Is Tech Dismantling Democracy?

0:00This message is brought to you by today's sponsor, Walden University. Set a course for change. Now is the time to make a real change in your life, career, and community. At Walden University, we give you the support and flexibility to get the W. Walden's online programs are designed for working professionals like you. You'll gain hands-on skills to take on real-world challenges and succeed. Your future is waiting and Walden is here to help you achieve it. Take the first step to make your impact. Visit waldenu.edu. Walden University. Set a course for change. Certified to operate by Shev. Your call has been forwarded to an automatic voice message system.

0:39A missed call doesn't feel like anything. No red flag. No notifications screaming at you. It just disappears into your call log. And nine times out of ten, that was someone ready to hand you money. That's why today's episode is brought to you by Quo, spelled Q-U-O. The business phone system built so you never miss a call. Here's what I like about it. All your calls, texts, and voicemails live in one place, so anyone on your team can pick up a conversation, see the full history, and respond fast. No more, wait, who talked to this customer last? And if you're worried about after-hours leads slipping through, Quo's optional built-in AI agent can answer questions and even book appointments while your team's offline.

1:20It's the number one rated business phone system on G2, and over 90 ,000 businesses already trust it to stay reachable. Money is on the line. Always say hello with Quo. Try Quo for free. Plus get 20 % off your first six months when you go to Quo.com slash tech. That's Q-U-O dot com slash tech.

1:48When I sat down with Jill Lepore, I asked her to tell me a story. one that begins in the 1930s, in a moment when American democracy was fragile. Two years before FDR's election in 1932, the country was really struggling with the Depression. There was a fair amount of support for fascism in the United States, the American Bund, and a lot of support for communism. Like, democracy is not working for us. Jill's a historian, a professor at Harvard. She's won the Pulitzer Prize and is a staff writer at The New Yorker. Her new book, The Rise and Fall of the Artificial State, is about how technology is corroding democracy.

2:34It comes out next week. This story I asked her to tell about the 30s holds some lessons for today. There was a third movement that people have forgotten about called technocracy, with a capital T. and under the banner of Technocracy Incorporated. And it was led in the United States by a guy named Howard Scott and in Canada by a guy named Joshua Haldeman. So technocracy, it sounds preposterous, except also it sounds creepily familiar. Technocrats believed that democracy was obsolete and not up to the task of dealing with technological and economic change in the modern world. And that therefore there should be no elections, there should be no politicians, also shouldn't be any banks.

3:16There really shouldn't be any jobs. And that engineers and scientists would rule over everyone else. Hundreds of thousands of Americans and Canadians joined this movement. They wore identical gray suits. They drove around in gray cars. They had these gray parades. They had their huge, like tens of thousands of people would show up in stadiums for technocracy speeches. Technocracy would eventually fail. In part because because when you don't believe in elections, it can be hard to come to power. FDR was elected in 1932 and ushered in the New Deal. The American technocracy leader, Howard Scott, was later revealed to be a fraud.

3:55His Canadian counterpart, Joshua Haldeman, eventually moved to South Africa in 1950, because he supported the apartheid system.

4:06he publishes self-publishes a lot of uh like crazy white supremacist tracks anti-semitic tracks he's opposed to vaccines anyway joshua haldeman is important in my story because technocracy is important as a antecedent to modern silicon valley techno libertarianism but he's also important because it happens that he is elon musk's grandfather Today on the show, Jill Lepore on how technology captured American life, politics, and democracy, and how we can take it back. I'm Lizzie O 'Leary in for Mary Harris, and you're listening to What Next? Stick around.

4:52Hi, Brooke DeVard, host of Naked Beauty. Picture this, you walking from the cold and every room already feels like fall. That's what whole home scenting means at Pira. One system working quietly in the background so your home always feels like the season and like you. Learn more at Pira.com. Hi, this is Nicaela Matthews-Okome from SideHustle Pro. The sale's right there. Don't miss it. This holiday, give shoppers a flexible way to pay with PayPal Pay Later and turn them into regulars. PayPal is built for all business. Get started at paypal.com slash business. Hi, this is Mark Bittman from the podcast Food with Mark Bittman.

5:33I've been writing about food and restaurants for almost 50 years, my whole career, really. And what I know is that the good restaurants all have something in common. They're busy. Genuinely, chaotically busy. And somehow, in the last few years, the best of them have begun to make it look easy. And do you know why? Because they're running on Toast's technology. Toast is built for restaurant owners who understand that Toast's tools keep the line moving and keep their customers happy, with fewer mistakes and hiccups in ordering and paying. For owners, that turns busy into business. To learn more, head to ToastTab.com.

6:14That's T-O-A-S-T-T-A-B, ToastTab.com. Toast, built for busy.

6:26Let's define the artificial state and explain to people what you mean. Because it sounds like you're talking about AI, but your definition is much broader. And it seems to begin with this idea of kind of making people into data. Yeah. So I mean it to describe what is the sort of emerging successor, possible successor to the liberal nation state, right? The liberal nation state, like a democratic constitutional society, that's not that old. It's like really the late 18th century that we have this kind of system of government. Government by the consent of the people. Like you count the people and you count their votes and they give their consent.

7:01But the artificial state is government by machine in which our consent is not required, asked for, sought after or in any way solicited. We are increasingly ruled by machines. And there are ways you can take a look at how that is in some ways already in place. It's also kind of a fantasy. It's a real fantasy of a certain number of Silicon Valley merchant princes. They don't believe in liberal democracy. They believe essentially in technocracy. But if you think about social media, which is where most people in the United States and around the world get their news one way or the other, there are more bots on every single social media platform than there are humans.

7:47You know, those bots can be owned by, you know, foreign actors. They could be owned by foreign governments. They could be owned by corporations, foreign corporations. They could be run by terrorists. They could be like subversive bots by foreign actors. Like you have no way of knowing what the bot. They could be perfectly innocent just like trying to increase traffic to someone's like X page or whatever, X account. But our public sphere, a place where people come together to deliberate democratically, to learn about the world, to gain knowledge that is required of citizens to act responsibly in a democracy.

8:28It's not really a public sphere anymore, right? It's an artificial place. It's a largely virtual place. And it is owned by corporations. And governments have pretty much nothing to do with it. Nor do people. We're not setting the rules of social media. they're set by corporations in their terms of use and i don't think that was this not like a dark sinister conspiracy like the artificial state's not like the deep state like well like some sinister conspiracy that i have imagined like you can figure out like well okay it was more efficient to do things this way or you know when newspapers decided to go digital it was like that was going to be a way to deal with that the internet existed and still have a circulation or well but then then you don't have the whole paper you have mass circulation or shared experience of reading the paper, then you have individual stories that are sent to you and just to you.

9:13And then, well, then you maybe don't have stories. Maybe you have like summaries of those stories that are sent to you by someone who's amplifying a certain point. And then you no longer see the stories that might tell you something that you really need to know about because people with money want you to see only these stories. Like, it just kind of happened. Yeah, you're describing something that feels, this is going to sound nerdy, but sort of akin to the tax code where little aspects of it were created and sprung up in different ways. And now it's a coherent entity. But I think someone might listen to you and say, wait a minute, I'm not governed by a machine.

9:44I wonder if you could make that manifest in someone's daily life. How are they governed by a machine if they don't realize it? An example would be Twitter. So Twitter's founded in, I think, 2006. And it's just a goof. It's meant to be like, oh, what did you have for lunch today? I had a tuna fish sandwich. It was good. It was tasty. Did you put chopped cucumbers in yours or do you rather have pickles? But if you fast forward to 2012, by then, really, like for instance, every member of Congress at that point has a Twitter account. And Twitter has decided to market itself as the replacement for the town hall.

10:20So they call Twitter the town hall meeting in your pocket. And they print this like Twitter elections handbook, like a guide for candidates and office holders how to use Twitter to run your campaign, to communicate with your constituents. And, you know, so increasingly Twitter is offering itself as a replacement for face-to-face democratic deliberation and face-to-face campaigning, right? And you're like, OK, well, it may be innocent enough and maybe so. But meanwhile, at that time, and certainly over the following years, like to go from like 2012 to 2022 when Musk buys Twitter, something like fewer than, I think, 20 % of Americans even has a Twitter account.

11:05And most people don't use their Twitter accounts. And above 90 % of all posts on Twitter about politics are posted by fewer than 10 % of Twitter users. And the people on Twitter who do post about politics, which is a tiny proportion of a tiny proportion are ideologically extreme and their posts have a radicalizing consequence. And so now you think, okay, you're a member of Congress and you're like, I wonder how I should vote about this housing bill. I guess I'll just look to Twitter. What are people saying on Twitter? And then it's going to actually inform your views, or maybe you'd put out a query on Twitter and get some ideas back.

11:43And that's not really representative anymore. I mean, that's a very skewed section of the electorate that you are consulting with the idea that you are doing your due diligence as a representative of the people. But then you fast forward to now, again, there are more bots on X than there are humans. And people are still using Twitter as if it is a reliable source of information about public opinion. Not treating it as a sort of a billionaire's deranged play thing? I think people think it's both. I think people still, you still hear like, what are people saying on X about that? Like as if that's like people as opposed to the strange and highly unrepresentative segment of the population that is on Twitter and where they are vastly outnumbered by bots who have political and financial interests.

12:29So it's sort of an external manifestation of how some of these things sort of come to play in communications, right? Or in members of Congress trying to talk to people. You also write about a very internal version of it, which is really the rise of data and targeted advertising, both in the political sphere, but then also as it comes to underpin all of these big social media companies. Where do you see targeted ads as being so dangerous? You know, targeted ads go back to the 1950s when Eisenhower was kind of fatally convinced by his campaign that they really needed to run their campaign using an ad company.

13:14And Adlai Stevenson famously called it the Corn Flakes campaign because it was, you know, like, do you want Crest or do you want Colgate? Like they were the ads of the political ads of the 1950s seem to reduce the choice of electing a president to choosing a brand of toothpaste. And that was a fair criticism. And Stevenson was really upset about that. And he offered a very coherent criticism of it. And if you go back and look at, I once did a podcast episode looking at the records of the advertising company that Eisenhower retained. And it's pretty concerning the way that worked. But their tools were, of course, incredibly primitive.

13:48I think it's by the late 1950s. I once wrote a book about this company called the Simulmatics Corporation that was founded in 1958 by like a madman, like a Madison Avenue ad guy and a political scientist and a computer scientist. And they built what they called a people machine. They said they wanted to use the techniques of a kind of scientific representative sampling of the population that good polling industries used, marry that to the strategies of advertising agencies to simulate the American electorate and provide advice to candidates about like if then. And my book was called If Then, because like if you, they're really, they were retained by the DNC than by the Kennedy campaign.

14:34If you talk more about that, you're a Catholic, then voters, you know, Protestant voters and Jewish voters in Detroit will vote this way. You know, some of them will switch, this number of them will switch to Stevenson. This number of them will gain your support. If you do this, then that, if you do, they just kind of simulate the electorate and model it out. So they founded this company to do that and they did so with great success. But we forget, for instance, that the Kennedy campaign, when it came out and the news stories were like, a robot elected Kennedy. They denied ever use. They just lied and said, we didn't hire them.

15:14We don't even know who these people are. because it was so embarrassing, because it would have been so scandalous to admit in 1960 that you had used a mainframe computer to simulate the electorate and test out your messages. So I find the shock that people expressed at the time about where that might lead really revealing. Because almost everything that they said in the 1960s about things like the people machine, the damage that it could potentially do to a democracy has since come to pass. Like their predictions were very, very accurate. So I think it's worth revisiting that history. And it's also worth remembering that we live in a time, I think people are, feel that they're kind of flooding.

16:03They're like drowning in a sea of uncertainty. and that what to hold on to as a kind of raft that's floating by are, you know, the manifestos of tech futurists who say, well, there'll be no poverty in five years. There'll be robots in your living room bringing you cups of tea. That these people know better than the rest of us, that we don't actually understand the world. Like we need the technocracy movement because this stuff is just so far above us. But the ideas that these technologists have, they're kind of shitty ideas from the past. Technocracy was a terrible idea. It was a terrible idea.

16:42You talk about the rights language, particularly the tech rights language around AI as kind of a religious fervor. There are these manifestos. Mark Zuckerberg released one last week. But I guess a question I have is, do you believe that they are genuine? Like, do they believe this? Or are they kind of breathing life into a world that would be profitable for them? Is it that cynical? Or is there belief there? I think it's both. I think I would lean toward more of the cynicism, but I wouldn't discredit some sincerity to it. I think it is part of a long pattern and a culture in Silicon Valley that dates to the 1980s, when Apple first promised that the Macintosh in 1984 would save us from an Orwellian future, that the Macintosh, the personal computer, would aid an advanced democracy.

17:39And to the 1990s, when libertarians convinced Congress that the internet should be a lawless place with no regulations and no rule for government, and that that would aid democracy. It would be emancipatory and liberating for humankind. So when Zuckerberg comes around in 2004 with Facebook's mission statement and its later mission statements, we're making the world a better place. We're connecting all of humanity. We have the future of civilization in our hands. All will be well. This will empower the people and democratize the world. That didn't come out of nowhere. That rhetoric had been in place since the 1980s.

18:18And it was part of how Silicon Valley sold its products to the American public and exported them to the world as an American export. These tools mean freedom. It's a culture of belief that's part of, like in the 1960s, it was called the California ideology, which kind of married counterculturalism to libertarianism. And that's still the vibe that remains the vibe. That's why you can wear a hoodie, but be a totalitarian. And like, that's, that's, they drink that water. And one of the things that's also sincere is, as a cultural element of Silicon Valley is the rejection of all forms of knowledge that are different from those that can be derived through coding.

19:05So for instance, the study of history is renounced. Remember when the dot-com and then the early tech startups and the serial entrepreneurship of disruptive innovation, it was always like, whatever you do, don't study the past. Do you want to start Uber? Don't look at the history of taxis or don't collect information about urban traffic, all this social science history, urban planning. Just fucking do it. Just do it, man. Just do it. Just do it. Um, that was an ethos and it is still an ethos. And so I think they don't know that their political ideas are crap and they've been discredited a century ago, that they've been tried and that they failed.

19:48They're so, I think, convinced of the novelty of their own. We're at the cusp of a new era in the human condition, which, okay, we are like, we are like, like I can see that. But, uh, the technology is new and the politics is very old.

20:05When we come back, how the artificial state might fall.

20:33business easy. You log your hours, you send a branded invoice, you get paid and know your numbers instead of chasing them. Money in, money out, all in one place. No more juggling one app for clients, another for billing, plus a pile of spreadsheets and emails. FreshBooks is designed for how small business owners think about money, not how an accountant does. You don't need a financial background to use FreshBooks. It's simple on purpose. Most owners are up and running in minutes, not days. And if you need help, a real person is available on every plan. FreshBooks has been trusted by service businesses for over 20 years, helping over 500 ,000 owners and solopreneurs run their business confidently.

21:13Right now, my listeners can get FreshBooks for less than three bucks a month for your first four months. That is 90 % off. Head to freshbooks.com slash podcast to get started. That's 90 % off under three bucks a month for four months at freshbooks.com slash podcast.

21:34Hi, Brooke DeVard, host of Naked Beauty. Picture this, you walking from the cold and every room already feels like fall. That's what whole home scenting means at Pura. One system working quietly in the background so your home always feels like the season and like you. Learn more at Pura.com.

21:57I think one of the ways in this comes up in your book a lot is this profound misreading of science fiction. Right. A lot of the second half of your book is looking at science fiction and perhaps aware members of Silicon Valley Tech Right read it wrong. do they understand that they're reading it wrong like how do they square this circle for themselves like haha look I named all my things after evil parts of Tolkien like that's where I have this big question mark hanging in the air yeah I don't know I mean like they're not one person like Peter Thiel is a different view than Jeff Bezos and um you know they're not books people um even Jeff Bezos You know, they're really not books people.

22:43Like the stuff about Anthropic recently, you know, ripping the spines off all these books to get new data before AI slop corrupted what they could possibly collect online. I like it's just metaphorical to me of like the disdain for the kind of knowledge that is contained in books that can be extracted. And I think it's I don't mean to be personal about it, but some of it is just dispositional. Everybody knows someone who would rather like call DoorDash and get some tacos delivered than go to the corner taqueria and like order a taco and talk to the person behind the bar who's putting together your taco.

23:23But I think there's a point at which the dehumanization accumulates and then people are like, wow, I really kind of do miss going to vote in person. Or I actually did like the bake sale when you had to drop out, you know, go in and do your ballot and like talk to that lady who staffs the table. Like there was fun. That was kind of fun. And like it's nice to do my absentee voting because I'm on the road a lot. But like, I'm really just kind of interested here in thinking about what does it mean for a democracy? When, when, when we talk about a Supreme Court, we might be talking about Facebook Supreme Court.

23:59When we talk about a constitution, we might be talking about Claude's constitution. When we talk about the presidency, we might be talking about Sam Altman thinks we should have an AI president, like the trappings of what makes our government, the sort of 18th century foundations that make being free in the world today in the United States possible. are being very slowly dismantled, like with every click of our phones. There's a social piece that we can see. You can see, and you're like, oh, you can make a choice. But there's a political piece that I don't think people are specifically choosing.

24:35And you see it in the backlash against data centers. I think that's rare. You see the manifestation of the accumulation of, I do feel kind of dehumanized. I don't know why we need this. You know, like that, you hear that. I think you hear that in a different way than you heard it in 2012 or 2016 or 2020. So I want to get to data centers, but I want to ask you first, because I think there is a reading someone could take of this book that says, E, Jill doesn't like computers. And so I guess the question is like, is there a world that you can envision in which we have the Internet, but it does not lead to the fall of a liberal democracy?

25:17absolutely i think it's so cool we can talk to a machine like we can have we can communicate with something that's not human like we don't haven't connected with people from other planets i i don't know what the dolphins are saying like people get these pads for their dogs to see if their dogs can communicate with them like we have like teach sign language to apes but we've done it like it's a thing like we don't know what they're think how they're thinking whether they're thinking what is reasoning what's entirely going on. And it's also terrifying, but like, I think that's tremendously exciting.

25:48But that like, again, like we're using it to decide like which brand of cat litter would be better for me to buy. And for that reason, we have to build these massive data centers. Like why, like, where's it like, let's use this for scientific research and space exploration and the study of the oceans and the study of other planets and, and, you know, medical research and public health research, but like, why do we all have to buy this as a consumer good to do crap that's going to make people lose their jobs and destroy childhoods and have old people living with robots instead of with their families?

26:24Like just like, well, this is, this is where that's a, that's a grumpy rant that I do think you hear that grumpy rant when people show up to the data center meetings. I don't mean to keep returning to that, but I, I think there's this kind of like howl. I think that howl is accurate. And I do think that data centers are like a physical manifestation, right, of this inchoate anger, discomfort, whatever that people have been feeling. But I also think, and I heard you talk about this with Nilay Patel, like some of these networked mechanisms, even social media platforms have allowed people new pathways that would not have been possible 30, 40 years ago for kinds of people that would not have been possible.

27:09I don't know what to do with that, because you are correct that those platforms are owned by a handful of merchant princes. But the platforms themselves do seem to have some value. Yeah, I mean, I certainly I'm delighted that the Internet exists. Like I don't have a like on the other hand, everybody I talk to says like I did a piece for the New Yorker this week about the number of bots online. And the people I talked to in the bot management, bot detection industry all said the internet is going to be all bots soon. Like we will yield the internet back to the machines that it was built for so they can communicate with one another.

27:46We'll have to have like a, yeah, something like a, like a very swanky first class airport lounge that like you've never been in, but like only the humans get to go in and there'll be this other kind of, it would be like, I think it'll be just for the rich humans though. Like, I don't know. Yes. Like, I will concede there's all kinds of wonders and marvels, forms of connection, forms of communication that have been made possible by these tools. Like, I'm not an idiot. Like, I don't know. Like, who thinks that? Who's going to say, like, God damn it? No. Like, my point is that in the realm of liberal political democracy, these tools have been manifestly bad, manifestly, universally malign.

28:34And mostly not intentionally, and certainly at first, not intentionally at all. And, but I think we have arrived at a turning point in which liberal democracy is at stake.

28:51and throwing away liberal democracy so that you can have your agentic AI order you your favorite kind of pizza on a Tuesday because you always want it on a Tuesday and it's there when you get home from work. That's not worth it. So how does that take shape? How does the fall take shape? I feel like I've been saying, oh, the midterm sneaker issue is data centers. I have seen this in town hall meetings. I've seen it in the votes in Virginia a year ago. How does that become a movement and the fall part of the rise and fall begin to look more concrete? So half the book that's about the fall is largely informed by science fiction, where something that I call the parable of the artificial state has been ubiquitous in science fiction since the 1860s.

29:48When people could first imagine like, oh yeah, we're building a lot of machines that are getting better and faster. Actually, we're building something that could maybe talk. And then what if we build them something that could think? And then actually, wouldn't they just eventually become smarter than we are? And then wouldn't they rule over us? And then wouldn't we all die? And that's the parable of the artificial state. But the reason the artificial state always fails in the stories is that the machines are powered by resources from the natural world and those are finite. And without humans to monitor and protect them, they become used up.

30:18So in these stories, either humans eventually escape machine rule to the natural world and kind of have to start all over again, these weird kind of H.G. Wells-like tales, or else the machine stops because it doesn't have any more fuel. um so i think the data center piece is actually kind of interestingly on target with that parable because it's really about it's partly about do we want this wouldn't we don't we feel like someone else is making all the decisions here why are we we could be we we thought we needed housing i'm like we're building houses for machines like well why are we doing that you have a quote in hear from Sam Altman saying, if I weren't in on this, I'd be like, why do these fuckers get to decide what happens to me?

31:05That's the howl. Why do these fuckers get to decide what happens to me? So the data center thing is on target with the parable of the artificial state, because it really is about the natural world. People are like, there's only so much land. There's only so much water. There's only so much electricity. If we're going to give up the farms and the forests and the parks and the national park, like, and our electrical grid over to this. Like, maybe we do want to do that. But let's, I mean, this is the kind of really increasingly bipartisan call of, like, let's at least study this for a little while.

31:39What would be the right number and size? What would be the right places? As opposed to, we're the parts of the country where elected officials are corrupt enough to sign these NDAs and say, okay, yes, yes, you can have it. I'll I'll take all your math. Like, there are other ways to make these decisions. You know, maybe we do put data center. Maybe we decide we need them. Maybe we put them in space. Maybe we don't. You know, maybe we decide we're going to give over whole cities. We're going to like, all right, we're going to desert Houston because that should just be one big deal. I don't know what, like, you think the things that are happening now are preposterous.

32:13Wait till what could happen next unless people say, let's have a rational decision-making process here. It's as opposed to one that is just answering the stock market bubble and attempt to deliver to your venture capital commitments. One of the things I've been thinking about a lot this summer is that America is a really young country, like 250 years is not a long time. You're an historian. I wonder where you put us in our country's timeline. And are we at some fork in the road where there are multiple possible endings, just sort of depending on the public will of how to write them? You know, I am a deep admirer of the Federalist Papers, which I teach all the time.

33:06And my favorite is the First Federalist by Alexander Hamilton, in which you remember, like, the Federalist wrote the Constitution and they're like, shoot, Americans don't really want this. We have to convince. Yeah, so we got to like write all these papers to... 85 essays. They're manifestos. And Hamilton wrote... You know, in all of human history, humans have been ruled by force or by accident. You know, there could be an earthquake and that changes the fate of a people. But mainly ruled by armies, tyrants, and their soldiers. And we are at a moment in the history of humankind when it falls to this country, to the United States, to decide the important question, whether any people can be ruled not by accident and force, but by reflection and choice, by reason and votes and deliberation, by our own consent.

34:01And on this question, your decision turns. Will this country adopt this constitution in 1787 and try, become a trial, a public trial, an experiment into the question of whether it's possible for humans to rule themselves with reflection and choice instead of by accident and force? Or are we just going to like give up and vote this thing down and just go back to being kind of a crappy country ruled by the Articles of Confederation, which weren't really working? And it's a really beautiful essay. And it actually is quite a lot like some of the rhetoric you hear out of Silicon Valley. Like we are at a moment in time where we stand on a precipice where great decisions lie before us that involve the future of humankind.

34:48But I think the question offered is essentially the same. Are we going to abandon the American experiment that's been going on now for 250 years in which for all of the flaws of this nation's history and all of its shortcomings, the genius of this country was from the start and remains, we rule ourselves. We are a nation, a government by the people, for the people, and of the people. And if we don't deter the handing over of the reins of government to machines owned by corporations that choose to rule us in whatever way the owners of those corporations see fit, then we will have said no to Alexander Hamilton's Federalist number one.

35:40Jill Lepore, thank you so much for talking with me. Thank you. Jill Lepore is a Pulitzer Prize winning author and historian and the David Woods Kemper Professor of American History at Harvard. Her book, The Rise and Fall of the Artificial State, is out next week. All right, that's the show for today. What Next is produced by Rob Gunther, Evan Campbell, Madeline Thames-Ducharme, and Patrick Fort. Paige Osborne is the senior supervising producer of What Next and What Next TBD. Mia Lobel is the executive producer of podcasts here at Slate. Ben Richmond is the senior director of podcast operations.

36:18I'm Lizzie O 'Leary. You can find me on Blue Sky. I'm at Lizzie O 'Reilly. Thanks so much for listening. Talk to you soon.

36:35Hey, it's Paige DeSorbo from Giggly Squad. Everyone is always looking for a new way to make some extra cash. But sometimes the easiest place to start is your own closet. With a little help from Depop. Think about how many clothes you have that you love, but you just don't wear anymore. On Depop, it's quick and easy to list those pieces. There's no selling fees. And suddenly those clothes have a chance to find someone who actually wants them. And the best part? you're making room for whatever you're into next. Make money on Depop with no selling fees and find what you want for less. This message is brought to you by Depop.

37:0798 of the top 100 U.S. accounting firms trust Bill to simplify and secure BillPay. That's proven financial infrastructure built on over a trillion dollars of secure payments. Visit Bill.com slash proven for a special offer.