1. Podcasts
  2. What Next | Daily News and Analysis
  3. Who the "Protect College Sports Act" Actually Protects
What Next | Daily News and Analysis

1 Oct 2026 · 30m · 8 chapters

Episode artwork

Who the "Protect College Sports Act" Actually Protects

In short

The episode examines the U.S. Senate’s “Protect College Sports Act,” arguing it’s less about “protecting” college sports and more about limiting athlete pay while preserving revenue for schools and coaches.

Guest backgrounds

Alex Kirshner, Slate’s sports writer (and co-host of Split Zone Duo), discusses college sports economics and policy. Host Mary Harris interviews him.

Key claims

The bill would impose a federal “revenue sharing cap” (about $50 million/year) on what schools can spend on players, while avoiding whether athletes are employees. Critics say it will shift money away from largely non-white football players toward largely white coaches and administrators. The episode also argues the bill won’t truly fix “managed chaos” caused by NIL, direct pay, transfers, and NCAA legal losses.

Notable examples

Mississippi State QB Kamario Taylor; the “Lane Kiffin rule” (punishing coaches who leave during season); Washington State’s conference instability after Pac-12 collapse; references to Ted Cruz’s ESPN appearance and Nick Saban’s support.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes.

Chapters

3:20

The Protect College Sports Act Explained

Explore the implications of the Protect College Sports Act and who it benefits.

“Americans are anxious about the cost of living, artificial intelligence.”
8:32

The State of College Football

Discuss the current challenges and chaos in college football.

“Okay, I'm trying to figure out the urgency behind this bill, and I wonder if you can help me do that.”
14:00

The Impact of Recent Legal Changes on College Sports

Explore how legal defeats of the NCAA have led to significant changes in college athletics and athlete compensation.

“wherever they can get it, even if it's kind of like an edge case of can we do this?”
21:13

Analyzing the 'Protect College Sports Act'

A detailed discussion on the components of the bill, its implications for athletes, and the ongoing controversies surrounding it.

“I am always looking for ways to elevate our daily rituals.”
28:00

The Economics of College Sports

Explore how college sports revenue redistribution affects players and coaches.

“Their labor is under compensated historically.”
30:27

Colleges and Athletic Departments

Discuss the problematic relationship between colleges and their athletic programs.

“acknowledge that is just to not acknowledge reality.”
31:46

Legislative Prospects of the Bill

Analyze the potential impact and passage of the Protect College Sports Act.

“So I think you make a very reasonable point.”
33:59

Closing Thoughts and Guest Introduction

Wrap-up discussion with guest Alex Kirshner on the episode's themes.

“three or four paragraphs of what is in this bill.”
A man walking through an airport, asking his phone a question

Ask about this episode

Get the gist, explore an idea or ask about something said.

Claude

On What Next | Daily News and Analysis, what are the key points of this episode?

Searching your listening

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Grainger knows if you're a procurement manager at an industrial manufacturing facility, you're balancing inventory and budget while sourcing critical supplies across the operation. Too much inventory? Costs climb. Too little? Production slows. Grainger's$2 billion in on-hand inventory helps you get what you need when you need it. So you can help keep budgets balanced and lines moving. Call 1-800-GRAINGER, click grainger.com or just stop by. Grainger, for the ones who get it done.

0:32Decisions made in Washington can affect your portfolio every day. But what policy changes should investors be watching? Listen to Washington Wise, an original podcast for investors from Charles Schwab, to hear the stories making news in Washington right now. Host Mike Townsend, Charles Schwab's Managing Director for Legislative and Regulatory Affairs, takes a nonpartisan look at the stories that matter most to investors, including policy initiatives for retirement savings, taxes and trade, inflation concerns, the Federal Reserve, and how regulatory developments can affect companies, sectors, and even the entire market.

1:09Mike and his guests offer their perspective on how policy changes could affect what you do with your portfolio. Download the latest episode and follow at schwab.com slash WashingtonWise, or wherever you listen. Hey everyone, it's Mary, and I want to tell you a little bit about how this show works. It comes out of the creative minds of a whole bunch of wonderful folks. You usually hear from me or Lizzie O 'Leary. But there's also Paige, our supervisor. She spent years at public radio. So when news breaks, she is the person you want right by your side. There's Evan, who can turn what you're listening to into a video basically by snapping his fingers.

1:49There's Madeline, who a couple years back was my amazing producing partner when I went to the Democratic National Convention, and Patrick, who's got one of the sharpest ears in the podcast world. And you know what? All those people. That is just our show. And you know, all those folks. They need a living wage. They gotta, like, pay their grocery bills. Slate is full of amazing people just like this, and we need your support. It's pledge drive time right now, which means you actually can show this crew your love. And you can do it at a bargain basement price, just 59 bucks for a full year of ad-free listening and all access at slate.com.

2:35It's half off. And the thing is, while you save a little money, you'll also be telling our bosses you value what we do. You value our late nights, our hard work. So we're asking, if you can, Show us a little love. The way to do it is to go to slate.com slash whatnextplus. When you get to checkout, you use the code whatnext50. That is whatnext50. So the URL, slate.com slash whatnextplus. The checkout code, whatnext50. Show some love to the people who make this work possible. Join us. Okay, on to the show.

3:19Alex Kirshner, I have a question for you. I have an answer.

3:26We're heading into a midterm election. Americans are anxious about the cost of living, artificial intelligence. And the Senate has been in session, passing legislation. Does their new legislation address any of this? no but i heard from the waitress at my local diner that the thing that was most important to her was stopping college football players from making too much money you did not no i did i heard it from my my postman the other day uh the garbage collector came and said this to me yeah this i'm having these very organic uh reactions uh you know with all kinds of pillars of the community this is what they want they're saying i want college football players to make less money.

4:12Please help me, U.S. Senate.

4:18Alex Kirshner is Slate's sports guy. So when I heard that a whopping 77 senators had voted to pass the Protect College Sports Act on Monday, I thought, Alex will be able to tell me who this bill protects and why, right? Who does this bill help? This bill absolutely helps university presidents, college athletic directors, head coaches of football teams, people who have made a really good living in college sports. And it helps them keep a cap, a real strict cap on the earnings of the athletes so that that money can, in theory, be distributed elsewhere in the college sports ecosystem, certainly including the salaries of coaches and athletic directors and university administrators.

5:08This sounds like the rich getting richer. It sounds like the rich consolidating power and trying to prevent any sort of redistribution of wealth in college sports towards the people fundamentally creating that wealth.

5:24For the last five years, college sports have been living in a new era. First, one in which college athletes could make money off their name, image and likeness. And now one in which schools can pay players directly. Surprise, surprise. The schools are not so hot on all that. I mean, the bill purports to fix chaos in college sports, but I guess that leads me to a couple of questions. Which is, first of all, is there chaos in college sports? Yes, but I would call it managed chaos. And does this bill fix the chaos? No. No, it doesn't. Today on the show, politicians got behind the very important work of rescuing college sports.

6:12Are the right people being rescued? I'm Mary Harris. You're listening to What Next. Stick around.

6:27I love days like these at the pool. but my moderate to severe plaque psoriasis can sometimes take me out of the moment. I'm ready to make a splash with clearer skin thanks to SkyRizzy, Rizinkizumab RZA. SkyRizzy is a prescription-only injection for adults who are candidates for systemic or phototherapy. At four months, most people saw 90 % clearer skin when measured from head to toe, and many were even 100 % plaque-free. People also saw significant improvement in psoriasis symptoms of pain, redness, itching, and burning. Don't use if allergic to SkyRizzy. Serious allergic reactions, increased infections, or lower ability to fight them may occur.

7:03Before treatment, get checked for infections and tuberculosis. Tell your doctor about any flu-like symptoms or vaccines. Now there's nothing on my skin, thanks to SkyRizzy. And that means everything. Ask your doctor about SkyRizzy, the number one dermatologist prescribed biologic and psoriasis. Visit SkyRizzy.com or call 1-866-SKYRizzy to learn more.

7:26Hi, this is Brooke DeVard from Naked Beauty. I am always looking for ways to elevate our daily rituals. And the Kohler Smart Toilet is proof that design changes everything. It's this stunning sculptural piece that feels like quiet luxury for your bathroom. It totally transforms your daily ritual into something elevated with customizable cleansing and touchscreen controls. It's functional art that makes your space feel cleaner and more intentional. A modern home deserves a modern toilet. Experience the difference of Kohler smart toilets. Find more at Kohler.com.

8:22Alex Kirshner: Buy or sell your next car today with CarGurus at CarGurus.com. Go to CarGurus.com to make sure your big deal is the best deal. That's C-A-R-G-U-R-U-S dot com.

8:41Okay, I'm trying to figure out the urgency behind this bill, and I wonder if you can help me do that. But like, what is going on in college sports that the U.S. federal government needed to swoop in and fix? Like you said, there is some chaos. What is it? Yeah. Mary, where are you from? Or where did you go to college? Better question. Mary, where did you go to college? I went to Penn. I'm from Maryland. So as a Penn Quaker, you're actually a bit set aside from this because the Ivy League schools really don't rule this way. But say that you, like me, went to the University of Maryland. If you had been a college student or a college football fan 20 years ago or any time before that, and you showed up to watch your team play, and there was a really talented freshman quarterback on your team, and you enjoyed watching him throw touchdowns, and you thought, wow, this guy's great, you'd be very excited because you would get to watch that player develop into something big over three minimum, four, five years sometimes, and really follow this player's growth.

9:46And you could dream about a better tomorrow for your team because sure, we're not very good right now, but look at these young guys that we have and we have time to develop them. I feel like a good example of this is like Michael Jordan, who went to UNC and became very associated with UNC and like he grew and developed there. Absolutely. If you are a college football fan today and your team has a great freshman quarterback or a great sophomore quarterback. This is in fact happening right now at Mississippi State University. They've got this guy with a golden arm, Kamario Taylor. You'll be hearing about him in the National Football League for a decade.

10:21But Mississippi State is one of the poorest programs revenue-wise in the Southeastern Conference. And everyone just assumes, not without reason, that another team in college football now that players can be paid directly by the schools and by outside booster groups, and that players can transfer from school to school freely, which they couldn't do before until about eight years ago without having to sit out a season. People just assume if you have that player, he's gone. It's like we got lucky. That guy's out of here. He's going to follow the money to wherever he needs to be. And frankly, that is happening in some respects in college sports right now, if you're a fan of one of the athletic departments in a smaller conference, so the MAC, for example, or even the Ivy League, or the Mountain West, what have you, what we have seen in the last handful of years is a real drain of talent from those leagues to the much more moneyed SEC and Big Ten and the like.

11:27And to some extent, the ACC and the Big 12, it's all a food chain and there's always going to be someone below you and someone above you, unless you're the SEC or the Big Ten and you're at the top. And I do think that it is worth chewing on whether that system poses problems for the overall health of the sport, such as you can even evaluate that. Not sure I'd say this is a problem that the US Congress should step in and solve, but sure, a problem to solve. Right. I think that if you are a fan of a team that feels like it's been left behind, you feel motivated to go and do something about it. And there's a lot of people who think that Maria Cantwell, the senator from Washington State, who is giving this the veneer of legitimacy on the Democratic side, not just the veneer, but the very real legitimacy on the Democratic side.

12:14She's sponsoring it. Yeah. Is doing it because she wants justice for Washington State University, which is a really fun, unique program in college football history that for many years was a member of the Pac-12. when the Pac-12 had USC and UCLA and Oregon and Stanford and all of these big brands in college sports. But a few years ago, because of the economic forces of television money, the Pac-12 essentially died. It still exists kind of as a husk. It's been reborn. And all of the teams in the Pac-12 went to other conferences, the Big 12 or the Big 10, except for two. One of them was Washington State, which was just stranded.

12:54And now they can't afford the same players as the University of Washington, their rival in the Apple Cup. And this really does feel like an injustice. The question that I would ask is, what caused that injustice? Was it college football players finally having a chance to make a little bit of money for what they do? Or was it the almighty television dollar and university's decisions to chase that at all costs yeah i do feel like we should say that it feels like all kinds of colleges are feeling this pressure even if they are within the sec or the big 10 or whatever like every college is feeling like people can leave at any time that is chaotic i think we could see this this fall in the last couple months with all of the chatter about what was happening at lsu where they were talking about like oh maybe we'll have people who have like trained with the pros come back and play for LSU football.

13:50And it got everyone like, oh, like, can we do that? But you could see in that idea, the fact that these coaches are feeling this pressure to find talent, retain talent, wherever they can get it, even if it's kind of like an edge case of can we do this? Yeah. And another key part of the scaffolding that's allowed that to happen is that in the last handful of years, the NCAA has taken some pretty embarrassing, sweeping legal defeats, including one at the Supreme Court a handful of years ago that have basically chiseled away one by one at the NCAA's attempts to enforce the longstanding rules of amateurism that have governed college sports.

14:34And so in the case of LSU that you mentioned, these players signed NFL contracts. They left college sports. They became not just quasi-professionals like all college athletes or all college football players at major schools are, but literally were NFL players. They were professionals. They signed contracts to become NFL players. But in fact, according to these plaintiff's attorneys, and in some cases, judges via the granting of injunctions that have at least given temporary relief to these plaintiffs, even those rules just can't fly. And coaches who you're exactly right, are desperate for every advantage they can find, have been happy to take advantage of this and to complain about it when it is other teams doing it.

15:17I mean, you've kind of said this, but there is a bit of a justice here, which is like all of this chaos that you're laying out here. It's because suddenly athletes can be fairly compensated, right? And for years, they have been part of this system where their labor as college athletes paid everyone at the college except for themselves. You know, school presidents were compensated more and coaches were compensated more, but not the athletes themselves. Can you just lay out for me this bill? How does it tweak the situation in theory? The most important thing that the bill does is it puts the force of the federal government behind what is basically a salary cap, even though it's not really salary because the players are not considered employees, which I think is a key thing.

16:13Yeah, it punts on the question of whether they're employees, right? That is something that this bill explicitly punts on. You know, I am a proud member, along with a lot of slate staff of the Writers Guild of America East. I'm a believer in collective bargaining as a way, not just frankly, to address worker problems, but to make workplaces run better and to be structurally more buttoned up and simple. And it's just extremely obvious to me and to many other people that the ultimate thing that needs to happen in college sports is for at least some athletes like football players at big schools to just be employees of their schools.

16:51Sign employment contracts that would limit, by the way, your ability to just transfer whenever you want and go to another school. That would provide the stability that schools crave. But instead, because universities and their conferences that represent them and the NCAA are so petrified of some sort of worker organization and of being subject to the employment laws of this country, we just have this weird structure where it's essentially a contractor relationship between the athletes and the schools. Student athletes. Student athlete is still the term kind of hanging off like a little nub that was initially created, by the way, by the NCAA to get around workers' compensation concerns decades ago.

17:32That's the history of the word student athlete. And so this bill has not technically a salary cap, but they'll call it a revenue sharing cap that takes a specific amount of money that is about$50 million a year and says you cannot spend more than this on your players. Sounds like that protects the people paying the players, the universities. It certainly does. And it's important to these schools because just the last handful of years, we have really seen massive exponential growth in the player compensation market. Right now, the richest teams in college football are just giving their football players something on the order of$45 to$50 million or so a year.

18:15Two or three years ago,$20 was a lot. And so what you're seeing right now is university administrators, U.S. senators who, in Ted Cruz's case, just don't like labor, don't like workers, have allied themselves with plenty of people who don't like black workers, which is a key consideration with college football and basketball, don't like these workers, these kinds of workers making as much money as they're making and having the uncapped potential to make more. And so there are a lot of things in this bill. We wouldn't have time to get to them on a three-hour podcast. But the most important one, the thing that is driving it unquestionably, is Ted Cruz and his allies in the Senate, of whom there are about 76.

19:00This thing got a lot of votes, including some Democrats, wanting to stop the growth in the largely non-white player base of college athletes earning money. when we come back. There are some good things in this bill. Even Alex says so. But quick reminder before we head to break, you are listening to this show in the heat of pledge season here. And you're only hearing Alex's hottest takes because he and I and everyone else who helped make this conversation come to life, we work at Slate. So if you can, become a member and support us. The way to do it is to go to slate.com slash whatnextplus. At checkout, you put in the code whatnext50.

19:44That's whatnext50. You get 50 % off your first year on the team. We would love to have you. Thanks for helping us out.

19:55This episode is brought to you by FreshBooks. Whether you just launched your service business or you've been at it for years, the money side has a way of pulling you from the work you actually love doing. FreshBooks changes that. FreshBooks makes the money side of your service-based business easy. You log your hours, you send a branded invoice, you get paid and know your numbers instead of chasing them. Money in, money out, all in one place. No more juggling one app for clients, another for billing, plus a pile of spreadsheets and emails. FreshBooks is designed for how small business owners think about money, not how an accountant does.

20:29You don't need a financial background to use FreshBooks. It's simple on purpose. Most owners are up and running in minutes, not days. And if you need help, a real person is available on every plan. FreshBooks has been trusted by service businesses for over 20 years, helping over 500 ,000 owners and solopreneurs run their business confidently. Right now, my listeners can get FreshBooks for less than$3 a month for your first four months. That is 90 % off. Head to freshbooks.com slash podcast to get started. That's 90 % off under three bucks a month for four months at freshbooks.com slash podcast.

21:11Hi, this is Brooke DeVard from Naked Beauty. I am always looking for ways to elevate our daily rituals. And the Kohler Smart Toilet is proof that design changes everything. It's this stunning sculptural piece that feels like quiet luxury for your bathroom. It totally transforms your daily ritual into something elevated. with customizable cleansing and touchscreen controls. It's functional art that makes your space feel cleaner and more intentional. A modern home deserves a modern toilet. Experience the difference of Kohler smart toilets. Find more at Kohler.com.

21:53I feel like we should say there are some things here that I think some observers have said are good things like medical coverage, injury, protections. Those things are things athletes would want, right? Yes, I think there are some interesting things in this bill. I'm still working on a story for Slate about this that might be out by the time this episode is being listened to. But I think that this bill is in some ways a legitimately thoughtful effort where different senators have made efforts to subject coaches to the same economic constraints that the bill is trying to subject players to. And there is some language in here that deals with the realignment of conferences that could prevent more of the instability that I was talking about with a school like Washington State.

22:37But what's happened as this bill has gone through the legislative rigmarole is that those provisions in many cases have just been watered down by university administrators who will whisper in the ear of their senators. You have administrators at, say, the University of Miami, who might have an eye toward leaving their conference, the ACC in the next few years, going to their senators and saying, hey, Senator, can you water this down a bit so that actually it wouldn't be quite so restrictive on us if we wanted to do the thing that the bill seeks to prevent? And I think that's what's happened. Yikes.

23:16I mean, what I noticed is like, for instance, college players in this bill, I was reading they can only transfer once as student athletes. College coaches, they can move around. I mean, not during the season, but they can move around. And to me, it's just like one group here is clearly getting a better deal. They can move around during the season. Lane Kiffin left the University of Mississippi. He's an LSU coach now. To go to LSU in the middle of a run to the national championship last year, left his team right before the playoffs started. There's a provision that is in this bill, which is somewhat disaffectionately called the Lane Kiffin rule.

23:58And I find that to be probably the most appealing part of this bill that didn't get watered down. There's a provision that would - What does it do? It would provide very real punishments in the form of suspension and monetary damages if coaches, head coaches, were to leave their teams during the competition season, as Lane Kiffin just did to leave Ole Miss for LSU. But there's still a problem even with this, which is that enterprising agents and headhunter firms that work in the coaching carousel in college sports are going to find technical ways around this. You can spot the ways in which it would be pretty straightforward to do so whenever they have the opportunity to place a motivated coach with a motivated school that wants to hire them.

24:49You're putting your finger on something, which is like, I just feel a lot of people don't trust this bill because there's so much money sloshing around back and forth that the motivations of like any one person talking about it are questionable at best. I think a lot of people started paying attention to this bill. The spotlight really came when Ted Cruz, senator, who you brought up before. Ted Cruz goes on college game day on ESPN and kind of is able to talk about this bill and how great it is. He gets very little pushback. And of course, people have lots of opinions about Ted Cruz. But when I read some analysis of this appearance, like the writer was basically like, well, the thing you have to keep in mind is that ESPN is like in the hole for having, you know, a broadcast deal with the SEC.

25:37The SEC is not doing well. So ESPN has its own reasons for having Ted Cruz on, like saying this bill should move forward. Like everyone involved has some kind of connection to a little pot of money that makes their motivations sus. Sure. The national spokesman for this bill, to the extent that it is not Ted Cruz, is Nick Saban, the greatest coach of all time, who retired a couple of years from Alabama. And Nick Saban in so many words has admitted that he got out of the game because as players started to be paid, that wasn't the college football that he had come up in or was interested in continuing to sort of lord over as the best coach in the sport.

26:19What does that mean? Like, I just don't want to play these guys. It means a number of things. I think the biggest thing that it means is that the University of Alabama, while it has plenty of money, went from being the biggest funder of football expenses in the country to a more middle of the pack, upper middle of the pack roster spender when they could actually start paying players because there just frankly aren't that many rich people in the state of Alabama, even those who would be motivated to give to the tide to make sure that they're good. And so Nick Saban has spent his retirement doing two things.

26:51Number one, being a panelist on college game day and going around the country sort of on this barnstorming college football show that has been very beloved over the years and in some corners still is, and advocating for this bill that would, in his view, prevent more of the transformation of college football away from the system that he enjoyed so much, where Nick Saban, no doubt, was the best to ever do it and frankly was the very rare coach who I would argue was underpaid, even if he made 10 million bucks a year or whatever it was, because of the amount of money that he made for Alabama by building that football program.

27:27But Nick Saban has devoted his career, his retirement, to trying to keep money out of the hands of college football players in service of stability of the enterprise. I mean, I do feel like we have to talk about race, which you have touched on in your comments already. The NAACP has come out against this bill. Cory Booker, who was a college athlete at Stanford, definitely not in favor of this bill. And basically saying that so many college athletes are black. Their labor is under compensated historically. And what people actually need is the right to collectively bargain, which is not what this bill is doing.

28:15It sounds like you say that's a fair critique. The key thing to understand about college sports economics is that football makes the money. There are some exceptions to this. There are some schools where other sports are a really big deal, but football makes the money. Football is certainly what is responsible for the multi-billion dollar television deals that keep the money flowing for Big Ten, for SEC schools, etc. etc. The coaches in college football, according to NCAA demographic data that the association collects, are about 80 % white. The player population in college football in the NCAA is about 42 % white, about 40 % black, and about 18 % classified as other.

29:01It is a majority non-white sport where there's pretty much parity between black athletes and white athletes. People call this wokeness. People call this virtue signaling. People call this all kinds of things to avoid dealing with the obvious thing here, which is that when you prevent college football players from earning money that they are by rights generating with the product that they put on the field for millions of people to watch every Saturday, you are moving that money somewhere. And I think it's pretty clear that you are moving that money to the salaries of largely white coaches who make anywhere from a million or so a year at the lower end of the head coaching level to well over$10 million a year, as well as hundreds of thousands or low millions for assistance.

29:49you're moving it to university administrators and you're also moving it to athletes in other sports who just objectively are number one not as black not as non-white as college football players but are likelier to come from better socioeconomic backgrounds where frankly they might not need the scholarship as a ticket for upward mobility in the way that many football players do also many basketball players do. That system is fundamentally redistributive away from a largely non-white player base towards largely wealthy and white groups elsewhere in college sports. To not acknowledge that is just to not acknowledge reality.

30:30And I have no patience for it when people pretend to be dumb and not see that that is happening when maneuvers like this are made in the economy of college sports. I think it's willfully dishonest. Can I tell you what I think when I think about this bill and like where it's at and the fact that it was just put through? I really wonder about everyone else in college. Like, I feel like there's this wistful nostalgia for like, oh, college sports used to be this. And like, now it's, I don't have that. What I look at when I see this bill is I'm like, these universities have set themselves up so that they really love this money that comes in from college sports but college sports is not actually what they're supposed to be doing they are colleges like there are tons of other people in these places who are just students and are not elite athletes they're not even like part of this picture you know what i mean like it's just a it's a really weird setup to be like, the thing we're going to talk about about college right now is like the athletes and this structure we've built for the sports programs when it seems like the tail wagging the dog.

31:46It does often feel like that. I am somewhat of an optimist about what sports can be and sometimes are for a university, but where the thing you're talking about becomes really obvious and a problem is in things like student fees, where every student who goes to a given university, pays hundreds of dollars a year to subsidize the athletic department. This is a massive source of funding for pretty much all of the athletic departments outside of the power conferences and for some of them, even within them, which I think is particularly indefensible when you're making 50 million bucks a year or more from television and you still feel like you need to turn your students into a piggy bank for sports, whether they care about sports or not.

32:27So I think you make a very reasonable point. And it's one of about 50 real problems right now in American higher education. But where do you put it on the list? There are so many choices. So what happens with this bill next? I mean, it's past the Senate. It needs to go to the House. My understanding is like the House is not really open for business because as soon as they open their doors, they're going to have to vote about impeaching Pete Hegseth. And Mike Johnson doesn't want them to do that. And so what do you think is going to happen when this gets to the lower chamber? Well, it's going to get to the House in theory in the lame duck session after the midterm elections.

33:04And at that point, I turn it over to Jim Newell and all of the congressional reporters and correspondent Mussel at Slate to explain what is likely to happen once it gets there. But I think the fact that if it's going to get done at all, gets done in the lame duck session, speaks to the point that you brought up to me at the beginning of this interview, which is that this is not an electoral needle mover. Nobody really even pretends that it is, despite all those fictional community members that I made up when you asked me who is asking for this. Is this the thing that Congress should be spending its time on?

33:41This is not a thing that any body of political science suggests is going to change votes or even could, given that it's not going to come down until after the midterms. But Donald Trump really wants it to pass because he loves sports and he would feel like the big special guy who got it done, even though I am quite certain that he does not know even three or four paragraphs of what is in this bill. It's very long, right? It's like more than 100 pages. It's very long. And I don't think Trump's a big reader. Trump has been told by Randy Levine of the New York Yankees and by Ted Cruz and by Nick Saban, sir, you'll save college sports if you do this.

34:20And just like anything that you could probably get Donald Trump to support, if you told him that he would be seen as a hero for doing it and he would get to sign it in a big splashy ceremony on TV and hang out with athletes, you're damn right. Donald Trump really wants this bill to pass, which means House Republicans might be pretty motivated. Alex, I'm so grateful for your time. Thanks for coming on the show. Always fun. Alex Kirshner is a contributing writer for Slate He also co-hosts the Split Zone Duo podcast And that's our show What Next is produced by Evan Campbell, Madeline Thames-Ducharm, and Patrick Fort Paige Osborne is the senior supervising producer of What Next and What Next TBD Mia Lobel is the executive producer of podcasts here at Slate Ben Richmond is the senior director of podcast operations And I'm Mary Harris Go track me down on Blue Sky and say hey, I'm Matt Mary Harris Thanks for listening Catch you back here next time.

35:29Alex Kirshner: This is the story of the one. As a shipping manager, he's running the dock, stocking supplies, and making sure every order goes out on time. And Grainger helps him stay prepared. From shipping supplies to PPE to hand tools, he counts on Grainger to keep products moving and trucks rolling. So his operation runs smoothly no matter the shift. Call 1-800-GRAINGER, click grainger.com or just stop by Grainger for the ones who get it done. Hey, it's Paige DeSorbo from Giggly Squad. Everyone is always looking for a new way to make some extra cash. But sometimes the easiest place to start is your own closet with a little help from Depop.

36:09Alex Kirshner: Think about how many clothes you have that you love, but you just don't wear anymore. On Depop, it's quick and easy to list those pieces. There's no selling fees, and suddenly those clothes have a chance to find someone who actually wants them. And the best part? You're making room for whatever you're into next. Make money on Depop with no selling fees and find what you want for less. This message is brought to you by Depop.

From the publisher

Why the NAACP spoke out against the “Protect College Sports Act,” which was just passed by the US Senate—and why the bill is unlikely to get a vote in the House anytime soon.


Guest: Alex Kirshner, Slate contributing writer and co-host of the college football podcast Split Zone Duo.


Want more What Next? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.


Podcast production by Evan Campbell, Madeline Thames-Ducharme and Patrick Fort.


Paige Osburn is the senior supervising producer of What Next and What Next TBD.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

More from What Next | Daily News and Analysis

All episodes