this is a production. They're telling a story. They're there to get viewers. They're not always there to tell it extremely accurately. And unfortunately, even in the History Channel, right? I think a lot of us live through the dupe that was that like mermaid's mockumentary or whatever. It's not the same standard as it was when we were watching, you know, the specials in school or whatever.
1:20:18It's these broadcasts, these, you know, documentaries, these programs, whatever they are, they're there for entertainment and that is their first priority and then second it's like getting things right um and I hate to say it but I feel like that's the hard truth of it yeah and you know I've had so many people you know suggest to me that you know you should reach out to this show or this show or you should have a movie made about it and i'm like no i i would not ever do that like i for one you know george and jenny i doubt george and jenny would want that to happen and two i'm not gonna risk you know the getting them getting the story wrong just because they want to sensationalize it.
1:21:16Yeah. I mean, and when you do productions like that, you know, they can make you an executive producer or give you, you know, creative consultation or whatever, but ultimately it's never in your hands and you just have to deal with what they put out. And oftentimes you are contractually obligated to stay silent on that. And I wish more people knew that too. You know what I mean? Like, there's so many reasons to not participate in those programs, and I totally get it. Oh, yeah. Unless you can agree to not only give me full clearance over, you know, approving everything before it's produced, but you can also agree that you are not going to make money off of it and that you'll do, you'll either, you know, donate the money to somebody I wanted to be donated to or, you know, something else, then I would not agree to it.
1:22:11And I know that no production company is going to be like, oh, yeah, we'll make this and not make money off of it. Sure. I was going to say, right, like, let's be real. They wouldn't even agree to just like recouping their costs and breaking even. It's just not the way that it happens. Like, and I love that we're talking about like true crime in the entertainment industry. It's something I'm so passionate about. And I think it's just important for people to realize the reality of it, right? And they can make up their own minds about it, right? Do you think it's okay? Do you think it's not okay to profit off this type of stuff?
1:22:45Like, I think that's kind of for everyone to decide. But knowing how it actually happens behind the scenes is extremely crucial in them making that decision for themselves, right? Like, how is the bacon made? And nine times out of 10 in this industry, it's pretty unethical. It's pretty horrible for the families involved. And it's not just like not getting paid. It's the trauma of it all. It's having to watch this final production that, you know, could be vastly inaccurate. Yes. And I read about that all the time. And, And, you know, like with the Dahmer show that Ryan Murphy did, you know, people, I didn't watch it because the families of the victims were so upset by it.
1:23:39And I think if there's a right way and a wrong way to do it, right? Like if you, and with anything, not just, you know, like movies and TV shows, but with true crime books as well. Like if you do not have the family's interest at heart, then, you know, you really shouldn't be doing it. Like, I don't think that you should be able to profit off of somebody else's tragedy, if that makes sense. you know i think it's hard because i think money rules everything is like the unfortunate reality in our society so i think when you remove that monetary incentive it removes incentive altogether and like if there was no money to be had in true crime i fear that so many of these crucial stories would not be shared when they need to i do think it would lead to less resolutions in these cases but i also think that there has to be a balance and i think that people need to be more honest.
1:24:42You know, if you create something specifically going against the will of a family, you know, then be bold enough to say it and tell your audience that and deal with the consequences of that. I think one of the most harmful things I see is when people know that they are purposely harming a family and disguise it as not that. I think it's fundamentally not honest. I think it's fundamentally, you know, against the victim at the center of the stories. I mean, that's certainly not what they would want. You know, and of course, like there's exceptions, right? You know, if a family is like directly involved and could be like the perpetrators of the case, that's one thing.
1:25:18But like something like this, you know, to your point, I think somebody could make an amazing production following you and what you're doing and then, you know, donate the proceeds to, you know, the flower garden, right? To, you know, some type of beautiful memorial. I think that's one of the ways that we could really get like the best of all worlds in true crime. Yeah, I think, you know, that I mean, that would that would be great. I don't know that I would want people following me around now. I'm not gonna lie to you. I mean, fair. I mean, fair. It is like the worst thing ever. But, you know, I think what I see in you right now is like what I saw in myself in that, like, I had to have a million people tell me like, hey, like, you're a part of this too.
1:26:02And what you're doing matters and people care about what you're doing. That's something I still struggle with today. Like when people are like, no, like we care about you. And I'm like, me? Like, I'm not the missing kid in this story, right? But people, you know, they do care about you and they care about the journey that you go on. And like I said, it's taken me years and I still struggle with it. But I do feel like that's part of the story, too. You know, this like generational curse, for lack of a better word, that families like you and I have to deal with when these cases just go, you know, unsolved or unresolved or without answers for so long.
1:26:42So in short, you know, give yourself credit. I would watch a documentary following you around. But also you have the right to say no thank you. Listen, they'd just be seeing me sitting with my cats the whole time. Cats and a big stack of papers. Yes. Oh, my goodness. A big stack of papers. My binder is so thick. And I haven't even added anything more to it, even though I need to. I just, you know, I kind of did this really quickly. But, you know, I will say that, you know, you have been a huge inspiration for me. Because, you know, I listened to your podcast for a long time before I decided to do this.
1:27:26And, you know, when I finally listened to the coverage that you did on the case, that's when I was like, you know what? I should reach out to her, but I should also start doing it myself. I think that I, you know, because I've played around with the idea for years, but I just never was really ready. And then I finally was just like, you know what, I'm going to do it. I'm going to try. And, you know, if it doesn't work out, it doesn't work out. But I've, you know, learned to trust the universe with this. And I know that if something is meant to happen, then it will. And if it's not, then okay. Well, thank you.
1:28:10That really does mean a lot to me. Like always makes me tear up when people say that. I don't know. I love family member led true crime. I think that that is like the most raw and honest, you know, because I think we can easily come in here and say like, we're family. So yeah, of course we're biased. But I also have the best intentions with figuring out the answers in this case. And especially in your case, like you have absolutely nothing to hide. You know, you're so, of course, you're family, right? But you're so far removed with the time of it all. It's like, you know, you just want the answers.
1:28:44And I think when it's such a raw and pure mission like that, it's something that I love to hear about. And I think it's something that people also love to cheer on. So in short, like, you know, I think you're amazing. And, you know, I would support and love to help you do anything you want to do with this case. And I genuinely think people are going to be excited to hear from you, and they're going to want to hear from you more. Like, I would be so fascinated to hear an entire series of you telling this story with all the information that you found.
1:29:19I've toyed around with it a little bit. I'm, you know, maybe one day I would like to do, I certainly would have plenty to talk about. I, you know, I would definitely need to learn how to separate everything just because there is so much talk about. And like, you know, I can I can ramble for, you know, hours about one specific thing. But, you know, maybe I might do it one day. I think it would I definitely think people would love to hear it. Um, you know, I, you know, and I would, whatever advice you would have for me for that, I would love to hear it too. I mean, that's something I could talk about all day and we can, um, we can.
1:30:08Um, but yeah, I think I just, I don't know, I love what you're doing and I want to support in any way I can. And, um, please never hesitate to reach out. And I hope that this interview, you know, will just draw more people to your group and to you and to follow you. You know what I mean? more so than, you know, sharing my episodes or whatever. I'd rather them go to you. So I also have an email since, you know, I am a one-person investigative team. My tip email is the number five and then solderkids at gmail.com. So the number five, S-O-D-D-E-R-K-I-D-S at gmail.com. And, you know, that's for if you, you know, have any tips or, you know, I would really love to see since, you know, the billboard was up for decades.
1:31:02If anybody happens to have any pictures, I would love to see pictures that people have taken. Or, you know, if you if you just have any questions, like that's mainly the emails I've gotten so far is just people asking more questions. And I, you know, as long as I have the time, I'm more than willing to answer them. I just wanted to thank you for taking the time to do this with me. I know that it's not easy. It's not fun, especially this time of year. But I do appreciate it. No, of course. I'm I'm I was so excited to be able to do this. I've I've been hoping that I could get on your podcast for a while because I knew that one, I knew you'd come up with really good questions than you did.
1:31:47And, you know, talking to you is always fun. So. Oh, my gosh, you're so sweet. Anytime, anytime. Insurance isn't one size fits all. That's why customers have enjoyed Progressive's Name Your Price tool for years now. With the Name Your Price tool, you tell them what you want to pay and they'll show you options that fit your budget. So whether you're picking out your first policy or just looking for something that works better for you and your family, They make it easy to see your options. Visit Progressive.com. Find a rate that works for you with the Name Your Price tool. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates.
1:32:22Price and coverage match limited by state law. Monday.com AI agents took over my work. And I absolutely love it. Chasing deadlines, writing status reports, updating stakeholders. Agents handle the daily grind now. I stay in the loop only when it matters. Create your own AI agent in minutes on Monday.com.
From the publisher
At around 1:00 am on December 25, 1945, Jennie Sodder woke up to smoke pouring into her bedroom. She woke up her husband, George, and they started evacuating the house of their nine children. By the time the fire took over the Sodder residence, only Jennie, George, and four of their children made it outside safely.
George and two of his sons frantically tried to get into the house to save the remaining children, but they couldn’t. When George went to fill up a bucket with water to start extinguishing the flames, the water was frozen, when he went to grab their ladder to get his children from the top story, the ladder was missing; when he went to drive his trucks to the second story window, neither would start despite having worked just the day before. And when they tried to call the fire department for help, no one responded for hours.
The only thing the family could do was watch as their home burned to the ground. Hours later, after the smoldering ashes were put out, a group of people began searching for the children’s remains, but nothing was found. Not a single bone was found in the ashes. The fire was quickly ruled an accident, and investigators told the family the children’s bodies had burned up completely in the fire, leaving nothing of them behind, not even their bones.
But between the mishaps, while trying to put out the fire, threats made against the family before the fire, and the strange behavior of authorities throughout the investigation, Jennie and George Sodder refused to believe five of their children were killed in the home. They were convinced their children didn’t die in the fire, and they spent the rest of their lives trying to prove it.
Anyone with information is urged to contact Miranda Weeks, great great granddaughter of Jennie and George Sodder at 5SodderKids@gmail.com
Join Miranda's Facebook Group:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/25548885931374708
Sign Miranda's petition to create a flowerbed for the Sodder children: https://www.change.org/p/create-a-flower-garden-for-the-sodder-children-in-fayetteville-wv
For more information about the show, visit VoicesforJusticePodcast.com.
Follow us on social media:
Twitter: @VFJPod
Instagram: @VoicesforJusticePodcast
TikTok: @VoicesforJusticePodcast
Facebook: @VoicesforJusticePodcast
Voices for Justice is hosted by Sarah Turney
Twitter: @SarahETurney
Instagram: @SarahETurney
TikTok: @SarahETurney
Facebook: @SarahETurney
YouTube: @SarahTurney
The introduction music used in Voices for Justice is Thread of Clouds by Blue Dot Sessions. Outro music is Melancholic Ending by Soft and Furious. The track used for ad transitions is Pinky by Blue Dot Sessions.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




